JP2007133805A - Risk prediction management system - Google Patents

Risk prediction management system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2007133805A
JP2007133805A JP2005328422A JP2005328422A JP2007133805A JP 2007133805 A JP2007133805 A JP 2007133805A JP 2005328422 A JP2005328422 A JP 2005328422A JP 2005328422 A JP2005328422 A JP 2005328422A JP 2007133805 A JP2007133805 A JP 2007133805A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
risk
text
report
information
score
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2005328422A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4819483B2 (en
Inventor
Masahiro Hiwatari
政洋 樋渡
Shigeru Yoshida
滋 吉田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Asahi Kasei Corp
Osaka Gas Co Ltd
Asahi Kasei Engineering Corp
Original Assignee
Asahi Kasei Corp
Osaka Gas Co Ltd
Asahi Kasei Engineering Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Asahi Kasei Corp, Osaka Gas Co Ltd, Asahi Kasei Engineering Corp filed Critical Asahi Kasei Corp
Priority to JP2005328422A priority Critical patent/JP4819483B2/en
Publication of JP2007133805A publication Critical patent/JP2007133805A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4819483B2 publication Critical patent/JP4819483B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Machine Translation (AREA)
  • Document Processing Apparatus (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a risk prediction management system capable of recognizing the magnitude of a risk before an accident takes place and immediately following even an ever-changing social situation. <P>SOLUTION: A sentence element dissolving part 8 dissolves text sentence information of a proposal, report and coverage into text vocabulary information, risk points stored in a risk evaluation dictionary DB 9 are allocated to the text vocabulary information to make the total risk points of the undissolved text sentence information its total risk points, and a similarity risk item category dividing part 12 divides the text sentence information into a category group of a similar risk items. The risk prediction management system has a total risk points changing part 13 which makes the highest points in the risk points of the text sentence information representative total risk points of the category group in the category group, and changes the representative total points to the total risk points of text sentence information that is newly input and stored when the total risk point of the newly inputted and stored text sentence information are larger than the representative total risk points of the category group. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、事故が発生する前に事前にリスクの大きさを認識出来る危険予知管理システムに関するものである。   The present invention relates to a risk prediction management system that can recognize the magnitude of risk in advance before an accident occurs.

従来から事業所等の現場で安全活動が実施されている。事業所内で気が付いた危険事項に関する提案や報告に基づいて予想される事故の規模や頻度を推定し、安全評価を行って対策を考え実施することが一般である。   Conventionally, safety activities have been carried out at business sites. It is common to estimate the scale and frequency of anticipated accidents based on proposals and reports on dangerous matters that have been noticed in the office, conduct safety assessments, and implement countermeasures.

危険を予知するという観点では、特開2004−240886号公報(特許文献1)に記載されたように、地震に伴うリスクを低減させるために、地震時の家具の挙動を予測して対策を提案するものや、特開2005−025297号公報(特許文献2)に記載されたように、製造所の操業に係るリスクを回避するものが種々提案されている。   From the viewpoint of predicting danger, as described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2004-240886 (Patent Document 1), in order to reduce the risk associated with an earthquake, the behavior of the furniture at the time of the earthquake is predicted and a countermeasure is proposed. As described in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2005-025297 (Patent Document 2), various techniques for avoiding risks associated with the operation of a factory have been proposed.

特開2004−240886号公報JP 2004-240886 A 特開2005−025297号公報JP 2005-025297 A

しかしながら、前述の従来例では、提案や報告に基づいて予想される事故の規模や頻度の推定評価があいまいで時々刻々と変化する社会情勢に即時に追従することも出来ないため将来大事故につながる可能性がある提案や報告も見過ごされ、大量の提案や報告に埋もれてしまい、せっかくの提案や報告が有効活用されないという問題があった。   However, in the above-mentioned conventional example, the estimated evaluation of the scale and frequency of the expected accident based on the proposal and the report is ambiguous, and it is not possible to immediately follow the changing social situation from time to time, leading to a major accident in the future Possible proposals and reports were overlooked and buried in a large number of proposals and reports, and there was a problem that the proposals and reports were not used effectively.

本発明は前記課題を解決するものであり、その目的とするところは、事故が発生する前に事前にリスクの大きさを認識出来、時々刻々と変化する社会情勢にも即時に追従することが出来る危険予知管理システムを提供せんとするものである。   The present invention solves the above-mentioned problems, and the purpose of the present invention is to recognize the magnitude of risk in advance before an accident occurs, and to immediately follow the social situation that changes from moment to moment. It is intended to provide a possible risk prediction management system.

前記目的を達成するための本発明に係る危険予知管理システムの第1の構成は、危険事項に関する提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報を入力する文章情報入力手段と、前記文章情報入力手段により入力された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報を、いつ(When)、どこで(Where)、誰が(Who)、何を(What)、なぜ(Why)、どのようにして(How)の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に分解する文章要素分解手段と、前記文章要素分解手段により分解された各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報を、分解前の提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報と関連付けて各要素毎に分割して記憶する語彙別記憶手段と、いつ(When)、どこで(Where)、誰が(Who)、何を(What)、なぜ(Why)、どのようにして(How)の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報を予め設定した危険点数毎に分類して記憶した危険評価辞書記憶手段と、前記語彙別記憶手段に記憶された各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報について、前記危険評価辞書記憶手段に記憶された危険点数を割り当てて、分解前の提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数を算出する総合危険点数算出手段と、前記総合危険点数算出手段により算出された分解前の提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数を、その提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数として記憶する総合危険点数記憶手段と、前記提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報を、前記文章要素分解手段により分解された各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に基づいて、類似する危険事項のカテゴリ群に分類する類似危険事項カテゴリ分類手段と、前記類似危険事項カテゴリ分類手段により分類された類似危険事項のカテゴリ群において、前記提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数のうち最も大きい総合危険点数をそのカテゴリ群の代表総合危険点数とし、新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数が前記カテゴリ群の代表総合危険点数よりも大きい場合に、その代表総合危険点数を、新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数に変更する総合危険点数変更手段とを有することを特徴とする。   The first configuration of the risk prediction management system according to the present invention for achieving the above object is to provide text information input means for inputting text text information of proposals, reports and news reports related to risk items, and input by the text information input means. Proposed, reported and reported textual text information for each element of When, Where (Where), Who (Who), What (What), Why (Why), and How (How) Sentence element decomposing means for decomposing into text vocabulary information, and text vocabulary information for each element decomposed by the sentence element decomposing means in association with the text sentence information of proposal / report / report before decomposing for each element Vocabulary storage means to divide and memorize and text for each element of When, Where, Where, Who, What, Why, and How Danger points with preset vocabulary information The risk evaluation dictionary storage means classified and stored for each item and the text vocabulary information for each element stored in the vocabulary storage means are assigned a risk score stored in the risk evaluation dictionary storage means before The total risk score calculation means for calculating the total risk score of the text sentence information of the proposal / report / report, and the total risk score of the text text information of the proposal / report / report before the calculation calculated by the total risk score calculation means Is stored as the total risk score of the text sentence information of the proposal / report / report, and for each element obtained by decomposing the text sentence information of the proposal / report / report by the sentence element decomposing means. Similar risk category classification means for classifying into similar risk category categories based on the text vocabulary information, and the similar risk category classification means In the category group of similar risk items classified by the above, the largest total risk score among the total risk score of the text sentence information of the proposal / report / report is set as the representative total risk score of the category group and newly inputted and stored. If the total risk score of the text text information of the proposal / report / report is larger than the representative total risk score of the category group, the representative total risk score is newly entered and stored in the text of the proposal / report / report And a comprehensive risk score changing means for changing the total risk score to sentence information.

また、本発明に係る危険予知管理システムの第2の構成は、前記第1の構成において、前記総合危険点数は、危険規模点数と、危険頻度点数とから構成されることを特徴とする。   The second configuration of the risk prediction management system according to the present invention is characterized in that, in the first configuration, the total risk score is composed of a risk scale score and a risk frequency score.

また、本発明に係る危険予知管理システムの第3の構成は、前記第1の構成において、新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数が、既に入力され記憶されている類似危険事項カテゴリにおける代表総合危険点数を超えた場合に、該既に入力され記憶されている類似危険事項カテゴリに属する全ての総合危険点数を、前記新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数に置き換えることを特徴とする。   Further, the third configuration of the risk prediction management system according to the present invention is that the total risk score of the text text information of the proposal / report / report newly input and stored in the first configuration is already input and stored. If the representative total risk score in the similar risk item category is exceeded, all the total risk points belonging to the similar risk item category already input and stored are newly input and stored in the proposal / report.・ It is characterized by the fact that it is replaced with the total risk score of the textual text information of the report.

本発明に係る危険予知管理システムの第1の構成によれば、文章情報入力手段により入力された危険事項に関する提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報を、文章要素分解手段により、いつ(When)、どこで(Where)、誰が(Who)、何を(What)、なぜ(Why)、どのようにして(How)の構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に分解し、各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報を、分解前の提案・報告のテキスト文章情報と関連付けて各要素毎に分割して語彙別記憶手段に記憶することが出来る。   According to the first configuration of the risk prediction management system according to the present invention, when the text element information of the proposal / report / report regarding the dangerous matter input by the text information input means is read by the sentence element decomposition means, Where (Where), Who (Who), What (What), Why (Why), How (How) Decompose the text vocabulary information for each element of each element, and divide the text vocabulary information for each element It is possible to divide into each element in association with the text sentence information of the proposal / report before decomposition and store it in the vocabulary storage means.

一方、危険評価辞書記憶手段には、いつ(When)、どこで(Where)、誰が(Who)、何を(What)、なぜ(Why)、どのようにして(How)の構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報が予め設定した危険点数毎に分類して記憶されている。   On the other hand, the risk assessment dictionary storage means includes when, where (Where), who (Who), what (What), why (Why), and how (How). Text vocabulary information is classified and stored for each preset risk score.

そして、総合危険点数算出手段により、語彙別記憶手段に記憶された構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報について、危険評価辞書記憶手段に記憶された危険点数を割り当てて、分解前の提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数を算出し、その提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数として総合危険点数記憶手段に記憶することが出来る。   Then, the total risk score calculation means assigns the risk score stored in the risk evaluation dictionary storage means to the text vocabulary information for each element of the syntax stored in the vocabulary storage means, and proposes, reports, The total risk score of the text text information of the news report can be calculated and stored in the total risk score storage means as the total risk score of the text text information of the proposal / report / report.

他方、類似危険事項カテゴリ分類手段により、提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報を、文章要素分解手段により分解された構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に基づいて、類似する危険事項のカテゴリ群に分類し、総合危険点数変更手段により、その分類された類似する危険事項カテゴリにおいて、提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数のうち最も大きい総合危険点数をそのカテゴリにおける代表総合危険点数とし、新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数がその類似危険事項カテゴリにおける代表総合危険点数よりも大きい場合に、その代表総合危険点数を、新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数に変更することが出来る。   On the other hand, the text category information of proposal / report / report is classified into similar risk category categories based on the text vocabulary information for each element of the syntax decomposed by the text element decomposition means by the similar risk category classification means. By classifying and changing the total risk score, in the classified similar risk category, the largest total risk score among the total risk scores in the text text information of proposal / report / report is set as the representative total risk score in that category. If the total risk score of the newly entered and stored text text information of the proposal / report / report is greater than the representative total risk score in the similar risk category, the representative total risk score is newly input and stored. It can be changed to the total risk score of the text text information of proposed proposals, reports and reports.

また、本発明に係る危険予知管理システムの第2の構成によれば、総合危険点数を危険規模点数と危険頻度点数とにより構成したことで、危険規模と危険頻度の両方の観点から評価した総合危険点数とすることが出来る。   Further, according to the second configuration of the risk prediction management system according to the present invention, the total risk score is composed of the risk scale score and the risk frequency score, so that the overall risk score is evaluated from the viewpoint of both the risk scale and the risk frequency. It can be a risk score.

また、本発明に係る危険予知管理システムの第3の構成によれば、前記総合危険点数変更手段において、既に入力され記憶されている当該類似危険事項カテゴリに属する提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数の全てを、変更された該代表総合危険点数に置き換えることで、その類似する危険事項カテゴリ群全体の危険度を際立たせることが出来る。   Further, according to the third configuration of the risk prediction management system of the present invention, in the total risk score changing means, the text text information of proposals / reports / reports belonging to the similar risk item category already input and stored By substituting all of the total risk points, the risk level of the entire group of similar risk item categories can be made to stand out.

これにより、事故、特に重大な事故が発生する前に、事前に提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報のリスクの大きさを認識出来、時々刻々と変化する社会情勢にも即時に追従することが出来る。   As a result, before the occurrence of an accident, especially a serious accident, it is possible to recognize the level of risk of textual text information in proposals, reports, and news reports in advance, and to immediately follow the changing social situation. I can do it.

図により本発明に係る危険予知管理システムの一実施形態を具体的に説明する。図1は本発明に係る危険予知管理システムの制御系の構成を示すブロック図であり、図2は本発明に係る危険予知管理システムの動作を示すフローチャートであり、図3は文章要素分解手段によりテキスト文書情報を構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に分解し危険規模点数と危険頻度点数を計算する様子を示す図であり、図4は類似危険事項のカテゴリを検索し、危険規模点数及び危険頻度点数を更新する様子を示す図であり、図5は過去の事例の危険点数を再計算する様子を示す図であり、図6は日常行動チェック画面の一例を示す図であり、図7は危険予知提案画面の一例を示す図であり、図8は異常報告画面の一例を示す図であり、図9は危険規模選択画面の一例を示す図であり、図10は発生頻度選択画面の一例を示す図であり、図11は高危険度事例探索画面の一例を示す図であり、図12は改善提案画面の一例を示す図であり、図13は変更管理画面の一例を示す図である。   An embodiment of the risk prediction management system according to the present invention will be specifically described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the control system of the risk prediction management system according to the present invention, FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing the operation of the risk prediction management system according to the present invention, and FIG. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a state in which text document information is decomposed into text vocabulary information for each element of the syntax to calculate a risk scale score and a risk frequency score. FIG. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing how the frequency score is updated, FIG. 5 is a diagram showing how the risk score of past cases is recalculated, FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a daily action check screen, and FIG. FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of a risk prediction proposal screen, FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of an abnormality report screen, FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of a risk scale selection screen, and FIG. 10 is an example of an occurrence frequency selection screen. FIG. FIG. 12 is a diagram showing an example of a high-risk case search screen, FIG. 12 is a diagram showing an example of an improvement proposal screen, and FIG. 13 is a diagram showing an example of a change management screen.

図1において、1は危険事項に関する提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報を入力する文章情報入力手段を構成するパーソナルコンピュータ(以下、「パソコン」という)である。2は公の報道機関が提供する報道情報等を含む社外の危険事項に関する報道事例を通信手段となるインターネット3上にテキスト文章情報で提供する社外事例サーバ装置であり、危険事項に関する報道のテキスト文章情報を入力する文章情報入力手段を兼ねる。   In FIG. 1, reference numeral 1 denotes a personal computer (hereinafter referred to as “personal computer”) that constitutes text information input means for inputting text text information on proposals, reports, and news reports regarding dangerous matters. 2 is an external case server device that provides news case examples related to external dangerous matters including public information provided by public news organizations as textual text information on the Internet 3 as a communication means. Also serves as text information input means for inputting information.

社内の各工場でパソコン1から入力された危険事項に関する提案・報告のテキスト文章情報は社内LAN(Local Area Network)4を経由して危険予知管理サーバ装置5に送られ、一方、社外事例サーバ装置2から提供された危険事項に関する報道のテキスト文章情報はインターネット3、ファイアウォール7を介して危険予知管理サーバ装置5に送られる。   Proposed / reported textual text information related to dangerous matters input from the personal computer 1 at each in-house factory is sent to the risk prediction management server device 5 via the in-house LAN (Local Area Network) 4, while the external case server device. 2 is sent to the risk prediction management server device 5 via the Internet 3 and the firewall 7.

パソコン1、社外事例サーバ装置2により入力、或いは取得された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報は、危険予知管理サーバ装置5に設けられた文章要素分解手段となる文章要素分解部8により、いつ(When)、どこで(Where)、誰が(Who)、何を(What)、なぜ(Why)、どのようにして(How)の構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に分解される。   The text text information of the proposal / report / report input / acquired by the personal computer 1 and the external case server apparatus 2 is sent to the text element decomposition unit 8 serving as the text element decomposition means provided in the risk prediction management server apparatus 5 at any time. (When), Where (Where), Who (Who), What (What), Why (Why), and How (How) are decomposed into text vocabulary information for each element of the syntax.

例えば、図3(a)に示すように「B工場で、高圧ガスタンクが爆発。消防署によると冷却水配管の腐食が主因との見解。同社では5年前にも同種の事故を起こしている。」等のテキスト文章情報が入力された場合には、図3(b)に示すように、各構文区分である、「いつ(When)」、「どこで(Where)」、「誰が(Who)」、「何を(What)」、「なぜ(Why)」、「どのようにして(How)」の構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に分解し、分解前の提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報と関連付けて語彙別記憶手段となる事例情報管理データベース(以下、「事例情報管理DB」という)6に記憶して格納される。   For example, as shown in Fig. 3 (a), "A high-pressure gas tank exploded at factory B. According to the fire department, the main cause is corrosion of cooling water piping. The company has caused the same type of accident five years ago. When text text information such as “” is input, as shown in FIG. 3B, each syntax division is “When”, “Where”, “Who”. , "What," "Why," and "How", the text text of the proposal / report / report before breaking down into text vocabulary information for each element of the syntax The information is stored and stored in a case information management database (hereinafter referred to as “case information management DB”) 6 serving as a vocabulary storage unit in association with information.

一方、危険評価辞書記憶手段となる危険評価辞書データベース(以下、「危険評価辞書DB」という)9には、いつ(When)、どこで(Where)、誰が(Who)、何を(What)、なぜ(Why)、どのようにして(How)の構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報が予め設定した危険点数毎に分類して記憶されている。   On the other hand, in the risk assessment dictionary database (hereinafter referred to as “danger assessment dictionary DB”) 9 serving as a risk assessment dictionary storage means, when, where (Where), who (Who), what (What), why (Why), how the text vocabulary information for each element of the syntax of (How) is classified and stored for each preset risk score.

本実施形態の危険点数は危険規模点数と危険頻度点数とで構成されており、例えば、図3(c)に示すように、「消防署」、「高圧ガス」、「冷却水」、「腐食」、「爆発」、「事故」のそれぞれの危険規模点数が「300」点、「50」点、「5」点、「30」点、「800」点、「50」点のように設定されており、「5年前」の危険頻度点数が「5」点のように設定されている。   The risk score of the present embodiment is composed of a risk scale score and a risk frequency score. For example, as shown in FIG. 3C, “fire station”, “high pressure gas”, “cooling water”, “corrosion”. , “Explosion” and “accident” are set as “300” points, “50” points, “5” points, “30” points, “800” points, “50” points, respectively. The risk frequency score of “5 years ago” is set to “5”.

危険予知管理サーバ装置5に設けられた総合危険点数算出手段となる総合危険点数算出部10は、語彙別記憶手段となる事例情報管理DB6に記憶された構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報について、危険評価辞書DB9に記憶された危険規模点数と危険頻度点数とからなる危険点数を割り当てて、分解前の提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数を算出する。   A total risk score calculation unit 10 serving as a total risk score calculation unit provided in the risk prediction management server device 5 is provided for text vocabulary information for each element of the syntax stored in the case information management DB 6 serving as a vocabulary storage unit. A risk score composed of a risk scale score and a risk frequency score stored in the risk evaluation dictionary DB 9 is assigned to calculate a total risk score of the text sentence information of the proposal / report / report before the disassembly.

本実施形態では、総合危険点数を算出する場合に、構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に予め設定された危険規模点数の総合計に、危険頻度点数を乗じて求めたものである。即ち、図3に示すテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数は、{危険規模点数の総合計である「1235点」}×{危険頻度点数である「5点」}=6175点として算出される。   In the present embodiment, when the total risk score is calculated, the total risk score score set in advance in the text vocabulary information for each element of the syntax is multiplied by the risk frequency score. That is, the total risk score of the text sentence information shown in FIG. 3 is calculated as {total number of danger scale points “1235 points”} × {risk frequency score “5 points”} = 6175 points.

このようにして、総合危険点数算出部10により算出された分解前の提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数は、その提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数として総合危険点数記憶手段となる総合危険点数データベース(以下、「総合危険点数DB」という)11に記憶して格納される。   In this way, the total risk score of the text sentence information of the proposal / report / report text sentence information calculated by the total risk score calculation unit 10 is the total risk score of the proposal / report / report text sentence information. It is stored and stored in a total risk score database (hereinafter referred to as “total risk score DB”) 11 serving as a score storage means.

一方、提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報は、文章要素分解部8により分解された構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に基づいて、類似危険事項カテゴリ分類手段となる類似危険事項カテゴリ分類部12により類似する危険事項のカテゴリ群に分類する。危険評価辞書DB9には各危険事項のカテゴリ群毎に予めキーワードと、そのカテゴリ群に類似するか否かを判断するための類似度閾値が設定されており、例えば図3(a)に示すテキスト文章情報に含まれる構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報と、各危険事項のカテゴリ群毎に予め設定されたキーワードとの一致・不一致を照合し、その一致したテキスト語彙情報の数が図4(a)の類似度欄22に記録される。そして、その類似点数が予め設定された類似度閾値を超えた場合に類似する危険事項のカテゴリ群に分類して事例情報管理DB6に記憶して格納される。   On the other hand, the text text information of the proposal / report / report is based on the text vocabulary information for each element of the syntax decomposed by the text element decomposition section 8, and the similar risk category classification section 12 serving as a similar risk category classification means. Into similar risk categories. In the risk assessment dictionary DB 9, a keyword and a similarity threshold for determining whether or not it is similar to the category group are set in advance for each category of each risk item. For example, the text shown in FIG. The text vocabulary information for each element of the syntax included in the sentence information is checked for matches / mismatches with keywords set in advance for each category of each dangerous matter, and the number of matched text vocabulary information is shown in FIG. It is recorded in the similarity column 22 of a). Then, when the number of similar scores exceeds a preset similarity threshold, the similar risk items are classified into category groups and stored in the case information management DB 6.

例えば、図4(a)に示すように、比較的類似度が高い「高圧ガスタンクの液漏れ」、「高圧ガスタンクの異臭」、「高圧ガスタンクの温度上昇」の中から最も類似度が高い「高圧ガスタンクの液漏れ」が図3(a)に示すテキスト文章情報のカテゴリ群として選択される。本実施形態の類似度閾値は「5」に設定されている。   For example, as shown in FIG. 4 (a), “high pressure gas tank liquid leakage”, “high pressure gas tank odor”, and “high temperature gas tank temperature rise” having the highest similarity have the highest similarity. “Liquid leakage in gas tank” is selected as the category group of the text sentence information shown in FIG. In this embodiment, the similarity threshold is set to “5”.

危険予知管理サーバ装置5に設けられた総合危険点数変更手段となる総合危険点数変更部13は、類似危険事項カテゴリ分類部12により分類された類似する危険事項のカテゴリ群において、提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数のうち最も大きい総合危険点数をそのカテゴリ群の代表総合危険点数とし、新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数が前記カテゴリ群の代表総合危険点数よりも大きい場合に、その代表総合危険点数を、新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数に変更する。   The total risk score changing unit 13 provided as a means for changing the total risk score provided in the risk prediction management server device 5 is a group of similar risk items classified by the similar risk item category classifying unit 12, and proposes / reports / reports. The total risk score of the text text information of the text is the largest total risk score of the category group as the representative total risk score of the category group. If it is larger than the representative total risk score, the representative total risk score is changed to the total risk score of the text sentence information of the proposal / report / report newly input and stored.

即ち、図4(a)に示す「高圧ガスタンクの液漏れ」のカテゴリ群の代表総合危険点数として危険規模点数「150」、危険頻度点数「3」が設定されており、図3(a)に示すように、新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数として危険規模点数「1235」、危険頻度点数「5」が設定されており、これ等の危険点数が「高圧ガスタンクの液漏れ」のカテゴリ群の代表総合危険点数(危険規模点数「150」、危険頻度点数「3」)よりも大きい場合に、図4(b)に示すように、その代表総合危険点数である危険規模点数と、危険頻度点数とを、新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数である危険規模点数「1235」、危険頻度点数「5」に変更する。   That is, the risk scale score “150” and the risk frequency score “3” are set as the representative total risk score of the “high-pressure gas tank liquid leak” category group shown in FIG. As shown, the risk scale score “1235” and the risk frequency score “5” are set as the total risk score of the newly entered and stored text text information of the proposal / report / report, and these risk scores are As shown in FIG. 4B, if the representative total risk score (risk scale score “150”, risk frequency score “3”) of the category group of “high-pressure gas tank leakage” is larger than that, The risk scale score and the risk frequency score, which are score points, are changed into a risk scale score “1235” and a risk frequency score “5”, which are the total risk scores of the text text information of proposals, reports, and news reports that are newly input and stored. change.

このとき、例えば提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数として危険規模点数、或いは危険頻度点数の一方のみが代表総合危険点数の危険規模点数、或いは危険頻度点数の一方よりも大きい場合には、大きい方の危険規模点数、或いは危険頻度点数の一方のみを変更し、小さい方はそのままの総合危険点数となる。   At this time, for example, when only one of the risk scale score or the risk frequency score is larger than one of the risk scale score of the representative comprehensive risk score or the risk frequency score as the total risk score of the text text information of proposal / report / report Changes only one of the larger risk scale score or the risk frequency score, and the smaller risk score becomes the total risk score as it is.

また、総合危険点数変更部13は、図5に示すように、代表総合危険点数が変更された場合、既に入力され記憶されている当該類似危険事項カテゴリに属する提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数の全てを、変更された該代表総合危険点数に置き換えて変更する。   Further, as shown in FIG. 5, when the representative total risk score is changed, the total risk score changing unit 13 provides text text information of proposals / reports / reports belonging to the similar risk category already input and stored. All of the total risk points are replaced with the changed representative total risk score.

即ち、図5(a)に示すように、「高圧ガスタンクの液漏れ」のカテゴリ群の各危険点数欄に記録された点数を、新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数{危険規模点数の総合計である「1235点」}×{危険頻度点数である「5点」}=6175点に変更する。   In other words, as shown in FIG. 5 (a), the text recorded in the proposal / report / report text text newly entered and stored in the risk score column of the category "leakage of high-pressure gas tank" The total risk score of {1235 points, which is the total sum of the risk scale scores} × {5 points, which is the risk frequency score} = 6175 points.

そして、総合危険点数変更部13により変更された総合危険点数に基づいて、出力手段となるパソコン1の表示画面に図5(b)に示すように、総合危険点数の大きい順に提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報が並べて出力される。   Then, based on the total risk score changed by the total risk score change unit 13, as shown in FIG. 5 (b) on the display screen of the personal computer 1 serving as the output means, the proposal / report / report is arranged in descending order of the total risk score. The text text information is output side by side.

次に図2を用いて本発明に係る危険予知管理システムを利用する様子について説明する。先ず、図2のステップSにおいて、作業者はパソコン1を利用して図6に示す日常行動チェック画面14上で日常的にチェックする項目についてチェックを行う。危険予知提案を行う場合には、日常行動チェック画面14の危険予知提案ボタン14aをクリックして、図7に示す危険予知提案画面15に移り、提案内容をテキスト文章情報により入力する(ステップS)。 Next, using the risk prediction management system according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. First, in step S 1 in FIG. 2, the operator checks for items to be checked routinely on daily activities check screen 14 shown in FIG. 6 by using the personal computer 1. In the case of performing the risk prediction proposal, click the danger prediction proposal button 14a of the day-to-day behavior check screen 14, it moves to the risk prediction proposal screen 15 shown in FIG. 7, to enter a proposal by the text sentence information (step S 2 ).

また、異常報告を行う場合には、図6の日常行動チェック画面14の異常報告ボタン14bをクリックして、図8に示す異常報告画面16に移り、異常内容をテキスト文章情報により入力する(ステップS)。 Further, when an abnormality report is made, the abnormality report button 14b on the daily action check screen 14 in FIG. 6 is clicked to move to the abnormality report screen 16 shown in FIG. S 3).

社内LAN4を経由して危険予知管理サーバ装置5に送られた提案内容或いは異常内容のテキスト文章情報は、図3(b)に示して前述したと同様に、文章要素分解部8により、いつ(When)、どこで(Where)、誰が(Who)、何を(What)、なぜ(Why)、どのようにして(How)の構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に分解されて事例文章が分析され(ステップS)、図3(c)に示して前述したように、総合危険点数算出部10により、語彙別記憶手段となる事例情報管理DB6に記憶された各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報について、危険評価辞書DB9に記憶された危険規模点数及び危険頻度点数からなる危険点数を割り当てて、分解前の提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数を算出する規模頻度点数計算を行う(ステップS)。 As described above with reference to FIG. 3 (b), the text element information of the proposal contents or abnormal contents sent to the risk prediction management server device 5 via the in-house LAN 4 is sent to the When, where (Where), who (Who), what (What), why (Why), and how (How), the sentence is analyzed into text lexical information for each element of the syntax. (Step S 4 ), as described above with reference to FIG. 3 (c), for the text vocabulary information for each element stored in the case information management DB 6, which is a vocabulary storage means, by the total risk score calculation unit 10. The scale frequency score calculation is performed to assign the risk score composed of the risk scale score and the risk frequency score stored in the risk evaluation dictionary DB9, and to calculate the total risk score of the text sentence information of the proposal / report / report before the decomposition (step) S 5 ).

次に、図4(a)に示して前述したように、類似危険事項カテゴリ分類部12により、テキスト文章情報を、文章要素分解部8により分解された構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に基づいて、類似する危険事項のカテゴリ群に分類する類似危険事項のカテゴリ検索を行う(ステップS)。 Next, as described above with reference to FIG. 4 (a), the textual sentence information is converted by the similar risk item category classification unit 12 based on the text vocabulary information for each element of the syntax decomposed by the sentence element decomposition unit 8. Then, a category search for similar risk items classified into a category group of similar risk items is performed (step S 6 ).

次に図4(b)に示して前述したように、総合危険点数変更部13は、類似危険事項カテゴリ分類部12により分類された類似する危険事項のカテゴリ群において、テキスト文章情報の総合危険点数のうち最も大きい総合危険点数をそのカテゴリ群の代表総合危険点数とし、新たに入力され記憶されたテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数がそのカテゴリ群の代表総合危険点数よりも大きい場合に、その代表総合危険点数を、新たに入力され記憶されたテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数に変更する規模頻度点数更新を行う(ステップS)。 Next, as shown in FIG. 4B and described above, the total risk score changing unit 13 determines the total risk score of the text sentence information in the category group of similar risk items classified by the similar risk item category classification unit 12. If the total risk score of the newly entered text sentence information is larger than the representative total risk score of the category group, the representative total risk score of the category group is set as the representative total risk score of the category group. The scale frequency score is updated to change the risk score to the total risk score of the text sentence information newly inputted and stored (step S 7 ).

次に図5に示して前述したように、総合危険点数変更部13は、新たに入力され記憶されたテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数に変更されたカテゴリ群に含まれる全ての各カテゴリの総合危険点数をその新たに入力され記憶されたテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数に変更する危険点数再計算を行う(ステップS)。 Next, as shown in FIG. 5 and described above, the total risk score changing unit 13 includes the total risk of all categories included in the category group that has been changed to the total risk score of the text sentence information that is newly input and stored. The risk score recalculation is performed to change the score to the total risk score of the text sentence information newly input and stored (step S 8 ).

一方、前記ステップSで行った類似危険事項のカテゴリの自動設定を人為的に修正する機能が用意されており、図9に示す危険規模選択画面17上で規模カテゴリの修正入力を行い(ステップS)、図10に示す発生頻度選択画面18上で頻度カテゴリの修正入力を行うことが出来る(ステップS10)。 Meanwhile, the has function of artificially modified is prepared autoconfiguration category similar hazards that performed in step S 6, performs a correction input of the scale categories on dangerous scale selection screen 17 shown in FIG. 9 (step S 9), can be corrected input frequency category on frequency selection screen 18 shown in FIG. 10 (step S 10).

そして、前記ステップS,S10で人為的に選択した規模カテゴリの危険規模点数、頻度カテゴリの危険頻度点数により総合危険点数を算出する危険度計算を行う(ステップS11)。本実施形態では、{総合危険点数=危険規模点数×危険頻度点数}により算出する。 Then, a risk calculation is performed to calculate a total risk score based on the risk scale score of the scale category and the risk frequency score of the frequency category that are artificially selected in steps S 9 and S 10 (step S 11 ). In this embodiment, it is calculated by {total risk score = danger scale score × danger frequency score}.

次に図11に示す高危険度事例探索画面19により、高危険度事例探索を行う(ステップS12)。出力手段となるパソコン1の表示画面に表示される高危険度事例探索画面19は、総合危険点数変更部13により変更された、或いは前記ステップS,S10で人為的に変更された総合危険点数に基づいて該総合危険点数の大きい順に危険事項に関する提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報が並べて出力される。 Next, a high risk case search is performed on the high risk case search screen 19 shown in FIG. 11 (step S 12 ). The high-risk case search screen 19 displayed on the display screen of the personal computer 1 serving as the output means has been changed by the total risk score changing unit 13 or has been artificially changed in steps S 9 and S 10. Based on the score, the text text information of the proposal / report / report regarding the dangerous matter is arranged and output in descending order of the total risk score.

そして、図12に示す改善提案画面20を利用して改善提案を行い(ステップS13)、図13に示す変更管理画面21を利用して変更管理を行う(ステップS14)。 Then, an improvement proposal is made using the improvement proposal screen 20 shown in FIG. 12 (step S 13 ), and change management is performed using the change management screen 21 shown in FIG. 13 (step S 14 ).

これにより、事故が発生する前に事前に提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報のリスクの大きさを認識出来、時々刻々と変化する社会情勢にも即時に追従することが出来る。   As a result, it is possible to recognize in advance the risk level of textual text information for proposals, reports, and reports before an accident occurs, and to immediately follow the changing social situation.

本発明の活用例として、事故が発生する前に事前にリスクの大きさを認識出来る危険予知管理システムに適用出来る。   As an application example of the present invention, the present invention can be applied to a risk prediction management system that can recognize the magnitude of risk in advance before an accident occurs.

本発明に係る危険予知管理システムの制御系の構成を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the control system of the danger prediction management system which concerns on this invention. 本発明に係る危険予知管理システムの動作を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows operation | movement of the danger prediction management system which concerns on this invention. 文章要素分解手段によりテキスト文書情報を構文の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に分解し危険規模点数と危険頻度点数を計算する様子を示す図である。It is a figure which shows a mode that text document information is decomposed | disassembled into the text vocabulary information for every element of a syntax by a sentence element decomposition | disassembly means, and a risk scale score and a risk frequency score are calculated. 類似危険事項のカテゴリを検索し、危険規模点数及び危険頻度点数を更新する様子を示す図である。It is a figure which shows a mode that the category of a similar dangerous matter is searched and a dangerous scale score and a dangerous frequency score are updated. 過去の事例の危険点数を再計算する様子を示す図である。It is a figure which shows a mode that the risk score of the past example is recalculated. 日常行動チェック画面の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of a daily activity check screen. 危険予知提案画面の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of a danger prediction proposal screen. 異常報告画面の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of an abnormality report screen. 危険規模選択画面の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of a dangerous scale selection screen. 発生頻度選択画面の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the occurrence frequency selection screen. 高危険度事例探索画面の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of a high risk example search screen. 改善提案画面の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of an improvement proposal screen. 変更管理画面の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of a change management screen.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1…パソコン
2…社外事例サーバ装置
3…インターネット
4…社内LAN
5…危険予知管理サーバ装置
6…事例情報管理DB
7…ファイアウォール
8…文章要素分解部
9…危険評価辞書DB
10…総合危険点数算出部
11…危険点数DB
12…類似危険事項カテゴリ分類部
13…総合危険点数変更部
14…日常行動チェック画面
14a…危険予知提案ボタン
14b…異常報告ボタン
15…危険予知提案画面
16…異常報告画面
17…危険規模選択画面
18…発生頻度選択画面
19…高危険度事例探索画面
20…改善提案画面
21…変更管理画面
22…類似度欄
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Personal computer 2 ... External case server apparatus 3 ... Internet 4 ... Internal LAN
5 ... Risk prediction management server device 6 ... Case information management DB
7 ... Firewall 8 ... Text element decomposition unit 9 ... Risk assessment dictionary DB
10 ... Total risk score calculation section
11… Danger point DB
12 ... Similar risk category classification
13… Total risk score change section
14 ... Daily behavior check screen
14a… Danger prediction button
14b… Abnormality report button
15… Danger prediction proposal screen
16… Abnormality report screen
17… Danger scale selection screen
18 ... Frequency selection screen
19… High-risk case search screen
20 ... Improvement proposal screen
21 ... Change management screen
22… Similarity column

Claims (3)

危険事項に関する提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報を入力する文章情報入力手段と、
前記文章情報入力手段により入力された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報を、いつ(When)、どこで(Where)、誰が(Who)、何を(What)、なぜ(Why)、どのようにして(How)の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に分解する文章要素分解手段と、
前記文章要素分解手段により分解された各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報を、分解前の提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報と関連付けて各要素毎に分割して記憶する語彙別記憶手段と、
いつ(When)、どこで(Where)、誰が(Who)、何を(What)、なぜ(Why)、どのようにして(How)の各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報を予め設定した危険点数毎に分類して記憶した危険評価辞書記憶手段と、
前記語彙別記憶手段に記憶された各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報について、前記危険評価辞書記憶手段に記憶された危険点数を割り当てて、分解前の提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数を算出する総合危険点数算出手段と、
前記総合危険点数算出手段により算出された分解前の提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数を、その提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数として記憶する総合危険点数記憶手段と、
前記提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報を、前記文章要素分解手段により分解された各要素毎のテキスト語彙情報に基づいて、類似する危険事項のカテゴリ群に分類する類似危険事項カテゴリ分類手段と、
前記類似危険事項カテゴリ分類手段により分類された類似危険事項のカテゴリ群において、前記提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数のうち最も大きい総合危険点数をそのカテゴリ群の代表総合危険点数とし、新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数が前記カテゴリ群の代表総合危険点数よりも大きい場合に、その代表総合危険点数を、新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数に変更する総合危険点数変更手段と、
を有することを特徴とする危険予知管理システム。
Text information input means for inputting text text information on proposals, reports and news reports on dangerous matters;
Proposal / report / report text text information entered by the text information input means, when, where (Where), who (Who), what (What), why (Why), how Sentence element decomposition means that decomposes into text vocabulary information for each element of (How),
Vocabulary storage means for storing the text vocabulary information for each element decomposed by the sentence element decomposition means in association with the text sentence information of the proposal / report / report before the decomposition and storing for each element;
Text vocabulary information for each element of When, Where (Where), Who (Who), What (What), Why (Why), and How (How) is classified by preset risk score A risk assessment dictionary storage means stored as
For the text vocabulary information for each element stored in the vocabulary storage means, the risk score stored in the risk evaluation dictionary storage means is assigned, and the total risk score of the text sentence information of the proposal / report / report before the decomposition. Comprehensive risk score calculation means for calculating
Total risk score storage means for storing the total risk score of the text sentence information of the proposal / report / report text sentence information calculated by the total risk score calculation means as the total risk score of the proposal / report / report text sentence information When,
Similar risk item category classification means for classifying the text sentence information of the proposal / report / report into similar risk category categories based on the text vocabulary information for each element decomposed by the sentence element decomposition means;
In the category group of similar risk items classified by the similar risk item category classification means, the largest total risk score among the total risk scores of the text text information of the proposal / report / report is the representative total risk score of the category group. When the total risk score of the newly entered and stored text sentence information of the proposal / report / report is larger than the representative total risk score of the category group, the representative total risk score is newly input and stored. Total risk score changing means for changing to the total risk score of text text information of proposals, reports and reports,
A risk prediction management system characterized by comprising:
前記総合危険点数は、危険規模点数と、危険頻度点数とから構成されることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の危険予知管理システム。 The risk prediction management system according to claim 1, wherein the total risk score includes a risk scale score and a risk frequency score. 新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数が、既に入力され記憶されている類似危険事項カテゴリにおける代表総合危険点数を超えた場合に、該既に入力され記憶されている類似危険事項カテゴリに属する全ての総合危険点数を、前記新たに入力され記憶された提案・報告・報道のテキスト文章情報の総合危険点数に置き換えることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の危険予知管理システム。 When the total risk score of the newly entered and stored text text information of the proposal / report / report exceeds the representative total risk score in the similar risk category already input and stored, it is already input and stored. 2. The risk according to claim 1, wherein all the total risk points belonging to the similar risk item category are replaced with the total risk score of the newly input and stored text text information of the proposal / report / report. 3. Predictive management system.
JP2005328422A 2005-11-14 2005-11-14 Hazard prediction management system Expired - Fee Related JP4819483B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005328422A JP4819483B2 (en) 2005-11-14 2005-11-14 Hazard prediction management system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005328422A JP4819483B2 (en) 2005-11-14 2005-11-14 Hazard prediction management system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007133805A true JP2007133805A (en) 2007-05-31
JP4819483B2 JP4819483B2 (en) 2011-11-24

Family

ID=38155389

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005328422A Expired - Fee Related JP4819483B2 (en) 2005-11-14 2005-11-14 Hazard prediction management system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4819483B2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014238654A (en) * 2013-06-06 2014-12-18 株式会社豊田中央研究所 Operation assist device and program
JP2020119174A (en) * 2019-01-23 2020-08-06 アスクラボ株式会社 Sales risk management system
CN116402630A (en) * 2023-06-09 2023-07-07 深圳市迪博企业风险管理技术有限公司 Financial risk prediction method and system based on characterization learning
CN117789907A (en) * 2024-02-28 2024-03-29 山东金卫软件技术有限公司 Intelligent medical data intelligent management method based on multi-source data fusion

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR3060410B1 (en) 2016-12-21 2019-05-24 Technologies Avancees Et Membranes Industrielles TANGENTIAL FLOW SEPARATION ELEMENT INTEGRATING FLEXIBLE CHANNELS

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10320411A (en) * 1997-05-21 1998-12-04 N Ii C Joho Syst:Kk Document sorting device, method therefor and recording medium recorded with document storing program
JP2004133714A (en) * 2002-10-10 2004-04-30 Just Syst Corp Document classification device and method, and program enabling computer to execute the method
JP2004178123A (en) * 2002-11-26 2004-06-24 Hitachi Ltd Information processor and program for executing information processor
JP2005182465A (en) * 2003-12-19 2005-07-07 Toshiba Corp Maintenance support method and program
JP2005190284A (en) * 2003-12-26 2005-07-14 Nec Corp Information classification device and method
JP2005316723A (en) * 2004-04-28 2005-11-10 Nomura Research Institute Ltd Program and method for preparing content map

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10320411A (en) * 1997-05-21 1998-12-04 N Ii C Joho Syst:Kk Document sorting device, method therefor and recording medium recorded with document storing program
JP2004133714A (en) * 2002-10-10 2004-04-30 Just Syst Corp Document classification device and method, and program enabling computer to execute the method
JP2004178123A (en) * 2002-11-26 2004-06-24 Hitachi Ltd Information processor and program for executing information processor
JP2005182465A (en) * 2003-12-19 2005-07-07 Toshiba Corp Maintenance support method and program
JP2005190284A (en) * 2003-12-26 2005-07-14 Nec Corp Information classification device and method
JP2005316723A (en) * 2004-04-28 2005-11-10 Nomura Research Institute Ltd Program and method for preparing content map

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014238654A (en) * 2013-06-06 2014-12-18 株式会社豊田中央研究所 Operation assist device and program
JP2020119174A (en) * 2019-01-23 2020-08-06 アスクラボ株式会社 Sales risk management system
CN116402630A (en) * 2023-06-09 2023-07-07 深圳市迪博企业风险管理技术有限公司 Financial risk prediction method and system based on characterization learning
CN116402630B (en) * 2023-06-09 2023-09-22 深圳市迪博企业风险管理技术有限公司 Financial risk prediction method and system based on characterization learning
CN117789907A (en) * 2024-02-28 2024-03-29 山东金卫软件技术有限公司 Intelligent medical data intelligent management method based on multi-source data fusion
CN117789907B (en) * 2024-02-28 2024-05-10 山东金卫软件技术有限公司 Intelligent medical data intelligent management method based on multi-source data fusion

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4819483B2 (en) 2011-11-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7822747B2 (en) Predictive analytic method and apparatus
US8302197B2 (en) Identifying data associated with security issue attributes
US8250651B2 (en) Identifying attributes of aggregated data
US10067815B2 (en) Probabilistic prediction of software failure
US20110131076A1 (en) Method and apparatus for risk mining
CN104933081A (en) Search suggestion providing method and apparatus
JP4819483B2 (en) Hazard prediction management system
Mawudeku et al. Global public health intelligence network (GPHIN)
JP2007128169A (en) Risk evaluation device and computer program
KR20130108503A (en) Ascribing actionable attributes to data that describes a personal identity
Mohammadfam et al. Developing a process equipment failure knowledge base using ontology approach for process equipment related incident investigations
Deiva Ganesh et al. Supply chain risk identification: a real-time data-mining approach
US20110047265A1 (en) Computer Implemented Method for Identifying Risk Levels for Minors
CN110895566A (en) Vehicle evaluation method and device
JP2007310663A (en) Information retrieval support system, information retrieval support method, and information retrieval support program
Macedo et al. Identifying low-quality patterns in accident reports from textual data
Shabani et al. A comprehensive review of the Swiss cheese model in risk management
AlMansour et al. Evaluation of credibility assessment for microblogging: models and future directions
Kincl et al. Getting inside the minds of the customers: automated sentiment analysis
Bouma et al. On the early detection of threats in the real world based on open-source information on the internet
JP6717555B1 (en) Troubleshooting system with notification function
Gangadhari et al. Disaster impacts analysis using social media data
US20180189699A1 (en) A method and system for locating regulatory information
JP4362492B2 (en) Document indexing device, document search device, document classification device, method and program thereof
Wang et al. Beyond Pareto Analysis: A Decision Support Model for the Prioritization of Deviations with Natural Language Processing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A711 Notification of change in applicant

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A711

Effective date: 20070222

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20070222

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20081021

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20110830

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20110901

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140909

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4819483

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313117

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees