JP2007080201A - Information processing system, information processor, functional verification support method of new computer and computer program - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To allow a user to correctly and rapidly confirm in which data item in which message a processing result is different when functional verification of a new controlling computer is executed by operating the new controlling computer and an old controlling computer in parallel with each other. <P>SOLUTION: This information processing system is provided with: the old controlling computer 1 and the new controlling computer 2 into which input messages (data including a plurality of data items) from an upper system 3 and a lower system 5 are input in parallel with each other; and an information processor 7 acquiring output messages for the input messages in the old controlling computer 1 and the new controlling computer. The information processor 7 is provided with: a message format storage part 71 for storing information of a previously created specification including titles of the data items of the output messages; and a correlation part 73 for correlating the titles of the data items with the output messages in the old controlling computer 1 and the new controlling computer by referring to the information of the specification. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention is suitable for use when, for example, a control computer updates (replaces) a control computer to a new control computer in a control computer system in which a control computer exchanges messages with a host system or a subordinate system. The present invention relates to a processing system, an information processing apparatus, a function verification support method for a new computer, and a computer program.

  When a control computer such as a large-scale manufacturing plant exchanges messages with a higher-level system or lower-level system, when the control computer is updated to a new control computer, the processing by the old and new control computers As long as the contents are not modified, the processing results in both should be the same, but the processing results may differ due to a program error of the new control computer.

  Therefore, the new control computer and the old control computer are operated in parallel, and the function verification of the new control computer is performed by comparing the processing results of both.

  For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a test operation confirmation system when a control computer is updated in a control facility. An old control computer, a host computer, a new control computer, and a test operation confirmation system are connected in parallel through a transmission line. In addition, the old control computer and the new control computer are connected to the lower level control device, and the signals of the old and new control computers are taken into the test run confirmation system from the transmission line, and both signals are compared.

JP 2003-316433 A

  In the test run confirmation system disclosed in Patent Document 1, the processing results in the old and new control computers are automatically compared and confirmed. However, in which data item of which message the processing result is different. In order for the user to grasp, it is necessary to identify the processing result automatically compared with the specification about the message, which is inefficient.

  In addition, because there is a difference in processing capacity (processing speed) between old and new control computers, automatic comparison of processing results in old and new control computers based on time may also compare unintended messages. It can be.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above points, and in the case where the new control computer and the old control computer are operated in parallel to verify the function of the new control computer, which message It is an object of the present invention to enable a user to accurately and quickly confirm which data item has a different processing result.

An information processing system according to the present invention includes a first computer and a second computer to which input data including a plurality of data items is input in parallel from a higher system and / or a lower system, the first computer, and the first computer. And an information processing device capable of acquiring each output data for the input data, wherein the information processing device stores information on a specification prepared in advance including a data item name of the output data. It is characterized in that it comprises storage means for storing, and linking means for linking data item names to respective output data in the first computer and the second computer with reference to the information of the specification. Have.
An information processing apparatus according to the present invention is an information processing apparatus connected to a first computer and a second computer to which input data including a plurality of data items is input in parallel from a higher system and / or a lower system. In the first computer and the second computer, an acquisition means for acquiring each output data for the input data, and a storage for storing information of a specification prepared in advance including a data item name of the output data And a means for associating a data item name with each output data in the first computer and the second computer with reference to information in the specification.
In the function verification support method for a new computer according to the present invention, input data including a plurality of data items is input from a higher system and / or lower system, and an old computer that outputs output data for the input data is updated to a new computer. And a function verification support method for a new computer for verifying the function of the new computer by operating the old computer and the new computer in parallel, the host computer and the new computer having the upper system and / or Alternatively, after the system is constructed so that input data including a plurality of data items is input in parallel from the lower system, the information processing apparatus respectively corresponds to the input data in the first computer and the second computer. The output data, and the information processing apparatus creates a pre-created process including the data item name of the output data. Using the information from writing, characterized in that it has a procedure for attaching the cord to the data item name in the output data at the first computer and the second computer.
The computer program according to the present invention is a computer program to be executed by a computer connected to a first computer and a second computer to which input data including a plurality of data items is input in parallel from a higher system and / or a lower system. In the first computer and the second computer, reference is made to an acquisition process for acquiring each output data for the input data, and information on a specification prepared in advance including a data item name of the output data. Then, the present invention is characterized in that the computer executes a linking process for linking a data item name to each output data in the first computer and the second computer.

  According to the present invention, since the data item name is associated with the output data in the first computer and the second computer, for example, the new control computer and the old control computer are operated in parallel, and the new control When performing functional verification of a computer, the user can accurately and quickly confirm which data item of which message has a different processing result.

Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a schematic configuration of an information processing system according to the present embodiment. The information processing system shown in FIG. 1 is a control computer system in which a control computer 1 exchanges messages with a host system 3 and a subordinate system 5 (see FIG. 2), and the control computer 1 is replaced with a new control computer 2. This is used for verifying the function of the new control computer 2 when updating to.

  Here, the message is data including a plurality of data items. In the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, a control calculation system for controlling the converter operation in the steel plant will be described as an example. Between the host system 3 and the control computer 1, the charge calculation information message, the TPC payout information message, the main raw material information message, the blowing start information message, and the blowing end information message are transmitted as the host transmission. , High-order messages with the names such as steel start information message, steel output completion information message, ladle real information message, blowing experience I message, blowing experience II message, etc. are exchanged. Each message includes a plurality of data items. For example, a TPC payout information message includes a length, a start code, a ILLLER, a control field, a spare, a destination, a transmission source, an information type, a block order, etc. And so on.

  Similarly, between the subordinate system 5 and the control computer 1, as subordinate transmission, an EI-GW start-up completion message, a P / C screen request information message, a secondary material next charge transmission request message, and a status information message are transmitted. Subordinate messages with names such as Sentence, Sublance Measurement Information Message, Blowing Result Message, Lance Height Result Message, SSC Lance Height Result Message, Sub-Material Input Result Message, OB Result Information Message, etc. Exchanged. Each message includes a plurality of data items. For example, the P / C screen request information message includes a length, a start code, a ILLLER, a control field, a spare, a destination, a transmission source, an information type, and a block order. Data items with names such as... Are included.

  In FIG. 1, reference numeral 1 denotes an old control computer. The old control computer 1 includes a recording device 1a for storing input / output messages in the old control computer 1.

  Reference numeral 2 denotes a new control computer to be updated from the old control computer 1. The new control computer 2 includes a recording device 2a for storing input / output messages in the new control computer 2.

  An existing host system 3 such as a process computer is connected in parallel to the old control computer 1 and the new control computer 2 via a hub 4 with a mirror port.

  Reference numeral 5 denotes an existing lower system such as electric instrumentation, which is connected in parallel to the old control computer 1 and the new control computer 2 via a hub 6 with a mirror port.

  Reference numeral 7 denotes an information processing apparatus connected to the old control computer 1 and the new control computer 2 via the hub 4 and the hub 6. The old control computer 1 and the new control computer 2 are operated in parallel to perform the new control. This is to support the function verification when the function verification of the computer 2 is performed. The information processing device 7 includes a display device 7a.

In FIG. 1, when an input message is input from the host system 3 to the old control computer 1 via the hub 4 (solid arrow I ₁ ), the input message is transferred to the new control computer 2 via the hub 4. Are also input in parallel (solid arrow I ₂ ).

Further, an output message corresponding to the input message in the old control computer 1 is output to the host system 3 (dotted arrow O ₁ ), and the converter operation is continued as it is. In this case, the input / output message in the old control computer 1 is recorded in the recording unit in the computer 1 for the past fixed time from the latest one, and the past is stored in the recording device 1a. (Message 2 file).

  On the other hand, the output message corresponding to the input message in the new control computer 2 is not output to the host system 3, but the input / output message in the new control computer 2 is in the computer 2 for a certain past time from the latest one. Are recorded in the recording unit, and past data is accumulated in the recording device 2a (message 1 file).

Further, in response to a request from the information processing device 7, an input / output message in the old control computer 1 is output to the information processing device 7 via the hub 4 (dotted line arrow O ₂ ). Similarly, an input / output message in the new control computer 2 is output to the information processing device 7 via the hub 4 (dotted arrow O ₃ ).

  Note that the exchange with the lower system 5 is the same as that in the higher system 3, and a detailed description thereof is omitted here.

  FIG. 3 shows a functional configuration of the information processing apparatus 7. Reference numeral 71 denotes a message format storage unit (folder) that stores a message format based on a specification created by the user for each message. Here, FIG. 4 shows an example of the specification. The figure shows a part of the specification of the message (subordinate transmission) named “alloy weighing preset”. In the specification, for each data item, data item name, type, unit, number of bytes, data specification / description, lower and upper limit of data, input / output file, and remarks are set. Each message is given a unique number (message number) for each message, and the message “alloy weighing preset” in the illustrated example has a message number. “1261” is attached. Such a specification is created for each message, and a message format based on the specification is stored in the message format storage unit 71.

Reference numeral 72 in FIG. 3 denotes an acquisition unit that acquires input / output messages in the old control computer 1 and input / output messages in the new control computer 2 (dotted arrows O ₂ and O _{3 in} FIG. 1).

  73, referring to the message format stored in the message format storage unit 71, the input / output message in the old control computer 1 and the input / output message in the new control computer 2 acquired by the acquisition unit 72 This is a linking unit for linking message names and data item names.

  74 is a comparison check unit that compares data values in the old and new control computers 1 and 2 for each data item included in the specified message.

  75 is a display control for displaying a list on the display device 7a in a state where message names and data item names are linked to the input / output messages in the old control computer 1 and the input / output messages in the new control computer 2. Part.

  FIG. 5 shows an example of a screen displayed on the display device 7 a of the information processing device 7. In this screen, the storage folder designation unit 101 designates a folder for storing the message format. For example, when the message format is divided into an upper transmission folder and a lower transmission folder, one of them is designated.

  The message reading unit 102 specifies a message file. When functional verification of the new control computer 2 is performed, a message file (message 1 file) of the new control computer 2 (newly installed) and a message file (message 2 file) of the old control computer 1 (existing) ) Is specified. Two message files can be specified, but if you want to check the input / output messages in either the old control computer 1 or the new control computer 2 instead of comparative verification, only one message file is required. It is also possible to specify.

  The time setting unit 103 inputs and sets the search start time and the search end time. Note that both the search start time and the search end time can be set, only one of them can be set, or no setting can be made.

  After specifying the folder and message file for storing the message format and setting the time in this way, when the “Read message 1” button 104 is pressed, the display area 105 is entered in the new control computer 2. A list is displayed with the message name linked to the output message (message list). Specifically, the message received (RECV) by the new control computer 2 and the message sent (SEND) within the period set by the time setting unit 102 are the message name and message number. And a list with the transmission and reception times.

  Similarly, when the “read message 2” button 106 is pressed, a list is displayed in the display area 107 with the message names linked to the input / output messages in the old control computer 2.

  FIG. 6 is a flowchart for explaining the processing operation when the “read message 1” button 104 is pressed. When the “read message 1” button 104 is pressed (step S601), it is first determined whether or not the folder for storing the message format is specified by the storage folder specifying unit 101 (step S602). Notifies that on the screen (step S603).

  When the folder for storing the message format is designated, it is determined whether or not the message 1 file (input / output message file in the new control computer 2) is designated (step S604). If not, a notification to that effect is given on the screen (step S605).

  If a message 1 file is specified, a message list file is generated from the message 1 file with the message name linked (step S606), and it is determined whether a search start time is set. (Step S607) Subsequently, it is determined whether or not a search end time is set (Steps S608 and S609).

  If both the search start time and the search end time are set, a list of messages within that period is displayed in the display area 105 as shown in FIG. 5 (step S610). If only the search start time is set, a list of messages from the search start time to the present is displayed in the display area 105 (step S611). If only the search end time is set, a message list up to the search end time is displayed in the display area 105 (step S612). When the search start time and the search end time are not set, all past message lists are displayed in the display area 105 (step S613).

  Note that the processing operation when the “read message 2” button 106 is pressed is the same as in the flowchart of FIG. 6, and detailed description thereof is omitted here.

  Here, as shown in FIG. 5, in the state where the message list of the new control computer 2 is displayed in the display area 105 and the message list of the old control computer 1 is displayed in the display area 107, In these display areas 105 and 107, a message to be compared can be selected and specified. In the illustrated example, the message “alloy weighing preset” is selected and specified from the message list in the display areas 105 and 107.

  In the illustrated example, the transmission times of the messages “alloy weighing presets” in the display areas 105 and 107 coincide with each other. However, as described above, there is a difference in processing capacity (processing speed) between the old and new control computers. If it is based on, it can also result in comparing unintended messages. On the other hand, in this embodiment, since the message names are linked and displayed in a list, the inconvenience of comparing unintended messages from the relationship between the message name and the preceding and following messages. Can be avoided.

  After selecting and specifying the message to be compared in this way, when the “message comparison / display” button 108 is pressed, as shown in FIG. 7, for each data item included in the message “alloy weighing preset”, data The item name, type, unit, number of bytes, data value (message 1) in the new control computer 2 and data value (message 2) in the old control computer 1 are displayed in a list. Furthermore, as a result of the comparison by the comparison check unit 74, “109” characters 109 are appended to data items having different data values between the message 1 and the message 2 (message comparison list).

  FIG. 8 is a flowchart for explaining the processing operation when the “message comparison / display” button 108 is pressed. When the “message comparison / display” button 108 is pressed (step S801), it is determined whether or not a message to be compared is selected in the display areas 105 and 107 (step S802). Notifies that effect on the screen (step S803). When a message to be compared is selected and specified, a comparison check is performed between the data item included in message 1 and the data item included in message 2 (step S804), and as shown in FIG. A list is displayed (step S805).

  As described above, the message list of the new control computer 2 is displayed in the display area 105 including the message name, and the message list of the old control computer 1 is displayed in the display area 107. Therefore, the user can grasp input / output messages in the new control computer 2 and the old control computer 1 at a glance.

  And if you select and specify the message you want to compare from the message list of the new control computer 2 and the message list of the old control computer 1, the data items included in the message will be displayed together with the data item names. The user can accurately determine which data item has a different processing result between the new control computer 2 and the old control computer 1 simply by looking at the screen display without taking the trouble of checking the specifications. And it can be confirmed quickly.

  Further, as a result of the comparison by the comparison check unit 74, “NG” characters 109 are automatically added to data items having different data values between the new control computer 2 and the old control computer 1. Therefore, the visibility can be further improved.

  In the information processing system of this embodiment described above, not only the above-described list display (message list, message comparison list) but also the display described below is possible. 9 is a state in which the screen shown in FIG. 5 is scrolled, and a “display with message number” button 110 is set. From the combo box 111, the message No. When the “Display with Message No.” button 110 is pressed after designating “No.”, the designated message No. is displayed in the display area 105 and the display area 107 (only the display area 107 in the illustrated example) as shown in FIG. A list of messages corresponding to is displayed. In the illustrated example, the message No. “1261” is designated. In this case, as shown in FIG. A list of messages “alloy weighing presets” corresponding to is displayed. In the present embodiment, message numbers of up to four messages are stored. Can be specified.

  FIG. 11 is a flowchart for explaining the processing operation when the “display with message number” button 110 is pressed. Message No. Is designated (step S1101), and when the “display with message number” button 110 is pressed (step S1102), a list of messages is displayed in both display areas 105 and 107, or one of them is displayed. It is determined whether only the message list is displayed (steps S1103, S1104, S1105).

  When the message list is displayed in both the display areas 105 and 107, the message numbers specified in both the display areas 105 and 107 are displayed. A message list corresponding to is displayed (step S1106). On the other hand, when the message list is displayed only in one of the display areas 105 and 107, the message No. specified in that display area only. A message list corresponding to is displayed (step S1107). In the example of FIGS. 9 and 10, the message list is displayed only in the display area 107. A list of messages “alloy weighing presets” corresponding to “1261” is displayed.

  Further, as shown in FIG. 5, a “continuous display” button 112 is set. When a “continuous display” button 112 is pressed after selecting and specifying a message from the message list in the display area 107, as shown in FIG. 12, for each data item included in the selected and specified message, an item name is displayed. , Type, unit, number of bytes, and transition of data value are listed (continuous display).

  FIG. 13 is a flowchart for explaining the processing operation when the “continuous display” button 112 is pressed. When the “continuous display” button 112 is pressed (step S1301), it is determined whether or not a message is selected and specified in the display area 107 (step S1302). Notification is made (step S1303). When the message is selected and designated, a continuous display is displayed as shown in FIG. 12 (step S1305).

  The functions described in FIGS. 9 to 13 are not only for verifying the function of the new control computer 2 by operating the old control computer 1 and the new control computer 2 in parallel, but also for example the new control computer 2. After the function verification is completed and the old control computer 1 is removed, it can be used to check input / output messages in the new control computer 2.

  Note that the information processing apparatus 700 of the above-described embodiment is specifically configured by a computer system or apparatus. Accordingly, a storage medium storing software program codes for realizing the functions described above is supplied to the system or apparatus, and a computer (or CPU or MPU) of the system or apparatus reads and executes the program codes stored in the storage medium. Needless to say, this can be achieved.

  In this case, the program code itself read from the storage medium realizes the functions of the above-described embodiments, and the program code itself and the storage medium storing the program code constitute the present invention. As a storage medium for supplying the program code, for example, a flexible disk, a hard disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a CD-ROM, a CD-R, a magnetic tape, a nonvolatile memory card, a ROM, or the like can be used.

It is a figure which shows schematic structure of the information processing system of this embodiment. It is a figure which shows schematic structure of the calculation system for control. It is a figure which shows the function structure of information processing apparatus. It is a figure which shows an example of a specification document. It is a figure which shows an example of the screen displayed on the display apparatus of information processing apparatus. It is a flowchart for demonstrating the processing operation | movement when the "message 1 reading" button is pressed down. It is a figure which shows an example of a screen when the "message comparison / display" button is pressed down. It is a flowchart for demonstrating the processing operation | movement when the "message comparison / display" button is pressed down. FIG. 6 is an example of a screen displayed on the display device of the information processing apparatus, and shows a state in which the screen shown in FIG. 5 is scrolled. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a screen when a “display with message number” button is pressed. FIG. 10 is a flowchart for explaining a processing operation when a “display with message number” button is pressed. It is a figure which shows an example of a screen when the "continuous display" button is pressed down. It is a flowchart for demonstrating the processing operation | movement when the "continuous display" button is pressed down.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Old control computer 1a Recording device 2 New control computer 2a Recording device 3 Upper system 4 Hub 5 Lower system 6 Hub 7 Information processing apparatus 71 Message format storage part 72 Acquisition part 73 Linking part 74 Comparison check part 75 Display control Part

Claims (6)

A first computer and a second computer to which input data including a plurality of data items is input in parallel from the upper system and / or the lower system;
An information processing device capable of acquiring respective output data for the input data in the first computer and the second computer;
The information processing apparatus refers to storage means for storing information on a pre-created specification including a data item name of the output data, and refers to the information on the specification so that the first computer and the second computer An information processing system comprising: a linking unit for linking a data item name to each output data in a computer.   The information processing apparatus includes display control means for displaying a list on a display device in a state where data item names are associated with output data of the first computer and the second computer, respectively. Item 4. The information processing system according to Item 1.   The first computer is an old computer, and the second computer is a new computer to be updated from the old computer, and the old computer and the new computer are operated in parallel, and the new computer The information processing system according to claim 1, wherein the function is verified. An information processing apparatus connected to a first computer and a second computer to which input data including a plurality of data items is input in parallel from a higher system and / or a lower system,
Obtaining means for obtaining respective output data for the input data in the first computer and the second computer;
Storage means for storing information of a pre-created specification including a data item name of the output data;
An information processing apparatus comprising: a linking unit for linking a data item name to output data in each of the first computer and the second computer with reference to information in the specification. When input data including a plurality of data items is input from the upper system and / or lower system, and the old computer that outputs output data for the input data is updated to the new computer, the old computer and the new computer are paralleled. A function verification support method for a new computer for operating and verifying the function of the new computer,
After constructing a system to input input data including a plurality of data items from the upper system and / or the lower system to the old computer and the new computer in parallel,
A procedure in which the information processing apparatus acquires respective output data for the input data in the first computer and the second computer;
The information processing apparatus refers to information of a specification prepared in advance including the data item name of the output data, and associates the data item name with the output data in the first computer and the second computer And a function verification support method for a new computer. A computer program to be executed by a computer connected to a first computer and a second computer to which input data including a plurality of data items is input in parallel from a higher system and / or a lower system,
An acquisition process for acquiring respective output data for the input data in the first computer and the second computer;
Referring to information of a specification prepared in advance including the data item name of the output data, a linking process for linking the data item name to each output data in the first computer and the second computer A computer program that is executed by a computer.

Images