JP2006302225A - Skill information processor and skill information processing method - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a skill information processor and a skill information processing method, enabling a temporary employee, a person in charge of a dispatch destination company, and a salesman of a temporary-employment agency to efficiently work on dispatch business in fair situations by setting a skill key word the three persons can objectively evaluate according to a business content, and making evaluation contents along the skill key work browsable by the three persons, so that the thrusts are secured to establish a relation of thrust among the three person, and the risks of the three persons in the dispatch business are distributed. <P>SOLUTION: In each skill sheet 251-253, a part with a numerical value within a frame shows that evaluations by the three persons are inputted, and a part with no frame shows that evaluations by the three persons are not inputted. The skill sheets 251-253 are superposed, whereby a skill cube is formed, and a composed color is displayed for each skill keyword with evaluation input. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a skill information processing apparatus, a skill information processing server, and a skill information processing method, and in particular, a skill information processing apparatus and skill information for sharing skill information among a temporary employee, an agent, and a dispatched company. It relates to the processing method.

  Recently, the employment situation in companies has changed, and it has changed from a life-time employment form to a form of mid-career hiring and active use of temporary employees. This is because there are situations in which companies need ready-to-use human resources in order to cope with rapid market changes and rapid technological advances.

  Demand for the temporary staffing industry is expanding as an industry that responds to such changes in the employment situation. In the temporary staffing business, it is possible to register the career and skills of human resources and provide the necessary human resources only for a necessary period according to the work contents of the company. Opportunities are increasing because companies can use staffing to improve work efficiency and reduce labor costs.

  First of all, a person who is looking for a job registers his work history and skills with a temporary staffing company. Next, the temporary staffing company conducts business by introducing registered people to various companies. Here, when a company tries to hire an introduced human resource, the person in charge of the company interviews and decides whether or not to hire. If hired, the employer works at the recruiting company, and the salary of the employer is paid from the company via the temporary staffing company.

  However, in the temporary staffing business, the dispatching company's sales staff is responsible for responding when the work at the destination is different from the employer's wishes, dealing with complaints about work, dealing with various problems at the workplace, etc. However, there is a problem that the problem cannot be solved easily because of the large number of temporary employees to manage.

  In addition, there is a problem in that the company at the dispatch destination cannot receive an honest evaluation because it receives from the temporary staff and fills in an evaluation table for evaluating the work of the temporary staff from the temporary staff. For this reason, the temporary staffing company has a problem that it cannot accurately grasp the ability of the temporary staff.

As a countermeasure to these problems, for example, there is a method and a storage medium (see Patent Document 1) for smoothly dispatching human resources. In this method, multiple temporary employees use a communication terminal to access a temporary staffing company's database, register information related to the work, and the recruiting company uses a communication terminal to access the temporary staffing company's database, and multiple temporary staffing Register the contents related to the work of the employees, and the employees of the sales staff of the temporary staffing company access the database using a communication terminal, and refer to the contents registered by the temporary staff and the contents registered by the hiring company. Depending on the situation, the problem of the temporary staff and / or the recruiting company is grasped and dealt with, and the work contents, working attitude, and work evaluation of each temporary staff are accurately grasped, and the optimum working environment is selected as the optimum temporary staff. Dispatch to.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-325404

  However, in the above-mentioned conventional method, there is no particular provision on the work contents that the temporary staff and the recruiting company register in the database of the temporary staffing company, so the criteria for matching the work contents of both the temporary staff and the hiring company are unclear. It is.

  In other words, the work contents registered by the temporary staff and recruiting company in the database of the temporary staffing company are to register subjective contents from their respective positions. The terms used by the company for business content and job type do not match, and the criteria for judging both requests are not clear.

  For this reason, it is difficult for employees of sales staff at temporary staffing companies to accurately grasp the work contents, work attitudes, and work evaluations of each temporary staff from the contents registered in the database. Dispatching to the work environment is actually difficult.

  Also, in the conventional temporary work, the evaluation of the work at the hiring company where the temporary employee is located cannot be used by another hiring company, so the credit of the temporary employee is not guaranteed, and the hiring company of each temporary employee is not trusted. The burden to get is large.

  In other words, the contents of the dispatched employees change depending on the work of the dispatched company, and the evaluation contents of the dispatched employee are judged by the subjective factors from the standpoint of the dispatched employee, the company staff, and the sales staff of the staffing agency. In many cases, the evaluation criteria are not constant, so the credit of the temporary staff is not guaranteed.

  Also, in the conventional dispatching business, the evaluation target is always concentrated only on the temporary staff, and the corporate staff and the sales staff of the temporary staffing company are not the target of the evaluation, which is only the temporary staff takes the risk. In other words, there is a problem that the risk distribution among the three parties is not fair.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and the skill keywords that can be objectively evaluated mutually by the temporary staff, the person in charge of the dispatched company, and the sales staff of the temporary staffing company are based on the business content. Set up and allow the three parties to browse the evaluation content according to the skill keyword, secure the trust so that a trusting relationship between the three parties is fostered, and spread the risk of the three parties in the dispatch operation An object of the present invention is to provide a skill information processing apparatus and a skill information processing method that enable the three parties to efficiently work on dispatch work from a fair position.

  The skill information processing apparatus of the present invention is a skill information processing for processing evaluation information for evaluating skills required for work by each of a dispatched employee involved in a dispatch work, an agent of a dispatch company, and a company representative of a dispatched company. A skill keyword representing a skill that each of the temporary staff, the agent, and the person in charge of the company owns for the temporary work or a skill required for another person is registered in the storage unit. Skill keyword registration processing means, based on the registered skill keyword, the temporary employee inputs a self-evaluation and another person's evaluation for the other two, and the agent performs self-evaluation and other A skill sheet for agents that inputs the other person's evaluation for the two parties, and the person in charge of the company conducts self-evaluation and others for the other two parties. A skill sheet creation means for creating a skill sheet for a company person who inputs a price for each dispatch operation, and the temporary staff inputs self-evaluation and other person evaluation for each skill keyword of the temporary staff skill sheet. The agent inputs self-evaluation and other-party evaluation for each skill keyword in the agent skill sheet, and the company person in charge self-evaluates and others for each skill keyword in the company-person skill sheet. An input means for inputting an evaluation and a self-evaluation and other-person evaluation input to the same skill keyword of each skill sheet are processed to obtain a mutual evaluation for each skill keyword of the temporary staff, agent and company staff A mutual evaluation calculation processing means, a self-evaluation value of each skill keyword input to each skill sheet, and Customer rating displays an employs a configuration having a display means for displaying the cross-evaluation by superimposing same skill keywords in each skill sheet.

  According to the present invention, a skill keyword that can be objectively evaluated mutually by a temporary employee, a person in charge at a dispatched company, or a sales staff member of a temporary staffing company is set according to the work contents, and the skill keyword is set as the skill keyword. The three parties can view each other's evaluation contents mutually, secure the trust so as to foster a trusting relationship between the three parties, aim to spread the risk of the three parties in dispatch operations, and the three parties have a fair position Can work on dispatch work efficiently.

  The skill information processing apparatus according to the first aspect of the present invention provides evaluation information for evaluating skills required for work by each of a dispatched employee involved in dispatch work, an agent of a dispatch company, and a company representative of a dispatch destination company. A skill keyword representing a skill possessed by each of the dispatched employee, the agent, and the person in charge of the company for the dispatching work, or a skill required for another person. A skill keyword registration processing means for registering the information in the storage unit, a temporary employee employee skill sheet on which the temporary employee inputs self-evaluation and other person evaluations based on the registered skill keyword, and the agent Agent's skill sheet for inputting self-assessment and other person's evaluation for the other two, and A skill sheet creation means for creating a skill sheet for the person in charge of the company who inputs the other person's evaluation for the worker for each of the dispatch operations, and the temporary employee performs self-evaluation and others for each skill keyword of the skill sheet for the temporary staff An evaluation is input, the agent inputs self-evaluation and other-party evaluation for each skill keyword in the agent skill sheet, and the company person in charge self-evaluates each skill keyword in the company person skill sheet. Input means for inputting evaluations and other person evaluations, and processing the self-evaluation and other person evaluations input to the same skill keyword of each skill sheet, and for each skill keyword of the temporary employee, agent and company person in charge Mutual evaluation calculation processing means for obtaining mutual evaluation, and each skill keyword input to each skill sheet And displays the self-evaluation value and others evaluate, employs a configuration having a display means for displaying the cross-evaluation by superimposing same skill keywords in each skill sheet.

  According to this configuration, skill keywords that can be evaluated objectively by dispatched employees, personnel in the dispatched company, and sales staff members of temporary staffing companies are set according to the work contents, and the skill keywords The three parties can view each other's evaluation contents mutually, secure the trust so as to foster a trusting relationship between the three parties, aim to spread the risk of the three parties in dispatch operations, and the three parties have a fair position Can work on dispatch work efficiently.

  The skill information processing apparatus according to a second aspect of the present invention is the skill information processing apparatus according to the first aspect, wherein the input means inputs the self-evaluation and other-person evaluation with numerical values within a predetermined range, and the mutual evaluation The calculation processing means calculates the self-evaluation value and the other-party evaluation value of each skill keyword input to each skill sheet to obtain a mutual evaluation value for each skill keyword of the temporary staff, agent and company staff, The display means displays the self-evaluation value and the other-person evaluation value of each skill keyword input to each skill sheet, and displays the mutual evaluation value by superimposing the same skill keyword on each skill sheet. Take the configuration.

  According to this configuration, the mutual evaluation value is calculated based on the self-evaluation value and the other person evaluation value for the skill keyword registered in advance, and the self-evaluation value, the other person evaluation value and the mutual evaluation value of each of the temporary staff, the agent, and the company person in charge are calculated. Since the evaluation value is displayed, it is possible to easily check the evaluation of the skill level of the temporary staff, the agent, and the company person in charge who participated in the past. As a result, when starting a new job, the skill keyword to be evaluated can be easily set among the three members of the temporary staff, the agent, and the person in charge of the company.

  The skill information processing apparatus according to a third aspect of the present invention is the skill information processing apparatus according to the second aspect, wherein the display means sets a display color for each of the temporary employee, the agent, and the person in charge of the company, The self-evaluation value and the other-person evaluation value of each skill keyword input to the sheet are displayed in gradation in each display color, and the same skill keyword in each skill sheet is overlapped to display the mutual evaluation value in each display color A configuration is adopted in which the number of gradations is displayed.

  According to this configuration, the temporary evaluation staff, agent, and company staff in charge of past participation in operations that have participated in the past, because the self-evaluation values, other-party evaluations, and mutual evaluation values of the temporary staff, agents, and company staff are displayed by gradation. It is possible to easily check the evaluation of the skill keyword of the person. In addition, temporary staff, agents, and company staff can easily understand their skills to improve based on self-evaluation, other-person evaluations, and mutual evaluation values in the work they have participated in the past. Can be useful.

  A skill information processing apparatus according to a fourth aspect of the present invention is the skill information processing apparatus according to the second aspect, wherein the display means sets a plurality of business items on one axis and sets the business items on the other axis. A two-dimensional matrix in which a plurality of corresponding skill keywords are set is set for each temporary employee, agent, and company person in charge, and the self-evaluation value and the other-party evaluation value are displayed on each skill keyword of each two-dimensional matrix, The mutual evaluation value is displayed by superimposing the same work item and the same skill keyword in the two-dimensional matrix.

  According to this configuration, since a temporary employee, an agent, and a person in charge of a company each display a self-evaluation value, another person evaluation, and a mutual evaluation value for a plurality of skill keywords of a plurality of operations that participated in the past in a two-dimensional matrix, It is possible to easily confirm the evaluation of a plurality of skill keywords of a temporary employee, an agent, and a company person in charge in a plurality of operations that participated in.

  A skill information processing apparatus according to a fifth aspect of the present invention is the skill information processing apparatus according to the third aspect, wherein the display means sets a plurality of business items on one axis and sets the business items on the other axis. A two-dimensional matrix in which a plurality of corresponding skill keywords are set is set for each temporary employee, agent, and company person in charge, and the self-evaluation value and the other-party evaluation value are assigned to each skill keyword of each two-dimensional matrix according to the display color. A configuration is adopted in which the same work item and the same skill keyword of the two-dimensional matrix are superimposed and the mutual evaluation value is displayed with the number of gradations obtained by adding the display colors.

  According to this configuration, the self-evaluation value, the other-party evaluation value, and the mutual evaluation value for a plurality of skill keywords of a plurality of operations that have been previously participated by temporary employees, agents, and company staffs are displayed in a two-dimensional matrix according to display colors. Since it is displayed, it is possible to easily confirm the evaluation of a plurality of skill keywords of a temporary employee, an agent, and a company person in charge in a plurality of operations that participated in the past.

  The skill information processing apparatus according to a sixth aspect of the present invention is the skill information processing apparatus according to the second aspect, wherein the mutual evaluation calculation processing means includes a self-evaluation value input to the same skill keyword of each skill sheet, A configuration is adopted in which the mutual evaluation value is obtained by calculating an average value of the other person evaluation values.

  According to this configuration, the mutual evaluation value calculation process can be facilitated, and the processing burden can be reduced.

  The skill information processing apparatus according to the seventh aspect of the present invention provides evaluation information for evaluating skills required for work by each of a dispatched employee involved in dispatch work, an agent of a dispatch company, and a company representative of a dispatch destination company. A skill keyword representing a skill possessed by each of the dispatched employee, the agent, and the person in charge of the company for the dispatching work, or a skill required for another person. A skill keyword registration processing step for registering the information in the storage unit, a skill sheet for a temporary employee in which the temporary employee inputs a self-evaluation and another person's evaluation for the other two based on the registered skill keyword, and the agent The agent's skill sheet for inputting self-evaluation and other person's evaluation for the other two, and the company person in charge A skill sheet creation step for creating a skill sheet for a person in charge of a company for inputting the other person's evaluation for each of the two for each of the dispatch operations, and the temporary staff performs self-evaluation on each skill keyword of the skill sheet for the temporary staff and The other person's evaluation is input, the agent inputs the self-evaluation and the other person's evaluation for each skill keyword of the agent skill sheet, and the company person in charge receives each skill keyword of the company person's skill sheet. The input step of inputting self-evaluation and other-party evaluation, and the skills of the temporary employee, agent, and company person in charge by calculating and processing the self-evaluation and other-party evaluation input to the same skill keyword of each skill sheet Mutual evaluation calculation processing step for obtaining mutual evaluation for keywords, and each skill sheet input to each skill sheet And displays the self-evaluation value and others assessment of kill keyword, a method and a display step of displaying the cross-evaluation by superimposing same skill keywords in each skill sheet.

  According to this method, skill keywords that can be evaluated objectively by dispatched employees, persons in charge at dispatched companies, and sales staff at temporary staffing companies are set according to the work contents. The three parties can view each other's evaluation contents mutually, secure the trust so as to foster a trusting relationship between the three parties, aim to spread the risk of the three parties in dispatch operations, and the three parties have a fair position Can work on dispatch work efficiently.

  Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a block configuration of a skill evaluation information processing apparatus to which the present invention is applied.

  In FIG. 1, the skill evaluation information processing apparatus 100 includes a CPU 101, a storage unit 102, a display unit 103, an input unit 104, a large capacity storage unit 105, and a communication unit 106, and each unit is connected by a bus 107.

  The skill evaluation information processing apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment includes a dispatch engineer (hereinafter referred to as an engineer), a dispatch company agent (hereinafter referred to as an agent), and a dispatch destination company (hereinafter referred to as an engineer). Each company registers as a user and exchanges their own skill information and review (evaluation) information, etc., and the project (business) registration process, team formation process related to the project, skill keywords related to the project within the team, etc. A consignment work support site called “skill auction” that provides a service that enables a consensus building process, a review (skill evaluation information) registration process, etc. of each person after the end of the project is provided.

  A CPU (Central Processing Unit) 101 controls each unit in the skill evaluation information processing apparatus 100 based on the skill auction business program stored in the storage unit 102 and executes a skill auction business process (see FIG. 10) described later. To do. In addition, the CPU 101 performs a project registration work described later based on the project registration work program, the team formation work program, the consensus work work program, the in-work work program, and the review registration work program stored in the storage unit 102 in the skill auction work process. Processing (see FIG. 15), team formation work processing (see FIG. 16), consensus building work processing (see FIG. 18), work-in-progress processing (see FIG. 19), and review registration work processing (see FIG. 20) are executed.

  Further, the CPU 101 executes a trust square calculation process (see FIG. 26) and an average credit calculation process (see FIG. 27), which will be described later, based on the trust square calculation program and the average credit calculation process program stored in the storage unit 102. The CPU 101 functions as a skill keyword registration processing unit, a skill sheet creation unit, an input unit, and a mutual evaluation calculation processing unit.

  The storage unit 102 has a function as a ROM (Read Only Memory) that stores a skill auction business program, a project registration business program, a team formation business program, an agreement formation business program, an on-the-job business program, and a review registration business program, and the CPU 101 When the above processes are executed, the system has a function as a RAM (Random Access Memory) used as a work area for developing the various programs and various data.

  The display unit 103 is configured by a CRT (Cathode Ray Tube) or the like, and displays input data from the input unit 104 input from the CPU 101 or data being processed. The display unit 103 functions as a display unit.

  The input unit 104 includes a pointing device such as a keyboard and a mouse, and outputs key input information operated by an operator and input instruction information from the pointing device to the CPU 101. For example, when the skill evaluation information processing apparatus 100 is maintained. Used for.

  The large-capacity storage unit 105 includes a hard disk device or the like, and as shown in the figure, a user information table 105a, a user skill keyword (hereinafter also referred to as SK) table 105b, a project table 105c, a project SK table 105d, and a skill keyword The table 105e and the like are stored.

  The user information table 105 a is a table for storing user (engineer, agent, company) information registered at the “skill auction” site operated on the WEB site by the skill evaluation information processing apparatus 100. In this table 105a, as shown in FIG. 2, “data name”, data “type”, and “data content” are set, and specifically, “User ID: integer: user” that identifies each user. Unique ID ”,“ account: text: account ”for setting the access authority to each user's site,“ password: text: password ”for authenticating each user, and the user name“ name: text: The “name” and the email address “email: text: email address” of each user are stored in association with each other.

  The user SK table 105b is a table for storing information on skill keywords registered by the registered user (engineer, agent, company) during the project registration work process. In this table 105b, as shown in FIG. 3, “data name”, data “type”, and “data content” are set, and specifically, “User SK” that identifies the user who registered the skill keyword. “ID: integer: unique ID”, “User ID: integer: user's unique ID”, “SKID: integer: skill keyword ID” for identifying skill keywords, and “rank” indicating the self-evaluation level for each user skill. : Integer: evaluation 0-5 (0: unanswered, 1-5: rank) "and" self Memo: text: self-evaluation memo "storing the self-evaluation explanation by each user are stored in association with each other. Note that the user SK table 105b functions as a storage unit.

  In this table 105b, the case where the self-evaluation level is set to 6 levels of “0 to 5” is shown, but the setting level is not limited, and the skill evaluation information processing apparatus 100 side sets it as a default. Alternatively, it may be arbitrarily set based on an agreement between users.

  The project table 105c is a table for storing information related to a project registered by the registered user (a technician, an agent, or a project owner of a company) during the project registration work process. In this table 105b, as shown in an example in FIG. 4, “data name”, data “type”, and “data content” are set, and specifically, “PJID: integer: project ID” that identifies the project table. "User ID Client: Integer: User ID of the company", "User ID Engineer: Integer: User ID of the engineer", and "User ID Agent: “Integer: Agent User ID”, “Agree Client: Boolean: Did the company agree? (True / False)” indicating whether or not the agreement of the company's project is correct, and “Agle Engine: BOOT: Did the company agree? (True / F alse) ”,“ Agree Agent: BOOT: Do you agree with the agent? (True / False) ”, and“ PJCategory ID: Integer: Skill keyword belongs ” “Category”, “PJname: text: project name” indicating the project name, “Stat date: date: project start date” indicating the project start date, and “End date: date: project end” indicating the project end date "Mem: text: description of the project" that stores the description of the project and "status ID: integer: progress status ID of the project (0: team is being formed, 1: “Consensus building in progress, 2: project in progress, 3: mutual review in progress, 4: complete”) in association with each other.

  The project SK table 105d includes a project SK table 105d1 for storing information on skill keywords registered based on an agreement of users (engineers, agents, companies) participating in the project, and users (engineers, engineers, And an evaluation information table 105d2 for storing evaluation information of agents and companies.

  As shown in FIG. 5, the project SK table 105d1 sets “data name”, data “type”, and “data content”, and specifically identifies “PJSKID: integer: “Project SKID”, “PJID: Integer: Project ID that registered the skill keyword” that identifies the project that registered the skill keyword, and “User ID Owner: Integer: skill keyword that registered the owner who registered the skill keyword” “Owner ID”, “Target Client: BOOT: Skill required for company (True / False)” indicating whether the skill request destination is a company, and whether the skill request destination is an engineer "Target Engineer: BOOT: Engineer "Skill to be requested (True / False)", "Target Agent: BOOT: Skill requested to the agent (True / False)" indicating whether the request destination of the skill is an agent, “Agree Client: BOOT: Indicates whether the company agrees (True / False)” and “Agree Engineer: BOOT: Indicates that the engineer agrees. "Agree Agent: BOOT: Whether the agent has agreed (True / False)" indicating whether the agent has agreed with the skill, and "SKID: integer: identifying the skill keyword table" Skill keyword ID "and the skill “Rank: integer: evaluation 0-5 (0: unanswered, 1-5: rank)” for storing a settable evaluation level, and “Memo Owner: text: memo (owner) for storing the owner's memo for the skill ”And“ Memo Client: text: memo (for a company) ”for storing the company's memo for the skill and“ Memo Engineer: text: memo (for the engineer) ”for storing the memo of the engineer for the skill. And “Memo Agent: text: memo (for agent)” that stores the agent's memo for the skill in association with each other.

  As shown in FIG. 6, the project SK table 105 d 2 sets “data name”, data “type”, and “data content”, and specifically stores the self-evaluation level for the skill keyword of the company. “Reviewrank C2C: integer: self-evaluation of company (0 to 5)” and “reviewrank C2E: integer: evaluation of company to engineer (0-5) ) ”And“ reviewrank C2A: integer: evaluation from the company to the agent (0 to 5) ”and the evaluation level from the engineer to the skill keyword of the company are stored. "Reviewrank E2C: integer: from engineers to companies “Reviewrank E2E: Integer: Company self-evaluation (0-5)” that stores the self-evaluation level for the skill keyword of the engineer and the evaluation level for the skill keyword of the agent from the engineer Stores “reviewrank E2A: integer: evaluation from engineer to agent (0 to 5)”, and stores “reviewrank A2C: integer: agent to company” “Evaluation (0 to 5)”, “Evaluation level from agent to engineer (0 to 5)” for storing the evaluation level for the skill keyword of the engineer, and “Memorization for self-evaluation of the company” reviewmem C2C: Integer: Self-evaluation of company ( “)” And “reviewmemo C2E: integer: evaluation from company to engineer (memo)” and memo for evaluation from company to agent “Reviewmemo C2A: integer: evaluation from company to agent (memo)” and “reviewmem E2C: integer: from engineer to company” "Review memo E2E: integer: engineer self-evaluation (memo)", and memorize memo for engineer-to-agent evaluation reviewmeme E2A: integer: evaluation from engineer to agent (memo) ”, agent “Reviewmemo A2C: Integer: Evaluation from agent to company (memo)” and “reviewmem A2E” to store memo for evaluation from agent to engineer : Integer: evaluation from agent to engineer (memo) and “reviewmemo A2A: integer: agent self-evaluation (memo)” for storing a memo for agent self-evaluation.

  In the skill keyword table 105e, as shown in an example in FIG. 7, “data name”, data “type”, and “data content” are set, and specifically, “SKID: integer” that stores the ID of the skill keyword : ID of skill keyword ”,“ Owner User ID: integer: user ID of owner ”for storing the project owner's user ID, and“ SK Category ID: integer: skill keyword for storing the ID indicating the category to which the skill keyword belongs. “SK category: text: name of skill keyword” and “SKrank memo: text: description of desired skill of skill keyword”. And skill keywords “SKrank url: text: learning destination URL related to skill keyword” is stored, and skill description desired for skill rank 1 is stored “SKrank1 memo: text: description of skill desired for rank 1” "SKrank1 url: text: learning destination URL related to rank 1" for storing the learning destination URL related to skill rank 1 and "SKrank2 memo: text: rank 2" for storing the skill description desired for skill rank 2 "Skill description desired for", "SKrank2 url: Text: Learning destination URL related to rank 2" for storing the learning destination URL associated with skill rank 2, and "Skill description desired for skill rank 3" SKrank3 memo: Text: Rank 3 "SKrank 3 url: text: learning destination URL related to rank 3" and "SKrank 4" to store the skill description desired for skill rank 4 memo: text: description of skill desired for rank 4 and “SKrank4 url: text: learning destination URL related to rank 4” for storing skill URL 4 and skill rank 5 desired “SKrank5 memor: text: description of skill desired in rank 5” for storing skill explanation, and “SKrank5 url: text: learning destination URL related to rank 5” for storing the learning destination URL related to skill rank 5. Are stored in association with each other.

  The communication unit 106 is connected to the Internet, and executes access control to the “skill auction” site, transmission / reception control of various information, and the like between the skill evaluation processing device 100 and the communication terminal devices of engineers, companies, and agents. .

  Next, the service outline of the “skill auction” site operated on the WEB site by the skill evaluation information processing apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. 8 and 9.

  FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a concept of a mutual evaluation database called a skill cube generated for each project on the “skill auction” site.

  In the “skill auction” site, engineers, companies, and agents registered as users for each project can review their own self-evaluation and evaluation of the other two for skill keywords after the project is completed (see FIGS. 21 to 23). The first objective is to construct a mutual evaluation database called “skill cube” as shown in FIG. 8 by expressing each other's self-evaluation and other person's evaluation. To do.

  In this skill cube, specific colors are set for engineers, companies, and agents, for example, “red” for engineers, “blue” for companies, and “green” for agents.

  Then, the self-evaluation level or the other-party evaluation level for each keyword is represented by the number of gradations of the set color. For example, in the present embodiment, “evaluation 0 to 5 (0: unanswered, 1 to 5) stored in the self-evaluation item and the other-evaluation item for each company, engineer, and agent shown in the project SK table 105d2. : Evaluation) ”,“ Evaluation 0 → White ”,“ Evaluation 1 → Setting color of gradation 1 ”,“ Evaluation 2 → Setting color of gradation 2 ”,“ Evaluation 3 → Setting color of gradation 3 ” , “Evaluation 4 → set color of gradation 4” and “evaluation 5 → set color of gradation 5”, the evaluation level is represented by the shade of the set color. In this case, the number of gradations of the set color for each of the evaluations 1 to 5 is expressed as the evaluation value increases, that is, the set color becomes darker.

  The configuration of the “skill cube” will be described in detail later (see FIG. 27), but as illustrated in FIG. 9, a two-dimensional configuration in which the vertical axis is “project axis” and the horizontal axis is “skill keyword axis”. It is expressed as a matrix, and the engineer matrix 901, the company matrix 902, and the agent matrix 903 are superposed in the order of three.

  In each of the matrices 901 to 903, each row represents a plurality of skill keywords set for one project, and here, seven skill keywords are set for each project. The color shown in each area in the frontmost engineer matrix 901 indicates that only one evaluation is performed by an engineer, a company, or an agent for one skill keyword. It represents that a mutual evaluation by two or three parties is set for one skill keyword, and is represented by a color obtained by adding each setting color as a result of total evaluation of the respective evaluation levels.

  In this case, “white” indicates that no evaluation of the three parties is set, and “black” indicates that the result of the total evaluation of the three evaluation levels is the maximum, that is, the evaluation of all three is “5”. ". “Red” indicates that only the engineer's self-evaluation (for example, evaluation 5) is set, and “blue” indicates that only the evaluation from the company to the engineer (for example, evaluation 5) is set. “Green” indicates that only the evaluation (for example, evaluation 5) from the agent to the engineer is set, that is, only the single evaluation is set.

  In addition, “light red”, “light blue”, and “light green” represent the same single evaluation, but the evaluation with a low evaluation level (for example, evaluation 3) is set. . In addition, “ash” indicates that an evaluation is made by three parties, but an evaluation with a low evaluation level (for example, evaluation 3) is set.

  The configuration of the “skill cube” shown in FIG. 9 is an example, and the number of projects and the number of skill keywords in each of the matrices 901 to 903 can be changed according to the number of registered projects and the number of skill keywords.

  Next, the entire process of the “skill auction” service provided by the skill evaluation information processing apparatus 100 will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG.

  The skill evaluation information processing apparatus 100 opens a “skill auction” site on the WEB and is accessed by a company that is a user who intends to start a new project, a technician and an agent that are users who participate in the project. .

  When these users access the “Skill Auction” site, they agree to the terms of service displayed on the site, perform the membership procedure, account, password, etc. to access company information, personal information, user pages, etc. User information and skill information possessed by each user are registered (step S101). At this time, user information is registered in the user information table 105a, and skill information is registered in the user SK table 105b.

  Next, the user (company) who has completed the enrollment procedure, before registering the project, user information, skill information of engineers, companies, and agents already registered in the “skill auction” site, a trust cube described later, etc. (Step S102), the progress status of the registered project, the operating status and skill information of the engineer, the skill information of the agent, and the like are confirmed.

  FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of the skill keyword browsing screen 1100. In this skill keyword browsing screen 1100, a “creator” display frame 1101 that displays the creator who created the skill keyword, a “category” display frame 1102 that displays the category to which the skill keyword belongs, and a “skill keyword” that displays the skill keyword name. "Name" display frame 1103, "desired skill level" display frame 1104 for displaying each explanation of the skill level desired for the skill, and "address for learning desired skill" display for displaying the address of the URL for learning the desired skill level A frame 1105 and the like are displayed.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of a technician user information screen 1200. In this user information screen 1200, a user skill summary display frame 1201 for displaying the engineer's personal information, evaluation of skill keywords by category, and the like, and inquiries to participants in projects in which the engineer has participated in the past are performed. A “dive in the cube” display frame 1202 for displaying a transition condition to “dive in the cube” (to the screen 2800) is displayed.

  In the user skill summary display frame 1201, a “squeeze” button (to the screen 1200) for narrowing down by specifying the “number of projects” or “period (how many months)” of the project in which the technician has participated is displayed. Each skill keyword registered in all projects that participated in the past is displayed by category, and an average evaluation of each skill keyword is displayed.

  In the user skill summary display frame 1201, a “detailed display” link (to the screen 1400) and an “evaluation axis confirmation” link (to the screen 1100) are displayed for each skill keyword. The user designates “number of cases” or “period (how many months)” and operates the “narrow down” button to select the designated “number of cases” or “period ( The skill keyword and average evaluation of the project narrowed down by “how many months” are redisplayed in the display frame 1201.

  When the user operates the “detail display” link, the skill cube detail screen 1400 shown in FIG. 14 is displayed. On this skill cube detail screen 1400, detailed information of each project, each evaluation of the three parties for each skill keyword, and the like are displayed. On this screen 1400, it is possible to confirm the detailed explanation of the project and make an inquiry to the person (engineer) or the three parties regarding the skill keyword.

  Also, the average evaluation value of each skill keyword in FIG. 12 is linked to the skill keyword detailed screen 1300 shown in FIG. 13, and by operating this average evaluation value, the skill keyword detailed screen 1300 shown in FIG. It is transferred to. In this skill keyword detail screen 1300, a user skill detail display frame 1301 for displaying details of skill evaluation for each project in which the engineer participated, a “dive in the cube” display frame 1202 similar to FIG. 12, etc. Is displayed. In addition, on this screen 1300, it is possible to make an inquiry to participating users (the person or three parties) for each project.

  When the user operates the “evaluation axis confirmation” link for each skill keyword in FIG. 12, the screen shifts to the skill keyword browsing screen 1100 in FIG. 11 to confirm information related to evaluation such as a skill level desired for the skill. be able to.

  Returning to FIG. 10 again, after the user (company) confirms information on the registered user's project and skill on each of the screens 1100 to 1400, a new project registration work process is performed (step S103). Details of the project registration work process will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG.

  In FIG. 15, the client owner (company) who is the project owner starts project registration on the project registration update screen 1700 shown in FIG. As the project information, the author of the project “ABCD Corporation”, the project category “open system”, the project name “construction of financial system for government offices”, the project period “2004/10/01 to 2004/12/31”, work contents “Java (registered trademark) language is a person with practical experience of 3 years or more. Class design skill is not necessary” etc. is input (step S201). This project information is registered in the project table 105c by the CPU 101 of the skill evaluation information processing apparatus 100.

  Next, the CPU 101 registers the status ID indicating the progress status of the project as “1” in the project table 105c by registering the project information (step S202). Next, the client owner inputs a skill keyword desired by an engineer participating in the project on the project registration update screen 1700 (step S203), thereby completing the project registration. At this time, the category, keyword and evaluation of the skill keyword can be selected from a pull-down menu prepared on the device side. It is also possible to enter a work memo for each skill keyword. Information regarding this skill keyword is stored in the project SK table by the CPU 101.

  Returning to FIG. 10 again, the client owner performs team formation work processing (step S104). Details of this team formation work process will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG.

  In FIG. 16, the client owner starts team formation and determines engineers and agents who wish to participate in this project (step S301). At this time, the client owner determines a human resource corresponding to the skill keyword information registered at the time of project registration from the engineers and agents registered in the site. At this time, the user IDs “UserID Engineer, UserID Agent” of the engineer and agent determined are registered in the project table 105 c by the CPU 101.

  Next, the CPU 101 registers the status ID indicating the progress of the project as “1” in the project table 105c (step S302), and completes the team formation.

  Returning to FIG. 10 again, the client owner performs consensus building work processing after team formation (step S105). Details of the consensus building work process will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG. In this consensus building process, the participating members who form a team form an agreement on the skill keyword information registered by the client owner.

  In FIG. 18, the participants (client owner, engineer, agent) who formed the team confirm whether or not there are insufficient skill keywords for the skill keywords registered at the time of project registration (step S401). When there are insufficient skill keywords (step S401: YES), participants discuss the addition of skill keywords, who has added the skill keywords, who is the target, unknown points, etc. via the site (step S402). ). As a result of the discussion, information regarding the additional skill keyword is registered in the skill keyword table 105e and the project SK table 105d by the CPU 101.

  Next, it is confirmed whether or not the target person of the added skill keyword has agreed on the additional skill keyword (step S403). If the target person does not agree with the additional skill keyword (step S403: NO), the process returns to step S402. If the target person agrees (step S403: YES), the process proceeds to step S404, and the client owner of the skill keyword that does not reach the agreement Promote consensus with authority (delete or modify skill keywords that do not reach consensus).

  Next, it is confirmed whether or not all the participants have agreed to the project (step S405), and if agreed (step S405: YES), the CPU 101 sets the status ID indicating the progress status of the project to “2”. After setting, this status ID is registered in the project table 105c (step S406), and consensus formation is completed.

  In step S401, if there is no deficient keyword (step S401: NO), the process proceeds to step S404 to promote agreement with the client owner authority. If all the participants do not agree on the project in step S405 (step S405: NO), the process returns to step S401, and the processes after step S401 are repeatedly executed to complete the consensus formation of the participating members for the project. .

  Returning to FIG. 10 again, after the consensus building is completed, the participating members perform work processing during work (step S106). The details of the work process during work will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG.

  In FIG. 19, project participants who are participating members start a project and perform actual work on the project according to the schedule set by the client owner (step S501). When the actual work of the project is started, the CPU 101 sets the status ID indicating the progress status of the project to “3”, registers this status ID in the project table 105c (step S502), and selects the project. Complete.

  Returning to FIG. 10 again, after completion of the consensus formation, the participating members perform review registration work processing for the registered skill keywords of each member in the completed project (step S107). Details of the review registration work process will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG.

  In FIG. 20, a project person (company, engineer, agent) starts a review registration process, and evaluates (reviewrank, reviewmem) “reviewrank, reviewmem” for a project that participates in a review input screen on the site. "Is written (step S601).

  Here, specific examples of the review input screen are shown in FIGS. FIG. 21 shows an example of a review input screen 2100 on which a technician inputs a self-evaluation. In this review input screen 2100, “evaluator” and “evaluated person” are the same as the engineer's name “Taro Yamada”, and points representing self-assessment for each skill keyword are arbitrarily selected from the five-level evaluation. You can choose. The review input screen 2100 functions as a skill sheet for temporary employees.

  FIG. 22 shows an example of a review input screen 2200 on which a company inputs an evaluation (another person evaluation) for an engineer. On this review input screen 2200, “Evaluator” is “Taro Yamada”, “Evaluator” is “ABCD Inc.”, and points representing self-evaluation for each skill keyword are arbitrarily selected from 5 levels of evaluation. can do. The review input screen 2200 functions as a skill sheet for company personnel.

  FIG. 23 shows an example of a review input screen 2300 on which an agent inputs an evaluation (another self evaluation) for an engineer. In this review input screen 2300, “Evaluator” is “Taro Yamada”, “Evaluator” is “IT Outsourcing Co., Ltd.”, and points representing self-evaluation for each skill keyword are arbitrarily selected from the five-level evaluation. You can choose. The review input screen 2300 functions as an agent skill sheet.

  As described above, when the input of each evaluation is completed on each review input screen 2100 to 2300 and the review input screen for self-evaluation and the review input screen for other self-evaluation for companies and agents (not shown), each evaluation is assigned to the project table 105c by the CPU 101. And registered in the project SK table 105d.

  Next, the CPU 101 sets the status ID indicating the progress status of the project to “4”, registers this status ID in the project table 105c (step S602), and completes the review registration.

  Returning to FIG. 10 again, after the review registration is completed, the participating members confirm whether or not everyone agrees to complete the project (step S108). When the project completion is not agreed (step S108: NO), the process returns to step S101. When the project is agreed (step S108: YES), the skill auction process is terminated.

  A specific example of the above “skill auction” service process will be described with reference to the sequence diagram shown in FIG.

  In FIG. 24, steps S2041 to S2405 execute processing from project registration to team formation. First, in step S2401, the company accesses the skill auction site and performs project registration and skill keyword registration. The agent accesses the skill auction site, searches for a project to be proposed to an engineer registered in the company (step S2402), and proposes the searched project to the engineer (step S2403).

  The engineer confirms whether or not the skill level of the skill keyword set in the project proposed by the agent can be handled by his / her skill, and enters the project (step S2404). With the above processing, team (company, agent, engineer) formation for the current project is completed (step S2405).

  Next, the identity verification work among the three parties, and if each person has an unknown point in the current skill cube, an inquiry is made to a party of a past project (step S2406). The company accesses each skill cube detail screen 1400 (see FIG. 14) of the agent and engineer participating in the current project, and inquires to the parties of the project in which the agent and engineer have participated in the past (dive-in-the-cube function ( Step S2410)) (Step S2407).

  In addition, the agent accesses each skill cube detail screen 1400 (see FIG. 14) of the company and the engineer participating in the current project, and inquires the parties of the project in which the company and the engineer have participated in the past (dive in the cube). Function (Step S2410)) (Step S2408).

  In addition, the engineer accesses each skill cube detail screen 1400 (see FIG. 14) of the company and the agent participating in the current project, and inquires the parties of the project in which the company and the agent have participated in the past (dive-in-the-cube function). (Step S2410)) (Step S2409).

  Next, work details confirmation work requested in this project and skill keywords necessary for companies, agents, and engineers are registered and the work contents are confirmed (step S2411). The company registers the detailed description of the project (including skill information desired by the three parties) in the project table 105e (step S2412). The agent confirms the skill cubes of the company and the engineer from the detailed description of the project registered by the company (step S2413). Further, the engineer confirms the skill cube of the company and the agent from the detailed description of the project registered by the company (step S2414).

  Thus, the preparation work until the start of the current project is completed, and the work is actually performed between the three parties (step S2415). When the work is completed, the evaluation for the current project between the three parties and the evaluation points for the skill keyword set before the start of the project are written (step S2416). The company writes the self-evaluation for each skill keyword of the current project and the evaluation for each skill keyword of the agent and engineer on the review input screen (see FIGS. 21 to 23) (step S2417).

  Further, the agent writes the self-evaluation for each skill keyword of the current project and the evaluation for each skill keyword of the company and the engineer on the review input screen (see FIGS. 21 to 23) (step S2418). Further, the engineer writes the self-evaluation for each skill keyword of the current project and the evaluation for each skill keyword of the company and the agent on the review input screen (see FIGS. 21 to 23) (step S2419).

  When the self-evaluation and the self-evaluation for each skill keyword are input every time the project is completed by the three parties, the skill evaluation information processing apparatus 100 creates a skill cube as shown in FIG.

  Each skill sheet 251 to 253 shown in FIG. 25 is configured by a two-dimensional matrix plane with the vertical axis representing the project axis and the horizontal axis representing the skill keyword axis, as outlined in FIG. A skill sheet 251 indicates a sheet indicating the self-evaluation of the engineer, a skill sheet 252 indicates a sheet indicating the evaluation for the engineer of the company, and 253 indicates a sheet for the engineer of the agent.

  Each skill sheet 251 to 253 shows a case where four skill keywords are set for each of the four projects. The project axis also represents the time axis, and is arranged in order from the oldest project from top to bottom in the figure. Therefore, the lowest project is the latest project.

  Also, in each skill sheet 251 to 253, the part in which the numerical value is input in the frame is input by the three parties, and the part in which the frame is not shown is not input by the three parties Is shown. Further, in the skill sheets 251 to 253, a frame connected with a broken line indicates that the three parties input evaluations for the same skill keyword of the same project.

By superposing these skill sheets 251 to 253, a skill cube is formed, and as shown in FIG. 9, the composite color is displayed for each skill keyword for which evaluation is input. The following formula is applied as an arithmetic expression for displaying the composite color.
SC = Project x Skill Keyword x Evaluation (5 levels)

  As described above, every time a project is completed, a skill cube agreed between the three parties is formed, and as shown on the right side of FIG. 24, the engineer's trust is secured. In other words, skill cubes include not only subjective evaluations by oneself but also customer evaluations by others based on skill keywords agreed upon by the three parties. Even it is worthy of trust.

  As a result, each time a company, agent, or engineer processes a project using a skill auction, as shown in FIG. 24, the credit value of a skill cube that evaluates each skill is secured while accumulating. become.

  Below, the detail of the trust square calculation process showing the parameter | index of credit collateral | security by a skill cube is demonstrated with reference to the flowchart shown to FIG.

  First, the CPU 101 of the skill evaluation information processing apparatus 100 starts the process shown in FIG. 26 as the process associated with the user ID of the company, agent, or engineer.

  In FIG. 26, first, the CPU 101 initializes “Trust Square [PJ] [SK]” and “Trust”, which are parameters of this processing (step S701).

  However, “Trust Square [PJ] [SK]” is calculated from the self-evaluation value and other-party evaluation value of each skill keyword set for each project of the project member (company, agent or engineer) specified by the user ID. The calculated average trustworthiness “Trust” (one-dimensional) is developed in a matrix (two-dimensional) in order from the latest in the time axis direction. “Trust” is the average credit score “Trust” calculated from the self-evaluation value and other-party evaluation value of each skill keyword set for each project of the project member (company, agent or engineer) specified by the user ID. Originally developed.

  Next, the CPU 101 sequentially extracts project information from the project table 105c in which the member (company, agent, or engineer) designated by the user ID has participated (step S702).

  Based on the project ID stored in the acquired latest project information, the CPU 101 extracts the self-evaluation value and the other-party evaluation value of each skill keyword of the corresponding project ID from the project SK table 105d, and A process of calculating an average credit rating (Trust Square) in the project is executed (step S703). The details of the average credit calculation process will be described with reference to the flowchart shown in FIG.

  In FIG. 27, first, the CPU 101 initializes “Total Trust” and “Total NO”, which are parameters of this processing (step S801).

  However, “Total Trust” is “average distance of three evaluation values: One Trust” calculated from the self-evaluation value and other self-evaluation value of each skill keyword set in the project SK table 105d of the project. The result of adding all keywords. “Total NO” is the total number of skill keywords set in the project SK table of the project.

  Next, the CPU 101 extracts one skill keyword of the project ID from the project SK table 105d. That is, the self-evaluation value and the other-party evaluation value (one person or two persons) of the user ID of the skill keyword are extracted (step S802).

  If there are two other person evaluation values, the CPU 101 calculates the average value of the other person evaluation values and the other person evaluation value as it is as “AvgTrust: average value of other person evaluation” (step). S803).

  Next, using the average value (AvgTrust) of the other person evaluation calculated in step S803, the CPU 101 calculates “One Trust” indicating the average value of the evaluation value distance between the three parties by the following equation (1). (Step S804).

"1-ABS (AvgTrust-self-evaluation value) / 4" (1)
However, the absolute value of ABS: “AvgTrust−self-evaluation value” is taken.

  Next, the CPU 101 associates “One Trust” calculated in step S804 with the project ID [PJID] and [skill keyword] of the “Trust Square” (step S805). Further, the CPU 101 adds “One Trust” calculated in step S804 to a parameter “Total Trust” indicating the result of adding each skill keyword (step S806).

  Next, the CPU 101 adds “1” to the parameter “Total NO” indicating the result of adding the number of skill keywords (step S807). Next, the CPU 101 confirms the presence or absence of remaining skill keywords from the project SK table, and if there are remaining skill keywords, repeats steps S802 to S807 for all skill keywords (step S808).

  Next, the CPU 101 divides the parameter “Total Trust” indicating the result of adding “One Trust” of all skill keywords by “Total NO” which is the result of adding all the skill keyword numbers, The average credit rating (Trust Square) in the project is calculated (step S809), and this process ends.

Here, the CPU 101 returns to step S704 and obtains the elapsed time “Time” after completion of the project in units of months. Next, the CPU 101 calculates a parameter “Trust” indicating the collateral value after the lapse of time of the average credit rating (Trust Square) calculated in Step S703 by the following equation (2).
Trust = [Trust + (average credit * 0.5)] / (1 + Time ² * coefficient) (2)

  Next, the CPU 101 confirms the presence or absence of another project from the project table 105c. If there is another project (step S706: YES), the CPU 101 returns to step S701, and if there is no next project (step S706: NO). This trust square calculation process is terminated.

  As described above, by executing the trust square calculation process and the average credit calculation process, for each skill keyword agreed upon in the project in which the three parties participated, the average credit (Trust Square) is calculated based on the self-evaluation value and the other self-evaluation value. ) And a parameter “Trust” indicating the collateral value after the lapse of the project time of the average credit (Trust Square).

  As a result, companies, agents, and engineers can use the skill auction service to secure trust so that a trust relationship between the three parties can be established based on the skill keywords agreed in the project. In addition to diversifying the risks of the three parties, the three parties can work on dispatching work efficiently from a fair position.

  In addition, in the trust square calculation process, the average creditworthiness weight is calculated to be reduced with the passage of time of the project. For example, even if the evaluation in a project that participated in the past was low, Thus, it is possible to increase the average creditworthiness and reduce the situation where the current average creditworthiness is lowered due to the past evaluation.

  As a result, it is possible to give a sense of security to the users who participate in the project, and it is possible to improve the confidence that the user secures trust using the skill auction service.

  Next, a display example of the dive in the cube screen 2800 displayed when the “execute” button of the “dive in the cube” display frame 1202 displayed on the engineer user information screen 1200 of FIG. 12 is operated. Will be described with reference to FIG.

  The company or agent who browsed the engineer's user information screen 1200 in FIG. 12 selects a participant (engineer, engineer, company, agent, anonymous) in a project in which the engineer participated in the past and makes an inquiry. In this case, when a participant who makes an inquiry in the “dive in the cube” display frame 1202 is checked and the “execute” button is operated, the dive in the cube screen 2800 of FIG. 28 is displayed.

  FIG. 28 shows a display example of the dive-in-the-cube screen 2800 when an inquiry is made to the engineer. On this dive-in-the-cube screen 2800, detailed information on projects that the engineer has participated in the past and evaluation comments of other participants (organizer, anonymous company, company, agent, etc.) on the engineer are displayed along with the date. Has been. Further, in this screen 2800, a new inquiry can be made to the organizer, company or agent who participated in this past project by filling in the “inquiry” column and operating the “new posting” button. .

  Therefore, companies and agents who want to participate in this project can easily inquire about the evaluation contents of the past projects of the engineers who are going to participate, and can easily confirm the authenticity of the evaluation contents in the past projects. can do.

  As a result, by implementing the “dive in the cube” function on the skill auction site, the trust relationship between users participating in the skill auction service can be further improved.

  In the above embodiment, the case where the skill auction service is applied to the dispatch work of the IT-related project has been described. However, the present invention can be applied to the dispatch work of other industries. When applying to other industries, a skill keyword table corresponding to the industry may be prepared.

  Therefore, the skill information processing apparatus of the present invention can be easily applied to dispatch work in various types of business, and can easily improve the work efficiency and reliability of users participating in the dispatch work.

  In the present invention, a skill keyword that can be objectively evaluated mutually by a temporary employee, a person in charge of a dispatched company, or a sales employee of a temporary staffing company is set in accordance with the work contents, and the skill keyword is The three parties can view each other's evaluations, secure trust so that a trusting relationship between the three parties can be fostered, spread the risks of the three parties in the dispatching work, and the three parties can operate in a fair manner. It can be applied to a skill information processing apparatus that can often work in dispatch work and can be used for dispatch work.

The block diagram which shows the structure of the skill information processing apparatus which concerns on one embodiment of this invention The figure which shows an example of the user information table which concerns on this Embodiment The figure which shows an example of the user SK table which concerns on this Embodiment. The figure which shows an example of the project table which concerns on this Embodiment The figure which shows an example of the project SK table which concerns on this Embodiment The figure which shows an example of the project SK table which concerns on this Embodiment The figure which shows an example of the skill keyword table which concerns on this Embodiment The figure which shows the concept of the mutual evaluation database called skill cube which concerns on this Embodiment The figure which shows the structural example of the skill cube which concerns on this Embodiment Flowchart showing overall processing of “skill auction” service according to the present embodiment The figure which shows an example of the skill keyword browsing screen which concerns on this Embodiment The figure which shows an example of the user information screen of the engineer which concerns on this Embodiment The figure which shows an example of the skill keyword detailed screen which concerns on this Embodiment The figure which shows an example of the skill cube detail screen which concerns on this Embodiment A flowchart showing details of the project registration work process according to the present embodiment The flowchart which shows the detail of the team formation work process which concerns on this Embodiment The figure which shows an example of the project registration update screen which concerns on this Embodiment Flowchart showing details of consensus building operation processing according to the present embodiment The flowchart which shows the detail of the work process in work which concerns on this Embodiment The flowchart which shows the detail of the review registration business process which concerns on this Embodiment The figure which shows an example of the review input screen where the engineer which concerns on this Embodiment inputs self-evaluation The figure which shows an example of the review input screen in which the company which concerns on this Embodiment inputs evaluation (other self-evaluation) with respect to an engineer The figure which shows an example of the review input screen in which the agent which concerns on this Embodiment inputs evaluation (other self-evaluation) with respect to an engineer Sequence diagram showing a specific example of “skill auction” service processing according to the present embodiment The figure which shows the specific example of the skill cube produced in the skill information processing apparatus which concerns on this Embodiment The flowchart which shows the detail of the trust square calculation process which concerns on this Embodiment The flowchart which shows the detail of the average credit calculation process which concerns on this Embodiment The figure which shows an example of the dive in the cube screen which concerns on this Embodiment

Explanation of symbols

100 skill information processing apparatus 101 CPU
102 storage unit 103 display unit 104 input unit 105 large capacity storage unit 105a user information table 105b user SK table 105c project table 105d1 project SK table 105d2 project SK table 105e skill keyword table

Claims (7)

A skill information processing apparatus for processing evaluation information for evaluating skills required for work by each of a temporary worker involved in a temporary work, an agent of a temporary company, and a company representative of a temporary company,
Skill keyword registration processing means for registering, in the storage unit, a skill keyword representing a skill that each of the temporary staff, the agent, and the person in charge of the company owns with respect to the temporary work or a skill required for another person When,
Based on the registered skill keyword, the temporary employee's skill sheet for inputting self-evaluation and other person's evaluation for the other two, and the agent performs self-evaluation and other person's evaluation for the other two. A skill sheet creation means for creating a skill sheet for an agent to input, and a skill sheet for a company person in charge to input the self-evaluation and other person evaluations for the other two by the company person in charge,
The temporary employee inputs self-evaluation and other person evaluation for each skill keyword of the temporary employee skill sheet, and the agent inputs self-evaluation and other person evaluation for each skill keyword of the agent skill sheet. And input means for the company person in charge to input self-evaluation and others evaluation for each skill keyword of the company person skill sheet,
A mutual evaluation calculation processing means for calculating a self-evaluation and another person evaluation input to the same skill keyword of each skill sheet to obtain a mutual evaluation for each skill keyword of the temporary staff, agent and company staff;
A display means for displaying the self-evaluation value and the other person evaluation of each skill keyword input to each skill sheet, and displaying the mutual evaluation by superimposing the same skill keyword in each skill sheet;
A skill information processing apparatus comprising: The input means inputs the self-evaluation and the other-person evaluation with numerical values within a predetermined range,
The mutual evaluation calculation processing means calculates and processes the self-evaluation value and the other-party evaluation value of each skill keyword input to each skill sheet, and the mutual evaluation value for each skill keyword of the temporary staff, agent and company staff Seeking
The display means displays the self-evaluation value and the other-person evaluation value of each skill keyword input to each skill sheet, and displays the mutual evaluation value by superimposing the same skill keyword on each skill sheet. The skill information processing apparatus according to claim 1.   The display means sets a display color for each of the temporary staff, agent, and company person in charge, and displays the self-evaluation value and the other-party evaluation value of each skill keyword input to each skill sheet in gradations in each display color. 3. The skill information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the same skill keyword in each skill sheet is superimposed and the mutual evaluation value is displayed with the number of gradations obtained by adding the display colors.   The display means sets a plurality of business items on one axis and sets a two-dimensional matrix in which a plurality of skill keywords corresponding to the business items are set on the other axis for each temporary employee, agent, and company person in charge, The self-evaluation value and the other person evaluation value are displayed on each skill keyword of each two-dimensional matrix, and the mutual evaluation value is displayed by superimposing the same job item and the same skill keyword on the two-dimensional matrix. The skill information processing apparatus according to claim 2.   The display means sets a plurality of business items on one axis and sets a two-dimensional matrix in which a plurality of skill keywords corresponding to the business items are set on the other axis for each temporary employee, agent, and company person in charge, The self-evaluation value and the other-person evaluation value are displayed in gradation for each display color on each skill keyword of each two-dimensional matrix, and the mutual evaluation value is obtained by superimposing the same skill item and the same skill keyword on the two-dimensional matrix. 4. The skill information processing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein each of the display colors is displayed with a number of gradations added.   The mutual evaluation calculation processing means obtains the mutual evaluation value by calculating an average value of a self-evaluation value and another person evaluation value input to the same skill keyword of each skill sheet. The skill information processing device described. A skill information processing apparatus for processing evaluation information for evaluating skills required for work by each of a temporary worker involved in a temporary work, an agent of a temporary company, and a company representative of a temporary company,
Skill keyword registration processing step of registering, in the storage unit, a skill keyword representing a skill possessed by the temporary staff, the agent, and the person in charge of the company for the temporary work, or a skill required for another person. When,
Based on the registered skill keyword, the temporary employee's skill sheet for inputting self-evaluation and other person's evaluation for the other two, and the agent performs self-evaluation and other person's evaluation for the other two. A skill sheet creation step for creating a skill sheet for an agent to input, and a skill sheet for a company person in charge to input a self-evaluation and other person evaluation for the other two by the company person in charge;
The temporary employee inputs self-evaluation and other person evaluation for each skill keyword of the temporary employee skill sheet, and the agent inputs self-evaluation and other person evaluation for each skill keyword of the agent skill sheet. And an input step in which the person in charge of the company inputs self-evaluation and evaluation of others for each skill keyword of the skill sheet for the person in charge of the company;
A mutual evaluation calculation processing step for calculating a self-evaluation and another person evaluation inputted to the same skill keyword of each skill sheet to obtain a mutual evaluation for each skill keyword of the temporary staff, agent and company staff;
A display step of displaying the self-evaluation value and other person evaluation of each skill keyword input to each skill sheet, and displaying the mutual evaluation by overlapping the same skill keyword in each skill sheet;
A skill information processing method characterized by comprising:

Images