JP2006275676A - Collision testing device - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To solve a problem wherein dropping impact body force is difficult to be measured quantitatively, because impacts are applied a plurality of times onto a tested body, with rebounding after dropping collision, and because results vary greatly according to manners of the collision. <P>SOLUTION: This collision testing device is provide with an collision face, a carriage for holding the tested body and moving horizontally, and a cord dropped vertically by a weight connected to an opposite side of the carriage after connected to the carriage via a pulley, and the tested body is prevented from colliding with the collision face the plurality of times, by run-out of the weight out of the cord, when the tested body collides with the collision face. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a collision test apparatus used when a shock is applied to a mobile product or a component mounted on the mobile product at the time of a drop collision.

  In order to assess the physical strength of portable products, manufacturers impact these products and then test their functionality and reliability on an ongoing basis.

  With the progress of miniaturization of electronic devices, the use of portable electronic devices has increased recently. Since portable electronic devices are often used by hand or carried around, there is a risk of inadvertent dropping. Therefore, it is necessary to take measures against dropping, and it is necessary to provide a highly reliable device that is resistant to dropping impact so that the device does not malfunction even if it is accidentally dropped. For this reason, manufacturers have previously tested the drop impact to improve the drop impact.

  In the drop test, the product was actually dropped from the specified height toward the collision surface, and it was confirmed that there was no failure.

  Conventionally, as a dropping method, a product is held by hand and released by releasing the hand at a specified height. However, with the manual method, the position where the product is released is not constant, the posture changes in the air depending on how it is released, and the location of the collision is not fixed. Later, there was a problem that the number of collisions would be multiple because it bounced back.

  On the other hand, in the method using the dropping device as shown in FIG. 6, the position where the product is dropped can be kept constant, and the reproducibility of the dropping height is improved, but the posture change in the air is not improved, and the product is Once it collides with the concrete material, it bounces back, so there is a problem that the number of collisions becomes multiple times.

The following patent documents exist in such a collision test apparatus.
JP-A-1-239465

  In conventional test methods, it is difficult to measure quantitative impact resistance due to the impact of multiple impacts on the DUT due to rebound after a drop collision, and because the results vary greatly depending on the collision method. It is. As a solution to this problem, the object to be measured after dropping manually is collected instantaneously, or the number of tests is increased and statistically processed. However, the efficiency is low and it is not a realistic solution.

  In the present invention, the collision test apparatus according to the first aspect of the present invention is connected to the collision surface, a carriage that holds the object to be tested and moves in the horizontal direction, and is connected to the carriage via the pulley and then connected to the opposite side of the carriage. The cord includes a string that falls in a vertical direction by a weight, and a weight that is removed from the string when the DUT collides with the collision surface and prevents the DUT from colliding with the collision surface a plurality of times.

  In the present invention, the collision test apparatus according to the second invention is the first invention, wherein the end of the string connected to the weight is provided with a ring-shaped metal fitting, and the weight has a metal fitting sandwiched between two opposing springs. The ring-shaped metal fitting is connected to a metal fitting sandwiched between springs.

  In the present invention, the collision test apparatus according to the third aspect of the present invention is the collision sensor according to the first aspect, wherein the collision sensor detects that the DUT collides with the collision surface, and the acceleration when the DUT collides with the collision surface. At least one of an acceleration sensor that detects that the test object is in a position where it collides with the collision surface, and a separation control unit that separates the weight upon notification from the sensor It is that.

In the present invention, the collision test apparatus of the fourth invention comprises a collision surface, a first weight connected to the string, a string falling in a vertical direction by the connected first weight and the second weight, A holding member for holding a device under test connected to a string rising in the vertical direction after passing through a pulley;
A second weight connected to the first weight that prevents the DUT from coming off the first weight when the DUT collides with the collision surface and prevents the DUT from colliding with the collision surface a plurality of times. Is.

  In the present invention, the collision test apparatus according to the fifth invention is the fourth invention, wherein the first weight includes a ring-shaped metal fitting, and the second weight includes a metal fitting sandwiched between two opposing springs. The metal fitting is connected to the metal fitting sandwiched by the spring.

  As described above, according to the present invention, when the DUT collides with the collision surface, the weight is separated, so the DUT does not collide with the collision surface, and the collision surface is constant. Test results with little variation can be obtained, and by changing the weight of the weight, it is possible to quantitatively measure the strength of the DUT against the drop impact.

  FIG. 1 shows an example of a horizontal collision. The weight of the weight 108 is a weight that can obtain a specified acceleration of the DUT 104 when it collides with the collision surface 103. The carriage 106 travels by the weight 108, and the DUT 104 fixed to the carriage 106 collides with the collision surface 103 such as a concrete material and rebounds. However, since the weight 108 is separated at the time of the collision, the carriage 106 is again moved to the collision surface 103. Therefore, the DUT 104 does not collide with the collision surface 103 again. There are the following four methods for separating the weight 108 at the time of collision.

  A ring-shaped metal fitting 109 provided at the end of the string 107 and a metal fitting 110 sandwiched between two opposing springs provided in the weight 108 are connected as shown in FIG. The metal fittings 110 are not connected to each other at the apex, but are apart but are in contact with each other with a predetermined force. Therefore, the metal fitting 109 and the metal fitting 110 are kept connected. However, when the DUT 104 collides with the collision surface 103, a downward force is applied to the metal fitting 110, but an upward force is applied to the metal fitting 109 due to the string 107. Thereby, the metal fitting 109 and the metal fitting 110 are separated.

FIG. 5 shows a structure of the metal fitting 110 sandwiched between two springs connected to the weight 108. The U-shaped bracket 501 is pressed by the spring 503, the U-shaped bracket 502 is pressed by the spring 504, and the tops of the two U-shaped brackets 501 and 502 are contacted by a predetermined force. To do. These two character-shaped metal fittings 501 and 502 are the metal fitting 110 sandwiched between the two springs in FIG. 1 and the metal fitting 308 sandwiched between the two springs in FIG.

  The other three methods are methods in which a sensor is used, and when the sensor is detected, it is disconnected from the sensor and notified to the control unit 208, and the string 207 and the weight 209 are separated. This embodiment is shown in FIG. There are three types, a collision sensor 210, an acceleration sensor 212, and a position sensor 211, which can be realized by any one of the sensors.

  The collision sensor 210 detects that the DUT 204 has collided with the collision surface 203. The acceleration sensor 212 detects that the acceleration of the DUT 204 when it collides with the collision surface 203 is detected. The position sensor 211 detects that the device under test 204 has come to a position where it collides with the collision surface 203.

  An example of a vertical collision is shown in FIG. The sum of the weight of the weight 305 and the weight of the weight 306 is set to a weight capable of obtaining a specified acceleration of the test object when it collides with the collision surface 303. The DUT 304 is pulled up by the weights 305 and 306, collides with the collision surface 303 such as a concrete material, and bounces back. And the total weight of the holding member 304 and the suspension can be prevented from re-collision.

  There are the following three methods for separating the weight 306 at the time of collision.

  A ring-shaped metal fitting 309 provided on the weight 305 and a metal fitting 308 sandwiched between two opposing springs provided on the weight 306 are connected as shown in FIG. The metal fittings 308 are not connected to each other at the apex, but are apart but are in contact with each other with a predetermined force. Therefore, the metal fitting 308 and the metal fitting 309 are kept connected. However, when the DUT 307 collides with the collision surface 303, the downward force is applied to the metal fitting 308, but the upward force is applied to the metal fitting 309 by the weight 305. Thereby, the metal fitting 308 and the metal fitting 309 are separated.

  The other two methods use electromagnets for the weights 305 and 306, and use sensors to connect the weights 305 and 306 as magnets when the sensor does not detect them. In this method, 305 and weight 306 are separated. This embodiment is shown in FIG. There are two types of sensors, a collision sensor 408 and an acceleration sensor 409, which can be realized by any one of the sensors.

Next, technical ideas extracted from the embodiments of the collision test apparatus described above are listed as appendices according to the description format of the claims. The technical idea according to the present invention can be grasped by various levels and variations from a superordinate concept to a subordinate concept, and the present invention is not limited to the following supplementary notes.
(Supplementary note 1)
A dolly that holds the device under test and moves horizontally;
After passing through a pulley connected to the carriage, a string that falls vertically by a weight connected to the opposite side of the carriage,
The weight that prevents the DUT from coming off the string when it collides with the collision surface, and prevents the DUT from colliding with the collision surface multiple times;
A collision test apparatus comprising:
(Supplementary Note 2) The end of the string connected to the weight includes a ring-shaped member, the weight includes a metal fitting sandwiched between two opposing springs, and the ring-shaped member is sandwiched between the springs. The collision test apparatus according to appendix 1, wherein the collision test apparatus is connected to a metal fitting.
(Supplementary Note 3) A collision sensor for detecting that the DUT collides with the collision surface, an acceleration sensor for detecting that the DUT has an acceleration when colliding with the collision surface, or the DUT Supplementary note 1 characterized by comprising at least one of position sensors for detecting that the test body is in a position where it collides with the collision surface, and a separation controller for separating the weight upon notification from the sensor. The collision test apparatus described.
(Appendix 4) The collision surface,
A first weight connected to the string;
The string falling vertically by the connected first and second weights;
A holding member for holding a test object connected to the string that rises in the vertical direction after passing through a pulley;
A second weight connected to the first weight that prevents the DUT from colliding with the collision surface a plurality of times when the DUT collides with the collision surface and prevents the DUT from colliding with the collision surface a plurality of times. When,
A collision test apparatus comprising:
(Supplementary Note 5) The first weight includes a ring-shaped member, the second weight includes a metal fitting sandwiched by two opposing springs, and the ring-shaped member is connected to the metal fitting sandwiched by the spring. The collision test apparatus according to appendix 4, wherein:
(Supplementary Note 6) The first weight and the second weight are electromagnets, and a collision sensor for detecting that the DUT collides with the collision surface or the DUT collides with the collision surface. The collision test apparatus according to appendix 4, further comprising an acceleration sensor that detects that the acceleration is in time.

It is a figure which shows the structure of the collision test apparatus with which a to-be-tested body collides in a horizontal direction. It is a figure which shows the structure of the collision test apparatus which a to-be-tested object collides in the horizontal direction using a sensor. It is a figure which shows the structure of the collision test apparatus with which a to-be-tested object collides in the orthogonal | vertical direction. It is a figure which shows the structure of the collision test apparatus which a to-be-tested object collides in the perpendicular direction using a sensor. It is a figure which shows the structure of the metal fitting pinched | interposed with two springs shown by FIG.1 and FIG.3. It is explanatory drawing of a prior art example.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 102 Pulley 103 Collision surface 104 Test object 106 Cart 108 Weight 210 Collision sensor 211 Position sensor 308 Metal fittings sandwiched by two springs 309 Ring-shaped metal fittings 409 Acceleration sensor 501 V-shaped metal fittings

Claims (5)

The impact surface,
A dolly that holds the device under test and moves horizontally;
After passing through a pulley connected to the carriage, a string that falls vertically by a weight connected to the opposite side of the carriage,
The weight that prevents the DUT from colliding with the collision surface when the DUT collides with the collision surface, and prevents the DUT from colliding with the collision surface multiple times;
A collision test apparatus comprising:   The end of the string connected to the weight includes a ring-shaped member, the weight includes a metal fitting sandwiched by two opposing springs, and the ring-shaped member is connected to the metal fitting sandwiched by the spring The collision test apparatus according to claim 1, wherein:   A collision sensor that detects that the DUT collides with the collision surface, an acceleration sensor that detects that the DUT has an acceleration when colliding with the collision surface, or the DUT The collision according to claim 1, further comprising: a separation control unit that includes at least one of position sensors that detect a position of colliding with a collision surface, and that separates the weight upon notification from the sensor. Test equipment. The impact surface,
A first weight connected to the string;
The string falling vertically by the connected first and second weights;
A holding member for holding a test object connected to the string rising in the vertical direction after passing through the pulley;
A second weight connected to the first weight for preventing the DUT from colliding with the collision surface a plurality of times when the DUT collides with the collision surface. When,
A collision test apparatus comprising:   The first weight includes a ring-shaped member, the second weight includes a metal fitting sandwiched by two opposing springs, and the ring-shaped member is connected to the metal fitting sandwiched by the spring. The collision test apparatus according to claim 4.

Images