JP2006170694A - Tire endurance test method - Google Patents
Tire endurance test method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2006170694A JP2006170694A JP2004361191A JP2004361191A JP2006170694A JP 2006170694 A JP2006170694 A JP 2006170694A JP 2004361191 A JP2004361191 A JP 2004361191A JP 2004361191 A JP2004361191 A JP 2004361191A JP 2006170694 A JP2006170694 A JP 2006170694A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- tire
- running
- lateral force
- slip angle
- test method
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Tires In General (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明は、ドラム式耐久試験装置を用いたタイヤ耐久試験方法に関し、さらに詳しくは、回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で空気入りタイヤの耐久性を評価するにあたって、実走行での耐久性をより正確に評価することを可能にしたタイヤ耐久試験方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a tire endurance test method using a drum type endurance test apparatus, and more specifically, in evaluating the durability of a pneumatic tire in a state where a load and a slip angle are given on a rotating drum, The present invention relates to a tire durability test method that makes it possible to more accurately evaluate durability.
ドラム式耐久試験装置を用いたタイヤ耐久試験方法において、走行条件の入力パラメータとしてスリップ角が採用されている。例えば、スラローム試験を実施する場合、回転ドラム上で連続走行する空気入りタイヤのスリップ角を一定の変動幅で周期的に変化させている(例えば、特許文献1参照)。 In a tire durability test method using a drum-type durability test apparatus, a slip angle is employed as an input parameter for running conditions. For example, when a slalom test is performed, the slip angle of a pneumatic tire continuously running on a rotating drum is periodically changed with a certain fluctuation range (see, for example, Patent Document 1).
しかしながら、スリップ角を同一にした条件で複数種類の空気入りタイヤについて耐久性を評価した場合、走行中に生じる横力がタイヤ特性に応じて相違することになる。例えば、タイヤ同士でコーナリングパワーが異なる場合、同じスリップ角であっても、コーナリングパワーが大きいタイヤの方がタイヤ回転軸方向に発生する横力が大きくなるため、耐久性の評価において不利になる。これに対して、実走行では、如何なる特性を有するタイヤであっても、同一コースを同一速度で走行する場合、同一の横力を受けることになる。つまり、スリップ角を同一にした条件で耐久性の評価を行った場合、タイヤが受ける横力がタイヤ特性に応じて相違し、実走行での耐久性が必ずしも正確に反映されないという問題がある。 However, when durability is evaluated for a plurality of types of pneumatic tires under the same slip angle, the lateral force generated during running differs depending on the tire characteristics. For example, when the cornering power is different between tires, even if the slip angle is the same, a tire having a large cornering power has a greater lateral force in the tire rotation axis direction, which is disadvantageous in durability evaluation. On the other hand, in actual traveling, tires having any characteristics receive the same lateral force when traveling on the same course at the same speed. That is, when the durability is evaluated under the same slip angle, the lateral force applied to the tire differs depending on the tire characteristics, and there is a problem that the durability in actual running is not always accurately reflected.
また、タイヤ耐久試験ではタイヤトレッド部が徐々に摩耗し、その摩耗に伴ってタイヤのコーナリング特性が変化するので、走行環境の過酷さ(シビアリティ)が経時的に変化し、耐久性に大きな影響を与えるベルトエッジ部の温度が変化することになる。そのため、タイヤ耐久試験の初期から末期まで一定のシビアリティを与えるような試験方法が望まれている。
本発明の目的は、回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で空気入りタイヤの耐久性を評価するにあたって、実走行での耐久性をより正確に評価することを可能にしたタイヤ耐久試験方法を提供することにある。 An object of the present invention is to evaluate a durability of a pneumatic tire in a state where a load and a slip angle are applied on a rotating drum, and a tire durability test that can more accurately evaluate durability in actual running. It is to provide a method.
上記目的を達成するための本発明の第1のタイヤ耐久試験方法は、空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持することを特徴とすることを特徴とするものである。 In order to achieve the above object, the first tire durability test method of the present invention is a method in which a pneumatic tire is caused to travel on a rotating drum with a load and a slip angle applied, and a lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during traveling. Is detected, and the running state is maintained while controlling the lateral force to a desired value.
また、上記目的を達成するための本発明の第2のタイヤ耐久試験方法は、空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力とスリップ角との積を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持することを特徴とするものである。 Further, the second tire durability test method of the present invention for achieving the above object is to cause a pneumatic tire to travel on a rotating drum with a load and a slip angle applied, and to occur in the tire rotation axis direction during traveling. The lateral force is detected, and the running state is maintained while controlling the product of the lateral force and the slip angle to a desired value.
本発明の第1のタイヤ耐久試験方法では、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持することにより、走行環境の過酷さ(シビアリティ)を同等にした条件で耐久性を評価することができる。従って、回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で空気入りタイヤの耐久性を評価するにあたって、実走行での耐久性をより正確に評価することができる。 In the first tire endurance test method of the present invention, the lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during traveling is detected, and the traveling state is maintained while controlling the lateral force to a desired value. Durability can be evaluated under the conditions of equality (severity). Therefore, when evaluating the durability of a pneumatic tire in a state where a load and a slip angle are applied on the rotating drum, the durability in actual traveling can be more accurately evaluated.
第1のタイヤ耐久試験方法の一形態として、空気入りタイヤに酸素濃度30%以上の気体を充填した状態で少なくとも24時間の乾熱処理を含む前処理を実施し、次いで、空気入りタイヤの封入気体を入れ替えて回転ドラム上での本走行を実施するタイヤ耐久試験方法であって、前記本走行を実施するに際して、空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持することを特徴とするタイヤ耐久試験方法が提供される。 As one form of the first tire endurance test method, a pretreatment including a dry heat treatment for at least 24 hours is performed in a state where a pneumatic tire is filled with a gas having an oxygen concentration of 30% or more, and then the sealed gas of the pneumatic tire is filled. Is a tire endurance test method for carrying out a main run on a rotating drum by exchanging, and when the main run is carried out, the pneumatic tire is run on a rotating drum with a load and a slip angle applied thereto, There is provided a tire durability test method characterized by detecting a lateral force generated in a tire rotation axis direction and maintaining a running state while controlling the lateral force to a desired value.
また、第1のタイヤ耐久試験方法の一形態として、空気入りタイヤに酸素濃度30%以上の気体を充填した状態で少なくとも24時間の連続走行を含む回転ドラム上での前処理走行を実施し、次いで、空気入りタイヤの封入気体を入れ替えて回転ドラム上での本走行を実施するタイヤ耐久試験方法であって、前記本走行を実施するに際して、空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持することを特徴とするタイヤ耐久試験方法が提供される。 Further, as one form of the first tire durability test method, a pretreatment running on a rotating drum including continuous running for at least 24 hours in a state where a pneumatic tire is filled with a gas having an oxygen concentration of 30% or more is performed. Next, a tire endurance test method for carrying out the main running on the rotating drum by changing the sealed gas of the pneumatic tire, and when carrying out the main running, the load and slip angle of the pneumatic tire are adjusted on the rotating drum. There is provided a tire durability test method characterized in that the vehicle is run in a given state, a lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during the running is detected, and the running state is maintained while the lateral force is controlled to a desired value. The
更に、第1のタイヤ耐久試験方法の一形態として、市場走行後の空気入りタイヤの残存耐久性を評価するためのタイヤ耐久試験方法であって、市場走行に供された空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持することを特徴とするタイヤ耐久試験方法が提供される。 Furthermore, as one form of the first tire durability test method, there is a tire durability test method for evaluating the remaining durability of a pneumatic tire after running on the market, wherein the pneumatic tire provided for running on the market is a rotating drum. The vehicle is run with a load and a slip angle applied thereto, detects lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during running, and maintains the running state while controlling the lateral force to a desired value. A tire durability test method is provided.
更に、第1のタイヤ耐久試験方法の一形態として、市場走行後の空気入りタイヤの残存耐久性を評価するためのタイヤ耐久試験方法であって、市場走行に供された空気入りタイヤのトレッド面をバフ処理した後、該空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持することを特徴とするタイヤ耐久試験方法が提供される。 Furthermore, as one form of the first tire durability test method, a tire durability test method for evaluating the remaining durability of a pneumatic tire after running on the market, the tread surface of the pneumatic tire being used for running on the market After buffing, the pneumatic tire is run on a rotating drum with a load and a slip angle applied, and the lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during running is detected, and the lateral force is set to a desired value. There is provided a tire durability test method characterized by maintaining a running state while being controlled.
一方、本発明の第2のタイヤ耐久試験方法では、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力とスリップ角との積を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持することにより、タイヤトレッド部の摩耗に拘らず、走行環境の過酷さを一定にした条件で耐久性を評価することができる。これにより、回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で空気入りタイヤの耐久性を評価するにあたって、実走行での耐久性をより正確に評価することができる。 On the other hand, in the second tire durability test method of the present invention, the lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during traveling is detected, and the traveling state is maintained while controlling the product of the lateral force and the slip angle to a desired value. By doing so, it is possible to evaluate the durability under the condition in which the severity of the traveling environment is made constant regardless of the wear of the tire tread portion. Thereby, when evaluating the durability of a pneumatic tire in a state where a load and a slip angle are applied on the rotating drum, it is possible to more accurately evaluate the durability in actual driving.
第2のタイヤ耐久試験方法の一形態として、空気入りタイヤに酸素濃度30%以上の気体を充填した状態で少なくとも24時間の加熱処理を含む前処理を実施し、次いで、空気入りタイヤの封入気体を入れ替えて回転ドラム上での本走行を実施するタイヤ耐久試験方法であって、前記本走行を実施するに際して、空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力とスリップ角との積を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持することを特徴とするタイヤ耐久試験方法が提供される。 As one form of the second tire durability test method, a pretreatment including a heat treatment for at least 24 hours is performed in a state where a pneumatic tire is filled with a gas having an oxygen concentration of 30% or more, and then the sealed gas of the pneumatic tire is filled. Is a tire endurance test method for carrying out a main run on a rotating drum by exchanging, and when the main run is carried out, the pneumatic tire is run on a rotating drum with a load and a slip angle applied thereto, There is provided a tire durability test method for detecting a lateral force generated in a tire rotation axis direction and maintaining a running state while controlling a product of the lateral force and a slip angle to a desired value.
また、第2のタイヤ耐久試験方法の一形態として、空気入りタイヤに酸素濃度30%以上の気体を充填した状態で少なくとも24時間の連続走行を含む回転ドラム上での前処理走行を実施し、次いで、空気入りタイヤの封入気体を入れ替えて回転ドラム上での本走行を実施するタイヤ耐久試験方法であって、前記本走行を実施するに際して、空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力とスリップ角との積を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持することを特徴とするタイヤ耐久試験方法が提供される。 Further, as one form of the second tire durability test method, pretreatment running including continuous running for at least 24 hours in a state where a pneumatic tire is filled with a gas having an oxygen concentration of 30% or more is performed. Next, a tire endurance test method for carrying out the main running on the rotating drum by changing the sealed gas of the pneumatic tire, and when carrying out the main running, the load and slip angle of the pneumatic tire are adjusted on the rotating drum. A tire that travels in a given state, detects a lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during traveling, and maintains a traveling state while controlling a product of the lateral force and a slip angle to a desired value. An endurance test method is provided.
更に、第2のタイヤ耐久試験方法の一形態として、市場走行後の空気入りタイヤの残存耐久性を評価するためのタイヤ耐久試験方法であって、市場走行に供された空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力とスリップ角との積を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持することを特徴とするタイヤ耐久試験方法が提供される。 Furthermore, as one form of the second tire durability test method, there is a tire durability test method for evaluating the remaining durability of a pneumatic tire after running on the market, wherein the pneumatic tire provided for running on the market is a rotating drum. Running with the load and slip angle applied above, detect the lateral force generated in the direction of the tire rotation axis during running, and maintain the running state while controlling the product of the lateral force and slip angle to the desired value A tire durability test method is provided.
更に、第2のタイヤ耐久試験方法の一形態として、市場走行後の空気入りタイヤの残存耐久性を評価するためのタイヤ耐久試験方法であって、市場走行に供された空気入りタイヤのトレッド面をバフ処理した後、該空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力とスリップ角との積を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持することを特徴とするタイヤ耐久試験方法が提供される。 Furthermore, as one form of the second tire durability test method, there is a tire durability test method for evaluating the remaining durability of a pneumatic tire after running on the market, the tread surface of the pneumatic tire being used for running on the market After the buff treatment, the pneumatic tire is caused to travel on the rotating drum with a load and a slip angle applied thereto, and a lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during the traveling is detected, and the lateral force and the slip angle are detected. There is provided a tire durability test method characterized by maintaining a running state while controlling a product to a desired value.
本発明者は、横力とスリップ角との積が走行時におけるタイヤトレッド部のベルトエッジ付近での温度に対して比例関係にあることを知見した。そのため、横力とスリップ角との積に基づいてタイヤ内部温度を所望の範囲(±3℃)に制御することができる。つまり、本発明によれば、空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力とスリップ角との積に基づいてタイヤ内部温度を所望の範囲に制御しながら走行状態を維持することを特徴とするタイヤ耐久試験方法が提供される。 The inventor has found that the product of the lateral force and the slip angle is proportional to the temperature in the vicinity of the belt edge of the tire tread portion during traveling. Therefore, the tire internal temperature can be controlled within a desired range (± 3 ° C.) based on the product of the lateral force and the slip angle. That is, according to the present invention, a pneumatic tire is caused to travel on a rotating drum with a load and a slip angle applied thereto, a lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during traveling is detected, and the lateral force and the slip angle are detected. A tire durability test method is provided that maintains the running state while controlling the tire internal temperature within a desired range based on the product of
本発明において、空気入りタイヤの走行状態を維持しながら行う耐久試験の評価項目は特に限定されるものではなく、タイヤが破壊する迄の走行距離、セパレーション等の故障が生じる迄の走行距離、摩耗特性等を挙げることができる。 In the present invention, the evaluation items of the durability test performed while maintaining the running state of the pneumatic tire are not particularly limited, the running distance until the tire breaks, the running distance until a failure such as separation occurs, and the wear The characteristic etc. can be mentioned.
本発明のタイヤ耐久試験方法では、ドラム式耐久試験装置を使用する。このドラム式耐久試験装置は、空気入りタイヤを転動させるドラムと、該ドラムを回転させる駆動手段と、空気入りタイヤを所定の荷重とスリップ角の条件で回転自在に支持する支持手段とを備えるものであり、タイヤ業界において公知のものを使用することができる。ドラムの直径は、例えば、1500〜2000mmの範囲にあれば良く、一般的には1707mmである。 In the tire durability test method of the present invention, a drum-type durability test apparatus is used. This drum type durability test apparatus includes a drum for rolling a pneumatic tire, a driving means for rotating the drum, and a support means for rotatably supporting the pneumatic tire under conditions of a predetermined load and a slip angle. And those known in the tire industry can be used. The diameter of the drum may be in the range of 1500 to 2000 mm, for example, and is generally 1707 mm.
第1のタイヤ耐久試験方法では、空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力をロードセル等を用いて検出し、該横力を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持する。横力を所望の値に制御するとは、横力を予め設定された数値に導くことである。横力を制御する方法としては、スリップ角を変化させる方法、空気圧を変化させる方法、荷重を変化させる方法、速度を変化させる方法等があるが、これらを組み合わせても良い。 In the first tire durability test method, a pneumatic tire is run on a rotating drum with a load and a slip angle applied thereto, and a lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during running is detected using a load cell or the like, The running state is maintained while controlling the lateral force to a desired value. Controlling the lateral force to a desired value means guiding the lateral force to a preset value. As a method of controlling the lateral force, there are a method of changing a slip angle, a method of changing an air pressure, a method of changing a load, a method of changing a speed, and the like, but these may be combined.
ここで、コーナリングパワーが相対的に高いタイヤAと、コーナリングパワーが相対的に低いタイヤBについて考えてみる。図1に示すように、スリップ角SA(振幅)を周期的に変化させるスラローム試験において、回転ドラムD上で走行するタイヤA,Bのスリップ角SAを同一にした場合、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力SF(振幅)はタイヤBよりもタイヤAの方が大きくなる。つまり、タイヤAの方が過酷な走行環境に晒されることになる。これに対して、図2に示すように、スリップ角SAを周期的に変化させるスラローム試験において、回転ドラムD上で走行するタイヤA,Bのスリップ角SAを適正化し、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力SFを同一にした場合、走行環境の過酷さを同等にした条件で耐久性を評価することができる。 Here, consider a tire A having a relatively high cornering power and a tire B having a relatively low cornering power. As shown in FIG. 1, in the slalom test in which the slip angle SA (amplitude) is periodically changed, when the slip angles SA of the tires A and B running on the rotary drum D are the same, the tire rotation axis during running The lateral force SF (amplitude) generated in the direction is larger in the tire A than in the tire B. That is, the tire A is exposed to a severer driving environment. On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 2, in the slalom test in which the slip angle SA is periodically changed, the slip angle SA of the tires A and B traveling on the rotary drum D is optimized, and the tire rotation shaft is rotated during the travel. When the lateral force SF generated in the direction is the same, the durability can be evaluated under the condition that the harshness of the traveling environment is made equal.
上述のように走行条件の入力パラメータとして横力を採用することにより、走行環境の過酷さを同等にした条件で耐久性を評価することができ、その結果として、実走行での耐久性をより正確に評価することができる。 By adopting lateral force as an input parameter for driving conditions as described above, it is possible to evaluate durability under the conditions where the harshness of the driving environment is equivalent, and as a result, durability in actual driving is further improved. Accurate evaluation is possible.
一方、第2のタイヤ耐久試験方法では、空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力をロードセル等を用いて検出し、該横力とスリップ角との積を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持する。横力とスリップ角との積を所望の値に制御するとは、横力とスリップ角との積を予め設定された数値に導くことである。横力とスリップ角との積を制御する方法としては、スリップ角を変化させる方法、空気圧を変化させる方法、荷重を変化させる方法、速度を変化させる方法等があるが、これらを組み合わせても良い。 On the other hand, in the second tire endurance test method, a pneumatic tire is run on a rotating drum with a load and a slip angle applied, and a lateral force generated in the tire rotating axis direction during running is detected using a load cell or the like. The running state is maintained while controlling the product of the lateral force and the slip angle to a desired value. Controlling the product of the lateral force and the slip angle to a desired value is to lead the product of the lateral force and the slip angle to a preset value. As a method of controlling the product of the lateral force and the slip angle, there are a method of changing the slip angle, a method of changing the air pressure, a method of changing the load, a method of changing the speed, etc., but these may be combined. .
ここで、スラローム試験において、スリップ角SA(振幅)を一定にした場合の横力SF(振幅)の経時的な変化を図3に示し、横力SF(振幅)を一定にした場合のスリップ角SA(振幅)の経時的な変化を図4に示す。図3から判るように、スリップ角SAを一定にした場合、タイヤトレッド部の摩耗に伴ってコーナリングパワーが増加するため、横力SFが徐々に増加することになる。そのため、走行環境の過酷さは経時的に増加する。一方、図4から判るように、横力SFを一定にした場合、タイヤトレッド部の摩耗に伴ってコーナリングパワーが増加するため、スリップ角SAが徐々に減少することになる。そのため、走行環境の過酷さは経時的に減少する。 Here, in the slalom test, FIG. 3 shows changes with time of the lateral force SF (amplitude) when the slip angle SA (amplitude) is constant, and the slip angle when the lateral force SF (amplitude) is constant. The change with time of SA (amplitude) is shown in FIG. As can be seen from FIG. 3, when the slip angle SA is made constant, the cornering power increases with wear of the tire tread portion, so the lateral force SF gradually increases. For this reason, the severity of the driving environment increases with time. On the other hand, as can be seen from FIG. 4, when the lateral force SF is made constant, the cornering power increases with wear of the tire tread portion, so the slip angle SA gradually decreases. Therefore, the severity of the driving environment decreases with time.
一方、スラローム試験において、スリップ角SAを一定にした場合、横力SFを一定にした場合、スリップ角SAと横力SFの積を一定にした場合について、それぞれスリップ角SAと横力SFの積の経時的な変化を図5に示す。図5に示すように、スリップ角SAと横力SFの積を一定にした場合、タイヤトレッド部の摩耗に拘らず、タイヤトレッド部に与えられるエネルギーが一定になり、走行環境の過酷さは試験初期から末期まで一定に維持される。 On the other hand, in the slalom test, when the slip angle SA is constant, the lateral force SF is constant, and the product of the slip angle SA and the lateral force SF is constant, the product of the slip angle SA and the lateral force SF, respectively. FIG. 5 shows the change over time. As shown in FIG. 5, when the product of the slip angle SA and the lateral force SF is made constant, the energy given to the tire tread is constant regardless of the wear of the tire tread, and the severity of the driving environment is tested. It remains constant from the beginning to the end.
上述のように走行条件の入力パラメータとして横力とスリップ角との積を採用することにより、走行環境の過酷さを一定にした条件で耐久性を評価することができ、その結果として、実走行での耐久性をより正確に評価することができる。 By adopting the product of lateral force and slip angle as an input parameter for driving conditions as described above, it is possible to evaluate the durability under the condition that the severity of the driving environment is constant. It is possible to more accurately evaluate the durability.
図6はスラローム試験におけるスリップ角SA(振幅)とベルトエッジ温度との関係を示し、図7はスラローム試験における横力SF(振幅)とスリップ角SA(振幅)との積とベルトエッジ温度との関係を示すものである。これら図6及び図7はタイヤサイズ11R22.5のタイヤについて空気圧を700kPaと850kPaにした場合の結果を示すものである。図6及び図7から判るように、横力SFとスリップ角SAとの積とベルトエッジ温度と間には線形の比例関係が認められる。 6 shows the relationship between the slip angle SA (amplitude) and the belt edge temperature in the slalom test, and FIG. 7 shows the product of the lateral force SF (amplitude) and the slip angle SA (amplitude) in the slalom test and the belt edge temperature. It shows the relationship. FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 show the results when the air pressure is set to 700 kPa and 850 kPa for the tire of tire size 11R22.5. As can be seen from FIGS. 6 and 7, a linear proportional relationship is recognized between the product of the lateral force SF and the slip angle SA and the belt edge temperature.
つまり、走行条件の入力パラメータとして横力SFとスリップ角SAとの積を採用し、これら横力SFとスリップ角SAとの積を一定にした場合、ベルトエッジ温度を所望の範囲(±3℃)に制御することができる。これにより、耐久性に大きな影響を与えるベルトエッジ温度を一定にしながら空気入りタイヤの耐久性を評価することができる。 That is, when the product of the lateral force SF and the slip angle SA is adopted as an input parameter of the running condition and the product of the lateral force SF and the slip angle SA is made constant, the belt edge temperature is set within a desired range (± 3 ° C. ) Can be controlled. This makes it possible to evaluate the durability of the pneumatic tire while keeping the belt edge temperature that greatly affects the durability constant.
上記タイヤ耐久試験方法は、空気入りタイヤに酸素濃度30%以上の気体を充填した状態で少なくとも24時間の乾熱処理を含む前処理を実施し、次いで、空気入りタイヤの封入気体を入れ替えて回転ドラム上での本走行を実施する場合に有効である。つまり、本走行を実施するに際して、空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力又は横力とスリップ角との積を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持するのである。 In the tire durability test method, a pretreatment including a dry heat treatment for at least 24 hours is performed in a state in which a pneumatic tire is filled with a gas having an oxygen concentration of 30% or more, and then a sealed drum of the pneumatic tire is replaced with a rotating drum. This is effective when carrying out the above main driving. That is, when carrying out the main running, the pneumatic tire is run with a load and a slip angle on the rotating drum, and the lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during running is detected. The running state is maintained while controlling the product of the slip angle and the desired value.
前処理において、空気入りタイヤに酸素濃度30%以上の気体を充填した状態で少なくとも24時間の乾熱処理を行うのは、酸化劣化を促進し、その本走行において、実走行での耐久性をより正確に評価するためである。ここで言う酸素濃度とは体積分率であり、例えば、気体の全圧に対する酸素の分圧から求めることができる。前処理での酸素濃度が30%未満であると酸化劣化の促進が不十分になる。また、前処理での乾熱処理が24時間未満であると酸化劣化の促進が不十分になる。乾熱処理時間の上限は480時間とすることが望ましい。 In the pre-treatment, performing dry heat treatment for at least 24 hours in a state where the pneumatic tire is filled with a gas having an oxygen concentration of 30% or more promotes oxidative degradation, and in the actual running, the durability in actual running is further increased. This is for accurate evaluation. The oxygen concentration referred to here is a volume fraction, and can be obtained from, for example, the partial pressure of oxygen with respect to the total pressure of gas. If the oxygen concentration in the pretreatment is less than 30%, the promotion of oxidative deterioration becomes insufficient. Further, if the dry heat treatment in the pretreatment is less than 24 hours, the oxidation deterioration is not sufficiently promoted. The upper limit of the dry heat treatment time is desirably 480 hours.
また、上記タイヤ耐久試験方法は、空気入りタイヤに酸素濃度30%以上の気体を充填した状態で少なくとも24時間の連続走行を含む回転ドラム上での前処理走行を実施し、次いで、空気入りタイヤの封入気体を入れ替えて回転ドラム上での本走行を実施する場合に有効である。つまり、本走行を実施するに際して、空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力又は横力とスリップ角との積を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持するのである。 In the tire durability test method, pretreatment running is performed on a rotating drum including continuous running for at least 24 hours in a state where a pneumatic tire is filled with a gas having an oxygen concentration of 30% or more, and then the pneumatic tire is used. It is effective when carrying out the main running on the rotating drum by replacing the enclosed gas. That is, when carrying out the main running, the pneumatic tire is run with a load and a slip angle on the rotating drum, and the lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during running is detected. The running state is maintained while controlling the product of the slip angle and the desired value.
前処理走行において、空気入りタイヤに酸素濃度30%以上の気体を充填した状態で少なくとも24時間の連続走行を行うのは、空気入りタイヤを固有の発熱特性に応じて発熱させ、実走行に近似した発熱状態で酸化劣化と外径成長を促進し、その本走行において、実走行での耐久性をより正確に評価するためである。ここで言う酸素濃度とは体積分率であり、例えば、気体の全圧に対する酸素の分圧から求めることができる。前処理走行での酸素濃度が30%未満であると酸化劣化の促進が不十分になる。また、前処理走行での連続走行が24時間未満であると酸化劣化と外径成長の促進が不十分になる。前処理走行での連続走行時間は、タイヤへの荷重及びタイヤの走行速度に応じて任意に設定することができるが、その上限は480時間とすることが望ましい。 In pre-treatment running, continuous running for at least 24 hours in a state where the pneumatic tire is filled with a gas having an oxygen concentration of 30% or more causes the pneumatic tire to generate heat according to its inherent heat generation characteristics and approximates actual running This is to promote oxidation deterioration and outer diameter growth in the generated heat state, and to more accurately evaluate the durability in actual traveling in the actual traveling. The oxygen concentration referred to here is a volume fraction, and can be obtained from, for example, the partial pressure of oxygen with respect to the total pressure of gas. If the oxygen concentration in the pretreatment traveling is less than 30%, the promotion of oxidation deterioration becomes insufficient. Further, when the continuous running in the pretreatment running is less than 24 hours, the oxidation deterioration and the promotion of the outer diameter growth are insufficient. The continuous running time in the pretreatment running can be arbitrarily set according to the load on the tire and the running speed of the tire, but the upper limit is desirably 480 hours.
更に、上記タイヤ耐久試験方法は、市場走行後の空気入りタイヤの残存耐久性を評価する場合に有効である。つまり、市場走行に供された空気入りタイヤを回転ドラム上で荷重とスリップ角を与えた状態で走行させ、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力を検出し、該横力又は横力とスリップ角との積を所望の値に制御しながら走行状態を維持するのである。市場走行に供された空気入りタイヤのトレッド面をバフ処理した後、走行試験に供しても良い。この場合、市場走行に供された空気入りタイヤに生じたヒールアンドトウ摩耗、センター摩耗、ショルダー摩耗、多角形摩耗等の偏摩耗の要因を排除し、タイヤ構造に関わる残存耐久性をより正確に評価することができる。 Furthermore, the tire durability test method is effective in evaluating the remaining durability of a pneumatic tire after running on the market. That is, a pneumatic tire subjected to market driving is run on a rotating drum with a load and a slip angle applied, and a lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction during running is detected. The running state is maintained while controlling the product of the slip angle to a desired value. You may buff the tread surface of the pneumatic tire used for market driving | running | working, and you may use for a running test. In this case, it eliminates the causes of uneven wear such as heel and toe wear, center wear, shoulder wear, polygonal wear, etc. that occur in pneumatic tires that have been put on the market, and more accurately maintains the remaining durability related to the tire structure. Can be evaluated.
タイヤサイズ11R22.5であって耐久性について市場から同等の評価を得ている2種類の空気入りタイヤA,Bを用意した、これらタイヤA,Bのコーナリング特性は図8の通りである。即ち、タイヤAはコーナリングパワーが相対的に高く、タイヤBはコーナリングパワーが相対的に低いものである。これらタイヤA,Bについて、2通りのタイヤ耐久試験(スラローム試験)を実施した。一方のタイヤ耐久試験(従来例)では、スリップ角SA(振幅)を約±2.5°に制御しながら走行状態を維持し、タイヤが破壊する迄の走行距離を計測した。他方のタイヤ耐久試験(実施例)では、走行中にタイヤ回転軸方向に生じる横力SFを検出し、該横力SFを約5.61kNに制御しながら走行状態を維持し、タイヤが破壊する迄の走行距離を計測した。いずれの場合も、荷重を32.08kNとし、速度を45km/hとした。これらタイヤ耐久試験において計測された走行距離を図9に示した。 Two types of pneumatic tires A and B having a tire size of 11R22.5 and having the same evaluation from the market for durability are prepared. The cornering characteristics of these tires A and B are as shown in FIG. That is, the tire A has a relatively high cornering power, and the tire B has a relatively low cornering power. For these tires A and B, two types of tire durability tests (slalom tests) were performed. In one tire durability test (conventional example), the running state was maintained while controlling the slip angle SA (amplitude) to about ± 2.5 °, and the running distance until the tire broke was measured. In the other tire endurance test (Example), the lateral force SF generated in the tire rotation axis direction during running is detected, the running state is maintained while the lateral force SF is controlled to about 5.61 kN, and the tire is destroyed. The distance traveled was measured. In either case, the load was 32.08 kN and the speed was 45 km / h. The traveling distance measured in these tire durability tests is shown in FIG.
図9から判るように、実施例のタイヤ耐久試験方法によれば、市場にて同等の耐久性評価を得ている2種類の空気入りタイヤA,Bについて、市場での評価をより正確に反映した結果を得ることができた。 As can be seen from FIG. 9, according to the tire durability test method of the example, the evaluation in the market is more accurately reflected on the two types of pneumatic tires A and B that have obtained the same durability evaluation in the market. I was able to get the results.
A,B タイヤ
D 回転ドラム
SA スリップ角
SF 横力
A, B Tire D Rotating drum SA Slip angle SF Lateral force
Claims (11)
A pneumatic tire is run on a rotating drum with a load and a slip angle applied, and a lateral force generated in the tire rotation axis direction is detected during running, and the tire internal temperature is determined based on the product of the lateral force and the slip angle. A tire durability test method characterized in that the running state is maintained while controlling the pressure within a desired range.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2004361191A JP4617865B2 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2004-12-14 | Tire durability test method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2004361191A JP4617865B2 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2004-12-14 | Tire durability test method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2006170694A true JP2006170694A (en) | 2006-06-29 |
JP4617865B2 JP4617865B2 (en) | 2011-01-26 |
Family
ID=36671622
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2004361191A Expired - Fee Related JP4617865B2 (en) | 2004-12-14 | 2004-12-14 | Tire durability test method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP4617865B2 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2012126321A (en) * | 2010-12-17 | 2012-07-05 | Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd | System and method for testing air leak in pneumatic tire, |
JP2012247301A (en) * | 2011-05-27 | 2012-12-13 | Toyo Tire & Rubber Co Ltd | Rubber friction/abrasion characteristic testing method and rubber friction/abrasion characteristic testing apparatus |
JP2014144676A (en) * | 2013-01-28 | 2014-08-14 | Bridgestone Corp | Rim slip testing method |
JP2015090329A (en) * | 2013-11-07 | 2015-05-11 | 住友ゴム工業株式会社 | Test method for pneumatic tire |
CN104614189A (en) * | 2015-02-10 | 2015-05-13 | 宁波大学 | Radial loading experimental device for tire dynamic test |
JP2016145760A (en) * | 2015-02-09 | 2016-08-12 | Ntn株式会社 | Wheel speed rotation fluctuation pattern extraction device and reference pattern setting method therefor |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS55106334A (en) * | 1979-02-09 | 1980-08-15 | Saginomiya Seisakusho Inc | Tire endurance test |
JPH0835915A (en) * | 1994-07-25 | 1996-02-06 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Method and apparatus for measuring side force in tire running testing machine |
JPH08253004A (en) * | 1994-12-14 | 1996-10-01 | Bridgestone Corp | Highly endurable pneumatic steel radial tire |
JPH11334313A (en) * | 1998-05-28 | 1999-12-07 | Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The | Pneumatic radial tire |
JP2000301913A (en) * | 1999-04-16 | 2000-10-31 | Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The | Pneumatic radial tire |
JP2003161674A (en) * | 1995-09-07 | 2003-06-06 | Bridgestone Corp | Endurance testing method for pneumatic tire |
JP2004243820A (en) * | 2003-02-12 | 2004-09-02 | Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The | Retreaded tire |
-
2004
- 2004-12-14 JP JP2004361191A patent/JP4617865B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS55106334A (en) * | 1979-02-09 | 1980-08-15 | Saginomiya Seisakusho Inc | Tire endurance test |
JPH0835915A (en) * | 1994-07-25 | 1996-02-06 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Method and apparatus for measuring side force in tire running testing machine |
JPH08253004A (en) * | 1994-12-14 | 1996-10-01 | Bridgestone Corp | Highly endurable pneumatic steel radial tire |
JP2003161674A (en) * | 1995-09-07 | 2003-06-06 | Bridgestone Corp | Endurance testing method for pneumatic tire |
JPH11334313A (en) * | 1998-05-28 | 1999-12-07 | Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The | Pneumatic radial tire |
JP2000301913A (en) * | 1999-04-16 | 2000-10-31 | Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The | Pneumatic radial tire |
JP2004243820A (en) * | 2003-02-12 | 2004-09-02 | Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd:The | Retreaded tire |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2012126321A (en) * | 2010-12-17 | 2012-07-05 | Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd | System and method for testing air leak in pneumatic tire, |
JP2012247301A (en) * | 2011-05-27 | 2012-12-13 | Toyo Tire & Rubber Co Ltd | Rubber friction/abrasion characteristic testing method and rubber friction/abrasion characteristic testing apparatus |
JP2014144676A (en) * | 2013-01-28 | 2014-08-14 | Bridgestone Corp | Rim slip testing method |
JP2015090329A (en) * | 2013-11-07 | 2015-05-11 | 住友ゴム工業株式会社 | Test method for pneumatic tire |
JP2016145760A (en) * | 2015-02-09 | 2016-08-12 | Ntn株式会社 | Wheel speed rotation fluctuation pattern extraction device and reference pattern setting method therefor |
CN104614189A (en) * | 2015-02-10 | 2015-05-13 | 宁波大学 | Radial loading experimental device for tire dynamic test |
CN104614189B (en) * | 2015-02-10 | 2017-03-01 | 宁波大学 | A kind of radial loaded experimental provision for tire dynamic test |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP4617865B2 (en) | 2011-01-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP2006300725A (en) | Method of testing tire wear | |
WO2011105498A1 (en) | Method of testing rubber wear, and method, device and program of calculating rubber index of tire using method of testing rubber wear | |
JP5457662B2 (en) | Pneumatic tire durability test method | |
JP4453672B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for measuring resistance force of conveyor belt overcoming conveyor roller and evaluation method of power loss of conveyor belt | |
WO2009003108A4 (en) | Lateral position control for tire tread wear test machine | |
EP3732065B1 (en) | Tire with improved snow performance without sacrificing dry braking or wear | |
JP4617865B2 (en) | Tire durability test method | |
JP5889605B2 (en) | Rubber abrasion test method | |
US3563088A (en) | Non-destructive method of determining tire life | |
EP3732063B1 (en) | Tire with improved handling performance and speed durability | |
AU2003243148B2 (en) | Improvements in tire uniformity testing | |
EP3591376B1 (en) | Test method for wear resistance performance of tread rubber for a tire | |
JP6922722B2 (en) | Evaluation method of uneven wear resistance of rubber members and tire manufacturing method using this | |
JP2004053482A (en) | Abrasion testing method of tire | |
JP2016218017A (en) | Antiwear performance evaluation method of rubber material | |
KR101084045B1 (en) | Crack tester of tire grooves | |
JP2009047648A (en) | Method and device for testing tire | |
JP2011153865A (en) | Rubber testing machine, and rubber test method using the same | |
JP5467091B2 (en) | Evaluation method of tire performance | |
JP2018146508A (en) | Tire performance evaluation method | |
JP4415845B2 (en) | Tire durability test method | |
CN207644080U (en) | A kind of belt side plastic structure | |
JP6270503B2 (en) | Method for forming snow road of tire test drum | |
JP6571499B2 (en) | Rubber friction and wear test method | |
JPS59206209A (en) | Pneumatic tire suitable for ice-snow road |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20070928 |
|
A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20091026 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20100706 |
|
A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20100902 |
|
TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20100928 |
|
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20101011 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131105 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131105 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
R250 | Receipt of annual fees |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |