JP2006110423A - Treatment method of fly ash - Google Patents

Treatment method of fly ash Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2006110423A
JP2006110423A JP2004298522A JP2004298522A JP2006110423A JP 2006110423 A JP2006110423 A JP 2006110423A JP 2004298522 A JP2004298522 A JP 2004298522A JP 2004298522 A JP2004298522 A JP 2004298522A JP 2006110423 A JP2006110423 A JP 2006110423A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
ash
fly ash
weight
parts
less
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2004298522A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4830282B2 (en
Inventor
Tsuneyuki Yoshida
恒行 吉田
Ayumi Ono
あゆみ 小野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kurita Water Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Kurita Water Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kurita Water Industries Ltd filed Critical Kurita Water Industries Ltd
Priority to JP2004298522A priority Critical patent/JP4830282B2/en
Publication of JP2006110423A publication Critical patent/JP2006110423A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4830282B2 publication Critical patent/JP4830282B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02WCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W30/00Technologies for solid waste management
    • Y02W30/20Waste processing or separation

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a treatment method of fly ash, in which elution amount of heavy metals contained in fly ash generated when incinerating, melting or firing waste or fuel and adding sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO<SB>3</SB>) into a flue in order to treat acidic gas is reduced by adding a small amount of chemicals, and the fly ash or the like is made harmless to an extent allowing landfill. <P>SOLUTION: In this fly ash treatment method, a chemical containing one or more kinds of substances selected from phosphoric acid, phosphate and ferrous salt is added to and mixed with fly ash, gas treatment residue or mixed ash thereof generated from an exhaust gas treatment facility for treating acidic gas by adding sodium hydrogen carbonate to the flue. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

本発明は、飛灰の処理方法に関する。さらに詳しくは、本発明は、廃棄物や燃料などを焼却、溶融又は焼成し、炭酸水素ナトリウム(重炭酸ナトリウム、NaHCO3)を煙道に添加して酸性ガスを処理する際に発生する飛灰などに含まれる重金属類の溶出量を、少ない量の薬剤の添加により低下させ、飛灰などを埋立処分が可能なまでに無害化することができる飛灰の処理方法に関する。 The present invention relates to a method for treating fly ash. More specifically, the present invention relates to fly ash generated when incineration, melting, or calcination of waste, fuel, or the like, and sodium bicarbonate (sodium bicarbonate, NaHCO 3 ) is added to the flue to treat acid gas. It is related with the processing method of fly ash which can reduce the elution amount of heavy metals contained in etc. by addition of a small amount of chemical | medical agents, and can make fly ash etc. harmless before a landfill disposal is possible.

廃棄物や燃料などを焼却、溶融又は焼成すると、発生する排ガスの中には塩素系、硫黄系などの酸性ガスが含まれるので、従来より煙道に消石灰(Ca(OH)2)を添加して酸性ガスを処理する方法が行われていた。焼却炉などから発生する排ガスには、酸性ガス以外に、Pb、Cd、Hg、Cr(VI)、As、Seなどの有害物質が含まれ、飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合灰に濃縮して含有される。As、Se及びCr(VI)は、消石灰中のカルシウムの効果により溶出しにくいので、酸性ガスの処理に消石灰を用いた場合には、Pb、Cd及びHgを対象として、飛灰などに水とキレート剤やリン酸などを添加、混合することによる有害物質の無害化が一般に行われている。 When waste, fuel, etc. are incinerated, melted or calcined, the exhaust gas generated contains acidic gases such as chlorine and sulfur, so slaked lime (Ca (OH) 2 ) has been added to the flue. Thus, a method for treating acid gas has been performed. Exhaust gas generated from incinerators contains harmful substances such as Pb, Cd, Hg, Cr (VI), As, and Se in addition to acid gases, and concentrates in fly ash, gas treatment residue, or mixed ash of these. Contained. As, Se and Cr (VI) are difficult to elute due to the effect of calcium in slaked lime, so when slaked lime is used for the treatment of acid gas, Pb, Cd and Hg are targeted for fly ash and water. Detoxification of harmful substances is generally performed by adding and mixing chelating agents and phosphoric acid.

近年、消石灰に代わり、より効果的な酸性ガス処理剤として、炭酸水素ナトリウムが使用される場合がでてきた。例えば、湿式電気集塵装置を用いることなく、排煙中のSO3量が変動した場合にも、硫酸ミストを高効率で除去することが可能な簡易かつ低コストのSO3分除去装置として、煙道に配置された脱硫装置の上流側に炭酸水素ナトリウム粉末を供給する装置を設置し、所定箇所で検出したSO3分量に応じて、炭酸水素ナトリウム供給量を制御する装置が提案されている(特許文献1)。 In recent years, sodium hydrogen carbonate has been used as a more effective acidic gas treating agent in place of slaked lime. For example, as a simple and low-cost SO 3 component removal device that can remove sulfuric acid mist with high efficiency even when the amount of SO 3 in the flue gas fluctuates without using a wet electrostatic precipitator, A device for supplying sodium hydrogen carbonate powder to the upstream side of the desulfurization device arranged in the flue and controlling the sodium hydrogen carbonate supply amount according to the SO 3 quantity detected at a predetermined location has been proposed. (Patent Document 1).

酸性ガスの処理に炭酸水素ナトリウムを用いると、カルシウムの含有量が少ないために、従来のPb、Cd及びHgに加えて、As、Se及びやCr(VI)の不溶化処理も行う必要が生ずる。固体廃棄物中のカドミウム及び鉛を広いpH範囲にわたって不溶化する方法として、フライアッシュ又はフライアッシュとボトムアッシュとの混合物からなる乾燥固形体残留物と、水溶性ホスフェート源とを遊離石灰源の存在下で接触させる方法が提案されている(特許文献2)。本出願人は、先に、取り扱い性に優れた処理剤により、pH調整を必要とすることなく、鉛、六価クロム、ヒ素及びセレンを含有する灰を、容易、効率的かつ安全に処理して、処理物からの鉛、六価クロム、ヒ素及びセレンの溶出を確実に防止する方法として、鉛、六価クロム、ヒ素及びセレンを含有する灰に、水、第一鉄化合物及び正リン酸、リン酸二水素一ナトリウム、リン酸一水素二ナトリウム又は縮合リン酸を加えて混練する方法を提案した(特許文献3)。しかし、排ガス処理に炭酸水素ナトリウムを使用する場合に、この方法を適用することが特に効果的であることは明らかではなかった。   When sodium hydrogen carbonate is used for the treatment of the acid gas, since the calcium content is small, it is necessary to perform insolubilization treatment of As, Se, and Cr (VI) in addition to the conventional Pb, Cd, and Hg. In order to insolubilize cadmium and lead in solid waste over a wide pH range, dry solid residue consisting of fly ash or a mixture of fly ash and bottom ash, and a water-soluble phosphate source in the presence of a free lime source Has been proposed (Patent Document 2). The present applicant first processed ash containing lead, hexavalent chromium, arsenic and selenium easily, efficiently and safely without the need for pH adjustment with a processing agent having excellent handleability. As a method for reliably preventing elution of lead, hexavalent chromium, arsenic and selenium from the treated material, water, ferrous compound and orthophosphoric acid are added to the ash containing lead, hexavalent chromium, arsenic and selenium. And a method of adding and kneading by adding monosodium dihydrogen phosphate, disodium monohydrogen phosphate or condensed phosphoric acid (Patent Document 3). However, it has not been clear that applying this method is particularly effective when using sodium bicarbonate for exhaust gas treatment.

一方で、炭酸水素ナトリウムは、排ガスとの反応効率がよいので、リン酸で重金属固定を行う場合に妨害となる未反応のアルカリ分が消石灰の場合と比較して非常に少なく、リン酸の必要量が少なくてよいという利点があり、As、Se及びCr(VI)がもともと溶出しない灰の場合には、リン酸単独での処理が消石灰の場合にくらべ明らかに容易になる。本発明者らは、先に、重金属含有量の変動の大きい中性飛灰を、水酸化カルシウム源不添加にて、重金属の溶出を増加させるpHの上昇や処理物の増量を引き起こすことなく、容易かつ効率的に処理することができる方法として、中性飛灰に対して、アルカリ金属とリン酸のモル比が1〜4のリン酸系化合物を添加してpHを6〜12の範囲に調整する方法を提案した(特許文献4)。この方法は、排ガス処理剤を使用しておらず、pHが5〜9である灰に対する処理方法であり、重金属固定の最適pHが9〜10程度であるという理由から、アルカリ分を有するリン酸塩を用いることが適しており、強い酸性であるリン酸を用いることに利点はなかった。しかし、炭酸水素ナトリウムを用いて処理した飛灰は、pHが8〜12の弱アルカリ性になる場合が多く、したがって、リン酸塩のほかにリン酸を用いることも可能となる。
特開2002−263442号公報(第2頁) 特公平4−61710号公報(第1、3頁) 特開平10−128273号公報(第2頁) 特開平7−155725号公報(第2頁)
On the other hand, sodium hydrogen carbonate has a high reaction efficiency with exhaust gas, so the amount of unreacted alkali that becomes a hindrance when fixing heavy metals with phosphoric acid is very small compared to slaked lime, and phosphoric acid is necessary. There is an advantage that the amount may be small, and in the case of ash from which As, Se and Cr (VI) do not elute originally, the treatment with phosphoric acid alone is clearly easier than in the case of slaked lime. The present inventors, first, neutral fly ash with a large variation in heavy metal content, without adding a calcium hydroxide source, without causing an increase in pH and an increase in the amount of the processed product, As a method that can be easily and efficiently treated, a phosphate compound having a molar ratio of alkali metal to phosphoric acid of 1 to 4 is added to neutral fly ash to bring the pH to a range of 6 to 12 A method of adjusting was proposed (Patent Document 4). This method does not use an exhaust gas treatment agent, and is a treatment method for ash having a pH of 5 to 9. Phosphoric acid having an alkali content because the optimum pH for fixing heavy metals is about 9 to 10 It was suitable to use a salt and there was no advantage to using phosphoric acid which is strongly acidic. However, fly ash treated with sodium bicarbonate often becomes weakly alkaline with a pH of 8 to 12, and therefore it is possible to use phosphoric acid in addition to phosphate.
JP 2002-263442 A (2nd page) Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. 4-61710 (first and third pages) JP 10-128273 A (second page) JP 7-155725 A (2nd page)

本発明は、廃棄物や燃料などを焼却、溶融又は焼成し、炭酸水素ナトリウム(重炭酸ナトリウム、NaHCO3)を煙道に添加して酸性ガスを処理する際に発生する飛灰などに含まれる重金属類の溶出量を、少ない量の薬剤の添加により低下させ、飛灰などを埋立処分が可能なまでに無害化することができる飛灰の処理方法を提供することを目的としてなされたものである。 The present invention is included in fly ash generated when incinerating, melting or firing waste, fuel, etc., and adding sodium bicarbonate (sodium bicarbonate, NaHCO 3 ) to the flue to treat acid gas. It was made for the purpose of providing a treatment method for fly ash that can reduce the elution amount of heavy metals by adding a small amount of chemicals and make the fly ash harmless before landfilling is possible. is there.

本発明者らは、上記の課題を解決すべく鋭意研究を重ねた結果、炭酸水素ナトリウムを煙道に添加する排ガス処理施設から発生する飛灰などに対しては、リン酸、リン酸塩、鉄(II)塩又はこれらを組み合わせた薬剤が、特異的な重金属類の溶出防止効果を発揮することを見いだし、この知見に基づいて本発明を完成するに至った。
すなわち、本発明は、炭酸水素ナトリウムを煙道に添加して酸性ガスを処理する排ガス処理施設から発生する飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合灰に対して、リン酸、リン酸塩及び鉄(II)塩より選ばれる1種以上を含む薬剤を添加、混合することを特徴とする飛灰の処理方法を提供するものである。
As a result of intensive studies to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present inventors have made phosphoric acid, phosphates, etc. against fly ash generated from an exhaust gas treatment facility where sodium hydrogen carbonate is added to the flue. It has been found that iron (II) salts or drugs combining these exhibit a specific heavy metal elution preventing effect, and the present invention has been completed based on this finding.
That is, the present invention provides phosphoric acid, phosphate, and iron for fly ash, gas treatment residue, or mixed ash generated from an exhaust gas treatment facility that treats acidic gas by adding sodium hydrogen carbonate to the flue. (II) A fly ash treatment method comprising adding and mixing a chemical containing at least one selected from salts.

本発明の飛灰の処理方法によれば、炭酸水素ナトリウムを煙道に添加して酸性ガスを処理する排ガス処理施設から発生する飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合灰に対して、リン酸、リン酸塩及び鉄(II)塩より選ばれる1種以上を含む薬剤を添加、混合することにより、少ない量の薬剤の添加により、飛灰などからの重金属の溶出を効果的に防止することができる。   According to the fly ash treatment method of the present invention, phosphoric acid is used for fly ash, gas treatment residue, or mixed ash generated from an exhaust gas treatment facility in which sodium hydrogen carbonate is added to a flue to treat acid gas. By adding and mixing a chemical containing at least one selected from phosphate and iron (II) salt, it is possible to effectively prevent elution of heavy metals from fly ash by adding a small amount of chemical. Can do.

本発明の飛灰の処理方法においては、炭酸水素ナトリウム(重炭酸ナトリウム、NaHCO3)を煙道に添加して酸性ガスを処理する排ガス処理施設から発生する飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合灰に対して、リン酸、リン酸塩及び鉄(II)塩より選ばれる1種以上を含む薬剤を添加、混合する。 In the method for treating fly ash according to the present invention, fly ash generated from an exhaust gas treatment facility for treating acid gas by adding sodium hydrogen carbonate (sodium bicarbonate, NaHCO 3 ) to the flue, gas treatment residue, or a mixture thereof A chemical containing at least one selected from phosphoric acid, phosphate and iron (II) salt is added to and mixed with ash.

産業廃棄物、都市ごみ、燃料などを焼却、溶融又は焼成する燃焼炉においては、被燃焼物中に含まれる硫黄化合物や塩素化合物などに由来する三酸化硫黄、二酸化硫黄、塩化水素などの酸性ガスが発生する。これらの酸性ガスは、燃焼炉の設備を腐食させるのみならず、そのまま大気中に排出されると環境汚染をもたらすので、焼却炉の煙道に粉末状の塩基性物質を添加して酸性ガスを中和する処理がなされている。従来、塩基性物質として、消石灰が広く用いられていたが、近年、より効果的な酸性ガス処理剤として、炭酸水素ナトリウムが用いられるようになった。本発明方法は、塩基性物質として炭酸水素ナトリウムを用いる燃焼炉の飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合灰の処理に適用する。飛灰は、燃焼炉、溶融炉等においてバグフィルター、電気集塵機などにより捕集される灰であり、ガス処理残渣は、HClやSOx等のガスとCa(OH)2やNaHCO3等のガス処理剤の反応生成物である。ガス処理残渣は、ごみ等の燃焼物由来のばいじん(灰)は含まない。 In a combustion furnace that incinerates, melts or burns industrial waste, municipal waste, fuel, etc., acidic gases such as sulfur trioxide, sulfur dioxide, and hydrogen chloride derived from sulfur compounds and chlorine compounds contained in the burned material Will occur. These acid gases not only corrode the combustion furnace equipment, but also cause environmental pollution if discharged into the atmosphere as they are. Therefore, by adding a powdery basic substance to the flue of the incinerator, Neutralization has been done. Conventionally, slaked lime has been widely used as a basic substance, but in recent years, sodium hydrogen carbonate has come to be used as a more effective acidic gas treating agent. The method of the present invention is applied to the treatment of combustion furnace fly ash, gas treatment residue, or mixed ash thereof using sodium hydrogen carbonate as a basic substance. Fly ash is ash collected by bag filters, electrostatic precipitators, etc. in combustion furnaces, melting furnaces, etc., and gas treatment residues are gases such as HCl and SO x and gases such as Ca (OH) 2 and NaHCO 3. It is a reaction product of a treating agent. The gas treatment residue does not include dust (ash) derived from combustion products such as garbage.

本発明方法に用いるリン酸としては、例えば、オルトリン酸H3PO4、二リン酸、三リン酸、四リン酸などの直鎖状のポリリン酸、環状リン酸と直鎖状のポリリン酸の混合物であるメタリン酸などを挙げることができる。本発明方法に用いるリン酸塩としては、例えば、リン酸二水素アンモニウム、リン酸二水素リチウム、リン酸二水素ナトリウム、リン酸二水素カリウム、リン酸二水素バリウム、リン酸水素二アンモニウム、リン酸水素アンモニウムナトリウム、リン酸水素二ナトリウム、リン酸水素二カリウム、リン酸三ナトリウム、リン酸三カリウム、ポリリン酸ナトリウム、ポレレン酸カリウム、メタリン酸ナトリウム、メタリン酸カリウムなどを挙げることができる。本発明方法に用いる鉄(II)塩としては、例えば、フッ化鉄(II)、塩化鉄(II)、臭化鉄(II)、ヨウ化鉄(II)、硫酸鉄(II)、チオシアン酸鉄(II)、リン酸鉄(II)、グルコン酸鉄(II)などを挙げることができる。本発明方法において、リン酸、リン酸塩及び鉄(II)塩は、1種を単独で用いることができ、あるいは、2種以上を組み合わせて用いることもできる。 Examples of phosphoric acid used in the method of the present invention include linear polyphosphoric acid such as orthophosphoric acid H 3 PO 4 , diphosphoric acid, triphosphoric acid, tetraphosphoric acid, cyclic phosphoric acid and linear polyphosphoric acid. Examples thereof include metaphosphoric acid which is a mixture. Examples of the phosphate used in the method of the present invention include ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, lithium dihydrogen phosphate, sodium dihydrogen phosphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, barium dihydrogen phosphate, diammonium hydrogen phosphate, phosphorus Examples thereof include sodium ammonium oxyhydrogen, disodium hydrogen phosphate, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, trisodium phosphate, tripotassium phosphate, sodium polyphosphate, potassium polarene, sodium metaphosphate, and potassium metaphosphate. Examples of the iron (II) salt used in the method of the present invention include iron fluoride (II), iron chloride (II), iron bromide (II), iron iodide (II), iron (II) sulfate, and thiocyanic acid. Examples thereof include iron (II), iron (II) phosphate, and iron (II) gluconate. In the method of the present invention, phosphoric acid, phosphate and iron (II) salt can be used singly or in combination of two or more.

本発明方法において、飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合物に対するリン酸、リン酸塩及び鉄(II)塩より選ばれる1種以上を含む薬剤の添加量に特に制限はないが、飛灰などの100重量部に対して、薬剤0.1〜20重量部であることが好ましく、薬剤0.5〜15重量部であることがより好ましい。燃焼炉などから発生する飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合物の成分含有量は、被燃焼物により大きく変動するので、処理する飛灰などを対象として、あらかじめ環境庁告示第13号にしたがって溶出試験を行い、薬剤の適正な添加量を定めることが好ましい。   In the method of the present invention, the amount of the chemical containing at least one selected from phosphoric acid, phosphate and iron (II) salt to fly ash, gas treatment residue or mixture thereof is not particularly limited, but fly ash, etc. The amount of the drug is preferably 0.1 to 20 parts by weight, and more preferably 0.5 to 15 parts by weight. The component content of fly ash generated from combustion furnaces, gas treatment residues, or mixtures of these varies greatly depending on the combusted material, so elution is performed according to Environment Agency Notification No. 13 in advance for fly ash to be treated. It is preferable to conduct a test to determine an appropriate amount of drug to be added.

本発明方法において、飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合物に薬剤を添加、混合する方法に特に制限はなく、バッチ式混練機、連続的混練機などを用い、飛灰などに薬剤とともに少量の水を添加して混練することができる。図1は、本発明方法の実施の一態様の説明図である。本態様においては、飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合物からなる原灰がホッパー1に投入され、二軸式混練機2のバレルの中で薬剤と水が添加され、混練される。少量の水を添加し、二軸式混練機を用いて混練することにより、灰と薬剤を均一に混合して、薬剤による処理効果を十分に高めることができる。図1に示す態様においては、二軸式混練機で薬剤と混合された処理灰は、造粒機3へ送られ、高圧で押出成形されて粒状化する。処理灰を造粒することにより、容積を減少し、処理灰搬出用のトラックの台数を減少するとともに、最終処分場を延命することができる。   In the method of the present invention, there is no particular limitation on the method of adding and mixing the chemicals to the fly ash, gas treatment residue or a mixture thereof. Water can be added and kneaded. FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram of one embodiment of the method of the present invention. In this embodiment, raw ash composed of fly ash, gas treatment residue or a mixture thereof is charged into the hopper 1, and the chemical and water are added and kneaded in the barrel of the twin-screw kneader 2. By adding a small amount of water and kneading using a twin-screw kneader, the ash and the drug can be mixed uniformly, and the treatment effect by the drug can be sufficiently enhanced. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the treated ash mixed with the drug by the twin-screw kneader is sent to the granulator 3 and is extruded and granulated at a high pressure. By granulating the treated ash, the volume can be reduced, the number of trucks for carrying out the treated ash can be reduced, and the final disposal site can be extended.

消石灰を煙道に添加して酸性ガスを処理する排ガス処理施設から発生する飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合灰に対しては、キレート剤を添加することにより、効率的に重金属類を不溶化し、溶出濃度を低下させることが可能である。しかし、消石灰の代わりに炭酸水素ナトリウムを煙道に添加して酸性ガスを処理する排ガス処理施設から発生する飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合灰に対してキレート剤を添加すると、重金属類を不溶化して溶出濃度を低下させるためには、多量のキレート剤の添加が必要である。本発明方法によれば、炭酸水素ナトリウムを煙道に添加して酸性ガスを処理する排ガス処理施設から発生する飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合灰にリン酸、リン酸塩及び鉄(II)より選ばれる1種以上を含む薬剤を添加、混合することにより、少量の薬剤で効率的に重金属類を不溶化し、溶出濃度を低下させることができる。   Addition of a chelating agent to fly ash, gas treatment residue, or mixed ash generated from an exhaust gas treatment facility that treats acid gas by adding slaked lime to the flue effectively insolubilizes heavy metals. In addition, the elution concentration can be reduced. However, if a chelating agent is added to fly ash, gas treatment residue or mixed ash generated from an exhaust gas treatment facility that treats acid gas by adding sodium bicarbonate to the flue instead of slaked lime, heavy metals In order to insolubilize and lower the elution concentration, it is necessary to add a large amount of chelating agent. According to the method of the present invention, phosphoric acid, phosphate and iron (II) are added to fly ash, gas treatment residue or mixed ash generated from an exhaust gas treatment facility for treating acid gas by adding sodium hydrogen carbonate to the flue. By adding and mixing a drug containing one or more selected from the above, heavy metals can be efficiently insolubilized with a small amount of drug, and the elution concentration can be lowered.

以下に、実施例を挙げて本発明をさらに詳細に説明するが、本発明はこれらの実施例によりなんら限定されるものではない。
なお、実施例及び比較例において、灰の重金属類溶出試験は、環境庁告示第13号にしたがって行った。
実施例及び比較例で用いた飛灰とガス処理残渣の混合灰A、B、C及びDの成分含有量を、第1表に示す。灰Aは、産業廃棄物焼却炉の煙道に炭酸水素ナトリウムを添加して処理した灰であり、灰Bは、都市ごみ焼却炉の煙道に炭酸水素ナトリウムを添加して処理した灰であり、灰Cは、産業廃棄物焼却炉の煙道に消石灰を添加して処理した灰であり、灰Dは、都市ごみ焼却炉の煙道に消石灰を添加して処理した灰である。
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to examples, but the present invention is not limited to these examples.
In Examples and Comparative Examples, the ash heavy metal dissolution test was conducted according to Environmental Agency Notification No. 13.
Table 1 shows the component contents of the mixed ash A, B, C and D of fly ash and gas treatment residue used in the examples and comparative examples. Ash A is the ash processed by adding sodium hydrogen carbonate to the flue of the industrial waste incinerator, and Ash B is the ash processed by adding sodium hydrogen carbonate to the flue of the municipal waste incinerator Ash C is an ash processed by adding slaked lime to the flue of an industrial waste incinerator, and ash D is an ash processed by adding slaked lime to the flue of a municipal waste incinerator.

Figure 2006110423
Figure 2006110423

比較例1
炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰Aについて、溶出試験を行った。pH11.0、Pb3.5mg/L、Cd0.3mg/L未満、Hg0.052mg/L、Cr(VI)5.0mg/L、As0.92mg/L、Se0.4mg/Lであった。
比較例2
炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰A100重量部に、水20重量部及びキレート剤[栗田工業(株)、アッシュナイトS803]5重量部を添加し、乳鉢で10分間混練したのち、溶出試験を行った。Pb3.2mg/L、Cr(VI)5.0mg/L、As0.91mg/L、Se0.4mg/Lであった。
比較例3
キレート剤の添加量を10重量部とした以外は、比較例2と同じ操作を行った。Pb0.32mg/L、Cr(VI)4.8mg/L、As0.92mg/L、Se0.4mg/Lであった。
実施例1
炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰A100重量部に、水20重量部及び75重量%リン酸(H3PO4)水溶液と30重量%塩化鉄(II)(FeCl2)水溶液との重量比5:5混合液9.5重量部を添加し、乳鉢で10分間混練したのち、溶出試験を行った。pH10.5、Pb0.3mg/L未満、Cd0.3mg/L未満、Hg0.005mg/L未満、Cr(VI)0.2mg/L未満、As0.3mg/L未満、Se0.3mg/Lであった。
実施例2
リン酸水溶液と塩化鉄(II)水溶液の混合液の添加量を19重量部とした以外は、実施例1と同じ操作を行った。pH10.2、Pb0.3mg/L未満、Cd0.3mg/L未満、Hg0.005mg/L未満、Cr(VI)0.2mg/L未満、As0.3mg/L未満、Se0.3mg/L未満であった。
比較例1〜3及び実施例1〜2の結果を、第2表に示す。
Comparative Example 1
The sodium bicarbonate-treated ash A was subjected to a dissolution test. It was pH 11.0, Pb 3.5 mg / L, Cd less than 0.3 mg / L, Hg 0.052 mg / L, Cr (VI) 5.0 mg / L, As 0.92 mg / L and Se 0.4 mg / L.
Comparative Example 2
To 100 parts by weight of sodium bicarbonate-treated ash A, 20 parts by weight of water and 5 parts by weight of a chelating agent [Kurita Kogyo Co., Ltd., Ashnite S803] were added and kneaded in a mortar for 10 minutes, and then an elution test was performed. Pb was 3.2 mg / L, Cr (VI) was 5.0 mg / L, As was 0.91 mg / L, and Se was 0.4 mg / L.
Comparative Example 3
The same operation as in Comparative Example 2 was performed except that the addition amount of the chelating agent was 10 parts by weight. Pb was 0.32 mg / L, Cr (VI) was 4.8 mg / L, As was 0.92 mg / L, and Se was 0.4 mg / L.
Example 1
A 5: 5 mixture of 20 parts by weight of water and 75% by weight phosphoric acid (H 3 PO 4 ) aqueous solution and 30% by weight iron (II) chloride (FeCl 2 ) aqueous solution in 100 parts by weight of sodium bicarbonate-treated ash A After adding 9.5 parts by weight and kneading in a mortar for 10 minutes, an elution test was performed. pH 10.5, Pb less than 0.3 mg / L, Cd less than 0.3 mg / L, Hg less than 0.005 mg / L, Cr (VI) less than 0.2 mg / L, As less than 0.3 mg / L, and Se 0.3 mg / L. It was.
Example 2
The same operation as in Example 1 was performed except that the addition amount of the mixed solution of the phosphoric acid aqueous solution and the iron (II) chloride aqueous solution was 19 parts by weight. pH 10.2, Pb less than 0.3 mg / L, Cd less than 0.3 mg / L, Hg less than 0.005 mg / L, Cr (VI) less than 0.2 mg / L, As less than 0.3 mg / L, Se less than 0.3 mg / L there were.
The results of Comparative Examples 1-3 and Examples 1-2 are shown in Table 2.

Figure 2006110423
Figure 2006110423

第2表に見られるように、炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰Aに、キレート剤を添加し、混練した比較例2〜3では、Cr(VI)、As及びSeの溶出濃度は、比較例1の無処理灰と比べてほとんど低下しないが、リン酸と塩化鉄(II)を添加し、混練した実施例1〜2では、すべての重金属の溶出濃度が、埋立基準値以下となつている。
比較例4
炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰Bについて、溶出試験を行った。pH11.8、Pb1.1mg/L、Cd0.3mg/L未満、Hg0.005mg/L未満、Cr(VI)0.2mg/L未満、As0.3mg/L未満、Se0.3mg/L未満であった。
実施例3
炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰B100重量部に、水20重量部及び75重量%リン酸(H3PO4)水溶液1.3重量部を添加し、乳鉢で10分間混練したのち、溶出試験を行った。pH11.0、Pb0.3mg/L未満、Cd0.3mg/L未満、Hg0.005mg/L未満、Cr(VI)0.2mg/L未満、As0.3mg/L未満、Se0.3mg/L未満であった。
実施例4
炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰B100重量部に、水20重量部及びリン酸水素二ナトリウム(Na2HPO4)1重量部を添加し、乳鉢で10分間混練したのち、溶出試験を行った。pH11.5、Pb0.3mg/L、Cd0.3mg/L未満、Hg0.005mg/L未満、Cr(VI)0.2mg/L未満、As0.3mg/L未満、Se0.3mg/L未満であった。
実施例5
リン酸水素二ナトリウムの添加量を2重量部とした以外は、実施例4と同じ操作を行った。pH11.3、Pb0.3mg/L未満、Cd0.3mg/L未満、Hg0.005mg/L未満、Cr(VI)0.2mg/L未満、As0.3mg/L未満、Se0.3mg/L未満であった。
比較例5
炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰B100重量部に、水20重量部及びキレート剤[栗田工業(株)、アッシュナイトS803]1重量部を添加し、乳鉢で10分間混練したのち、溶出試験を行った。Pb1.0mg/Lであった。
比較例6
キレート剤の添加量を2重量部とした以外は、比較例5と同じ操作を行った。Pb0.4mg/Lであった。
比較例7
キレート剤の添加量を3重量部とした以外は、比較例5と同じ操作を行った。Pb0.3mg/L未満であった。
実施例3〜4及び比較例4〜7の結果を、第3表に示す。
As can be seen in Table 2, in Comparative Examples 2 to 3 in which a chelating agent was added to the sodium hydrogen carbonate treated ash A and kneaded, the elution concentrations of Cr (VI), As and Se were the same as those in Comparative Example 1. In Examples 1 and 2 in which phosphoric acid and iron (II) chloride were added and kneaded, the elution concentration of all heavy metals was below the landfill standard value, although it hardly decreased as compared with the treated ash.
Comparative Example 4
The dissolution test was performed on the sodium bicarbonate-treated ash B. pH 11.8, Pb 1.1 mg / L, Cd less than 0.3 mg / L, Hg less than 0.005 mg / L, Cr (VI) less than 0.2 mg / L, As less than 0.3 mg / L, Se less than 0.3 mg / L. It was.
Example 3
20 parts by weight of water and 1.3 parts by weight of a 75% by weight aqueous solution of phosphoric acid (H 3 PO 4 ) were added to 100 parts by weight of sodium bicarbonate-treated ash B, kneaded in a mortar for 10 minutes, and then subjected to an elution test. pH 11.0, Pb less than 0.3 mg / L, Cd less than 0.3 mg / L, Hg less than 0.005 mg / L, Cr (VI) less than 0.2 mg / L, As less than 0.3 mg / L, Se less than 0.3 mg / L there were.
Example 4
20 parts by weight of water and 1 part by weight of disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na 2 HPO 4 ) were added to 100 parts by weight of sodium bicarbonate-treated ash B and kneaded in a mortar for 10 minutes, and then an elution test was performed. pH 11.5, Pb 0.3 mg / L, Cd less than 0.3 mg / L, Hg less than 0.005 mg / L, Cr (VI) less than 0.2 mg / L, As less than 0.3 mg / L, Se less than 0.3 mg / L. It was.
Example 5
The same operation as in Example 4 was performed except that the amount of disodium hydrogen phosphate added was 2 parts by weight. pH11.3, Pb less than 0.3 mg / L, Cd less than 0.3 mg / L, Hg less than 0.005 mg / L, Cr (VI) less than 0.2 mg / L, As less than 0.3 mg / L, Se less than 0.3 mg / L there were.
Comparative Example 5
20 parts by weight of water and 1 part by weight of a chelating agent [Kurita Kogyo Co., Ltd., Ashnite S803] were added to 100 parts by weight of sodium bicarbonate-treated ash B, and after kneading in a mortar for 10 minutes, an elution test was performed. Pb was 1.0 mg / L.
Comparative Example 6
The same operation as Comparative Example 5 was performed except that the amount of the chelating agent added was 2 parts by weight. Pb was 0.4 mg / L.
Comparative Example 7
The same operation as Comparative Example 5 was performed except that the addition amount of the chelating agent was 3 parts by weight. Pb was less than 0.3 mg / L.
The results of Examples 3 to 4 and Comparative Examples 4 to 7 are shown in Table 3.

Figure 2006110423
Figure 2006110423

第3表に見られるように、炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰Bに、リン酸又はリン酸水素二ナトリウムを添加し、混練した実施例3〜5では、リン酸は灰100重量部に対して1重量部の添加によりPbの溶出濃度0.3mg/L未満となり、リン酸水素二ナトリウムは灰100重量部に対して1重量部では、Pbはちょうど埋立基準値の0.3mg/Lとなり、灰100重量部に対して2重量部の添加で、Pb0.3mg/L未満となる。炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰Bに、キレート剤を添加し、混練した比較例5〜7では、キレート剤の添加量を灰100重量部に対して3重量部まで増やさないと、Pb0.3mg/L未満とならない。
比較例8
消石灰処理灰Cについて、溶出試験を行った。pH12.5、Pb100mg/L、Cd0.3mg/L未満、Hg0.03mg/L、Cr(VI)2.0mg/L、As0.3mg/L未満、Se0.3mg/L未満であった。
比較例9
消石灰処理灰C100重量部に、水20重量部及びキレート剤[栗田工業(株)、アッシュナイトS803]5重量部を添加し、乳鉢で10分間混練したのち、溶出試験を行った。Pb40mg/L、Cr(VI)1.8mg/Lであった。
比較例10
キレート剤の添加量を10重量部とした以外は、比較例9と同じ操作を行った。Cr(VI)1.8mg/Lであった。
比較例11
消石灰処理灰C100重量部に、水20重量部及び75重量%リン酸(H3PO4)水溶液と30重量%塩化鉄(II)(FeCl2)水溶液との重量比5:5混合液9.5重量部を添加し、乳鉢で10分間混練したのち、溶出試験を行った。Pb22mg/L、Hg0.009mg/Lであった。
比較例12
リン酸水溶液と塩化鉄(II)水溶液の混合液の添加量を19重量部とした以外は、比較例11と同じ操作を行った。Pb0.3mg/L未満、Hg0.005mg/L未満であった。
比較例8〜12の結果を、第4表に示す。
As can be seen in Table 3, in Examples 3 to 5 in which phosphoric acid or disodium hydrogen phosphate was added to the sodium bicarbonate-treated ash B and kneaded, phosphoric acid was 1 weight per 100 parts by weight of the ash. Pb elution concentration is less than 0.3 mg / L, and disodium hydrogen phosphate is 1 part by weight with respect to 100 parts by weight of ash, and Pb is just 0.3 mg / L of the landfill standard value. Addition of 2 parts by weight with respect to parts by weight results in a Pb of less than 0.3 mg / L. In Comparative Examples 5 to 7 in which a chelating agent was added to and kneaded with sodium hydrogen carbonate-treated ash B, the amount of the chelating agent was not increased to 3 parts by weight with respect to 100 parts by weight of ash, and less than Pb 0.3 mg / L Not.
Comparative Example 8
About the slaked lime processing ash C, the elution test was done. The pH was 12.5, Pb 100 mg / L, Cd less than 0.3 mg / L, Hg 0.03 mg / L, Cr (VI) 2.0 mg / L, As less than 0.3 mg / L, and Se less than 0.3 mg / L.
Comparative Example 9
To 100 parts by weight of slaked lime-treated ash C, 20 parts by weight of water and 5 parts by weight of a chelating agent [Kurita Kogyo Co., Ltd., Ashnite S803] were added and kneaded in a mortar for 10 minutes, and then an elution test was performed. Pb was 40 mg / L and Cr (VI) was 1.8 mg / L.
Comparative Example 10
The same operation as Comparative Example 9 was performed except that the addition amount of the chelating agent was 10 parts by weight. The Cr (VI) was 1.8 mg / L.
Comparative Example 11
9. A 5: 5 mixture of 20 parts by weight of water and 75% by weight aqueous solution of phosphoric acid (H 3 PO 4 ) and 30% by weight aqueous solution of iron (II) chloride (FeCl 2 ) in 100 parts by weight of slaked lime ash C After adding 5 parts by weight and kneading in a mortar for 10 minutes, an elution test was conducted. Pb was 22 mg / L and Hg was 0.009 mg / L.
Comparative Example 12
The same operation as in Comparative Example 11 was performed except that the addition amount of the mixed solution of the phosphoric acid aqueous solution and the iron (II) chloride aqueous solution was 19 parts by weight. Pb was less than 0.3 mg / L and Hg was less than 0.005 mg / L.
The results of Comparative Examples 8 to 12 are shown in Table 4.

Figure 2006110423
Figure 2006110423

第4表に見られるように、消石灰処理灰Cに、キレート剤を添加し、混練した比較例9〜10では、Cr(VI)の溶出濃度が埋立基準値の1.5mg/Lまで低下しない。リン酸と塩化鉄(II)を添加し、混練した比較例11〜12では、灰100重量部に対する添加量が5重量部ではPbとHgの溶出濃度が高く、添加量を10重量部にしてはじめて全ての重金属の溶出濃度が埋立基準値を満たす。
比較例13
消石灰処理灰Dについて、溶出試験を行った。pH12.6、Pb27mg/L、Cd0.3mg/L未満、Hg0.005mg/L未満、Cr(VI)0.2mg/L未満、As0.3mg/L未満、Se0.3mg/L未満であった。
比較例14
消石灰処理灰D100重量部に、水20重量部及び75重量%リン酸(H3PO4)水溶液4重量部を添加し、乳鉢で10分間混練したのち、溶出試験を行った。Pb3.1mg/Lであった。
比較例15
75重量%リン酸水溶液の添加量を6.7重量部とした以外は、比較例14と同じ操作を行った。Pb0.34mg/Lであった。
比較例16
消石灰処理灰D100重量部に、水20重量部及びキレート剤[栗田工業(株)、アッシュナイトS803]2重量部を添加し、乳鉢で10分間混練したのち、溶出試験を行った。pH12.6、Pb0.3mg/L未満、Cd0.3mg/L未満、Hg0.005mg/L未満、Cr(VI)0.2mg/L未満、As0.3mg/L未満、Se0.3mg/L未満であった。
比較例13〜16の結果を、第5表に示す。
As seen in Table 4, in Comparative Examples 9 to 10 in which a chelating agent was added to the slaked lime-treated ash C and kneaded, the elution concentration of Cr (VI) did not decrease to the landfill reference value of 1.5 mg / L. . In Comparative Examples 11 to 12 in which phosphoric acid and iron (II) chloride were added and kneaded, the elution concentration of Pb and Hg was high when the addition amount with respect to 100 parts by weight of ash was 5 parts by weight, and the addition amount was 10 parts by weight. For the first time, the elution concentration of all heavy metals satisfies the landfill standard value.
Comparative Example 13
About the slaked lime processing ash D, the elution test was done. The pH was 12.6, Pb 27 mg / L, Cd less than 0.3 mg / L, Hg less than 0.005 mg / L, Cr (VI) less than 0.2 mg / L, As less than 0.3 mg / L, and Se less than 0.3 mg / L.
Comparative Example 14
20 parts by weight of water and 4 parts by weight of a 75% by weight aqueous solution of phosphoric acid (H 3 PO 4 ) were added to 100 parts by weight of slaked lime-treated ash D, and after kneading in a mortar for 10 minutes, an elution test was conducted. Pb was 3.1 mg / L.
Comparative Example 15
The same operation as in Comparative Example 14 was performed except that the addition amount of the 75 wt% phosphoric acid aqueous solution was changed to 6.7 parts by weight. Pb was 0.34 mg / L.
Comparative Example 16
20 parts by weight of water and 2 parts by weight of a chelating agent [Kurita Kogyo Co., Ltd., Ashnite S803] were added to 100 parts by weight of slaked lime-treated ash D, and after kneading in a mortar for 10 minutes, an elution test was performed. pH 12.6, Pb less than 0.3 mg / L, Cd less than 0.3 mg / L, Hg less than 0.005 mg / L, Cr (VI) less than 0.2 mg / L, As less than 0.3 mg / L, Se less than 0.3 mg / L there were.
The results of Comparative Examples 13 to 16 are shown in Table 5.

Figure 2006110423
Figure 2006110423

第5表に見られるように、消石灰処理灰Dにリン酸を添加し、混練した比較例14〜15では、リン酸の添加量を灰100重量部に対して5重量部としても、Pbの溶出濃度が0.34mg/Lまでしか低下しない。これに対して、灰100重量部に対してキレート剤2重量部を添加した比較例16では、全ての重金属の溶出濃度が埋立基準値を満たしている。   As seen in Table 5, in Comparative Examples 14 to 15 in which phosphoric acid was added to the slaked lime-treated ash D and kneaded, the addition amount of phosphoric acid was 5 parts by weight with respect to 100 parts by weight of ash. The elution concentration decreases only to 0.34 mg / L. On the other hand, in Comparative Example 16 in which 2 parts by weight of the chelating agent was added to 100 parts by weight of ash, the elution concentration of all heavy metals satisfied the landfill standard value.

第1表に見られるように、炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰Bと消石灰処理灰Dの成分含有量は、ほぼ同程度である。しかし、第3表の実施例3に見られるように、炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰B100重量部に対してリン酸1重量部を添加することにより、全ての重金属の溶出濃度が埋立基準値を満たすのに対して、第5表の比較例15に見られるように、消石灰処理灰D100重量部に対してリン酸5重量部を添加しても、Pbの溶出濃度の埋立基準値が満たされない。この結果から、炭酸水素ナトリウムを煙道に添加して酸性ガスを処理する排ガス処理施設から発生する灰に対しては、リン酸が特異的に重金属の溶出防止効果を発揮することが分かる。   As can be seen from Table 1, the component content of the sodium bicarbonate-treated ash B and the slaked lime-treated ash D are substantially the same. However, as seen in Example 3 of Table 3, by adding 1 part by weight of phosphoric acid to 100 parts by weight of sodium bicarbonate-treated ash B, the elution concentration of all heavy metals satisfies the landfill standard value. On the other hand, as seen in Comparative Example 15 in Table 5, even when 5 parts by weight of phosphoric acid is added to 100 parts by weight of slaked lime-treated ash D, the landfill reference value for the elution concentration of Pb is not satisfied. From this result, it can be seen that phosphoric acid exhibits a heavy metal elution preventing effect specifically for ash generated from an exhaust gas treatment facility that treats acidic gas by adding sodium bicarbonate to the flue.

第5表の比較例16に見られるように、消石灰処理灰D100重量部に対してキレート剤2重量部を添加することにより、全ての重金属の溶出濃度が埋立基準値を満たすのに対して、第3表の比較例6〜7に見られるように、炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰Bでは、灰100重量部に対してキレート剤2重量部では不十分で、全ての重金属の溶出濃度が埋立基準値を満たすためには、キレート剤3重量部の添加が必要である。この結果からも、炭酸水素ナトリウム処理灰と消石灰処理灰の間には、重金属溶出防止処理の効果において相違があることが分かる。   As seen in Comparative Example 16 in Table 5, by adding 2 parts by weight of chelating agent to 100 parts by weight of slaked lime-treated ash D, the elution concentration of all heavy metals satisfies the landfill standard value, As seen in Comparative Examples 6 to 7 in Table 3, with sodium bicarbonate-treated ash B, 2 parts by weight of chelating agent is insufficient with respect to 100 parts by weight of ash, and the elution concentration of all heavy metals is the landfill standard value. In order to satisfy the above, it is necessary to add 3 parts by weight of a chelating agent. This result also shows that there is a difference in the effect of the heavy metal elution prevention treatment between the sodium hydrogen carbonate treated ash and the slaked lime treated ash.

本発明の飛灰の処理方法によれば、炭酸水素ナトリウムを煙道に添加して酸性ガスを処理する排ガス処理施設から発生する飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合灰に対して、リン酸、リン酸塩及び鉄(II)塩より選ばれる1種以上を含む薬剤を添加、混合することにより、少ない量の薬剤の添加により、飛灰などからの重金属の溶出を効果的に防止することができる。   According to the fly ash treatment method of the present invention, phosphoric acid is used for fly ash, gas treatment residue, or mixed ash generated from an exhaust gas treatment facility in which sodium hydrogen carbonate is added to a flue to treat acid gas. By adding and mixing a chemical containing at least one selected from phosphate and iron (II) salt, it is possible to effectively prevent elution of heavy metals from fly ash by adding a small amount of chemical. Can do.

本発明方法の実施の一態様の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of 1 aspect of implementation of the method of this invention.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 ホッパー
2 二軸式混練機
3 造粒機
1 Hopper 2 Twin-screw kneader 3 Granulator

Claims (1)

炭酸水素ナトリウムを煙道に添加して酸性ガスを処理する排ガス処理施設から発生する飛灰、ガス処理残渣又はこれらの混合灰に対して、リン酸、リン酸塩及び鉄(II)塩より選ばれる1種以上を含む薬剤を添加、混合することを特徴とする飛灰の処理方法。   Select from phosphoric acid, phosphate and iron (II) salt for fly ash, gas treatment residue or mixed ash generated from an exhaust gas treatment facility that treats acid gas by adding sodium bicarbonate to the flue A method for treating fly ash, comprising adding and mixing a chemical containing at least one selected from the above.
JP2004298522A 2004-10-13 2004-10-13 Fly ash treatment method Active JP4830282B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004298522A JP4830282B2 (en) 2004-10-13 2004-10-13 Fly ash treatment method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004298522A JP4830282B2 (en) 2004-10-13 2004-10-13 Fly ash treatment method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006110423A true JP2006110423A (en) 2006-04-27
JP4830282B2 JP4830282B2 (en) 2011-12-07

Family

ID=36379382

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004298522A Active JP4830282B2 (en) 2004-10-13 2004-10-13 Fly ash treatment method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4830282B2 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011056495A (en) * 2009-08-11 2011-03-24 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method for preventing elution of heavy metal
JP2012066158A (en) * 2010-09-21 2012-04-05 Swing Corp Method for stabilizing collected dust ash
JP2012205999A (en) * 2011-03-29 2012-10-25 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method for treating heavy metal-containing solid
JP2013193039A (en) * 2012-03-21 2013-09-30 Swing Corp Heavy metal fixing agent used for incineration fly ash and stabilization treatment method of the incineration fly ash
JP2014008420A (en) * 2012-06-27 2014-01-20 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method for treating fly ash and the like and method for determining additive amount of iron salt using for treating fly ash and the like
CN112547762A (en) * 2020-11-23 2021-03-26 杭州联体消修化工有限公司 Treatment process for treating fly ash and fly ash by using waste to treat waste by using industrial waste acid
WO2021079824A1 (en) * 2019-10-24 2021-04-29 Agc株式会社 Exhaust gas treatment method

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09155319A (en) * 1995-12-13 1997-06-17 Takeo Tsutsui Method for processing for making heavy metal-containing incineration ash, etc., and shredder dust pollution-free and manufacture of reuse material
JPH09299905A (en) * 1996-05-15 1997-11-25 Kanegafuchi Chem Ind Co Ltd Harmful waste treating agent and its treatment
JP2003088831A (en) * 2001-09-19 2003-03-25 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method of treating alkaline component-containing fly ash
JP2003251303A (en) * 2002-03-04 2003-09-09 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method for decomposing dioxins
JP2004066202A (en) * 2002-08-09 2004-03-04 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Treating agent for waste containing dioxins and heavy metal, treatment method of exhasut gas and fly ash, and treatment method of fly ash

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09155319A (en) * 1995-12-13 1997-06-17 Takeo Tsutsui Method for processing for making heavy metal-containing incineration ash, etc., and shredder dust pollution-free and manufacture of reuse material
JPH09299905A (en) * 1996-05-15 1997-11-25 Kanegafuchi Chem Ind Co Ltd Harmful waste treating agent and its treatment
JP2003088831A (en) * 2001-09-19 2003-03-25 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method of treating alkaline component-containing fly ash
JP2003251303A (en) * 2002-03-04 2003-09-09 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method for decomposing dioxins
JP2004066202A (en) * 2002-08-09 2004-03-04 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Treating agent for waste containing dioxins and heavy metal, treatment method of exhasut gas and fly ash, and treatment method of fly ash

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011056495A (en) * 2009-08-11 2011-03-24 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method for preventing elution of heavy metal
JP2012066158A (en) * 2010-09-21 2012-04-05 Swing Corp Method for stabilizing collected dust ash
JP2012205999A (en) * 2011-03-29 2012-10-25 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method for treating heavy metal-containing solid
JP2013193039A (en) * 2012-03-21 2013-09-30 Swing Corp Heavy metal fixing agent used for incineration fly ash and stabilization treatment method of the incineration fly ash
JP2014008420A (en) * 2012-06-27 2014-01-20 Kurita Water Ind Ltd Method for treating fly ash and the like and method for determining additive amount of iron salt using for treating fly ash and the like
WO2021079824A1 (en) * 2019-10-24 2021-04-29 Agc株式会社 Exhaust gas treatment method
CN112547762A (en) * 2020-11-23 2021-03-26 杭州联体消修化工有限公司 Treatment process for treating fly ash and fly ash by using waste to treat waste by using industrial waste acid

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4830282B2 (en) 2011-12-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5807349B2 (en) Detoxification method for solid waste containing heavy metals
JP2007260613A (en) Method of treating ashes containing heavy metal
JP4830282B2 (en) Fly ash treatment method
JP5842423B2 (en) Detoxification method for solid waste containing heavy metals
JP4893059B2 (en) Treatment method of exhaust gas and fly ash from incineration facilities
JP5652293B2 (en) Method for processing heavy metal-containing solids
JPH09299905A (en) Harmful waste treating agent and its treatment
JP3271534B2 (en) Method for treating ash containing lead, hexavalent chromium, arsenic and selenium
JP2006015290A (en) Fixing method for heavy metal in fly ash using no mixing nor kneading apparatus
JP2012066158A (en) Method for stabilizing collected dust ash
JP2008272591A (en) Method for treating ashes containing heavy metal
JP3402535B2 (en) Treatment of alkaline fly ash
JP2008200628A (en) Heavy metal treatment agent and method for treating material contaminated with heavy metal using the same
JP6034011B2 (en) Heavy metal insolubilizer and method for insolubilizing heavy metal
JP2020049430A (en) Processor and processing method of fly ashes
JP4119534B2 (en) Metal and dioxin and / or organochlorine compound simultaneous treating agent and processing method
JP4702874B2 (en) Heavy metal-containing waste treatment agent and heavy metal-containing waste treatment method
JPH10113634A (en) Solidification treatment of flying ashes
JP6606132B2 (en) Radiocesium removal method and treatment facility
JPH09122620A (en) Material for waste treatment and method for waste treatment
JP5352339B2 (en) Chemical treatment method for molten fly ash
JPH01262978A (en) Method for immoblizing lead and cadmium in solid residue generated by incineration of waste using lime and phosphate
JP4259270B2 (en) Incineration main ash treatment method
JP6850500B1 (en) Composite treatment agent and composite treatment method
JP4442890B2 (en) Waste disposal method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20071004

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20100126

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100205

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20100405

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20101208

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20110207

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20110823

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20110905

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4830282

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140930

Year of fee payment: 3