JP2006092351A - Graphic arrangement apparatus, graphic arrangement method and program making computer execute its method - Google Patents

Graphic arrangement apparatus, graphic arrangement method and program making computer execute its method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2006092351A
JP2006092351A JP2004278178A JP2004278178A JP2006092351A JP 2006092351 A JP2006092351 A JP 2006092351A JP 2004278178 A JP2004278178 A JP 2004278178A JP 2004278178 A JP2004278178 A JP 2004278178A JP 2006092351 A JP2006092351 A JP 2006092351A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
priority
arrangement
base material
nesting
members
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2004278178A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4593218B2 (en
Inventor
Hiroaki Shibata
裕章 柴田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority to JP2004278178A priority Critical patent/JP4593218B2/en
Publication of JP2006092351A publication Critical patent/JP2006092351A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4593218B2 publication Critical patent/JP4593218B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To obtain a graphic arrangement method capable of easily setting a cutting path and storing and managing processed data and capable of simplifying work for processing in a processing device based on an arrangement result obtained through one and the same process in arranging members over a plurality of base materials. <P>SOLUTION: Arrangement for cutting the required members from the base materials involves: firstly calculating the arrangement of nesting in favor of yield to obtain the number of required base materials; and arranging the members on the base materials so that a plurality of base materials may have the same arrangement state as that of the members having the number of base materials or below in number. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

この発明は、レーザ加工機、ウォータジェット加工機、プラズマ切断機、タレットパンチプレス加工機、裁断装置などの複数個の部材を母材から切り抜き切断加工する加工装置を動作させる加工データを生成する図形配置装置、図形配置方法およびその方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムに関するものである。   The present invention is a figure for generating processing data for operating a processing device for cutting and cutting a plurality of members from a base material such as a laser processing machine, a water jet processing machine, a plasma cutting machine, a turret punch press processing machine, and a cutting apparatus. The present invention relates to an arrangement device, a figure arrangement method, and a program for causing a computer to execute the method.

従来、母材から切り抜く部材を母材に配置する部材配置方法として種々のものが提案されている。たとえば、第1の従来技術として、自動プログラミング装置での部材配置において母材(定尺材)に板取りする部材(単品)を配置する際の歩留りを向上させる部材配置方法が知られている(たとえば、特許文献1参照)。通常、このような部材配置方法においては、歩留り率を向上させるために、図形を適宜回転させた状態のものや、さらに表裏の区別を考慮しなくてもよい加工方法や材料の場合には図形を裏返し反転させた状態のものまでも判断の範囲に入れて、効率的な図形配置結果を求めている。また、第2の従来技術として、部材に納期などの優先順位を設定し、優先順位の高い部材から先にネスティング(Nesting:入れ子構造)配置する部材配置方法が知られている(たとえば、特許文献2参照)。   2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, various member arrangement methods for arranging a member cut out from a base material on the base material have been proposed. For example, as a first conventional technique, there is known a member arrangement method for improving the yield when arranging a member (single item) to be cut off on a base material (fixed length material) in a member arrangement in an automatic programming device ( For example, see Patent Document 1). Usually, in such a member arrangement method, in order to improve the yield rate, the figure is in a state in which the figure is appropriately rotated, or in the case of a processing method or material that does not need to consider the distinction between the front and back sides. Even those in the state of being reversed and reversed are included in the judgment range, and an efficient figure layout result is obtained. Further, as a second prior art, there is known a member arrangement method in which priorities such as delivery dates are set for members, and nesting (Nesting) is arranged first from members with higher priorities (for example, Patent Documents) 2).

特開平4−63616号公報JP-A-4-63616 特開平8−297503号公報JP-A-8-297503

図19は、部材の形状とその必要個数を示す図であり、図20は、図19に示される部材を3枚の母材に従来の部材配置方法で配置した一例を示す図であり、図21は、図20の母材200Aに対して生成した切断経路の一例を示す図である。従来の部材配置方法では、材料(母材)200A〜200Cの使用効率を最優先にして、つまり配置歩留り率を高くすることを優先し、またはそれに納期などの優先順位に対する考慮を加えて、部材201A〜201Fの配置を行っている。そのため、たとえば部材201A〜201Fの配置が複数枚の母材200A〜200Cにわたる際にその配置結果が、それぞれの母材200A〜200Cで異なるものとなる場合が多い。たとえば、図20では、配置歩留り率を高くして配置した結果を示すものであるとすると、3枚の母材200A〜200Cのそれぞれにおいて、部材201A〜201Fの配置状態が異なっている。   FIG. 19 is a diagram showing the shape of members and the required number thereof, and FIG. 20 is a diagram showing an example in which the members shown in FIG. 19 are arranged on three base materials by a conventional member arrangement method. 21 is a diagram illustrating an example of a cutting path generated for the base material 200A of FIG. In the conventional member arrangement method, the use efficiency of the materials (base materials) 200 </ b> A to 200 </ b> C is given top priority, that is, priority is given to increasing the placement yield rate, or priority is given to the delivery date, etc. The arrangement of 201A to 201F is performed. For this reason, for example, when the arrangement of the members 201A to 201F extends over a plurality of base materials 200A to 200C, the arrangement results are often different for the respective base materials 200A to 200C. For example, in FIG. 20, assuming that the arrangement yield ratio is increased, the arrangement state of the members 201A to 201F is different in each of the three base materials 200A to 200C.

このようにして得られた配置結果に基づいて、レーザ加工機、ウォータジェット加工機、プラズマ切断機、タレットパンチプレス加工機、裁断装置などの加工装置で部材201A〜201Fを切り抜き切断加工するための図21に示されるような切断経路Lを含む加工データが生成され、さらにその加工データが保管管理される。しかし、部材配置方法によって求められた複数の母材200A〜200Cにおける配置結果は、上述したようにそれぞれ異なるものであるので、同時に配置処理された母材200A〜200Cであっても、それぞれの母材200A〜200Cに対して切断経路Lの設定やこの切断経路Lを含む加工データの保管管理をしなければならないという問題点があった。   Based on the arrangement result thus obtained, the members 201A to 201F are cut and cut by a processing device such as a laser processing machine, a water jet processing machine, a plasma cutting machine, a turret punch press processing machine, or a cutting apparatus. Machining data including the cutting path L as shown in FIG. 21 is generated, and the machining data is stored and managed. However, since the placement results of the plurality of base materials 200A to 200C obtained by the member placement method are different as described above, even if the base materials 200A to 200C are simultaneously placed, There is a problem that the cutting path L must be set and the processing data including the cutting path L must be managed for the materials 200A to 200C.

また、加工装置の操作上においても、複数枚の母材200A〜200Cを載せ変えて全ての部材201A〜201Fを加工するが、たとえ全ての母材が同じ大きさであっても使用すべき加工データが異なるために母材200A〜200Cを載せ変える度に加工データの呼び出し作業を実施しなければならないという問題点もあった。   Also, in the operation of the processing apparatus, a plurality of base materials 200A to 200C are transferred to process all the members 201A to 201F. However, even if all the base materials have the same size, processing to be used Since the data is different, there is also a problem that the work data must be called every time the base materials 200A to 200C are replaced.

この発明は、上記に鑑みてなされたもので、部材を複数枚の母材にわたって配置する際に、切断経路の設定や加工データの保管管理を容易にするとともに、同一の工程で得られた配置結果に基づいて加工装置における加工処理の作業を簡略化することができる図形配置装置、図形配置方法およびその方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムを得ることを目的とする。   The present invention has been made in view of the above, and facilitates setting of a cutting path and storage management of processing data when a member is disposed over a plurality of base materials, and is obtained in the same process. It is an object of the present invention to obtain a graphic arrangement device, a graphic arrangement method, and a program for causing a computer to execute the graphic arrangement method that can simplify the processing operation in the processing apparatus based on the result.

上記目的を達成するため、この発明にかかる図形配置装置は、入力される部材の種類と個数を含む情報に基づいて前記部材を所定の母材に歩留り優先のネスティング配置を行う歩留り優先ネスティング手段と、前記歩留り優先ネスティング手段によって得られる配置結果から、前記部材を配置するのに必要な必要母材枚数と、前記母材中の前記部材が配置されない領域である有効活用領域の面積とを含む配置状態情報を求める配置状態確認手段と、配置すべき部材のうち、部材が均等に配置される均等配置母材に割り当てる部材の種類と個数を計算する部材均等配分計算手段と、前記配置状態確認手段によって求められる、配置すべき部材を歩留り優先で配置した場合の歩留り優先配置状態情報と、前記部材を母材に均等配分優先で配置した場合の均等配分優先配置状態情報とを比較して、均等配分を優先した配置結果が適切か否かを判定する配置状態比較判定手段と、を備え、前記歩留り優先ネスティング手段は、配置すべき部材の種類と個数を含む必要部材情報に基づいて行う第1のネスティング配置処理と、前記部材均等配分計算手段によって算出された部材に基づいて前記均等配置母材に配置処理を行うとともに、前記均等配置母材に配置されなかった余りの部材を前記均等配置母材以外の残余配置母材に歩留り優先のネスティング配置処理を行う第2のネスティング配置処理とを行い、前記部材均等配分計算手段は、前記第1のネスティング配置処理の配置結果に基づく前記配置状態確認手段によって求められた必要母材枚数を、前記均等配置母材枚数として設定し、前記配置状態比較判定手段は、判定の結果、前記第2のネスティング配置処理による配置結果が適切でない場合に前記均等配置母材枚数から1を減算した値を新たな均等配置母材枚数として前記部材均等配分計算手段に設定することを特徴とする。   In order to achieve the above object, a graphic layout apparatus according to the present invention comprises yield priority nesting means for performing yield priority nesting layout on a predetermined base material based on information including the type and number of members input. An arrangement including the necessary number of base materials necessary for arranging the members and the area of the effective use area, which is an area in which the members are not arranged, from the arrangement result obtained by the yield priority nesting means Arrangement state confirmation means for obtaining state information, among the members to be arranged, member equal distribution calculation means for calculating the type and number of members to be allocated to an evenly arranged base material on which the members are evenly arranged, and the arrangement state confirmation means Yield priority placement state information when the members to be placed are placed with priority on yield, and the members are placed on the base material with priority on even distribution. The distribution priority comparison nesting means for determining whether or not the arrangement result giving priority to the equal distribution is appropriate, and the yield priority nesting means is a member to be arranged. A first nesting arrangement process performed based on necessary member information including the type and number of elements, and an arrangement process performed on the uniform arrangement base material based on the member calculated by the member equal distribution calculation means, and the equal arrangement A second nesting arrangement process for performing a yield priority nesting arrangement process on the remaining arrangement matrix other than the uniform arrangement matrix, and the member equal distribution calculation means, The necessary number of base materials obtained by the placement state confirmation means based on the placement result of the first nesting placement processing is set as the number of evenly placed base materials, The arrangement state comparison / determination means determines that the result of the determination is that the result of the second nesting arrangement process is not appropriate, and that the value obtained by subtracting 1 from the number of uniformly arranged base materials is used as the new number of uniformly arranged base materials. It is set in the distribution calculation means.

この発明によれば、母材上への部材の配置パターンを均一化することにより、切断経路を設定する処理や加工データを生成する処理、さらに加工データを運用したり保管管理したりする作業の手間を削減することができるという効果を有する。   According to the present invention, by uniformizing the arrangement pattern of members on the base material, processing for setting a cutting path, processing for generating processing data, and operations for operating and storing the processing data. There is an effect that labor can be reduced.

以下に添付図面を参照して、この発明にかかる図形配置装置、図形配置方法およびその方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムの好適な実施の形態を詳細に説明する。   Exemplary embodiments of a graphic arrangement device, a graphic arrangement method, and a program for causing a computer to execute the method according to the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.

実施の形態1.
図1は、この発明にかかる図形配置装置の概略構成を示すブロック図である。図形配置装置10は、母材と母材から切り出される部材の形状などの情報である図形データを格納する図形データ格納部11と、入力される図形データに基づいて母材の歩留りを優先してネスティング配置処理を行う歩留り優先ネスティング部12と、複数の部材を複数の母材に均等に配分する計算処理を行う部材均等配分計算部13と、歩留り優先ネスティング部12によって出力された結果から母材の枚数と使用状況を確認する配置状態確認部14と、歩留り優先でネスティングした場合と部材の均等配分を優先でネスティングした場合の母材の使用状況を比較して部材の配置が適切か否かを判定する配置状態比較判定部15と、配置状態比較判定部15によって適切と判定された配置結果に基づいて母材の加工情報を作成する加工情報生成部16と、生成した加工情報を格納する加工情報格納部17と、この装置の使用者による各種のデータなどの入力を行う際のインタフェースとなる入力部18と、配置結果や加工情報を表示したり印刷したりする出力部19と、これらの各処理部を制御する制御部20と、を備えて構成される。
Embodiment 1 FIG.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a schematic configuration of a graphic arrangement device according to the present invention. The graphic placement device 10 gives priority to the yield of the base material based on the graphic data storage unit 11 for storing the base material and the shape data such as the shape of the member cut out from the base material, and the input graphic data. Yield priority nesting unit 12 that performs nesting arrangement processing, member equal distribution calculation unit 13 that performs calculation processing for evenly distributing a plurality of members to a plurality of base materials, and the base material from the results output by the yield priority nesting unit 12 The arrangement state confirmation unit 14 for confirming the number of sheets and the usage status, and whether or not the arrangement of the members is appropriate by comparing the usage status of the base material when nesting with yield priority and nesting with equal distribution priority The processing information for creating the processing information of the base material based on the arrangement result determined to be appropriate by the arrangement state comparison determination unit 15 and the arrangement state comparison determination unit 15 The forming unit 16, the processing information storage unit 17 for storing the generated processing information, the input unit 18 serving as an interface for inputting various data by the user of the apparatus, and the arrangement result and processing information are displayed. And an output unit 19 that performs printing and printing, and a control unit 20 that controls each of these processing units.

歩留り優先ネスティング部12は、与えられた部材に基づいて、母材上に部材を歩留り率優先でネスティング配置処理を行う機能を有する。この歩留り優先ネスティング部12の処理は、公知の歩留り優先ネスティング方法によって実現することができる。この歩留り優先ネスティング部12は、入力部18から使用者によって必要な部材の種類と個数を含む必要部材情報が入力されると、歩留り優先のネスティング処理を実行する。この処理は、特許請求の範囲における第1のネスティング配置処理に対応する。また、部材均等配分計算部13によって均等に部材を配分する母材の枚数と部材の個数が入力されると、その母材にその部材を歩留り優先のネスティング配置処理を行うとともに、その結果配置できなかった部材と均等配分する母材に割り当てられなかった部材とを他の母材に歩留り優先のネスティング処理を実行する。この処理は、特許請求の範囲における第2のネスティング配置処理に対応する。   The yield priority nesting unit 12 has a function of performing a nesting arrangement process on a base material with a yield ratio priority based on a given member. The processing of the yield priority nesting unit 12 can be realized by a known yield priority nesting method. The yield priority nesting unit 12 executes yield priority nesting processing when necessary member information including the type and number of necessary members is input from the input unit 18 by the user. This process corresponds to the first nesting arrangement process in the claims. Further, when the number of base materials and the number of members to which the members are evenly distributed are input by the member uniform distribution calculating unit 13, the members are placed on the base material and the nesting arrangement processing with priority on yield is performed, and as a result, the placement can be performed. The member that has not been allocated and the member that has not been allocated to the base material to be equally distributed are performed on other base materials, and the priority nesting process is executed. This process corresponds to the second nesting arrangement process in the claims.

配置状態確認部14は、すべての部材が配置された母材の枚数である必要母材枚数Nと母材の使用状況である母材の有効活用領域の面積Sを、歩留り優先ネスティング部12によって出力された配置結果から求め、その結果を配置状態情報として保持するものである。なお、ここで、母材の有効活用領域とは、母材の一部分に部材が配置され、それを切断した後の端材のことである。以下の説明では、必要部材情報に基づいて歩留り優先ネスティング部12が出力した配置結果から求められる配置状態情報を歩留り優先配置状態情報とし、その母材の枚数と有効活用領域の面積をそれぞれN0,S0とし、また、部材均等配分計算部13によって計算された母材に均等に配置する部材の種類と個数に基づいて歩留り優先ネスティング部12が出力した配置結果から求められる配置状態情報を均等配分優先配置状態情報とし、その母材の枚数と有効活用領域の面積をそれぞれN1,S1とする。 The placement state confirmation unit 14 uses the yield priority nesting unit 12 to calculate the required number of base materials N, which is the number of base materials on which all members are placed, and the area S of the base material effective use area, which is the use status of the base material. It is obtained from the output arrangement result and the result is held as arrangement state information. Here, the base material effective utilization region is an end material after a member is arranged on a part of the base material and cut. In the following description, the arrangement state information obtained from the arrangement result output by the yield priority nesting unit 12 based on the necessary member information is used as the yield priority arrangement state information, and the number of base materials and the area of the effective utilization area are each N 0. , S 0, and the arrangement state information obtained from the arrangement result output by the yield priority nesting unit 12 based on the type and number of members arranged uniformly on the base material calculated by the member uniform distribution calculation unit 13 is equalized. The distribution priority placement state information is used, and the number of base materials and the area of the effective use area are N 1 and S 1 , respectively.

図2−1〜図2−3は、有効活用領域の求め方の一例を示す図である。図2−1は、有効活用領域が矩形となるように直線状で母材を切断することを前提に面積を求める場合を示している。すなわち、この場合、配置された部材52a〜52cのうち母材50の長辺方向に最も突出している部分に切り代を加えた位置に引かれた直線a1で切断した場合の残りの母材50の面積Sが有効活用領域となる。また、図2−2は、所定の長さ以上の凹凸を判断基準として凹凸状に母材を切断することを前提に面積を求める場合を示している。すなわち、この場合、配置された部材52a〜52cのうち母材50の凹凸が所定の長さ以上ある場合に、その部材52b,52c材に切り代を加えた位置で切断するための線a2を引く。このときの残りの母材50の面積Sが有効活用領域となる。さらに、図2−3は、図2−2と同様に部材52a〜52cに所定の長さ以上の凹凸がある場合に、切断される部分に凹部を作らないようにして凹部分短絡状に母材50を切断することを前提に面積を求める場合を示している。つまり、図2−2において、部材52bと部材52cとの間に作られる切断線a2の凹部53をなくし、この部分を直線状に結んだ位置で切断するための線a3を引き、残りの母材50の面積Sが有効活用領域となる。なお、以上の図2−1〜図2−3は、有効活用領域を求める一例であり、他の方法を用いてもよい。 FIGS. 2-1 to 2-3 are diagrams illustrating an example of how to obtain an effective utilization area. FIG. 2-1 shows a case where the area is obtained on the assumption that the base material is cut in a straight line so that the effective use area is rectangular. That is, in this case, the remaining base material when cut by a straight line a 1 drawn at a position where a cutting margin is added to the portion of the arranged members 52a to 52c that protrudes most in the long side direction of the base material 50 An area S of 50 is an effective use area. FIG. 2-2 shows a case where the area is obtained on the assumption that the base material is cut into a concavo-convex shape with a concavo-convex length of a predetermined length or more as a criterion. That is, in this case, when the unevenness of the base material 50 is not less than a predetermined length among the arranged members 52a to 52c, a line a 2 for cutting at a position where a cutting margin is added to the members 52b and 52c. pull. The area S of the remaining base material 50 at this time is an effective utilization area. Further, FIG. 2-3 shows that when the members 52a to 52c have irregularities longer than a predetermined length as in FIG. The case where an area is calculated | required on the assumption that the material 50 is cut | disconnected is shown. That is, in FIG. 2-2, eliminating the recess 53 of the cutting line a2 to be created between the member 52b and the member 52c, draw a line a 3 to cut at a position that connects this part straight, remaining The area S of the base material 50 is an effective utilization area. In addition, the above FIGS. 2-1 to 2-3 are examples for obtaining the effective utilization area, and other methods may be used.

部材均等配分計算部13は、部材を均等に配置する母材(以下、均等配置母材という)の枚数(以下、均等配置母材枚数という)を所定の基準にしたがって設定するとともに、設定した枚数の母材に均等に配分する部材の数を求める計算処理を行う機能を有する。具体的には、最初に、使用者によって入力された必要部材情報を用いて歩留り優先ネスティング部12で出力された配置結果に基づいて配置状態確認部14によって得られた母材の枚数N0を、均等配置母材枚数Mに設定する。そして、各部材の数ni(iは部材の種類の数で、自然数であり、nも自然数である)をMで割った商Qi(Qは整数)をM枚の均等配置母材それぞれに配置する部材の数として割り当てる。そして、この結果を歩留り優先ネスティング部12に出力する。また、後述する配置状態比較判定部15によってその配置が適切でないと判定された場合には、配置状態比較判定部15によって得られる「M−1」を新たな均等配置母材枚数Mに設定し、上記と同様の処理を行う。 The member uniform distribution calculation unit 13 sets the number of base materials (hereinafter referred to as evenly arranged base materials) on which the members are evenly arranged according to a predetermined standard and sets the number of base materials. It has the function to perform the calculation process which calculates | requires the number of the members distributed equally to the base material. Specifically, first, the number N 0 of base materials obtained by the arrangement state confirmation unit 14 based on the arrangement result output by the yield priority nesting unit 12 using the necessary member information input by the user is obtained. , The number M of equally arranged base materials is set. Then, the quotient Qi (Q is an integer) obtained by dividing the number ni of each member (i is the number of member types, a natural number, and n is a natural number) by M is arranged on each of the M equally arranged base materials. Assign as the number of members. Then, this result is output to the yield priority nesting unit 12. In addition, when the arrangement state comparison / determination unit 15 described later determines that the arrangement is not appropriate, “M−1” obtained by the arrangement state comparison / determination unit 15 is set as a new uniform arrangement base material number M. The same processing as described above is performed.

配置状態比較判定部15は、歩留り優先での部材の配置結果である歩留り優先配置状態情報と、均等配分を優先した部材の配置結果である均等配分優先配置状態情報とを比較して、部材均等配分計算部13で計算した均等配分した部材の数に基づいて得られる配置結果が適切か否かを判定する機能を有する。具体的には、第1次判定として、均等配分優先配置状態情報の必要母材枚数N1が、歩留り優先配置状態情報の必要母材枚数N0以下であるか否かの判定を行い、この条件を満たす場合にさらに第2次判定として、均等配分優先配置状態情報の母材の有効活用領域の面積S1が、歩留り優先配置状態情報の母材の有効活用領域の面積S0と比較して所定の条件(たとえば、|S0−S1|≦C(Cは所定値))を満たすか否かの判定を行う。そして、これらの条件を満たす場合に、部材均等配分計算部13で計算した部材の数に基づいて得られる配置結果を、母材から部材を切り出す際の配置として適用する。一方、第1次判定を満たさない場合と、第1次判定を満たすが第2次判定を満たさない場合には、現在の均等配置母材枚数Mから1枚減数した値である「M−1」を、新たな均等配置母材枚数Mとして設定して部材均等配分計算部13にその結果を出力する。 The arrangement state comparison / determination unit 15 compares the yield priority arrangement state information, which is the result of arrangement of the members with priority on yield, and the equal distribution priority arrangement state information, which is the arrangement result of the members on which priority is given to uniform distribution, to equalize the members. It has a function of determining whether or not an arrangement result obtained based on the number of members equally distributed calculated by the distribution calculation unit 13 is appropriate. Specifically, as the primary determination, it is determined whether or not the required base material number N 1 of the uniform distribution priority placement state information is less than or equal to the required base material number N 0 of the yield priority placement state information. When the condition is satisfied, as a second determination, the area S 1 of the effective use area of the base material in the uniform distribution priority arrangement state information is compared with the area S 0 of the effective use area of the base material in the yield priority arrangement state information. Then, it is determined whether or not a predetermined condition (for example, | S 0 −S 1 | ≦ C (C is a predetermined value)) is satisfied. And when satisfy | filling these conditions, the arrangement | positioning result obtained based on the number of members calculated by the member equal distribution calculation part 13 is applied as arrangement | positioning at the time of cutting out a member from a base material. On the other hand, when the primary determination is not satisfied and when the primary determination is satisfied but the secondary determination is not satisfied, a value obtained by subtracting one from the current evenly arranged base material number M is “M−1”. ”Is set as the new evenly arranged base material number M and the result is output to the member uniform distribution calculating unit 13.

図形データ格納部11は、母材と部材のサイズや材質、形状などに関する図形データを格納する機能を有する。この図形データは、入力部18から使用者によって入力されたり、予め設定されていたりする。   The graphic data storage unit 11 has a function of storing graphic data relating to the size, material, shape, etc. of the base material and members. This graphic data is input by the user from the input unit 18 or preset.

加工情報生成部16は、配置状態比較判定部15によって決定された母材上の部材の配置結果に基づいて切断経路を求めて、切断条件を含む加工情報を生成する機能を有する。加工情報格納部17は、この加工情報生成部16によって生成された加工情報を格納する機能を有する。   The processing information generation unit 16 has a function of obtaining a cutting path based on the arrangement result of the members on the base material determined by the arrangement state comparison determination unit 15 and generating processing information including cutting conditions. The processing information storage unit 17 has a function of storing the processing information generated by the processing information generation unit 16.

入力部18は、図形配置装置10に所定の命令や図形データなどを入力する機能を有するもので、キーボードや、マウスなどのポインティングデバイスなどによって構成される。出力部19は、図形配置装置10によって生成された図形の配置結果や加工情報などを表示出力する機能を有するもので、CRT(Cathode Ray Tube)や液晶ディスプレイなどの表示装置のほか、プリンタなどの印刷装置によって構成される。   The input unit 18 has a function of inputting predetermined commands, graphic data, and the like to the graphic arrangement device 10 and is configured by a keyboard, a pointing device such as a mouse, and the like. The output unit 19 has a function of displaying and outputting the arrangement result and processing information of the graphic generated by the graphic arrangement device 10, in addition to a display device such as a CRT (Cathode Ray Tube) or a liquid crystal display, as well as a printer or the like. Consists of a printing device.

以上のような機能を有する図形配置装置10は、パーソナルコンピュータなどの情報処理装置によって構成することができる。図3は、図形配置装置の機能を有する情報処理装置のハードウェアの構成の一例を示すブロック図である。この情報処理装置100は、入力された各種データを基に部材の形状を定義した図形データを作成し、切断方向や切断条件を解析して切断情報などを生成するCPU(Central Processing Unit)101と、入力された各種データを記憶するとともに、一枚の母材上に形成する複数個の部材の図形データを描くことができ、かつ、配置パターンを均一化する機能を実現するのに必要なソフトウェアを格納するメモリ102と、切断情報や画面の表示内容などの印刷を行うプリンタやプロッタなどの印刷装置103と、定義済みの図形データや切断経路、切断条件、入力要求メッセージなどを画面に表示すると共に、一枚の母材上に形成する複数個の部材の図形データの全てを描くことができるCRT(Cathode Ray Tube)、液晶ディスプレイなどのディスプレイ104と、形状データや切断条件などの各種データを入力する入力手段としてのキーボード105と、ディスプレイ104に表示される図形やメニューの選択を行うポインティングデバイスとしてのマウス106と、定義済みの図形データを記憶するためのハードディスクドライブなどの外部記憶装置107とが、バスライン109によって接続されて構成される。また、バス109にはケーブルなどを介してレーザ加工機などの加工装置が接続される場合もある。   The graphic layout apparatus 10 having the functions as described above can be configured by an information processing apparatus such as a personal computer. FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an example of a hardware configuration of the information processing apparatus having the function of the graphic layout apparatus. This information processing apparatus 100 creates graphic data defining the shape of a member based on various types of input data, analyzes a cutting direction and cutting conditions, and generates cutting information and the like, and a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 101 Software required to realize the function of storing various input data and drawing graphic data of a plurality of members formed on one base material and making the arrangement pattern uniform , A printing apparatus 103 such as a printer or a plotter that prints cutting information and display contents of the screen, and predefined graphic data, cutting path, cutting condition, input request message, and the like are displayed on the screen. In addition, displays such as CRT (Cathode Ray Tube) and liquid crystal displays that can draw all of the graphic data of multiple members formed on a single base material. 104, a keyboard 105 as input means for inputting various data such as shape data and cutting conditions, a mouse 106 as a pointing device for selecting a figure and menu displayed on the display 104, and predefined figure data Is connected to an external storage device 107 such as a hard disk drive for storing the data via a bus line 109. In addition, a processing apparatus such as a laser processing machine may be connected to the bus 109 via a cable or the like.

つぎに、この発明にかかる図形配置方法の処理手順について、具体例を挙げながら説明する。図4は、この発明にかかる図形配置方法の処理の一例を示すフローチャートである。また、図5〜図9−2は、母材から切り出す部材の母材への配置状態の具体例を示す図であり、図5は、母材から切り出す部材の種類と個数を模式的に示す図であり、図6は、部材の元となる母材の形状を模式的に示す図であり、図7は、図5の部材を図6の母材に歩留り優先でネスティング配置計算処理を行った結果の一例を示す図であり、図8−1は、図5の部材を3枚の母材に均等に配置する場合の部材均等配分の計算方法を示す図であり、図8−2は、図8−1の結果を用いて歩留り優先でネスティング配置計算処理を行った結果を示す図であり、図9−1は、図5の部材を2枚の母材に均等に配置する場合の部材均等配分の計算方法を示す図であり、図9−2は、図9−1の結果を用いて歩留り優先でネスティング配置計算処理を行った結果を示す図である。   Next, the processing procedure of the graphic layout method according to the present invention will be described with specific examples. FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing an example of processing of the graphic arrangement method according to the present invention. 5 to 9-2 are diagrams showing specific examples of arrangement states of members cut out from the base material on the base material, and FIG. 5 schematically shows types and numbers of members cut out from the base material. FIG. 6 is a diagram schematically showing the shape of the base material from which the member is based, and FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating the nesting arrangement calculation process in which the member of FIG. 5 is given priority to the base material of FIG. FIG. 8A is a diagram illustrating a calculation method of member equal distribution when the members of FIG. 5 are evenly arranged on the three base materials, and FIG. FIG. 8-1 is a diagram showing a result of performing a nesting arrangement calculation process with yield priority using the result of FIG. 8A, and FIG. 9A is a diagram in the case where the members of FIG. 5 are arranged evenly on two base materials. FIG. 9B is a diagram showing a calculation method of the equal distribution of members. FIG. 9B is a diagram illustrating the nesting arrangement calculation process with the yield priority using the result of FIG. Is a diagram showing the results of Tsu.

まず、使用者によって、必要な部材の種類(サイズなど)や個数などの必要部材情報の入力が入力部18を介して行われる(ステップS11)。たとえば、部材や母材の形状が図形データ格納部11に格納されている場合には、図形データ格納部11から該当する図形データを呼び出して、必要な個数を入力してもよいし、図形データ格納部11に所望の部材や母材の形状などの図形データがない場合には、入力部18から新たな図形データを入力してもよい。ここでは、図5に示されるそれぞれ8個、9個、2個、2個、2個、2個の6種類の形状の部材51A〜51Fを、図6に示される同一種類の母材50から切り出すものとする。入力された部材51と母材50の必要部材情報は歩留り優先ネスティング部12に出力される。   First, the user inputs necessary member information such as a necessary member type (size, etc.) and the number of members through the input unit 18 (step S11). For example, when the shape of the member or base material is stored in the graphic data storage unit 11, the corresponding graphic data may be called from the graphic data storage unit 11, and the necessary number may be input, or the graphic data When there is no graphic data such as the shape of a desired member or base material in the storage unit 11, new graphic data may be input from the input unit 18. Here, eight, nine, two, two, two, and two members 51A to 51F shown in FIG. 5 are formed from the same type of base material 50 shown in FIG. It shall be cut out. The input necessary member information of the member 51 and the base material 50 is output to the yield priority nesting unit 12.

ついで、歩留り優先ネスティング部12は、入力された必要部材情報に関して従来から公知の方法で歩留り率優先のネスティング配置計算処理を行う(ステップS12)。ここでは、歩留り優先のネスティング配置処理によって、図7に示されるように図6の3枚の母材50A〜50Cに図5の部材51A〜51Fが配置されたものとする。   Next, the yield priority nesting unit 12 performs a yield rate priority nesting arrangement calculation process on the input necessary member information by a conventionally known method (step S12). Here, it is assumed that the members 51A to 51F of FIG. 5 are arranged on the three base materials 50A to 50C of FIG. 6 as shown in FIG.

ついで、配置状態確認部14により部材51の配置に使用された全ての母材50の枚数である必要母材枚数N0と母材の有効活用領域の面積S0を求め、歩留り優先配置状態情報としてその値を保持する(ステップS13)。ここでは、図7に示されるように、必要母材枚数N0=3であり、有効活用領域が矩形状となるように直線状での切断を前提にしてその面積S0を求めるものとする。 Next, the placement state confirmation unit 14 obtains the required number of base materials N 0 that is the number of all base materials 50 used for the placement of the members 51 and the area S 0 of the base material effective utilization area, and yield priority placement state information. And hold the value (step S13). Here, as shown in FIG. 7, the required number of base materials N 0 = 3, and the area S 0 is obtained on the premise of cutting in a straight line so that the effective use area is rectangular. .

つぎに、部材均等配分計算部13は、ステップS13で配置状態確認部14によって求められた必要母材枚数N0を、均等配置母材枚数Mとして設定する(ステップS14)。図7の例の場合では、部材51A〜51Fは3枚の母材50A〜50Cに配置されており、N0=3であるので、均等配置母材枚数Mは「3」となる。 Next, the member uniform distribution calculation unit 13 sets the required base material number N 0 obtained by the placement state confirmation unit 14 in step S13 as the evenly placed base material number M (step S14). In the case of the example of FIG. 7, the members 51A to 51F are arranged on the three base materials 50A to 50C, and N 0 = 3. Therefore, the number of equally arranged base materials M is “3”.

その後、部材均等配分計算部13は、設定したM枚の均等配置母材に部材51を均等に配分する計算を行い、その結果を歩留り優先ネスティング部12に出力する(ステップS15)。つまり、各部材51の個数niをM(=N0=3)で除して得られる商QiをM枚の均等配置母材に配置する各部材51の個数とする。図8−1に示されるように、各部材51A〜51Fを「3」で除した商はそれぞれ、2,3,0,0,0,0となるので、2個の部材51Aと3個の部材51Bを3枚の均等配置母材50A〜50Cに配置するように設定する。また、部材51の個数niをM(=N0=3)で除して得られる余りRi(Rは整数)も求める。この場合、各部材51A〜51Fの余りは、それぞれ2,0,2,2,2,2となる。 Thereafter, the member uniform distribution calculation unit 13 performs a calculation to evenly distribute the members 51 to the set M equally arranged base materials, and outputs the result to the yield priority nesting unit 12 (step S15). That is, the quotient Qi obtained by dividing the number ni of each member 51 by M (= N 0 = 3) is the number of members 51 arranged on the M equally arranged base materials. As shown in FIG. 8A, the quotients obtained by dividing the members 51A to 51F by “3” are 2, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, respectively. It sets so that the member 51B may be arrange | positioned to the three equal arrangement | positioning base materials 50A-50C. Further, a remainder Ri (R is an integer) obtained by dividing the number ni of the members 51 by M (= N 0 = 3) is also obtained. In this case, the remainders of the members 51A to 51F are 2, 0, 2, 2, 2, and 2, respectively.

ついで、歩留り優先ネスティング部12は、均等配置母材に分配された部材51の個数に基づいて、すなわちステップS15で各部材の個数niをMで除して得られる商Qiを均等配置母材に配置する各部材51の個数として、歩留り率優先のネスティング配置計算処理を行う(ステップS16)。その結果、図8−2に示されるように、2個の部材51Aと3個の部材51Bを、3枚の均等配置母材のそれぞれに配置し、2個の部材51Aと全ての個数の部材51C〜51Fはその中に配置しないという結果になる。   Next, the yield priority nesting unit 12 sets the quotient Qi obtained by dividing the number ni of each member by M in step S15 based on the number of members 51 distributed to the uniformly arranged base material. As the number of members 51 to be arranged, a nesting arrangement calculation process giving priority to the yield rate is performed (step S16). As a result, as shown in FIG. 8B, two members 51A and three members 51B are arranged on each of the three equally arranged base materials, and the two members 51A and all the members are arranged. The result is that 51C to 51F are not arranged therein.

さらに、歩留り優先ネスティング部12は、均等配置母材に配置できなかった部材51、すなわちステップS15で各部材の個数niをMで除して得られる余りRiを個数とする部材と、ステップS16で均等配置母材に配置されるはずの部材で実際には配置できなかった部材とを、均等配置母材以外の母材(以下、残余配置母材という)に歩留り率優先のネスティング配置計算処理を行う(ステップS17)。その結果、図8−2に示されるように、それぞれ2個の部材51A,51C〜51Fが、追加された1枚の残余配置母材50Dに配置される。以上の工程によって、配置結果が全く同じ3枚の母材50A〜50Cと、他の配置結果を有する1枚の母材50Dによって、必要な全ての部材51A〜51Fが配置されることになる。   Further, the yield priority nesting unit 12 is a member 51 that could not be placed on the uniform base material, that is, a member that uses the number Ri of each member divided by M in step S15 and a remainder Ri to obtain the number in step S16. Nested placement calculation processing with priority on yield rate is performed on members that should have been placed on the evenly placed base material but could not be placed on the base material other than the evenly placed base material (hereinafter referred to as the remaining placed base material). This is performed (step S17). As a result, as shown in FIG. 8B, each of the two members 51A and 51C to 51F is arranged on the added one remaining arrangement base material 50D. Through the above steps, all the necessary members 51A to 51F are arranged by the three base materials 50A to 50C having the same placement result and the one base material 50D having the other placement results.

ついで、配置状態確認部14は、ステップS16〜S17で得た配置に使用された全ての母材の枚数である必要母材枚数N1と母材の有効活用領域の面積S1を求め、均等配分優先配置状態情報として保持する(ステップS18)。図8−2の場合、配置に使用された全ての母材の枚数N1は「4」である。 Next, the arrangement state confirmation unit 14 obtains the required base material number N 1 that is the number of all base materials used in the placement obtained in steps S16 to S17 and the area S 1 of the base material effective utilization region, and equalizes them. The distribution priority arrangement state information is retained (step S18). In the case of FIG. 8B, the number N 1 of all the base materials used for the arrangement is “4”.

その後、配置状態比較判定部15は、歩留り優先配置状態情報と均等配分優先配置状態情報とを比較して、ステップS15〜S17で求めた均等配分を優先した配置状態が適切か否かを判定する。具体的には、均等配分を優先して配置した場合の必要母材枚数N1が歩留り配分を優先して配置した場合の必要母材枚数N0以下であるか否かを判定する(ステップS19)。図8−2の場合、N1=4であり、N0=3であり、N1>N0となるので、上記条件を満たさない。このように、N1がN0以下でない場合(ステップS19でNoの場合)には、その配置状態は適切ではないと判定し、配置状態比較判定部15は、現時点で設定されている均等配置母材枚数Mから1枚減算したM=M−1を新たな均等配置母材枚数Mとし(ステップS31)、新たな均等配置母材枚数Mが「1」であるか否かを判定する(ステップS32)。 Thereafter, the arrangement state comparison / determination unit 15 compares the yield priority arrangement state information with the equal distribution priority arrangement state information and determines whether the arrangement state giving priority to the equal distribution obtained in steps S15 to S17 is appropriate. . Specifically, it is determined whether the required less than preform number N 0 is when the required preform number N 1 when arranged in favor of the equal distribution is arranged in favor of the yield distribution (step S19 ). In the case of FIG. 8B, N 1 = 4, N 0 = 3, and N 1 > N 0 , so the above condition is not satisfied. Thus, if N 1 is not equal to or less than N 0 (No in step S19), it is determined that the arrangement state is not appropriate, and the arrangement state comparison determination unit 15 performs the equal arrangement set at the present time. M = M−1 obtained by subtracting one from the base material number M is set as a new uniform base material number M (step S31), and it is determined whether or not the new base material number M is “1” (step S31). Step S32).

新たな均等配置母材枚数Mが「1」である場合(ステップS32でYesの場合)には、ステップS12で得られた歩留り優先の配置結果を採用し(ステップS33)、図形配置処理が終了する。一方、新たな均等配置母材枚数Mが「1」でない場合(ステップS32でNoの場合)には、ステップS15に戻り、上述した処理が繰り返し実行される。なお、ステップS19の判定において、母材の枚数を歩留り優先で配置した場合の母材の枚数以下とするのは、作業の手間を削減することが目的ではあるが、そのために母材を1枚余分に使ってしまうことは材料費削減などにおいて無駄が大き過ぎる場合をここでは想定しているためである。   If the new evenly arranged base material number M is “1” (Yes in step S32), the yield priority placement result obtained in step S12 is adopted (step S33), and the figure placement process is completed. To do. On the other hand, if the new evenly arranged base material number M is not “1” (No in step S32), the process returns to step S15 and the above-described processing is repeatedly executed. In the determination of step S19, the purpose of reducing the number of base materials to be equal to or less than the number of base materials when placing priority on yield is to reduce the labor of the work. The excessive use is because it is assumed here that the waste is too great in reducing material costs.

この例では、均等配置母材枚数Mとして最初に「3」に設定されているので、ステップS21では新たに均等配置母材枚数Mとして「2」が設定される。その後、ステップS15からの処理において、2枚の均等配置母材に部材51を均等に配置し、それが適切か否かを判定する処理を繰り返し実行する。まず、部材均等配分計算部13は、図9−1に示されるように、各部材の個数niを、均等に部材を配置する母材の枚数M=2で割った商Qiと余りRiとを求める。部材51A〜51Fの商Qiはそれぞれ4,4,1,1,1,1であり、部材51A〜51Fの余りRiはそれぞれ0,1,0,0,0,0,0である。   In this example, since “3” is initially set as the number M of equally arranged base materials, “2” is newly set as the number M of evenly arranged base materials in step S21. Thereafter, in the processing from step S15, the members 51 are evenly arranged on the two equally arranged base materials, and the processing for determining whether or not it is appropriate is repeatedly executed. First, as shown in FIG. 9A, the member equal distribution calculation unit 13 calculates a quotient Qi obtained by dividing the number ni of each member by the number M = 2 of the base materials on which the members are evenly arranged and the remainder Ri. Ask. The quotients Qi of the members 51A to 51F are 4, 4, 1, 1, 1, 1, respectively, and the remainders Ri of the members 51A to 51F are 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, respectively.

ついで、歩留り優先ネスティング部12は、均等配置母材50A〜50Bには、上記で求めた商Qiを個数とする部材51A〜51Fで、歩留り優先のネスティング配置処理を行う。その結果が図9−2の母材50A,50Bに示されている。ここでは、歩留り優先のネスティング配置処理を行った結果、均等配置母材50A,50Bには部材51Dが配置できない場合が示されており、2個の部材51Dが余ることになる。ついで、歩留り優先ネスティング部12は、均等配置母材50A,50Bに配置されなかった2個の部材51Dと、上記で求めた余りRiを個数とする部材51Bとを残余配置母材50Cに歩留り優先でネスティング配置処理を行う。その結果が図9−2の母材50Cに示されている。以上より、配置結果が全く同じ2枚の母材50A,50Bとこれらの母材50A,50Bとは配置結果の異なる他の母材50Cによって、必要な全ての部材51A〜51Fが配置されることになる。その後、配置状態確認部14は、均等配置優先で求められた部材の配置結果から、必要母材枚数N1=3と母材の有効活用領域の面積S1とを求める。 Next, the yield priority nesting unit 12 performs yield priority nesting arrangement processing on the equally arranged base materials 50A to 50B with the members 51A to 51F having the number of the quotients Qi obtained above. The result is shown in the base materials 50A and 50B of FIG. 9-2. Here, the case where the member 51D cannot be arranged on the equally arranged base materials 50A and 50B is shown as a result of the yield priority nesting arrangement processing, and the two members 51D remain. Next, the yield priority nesting unit 12 gives the yield priority to the remaining placed base material 50C by using the two members 51D that are not placed on the evenly placed base materials 50A and 50B and the member 51B that has the number of the remainders Ri obtained above. The nesting arrangement process is performed at. The result is shown in the base material 50C of FIG. 9-2. As described above, all the necessary members 51A to 51F are arranged by the two base materials 50A and 50B having the same placement result and the other base materials 50C having different placement results from the base materials 50A and 50B. become. Thereafter, the arrangement state confirmation unit 14 obtains the necessary number of base materials N 1 = 3 and the area S 1 of the effective use area of the base material from the result of member placement obtained with priority on equal placement.

そして、均等配分を優先して配置した場合の必要母材枚数N1が歩留りを優先して配置した場合の必要母材枚数N0以下であるか否かの判定を行う。図9−2の場合、N1=3,N0=3であり、N1≦N0であるので、上記条件を満たす。このように、N1がN0以下である場合(ステップS19でYesの場合)には、ステップS16〜S17で得られた配置が適切であると判定し、さらにステップS13で求めた歩留り優先の配置における有効活用領域の面積S0とステップS18で求めた均等配分優先の配置における有効活用領域の面積S1とを比較する(ステップS20)。具体的には、歩留り優先の配置における有効活用領域の面積S0と均等配分優先の配置における有効活用領域の面積S1との差の絶対値が所定値C以下であるか否かを判定する。通常、ステップS16〜S17で計算される配置結果から得られる有効活用領域の面積S1はステップS12で計算される配置結果から得られる有効活用領域の面積S0よりも小さくなる場合が多いので、S0とS1の差が所定値C以下であるか否かを判定すればよい。 Then, a determination must preform number N 1 of whether necessary or less preform number N 0 is the case of arranging preferentially yield when placed in favor of the sharing. In the case of FIG. 9B, since N 1 = 3 and N 0 = 3 and N 1 ≦ N 0 , the above condition is satisfied. Thus, when N 1 is N 0 or less (Yes in step S19), it is determined that the arrangement obtained in steps S16 to S17 is appropriate, and the yield priority obtained in step S13 is determined. The area S 0 of the effective utilization area in the arrangement is compared with the area S 1 of the effective utilization area in the equal distribution priority arrangement obtained in step S18 (step S20). Specifically, the absolute value of the difference between the area S 1 of the effective use area in the arrangement of the effective use region area S 0 and sharing priority in the arrangement of the yield priority is equal to or less than a predetermined value C . Usually, the area S 1 of the effective utilization area obtained from the arrangement result calculated in steps S16 to S17 is often smaller than the area S 0 of the effective utilization area obtained from the arrangement result calculated in step S12. It may be determined whether or not the difference between S 0 and S 1 is equal to or less than a predetermined value C.

この図9−2の場合でも、図7の結果に比べて母材の有効活用領域の面積S1がやや小さくなっている結果が示されている。なお、図7の母材50A,50Bと図9−2の母材50A,50Bのいずれにおいても母材のほぼ全域に渡って部材51が配置されているが、そのわずかに残った余りの領域には別の小さな部材を配置するということは行っておらず、加工を行った後には、この余りの領域である端材(残材)は捨てられてしまう。そのため、ステップS21における有効活用領域の面積の比較では、最後の1枚の母材50C以外の母材50A,50Bの有効活用領域は考慮に入れなくてよく、最後の1枚の母材50Cの有効活用領域の面積だけを比較すればよい。なお、両者の有効活用領域の面積の差分と比較する所定値Cは、母材のコストなどを加味した任意の値を設定することができる。 9-2 also shows the result that the area S 1 of the base material effective utilization region is slightly smaller than the result of FIG. In addition, in both of the base materials 50A and 50B in FIG. 7 and the base materials 50A and 50B in FIG. 9-2, the member 51 is disposed over almost the entire area of the base material. In this case, no other small member is arranged, and after processing, the remaining material (remaining material), which is the remaining region, is discarded. Therefore, in the comparison of the area of the effective use area in step S21, the effective use areas of the base materials 50A and 50B other than the last one base material 50C need not be taken into consideration, and the last one base material 50C is not considered. Only the area of the effective utilization area needs to be compared. In addition, the predetermined value C compared with the difference of the area of both effective utilization area | regions can set the arbitrary values which considered the cost etc. of the base material.

ステップS20で、両者の有効活用領域の面積の差が所定の値の範囲内に収まらない場合(ステップS20でNoの場合)には、配置は適切でないと判定し、ステップS31に処理が移り、上述した処理が繰り返し実行される。つまり、ステップS16〜S17において均等配置した場合の有効活用領域の面積S1が、ステップS12において歩留り優先で配置した場合の有効活用領域の面積S0に比べてかなり小さく母材のロスが多すぎる場合は、その均等配置は不適切と判断するようにしている。 In step S20, if the difference between the areas of the effective utilization areas does not fall within the predetermined value range (in the case of No in step S20), it is determined that the arrangement is not appropriate, and the process moves to step S31. The above-described processing is repeatedly executed. In other words, the area S 1 of the effective utilization area in the case of uniformly arranged in step S16~S17 is considerably smaller loss of the base material is too large compared to the area S 0 of the effective utilization area of when placed in the yield priority in step S12 In such a case, it is determined that the uniform arrangement is inappropriate.

一方、ステップS20で、両者の差の絶対値が所定の値の範囲内に収まる場合(ステップS20でYesの場合)には、配置は適切であると判定し、ステップS16〜S17で求められた均等配分優先の配置結果が母材から部材を切り出すための配置結果として採用される(ステップS21)。この場合には、図7と図9−2に示されるように、ステップS16〜S17において均等配置した場合の有効活用領域の面積S1が、ステップS12において歩留り優先で配置した場合の有効活用領域の面積S0に比べて小さいが、たとえば、有効活用領域の面積を図2−1の直線状を用いて求めるようにした場合には、図7における有効活用領域の面積S0と図9−2における有効活用領域の面積S1とはほとんど変わらず(その差が非常に大きくなく)、S0−S1≦Cであるとし、ステップS16〜S17で計算された配置情報が部材を切り出す配置として適用される。これにより、図形配置処理は終了する。 On the other hand, if the absolute value of the difference between the two is within the range of the predetermined value in Step S20 (Yes in Step S20), it is determined that the arrangement is appropriate and obtained in Steps S16 to S17. An even distribution priority placement result is adopted as a placement result for cutting out a member from the base material (step S21). In this case, as shown in FIGS. 7 and 9-2, the effective use area when the area S 1 of the effective use area when equally arranged in steps S16 to S17 is arranged with priority on yield in step S12 is used. Although smaller than the area S 0, for example, in the case where the area of the effective utilization area as determined using the linear Figure 2-1, the area S 0 of the effective utilization area in Figure 7 Figure 9 2 is almost the same as the area S 1 of the effective use area (the difference is not very large), and S 0 −S 1 ≦ C, and the arrangement information calculated in steps S16 to S17 cuts out the members. As applied. As a result, the graphic layout process ends.

このように、この実施の形態1では、母材の必要母材枚数N0で最も効率のよい均等配分が不可能な場合でも、ステップS31で割る数を1つずつ減らして順次処理し、できる限り均等配分される母材の数が多いパターンを求めるように処理される。そして最後に最も少ない2枚の母材でも均等配分にて適合できる配置が求められなかった場合には、割る数が「1」となる。この場合には、ステップS12での入力された必要部材情報を用いて歩留り優先で母材に配置処理する結果と同じとなる。 Thus, in the first embodiment, even when the most efficient uniform distribution is impossible with the required number of base materials N 0 , the number divided in step S31 can be reduced one by one and processed sequentially. Processing is performed so as to obtain a pattern having a large number of base materials that are equally distributed. Finally, when an arrangement that can be adapted by even distribution is not required even with the smallest two base materials, the number to be divided is “1”. In this case, the result is the same as the result of the placement processing on the base material with the yield priority using the input necessary member information in step S12.

なお、上述した説明では、ステップS32で均等配置母材枚数Mが「1」の場合にステップS33でステップS12の配置結果を採用するようにしているが、ステップS15に処理が戻るようにしてもよい。この場合には、ステップS17〜S18で求められる配置はステップS12の配置と同じもとのなり、ステップS19〜S20の条件を当然満たすこととなり、図形配置処理が終了する。   In the above description, when the number of equally arranged base materials M is “1” in step S32, the arrangement result in step S12 is adopted in step S33. However, the process may return to step S15. Good. In this case, the arrangement obtained in steps S17 to S18 is the same as the arrangement in step S12, and the conditions in steps S19 to S20 are naturally satisfied, and the graphic arrangement process is completed.

図4のフローチャートに示される図形配置処理の後は、加工情報生成部16によって、ステップS16〜S17で計算された配置情報に基づいて、母材50の切断経路などを設定した加工情報が生成され、加工情報格納部17に格納される。この加工情報生成部16による加工情報の生成は、均等配置母材と残余配置母材に対してのみ行うだけでよいので、すなわち図9−2では母材50Aと母材50Bが同一の配置状態であるので、母材(均等配置母材)50Aと母材(残余配置母材)50Cの加工情報のみを生成すればよい。これによって、加工情報の生成の手間が省かれる。そして、図示しない加工装置によって部材51を母材50から切り出す際に、この加工情報に基づいて母材50の切断処理が行われる。   After the graphic arrangement process shown in the flowchart of FIG. 4, the machining information generation unit 16 generates machining information in which the cutting path of the base material 50 is set based on the arrangement information calculated in steps S <b> 16 to S <b> 17. And stored in the machining information storage unit 17. Since the processing information generation unit 16 only needs to generate the processing information only for the uniformly arranged base material and the remaining base material, that is, in FIG. 9-2, the base material 50A and the base material 50B are in the same arrangement state. Therefore, it is only necessary to generate processing information for the base material (uniformly arranged base material) 50A and the base material (residually arranged base material) 50C. This saves the labor of generating machining information. When the member 51 is cut out from the base material 50 by a processing device (not shown), the base material 50 is cut based on the processing information.

なお、上述した例では、ステップS20の2次判定において、有効活用領域の面積を基に判定を行ったが、これは図2−1〜図2−3や図7、図9−2で示したように、母材50Cの部材51を切断加工した後の穴のあいた左側部分(部材51の存在した側の領域)54を点線aの部分で切断し処分して残った右側部分の端材55のみをつぎの加工のために保管しておくという処置が行われる場合に適切な判定方法である。しかし、部材51を切断加工した後の穴の開いた状態の端材(上記左側部分)54を、つぎの加工のために保管する場合も考えられる。この場合の第2次判定の方法は、たとえば、残った端材の全面積を比較したり、元の母材50の面積に対する端材の全面積の割合を比較したりすることにより判定を行ってもよい。   In the above-described example, in the secondary determination in step S20, the determination is made based on the area of the effective use region. This is illustrated in FIGS. 2-1 to 2-3, FIG. 7, and FIG. 9-2. As shown, the left side portion 54 (the region on the side where the member 51 is present) 54 with a hole after cutting the member 51 of the base material 50C is cut at the portion indicated by the dotted line a, and the end material of the right side portion left after disposal. This is an appropriate determination method in the case where only 55 is stored for the next processing. However, it is also conceivable that the end material (the left portion) 54 in the state where the hole is opened after the member 51 is cut and processed is stored for the next processing. The secondary determination method in this case is performed, for example, by comparing the total area of the remaining mill ends or by comparing the ratio of the total area of the mill ends to the area of the original base material 50. May be.

また、残った母材の確保できる矩形の面積部分において、ステップS13での確認結果が母材全体の所定の割合以下、たとえば30%以下、であった場合には、その端材を特に保管せずに廃棄してしまうなどの運用上の決まりごとがある場合には、ステップS18の結果で同じ比較母材上の残り面積に関係なくステップS16〜S17で得られた結果の方を採用するなどの判断を行うように適宜設定してもよい。   In addition, in the rectangular area where the remaining base material can be secured, if the confirmation result in step S13 is a predetermined ratio or less of the entire base material, for example, 30% or less, the end material is particularly stored. If there is an operational rule, such as discarding the data, the result obtained in steps S16 to S17 is adopted regardless of the remaining area on the same comparison base material in the result of step S18. It may be set as appropriate so as to make this determination.

さらに、上記の説明では、図4のステップS15において均等配分の計算を行う際に、ステップS13での均等配置母材枚数Mとして、歩留り優先配置状態情報から得られる必要母材枚数である「3」から「1」を引いた数の「2」で各部材51の個数に対して除算を行い、各部材51の均等配分個数を求めた場合に最適な配置が求められた。しかし、これはこの図形配置方法を説明するために設定した一例であり、すべてがこの手順のように処理されるわけではないことはもちろんである。つまり、ステップS13での均等配置母材枚数Mとして最初に設定した値で最適な配置が求められることもあれば、最初に設定した均等配置母材枚数Mから1を減算する処理を複数回行って最適な配置が求められることもある。そこで、以下では、別の例として(1)ステップS13での必要母材枚数で最適な配置が得られる例と、(2)ステップS13での必要母材枚数から2を引いた場合に最適な配置が得られる例を簡単に説明する。   Furthermore, in the above description, when the uniform distribution is calculated in step S15 in FIG. 4, the number of the base materials required to be obtained from the yield priority placement state information is “3” as the base material number M of the uniform placement in step S13. When the number of each member 51 is divided by “2”, which is the number obtained by subtracting “1” from “,” and the equally distributed number of members 51 is obtained, the optimum arrangement is obtained. However, this is an example set for explaining this graphic arrangement method, and it is needless to say that not all of them are processed in this procedure. That is, the optimal placement may be obtained with the initially set value as the number M of uniformly arranged base materials in step S13, or the process of subtracting 1 from the initially set number of uniformly placed base materials M is performed a plurality of times. In some cases, an optimal arrangement is required. Therefore, in the following, as another example, (1) an example in which an optimum arrangement is obtained with the required number of base materials in step S13, and (2) an optimal case in which 2 is subtracted from the required number of base materials in step S13. An example of obtaining the arrangement will be briefly described.

(1)ステップS13での必要母材枚数で最適な配置が得られる例
ここでは、同じ大きさの矩形状の部材51を、母材50から15個切り出す場合を例に挙げる。図4のフローチャートにしたがって処理が進められるが、まず、部材51の個数(15個)や形状(矩形状)、材質などを含む必要部材情報が入力され(ステップS11)、歩留り優先のネスティング配置処理が実施される(ステップS12)。図10−1は、同一形状の15個の部材を歩留り優先で母材にネスティング配置計算を行った結果を模式的に示す図である。これにより、必要母材枚数N0=3と、有効活用領域の面積S0を得る(ステップS13)。
(1) Example of Optimal Arrangement Obtained with the Required Number of Base Materials in Step S13 Here, a case where 15 rectangular members 51 of the same size are cut out from the base material 50 is taken as an example. The process proceeds according to the flowchart of FIG. 4. First, necessary member information including the number (15), shape (rectangular shape), material, and the like of the members 51 is input (step S11), and yield priority nesting arrangement processing is performed. Is implemented (step S12). FIG. 10A is a diagram schematically illustrating a result of performing nesting arrangement calculation on a base material with priority given to yield of 15 members having the same shape. As a result, the necessary number of base materials N 0 = 3 and the area S 0 of the effective utilization area are obtained (step S13).

ついで、必要母材枚数N0=3が、均等配置母材枚数Mに設定され(ステップS14)、部材51の個数「15」をM(=3)で割った商である「5」を均等配置母材に配置する部材51の個数として、歩留り優先のネスティング配置計算処理が実施される(ステップS15〜S16)。図10−2は、同一形状の15個の部材を均等配置優先で母材にネスティング配置計算を行った結果を模式的に示す図である。余った部材はないので(ステップS17)、この図より、必要母材枚数N1=3と、有効活用領域の面積S1を得る(ステップS18)。歩留り優先配置状態情報の必要母材枚数N0=3と、均等配分優先配置状態情報の必要母材枚数N1=3とは同じであり(ステップS19)、また、歩留り優先配置状態情報の有効活用領域の面積S0と均等配置優先配置状態情報の有効活用領域の面積S1との差分が所定値以下に収まるものとすると(ステップS20)、ステップS17〜S18で得られた部材51の配置結果が採用されることになる。 Next, the required number of base materials N 0 = 3 is set to the number M of equally arranged base materials (step S14), and “5” which is a quotient obtained by dividing the number “15” of the members 51 by M (= 3) is equalized. As the number of members 51 to be placed on the placement base material, yield priority nesting placement calculation processing is performed (steps S15 to S16). FIG. 10B is a diagram schematically illustrating a result of performing nesting arrangement calculation on the base material with equal arrangement priority for 15 members having the same shape. Since there is no surplus member (step S17), the required number of base materials N 1 = 3 and the area S 1 of the effective use area are obtained from this figure (step S18). Required matrix number N 0 = 3 yield preferential arrangement information is the same as the required base material number N 1 = 3 in the even distribution priority layout state information (step S19), The effective yield priority layout state information If the difference between the area S 0 of the utilization area and the area S 1 of the effective utilization area of the uniform placement priority arrangement state information is within a predetermined value (step S20), the arrangement of the members 51 obtained in steps S17 to S18. The result will be adopted.

(2)ステップS13での必要母材枚数から2を引いた場合に最適な配置が得られる例
図11は、必要な部材の数と種類を模式的に示す図である。ここでは、9個の矩形状の部材51Gと、部材51Gよりもサイズの小さい9個の矩形状の部材51Hと、9個の三角形状の部材51Iとを、母材50から切り出す場合を例に挙げる。まず、図11に示されるような部材の形状や個数、母材などの必要部材情報が入力され(ステップS11)、歩留り優先のネスティング配置計算が実施される(ステップS12)。図12は、部材を歩留り優先で母材にネスティング配置計算を行った結果を模式的に示す図である。これにより、必要母材枚数N0=6と、有効活用領域の面積S0を得る(ステップS13)。
(2) Example in which optimum arrangement is obtained when 2 is subtracted from required number of base materials in step S13 FIG. 11 is a diagram schematically showing the number and types of necessary members. Here, as an example, nine rectangular members 51G, nine rectangular members 51H having a smaller size than the member 51G, and nine triangular members 51I are cut out from the base material 50. I will give you. First, necessary member information such as the shape and number of members and the base material as shown in FIG. 11 is input (step S11), and yield priority nesting arrangement calculation is performed (step S12). FIG. 12 is a diagram schematically illustrating a result of performing nesting arrangement calculation on a base material with priority given to yield of members. As a result, the required number of base materials N 0 = 6 and the area S 0 of the effective utilization area are obtained (step S13).

ついで、必要母材枚数N0=6が均等配置母材枚数Mに設定され(ステップS14)、部材51G〜51Iの個数「9」をM=「6」で割った商である「1」を均等配置母材に配置する部材51の数として、歩留り優先のネスティング配置計算処理が実施される(ステップS15〜S16)。また、上記の均等配置母材に配置されなかった部材51G〜51Iを残余配置母材に歩留り優先でネスティング配置する計算処理が実施される(ステップS17)。この場合、6枚の母材50A〜50Fにそれぞれの部材51G〜51Iがわずか1個ずつ配置され、余りの分が全て7枚目以降の残余配置母材に配分されることになるため、7枚以上の母材50が必要となる。つまり、図4のステップS19で、N1≦N0を満たさないために適切な配置でないと判断され、ステップS31で均等配置母材枚数Mを1つ減数して、この条件で再びステップS15以降の処理を実行する。 Next, the required base material number N 0 = 6 is set to the evenly arranged base material number M (step S14), and “1” which is a quotient obtained by dividing the number “9” of the members 51G to 51I by M = “6” is set. As the number of members 51 to be arranged on the uniformly arranged base material, yield priority nesting arrangement calculation processing is performed (steps S15 to S16). Further, a calculation process for nesting and arranging the members 51G to 51I that are not arranged on the above-described equally arranged base material on the remaining arranged base material with priority on yield is performed (step S17). In this case, since only one member 51G to 51I is disposed on each of the six base materials 50A to 50F, and the remainder is allotted to the seventh and subsequent remaining base materials. One or more base materials 50 are required. That is, in step S19 in FIG. 4, N 1 ≦ N 0 is not satisfied, so it is determined that the layout is not appropriate. In step S31, the number of equally arranged base materials M is decremented by 1 , and step S15 and subsequent steps are performed again under this condition. Execute the process.

つまり、均等配置母材枚数Mとして「5(=6−1)」を設定し(ステップS14)、それぞれの部材51G〜51Iの個数「9」をM=「5」で割った商である「1」を均等配置母材に配置する部材51の数として、歩留り優先のネスティング配置計算処理が実施される(ステップS15〜S16)。また、上記の均等配置母材に配置されなかった部材51G〜51Iを残余配置母材に歩留り優先でネスティング配置する計算処理が実施される(ステップS17)。この場合には、5枚の母材50にそれぞれの部材51G〜51Iがわずか1個ずつ配置され、余りの分が全て6枚目以降の母材50に配分されることになる。しかし、余りの部材51G〜51Iは6枚目に入りきらず、全体として7枚以上の母材50が必要となる。そのため、図4のステップS19でN1≦N0を満たさないために適切な配置でないと判断され、再度ステップS20にて均等配置母材枚数Mを1つ減数し、この条件で再びステップS15以降の処理を実行する。 In other words, “5 (= 6-1)” is set as the number of equally arranged base materials M (step S14), and the number “9” of each member 51G to 51I is divided by M = “5”. Yield-priority nesting arrangement calculation processing is performed with the number of members 51 to be placed on the uniformly arranged base material (steps S15 to S16). Further, a calculation process for nesting and arranging the members 51G to 51I that are not arranged on the above-described equally arranged base material on the remaining arranged base material with priority on yield is performed (step S17). In this case, only one member 51G to 51I is arranged on each of the five base materials 50, and the remainder is allotted to the sixth and subsequent base materials 50. However, the surplus members 51G to 51I do not fit in the sixth sheet, and seven or more base materials 50 are required as a whole. Therefore, in step S19 in FIG. 4, N 1 ≦ N 0 is not satisfied, so it is determined that the placement is not appropriate. In step S20, the number of equally arranged base materials M is reduced by one, and step S15 and subsequent steps are performed again under this condition. Execute the process.

同様にして、均等配置母材枚数Mとして「4(=5−1)」を設定し(ステップS14)、それぞれの部材51G〜51Iの個数をM=「4」で割った商である「2」を均等配置母材に配置する部材51の個数として、歩留り優先のネスティング配置計算処理が実施される(ステップS15〜S16)。また、上記の均等配置母材に配置されなかった部材51G〜51Iを残余配置母材に歩留り優先でネスティング配置する計算処理が実施される(ステップS17)。   Similarly, “4 (= 5-1)” is set as the number of equally arranged base materials M (step S14), and “2” is a quotient obtained by dividing the number of members 51G to 51I by M = “4”. ”Is used as the number of the members 51 to be arranged on the uniformly arranged base material, and the yield priority nesting arrangement calculation processing is performed (steps S15 to S16). Further, a calculation process for nesting and arranging the members 51G to 51I that are not arranged on the above-described equally arranged base material on the remaining arranged base material with priority on yield is performed (step S17).

図13は、部材を均等配置優先で母材にネスティング配置計算を行った結果を模式的に示す図である。この図の母材50A〜50Dに示されるように、均等配置母材には2個の部材51H,51Iと1個の部材51Gが配置される。つまり、均等配置母材にそれぞれ2個の部材51G〜51Iを歩留り優先でネスティング配置処理を行うと、1つの部材51Gが母材50に配置できない。そこで、残余配置母材には、この配置できなかった4個の歩合51Gと、それぞれの部材51G〜51Iの個数をM=「4」で除した余りRiであるそれぞれ1個の部材51G〜51Iの個数とを、歩留まり優先でネスティング配置処理する。その結果が図13の母材50E,50Fに示されている。このように、同じ配置結果を有する母材50A〜50Dが4枚と、残りの部材51が配置される5枚目と6枚目の母材50E,50Fが生成される。これより、必要母材枚数N1=6と、有効活用領域の面積S1を得る(ステップS18)。 FIG. 13 is a diagram schematically illustrating a result of performing nesting arrangement calculation on a base material with priority given to uniform arrangement of members. As shown in the base materials 50A to 50D in this figure, the two members 51H and 51I and the one member 51G are disposed in the equally disposed base material. That is, if the nesting arrangement process is performed with priority given to the yield of two members 51G to 51I on the equally arranged base material, one member 51G cannot be placed on the base material 50. Therefore, in the remaining base material, the four commissions 51G that could not be placed and one member 51G to 51I that is a remainder Ri obtained by dividing the number of the respective members 51G to 51I by M = “4”. The nesting arrangement processing is performed with the yield priority. The results are shown in the base materials 50E and 50F in FIG. In this manner, four base materials 50A to 50D having the same placement result and fifth and sixth base materials 50E and 50F on which the remaining members 51 are placed are generated. As a result, the required number of base materials N 1 = 6 and the area S 1 of the effective utilization area are obtained (step S18).

その後、歩留り優先配置状態情報の必要母材枚数N0=6と、均等配分優先配置状態情報の必要母材枚数N1=6とは同じであり(ステップS19)、また、歩留り優先配置状態情報の有効活用領域の面積S0と均等配分優先配置状態情報の有効活用領域の面積S1との差分が所定値以下に収まるものとすると(ステップS20)、ステップS17〜S18で3度目の計算で得られた部材51G〜51Iの配置結果が採用されることになる。 Thereafter, the required preform number N 0 = 6 yield preferential arrangement information is the same as the required base material number N 1 = 6 for sharing priority layout state information (step S19), also yield priority layout state information Assuming that the difference between the area S 0 of the effective use area and the area S 1 of the effective use area of the uniform distribution priority arrangement state information falls within a predetermined value (step S20), the third calculation is performed in steps S17 to S18. The arrangement results of the obtained members 51G to 51I are employed.

なお、上述した説明では、加工を行う際の作業の効率化を前提とした場合のものであるが、加工材料である母材50の単価が非常に高価で、作業効率よりも母材50への部材配置歩留り率を高めることが最優先であるような状況の場合には、この実施の形態1に示した部材51を均等に母材50に配置する方法の適用の有無を図形配置装置10上の処理として適宜切り替えることができるようにパラメータなどで設定してもよい。   The above description is based on the premise that the work efficiency when processing is performed. However, the unit price of the base material 50 that is a processing material is very expensive, and the base material 50 is more expensive than the work efficiency. In the situation where the highest priority is to increase the member placement yield rate, the graphic placement device 10 determines whether or not the method of placing the members 51 shown in the first embodiment evenly on the base material 50 is applied. You may set by a parameter etc. so that it can change suitably as an upper process.

また逆に、母材50の単価が非常に安価で、作業効率を上記で想定した状況よりも一層優先させることが重要であるような状況の場合には、図4のステップS19における必要母材枚数の判定において、ステップS13の確認結果に比べてステップS18の結果における母材50の使用枚数の増加が、コスト的に許容される所定の枚数(たとえば1枚)までであればそれを許容範囲として判定を行ってもよい。つまり、ステップS19でN1≦N0+x(xは任意の数)であれば、ステップS17〜S18で得られた配置結果を採用するようにしてもよい。この場合においても、コストなどの条件を考慮してどの程度の範囲までなら許容できるのかをあらかじめパラメータなどで設定しておく機能などを具備しておけばよい。 Conversely, in the situation where the unit price of the base material 50 is very low and it is important to prioritize the work efficiency over the situation assumed above, the necessary base material in step S19 in FIG. In the determination of the number of sheets, if the increase in the number of used base materials 50 in the result of step S18 compared to the confirmation result of step S13 is up to a predetermined number (for example, one) that is allowed in terms of cost, it is within an allowable range. The determination may be made as That is, if N 1 ≦ N 0 + x (x is an arbitrary number) in step S19, the arrangement result obtained in steps S17 to S18 may be adopted. Even in this case, it is sufficient to provide a function for setting in advance a parameter or the like to what extent is acceptable in consideration of conditions such as cost.

この実施の形態1によれば、必要とされる部材51を母材50から切り出すための配置を行う際に、最初に歩留り優先のネスティング配置計算を行ってそのときに必要な母材数を求め、この母材数以下でしかも同じ部材51の配置状況となる母材50が複数枚となるように、部材51の母材50上への配置を行うようにしたので、得られた配置結果から切断経路の設定処理を行う回数を減らすことができるという効果を有する。また、同じ配置結果を有する母材50が複数枚存在するので、切断経路を含む加工データの保管管理が容易になるとともに、母材50を加工装置で加工処理する際に、同じ配置結果を有する母材50であれば、母材50を入れ替える度に加工データを入れ替える必要がなくなり、加工作業を効率化することができるという効果も有する。   According to the first embodiment, when the arrangement for cutting out the required member 51 from the base material 50 is performed, the yield priority nesting arrangement calculation is first performed to obtain the number of base materials required at that time. Since the arrangement of the member 51 on the base material 50 is performed so that there are a plurality of base materials 50 in which the number of base materials 50 is equal to or less than the number of the base materials, the result of the obtained placement results. This has the effect of reducing the number of times the cutting path setting process is performed. In addition, since there are a plurality of base materials 50 having the same placement result, storage management of processing data including a cutting path is facilitated, and the same placement result is obtained when processing the base material 50 with a processing device. If the base material 50 is used, there is no need to change the processing data every time the base material 50 is replaced, and the processing work can be made more efficient.

実施の形態2.
実施の形態1では、同じ大きさの定型寸法材料だけを母材として使用して配置処理を行った場合を示したが、この実施の形態2では、異なる大きさの母材が混在する中で効率のよい配置を求める場合について説明する。
Embodiment 2. FIG.
In the first embodiment, the case where the placement processing is performed by using only the fixed-size material having the same size as the base material is shown. However, in the second embodiment, the base materials having different sizes are mixed. A case of obtaining an efficient arrangement will be described.

まず、異なる大きさの母材が混在する場合における部材の配置処理方法の従来例の概略について説明する。図14−1〜図14−2は、21枚の同一形状の矩形状の部材を、サイズの比較的大きな第1の母材とサイズの比較的小さな第2の母材とに歩留り優先で配置した状態を模式的に示している。第1の母材50は、通常の定型サイズの大きな母材であり、多数枚用意されているものとする。また、第2の母材60は、たとえば以前に加工処理によって第1の母材50から部材51を切り出した際に残った端材(残材)であり、第1の母材50よりもサイズが小さく、ここでは1枚だけ余っているものとする。   First, an outline of a conventional example of a member arrangement processing method when base materials of different sizes coexist will be described. 14-1 to FIG. 14-2, 21 rectangular members having the same shape are arranged on the first base material having a relatively large size and the second base material having a relatively small size in priority to yield. This state is schematically shown. The first base material 50 is a base material having a large standard size, and a large number of first base materials 50 are prepared. In addition, the second base material 60 is an end material (remaining material) left when the member 51 is cut out from the first base material 50 by processing, for example, and is larger in size than the first base material 50. It is assumed that only one sheet is left here.

通常、定型サイズの大きな第1の母材50が多数枚用意されている状態においては、できる限り小さな端材は残さず優先して先に使い切りたいと考えるため、歩留り優先のネスティング配置処理を行う際に、使用する母材として面積の小さなものから順に高い優先度を設定する。その結果、図14−1〜図14−2に示す様に、1枚目の小さな面積の第2の母材60に対して部材を効率良く配置した後、残りの部材51を多数枚用意されている別の第1の母材50に配置する。図14−1では、3枚目の第1の母材50Bにできる限り部材を左側に寄せて配置し、残りの母材(すなわち端材)ができる限り矩形に近い形で残るように配置される場合を示しており、図14−2では、3枚目の第1の母材50Bに部材51を同じ方向に順に配置した場合を示している。これらの配置の選択は、予め定められているものもあれば、パラメータで選択設定できるものもある。また、面積の小さい第2の母材60を優先するという設定にしていない場合でも、図14−1に示されるように、1枚目の第2の母材60は非常に歩留り率が高く配置され、さらに3枚目の第1の母材50Bにおいても残りの形状がほぼ矩形に近い形で残るため、その端材が後の別の加工で使用できると判断され、やはり図14−1に示す通りの配置が行われる場合が多い。このように、従来の部材配置方法においては、小さいサイズの母材と大きいサイズの母材が存在する場合に、小さいサイズの母材から先に使用するように配置が行われる。   Usually, in a state where a large number of first base materials 50 having a large standard size are prepared, the nesting arrangement processing with priority on yield is performed in order to preferentially use up as much as possible without leaving as small an end material as possible. In this case, as a base material to be used, a higher priority is set in descending order of area. As a result, as shown in FIGS. 14A to 14B, after the members are efficiently arranged on the second base material 60 having the first small area, a large number of remaining members 51 are prepared. It arrange | positions to another 1st preform | base_material 50 which is. In FIG. 14A, the first base material 50B of the third sheet is arranged as close as possible to the left side, and the remaining base material (that is, the end material) is arranged to remain as close to a rectangle as possible. FIG. 14B illustrates a case where the members 51 are sequentially arranged in the same direction on the third first base material 50B. Some of these arrangements are predetermined and others can be selected and set by parameters. Even when the second base material 60 having a small area is not set to be prioritized, as shown in FIG. 14A, the first second base material 60 is arranged with a very high yield rate. In addition, since the remaining shape of the third first base material 50B remains in a nearly rectangular shape, it is determined that the end material can be used in another processing later, and also in FIG. Arrangement as shown is often performed. Thus, in the conventional member arrangement method, when there is a small-size base material and a large-size base material, the placement is performed so that the small-size base material is used first.

図15は、この発明にかかる図形配置装置の実施の形態2の構成を示すブロック図である。この図形配置装置10bは、実施の形態1の図形配置装置10において、歩留り優先ネスティング部12による歩留り優先のネスティング配置時に使用する複数種類の母材間の優先順位を予め指定する母材使用優先順位指定部21と、部材均等配分計算部13によって算出される部材を歩留り優先ネスティング部12が均等配置の計算時に使用する母材の優先順位を決定する母材使用優先順位決定部22と、をさらに備える構成を有するものである。   FIG. 15 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the second embodiment of the graphic layout apparatus according to the present invention. This graphic placement device 10b is a base material use priority order that pre-designates priorities among a plurality of types of base materials used in the yield priority nesting placement by the yield priority nesting unit 12 in the graphic placement device 10 of the first embodiment. A specifying unit 21, and a base material use priority order determining unit 22 that determines the priority order of base materials that the yield priority nesting unit 12 uses when calculating the uniform arrangement of the members calculated by the member uniform distribution calculating unit 13. It has the composition provided.

母材使用優先順位指定部21は、図形データ格納部11に異なる大きさの母材が用意されている場合に、各母材を使用する優先順位を予め使用者が指定したり、それぞれの母材に対して付された複数ある優先順位の中から自動的に1つの優先順位を選択したりするなどして、その優先順位を歩留り優先ネスティング部12に出力する機能を有する。通常、母材のサイズが小さいものほど高い優先順位が設定されている。なお、歩留り優先ネスティング部12によってある優先順位における配置結果が算出された後に、さらに母材の優先順位を適宜変えた優先順位情報を歩留り優先ネスティング部12に出力する機能を持たせてもよい。このようにすることで、歩留り優先ネスティング部12による複数の配置が計算され、その中から最も歩留りがよい配置結果を得ることもできる。   When the base material use priority order specifying unit 21 prepares base materials of different sizes in the graphic data storage unit 11, the base material use priority order specifying unit 21 specifies the priority order for using each base material in advance, It has a function of outputting one of the priorities to the yield priority nesting unit 12 by, for example, automatically selecting one priority from a plurality of priorities assigned to the material. Usually, a higher priority is set for a smaller base material. In addition, after the yield priority nesting unit 12 calculates the arrangement result in a certain priority order, the priority priority nesting unit 12 may be further provided with a function of outputting priority order information obtained by appropriately changing the priority order of the base material. By doing in this way, the arrangement | positioning by the yield priority nesting part 12 is calculated, and the arrangement | positioning result with the highest yield can also be obtained among them.

母材使用優先順位決定部22は、図形データ格納部11に異なる大きさの母材が用意されている場合の部材均等配分計算部13によって配分計算された部材数を基に歩留り優先ネスティング部12がネスティング配置を行うときに、前回指定された優先順位を出力するか、あるいは、適宜異ならせた優先順位を出力する機能を有する。より具体的には、均等配置母材に部材を配置する場合には、母材の枚数の多いものほど高い優先順位を設定し、残余配置母材に余りの部材を配置する場合には母材のサイズの小さいものほど高い優先順位を設定する機能を有する。この母材使用優先順位決定部22も、母材使用優先順位指定部21と同様に、歩留り優先ネスティング部12によってある優先順位における配置結果が算出された後に、さらに母材の優先順位を適宜変えた優先順位情報を歩留り優先ネスティング部12に出力し、その中から最も歩留りがよい配置結果を得るようにしてもよい。   The base material use priority order determination unit 22 is a yield priority nesting unit 12 based on the number of members distributed and calculated by the member uniform distribution calculation unit 13 when base materials of different sizes are prepared in the graphic data storage unit 11. Has a function of outputting the priority level designated last time or appropriately changing the priority level when performing the nesting arrangement. More specifically, when a member is arranged on an evenly arranged base material, a higher priority is set for a larger number of base materials, and when a surplus member is placed on a remaining placed base material, the base material is set. The smaller the size, the higher priority is set. Similarly to the base material use priority order specifying unit 21, the base material use priority order determination unit 22 further changes the base material priority order as appropriate after the yield priority nesting unit 12 calculates the placement result at a certain priority order. The priority order information may be output to the yield priority nesting unit 12 to obtain an arrangement result with the best yield.

歩留り優先ネスティング部12は、必要部材情報に基づいて部材を母材に歩留り優先で配置計算する際に、母材使用優先順位指定部21によって出力された優先順位に基づいて母材を使用して、部材のネスティング配置を行う。また、歩留り優先ネスティング部12は、部材均等配分計算部13で計算された部材数に基づいて部材の均等配分計算を行う際に、母材使用優先順位決定部22によって出力された優先順位に基づいて使用する母材を選択して部材のネスティング配置を行う。なお、実施の形態1の図1と同一の構成要素には同一の符号を付してその説明を省略している。   The yield priority nesting unit 12 uses the base material based on the priority output by the base material use priority order specifying unit 21 when calculating the placement of the member on the base material with the yield priority based on the necessary member information. The nesting arrangement of the members is performed. In addition, the yield priority nesting unit 12 is based on the priority output by the base material use priority determining unit 22 when performing the uniform distribution calculation of the members based on the number of members calculated by the member uniform distribution calculation unit 13. The base material to be used is selected and the members are nested. In addition, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected to the component same as FIG. 1 of Embodiment 1, and the description is abbreviate | omitted.

つぎに、この発明にかかる図形配置方法の実施の形態2の処理手順について、具体例を挙げながら説明する。図16は、この発明にかかる図形配置方法のフローチャートである。また、具体例として、図14−1〜図14−2に示される場合と同じように、21個の矩形状の部材51を、サイズの大きい複数の第1の母材50とサイズの小さい1枚の第2の母材60からなる母材群の中から選択した母材に配置する場合を挙げる。図17〜図18は、母材から切り出す部材の母材への配置状態の具体例を示す図であり、図17は、同じ大きさの3枚の第1の母材に部材を歩留り優先でネスティング配置計算処理を行った結果を示す図であり、図18は、均等配分を優先して部材を異なる種類の母材にネスティング配置計算処理を行った結果を示す図である。   Next, the processing procedure of the second embodiment of the graphic arrangement method according to the present invention will be described with reference to specific examples. FIG. 16 is a flowchart of the graphic arrangement method according to the present invention. As a specific example, as in the case shown in FIGS. 14A to 14B, 21 rectangular members 51 are combined with a plurality of first base materials 50 having a large size and a small size 1. The case where it arrange | positions to the base material selected from the base material group which consists of the 2nd base material 60 of a sheet | seat is given. FIGS. 17 to 18 are diagrams showing specific examples of the arrangement state of the members cut out from the base material on the base material. FIG. 17 shows the priority given to yield of the members on the three first base materials of the same size. FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating a result of performing the nesting arrangement calculation processing on different types of base materials with priority given to uniform distribution.

まず、使用者によって、必要な部材の種類や数、母材などの必要部材情報の入力が入力部18を介して行われる(ステップS51)。ついで、母材使用優先順位指定部21は、入力された母材について、母材の大きさが小さいほど母材の使用優先順位が高くなるように優先順位を設定する(ステップS52)。ここでは、通常の部材配置装置で採用される基準である小さい母材から優先して使用する方法を採用している。つまり、この例では、サイズの小さい第2の母材60を第1使用優先順位に設定し、サイズの大きい第1の母材50を第2使用優先順位に設定する。   First, the user inputs necessary member information such as the type and number of necessary members and a base material through the input unit 18 (step S51). Next, the base material use priority order specifying unit 21 sets the priority order for the input base material so that the base material use priority becomes higher as the size of the base material is smaller (step S52). In this case, a method of preferentially using a small base material, which is a standard adopted in a normal member placement apparatus, is adopted. That is, in this example, the second base material 60 having a small size is set to the first use priority order, and the first base material 50 having a large size is set to the second use priority order.

ついで、実施の形態1の図4のフローチャートのステップS12〜S15と同様に、歩留り優先で部材の配置計算処理を行い、必要母材枚数N0と有効活用領域の面積S0を求め、均等配置母材枚数Mとして必要母材枚数N0を設定し、各部材の個数をMで割った商Qiと余りRiを求める(ステップS53〜S56)。ただし、歩留り優先ネスティング部12は、サイズの小さい第2の母材60から優先してネスティング配置計算処理を行う点が、実施の形態1の場合と異なる点である。この例では、サイズの小さい第2の母材60は1枚だけなので、この第2の母材60に部材51を配置した後は、サイズの大きい第1の母材50に部材51を配置する処理を行う。その結果が図14−1であるとする。この図より、必要母材枚数N0=3と有効活用領域の面積S0が求められ、部材を均等に配置する母材の枚数M=3が設定される。部材51の個数は「21」であるので、これをM=3で割った商Qiは「7」で余りRiは「0」となる。 Then, as in step S12~S15 in the flowchart of FIG. 4 of the first embodiment performs the arrangement calculation processing member in yield priority, and measuring the area S 0 of the effective utilization area required matrix number N 0, justification A necessary number of base materials N 0 is set as the number of base materials M, and a quotient Qi and a remainder Ri obtained by dividing the number of each member by M are obtained (steps S53 to S56). However, the yield priority nesting unit 12 is different from the first embodiment in that the nesting arrangement calculation processing is performed in preference to the second base material 60 having a smaller size. In this example, since there is only one small second base material 60, the member 51 is disposed on the first base material 50 having a large size after the member 51 is disposed on the second base material 60. Process. Assume that the result is shown in FIG. From this figure, the required number of base materials N 0 = 3 and the area S 0 of the effective utilization area are obtained, and the number of base materials M = 3 on which members are evenly arranged is set. Since the number of members 51 is “21”, the quotient Qi obtained by dividing this by M = 3 is “7”, and the remainder Ri is “0”.

ついで、母材使用優先順位決定部22は、母材の枚数が多いほど母材の使用優先順位が高くなるように優先順位を設定する(ステップS57)。これは、同じ配置の母材をできる限り多くすることが目的だからである。この例では、サイズの小さい第2の母材60は1枚だけであり、サイズの大きい第1の母材50は多数有るので、サイズの大きい第1の母材50を第1使用優先順位に設定し、サイズの小さい第2の母材60を第2使用優先順位に設定する。   Next, the base material use priority order determination unit 22 sets the priority order so that the base material use priority order increases as the number of base materials increases (step S57). This is because the purpose is to increase the number of base materials with the same arrangement as much as possible. In this example, there is only one second base material 60 having a small size, and there are a large number of first base materials 50 having a large size. Therefore, the first base material 50 having a large size is set to the first use priority order. The second base material 60 having a smaller size is set to the second usage priority order.

ついで、歩留り優先ネスティング部12は、ステップS56で求めた商Qiの「7」個の部材を、均等配置母材すなわち使用優先順位の高い第1の母材50に対して、歩留り率優先のネスティング配置計算処理を行う(ステップS58)。ここでは、図17に示されるように、サイズの大きい3枚の第1の母材50のそれぞれに7個の部材51がちょうど収まるという結果が得られる。   Next, the yield priority nesting unit 12 sets the “7” members of the quotient Qi obtained in step S56 with respect to the uniformly arranged base material, that is, the first base material 50 having a high use priority, nesting with priority on the yield rate. Arrangement calculation processing is performed (step S58). Here, as shown in FIG. 17, the result is that the seven members 51 just fit into each of the three first base materials 50 having a large size.

ついで、母材使用優先順位決定部22は、ステップS58で配置されなかった残りの部材、この場合にはステップS56で求めた余りRiを、残余配置母材に配置する際のために、母材のサイズが小さいほど高い優先順位となるように各母材50,60に優先順位を設定する(ステップS59)。これは、均等配置後に余った部材51を配置するので、特に同じ配置を考慮することなく、サイズの小さい母材から消費していくことが望ましいからである。この例では、サイズの小さい1枚の第2の母材60には第1使用優先順位を設定し、サイズの大きい複数枚の第1の母材50には第2使用優先順位を設定する。   Next, the base material use priority order determination unit 22 sets the remaining members not placed in step S58, in this case, the remainder Ri obtained in step S56, in order to place them in the remaining placed base material. The priority order is set for each of the base materials 50 and 60 so that the smaller the size is, the higher the priority order is (step S59). This is because the surplus members 51 are arranged after the uniform arrangement, so that it is desirable to consume from a small-sized base material without considering the same arrangement in particular. In this example, the first use priority is set for one second base material 60 having a small size, and the second use priority is set for a plurality of first base materials 50 having a large size.

その後、歩留り優先ネスティング部12は、母材使用優先順位決定部22によって決定された優先順位に基づいて、ステップS58で配置されずに残った部材51(すなわち、ステップS56で求められた余りRiを個数とする部材とステップS58で均等配置母材に配置されるべき部材のうち配置されなかった部材)を、残余配置母材すなわち使用優先順位の高い第2の母材60から順に歩留り優先で配置する処理を行う(ステップS60)。この例では余りがないので、ステップS59〜S60の処理は省略される。   Thereafter, the yield priority nesting unit 12 uses the priority determined by the base material use priority determination unit 22 to determine the remaining member 51 that is not disposed in step S58 (that is, the remainder Ri obtained in step S56). The number of members and the members that should not be placed among the members that should be placed on the uniformly placed base material in step S58) are placed in order of yield in order from the remaining placed base material, that is, the second base material 60 with the highest use priority. Is performed (step S60). Since there is no remainder in this example, the processing of steps S59 to S60 is omitted.

ついで、実施の形態1の図4のフローチャートのステップS18〜S20と同様に、部材51を均等に配分するために配置計算された結果から、必要母材枚数N1と母材50,60の有効活用領域の面積S1を求め、ステップS54で求めた歩留り優先配置状態情報の必要母材枚数N0と有効活用領域の面積S0と比較して、ステップS58とステップS60で計算した配置状態が適切か否か判定し、適切でない場合には部材を均等に配置する母材の枚数Mを1つ減算して再びステップS56からの処理を行い、適切である場合にはステップS58,S60の配置結果を採用して、図形配置処理が終了する(ステップS61〜S64,S71〜S73)。なお、ステップS71〜S73は、実施の形態1の図4のステップS31〜S33と同一であるので、その説明を省略する。 Then, as in step S18~S20 in the flowchart of FIG. 4 in the first embodiment, from the results which are arranged calculated to evenly distribute the member 51, the required preform number N 1 and the base material 50 and 60 enable The area S 1 of the utilization area is obtained, and the arrangement state calculated in steps S58 and S60 is compared with the required number of base materials N 0 in the yield priority arrangement state information obtained in step S54 and the area S 0 of the effective utilization area. It is determined whether or not it is appropriate. If it is not appropriate, the number M of base materials on which the members are evenly arranged is subtracted by 1 and the processing from step S56 is performed again. If appropriate, the arrangement of steps S58 and S60 is performed. The graphic placement process is completed by adopting the result (steps S61 to S64, S71 to S73). Note that steps S71 to S73 are the same as steps S31 to S33 of FIG.

この例では、必要部材枚数はN1=3,N0=3であり、N1とN0を比較する1次判定では、N1≦N0を満たすので、その配置は適切であると判断する。そして、有効活用領域の面積S1,S0を比較する第2次判定に進む。図17の有効活用領域の面積S1は、図14−1の有効活用領域の面積S0に比して明らかに大きい。これは、図14−1では3枚の母材の中にサイズの小さい第2の母材60が使用されていることが主な原因である。ここで、S1〜S0が所定値(C)以下であると判断されれば図17の配置を採用することとなる。この場合、サイズの小さい第2の母材60は使用されなかったが、部材51の母材50に対する配置は1種類のみとなり加工データ処理の手間を削減することができるという利点がある。また、S1〜S0が所定値(C)以下と判断されなければ、図17の配置は不適切であると判断され、部材51を均等に配置する母材50,60の枚数を1減算し、再び上述したステップS56から処理が行われる。 In this example, the required number of members is N 1 = 3, N 0 = 3, and in the primary determination comparing N 1 and N 0 , N 1 ≦ N 0 is satisfied, so that the arrangement is determined to be appropriate. To do. Then, the process proceeds to the secondary determining comparing the area S 1, S 0 of the effective utilization area. The area S 1 of the effective use area in FIG. 17 is clearly larger than the area S 0 of the effective use area in FIG. This is mainly because the second base material 60 having a small size is used among the three base materials in FIG. Here, if it is determined that S 1 to S 0 are equal to or smaller than the predetermined value (C), the arrangement of FIG. 17 is adopted. In this case, the second base material 60 having a small size is not used, but there is an advantage that the arrangement of the member 51 with respect to the base material 50 is only one type, and the labor of processing data processing can be reduced. If it is not determined that S 1 to S 0 are equal to or less than the predetermined value (C), it is determined that the arrangement in FIG. 17 is inappropriate, and the number of base materials 50 and 60 on which the members 51 are evenly arranged is decremented by one. Then, the processing is performed again from step S56 described above.

ここでは、S1〜S0が所定値(C)よりも大きいと判断されたものとして、さらに説明を行う。この場合、配置状態比較判定部15は、ステップS55で設定された均等配置母材枚数Mから「1」を減算した値「M−1」を新たなMとして設定する。この例では、M=2(=3−1)となる。部材51の個数「21」をこの「2」で除算すると商は「10」で、余りは「1」となる。また、上述したステップS57と同様に母材50,60に設定された使用優先順位にしたがって、すなわち第1使用優先順位のサイズの大きい第1の母材50に10個の部材51を歩留り優先でネスティング配置計算を行う。その結果、実際には図18に示すように、2枚の第1の母材50に部材51がそれぞれ9個しか配置できないので、それぞれの母材で余りが1つずつ生じて、部材51の余りが合計3個となったものとする。この後に、余った部材51を配置する処理を行うが、母材使用優先順位決定部22により母材のサイズが小さいほど高い使用優先順位が設定されているので、第2の母材60に余った3個の部材51を、歩留り率優先のネスティング配置計算処理を行う。その結果が、図18の3枚目の第2の母材60に示されている。これらの第1と第2の母材50,60への部材51の配置結果から、必要母材枚数N1=3と母材の有効活用領域の面積S1が求められる。そして、これらがステップS54で得られた歩留り優先でネスティング配置を行った際の必要母材枚数N0と母材の有効活用領域の面積S0と比較され、ステップS58,S60計算された配置が適切か否かが判定される。この場合、N1≦N0を満たすので、有効活用領域の面積S1とS0とが比較される。図18の有効活用領域の面積S1は、図14−1の有効活用領域の面積S0に比べてやや大きいが、|S1−S0|が所定値(C)以下と判断されれば、図18の配置が採用されることとなる。この配置が採用されれば、使用した母材の構成は図14−1と同じであるが、配置は2種類となり図14−1の場合よりも1種類少ないので、加工データ処理の手間が削減される。 Here, the description will be further made assuming that S 1 to S 0 are determined to be larger than the predetermined value (C). In this case, the arrangement state comparison / determination unit 15 sets a value “M−1” obtained by subtracting “1” from the number M of uniformly arranged base materials set in step S55 as a new M. In this example, M = 2 (= 3-1). When the number “21” of the members 51 is divided by this “2”, the quotient is “10” and the remainder is “1”. Similarly to step S57 described above, according to the use priority set for the base materials 50 and 60, that is, ten members 51 are given priority to the first base material 50 having a large size of the first use priority. Perform nesting placement calculations. As a result, as shown in FIG. 18, since only nine members 51 can be arranged on the two first base materials 50, one remainder is generated in each base material. The remainder is 3 in total. After this, a process of arranging the surplus member 51 is performed. Since the base material use priority order determination unit 22 sets a higher use priority as the base material size is smaller, the surplus member 51 is left in the second base material 60. The three members 51 are subjected to a nesting arrangement calculation process giving priority to the yield rate. The result is shown in the third second base material 60 of FIG. From the arrangement result of the member 51 on the first and second base materials 50 and 60, the required number of base materials N 1 = 3 and the area S 1 of the base material effective utilization region are obtained. These are compared with the required base material number N 0 when the nesting placement is performed with priority given to the yield obtained in step S54 and the area S 0 of the base material effective utilization area, and the placement calculated in steps S58 and S60 is obtained. It is determined whether it is appropriate. In this case, since N 1 ≦ N 0 is satisfied, the areas S 1 and S 0 of the effective use region are compared. The area S 1 of the effective use area in FIG. 18 is slightly larger than the area S 0 of the effective use area in FIG. 14-1, but if | S 1 −S 0 | is determined to be equal to or less than a predetermined value (C). The arrangement shown in FIG. 18 is adopted. If this arrangement is adopted, the configuration of the base material used is the same as that shown in FIG. 14-1, but there are two types of arrangement and one type less than the case shown in FIG. Is done.

なお、上述した例では2種類の母材50,60が存在する場合を示したが、3種類以上の母材が存在する場合でも同様の処理を適用することができる。また、母材が矩形状ではなく異形状の場合などでも同じ形状の母材がある場合には同様の処理を適用することができる。さらに、上述した例では、1種類の部材51だけを回転などさせながら配置する場合を示したが、実施の形態1の場合と同様に複数種類の部材51を組み合わせて複数種類の母材に配置する場合の処理にも適用することができる。   In the above-described example, the case where two types of base materials 50 and 60 exist is shown, but the same processing can be applied even when three or more types of base materials exist. In addition, even when the base material is not rectangular but has a different shape, the same processing can be applied when there is a base material having the same shape. Furthermore, in the above-described example, the case where only one type of member 51 is arranged while being rotated is shown. However, as in the case of the first embodiment, a plurality of types of members 51 are combined and arranged on a plurality of types of base materials. It can also be applied to processing in the case of.

また、上述した説明では、部材均等配分計算部13による部材の均等配分の計算処理において、全く同じ大きさの母材に対して適用する場合を示したが、予め指定した誤差の範囲内での異なる大きさの母材に対しては同じ大きさの母材とみなして部材均等配分計算部13による部材の均等配分の計算処理を実行するようにしてもよい。これにより、作成する加工データの種類を減らすことができ、作業効率を上げることができる。さらに、定型の母材に対して既に一部の加工が行われ、母材の残っている部分の形状が同等の範囲内の母材とみなせる場合においても同様に処理することができる。   Further, in the above description, in the calculation process of the uniform distribution of the member by the member uniform distribution calculation unit 13, the case where it is applied to the base material of exactly the same size is shown, but within the range of the error specified in advance. The base material of different sizes may be regarded as the base material of the same size, and the member uniform distribution calculation unit 13 may execute the member uniform distribution calculation processing. As a result, the types of processing data to be created can be reduced, and work efficiency can be increased. Furthermore, the same processing can be performed when a part of the base material is already processed and the shape of the remaining part of the base material can be regarded as a base material within an equivalent range.

この実施の形態2によれば、実施の形態1の効果に加えて、異なるサイズの母材50,60が複数種類存在する場合でも、異なるサイズの母材50,60ごとに使用する優先順位を付するようにしたので、加工データの種類を減らす配置を優先することができる。また、部材51を均等に配置する均等配置母材以外の残余配置母材に余りの部材を配置する際には、数の少ない母材に高い優先順位を付すようにしたので、前回の加工時に出された端材を効果的に使用することもできるという効果を有する。   According to the second embodiment, in addition to the effects of the first embodiment, even when there are a plurality of types of base materials 50 and 60 of different sizes, the priority order to be used for the base materials 50 and 60 of different sizes is set. Therefore, priority can be given to an arrangement that reduces the type of processed data. In addition, when placing the surplus members on the remaining placement base material other than the uniform placement base material that places the members 51 evenly, a high priority is assigned to the few base materials. It has the effect that the discharged end material can also be used effectively.

なお、上述した実施の形態1と2に示した方法を、これらの方法の処理手順が格納されたプログラムとして構成し、これらのプログラムを、パーソナルコンピュータやワークステーションなどのコンピュータで実行することによって実現することができる。   The methods described in the first and second embodiments are configured as programs in which the processing procedures of these methods are stored, and these programs are executed by a computer such as a personal computer or a workstation. can do.

以上のように、この発明にかかる図形配置装置、図形配置方法およびその方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムは、レーザ加工機、ウォータジェット加工機、プラズマ切断機、タレットパンチプレス加工機、裁断装置など、複数個の製品を切り抜き切断加工する加工装置で、部材を母材から切り出す際の図形の配置処理に有用であり、特に、複数種類の部材を複数種類の母材に配置して加工を行う際の作業効率を向上させる場合に適している。   As described above, the graphic layout device, the graphic layout method and the program for causing the computer to execute the method according to the present invention include a laser processing machine, a water jet processing machine, a plasma cutting machine, a turret punch press processing machine, a cutting apparatus, etc. It is a processing device that cuts out and cuts multiple products, and is useful for graphic placement processing when parts are cut out from the base material. Especially, when processing by placing multiple types of members on multiple types of base materials It is suitable for improving work efficiency.

この発明にかかる図形配置装置の概略構成を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows schematic structure of the figure arrangement | positioning apparatus concerning this invention. 有効活用領域の求め方の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of how to obtain | require an effective utilization area | region. 有効活用領域の求め方の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of how to obtain | require an effective utilization area | region. 有効活用領域の求め方の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of how to obtain | require an effective utilization area | region. 図形配置装置の機能を有する情報処理装置のハードウェアの構成の一例を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows an example of the hardware constitutions of the information processing apparatus which has a function of a figure arrangement | positioning apparatus. この発明にかかる図形配置方法のフローチャートである。It is a flowchart of the figure arrangement | positioning method concerning this invention. 母材から切り出す部材の種類と個数を模式的に示す図である。It is a figure which shows typically the kind and number of members cut out from a base material. 部材の元となる母材の形状を模式的に示す図である。It is a figure which shows typically the shape of the base material used as the origin of a member. 図5の部材を図6の母材に歩留り優先でネスティング配置計算処理を行った結果を示す図である。FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a result of performing a nesting arrangement calculation process on the base material of FIG. 図5の部材を3枚の母材に均等に配置する場合の部材均等配分の計算方法を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the calculation method of member equal distribution in the case of arrange | positioning the member of FIG. 5 equally to three base materials. 図8−1の結果を用いて歩留り優先でネスティング配置計算処理を行った結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the result of having performed the nesting arrangement | positioning calculation process by the yield priority using the result of FIGS. 図5の部材を2枚の母材に均等に配置する場合の部材均等配分の計算方法を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the calculation method of member equal distribution in the case of arrange | positioning the member of FIG. 5 equally on two base materials. 図9−1の結果を用いて歩留り優先でネスティング配置計算処理を行った結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the result of having performed the nesting arrangement | positioning calculation process by the yield priority using the result of FIGS. 同一形状の15個の部材を歩留り優先で母材にネスティング配置計算を行った結果を模式的に示す図である。It is a figure which shows typically the result of having performed the nesting arrangement | positioning calculation to the base material by yield priority with respect to 15 members of the same shape. 同一形状の15個の部材を均等配置優先で母材にネスティング配置計算を行った結果を模式的に示す図である。It is a figure which shows typically the result of having carried out the nesting arrangement | positioning calculation to the base material with equal arrangement | positioning priority for 15 members of the same shape. 必要な部材の数と種類を模式的に示す図である。It is a figure which shows typically the number and kind of a required member. 部材を歩留り優先で母材にネスティング配置計算を行った結果を模式的に示す図である。It is a figure which shows typically the result of having performed the nesting arrangement | positioning calculation to the base material in the yield priority. 部材を均等配置優先で母材にネスティング配置計算を行った結果を模式的に示す図である。It is a figure which shows typically the result of having performed the nesting arrangement | positioning calculation to the base material with priority of the arrangement | positioning of a member. 複数枚の同一形状の部材を、サイズの異なる第1と第2の母材に歩留り優先で配置した状態を模式的に示している。A state in which a plurality of members having the same shape are arranged on the first and second base materials having different sizes with priority on yield is schematically shown. 複数枚の同一形状の部材を、サイズの異なる第1と第2の母材に歩留り優先で配置した状態を模式的に示している。A state in which a plurality of members having the same shape are arranged on the first and second base materials having different sizes with priority on yield is schematically shown. この発明にかかる図形配置装置の実施の形態2の構成を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows the structure of Embodiment 2 of the figure arrangement | positioning apparatus concerning this invention. この発明にかかる図形配置方法のフローチャートである。It is a flowchart of the figure arrangement | positioning method concerning this invention. 同じ大きさの3枚の第1の母材に部材を歩留り優先でネスティング配置計算処理を行った結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the result of having performed the nesting arrangement | positioning calculation process with priority on the yield to three 1st base materials of the same magnitude | size. 均等配分を優先して部材を異なる種類の母材にネスティング配置計算処理を行った結果を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the result of having performed the nesting arrangement | positioning calculation process to a different kind of base material prioritizing equal distribution. 部材の形状とその使用個数を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the shape of a member, and its use number. 図19に示される部材を3枚の母材に従来の部材配置方法で配置した一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example which has arrange | positioned the member shown by FIG. 19 to the base material of 3 sheets with the conventional member arrangement | positioning method. 図20の1枚目の部材に対して生成した切断経路の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of the cutting | disconnection path | route produced | generated with respect to the 1st member of FIG.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

10 図形配置装置
11 図形データ格納部
12 歩留り優先ネスティング部
13 部材均等配分計算部
14 配置状態確認部
15 配置状態比較判定部
16 加工情報生成部
17 加工情報格納部
18 入力部
19 出力部
20 制御部
21 母材使用優先順位指定部
22 母材使用優先順位決定部
50,60 母材
51,52 部材
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Graphic arrangement | positioning apparatus 11 Graphic data storage part 12 Yield priority nesting part 13 Member equal distribution calculation part 14 Arrangement state confirmation part 15 Arrangement state comparison determination part 16 Processing information generation part 17 Processing information storage part 18 Input part 19 Output part 20 Control part 21 Base material use priority designation part 22 Base material use priority order determination part 50, 60 Base materials 51, 52

Claims (9)

入力される部材の種類と個数を含む情報に基づいて前記部材を所定の母材に歩留り優先のネスティング配置を行う歩留り優先ネスティング手段と、
前記歩留り優先ネスティング手段によって得られる配置結果から、前記部材を配置するのに必要な必要母材枚数と、前記母材中の前記部材が配置されない領域である有効活用領域の面積とを含む配置状態情報を求める配置状態確認手段と、
配置すべき部材のうち、部材が均等に配置される均等配置母材に割り当てる部材の種類と個数を計算する部材均等配分計算手段と、
前記配置状態確認手段によって求められる、配置すべき部材を歩留り優先で配置した場合の歩留り優先配置状態情報と、前記部材を母材に均等配分優先で配置した場合の均等配分優先配置状態情報とを比較して、均等配分を優先した配置結果が適切か否かを判定する配置状態比較判定手段と、
を備え、
前記歩留り優先ネスティング手段は、配置すべき部材の種類と個数を含む必要部材情報に基づいて行う第1のネスティング配置処理と、前記部材均等配分計算手段によって算出された部材に基づいて前記均等配置母材に配置処理を行うとともに、前記均等配置母材に配置されなかった余りの部材を前記均等配置母材以外の残余配置母材に歩留り優先のネスティング配置処理を行う第2のネスティング配置処理とを行い、
前記部材均等配分計算手段は、前記第1のネスティング配置処理の配置結果に基づく前記配置状態確認手段によって求められた必要母材枚数を、前記均等配置母材枚数として設定し、
前記配置状態比較判定手段は、判定の結果、前記第2のネスティング配置処理による配置結果が適切でない場合に前記均等配置母材枚数から1を減算した値を新たな均等配置母材枚数として前記部材均等配分計算手段に設定
することを特徴とする図形配置装置。
Yield priority nesting means for performing yield priority nesting arrangement on a predetermined base material based on information including the type and number of input members;
From the arrangement result obtained by the yield priority nesting means, the arrangement state includes the necessary number of base materials necessary for arranging the members and the area of the effective use area which is an area in which the members are not arranged in the base material. An arrangement state confirmation means for obtaining information;
Among the members to be arranged, member equal distribution calculating means for calculating the type and number of members to be allocated to the uniformly arranged base material in which the members are arranged uniformly,
Yield priority arrangement state information obtained when the members to be arranged are arranged with priority on yield, and equal distribution priority arrangement state information when the members are arranged on the base material with priority over equal distribution, which are obtained by the arrangement state confirmation unit. In comparison, arrangement state comparison determination means for determining whether or not the arrangement result giving priority to uniform distribution is appropriate;
With
The yield priority nesting means includes a first nesting arrangement process performed based on necessary member information including the type and number of members to be arranged, and the equal arrangement base based on the members calculated by the member equal distribution calculation means. A second nesting arrangement process for performing a nesting arrangement process for giving priority to a remaining arrangement matrix material other than the uniform arrangement matrix material for a surplus member that has not been arranged on the equally arranged matrix material. Done
The member equal distribution calculation means sets the required number of base materials obtained by the placement state confirmation means based on the placement result of the first nesting placement processing as the number of equally placed base materials,
The arrangement state comparison / determination means uses the value obtained by subtracting 1 from the number of equally arranged base materials as a new number of evenly arranged base materials when the result of the determination shows that the placement result by the second nesting placement processing is not appropriate. A graphic arrangement device characterized by being set as a uniform distribution calculation means.
前記配置状態比較判定手段は、
前記均等配分優先配置状態情報と前記歩留り優先配置状態情報の必要母材枚数の差が所定の数以下か否かを判定する第1次判定機能と、
前記均等配分優先配置状態情報と前記歩留り優先配置状態情報の有効活用領域の面積の差が所定の値以下か否かを判定する第2次判定機能と、
を有し、
前記第1次判定機能と前記第2次判定機能の両方を満たす場合に、前記部材均等配分計算手段で計算された部材から得られる前記第2のネスティング配置処理の配置結果を採用することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の図形配置装置。
The arrangement state comparison determination means
A first determination function for determining whether or not a difference in the number of necessary base materials between the uniform distribution priority arrangement state information and the yield priority arrangement state information is a predetermined number or less;
A second determination function for determining whether or not the difference in the area of effective use of the uniform distribution priority arrangement state information and the yield priority arrangement state information is a predetermined value or less;
Have
When both the primary determination function and the secondary determination function are satisfied, the arrangement result of the second nesting arrangement process obtained from the member calculated by the member uniform distribution calculation means is employed. The graphic arrangement device according to claim 1.
前記母材が複数の種類からなり、
前記母材のサイズの小さい順に使用優先順位を設定して、前記歩留り優先ネスティング手段に出力する使用優先順位指定手段と、
前記部材均等配分計算手段によって計算された数の部材の前記均等配置母材へのネスティング配置処理時に、前記母材の枚数が多い順に高い使用優先順位を設定して、前記歩留り優先ネスティング手段に出力し、前記均等配置母材へ配置されなかった部材の残余配置母材へのネスティング配置処理時に、前記母材のサイズの小さい順に使用優先順位を設定して、前記歩留り優先ネスティング手段に出力する使用優先順位決定手段と、
をさらに備えることを特徴とする請求項1または2に記載の図形配置装置。
The base material consists of a plurality of types,
Use priority order specifying means for setting the use priority order in ascending order of the size of the base material and outputting to the yield priority nesting means;
At the time of nesting arrangement processing of the number of members calculated by the member uniform distribution calculation means to the uniform arrangement base material, a higher use priority is set in descending order of the number of the base materials, and output to the yield priority nesting means In the nesting arrangement processing of the members that are not arranged on the uniform arrangement base material to the residual arrangement base material, use priority is set in ascending order of the size of the base material and output to the yield priority nesting means A priority determination means;
The graphic layout device according to claim 1, further comprising:
前記使用優先順位指定手段と前記使用優先順位決定手段は、前記母材の使用優先順位を適宜変えて前記歩留り優先ネスティング手段に出力する機能を有し、
前記歩留り優先ネスティング手段は、前記使用優先順位指定手段または前記使用優先順位決定手段から出力される使用優先順位に基づいて配置したもののうち最も歩留りがよいものを配置結果として採用することを特徴とする請求項3に記載の図形配置装置。
The use priority specifying means and the use priority determining means have a function of appropriately changing the use priority of the base material and outputting it to the yield priority nesting means,
The yield priority nesting means adopts, as an arrangement result, the one with the best yield among those arranged based on the use priority output from the use priority specifying means or the use priority determining means. The figure arrangement device according to claim 3.
同一形状の複数の部材または複数種類の形状の複数の部材を、母材から切り出すために所定の基準にしたがって前記母材上に配置する図形配置方法であって、
前記母材から切り出す必要な部材の形状と数量を含む必要部材情報が入力されると、この必要部材情報に基づいて歩留り優先で前記母材にネスティング配置処理を行う歩留り優先ネスティング工程と、
前記歩留り優先ネスティング工程による配置結果から、前記部材を配置した母材の枚数である必要母材枚数と前記母材のうち前記部材が配置されない有効活用領域の面積とを含む歩留り優先配置状態情報を求める第1配置状態確認工程と、
前記歩留り優先配置状態情報の前記必要母材枚数を、前記部材を均等に配置する均等配置母材枚数として設定する均等配置母材枚数設定工程と、
前記必要な部材の数量を前記均等配置母材枚数で除した商を個数として、前記均等配置母材にネスティング配置処理を行うとともに、前記均等配置母材に配置されなかった部材を前記母材以外の他の母材に歩留り優先のネスティング配置処理を行う均等配分優先ネスティング工程と、
前記均等配分優先ネスティング工程による配置結果から、必要母材枚数と有効活用領域の面積とを含む均等配分優先配置状態情報を求める第2配置状態確認工程と、
前記均等配分優先配置状態情報と前記歩留り優先配置状態情報とを比較して、前記均等配分優先ネスティング工程による配置結果を採用するか否かを判定する判定工程と、
を含み、
前記判定工程で、前記均等配分優先配置状態情報が前記歩留り優先配置状態情報と比較して所定の条件を満たさない場合に、設定された前記均等配置母材枚数から1枚減算した値を新たな均等配置母材枚数として設定し、前記均等配分優先ネスティング工程から前記判定工程までを繰り返し実行することを特徴とする図形配置方法。
In order to cut out a plurality of members of the same shape or a plurality of types of shapes on the base material according to a predetermined standard in order to cut out from the base material,
When necessary member information including the shape and quantity of a member necessary to be cut out from the base material is input, a yield priority nesting step of performing nesting arrangement processing on the base material with yield priority based on the necessary member information;
Yield priority arrangement state information including a necessary number of base materials, which is the number of base materials on which the members are arranged, and an area of an effective use area in which the members are not arranged among the base materials, from the arrangement result by the yield priority nesting step. A first arrangement state confirmation step to be obtained;
An evenly arranged base material number setting step for setting the required base material number of the yield priority placement state information as an evenly placed base material number for uniformly arranging the members;
The quotient obtained by dividing the number of the necessary members by the number of the uniformly arranged base materials is used as a number, and the nesting placement processing is performed on the uniformly placed base material, and the members that are not placed on the uniformly placed base material are other than the base material Equal distribution priority nesting process for performing yield priority nesting placement processing on other base materials,
A second arrangement state confirmation step for obtaining equal distribution priority arrangement state information including the required number of base materials and the area of the effective utilization area from the arrangement result by the equal distribution priority nesting step;
A determination step of comparing the equal distribution priority arrangement state information with the yield priority arrangement state information and determining whether to adopt an arrangement result by the equal distribution priority nesting step;
Including
In the determination step, when the uniform distribution priority arrangement state information does not satisfy a predetermined condition as compared with the yield priority arrangement state information, a value obtained by subtracting one from the set number of uniform arrangement base materials is newly set. A figure arranging method, wherein the number of equally arranged base materials is set and the steps from the uniform distribution priority nesting step to the determining step are repeatedly executed.
前記判定工程は、
前記均等配分優先配置状態情報と前記歩留り優先配置状態情報の必要母材枚数の差が所定の数以下か否かを判定する第1次判定工程と、
前記均等配分優先配置状態情報と前記歩留り優先配置状態情報の有効活用領域の面積の差が所定の値以下か否かを判定する第2次判定工程と、
を含み、
前記第1次判定工程と前記第2次判定工程の両方を満たす場合に、前記均等配分優先ネスティング工程で得られた配置結果を採用することを特徴とする請求項5に記載の図形配置方法。
The determination step includes
A primary determination step of determining whether a difference in the number of necessary base materials between the uniform distribution priority arrangement state information and the yield priority arrangement state information is a predetermined number or less;
A second determination step of determining whether or not the difference in the area of effective use of the equally distributed priority arrangement state information and the yield priority arrangement state information is a predetermined value or less;
Including
6. The graphic layout method according to claim 5, wherein the layout result obtained in the equal distribution priority nesting process is adopted when both the primary determination process and the secondary determination process are satisfied.
前記母材は、サイズの異なる複数種類の母材から構成され、
前記歩留り優先ネスティング工程は、サイズの小さい母材ほど使用優先順位を高くして、歩留り優先のネスティング配置処理を行い、
前記均等配分優先ネスティング工程は、母材の枚数の多い母材ほど使用優先順位を高くして、前記必要な部材の数量を前記均等配置母材枚数で除した商を個数として前記均等配置母材にネスティング配置処理を行い、サイズの小さい母材ほど使用優先順位を高くして前記均等配置母材に配置されなかった部材を前記母材以外の他の母材に歩留り優先のネスティング配置処理を行うことを特徴とする請求項5または6に記載の図形配置方法。
The base material is composed of a plurality of types of base materials having different sizes,
In the yield priority nesting step, the smaller the size of the base material, the higher the use priority, and the yield priority nesting arrangement processing is performed.
In the equal distribution priority nesting step, the base material having a larger number of base materials has a higher use priority, and the equal base material is obtained by dividing the number of necessary members by the number of base materials. Nesting placement processing is performed, and the smaller the size of the base material, the higher the priority of use is, and the members that are not placed on the uniform placement base material are subjected to yield priority nesting placement processing on other base materials other than the base material. The figure arrangement method according to claim 5 or 6, characterized by the above-mentioned.
前記歩留り優先ネスティング工程と前記均等配分優先ネスティング工程では、前記母材の使用優先順位を適宜変化させた場合のそれぞれについて歩留り優先のネスティング配置処理を行い、その中で最も歩留りのよいものを配置結果として採用することを特徴とする請求項7に記載の図形配置方法。   In the yield priority nesting step and the equal distribution priority nesting step, the yield priority nesting placement processing is performed for each of the cases where the use priority of the base material is appropriately changed, and the best yield among them is the placement result. The graphic layout method according to claim 7, wherein the graphic layout method is employed. 請求項5〜8のいずれか1つに記載された図形配置方法をコンピュータに実行させるプログラム。   The program which makes a computer perform the figure arrangement | positioning method as described in any one of Claims 5-8.
JP2004278178A 2004-09-24 2004-09-24 Graphic arrangement apparatus, graphic arrangement method, and program for causing computer to execute the method Expired - Fee Related JP4593218B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004278178A JP4593218B2 (en) 2004-09-24 2004-09-24 Graphic arrangement apparatus, graphic arrangement method, and program for causing computer to execute the method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004278178A JP4593218B2 (en) 2004-09-24 2004-09-24 Graphic arrangement apparatus, graphic arrangement method, and program for causing computer to execute the method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006092351A true JP2006092351A (en) 2006-04-06
JP4593218B2 JP4593218B2 (en) 2010-12-08

Family

ID=36233241

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004278178A Expired - Fee Related JP4593218B2 (en) 2004-09-24 2004-09-24 Graphic arrangement apparatus, graphic arrangement method, and program for causing computer to execute the method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4593218B2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014021657A (en) * 2012-07-17 2014-02-03 Amada Co Ltd Automatic programming device and its method and working system
WO2016163048A1 (en) * 2015-04-10 2016-10-13 常石造船株式会社 Nesting method, nesting device, and nesting program
WO2019065026A1 (en) * 2017-09-29 2019-04-04 常石造船株式会社 Seam arranging method, seam arranging device, and seam arranging program
JP2020173559A (en) * 2019-04-09 2020-10-22 Vuild株式会社 Work processing system, work processing program, and work processing method

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001184112A (en) * 1999-12-27 2001-07-06 Amada Co Ltd Method and device for automatically blanking parts and computer readable recording medium recording program for executing automatic blanking of parts

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001184112A (en) * 1999-12-27 2001-07-06 Amada Co Ltd Method and device for automatically blanking parts and computer readable recording medium recording program for executing automatic blanking of parts

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014021657A (en) * 2012-07-17 2014-02-03 Amada Co Ltd Automatic programming device and its method and working system
WO2016163048A1 (en) * 2015-04-10 2016-10-13 常石造船株式会社 Nesting method, nesting device, and nesting program
JPWO2016163048A1 (en) * 2015-04-10 2017-06-08 常石造船株式会社 Nesting method, nesting apparatus and nesting program
WO2019065026A1 (en) * 2017-09-29 2019-04-04 常石造船株式会社 Seam arranging method, seam arranging device, and seam arranging program
JPWO2019065026A1 (en) * 2017-09-29 2019-11-14 常石造船株式会社 Seam placement method, seam placement device, and seam placement program
JP2020173559A (en) * 2019-04-09 2020-10-22 Vuild株式会社 Work processing system, work processing program, and work processing method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4593218B2 (en) 2010-12-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6065021A (en) Apparatus and method for alignment of graphical elements in electronic document
US7545525B2 (en) Input-output apparatus selecting method for network system
US6232968B1 (en) Data processor controlled display system with a plurality of switchable customized basic function interfaces for the control of varying types of operations
US20100169767A1 (en) Method and apparatus for processing layout and storage medium
CN107590592B (en) Job dependency relationship representation method, job display and scheduling control method and device
KR20130055554A (en) Sequence program creating apparatus
JP3966203B2 (en) Barcode image generation apparatus and program
JP4593218B2 (en) Graphic arrangement apparatus, graphic arrangement method, and program for causing computer to execute the method
US7405733B2 (en) Spline drawing in a computer-implemented graphics program
JP5253060B2 (en) Print control apparatus, print control method, and program
JP4285022B2 (en) Object display device and program
JP4237125B2 (en) Graphic arrangement apparatus, graphic arrangement method, and program for causing computer to execute the method
JP2009252084A (en) Blank layout device for wall surface part, blank layout program for wall surface part, recording medium and precut device
JP4378930B2 (en) Production plan creation method and apparatus
JP2012088791A (en) Information processor, information processing method, and program
JP2007072527A (en) Method for dynamic lot size scheduling involving setup having a plurality of attributes
JP2014112289A (en) Print management device, method, and program
JP2003283198A (en) System for optimizing mounting process
JP2005063084A (en) Method and system for managing process plan, progress performance and productivity using multiviewer gantt chart
CN102054231A (en) Method and device for generating bill of material
JP2005186315A (en) Printing process device, method and program
JP2002092053A (en) Apparatus for arranging equipment and method for the same
US6879736B1 (en) Apparatus and method of processing characters
EP3373088B1 (en) Apparatus and method to create a machining program
JP2002007089A (en) Printer driver and information processor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20061110

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20100205

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100209

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20100409

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100720

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20100824

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20100914

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20100915

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130924

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4593218

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees