JP2006070417A - Flame retardant for polyester-based fiber and method for flame proof finish - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a material solving the problem of durability of condensed phosphate ester as the phosphorus-based flame retardant of polyester-based fiber and for the method of flame proof finish using the retardant, and, at the same time, solving the problem caused by volatility of low molecular weight phosphate ester. <P>SOLUTION: The flame retardant is obtained by dispersing and emulsifying a naphthyl phosphate compound of general formula (1) by using a nonionic and an anionic surfactant. Impartation and thermal fixation of the flame retardant are performed by (1) a method which comprises adsorbing in fibers concurrently with dyes (same dye bath), (2) a method which comprises immersing and then squeezing to have the predetermined deposit amount and performing drying and heat setting (pad dry thermocure method), or (3) a method which comprises mixing with a resin binder or the like, coating the obtained and performing drying and heat setting (coating method). <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

  The present invention relates to a non-halogen flame retardant for imparting flame retardancy to a fiber product such as polyester fiber or a fabric made thereof by post-processing, and a flame retardant processing method using the same.

  Conventionally, halogen-based flame retardants have been used to impart flame retardancy to post-processing fiber products such as fabrics made of polyester fibers. For example, there is a method in which a brominated cycloalkane such as 1,2,5,6,9,10-hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) is dispersed in water and attached to a polyester fiber fabric using a dispersant. Known (Japanese Patent Publication No. 53-8840). The attachment at this time was performed by a known method such as an exhaustion method using a dyeing machine or the like. However, halogen-based flame retardants may cause bromine-based dioxins when textile products are incinerated or when a fire breaks out. In particular, hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) has been found to be persistent and highly accumulative, and its toxicity is a problem in terms of safety to the environment and the human body.

  Therefore, various phosphoric flame retardants have been studied.

  However, when a condensed phosphate ester is used, the flame retardant adherence layer falls off relatively easily due to alkaline soaping such as reduction cleaning (RC) or solvent treatment such as dry cleaning, and the durability of the flame retardant treatment is reduced. There was a problem that it could not be obtained (for example, JP-A-2000-328445).

  On the other hand, when it is a low molecular weight phosphate ester, the sorption property with respect to a polyester fiber is favorable, and various examination is performed. However, the known low molecular weight phosphate ester has high volatility and has the following problems.

 (1) “Smoke” occurs during heat treatment of flame retardant processing.

(2) When used in automobile interior materials, the windshield may become cloudy when left in a high temperature environment in summer. ("Haze" (haze), which is an evaluation value of cloudiness, increases.)
(3) It is difficult to provide sufficient flameproofing performance to decompose and volatilize below the flash point of the polyester synthetic fiber.

(4) In order to satisfy the flameproof performance, it is necessary to use a large amount of flame retardant. For this reason, the texture of the fabric is lowered, and the dye surface is bleed on the fiber surface over time, leading to a reduction in friction fastness.
JP 2000-328445 A JP2003-20399

  The inventors of the present invention have made intensive studies in view of the above problems, and used a solid naphthyl phosphate compound (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2003-20399) proposed for use in a special resin for flame-retardant processing of polyester fibers. I came up with the idea of using it. As a result of further investigation, if a treatment liquid in which a solid naphthyl phosphate compound is dispersed in an aqueous medium using an appropriate amount of a surfactant is used, it can be easily sorbed to the polyester fiber by an appropriate heat treatment. I found out that I can.

  As described above, the present invention relates to a flame retardant processing agent for polyester fibers using a phosphorus compound, and a flame retardant processing method for polyester fibers using the same. It is intended to provide a solution that can solve the problem caused by volatility in low molecular weight phosphate ester at the same time.

The flame retardant processing agent for polyester fiber of the present invention is obtained by emulsifying or dispersing one kind of naphthyl phosphate compound represented by the following general formula [1] or a mixture thereof in water using a surfactant. It is characterized by. However, in formula, n is an integer of 1-3.

  As the surfactant, a combination of a nonionic surfactant and an anionic surfactant, or one of them is preferably used.

  In the method for processing a polyester fiber according to the present invention, the flame retardant processing agent is applied to a polyester fiber or a fiber product comprising the same by dipping or coating, and then the naphthyl phosphate compound is sorbed onto the fiber. A heat treatment at 80 ° C. or higher is performed.

  Here, the application of the flame retardant compound and the fixing by the heat treatment can be performed by a method such as high temperature exhaustion. For example, (1) A method of sorbing into the fiber simultaneously with the dye (same dyeing bath), (2) A method of squeezing to a predetermined amount after soaking, drying and heat setting (pad dry thermocuring) Method), or (3) a method of coating with mixing with a resin binder and / or a flame retardant aid, followed by drying and heat setting (coating method).

  It can solve the problem of “smoke” during heat treatment due to volatility and the problem that the glass surface is clouded (increased cloudiness), and has excellent durability and flame retardant performance for washing, dry cleaning, etc. required for interior use can get. Moreover, since the phosphorus compound used in the present invention is solid at room temperature, it is difficult to bleed out, and there is little risk of lowering the fastness to friction.

  Since a non-halogen phosphorous compound is used, there is no concern that bromo dioxins or other halogenated gases are generated when the polyester fiber is burned, which can contribute to environmental protection.

  Specific examples of the naphthyl phosphate compound (formula [1]) used in the present invention include 1-naphthyl diphenyl phosphate, 2-naphthyl diphenyl phosphate, di (1-naphthyl) phenyl phosphate, and di (2-naphthyl). Mention may be made of phenyl phosphate, 1-naphthyl-2-naphthylphenyl phosphate, tri-1-naphthyl phosphate, 1-naphthyl-2-naphthyl phosphate, di (1-naphthyl) -2-naphthyl phosphate, and tri-2-naphthyl phosphate. It is done. Any combination thereof may be used.

  As a method of synthesizing the naphthyl phosphate compound (the above formula [1]) used in the present invention, (1) a method of reacting diphenylphosphochloridate or monophenylphosphochloridate with naphthol, or (2) naphthol or An example is a method in which a small excess of phosphorus oxychloride is reacted with phenol and then reacted with phenol or naphthol, respectively.

  The surfactant for dispersing the naphthyl phosphate compound and the like is preferably added in an amount of 5 to 20 parts by weight with respect to 100 parts by weight of the naphthyl phosphate compound which is a phosphorus compound. Further, the content of the phosphorus compound in the flame retardant processing agent as an emulsification / dispersion liquid is usually in the range of 30 to 50% by weight.

  When dispersing or emulsifying the phosphorus compound in water, a nonionic active agent and an anionic active agent are used. In some cases, one of these may be used. Preferably, the nonionic activator is polyoxyethylene distyrenated phenyl ether or polyoxyethylene tristyrenated phenyl ether, the anionic activator is polyoxyethylene distyrenated phenyl ether sulfate, or polyoxyethylene tristyrenated phenyl ether. Styrenated phenyl ether sulfate salt is used.

  Specific examples of the nonionic surfactant include polyoxyalkylene alkyl phenyl ether, polyoxyalkylene alkyl ether, polyoxyalkylene alkyl ester, polyhydric alcohol fatty acid ester alkylene oxide adduct, higher alkylamine alkylene oxide adduct, fatty acid amide Examples include alkylene oxide adducts, alkyl glycosides, and sucrose fatty acid esters. Preferable examples include polyoxyethylene distyrenated phenyl ether and polyoxyethylene tristyrenated phenyl ether.

  Specific examples of anionic surfactants include alkyl alcohol salts such as higher alcohol sulfates, higher alkyl ether sulfates, sulfated fatty acid esters, and alkyl sulfonates such as alkyl benzene sulfonates and alkyl naphthalene sulfonates, Furthermore, alkyl phosphate salts such as higher alcohol phosphate esters and higher alcohol alkylene oxide adduct phosphate esters are exemplified. In addition, alkyl aryl sulfonate salt, polyoxyalkylene alkyl ether sulfate salt, polyoxyalkylene alkyl ester phosphate salt, polyoxyalkylene alkyl ether carboxylate salt, polycarboxylate salt, funnel oil, petroleum sulfonate, alkyl diphenyl ether sulfonate salt, etc. It is done. Polyoxyethylene distyrenated phenyl ether sulfate ester salt or polyoxyethylene tristyrenated phenyl ether sulfate ester salt is preferable.

  The flame retardant processing agent of the present invention may contain an organic solvent such as methanol, ethanol, toluene, ethylene glycol, or butyl cellosolve in order to stabilize the dispersion state. Further, a protective colloid agent that is stabilized by a thickening action may be added after emulsification and dispersion. Examples of the protective colloid agent (water-soluble polymer) to be added include carboxymethyl cellulose salt, xanthan gum (xanthan gum), gum arabic, locust bean gum, sodium alginate, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), gelatin, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyethylene oxide, polyacrylamide, Examples thereof include methoxyethylene maleic anhydride copolymer, methyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, soluble starch, carboxymethyl starch, and cationized starch. Among these, carboxymethylcellulose salt and xanthan gum are preferable from the viewpoints of the properties of the resulting solution and its stability. Moreover, resin additives, such as a ultraviolet absorber and antioxidant, can be mix | blended.

  Moreover, when processing by the coating method mentioned later, water-based binder resin, such as a self-emulsification type acrylic resin, is made into the liquid of a flame retardant processing agent by solid content weight ratio with respect to 100 weight part of the said naphthyl phosphate compounds. For example, 30 to 150 parts by weight can be added. In addition, as a flame retardant aid, ammonium polyphosphate and other ammonium phosphate compounds can be added. The amount of the flame retardant auxiliary added is, for example, 10 to 100 parts by weight in solid weight ratio with respect to 100 parts by weight of the naphthyl phosphate compound.

  Polyester fibers to be treated include polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), and polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT), as well as isophthalic acid, isophthalic acid sulfonate, adipic acid, and polyethylene glycol. Those obtained by copolymerization of three components, such as cationic dyeable polyester, are included. In addition, an original yarn formed by kneading a pigment when producing a yarn can be used. The textile products to be treated include various yarns, woven and knitted fabrics, non-woven fabrics, ropes, etc., and may be woven fabrics or composite materials using different yarns of the above-mentioned fibers. Includes union cloth. The fiber product may be a combination of other synthetic fibers, natural fibers, or semi-synthetic fibers by blending or the like.

  The flame retardant processing agent of the present invention is used to impart flame retardancy to such polyester fiber or fiber product by post-processing. The post-processing treatment using the flame retardant processing agent of the present invention can be performed by a high temperature exhaustion method, a pad thermo method, a coating method, or the like.

  In the high temperature exhaustion method, a polyester fiber or fiber product is immersed in a treatment bath to which a flame retardant processing agent is added, and is heated at a high temperature (usually 80 ° C. or more, preferably 110 to 150 ° C.) for a predetermined time (eg, 2 to 60 minutes). ) Treat the flame retardant to the fiber. It is efficient and preferable if a flame retardant finish is added to the dyeing bath and the flame retardant compound is sorbed onto the fiber simultaneously with the dye (dyeing bath method).

  In the pad thermo method, a polyester fiber or fiber product is immersed in a solution obtained by diluting a flame retardant with water or the like, and is squeezed with a mangle or the like so that a predetermined adhesion amount is obtained. The flame retardant compound is sorbed onto the fiber by steaming. The heat treatment temperature at this time is usually in the range of 110 to 210 ° C. Preferably, after dipping, squeezing with a mangle, drying and heat setting are performed (pad dry thermocuring method).

  In the coating method, a resin binder and / or a flame retardant aid are mixed and thickened in the flame retardant processing agent, and then applied to a fabric or the like, and thereafter, the same heat treatment as in the pad thermo method is performed. .

  The flame retardant processing agent and the flame retardant processing method according to the present invention include, for example, flame retardant processing of polyester fiber fabrics used for interiors of houses, offices, public spaces, etc., or furniture, as well as for interiors of automobiles and other vehicles. Can be applied to. For example, various interior materials such as curtains, cloth blinds, carpets and other rugs, wall coverings, car seat skins, sofas and other seat skin materials, black curtains, and other fabrics that are difficult to use Suitable for fuel processing.

  Hereinafter, examples and comparative examples will be described.

<Prescription of flame retardant finishing agent>
About the compounding prescription of the flame retardant processing agent of an Example and Comparative Examples 1-2, it shows in Table 1 below collectively. The numbers in the table are weight percents in the flame retardant finish. In the table, “NDPP (naphthyl diphenyl phosphate)” means that 1 mol of monophenylphosphochloridate is reacted with 2 mol of 2-naphthol in the presence of anhydrous magnesium chloride, washed, and then steam distilled. And the purity is 98% or more. Further, as “TPP (triphenyl phosphate)”, a commercially available product “TPP” of Daihachi Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. was used as it was.

<Evaluation method>
1. Test Specimen A fabric made of 100% regular polyester woven fabric (tropical) was treated with each flame retardant finishing agent shown in Table 1 to evaluate the flame retardancy.

2. Flame retardant evaluation method (1)
The flame retardancy is determined according to JIS L 1091 A-1 method (micro burner method) and JIS L 1091 D method (coil method) in the following “1. Dyeing same bath method” and “2. Pad dry thermocure method”. And evaluated. In the micro burner method, “○” means that the after flame is 3 seconds or less, the residual dust is 5 seconds or less, and the carbonization area is 30 cm ² or less after heating for 1 minute and after heating for 3 seconds. Other than that, “x” was given. In the coil method, the case where the number of times of flame contact was 3 times or more was “◯”, and the case where it was 2 times or less was “x”.

  Such evaluation of flame retardancy is based on a fabric test piece that has been subjected to the above flame retardant / dyeing treatment (“processed”), and this fabric is washed five times with water or five times dry cleaning (DC ). Specific conditions for water washing and dry cleaning are as follows.

  Washing in water: Washing was carried out according to JIS K 3371 as follows. The weak alkaline first type detergent was used at a rate of 1 g / L, and the bath ratio was 1:40, followed by washing with water at 60 ± 2 ° C. for 15 minutes. Thereafter, rinsing was performed 3 times at 40 ± 2 ° C. for 5 minutes, followed by centrifugal dehydration for 2 minutes, and hot-air drying at 60 ± 5 ° C. This series of treatments was repeated 5 times.

  Dry cleaning: 12.6 mL of tetrachloroethylene, 0.265 g of charge soap (nonionic surfactant / anionic surfactant / water = 10/10/1 (weight ratio)) per 1 g of fabric test piece, 30 ± 2 ° C. After washing for 15 minutes, it was dried. This process was repeated 5 times.

3. Flame retardant evaluation method (2)
Evaluation of flame retardancy when flame retardant treatment is performed by the following “3. Backcoat method” is performed according to the JIS D-1201 FMVSS flammability tester (horizontal method) used as a flame retardant standard for automobiles. It was. Further, at this time, the washing resistance test was not performed, and the flame retardancy was evaluated only for the “finished” products. The evaluation criteria are as follows, and after evaluating two samples, the worse one was recorded.

A: Self-extinguishing and flame disappears immediately after digestion of fire source ○: Self-extinguishing and residual flame after digestion of fire source, but extinguishes within measurement start point XX: Combustible And burned.

4). Haze value evaluation method The difference from the BLANK value was compared with a haze meter (Suga Test Instruments Co., Ltd .: Direct Reading Haze Computer). In detail, it went as follows. A 100 cm ² test piece was placed in a 4 cm diameter glass bottle and a 4.7 cm square glass plate was placed on the bottle without any gaps. And the glass bottle of this state was immersed in a 110 degreeC oil bath, the glass plate was removed after standing for 3 hours, and it measured with the haze meter. Moreover, the measured value about the same unused glass plate was obtained as a blank (BLANK).

<Flame retardant treatment method and evaluation results>
Below, the detail of each flame-retardant processing method performed in order to make a fiber surface sorb a flame retardant compound (naphthyl phosphate), and the obtained evaluation result are demonstrated.

1. Dyeing bath method Using a mini-color dyeing machine (Mini-Color; Teksam Giken Co., Ltd.), treated at 135 ° C for 30 minutes by raising the temperature from 60 ° C at a bath ratio of 1:10 using the dye bath formulation shown in Table 2 below. did. After the treatment, the temperature was lowered to 80 ° C., and then the fabric test piece was taken out. After washing with hot water and water for 5 minutes, reduction cleaning (RC) was performed under the conditions shown in Table 3 below. Finally, heat setting was performed by heat treatment at 180 ° C. × 30 sec.

  As shown in Table 4, no “smoke” due to volatilization was observed during heat setting (180 ° C.) when the flame retardant processing agent of the example was used (Example 1-1). At this time, the sorption amount of the flame retardant compound (phosphorus compound) was a sufficient amount of 2.2% owf (% on weight of fiber). Moreover, the flame retardance was a favorable result in the test of any conditions. Further, the haze value was as low as 0.1, which was at the level of condensed phosphate ester, and was suitable as an automobile interior material.

  On the other hand, when the flame retardant processing agent B made of triphenyl phosphate (TPP) was used (Comparative Example 1-1), a sorption amount almost similar to that in Example 1-1 was obtained. It was observed that the phosphorus compound was volatilized into white smoke during heat setting. Although the flame retardancy was good under any other conditions, it was poor in the evaluation of the coil method after dry cleaning. Moreover, the haze value was very large and was a level that could not be used as an interior material for automobiles and the like.

  On the other hand, when the flame retardant finishing agent C made of resorcin bis (di-2,6-xylyl phosphate) was used (Comparative Example 1-2), “smoke” was not observed during heat setting, The amount of sorption was extremely small, and the evaluation of flame retardancy was judged to be unsatisfactory under all test conditions except for “processed” by the microburner method. Further, the haze value was also larger than that in Example 1-1.

2. Pad Dry Thermocure Method Each flame retardant finishing agent of Examples and Comparative Examples was diluted to 15% with water to make a treatment solution. After immersing the fabric test piece in the treatment solution, it was squeezed to 70% with a mangle, dried by heating at 110 ° C. for 2 minutes, and further cured by heating at 180 ° C. for 2 minutes. Subsequently, soaping was performed under the conditions shown in Table 5, followed by washing with hot water and drying for 5 minutes.

  The results in Table 6 are generally the same as the evaluation results in the dyeing and bathing process in Table 4. However, when the flame retardant processing agent C made of resorcin bis (di-2,6-xylyl phosphate) was used (Comparative Example 2-2), the evaluation of the flame retardancy was 5 times after dry cleaning of the coil method. The results are the same as in the case of using the flame-retardant processed material B (Comparative Example 2-1).

  In particular, from the results of Example 2-1 in Table 6, it is known that a flame retardant treatment comparable to that of the dyed bathing method can be easily realized even with the pad dry thermocure method. That is, sufficient sorption of naphthyl phosphate to the fiber can be realized by a pad dry thermocuring method that is performed within a much shorter time than the dyeing bath method.

3. Back coating method With the formulation of the coating agent shown in Table 7 below, the coating was applied to the back surface of the fabric test piece so that the solid-equivalent coating amount was 70 g / m ² (Dry). Thereafter, drying and sorption of the flame retardant compound were performed by heating at 150 ° C. for 2 minutes.

  As is known from the results in Table 7, the flame retardancy evaluation results were good when any of the flame retardant processing agents of Examples and Comparative Examples was used. However, the haze value is sufficiently low only when the flame retardant processing agent of the example is used (Example 3-1), and when the flame retardant processing agent C of the comparative example is used (Comparative Example 3-2). Was a little bigger. Moreover, when the flame-retardant processing agent B of the comparative example was used (Comparative Example 3-1), the haze value was considerably large. That is, only when the flame retardant processing agent of the example was used, good flame retardant processing suitable for use as an automobile interior material could be realized.

Claims (3)

A flame retardant processing agent for polyester fibers, wherein one or a mixture of naphthyl phosphate compounds represented by the following general formula [1] is emulsified or dispersed in water using a surfactant: . However, in formula, n is an integer of 1-3.

  The combination of a nonionic surfactant and an anionic surfactant, or one of these is used as the surfactant, the difficulty for polyester fibers according to claim 1 Burning agent. The flame retardant processing agent according to claim 1 or 2 is used for a treatment by a high temperature exhaustion method, or after being applied to a polyester fiber or a fiber product comprising the same by dipping or coating, a heat treatment at 80 ° C or higher is performed. A flame-retardant processing method for polyester fiber, characterized by comprising: