JP2006004221A - Evaluation decision system and evaluation decision method - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To decide evaluation of evaluation requesting contents by acquiring comparison data or evaluation by the third party regarding arbitrary evaluation requesting contents in real time and making a comparison decision on the basis of the evaluation result data. <P>SOLUTION: In an evaluation decision apparatus 1 on a subject side, evaluation requesting contents whose objective or relative evaluation is to be obtained are decided and object side evaluation decision auxiliary apparatuses 2a and 2b connected by P2P communication via a network 3 are requested to evaluate the evaluation requesting contents. An object side evaluation decision auxiliary apparatus acquires the evaluation of the evaluation requesting contents and data for evaluating, and replies to the evaluation decision apparatus on the subject side. The evaluation decision apparatus on the subject side decides the evaluation of the evaluation requesting contents on the basis of the data received from the object side evaluation decision auxiliary apparatuses and data on a local environment where the evaluation decision apparatus on the subject side exists, and notifies a user of the evaluation result through a display part 13 or a sound output part 14. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

  The present invention relates to an evaluation determination system and an evaluation determination method for performing an evaluation process on an evaluation target, analyzing the evaluation result, obtaining a conclusion, and informing the user of the conclusion.

  Conventionally, for example, in an auction site opened on the Internet, evaluation for the contents of the evaluation request is gradually determined by repeatedly bidding on the contents of the evaluation request (target product), and finally the objective according to the market principle is established. Price setting (determining the winning bid) is performed. In other words, the auction site employs an evaluation method in which an evaluation for an arbitrary evaluation request content is determined as a successful bid price by a bid action by a third party.

Further, for example, Patent Document 1 below discloses intangible assets (ideas, inventions, etc.) that are difficult to objectively evaluate as target products, and the target products are disclosed on the Internet where third parties can browse freely. Thus, a market evaluation method is disclosed in which bids are solicited and the price at which the highest number of bids is finally obtained is regarded as an objective evaluation result for the target product.
JP 2002-49789 (paragraphs 0023-0027, FIG. 1)

However, the conventional evaluation method using communication such as the Internet has the following problems.
(1) There is a problem that it is possible to evaluate only the evaluation request contents limited by a Web page provided by a specific Web server.
(2) In order to obtain an evaluation on the content of the evaluation request, it is necessary to passively wait for an unspecified third party to perform a browsing operation on the Web page and an input operation of the evaluation. There is a problem that it takes time until it is obtained (the evaluation is gradually determined, so the real-time property is low).
(3) There is a problem that there is a high probability of being mis-evaluated by being evaluated by a third party whose unknown viewpoint is unknown.
(4) There is a problem related to the intervening (browsing / defaming) of unspecified third parties.
Furthermore, since the environmental inconsistency is high, there is a concern that the sympathy affected by the place and time is impaired, and misunderstanding and blurring occur in recognition and recognition.

In view of the above problems, the present invention
(1) Allowing users to request third-party evaluation cooperation for any evaluation request content (2) Emphasizing real-time performance and enabling acquisition of evaluation results (evaluation result data) (3) An evaluation decision system and evaluation capable of notifying a user of an objective or relative evaluation result as a conclusion by aggregating evaluation results from a third party (and another viewpoint) Providing a decision method (4) Suppressing inconsistencies in the evaluation environment and / or evaluation mechanism (if necessary) (5) (If necessary) Evaluation calculation processing can be performed efficiently by distributed coordination Objective. In addition, when acquiring a third-party evaluation (evaluation result data) for an arbitrary content of an evaluation request, for example, time for communication or data processing is actually required, but time required for such communication or data processing is required. Is not extremely long. In this specification, even if communication and data processing take a certain amount of time, they are referred to as real time. In addition, P2P (Peer to Peer: PtoP, sometimes referred to as PtoP) communication includes both physical (pure) peer-to-peer communication and logical (pseudo) peer-to-peer communication. It is a communication method. The communication infrastructure (lines, protocol specifications other than P2P) used for this P2P communication is not particularly limited. For example, a wireless communication network using a mobile phone carrier and Ethernet (registered trademark) Wired communication networks that are used are allowed. Further, communication may be performed across a plurality of networks.

In the present invention, in order to achieve the above object, an evaluation determination system for performing an evaluation process of an evaluation object, analyzing the evaluation result, obtaining a conclusion, and informing the user of the conclusion,
The evaluation determination device belonging to the subject side and one or more evaluation determination auxiliary devices belonging to the object side exist in a network environment in which P2P communication can be performed mutually,
The evaluation determination device makes an evaluation request for the evaluation object to the evaluation determination auxiliary device via the connection of the P2P communication established between the evaluation determination device and the evaluation determination auxiliary device. The evaluation determination auxiliary device interprets and understands the content of the evaluation request acquired from the evaluation determination device, executes an evaluation process according to the content of the evaluation request, and uses the evaluation result as an object side evaluation result. By responding to the evaluation determination device, an evaluation determination system is provided in which the evaluation determination device can report the evaluation result with the viewpoint on the object side as the conclusion.

Further, in the present invention, in order to achieve the above object, an evaluation determination system for performing an evaluation process of an evaluation object, analyzing the evaluation result, obtaining a conclusion, and informing the user of the conclusion, Evaluation in the evaluation determination system in which the evaluation determination device belonging to the side and one or more evaluation determination auxiliary devices belonging to the object side exist in a network environment so as to be able to perform P2P communication with each other A decision method,
An evaluation request generating step in which the evaluation determination device generates the content of the evaluation request; and
The evaluation determination device searches for and finds the evaluation determination auxiliary device that accepts the evaluation request, and a partner search / discovery step;
A connection establishment step for establishing a connection of the P2P communication between the evaluation determination device and the evaluation determination auxiliary device;
An evaluation requesting step in which the evaluation determination device makes the evaluation request to the evaluation determination auxiliary device;
An evaluation processing step in which the evaluation determination auxiliary device executes an evaluation process according to the content of the evaluation request from the evaluation determination device;
An evaluation result response step in which the evaluation determination assisting device responds to the evaluation determination device with an object side evaluation result generated by executing the evaluation process;
The evaluation determining apparatus, a notification step for notifying the user on the subject side of the evaluation result based on the object-side evaluation result,
An evaluation determination method is provided.

  By providing an evaluation determination system and an evaluation determination method having the above-described configuration, the present invention acquires a third-party evaluation (evaluation result data) for any evaluation request content in real time and is based on the evaluation result data. By performing the comparison determination, the evaluation request content can be determined.

  Hereinafter, the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. First, an outline of the present invention will be described. In the present invention, the subject (subject) makes an evaluation request relating to the evaluation request content (evaluation target) to one or more other (objects), and the object interprets and understands the evaluation target. The evaluation process (relative evaluation process or objective evaluation process) is performed, and the result is returned to the subject side as an evaluation result, so that the subject side performs the relative evaluation process or objective evaluation process from the viewpoint of the object side. And the acquisition and notification of the evaluation result in consideration of the evaluation result on the object side can be performed. In addition, the subject side may aggregate the evaluation results of the object side and notify the aggregation results. Further, the subject side also performs an evaluation process and obtains the evaluation result (pseudo object side evaluation result). It is also possible to perform addition and notification. The subject is the person who requests the evaluation or the person who wants to obtain the evaluation results related to the evaluation target. The object is the subject of the evaluation by cooperating with the evaluation request by the subject (accepting the evaluation request by the subject). A person who performs a relative evaluation process or an objective evaluation process and responds to the result.

  FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram for explaining the outline of the present invention. In the present invention, an evaluation request (evaluation cooperation request) including the contents for specifying the evaluation object is sent from the subject to the object via the evaluation determination system, and after the evaluation process in the object, Evaluation results are sent from to the subject. Note that the evaluation target can be arbitrarily set by the subject, and may be proposed and set autonomously by the evaluation determination system.

  The above-mentioned relative evaluation result (relativity) indicates a relative evaluation (difference comparison) between the subject and the object (not absolute). In other words, in the present invention, when the fuel consumption comparison system is taken as an example, as shown in FIG. 4 described later, “Your fuel consumption is 8 liters / km and I is 10 liters / km. Therefore, the difference of 2 liters / km. A comparison method such as “is available” can be implemented. Moreover, said objective evaluation result (objective theory) refers to another viewpoint evaluation (objective evaluation) to the evaluation object by the object (not the subject). In other words, in the present invention, when the car washing and triumphing system is taken as an example, as shown in FIG. 6 to be described later, “8 out of 10 people say that your car is“ dirty ”.” A simple questionnaire method (or objective test method).

  The evaluation determination system is a system for performing an evaluation process of an evaluation target, analyzing the evaluation result, obtaining a conclusion, and notifying the user of the conclusion. FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a configuration example of the evaluation determination system according to the present invention. For example, as shown in FIG. 9, the evaluation determination system has a self (main) system located on the subject side and another (object) system located on the object side. The own system and the other system are basically the same, and have an evaluation determination device or an evaluation determination auxiliary device including an evaluation mechanism and viewpoint resources. In the own system belonging to the subject side, the evaluation decision device for obtaining the evaluation request related to the relative evaluation process or the objective evaluation process and obtaining the evaluation result from the object side operates mainly. In the system, mainly an evaluation determination assisting device that performs a relative evaluation process or an objective evaluation process for an evaluation target designated by the subject side operates. The viewpoint resource is a device (evaluation target data acquisition device) that can visually recognize an evaluation target, such as a camera, a millimeter wave radar sensor, another sensor, or an image acquisition unit. Note that it is possible to include human vision as the viewpoint resource, and in this case, the evaluation target data is a human visual recognition result (representing a visual image).

  Next, the difference between the case where the subject side acquires a relative evaluation and the case where an objective evaluation is acquired will be described. FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram for explaining an objective evaluation process according to the present invention, and FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram for explaining a relative evaluation process according to the present invention.

  In the relative evaluation process, the relative difference is obtained by comparing the evaluation and data obtained from the viewpoint of the subject and the evaluation and data obtained from the viewpoint of each object, and this relative difference is evaluated. It is intended to be used as That is, as shown in FIG. 10, when there is one subject and two objects, the evaluation determination system determines the relative difference between the self and the other 1, the relative difference between the self and the other 1, the other 1 The relative difference between the evaluation result obtained from one's own viewpoint and the evaluation result obtained from another viewpoint is obtained from these relative differences. Can be grasped. Note that the comparison of fuel consumption shown in FIG. 4 described later is an example of a relative evaluation process.

  On the other hand, in the objective evaluation process, the subject uses the result of subjective evaluation (subjective evaluation by the object) obtained from another viewpoint (an objective viewpoint different from the self) as an evaluation value as it is. . That is, as shown in FIG. 11, the evaluation determination system acquires the subjective evaluation performed by each object, whereby the subject can grasp the evaluation (other opinions) from other viewpoints. Note that the evaluation of the degree of dirt on the vehicle body shown in FIG. 6 described later is an example of an objective evaluation process.

  Next, first and second embodiments of the present invention will be described. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of an evaluation determination system in the first and second embodiments of the present invention. The evaluation determination system shown in FIG. 1 includes an evaluation determination device 1 and a plurality of object-side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b that can perform P2P communication via wired or wireless. is doing. Note that the evaluation determination device 1 can communicate with the object-side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b by an arbitrary communication method. In FIG. A state in which P2P communication is performed with the object-side evaluation determination assisting device 2a and P2P communication is performed with the object-side evaluation determination assisting device 2b via the network 3 such as the Internet is illustrated. FIG. 1 shows two object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b, but the number of object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b is arbitrary. It is possible to perform communication 1 to 1 to n (n is an arbitrary integer) with the evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b.

  1 includes a central processing unit 11 such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit), an information storage unit 12 in which an evaluation determination program 20 for executing the evaluation determination operation of the present invention is stored, A display unit 13 such as a liquid crystal display for visually informing the user of information, a sound output unit 14 such as a speaker for audibly informing the user of information (by voice), and user operation / input are possible. Operation input unit 15 such as a mouse, keyboard, touch panel, operation buttons, etc., voice input unit 16 such as a microphone that enables voice input by the user, and communication unit for performing P2P communication with the object side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b 17. Connect to local peripheral devices existing in the vicinity of the evaluation determination device 1, and acquire data necessary for the evaluation determination from the peripheral devices. And a communication port 18 which allows the door.

  The evaluation determination program 20 stored in the information storage unit 12 can be executed by the central processing unit 11, and an evaluation result for a predetermined evaluation request content by the execution of the evaluation determination program 20 by the central processing unit 11. Various operations according to the present invention such as an operation for requesting data to the object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b and an operation for determining an evaluation for predetermined evaluation request contents are realized.

  FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram showing a configuration example of an evaluation determination program that can be executed by the evaluation determination apparatus according to the first and second embodiments of the present invention. For example, the evaluation determination program 20 includes an evaluation request content generation unit (comparison determination request information generation unit) 201, a request partner search / discovery unit 202, a comparison determination request / evaluation result reception unit 203, an evaluation result data comparison unit 204, a comparison The result notification unit 205 is configured.

  The evaluation request content generation unit (comparison determination request information generation unit) 201 is a program for generating arbitrary evaluation request content (including evaluation request content that a user desires evaluation by a third party). Thus, for example, a process related to step S101 in FIG. 3 described later is performed. The evaluation request partner search / discovery unit 202 is a program for searching and finding the object-side evaluation decision assisting devices 2a and 2b that are the targets of the evaluation request, and for example, FIG. The process concerning step S103 is performed. Further, the comparison determination request / evaluation result receiving unit 203 includes information for requesting a comparison determination request (comparison determination request information) including evaluation request contents for comparison determination with respect to the object side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b. Is transmitted to the object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b, and finally receives basic data (evaluation result data from the object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b) for determining the evaluation result. Yes, by this program, for example, the processing related to step S107 in FIG. 3 described later and the reception of the evaluation result data transmitted in steps S111a and S111b are performed. The evaluation result data comparison unit 204 is a program for collecting the evaluation result data received from the object side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b and for performing evaluation in the evaluation determination device 1 (subject side). For example, a process related to step S113 in FIG. 3 described later is performed. Further, the comparison result notifying unit 205 is a program for notifying the user of the finally obtained evaluation result of the subject side, and for example, a process related to step S115 in FIG. Is called.

  In addition, the evaluation determination device 1 is, for example, a mobile terminal such as a PC (Personal Computer), a mobile phone or a PDA (Personal Digital Assistance), an in-vehicle navigation device installed in a vehicle, or a household electrical appliance that can be connected to a network (so-called However, it is particularly useful to implement in a mobile terminal or a computer mounted on a mobile body in which the user environment changes greatly with movement. In addition, for example, the computer in the moving body is installed separately from the computer installed in the moving body and the evaluation determination apparatus 1 installed in a predetermined facility or the like through wireless communication or the like. It is also possible to make the evaluation determination apparatus 1 usable over a network.

  Next, based on the evaluation determination system shown in FIG. 1, evaluation result data for an arbitrary evaluation request content is acquired in real time, and evaluation result data comparison processing based on a plurality of evaluation result data is performed, whereby the evaluation request content is obtained. An evaluation request by obtaining a relative evaluation for the evaluation (first embodiment) and a third party's evaluation for an arbitrary evaluation request content in real time and performing a comparative determination based on the evaluation A mode (second embodiment) for determining objective evaluation of contents will be described.

<First Embodiment>
First, an aspect will be described in which evaluation result data for an arbitrary evaluation request content is acquired in real time and an evaluation for the evaluation request content is determined by performing comparison determination based on a plurality of evaluation result data. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a configuration of the object-side evaluation decision assisting device of the evaluation decision system in the first embodiment of the present invention. The object-side evaluation decision assisting devices 2a and 2b shown in FIG. 2 receive the evaluation for comparison determination received from the evaluation decision device 1 via the communication unit 21 and the communication unit 21 for performing P2P communication with the evaluation decision device 1. Information processing unit 22 for performing processing related to comparison determination request information including determination request content (for example, processing for understanding request content by performing ontology analysis at a meta level between different systems), object side evaluation determination assisting device 2a 2b, local comparison data holding device 30 and operation input / output system devices (evaluation request data output device 31 corresponding to display unit 53 and audio output unit 54 shown in FIG. 5 through the communication port unit 23, the communication port unit 23, and the evaluation request unit 25 that enable connection with the operation result input unit 55 and the evaluation result input device 32) corresponding to the voice input unit 56 shown in FIG. Comparison data acquisition unit 24 that acquires, as comparison data, data output from the comparison data holding device 30 and data input from the evaluation result input device 32, and an evaluation request unit that acquires evaluation request comparison data based on the comparison determination request information 25.

  The evaluation request unit 25 includes an evaluation request data automatic evaluation unit 26 and an evaluation request data user evaluation request unit 27. The evaluation request data automatic evaluation unit 26 uses, for example, data held by the comparison data holding device 30 (for example, output data from an in-vehicle device that does not require the user to make an evaluation input request) to the user. This function can be acquired automatically without requesting an evaluation input. On the other hand, the evaluation request data user evaluation request unit 27 is a function capable of entrusting the evaluation process to the user for data that needs to be requested to be input to the user. Specifically, the evaluation request data user evaluation request unit 27 notifies the user of the evaluation request contents and the evaluation input by the evaluation request data output device 31 that is an output device, and the evaluation result that is the input device. User input can be obtained from the input device 32.

  The comparison data holding device 30 that outputs the comparison data can use any data processing device. The comparison data holding device 30 stores measurement data that the comparison data holding device 30 can acquire from various sensors (not shown) and an information storage unit (not shown) that can be referred to by the comparison data holding device 30. The stored data or the like is output as comparison data in response to a request from the comparison data acquisition unit 24 based on the comparison determination request information. The automatic evaluation request data evaluation unit 26 can be realized by an agent program that performs processing on behalf of the user.

  Next, an outline of the operation of the evaluation determination system in the first embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the configuration shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. FIG. 3 is a sequence chart showing an outline of the operation of the evaluation determination system in the first embodiment of the present invention.

  First, in the evaluation determination device 1, the user inputs the evaluation request content using the operation input unit 15 or the voice input unit 16, or the evaluation determination device 1 automatically determines the evaluation request content according to the situation or the user's characteristics. As a result, the contents of the evaluation request are generated (Step S101: Generate the contents of the evaluation request). The content of the evaluation request generated in step S101 is, for example, a relative evaluation determination (similar to the local environment to which the evaluation determination device 1 belongs) only by information in the local environment to which the evaluation determination device 1 belongs. It is difficult to determine the relative status of the local environment by comparing it to the environment of the system). For example, the evaluation result data related to the content of the evaluation request in another system is acquired and compared with the data related to the content of the evaluation request in the local environment to which the evaluation determination apparatus 1 belongs, thereby comparing the content of the evaluation request content. This makes it possible to determine the relative evaluation of how excellent (or inferior) the state of the local environment to which the evaluation determining device 1 belongs is compared to other systems. It becomes possible to do.

  Next, the evaluation determination device 1 searches for and finds the object side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b capable of transmitting the evaluation result data necessary for the comparison determination of the evaluation request contents (step S103: object side) Search / discover the evaluation decision assisting device), and establish a P2P communication connection with the discovered object-side evaluation decision assisting devices 2a, 2b (steps S105a, S105b: establish a P2P communication connection). In the search / discovery of the object side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b, for example, a predetermined message for recruiting an evaluation collaborator is transmitted from the evaluation determining device 1 by broadcast or anycast. Further, the search / discovery of the object-side evaluation decision assisting devices 2a and 2b can use the basic capabilities (such as the Discover function and the Bind function) of P2P communication.

  At this time, it is a necessary condition to search for the object side evaluation decision assisting devices 2a and 2b that can establish a connection by P2P communication, but simultaneously with the confirmation of the connection establishment of P2P communication, the object side evaluation decision assisting device 2a, Object side that can confirm whether 2b can acquire comparison data related to evaluation request contents or transmit evaluation result data, and can acquire comparison data related to evaluation request contents and transmit evaluation result data By establishing a connection for P2P communication only with the evaluation decision assisting devices 2a and 2b, it is possible to perform subsequent processing more efficiently and to reduce useless communication traffic. Further, the object side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b can determine whether or not evaluation cooperation is possible in response to the evaluation request from the evaluation determination device 1 (steps S106a and 106b: determination of whether or not evaluation cooperation is possible). In FIG. 3, the object-side evaluation decision assisting devices 2 a and 2 b determine whether or not the evaluation cooperation is possible after establishing the connection of the P2P communication with the evaluation decision device 1. The connection establishment of the P2P communication may be performed only when the determination is performed and the evaluation cooperation is performed. In FIG. 3, the case where both the evaluation object side determination auxiliary devices 2 a and 2 b cooperate with the evaluation request from the evaluation determination device 1 will be described.

  And the evaluation determination apparatus 1 gives the evaluation result required for the comparison determination of the evaluation request content determined in step S101 to the object side evaluation determination auxiliary apparatuses 2a and 2b via the P2P communication with which the connection has been established. Request (Step S107: Send comparison determination request information). At this time, the evaluation determination device 1 may transmit information merely requesting predetermined numerical data as the comparison determination request information, or transmit the comparison determination request information in an abstract agenda or question format. In the object side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b, it is also possible to have an evaluation result that is an answer to the content of the agenda or question be judged. Note that when the comparison determination request information is transmitted, it is also possible to make an evaluation request directly (for example, a subroutine call method, a synchronous / asynchronous event drive method, etc.) without using P2P communication.

  Note that in this step S107, the evaluation determining apparatus 1 performs comparison data (or evaluation result data) viewed from the viewpoint on the subject side, and evaluation performed on the contents of the evaluation request in the evaluation determination apparatus 1 on the subject side. The results (subject side evaluation results) can be transmitted simultaneously, and each object side evaluation decision assisting device 2a, 2b uses the subject side evaluation results to perform an evaluation process (for example, a relative evaluation process). ), It is also possible to achieve distributed evaluation processing.

  Further, in this step S107, the evaluation determination device 1 can also transmit the evaluation result input form at the same time, whereby each object side evaluation determination auxiliary device 2a, 2b fills a predetermined form, By making the selection of a predetermined selection item, it is possible to perform a simple and uniform evaluation, and the evaluation result blur (for example, the accuracy of the comparison result, the difference in the type of desired evaluation result, etc.) ) Can be reduced.

  In step S107, the evaluation determination device 1 can simultaneously provide the evaluation mechanism program to the object-side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b, whereby a uniform (unified) evaluation can be performed. Evaluation results from the viewpoint of each object are obtained by the algorithm. In this case, it is desirable that the evaluation mechanism unit is realized by, for example, Java (registered trademark) Script having program portability so that the program can be executed by the other party.

  Each object side evaluation determination auxiliary device 2a, 2b that has received the comparison determination request information from the evaluation determination device 1 analyzes the contents of the received comparison determination request information by the information processing unit 22, and the data required as comparison data, The comparison data holding device 30 that outputs the data is determined. And according to the determination result, the comparison data acquisition unit 24 performs the object side evaluation process by acquiring the comparison data from the comparison data holding device 30 or acquiring the evaluation result input by the user ( Steps S109a and S109b: Object side evaluation process), and the final evaluation result for the evaluation request content is transmitted as evaluation result data to the evaluation determination device 1 (steps S111a and S111b: evaluation result data is transmitted). When transmitting the evaluation result data, the user of each object-side evaluation decision assisting device 2a, 2b is confirmed to transmit the evaluation result data, and the user is instructed to transmit. It is desirable to transmit evaluation result data later. Further, when the evaluation result data is transmitted, it is also possible to request an evaluation directly (for example, a subroutine call method, a synchronous / asynchronous event driving method, etc.) without using P2P communication.

  The evaluation determination device 1 that has received the evaluation result data from each object-side evaluation determination auxiliary device 2a, 2b performs a subject-side evaluation process by performing a tabulation process based on the received evaluation result data (step S113: evaluation result data). Aggregation and subject side evaluation process). For example, the evaluation determination device 1 acquires reference data when evaluating the contents of the evaluation request from the peripheral device via the communication port unit 18, and the evaluation result data received from each object side evaluation determination auxiliary device 2a, 2b It is possible to compare the local environment to which the evaluation determination apparatus 1 belongs and the environment in another similar system.

  The sequence chart shown in FIG. 3 describes the case where the relative evaluation processing is performed intensively on the subject side. However, as described above, the relative evaluation processing is performed for each object-side evaluation determination assisting device. It is also possible to disperse to 2a and 2b. The intensive evaluation process on the subject side is based on the standardization / unification of the calculation by a uniform evaluation mechanism in each object side evaluation decision assisting device 2a, 2b, and the same evaluation object using the evaluation mechanism on the subject side. This is useful for performing intensive and intensive evaluation when different evaluation target data is acquired for each evaluation, object-side evaluation determination assisting device 2a, 2b. On the other hand, decentralized evaluation processing on the object side is a non-uniform (unequally implemented) evaluation mechanism in each object-side evaluation decision assisting device 2a, 2b, non-standardized / ununiformized calculation, object-side evaluation mechanism When performing multi-faceted evaluation of the same evaluation object using the object, discrete / diffusion evaluation when different evaluation object data is acquired for each of the object side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b (for example, Cullback Live It is useful for the calculation mechanism of error information and the calculation mechanism of inverse matrix problems.

  Then, for example, from the display unit 13 or the voice output unit 14, the above-described reference data and the evaluation result data received from each object-side evaluation determination assisting device 2a, 2b are notified, or the evaluation request content obtained by further analyzing the evaluation result data By notifying the evaluation result (step S115: Notifying the evaluation result), the user compares the local environment to which the evaluation determining device 1 belongs with the environment in another similar system, and the contents of the evaluation request Can be evaluated relative to. It should be noted that the user on the subject side can grasp the evaluation result data on the object side by notifying the evaluation result data received from the object side as it is without performing the aggregation or the subject side evaluation process in step S113. Good. In addition, it is useful to provide a notification content control means for analyzing the evaluation result and to notify the user (selecting only an evaluation result (for example, an original evaluation)) that is useful (evaluation is meaningful). It is also possible to perform notification.

  Next, the operation of the evaluation determination system in the first embodiment will be described with a specific example. FIG. 4 is a diagram schematically showing the outline of the operation of the evaluation determination system in the first embodiment of the present invention. Here, it is assumed that the evaluation determination device 1 is realized by an in-vehicle device installed in the vehicle C, and the object-side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b are realized by the in-vehicle devices installed in the vehicles A and B. Each vehicle A to C is equipped with a fuel consumption sensor (not shown) that measures fuel consumption (travel distance / gasoline usage), and the evaluation determination device 1 and the object-side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b are: It is assumed that fuel consumption measurement data obtained by the fuel consumption sensor can be acquired.

  Vehicles A to C shown in FIG. 4 are traveling 100 km or more on an expressway or the like, and it is considered that gasoline is consumed under substantially the same conditions. Thus, for example, it is assumed that the user of the vehicle C inputs to the evaluation determination device 1 that he / she wants to evaluate the superiority or inferiority of the own fuel consumption by comparing the fuel consumption as the agenda of the evaluation request content (corresponding to step S101). In addition, for example, the evaluation determination apparatus 1 detects conditions such as that the user of the vehicle C is a person who cares about fuel consumption, and that the vehicles A and B are running in parallel with the vehicle C for 100 km or more. It is also possible for the evaluation determination device 1 itself to determine that the fuel consumption is compared as the request content.

  After receiving the determination of the contents of the evaluation request, the evaluation determination device 1 establishes connection of P2P communication with the object-side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b of the vehicles A and B (corresponding to steps S103, S105a, and S105b). The request “Please tell me the fuel consumption of the 100 km section so far” is sent as comparison determination request information to the object side evaluation decision assisting devices 2a and 2b (corresponding to step S107).

  The object-side evaluation decision assisting devices 2a and 2b receive the comparison determination request information, and obtain fuel consumption measurement data for the 100 km section so far from the fuel consumption sensor (corresponding to the comparison data holding device 30) (step S109a, (Corresponding to S109b), this measurement data is transmitted to the evaluation determining apparatus 1 as evaluation result data (corresponding to steps S111a and S111b). For example, when the fuel consumption measurement data (reference data) of the vehicle C is 8 km / liter, and the fuel consumption measurement data (evaluation result data) of the vehicle A and the vehicle B are 10 km / liter and 12 km / liter, respectively, the evaluation is performed. The determination device 1 performs a tabulation and evaluation process of these data to relatively grasp that the fuel efficiency of the own vehicle is bad (corresponding to step S113). In response to the content of the evaluation request “I want to evaluate”, the user is notified of information including an evaluation result that “the fuel efficiency of the vehicle is bad” (corresponding to step S115). It should be noted that the user is simply informed of the information “vehicle A fuel consumption: 10 km / liter, vehicle B fuel consumption: 12 km / liter, own vehicle fuel consumption: 8 km / liter”, or “own vehicle fuel consumption: 8 km / liter. It is 2km / liter below the fuel consumption of vehicle A. The fuel consumption of vehicle B is 4km / liter lower. It is also possible to notify by changing the expression such as In addition, the evaluation result can be stored in the information storage unit 12 or the like, and the evaluation result can be shared with the object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b.

  Moreover, in the example shown in FIG. 4, since the evaluation determination apparatus 1 installed in the vehicle A acquires comparison data under the same conditions, the object-side evaluation determination assistance in the vehicles B and C existing around the vehicle A Although the evaluation result data is acquired by establishing the connection of the P2P communication with the devices 2a and 2b, the evaluation determination device 1 does not necessarily need to select the object side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b existing around the device. The object side evaluation decision assisting devices 2a and 2b capable of acquiring the evaluation result data (in this case, the fuel consumption measurement data of the latest 100 km section) related to the desired evaluation request content are sent via the network 3. You may search and discover.

<Second Embodiment>
Next, an aspect will be described in which an evaluation based on the subjectivity of a third party for an arbitrary evaluation request content is acquired in real time, and an objective evaluation for the evaluation request content is determined by performing a comparative determination based on the evaluation. . In addition, the evaluation of the evaluation request content acquired by the evaluation determination apparatus 1 in the second embodiment from the object side evaluation determination auxiliary apparatuses 2a and 2b is based on the subjectivity of the user of the object side evaluation determination auxiliary apparatuses 2a and 2b. These are opinions and impressions to be determined, and differ depending on each user's intention and feeling.

  FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing a configuration of an object side evaluation determination assisting device of the evaluation determination system in the second embodiment of the present invention. The object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b shown in FIG. 5 are communication units 51 for performing P2P communication with the evaluation determination device 1 and information for requesting evaluation for comparison determination via the communication unit 51 (comparison determination request). Information) from the evaluation determination device 1, and a liquid crystal display for visually informing the user of the object side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b, which performs processing related to the comparison determination request information, etc. Display unit 53, audio output unit 54 such as a speaker for informing the user of the object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a, 2b audibly (by voice), and by the user of the object-side evaluation determining assisting devices 2a, 2b Enables voice input by the user of the operation input unit 55 such as a mouse, keyboard, touch panel, operation buttons, etc., and the object side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b that enable operation and input. And a voice input unit 56 such as a microphone. As described above, the display unit 53 and the voice output unit 54 correspond to the evaluation request data output device 31 shown in FIG. 2, and the operation input unit 55 and the voice input unit 56 show the evaluation results shown in FIG. It corresponds to the input device 32.

  Next, an outline of the operation of the evaluation determination system in the second embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the configuration shown in FIGS. In the following, the outline of the operation of the second embodiment of the present invention will be described by appropriately replacing the wording of the sequence chart shown in FIG. 3 as necessary.

  Also in the second embodiment, as in the first embodiment, first, generation of evaluation request contents in the evaluation determination device 1 (step S101), search and discovery of the object side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b ( Step S103), connection establishment of P2P communication (steps S105a and S105b), and determination as to whether or not evaluation cooperation is possible in the object side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b (steps S106a and S106b).

  Then, the evaluation determination device 1 transmits comparison determination request information, which is the content of the evaluation request, to the object side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b via the P2P communication with which the connection has been established (step S107: comparison determination). Send request information). This comparison determination request information includes an agenda and a question for asking evaluation based on the subjectivity of the users of the object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b (evaluation of what to think and how to feel).

  Each object-side evaluation determination assisting device 2a, 2b that has received the comparison determination request information from the evaluation determining device 1 notifies the agenda or question for asking evaluation based on the user's subjectivity through the display unit 53 or the voice output unit 54. And the subjective evaluation (subjective evaluation data by the object side) which acquires the subject, the question, etc. which were input from the operation input part 55 or the voice input part 56 by the user of each object side evaluation determination auxiliary | assistance apparatus 2a, 2b is acquired. (Steps S109a, S109b: Subjective evaluation acquisition processing), this subjective evaluation data is transmitted to the evaluation determination device 1 (Steps S111a, S111b: Subjective evaluation data is transmitted). The operations in the object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b are shown in FIG. 3 (steps S109a and S109b: object-side evaluation processing) and (steps S111a and S111b: send evaluation result data). (Steps S109a, S109b: Subjective evaluation acquisition processing) and (Steps S111a, S111b: Send subjective evaluation data) are read and transmitted from the object-side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a, 2b to the evaluation determination device 1. This is explained by replacing the evaluation result data with subjective evaluation data.

  In addition, it is desirable that the objective evaluation process is performed by different evaluation mechanisms in the respective object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b. As a result, non-standardized / ununiformized calculation by a non-uniform (different viewpoint) evaluation mechanism, multi-faceted evaluation of the same evaluation object using the object-side evaluation mechanism, object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a, 2b Discrete / diffuse evaluation when different evaluation target data is acquired for each is realized. In addition, when an evaluation mechanism program is provided from the subject side for evaluation processing on the object side, this program is provided to complement the evaluation mechanism on the object side and to standardize and unify the calculation by the evaluation mechanism. It is desirable to be performed for the purpose of decentralizing / diffusing the evaluation of the evaluation object and the calculation of the evaluation process.

  Subjective evaluation data transmitted from each object-side evaluation determination assisting device 2a, 2b to the evaluation determining device 1 is based on the subjective ( The result of evaluation based on the subjectivity of the object side is included. Therefore, the evaluation included in the subjective evaluation data is a subjective evaluation of the user of each object-side evaluation determination assisting device 2a, 2b, but for the user of the evaluation determining device 1, a third party (each object side This is an objective evaluation result determined by the users of the evaluation decision assisting devices 2a and 2b) and is useful information for the user of the evaluation decision device 1 to make a decision.

  The evaluation determination device 1 that has received the subjective evaluation data from each object-side evaluation determination auxiliary device 2a, 2b performs aggregation of the received subjective evaluation data and performs an evaluation process on the evaluation determination device 1 side (subject side) (step S113: evaluation). Result data aggregation and subject-side evaluation processing), for example, the subjective evaluation data received from the object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b from the display unit 13 and the audio output unit 14 as they are, or a plurality of subjective evaluation data By notifying the statistical processing result of the evaluation data (step S115: notifying the evaluation result), the user of the evaluation determining device 1 makes a consideration and decision making that takes objective evaluation into consideration for the content of the evaluation request. You can do it.

  Next, the operation of the evaluation determination system in the second embodiment will be described with a specific example. FIG. 6 is a diagram schematically showing the outline of the operation of the evaluation determination system in the second embodiment of the present invention. Here, it is assumed that the evaluation determination device 1 is realized by an in-vehicle device installed in the vehicle C, and the object-side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b are realized by the in-vehicle devices installed in the vehicles A and B.

  The vehicle C shown in FIG. 6 stops at the gas station and performs refueling, but is still in a state where it is not possible to decide whether or not to wash the vehicle. Therefore, for example, it is assumed that the user of the vehicle C inputs to the evaluation determination device 1 that the objective of the evaluation request is to receive an objective evaluation as to whether or not the vehicle is dirty (corresponding to step S101). .

  In response to the determination of the content of the evaluation request, the evaluation determination device 1 establishes the connection of the P2P communication with the object side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b of the vehicles A and B waiting for the signal around the vehicle C, for example. After going (corresponding to steps S103, S105a, S105b), “Is my car dirty? Is transmitted as comparison determination request information to the object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b (corresponding to step S107).

  Each of the object side evaluation decision assisting devices 2a and 2b receives this comparison determination request information, and “is vehicle C dirty? ] Is notified to the users of the object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b. And the user of each object side evaluation determination auxiliary | assistance apparatus 2a, 2b judges whether the vehicle C is dirty by looking at the vehicle C, and inputs subjective evaluation based on the judgment (step S109a, S109b). Corresponding). The input subjective evaluation is transmitted to the evaluation determination device 1 as subjective evaluation data (corresponding to steps S111a and S111b).

  For example, when the users of the object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b (passengers of the vehicles A and B) both perform the evaluation “Vehicle C is dirty”, the evaluation determining device 1 Subjective evaluation data including the result is received, and processing related to the subjective evaluation data is performed (corresponding to step S113), and “Vehicle C is dirty? ”Is notified to the user of the evaluation determination apparatus 1 that the evaluation result“ Vehicle C is dirty ”has been received from the vehicle A and the vehicle B (corresponding to step S115). As a result, the user of the evaluation determination device 1 grasps the objective evaluation result determined by the third party, and makes a final decision as to whether or not to perform car washing while considering the evaluation result. It becomes possible. In addition, for example, statistical processing of evaluation results was performed, and “I got evaluation from two people. For example, the vehicle C is dirty: 100% and the vehicle C is clean: 0%. In addition, the evaluation result can be stored in the information storage unit 12 or the like, and the evaluation result can be shared with the object-side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b.

  Also, the car wash service device 60 shown in FIG. 6 takes an image of the vehicle body of the vehicle C using the imaging camera 61, and the image data of the vehicle body of the vehicle C is received from the image data transmission unit 62 together with the car wash mediation advertisement information. It is also possible to configure to transmit to 1. In this case, the evaluation determination device 1 transmits the imaging data to the object-side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b of the vehicles A and B, and the user of each object-side evaluation determination auxiliary device 2a and 2b By browsing, it is possible to determine the evaluation for the content of the evaluation request. In addition, when the evaluation request content can be evaluated by the imaging data, the user of each object side evaluation determination assisting device 2a, 2b does not need to perform the evaluation by visually checking the vehicle C. Even the users of the object-side evaluation decision assisting devices 2a and 2b existing at the place (place where the vehicle body of the vehicle C cannot be seen) can evaluate the content of the evaluation request by browsing the imaging data.

  In the first embodiment, the evaluation result for the evaluation request content is determined based on a relative comparison between the local environment to which the evaluation determination apparatus 1 belongs and the environment of another similar system. In the second embodiment, the evaluation result for the evaluation request content is determined based on an objective evaluation by a third party. The acquisition method of the comparison data and the subjective evaluation data in the evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b is not limited. That is, in the first embodiment, for example, the user of the object side evaluation determination assisting devices 2a and 2b can input the comparison data using the operation input unit 15, such as the user inputting numerical data of fuel consumption. In the second embodiment, for example, whether a computer capable of executing an algorithm that models user preferences analyzes the imaging data of the vehicle body of the vehicle C to determine whether the vehicle C is dirty. It is also possible to acquire subjective evaluation data from a predetermined subjective evaluation data output device, such as outputting the determination result.

  Moreover, in said 1st and 2nd embodiment, for example, the evaluation determination apparatus 1 and the object side evaluation determination auxiliary | assistance apparatus 2a, 2b have each function (each block shown in FIG.1, FIG.2, FIG.5). Although illustrated to be implemented in advance, for example, each function is realized by a program called a mobile agent as needed (when a series of evaluation determination operations are performed in the evaluation determination system). It is also possible.

  The mobile agent is a program that has mobility to other systems and computers, and can perform data processing autonomously while adapting to the external environment in the destination external environment. In order to manage the operation of the mobile agent, each computer only needs to have a predetermined agent platform, and the mobile agent moves through the agent platform installed in each computer and performs various processes such as data acquisition processing. It is possible to perform various operations.

  Therefore, also in the present invention, the evaluation determination device 1 and the object side evaluation determination auxiliary devices 2a and 2b each implement an agent platform, and manage and allow the operation of the mobile agent, thereby realizing only a specific function in advance. It is possible to realize an evaluation determination system that can appropriately obtain an evaluation result by adapting to various evaluation request contents without implementing.

  Next, an implementation pattern of the evaluation determination method according to the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. As shown in FIG. 12 to FIG. 16, in the present invention, there are various evaluation determination method implementation patterns by combining use of the same or different evaluation target instances, the same or different viewpoints, and uniform or independent evaluation mechanisms. .

  FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram showing a first example of an implementation pattern of the evaluation determination method according to the present invention. FIG. 12 shows the subject and two objects (other 1, other 2). The subject side evaluation determination device, the other 1 (object) side evaluation determination assisting device, and the other 2 (object) side evaluation determination assisting device belong to each of the subject and the object (other 1, other 2), and the viewpoint resource (Self-viewpoint resource, another one-viewpoint resource, another two-viewpoint resource) and an evaluation mechanism (self-assessment mechanism, another one-evaluation mechanism, another two-evaluation mechanism).

  In the evaluation determination method shown in FIG. 12, each of the subject and the object (other 1, other 2) has different evaluation object instances (self-evaluation object instance, other evaluation object instance 1, other evaluation object instance) from different viewpoints. Each evaluation mechanism outputs evaluation result data (self-evaluation result data, other 1 evaluation result data, and other 2 evaluation result data).

  As a result, in each of the subject and the object (other 1, other 2), the evaluation mechanism (that is, the evaluation mechanism having a different viewpoint) of each evaluation determination (auxiliary) device that may have different functions and algorithms, respectively, It is possible to derive evaluation result data by performing evaluation processing related to different evaluation target instances acquired from different viewpoints, and discrete and diffuse evaluation is performed when different targets are viewed from different viewpoints. It becomes like this.

  FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram showing a second example of an implementation pattern of the evaluation determination method according to the present invention. In FIG. 13, as in FIG. 12, the subject side evaluation determination device, the other 1 (object) side evaluation determination assisting device, and the other 2 (object) side evaluation determination assisting device are the same for the subject and the object (other 1, other 2). Each of them belongs to each of them and has a viewpoint resource (own viewpoint resource, another viewpoint resource, another viewpoint resource) and an evaluation mechanism (self evaluation mechanism, other 1 evaluation mechanism, other 2 evaluation mechanism). It is shown schematically.

  In the evaluation determination method shown in FIG. 13, each of the subject and the object (other 1, other 2) obtains evaluation target data related to the same evaluation target instance (same evaluation target instance) from different viewpoints, Each evaluation mechanism outputs evaluation result data (self-evaluation result data, other 1 evaluation result data, and other 2 evaluation result data).

  As a result, in each of the subject and the object (other 1, other 2), the evaluation mechanism (that is, the evaluation mechanism having a different viewpoint) of each evaluation determination (auxiliary) device that may have different functions and algorithms, respectively, It is possible to perform evaluation processing related to the same evaluation target instance acquired from different viewpoints and derive each evaluation result data, and multi- and multi-view evaluations when viewing the same target from different viewpoints To be done.

  FIG. 14 is a schematic diagram showing a third example of an implementation pattern of the evaluation determination method according to the present invention. In FIG. 14, as in FIG. 12, the subject-side evaluation determination device, the other 1 (object) side evaluation determination assisting device, and the other 2 (object) side evaluation determination assisting device are connected to the subject and the object (other 1, other 2). Each of them belongs to each of them and has a viewpoint resource (own viewpoint resource, another viewpoint resource, another viewpoint resource) and an evaluation mechanism (self evaluation mechanism, other 1 evaluation mechanism, other 2 evaluation mechanism). It is shown schematically. However, here, each object-side evaluation determination assisting device acquires the evaluation object data related to the evaluation object instance by using the own viewpoint resource of the subject-side evaluation determination apparatus.

  In the evaluation determination method shown in FIG. 14, each of the subject and the object (other 1, other 2) relates to the same evaluation target instance (the same evaluation target instance) from the same viewpoint (here, the viewpoint of the main subject). The evaluation object data is acquired, and each evaluation mechanism outputs evaluation result data (self-evaluation result data, other 1 evaluation result data, and other 2 evaluation result data).

  Thereby, in each of the subject and the object (other 1, other 2), the evaluation mechanism (that is, the evaluation mechanism having a different viewpoint) of each evaluation determination (auxiliary) device that may have different functions and algorithms is the same. It is possible to derive the evaluation result data by performing the evaluation process for the same evaluation target instance acquired from the viewpoint, and there are various evaluations that can occur when the same object is viewed from the same viewpoint. To be done.

  FIG. 15 is a schematic diagram showing a fourth example of an implementation pattern of the evaluation determination method according to the present invention. In FIG. 15, as in FIG. 12, the subject side evaluation determination device, the other 1 (object) side evaluation determination assisting device, and the other 2 (object) side evaluation determination assisting device are connected to the subject and the object (other 1, other 2). Each of them belongs to each of them and has a viewpoint resource (own viewpoint resource, another viewpoint resource, another viewpoint resource) and an evaluation mechanism (self evaluation mechanism, other 1 evaluation mechanism, other 2 evaluation mechanism). It is shown schematically. However, here, the program of the self-evaluation mechanism of the subject-side evaluation determination device moves on each object-side evaluation determination auxiliary device, and performs a predetermined evaluation process while using the resources of the destination device.

  In the evaluation determination method shown in FIG. 15, each of the subject and the object (other 1, other 2) has different evaluation object instances (self-evaluation object instance, other evaluation object instance 1, other evaluation object instance) from different viewpoints. The same evaluation mechanism (in this case, the self-evaluation mechanism provided by the subject) is obtained as the evaluation result data (self-evaluation result data, other 1 evaluation result data, and other 2 evaluation result data). Is output.

  Thereby, in each of the subject and the object (other 1, other 2), the same evaluation mechanism (that is, the evaluation mechanism having the same viewpoint) performs the evaluation processing related to different evaluation target instances acquired from different viewpoints. Thus, each evaluation result data can be derived, and a unified or integrated evaluation when different objects are viewed from different viewpoints is performed by a standardized or unified evaluation mechanism.

  FIG. 16 is a schematic diagram showing a fifth example of an implementation pattern of the evaluation determination method according to the present invention. In FIG. 16, as in FIG. 12, the subject side evaluation determination device, the other 1 (object) side evaluation determination assisting device, and the other 2 (object) side evaluation determination assisting device Each of them belongs to each model and has a viewpoint resource (own viewpoint resource, another one viewpoint resource, another two viewpoint resource) and an evaluation mechanism (self evaluation mechanism, other one evaluation mechanism, other two evaluation mechanism). It is shown schematically. However, here, the program of the self-evaluation mechanism of the subject-side evaluation determination device moves on each object-side evaluation determination auxiliary device, and performs a predetermined evaluation process while using the resources of the destination device.

  In the evaluation determination method shown in FIG. 16, each of the subject and the object (other 1, other 2) acquires evaluation target data related to the same evaluation target instance (same evaluation target instance) from different viewpoints, The same evaluation mechanism (here, the self-evaluation mechanism provided by the subject) outputs the evaluation result data (self-evaluation result data, other 1 evaluation result data, and other 2 evaluation result data).

  Thereby, in each of the subject and the object (other 1, other 2), the same evaluation mechanism (that is, the evaluation mechanism having the same viewpoint) performs the evaluation processing related to the same evaluation target instance acquired from different viewpoints. It is possible to derive each evaluation result data, and to perform multi-view and integrated evaluation when the same object is viewed from different viewpoints by a standardized or unified evaluation mechanism Become.

  The evaluation determination system and the evaluation determination method according to the present invention obtains comparison data for a given evaluation request content or a third party's evaluation in real time, and performs comparison determination based on the evaluation result data. It has the effect that the evaluation can be determined, and is applied to a communication system that performs wired or wireless communication. It also applies to systems for objective and relative reviews by deterring environmental discrepancies and incorporating third-party perspectives.

It is a figure which shows the structure of the evaluation determination system in the 1st and 2nd embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the structure of the object side evaluation determination auxiliary | assistance apparatus of the evaluation determination system in the 1st Embodiment of this invention. It is a sequence chart which shows the outline | summary of operation | movement of the evaluation determination system in the 1st Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows typically the outline | summary of operation | movement of the evaluation determination system in the 1st Embodiment of this invention. It is a schematic diagram which shows the structure of the object side evaluation determination auxiliary | assistance apparatus of the evaluation determination system in the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows typically the outline | summary of operation | movement of the evaluation determination system in the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. It is a schematic diagram which shows one structural example of the program for evaluation determination which can be performed by the evaluation determination apparatus in the 1st and 2nd embodiment of this invention. It is a schematic diagram for demonstrating the outline | summary of this invention. It is a figure which shows the example of 1 structure of the evaluation determination system which concerns on this invention. It is a schematic diagram for demonstrating the objective evaluation process which concerns on this invention. It is a schematic diagram for demonstrating the relative evaluation process which concerns on this invention. It is a schematic diagram which shows the 1st example of the implementation | achievement pattern of the evaluation determination method which concerns on this invention. It is a schematic diagram which shows the 2nd example of the implementation | achievement pattern of the evaluation determination method which concerns on this invention. It is a schematic diagram which shows the 3rd example of the implementation | achievement pattern of the evaluation determination method which concerns on this invention. It is a schematic diagram which shows the 4th example of the implementation | achievement pattern of the evaluation determination method which concerns on this invention. It is a schematic diagram which shows the 5th example of the implementation | achievement pattern of the evaluation determination method which concerns on this invention.

Explanation of symbols

1 Evaluation determining device 2a, 2b Object side evaluation determination assisting device (Evaluation determining assisting device)
3 Network 11 Central processing unit (CPU)
12 Information storage unit 13, 53 Display unit 14, 54 Audio output unit 15, 55 Operation input unit 16, 56 Audio input unit 17, 21, 51 Communication unit 18, 23 Communication port unit 20 Evaluation determination program 22, 52 Information processing Unit 24 Comparison data acquisition unit 25 Evaluation request unit 26 Evaluation request data automatic evaluation unit 27 Evaluation request data user evaluation request unit 30 Comparison data holding device 31 Evaluation request data output device 32 Evaluation result input device 60 Car wash mediation service device 61 Imaging camera 62 Imaging data transmission unit 201 Evaluation request content generation unit (comparison determination request information generation unit)
202 Request partner search / discovery unit 203 Comparison determination request / evaluation result reception unit 204 Evaluation result data comparison unit 205 Comparison result notification unit

Claims (17)

An evaluation determination system for performing an evaluation process of an evaluation target, analyzing the evaluation result, drawing a conclusion, and informing the user of the conclusion,
The evaluation determination device belonging to the subject side and one or more evaluation determination auxiliary devices belonging to the object side exist in a network environment in which P2P communication can be performed mutually,
The evaluation determination device makes an evaluation request for the evaluation object to the evaluation determination auxiliary device via the connection of the P2P communication established between the evaluation determination device and the evaluation determination auxiliary device. The evaluation determination auxiliary device interprets and understands the content of the evaluation request acquired from the evaluation determination device, executes an evaluation process according to the content of the evaluation request, and uses the evaluation result as an object side evaluation result. An evaluation determination system in which the evaluation determination device is able to notify the evaluation result including the object-side viewpoint as the conclusion by responding to the evaluation determination device.   The evaluation determination system according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the evaluation determination device and the evaluation determination auxiliary device is a communication device mounted on a mobile communication terminal or a mobile body. The evaluation determining device is
Evaluation request generating means for generating the contents of the evaluation request;
Partner search / discovery means for searching / discovering the evaluation decision assisting device that accepts the evaluation request;
A connection establishment means for establishing a connection of the P2P communication with the evaluation determination auxiliary device;
Evaluation request means for making the evaluation request to the evaluation determination assisting device;
Evaluation result receiving means for receiving the object side evaluation result, which is an execution result of the evaluation process according to the content of the evaluation request, from the evaluation determination assisting device;
An informing means for informing a user of an evaluation result based on the object side evaluation result,
And the evaluation decision assisting device,
An evaluation request receiving means for receiving the evaluation request from the evaluation determination device;
An evaluation processing means for executing an evaluation process according to the content of the evaluation request from the evaluation determination device;
An evaluation result response means for responding to the object side evaluation result generated by execution of the evaluation process, with respect to the evaluation determination device,
The evaluation decision system according to claim 1 or 2. When the evaluation determination device receives the object side evaluation results from each of the plurality of evaluation determination auxiliary devices, the evaluation determination device has an evaluation result totaling unit for totaling the plurality of object side evaluation results,
The evaluation determination system according to claim 3, wherein the notification unit is configured to notify the user based on a result of counting by the evaluation result totaling unit. The evaluation determination device has an evaluation processing means for executing an evaluation process based on the object side evaluation result,
The evaluation determination system according to claim 3 or 4, wherein the notification unit is configured to notify the user based on a result of the evaluation process performed by the evaluation processing unit.   The evaluation determination device includes an evaluation determination auxiliary device, and the evaluation request is made from the evaluation determination device to the evaluation determination auxiliary device, and the evaluation determination auxiliary device is a pseudo evaluation determination auxiliary device. The evaluation determination system according to any one of claims 3 to 5, configured to execute an evaluation process according to the content of the evaluation request and generate an object-side evaluation result. The evaluation determination device and the evaluation determination auxiliary device each include an evaluation target data acquisition unit for acquiring evaluation target data necessary for performing the evaluation processing of the evaluation target,
When the evaluation determination device makes the evaluation request by the evaluation request unit, the evaluation determination auxiliary device responds to the contents of the evaluation request by the evaluation object data acquisition unit of the evaluation determination auxiliary device. Requesting the data to be evaluated at the same time,
The evaluation determination assisting device responds to the evaluation determining device with the evaluation target data acquired by the evaluation target data acquiring means of the evaluation determination assisting device as the evaluation result,
The evaluation determination device receives the evaluation target data from the evaluation determination auxiliary device, acquires the evaluation target data by the evaluation target data acquisition unit of the evaluation determination device, and the evaluation processing unit includes the evaluation processing unit, 6. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein a relative evaluation result between the subject side and the object side is obtained by performing a difference comparison process between the evaluation target data on the subject side and the evaluation subject data on the object side. The described evaluation decision system. The evaluation determination device and the evaluation determination auxiliary device each include an evaluation target data acquisition unit for acquiring evaluation target data necessary for performing the evaluation processing of the evaluation target,
When the evaluation determination device performs the evaluation request by the evaluation request unit by acquiring the evaluation target data by the evaluation target data acquisition unit of the evaluation determination device, the evaluation determination auxiliary device, Simultaneously transmitting the evaluation target data acquired by the evaluation target data acquisition means,
The evaluation determination assisting device acquires the evaluation target data corresponding to the content of the evaluation request by the evaluation target data acquiring unit of the evaluation determination assisting device, and the evaluation processing unit includes the evaluation target data on the subject side. The relative evaluation result between the subject side and the object side is calculated on the object side by performing a difference comparison process with the evaluation object data on the object side. The evaluation decision system as described in any one of these. The evaluation determination assisting device has an evaluation target data acquisition means for acquiring evaluation target data necessary for performing the evaluation target evaluation process,
The evaluation processing means of the evaluation determination assisting device uses the evaluation processing result as the evaluation result based on the evaluation target data acquired by the evaluation target data acquiring means of the evaluation determination assisting device. The evaluation determination system according to any one of claims 3 to 6, wherein the main body side is configured to acquire the objective evaluation result relating to the evaluation object by the object side by responding.   The evaluation processing means of the evaluation determination assisting device can generate the evaluation result based on an input by the object-side user or an output from a program in which the object-side user's preference is a knowledge model. 10. The evaluation determination system according to claim 9, which is configured. When the evaluation determination device performs the evaluation request by the evaluation request means, it simultaneously transmits a program of an evaluation mechanism for performing an evaluation process related to the object,
The said evaluation process means of the said evaluation determination assistance apparatus is comprised so that the said evaluation process may be performed using the said program of the said evaluation mechanism received from the said evaluation determination apparatus. The evaluation decision system according to one.   The evaluation determination device is configured to simultaneously transmit a predetermined input form for inputting the evaluation result by the evaluation determination auxiliary device when the evaluation request is made by the evaluation request unit. The evaluation determination system according to any one of 3 to 11.   The said evaluation determination apparatus is comprised so that the said conclusion may be selectively alert | reported to the said user of the said main body based on a predetermined | prescribed reference | standard. Evaluation decision system.   In the network environment, there is further a communication device different from the evaluation determination device and the evaluation determination auxiliary device, and the communication device acts as a proxy for the evaluation determination auxiliary device with respect to the evaluation determination auxiliary device. The evaluation determination system according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation determination system is configured to make a request.   The agent side uses agent-oriented technology for the evaluation request from the evaluation determination device to the evaluation determination auxiliary device, and the agent program acts as a proxy for the operation of the user on the subject side and / or the user on the object side. The evaluation determination system according to any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the evaluation determination system is configured to perform processing without the intervention of the user and / or the user on the object side.   The evaluation determination system according to any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein the object side evaluation result from the evaluation determination auxiliary device is information relating to a local environment to which the evaluation determination auxiliary device belongs. An evaluation determination system for performing an evaluation process of an evaluation target, analyzing the evaluation result, obtaining a conclusion, and informing the user of the conclusion, an evaluation determination apparatus belonging to the subject side, and 1 belonging to the object side An evaluation determination method in the evaluation determination system that exists in a network environment so that two or more evaluation determination auxiliary devices can perform P2P communication with each other,
An evaluation request generating step in which the evaluation determination device generates the content of the evaluation request; and
The evaluation determination device searches for and finds the evaluation determination auxiliary device that accepts the evaluation request, and a partner search / discovery step;
A connection establishment step for establishing a connection of the P2P communication between the evaluation determination device and the evaluation determination auxiliary device;
An evaluation requesting step in which the evaluation determination device makes the evaluation request to the evaluation determination auxiliary device;
An evaluation processing step in which the evaluation determination auxiliary device executes an evaluation process according to the content of the evaluation request from the evaluation determination device;
An evaluation result response step in which the evaluation determination assisting device responds to the evaluation determination device with an object side evaluation result generated by executing the evaluation process;
The evaluation determining apparatus, a notification step for notifying the user on the subject side of the evaluation result based on the object-side evaluation result,
Evaluation evaluation method having.

Images