JP2005266960A - Work contract company selection system - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a work contract company selection system capable of comparatively easily and surely selecting a work contract company having adequacy to ordered work from a plurality of work contract candidate companies. <P>SOLUTION: A work contract company selection server 30 comprises a database 50 accumulating condition data composed of an order condition data 51a, a caution condition data 51b and a selection condition data 51c, and a company evaluation criteria reference data 53a indicating the evaluation criteria of every item of conditions of the condition data, an order creating means 60 for listing the ordered contents and conditions by extracting the condition data from the database 50 in accordance with the condition of the input work contents, creating the order data 200 having an answer field, and permitting the edition of the order data 200 in accordance with the necessity, and a work contract company selection means 70 representing the order data 200 to work contract candidate companies A-C as electronic data, receiving the condition answer data 200a-200c to the order data 200 from the work contract candidate companies A-C, and evaluating the same on the basis of the company evaluation criteria data 53a to select the work contract company. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

  The present invention relates to a construction contractor selection system for selecting a construction contractor that is a construction contractor from a plurality of construction contract candidate companies.

  Conventionally, for example, when ordering construction work from a construction company such as a construction company, in general, according to the provisions of the construction contract agreement, etc. A so-called successful bid method is adopted in which an estimate document describing the estimated amount of construction is submitted, and the construction is ordered from the company that presented the lowest estimated amount.

  Here, the estimate is an important form for determining the budget amount required for the construction, but there are various ways of thinking and notation methods depending on the company. For this reason, there is a problem in that if a company with the lowest estimated amount is selected by comparing companies only with an estimate, a problem may occur.

  For example, there is a possibility that some of the construction contractors include companies that are good at and not good at construction due to construction ability and past performance. For this reason, even if the company with the lowest estimated amount stated in the estimate is selected, it does not mean that the company that is suitable for the construction is selected.If the construction capacity of the selected company is low, the construction quality is poor. There is a risk of becoming.

  Also, in recent years, with the spread of the Internet, etc., the contractor himself registers skill data, thereby constructing a database in which the registered skill data is stored, and extracting contractors suitable for work from the database A system has been proposed (see, for example, Patent Document 1). However, in such a system, when selecting a construction contracting company that is a construction contractor out of a plurality of construction contracting candidate companies, an evaluation is made as to whether or not the construction contracting company is suitable for the construction based on the contents of the construction. Cannot be solved.

JP 2002-318846 A (FIGS. 17 and 12)

  In view of such circumstances, the present invention provides a construction contractor selection system capable of relatively easily and reliably selecting a construction contractor having suitability for ordering work from a plurality of construction contract candidate companies. The task is to do.

  A first aspect of the present invention that solves the above-described problem is a construction contractor selection system including a construction contractor selection server that selects a construction contractor that is a construction contractor from a plurality of construction contract candidate companies. The construction contractor selection server is a database in which condition data composed of ordering condition data, caution condition data, and selection condition data, and company evaluation standard data, which is data indicating an evaluation standard for each condition item of the condition data, are stored. And extracting the condition data from the database in accordance with the conditions of the inputted construction contents, enumerating the order contents and conditions, and creating the purchase order data having the answer column, and if necessary, the purchase order data A purchase order creation means that permits editing of the purchase order, and the purchase order data to be presented as electronic data to the construction contract candidate company. Construction work comprising: a construction contractor selection means for selecting the construction contractor by receiving condition response data for the purchase order data from the subsidiary company and evaluating based on the company evaluation standard data In the contractor selection system.

  In the first aspect, the purchase order data created in accordance with the conditions of the construction content is presented to the construction contract candidate company, and the condition response data for the purchase order data from the construction contract candidate company is based on the company evaluation standard data. By performing the evaluation, it is possible to relatively easily and surely select a construction contracting company having suitability for the ordering work from a plurality of construction contracting candidate companies.

  According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect, a terminal of a construction ordering company that is a construction ordering source, a terminal of the construction contract candidate company, and the construction contractor selection server are connected via a network. It is in the construction contractor selection system characterized by

  In the second aspect, since the terminals of the construction ordering company and the construction contract candidate company and the construction contracting company selection server are connected via the network, the ordering of the construction is relatively easy.

  According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the first or second aspect, the construction contractor selection server changes the weighting of the evaluation for each condition item of the company evaluation reference data according to at least the condition of the construction content. The construction contractor selection system further includes an evaluation standard changing means.

  In the third aspect, the suitability of the construction contract candidate company for the ordering work can be more accurately evaluated by appropriately changing the weighting of the evaluation according to the condition of the construction content.

  According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, in any one of the first to third aspects, the construction contracting company selection server externally includes only condition items preset by the construction ordering company in the company evaluation standard data. The construction contractor selection system further comprises browsing means for enabling browsing.

  In the fourth aspect, it is possible to ensure the publicity of information and the fairness of evaluation.

  According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, in any one of the first to fourth aspects, the database is at least one company aptitude data selected from qualification data, past performance data, and credit data of the construction contract candidate company. In the construction contractor selection system, the purchase order creation means edits the order contents and conditions of the purchase order data based on the company suitability data extracted from the database. is there.

  In the fifth aspect, by evaluating the construction contract candidate company in consideration of the company suitability data of the construction contract candidate company, the suitability of the construction contract candidate company for the ordering work can be more accurately evaluated.

  According to the construction contractor selection system of the present invention, condition data is extracted from the database in accordance with the conditions of the construction content from the construction ordering company that is the construction ordering source, and the order contents and conditions are listed, and an answer column is provided. Create purchase order data, present the purchase order data as electronic data to the construction contract candidate company, and evaluate the condition response data for the purchase order data from the construction contract candidate company based on the prescribed company evaluation criteria data. By selecting a contracting company, it is possible to select a construction contracting company having suitability for ordering work from a plurality of construction contracting candidate companies relatively easily and reliably.

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail based on embodiments.
(Embodiment 1)
FIG.1 and FIG.2 is a figure which shows schematic structure of the construction contractor selection system which concerns on Embodiment 1 of this invention. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of company evaluation reference data according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the construction contractor selection system 100 of this embodiment includes terminals 10a to 10c of a plurality of construction contract candidate companies A to C which are construction order candidate destinations, and a construction order company X which is a construction order source. Terminal 20 and a construction contractor selection server 30 having a function of selecting a construction contractor that is a construction contractor (a business partner of construction contractor X) are connected via a network 40. The construction contractor selection server 30 selects a construction contractor from among a database (DB) 50 for storing various data, a purchase order creation means 60 for creating purchase order data 200, and construction contract candidate companies A to C. A construction contractor selection means 70 to be selected, a transmission means 80 for transmitting various data to the construction contract candidate companies A to C, etc., and a receiving means 90 for receiving various data transmitted from the construction contract candidate companies A to C, etc. It comprises.

  In such a construction contractor selection system 100, when the construction content determined by the construction ordering company X is transmitted to the construction contractor selection server 30 via the network 40, as shown in FIG. The purchase order creation means 60 creates purchase order data 200 corresponding to the construction contents, and the transmission means 80 transmits the purchase order data 200 to the terminals 10a to 10c of the construction contract candidate companies A to C. When receiving the condition reply data 200a to 200c for the purchase order data 200 from the construction contract candidate companies A to C to which the receiving means 90 bids, the construction contractor selecting means 70 receives the condition reply received as described in detail later. By evaluating the data 200a based on the company evaluation standard data 53a, a construction contractor is selected from the construction contract candidate companies A to C, and the transmission means 80 sends the formal purchase order data 300 to the selected construction contractor. To send to.

  The construction contractor selection server 30, the terminals 10a to 10c of the construction contract candidate companies A to C, and the terminal 20 of the construction ordering company X may be information communication devices having various functions of a general computer. For example, a personal computer (PC) or the like may be used. In addition, as a network environment, for example, the terminals of the construction contract candidate companies A to C and the construction ordering company X and the construction contractor selection server 30 are connected by a LAN (Local-Area Network) cable or a wireless LAN. Examples include a network environment such as a dedicated network or a connection via the Internet. In this embodiment, the construction ordering company X and the construction contractor selection server 30 are connected by a dedicated network, and the dedicated network and the construction contract candidate companies A to C are connected via the Internet.

  Hereinafter, the configuration of the construction contractor selection server 30 will be described in detail. As shown in FIG. 2, in this embodiment, the database 50 in the construction contractor selection server 30 includes a condition database (condition DB) 51 in which order condition data 51a, caution condition data 51b, and selection condition data 51c are stored. , A company database (company DB) 52 that stores company data 52a and company aptitude data 52b to 52d described later, and a company determination database (company determination DB) 53 that stores company evaluation reference data 53a.

  Here, each data stored in the database 50 will be described. Specifically, the ordering condition data 51a accumulated in the condition database 51 is condition data relating to ordering. For example, whether or not there is a construction contract, construction period (scheduled start date, scheduled completion date), payment conditions, construction site And the like. The caution condition data 51b is condition data related to matters that need to be noted for each construction, and includes, for example, a procurement source of materials used for construction and designation of materials. The selection condition data 51c is condition data necessary for determining the specific suitability of the company. For example, the handling speed of the contract (response), the negotiating contents of the contract, the adjustment power of related construction, various laws and regulations. Status of compliance, safety measures, environmental conservation, handling of intellectual property rights, process management, construction witness implementation, construction material management, remodeling ability and destructive inspection in case of specification inconvenience, This includes the presence or absence of process delays, payment of overdue prize money, the ability to respond to temporary measures, the status of changes in contract fees, and the presence or absence of defects. These condition data 51a to 51c serve as judgment materials for evaluating the suitability of the construction contract candidate companies A to C for the ordering work.

  The company data 52a stored in the company database 52 is company information data of the construction contract candidate companies A to C. For example, the company code (company name), the employee number, the head office / person in charge (postal code, Address), telephone / facsimile number, company website, e-mail address, representative director name, etc. In this embodiment, the company database 52 includes qualification data 52b, past performance data 52c, credit data 52d, etc. Company aptitude data is also accumulated. This company aptitude data is also a judgment material for evaluating the suitability of the construction contract candidate companies A to C for the ordering work together with the above condition data 51a to 51c.

  Furthermore, the company evaluation reference data 53a accumulated in the company determination database 53 is data indicating the weighting of evaluation set in advance by the construction ordering company X for each condition item of the above condition data. As shown in FIG. In FIG. 3, for example, “10” is assigned as the evaluation weight for “rapid handling (response)” and “8” is assigned to the “negotiation contents of contract”. This means that in evaluating the suitability for construction, “contract handling speed (response)” is more important than “contract negotiation details”.

  Here, “having suitability for ordering work” in the present invention means, for example, the ordering work presented by the above-mentioned construction ordering company X in addition to the technical ability of the construction contract candidate companies A to C for ordering work. It has the property of determining whether or not it is suitable for the ordering work by judging the answers of the construction contract candidate companies A to C with respect to the contents and conditions.

  In addition, the purchase order creation means 60 in the construction contractor selection server 30 receives the condition data 51a to 51c and 52a to 52d from the condition database 51 and the company database 52 in accordance with the conditions of the construction content determined by the construction ordering company X. Are automatically extracted, the order contents and conditions of construction are listed, and a purchase order data 200 having a response column is created.

  For example, in the present embodiment, the condition items shown in FIG. 3 are extracted from the condition data 51 a to 51 c of the condition database 51 to create the purchase order data 200. That is, the order contents and conditions of the purchase order data 200 are associated with the condition items of the company evaluation reference data 53a. In this embodiment, the purchase order data 200 is provided with a ten-point evaluation entry field as an order condition response field. Further, the order contents of the purchase order data 200 include, in addition to the questions about the construction contents, questions about the cost for the construction, that is, the estimated amount and its breakdown.

  Further, the purchase order creation means 60 has a function that allows the purchase order data 200 to be edited as necessary. Specifically, with respect to the purchase order data 200 once created by the purchase order creation means 60, the order contents and conditions are added and deleted or modified by the input operation from the terminal 20 of the construction ordering company X. Can do.

  Here, such editing work can be performed based on company suitability data stored in the company database 52. For example, when a qualification is necessary to perform the construction, a question or the like for confirming the presence or absence of the qualification data 52b may be added to the purchase order data 200, or listed once from the past performance data 52c. Unnecessary condition items may be deleted from the purchase order data 200 from the set condition items. In addition, payment conditions and the like may be added to, deleted from, or modified with respect to the purchase order data 200 in consideration of the company credit data 53d. Thus, when the purchase order data 200 once created is edited based on, for example, the company suitability data of the construction contract candidate companies A to C, the purchase order data 200 is created for each of the construction contract candidate companies A to C. Therefore, the suitability of the construction contract candidate companies A to C for the ordering work can be more accurately evaluated. Note that such editing of the purchase order data 200 may be performed automatically by a control unit (not shown), or may not be performed as necessary.

  Here, in the construction contractor selection server 30 of the present embodiment, the purchase order data 200 created in this way is transmitted to the terminals 10a to 10c of the construction contract candidate companies A to C by the transmission means 80. Then, the construction contract candidate companies A to C that have received the purchase order data 200 examine the order contents and conditions of the purchase order data 200, and in the case of bidding, input the answer in the response column and the condition response data 200a. -200c are created, and the condition answer data 200a-200c are transmitted from the terminals 10a-10c to the construction contractor selection server 30 via the network 40. The construction contracting company selection server 30 receives the condition answer data 200a via the receiving means 90, and the bids of the construction contracting candidate companies A to C are determined. Here, a case has been described where all of the construction contract candidate companies A to C bid, but the construction contract candidate companies that have not returned the condition response data are excluded from the selection targets of the construction ordering party.

  In the construction contractor selection server 30, the condition response data 200 a to 200 c received via the reception unit 90 is used as the company evaluation reference data 53 a extracted from the company determination database 53 by the evaluation unit 71 of the construction contractor selection unit 70. Based on the evaluation. Specifically, the evaluation means 71 evaluates each condition item of the condition answer data 200a to 200c for each construction contract candidate company A to C based on the weighting of the evaluation set for each condition item of the company evaluation reference data 53a. To do.

  For example, in the present embodiment, a ten-point evaluation entry field is provided in the order condition response column listed in the purchase order data 200, and the construction contract candidate companies A to C are entered in the ten-point evaluation entry field. Is multiplied by the number (for example, a number from 1 to 10) and a number (for example, a number from 1 to 10) representing the weighting of the evaluation set for each condition item in the company evaluation reference data 53a. And compare and evaluate the total score for each of the construction contract candidate companies A to C. In addition, the estimated amounts described in the condition answer data 200a to 200c for each construction contract candidate company A to C are also compared and evaluated. Then, a construction contracting company having aptitude for the ordering work is selected from the construction contracting candidate companies A to C. For example, if there is a construction contract candidate company with the lowest estimated amount and the highest total sum of the ordering conditions, that construction contract candidate company may be selected as the construction contractor. By comprehensively evaluating the total points of the conditions and the estimated amount, the construction contracting company judged to be most appropriate by the construction ordering company is selected. If a plurality of construction contract candidate companies compete in the evaluation, the competing construction contract candidate companies may be selected once, and the final construction ordering party may be determined by discussion between the companies. Moreover, in this invention, when evaluating construction contract candidate company AC, you may consider the company aptitude data for every construction contract candidate company AC mentioned above. As a result, the suitability of the construction contract candidate companies A to C for the ordering work can be more accurately evaluated.

  As described above, according to the construction contractor selection system 100 of the present embodiment, the order contents and conditions are listed according to the conditions of the construction contents, and the purchase order data 200 having the answer column is created, By evaluating the condition response data 200a to 200c of the construction contract candidate companies A to C with respect to the purchase order data 200 based on the company evaluation standard data 53a, the construction contract candidate companies A to C can perform the ordering work. It is possible to select an appropriate construction contractor relatively easily and reliably.

  Further, the order condition of the purchase order data 200 is mainly composed of the condition data 51 a to 51 c of the condition database 51 and is associated with each condition item of the company evaluation reference data 53 a of the company determination database 53. By evaluating each of the condition response data 200a to 200c from the construction contract candidate companies A to C based on such company evaluation standard data 53a, the plurality of construction contract candidate companies A to C are evaluated fairly and promptly. be able to.

  Hereinafter, the operation of the construction contractor selection system 100 will be described in detail. In addition, FIG. 4 is a figure explaining the sequence of the construction contractor selection system which concerns on Embodiment 1 of this invention. As shown in FIG. 4, when the ordering work is determined, the construction ordering company X inputs the construction content on the input screen of the terminal 20 (S1). When the construction content is input in this way, the construction content electronic data is transmitted from the terminal 20 of the construction ordering company X to the construction contractor selection server 30 via the network 40 (S2). Then, the construction contractor selection server 30 receives the electronic data of the construction content via the receiving means 90 (S3). When the electronic data of the construction content is received in this way, the purchase order creation means 60 extracts the condition data from the condition database 51 according to the conditions of the construction content (S4). Here, the condition items shown in FIG. 3 are extracted as the condition data.

  Next, the purchase order creation means 60 creates the purchase order data 200 which lists the contents and conditions of the construction orders and has an answer column (S5). For example, as the order contents of the purchase order data 200, an estimated amount and its breakdown are listed, and as the order conditions, the condition items shown in FIG. 3 are listed. Further, the order form data 200 is provided with an answer column for these order contents and conditions, and in this embodiment, a reply column for entering a ten-point evaluation. Further, the purchase order creation means 60 edits the purchase order data 200 (S6). Here, based on company suitability data 52b, past performance data 52c, and credit data 52d stored in the company database 52, condition items are added / deleted / modified.

  Next, the transmission means 80 transmits the purchase order data 200 to the terminals 10a to 10c of the construction contract candidate companies A to C via the network 40 (S7). When the construction contract candidate companies A to C receive the purchase order data 200 (S8), the construction contents of the purchase order data 200, each condition item, etc. are examined, and whether or not to bid is selected (S9). Here, it is assumed that all of the construction contract candidate companies A to C bid. That is, the construction contract candidate companies A to C input ten-point evaluation numbers for each of the condition items of the purchase order data 200, enter the estimated amount, etc., and create the condition answer data 200a to 200c (S10). . Then, the created condition answer data 200a to 200c is transmitted from the terminals 10a to 10c of the construction contract candidate companies A to C to the construction contractor selection server 30 (S11).

  Next, the receiving means 90 of the construction contractor selection server 30 receives the condition answer data 200a to 200c for the construction contract candidate companies A to C (S12). Then, the evaluation means 71 of the construction contractor selection means 70 extracts the company evaluation standard data 53a shown in FIG. 2 from the company determination database 53, and evaluates the condition response data 200a to 200c based on the company evaluation standard data 53a. (S13). In this embodiment, the number indicating the ten-point evaluation entered in the answer column in the condition answer data 200a to 200c for each of the construction contract candidate companies A to C and the corresponding condition items of the company evaluation criteria data 53a are set. The score for each condition item is obtained by multiplying the number indicating the weight of the evaluated evaluation, and the total score for each construction contract candidate company A to C is compared to evaluate the suitability. In addition, the estimated amount presented by the construction contract candidate companies A to C is also evaluated. In this way, a construction contracting company having suitability for construction is selected by comprehensively evaluating the total score and estimated amount for each construction contracting candidate company A to C (S14). Here, construction contractor A was selected. Next, the construction ordering company X creates formal purchase order data 300, which is a formal construction purchase order (S15). Then, the transmission means 80 transmits the formal purchase order data 300 to the construction contractor A (S16). As a result, it becomes a formal construction order request.

After that, although not shown, the construction contracting contract is negotiated between the construction ordering company X and the construction contracting company A, and the contract contents are adjusted. When the construction contract contract is formally concluded, the construction ordering company X presents a construction start notice to the construction contracting company A, whereby the construction by the construction contracting company A is actually started. In addition, the construction contracting company A which has become the construction contractor in this way is stored (recorded) in the company database 52 as the past performance data 52c.
(Embodiment 2)
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a schematic configuration of a construction contractor selection system according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of company evaluation reference data according to Embodiment 2 of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 5, the construction contractor selection system 100A of this embodiment can browse only the condition items preset by the construction ordering company X in the company evaluation standard data 53a in the construction contractor selection server 30A. The browsing means 400 is provided. The company determination database 53A of the database 50A is the same as that of the first embodiment described above except that the company evaluation reference data in which the presence / absence of disclosure is input for each condition item by the construction ordering company as shown in FIG. It is the same composition. In such a construction contractor selection system 100A, disclosure can be made to a specific construction contractor that has been registered in advance and obtained permission from the construction ordering company, in this case, the candidate contractors A to C. Company evaluation standard data with limited condition items can be displayed on a monitor or the like for browsing. Thereby, the publicity of social information as the construction ordering company X, the fairness of evaluation, and the like can be ensured.
(Other embodiments)
As mentioned above, although embodiment of this invention was described, of course, this invention is not limited to the above-mentioned embodiment. For example, in the first embodiment described above, the condition answering data 200a to 200c from the construction contract candidate companies A to C are evaluated based on the company evaluation standard data 53a in which the construction ordering company X sets the weighting of the evaluation for each condition item. Although not limited to this, although not shown in the drawings, an evaluation standard changing means is provided in the construction contractor selection server, and this evaluation standard changing means weights the evaluation for each condition item of the company evaluation standard data. The condition answer data from the construction contract candidate company may be evaluated based on the changed company evaluation standard data as appropriate according to the content conditions. Further, the evaluation standard changing means may edit the company evaluation standard data according to the suitability data of the company, for example. Thereby, the suitability of the construction contract candidate company for construction can be more accurately evaluated.

  The present invention can be applied to a service industry or the like using a system for selecting a construction contracting company as a construction ordering party from a plurality of construction contracting companies.

It is a figure which shows schematic structure of the construction contractor selection system which concerns on Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a figure which shows schematic structure of the construction contractor selection system which concerns on Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a figure showing an example of company evaluation standard data concerning Embodiment 1 of the present invention. It is a figure explaining the sequence of the construction contractor selection system which concerns on Embodiment 1 of this invention. It is a figure which shows schematic structure of the construction contractor selection system which concerns on Embodiment 2 of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the company evaluation reference | standard data concerning Embodiment 2 of this invention.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 100 Construction contractor selection system 10a-10c Terminal of construction contract candidate company A-C 20 Terminal of construction ordering company X 30 Construction contractor selection server 40 Network 50 Database 51 Condition database 52 Company database 53 Company judgment database 60 Purchase order preparation means 70 Construction Contractor Selection Means 80 Transmission Means 90 Receiving Means 200 Purchase Order Data 200a-200c Condition Response Data 300 Formal Purchase Order Data

Claims (5)

A construction contractor selection system comprising a construction contractor selection server for selecting a construction contractor as a construction contractor from a plurality of construction contract candidate companies,
The construction contractor selection server includes a database in which condition data including order condition data, caution condition data, and selection condition data, and company evaluation reference data that is data indicating an evaluation reference for each condition item of the condition data, , Extract the condition data from the database in accordance with the conditions of the input work contents, enumerate the order contents and conditions, create the purchase order data having the answer column, and if necessary, A purchase order creation means that permits editing, and the purchase order data is presented as electronic data to the construction contract candidate company, and condition answer data for the purchase order data from the construction contract candidate company is received, and the company evaluation criteria And a construction contractor selection means for selecting the construction contractor by evaluating based on data. Construction contractor selection system that. The construction contractor selection method according to claim 1, wherein a terminal of a construction ordering company that is a construction ordering source, a terminal of the construction contracting candidate company, and the construction contractor selection server are connected via a network. system. 3. The construction contractor selection server according to claim 1, further comprising evaluation criteria changing means for changing the weighting of evaluation for each condition item of the company evaluation criteria data according to at least the conditions of the construction contents. Characteristic construction contractor selection system. 4. The construction contractor selection server according to any one of claims 1 to 3, further comprising browsing means for allowing only the condition items preset by the construction ordering company in the company evaluation standard data to be browsed to the outside. A construction contractor selection system characterized by that. 5. The database according to claim 1, wherein the database stores at least one company aptitude data selected from qualification data of the construction contract candidate company, past performance data, and credit data, and the purchase order form. The construction means is a construction contractor selection system that edits the order contents and conditions of the purchase order data based on the company suitability data extracted from the database.

Images