JP2015102996A - Trader selection support device, trader selection support method, and trader selection support program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a technology that supports improvement of efficiency for invitation of a constructor.SOLUTION: A trader selection support device includes: a trader information acquisition section that acquires information indicating achievements of a trader from a trader terminal of the trader wishing to bid for a construction project; and an offering processing section that calculates a predetermined evaluation point on the basis of the information indicating the achievements of the trader, and extracts the trader whose evaluation point is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold as a subject to which an estimation is requested.

Description

  The present invention relates to a supplier selection support apparatus, a supplier selection support method, and a supplier selection support program.

  For example, in a construction contract in the civil engineering / architecture field, there is a method in which a so-called semi-delegation contract is made between an orderer and a primary contractor, and the primary contractor recruits a contractor as a subcontractor and selects by contract. In such a case, the primary contractor may be required to be transparent about the contractor's selection and cost with respect to the orderer.

  Conventionally, techniques for supporting a bid by a trader using a computer have been proposed (for example, Patent Documents 1 to 4).

JP 2002-32431 A JP 2002-297976 A JP 2002-324177 A JP 2003-281357 A

  Conventionally, a system for processing a bid for construction by a computer has been proposed, but there has not been a system that supports the efficiency of recruiting contractors. An object of this invention is to provide the technique which assists so that efficiency can be aimed at about the recruitment | collection of a constructor.

  The supplier selection support device according to the present invention is based on a supplier information acquisition unit that acquires information indicating the performance of the supplier from the supplier terminal of the supplier who desires to bid on a construction project, and predetermined information based on the information indicating the performance of the supplier And a public offering processing unit that extracts a supplier whose evaluation score is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold as a target for requesting an estimate.

  In this way, it is possible to evaluate a contractor (constructor) before requesting a quote and request a quote from an appropriate trader. In other words, it is possible to improve the efficiency of recruitment of traders. As a contractor, an estimate is made for a construction project that has a possibility of receiving an order.

  Further, the supplier information acquisition unit further acquires information on the region where the supplier is based, and the public offering processing unit is based on the information indicating the results of the supplier, and the base region is a predetermined region. An order that calculates an evaluation score so that the value is high, calculates a predetermined evaluation value based on the evaluation score and the estimate obtained from the contractor terminal, and determines a contractor that is a candidate for the order of the construction project based on the evaluation value You may make it further include a contractor selection part. In this way, when it is desired to raise the priority of utilization of a contractor in a predetermined area, it is possible to make a comprehensive evaluation together with the estimate.

In addition, the history of construction projects received in the past is stored in the data storage unit for each contractor, and the ordering contractor selection unit may calculate the evaluation value so that the value decreases as the past order volume increases. Good. In this way, in the case where it is desired to place an order with respect to a plurality of traders without any bias, it becomes possible to determine a candidate for an ordering destination in consideration of the past order volume.

  In addition, a request was received from the terminal of the orderer of the construction project via the network and the examination information acquisition unit that receives data certifying that the contractor has business qualification from the supplier terminal and stores it in the data storage unit. In this case, the information processing unit may further include a supplier information acquisition unit that transmits data certifying that the supplier stored in the data storage unit has business qualifications to the terminal of the orderer. In this way, the orderer of the construction project can easily confirm the information of the supplier who wishes to bid.

  The ordering company selection department calculates the evaluation score by weighting so that the score related to the region where the business is based is weighted so that the score is high, and the score related to the performance of the business is high. You may make it switch the calculation formula to perform according to the information which shows the category memorize | stored linked | related with the construction project. In this way, even if priority is given to the use of contractors in a given area, or even when orders are placed without bias from multiple contractors, the quality of construction depends on the category of the construction project. Can be secured.

  In addition, the content of the means for solving the said subject can be combined as much as possible within the range which does not deviate from the subject and technical idea of this invention. Further, a recording medium that holds the program may be provided. It is also possible to provide a supplier selection support method in which the contents of the means are executed by a computer, and a supplier selection support program for causing the computer to execute the contents of the means.

  ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the technique which supports a contractor selection consistently from the recruitment of a contractor can be provided.

It is a block diagram which shows the outline | summary of a system configuration. It is a functional block diagram which shows an example of a server. It is an apparatus block diagram which shows an example of a computer. It is a processing flow figure showing processing concerning an embodiment. It is a processing flow figure showing processing concerning an embodiment. It is a processing flow figure showing processing concerning an embodiment. It is a table | surface which shows an example of the confirmation matter for obtaining the information which shows the eligibility of a construction contractor. It is a table | surface which shows an example of the confirmation matter for obtaining the information for evaluating the construction contractor which concerns on a local company. It is a table | surface which shows an example of the confirmation matter for obtaining the information for evaluating the construction contractor concerning a highly specialized company. It is a table | surface which shows an example of the confirmation matter for judging eligibility. It is a table | surface which shows an example of the reference | standard for calculating the company evaluation score which evaluates a trader. It is a table | surface which shows an example of the weighting of the score of a company evaluation score. It is a table | surface which shows an example of the weighting of the score of a company evaluation score. It is a figure which shows the outline from examination of eligibility to preparation of a list.

Hereinafter, an example of an embodiment will be described with reference to the drawings. The configuration of the embodiment is an exemplification, and the program, apparatus, and method according to the present invention are not limited to the configuration of the embodiment. In this embodiment, the orderer of the construction project and the primary contractor (construction manager (Construction
Manager: CM (also referred to as “CMR”)))), and a method (“CM method”) in which a contractor (contractor), whose primary contractor is subcontracted, is selected by bidding. It shall be adopted. Further, in the present embodiment, a contractor can be selected in consideration of an evaluation standard according to the request of the orderer or CM in addition to the estimated amount and the past performance (that is, business execution ability). As an example, in this embodiment, a local-based company, a company that employs many local employees to support disaster recovery, a subcontract order to a local company, and a local company utilization degree that carries out the development of a local company. Priority is given to selecting a high contractor. In addition, in order to increase the transparency of the construction contractor selection, information that can verify the validity of the selection shall be output to the orderer.

<System overview>
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an outline of a system configuration. The system according to the present embodiment includes a server 1, which is a contractor selection support apparatus according to the present invention, an orderer terminal 2, a CM terminal 3, and a construction contractor terminal 4, which are connected to each other via a network 5. Has been. The server 1 receives data input from the CM terminal 3, the construction contractor terminal 4 and the like, and performs processing for supporting contractor selection. Further, the server 1 may disclose the data held in response to a request from the orderer terminal 2. The CM terminal 3 is a CM terminal that has received a semi-delegation for the construction work from the orderer, and registers publicly recruited information in the server 1 and acquires construction contractor information from the server 1. The contractor terminal 4 receives information related to the public call for construction from the server 1 and transmits information input by the user to the server 1. In FIG. 1, one server 1, orderer terminal 2, CM terminal 3, and construction contractor terminal 4 are shown, but a plurality of them may exist.

<Functional configuration>
FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram illustrating an example of the server 1. The server 1 includes a data storage unit 101, a supplier information acquisition unit 102, an examination material output unit 103, an examination result acquisition unit 104, a list creation unit 105, an open recruitment processing unit 106, an estimated information acquisition unit 107, An orderer selection unit 108, an order verification material output unit 109, and a result disclosure unit 110 are included. The data storage unit 101 holds data used for processing to be described later. The contractor information acquisition unit 102 acquires information on the contractor transmitted from the contractor terminal 4 by the contractor who wishes to bid for the public offering. The examination material output unit 103 outputs information for examining the bid participation qualification of the construction company to the CM terminal 3. At this time, the examination material output unit 103 calculates a company evaluation score for each construction contractor based on the input information of the construction contractor. Also, the examination result acquisition unit 104 acquires information indicating whether or not to participate in the public offering for each construction contractor from the CM terminal 3. The list creation unit 105 creates a list of construction contractors and outputs it to the CM terminal 3. This list may be viewed from the orderer terminal 2 via a network. The public offering processing unit 106 acquires information related to construction project specifications and the like from the CM terminal 3 and publishes the information on the Internet via the network 5. In addition, the estimate acquisition unit 107 acquires information such as an estimated amount for a construction item for which the construction contractor bids from the construction contractor terminal 4. The order supplier selection unit 108 determines a contractor who is a candidate for an order based on information regarding the evaluation value and estimate of the contractor and a predetermined standard. The order verification material output unit 109 outputs, to the CM terminal 3, information on a contractor who is an ordering candidate, an evaluation value, information on an estimate, and the like, for example, in the form of a report material to the orderer. The order verification material may be viewed from the orderer terminal 2 via the network 5. The result disclosing unit 110 transmits the result of the public offering to the contractor terminal 4 of the contractor who has bid.

<Device configuration>
FIG. 3 is an apparatus configuration diagram illustrating an example of a computer. The server 1, the orderer terminal 2, the CM terminal 3, and the contractor terminal 4 are computers as shown in FIG. In particular, the orderer terminal 2, the CM terminal 3, and the contractor terminal 4 may be a personal computer, a tablet (slate PC), or the like. A computer 1000 shown in FIG. 3 includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit) 1001, a main storage device 1002, an auxiliary storage device 1003, a communication IF (Interfa
ce) 1004, input / output IF (Interface) 1005, drive device 1006, communication bus 1
007. The CPU 1001 performs processing according to the present embodiment by executing a program (also referred to as “software” or “application”). The main storage device 1002 caches programs and data read by the CPU 1001 and develops a work area of the CPU. Specifically, the main storage device is a RAM (Random Access Memory), a ROM (Read Only Memory), or the like. The auxiliary storage device 1003 stores programs executed by the CPU 1001, setting information used in the present embodiment, and the like. Specifically, the auxiliary storage device 1003 is an HDD (Hard-disk Drive), an SSD (Solid State Drive), a flash memory, or the like. The main storage device 1002 and the auxiliary storage device 1003 work as the data storage unit 101 of the server 1. The communication IF 1004 transmits / receives data to / from other computers. The communication IF 1004 is specifically a wired or wireless network card or the like. The server 1, orderer terminal 2, CM terminal 3, and contractor terminal 4 are connected to the network 5 via a communication IF 1004. The input / output IF 1005 is connected to the input / output device and accepts an operation from the user or presents information to the user. Specifically, the input / output device is a keyboard, a mouse, a display, a touch panel, or the like. The drive device 1006 reads data recorded on a storage medium such as a magnetic disk, a magneto-optical disk, and an optical disk, and writes data to the storage medium. The above components are connected by a communication bus 1007. A plurality of these components may be provided, or some of the components (for example, the drive device 1006) may not be provided. Further, the input / output device may be integrated with the computer. In addition, the program executed in this embodiment is provided via a portable storage medium readable by the drive device 1006, a portable auxiliary storage device 1003 such as a flash memory, a communication IF 1004, and the like. It may be. Then, the CPU 1001 executes the program, thereby causing the computer shown in FIG. 3 to work as the server 1 shown in FIG.

<Processing>
4 to 6 are process flows of processes executed by the system according to the present embodiment. Note that the server 1 may have an e-learning function that allows a construction contractor to learn how to use the system prior to the processing of FIGS. 4 to 6. Based on the operation of the construction contractor who is the user, the construction contractor terminal 4 transmits information on the construction contractor to the server 1 (FIG. 4: S1). In the present embodiment, information indicating the eligibility of the construction contractor and information for evaluating the construction contractor are input as the construction contractor information. In this embodiment, the construction contractor (company) is divided into a local company and a highly specialized company. In addition, for each construction project, either a construction or business for a local company or a construction or business for a highly specialized company shall be set.

FIG. 7 is an example of confirmation items for obtaining information indicating the eligibility of a construction contractor. The contractor inputs a reply via the contractor terminal 4 and attaches (registers) a document for certifying the validity of the reply as electronic data (for example, data in a Portable Document Format (PDF) format). Items to be confirmed include “business category”, “related to legal compliance”, “related to providing order opportunities”, and “related to ensuring quality of deliverables”. For “Business Category”, select “Construction”, “Survey”, “Survey” or “Design” and attach a copy of the commercial registry. In addition, regarding the compliance with laws and regulations, “construction business license” or “construction consultant registration certificate” is attached as “the implementation status of various procedures such as registration necessary for business”. In the “Construction capacity” item, a financial statement within a predetermined period is registered. A “Construction License Number” or “Construction Consultant Registration Certificate” is attached to the “permission / registration according to scale” item. The presence / absence of self-declaration shall be registered in the “No. The “Notice on Notification Obligation” is attached to the item of “Notification when Suspended Nomination / Suspension”. In the item of “existence of violation of laws and / or administrative sanctions”, the presence / absence is registered by self-report. The item “Relationship with gangs” is accompanied by a declaration that there is no relationship. The item “No relationship between the contractor and the capital relationship” is attached with “Declaration of No Relationship” and “Company Profile”. “Company evaluation sheet” is attached to the item “Being a company with construction ability, such as having a past record according to the scale of work in charge”. For the item “Being a company that performs good-quality construction work,” a declaration that there has been no construction with a performance evaluation less than the prescribed number of works in the past designated period is attached.

  FIG. 8 is an example of confirmation items for obtaining information for evaluating a construction company related to a local company. The confirmation items mainly include matters related to “local enterprise”, “business performance” and “local familiarity”. In the “Location” section, register the location of the head office or head office, sales office, branch, etc., and attach a copy of the commercial register. In the “Annual construction amount” item, register the annual construction amount of the previous year and attach a financial statement. In the item “Number of engineers”, the number of holders of a predetermined qualification (for example, civil engineering management engineer) is registered. In the item of “Construction Evaluation Score”, the construction performance score of the construction contractor is registered and a copy of the notification of the construction performance score is attached. In addition, the number of days of lost work and the number of cases that occurred during a predetermined period are registered in the item “number of industrial accidents”. In the item of “Number of direct employees”, the ratio of directly employed workers in the total number of employees is registered. In the “Machine possession” item, register the possession of construction machinery and construction vehicles. It should be noted that answer options for these items may be prepared so that the contractor can alternatively select the answer using a radio button or the like.

  FIG. 9 is an example of confirmation items for obtaining information for evaluating a contractor related to a highly specialized company. The confirmation items mainly include items related to “utilization of local companies”, “business execution ability”, and “local familiarity”. In the item “Utilization of local companies by sub-contractors under secondary,” the record of contracts with local companies in the past predetermined period is registered. Register the future utilization plans of local companies, employment plans of local residents, etc. in the item of “Local Company Development Ability”. The number of holders of a predetermined qualification (for example, civil engineering management engineer) is registered in the item “business execution system, number of qualified persons”. In the items of "Procurement capacity of large heavy machinery, number of specialized machines," register the number of machines owned for a given construction machine, construction vehicle, etc. The past construction plan is attached to the item of “construction plan capability, past construction plan”. In the item of “information familiarity in this work”, the number of construction works in the past predetermined period in the work is registered. The number of constructions in the same municipality / prefecture in the past predetermined period is registered in the items of “local company procurement ability, contract record with local company”. The number of employment of local municipalities is registered in the item “Number of employment of municipalities”. In the item “Regional contribution, municipal construction results / disaster agreements”, record the volunteer's performance in the same municipality in the past specified period and whether or not a disaster agreement with the municipality has been concluded. . In the case of FIG. 9 as well, answer options for each item may be prepared so that the contractor can select an answer alternatively using a radio button or the like.

  Although the confirmation items have been described separately in FIGS. 8 and 9, in S <b> 1, the contractor transmits all items shown in FIGS. 8 and 9 as “information for evaluating the contractor”. May be. In this embodiment, as will be described later, construction companies are classified into “local companies” and “highly specialized companies”, and local companies are evaluated based on the items shown in FIG. Is evaluated based on the matters shown in FIG.

On the other hand, the contractor information acquisition unit 102 of the server 1 receives the contractor information from the contractor terminal 4 and stores it in the data storage unit 101 (S2). That is, answers and attached data input to the items in FIGS. 7 to 9 are stored in the server 1. Further, the contractor information acquisition unit 102 of the server 1 classifies the contractor as “local company” or “highly specialized company” based on the information indicating the location of the contractor input in Q1-1 in FIG. You may do it. For example, a contractor whose location is in the same prefecture as the site is determined as a “local company”, and a contractor whose location is outside the prefecture is determined as a “professional company”. Further, the examination material output unit 103 of the server 1 reads the information on the construction company from the data storage unit 101, and outputs the material used in the examination of the eligibility of the construction company (S3). Here, for example, data as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11, and the answer and attached data acquired in S2 are output.

  FIG. 10 shows the confirmation contents for judging eligibility based on the answers and attached data input for the items of FIG. The data in FIGS. 10 and 11 may be displayed on a computer screen, or printable document data may be created. In S3, the message is output to the CM terminal 3, but a screen having a confirmation button indicating that the orderer has confirmed the contents of each item may be output to the orderer terminal 2. .

  FIG. 10 is provided with confirmation contents, suitability input fields, confirmation fields by the orderer, etc. for each item shown in FIG. Further, FIG. 11 shows a score for calculating a company evaluation score for evaluating a supplier based on the answer and attached data input for the items of FIG. In FIG. 11, specific values are concealed by “*”, but an arbitrary reference can be set. As the company evaluation score, a score assigned when an answer to each question satisfies a predetermined condition is added. In addition, as shown in FIG. 11, the maximum value of a score may be provided for each predetermined category of question items. FIG. 11 shows an example of evaluation of a local company. Similarly, a company evaluation point is calculated based on a predetermined score for a highly specialized company.

  In addition, between local companies and highly specialized companies, the weights of the evaluation items regarding local entrepreneurship or local enterprise utilization, the evaluation items regarding business performance, and the evaluation items regarding local familiarity are weighted. You may make it make a difference. For example, in the case of construction or business for a local company, points are assigned as shown in FIG. Further, in the case of construction or business for a highly specialized company, a score is assigned as shown in FIG. In the examples of FIGS. 11 and 12, in the case of a local company, the score of local entrepreneurship and local familiarity is increased, and in the case of a highly specialized company, the score of business execution ability is increased.

  On the other hand, the CM terminal 3 acquires material data as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11 (S4). Further, the CM terminal 3 receives an input of examination results from the user for each item shown in FIG. 10 (S5). The item of “business permission” refers to “construction business license” or “construction consultant registration certificate”, and the user inputs suitability. The item of “construction capacity” is determined to be ineligible if the account has been in red for more than a predetermined number of years (for example, two years). The item “permission / registration according to scale” is judged to be ineligible if there is no “construction license number” or “construction consultant registration certificate”. If there is a “nomination / no-transaction” item, the item is deemed ineligible. The item “Notification in case of suspension of designation / decommissioning” is judged to be ineligible if there is no oath. If there is a violation of laws and / or administrative dispositions, the item is deemed ineligible. The item “relationship with gangs” is deemed ineligible if there is no oath. Whether or not there is no relationship between the primary contractor and the capital relationship is judged based on the “Declaration of No Relationship” and “Company Information”. The item of “construction capability” is judged as appropriate based on the “company evaluation sheet”. The item “Good quality construction” is judged to be ineligible if there is no oath. The determination of suitability as described above is input by the user while confirming the attached data via the CM terminal 3. In addition, if there is at least one item of “not qualified”, the result of examination of the qualification for the contractor is judged as “not qualified”. If there is an item “not qualified”, the construction company terminal 4 may be requested to make corrections.

  Next, the server 1 receives the examination result from the CM terminal 3 and stores it in the data storage unit 102 (S6). Note that the examination result acquisition unit 104 of the server 1 may further output the examination result to the construction company terminal 4.

  Further, the list creation unit 105 of the server 1 generates a list of construction contractors whose examination result is “qualified” (S7). FIG. 14 is a diagram showing an outline from examination of eligibility to creation of a list. As shown in FIG. 14, in this step, for example, a company that is a local company and whose business classification is “investigation”, “surveying” or “design”, a local company that is a business company whose business classification is “construction”, A list is created by dividing into a highly specialized company whose business category is “Survey”, “Survey” or “Design”, or a highly specialized company whose business category is “Construction”. The list includes items such as a trader's name, location information, and an evaluation value. Moreover, you may rearrange in descending order based on the value of an evaluation value, for example. Further, when receiving a request from the orderer terminal 2, the server 1 may transmit the list to the orderer terminal 2.

  Further, the CM terminal 3 accepts input of public recruitment information related to the construction project from the user (S8). In each construction project, a work type such as survey, surveying, design, or construction is set in consideration of the contents of the construction. In addition, in consideration of the technical difficulty level, each construction project has a category such as “operations mainly for selecting a supplier from a local company” or “operations that are difficult to select from a local company”. . Then, a construction summary (specification), a bid date, a planned price, etc. are registered in association with each construction project.

  In addition, in this step, each contractor bids on the basis of the contractor included in the list created in S7, which has the smallest construction performance scale (for example, the number of machines / vehicles owned or the procurement capacity of materials). An order lot may be set so that it can be done. In this way, all traders can be given a chance to bid.

  In addition, for example, out of work related to surveying, surveying, and design, a typical work is “work that mainly selects a supplier from a local company”. In addition, work related to survey, surveying, or design that includes advanced knowledge and analysis, or survey or survey using special equipment, etc. shall be “work that is difficult to select from local companies”. Among the work related to construction, small-scale construction, water and sewage construction, temporary construction, preparatory work, etc. shall be "work mainly for selecting suppliers from local companies". In addition, work related to construction that requires advanced technology, construction that requires special machinery, large-scale soil construction, or road pavement construction is designated as a “work that is difficult to select from local companies”.

  Thereafter, the CM terminal 3 transmits the above-mentioned public offering information to the server 1, and the public offering processing unit 106 of the server 1 stores it in the data storage unit 101 (S9). Further, the public offering processing unit 106 is a construction contractor included in the list created in S7 (that is, a construction contractor that has passed the examination of eligibility), and the type of work such as survey, surveying, design, or construction, and a local company Alternatively, the public offering information is transmitted by e-mail or the like to a construction company whose categories such as highly specialized companies match and the total of the company evaluation points calculated in FIG. 11 is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold. In addition, for example, information indicating that it is a period for soliciting an estimate for a predetermined construction is also disclosed on the Internet. In this step, it is also possible to send the solicitation information to all construction contractors that have passed the screening of eligibility without narrowing down the request for quotation.

  On the other hand, the construction contractor terminal 4 receives the public offering information transmitted from the server 1 by e-mail or the like (S10). Then, the construction contractor examines whether or not to bid on the construction project, and when bidding, bid information including the estimated amount is input (S11). Further, the estimate information acquisition unit 107 of the server 1 receives the estimate information from the contractor terminal 4 and stores it in the data storage unit 101 (S12).

Then, the orderer selection unit 108 of the server 1 calculates an evaluation value of the construction contractor using the evaluation score of the company and the estimate information, and selects an orderee candidate based on the evaluation value (S13). The evaluation value is calculated based on the following mathematical formula, for example. The category of construction or work for local companies or construction or work for highly specialized companies is registered in the public information of construction projects, and the evaluation value is calculated based on one of the following formulas: . In this way, in order to switch the evaluation value calculation method and candidate companies according to the construction or business, in this embodiment, the points are weighted so as to improve the evaluation of local companies and companies familiar with the local area. However, orders that exceed the capabilities of the company are restrained.

<Construction or operations for local companies>
Evaluation value = Evaluation point + Estimated price Evaluation point Evaluation point = Standard point + Company evaluation point In the case of construction or business for a local company, for example, it is calculated by the addition method as described above. The estimated price evaluation point is calculated by dividing the estimated amount into 10 points with the estimated price as 10 points and the contract limit amount as 40 points. In addition, 30 points will be given to the person who submitted the commitment. As for the company evaluation points, a total of 40 points are assigned as shown in FIG. The planned price is calculated based on a predetermined integration standard. The contract limit price is generally set to 90% to 85% of the planned price depending on the business content and scale.

<Construction or operations for highly specialized companies>
Evaluation value = Evaluation point ÷ Estimated price Evaluation point = Standard point + Company evaluation point In the case of construction or business for a highly specialized company, for example, it is calculated by the division method as described above. In addition, 100 points will be given to the person who submitted the commitment. As the company evaluation score, 40 points are assigned as shown in FIG.

  Thereafter, the order verification material output unit 109 of the server 1 outputs order verification material for reporting to the orderer the process leading to the selection (ordering) of the supplier (S14). On the other hand, the CM terminal 3 receives the order verification material (S15). The order verification material includes, for example, a publicity date, a list of companies that have sent an e-mail for requesting a quotation, a company that bids, a date and time of bidding, a list of estimated amounts and evaluation values, and information indicating the eligibility of the vendor. In this embodiment, it is assumed that the ordering party is approved by using the order verification material and the ordering party is determined. Although the CM terminal 3 receives the order verification material in S15, the orderer terminal 2 may receive the order verification material and receive the approval of the orderer directly.

  If the orderer's approval is obtained for the ordering party, the CM terminal 3 registers information indicating the result in the server 1 (S16). Further, the result disclosing unit 110 of the server 1 stores information indicating the result in the data storage unit 101 and transmits the information to the construction contractor terminal 4 (S17). Then, the contractor terminal 4 acquires information indicating the result (S18). In this way, the contractor can know the success or failure of the order.

  In addition to the estimated price and business execution capability (actual results), comprehensive evaluation is performed taking into account the conditions according to the request of the orderer (in this embodiment, the company must be a local company or a company familiar with the local area). be able to. In this embodiment, an example is shown in which a local company or a company familiar with the local area is weighted so as to give preferential treatment, but according to such conditions, the local area is used in situations such as reconstruction support. This is effective when you want to promote the use of the workforce.

  However, the present invention is not limited to selection of contractors based on such conditions. In addition, in order to ensure the transparency of the selection of suppliers regardless of the conditions under which conditions are assigned, it is possible to generate examination materials and order verification materials and fulfill accountability from the CM to the orderer It is like that.

<Others>
The order receiving party may be determined so that the order quantity (for example, the number of cases and the construction amount) within a predetermined period is averaged with reference to the order receiving history so that the order receiving party is not biased to some contractors. For example, when registering information indicating the result in S16, a history of orders received for each supplier is stored. When calculating the evaluation value next time, the orderer selection unit 108 adjusts so that the value of the evaluation value decreases as the order quantity in the predetermined period increases in S13. In this way, for example, when it is desired to distribute a construction project to many contractors in a scene such as reconstruction support, it is possible to determine an ordering party on average. Even in such a case, according to the present embodiment, the predetermined ability is obtained depending on a category such as “operations mainly for selecting a supplier from a local company” or “operations that are difficult to select from a local company”. Necessary construction projects can be ordered from appropriate contractors.

  In the above embodiment, the construction companies are classified as “local companies” or “highly specialized companies” based on the locations of the construction companies, but the present invention is not limited to such examples. For example, it is possible to bid for any category of construction projects, and to switch the calculation method according to the category of the construction project and calculate the evaluation value of the construction contractor.

  In addition, the server 1 continuously acquires information indicating the eligibility of the construction contractor and information for evaluating the construction contractor, and analyzes changes in the utilization level of local companies and municipalities, You may be able to report.

  Further, as described above, it is possible to evaluate a construction contractor before requesting a quotation and request a quotation from an appropriate contractor. In other words, it is possible to improve the efficiency of recruitment of construction contractors. On the other hand, as a construction contractor, an estimate is made for a construction project that has a possibility of receiving an order.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Server 101 Data storage part 102 Supplier information acquisition part 103 Examination material output part 104 Examination result acquisition part 105 List preparation part 106 Public offer processing part 107 Estimate information acquisition part 108 Order supplier selection part 109 Order verification data output part 110 Result disclosure part 2 Orderer terminal 3 CM terminal 4 Contractor terminal 5 Network

Claims (7)

A supplier information acquisition unit that acquires information indicating the performance of the supplier from the supplier terminal of the supplier who wishes to bid for the construction project,
A solicitation processing unit that calculates a predetermined evaluation score based on information indicating the performance of the supplier, and extracts a supplier whose evaluation score is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold as a target for requesting an estimate;
A vendor selection support apparatus. The supplier information acquisition unit further acquires information on a region where the supplier is based,
The public offering processing unit calculates the evaluation score based on information indicating the performance of the supplier, and so that the value becomes higher when the area as the base is a predetermined area,
The ordering agent selection part which calculates a predetermined evaluation value based on the said evaluation score and the estimate acquired from the contractor terminal, and determines the supplier of the ordering destination candidate of the construction project based on the evaluation value. The supplier selection support apparatus described. The history of construction projects received in the past is stored in the data storage unit for each contractor, and the ordering contractor selection unit calculates the evaluation value so that the value decreases as the past order volume increases. The supplier selection support apparatus described. From the trader terminal, an examination information acquisition unit that receives data certifying that the trader has business qualification and stores the data in the data storage unit;
When a request is received from the terminal of the orderer of the construction project via the network, the contractor transmits data certifying that the contractor stored in the data storage unit has a business qualification to the terminal of the orderer. An information acquisition unit;
The vendor selection support device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, further comprising: The ordering supplier selecting unit weights the calculation points for calculating the evaluation points by weighting the points relating to the area where the supplier is based and the points relating to the achievements of the suppliers to be high. The supplier selection support device according to any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein the calculation formula for calculating the evaluation score is switched according to information indicating a category stored in association with the construction project. A contractor information acquisition step for acquiring information indicating the performance of the contractor from the contractor terminal of the contractor who wishes to bid for the construction project,
A public offering process step of calculating a predetermined evaluation score based on information indicating the performance of the supplier, and extracting a supplier whose evaluation score is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold as a target for requesting an estimate;
A supplier selection support method in which a computer is executed. A contractor information acquisition step for acquiring information indicating the performance of the contractor from the contractor terminal of the contractor who wishes to bid for the construction project,
A public offering process step of calculating a predetermined evaluation score based on information indicating the performance of the supplier, and extracting a supplier whose evaluation score is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold as a target for requesting an estimate;
A supplier selection support program that causes a computer to execute.