JP2005122079A - SELF-MANAGEMENT TYPE e-LEARNING TOOL - Google Patents

SELF-MANAGEMENT TYPE e-LEARNING TOOL Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2005122079A
JP2005122079A JP2003387221A JP2003387221A JP2005122079A JP 2005122079 A JP2005122079 A JP 2005122079A JP 2003387221 A JP2003387221 A JP 2003387221A JP 2003387221 A JP2003387221 A JP 2003387221A JP 2005122079 A JP2005122079 A JP 2005122079A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
user
learning
system side
self
answer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2003387221A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Masayasu Anzai
正育 安西
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
DIGITAL BOUTIQUE Inc
Original Assignee
DIGITAL BOUTIQUE Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by DIGITAL BOUTIQUE Inc filed Critical DIGITAL BOUTIQUE Inc
Priority to JP2003387221A priority Critical patent/JP2005122079A/en
Publication of JP2005122079A publication Critical patent/JP2005122079A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an e-learning tool which enables a user to efficiently manage the progress condition/intelligibility of self-learning and to enable a system side to propose a learning program optimum for the user by constituting the e-learning tool developed for computer information terminal equipment including a cellular phone having an internet connection function in such a manner that the tool can inexpensively and easily deal with various answer systems and that the system side can exactly recognize the progress condition and intelligibility of the user's learning. <P>SOLUTION: Not the system side carries out the correction of the user's answers but the user sends the self-marked results as self-declaration to the system side to allow the results of such self-declaration to be managed by the system side, by which the exact recognition of the progress condition/intelligibility of the user's learning on the system side is made possible and therefore it becomes possible for the user to efficiently manage the progress condition/intelligibility of the self-learning and for system side to propose the learning program optimum for the user. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

本発明は、研修や授業を行う教育者や研修・教育機関等から提供される学習サービスを、インターネットを利用し、インターネット接続機能を持つ携帯電話を含むコンピュータ情報端末機器を対象に展開することにより、社員への研修を必要とする企業や教育を必要とする個人の会員を募り、会員の個人情報のデータベース化を行うとともに、それぞれの会員に適した学習プログラムの提案や情報の提供を行おうとする、学習サービスと情報収集システムとを組み合わせたシステムに関するものである。The present invention provides a learning service provided by an educator who conducts a training or class, a training / education institution, or the like to a computer information terminal device including a mobile phone having an Internet connection function using the Internet. Recruiting companies who need training for employees and individual members who need education, creating a database of personal information of members, and proposing learning programs and providing information suitable for each member The present invention relates to a system that combines a learning service and an information collection system.

従来のパソコンやインターネットを利用し、インターネット接続機能を持つ携帯電話を含むコンピュータ情報端末機器を対象に展開するe−ラーニングツールにおいては、利用者が問題に回答後、自分自身の回答をシステム側に送信し、その回答が正解か不正解かをシステム側が判断していた。In an e-learning tool that uses a personal computer or the Internet and deploys to computer information terminal devices including mobile phones with Internet connection functions, after the user answers the problem, the user's own answer is sent to the system side. The system side determined whether the answer was correct or incorrect.

従来の技術では、択一式か記述式か等の回答形式によって別個のプログラムを必要とし、複数の回答形式を用意するためにはそれぞれの回答形式に対応する複数のプログラムを必要とするため、システムの複雑化を招く。特に記述式の回答形式を用意するためには、添削するための人間が必要となる。In the conventional technology, a separate program is required depending on the answer format such as alternative or descriptive type, and in order to prepare a plurality of answer formats, a plurality of programs corresponding to each answer format are required. Incurs complications. In particular, in order to prepare a descriptive answer format, a human being for correction is required.

従来の技術では、システムの複雑化とともに作成のための資金も増加するため、問題の提供を個人が担うことは難しい。In the conventional technology, as the system becomes complicated, the funds for creation increase, so it is difficult for individuals to provide problems.

従来の技術では、利用者から送信された回答が、本人が確実に理解した上での正解であるのか、間違った理解のもとのまぐれや勘などによる偶然の正解であるのかをシステム側が区別することができないため、システム側の認識する利用者の学習の進渉状況・理解度と正確な利用者の学習の進渉状況・理解度との間にギャップが生じる。したがって、利用者から送信された回答データをもとにシステム側が認識する利用者の学習の進渉状況・理解度を反映した学習プログラムをそれぞれの利用者に提案したとしても、それぞれの利用者にとって真に最適な学習プログラムではない可能性が高い。In the conventional technology, the system distinguishes whether the answer sent from the user is a correct answer that the person himself or herself understands correctly, or whether it is a chance correct answer due to a misunderstanding or misunderstanding of the wrong understanding. Therefore, there is a gap between the user's learning progress / understanding level recognized by the system and the accurate user learning progress / understanding level. Therefore, even if a learning program that reflects the user's learning progress and level of understanding that the system recognizes based on the response data sent from the user is proposed to each user, It's likely not a truly optimal learning program.

従来の技術では、利用者が正確な自分自身の学習の進渉状況・理解度を把握するためには、システム外において紙面にまぐれや勘などによる偶然の正解に関してのメモをとるなどの方法をとらねばならず、非効率的である。In the conventional technology, in order for the user to accurately grasp the progress and understanding level of his / her own learning, there is a method such as taking notes about accidental correct answers due to flickering or intuition outside the system. It must be taken and is inefficient.

したがって、本発明が解決しようとする課題は、簡易なシステムにより安価にどのような回答形式を必要とする問題にも対応し、また、利用者の学習の進渉状況・理解度をシステム側が正確に認識し、管理することにより、利用者が効率的に自己の学習の進渉状況・理解度を管理することやシステム側から利用者に対し真に最適な学習プログラムを提案していくことのできるe−ラーニングツールを提供することである。Therefore, the problem to be solved by the present invention is to deal with a problem that requires any answer format at a low cost with a simple system, and the system side can accurately determine the progress and understanding of the user's learning. By recognizing and managing the system, the user can efficiently manage the progress and understanding of his / her own learning, and the system can propose a truly optimal learning program to the user. It is to provide an e-learning tool that can.

本発明は、図1に示すように、利用者が問題に対する回答を自分自身で考えた後、システム側から正解及び解説を受信し、正解及び解説をもとに利用者が自分自身の考えた回答が解説通り理解した上での正解であるのか、間違った理解のもとのまぐれや勘などによる偶然の正解であるのか、または不正解であるのかを自分自身で判断し、その判断結果をシステム側に対し自己申告する機能を持つことで、どのような回答形式を必要とする問題であってもシステム側で管理するのは利用者からの自己申告データであるため、回答形式によって複数のプログラムを必要としない。In the present invention, as shown in FIG. 1, after the user thinks about the answer to the problem by himself / herself, the correct answer and explanation are received from the system side, and the user thinks of himself / herself based on the correct answer and explanation. Judge yourself whether the answer is a correct answer based on an explanation, whether it is a chance correct answer due to a misunderstanding or misunderstanding based on an incorrect understanding, or an incorrect answer. By having the function of self-reporting to the system side, it is the self-reported data from the user that is managed on the system side, no matter what kind of response format is required. Does not require a program.

上記の利用者の自己申告データをもとに、システム側は利用者が理解した上での回答とまぐれや勘などによる偶然の回答とを区別して認識することができるため、利用者の学習の進渉状況・理解度をシステム側が正確に認識し、管理する。Based on the above self-reported data of the user, the system side can distinguish and recognize the answer that the user understands and the accidental answer such as a fluke or intuition. The system side accurately recognizes and manages the status of progress and understanding.

上記のシステム側が管理する正確な利用者の学習の進渉状況・理解度をもとに、それぞれの利用者に最適な学習プログラムの提案や情報の提供を行う。Based on the progress and understanding of accurate user learning managed by the above-mentioned system, we propose the best learning program and provide information for each user.

問題の回答形式によって複数のプログラムを必要とせず、簡易なシステムによって、利用者に対し、回答形式に関わらず様々な問題を提供することができるため、利用者の学ぶことのできる範囲が広がる。A plurality of programs are not required depending on the answer format of the problem, and various problems can be provided to the user regardless of the answer format by a simple system, so that the user can learn.

簡易なシステムにより、安価に学習プログラムを制作できるので、企業や教育機関のみならず個人でも特定分野の深い知識を有していれば学習ツールを作ることができる。したがって、e−ラーニングによって学ぶことのできる分野や学習ツールの利用者層が広がり、知識の広がりのスピードも増す。Since a simple system can be used to create a learning program at a low cost, a learning tool can be created not only by companies and educational institutions but also by individuals who have deep knowledge in a specific field. Therefore, the fields that can be learned by e-learning and the user group of learning tools are expanded, and the speed of the spread of knowledge is also increased.

システム側が正確な利用者の学習の進渉状況・理解度を認識し、管理することができるため、利用者は効率的に正確な自己の学習管理ができる。Since the system side can recognize and manage the progress and understanding of accurate user learning, the user can efficiently and accurately manage his / her own learning.

システム側が管理する正確な利用者の学習の進渉状況・理解度をもとにそれぞれの利用者にとって最適な学習プログラムの提案や情報の提供がなされるため、利用者は効果的に学習を進めていくことができる。Based on the progress and level of understanding of accurate user learning managed by the system, the optimal learning program for each user is proposed and information is provided. Can continue.

以下に実施例にもとづき本発明の実施の形態を具体的に説明するが、本発明はこれらにより限定されるものではなく、下記のように問題を1問ずつ通信しながら学習をすすめていく形態のみならず、またまった量の問題及び解答・解説をあらかじめインターネット接続機能を持つ携帯電話を含むコンピュータ情報端末機器に取り込んでおき、学習をすすめていく形態も含まれる。Embodiments of the present invention will be specifically described below based on examples. However, the present invention is not limited to these embodiments, and learning is promoted while communicating problems one by one as described below. In addition to this, there is a form in which a large amount of questions and answers / explanations are taken in advance to a computer information terminal device including a mobile phone having an Internet connection function to promote learning.

利用者は、インターネット接続機能を持つ携帯電話を含むコンピュータ情報端末機器から、教育機関等の運営するウェブサイト上の各コース毎の会員申込み要項に沿って会員情報を入力し、サービスサーバーのデータベースに会員登録を行うことで新規登録ができる。Users enter member information from computer information terminal equipment including mobile phones with Internet connection functions according to the membership application guidelines for each course on websites operated by educational institutions, etc., and enter the service server database. New registration is possible by registering as a member.

会員は希望の時間に、登録した情報端末機器から教育機関等の運営するウェブサイトにアクセスし、自分の学習テーマを選び、学習をすすめる。At a desired time, the member accesses the website operated by the educational institution from the registered information terminal device, selects his / her learning theme, and proceeds with the learning.

会員がウェブサイト上で問題を要求すると、サービスサーバーから問題が送信される。When a member requests a problem on the website, the problem is sent from the service server.

会員は、問題に対する自分自身の回答を頭の中で記憶した上で、正解及び解説を要求すると、サービスサーバーから正解及び解説が送信される。When the member requests his / her own answer to the problem in the head and requests a correct answer and explanation, the correct answer and explanation are transmitted from the service server.

会員は、受信した正解及び解説をもとに自分自身の回答が、理解した上での正解であるのかまぐれや勘などによる偶然の正解であるか、または不正解であるかを判断、入力し、送信する。Based on the received correct answer and explanation, the member judges and inputs whether his / her answer is a correct answer after understanding whether it is a correct answer by chance or by intuition. ,Send.

会員から送信されたデータをもとに、システム側が会員の学習の進渉状況・理解度を管理する。Based on the data sent from the member, the system manages the progress and understanding of the member's learning.

システム側が収集した会員の学習の進渉状況・理解度に関する情報をもとに、システム側から会員に対し最適な学習プログラムの提案や情報の提供がなされる。Based on the information about the progress and understanding of the member's learning collected by the system, the system proposes an optimal learning program and provides information to the member.

サービスサーバーから送られてくる問題画面と正解・解説画面のイメージ図。An image of the problem screen and the correct answer / explanation screen sent from the service server.

Claims (3)

インターネットを利用し、インターネット接続機能を持つ携帯電話を含むコンピュータ情報端末機器を対象に展開するe−ラーニングツールにおいて、利用者が問題に回答後、システム側に対し自分自身の回答を送信せず、まずシステム側から正解及び解説を受信し、正解及び解説をもとに利用者が自分自身の回答が理解した上での正解であるのかまぐれや勘などによる偶然の正解であるのか、または不正解であるのかを判断し、その判断結果をシステム側に対し自己申告する機能を有すシステム(【図1】参照)。In the e-learning tool that uses the Internet and deploys to computer information terminal equipment including mobile phones with internet connection functions, after the user answers the problem, the user does not send his / her own answer to the system side, First, the correct answer and explanation are received from the system side, and whether the answer is a correct answer based on the correct answer and explanation based on the user's own answer or whether it is a chance correct answer by chance or intuition. A system that has the function of self-declaring the judgment result to the system side (see Fig. 1). インターネットを利用し、インターネット接続機能を持つ携帯電話を含むコンピュータ情報端末機器を対象に展開するe−ラーニングツールにおいて、システム側が請求項1記載の利用者からの自己申告データをもとに正確な利用者の学習の進渉状況・理解度を認識し、管理し、利用者はシステムの管理するデータをもとに自分自身の学習の進渉状況・理解度を確認することのできるシステム。In an e-learning tool that is developed for computer information terminal devices including mobile phones having an Internet connection function using the Internet, the system side uses the data correctly based on self-reported data from the user as claimed in claim 1 A system that allows users to recognize and manage the progress and understanding of learning and to check the progress and understanding of their own learning based on data managed by the system. 請求項2記載のシステム側が管理する正確な利用者の学習の進渉状況・理解度をもとに、それぞれの利用者にとって最適な学習プログラムの提案や情報の提供を行うことのできるシステム。A system capable of proposing an optimal learning program and providing information for each user based on the accurate progress and understanding of learning of the user managed by the system according to claim 2.
JP2003387221A 2003-10-15 2003-10-15 SELF-MANAGEMENT TYPE e-LEARNING TOOL Pending JP2005122079A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003387221A JP2005122079A (en) 2003-10-15 2003-10-15 SELF-MANAGEMENT TYPE e-LEARNING TOOL

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003387221A JP2005122079A (en) 2003-10-15 2003-10-15 SELF-MANAGEMENT TYPE e-LEARNING TOOL

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005122079A true JP2005122079A (en) 2005-05-12

Family

ID=34616135

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2003387221A Pending JP2005122079A (en) 2003-10-15 2003-10-15 SELF-MANAGEMENT TYPE e-LEARNING TOOL

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2005122079A (en)

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH08146867A (en) * 1994-11-17 1996-06-07 Gutsudo Geimu:Kk Method and system of self-evaluation introduction type evaluation, and work sheet used for the same
JP2000147991A (en) * 1998-11-18 2000-05-26 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Device and method for supporting study, and recording medium with study support program stored therein
JP2002091284A (en) * 2000-09-12 2002-03-27 Wareport Corp Individual learning management system
JP2002091292A (en) * 2000-09-11 2002-03-27 Inter-Edu.Com:Kk Scholastic ability judging method and scholastic ability judgment system
JP2002132135A (en) * 2000-10-24 2002-05-09 Haruyuki Amano Learning support system
JP2002197202A (en) * 2000-12-25 2002-07-12 Namco Ltd Learning information providing system, learning information providing method, program and information storage medium
JP2003066819A (en) * 2001-08-24 2003-03-05 Dainippon Printing Co Ltd Communication correction system, terminal device, and storage medium
WO2003050782A1 (en) * 2001-12-12 2003-06-19 Hogakukan Co., Ltd. Exercise setting system
JP2003228272A (en) * 2002-02-06 2003-08-15 Univ Saga Educational material learning system
JP2003255813A (en) * 2002-03-05 2003-09-10 Misawa Homes Co Ltd Learning support device, learning support system, learning support method, and storage medium
JP2003271750A (en) * 2002-03-13 2003-09-26 Byuudento:Kk Education system

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH08146867A (en) * 1994-11-17 1996-06-07 Gutsudo Geimu:Kk Method and system of self-evaluation introduction type evaluation, and work sheet used for the same
JP2000147991A (en) * 1998-11-18 2000-05-26 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Device and method for supporting study, and recording medium with study support program stored therein
JP2002091292A (en) * 2000-09-11 2002-03-27 Inter-Edu.Com:Kk Scholastic ability judging method and scholastic ability judgment system
JP2002091284A (en) * 2000-09-12 2002-03-27 Wareport Corp Individual learning management system
JP2002132135A (en) * 2000-10-24 2002-05-09 Haruyuki Amano Learning support system
JP2002197202A (en) * 2000-12-25 2002-07-12 Namco Ltd Learning information providing system, learning information providing method, program and information storage medium
JP2003066819A (en) * 2001-08-24 2003-03-05 Dainippon Printing Co Ltd Communication correction system, terminal device, and storage medium
WO2003050782A1 (en) * 2001-12-12 2003-06-19 Hogakukan Co., Ltd. Exercise setting system
JP2003228272A (en) * 2002-02-06 2003-08-15 Univ Saga Educational material learning system
JP2003255813A (en) * 2002-03-05 2003-09-10 Misawa Homes Co Ltd Learning support device, learning support system, learning support method, and storage medium
JP2003271750A (en) * 2002-03-13 2003-09-26 Byuudento:Kk Education system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Justice et al. Print referencing
Boss et al. Conscientious practice: Post-master’s student affairs professionals’ perspectives on engaging social justice
Wood Problematizing the inclusion agenda in higher education: Towards a more inclusive technology enhanced learning mode
Bruce et al. Guidelines for the Administration of Educational Programs for Students Who Are Deaf/Hard of Hearing, Visually Impaired, or Deafblind.
Friedensen et al. Using qualitative research to document variations in student experience
Zare Personalization in mobile learning for people with special needs
JP2017026827A (en) Learning support system and learning support method
Corn et al. Providing access to the visual environment: A model of low vision services for children
Erlenkamp et al. Becoming the ears, eyes, voice and hands of someone else: Educating generalist interpreters in a three-year programme
Shaban et al. Developing a student attendance app using QR codes: educational and practical considerations
Jones et al. Students with multiple disabilities
Papavasiliou et al. Providing assistive ICT learning for people with disabilities through a personalised mobile application
Chennat Conceptualizing disability inclusion
Mpaza et al. Primary school-based support teams’ experiences and practices when supporting teachers
Johnson et al. Building health promoting and inclusive schools in South Africa: Community-based prevention in action
JP2005122079A (en) SELF-MANAGEMENT TYPE e-LEARNING TOOL
Li et al. Holistic transfer educational learning approach for higher education
Alrashidi Synergistic integration between internet of things and augmented reality technologies for deaf persons in e-learning platform
Nobriga et al. Training goal writing: A practical and systematic approach
Mercurio-Standridge Conducting AAC assessments with competence
Dissinger Core curriculum in assistive technology: In-service for special educators and therapists
Parette et al. School-age children with disabilities: Technology implications for counselors
Sefotho et al. Teaching learners with visual impairment
Gomez et al. Design considerations and evaluation methodology for adapted navigational assistants for people with cognitive disabilities
Stavem Student mobility: Creating an environment for social and academic success

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20060804

RD02 Notification of acceptance of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7422

Effective date: 20060804

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20071220

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20071225

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20080225

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20080610

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20080811

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20081111

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20081225

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20090519