JP2004280694A - Personnel allocation support system - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a personnel allocation support system capable of proposing an efficient personnel allocation as the whole organization, considering the progress of each work. <P>SOLUTION: This personnel allocation support system 100 comprises each processing part of a progress information registration processing part 101, a pending item registration processing part 102, and a personnel allocation proposal processing part 103, and each storage part of a personnel database 104, a work database 105, a pending item database 106, a protect database 107. The personnel allocation proposal processing part 103 calculates the necessary cost based on the progress of each work and the unit cost, skill or the like of each staff according to a request from a terminal 110, and compares gains calculated from the difference in necessary cost, and proposes a personnel allocation according to the comparison result. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

[0001]
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a staffing support system, and more particularly, to a technique for an organization to efficiently staff a large number of projects.
[0002]
[Prior art]
As a conventional staffing system, a system including a means for calculating a business added value and a resource allocating means for making a staffing plan according to the business added value and the skill of each staff (for example, see Patent Document 1). Also, a system including a personnel selecting unit for selecting personnel to be arranged based on a degree of importance set in advance for each task (for example, see Patent Document 2) is known.
[0003]
[Patent Document 1]
JP 2002-073918 A
[Patent Document 2]
JP-A-2002-109161
[0004]
[Problems to be solved by the invention]
However, in the staffing support systems described in Patent Literature 1 and Patent Literature 2, staffing is performed in accordance with the added value of work and the skills of each staff. It was not possible to propose efficient staffing for the entire organization according to the progress.
That is, the system described in Patent Literature 1 can make a staffing plan for a new project, but efficiently assigns personnel assigned to work already in progress according to the progress of each work. Staffing could not be done.
Further, the system described in Patent Literature 2 makes it possible for a staff member assigned to a work in progress to propose a change in the arrangement according to the comparison result of the importance levels set for each work. However, it did not consider the progress of each task and did not necessarily suggest efficient staffing.
[0005]
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and has as its object to provide a staffing support system that enables efficient proposal of staffing for the entire organization in consideration of the progress of each operation.
[0006]
[Means for Solving the Problems]
In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention is a staffing support system that proposes staffing belonging to an organization for each task constituting a project, and stores a preset unit cost and work efficiency for each staff. A staff information storage unit that obtains progress information registered for each work, and based on a difference between a scheduled time set in advance for each work and a work actual time included in the progress information, until the work is completed. The required time calculating means for calculating the required time, the required time, and the required cost when each person is allocated to each work based on the unit cost and work efficiency obtained from the personnel information storage means for each person. Based on the required cost for each person calculated by the required cost calculating means for each task. Depending on the constant has been selected criteria, characterized in that it comprises a staffing proposed processing means for determining personnel to propose an arrangement.
Further, the required time calculation means includes a difference between a scheduled countermeasure time set in advance for an issue arising in each work and a countermeasure actual time included in the progress information in the required time.
Further, the required cost calculation means includes a required cost for the allocated work as the required cost calculated for the personnel allocated to each work.
Further, in the personnel information storage means, an identification flag indicating whether or not the personnel allocated to each task can be allocated to another task is set. Based on the flag, only the staff members who can be arranged are set as recommendation targets.
[0007]
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a schematic configuration of a staffing support system according to one embodiment of the present invention.
The staffing support system 100 according to the present embodiment includes a progress information registration processing unit 101, a pending matter registration processing unit 102, a staffing proposal processing unit 103, a staff database 104, a work database 105, and a pending database. 106 and a project database 107 are provided. The staffing support system 100 is connected via a network or the like to a terminal 110 operated by a worker or an administrator, and proposes information on a change in staffing based on progress information and the like input by the terminal 110. Generate Although only one terminal 110 is connected to the staffing support system 100 in FIG. 1, a plurality of terminals 110 are actually connected.
The progress information registration processing unit 101 and the pending matter registration processing unit 102 register the progress information and pending information input from the terminal 110 in the work database 106 and the pending matter database 107.
The staffing proposal processing unit 103 performs a staffing proposal process based on information registered in each of the databases 104 to 107 in response to a request from the terminal 110.
In the present embodiment, as the proposal processing by the staffing proposal processing unit 103, the required costs are calculated based on the progress of each work, the unit cost of each staff, the skills, etc., in response to a request from the terminal 110, and the necessary costs are calculated. The profit calculated from the difference is compared, and the staffing is proposed according to the comparison result.
[0008]
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of a personnel information table constituting the personnel database 104.
The personnel information table 200 stores information about personnel in the organization to be allocated, and includes a personnel ID 201 for uniquely identifying each personnel, an affiliation 202, a personnel name 203, and a unit cost of each personnel. , A rearrangeable flag 205, and skill levels 206 to 210.
The relocation possible flag 205 indicates whether or not a person in charge of a certain task can be assigned to another task. For example, by setting “FALSE” for the main members and the like in each project, it becomes possible not to make an arrangement proposal for other work.
The skill levels 206 to 210 indicate levels preset for each skill type for each person. The level for each skill type is set based on the work time and work performance of the work category corresponding to each skill type accumulated for each person. It should be noted that the items of the skill level are provided by the number of work sections that need to be set.
[0009]
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of a data structure of a skill-specific reduced time conversion table that configures the personnel database 104.
The skill-specific reduced time conversion table 300 stores, for each skill type, a reduced time coefficient indicating the work efficiency corresponding to each level. For each skill type 301 to 305 corresponding to each item of the skill levels 206 to 210 in the table 200, a shortening time coefficient is set in advance. In the present embodiment, the levels are shown in four stages, but may be divided into more or less stages.
The value calculated by the organization using the past performance data is used as each of the shortening time coefficients. For example, the performance time of the staff is totaled for each work category and calculated from the average value and the standard deviation.
[0010]
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the project database 105.
The project database 105 stores information on all projects owned by the organization, and includes data of a project ID 401 for uniquely identifying each project, a project name 402, a project rank 403, and a budget 404. With items.
The project rank 403 indicates the importance of each project among all the projects, and is set in advance based on the scale of the project, the order amount, the presence or absence of a continuous order, and the like.
[0011]
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the work database 106.
The work database 106 stores information related to each work constituting the project. The person in charge 509 and the pending ID 510 are provided.
The project ID 501 corresponds to the project ID 401 of the project database 105.
The work ID 502 uniquely identifies each work. The parent work ID 503 stores the work ID of the work that is the parent of each work as information indicating the hierarchical relationship of each work. The required skill 505 stores a skill type for identifying a skill required for each work. The subsequent work 506 stores the work ID of the work that cannot be started unless the work is completed. The scheduled time 507 stores a standard work time required until the work is completed. The actual time 508 stores the time actually spent on the work. The person-in-charge ID 509 stores the person ID of the person in charge of the work. The pending ID 510 stores a pending ID stored in a pending database, which will be described later, as a countermeasure that must be taken to complete the work. If there is a plurality of pending items in one work, the pending IDs are separated by commas and a plurality of IDs are stored.
In the present embodiment, the work is completed when the actual time 508 reaches the scheduled time 507, and all work delays are managed as pending items by information stored in the pending database 107 described later.
[0012]
FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of the data structure of the pending database 107.
The pending database 107 has data items of a pending ID 601 for uniquely identifying each pending item, a pending content 602, a countermeasure content 603, a scheduled countermeasure time 604, and an actual countermeasure time 605.
The pending ID 601 uniquely identifies each pending item, and corresponds to the pending ID 510 of the work database 106.
In the scheduled countermeasure time 604, a standard work time required for countermeasures for the concerned matter is stored. The actual countermeasure time 605 stores the time actually spent for the countermeasure for the concerned matter.
[0013]
The staffing proposal process by the staffing support system 100 configured as described above will be described.
First, as a prerequisite for performing the staffing proposal process, a registration process of progress information and pending information for each work is performed.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing the progress information registration processing procedure performed by the progress information registration processing unit 101.
The progress information registration processing unit 101 causes the terminal 110 to display a progress information registration screen (step 701), and receives input of progress information by a person in charge of each operation or an administrator.
The progress information registration processing unit 101 acquires the task identification information (or pending item identification information) and the task time from the progress information transmitted from the terminal 110 (step 702), and acquires the acquired task identification information (or pending item identification). Based on the information, a record in the work database 106 (or the pending database 107) is searched, the work time is registered, and the process is terminated (step 703). The work ID (or pending ID) is used as the identification information in this case. In addition, in the registration of the work time, the acquired work time is added to the actual time 508 (or the actual measure time 605).
[0014]
FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing a procedure of new pending information registration processing performed by the pending matter registration processing unit 102.
The issue registration processing unit 102 causes the terminal 110 to display an issue registration screen (step 801), and receives input of the issue information by the person in charge of each operation or the manager.
The pending matter registration processing unit 102 generates a pending ID with respect to the pending information transmitted from the terminal 110 (Step 802), and determines the pending ID and the pending content acquired from the pending information, a countermeasure method, and a scheduled countermeasure time. It is registered in the database 107 (step 803). Further, a record in the work database 106 is searched based on the work identification information included in the pending information, the pending ID is registered, and the process ends (step 804). In this case, the work ID is used as the identification information.
[0015]
FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a procedure of a staffing proposal process performed by the staffing proposal processing unit 103.
The staffing proposal processing unit 103 starts the staffing proposal processing in response to the operation of the terminal 110 by the administrator.
In the staffing proposal process, the following process is repeated for each work record (hereinafter, referred to as “work i”) in the work database 106 (steps 901 to 905).
An issue record is acquired from the issue database 107 based on the issue ID included in the work record (step 902), and a later-described work increase calculation process is performed based on the work record and the issue record (step 903). Here, the degree of increase in work indicates an index indicating how much the scheduled time increases from the originally scheduled time.
In addition, a necessary cost calculation process described later is performed on the work record (step 904).
The staffing proposal processing unit 103 calculates the degree of increase in work and the required cost for all work records in the work database 106 (step 905), and acquires all project records from the project database 105 (step 906). ), Acquire all personnel records from the personnel database 104 (step 907), and sort the acquired personnel records by affiliation (step 908).
The staffing proposal processing unit 103 performs a recommended placement selection process, which will be described later, based on the information acquired from each of the databases 104 to 107 (step 909), and causes the terminal 110 to display a processing result display screen (step 910). To end.
[0016]
FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating a work increase degree calculating process performed by the staffing proposal processing unit 103. The degree of increase in work is calculated so as to indicate how much time is required for countermeasures against the originally planned work time. In the present embodiment, the means for calculating the work increase is implemented as a function, the argument of the function is the work ID, and the return value is the work increase.
The staffing proposal processing unit 103 initializes the degree of increase in work to 0 (step 1001), and acquires a work record from the work database 106 based on the work ID (step 1002). It is determined whether or not the work is not completed for the acquired record (step 1003). If the work is not completed, the record is acquired from the concern database 107 based on the concern ID included in the work record (step 1004). ). Here, the determination as to whether or not the work is incomplete is performed by confirming whether or not the actual time of the work record has reached the scheduled time.
The staffing proposal processing unit 103 calculates the degree of work increase based on the planned time included in the acquired work record and the planned countermeasure time included in the pending record (step 1005), and ends the process. The degree of increase in work is calculated by dividing the sum of the scheduled time and the scheduled countermeasure time by the scheduled time. For example, the work increase degree of the work “module A” included in the work database 106 of FIG. 5 is 5 + 10/5 = 3.0. If there is no concern for the work, the work increase is calculated assuming that the scheduled countermeasure time of the time required to take measures for the work is 0, and thus the work increase is “1.0”.
On the other hand, if it is determined in step 1003 that the work has been completed, the process ends without calculating the work increase degree.
[0017]
FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating a necessary cost calculation processing procedure performed by the staffing proposal processing unit 103. The required cost is calculated by the product of the time required for the personnel to complete the work and the hourly wage of the personnel. That is, if the skills of the personnel performing the work are high (the time reduction coefficient is small), and if the wages of the personnel are low, the required cost is low. Conversely, if the skills of the personnel performing the work are low (when the shortening time coefficient is large), and if the wages of the personnel are high, the required cost increases. In the present embodiment, the means for calculating the required cost is implemented as a function, the argument of the function is the work ID, and the return value is the required cost.
The staffing proposal processing unit 103 obtains a work record based on the work ID from the work database 106 as a necessary cost calculation process (step 11011), and transmits the work record from the work database 107 based on the work ID included in the obtained work record. A pending record is obtained (step 1102).
The required time is calculated based on each information included in the acquired work record and pending record (step 1103). The required time is calculated by subtracting the value obtained by adding the actual measure time to the actual time from the value obtained by adding the planned measure time to the scheduled time. For example, the required time of the work “module A” included in the work database 106 of FIG. 5 is 5 + 10−2 + 3 = 10.
Further, based on the project ID and the staff ID included in the work record, records are acquired from the project database 105 and the personnel database 104 (step 1104), and based on the required time calculated in step 1103 and the information included in each record. Then, the necessary cost is calculated, and the process ends (step 1105). In the present embodiment, in order to calculate the required cost by the amount of money, the calculation process is performed by multiplying the required time by the reduced time coefficient, the wage, and the project rank. For example, the required cost of the work “module A” included in the work database 106 of FIG. 5 is 10 × 0.98 × 1.25 × 3 = 36.75 (K).
[0018]
FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating a recommended arrangement selection process performed by the personnel arrangement proposal processing unit 103. In the present embodiment, means for selecting efficient staffing for the organization is implemented as a function. The arguments of the function are the records of the work DB, the degree of increase in the work of each work, and the required cost of each work, and the return value is the recommended work, the recommended staff, and the profit after staffing. It is.
The staffing proposal processing unit 103 initializes the recommended work, the recommended staff, and the profit 1 based on the work record acquired from the work database 106 (step 1201). In the initialization, the recommended work and the recommended staff are set by the information included in one work record, and the profit 1 is set to “0”. In this case, as the initialization, the recommended work and the recommended staff are set based on the information included in one work record. If the profit 1 is set to “0”, other information is set for the recommended work and the recommended staff. You may.
After the settings are initialized, the following processing is repeated for the n work items having a high calculated work increase degree among the work records obtained from the work database 106 (steps 1202 to 1211).
The required cost calculated by the required cost calculation process is set as the required cost 1 for the work (hereinafter, referred to as “work i”) shown in the obtained one work record (step 1203). For example, if the work “module A” included in the work database 106 in FIG. 5 is the work i, the required cost 1 is “36.75 (K)”.
The following processing is performed for each personnel record acquired from the personnel database 104 (steps 1204 to 1212).
The necessary cost when the work i is performed by the personnel shown in one personnel record (hereinafter, referred to as “the personnel j”) is calculated, and the calculation result is set as the required cost 2 (step 1205). Calculates the required cost of the original work that was assigned, and sets the calculation result as the required cost 3 (step 1206). Here, the original work for which the required cost is calculated indicates only the work (or work that can be performed) by the staff member j at the time. The calculation processing of each required cost is performed in the same manner as the required cost calculation processing shown in FIG. For example, when “Suzuki” shown in the personnel information table 200 in FIG. 2 is set as the personnel j, the required cost 2 is 10 × 1.0 × 1.0 × 3 = 30 (K), and the required cost is 3 is 1 × 1.0 × 1.0 × 3 = 3.0 (K). In this case, the work for which the required cost 3 is calculated is only the work name “visual test B” of the work ID “5” shown in the work database 106 of FIG.
The profit is calculated based on the set required costs 1 to 3 and set as profit 2 (step 1207). The profit in this case indicates a difference in required cost due to a change in the staffing, and is calculated by subtracting required cost 2 and required cost 3 from required cost 1. For example, in the above example, the profit 2 is 36.75-30-3 = 3.75 (K).
Profit 1 and profit 2 are compared on the assumption that personnel j is different from the original person in charge set for work i, and that the relocatable flag set for personnel j is "TRUE" (step 1208). .
If the profit 2 is larger than the profit 1, the work j is set as the recommendation work, the staff j is set as the recommendation staff, and the profit 2 is set as the profit (step 1209). For example, in the above example, work i: “module A”, personnel j “Suzuki”, and profit 1: “3.75 (K)”.
On the other hand, when the profit 1 is larger than the profit 2, the process is performed on other personnel records without changing each setting.
The processing of steps 1205-1209 is repeated for all records of the personnel database 106 (step 1210).
The processing of steps 1203 to 1210 is repeated for n work records (step 1211), and the processing ends.
Through the above processing, the staffing arrangement proposal processing unit 103 generates proposal information to be displayed on the display screen based on the combination of the recommended work and the recommended staff that can obtain the greatest benefit from the arrangement change.
In this case, the number (n) of operations i to be processed can be set by the administrator. Further, when it is not necessary to consider the processing time, all the operations may be performed.
[0019]
FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of a display screen that causes the terminal 110 to display the proposal information generated by the staffing proposal processing unit 103. FIG. 13 shows a case where the change in the layout of the work “module A” to the staff “Suzuki” is displayed as proposal information. In FIG. 13, the display information on the project B is omitted.
The proposal information display screen 1300 includes a progress information display section 1310 and a layout change proposal information display section 1320.
The progress information display unit 1310 has display fields of a work name 1311, a person in charge 1312, a work increase degree 1313, a required time 1314, a required cost 1315, a progress image 1316, and a staff 1317. In the progress information display unit 1310, progress information in the current staffing is indicated by a work increase degree 1313, a required time 1314, a required cost 1315, and a progress image 1316. The progress image 1316 displays the relationship between the scheduled time and the actual time as a graph, and also shows a graph of each work and the concerns of the work on one line. Further, the succeeding and succeeding tasks are connected by dotted arrows to indicate the preceding and succeeding relations of each task.
The proposal information display unit 1320 displays, as the proposal information generated by the personnel arrangement proposal processing unit 103, the recommendation work, the recommended personnel, the required cost when changing to the recommended personnel, and the profit due to the arrangement change, respectively.
On the proposal information display screen 1300, the proposal information display unit 1320 displays the staffing proposal information based on the profit, and also displays the current progress status on the progress image 1316.
The project manager or the like uses the contents displayed on the proposal information display unit 1320, the progress status of the current staffing displayed on the progress image 1316, and the like as judgment materials for changing the layout.
[0020]
As described above, in the staffing support system 100 according to the present embodiment, as the staffing according to the progress of each work, the staffing is proposed based on the required cost that varies depending on the progress, so that the management is proposed. By examining the change of the arrangement based on the proposal information, the person can efficiently allocate the personnel in consideration of the profit of the entire organization. Here, in the present embodiment, the necessary cost is calculated based on the required time according to the progress of each work, the unit cost set for each person, work efficiency, and the like. It is possible to make proposals for appropriate staffing in consideration of the situation and the capabilities of each staff. In particular, by considering the unit cost and the work efficiency, it is possible to propose an appropriate staffing even when the unit cost and the work efficiency do not correspond.
For work already staffed, the difference between the cost required for the current staff member to perform the work and the cost required for the new staff member to perform the work is taken as a profit. Since the person in charge (the person with the lowest necessary cost) is proposed as the recommended person, the manager can appropriately change the arrangement in the ongoing project. In this case, the necessary cost calculated for the new person in charge includes the cost required for the original work of the new person, so even if the new person performs both tasks, there is no problem An arrangement can be suggested.
In addition, as the necessary time, the sum of the time required for the original work and the countermeasure time for the issues arising in the work is used, so that an appropriate cost is calculated in consideration of the delay in progress in each work. be able to.
[0021]
In addition, a work efficiency coefficient corresponding to the skill level is set for each skill type corresponding to each work category, and a skill level is registered for each skill type for each person. It is possible to set an appropriate work efficiency.
In addition, the project rank is set for each project, and the project rank of the project to which each work belongs is taken into account in calculating the required cost. Placement proposal information can be generated.
Further, the degree of work increase is calculated according to the countermeasure time of the issues that have occurred in each work, and the manning recommendation process is performed for n tasks with a high degree of work increase. Processing can be performed.
[0022]
In the above-described embodiment, an example of a layout change for work of the same project and a layout change for personnel belonging to the same project is shown. However, the present invention is not limited to this. A change may be possible, and a change in the arrangement may be proposed for personnel who belong to another department in the organization.
Further, the relocation enable flag set in the personnel information table may be settable for each work record. This makes it possible to more appropriately set personnel who do not change the arrangement, such as main persons in each project.
In addition, a priority may be set for each work in consideration of the influence on the subsequent work, and the calculation processing may be performed based on the priority in calculating the required cost.
Further, in calculating the necessary cost of the original work (required cost 3) assigned to each person, the delay of the original work due to the assignment of the work i may be taken into consideration as a countermeasure time for the concerns.
Further, the combination of the recommendation work and the recommendation staff with the highest profit is generated as the proposal information. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and a plurality of combinations with the highest profit may be generated as the proposal information. As a result, the manager can change the staffing in consideration of a plurality of combinations.
Further, the configuration of the staffing support system of the present invention is not limited to the configuration described in the above embodiment, and any two or more of the processing units may be integrated, and each processing unit may be further subdivided. It is good also as comprising. Further, a separate device may be configured for each processing unit. Further, it is not always necessary to provide the progress information management means, and the progress information registered by another progress information management tool may be used.
[0023]
【The invention's effect】
As described above, according to the present invention, as the staffing according to the progress of each work, the staffing is proposed based on the necessary cost that varies depending on the progress, so that the manager assigns the staff based on the proposal information. By considering changes and the like, efficient staffing can be performed in consideration of the benefits of the entire organization.
[Brief description of the drawings]
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a schematic configuration of a staffing support system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of a personnel information table constituting a personnel database.
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of a skill-specific reduced time conversion table constituting a personnel database.
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of a data structure of a project database.
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of a data structure of a work database.
FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a data structure of a pending database.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a progress information registration process performed by a progress information registration processing unit;
FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating a pending information registration process performed by a pending item registration processing unit;
FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a staffing proposal process performed by a staffing proposal processing unit;
FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating a work increase degree calculating process performed by a staffing proposal processing unit;
FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating a necessary cost calculation process performed by a staffing proposal processing unit;
FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating a recommended placement selection processing procedure performed by a staffing proposal processing unit;
FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of a display screen of a result of the staffing proposal process.
[Explanation of symbols]
100 staffing support system, 101 progress information input processing unit, 102 pending item input processing unit, 103 staffing proposal processing unit, 104 staff database, 105 project database, 106 work database, 107 pending database, 200 staff information table, 204 wage , 205 Relocation flag, 206-210 Skill level, 300 Skill reduction time conversion table, 403 Project rank, 505 Required skill, 506 Subsequent work, 507 Scheduled time, 508 Actual time, 509 Person in charge, 510 Issue ID, 601 pending ID, 604 scheduled countermeasure time, 605 actual countermeasure time, 1300 proposal information display screen, 1310 progress information display part, 1313 work increase, 1314 required time, 1315 required cost, 1316 progress image, 20 proposed information display unit.

Claims (4)

A staffing support system that proposes staffing belonging to an organization for each work constituting a project,
Personnel information storage means for storing a preset unit cost and work efficiency for each personnel,
It is necessary to obtain the progress information registered for each work and calculate the required time until the completion of the work based on the difference between the scheduled time preset for each work and the actual work time included in the progress information. Time calculating means;
The required time, based on the unit cost and work efficiency obtained from the personnel information storage unit for each person, a necessary cost calculation unit that calculates a necessary cost when each person is allocated to each work,
For each operation, based on the required cost for each person calculated by the necessary cost calculation unit, a personnel arrangement proposal processing unit for determining a personnel to propose an arrangement in accordance with a preset selection criterion is provided. A staffing support system characterized by the following. 2. The required time calculating unit according to claim 1, wherein the required time includes a difference between a scheduled countermeasure time set in advance for an issue generated in each work and a countermeasure actual time included in the progress information. The staffing support system described in 2. 3. The staffing support system according to claim 1, wherein the required cost calculation unit includes a required cost for the allocated work as the required cost calculated for the staff allocated to each work. 4. In the personnel information storage means, an identification flag indicating whether or not the personnel allocated to each task can be allocated to another task is set,
The staffing support system according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the staffing proposal processing means sets only the staff who can be arranged as a recommendation target based on the identification flag.

Images