JP2003345951A5 - - Google Patents
Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2003345951A5 JP2003345951A5 JP2002148902A JP2002148902A JP2003345951A5 JP 2003345951 A5 JP2003345951 A5 JP 2003345951A5 JP 2002148902 A JP2002148902 A JP 2002148902A JP 2002148902 A JP2002148902 A JP 2002148902A JP 2003345951 A5 JP2003345951 A5 JP 2003345951A5
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- evaluator
- relationship
- column
- evaluated
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims 38
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 claims 1
Claims (7)
１ 評価者を特定する情報を記入する評価者欄
２ 複数の被評価者を特定する情報を記入する氏名欄
３ 前記評価者と前記被評価者との関係を記入する関係欄
４ 前記被評価者を評価するためのものであって、前記複数の被評価者について共通な評価項目と、前記評価項目に対する評価結果を記入する評価欄A multi-faceted evaluation sheet including the following columns 1 to 4 filled in by an evaluator.
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Evaluator column which fills in information for identifying an evaluator 2 Name column for filling in information for identifying a plurality of evaluators 3 Relationship column for filling in the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator 4 The evaluator An evaluation field for entering the evaluation items common to the plurality of persons to be evaluated and the evaluation results for the evaluation items
前記関係欄は、前記評価者と前記被評価者との関係が、前記評価者と前記被評価者の所属する組織内で、上下関係にあるか対等関係にあるかを示す情報が記入される欄であることを特徴とする多角的評価シート。In the multi-faceted evaluation sheet according to claim 1,
In the relationship column, information indicating whether the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator is in a vertical relationship or an equal relationship within the organization to which the evaluator and the evaluator belong is entered. A multi-faceted evaluation sheet characterized by being a column.
前記評価項目は被評価者の「規律性」、「責任性」、「協調性」、「積極性」を含み、
前記評価欄には、前記各評価項目毎に、前記各評価項目に対する評価点を選択する情報が記入されることを特徴とする被評価者の適正評価のための多角的評価シート。In the multi-faceted evaluation sheet according to claim 1 or 2,
The evaluation items include “discipline”, “responsibility”, “collaboration”, “aggressiveness” of the person being evaluated,
In the evaluation column, information for selecting an evaluation score for each evaluation item is entered for each evaluation item.
前記評価点は、前記評価項目によって重み付けされた任意の数値であることを特徴とする多角的評価シート。In the multi-faceted evaluation sheet according to claim 3,
The evaluation score is an arbitrary numerical value weighted by the evaluation item.
１ 評価者を特定する情報を記入する評価者欄
２ 複数の被評価者を特定する情報を記入する氏名欄
３ 前記評価者と前記被評価者との関係を記入する関係欄
４ 前記被評価者を評価するためのものであって、前記区数の被評価者について共通な評価項目と、前記評価項目に対する評価結果を記入する評価欄A multi-faceted evaluation sheet including the following columns 1 to 4 filled in by the evaluator is distributed to a plurality of evaluators having different relationships between the evaluator and the evaluated person, and for each evaluated person, The evaluation person and the evaluation person have the same or similar relationship to each other, and the evaluation result group including the evaluation persons viewed from a plurality of angles is created. Evaluation methods.
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Evaluator column which fills in information for identifying an evaluator 2 Name column for filling in information for identifying a plurality of evaluators 3 Relationship column for filling in the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator 4 The evaluator An evaluation column for entering an evaluation item common to the number of persons to be evaluated and an evaluation result for the evaluation item.
評価結果群には、評価者と被評価者との関係と、評価結果の集計値とが含まれ、各評価者の個別の評価結果を含まないことを特徴とする被評価者の多角的評価方法。In the multilateral evaluation method of the evaluated person according to claim 5,
The evaluation result group includes the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator and the aggregate value of the evaluation result, and does not include the individual evaluation result of each evaluator. Method.
各被評価者ごとに、前記評価者と被評価者との関係が同一または類似する評価結果を集計して、各評価者を複数の角度から見た評価結果群を生成して出力する手段、
としてコンピュータを機能させる、被評価者の多角的評価用コンピュータプログラム。
１ 評価者を特定する情報を記入する評価者欄
２ 複数の被評価者を記入する氏名欄
３ 前記評価者と前記被評価者との関係を記入する関係欄
４ 前記被評価者を評価するためのものであって、前記区数の被評価者について共通な評価項目と、前記評価項目に対する評価結果を記入する評価欄 Means for displaying a multi-faceted evaluation sheet including the following columns 1 to 4 filled in by the evaluator with respect to a plurality of evaluator terminal devices having different relationships between the evaluator and the evaluator;
A means for calculating and outputting an evaluation result group in which each evaluator is viewed from a plurality of angles, for each evaluated person, totaling evaluation results having the same or similar relationship between the evaluator and the evaluated person,
A computer program for multi-evaluation of the person being evaluated, which causes the computer to function as
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Evaluator column which fills in the information for identifying the evaluator 2 Name column which fills in a plurality of evaluators 3 Relationship column where the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator is entered 4 To evaluate the evaluator An evaluation field for entering an evaluation item common to the number of persons to be evaluated and an evaluation result for the evaluation item.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002148902A JP2003345951A (en) | 2002-05-23 | 2002-05-23 | Multilateral ranking sheet, multilateral ranking method, and computer program for executing the same |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002148902A JP2003345951A (en) | 2002-05-23 | 2002-05-23 | Multilateral ranking sheet, multilateral ranking method, and computer program for executing the same |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2003345951A JP2003345951A (en) | 2003-12-05 |
| JP2003345951A5 true JP2003345951A5 (en) | 2005-10-06 |
Family
ID=29767266
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002148902A Withdrawn JP2003345951A (en) | 2002-05-23 | 2002-05-23 | Multilateral ranking sheet, multilateral ranking method, and computer program for executing the same |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2003345951A (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006155342A (en) * | 2004-11-30 | 2006-06-15 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Personnel evaluation apparatus, personnel evaluation method, program, and its recording medium |
| JP2010086223A (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2010-04-15 | Tmf Create:Kk | Behavior evaluation system |
| JP5811068B2 (en) | 2011-10-11 | 2015-11-11 | 株式会社デンソー | Ignition device for internal combustion engine |
| JP2016212625A (en) * | 2015-05-08 | 2016-12-15 | 行徳 稲田 | Person evaluation program, recording medium, and person evaluation server |
| JP6415681B1 (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2018-10-31 | 株式会社経営人事パートナーズ | HR evaluation method and HR evaluation system |
| JP2021039572A (en) * | 2019-09-04 | 2021-03-11 | 株式会社サマデイ | Non-cognitive ability diagnosis device, and program |
-
2002
- 2002-05-23 JP JP2002148902A patent/JP2003345951A/en not_active Withdrawn
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Hayes | Behind the silicon curtain | |
| Koeman et al. | " Everyone Is Talking about It!" A Distributed Approach to Urban Voting Technology and Visualisations | |
| Tovar et al. | Social impacts of tourism: An Australian regional case study | |
| Devore et al. | Modern mathematical statistics with applications | |
| JP2003345951A5 (en) | ||
| Routman et al. | Beyond inspiration: Translating zoo and aquarium experiences into conservation behavior | |
| Baechler et al. | Aquarium visitor engagement with an ocean plastics exhibit: effects on self-reported intended single-use plastic reductions and plastic-related environmental stewardship actions | |
| Bell et al. | Groups and Indicators in Post‐Industrial Society | |
| JP2002099866A (en) | Information processor simulating propagation of information | |
| KR101573449B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for generating an opportunity map of mobile application | |
| Wagner et al. | Development and implementation of an evaluation strategy for measuring conservation outcomes | |
| Baig et al. | Impact of customer Satisfaction, Brand Image and Advertisement on Brand Loyalty of “Sting (Energy Drink)” with Special Focus on Karachi | |
| Rennick-Egglestone et al. | Personalizing the theme park: psychometric profiling and physiological monitoring | |
| US20110282713A1 (en) | Product positioning as a function of consumer needs | |
| Marable et al. | Beyond boundaries: the Manning Marable reader | |
| Caron | The US Refugee Resettlement Conundrum | |
| Shikhare | Power of Media Ethics in Modern Times: A Sneak Preview from the Millennial Generation Perspective | |
| Ogirko et al. | Information Technology to Determine the Effectiveness of Advertising Communication | |
| Matečić et al. | TOURIST PERCEPTION OF INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE-BASED TOURISM PRODUCTS-THE CASE OF ZAGREB | |
| Denzin | The Professional Fence. | |
| González et al. | Stochastic model for the process of Wine Award: Visualization and quantification | |
| Rapp | A Postcard from the Edge | |
| MING | RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MATERNAL ATTACHMENT AND MALAYSIAN ADOLESCENTS’SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY WITH AUTHORITATIVE PARENTING AS MEDIATOR | |
| Lynes et al. | Making a (Corporate) Killing | |
| CN103700290A (en) | Awarding method and electronic equipment |