JP2003345951A - Multilateral ranking sheet, multilateral ranking method, and computer program for executing the same - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a multilateral ranking sheet 10 providing a ranking result with objectivity. <P>SOLUTION: This multilateral ranking sheet comprises following respective columns of 1-4 to be written by an evaluator. The ranks concluded by the multilateral ranking sheet 10 are collected and totaled by a third party and total points according to rank items and comprehensive total points of all the rank items are set to the totaled results. 1. An evaluator column 20 for writing information specifying the evaluator. 2. Full name columns 14 for writing the names of a plurality of persons to be ranked. 3. Relation columns 15 for writing a relation between the evaluator and the persons to be ranked. 4. Ranking items for ranking the person to be ranked and being common in the plurality of persons to be ranked and a ranking column 18 for writing ranking results in the ranking items. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2004,JPO

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention is suitable for finding multifaceted evaluations by acquaintances in various relations, objectively finding out one's own talents, and giving a chance to improve work skills. The present invention relates to a diversified evaluation sheet, a diversified evaluation method, and a computer program for performing the same.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art In some cases, it is necessary to evaluate one's personality, adequacy, ability, etc. for the purpose of self-study. 2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, as a means for reviewing self-talent, for example, there is a means for performing evaluation by interview or self-report based on predetermined evaluation items. However, mere self-evaluation lacks objectivity. Therefore, evaluation by another person is preferable. For this purpose, various methods have been attempted in which a superior or superior is evaluated, or peers evaluate each other.

[0003]

However, the above-mentioned conventional methods have the following problems to be solved. In the case of evaluation by a third party, the evaluation result may not be sufficiently notified to the person himself, and there are aspects that the person himself cannot understand. Also, it does not directly contribute to improving the qualities of the person. In addition, when the evaluation is performed in an interview, since the evaluation is performed between the person and one or more evaluators, it may not be possible to make a calm self-determination. The evaluation of a teacher or direct supervisor alone is too dependent on the evaluator's ability to evaluate, and does not always provide sufficient persuasiveness. The evaluation content becomes ambiguous. Those evaluated only by self-assessment tend to be suspicious or biased, and may lack objectivity. In addition, there is a hindrance that aspects that they do not realize themselves are omitted from the evaluation. Also, a method of mutual evaluation between colleagues by anonymous is conceivable. However, there is a problem that the evaluation content tends to be irresponsible. In particular, with the development of information technology, the method of transmitting instruction information from the top to a person in charge through a pyramid-type command system has been reviewed, and the boss tends not to take over all the tasks of his direct reports. Depending on the theme, you may want to handle the issue at your own risk without waiting for your supervisor's order. At this time,
How to evaluate the ability of each person in charge is an important issue for organizations such as companies. In addition, each person in charge is required to take the evaluation and study independently.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made to solve the above-described problem, and has as its object to provide a multi-faceted evaluation sheet that provides objective evaluation results for a large number of evaluated persons. Another object of the present invention is to provide a multifaceted evaluation sheet in which a group having a certain human relationship evaluates a person to be evaluated using the same standard.

[0005]

The present invention solves the above-mentioned problems by the following constitution. <Structure 1> A multifaceted evaluation sheet characterized by including the following columns 1 to 4 filled out by an evaluator. 1 Evaluator column for entering information specifying the evaluator 2 Name column for entering a plurality of evaluators 3 Relationship column for entering the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator 4 To evaluate the evaluator An evaluation column for filling in a common evaluation item for the plurality of evaluated persons and an evaluation result for the evaluation item

Since it is a diversified evaluation sheet including each column, other columns may be included. The information specifying the evaluator to be entered in the evaluator column may be a name or a symbol such as a name code. Enter the name in the name column, because all the evaluators must be clear from the evaluator. This name may be entered in advance. The reason why a plurality of evaluators are entered is that the evaluation results can be obtained as relatively as possible with the same evaluation standard. The relation between the evaluator and the evaluator entered in the relation column is information indicating a personal relation such as a hierarchical relation or an equal relation in the organization. The reason why this relation is entered is that the evaluations of the evaluators having the same or similar relation to the evaluated person are totaled, and the evaluation of the evaluated person from a predetermined angle is obtained. The method of entering the evaluation result is optional.

<Structure 2> In the multifaceted evaluation sheet according to Structure 1, the relationship column indicates that the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator is within the organization to which the evaluator and the evaluator belong. A multifaceted evaluation sheet, which is a column in which information indicating whether there is a vertical relationship or an equal relationship is entered.

[0008] When there is an upper / lower relationship, information such as a supervisor and a subordinate is entered. If there is an equal relationship, enter information such as a colleague or a synchronous student.

<Structure 3> In the multifaceted evaluation sheet according to Structure 1 or 2, the evaluation items include “discipline”, “responsibility”, “cooperation”, and “aggression” of the evaluated person. In the column, information for selecting an evaluation point for each of the above-mentioned evaluation items is entered for each of the above-mentioned evaluation items.

[0010] For each evaluation item, for example, an evaluation result is entered so as to select one of 5, 3, and 1 points. The value of the selected evaluation point is arbitrary. By digitizing the evaluation result, the appropriate evaluation can be expressed numerically. Further, evaluation results of a plurality of evaluators can be totaled.

<Structure 4> The multifaceted evaluation sheet according to Structure 3, wherein the evaluation points are arbitrary numerical values weighted by the evaluation items.

The fact that the evaluation items are weighted means that the values of the evaluation points vary depending on the importance of the evaluation items. For a certain evaluation item, one of 5, 3, and 1 is selected, and for a certain evaluation item, one of 3, 2, and 1 is selected.

<Structure 5> The following 1 entered by the evaluator
A diversified evaluation sheet including each column of ~ 4 is distributed to a plurality of evaluators having different relationships between the evaluator and the evaluator,
It is characterized in that, for each evaluator, evaluation results in which the relation between the evaluator and the evaluator is the same or similar are totaled, and an evaluation result group in which each evaluator is viewed from a plurality of angles is created. , A multilateral evaluation method for the evaluated person. 1 Evaluator column for entering information specifying the evaluator 2 Name column for entering a plurality of evaluators 3 Relationship column for entering the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator 4 To evaluate the evaluator And an evaluation column for entering evaluation items common to the evaluated persons in the number of wards and evaluation results for the evaluation items

When the evaluation results having the same or similar relation between the evaluator and the evaluated person are totaled, the evaluation results of all the concerned persons from that angle are obtained. By creating a group of evaluation results when each evaluator is viewed from a plurality of angles, multiple evaluation results can be obtained.

<Structure 6> In the diversified evaluator's evaluation method according to Structure 5, the evaluation result group includes a relation between the evaluator and the evaluator, and a total value of the evaluation results. A multi-faced evaluation method for an evaluator, which does not include individual evaluation results of an evaluator.

By assuring that the individual evaluation results of each evaluator are not directly presented to the evaluated person, the evaluator can more objectively and honestly evaluate.

<Structure 7> The following 1 to be entered by the evaluator
A process of displaying a diversified evaluation sheet including the columns of (1) to (4) to a plurality of evaluators having different relations between the evaluator and the evaluator; A process of summarizing evaluation results having the same or similar relationship with the evaluator and generating and outputting an evaluation result group in which each evaluator is viewed from a plurality of angles. A computer program for the evaluator's multifaceted evaluation. 1 Evaluator column for entering information specifying the evaluator 2 Name column for entering a plurality of evaluators 3 Relationship column for entering the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator 4 To evaluate the evaluator And an evaluation column for entering evaluation items common to the evaluated persons in the number of wards and evaluation results for the evaluation items

An invention of a computer program for realizing the method of Configuration 5.

[0019]

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Embodiments of the present invention will be described below using specific examples. FIG. 1 is a diagram of one embodiment of the diversified evaluation sheet of the present invention. In a multi-faceted evaluation sheet 10 shown in FIG. 1, a number column 12 for entering a reference number 11, a name column 14 for entering the names 13 of a plurality of evaluators, and a relationship for entering a relationship between evaluators and evaluators. A column 15, an evaluation item 16 for evaluating an evaluator, an evaluation column 18 for entering information 17 for selecting an evaluation for the evaluation item 16, an evaluation point explanation column 19, and an evaluator column 20 for entering information for specifying an evaluator. Are provided respectively. Reference numeral 21 indicates a group name, and is provided as needed. In addition, in order to clarify the use of the evaluation result, the title of this sheet was set as “talent discovery sheet”, but the title is arbitrary.

Relationship column 1 showing the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluated person
5, the words "boss, colleague, subordinate" are written. Evaluation items 16 include “discipline”, “responsibility”,
The words "cooperativeness" and "positiveness" are adopted. For each of the evaluation items 16, the information 17 for selecting an evaluation for the evaluation item may be a numerical value in several steps, for example, “20, 1”.
5, 5, 5, and 0 "are assigned. These evaluation points may be numerical values weighted by the evaluation item 16, that is, not uniform, and may be numerical values different from “20, 15, 10, 5, 0” by the evaluation item 16.

In the evaluation point explanation column 19, the following words indicating the significance of each score are entered. "20 is always done and has a good influence on others.""15 is always done.""10 is done.""5 is sometimes done but sometimes not.""Yes""0 is not made"

When using the diversified evaluation sheet 10,
In principle, one evaluator fills in one sheet, and the number of evaluators is prepared.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a self-preserving sheet of the diversified evaluation sheet 10. In FIG. 2, a self-preservation sheet 25 includes an identification field 26 for inputting the name, age, affiliation name, title, entry date, etc. of the person to be evaluated, and an evaluation item showing the same contents as the evaluation item 16. A column 27, a content column 28 describing the contents of the evaluation item 27, a score column 29, and an evaluation point explanation column 30 are provided. This title was also referred to as the “talent discovery sheet”.

When performing an evaluation using the diversified evaluation sheet 10 of the present invention in a company such as a company, it is effective to emphasize the following to the evaluated person. That is,
Each person is equal as a human, but their roles are different. The person who has the ability to perform each role is the right person to take on that role. Each one reviews issues such as the ability to perform their current role and what is lacking. With this recognition, everyone evaluates each other.

For example, it is assumed that employees who have completed the apprenticeship and part-time workers who have been in the company for at least one year can participate in the evaluation. The participant selects information for selecting an evaluation for an evaluation item for each evaluation item 16 on the multi-dimensional evaluation sheet 10, that is, evaluation score 1
Check the appropriate numerical value from 7 and write the evaluation result.

The evaluations performed on the diversified evaluation sheet 10 are collected and tabulated by a third party including external company counseling. The total points for each evaluation item and the total total points for all evaluation items are used as the totaling results. Such tallying can be performed quickly and accurately, for example, by creating the multi-dimensional evaluation sheet 10 in a well-known mark sheet system or by making full use of a computer. An example using a computer will be described later.

The result of the tally is transmitted only to the person to be evaluated, for example, but not to the supervisor or anyone else. Therefore, the person himself / herself does not know at all how the other person's evaluation is made, as well as the result of counting others. FIG.
The self-evaluation performed on the sheet 25 shown in FIG. Use it to review yourself by comparing it to the ratings of others.

By carefully reviewing the results of the self-evaluation, the evaluator can objectively clarify which evaluation items are longer and shorter and which work environment they are suitable for. And it is a chance to increase motivation by thinking about what to do to grow as a human being and a working person.

In a company, evaluations using the above-described diversified evaluation sheets are periodically performed, and as a result of totaling, total points for each individual for each evaluation item and total points for each individual for the evaluation items are obtained. By selecting the best 10 people, publishing their names and honoring them as appropriate,
Human resources can also be activated.

Also, the third party who has compiled the data shows how the person concerned with the evaluator evaluates the boss, colleagues, and subordinates in their respective positions, or how the evaluation varies. It is also possible to perform analysis using a computer from another point of view, such as whether or not the data is used, and use the data as data for personnel evaluation of a company.

[Application Example] As described above, the present invention is applied to a case where there is a human relationship such as “boss, colleague, subordinate”.
They can be used for mutual evaluation of work abilities.
In the case of a relationship of "teacher, senior student, classmate, junior student", it can be used for, for example, appropriate evaluation of advancement to school or employment.

The principle is as follows. First, two or more types of persons having different types of human relations are mixed in a group. All the members belonging to the group use the diversified evaluation sheets having the same contents. Perform evaluation work with yourself as the evaluator and other people as evaluators. That is, when viewed from the evaluated person, a plurality of persons who are in different positions evaluate using the same evaluation criteria. Since the sheet has a column for simultaneously evaluating a plurality of evaluators, the relative evaluation is inevitably performed while comparing the respective evaluators.

Since evaluations by a plurality of persons having different positions are totaled for one evaluator, the total value of the evaluations becomes more objective. If you can see the evaluations from multiple people in different positions, you can self-evaluate from multiple perspectives. Each evaluator
Since a plurality of evaluated persons are evaluated simultaneously while comparing them, the relative evaluation increases the objectivity. Because it is a relative evaluation, for example, when looking at the evaluation results of a certain evaluator, if the evaluation of a specific evaluator is extremely low, there is a possibility that some prejudice is included,
It can also be excluded from counting.

In a method in which a plurality of persons become evaluators and evaluate a specific evaluator while exchanging opinions with each other, the opinion of one evaluator may influence the opinion of another evaluator. . In this case, an appropriate evaluation result cannot always be obtained. On the other hand, the result of one evaluator evaluating multiple evaluators by focusing on the same evaluation item,
There is little room for prejudice or prejudice.

In the above example, the evaluators are classified and totalized by focusing on the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator. The relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator can be such as the relationship of the post in the company organization, the relationship between the department and the school, the relationship between the teacher and the friend, and the relationship between the parent and the child. The object of the present invention can be attained by the fact that the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator is not the same. That is, those who have different angles to view the evaluated person become the evaluator and perform a comprehensive evaluation.

Further, how to evaluate the evaluated person,
The selection of evaluation items is optional. According to the present invention, a person having an arbitrary relationship with the evaluated person collects and analyzes the evaluation results of predetermined evaluation items when the evaluated person is viewed from a unique angle. For this reason, having the evaluator declare the relationship with the evaluator facilitates data processing. For example, the evaluator is the boss of the evaluator, and if the relationship, such as being an alumni or a relative, is clear, the evaluators with similar relationships are selected and the evaluation results are totaled. Then, a highly reliable evaluation from that angle becomes possible.

In any case, it is preferable that a large number of evaluators are included so that the evaluator cannot be identified from the evaluated person. As a result, the evaluator does not need to know the contents of the evaluation by the evaluated person, and thus the evaluator can perform the evaluation without reserve. For this reason, it is preferable to execute a process of collecting and counting evaluation materials by a computer, and, for example, when the evaluator having a specific relationship is one, devising the handling of the evaluation result. For example, if one or several computers operated by the evaluator accept the entry on the diversified evaluation sheet and execute all the tallying processing by a computer program, the evaluator's name is hidden and only the tallying result is displayed. It is possible to notify the evaluator and the administrator.

Furthermore, as the number of evaluators who evaluate from the same angle increases, the reliability of the evaluation result from that angle increases.
For this reason, it is preferable to conduct a wide-ranging survey in which the evaluator includes not only a narrow area such as the department to which the evaluator belongs but also a person in another department if the person who knows the evaluator. For a large company,
It takes a lot of trouble to distribute and collect questionnaires. Therefore, for example, it is practical to execute a company-wide survey using a network as follows.

[Example of Network Use] FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a specific example of the system of the present invention. In FIG. 3, a network 50 is any type of information communication network such as the Internet, an intranet (LAN, WAN), a telephone network, or the like. It can be a wired network or a wireless network. Network 50
Is connected to the server 51 and the terminal devices 52 of all employees. The terminal device 52 is a personal computer, a mobile computer, a mobile phone terminal, a general telephone terminal, or any other communication terminal having an information processing function and a communication function. Each terminal device 52 may be shared by a plurality of employees.

The server 51 is provided with a storage device 55 and an arithmetic processing device 56. The storage device 55 stores a diversified evaluation sheet 61, a personnel database 62, and an evaluation result database 63. The arithmetic processing unit 56 is provided with evaluation sheet processing means 65 and 66. The multilateral evaluation sheet 61 is web data for displaying an evaluation sheet input screen as described later. The personnel database 62 contains a multi-faceted evaluation sheet 6
1 and is used for generation processing and management of the evaluation result database 63. The evaluation result database 63 is a database of the data of the multilateral evaluation sheet 61 that has been input by the evaluator.

The evaluation sheet processing means 65 and the evaluation result processing means 66 are computer programs to be executed by the computer of the server 51. Evaluation sheet processing means 65
Has a function of displaying the multi-dimensional evaluation sheet 61 on the terminal device 52 to acquire the evaluation result, and executing a process of writing the evaluation result database 63. The evaluation result processing means 66 has a function of totalizing and outputting the evaluation results written in the evaluation result database 63.

In the following embodiment, mutual evaluation is performed for all members of a certain company. The evaluator is all employees belonging to the company. The evaluator is any employee who knows the evaluator.
Evaluation sheets are distributed to all employees. Specifically, the evaluation sheet shown in FIG. 1 is displayed on the terminal device 52 operated by the evaluator, so that data can be input. Each evaluator sequentially selects the employees that he or she knows, enters the relationship with the evaluator, and fills in the evaluation of that person.
When the numerical value of the evaluation value is selected and clicked, the color of the numerical value changes from black to blue, and the selection may be clearly indicated. Of course, you can use the drop-down list. Evaluators do not have to evaluate employees they do not know. Leave your evaluation box blank. For a given evaluator, for example, 2 out of 4 evaluation items in the example of FIG.
Sometimes one item does not have enough information to be evaluated. In that case, the evaluation item need not be evaluated.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operation of the system of the present invention. The computer determines in step S1
The diversified evaluation sheet 61 is uploaded to the storage device 55. It is assumed that the multilateral evaluation sheet 61 has been created in advance using the personnel database 62. In the case where the multilateral evaluation sheet 61 has a fixed format as shown in FIG. 1 and the evaluation is periodically executed, the evaluation sheet processing means 65 refers to the personnel database 62 and performs the evaluation. The multilateral evaluation sheet 61 may be automatically generated each time. In step S2, a notification is sent to all employees by e-mail to request cooperation. In step S3 and subsequent steps, the input operation of the diversified evaluation sheet 61 displayed on the terminal device 52 is started. In step S3, the diversified evaluation sheet 61 is downloaded from the server 51 to the terminal device 52.

In step S4, the evaluator section 2 shown in FIG.
At 0, the employee number or the like of the evaluator is input. This completes the input preparation. In step S5, a person to be evaluated is selected in order from the top of the sheet, and a corresponding evaluation value is clicked.
When the input operation is completed, the evaluation sheet processing means 65 acquires the input data in step S6 and transfers the input data to the evaluation result database 63. Thereafter, in step S7, the evaluation result processing means 66 totalizes the evaluation results. Step S8
Then, the evaluation result is converted into a data file for each evaluated person, and is added to the evaluation result database 63. In step S9, the evaluation result is sent to each evaluator by e-mail, facsimile, or letter.

[Evaluation Results] FIG. 5 is a plan view showing an example of evaluation results distributed to each evaluated person. As shown in FIG. 5, for each evaluation item, a value obtained by totaling and taking an average value,
The ranking of comparison with the evaluation values of all evaluators is displayed. In addition, for example, evaluation results of things that are different from the evaluated person, such as a boss, a colleague, and a subordinate, are distinguished and counted, and each is displayed. This allows you to recognize how you are viewed from different perspectives. For example, when there is only one boss for the evaluated person, it may be inconvenient if the evaluation value is directly presented. In this case, it is advisable to combine the evaluation values of the boss and the colleague or to not notify the boss of the evaluation value. In addition, in the case of using for personnel evaluation, it is preferable that an output including a list of each evaluation value and a relative ranking is obtained for all the members. For example, when the conventional pyramid-type management system does not fit into the actual situation and even a direct supervisor cannot control a subordinate, if the above evaluation results are used, all persons who have some relationship with the evaluator can be used. The result of the evaluation is incorporated into the personnel evaluation, so that accurate and objective evaluation can be performed. If a direct reporter works around a sales office or travels abroad, the evaluation will be made by a salesperson or branch office worker who has a lot of contact with his / her subordinate. May be able to evaluate accurately.

The method of outputting the evaluation result is arbitrary. The total value of the evaluation points as described above may be output, or an average value obtained by dividing the total value of the evaluation points by the number of evaluators may be output for each evaluation item. There is also effective information other than the evaluation points. For example, if two evaluators are compared, and the number of evaluators is 5 for one evaluator and 20 for the other evaluator,
It can be said that the latter evaluator has a wider human relationship in the organization. He is also active as a member of various groups and teams, and has a wide range of insights. Therefore, the number of evaluators is also important information in determining the qualities of the evaluator.
Therefore, it is preferable to include information on the number of evaluators in the output.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a plan view of one embodiment of a diversified evaluation sheet of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a plan view showing a self-preserving sheet of the diversified evaluation sheet 10. FIG.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a specific example of the system of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operation of the system of the present invention.

FIG. 5 is a plan view showing an example of evaluation results distributed to each evaluator.

[Explanation of symbols] 10. Multi-faceted evaluation sheet 11 Reference number 12 Number column 13 Name of evaluator 14 Name column 15 Relationship column 16 Evaluation items 17 Information for selecting an evaluation 18 Evaluation column 19 Evaluation point explanation column 20 Evaluator column 21 sign

Claims (7)

[Claims] 1. A multifaceted evaluation sheet comprising the following items 1 to 4 filled out by an evaluator. 1 Evaluator column for entering information specifying the evaluator 2 Name column for entering a plurality of evaluators 3 Relationship column for entering the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator 4 To evaluate the evaluator An evaluation column for filling in a common evaluation item for the plurality of evaluated persons and an evaluation result for the evaluation item 2. The multifaceted evaluation sheet according to claim 1, wherein the relation column indicates a relation between the evaluator and the evaluator.
A multifaceted evaluation sheet, which is a column in which information indicating whether the evaluator and the evaluator belong to an up-down relation or an equal relation in an organization to which the evaluator belongs is entered. 3. The multifaceted evaluation sheet according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation items are “discipline”, “responsibility”,
Including “cooperation” and “positiveness”, information for selecting an evaluation point for each of the evaluation items is entered in the evaluation column for each of the evaluation items. Evaluation sheet for 4. The multilateral evaluation sheet according to claim 3, wherein the evaluation point is an arbitrary numerical value weighted by the evaluation item. 5. A multi-faced evaluation sheet including the following columns 1 to 4 filled out by an evaluator is distributed to a plurality of evaluators having different relations between the evaluator and the evaluator, and For each evaluator, evaluation results having the same or similar relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator are totaled, and an evaluation result group is created in which each evaluator is viewed from a plurality of angles. Evaluator's multifaceted evaluation method. 1 Evaluator column for entering information specifying the evaluator 2 Name column for entering a plurality of evaluators 3 Relationship column for entering the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator 4 To evaluate the evaluator And an evaluation column for entering evaluation items common to the evaluated persons in the number of wards and evaluation results for the evaluation items 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the evaluation result group includes a relationship between the evaluator and the evaluatee, and a total value of the evaluation results. A multi-faceted evaluation method for the evaluated person, which does not include individual evaluation results of the evaluated persons. 7. A process of displaying, on a plurality of evaluators having different relationships between the evaluator and the evaluator, a multilateral evaluation sheet including the following columns 1 to 4 filled in by the evaluator: For each evaluator, a process of summing up evaluation results having the same or similar relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator, generating and outputting an evaluation result group in which each evaluator is viewed from a plurality of angles, and A computer program for diversified evaluation of a person to be evaluated, characterized by causing a computer to execute the following. 1 Evaluator column for entering information specifying the evaluator 2 Name column for entering a plurality of evaluators 3 Relationship column for entering the relationship between the evaluator and the evaluator 4 To evaluate the evaluator And an evaluation column for entering evaluation items common to the evaluated persons in the number of wards and evaluation results for the evaluation items