JP2003334715A - Taper end mill for machining rib groove - Google Patents

Taper end mill for machining rib groove

Info

Publication number
JP2003334715A
JP2003334715A JP2003064259A JP2003064259A JP2003334715A JP 2003334715 A JP2003334715 A JP 2003334715A JP 2003064259 A JP2003064259 A JP 2003064259A JP 2003064259 A JP2003064259 A JP 2003064259A JP 2003334715 A JP2003334715 A JP 2003334715A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
flank
taper
degrees
end mill
rib groove
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2003064259A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Takeshi Akamatsu
猛史 赤松
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Moldino Tool Engineering Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Tool Engineering Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Tool Engineering Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Tool Engineering Ltd
Priority to JP2003064259A priority Critical patent/JP2003334715A/en
Publication of JP2003334715A publication Critical patent/JP2003334715A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a taper end mill for machining a rib groove for obtaining the excellent taper accuracy of a rib groove, for example, with straightness of 0.01 mm or less and an average taper angle of ±0.15 degrees or less relative to a reference taper angle. <P>SOLUTION: This taper end mill for machining a rib groove has two or more tapered outer blades. A first flank and a second flank are provided backward in a tool rotative direction from the edge line of the outer blade. A first clearance angel of the first flank is set to 0.5 degrees or more and 7 degrees or less, and a second clearance angle of the second flank is set to 10 degrees or more and 20 degrees or less. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2004,JPO

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本願発明は、マシニングセンタ等
の工作機械を使用して用い、リブ溝の加工に使用される
リブ溝加工用テーパエンドミルの改良に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an improvement in a taper end mill for machining a rib groove which is used for machining a rib groove by using a machine tool such as a machining center.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】リブ溝加工は、1回当たりの工具軸方向
切り込みが0.02mmから0.1mm程度の微少な切
り込みで数十回〜数百回に分けて所定の深さまで仕上げ
る加工法であり、側面切削やポケット加工と異なり工具
は両側で拘束された状態で加工が行われ、極端に切り屑
の排出性が悪い状態で加工することになる。このような
リブ溝加工を行う工具としては、切削中、エンドミルに
たおれやビビリ振動が発生するため、剛性が弱くなれば
それだけ、振動が大きくなり加工ワ−クの被切削面に影
響を及ぼし、強いては、加工面精度が悪くなってしま
う。
2. Description of the Related Art Rib groove machining is a machining method in which a small number of incisions in the axial direction of the tool of 0.02 mm to 0.1 mm are divided into several tens to several hundreds to reach a predetermined depth. Yes, unlike side cutting or pocket machining, the tool is machined in a state in which it is constrained on both sides, resulting in extremely poor chip discharge performance. As a tool for performing such rib groove processing, during cutting, since the end mill experiences sagging and chatter vibrations, the weaker the rigidity, the greater the vibration, which affects the surface to be cut of the machining work. If it is strong, the precision of the machined surface will deteriorate.

【特許文献1】特開2001−310211号公報(第
4頁、図1)
[Patent Document 1] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2001-310211 (page 4, FIG. 1)

【特許文献2】特開平9−29531号公報(第3頁、
図2)
[Patent Document 2] JP-A-9-29531 (page 3,
(Fig. 2)

【特許文献3】特開2000−246532号公報(第
3頁、図3)特許文献1は、工具外径に対する心厚をエ
ンド刃側から刃元側に向かって徐々に大きくし、エンド
ミルの剛性を上げ、特許文献2、特許文献3は、側面切
削用で加工面粗さを良好にするために、逃げ面形状を工
夫している。
[Patent Document 3] Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2000-246532 (page 3, FIG. 3) In Patent Document 1, the core thickness with respect to the outer diameter of the tool is gradually increased from the end blade side toward the blade base side, and the rigidity of the end mill is increased. In Patent Documents 2 and 3, for flank cutting, the flank shape is devised in order to improve the processed surface roughness.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】リブ溝加工において重
要なのは、被切削面はもちろんであるが、それ以上に成
型時の型を抜く精度、即ち、リブ溝の抜け勾配であるテ
−パ精度が最も大きな要素となる。本願発明は、優れた
リブ溝のテーパ精度、例えば、真直度が0.01mm以
内、平均テーパ角度が基準テーパ角度に対して±0.1
5度以内、が得られるリブ溝加工用テーパエンドミルを
課題とする。
What is important in rib groove machining is not only the surface to be cut, but also the precision with which the die is removed during molding, that is, the taper precision, which is the clearance of the rib groove. It will be the biggest factor. The present invention provides excellent rib groove taper accuracy, for example, straightness within 0.01 mm, and average taper angle ± 0.1 with respect to the reference taper angle.
An object is to provide a taper end mill for rib groove processing that can obtain within 5 degrees.

【0004】[0004]

【課題を解決するための手段】本願発明は、リブ溝加工
用テーパエンドミルにおいて、該外周刃は2枚刃以上
で、テーパ状を成し、該外周刃の稜線から工具回転方向
後方に向かって第1逃げ面及び第2逃げ面を設け、該第
1逃げ面の第1逃げ角が0.5度以上7度以下、該第2
逃げ面の第2逃げ角が10度以上20度以下、としたこ
とを特徴とするリブ溝加工用テーパエンドミルである。
According to the present invention, in a taper end mill for rib groove machining, the outer peripheral blade is formed of two or more blades and forms a taper shape, and from the ridgeline of the outer peripheral blade toward the rear in the tool rotation direction. The first flank and the second flank are provided, and the first flank angle of the first flank is 0.5 degrees or more and 7 degrees or less, and the second flank is
The taper end mill for machining a rib groove is characterized in that the second clearance angle of the flank is 10 degrees or more and 20 degrees or less.

【0005】[0005]

【発明の実施の形態】テ−パ状のリブ溝加工を行う場
合、工具は両側で拘束された状態で加工が行われ、通常
の側面切削やポケット加工に比べて極端に切り屑詰まり
が起きやすいため、切り屑の噛み込みが原因で、リブ溝
のテ−パ仕上げ面精度に大きな影響を及ぼす。この要因
としては、逃げ面側に切り屑が付着することにより、切
削中に工具と被削材の間で噛み込みが発生するためであ
り、この現象を防止した。本願発明では、第1逃げ面及
び第2逃げ面を設けることにより、第1逃げ角は比較的
緩く設定されているため、第1逃げ面の後端に第1逃げ
角よりも大きい第2逃げ面を設けることによって被削材
とのクリアランスが増し、切り屑の噛み込みを抑制でき
る。第1逃げ角を0.5度以上7度以下とし、リブ溝の
ような特殊な加工を行う場合、工具刃先の食い付きが良
すぎると、すくい面側への切り屑の流れとともに逃げ面
側に切り屑が流出する。その逃げ面側に流出した切り屑
が溶着し、切り屑の噛み込みによってテーパ精度を大き
く劣化させている。第1逃げ角を小さくすると、切削面
にバニシング効果を与えるとともに、切削中の切り屑が
逃げ面側に流出しにくくなる。第1逃げ角が0.5度よ
り小さくなると、第1逃げ面と被削材のクリアランスが
少なくなりすぎ、第1逃げ面が被削材にこすりつけられ
るため、かえって精度が悪くなり、また第1逃げ角が7
度を越えると、切削中の逃げ面側への切り屑の流出を十
分に抑えることができなくなることから、第1逃げ角を
0.5度以上7度以下とした。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION When a taper-shaped rib groove is machined, the tool is machined in a state in which it is restrained on both sides, and chip clogging occurs extremely as compared with normal side surface cutting and pocket machining. Since it is easy, biting of chips has a great influence on the taper finish surface accuracy of the rib groove. This is because the chips adhere to the flank surface, which causes biting between the tool and the work material during cutting, and this phenomenon was prevented. In the present invention, the first flank and the second flank are provided so that the first flank angle is set to be relatively gentle. Therefore, the second flank larger than the first flank angle at the rear end of the first flank face. By providing the surface, the clearance with the work material is increased, and it is possible to suppress the biting of chips. When the first clearance angle is 0.5 degrees or more and 7 degrees or less and special machining such as a rib groove is performed, if the cutting edge of the tool edge is too good, the flow of chips to the rake surface side and the flank surface side Chips flow out to. The chips that have flowed out to the flank face are welded, and the chips are bitten, which significantly deteriorates the taper accuracy. When the first clearance angle is reduced, a burnishing effect is given to the cutting surface, and chips during cutting are less likely to flow out to the clearance surface side. When the first clearance angle is smaller than 0.5 degree, the clearance between the first flank and the work material becomes too small, and the first flank is rubbed against the work material, so that the accuracy is rather deteriorated. Clearance angle is 7
If it exceeds the degree, it becomes impossible to sufficiently suppress the outflow of chips to the flank side during cutting, so the first clearance angle is set to 0.5 degrees or more and 7 degrees or less.

【0006】第2逃げ角を10度以上20度以下とした
のは、第1逃げ角が小さいことから、わずかに逃げ面側
に流出した切り屑を除去するには、第1逃げ面の後方に
おいて、被削材とのクリアランスを大きくする必要があ
る。第1逃げ面の工具回転方向後方に向かって第2逃げ
面を設け、第2逃げ角を10度以上20度以下としたも
のである。第2逃げ角が10度より小さくなると、逃げ
面側に流出した、わずかな切り屑が十分除去できずに、
工具と被削材の間で噛み込みを起こし、満足のいくテー
パ精度が得られない。第2逃げ角が20度を越えると、
切れ刃のバックメタルが十分確保できず、剛性低下によ
り、ビビリ振動が発生し、被切削面が劣化し、テーパ精
度が得られない。ここで、好ましくは切れ刃の剛性を持
たせるため第2逃げ面はエキセントリック刃付けが望ま
しい。
The reason why the second clearance angle is set to be 10 degrees or more and 20 degrees or less is that the first clearance angle is small. Therefore, in order to remove the chips that slightly flowed out to the clearance surface side, the second clearance angle is set behind the first clearance surface. In, it is necessary to increase the clearance with the work material. A second flank is provided rearward of the first flank in the tool rotation direction, and the second flank angle is set to 10 degrees or more and 20 degrees or less. If the second clearance angle is less than 10 degrees, the small chips that have flowed out to the flank surface cannot be removed sufficiently,
Biting occurs between the tool and the work material, and satisfactory taper accuracy cannot be obtained. When the second clearance angle exceeds 20 degrees,
The back metal of the cutting edge cannot be sufficiently secured, and the rigidity is reduced, which causes chattering vibration, which deteriorates the surface to be cut, and the taper accuracy cannot be obtained. Here, it is preferable to attach an eccentric blade to the second flank in order to impart rigidity to the cutting edge.

【0007】実施態様として、第1逃げ面を中心線平均
面粗さRaで0.3μm以下としても良い。ここで一般
的に面粗さの良否の判断基準としては、最大高さRyが
用いられるが、ここでいう面粗さの良否は、安定した面
であることが重要であり、面粗さの安定性の良否の判断
基準として広く用いられているRaの評価で行うものと
した。第1逃げ面の面粗さRaが0.3μmを越える
と、逃げ面側に流出した一部の切り屑が面の凹凸部分で
滞留し、溶着を引き起こすことで、テーパ精度に悪影響
を及ぼすこととなり、好ましくはRa0.2μm以下が
望ましい。
As an embodiment, the first flank may have a center line average surface roughness Ra of 0.3 μm or less. Here, the maximum height Ry is generally used as a criterion for determining whether the surface roughness is good or bad. However, it is important that the surface roughness is a stable surface. Ra, which is widely used as a criterion of stability, is evaluated. If the surface roughness Ra of the first flank exceeds 0.3 μm, some of the chips that have flowed out to the flank face will stay in the irregularities of the surface and cause welding, adversely affecting the taper accuracy. Therefore, Ra is preferably 0.2 μm or less.

【0008】被覆は、第1逃げ面に、Al、Si、B、
周期律表4a、5a、6a族金属の炭化物、炭窒化物、
窒化物、酸化物、硼化物及び炭化硼素、硬質窒化硼素、
硬質炭素、更にこれらの固溶体又は混合体からなる群の
うちから選ばれた1種以上の硬質被膜を1層以上、0.
2〜10μmの厚みの皮膜を被覆しても良い。皮膜を設
けることにより、逃げ面への切り屑の溶着をさらに改善
できる。また、皮膜を設けると、成膜後蒸着によるドロ
ップレット等により凹凸を生じるため、研磨によりこの
ドロップレット等を除去することが望ましい。除去する
研磨方法としては、磁気研磨方法やショットブラスト処
理、ブラシによるホーニング処理、バフ研磨等、があ
る。
The coating is made of Al, Si, B, on the first flank.
Carbides, carbonitrides of metals of groups 4a, 5a and 6a of the periodic table,
Nitride, oxide, boride and boron carbide, hard boron nitride,
One or more hard coatings selected from the group consisting of hard carbon, and solid solutions or mixtures thereof;
You may coat the film of 2-10 micrometers in thickness. By providing the film, the welding of chips to the flank can be further improved. Further, when a film is provided, since unevenness is caused by droplets or the like formed by vapor deposition after film formation, it is desirable to remove these droplets or the like by polishing. As a polishing method for removing, there are a magnetic polishing method, a shot blasting process, a honing process with a brush, a buffing process and the like.

【0009】エンドミルの先端形状を、エンドコーナ部
にコーナR刃を設けたテーパラジアスエンドミル、エン
ド刃がボール刃であるテーパボールエンドミルとするこ
とで、局部摩耗やチッピングを抑制し、深いリブ溝加工
であっても、安定した切削ができ、良好なテーパ精度を
得ることができる。テーパラジアスエンドミルは、コー
ナRの半径を先端径の5%〜40%が望ましい。以下、
実施例に基づき本発明を具体的に説明する。
The end shape of the end mill is a taper radius end mill having a corner R blade at the end corner and a taper ball end mill having a ball blade as the end blade to suppress local wear and chipping and to form deep rib grooves. Even in this case, stable cutting can be performed and good taper accuracy can be obtained. In the taper radius end mill, the radius of the corner R is preferably 5% to 40% of the tip diameter. Less than,
The present invention will be specifically described based on examples.

【0010】(実施例1)本発明例1は、図1及び図2
に示す、工具母材が超硬合金製の工具先端刃径が1m
m、テ−パ角1が1度、外周刃2の切れ刃稜線から工具
回転方向後方に向かって第1逃げ面3及び第2逃げ面4
を設け、第1逃げ角5が5度、第2逃げ角6が15度
で、第1逃げ面幅7を0.04mm、TiAlNコ−テ
ィングを3μm被覆している。比較のため、本発明例1
と同寸法で、図3、図4に示す逃げ面は第1逃げ面3の
みで第2逃げ面を設けず、第1逃げ角5が15度の従来
例2を、同様に製作、TiAlNコ−ティングを3μm
被覆した。切削試験を行い、テーパ精度、被切削面粗さ
を比較した。テーパ精度は、図5のリブ溝の左側面のテ
ーパ形状を測定し、接触式の輪郭形状測定機で、先端ア
ール半径0.025mmの触針を用いて測定した。切削
諸元は、被削材に硬さがHRC38のプリハ−ドン鋼を
用い、回転数20000min−1、送り速度500m
m/min、切り込み量は工具軸方向に0.02mm/
回とし、水溶性の切削液を用いて湿式により行った。往
復リブ溝切削の形状は、図5に示すように底の幅が1m
mで深さが12mm、リブ溝のテーパ角8が1度の止ま
り溝であり、工具軸方向ステップ回数600回で加工を
行った。その結果、本発明例1は加工中も安定した加工
ができ、図6に示すように、基準テーパ角度であるテー
パ角1度の基準線9に対してほぼ重なるように測定線1
0が得られ、テーパ精度は、真直度が0.004mm、
平均テ−パ角度11が0.95度、即ち角度差で−0.
05度であり、被切削面粗さはRyで0.8μmと小さ
かった。従来例2は切削途中でビビリ振動が発生し、図
7に示すように、測定線10が基準線9より離れ、階段
状であり、テーパ精度は、真直度が0.032mm、平
均テ−パ角度11が0.6度、即ち角度差で−0.4
度、工具軸方向の被切削面粗さがRyで2.5μm、と
なった。
(Embodiment 1) The first embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIGS.
Tool tip material made of cemented carbide as shown in Fig. 1 has a tool tip blade diameter of 1 m
m, the taper angle 1 degree, the first flank 3 and the second flank 4 from the cutting edge ridge of the outer peripheral blade 2 toward the rear in the tool rotation direction.
The first clearance angle 5 is 5 degrees, the second clearance angle 6 is 15 degrees, the first clearance surface width 7 is 0.04 mm, and the TiAlN coating is 3 μm. For comparison, Example 1 of the present invention
3 and 4, the flanks shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 are only the first flanks 3 and the second flanks are not provided, and the first flank angle 5 is 15 degrees. − 3 μm
Coated. A cutting test was performed to compare the taper accuracy and the surface roughness of the cut surface. The taper accuracy was measured by measuring the taper shape of the left side surface of the rib groove in FIG. 5 and using a contact type contour shape measuring instrument and a stylus having a radius of tip radius of 0.025 mm. As for the cutting specifications, a pre-hardon steel having a hardness of HRC38 was used as a work material, the rotation speed was 20000 min −1 , and the feed rate was 500 m
m / min, depth of cut 0.02 mm / in the axial direction of the tool
The test was carried out by a wet method using a water-soluble cutting fluid. The shape of the reciprocating rib groove cutting is, as shown in Fig. 5, the width of the bottom is 1 m.
The depth was 12 mm, the taper angle 8 of the rib groove was a blind groove of 1 degree, and machining was performed with 600 tool axis step steps. As a result, Example 1 of the present invention can perform stable machining even during machining, and as shown in FIG. 6, the measurement line 1 is substantially overlapped with the reference line 9 having a taper angle of 1 degree, which is the reference taper angle.
0 was obtained, and the taper accuracy was straightness 0.004 mm,
The average taper angle 11 is 0.95 degrees, that is, the difference in angle is −0.
The surface roughness to be cut was Ry as small as 0.8 μm. In Conventional Example 2, chatter vibration occurs during cutting, the measurement line 10 is separated from the reference line 9 and has a stepped shape, as shown in FIG. Angle 11 is 0.6 degrees, that is, -0.4 in terms of angle difference
The surface roughness to be cut in the tool axis direction was Ry of 2.5 μm.

【0011】(実施例2)本発明例1と同仕様で、第1
逃げ角がそれぞれ、比較例3として0度、比較例4とし
て0.3度、本発明例5として0.5度、本発明例6と
して1度、本発明例7として3度、本発明例8として7
度、比較例9として9度、比較例10として11度であ
る9種類のリブ溝加工用テーパエンドミルを製作し、切
削試験を行った。切削諸元は、被削材に炭素鋼のS50
Cを用い、回転数20000min 、送り速度50
0mm/min、切り込み量は工具軸方向に0.02m
m/回とし、水溶性の切削液を用いて湿式による往復リ
ブ溝切削を行い、実施例1同様に評価した。その結果、
本発明例1及び5〜8は、安定した加工であり、テーパ
精度は、真直度がいずれも0.008mm以下、角度差
−0.02度〜−0.1度の範囲で高精度な仕上がり精
度を示し、被切削面も良好であった。比較例3、4は、
第1逃げ面と被削材の間にクリアランスがない、もしく
は非常に少ないため、切削面がこすれた状態となり、そ
の影響でテーパ精度が、真直度は0.01mm以下と良
好であったが、角度差が−0.25度〜−0.3度と劣
った。比較例9、10は、加工後、第1逃げ面に溶着が
みられ、テーパ精度は、真直度0.024〜0.026
mm、角度差−0.2度〜−0.3度と劣った。
(Embodiment 2) The first embodiment has the same specifications as the first embodiment of the present invention.
The clearance angle is 0 degree for Comparative Example 3, 0.3 degree for Comparative Example 4, 0.5 degree for Invention Example 5, 1 degree for Invention Example 6, 3 degrees for Invention Example 7, and Invention Example. 8 as 7
, 9 degrees for Comparative Example 9 and 11 degrees for Comparative Example 10, nine types of taper end mills for rib groove processing were manufactured and a cutting test was conducted. The cutting specifications are S50 of carbon steel as the work material.
C, rotation speed 20000 min - 1 , feed rate 50
0mm / min, depth of cut is 0.02m in tool axial direction
Reciprocating rib groove cutting was carried out by a wet method using a water-soluble cutting fluid at m / times, and the same evaluation as in Example 1 was performed. as a result,
Inventive Examples 1 and 5 to 8 are stable processing, and the taper accuracy is a highly accurate finish in the range of straightness of 0.008 mm or less and angle difference of -0.02 degrees to -0.1 degrees. The accuracy was shown and the surface to be cut was also good. Comparative Examples 3 and 4
Since there is no clearance between the first flank and the work material, or there is very little clearance, the cutting surface is rubbed, and the taper accuracy is good because the straightness is 0.01 mm or less due to the effect. The angle difference was inferior at -0.25 degrees to -0.3 degrees. In Comparative Examples 9 and 10, welding was observed on the first flank after processing, and the taper accuracy was straightness 0.024 to 0.026.
mm, the angle difference was inferior to -0.2 degrees to -0.3 degrees.

【0012】(実施例3)本発明例1と同仕様で、第2
逃げ角がそれぞれ、比較例11として8度、本発明例1
2として10度、本発明例13として12度、本発明例
14として14度、本発明例15として16度、本発明
例16として18度、本発明例17として20度、比較
例18として22度の8種類のエンドミルを製作し、実
施例2と同様の切削試験及び評価を行った。その結果、
本発明例12〜17のエンドミルは加工も安定し、被切
削面も良好であり、テーパ精度は、真直度0.008m
m以下、角度差−0.02度〜−0.1度の範囲で高精
度な仕上がり精度を示した。比較例11は、切削後、第
1逃げ面及び第2逃げ面に溶着物が確認され、テーパ精
度は、真直度0.015mm、角度差−0.2度と劣っ
た。比較例18は、ビビリ・振動を生じ、微小チッピン
グがみられ、テーパ精度は真直度0.018mm、角度
差−0.3度となった。
(Embodiment 3) The second embodiment has the same specifications as the first embodiment of the present invention.
The clearance angle is 8 degrees as Comparative Example 11 and the invention example 1
2 as 10 degrees, invention example 13 as 12 degrees, invention example 14 as 14 degrees, invention example 15 as 16 degrees, invention example 16 as 18 degrees, invention example 17 as 20 degrees, and comparative example 18 as 22 degrees. 8 types of end mills were manufactured, and the same cutting test and evaluation as in Example 2 were performed. as a result,
The end mills of Inventive Examples 12 to 17 are stable in processing, have a good surface to be cut, and have a taper accuracy of 0.008 m in straightness.
High-precision finishing accuracy was shown in the range of m or less and the angle difference of −0.02 degrees to −0.1 degrees. In Comparative Example 11, after cutting, deposits were confirmed on the first flank and the second flank, and the taper accuracy was inferior with a straightness of 0.015 mm and an angle difference of −0.2 degrees. In Comparative Example 18, chattering / vibration was generated, minute chipping was observed, and the taper accuracy was a straightness of 0.018 mm and an angle difference of −0.3 degrees.

【0013】(実施例4)本発明例1と同仕様で、第1
逃げ面の面粗さがRa0.2μmの本発明例1ととも
に、研削砥石の砥粒の粒度を変えることにより、第1逃
げ面の面粗さがRaでそれぞれ、本発明例19として
0.15μm、本発明例20として0.3μm、本発明
例21として0.5μmの4種類のエンドミルを製作
し、実施例2と同様の切削試験及び評価を行った。その
結果、本発明例1及び本発明例19、20はテーパ精度
が真直度0.003〜0.007mm、角度差−0.0
7度〜−0.03度と非常に良好な結果を示し、被切削
面粗さも良好であり、特に本発明例1及び本発明例19
は真直度が0.005mm以下と良好であった。本発明
例21は、第1逃げ面に若干溶着の後がみられ、テーパ
精度は真直度0.009mm、角度差−0.12度と若
干劣る結果となった。
(Embodiment 4) The first embodiment has the same specifications as the first embodiment of the present invention.
By changing the grain size of the abrasive grains of the grinding wheel together with Invention Example 1 in which the flank surface has a surface roughness Ra of 0.2 μm, the surface roughness of the first flank surface is Ra and is 0.15 μm in Invention Example 19 respectively. Four types of end mills of 0.3 μm as Inventive Example 20 and 0.5 μm as Inventive Example 21 were manufactured, and the same cutting test and evaluation as in Example 2 were performed. As a result, in Inventive Example 1 and Inventive Examples 19 and 20, the taper accuracy is a straightness of 0.003 to 0.007 mm and an angle difference of −0.0.
It shows a very good result of 7 degrees to -0.03 degrees, and the surface roughness to be cut is also good, and particularly, the present invention example 1 and the present invention example 19
Has a good straightness of 0.005 mm or less. In Inventive Example 21, a slight amount of welding was found on the first flank, and the taper accuracy was slightly inferior with a straightness of 0.009 mm and an angle difference of −0.12 degrees.

【0014】(実施例5)本発明例22として、本発明
例1と同様のエンドミルを製作し、その後、ショットブ
ラストにより研磨処理を施したものを用いて、実施例2
と同様の切削試験を行った。その結果、本発明例22
は、切削後の逃げ面には全く溶着物はみられず、テーパ
精度は真直度0.002mm、角度差−0.01度と非
常に優れ、被切削面粗さもRyで0.3μmと本発明例
1と比較しても良好な結果となった。
(Embodiment 5) As Embodiment 22 of the present invention, an end mill similar to that of Embodiment 1 of the present invention was manufactured, and then subjected to polishing treatment by shot blasting.
The same cutting test was performed. As a result, Example 22 of the present invention
Shows no deposits on the flank surface after cutting, has a taper accuracy of 0.002 mm, an angle difference of -0.01 degrees, and has an excellent surface roughness of Ry of 0.3 μm. Even when compared with Invention Example 1, good results were obtained.

【0015】(実施例6)本発明例23として、図8に
示す本発明例1と同仕様で、エンドミルの先端のエンド
コーナ部に半径0.2mmのコーナR刃を設けたテーパ
ラジアスエンドミルを製作した。本発明例24として、
図9に示す本発明例1と同仕様で、エンド刃がボール刃
であるテーパボールエンドミルも製作した。本発明例2
3、24を実施例1と同様の切削試験及び評価を行っ
た。その結果、本発明例23、24は、本発明例1と比
較して更に安定した切削状態であり、本発明例23は、
図10に示すようにテーパ精度が真直度0.002m
m、角度差−0.02度と非常に優れ、被切削面粗さも
Ryで0.3μmと良好であった。
(Example 6) As Example 23 of the present invention, a taper radius end mill having the same specifications as Example 1 of the present invention shown in FIG. 8 and having a corner R blade with a radius of 0.2 mm at the end corner portion of the end of the end mill is provided. I made it. As Example 24 of the present invention,
A tapered ball end mill having the same specifications as those of Example 1 of the present invention shown in FIG. Invention Example 2
The same cutting test and evaluation as in Example 1 were performed on Nos. 3 and 24. As a result, the invention examples 23 and 24 are in a more stable cutting state as compared with the invention example 1, and the invention example 23 is
As shown in FIG. 10, the taper accuracy is a straightness of 0.002 m.
m, the angle difference was −0.02 degrees, and the surface roughness to be cut was Ry as good as 0.3 μm.

【0016】(実施例7)本発明例25として、本発明
例1と同仕様で刃長が20mmのもの、本発明例26〜
30として、本発明例23と同仕様で刃長が20mm、
コーナR刃の半径が各々0.05mm、0.1mm、
0.2mm、0.3mm、0.4mmのものを製作し、
切削試験及び評価を行った。切削諸元は被削材に硬さが
HRC38のプリハ−ドン鋼を用い、回転数16000
min−1、テーブル送り速度500mm/min、切
り込み量は工具軸方向に0.016mm/回とし、水溶
性の切削液を用いて、リブ溝の深さが20mm、即ち、
工具軸方向ステップ回数1250回で止まり溝の往復リ
ブ溝切削を行った。その結果、本発明例25は被切削面
に若干のビビリがみられ、テーパ精度は真直度0.01
mm、角度差−0.14度となり、試験終了後のエンド
コーナ部には微小チッピング、局部摩耗が認められた。
本発明例26〜30はビビリ面も全くみられず、本発明
例27〜29は、テーパ精度が真直度0.003mm〜
0.005mm、角度差−0.04度〜−0.07度と
極めて良好なテーパ精度が得られた。本発明例26は、
切削試験終了後のエンドコーナ部に局部摩耗が僅かに認
められ、本発明例30は、切削試験中の切削抵抗が若干
大きく、テーパ精度も、本発明例27〜29と比較して
若干劣る結果となった。
(Embodiment 7) Inventive Example 25 has the same specifications as Inventive Example 1 and a blade length of 20 mm.
No. 30, with the same specifications as Example 23 of the present invention, the blade length is 20 mm,
The radius of the corner R blade is 0.05 mm, 0.1 mm,
Manufacture 0.2mm, 0.3mm, 0.4mm,
A cutting test and evaluation were performed. The cutting data used was prehardened steel with a hardness of HRC38 as the work material, and the rotation speed was 16000.
min -1 , table feed speed 500 mm / min, cutting depth 0.016 mm / turn in the axial direction of the tool, and using a water-soluble cutting fluid, the depth of the rib groove is 20 mm, that is,
The reciprocating rib groove of the blind groove was cut at 1250 times in the tool axial direction. As a result, in Invention Example 25, a slight chattering was observed on the surface to be cut, and the taper accuracy was a straightness of 0.01.
mm, the angle difference was -0.14 degrees, and minute chipping and local wear were observed at the end corners after the test.
In the invention examples 26 to 30, no chattering surface was observed at all, and in the invention examples 27 to 29, the taper accuracy was 0.003 mm in straightness.
A very good taper accuracy of 0.005 mm and an angle difference of −0.04 degrees to −0.07 degrees was obtained. Inventive Example 26,
A small amount of local wear was observed in the end corner portion after the cutting test, the invention sample 30 had a slightly larger cutting resistance during the cutting test, and the taper accuracy was slightly inferior to the invention examples 27 to 29. Became.

【0017】[0017]

【発明の効果】本発明を適用することにより、真直度が
0.01mm以内で±0.15度以内という優れたリブ
溝のテーパ精度が得られるリブ溝加工用テーパエンドミ
ルを提供することが可能となった。
EFFECTS OF THE INVENTION By applying the present invention, it is possible to provide a taper end mill for rib groove machining which can obtain an excellent taper accuracy of rib groove with a straightness within 0.01 mm and within ± 0.15 degrees. Became.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】図1は、本発明例1の側面図を示す。FIG. 1 shows a side view of Example 1 of the present invention.

【図2】図2は、図1の刃部の軸直角断面を示す。FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the blade of FIG.

【図3】図3は、従来例2の側面図を示す。FIG. 3 shows a side view of Conventional Example 2.

【図4】図4は、図3の刃部の軸直角断面を示す。FIG. 4 shows a cross-section perpendicular to the axis of the blade of FIG.

【図5】図5は、加工形状を説明する。FIG. 5 illustrates a processed shape.

【図6】図6は、本発明例1のテスト結果を示す。FIG. 6 shows the test results of Example 1 of the present invention.

【図7】図7は、従来例2のテスト結果を示す。FIG. 7 shows test results of Conventional Example 2.

【図8】図8は、本発明例23の側面図を示す。FIG. 8 shows a side view of Example 23 of the present invention.

【図9】図9は、本発明例24の側面図を示す。FIG. 9 shows a side view of Example 24 of the present invention.

【図10】図10は、本発明例23のテスト結果を示
す。
FIG. 10 shows the test results of Inventive Example 23.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1:テ−パ角 2:外周刃 3:第1逃げ面 4:第2逃げ面 5:第1逃げ角 6:第2逃げ角 7:第1逃げ面幅 8:リブ溝のテーパ角 9:基準線 10:測定線 11:平均テーパ角度 1: taper angle 2: Peripheral blade 3: First flank 4: Second flank 5: First clearance angle 6: Second clearance angle 7: 1st flank width 8: Rib groove taper angle 9: Reference line 10: Measurement line 11: Average taper angle

Claims (5)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】リブ溝加工用テーパエンドミルにおいて、
該外周刃は2枚刃以上で、テーパ状を成し、該外周刃の
稜線から工具回転方向後方に向かって第1逃げ面及び第
2逃げ面を設け、該第1逃げ面の第1逃げ角が0.5度
以上7度以下、該第2逃げ面の第2逃げ角が10度以上
20度以下、としたことを特徴とするリブ溝加工用テー
パエンドミル。
1. A taper end mill for processing a rib groove,
The outer peripheral blade has two or more blades and forms a taper shape, and a first flank and a second flank are provided from the ridgeline of the outer peripheral blade toward the rear in the tool rotation direction, and the first flank of the first flank is provided. A taper end mill for machining a rib groove, wherein the angle is 0.5 degrees or more and 7 degrees or less, and the second clearance angle of the second flank is 10 degrees or more and 20 degrees or less.
【請求項2】請求項1記載のリブ溝加工用テーパエンド
ミルにおいて、該第1逃げ面が中心線平均面粗さRaで
0.3μm以下であることを特徴とするリブ溝加工用テ
ーパエンドミル。
2. The tapered end mill for rib groove machining according to claim 1, wherein the first flank has a center line average surface roughness Ra of 0.3 μm or less.
【請求項3】請求項1乃至2いずれかに記載のリブ溝加
工用テーパエンドミルにおいて、該第1逃げ面に、A
l、Si、B、周期律表4a、5a、6a族金属の炭化
物、炭窒化物、窒化物、酸化物、硼化物及び炭化硼素、
硬質窒化硼素、硬質炭素、更にこれらの固溶体又は混合
体からなる群のうちから選ばれた1種以上の硬質被膜を
1層以上、0.2〜10μmの厚みの皮膜が被覆されて
いることを特徴するリブ溝加工用テーパエンドミル。
3. The tapered end mill for machining a rib groove according to claim 1, wherein the first flank has A
l, Si, B, carbides, carbonitrides, nitrides, oxides, borides and boron carbides of metals of groups 4a, 5a and 6a of the periodic table,
One or more hard coatings selected from the group consisting of hard boron nitride, hard carbon, and solid solutions or mixtures thereof, and a coating having a thickness of 0.2 to 10 μm. A characteristic taper end mill for rib groove processing.
【請求項4】請求項3記載のリブ溝加工用テーパエンド
ミルにおいて、該皮膜表面にある凹凸を研磨により除去
したことを特徴とするリブ溝加工用テーパエンドミル。
4. The taper end mill for rib groove machining according to claim 3, wherein the irregularities on the coating surface are removed by polishing.
【請求項5】請求項1記載のリブ溝加工用テーパエンド
ミルにおいて、該エンドミルがテーパラジアスエンドミ
ル又はテーパボールエンドミルであることを特徴とする
リブ溝加工用テーパエンドミル。
5. The taper end mill for rib groove machining according to claim 1, wherein the end mill is a taper radius end mill or a taper ball end mill.
JP2003064259A 2002-03-12 2003-03-11 Taper end mill for machining rib groove Pending JP2003334715A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003064259A JP2003334715A (en) 2002-03-12 2003-03-11 Taper end mill for machining rib groove

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002-67384 2002-03-12
JP2002067384 2002-03-12
JP2003064259A JP2003334715A (en) 2002-03-12 2003-03-11 Taper end mill for machining rib groove

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2003334715A true JP2003334715A (en) 2003-11-25

Family

ID=29714046

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2003064259A Pending JP2003334715A (en) 2002-03-12 2003-03-11 Taper end mill for machining rib groove

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2003334715A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005219176A (en) * 2004-02-09 2005-08-18 Nachi Fujikoshi Corp End mill
JP2006015417A (en) * 2004-06-30 2006-01-19 Mitsubishi Materials Kobe Tools Corp End mill
JP2010221397A (en) * 2002-12-26 2010-10-07 Mitsubishi Materials Corp Radius end mill
US20140363251A1 (en) * 2013-06-11 2014-12-11 Thomas M. Dieckilman Beveling / chamfering tool - router head for metal
WO2019244361A1 (en) 2018-06-22 2019-12-26 オーエスジー株式会社 Tapered end mill
JPWO2019017374A1 (en) * 2017-07-18 2020-07-27 株式会社Moldino Rib groove wall machining method and taper end mill

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2010221397A (en) * 2002-12-26 2010-10-07 Mitsubishi Materials Corp Radius end mill
JP2005219176A (en) * 2004-02-09 2005-08-18 Nachi Fujikoshi Corp End mill
JP2006015417A (en) * 2004-06-30 2006-01-19 Mitsubishi Materials Kobe Tools Corp End mill
US20140363251A1 (en) * 2013-06-11 2014-12-11 Thomas M. Dieckilman Beveling / chamfering tool - router head for metal
US9623491B2 (en) * 2013-06-11 2017-04-18 Thomas M. Dieckilman Beveling / chamfering tool—router head for metal
JPWO2019017374A1 (en) * 2017-07-18 2020-07-27 株式会社Moldino Rib groove wall machining method and taper end mill
JP7152673B2 (en) 2017-07-18 2022-10-13 株式会社Moldino Rib groove wall processing method and taper end mill
WO2019244361A1 (en) 2018-06-22 2019-12-26 オーエスジー株式会社 Tapered end mill
KR20210011019A (en) 2018-06-22 2021-01-29 오에스지 가부시키가이샤 Tapered end mill
US11623286B2 (en) 2018-06-22 2023-04-11 Osg Corporation Tapered end mill

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6347258B2 (en) Radius end mill and cutting method
JP2001300813A (en) Ball end mill
US6612786B1 (en) Cutting tool of polycrystalline hard sintered material
JP5088678B2 (en) Long neck radius end mill
WO2012023325A1 (en) Throwaway tip
JP2003311524A (en) Cemented carbide ball end mill
JPH06218613A (en) Solid ball nose tool
JP2005111651A (en) Tip, milling cutter, and machining method using the same
JP5974695B2 (en) Drill and method for manufacturing drill tip
JP5939208B2 (en) Ball end mill
JP2002059314A (en) Machining tool
CN102126109B (en) Method for machining thrust surface of forged steel fillet quenching crankshaft
JP2001212703A (en) Polycrystalline hard sintered cutting tool
JP2003334715A (en) Taper end mill for machining rib groove
JP2006088232A (en) Ball end mill
JP6179165B2 (en) Radius end mill
JP2003175408A (en) Polycrystal hard sintered body throw-away tip
JP5906838B2 (en) Square end mill
JP2003165016A (en) Formed cutter for machining turbine blade mounting part
JP2002254233A (en) Flat drag tip for face milling cutter
JP2013013962A (en) Cbn end mill
JPH11216608A (en) Ball end mill
JP6212863B2 (en) Radius end mill
JP5786770B2 (en) Cutting insert
JP4335593B2 (en) Hard coating coated cutting tool

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20050601

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20050909

A521 Written amendment

Effective date: 20050920

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20060301

A521 Written amendment

Effective date: 20060330

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

A911 Transfer of reconsideration by examiner before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20060512

A912 Removal of reconsideration by examiner before appeal (zenchi)

Effective date: 20060630

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A912