JP2003300083A - Waste water treatment method using iron powder - Google Patents
Waste water treatment method using iron powderInfo
- Publication number
- JP2003300083A JP2003300083A JP2002107422A JP2002107422A JP2003300083A JP 2003300083 A JP2003300083 A JP 2003300083A JP 2002107422 A JP2002107422 A JP 2002107422A JP 2002107422 A JP2002107422 A JP 2002107422A JP 2003300083 A JP2003300083 A JP 2003300083A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- iron powder
- reaction tank
- tank
- cod
- raw water
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Treatment Of Water By Oxidation Or Reduction (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【０００１】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明はＣＯＤ及び色度除去
に適した廃水処理方法に関し、特に、工場や畜産農場等
から発生する産業廃水の高度処理方法に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a wastewater treatment method suitable for COD and color removal, and more particularly to a method for advanced treatment of industrial wastewater generated from factories, livestock farms and the like.
【０００２】[0002]
【従来技術】廃水のＣＯＤや色度を低下させる方法とし
て、従来から活性炭吸着法、凝集沈殿法、オゾン酸化
法、紫外線酸化法などが知られているが、これらは何れ
もコスト高である。これに対し、コストの安い方法とし
て、第１鉄イオンの存在下で過酸化水素を作用させ、有
機物を酸化分解するフェントン反応法が知られている
（例えば、特開平６−１０６１７３号公報、同６−１８
２３６２号公報、同７−１３６４０８号公報）。このフ
ェントン反応は、Ｆｅ２＋＋Ｈ２Ｏ２→Ｆｅ３＋＋ＯＨ
−＋ＯＨ・の反応によって生じたＯＨ・ラジカルが汚水
中の有機物と反応し、該有機物を酸化分解するものであ
り、ＣＯＤの値に相当する酸素量の１．２〜１．５倍の
過酸化水素（酸素量として）を加えてゆっくり撹拌し、
２〜３時間酸化反応させるものである。尚、上記「酸素
量として」とは有効酸素量を意味し、過酸化水素「Ｈ２
Ｏ２」の場合には、そのうち実際に酸化反応に寄与する
１個の「Ｏ」の量を意味する。2. Description of the Related Art Activated carbon adsorption method, coagulation-sedimentation method, ozone oxidation method, ultraviolet oxidation method and the like have been conventionally known as methods for reducing COD and chromaticity of waste water, but all of them are expensive. On the other hand, as a low cost method, a Fenton reaction method in which hydrogen peroxide is allowed to act in the presence of ferrous ions to oxidatively decompose organic matter is known (for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 6-106173, the same. 6-18
2362 and 7-136408). This Fenton reaction is Fe 2+ + H 2 O 2 → Fe 3+ + OH
- + OH OH - radicals generated by the reaction of-reacts with organic matter in sewage, is intended to oxidize and decompose the organic matter, 1.2 to 1.5 times the peroxide oxygen amount corresponding to the value of COD Add hydrogen (as oxygen content) and stir slowly,
The oxidation reaction is carried out for 2 to 3 hours. In addition, the above "as oxygen amount" means an effective oxygen amount, and hydrogen peroxide "H 2
In the case of “O 2 ”, it means the amount of one “O” that actually contributes to the oxidation reaction.
【０００３】即ち、従来のフェントン反応処理の概念は
図１に示され、反応槽、中和槽、沈殿槽では下記
の作業がなされる。
反応槽
・滞留時間が数十分〜数時間となる流量で原水を流入さ
せる。
・第一鉄イオン（硫酸第一鉄など）を、ＣＯＤ濃度に応
じ５０〜５０００ｍｇ／ｌの範囲で添加する。
・原水のＣＯＤ量に対して０．１〜２倍の過酸化水素
（酸素量として）を添加する。
・硫酸（又はそれに変わるｐＨ調整剤）を注入し、ｐＨ
を２〜５に調節する。
中和槽
・苛性ソーダ（又はそれに変わるｐＨ調整剤）を添加し
ｐＨが６〜８となる迄中和し、沈殿物を生成させる。
・必要な場合には高分子凝集剤などの凝集剤を添加す
る。中和槽後に凝集剤を添加する凝集槽を設置すること
もある。
沈殿槽
・中和槽で生成した沈殿物と上澄み水を分離する。上澄
み水は処理水として流出させ、沈殿物は余剰汚泥として
排出する。That is, the concept of the conventional Fenton reaction treatment is shown in FIG. 1, and the following operations are performed in a reaction tank, a neutralization tank and a precipitation tank. Raw water is flowed in at a flow rate such that the reaction tank / residence time is several tens of minutes to several hours. -Add ferrous ions (such as ferrous sulfate) in the range of 50 to 5000 mg / l depending on the COD concentration. -Add 0.1 to 2 times the hydrogen peroxide (as oxygen amount) to the COD amount of raw water.・ Inject sulfuric acid (or pH adjuster that changes to it) to adjust pH
Is adjusted to 2-5. Neutralization tank ・ Add caustic soda (or a pH adjuster to change it) and neutralize until the pH becomes 6 to 8 to form a precipitate. -If necessary, add a flocculant such as a polymer flocculant. A coagulation tank for adding a coagulant may be installed after the neutralization tank. Separate the precipitate produced in the settling tank / neutralization tank from the supernatant water. The supernatant water is discharged as treated water, and the sediment is discharged as excess sludge.
【０００４】しかしながら、これらのフェントン反応を
利用した処理の場合でも、比較的高濃度の有機性廃水の
場合には、使用する過酸化水素水、鉄塩、その他の使用
薬剤の消費量が多くなる為に、処理コストが高くなると
いう欠点があった。斯かる欠点は、酸化処理時にアルミ
系化合物を使用することによって改善された（特開平９
−１１６２号公報）が、この場合にはアルミ系化合物を
使用する為に、処理コストの低減は大きなものではなか
った。However, even in the case of these treatments utilizing the Fenton reaction, when the organic wastewater having a relatively high concentration is used, the consumption amount of the hydrogen peroxide solution, iron salt and other chemicals used increases. Therefore, there is a drawback that the processing cost becomes high. Such drawbacks have been ameliorated by using an aluminum-based compound during the oxidation treatment (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. Hei 9 (1999) -96945).
However, since an aluminum compound is used in this case, the reduction in processing cost was not significant.
【０００５】[0005]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】そこで本発明者等は、
更に処理コストを低減させるべく鋭意検討した結果、鉄
イオン原として鉄粉を用いると共に、適当量の酸化剤を
使用した場合には、アルミ系化合物を共存させなくて
も、安価に、排水のＣＯＤ及び色度を低下させることが
出来ることを見出し、本発明に到達した。従って本発明
の目的は、工場や畜産農場等から発生する産業廃水のＣ
ＯＤ及び色度を安価に処理するための方法を提供するこ
とにある。Therefore, the present inventors
As a result of diligent studies to further reduce the treatment cost, when iron powder was used as the iron ion source and an appropriate amount of oxidizing agent was used, COD of the wastewater was obtained inexpensively without coexisting with an aluminum compound. Further, they have found that the chromaticity can be reduced and have reached the present invention. Therefore, the object of the present invention is to provide C for industrial wastewater generated from factories and livestock farms
It is to provide a method for inexpensively processing OD and chromaticity.
【０００６】[0006]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明の上記の目的は、
原水のＣＯＤを低減させる廃水処理方法において、少な
くとも、鉄粉入りの反応槽中に前記原水のＣＯＤ濃度に
対して酸素量として１／２０〜１倍の濃度となるように
酸化剤を添加し、撹拌することを特徴とする、鉄粉を用
いた廃水処理方法によって達成された。上記処理方法に
おいては、ｐＨを２〜５とすることが好ましく、反応槽
中の鉄粉の量は０．２〜５００ｇ／リットルであること
が好ましい。また、酸化剤は過酸化水素であることが好
ましい。The above objects of the present invention are as follows.
In a wastewater treatment method for reducing the COD of raw water, at least an oxidizing agent is added to a reaction tank containing iron powder so that the oxygen concentration is 1/20 to 1 times the COD concentration of the raw water. It was achieved by a wastewater treatment method using iron powder, characterized by stirring. In the above treatment method, the pH is preferably 2 to 5, and the amount of iron powder in the reaction tank is preferably 0.2 to 500 g / liter. Further, the oxidizing agent is preferably hydrogen peroxide.
【０００７】[0007]
【発明の実施の形態】本発明で処理の対象とする排水
は、工場又は畜産農場等から発生する着色した廃水であ
るが、この廃水をそのまま原水として使用しても、ＢＯ
Ｄが高い場合には、活性汚泥処理等によってＢＯＤを低
下させた処理水を原水として使用しても良い。本発明で
使用する鉄粉は、反応槽内で徐々にＦｅ２＋イオンを供
給するものであれば良く、特にその組成が限定されるわ
けではない。槽内の鉄粉量は溶出により徐々に減少する
ので、随時追加して槽内の鉄粉量がほぼ一定となるよう
にする。鉄粉の粒径が小さければ溶解し易いので、反応
槽内中の鉄粉量を少なくすることが出来る。従って、粒
径によっても異なるが、本発明においては反応槽中に鉄
粉を０．２〜５００ｇ／リットル存在させることが好ま
しく、特に１〜５０ｇ／リットル存在させることが好ま
しい。Ｆｅ２＋の溶出量は反応槽内に存在する鉄粉の表
面積に比例するので鉄粉の存在量を増やすことにより反
応時間を短縮し、結果的に反応槽を小型化することも可
能である。BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION The wastewater to be treated in the present invention is colored wastewater generated from factories or livestock farms. Even if this wastewater is used as it is as raw water, BO
When D is high, treated water whose BOD is lowered by treatment with activated sludge may be used as raw water. The iron powder used in the present invention may be any one as long as it gradually supplies Fe 2+ ions in the reaction tank, and the composition thereof is not particularly limited. The amount of iron powder in the tank gradually decreases due to elution, so additional iron powder should be added at any time so that the amount of iron powder in the tank becomes almost constant. If the particle size of the iron powder is small, the iron powder is easily dissolved, so that the amount of iron powder in the reaction tank can be reduced. Therefore, in the present invention, iron powder is preferably present in an amount of 0.2 to 500 g / liter, and particularly preferably 1 to 50 g / liter, although it varies depending on the particle size. Since the elution amount of Fe 2+ is proportional to the surface area of the iron powder existing in the reaction tank, the reaction time can be shortened by increasing the existing amount of the iron powder, and as a result, the reaction tank can be downsized.
【０００８】本発明で使用する酸化剤は、廃水処理に使
用される公知のものの中から適宜選択して使用すること
が出来るが、本発明においては特に過酸化水素を使用す
ることが好ましい。また、その使用量は、原水のＣＯＤ
濃度に対して酸素量として１／２０以上である事が必要
である。また、原水のＣＯＤ濃度に対して酸素量として
１倍以上となってもその添加効果が飽和するので、本発
明においては１／２０〜１倍とする。The oxidizing agent used in the present invention can be appropriately selected from known ones used for treating wastewater, and is preferably hydrogen peroxide in the present invention. In addition, the amount used is the COD of the raw water.
It is necessary that the oxygen amount is 1/20 or more with respect to the concentration. Further, even if the COD concentration of the raw water becomes 1 time or more, the effect of addition becomes saturated, so in the present invention, it is set to 1/20 to 1 time.
【０００９】従来技術において「鉄屑等の金属鉄や鉄イ
オンをイオン交換樹脂等で固定した固定鉄イオン」を使
用することが出来ることは知られている（特開平９−１
１６２のIt is known in the prior art that "fixed iron ions obtained by fixing metallic iron such as iron scraps or iron ions with an ion exchange resin or the like" can be used (JP-A-9-1).
162's
【００１３】）が、鉄粉を積極的に使用することによっ
て、安価な処理を行うべきことについては記載はもとよ
り示唆もされていない。確かに、鉄粉を単に硫酸第一鉄
等の場合と同様に反応槽に投入しても、鉄イオンの溶出
には時間がかかる為、未溶解の鉄粉が反応槽から流出
し、鉄粉が有効に利用されないだけでなく、余剰汚泥量
が増すことになるので、コストを下げることが出来ない
ことはもとより、かえってコスト高になる場合もある。[0013] However, there is no description or suggestion that an inexpensive treatment should be carried out by positively using iron powder. Certainly, even if iron powder is added to the reaction tank just as in the case of ferrous sulfate, elution of iron ions takes time, so undissolved iron powder flows out of the reaction tank, Not only is it not used effectively, but the amount of excess sludge increases, so not only can the cost not be reduced, but in some cases the cost may increase.
【００１０】そこで、本発明においては、下記（１）〜
（３）の少なくとも１つの手段を採用することが好まし
い。
（１）反応槽内に、鉄粉の流出を防止する為の沈殿室を
設ける（図２）。
（２）反応槽と中和槽の間に、鉄粉を沈殿分離する沈殿
槽を設け、沈殿した鉄粉を反応槽に返送する（図３）。
（３）中和槽の底部に沈殿した鉄粉を反応槽に返送する
（図４）。Therefore, in the present invention, the following (1)-
It is preferable to employ at least one means of (3). (1) A precipitation chamber for preventing the outflow of iron powder is provided in the reaction tank (Fig. 2). (2) A settling tank for settling and separating iron powder is provided between the reaction tank and the neutralization tank, and the precipitated iron powder is returned to the reaction tank (Fig. 3). (3) The iron powder precipitated at the bottom of the neutralization tank is returned to the reaction tank (Fig. 4).
【００１１】上記（１）の場合の処理フローは図２に示
した通りである。この場合の沈殿室は反応槽内に設けら
れるので、鉄粉分離室として機能する。具体的には、反
応槽の壁面の一部に囲いを設置したり、円筒形又は逆円
錐形等の沈殿管を設置すれば良い。この場合、反応後の
液が分離室の底部より流入し、分離室内を上昇した後流
出する構造とすることが好ましい。また、鉄粉の重力沈
降を妨げないように反応液の撹拌が行われることが好ま
しい。更に、分離室内における液の上昇速度（水面積負
荷）は１０ｍ／時間以下であることが好ましく、特に
０．５〜５ｍ／時間であることが好ましい。The processing flow in the case of the above (1) is as shown in FIG. Since the precipitation chamber in this case is provided in the reaction tank, it functions as an iron powder separation chamber. Specifically, an enclosure may be installed on a part of the wall surface of the reaction tank, or a precipitation tube having a cylindrical shape or an inverted conical shape may be installed. In this case, it is preferable that the liquid after the reaction flows in from the bottom of the separation chamber, rises in the separation chamber, and then flows out. Further, it is preferable to stir the reaction liquid so as not to interfere with gravity settling of the iron powder. Furthermore, the rising speed (water surface load) of the liquid in the separation chamber is preferably 10 m / hour or less, and particularly preferably 0.5 to 5 m / hour.
【００１２】前記（２）の場合の処理フローは図３に示
した通りである。この場合の沈殿槽は鉄粉分離槽として
機能する。ここで沈殿した鉄粉は反応槽に返送する。こ
の方式は、処理量が多く、反応槽内に分離室を設置する
ことが困難な場合に有効である。尚、鉄粉分離槽におけ
る水面積負荷は、前記鉄粉分離室の場合と同様である。The processing flow in the case of the above (2) is as shown in FIG. The sedimentation tank in this case functions as an iron powder separation tank. The iron powder precipitated here is returned to the reaction tank. This method is effective when the processing amount is large and it is difficult to install the separation chamber in the reaction tank. The water area load in the iron powder separation tank is the same as in the iron powder separation chamber.
【００１３】前記（３）の場合の処理フローは図４に示
した通りである。この場合、反応槽では、鉄粉をけん濁
する為に、比較的強い撹拌を行うが、中和槽ではフロッ
クを生成させる為、穏やかな撹拌を行うことが好まし
い。これによって、反応槽から流出した鉄粉の一部は中
和槽底部に沈殿する。中和槽に沈殿した鉄粉を連続的又
は間欠的に引き抜いて反応槽に返送する。尚、（１）の
沈殿室、（２）の沈殿槽、（３）の中和槽内に電磁石を
設置し、鉄粉の分離効率を上げることも可能である。The processing flow in the case of the above (3) is as shown in FIG. In this case, in the reaction tank, relatively strong stirring is performed in order to suspend the iron powder, but in the neutralization tank, it is preferable to perform gentle stirring in order to generate flocs. As a result, a part of the iron powder flowing out from the reaction tank is deposited on the bottom of the neutralization tank. The iron powder precipitated in the neutralization tank is continuously or intermittently withdrawn and returned to the reaction tank. It is also possible to increase the separation efficiency of iron powder by installing electromagnets in the precipitation chamber (1), the precipitation tank (2) and the neutralization tank (3).
【００１４】[0014]
【発明の効果】本発明の処理方法においては、安価な鉄
粉を無駄なく使用するだけでなく、余剰汚泥の発生量を
低減することが出来るので経済的である。また、本発明
の処理によって、色度はもとよりＣＯＤを低減させるこ
とが出来る上、ＳＳ、ＢＯＤ及びリンの除去にも有効で
あるので、河川などの環境水への応用も可能である。The treatment method of the present invention is economical because not only is it possible to use inexpensive iron powder without waste, but it is also possible to reduce the amount of excess sludge generated. In addition, the treatment of the present invention can reduce COD as well as chromaticity, and is effective for removing SS, BOD and phosphorus, so that it can be applied to environmental water such as rivers.
【００１５】[0015]
【実施例】以下、実施例によって本発明を更に詳述する
が、本発明はこれによって限定されるものではない。色
度測定に際しては、けん濁物質の影響を除く為、試料を
孔径０．２２μｍのシリンジフィルターでろ過した後測
定した。色度は、工業用水試験法（ＪＩＳ Ｋ ０１０
１）に示された白金・コバルト法（水１Ｌ中に白金・コ
バルト色度標準液１ｍｌを加えたときの色を白金・コバ
ルト色度１度とする）に準じ、波長４５５ｎｍの吸光度
を測定することにより求めた。The present invention will be described in more detail below with reference to examples, but the present invention is not limited thereto. In measuring the chromaticity, the sample was filtered through a syringe filter having a pore size of 0.22 μm in order to remove the influence of suspended substances. The chromaticity is measured by the industrial water test method (JIS K 010).
Measure the absorbance at a wavelength of 455 nm according to the platinum-cobalt method shown in 1) (the color when 1 ml of platinum-cobalt chromaticity standard solution is added to 1 L of water is platinum-cobalt chromaticity 1 degree). I asked for it.
【００１６】実施例１．沈殿室を有する容積１Ｌ（リッ
トル）の反応槽を用い、ＣＯＤが約２００ｍｇ／Ｌの牛
舎廃水２次処理水を原水として処理した。原水の反応槽
への流入量を１Ｌ／時間とし、過酸化水素注入量を１０
０ｍｇ／時間とした。反応槽内のｐＨが３．３となるよ
うにｐＨコントローラーを用いて硫酸の自動注入を行っ
た。また、鉄粉分離室の断面積を２．２５ｃｍ２、水面
積負荷を４．４ｍ／時間とし、実験開始時に反応槽に原
水１Ｌと鉄粉（粒径５０〜１５０μｍ）３ｇを投入し、
該投入後１時間は原水の流入を行わず、ｐＨ調整と過酸
化水素の注入のみを行った。反応槽内は、鉄粉がけん濁
状態になるように撹拌機で撹拌した。１時間経過後から
原水の流入を開始し、１時間おきに流出水の色度を測定
した。結果は図５に示した通りである。Example 1. Using a reaction tank having a settling chamber and a volume of 1 L (liter), COD was treated as secondary water with barn wastewater secondary treatment water of about 200 mg / L. The flow rate of raw water into the reaction tank was 1 L / hour, and the hydrogen peroxide injection rate was 10
It was set to 0 mg / hour. Sulfuric acid was automatically injected using a pH controller so that the pH in the reaction tank was 3.3. Moreover, the cross-sectional area of the iron powder separation chamber was 2.25 cm 2 , the water area load was 4.4 m / hour, and 1 L of raw water and 3 g of iron powder (particle size 50 to 150 μm) were added to the reaction tank at the start of the experiment.
For 1 hour after the addition, the raw water was not introduced, but only pH adjustment and hydrogen peroxide injection were performed. The inside of the reaction tank was stirred by a stirrer so that the iron powder was suspended. The inflow of raw water was started after 1 hour, and the chromaticity of the outflow water was measured every 1 hour. The results are as shown in FIG.
【００１７】比較例１．反応槽に沈殿室を設置しなかっ
た他は実施例１と同様にして色度を測定した。結果は図
５に示した通りである。図５の結果から明らかなよう
に、沈殿室を設置した実施例の場合には、６時間経過後
も流出水の色度上昇はみられなかったのに対し、沈殿室
を設置しなかった比較例では３時間経過後（流出開始よ
り２時間後）より色度上昇がみられた。即ち、沈殿室が
ある場合は、鉄粉の流出が少ない為、鉄粉の追加を行わ
なくても十分な脱色が行われていたのに対して、沈殿室
が無い場合は、３時間後に十分な脱色を行うのに必要最
低限の鉄粉量に達し、それ以降さらに鉄粉が流出した
為、色度除去能が低下した。Comparative Example 1. The chromaticity was measured in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the precipitation chamber was not installed in the reaction tank. The results are as shown in FIG. As is clear from the results of FIG. 5, in the case of the example in which the precipitation chamber was installed, no increase in the chromaticity of the outflow water was observed even after 6 hours, whereas the comparison in which the precipitation chamber was not installed was made. In the example, the chromaticity increased after 3 hours (2 hours after the start of outflow). That is, when the precipitation chamber is provided, the iron powder is less outflowed, so that sufficient decolorization was performed without adding the iron powder. The minimum amount of iron powder required for effective decolorization was reached, and further iron powder flowed out thereafter, resulting in a decrease in chromaticity removal ability.
【００１８】実施例２．容積が１Ｌの反応槽、０．５Ｌ
の中和槽、及び１Ｌの沈殿槽をそれぞれ図２の様に配し
た処理装置を用い、ＣＯＤが、約４００ｍｇ／Ｌの豚舎
廃水２次処理水を原水として、下記の条件で連続的に処
理した。
原水流入量：１Ｌ／時間
反応槽のｐＨ：３．４
過酸化水素流入量：２００ｍｇ／時間
実験開始時に、反応槽に鉄粉（粒径５０〜１５０μｍ）
５ｇを投入し、それ以上追加せずに実験を行った。反応
槽の撹拌を、鉄粉がけん濁状態になるように行い、中和
槽内の撹拌は、フロックがけん濁状態になるように行っ
た。中和槽のｐＨを６．２に調整し、沈殿室を通過して
中和槽底部に溜まった微少量の鉄粉を、１時間に一度の
割合で引き抜いた汚泥と共に反応槽に戻した。６時間連
続的に原水を供給し、６時間経過後に、沈殿槽から流出
した処理水のサンプリングを行い、ｐＨ、色度、ＣＯ
Ｄ、ＳＳ、全リン濃度を測定し、それぞれ原水のものと
比較した。結果は下記表１に示した通りである。Example 2. Reaction tank with a volume of 1 L, 0.5 L
Using the treatment equipment in which the neutralization tank of 1 and the precipitation tank of 1 L are arranged as shown in FIG. 2, the COD is about 400 mg / L, and the secondary treated water of pig house wastewater is treated as raw water continuously under the following conditions. did. Raw water inflow: 1 L / hour Reaction tank pH: 3.4 Hydrogen peroxide inflow: 200 mg / hour At the start of the experiment, iron powder (particle size 50-150 μm) was added to the reaction tank.
The experiment was conducted by adding 5 g and adding no more. The stirring in the reaction tank was carried out so that the iron powder was in a suspended state, and the stirring in the neutralization tank was carried out so that the flocs were in a suspended state. The pH of the neutralization tank was adjusted to 6.2, and a small amount of iron powder that had passed through the precipitation chamber and accumulated at the bottom of the neutralization tank was returned to the reaction tank together with the sludge extracted once per hour. Raw water was continuously supplied for 6 hours, and after 6 hours, the treated water flowing out from the settling tank was sampled to obtain pH, chromaticity, CO
The D, SS and total phosphorus concentrations were measured and compared with those of raw water. The results are as shown in Table 1 below.
【００１９】[0019]
【表１】
表１の結果から明らかな如く、本発明の方法によれば、
従来よりも低コストで、廃水の色度除去、ＣＯＤ、Ｓ
Ｓ、リン除去を効率良く行うことの出来ることが実証さ
れた。[Table 1] As is clear from the results in Table 1, according to the method of the present invention,
Lower cost than before, removal of chromaticity of wastewater, COD, S
It was demonstrated that S and phosphorus can be removed efficiently.
【図１】従来のフェントン反応処理装置の概念図であ
る。FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram of a conventional Fenton reaction processing apparatus.
【図２】反応槽内に沈殿室を設けた、本発明の処理装置
の概念図である。FIG. 2 is a conceptual diagram of a processing apparatus of the present invention in which a precipitation chamber is provided in a reaction tank.
【図３】反応槽と中間槽の間に沈殿槽を設けた、本発明
の処理装置の概念図である。FIG. 3 is a conceptual diagram of a processing apparatus of the present invention in which a precipitation tank is provided between a reaction tank and an intermediate tank.
【図４】中和槽の底部に沈殿した鉄粉を反応槽に返送す
る、本発明の処理装置の概念図である。FIG. 4 is a conceptual diagram of a processing apparatus of the present invention for returning the iron powder precipitated at the bottom of the neutralization tank to the reaction tank.
【図５】実施例１及び比較例１における、処理時間に対
する処理水の色度依存性を表すグラフである。FIG. 5 is a graph showing the chromaticity dependence of treated water with respect to treatment time in Example 1 and Comparative Example 1.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ───
【手続補正書】[Procedure amendment]
【提出日】平成１４年４月１２日（２００２．４．１
２）[Submission date] April 12, 2002 (2002.4.1)
2)
【手続補正１】[Procedure Amendment 1]
【補正対象書類名】明細書[Document name to be amended] Statement
【補正対象項目名】００１９[Correction target item name] 0019
【補正方法】変更[Correction method] Change
【補正内容】[Correction content]
【００１９】[0019]
【表１】
表１の結果から明らかな如く、本発明の方法によれば、
従来よりも低コストで、廃水の色度除去、ＣＯＤ、Ｓ
Ｓ、リン除去を効率良く行うことの出来ることが実証さ
れた。[Table 1] As is clear from the results in Table 1, according to the method of the present invention,
Lower cost than before, removal of chromaticity of wastewater, COD, S
It was demonstrated that S and phosphorus can be removed efficiently.
Claims (6)
において、少なくとも、鉄粉入りの反応槽中に前記原水
のＣＯＤ濃度に対して酸素量として１／２０〜１倍の濃
度となるように酸化剤を添加し、撹拌することを特徴と
する、鉄粉を用いた廃水処理方法。1. A wastewater treatment method for reducing the COD of raw water, which comprises oxidizing at least a COD concentration of the raw water in a reaction vessel containing iron powder to an oxygen concentration of 1/20 to 1 times. A method for treating wastewater using iron powder, which comprises adding an agent and stirring.
１に記載された鉄粉を用いた廃水処理方法。2. The method for treating wastewater using iron powder according to claim 1, wherein the pH of the raw water is adjusted to 2-5.
請求項２に記載された鉄粉を用いた廃水処理方法。3. The pH adjustment is performed in a reaction tank,
A wastewater treatment method using the iron powder according to claim 2.
０ｇ／リットルである、請求項１〜３の何れかに記載さ
れた、鉄粉を用いた廃水処理方法。4. The iron powder present in the reaction tank is 0.2 to 50.
The wastewater treatment method using iron powder according to any one of claims 1 to 3, which has a concentration of 0 g / liter.
応槽の後工程に沈殿槽を設置し、沈殿した鉄粉を反応槽
に返送する、請求項１〜４の何れかに記載された鉄粉を
用いた廃水処理方法。5. The method according to claim 1, wherein a precipitation chamber is installed in the reaction tank or a precipitation tank is installed in a subsequent step of the reaction tank, and the precipitated iron powder is returned to the reaction tank. Wastewater treatment method using iron powder.
１〜５の何れかに記載された鉄粉を用いた廃水処理方
法。6. The method for treating wastewater using iron powder according to claim 1, wherein the oxidizing agent is hydrogen peroxide.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002107422A JP2003300083A (en) | 2002-04-10 | 2002-04-10 | Waste water treatment method using iron powder |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002107422A JP2003300083A (en) | 2002-04-10 | 2002-04-10 | Waste water treatment method using iron powder |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2003300083A true JP2003300083A (en) | 2003-10-21 |
Family
ID=29391444
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2002107422A Pending JP2003300083A (en) | 2002-04-10 | 2002-04-10 | Waste water treatment method using iron powder |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2003300083A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006239507A (en) * | 2005-03-01 | 2006-09-14 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Organic arsenic compound-containing water treatment method and apparatus |
| JP2011212511A (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2011-10-27 | Sekisui Chem Co Ltd | Method and apparatus for treating water to be treated |
| JP2011251275A (en) * | 2010-06-04 | 2011-12-15 | Sekisui Chem Co Ltd | Water treatment method and water treatment apparatus used for water treatment method |
| JP2012115803A (en) * | 2010-12-03 | 2012-06-21 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Apparatus and method for water treatment |
-
2002
- 2002-04-10 JP JP2002107422A patent/JP2003300083A/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2006239507A (en) * | 2005-03-01 | 2006-09-14 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Organic arsenic compound-containing water treatment method and apparatus |
| JP2011212511A (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2011-10-27 | Sekisui Chem Co Ltd | Method and apparatus for treating water to be treated |
| JP2011251275A (en) * | 2010-06-04 | 2011-12-15 | Sekisui Chem Co Ltd | Water treatment method and water treatment apparatus used for water treatment method |
| JP2012115803A (en) * | 2010-12-03 | 2012-06-21 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Apparatus and method for water treatment |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US20110127220A1 (en) | Method for Treating Water by Advanced Oxidation and Ballasted Flocculation, and Corresponding Treatment Plant | |
| KR20030062324A (en) | Method and apparatus for treatment of water and wastewater | |
| KR101026734B1 (en) | Apparatus and method of treating discharge water for re-use | |
| JP2007029826A (en) | Apparatus for treating waste water and method for treating waste water using the apparatus | |
| JPH01228599A (en) | Two-stage batchwise waste water treatment | |
| CN109574387A (en) | A kind of combined technical method handling high concentration hard-degraded organic waste water | |
| JP4997724B2 (en) | Organic wastewater treatment method | |
| JP2020058984A (en) | Water treatment system and water treatment method | |
| JP2007029825A (en) | Apparatus for treating waste water and method for treating waste water using the apparatus | |
| KR100707975B1 (en) | Treatment method for livestock waste water including highly concentrated organic materials | |
| CN107840495A (en) | A kind of processing method of crude oil electric desalting waste water | |
| JP2003300083A (en) | Waste water treatment method using iron powder | |
| KR101646590B1 (en) | Method for treating recycle water of wastewater treatment | |
| JP2005199248A (en) | Raw water treatment process | |
| KR100368951B1 (en) | Method of Treating Highly Concentrated Organic Waste Water using Recycled Steeler's Dust as Catalysts | |
| JP2001149998A (en) | Sludge treating method and sludge treating device | |
| CN110540336A (en) | treatment method and application of ammoximation wastewater | |
| JP4166881B2 (en) | Wastewater treatment method and apparatus | |
| CN1179895C (en) | Sewage purifying treatment method | |
| JPH11319889A (en) | Treatment of selenium-containing waste water and device therefor | |
| JP2010162493A (en) | Method and device for flocculation and sedimentation treatment of low organic compound concentration wastewater | |
| JP2021074663A (en) | Wastewater treatment method and wastewater treatment system | |
| JP2002326088A (en) | Method and apparatus for treating phosphorous and cod- containing water | |
| JP2008055324A (en) | Sewage cleaning tank | |
| JPH03278899A (en) | Apparatus and method for treating organic waste water |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A621 | Written request for application examination |
Effective date: 20040220 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 |
|
| A977 | Report on retrieval |
Effective date: 20050318 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 |
|
| A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Effective date: 20050325 Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 |
|
| A521 | Written amendment |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20050506 |
|
| A02 | Decision of refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02 Effective date: 20050527 |