JP2003294717A - Seismic isolation damper and inspection method thereof - Google Patents

Seismic isolation damper and inspection method thereof

Info

Publication number
JP2003294717A
JP2003294717A JP2002102449A JP2002102449A JP2003294717A JP 2003294717 A JP2003294717 A JP 2003294717A JP 2002102449 A JP2002102449 A JP 2002102449A JP 2002102449 A JP2002102449 A JP 2002102449A JP 2003294717 A JP2003294717 A JP 2003294717A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
flange
joint
lead
seismic isolation
inspection
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2002102449A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3623486B2 (en
Inventor
Tatsuya Futami
達也 二見
Eisuke Kashiwagi
栄介 柏木
Hirobumi Ofune
博文 小舟
Takafumi Nakada
尚文 中田
Fumio Fukumori
文男 福森
Toshio Ishida
敏夫 石田
Fumio Oshima
二三男 大島
Masakatsu Ikeda
誠克 池田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd
Kimura Chemical Plants Co Ltd
Daiken Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd
Kimura Chemical Plants Co Ltd
Daiken Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd, Kimura Chemical Plants Co Ltd, Daiken Co Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd
Priority to JP2002102449A priority Critical patent/JP3623486B2/en
Publication of JP2003294717A publication Critical patent/JP2003294717A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3623486B2 publication Critical patent/JP3623486B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2291/00Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
    • G01N2291/04Wave modes and trajectories
    • G01N2291/044Internal reflections (echoes), e.g. on walls or defects

Landscapes

  • Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
  • Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
  • Vibration Dampers (AREA)
  • Foundations (AREA)
  • Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a simple and precise inspection method of a seismic isola tion damper that can inspect the joined state of a part of a lead column body and a flange simply and highly reliably by a nondestructive inspection and the seismic isolation damper which is inspected by the method. <P>SOLUTION: When an ultrasonic wave is incident from a flange side on a certain inspection area of a joined part of a lead column body and the flange, if a reflected echo from the joint part is greater than a predetermined threshold, it is judged that a joint defect is detected in the inspection area. In addition, the joined state of the lead column body and the flange of the whole damper is judged from a ratio of inspection areas where joining defects exist to the total areas to be inspected of the presence of joining defects using a method in which when an ultrasonic wave is incident from a flange side on a certain inspection area of a joined part of the lead column body and the flange, if a reflected echo from the joined part is greater than a predetermined threshold, a joining defect is detected in the inspection area. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2004,JPO

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本願発明は、地震などによる
構造物の揺れを抑制して構造物を保護するための免震ダ
ンパ及びその検査方法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a seismic isolation damper for suppressing the shaking of a structure due to an earthquake or the like to protect the structure and an inspection method thereof.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術及び発明が解決しようとする課題】近年、
地震などによる構造物の揺れを抑制して構造物を保護す
る目的で、種々の免震ダンパが用いられている。図4
は、これらの免震ダンパの一例を示す図である。この免
震ダンパは、一つの平面に沿って湾曲する湾曲部1aを
設けた鉛柱体1の両端面にフランジ2を接合した構造を
有している。
2. Description of the Related Art In recent years,
Various seismic isolation dampers are used for the purpose of protecting the structure by suppressing the shaking of the structure due to an earthquake or the like. Figure 4
FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of these seismic isolation dampers. This seismic isolation damper has a structure in which flanges 2 are joined to both end surfaces of a lead column body 1 provided with a curved portion 1a that curves along one plane.

【0003】なお、この免震ダンパにおいて、湾曲部1
aは、中央部分が所定量だけ湾曲しているとともに、こ
の湾曲した部分の両端から逆向きに湾曲して両端部に至
っている。また、鉛柱体1は、湾曲部1aから両端部に
至る部分で、径が徐々に大きくなる、いわゆるテーパ形
状を有しており、両端面は互いに平行で、正対するよう
に構成されている。
In this seismic isolation damper, the bending portion 1
In a, the central portion is curved by a predetermined amount, and the curved portion is curved in opposite directions from both ends to reach both ends. The lead column 1 has a so-called taper shape in which the diameter gradually increases from the curved portion 1a to both end portions, and both end surfaces are parallel to each other and face each other. .

【0004】また、鉛柱体1の両端面に取り付けられた
フランジ2は、ステンレス鋼などの鋼材(鋼板)から形
成されており、鉛柱体1の両端面よりも大きな面を有し
ている。また、フランジ2の四隅には、構造物及び構造
物の基礎にボルトで固定するための孔2aが設けられて
いる。
The flanges 2 attached to both end surfaces of the lead column body 1 are made of a steel material (steel plate) such as stainless steel and have a surface larger than both end surfaces of the lead column body 1. . In addition, holes 4a for fixing to the structure and the foundation of the structure with bolts are provided at the four corners of the flange 2.

【0005】上述のように構成されたこの免震ダンパ
は、通常、免震構造において、両端のフランジ2を介し
て建物と基礎との間に連結され、そして、振動に対し鉛
柱体1が柔らかく塑性変形することによって、振動エネ
ルギーを吸収し、免震構造に減衰性能を付与して、建物
と基礎との過大な相対変位を抑制する作用を果たすよう
に構成されている。
This seismic isolation damper constructed as described above is usually connected between the building and the foundation via the flanges 2 at both ends in the seismic isolation structure, and the lead column body 1 is protected against vibration. By softly plastically deforming, it absorbs vibration energy, imparts damping performance to the base isolation structure, and suppresses excessive relative displacement between the building and the foundation.

【0006】そして、上記の免震ダンパが、振動エネル
ギーを吸収し、免震構造に減衰性能を付与して、建物と
基礎との過大な相対変位を抑制する作用を確実に果たす
ためには、構造物及び構造物の基礎に固定されるフラン
ジ2と、振動エネルギーを吸収する鉛柱体1が確実に接
合されていることが必須の要件となる。
In order for the above-mentioned seismic isolation damper to absorb vibration energy and impart damping performance to the seismic isolation structure, and to surely fulfill the action of suppressing excessive relative displacement between the building and the foundation, It is an essential requirement that the structure 2 and the flange 2 fixed to the foundation of the structure and the lead column 1 that absorbs vibration energy are securely joined.

【0007】ところで、上記の免震ダンパは、例えば、
(1)フランジ2の鉛柱体1との接合面にホモゲン溶着材
を施すとともに、ホモゲン溶着材を施した面を平滑に加
工する工程、(2)溶融した鉛を金型により鋳込み成形し
て、所定形状の鉛柱体1を成形するとともに、鉛柱体1
の両端面を機械加工する工程、(3)成形された鉛柱体1
の両端面に、フランジのホモゲン溶着材を施した面を接
合し、加熱することによりその接合部(接合面)Aを溶
着し、さらにその外周をホモゲン溶接する工程、(4)成
形された鉛柱体1の両端部を機械加工して、所定の精度
及び寸法に仕上げる工程を経て製造されている。上述の
ように、鉛柱体1とフランジ2は、いわゆる鉛ホモゲン
による方法により接合されているが、鉛ホモゲンによる
接合工法は、十分な経験と、高度の技術を要するもので
あり、経験の浅い作業者が製造に従事した場合などにお
いては、鉛柱体1とフランジ2の接合強度が不十分にな
る場合があり、所定の免震効果を得ることができない場
合があり、必ずしも信頼性が十分ではないという問題点
がある。
By the way, the seismic isolation damper described above is, for example,
(1) A step of applying a homogen welding material to the joint surface of the flange 2 with the lead column body 1 and smoothing the surface to which the homogen welding material is applied, (2) casting the molten lead with a die While molding the lead column body 1 having a predetermined shape, the lead column body 1
Machining both end faces of (3) Molded lead column 1
(4) Forming lead on the both ends of the flange by joining the homogen-welding surface of the flange, heating the joint (joint surface) A, and homogen-welding the outer periphery It is manufactured through a process of machining both ends of the column 1 to finish it to a predetermined accuracy and size. As described above, the lead column 1 and the flange 2 are joined by a method using a so-called lead homogen. However, the joining method using lead homogen requires sufficient experience and a high degree of skill, and is inexperienced. When the worker is engaged in manufacturing, the joint strength between the lead column 1 and the flange 2 may be insufficient, and the prescribed seismic isolation effect may not be obtained, so that the reliability is not always sufficient. There is a problem that is not.

【0008】また、鉛柱体1とフランジ2の接合状態を
非破壊検査による方法で調べることは、(1)ステンレス
鋼などの鋼材と鉛又は鉛合金という異質な材料の接合で
あって、接合状態が特殊であること、(2)主たる材料と
して、鉛又は鉛合金が用いられており、X線撮影などの
方法にもなじまないことなどの理由から容易ではなく、
製品である免震ダンパの良否を確実に判定することは極
めて困難であるのが実情である。
[0008] Further, to check the joining state of the lead column 1 and the flange 2 by a method of nondestructive inspection is (1) joining of steel materials such as stainless steel and foreign materials such as lead or lead alloy. It is not easy because of its special condition, (2) Lead or lead alloy is used as the main material, and it is not suitable for X-ray photography.
In reality, it is extremely difficult to reliably judge the quality of a seismic isolation damper that is a product.

【0009】本願発明は、上記実情に鑑みてなされたも
のであり、鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態を非破壊検査に
よる方法で、確実に調べることが可能な免震ダンパの検
査方法及び該検査方法により検査された信頼性の高い免
震ダンパを提供することを目的とする。
The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and a method for inspecting a seismic isolation damper capable of surely inspecting the joining state of a lead column and a flange by a non-destructive inspection method and the inspection. It is intended to provide a highly reliable seismic isolation damper that has been inspected by the method.

【0010】[0010]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記目的を達成するため
に、本願発明(請求項1)の免震ダンパの検査方法は、
鉛又は鉛合金からなる柱体(以下「鉛柱体」という)の
両端面に、鋼材からなるフランジを接合してなる免震ダ
ンパの、前記鉛柱体と前記フランジの接合状態の良否を
判定するための検査方法であって、鉛柱体とフランジの
接合部の所定の検査領域に、フランジ側から超音波を入
射し、接合部からの反射エコーを検出して、反射エコー
の大きさが所定のしきい値より大きい場合には、当該検
査領域に接合欠陥があると判定することを特徴としてい
る。
In order to achieve the above object, the seismic isolation damper inspection method of the present invention (Claim 1) comprises:
Judgment of the joint state of the lead column body and the flange of the seismic isolation damper in which flanges made of steel are joined to both end surfaces of the column body made of lead or lead alloy (hereinafter referred to as "lead column body") An inspection method for doing so, in which a predetermined inspection area of the joint between the lead column and the flange is irradiated with ultrasonic waves from the flange side, the reflected echo from the joint is detected, and the size of the reflected echo is It is characterized in that it is judged that there is a bonding defect in the inspection region when it is larger than a predetermined threshold value.

【0011】鉛柱体とフランジの接合部の所定の検査領
域に、フランジ側から超音波を入射し、接合部からの反
射エコーを検出して、反射エコーの大きさが所定のしき
い値より大きい場合には、当該検査領域に接合欠陥があ
ると判定することにより、接合欠陥の有無を容易かつ確
実に検出して、信頼性の高い接合状態の良否判定を行う
ことが可能になる。
An ultrasonic wave is incident from the flange side into a predetermined inspection area of the joint between the lead column and the flange, a reflected echo from the joint is detected, and the magnitude of the reflected echo exceeds a predetermined threshold value. If it is large, it is possible to easily and surely detect the presence or absence of a bonding defect by determining that the inspection region has a bonding defect, and to perform a reliable judgment of the quality of the bonding state.

【0012】すなわち、鉛柱体とフランジが確実に接合
されている場合には、接合部においてフランジから鉛柱
体に超音波が透過しやすく、接合部からの反射エコーは
小さくなるが、鉛柱体とフランジが確実に接合されてい
ない場合(例えば接合部に隙間が存在しているような場
合)には、間隙(欠陥)の大きさに応じて、接合部から
の反射エコーは大きくなる。したがって、例えば、予
め、反射エコーの大きさと製品である免震ダンパの性能
の関係を調べて、所定のしきい値を定めておき、反射エ
コーがしきい値より大きくなると接合状態が不良である
(接合欠陥が存在する)と判定することにより、接合欠
陥の有無を容易かつ確実に検出して、信頼性の高い接合
状態の良否判定を行うことが可能になる。
That is, when the lead column and the flange are securely joined, ultrasonic waves are easily transmitted from the flange to the lead column at the joining portion, and the reflection echo from the joining portion becomes small. When the body and the flange are not securely joined (for example, when a gap exists in the joint), the reflection echo from the joint becomes large depending on the size of the gap (defect). Therefore, for example, the relationship between the size of the reflection echo and the performance of the seismic isolation damper, which is a product, is checked in advance, and a predetermined threshold value is set. When the reflection echo becomes larger than the threshold value, the bonding state is poor. By determining (there is a bonding defect), it is possible to easily and surely detect the presence or absence of a bonding defect, and to judge whether or not the bonding state is highly reliable.

【0013】また、本願発明(請求項2)の免震ダンパ
の検査方法は、鉛又は鉛合金からなる柱体(以下「鉛柱
体」という)の両端面に、鋼材からなるフランジを接合
してなる免震ダンパの、前記鉛柱体と前記フランジの接
合状態を検査するための検査方法であって、鉛柱体とフ
ランジの接合部の所定の検査領域に、フランジ側から超
音波を入射し、接合部からの反射エコーを検出して、反
射エコーの大きさから当該検査領域における接合欠陥の
有無を判定する方法により、鉛柱体とフランジの接合部
の複数の検査領域について接合欠陥の有無を判定し、接
合欠陥の有無を判定した全ての検査領域に対する、接合
欠陥が認められた検査領域の割合から、免震ダンパ全体
としての鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態の良否を判定する
ことを特徴としている。
The seismic isolation damper inspection method of the present invention (Claim 2) is such that a flange made of steel is joined to both end faces of a column made of lead or lead alloy (hereinafter referred to as "lead column"). An inspection method for inspecting a joint state between the lead column body and the flange of a seismic isolation damper, which comprises applying an ultrasonic wave from a flange side to a predetermined inspection region of a joint portion between the lead column body and the flange. Then, by detecting the reflection echo from the joint, by the method of determining the presence or absence of the joint defect in the inspection region from the size of the reflection echo, the joint defect of the plurality of inspection regions of the joint portion of the lead column and the flange. Judging the presence / absence of the lead column body and the flange as a seismic isolation damper as a whole based on the ratio of the inspection area where the joining defect is recognized to all the inspection areas where the presence or absence of the joining defect is judged. Featuring That.

【0014】鉛柱体とフランジの接合部の所定の検査領
域に、フランジ側から超音波を入射し、反射エコーの大
きさから当該検査領域における接合欠陥の有無を判定す
る方法により、鉛柱体とフランジの接合部の複数の検査
領域について接合欠陥の有無を判定し、接合欠陥の有無
を判定した全ての検査領域に対する、接合欠陥が認めら
れた検査領域の割合から、免震ダンパ全体としての鉛柱
体とフランジの接合状態の良否を判定することにより、
さらに確実に免震ダンパ全体としての鉛柱体とフランジ
の接合状態の良否を判定することが可能になり、本願発
明を実効あらしめることが可能になる。
A method of injecting ultrasonic waves from the flange side into a predetermined inspection region of the joint between the lead column and the flange and determining the presence or absence of a joint defect in the inspection region based on the size of the reflected echo is used. The presence or absence of joint defects is determined for multiple inspection areas of the joint part of the flange and the flange, and the ratio of the inspection area in which joint defects are recognized to all the inspection areas where the presence or absence of joint defects is judged By judging the quality of the joint between the lead column and the flange,
Further, it becomes possible to reliably judge the quality of the joint state of the lead column body and the flange of the seismic isolation damper as a whole, and it is possible to effectively present the present invention.

【0015】また、本願発明(請求項3)の免震ダンパ
の検査方法は、鉛又は鉛合金からなる柱体(以下「鉛柱
体」という)の両端面に、鋼材からなるフランジを接合
してなる免震ダンパの、前記鉛柱体と前記フランジの接
合状態を検査するための検査方法であって、(a)接合部
の全域を所定の面積を有する検査領域に区画するととも
に、各検査領域について接合欠陥の有無を判定し、(b)
接合部の全面積に対する、接合欠陥が認められた検査領
域の合計面積の割合から、免震ダンパ全体としての鉛柱
体とフランジの接合状態の良否を判定することを特徴と
している。
The seismic isolation damper inspection method of the present invention (Claim 3) is such that a flange made of steel is joined to both end faces of a columnar body made of lead or lead alloy (hereinafter referred to as "lead columnar body"). An inspection method for inspecting a joint state of the lead column body and the flange of a seismic isolation damper, which comprises: (a) partitioning the entire joint portion into an inspection area having a predetermined area and performing each inspection. The presence or absence of a bonding defect is determined for the area, and (b)
The feature is that the quality of the joint state of the lead column body and the flange of the seismic isolation damper as a whole is determined from the ratio of the total area of the inspection region where the joint defect is recognized to the total area of the joint portion.

【0016】接合部の全域を所定の面積を有する検査領
域に区画するとともに、各検査領域について接合欠陥の
有無を判定し、接合部の全面積に対する、接合欠陥が認
められた検査領域の合計面積の割合から、免震ダンパ全
体としての鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態の良否を判定す
ることにより、さらに確実に免震ダンパ全体としての鉛
柱体とフランジの接合状態の良否を判定することが可能
になり、本願発明を実効あらしめることが可能になる。
The entire area of the joint is divided into inspection areas having a predetermined area, the presence or absence of a junction defect is determined for each inspection area, and the total area of the inspection areas in which the joint defect is recognized is the total area of the joint. By determining the quality of the joint between the lead column and the flange as the seismic isolation damper as a whole, it is possible to more reliably determine the quality of the joint between the lead column and the flange as the seismic isolation damper as a whole. Therefore, the present invention can be effectively realized.

【0017】また、請求項4の免震ダンパの検査方法
は、鉛柱体の両端面へのフランジの接合が、鉛ホモゲン
又ははんだ付けによる方法により行われていることを特
徴としている。
The seismic isolation damper inspection method according to claim 4 is characterized in that the flanges are joined to both end surfaces of the lead column body by a lead homogen or soldering method.

【0018】鉛柱体の両端面へのフランジの接合が、鉛
ホモゲン又ははんだ付けによる方法により行われている
場合、鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態が問題になりやすい
が、そのような場合に、本願発明を適用することによ
り、鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態の良否を確実に判定す
ることが可能になり、信頼性の高い免震ダンパを提供す
ることが可能になる。
When the flanges are joined to both end faces of the lead column body by a method using lead homogen or soldering, the joint state of the lead column body and the flange tends to be a problem. By applying the present invention, it is possible to reliably determine the quality of the joint state between the lead column body and the flange, and it is possible to provide a highly reliable seismic isolation damper.

【0019】また、請求項5の免震ダンパの検査方法
は、前記鉛柱体が一つの平面に沿って湾曲する湾曲部を
有するものであることを特徴としている。
Further, the seismic isolation damper inspection method according to a fifth aspect is characterized in that the lead columnar body has a curved portion which is curved along one plane.

【0020】鉛柱体を用いた免震ダンパとしては、鉛柱
体が一つの平面に沿って湾曲する湾曲部を有するもので
ある場合に、大きな免震効果が得られることが知られて
いるが、鉛柱体がこのような湾曲部を有するものである
場合にも、本願発明を適用することにより、鉛柱体とフ
ランジの接合状態の良否を確実に判定することが可能に
なり、免震効果が大きく、信頼性の高い免震ダンパを提
供することが可能になる。
As a seismic isolation damper using a lead column, it is known that a large seismic isolation effect can be obtained when the lead column has a curved portion that curves along one plane. However, even when the lead column body has such a curved portion, by applying the present invention, it becomes possible to reliably determine the quality of the joined state of the lead column body and the flange, It is possible to provide a highly reliable seismic isolation damper with a large seismic effect.

【0021】また、請求項6の免震ダンパの検査方法
は、前記接合部からの反射エコーを検出して、反射エコ
ーの大きさから当該検査領域における接合欠陥の有無を
判定するにあたって、第1波反射エコーの大きさが、入
射した超音波の62%以上である場合に、当該検査領域
に接合欠陥があると判定することを特徴としている。
According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, the seismic isolation damper inspecting method detects a reflection echo from the joint portion, and determines the presence or absence of a joint defect in the inspection area based on the size of the reflection echo. The feature is that when the size of the wave reflection echo is 62% or more of the incident ultrasonic waves, it is determined that the inspection region has a bonding defect.

【0022】接合部からの反射エコーを検出して、反射
エコーの大きさから当該検査領域における接合欠陥の有
無を判定するにあたって、第1波反射エコーの大きさ
が、入射した超音波の62%以上である場合に接合欠陥
があると判定することにより、確実に鉛柱体とフランジ
の接合状態の良否を判定することが可能になり、本願発
明をさらに実効あらしめることが可能になる。なお、第
1波反射エコーの大きさが入射した超音波の62%以上
である場合に接合欠陥があると判定するようにしている
のは、第1波反射エコーの大きさが入射した超音波の6
2%以上になると、破壊検査において、100%の確率
で接合欠陥が認められることによる。
In detecting the reflection echo from the junction and determining the presence or absence of a junction defect in the inspection area from the size of the reflection echo, the size of the first wave reflection echo is 62% of the incident ultrasonic wave. By determining that there is a joint defect in the above cases, it is possible to reliably determine the quality of the joint state between the lead column body and the flange, and it is possible to further effectively realize the present invention. It should be noted that when the size of the first wave reflection echo is 62% or more of the incident ultrasonic wave, it is determined that there is a bonding defect because the size of the first wave reflection echo is the incident ultrasonic wave. Of 6
This is because when the content is 2% or more, a joint defect is recognized with a probability of 100% in the destructive inspection.

【0023】また、本願発明(請求項7)の免震ダンパ
は、請求項1〜6のいずれかに記載の免震ダンパの検査
方法により検査して、鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態が良
好であると判定されたものであることを特徴としてい
る。
Further, the seismic isolation damper of the present invention (claim 7) is inspected by the seismic isolation damper inspection method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, and it is confirmed that the lead column and the flange are joined well. It is characterized in that it is determined to be.

【0024】本願発明の免震ダンパは、請求項1〜6の
いずれかに記載の免震ダンパの検査方法により検査し
て、鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態が良好であると判定さ
れたものであり、請求項1〜6の検査方法によれば、鉛
柱体とフランジの接合状態の良否を確実に判定できるこ
とから、確実に高い信頼性を備えた免震ダンパを提供す
ることが可能になる。
The seismic isolation damper of the present invention is inspected by the seismic isolation damper inspection method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, and is determined to be in a good joint state between the lead column and the flange. According to the inspection method of claims 1 to 6, it is possible to reliably determine the quality of the joining state of the lead column body and the flange, so that it is possible to provide a seismic isolation damper with high reliability. Become.

【0025】[0025]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、本願発明の実施の形態を示
して、その特徴とするところをさらに詳しく説明する。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION The features of the present invention will be described below in more detail with reference to the embodiments of the present invention.

【0026】[実施形態1] (1)テスト試料 この実施形態1では、テスト試料として、図1に示すよ
うに、鉛柱体に相当する鉛円柱(鉛ブロック)11の上
下両面に鉛ホモゲンによる方法で、フランジに相当する
ステンレス鋼材12が接合された構造を有する円柱状の
接合構造体(免震ダンパに相当)を作製した。なお、テ
スト試料の寸法などの条件は以下の通りである。 (a)鉛円柱(鉛ブロック)11の厚みt1:100mm (b)ステンレス鋼材12の厚み t2:30mm (c)接合構造体の寸法 厚みT:160mm 直径D:200mm
[Embodiment 1] (1) Test Sample In this Embodiment 1, as a test sample, as shown in FIG. 1, lead homogenates were formed on both upper and lower surfaces of a lead cylinder (lead block) 11 corresponding to a lead column. By the method, a cylindrical joint structure (corresponding to a seismic isolation damper) having a structure in which the stainless steel material 12 corresponding to the flange was joined was produced. The conditions such as the size of the test sample are as follows. (a) Lead cylinder (lead block) 11 thickness t1: 100 mm (b) Stainless steel material 12 thickness t2: 30 mm (c) Joint structure dimensions Thickness T: 160 mm Diameter D: 200 mm

【0027】(2)接合状態の検査 ステンレス鋼材12側から、鉛円柱11とステンレス鋼
材12の接合部(接合面)Bの所定の検査領域に超音波
を入射し、探触子により反射エコーの大きさを調べ、反
射エコーの大きさから、接合構造体(免震ダンパ)を構
成する鉛円柱11とステンレス鋼材12の接合状態の良
否を判定した。
(2) Inspection of Joined State From the stainless steel material 12 side, ultrasonic waves are incident on a predetermined inspection area of the joint (joint surface) B of the lead cylinder 11 and the stainless steel material 12, and a reflection echo is generated by the probe. The size was examined, and based on the size of the reflection echo, it was determined whether or not the joined state of the lead cylinder 11 and the stainless steel material 12 constituting the joined structure (seismic isolation damper) was good.

【0028】図2は、探触子により反射エコーの大きさ
を調べたときの超音波伝播時間と反射エコーの大きさの
関係を示す図である。図2に示すように、1回目の反射
による第1波反射エコー、2回目の反射による第2波反
射エコー、3回目の反射による第3波反射エコーの順
に、その大きさが減少していることがわかる。なお、図
2では、第1波反射エコー、第2波反射エコー、第3波
反射エコーを検出しているが、通常は、第1波反射エコ
ーのみから、接合状態を検出することが可能であり、こ
の実施形態1でも、第1波反射エコーのみから接合状態
を調べた。
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the relationship between the ultrasonic wave propagation time and the size of the reflected echo when the size of the reflected echo is examined by the probe. As shown in FIG. 2, the first wave reflection echo by the first reflection, the second wave reflection echo by the second reflection, and the third wave reflection echo by the third reflection decrease in size in this order. I understand. In FIG. 2, the first-wave reflected echo, the second-wave reflected echo, and the third-wave reflected echo are detected, but normally, it is possible to detect the joining state from only the first-wave reflected echo. Therefore, also in the first embodiment, the bonding state was examined only from the first wave reflection echo.

【0029】なお、この実施形態1では、(a)上述の超
音波を入射して、第1波反射エコーの大きさを測定する
ことにより接合状態を調べる検査(非破壊検査)と、
(b)接合構造体を切断して、鉛円柱11とステンレス鋼
材12の接合面を露出させることにより接合状態を調べ
る検査、及び接合面の平行な方向への剪断強度を調べる
検査(破壊検査)を行い、反射エコーの大きさによる接
合状態の検査の信頼性を調べた。その結果を表1に示
す。
In the first embodiment, (a) an inspection (non-destructive inspection) for checking the bonding state by injecting the above-mentioned ultrasonic wave and measuring the size of the first wave reflection echo,
(b) Inspection for examining the joint state by cutting the joint structure and exposing the joint surface of the lead cylinder 11 and the stainless steel material 12, and for examining the shear strength in the parallel direction of the joint surface (destruction inspection) Then, the reliability of the inspection of the bonding state by the size of the reflection echo was examined. The results are shown in Table 1.

【0030】[0030]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0031】その結果、表1に示すように、この実施形
態1では、上記(a)の検査において、第1波反射エコー
の大きさが、入射した超音波の62%以上である検査領
域については、上記(b)の破壊検査でも、100%の確
率で接合欠陥が認められた。一方、第1波反射エコーの
大きさが、入射した超音波の30%以下の検査領域につ
いては、上記(b)の破壊検査において、接合欠陥の発生
が認められなかった。
As a result, as shown in Table 1, in the first embodiment, in the inspection of (a), the inspection area in which the magnitude of the first wave reflection echo is 62% or more of the incident ultrasonic wave In the destructive inspection of (b) above, a bonding defect was recognized with a probability of 100%. On the other hand, in the inspection area in which the size of the first wave reflection echo is 30% or less of the incident ultrasonic waves, no junction defect was observed in the destructive inspection in (b) above.

【0032】以上の結果より、所定の検査領域につい
て、第1波反射エコーの大きさが、入射した超音波の6
2%以上である検査領域については、100%の確率で
接合欠陥が存在していると判断してよく、また、第1波
反射エコーの大きさが、入射した超音波の30%以下の
検査領域については、接合欠陥が存在していないと判断
してよいことがわかる。なお、図3は、接合構造体の接
合部Bの一部に接合欠陥13が存在している状態を模式
的に示す図である。
From the above results, the magnitude of the first wave reflection echo is 6 for the incident ultrasonic wave in the predetermined inspection area.
With respect to the inspection area of 2% or more, it is possible to judge that there is a 100% probability that the bonding defect exists, and the size of the first wave reflection echo is 30% or less of the incident ultrasonic wave. It can be seen that it is possible to determine that no junction defect exists in the region. Note that FIG. 3 is a diagram schematically showing a state in which the bonding defect 13 exists in a part of the bonding portion B of the bonded structure.

【0033】[実施形態2]この実施形態2では、図4
に示すような、湾曲部1aを備えた鉛柱体1、湾曲部1
aから両端部に接合された、構造物及び構造物の基礎に
ボルトで固定するための孔2aを有するフランジ2とを
備えた構造を有する免震ダンパ(製品)について、本願
発明の方法により、鉛柱体1とフランジ2の接合部(接
合面)Aの接合状態を調べた。なお、図4の免震ダンパ
の詳しい構造は、既に、従来の技術の欄で説明している
ので、ここでは重複を避けるため説明を省略する。
[Second Embodiment] In the second embodiment, as shown in FIG.
As shown in FIG. 1, the lead column body 1 including the bending portion 1 a, the bending portion 1
A seismic isolation damper (product) having a structure including a structure 2 and a flange 2 having a hole 2a for bolting to the structure and a foundation of the structure, which is joined to both ends of the structure by the method of the present invention, The joint state of the joint portion (joint surface) A between the lead column body 1 and the flange 2 was examined. The detailed structure of the seismic isolation damper shown in FIG. 4 has already been described in the section of the conventional art, and therefore the description thereof is omitted here to avoid duplication.

【0034】なお、この免震ダンパについて、鉛柱体1
とフランジ2の接合状態を調べるにあたっては、(a)接
合部Aの全域を所定の面積を有する検査領域に区画する
とともに、区画された検査領域のそれぞれについて、フ
ランジ2側から、超音波を入射し、探触子により第1波
反射エコーの大きさを調べ、入射した超音波の62%を
しきい値として、第1波反射エコーの大きさがそれ以上
であるものについては、当該検査領域において接合欠陥
があるとして、鉛柱体1とフランジ2の接合状態の良否
を判定し、(b)接合部Aの全面積に対する、接合欠陥が
認められた検査領域の合計面積の割合から免震ダンパ全
体としての鉛柱体1とフランジ2の接合状態の良否を判
定するとともに、(c)免震ダンパを切断して、鉛柱体1
とフランジ2の接合面を露出させることにより接合状態
を調べる検査、及び接合面の平行な方向への剪断強度を
調べる検査(破壊検査)を行った。
Regarding this seismic isolation damper, the lead column 1
In examining the joining state of the flange 2 and the flange 2, (a) the entire area of the joining portion A is divided into inspection areas having a predetermined area, and an ultrasonic wave is incident on each of the divided inspection areas from the flange 2 side. Then, the size of the first-wave reflected echo is examined with a probe, and the size of the first-wave reflected echo is more than that, with 62% of the incident ultrasonic waves as the threshold value. It is judged that there is a joint defect in (3), and the quality of the joint state between the lead column body 1 and the flange 2 is judged. The quality of the joint between the lead column 1 and the flange 2 of the damper as a whole is determined, and (c) the seismic isolation damper is cut to obtain the lead column 1.
Then, an inspection for checking the bonding state by exposing the bonding surface of the flange 2 and a test for checking the shear strength in the direction parallel to the bonding surface (destructive inspection) were performed.

【0035】その結果、この実施形態2の場合にも、第
1波反射エコーの大きさが、入射した超音波の62%以
上である検査領域については、(c)の破壊検査において
100%の確率で接合欠陥が認められた。一方、第1波
反射エコーの大きさが、入射した超音波の30%以下の
検査領域については、上記(c)の破壊検査で接合欠陥の
発生が認められなかった。
As a result, also in the case of the second embodiment, the inspection area in which the size of the first wave reflection echo is 62% or more of the incident ultrasonic wave is 100% in the destructive inspection of (c). A joint defect was recognized with a probability. On the other hand, in the inspection area in which the size of the first-wave reflected echo is 30% or less of the incident ultrasonic waves, no junction defect was found in the destructive inspection in (c) above.

【0036】以上の結果より、実際の製品の場合におい
ても、所定の検査領域について、第1波反射エコーの大
きさが、入射した超音波の62%以上の検査領域につい
ては100%の確率で接合欠陥が存在していると判断し
てよく、また、第1波反射エコーの大きさが入射した超
音波の30%以下の検査領域については接合欠陥が存在
していないと判断してよいことが確認された。なお、上
記実施形態1及び2では、第1波反射エコーの大きさを
調べ、入射した超音波の62%をしきい値として、当該
検査領域において接合欠陥の有無を判定するようにして
いるが、しきい値は必ずしも62%に限られるものでは
なく、鉛柱体やフランジの構成材料の種類、寸法、形状
などの条件を考慮し、適宜、適切なしきい値を設定する
ようにすることが望ましい。
From the above results, even in the case of an actual product, there is a 100% probability that the size of the first wave reflection echo is 62% or more of the incident ultrasonic wave in the predetermined inspection region. It may be judged that a bonding defect exists, and it may be judged that a bonding defect does not exist in an inspection region in which the size of the first wave reflection echo is 30% or less of the incident ultrasonic wave. Was confirmed. In the first and second embodiments, the size of the first wave reflection echo is checked, and the presence or absence of a bonding defect in the inspection area is determined using 62% of the incident ultrasonic waves as a threshold value. However, the threshold value is not necessarily limited to 62%, and it is possible to set an appropriate threshold value in consideration of conditions such as the type, size and shape of the constituent material of the lead column and the flange. desirable.

【0037】なお、本願発明は、その他の点においても
上記実施形態1及び2に限定されるものではなく、鉛柱
体及びフランジの具体的な形状、入射する超音波の周波
数、鉛柱体とフランジの接合部の検査領域の区画方法な
どに関し、発明の範囲内において、種々の応用、変形を
加えることが可能である。
The present invention is not limited to the above-described first and second embodiments in other respects as well, and the specific shapes of the lead column and the flange, the frequency of the incident ultrasonic wave, and the lead column. Various applications and modifications can be made within the scope of the invention with respect to a method of partitioning the inspection area of the joint portion of the flange and the like.

【0038】[0038]

【発明の効果】上述のように、本願発明(請求項1)の
免震ダンパの検査方法は、鉛柱体とフランジの接合部の
所定の検査領域に、フランジ側から超音波を入射し、接
合部からの反射エコーを検出して、反射エコーの大きさ
が所定のしきい値より大きい場合に、当該検査領域に接
合欠陥が存在すると判定するようにしているので、接合
欠陥の有無を容易かつ確実に検出して、信頼性の高い良
否判定を行うことができる。
As described above, the seismic isolation damper inspection method according to the present invention (Claim 1) applies ultrasonic waves from the flange side to a predetermined inspection region of the joint between the lead column and the flange, Since the reflected echo from the joint is detected and if the magnitude of the reflected echo is larger than a predetermined threshold value, it is determined that there is a joint defect in the inspection area, it is easy to determine the presence or absence of the joint defect. In addition, it is possible to reliably detect and make a reliable quality decision.

【0039】すなわち、予め、反射エコーの大きさと製
品である免震ダンパの性能の関係を調べて、所定のしき
い値を定めておき、反射エコーがしきい値より大きくな
ると接合状態が不良である(接合欠陥が存在する)と判
定することにより、接合欠陥の有無を容易かつ確実に検
出して、信頼性の高い接合状態の良否判定を行うことが
可能になる。
That is, the relationship between the size of the reflection echo and the performance of the seismic isolation damper, which is a product, is checked in advance, and a predetermined threshold value is set. If the reflection echo becomes larger than the threshold value, the joining state is not good. By determining that there is a bonding defect (there is a bonding defect), it is possible to easily and surely detect the presence or absence of a bonding defect, and perform a highly reliable judgment of the bonding state.

【0040】また、本願発明(請求項2)の免震ダンパ
の検査方法は、鉛柱体とフランジの接合部の所定の検査
領域に、フランジ側から超音波を入射し、反射エコーの
大きさから当該検査領域における接合欠陥の有無を判定
する方法により、鉛柱体とフランジの接合部の複数の検
査領域について接合欠陥の有無を判定し、接合欠陥の有
無を判定した全ての検査領域に対する、接合欠陥が認め
られた検査領域の割合から、免震ダンパ全体としての鉛
柱体とフランジの接合状態の良否を判定するようにして
いるので、さらに確実に免震ダンパ全体としての鉛柱体
とフランジの接合状態の良否を判定することが可能にな
り、本願発明を実効あらしめることができる。
The seismic isolation damper inspection method of the present invention (claim 2) is such that ultrasonic waves are incident from the flange side into a predetermined inspection region of the joint between the lead column and the flange, and the magnitude of the reflection echo is increased. From the method of determining the presence or absence of a bonding defect in the inspection region, to determine the presence or absence of bonding defects for a plurality of inspection regions of the joint portion of the lead column and the flange, for all the inspection regions that have been determined the presence or absence of bonding defects, The quality of the joint between the lead column and the flange of the seismic isolation damper as a whole is determined based on the proportion of the inspection area where a joint defect was found. It becomes possible to judge the quality of the joined state of the flanges, and the present invention can be effectively realized.

【0041】また、本願発明(請求項3)の免震ダンパ
の検査方法は、接合部の全域を所定の面積を有する検査
領域に区画するとともに、各検査領域について接合欠陥
の有無を判定し、接合部の全面積に対する、接合欠陥が
認められた検査領域の合計面積の割合から、免震ダンパ
全体としての鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態の良否を判定
するようにしているので、さらに確実に免震ダンパ全体
としての鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態の良否を判定する
ことが可能になり、本願発明を実効あらしめることが可
能になる。
Further, the seismic isolation damper inspection method of the present invention (claim 3) divides the entire joint portion into inspection regions having a predetermined area, and judges the presence or absence of a joint defect in each inspection region, The quality of the joint between the lead column body and the flange of the seismic isolation damper as a whole is determined from the ratio of the total area of the inspection area where the joint defect is recognized to the total area of the joint, so it is more reliable. It becomes possible to judge the quality of the joining state of the lead column body and the flange of the seismic isolation damper as a whole, and it is possible to effectively present the present invention.

【0042】また、鉛柱体の両端面へのフランジの接合
が、鉛ホモゲン又ははんだ付けによる方法により行われ
ている場合、鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態が問題になり
やすいが、そのような場合に、請求項4のように、本願
発明を適用することにより、鉛柱体とフランジの接合状
態の良否を確実に判定することが可能になり特に有意義
である。
When the flanges are joined to both end faces of the lead column body by a method such as lead homogenization or soldering, the joint state of the lead column body and the flange tends to be a problem. In this case, by applying the present invention as described in claim 4, it is possible to reliably judge the quality of the joined state of the lead column body and the flange, which is particularly significant.

【0043】また、鉛柱体を用いた免震ダンパとして
は、鉛柱体が一つの平面に沿って湾曲する湾曲部を有す
るものである場合に、大きな免震効果が得られることが
知られているが、鉛柱体がこのような湾曲部を有するも
のである場合にも、請求項5のように、本願発明を適用
することにより、鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態の良否を
確実に判定することができる。
As a seismic isolation damper using a lead column, it is known that a large seismic isolation effect can be obtained when the lead column has a curved portion that curves along one plane. However, even when the lead column body has such a curved portion, by applying the invention of the present application as in claim 5, it is possible to ensure the quality of the joined state of the lead column body and the flange. Can be determined.

【0044】また、請求項6の免震ダンパの検査方法の
ように、接合部からの反射エコーを検出して、反射エコ
ーの大きさから当該検査領域における接合欠陥の有無を
判定するにあたって、第1波反射エコーの大きさが、入
射した超音波の62%以上である場合に接合欠陥がある
と判定するようにした場合、確実に鉛柱体とフランジの
接合状態の良否を判定することが可能になり、本願発明
をさらに実効あらしめることが可能になる。
According to the seismic isolation damper inspection method of claim 6, in detecting the reflection echo from the joint portion and judging the presence or absence of the joint defect in the inspection region from the size of the reflection echo, When it is determined that there is a bonding defect when the size of the one-wave reflected echo is 62% or more of the incident ultrasonic waves, it is possible to reliably judge the quality of the bonding state between the lead column and the flange. Therefore, the present invention can be further effectively realized.

【0045】また、本願発明(請求項7)の免震ダンパ
は、請求項1〜6のいずれかに記載の免震ダンパの検査
方法により検査して、鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態が良
好であると判定されたものであり、請求項1〜6の検査
方法によれば、鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態の良否を確
実に判定することができるので、確実に高い信頼性を備
えた免震ダンパを提供することが可能になる。
Further, the seismic isolation damper of the present invention (Claim 7) is inspected by the seismic isolation damper inspection method according to any one of Claims 1 to 6, and it is confirmed that the lead column body and the flange are joined well. According to the inspection method of claims 1 to 6, it is possible to reliably determine the quality of the joining state of the lead column body and the flange, and thus it is possible to reliably provide high reliability. It becomes possible to provide seismic isolation dampers.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】本願発明の実施形態1において用いたテスト試
料(接合構造体)の構成を示す図である。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a test sample (bonding structure) used in a first embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】本願発明の実施形態1にかかる方法を用い、探
触子により反射エコーの大きさを調べた場合の超音波伝
播時間と反射エコーの大きさの関係を示す図である。
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the relationship between the ultrasonic wave propagation time and the size of the reflected echo when the size of the reflected echo is examined by the probe using the method according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

【図3】接合部(接合面)の一部に接合欠陥が存在して
いる状態を模式的に示す図である。
FIG. 3 is a diagram schematically showing a state in which a bonding defect exists in a part of a bonding portion (bonding surface).

【図4】本願発明の実施形態2において、鉛柱体とフラ
ンジの接合状態を調べた免震ダンパの構造を示す図であ
る。
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a structure of a seismic isolation damper in which a joint state between a lead column body and a flange is examined in a second embodiment of the present invention.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 鉛柱体 1a 湾曲部 2 フランジ 2a ボルトで固定するための孔 11 鉛円柱(鉛ブロック) 12 ステンレス鋼材 13 接合欠陥 A 鉛柱体とフランジの接合部(接合面) B 鉛円柱(鉛ブロック)とステンレス鋼材
の接合部(接合面)
1 Lead Column 1a Curved Part 2 Flange 2a Hole for Fixing with Bolt 11 Lead Cylinder (Lead Block) 12 Stainless Steel Material 13 Joining Defect A Joint of Lead Column and Flange (Joint Surface) B Lead Cylinder (Lead Block) And stainless steel joint (joint surface)

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 二見 達也 東京都港区新橋5丁目11番3号 住友金属 鉱山株式会社内 (72)発明者 柏木 栄介 東京都港区新橋5丁目11番3号 住友金属 鉱山株式会社内 (72)発明者 小舟 博文 兵庫県尼崎市杭瀬寺島2丁目1番2号 木 村化工機株式会社内 (72)発明者 中田 尚文 兵庫県尼崎市杭瀬寺島2丁目1番2号 木 村化工機株式会社内 (72)発明者 福森 文男 兵庫県尼崎市杭瀬寺島2丁目1番2号 木 村化工機株式会社内 (72)発明者 石田 敏夫 兵庫県尼崎市杭瀬寺島2丁目1番2号 木 村化工機株式会社内 (72)発明者 大島 二三男 兵庫県尼崎市杭瀬寺島2丁目1番2号 木 村化工機株式会社内 (72)発明者 池田 誠克 大阪府守口市暁町4番27号 株式会社大検 内 Fターム(参考) 2D046 DA12 2G047 AA06 AB07 AC05 BA03 BC07 EA11 GG24 GG28 3J048 AA04 AB01 AC06 BE10 EA38 3J066 AA26 BA03 BB01 BB04 BC01 BF01    ─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continued front page    (72) Inventor Tatsuya Futami             5-11-3 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo Sumitomo Metals             Within Mining Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Eisuke Kashiwagi             5-11-3 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo Sumitomo Metals             Within Mining Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Hirofumi Kobune             2-1-2, Kiserejima Island, Amagasaki City, Hyogo Prefecture             Mura Kakoki Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Naofumi Nakata             2-1-2, Kiserejima Island, Amagasaki City, Hyogo Prefecture             Mura Kakoki Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Fumio Fukumori             2-1-2, Kiserejima Island, Amagasaki City, Hyogo Prefecture             Mura Kakoki Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Toshio Ishida             2-1-2, Kiserejima Island, Amagasaki City, Hyogo Prefecture             Mura Kakoki Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Fumio Oshima             2-1-2, Kiserejima Island, Amagasaki City, Hyogo Prefecture             Mura Kakoki Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Seikatsu Ikeda             4-27 Akamachicho, Moriguchi City, Osaka Prefecture Daiken Co., Ltd.             Within F term (reference) 2D046 DA12                 2G047 AA06 AB07 AC05 BA03 BC07                       EA11 GG24 GG28                 3J048 AA04 AB01 AC06 BE10 EA38                 3J066 AA26 BA03 BB01 BB04 BC01                       BF01

Claims (7)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】鉛又は鉛合金からなる柱体(以下「鉛柱
体」という)の両端面に、鋼材からなるフランジを接合
してなる免震ダンパの、前記鉛柱体と前記フランジの接
合状態の良否を判定するための検査方法であって、 鉛柱体とフランジの接合部の所定の検査領域に、フラン
ジ側から超音波を入射し、接合部からの反射エコーを検
出して、反射エコーの大きさが所定のしきい値より大き
い場合には、当該検査領域に接合欠陥があると判定する
ことを特徴とする免震ダンパの検査方法。
1. A seismic isolation damper in which a flange made of a steel material is joined to both end surfaces of a column body made of lead or a lead alloy (hereinafter referred to as "lead column body"), and the lead column body and the flange are joined together. This is an inspection method for judging the quality of the state, in which ultrasonic waves are incident from the flange side to a predetermined inspection area of the joint between the lead column and the flange, and the reflection echo from the joint is detected to reflect A method for inspecting a seismic isolation damper, characterized in that, when the size of the echo is larger than a predetermined threshold value, it is determined that the inspection area has a bonding defect.
【請求項2】鉛又は鉛合金からなる柱体(以下「鉛柱
体」という)の両端面に、鋼材からなるフランジを接合
してなる免震ダンパの、前記鉛柱体と前記フランジの接
合状態を検査するための検査方法であって、 鉛柱体とフランジの接合部の所定の検査領域に、フラン
ジ側から超音波を入射し、接合部からの反射エコーを検
出して、反射エコーの大きさから当該検査領域における
接合欠陥の有無を判定する方法により、鉛柱体とフラン
ジの接合部の複数の検査領域について接合欠陥の有無を
判定し、 接合欠陥の有無を判定した全ての検査領域に対する、接
合欠陥が認められた検査領域の割合から、免震ダンパ全
体としての鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態の良否を判定す
ることを特徴とする免震ダンパの検査方法。
2. A seismic isolation damper in which a flange made of steel is joined to both end surfaces of a pillar made of lead or a lead alloy (hereinafter referred to as "lead pillar"), and the lead pillar is joined to the flange. An inspection method for inspecting the condition, in which ultrasonic waves are incident from the flange side to a predetermined inspection area of the joint between the lead column and the flange, and the reflected echo from the joint is detected, All inspection areas that have been determined to have a bonding defect by determining the presence or absence of bonding defects in multiple inspection areas of the joint between the lead column and the flange by the method that determines the presence or absence of a bonding defect in the relevant inspection area from the size The method for inspecting a seismic isolation damper is characterized by determining the quality of the joint state between the lead column body and the flange of the seismic isolation damper as a whole from the ratio of the inspection area in which a joint defect is recognized.
【請求項3】鉛又は鉛合金からなる柱体(以下「鉛柱
体」という)の両端面に、鋼材からなるフランジを接合
してなる免震ダンパの、前記鉛柱体と前記フランジの接
合状態を検査するための検査方法であって、 (a)接合部の全域を所定の面積を有する検査領域に区画
するとともに、各検査領域について接合欠陥の有無を判
定し、 (b)接合部の全面積に対する、接合欠陥が認められた検
査領域の合計面積の割合から、免震ダンパ全体としての
鉛柱体とフランジの接合状態の良否を判定することを特
徴とする免震ダンパの検査方法。
3. A seismic isolation damper in which a flange made of steel is joined to both end surfaces of a pillar made of lead or a lead alloy (hereinafter referred to as "lead pillar") to join the lead pillar and the flange. An inspection method for inspecting a state, comprising: (a) partitioning an entire area of a joint into inspection areas having a predetermined area, and determining the presence or absence of a joint defect in each inspection area; A method for inspecting a seismic isolation damper, comprising determining the quality of the joint between the lead column and the flange of the seismic isolation damper as a whole, based on the ratio of the total area of the inspection area where a joint defect is recognized to the total area.
【請求項4】鉛柱体の両端面へのフランジの接合が、鉛
ホモゲン又ははんだ付けによる方法により行われている
ことを特徴とする請求項1〜3のいずれかに記載の免震
ダンパの検査方法。
4. The seismic isolation damper according to claim 1, wherein the flanges are joined to both end faces of the lead column by a method using lead homogen or soldering. Inspection method.
【請求項5】前記鉛柱体が一つの平面に沿って湾曲する
湾曲部を有するものであることを特徴とする請求項1〜
4のいずれかに記載の免震ダンパの検査方法。
5. The lead column body has a curved portion that curves along one plane.
Inspection method of seismic isolation damper described in any one of 4.
【請求項6】前記接合部からの反射エコーを検出して、
反射エコーの大きさから当該検査領域における接合欠陥
の有無を判定するにあたって、第1波反射エコーの大き
さが、入射した超音波の62%以上である場合に、当該
検査領域に接合欠陥があると判定することを特徴とする
請求項1〜5のいずれかに記載の免震ダンパの検査方
法。
6. A reflected echo from the joint is detected,
When determining the presence / absence of a bonding defect in the inspection area based on the size of the reflected echo, when the size of the first wave reflected echo is 62% or more of the incident ultrasonic wave, the bonding defect is present in the inspection area. The method for inspecting a seismic isolation damper according to claim 1, wherein the seismic isolation damper is inspected.
【請求項7】請求項1〜6のいずれかに記載の免震ダン
パの検査方法により検査して、鉛柱体とフランジの接合
状態が良好であると判定されたものであることを特徴と
する免震ダンパ。
7. The seismic isolation damper according to any one of claims 1 to 6, which is inspected by the inspection method and is determined to be in a good joint state between the lead column and the flange. Seismic isolation damper.
JP2002102449A 2002-04-04 2002-04-04 Inspection method of seismic isolation damper Expired - Lifetime JP3623486B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002102449A JP3623486B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2002-04-04 Inspection method of seismic isolation damper

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002102449A JP3623486B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2002-04-04 Inspection method of seismic isolation damper

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2003294717A true JP2003294717A (en) 2003-10-15
JP3623486B2 JP3623486B2 (en) 2005-02-23

Family

ID=29242257

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2002102449A Expired - Lifetime JP3623486B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2002-04-04 Inspection method of seismic isolation damper

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3623486B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7983726B2 (en) 2007-09-21 2011-07-19 Andrew Abolafia Superconducting generator

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7983726B2 (en) 2007-09-21 2011-07-19 Andrew Abolafia Superconducting generator

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3623486B2 (en) 2005-02-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Lanza di Scalea et al. Propagation of ultrasonic guided waves in lap-shear adhesive joints: case of incident A 0 Lamb wave
Beard Guided wave inspection of embedded cylindrical structures
CN105181799B (en) The transverse defect detection means and method of Cylinder Surface workpiece
US9678045B2 (en) Devices, systems, and methods for non-destructive testing of materials and structures
Kubit et al. Analysis of the effect of structural defects on the fatigue strength of RFSSW joints using C‐scan scanning acoustic microscopy and SEM
CN105784847A (en) Workpiece manufacturing method for eliminating defects of side wall blind zone of cylindrical workpiece
Soleimanpour et al. Damage detection and localization in loose bolted joints
CN105067708B (en) A kind of ultrasonic phase array detection voussoir detected for V-type turning workpiece
JP2003294717A (en) Seismic isolation damper and inspection method thereof
Murat et al. Impact damage detection in composite panels using guided ultrasonic waves
Zhou et al. Simulation and experimental study on the quality evaluation of laser welds based on ultrasonic test
Chen et al. Structural health monitoring of a smart composite structure with a Time-of-Flight method
Koodalil et al. Inspection of hidden and curved regions in composite structures using non-contact guided ultrasonic waves
CN205484218U (en) A probe for shear wave is detected a flaw
JPH10221308A (en) Method and device of detecting ruptured part in metal and probe
Seo et al. Improvement of crack sizing performance by using nonlinear ultrasonic technique
JP4552126B2 (en) Ultrasonic flaw detection method
Singh et al. Delamination detection and evaluation in composite laminates using guided ultrasonic waves
JP3635266B2 (en) Inspection method for joints between lead or lead alloy and steel
Tachibana et al. Detection of Water Ponding in Steel-plate-bonded Concrete Slab Using Ultrasonic Guided Wave
Chiou et al. Ultrasonic detection of cracks below bolts in aircraft skins
Schroeder et al. Comparison of Phased Array Ultrasound to Conventional Ultrasound and Radiographic Testing for Bridge Welds
Teoh et al. Structural vibration analysis of weld defects
LÓPEZ et al. Ultrasonic testing of ITER toroidal field coil cases closure welds
Thang et al. Fatigue performance of tubular X-joints: Numerical investigation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20040223

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20040330

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20040531

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20041109

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20041124

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Ref document number: 3623486

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313117

R360 Written notification for declining of transfer of rights

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R360

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20071203

Year of fee payment: 3

R370 Written measure of declining of transfer procedure

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R370

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20071203

Year of fee payment: 3

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313117

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20071203

Year of fee payment: 3

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20071203

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081203

Year of fee payment: 4

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091203

Year of fee payment: 5

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121203

Year of fee payment: 8

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121203

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20151203

Year of fee payment: 11

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313117

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term