JP2003167504A - Electronic learning machine, learning support method and computer readable recording medium with program for carrying out learning support method recorded thereon - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an electronic learning machine, etc., which reduces learner's burden of inputting an answer to an answer-requiring item by reducing the number of times to input and answer to the answer requiring item through enabling setting of neither too many nor too few number of answer-requiring items substantially useful for the improvement of learner's thinking ability according to the learning level of each learner. <P>SOLUTION: A question, provided with a first answer-requiring item which immediately makes the whole question correctly answered if a correct answer is given and with a plurality of second answer-requiring items, is presented. When an answer to any one of the answer-requiring items is inputted from an answer input section 17, a judging section 21 compares the inputted answer data with correct answer data stored in a storage section 19 and outputs the judgement result to an answer input restriction section 25. The answer input restriction section 25, according to the dependency corresponding to the prescribed judgement result of correct or incorrect stored in a relating storage section 23, outputs an answer input restriction signal to restrict input of the next answer to a display control section 29. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2003,JPO

Description

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an electronic learning machine, a learning support method, and a computer-readable recording medium in which a program for executing the learning support method is recorded, and a problem in which a plurality of answer request items are provided. The present invention relates to an electronic learning machine for displaying, a learning support method, and a computer-readable recording medium recording a program for executing the learning support method.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art FIG. 39 is a diagram showing a basic problem and an answer to a mathematical equation, which is an example of a problem to be asked in learning in an electronic learning machine, and FIG. It is the figure which showed the standard problem and its solution about the mathematical equation which is another example of the problem to be solved.

In the basic problem of the mathematical equation of FIG. 39, the first answer request item "Le" is provided as well as the first answer request item "Le" in which the correct answer as this problem should be input. A plurality of second answer request items “a”, “b”, “c”, “d”, “ho”,
"F", "T", "H", "R", and "N" are provided.

In solving the problem shown in FIG. 39, the learner usually uses the second answer request items "a", "b", "c",
"D,""H,""H,""T,""H,""L,"
Answers are input in the order of "nu", and finally the answer is input to the first answer request item "ru".

On the other hand, in the standard problem of the mathematical equation shown in FIG. 40, the first answer request item “L” is provided in which the correct answer as this problem should be input, and the first answer request item
A plurality of second answer request items "ha", "d", "ri", and "nu" are provided in order to derive the correct answer of the answer request item "ru".

[0006] When the learner usually solves the problem shown in Fig. 40, the second answer request item "ha", "d", "ri",
Answers are input in the order of "nu", and finally the answer is input to the first answer request item "ru".

Here, the first answer request item "Le" is shown in FIG.
The basic question of FIG. 9 and the standard question of FIG. 40 are both asked, but the plurality of second answer request items “a” of FIG. 39,
"B", "c", "two", "ho", "f", "to",
“H”, “L”, “N” and the plurality of second answer request items “H”, “D”, “L”, and “N” in FIG. 40 are provided in the number according to the difficulty level of the question. Has been.

Usually, the correctness / incorrectness of the answers entered in the questions of FIG. 39 and the questions of FIG. 40 is determined every time an answer is entered in each answer request item, or all answer request items are entered. After entering the answer to.

Therefore, in order to finish solving the problems of FIG. 39 and the problem of FIG. 40, the learner must input the answer to all the answer request items.

[0010]

However, as shown in FIG.
In the case of the basic problem of, for a learner who is already sufficiently proficient in learning similar problems, it may be possible to derive the correct answer to the problem without inputting the answers in all the answer request items. . In such a case, if answers must be entered in all the answer request items, such learners need to enter answers in a state like mere input work in which they do not need to focus on the thinking process. Since the answer request items that are merely present are included, the learning efficiency and thus the motivation for learning are reduced.

On the other hand, in the case of the standard question of FIG. 40, if answers must be entered in all the answer request items, the calculation process is expressed in a simplified form as appropriate. For learners with insufficient degrees, they cannot fully understand the intentions of the questions, and it becomes difficult to answer individual answer request items.

After all, for a problem including a plurality of answer request items, there is no excess or deficiency in the number of items that substantially contributes to the improvement of the learner's thinking ability according to the individual learner's proficiency level. Ideally, answer request items are provided.

However, there are individual differences in the proficiency level of each learner, and even the same learner has his / her weak points and weak points, and even within one subject, his / her strong points and weak points. For example, because there is a difference in proficiency levels, there is a sufficient number of answer requests depending on the proficiency level of each individual learner, which is practically useful for improving the learner's thinking ability. It was difficult to create a question that included items and give it a question.

Therefore, the object of the present invention is substantially useful for improving the learner's thinking ability according to each learner's proficiency level, regardless of the level of each learner's proficiency level. An electronic learning machine that enables the setting of as many answer request items as there is no excess or deficiency, and reduces the number of times an answer is input to the answer request items, thereby reducing the learner's answer input work load.
It is to provide a computer-readable recording medium in which a learning support method and a program for executing the learning support method are recorded.

[0015]

The invention according to claim 1 displays one question provided with a plurality of answer request items, wherein the plurality of answer request items are at least one first item.
An electronic learning machine configured to include the answer request item and a plurality of second answer request items, and determining that the one question is immediately answered correctly in response to the input of the correct answer to the first answer request item. A predetermined subordinate relationship according to the correctness of the answer entered in each of the second answer request items is defined between each second answer request item into which the answer is entered and the first answer request item, and Each second answer request item to which an answer is input and another second answer request item are set in advance in association with each other, and in response to the input of the answer to each of the plurality of answer request items, The judging means for judging whether the inputted answer is correct or not, and the judged second answer when the judgment result of the judging means is the correctness of the answer inputted to the second answer request item. Of the answers entered for the requirements In response to an error, among the answer request items for which no answer has been input yet, the first answer request item or the other second answer request item according to the subordinate relationship with the determined second answer request item. And an answer input limiting means for limiting the input of the next answer to.

Therefore, according to the input of the answer to each of the plurality of answer request items provided for one displayed question, the correctness of the entered answer is judged by the judging means, and a plurality of answer request items are constituted. When it is determined that the answer input to at least one first answer request item is a correct answer, it is immediately determined that the one question is correctly answered. Therefore, after that, it is not necessary to input the answer to the first answer request item and the second answer request item for which the answer has not been entered, and the above problem has been solved.

In addition, a predetermined subordinate relationship depending on the correctness of the answer input to each of the plurality of second answer request items constituting the plurality of answer request items provided for one displayed question is an answer. Correlation is preliminarily made between each second answer request item in which is input and the first answer request item, and between each second answer request item in which an answer is entered and another second answer request item. Is set. This subordination is effective in improving the thinking ability of each learner, regardless of the level of proficiency of each learner, in solving one problem. It is related so that it is possible to set a sufficient number of answer request items that are practically useful. The correctness of the answer input to each of the plurality of second answer request items constituting the plurality of answer request items provided for one displayed question is determined by the determining means, and the determined answer is determined. According to the correctness of the answer input to the answer request item of No. 2, the first answer request according to the subordinate relationship with the determined second answer request item among answer request items for which no answer has been input yet. The input of the next answer to the item or another second answer request item is restricted by the answer input limiting means. By setting the dependency relationship and limiting the input of the next answer in this way, the degree of freedom of inputting the answer is reduced compared to the case where the input of the next answer is not limited without setting the dependency relationship. For a person to complete one problem, it is sufficient to input the answers to the sufficient number of answer request items that are practically useful for improving the thinking ability of the learner.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the first aspect, the determination result of the determining means is the correctness or incorrectness of the answer input to the second answer request item, and the determined result is the first or second. In response to the result that the answer input to the second answer request item is a correct answer, the next answer is input by the answer input limiting means in accordance with the subordinate relationship with the determined second answer request item. A correct answer display means for displaying a correct answer to the limited first answer request item or the other second answer request item is provided.

Therefore, in response to the result that the answer input to the determined second answer request item is a correct answer, the answer input limiting means is in accordance with the subordinate relationship with the determined second answer request item. The correct answer is displayed by the correct answer display means for the first answer request item in which the input of the next answer is restricted or the other second answer request item, and the learner visually recognizes the correct answer for the restricted answer request item. it can.

The invention according to claim 3 is the invention according to claim 1 or 2.
In the determination result of the determination means, the answer input to the second answer request item is correct or incorrect, and
When the answer input to the determined second answer request item is the result of an incorrect answer, the answer input limiting means is operated according to the subordinate relationship with the determined second answer request item. An answer unacceptable display means for displaying that it is impossible to accept the input of an answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item in which the input of the next answer is restricted. is there.

Therefore, in response to the result that the answer input to the determined second answer request item is an incorrect answer, the answer input restriction is set according to the subordinate relationship with the determined second answer request item. It is displayed by the answer unacceptable display means that the input of the answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item in which the input of the next answer is restricted by the means is displayed, and the learner Can visually confirm that the input of the answer to the restricted answer request item cannot be accepted.

According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, in the third aspect, the correct answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item that is not dependent on the determined second answer request item. Input of the next answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item in which it is displayed by the answer unavailability display means that the answer cannot be accepted. It is provided with a restriction releasing means for releasing the restriction.

Therefore, in response to the input of the correct answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item which is not dependent on the determined second answer request item, the acceptance of the answer input is disabled. The input restriction of the next answer to the first answer request item or other second answer request item displaying the effect is canceled by the restriction removing means, and the first answer request item or the second answer after cancellation is released. It becomes possible to input the answer to the required item.

The invention according to claim 5 displays at least one question out of a plurality of prepared questions, each question is provided with a plurality of answer request items, and the plurality of answer request items are At least one first answer request item and a plurality of second answer request items are included.
Is an electronic learning machine that determines that a correct answer is immediately given to each question in response to the input of a correct answer to the answer request item, and is determined according to the correctness of the answer entered in each second answer request item of each question. The dependency relationship between the second answer request item of each question to which the answer is input and the first answer request item of each question, and to the second of each question to which the answer is entered.
Of the answer input to the second answer request item of the first question, which is set in advance in association with each other answer request item of the question and the other second answer request item of the question A predetermined subordinate relationship according to
Between each second answer request item of the question and each of the second answer request items of the second question, and the first answer is input.
Second answer request item for each question and the first item for the second question
Is set in advance in association with the answer request item, and in response to the input of the answer to each of the plurality of answer request items of the first question and the second question, the input answer According to the judgment means for judging correctness, the judgment result history storage means for storing the history of the judgment result for the first problem judged by the judgment means, and the history stored by the judgment result history storage means, While limiting the input of the next answer to the answer request item for which the answer of the plurality of answer request items of the second question has not been entered yet,
When the determination result of the determination means is correct or incorrect for the answer input to the second answer request item of the second question,
According to the correctness of the answer input to the second answer request item of the determined second question, among the answer request items for which the answer has not been input, the determined second question According to the subordinate relationship with the second answer request item, the second
The answer input limiting means for limiting the input of the next answer to the first answer request item of the question or the other second answer request item.

Therefore, a predetermined subordinate relationship according to the correctness or incorrectness of the answer input to each second answer request item of the first question has the second answer request item of each first question to which the answer is input. Between each second answer request item of the second question and each second answer request item of the first question to which the answer is input and the second answer request item
Is set in advance in association with the first answer request item of the question, the history of the determination result for the first question determined by the determination means is stored by the determination result history storage means, and is stored in the stored history. Accordingly, the input of the next answer to the answer request item of the plurality of answer request items of the second question for which the answer has not been entered is restricted by the answer input limiting means. Therefore, compared to the invention according to claim 1,
Since the input of the answer to the answer request item of the second problem is restricted, the degree of freedom of inputting the answer is further reduced as compared with the case where the input of the next answer is not restricted without setting the dependency relationship. For the purpose of solving one problem, the second problem, it is only necessary to input the answers for the sufficient number of answer request items that are practically useful for improving the learner's thinking ability.

According to a sixth aspect of the invention, in the fifth aspect, the determination result of the determining means is the second of the second problem.
Is the correctness of the answer entered for the answer request item
In addition, the second answer request item of the determined second question is determined in response to the result that the answer input to the second answer request item of the determined second question is a correct answer. A correct answer for displaying the correct answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item of the second question for which the input of the next answer is restricted by the answer input restriction means in accordance with It is provided with a display means.

Therefore, in solving the second problem,
The same effect as that of the invention of claim 2 can be obtained.

The invention according to claim 7 is the invention according to claim 5 or 6.
In, the determination result of the determination means is correct or incorrect of the answer input to the second answer request item of the second question, and the second answer request of the determined second question When the answer input to the item is the result of an incorrect answer, the answer input limiting means determines the next answer according to the subordinate relationship with the second answer request item of the determined second question. An answer unacceptable display means is provided for displaying that it is impossible to accept the input of an answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item of the second question whose input is restricted. It is a thing.

Therefore, in solving the second problem,
The same effect as that of the invention of claim 3 is obtained.

According to an eighth aspect of the present invention, in the seventh aspect, the second answer request item of the determined second question and the first answer request item of the second question having a non-dependent relationship or the above-mentioned first answer request item In response to the input of the correct answer to the other second answer request item, the first answer request item of the second question or the above-mentioned first answer request item displayed by the answer unavailability display means indicating that the answer input cannot be accepted. The restriction removing means is provided for canceling the restriction of the input of the next answer to the other second answer request item.

Therefore, in solving the second problem,
The same effect as that of the invention of claim 4 can be obtained.

The present invention according to claim 9 displays one question in which a plurality of answer request items are provided, and the plurality of answer request items are at least one first answer request item and a plurality of second answer request items. A learning support method that is configured by an answer request item and determines that the one question is correctly answered in response to the input of a correct answer to the first answer request item, and is input to each of the second answer request items. A predetermined subordinate relationship depending on whether the answer is correct is defined between each second answer request item to which the answer is input and the first answer request item, and each second answer to which the answer is input. The request item and the other second answer request item are set in association with each other in advance,
In response to the input of an answer to each of the plurality of answer request items, a first step of determining whether the entered answer is correct or incorrect, and the determination result of the first step is the second answer request item. In the case where the answer entered is correct or incorrect, among the answer request items for which no answer has yet been entered, depending on whether the answer entered for the determined second answer request item is correct, A second step of restricting the input of the next answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item according to the determined dependency relation with the second answer request item.

Therefore, the same operation as that of the first aspect of the invention can be obtained.

The invention according to claim 10 displays at least one question out of a plurality of prepared questions, each question is provided with a plurality of answer request items, and the plurality of answer request items are Electronic learning support that is configured by at least one first answer request item and a plurality of second answer request items, and determines that each question is immediately answered correctly in response to input of a correct answer to the first answer request item A predetermined dependency relationship according to the correctness of the answer input to each second answer request item of each question, and the second answer request item of each question to which the answer is input, First of each problem
And the second answer request item of each question to which the answer is input and the other second answer request item of each question, are set in association with each other in advance,
The predetermined dependency relationship according to the correctness of the answer input to each of the second answer request items of the first question is defined as the second answer request item of the first question to which the answer is input and the second Between the second answer request item of the question and the second answer request item of the first question to which the answer is input and the first answer request item of the second question The first step of establishing a relation in advance and determining whether the input answer is correct or incorrect according to the input of an answer to each of a plurality of answer request items of the first question; A second step of storing a history of determination results for the first question determined in step, and a plurality of answer request items for the second question according to the history stored in the second step. The next answer to the answer request item for which no answer has been entered yet A third step of limiting the input,
The fourth step of determining whether the entered answer is correct or incorrect in response to the input of an answer to each of the plurality of answer request items of the second question, and the determination result determined in the fourth step are If the answer input to the second answer request item of the second question is correct or incorrect, the answer entered to the second answer request item of the determined second question is correct or incorrect. Accordingly, the first answer request item of the second question or the first answer request item of the second question among the answer request items for which the answer has not been input yet is dependent on the determined second answer request item of the second question. And a fifth step of restricting the input of the next answer to the other second answer request item.

Therefore, an operation similar to that of the invention of claim 5 is obtained.

The invention according to claim 11 is a computer-readable recording medium in which a program for executing the learning support method according to claim 9 or 10 is recorded.

[0037]

BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of an electronic learning machine according to an embodiment of the present invention.

The electronic learning machine 1 is composed of a general personal computer. However, the present invention is not limited to the electronic learning machine 1, and may be applied to a word processor, an electronic book, an electronic encyclopedia, an electronic notebook, or the like. Further, the present invention may be a system form via an information communication network such as the Internet in addition to the stand-alone electronic learning machine 1, and in this case, the system is composed of a plurality of personal computers and servers.

The electronic learning machine 1 is a CD-ROM (not shown).
A CD-ROM drive 13 for reading program data from the hard disk 5, a hard disk 5 in which data (correct answer program and question file, etc.) read from the CD-ROM is installed, and a program etc. is read from the hard disk 5 to the memory 9. A CPU 7 that stores and executes a processing operation according to a program, a display 3 that displays a question and the like, an instruction for controlling the operation of the program, or data such as an answer for advancing learning, For example, a keyboard 1 for interactive input
1 and mouse 15.

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram showing a main part of the electronic learning machine 1 according to the embodiment of the present invention.

The electronic learning machine 1 includes an input unit 17 and a storage unit 1.
9, a determination unit 21, an association storage unit 23, an answer input restriction unit 25, a display unit 27, a display control unit 29, and a restriction release unit 39. The display control unit 29 includes a correct answer display unit 35 and an answer unacceptable display unit 37. Here, the question to be asked includes a description of the question in which a plurality of answer request items are provided.

The input section 17 corresponds to the keyboard 11 and the mouse 15 in FIG. 1, and may be a microphone or the like. The learner can select any one of the plurality of answer request items from the input unit 17 to input the answer, and the input unit 1
7 outputs the input answer data to the determination unit 21.

The storage unit 19 corresponds to one having a storage function such as a CD-ROM (not shown) which operates in the CD-ROM drive 13 shown in FIG. 1, a hard disk 5 and a memory 9. Then, the storage unit 19 outputs correct answer data corresponding to the answer data input from the input unit 17 to the determination unit 21.

The determination unit 21 corresponds to the CPU 7 in FIG. Then, the determination unit 21 compares the input answer data with the correct answer data, and determines whether the answer data input from the input unit 17 is the correct answer.

The relation storage unit 23 stores the relations of subordinate relations among the answer request items as described below, and a CD-ROM, a hard disk 5, not shown, which operates in the CD-ROM drive 13 of FIG. Those having a storage function such as the memory 9 are applicable.

First, the answer request items will be described. The plurality of answer request items include at least one first answer request item and a plurality of second answer request items, and it is determined that the first answer request item immediately answers the question in response to the correct answer input. This is a required answer item. Then, the association stored in the association storage unit 23 is the second answer request item to which the answer is input, with respect to the predetermined subordinate relationship depending on the correctness of the answer input to each second answer request item. It is set in association with the first answer request item and between each second answer request item to which the answer is input and the other second answer request item.

As an example of the problem in which the above-mentioned relation is set in advance, there is a fill-in-the-blank problem of mathematical equations shown in FIGS. 6 to 12. In this case, the first answer request item is a blank (answer column) for the unknown that is the solution of the equation, and the plurality of second answer request items are intermediate formulas for obtaining the first answer request item. It is a blank (answer column) provided. Further, as another example of the problem in which the above-mentioned association is set in advance, there is a five-limb alternative type problem shown in FIGS. 13 to 36. In this case, the first answer request item is an answer column consisting of five first answer request items that specify each of the five limbs, and the second answer request item is each limb is correct or incorrect. It is an answer column consisting of ten second answer request items that specify whether or not.

The answer input restriction unit 25 corresponds to the CPU of FIG. Then, the answer input restriction unit 25 receives the determination result of the determination unit 21, and at least when the determination result is the correct or incorrect answer input to the second answer request item, the determined second According to the correctness or incorrectness of the answer input to the answer request item, the first answer request item according to the subordinate relationship with the determined second answer request item among the answer request items for which the answer is not yet input, or An answer input limiting signal for limiting the input of the next answer to the other second answer request item is input to the display control unit 29.

The display unit 27 corresponds to the display 3 of FIG. 1, and is controlled by the display control unit 29 to which the CPU 7 of FIG. 1 corresponds. The display control unit 29 includes a correct answer display unit 35 and an answer unacceptable display unit 37. In the correct answer display unit 35, the determination result of the determination unit 21 is the correctness of the answer input to the second answer request item, and the answer input to the determined second answer request item. Is a correct answer, the first answer request item or another first answer request item in which the input of the next answer is restricted by the answer input restriction unit 25 according to the determined dependency relation with the second answer request item. The correct answer is displayed for the answer request item of 2. On the other hand, the answer unacceptable display unit 37 indicates that the determination result of the determination unit 21 is the correctness of the answer input to the second answer request item, and the determined second answer request item is The first answer request in which the input of the next answer is restricted by the answer input restriction unit 25 in accordance with the dependency relationship with the determined second answer request item in response to the result that the entered answer is an incorrect answer. It is displayed that input cannot be accepted for the item or the other second answer request item.

The restriction releasing unit 39 outputs from the judging unit 21 in response to the input of the correct answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item which is not dependent on the determined second answer request item. The judgment result is input and the answer cannot be accepted display section 37
In order to cancel the input restriction of the next answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item in which the fact that the input acceptance of the answer is disabled is displayed by the answer input restriction unit 25. Output to.

FIGS. 3, 4 and 5 are flowcharts for explaining the operation of the electronic learning machine shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a question to be asked, FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of association between answer request items in the question of FIG. 6, and FIG. 8 is a first answer. FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a state in which one of a plurality of second answer request items is selected and an answer is input in the process of answering the request item, and FIG. 9 shows the answer input in FIG. It is a diagram for explaining that the answer request item that accepts the input of the answer next to the case of a correct answer is restricted, and is a diagram showing that the display state of the restricted answer request item changes. 10 is a diagram showing a display state when the answer input in FIG. 8 is an incorrect answer, and FIG. 11 is FIG.
It is a diagram for explaining that the answer request item that accepts the input of an answer is restricted from the display state of, and is a diagram showing that the display state of the restricted answer request item changes. FIG. 12 is a diagram for explaining a state where the answer input acceptance restriction is released after the display state of FIG. 11.

First, the relationship shown in FIG. 7 is preset for the problem shown in FIG. 6 (the same basic problem as in FIG. 39). The subordination relationship in this relation is from the second answer request item “b” to the second answer request item “d”, “to”, “h” toward the first answer request item “ru”. , "Nu", and the second answer request item "a", the second answer request items "ha", "ho", "to",
There is a part related in the order of "ri". Both
In order to make a correct answer to the second answer request item at a position close to the first answer request item “L”, it is premised that the second answer request item at a position farther than that can be correctly answered. Specific subordinate relationships will be described later.

In step ST1, the question shown in FIG. 6 in which a predetermined subordinate relationship is set in advance among the plurality of answer request items is displayed.

In step ST2, the learner operates the input unit 17 to select one of the plurality of answer request items and input the answer. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 8, “3”, which is a part of the answer, is input to the second answer request item “C”.

In step ST3, the determination section 21 determines whether or not the input answer is a correct answer. If the answer is correct, the process proceeds to step ST4. If the answer is incorrect, the process proceeds to step ST7.

In step ST4, step ST
Since the answer input to the answer request item selected in 2 is the correct answer, the input of the next answer is restricted according to the dependency relationship in the case of the correct answer. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 9, the correct answer "3" is given to the second answer request item "C".
By inputting "x", the input of the answer to the second answer request item "a" is restricted. This is the second
In order to make a correct answer to the answer request item “C” of “No”, it is premised that the second answer request item “A” can be answered correctly.
This is because it may be possible to restrict the input of the answer of the second answer request item, which is considered to allow the learner to enter the correct answer.

Therefore, by limiting the input of the answer to the second answer request item, which is considered to allow the learner to input the correct answer, the learner knows the correct answer and becomes a simple answer input work. It is not necessary to input an answer to the above-mentioned second answer request item, which may result in a reduction of the answer input work load.

The second answer request item "b", which has a subordinate relationship different from that of the second answer request item "c",
No restriction is placed on the answer input for "ni", "he", "chi", "nu", and "ru".

In step ST5, step ST4
The correct answer display unit 35 displays the correct answer “x” in the second answer request item restricted by “4”, specifically, in the second answer request item “a” in the above example, as shown in FIG. . Therefore, the learner does not need to input the answer to the second answer request item whose input of the answer is limited based on the presumption that the correct answer can be input, and the learner can visually recognize the displayed correct answer.

In step ST6, it is determined whether the remaining answer request items are only the first answer request items. If only the first answer request item remains, the process proceeds to step ST19 in FIG. 5, and if there is an answer request item other than the first answer request item, the process returns to step ST2. Be seen. In the above example, since the second answer request items "e", "to", "ri", etc. remain, the process returns to step ST2.

On the other hand, in step ST7, since the input answer to the answer request item selected in step ST2 is an incorrect answer, the input of the next answer is restricted according to the dependency relation in the case of an incorrect answer. . That is, FIG.
When the answer entered in the second answer request item “HA” is an incorrect answer “32” as shown in FIG. 11, the second answer request item “HA”, “HO”, Input of answers to “TO”, “RI”, and the first answer request item “LE” is restricted. This means that the correct answer to the second answer request item “C” is the input of the correct answer to the second answer request item “H”, “T”, “Li” and the first answer request item “L”. This is because it is premised that the learner may limit the input of answers to answer request items that are difficult for the learner to input correct answers.

Therefore, by limiting the input of the answer to the answer request item which is difficult for the learner to input the correct answer in this way, the learner does not input an incorrect answer in the next answer. , You can enter an answer that has a good chance of being a correct answer. In this way, the reason for prompting the user to enter the correct answer for the next answer is to simply continue to enter the answer even after repeatedly entering the wrong answer, and to enter the correct answer, the correct answer must be entered. Because it is necessary. Then, by limiting the input of the next answer that prompts the correct answer, the number of times the wrong answer is input is suppressed, and the burden of the answer input work on the learner is reduced accordingly. In particular, when the input of an answer is an incorrect answer, the input restriction of the next answer prompts the input of the next answer at a level suitable for the learner's proficiency level. It is possible to input the answers to the answer request items as close as possible to the answer request items, which is practically useful for improving the thinking ability of the person.

The second answer request item "b", which has a subordinate relationship different from that of the second answer request item "c",
No restrictions are placed on "d", "he", "chi", and "nu".

Then, in step ST8, it is displayed that the answer input cannot be accepted for the answer request item for which answer input is restricted in step ST7. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 11, it is impossible to accept the input of the answer to the second answer request items “C”, “E”, “TO”, “Li” and the first answer request item “L”. The square symbols with black ink indicate that the answer request items are “H”, “H”, “TO”,
Assigned to "ri" and "ru". By displaying such an answer input unacceptable display, it is clear that the learner cannot enter the answer for the restricted answer request item because the entered answer is an incorrect answer and the answer input is restricted. Visible.

In step ST9, it is determined whether or not there is an answer request item in which the answer input cannot be accepted.
If there is no answer request item for which an answer can be input, the question cannot be solved, and the process ends. If there is an answer request item for which an answer can be entered, the process proceeds to step ST10 in FIG.

In step ST10, the answer request item for accepting the input of the next answer is selected within the restriction due to the incorrect answer, and the answer is input. In the above example, as shown in FIG. 12, the answer “x” is input to the answer request item “a”.

In step ST11, it is determined whether or not the input answer is the correct answer. If the answer is correct, step S
If the answer is wrong, the process proceeds to step ST16. In the above example, since the input “x” is the correct answer, the process proceeds to step 12.

In step ST12, step ST
7 and the answer input limitation of the answer request item displayed by the answer input not accepted display by limiting the answer input in step ST8 is released. Therefore, in the above example, as shown in FIG. 12, the black square mark in FIG. 11 indicates the answer request item “C”,
The answer can be entered by removing it from "e", "to", "ri", and "ru".

In step ST13, the input of the next answer is restricted according to the subordination relationship in the case of a correct answer. In the above example, as shown in FIG. 12, there is no corresponding second answer request item, but such restrictions are the same as in the case of step ST4.

In step ST14, step ST
The correct answer is displayed in the second answer request item for which the answer input is restricted in 13. The reason why such a correct answer is displayed is for the same reason as in step ST5. However, in the above example,
Since there is no corresponding answer request item, the correct answer is not displayed.

In step ST15, as in step ST6 of FIG. 3, it is determined whether the remaining answer request item is the first answer request item. If only the first answer request item remains, the process proceeds to step ST19 in FIG.
When there is an answer request item other than the first answer request item, the process returns to step ST10. In the above example, the second answer request items “HA”, “HO”, “TO”,
Since "ri" and the like remain, the process returns to step ST10.

On the other hand, in step ST16, if the answer input in step ST10 is an incorrect answer, the input of the next answer is restricted according to the dependency relation in the case of an incorrect answer. This limitation is made for the same reason as in step ST7 of FIG.

Then, in step ST17, a black square symbol indicating that the answer input cannot be accepted is assigned to the answer request item for which the answer input is further restricted within the restriction of step ST10. The reason why such an indication that the answer input cannot be accepted is added is for the same reason as in step ST8.

In step ST18, step ST
As in the case of 9, it is determined whether or not there is an answer request item that is not ready to accept the answer input. If there is no answer request item that can accept the answer input, the problem cannot be solved, and the process ends. If there is an answer request item that can accept the answer input, step S
Return to T10. Note that, in the above example, if the answer input to the second answer request item “a” from the state of FIG. 11 is an incorrect answer, the second answer request item “a” has a subordinate relationship. Since no second answer request item remains, the learner
Answer request items of "ro", "d", "f", "chi",
You can only select from "nu" and enter the answer.

Next, in step ST19 of FIG.
Since the remaining answer request items are only the first answer request items, the learner inputs an answer to the first answer request items.

Then, in step ST20, it is determined whether or not the input answer is a correct answer. If the answer is correct, it means that all the answer request items of this question have been answered correctly, so that the process ends. On the other hand, in the case of an incorrect answer, since all are correct except for the first answer request item, the correct answer to the first answer request item is displayed in step ST21, and the process ends.

As described above, steps ST5, ST6,
By performing the processing of ST19 and ST20, all of the answers input to the second answer request item selected until the correct answer is entered in the first answer request item are correct answers and are possible. An answer can be input to the second answer request item with the smallest number. This is the input of answers to a sufficient number of answer request items that are practically useful for improving the thinking ability of the learner according to the learner's proficiency level. In addition to lessening the problem, it is possible to carry out learning with an emphasis on thought, without giving an emphasis on the answer input work itself.

In the above embodiment, if the answer is to only the first answer request item and the answer is incorrect, step S
The processing after T7 may be performed, but if only the first answer request item is answered correctly and the answer is correct, step ST6,
It suffices to immediately display the correct answer in all the answer request items without performing the processes of ST19 and ST20 and end the processing.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing another example of the question to be asked, and FIG. 14 is a diagram showing an example of the association between the answer request items in the question of FIG.

This problem is one of the five choices.
There are five answer request items, "A", "B", "C", "D", and "E" of "a" that identify the five limbs, and there are ten second answer request items. “O” and “x” of “b”, “c”, “d”, “e”, and “f” that specify the correctness of each limb A, B, C, D, E.

Then, as shown in FIG. 14, the five first
“A” including the answer request item of “A”, and “B”, “C”, “D” including two second answer request items, respectively.
“H” and “H” are related by a predetermined subordinate relationship. The subordination relations here include a relation in which “b”, “d”, “ho”, and “f” including the second answer request item are treated as an independence relation, and the first answer request item “a” and the second answer request item. It is set by the relationship of interlocking with the answer request item "C".

FIG. 15 is a view showing a display state of the screen when an answer is input to the first answer request item “B” of “A”, and FIG. 16 is a view of FIG. FIG. 18 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen, and FIG. 17 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 16.

The question and the answer request item are displayed on the screen, and the learner selects "B" of the first answer request item "a".
When is clicked and selected to be input as the answer, the letter “B” of the first answer request item “a” is highlighted in bold as shown in FIG.

It is judged whether "B" of the first answer request item "a" is the correct answer, and since it is the correct answer of this question,
A large symbol "○" is displayed to represent the correct answer, and each second answer request item "b", "c", "d",
Either “o” or “x” of “e” or “he” is highlighted in bold.

Then, for example, when a predetermined key is pressed,
As shown in FIG. 17, the first answer request item “a”
A message screen 33 that describes the reason why "B" is correct
Is displayed. This message screen 33 is preferably a screen on which a reason or the like should be displayed in order to deepen the understanding or confirm the understanding.

FIG. 18 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen in which the display states of the screens of FIGS. 16 and 17 are combined. After the display state of the screen of FIG. 15, the display state of the screen of FIG. 18 is changed. You may let me. In this case, it is preferable to devise so that the part that the learner wants to see does not become difficult to see due to overlapping message screens. Furthermore, in the message screen 33, not only the contents about "B",
It is preferable to include the contents of “A”, “C”, “D”, and “E”.

FIG. 19 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen when "A" of the first answer request item "a" is inputted as an answer, and FIG. 20 is a display state of the screen of FIG. FIG. 22 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed later, and FIG.
21 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 20, and FIG. 22 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG.

The first answer request item “a” by the learner
When "A" of "A" is clicked and selected so as to be input as an answer, the letter "A" of the first answer request item "A" is highlighted in bold as shown in FIG.

As shown in FIG. 20, since it is an incorrect answer, a large "x" symbol is displayed in the "A" of the first answer request item "a", and "A" is an error. The message screen 34 in which the reason of is described is displayed.

Then, as shown in FIG. 21, as in the case where "B" of the first answer request item "a" is input as the answer, the "B" of the first answer request item "a" is in bold type. Is highlighted, and the second answer request item “B”, “C”,
Any one of “◯” and “×” of “d”, “e”, and “e” is highlighted in bold type. Furthermore, as shown in FIG. 22, a message screen 33 is displayed.

As described above, the task of solving this question is completed not only when a correct answer is input to the first answer request item but also when an incorrect answer is entered. That is, when the answer is input to any of the first answer request items, the first answer is not input.
Answer input is restricted for all the answer request items and the second answer request items, and the correct answer is displayed.

FIG. 23 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen when the "x" of the second answer request item "b" is inputted as an answer, and FIG. 24 is a display state of the screen of FIG. FIG. 26 is a diagram showing a display state of a screen changed later, and FIG.
FIG. 25 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 24.

Here, the learner does not input the answer to any of the five answer request items “a”, but instead of entering the answer to the “x” of the second answer request item “b”. If input is made, as shown in FIG. 23, "x" of the second answer request item "b" is highlighted in bold type, and "x" is the correct answer for the second answer request item "b". Figure 2
As shown in FIG. 4, the symbol “◯” is displayed large and the message screen 34 is displayed.

Thereafter, as shown in FIG. 25, the "x" of the second answer request item "b" is highlighted in bold, and the first answer request item "a""A" is a black square. The symbol is displayed, and the answer input is restricted, and the answer input cannot be accepted.

Then, the learner selects "○" and "x" for the second answer request items "C", "D", "E", and "F" and the first answer request item "A". "B", "C",
Answers can be input for "D" and "E".

FIG. 26 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen when an answer is input in the second answer request item “b” “◯”, and FIG. 27 is a view showing the screen of FIG. 26. FIG. 29 is a diagram showing a display state of a screen changed after the display state.
28 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 27, and FIG. 29 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 28.

Here, too, the learner does not input the answer to "A", "B", "C", "D", and "E" of the first answer request item "a". If an answer is entered for the second answer request item "b""○",
As shown in FIG. 26, "○" in the second answer request item "b"
Is highlighted in bold, and the second answer request item, "b"
Since the "x" of is a correct answer, the symbol of "x" is displayed large as shown in FIG.

After that, as shown in FIG. 28, the "x" of the second answer request item "b" is highlighted in bold to indicate that it is the correct answer, and the message screen 3 is displayed.
4 is also displayed.

After that, as shown in FIG. 29, the second
In addition to highlighting the "x" of the answer request item "b" in bold, the "A" part of the first answer request item "a" is displayed as a black square symbol and the input of the answer is restricted. , Answer input cannot be accepted. Then, the learner corresponds to the second answer request items “C” and “X” of the second answer request items “C”, “D”, “H”, and “F” and the first answer request item “A”. Answers to "B", "C", "D", and "E" can be input.

FIG. 30 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen when an answer is input to the second answer request item “C” of “◯”, and FIG. 31 is a view of FIG. 31. FIG. 33 is a diagram showing a screen display state changed after the screen display state, and FIG. 32 is a diagram showing a screen display state changed after the screen display state of FIG. 31.

Here, as shown in FIG. 30, the learner is inputting an answer to "○" in the second answer request item "ha", and the second answer request item "ha". "○"
Is highlighted rather than bold, and is the correct answer.
As shown in, the symbol "○" is displayed in large size, and at the same time, "B" of the first answer request item "a", the second answer request item "b", "d", "ho", Either “o” or “x” of “he” is highlighted in bold. As described above, inputting an answer for the second answer request item “C” of “◯” means inputting a correct answer for the first answer request item “A” of “B”. It is equivalent, and the same processing as the processing of FIGS. 15 to 17 is performed. Therefore, thereafter, the message screen 33 is displayed as shown in FIG.

FIG. 33 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen when an answer is input to the second answer request item “C” “×”, and FIG. 34 is a view showing the screen of FIG. 33. FIG. 36 is a diagram showing a display state of a screen changed after the display state.
34 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 34, and FIG. 36 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG.

Here, as shown in FIG. 33, the learner has input an answer to "x" of the second answer request item "ha", and the learner has entered the answer of the second answer request item "ha". "X" is highlighted in bold, but it is an incorrect answer, so
As shown in FIG. 4, the symbol “x” is displayed large. Then, as shown in FIG. 35, the first answer request item “a”
“B”, the second answer request item “B”, “C”,
Any one of "○" and "x" of "d", "e", and "e" is highlighted in bold type. In this way, displaying the fact that the answer is input to the second answer request item "ha""x" and indicating that it is an incorrect answer means that the answer request item "ha" is correctly answered. And the first answer request item "a"
Makes the learner know that "B" is the correct answer. Therefore, also in this case, thereafter, the message screen 33 is displayed as shown in FIG. 36, and the process ends.

As described above, "A" including the five first answer request items and "C" including the two second answer request items.
While limiting the input of the next answer by performing the same process in conjunction with, the "b", "ha", "d", "ho", each containing two second answer request items. When an answer is input to "f", the process is made independent without completely interlocking with "a" including the five first answer request items, and the first answer is further added. It is possible to input the answer to the first answer request item in which the answer input in the request item "a" is not restricted or the answer to the second answer request item in which the answer is not entered.

FIG. 37 is a schematic block diagram showing a main part of another electronic learning machine according to the embodiment of the present invention.

Here, in a plurality of questions, not only the input of answers to a plurality of answer request items in each question is controlled, but also the correctness of the answer entered for a plurality of answer request items of the first question is checked. The history of the determination result is used to limit the input of answers to the plurality of answer request items of the second question.

First, the electronic learning machine 30 also includes a determination result history storage unit 31. Then, a predetermined subordinate relationship according to the correctness or incorrectness of the answer input to each second answer request item of the first question has the second answer request item and the second answer request item of the first question to which the answer is input. Between each second answer request item of the question and between each second answer request item of the first question to which the answer is input and each second answer request item of the first question,
It is associated and set in advance. The determination result history storage unit 31 stores the history of the determination result because the determination unit 21 determines whether the answer input to the answer request item is correct or incorrect when solving the first question. Then, the answer input restriction unit 25 restricts the input of the next answer to the answer request item of the plurality of answer request items of the second question to which the answer has not been entered.

FIG. 38 is a flow chart for explaining the operation of the electronic learning machine of FIG.

In step S1, the correctness of the answer to the answer request item to which the answer is input among the plurality of answer request items of the first question is determined.

In step S2, the history of the determination result determined in step S1 is stored. This storage is performed by the determination result history storage unit 31.

In step S3, the input of the next answer to the plurality of answer request items of the second question is restricted according to the history. For example, it is assumed that there are a first problem and a second problem in which the number and position of answer request items are the same in the equation problem and the value of the constant for the unknown number of the equation is different. In this case, the answer request items corresponding to the first question and the second question are considered to have the same degree of difficulty in finding a correct answer. Therefore, if the answer input by the learner in the first selected answer request item in the first question is the correct answer, the second question is taken before solving the second question so as to correspond to the display state after the correct answer.
If the answer input to the answer request item of the question is correct and the correct answer is displayed, and if the answer entered in the answer request item selected first in the first question is an incorrect answer, the display state after the incorrect answer is displayed. In addition, before solving the second question, the input limitation of the answer to the answer request item of the second question and the display that the answer input cannot be accepted are displayed. Note that the first problem and the second problem may be the same problem, and the learner may solve the two problems after a certain time.

In step S4, the correctness of the entered answer of the plurality of answer request items of the second question is determined, and in step S5 the answer entered in the second answer request item of the second question. The input of the next answer to the first answer request item of the second question or the other second answer request item is restricted depending on whether the answer is correct or not. Since the above-mentioned processing may be applied to these processings, the description thereof will be omitted.

In step S6, it is determined whether or not the second answer request item remains. If it remains, loop processing is performed by returning to step S3, and if it does not remain, the process ends. Although the process from step S6 returns to step S3, the process may return to step S4. In this case, the history of correctness / incorrectness determination of the answer input to the answer request item of the first question is used only for the first answer request item.

In this way, the learner's answering process, which is the history of the judgment results in the first problem, is utilized in solving the second problem, and as a result, the learner's proficiency level is determined. Even at various levels, depending on the level of proficiency of each learner,
Answers are input to a sufficient number of answer request items that are practically useful for improving the learner's thinking ability. Therefore, it is possible to reduce the burden of the learner's answer input work by reducing the number of times the answer is input for the answer request item, and the learning that puts more emphasis on thinking rather than the answer input work itself is performed. Be seen.

Needless to say, the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and various modifications can be made within the scope of the technical idea described in the claims.

[0116]

According to the first, ninth and eleventh aspects of the present invention, if the answer input to the first answer request item is determined to be correct, it is determined that the question is answered correctly, and thereafter, It is not necessary to input an answer to the first answer request item and the second answer request item for which an answer has not been entered, and the above problem has been solved. Also, by setting a dependency between each second answer request item and the first answer request item or another second answer request item and limiting the input of the next answer, the dependency relationship is set. The degree of freedom in inputting the answer is smaller than that in the case where the input of the next answer is not limited without doing so, but as a result, the learner's thinking ability is increased when he / she finishes solving one problem. It becomes possible to input the answers to the answer request items of the exact number which is practically useful for improvement. Learning by reducing the number of times an answer is input to an answer request item while improving the learning efficiency by increasing the learner's thinking ability and thus the learning motivation, regardless of the level of proficiency of each learner It is possible to reduce the burden of answer input work for the person.

According to the invention of claim 2, since the learner can visually recognize the correct answer to the restricted answer request item, the correct answer is confirmed for the answer request item in which the correct answer is displayed, and the confirmed correct answer is kept in mind. You can enter the following answers to the answer request items that are not restricted by.

According to the third aspect of the invention, a message indicating that the answer input cannot be accepted is displayed for the restricted answer request item, and the learner clearly visually recognizes that the answer input cannot be accepted. Therefore, for the first answer request item or the other second answer request item that is not limited to not accepting the answer input, there is a sufficient possibility that the correct answer will be given by the thought separated from the most recent wrong answer. You can enter the answer.

According to the invention of claim 4, the determined second
In response to the input of the correct answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item that is not dependent on the answer request item
Input restriction of the next answer to the first answer request item or another second answer request item displaying that input acceptance of the answer is disabled is released, and the first answer request item or the first answer request item after cancellation is released. It becomes possible to input an answer to the answer request item of 2. As a result, it becomes possible to input the answer again to the second answer request item that has been erroneous once and the first answer request item or the other second answer request item of the dependency relationship in case of erroneous The learner can finish the problem in the correct form even if the answer entered in the past is an incorrect answer.

According to the inventions of claims 5, 10, and 11, between each second answer request item of the first question and each of the first answer request item and the second answer request item of the second question. In the following, the dependency is set, and the next answer to the answer request item for which the answer has not been input yet among the plurality of answer request items of the second question is stored according to the stored history of the determination result for the first question. Since the input of is limited, the degree of freedom of inputting the answer is smaller than that in the case of the invention of claim 1, as compared with the case where the input of the next answer is not limited without setting the dependency relation. As a result, it is further possible to complete the second problem by inputting the answers to the sufficient number of answer request items that are practically useful for improving the learner's thinking ability. Becomes Then, since the learner's answering process, which is the history of the judgment result in the first problem, is utilized in solving the second problem, the learning efficiency is improved and the learning motivation is further improved by improving the thinking ability of the learner Further, it is possible to further reduce the burden of the answer inputting work on the learner by reducing the number of times of inputting the answer to the answer request item.

According to the inventions of claims 6, 7 and 8, in addition to the effect of the invention of claim 5, in solving the second problem,
The same effects as the effects of the inventions of claims 2, 3 and 4 can be obtained.

[Brief description of drawings]

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of an electronic learning machine according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram showing a main part of the electronic learning machine 1 according to the embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a first flowchart for explaining the operation of the electronic learning machine shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.

4 is a second flowchart for explaining the operation of the electronic learning machine shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. FIG.

5 is a third flowchart for explaining the operation of the electronic learning machine shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. FIG.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of a question to be asked.

FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of association between answer request items in the question of FIG.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a state in which any one of a plurality of second answer request items is selected and an answer is input in the process of answering the first answer request item.

FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining that the answer request items for accepting the answer input are restricted when the answer entered in FIG. 8 is a correct answer, and the restricted answer request items are displayed. It is the figure which showed that it changed.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a display state when the answer entered in FIG. 8 is an incorrect answer.

FIG. 11 is a diagram for explaining that the answer request item for accepting an answer input is restricted from the display state of FIG. 10 and shows that the display state of the restricted answer request item changes. It is a figure.

FIG. 12 is a diagram for explaining a state in which the answer input acceptance restriction is released after the display state in FIG. 11;

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing another example of a question to be asked.

FIG. 14 is a diagram showing an example of association between answer request items in the problem of FIG.

FIG. 15 is a diagram showing a display state of a screen when an answer is input to “B” of the first answer request item “A”.

16 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG.

17 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG.

FIG. 18 is a diagram showing a screen display state in which the screen display states of FIGS. 16 and 17 are combined.

FIG. 19 is a diagram showing a display state of a screen when “A” of the first answer request item “A” is input as an answer.

20 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG.

21 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 20. FIG.

22 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 21.

FIG. 23 is a diagram showing a display state of a screen when “x” of the second answer request item “b” is input as an answer.

FIG. 24 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 23.

25 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 24.

FIG. 26 is a diagram showing a display state of a screen when an answer is input to “◯” of the second answer request item “b”.

27 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 26.

28 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 27.

29 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 28.

FIG. 30 is a diagram showing a display state of a screen when an answer is input to “◯” of the second answer request item “HA”.

31 is a diagram showing a screen display state changed after the screen display state of FIG. 30. FIG.

32 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 31. FIG.

FIG. 33 is a diagram showing a display state of a screen when an answer is input to “x” of the second answer request item “ha”.

34 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 33.

35 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 34.

36 is a diagram showing a display state of the screen changed after the display state of the screen of FIG. 35.

FIG. 37 is a schematic block diagram showing a main part of an electronic learning machine according to another embodiment of the present invention.

38 is a flow chart for explaining the operation of the electronic learning machine of FIG. 37. FIG.

FIG. 39 is a diagram showing a basic problem and a solution to a mathematical equation which is an example of a problem to be asked in learning in an electronic learning machine.

FIG. 40 is a diagram showing a standard problem and its solution to a mathematical equation, which is another example of a problem to be asked in learning in an electronic learning machine.

[Explanation of symbols]

1,30 Electronic learning machine 21 Judgment part 23 Relationship Storage 25 Answer input restriction section 27 Display 29 Display control unit 31 Judgment result history storage unit 35 Correct answer display 37 Display section for not accepting answers 39 Restriction release section

Claims (11)

[Claims] 1. A single question provided with a plurality of answer request items is displayed, and the plurality of answer request items are composed of at least one first answer request item and a plurality of second answer request items. An electronic learning machine that determines that a correct answer is immediately given to the one question in response to the input of a correct answer to the first answer request item, and whether the answer entered in each of the second answer request items is correct or incorrect. A predetermined subordinate relationship is set between the second answer request item to which the answer is input and the first answer request item and to the second answer request item to which the answer is input and the other second answer request item. And a determination unit that determines the correctness of the input answer in accordance with the input of an answer to each of the plurality of answer request items. The determination result of the means is the second When the answer input to the answer request item is correct or incorrect, the answer request item for which the answer is not yet input is determined according to the correctness of the answer input to the determined second answer request item. Of these, answer input limiting means for limiting the input of the next answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item in accordance with the determined subordinate relationship with the second answer request item. An electronic learning machine equipped. 2. The determination result of the determination means is the correctness or incorrectness of the answer input to the second answer request item, and is input to the determined second answer request item. In response to the answer being a correct answer, the first answer request item in which the input of the next answer is restricted by the answer input restricting means in accordance with the determined dependency relationship with the second answer request item, or The electronic learning machine according to claim 1, further comprising a correct answer display unit that displays a correct answer to the other second answer request item. 3. The determination result of the determination means is the correctness or incorrectness of the answer input to the second answer request item, and is input to the determined second answer request item. The first answer request item in which the input of the next answer is restricted by the answer input limiting means in accordance with the dependency relation with the determined second answer request item in response to the result that the answer is an incorrect answer. 3. The electronic learning machine according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising: an answer unacceptable display means for displaying a message indicating that the answer input cannot be accepted for the other second answer request item. 4. The answer unacceptable display in response to input of a correct answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item that is in a non-dependent relationship with the determined second answer request item. The first answer request item or the other second answer in which it is displayed that the answer input cannot be accepted by the means.
4. The electronic learning machine according to claim 3, further comprising restriction releasing means for releasing that the input of the next answer to the answer request item has been restricted. 5. Displaying at least one question of a plurality of prepared questions, each question is provided with a plurality of answer request items, and the plurality of answer request items are provided with at least one first question. An electronic learning machine configured to include an answer request item and a plurality of second answer request items, and determining that the question is answered correctly in response to input of a correct answer to the first answer request item. A predetermined subordinate relationship depending on the correctness of the answer input to each second answer request item of the question is defined as the second answer request item of each question to which the answer is input and the first answer of each question. The second answer request item for each question to which the answer is input and the other second answer request item for each question are set in association with each other in advance. Input to each of the second answer request items of the question A predetermined subordinate relationship depending on whether the answer is correct is defined between the second answer request item of the first question to which the answer is input and the second answer request item of the second question, and the answer. Is set in association with each second answer request item of the first question and the first answer request item of the second question in advance, the first question and the first question Determination means for determining the correctness of the input answer in response to the input of an answer to each of a plurality of answer request items for the second question, and a history of the determination results for the first question determined by the determining means A determination result history storage unit for storing the answer result item, and a next answer to the answer request item for which the answer is not yet input, of the plurality of answer request items for the second question, according to the history stored by the determination result history storage unit. While limiting the input of When the determination result of the determination means is correct or incorrect for the answer input to the second answer request item for the second question, for the second answer request item for the determined second question Depending on the correctness of the entered answer, among the answer request items for which no answer has been entered yet, the second question of the second question is subordinate to the second answer question item of the determined second question in accordance with the subordinate relationship. An electronic learning machine comprising: an answer input limiting means for limiting the input of the next answer to one answer request item or the other second answer request item. 6. The determination result of the determination means is the correctness or incorrectness of the answer input to the second answer request item of the second question, and the second answer of the determined second question. In response to the result that the answer input to the answer request item is a correct answer, the answer input limiting means sets the following by the subordinate relationship of the determined second question with the second answer request item. 6. The electronic learning according to claim 5, further comprising a correct answer display means for displaying a correct answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item of the second question in which the answer input is restricted. Machine. 7. The determination result of the determination means is the correctness of the answer input to the second answer request item of the second question, and the second answer of the determined second question. When the answer input to the answer request item is the result of an incorrect answer, the answer input limiting means determines whether or not the answer to the second answer request item of the determined second question is Answer acceptance impossible display means for displaying that it is impossible to accept the answer input for the first answer request item or the other second answer request item of the second question whose input of the answer is restricted. The electronic learning machine according to claim 5, further comprising: 8. A correct answer to the second answer request item of the determined second question and the first answer request item of the second question in a non-dependent relationship with the second answer request item or the other second answer request item. In response to the input, the next answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item of the second question for which it is displayed by the answer unavailability display means that the answer cannot be accepted 8. The electronic learning machine according to claim 7, further comprising restriction releasing means for releasing that the input of the answer is restricted. 9. A single question provided with a plurality of answer request items is displayed, and the plurality of answer request items are composed of at least one first answer request item and a plurality of second answer request items. A learning support method for determining that a correct answer is immediately given to the one question in response to the input of a correct answer to the first answer request item, wherein the answer input to each of the second answer request items is correct or incorrect. A predetermined subordinate relationship is set between the second answer request item to which the answer is input and the first answer request item and to the second answer request item to which the answer is input and the other second answer request item. A first step of determining whether the input answer is correct or incorrect according to the input of the answer to each of the plurality of answer request items, Judgment in the first step When the result is the correctness of the answer input to the second answer request item, the answer is still input according to the correctness of the answer input to the determined second answer request item. Of the unanswered answer request items, the input of the next answer to the first answer request item or the other second answer request item is restricted according to the subordinate relationship with the determined second answer request item. A learning support method including a second step. 10. Displaying at least one question out of a plurality of prepared questions, each question being provided with a plurality of answer request items, wherein the plurality of answer request items are at least one first item. An electronic learning support method comprising an answer request item and a plurality of second answer request items, and determining that the question is immediately answered correctly in response to input of a correct answer to the first answer request item, wherein The predetermined dependency relationship according to the correctness of the answer entered in each second answer request item of each question is defined by the second answer request item of each question to which the answer is entered and the first answer of each question. The answer request item and the second answer request item of each question to which the answer is input and the other second answer request item of each question are set in association with each other in advance, In each of the second answer request items of the question of 1 A predetermined subordination relationship according to the correctness of the applied answer is established between each second answer request item of the first question to which the answer is input and each second answer request item of the second question. And the second answer request item of the first question to which the answer is input and the first answer request item of the second question, which are set in association with each other in advance, In response to the input of an answer to each of the plurality of answer request items, a first step of determining the correctness of the entered answer, and a determination result of the first question determined in the first step. A second step of storing a history, and a next answer to an answer request item for which an answer has not yet been input among a plurality of answer request items of the second question according to the history stored in the second step. The third step to restrict the input of The fourth step of determining the correctness of the input answer in response to the input of the answer to each of the plurality of answer request items of the second question, and the determination result determined in the fourth step are the If the answer input to the second answer request item of the second question is correct, the answer entered to the second answer request item of the determined second question is correct. Then, among the answer request items for which no answer has been input yet, the first answer request item for the second question or the other item according to the subordinate relationship with the second answer request item for the determined second question. And a fifth step of limiting the input of the next answer to the second answer request item. 11. A computer-readable recording medium in which a program for executing the learning support method according to claim 9 or 10 is recorded.