JP2003130763A - Method and device for evaluation - Google Patents

Method and device for evaluation

Info

Publication number
JP2003130763A
JP2003130763A JP2001327742A JP2001327742A JP2003130763A JP 2003130763 A JP2003130763 A JP 2003130763A JP 2001327742 A JP2001327742 A JP 2001327742A JP 2001327742 A JP2001327742 A JP 2001327742A JP 2003130763 A JP2003130763 A JP 2003130763A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
frequency spectrum
mechanical equipment
abnormality
spectrum data
value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2001327742A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3858978B2 (en
Inventor
Takanori Miyasaka
孝範 宮坂
Yasuyuki Muto
泰之 武藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NSK Ltd
Original Assignee
NSK Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by NSK Ltd filed Critical NSK Ltd
Priority to JP2001327742A priority Critical patent/JP3858978B2/en
Priority to PCT/JP2001/009699 priority patent/WO2002037067A1/en
Priority to US10/415,931 priority patent/US20040030419A1/en
Priority to EP01982740A priority patent/EP1338873A1/en
Publication of JP2003130763A publication Critical patent/JP2003130763A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3858978B2 publication Critical patent/JP3858978B2/en
Priority to US11/896,022 priority patent/US20080010039A1/en
Priority to US11/896,020 priority patent/US7587299B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method and device for evaluation by which the speed and reliability of diagnostic work can be improved by reducing the burden imposed on the analysis work of vibration signals detected from an installation containing one or a plurality of sliding members. SOLUTION: The device 1 for evaluation is provided with an A/D-converting means 9 which converts analog signals of sounds or vibrations generated by the installation 3 into digital signals, and an arithmetic processing means 13 which generates actually-measured frequency spectrum data by analyzing the output of the means 9 and, at the same time, diagnoses the presence/absence of abnormality in the installation 3 from the presence/absence of peaks in the actually-measured frequency spectrum data to the first order, second order, and fourth order values of a frequency component generated due to the abnormality of the installation 3.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、1または複数の摺
動部材を含む機械設備から発生する音又は振動を検出
し、検出した信号を解析して、機械設備に起因する異常
の有無を診断する評価方法及び装置に関するもので、詳
しくは、検出した信号の解析作業時の負担を軽減して、
診断作業の迅速化及び信頼性の向上を実現するための改
良にかかるものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention detects sound or vibration generated from mechanical equipment including one or a plurality of sliding members, analyzes the detected signal, and diagnoses the presence or absence of abnormality caused by mechanical equipment. It relates to an evaluation method and a device, and more specifically, reduces the burden of analyzing the detected signal,
The present invention relates to improvement for realizing speeding up of diagnostic work and improvement of reliability.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】これまで、回転体等の1または複数の摺
動部材を含む機械設備の、摺動部材の摩耗や破損等の異
常の有無を診断する評価方法として、機械設備から発生
する音又は振動を検出し、検出した信号を適宜波形処理
によって周波数スペクトルデータに変換し、機械設備の
異常に起因した周波数成分と前記した周波数スペクトル
データとの比較照合により、異常の有無を診断する評価
方法が知られている。
2. Description of the Related Art Up to now, a sound generated from mechanical equipment has been used as an evaluation method for diagnosing the presence or absence of abnormality such as wear or damage of sliding members in mechanical equipment including one or a plurality of sliding members such as rotating bodies. Alternatively, an evaluation method for detecting the vibration, converting the detected signal into frequency spectrum data by appropriate waveform processing, and comparing the frequency component caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment with the frequency spectrum data described above to diagnose the presence or absence of abnormality. It has been known.

【0003】摺動部材を含む機械設備の異常に起因した
周波数成分は、摺動部材の設計諸元及び運用状況によっ
て決まるもので、例えば、前記した回転体の設計諸元や
運用状況等の条件から、演算処理によって求めることが
できる。従って、機械設備の異常の有無を自動診断する
評価装置では、コンピュータ等の演算処理手段を用い、
予め、診断対象となる機械設備の異常に起因した周波数
成分を算出処理すると共に、機械設備の発生する音又は
振動の信号を適宜波形処理して周波数スペクトルデータ
に変換する演算処理を行い、更には、予め算出して記憶
させた機械設備の異常に起因した周波数成分と前記した
周波数スペクトルデータとを比較照合する演算処理を行
う。
The frequency component caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment including the sliding member is determined by the design specifications and operating conditions of the sliding member. Can be obtained by calculation processing. Therefore, in the evaluation device for automatically diagnosing the presence / absence of abnormality in mechanical equipment, arithmetic processing means such as a computer is used,
In advance, the frequency component due to the abnormality of the mechanical equipment to be diagnosed is calculated and processed, and the arithmetic processing for converting the waveform of the sound or vibration signal generated by the mechanical equipment into the frequency spectrum data is performed. A calculation process for comparing and collating the frequency component caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment, which is calculated and stored in advance, with the frequency spectrum data is performed.

【0004】[0004]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】ところで、従来の評価
方法では、機械設備の特定部位毎に、異常時の周波数成
分を1次から多次まで多数求め、これらの多数の周波数
成分のそれぞれに対して、実測した機械設備の周波数ス
ペクトルデータ上にピークが表出するか否かを診断する
演算処理と、周波数スペクトルデータ上のピーク値が異
常を示すピークレベルであるかを診断する演算処理とを
繰り返す。そのため、最終的な診断を下すまでの演算処
理が膨大になり、演算処理手段に大きな負担がかかるた
めに、演算処理能力が高い高価なコンピュータが必要と
なって装置コストの増大を招いたり、また演算処理の所
要時間の長大化により診断作業の迅速化が困難になると
いう問題があった。
By the way, in the conventional evaluation method, a large number of abnormal frequency components from primary to multi-order are obtained for each specific part of the mechanical equipment, and for each of these numerous frequency components. Then, a calculation process for diagnosing whether or not a peak appears on the measured frequency spectrum data of the mechanical equipment and a calculation process for diagnosing whether or not the peak value on the frequency spectrum data is a peak level indicating an abnormality. repeat. Therefore, the amount of arithmetic processing until the final diagnosis becomes enormous and the arithmetic processing means is heavily burdened, and an expensive computer with high arithmetic processing capability is required, which leads to an increase in device cost, and There is a problem that it is difficult to speed up the diagnostic work due to the increase in the time required for the arithmetic processing.

【0005】本発明は上記事情に鑑みてなされたもの
で、1または複数の摺動部材を含む機械設備の異常の有
無を診断する際の演算処理の負担を軽減して、診断作業
の迅速化及び信頼性の向上を実現することのできる評価
方法及び装置を提供することを目的とする。
The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and reduces the load of arithmetic processing when diagnosing the presence or absence of abnormality in mechanical equipment including one or a plurality of sliding members, and speeds up diagnostic work. It is also an object of the present invention to provide an evaluation method and device capable of realizing improvement in reliability.

【0006】[0006]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記目的を達成するため
の請求項1に記載した本発明に係る評価方法は、摺動部
材を含む機械設備から発生する音又は振動を検出し、検
出した信号を解析して、前記機械設備に起因する異常の
有無を診断する評価方法であって、前記機械設備から発
生した音又は振動のアナログ信号をAD変換によりデジ
タル信号に変換して実測デジタルデータを生成し、この
実測デジタルデータに対して周波数分析及びエンベロー
プ分析等の適宜解析処理を行って実測周波数スペクトル
データを生成し、前記機械設備の異常に起因した周波数
成分の1次、2次、4次値に対する前記実測周波数スペ
クトルデータ上のピークの有無により、前記機械設備に
対する異常の有無の診断を行うことを特徴とする。
In order to achieve the above object, the evaluation method according to the present invention described in claim 1 detects a sound or vibration generated from mechanical equipment including a sliding member, and detects the detected signal. Is an evaluation method for diagnosing whether or not there is an abnormality caused by the mechanical equipment, wherein an analog signal of sound or vibration generated from the mechanical equipment is converted into a digital signal by AD conversion to generate measured digital data. Then, the measured digital data is subjected to appropriate analysis processing such as frequency analysis and envelope analysis to generate measured frequency spectrum data, and the primary, secondary, and quaternary values of the frequency component caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment are generated. The presence / absence of a peak on the actually measured frequency spectrum data is used to diagnose the presence / absence of abnormality in the mechanical equipment.

【0007】上記目的を達成するための請求項2に記載
した本発明に係る評価装置は、摺動部材を含む機械設備
から発生する音又は振動を検出し、検出した信号を解析
して前記機械設備に起因する異常の有無を診断する評価
装置であって、前記機械設備から発生した音又は振動の
アナログ信号をデジタル信号に変換して実測デジタルデ
ータを生成するAD変換手段と、このAD変換手段が出
力する実測デジタルデータに対して周波数分析及びエン
ベロープ分析等の適宜解析処理を行って実測周波数スペ
クトルデータを生成すると共に、前記機械設備の異常に
起因した周波数成分の1次、2次、4次値に対する前記
実測周波数スペクトルデータ上のピークの有無により、
前記機械設備に対する異常の有無の診断を行う演算処理
手段とを備えたことを特徴とする。
According to a second aspect of the present invention for achieving the above object, an evaluation device according to the present invention detects a sound or a vibration generated from mechanical equipment including a sliding member, analyzes the detected signal, and analyzes the detected signal. An evaluation device for diagnosing the presence or absence of an abnormality caused by equipment, including AD conversion means for converting an analog signal of sound or vibration generated from the mechanical equipment into a digital signal to generate measured digital data, and the AD conversion means. The measured digital data output by the device is subjected to appropriate analysis processing such as frequency analysis and envelope analysis to generate measured frequency spectrum data, and the primary, secondary, and quaternary frequency components caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment are generated. By the presence or absence of a peak on the measured frequency spectrum data for the value,
Arithmetic processing means for diagnosing the presence or absence of abnormality in the mechanical equipment.

【0008】そして、請求項1及び請求項2に記載した
構成の評価方法及び装置によれば、機械設備の異常に起
因した周波数成分に対応する実測周波数スペクトルデー
タ上のピークの有無を調べる照合処理は、機械設備の異
常に起因した周波数成分の1次、2次、4次値の3回に
限定されているため、例えば1次から高次の周波成分ま
で多数の周波数成分に対して照合処理を繰り返す従来技
術と比較すると、照合処理時の演算処理量が低減して、
演算処理手段への負担が大幅に軽減される。更に、機械
設備の異常に起因した周波数成分の1次、2次、4次値
の3回に渡って照合処理を実施するため、周波数成分の
1次のみで判断する場合と比較して、ノイズ等の影響に
よる誤診断が発生し難く、信頼性の高い診断が可能にな
る。
Further, according to the evaluation method and apparatus of the configurations described in claims 1 and 2, the collation processing for checking the presence or absence of a peak on the measured frequency spectrum data corresponding to the frequency component caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment. Is limited to three times of the primary, secondary, and quaternary values of the frequency component due to the abnormality of the mechanical equipment. Comparing with the conventional technology that repeats,
The burden on the arithmetic processing means is greatly reduced. Further, since the matching process is performed over three times of the primary, secondary, and quaternary values of the frequency component due to the abnormality of the mechanical equipment, noise is reduced compared to the case where only the primary of the frequency component is determined. A false diagnosis due to the influence of the above is unlikely to occur, and a highly reliable diagnosis is possible.

【0009】なお、好ましくは、請求項3及び請求項4
に記載のように、本発明に係る上記の評価方法及び装置
において演算処理手段が実施する一連の診断処理では、
前記実測周波数スペクトルデータの生成後、この実測周
波数スペクトルデータの実効値を算出すると共に、この
実効値に基づいて閾値を設定し、前記機械設備の異常に
起因した前記周波数成分の1次、2次、4次値に対する
前記実測周波数スペクトルデータ上のピークは前記閾値
を超える場合にのみ有効なピークとして扱う構成とする
とよい。このようにすると、例えば、機械設備の異常に
起因した周波数成分の1次、2次、4次値に対応する実
測周波数スペクトルデータ上のピークに対して照合のた
めの演算処理を実施する前に、閾値によって有効なピー
クを抽出する抽出処理をすれば、有意でないピークに対
して照合処理を実施する無駄を省くことができる。
[0009] Preferably, claim 3 and claim 4
As described above, in the series of diagnostic processes performed by the arithmetic processing means in the above evaluation method and device according to the present invention,
After the generation of the actually measured frequency spectrum data, the effective value of the actually measured frequency spectrum data is calculated, and a threshold value is set based on the effective value, and the primary and secondary frequencies of the frequency components caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment are set. The peak on the measured frequency spectrum data for the fourth order value may be treated as a valid peak only when it exceeds the threshold value. By doing so, for example, before performing the calculation processing for matching on the peaks on the measured frequency spectrum data corresponding to the primary, secondary, and quaternary values of the frequency component caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment, By performing the extraction process of extracting the effective peaks by the threshold value, it is possible to eliminate the waste of performing the matching process for the insignificant peaks.

【0010】そして、上記目的を達成するための請求項
5に記載した本発明に係る評価方法は、摺動部材を含む
機械設備から発生する音又は振動を検出し、検出した信
号を解析して、前記機械設備に起因する異常の有無を診
断する評価方法であって、前記機械設備から発生した音
又は振動のアナログ信号をAD変換によりデジタル信号
に変換して実測デジタルデータを生成し、この実測デジ
タルデータに対して周波数分析及びエンベロープ分析等
の適宜解析処理を行って実測周波数スペクトルデータを
生成後、この実測周波数スペクトルデータの実効値又は
平均値を算出して、算出した実効値又は平均値を基準レ
ベルに設定し、前記機械設備の異常に起因した周波数成
分の1次値に対する前記実測周波数スペクトルデータ上
のレベルと前記基準レベルとのレベル差から前記機械設
備の特定部位の損傷の大きさを推定することを特徴とす
る。
In order to achieve the above object, the evaluation method according to the present invention according to claim 5 detects sound or vibration generated from mechanical equipment including a sliding member and analyzes the detected signal. An evaluation method for diagnosing the presence or absence of an abnormality caused by the mechanical equipment, wherein an analog signal of sound or vibration generated from the mechanical equipment is converted into a digital signal by AD conversion to generate actually measured digital data. After performing appropriate analysis processing such as frequency analysis and envelope analysis on digital data to generate measured frequency spectrum data, calculate the effective value or average value of this measured frequency spectrum data, and calculate the calculated effective value or average value. The reference level is set, and the level on the measured frequency spectrum data for the primary value of the frequency component caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment and the reference value are set. Characterized in that the level difference between the level estimating the magnitude of the damage of the specific part of the machinery.

【0011】一般に、回転体等の摺動部材の損傷に起因
する実測周波数スペクトル上でのピークレベルの増大
は、異常に起因した周波数成分の一次値に対応するピー
クで一番顕著になる。そのため、この請求項5に記載し
た構成の評価方法に示すように、機械設備の異常に起因
した周波数成分の1次値に対する実測周波数スペクトル
データ上のレベルとこの実測周波数スペクトルデータの
実効値又は平均値とのレベル差を計算することで、最小
限の演算処理で効率よく損傷の大きさを推定でき、推定
した損傷の大きさから損傷部品の適切な交換時期を決定
することが可能になる。
Generally, the increase of the peak level on the actually measured frequency spectrum due to the damage of the sliding member such as the rotating body is most remarkable at the peak corresponding to the primary value of the frequency component due to the abnormality. Therefore, as shown in the evaluation method of the structure described in claim 5, the level on the measured frequency spectrum data with respect to the primary value of the frequency component caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment and the effective value or the average of the measured frequency spectrum data. By calculating the level difference from the value, it is possible to efficiently estimate the magnitude of damage with a minimum amount of arithmetic processing, and it is possible to determine an appropriate replacement time for a damaged part from the estimated magnitude of damage.

【0012】[0012]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明に係る評価方法及び
装置の好適な実施の形態を添付図面に基づいて詳細に説
明する。図1は本発明に係る評価方法及び装置の第1の
実施の形態の概略構成を示すブロック図、図2は図1に
示した評価装置の診断処理の手順を示すフローチャート
である。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Preferred embodiments of an evaluation method and apparatus according to the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a schematic configuration of a first embodiment of an evaluation method and device according to the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a procedure of a diagnostic process of the evaluation device shown in FIG.

【0013】先ず、第1の実施の形態の評価装置の概略
構成を、図1に基づいて説明した後に、この評価装置に
よる評価方法について詳述する。本実施の形態の評価装
置1は、診断対象となる1または複数の摺動部材を含む
機械設備3の発生する音又は振動に応じたアナログ信号
を出力する振動検出手段5と、この振動検出手段5の出
力する信号を増幅する増幅手段7と、増幅手段7によっ
て増幅されたアナログ信号をデジタル信号に変換して実
測デジタルデータを生成するAD変換手段9と、このA
D変換手段9が出力する実測デジタルデータに基づいて
機械設備3の特定部位の異常の有無を診断する演算処理
手段13とを備えた構成である。
First, a schematic structure of the evaluation apparatus according to the first embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. 1, and then an evaluation method by the evaluation apparatus will be described in detail. The evaluation device 1 according to the present embodiment includes a vibration detecting unit 5 that outputs an analog signal according to a sound or a vibration generated by a mechanical equipment 3 including one or a plurality of sliding members to be diagnosed, and this vibration detecting unit. Amplifying means 7 for amplifying the signal output by 5, A / D converting means 9 for converting the analog signal amplified by the amplifying means 7 into a digital signal to generate actually measured digital data, and this A
This is a configuration including arithmetic processing means 13 for diagnosing whether or not there is an abnormality in a specific part of the mechanical equipment 3 based on the measured digital data output by the D conversion means 9.

【0014】本実施の形態の場合、診断対象となる機械
設備3の摺動部材としては転がり軸受が適用される。そ
して、転がり軸受を構成している内外輪、転動体、保持
器等の摩耗や損傷を、転がり軸受の駆動時の音又は振動
から診断する。なお、本実施の形態において、転がり軸
受の音又は振動とは、転がり軸受の駆動時に現れる超音
波振動、所謂AE(Acoustic Emission )を含む意味で
ある。
In the case of the present embodiment, a rolling bearing is applied as the sliding member of the mechanical equipment 3 to be diagnosed. Then, the wear and damage of the inner and outer races, rolling elements, cages, etc. constituting the rolling bearing are diagnosed from the sound or vibration when the rolling bearing is driven. In the present embodiment, the sound or vibration of the rolling bearing is meant to include ultrasonic vibration that appears when the rolling bearing is driven, so-called AE (Acoustic Emission).

【0015】演算処理手段13は、予め記憶させた処理
用の諸データや、AD変換手段9から受ける実測デジタ
ルデータを、診断用プログラムに基づいて演算処理する
診断用コンピュータである。この演算処理手段13は、
AD変換手段9が出力する実測デジタルデータに対して
周波数分析及びエンベロープ分析等の適宜解析処理を行
って実測周波数スペクトルデータを生成すると共に、機
械設備3の異常に起因した周波数成分の1次、2次、4
次値に対する実測周波数スペクトルデータ上のピークの
有無により、機械設備3に対する異常の有無の診断を行
う。
The arithmetic processing means 13 is a diagnostic computer for arithmetically processing various data for processing stored in advance and actually measured digital data received from the AD converting means 9 based on a diagnostic program. This arithmetic processing means 13
Appropriate analysis processing such as frequency analysis and envelope analysis is performed on the actually measured digital data output from the AD conversion means 9 to generate actually measured frequency spectrum data, and the primary and second frequency components caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment 3 are generated. Next, 4
The presence / absence of a peak on the actually measured frequency spectrum data for the next value is used to diagnose the presence / absence of abnormality in the mechanical equipment 3.

【0016】以上の評価装置1は、図2に示す手順で、
処理を行う。先ず、振動検出手段5により機械設備3の
発生する音又は振動の検出を行い(ステップS10
1)、次いで、増幅手段7を経た信号をAD変換手段9
によるAD変換によってデジタル信号化して(ステップ
S102)、演算処理手段13に渡す。演算処理手段1
3は、AD変換手段9から受けた信号を、例えば、WA
Vファイル等のファイル形式でデジタルファイル化し
(ステップS103)、必要ならば、フィルタ処理を行
って、余分な信号の除去等を行って実測デジタルデータ
を生成する。
The evaluation apparatus 1 described above uses the procedure shown in FIG.
Perform processing. First, the vibration detecting means 5 detects the sound or vibration generated by the mechanical equipment 3 (step S10).
1), and then the signal that has passed through the amplification means 7 is AD conversion means 9
Is converted into a digital signal by AD conversion (step S102) and passed to the arithmetic processing means 13. Arithmetic processing means 1
3 receives the signal received from the AD conversion means 9, for example, WA
It is converted into a digital file in a file format such as a V file (step S103), and if necessary, filtered processing is performed to remove extra signals, etc. to generate measured digital data.

【0017】本実施の形態の場合、フィルタ処理は、演
算処理手段13に予め組み込んだフィルタ処理プログラ
ムによって入力信号に所定の処理を行うもので、予めカ
ットする周波数域等の設定を行うフィルタ帯域の選定工
程(ステップS104)と、選定されたフィルタ帯域に
従って余分な信号のカットを行うフィルタ処理工程(ス
テップS105)とで構成される。ステップS104及
びステップS105によるフィルタ処理は、収集してあ
るデータのS/N比を向上させるために行うもので、入
力信号のS/N比が十分であれば、不要である。
In the case of the present embodiment, the filter processing is to perform predetermined processing on an input signal by a filter processing program incorporated in the arithmetic processing means 13 in advance, and to set the frequency band to be cut in advance. It is composed of a selection process (step S104) and a filtering process process (step S105) for cutting an extra signal according to the selected filter band. The filtering process in steps S104 and S105 is performed to improve the S / N ratio of the collected data, and is unnecessary if the S / N ratio of the input signal is sufficient.

【0018】次いで、生成した実測デジタルデータに対
して、周波数分析及びエンベロープ分析等の解析処理を
行って(ステップS106、S107)、機械設備3か
ら検出した音又は振動を具現した実測周波数スペクトル
データd1を得る(ステップS108)。ここで得た実
測周波数スペクトルデータd1は、図3に示す波形w1
である。この波形w1は、摺動部材としての転がり軸受
において、外輪固定で、毎分150回転で内輪を回転さ
せた時のものである。
Next, the generated measured digital data is subjected to analysis processing such as frequency analysis and envelope analysis (steps S106 and S107), and the measured frequency spectrum data d1 embodying the sound or vibration detected from the mechanical equipment 3 is obtained. Is obtained (step S108). The measured frequency spectrum data d1 obtained here is the waveform w1 shown in FIG.
Is. This waveform w1 is obtained when the outer ring is fixed and the inner ring is rotated at 150 revolutions per minute in the rolling bearing as the sliding member.

【0019】更に、演算処理手段13は、機械設備3の
特定部位の異常時に発生する周波数成分の1次、2次、
4次値に対する実測周波数スペクトルデータd1上のピ
ークの有無により、機械設備3の特定部位に対する異常
の有無の診断を行う(ステップS109)。摺動部材で
ある軸受は、図4に示すように、設計諸元や使用条件に
応じて、特定部位の異常時に発生する周波数成分値が決
定される。演算処理手段13は、機械設備3について、
図4に示す特定部位の異常時に発生する周波数成分の1
次、2次、4次値を予め基準値として記憶していて、こ
れらの基準値に基づいて、ステップS109を行う。
Further, the arithmetic processing means 13 is provided for the primary, secondary, and frequency components of the frequency components generated when a specific portion of the mechanical equipment 3 is abnormal.
The presence / absence of a peak on the actually measured frequency spectrum data d1 for the quaternary value is used to diagnose the presence / absence of an abnormality in a specific part of the mechanical equipment 3 (step S109). As shown in FIG. 4, the bearing, which is a sliding member, determines the frequency component value that occurs when an abnormality occurs in a specific part, according to design specifications and usage conditions. The arithmetic processing means 13 relates to the mechanical equipment 3,
One of the frequency components that occurs when an abnormality occurs in a specific part shown in FIG.
Next, second, and fourth values are stored in advance as reference values, and step S109 is performed based on these reference values.

【0020】ステップS109では、具体的には、図5
に示す手順で、機械設備3の特定部位の異常時に発生す
る周波数成分の1次、2次、4次値に対する実測周波数
スペクトルデータd1上のピークの有無をチェックする
照合処理を実施し、周波数成分の1次値、2次値の双方
が実測周波数スペクトルデータd1上のピークに一致し
た場合(ステップS201、S202)、あるいは、周
波数成分の1次値は実測周波数スペクトルデータd1上
のピークに一致しないが、2次値、4次値の双方が実測
周波数スペクトルデータd1上のピークに一致した場合
(ステップS211、S212)など、二つ以上の周波
数成分において実測周波数スペクトルデータd1上にピ
ークが存在することが確認された場合には、その特定部
位について異常有りの診断を下す(ステップS22
1)。一方、実測周波数スペクトルデータd1上にピー
クが存在する周波数成分が一つ以下の場合には、他の部
位の異常に起因する振動等がノイズとして影響して、た
またまピークを形成している可能性が高く、異常無しの
診断を下す(ステップS231)。
In step S109, specifically, FIG.
According to the procedure shown in FIG. 3, the collation processing for checking the presence or absence of a peak on the measured frequency spectrum data d1 with respect to the primary, secondary, and quaternary values of the frequency component occurring when a specific part of the mechanical equipment 3 is abnormal is performed, and the frequency component When both of the primary value and the secondary value of are coincident with the peak on the measured frequency spectrum data d1 (steps S201 and S202), or the primary value of the frequency component is not coincident with the peak on the measured frequency spectrum data d1. However, when both the secondary value and the quaternary value coincide with the peak on the measured frequency spectrum data d1 (steps S211, S212), the peak exists on the measured frequency spectrum data d1 in two or more frequency components. If it is confirmed, the specific part is diagnosed as abnormal (step S22).
1). On the other hand, when the number of frequency components having a peak on the measured frequency spectrum data d1 is one or less, it is possible that vibration or the like caused by an abnormality in another part influences as noise and happens to form a peak. Is high, a diagnosis of no abnormality is made (step S231).

【0021】図6は、摺動部材としての転がり軸受にお
いて、外輪固定で、毎分150回転で内輪を回転させた
時の波形w1に対して、特定部位である外輪の損傷に起
因して発生する周波数成分の1次値Q1 、2次値Q2
4次値Q4 の3つの周波数成分を、破線で付記したもの
である。前述した図3の場合は、同様の波形w1に対し
て、外輪の損傷に起因して発生する周波数成分の一次値
1 から高次Qn までの全てのものを、破線により付記
している。
FIG. 6 shows that in the rolling bearing as a sliding member, the outer ring is fixed and the waveform w1 is generated when the inner ring is rotated at 150 revolutions per minute due to damage to the outer ring which is a specific portion. Primary value Q 1 of the frequency component to be generated, secondary value Q 2 ,
The three frequency components of the fourth-order value Q 4 are additionally shown by broken lines. In the case of FIG. 3 described above, with respect to the similar waveform w1, all the components from the primary value Q 1 to the high order Q n of the frequency component generated due to the damage of the outer ring are additionally indicated by broken lines. .

【0022】以上の第1の実施の形態の評価装置1で行
う評価方法では、機械設備3の特定部位の異常時に発生
する周波数成分に対応する実測周波数スペクトルデータ
d1上のピークの有無を調べる照合処理は、機械設備3
の異常に起因した周波数成分の1次、2次、4次値の3
回に限定されているため、例えば、図3に示したように
1次から高次の周波成分まで多数の周波数成分の全てに
対して照合処理を繰り返す従来技術の場合と比較する
と、照合処理時の演算処理量が大幅に低減する。
In the above-described evaluation method performed by the evaluation device 1 of the first embodiment, a check for checking whether or not there is a peak on the actually measured frequency spectrum data d1 corresponding to a frequency component occurring when a specific part of the mechanical equipment 3 is abnormal. Processing is mechanical equipment 3
Of the first, second, and fourth order frequency components due to the anomaly
Since it is limited to the number of times, for example, as shown in FIG. 3, as compared with the case of the conventional technique in which the matching process is repeated for all of a large number of frequency components from the first-order to high-order frequency components, the matching process The amount of calculation processing of is greatly reduced.

【0023】そのため、機械設備3から検出した信号の
解析作業時の演算処理手段13への負担が大幅に軽減さ
れ、診断作業の迅速化を図ることができる。また、演算
処理量が低減したことで、演算処理手段13として使用
するコンピュータに、演算処理能力が低い安価なコンピ
ュータを使用することが可能になり、装置コストの低減
を図ることも可能になる。
Therefore, the load on the arithmetic processing means 13 during the analysis work of the signal detected from the mechanical equipment 3 is greatly reduced, and the diagnosis work can be speeded up. Further, since the amount of arithmetic processing is reduced, it is possible to use an inexpensive computer with low arithmetic processing capability as the computer used as the arithmetic processing means 13, and it is also possible to reduce the apparatus cost.

【0024】更に、異常時に発生する周波数成分の1次
のみで判断すると、たまたまノイズ等の影響で、対応す
る実測周波数スペクトル上のピークにずれが生じたり、
逆にピークが増大しているために誤診断が生じる可能性
がある。しかし、上記のように、機械設備3の特定部位
の異常時に発生する周波数成分の1次値、2次値、4次
値の3回に渡って照合処理を実施する場合には、3回と
もノイズの影響を受ける確率は殆どなく、従って、2回
の照合処理を実施するだけで、診断に対する信頼性を向
上させることができる。
Further, if only the first order of the frequency component generated at the time of abnormality is judged, the peak on the corresponding actually measured frequency spectrum may shift due to the influence of noise or the like.
On the contrary, since the peak is increasing, a misdiagnosis may occur. However, as described above, in the case where the matching process is performed over three times of the primary value, the secondary value, and the quaternary value of the frequency component generated when the specific part of the mechanical equipment 3 is abnormal, all the three times are performed. There is almost no probability of being affected by noise, and therefore, it is possible to improve the reliability of diagnosis by performing the matching process only twice.

【0025】なお、好ましくは、演算処理手段13は、
実測周波数スペクトルデータd1の生成後、この実測周
波数スペクトルデータd1の実効値f1を算出すると共
に、この実効値f1に基づいて閾値t1を設定し、機械
設備3の特定部位の異常時に発生する周波数成分の1次
値Q1 、2次値Q2 、4次値Q4 に対する実測周波数ス
ペクトルデータd1上のピークは、閾値t1を超える場
合にのみ有効なピークとして扱う構成とするとよい。
Preferably, the arithmetic processing means 13 is
After the actual measurement frequency spectrum data d1 is generated, the effective value f1 of the actual measurement frequency spectrum data d1 is calculated, and the threshold value t1 is set based on the effective value f1 to generate a frequency component when an abnormality occurs in a specific part of the mechanical equipment 3. peak on the measured frequency spectrum data d1 to the primary value Q 1, 2-order value Q 2, 4-order value Q 4 of, may only configured treated as valid peaks exceed the threshold t1.

【0026】図7は、摺動部材としての転がり軸受にお
いて、外輪固定で、毎分150回転で内輪を回転させた
時の実測周波数スペクトルデータd1の波形w2に対し
て、実効値f1と、閾値t1とを書き込んだものであ
る。また、摺動部材としての転がり軸受の転動体の傷に
起因して発生する周波数成分の1次値q1 、2次値
2、4次値q4 を波形w2上に点線で書き込んでい
る。この場合、実効値f1は、波形w2の振幅の平均レ
ベルを算出したもので、−8.5dBである。 また、閾値t1は、t1=(f1+10dB) ……(1) に設定したため、閾値t1は1.5dBとなった。この
例の場合は、転動体の傷に起因して発生する周波数成分
(2fb)の1次値q1 、2次値q2 、4次値q4 のう
ち、2次値q2 が閾値t1より小さくノイズに埋もれて
いることから、閾値t1より大きな1次値q1 、4次値
4 のみについて照合処理が必要なことを示している。
FIG. 7 shows an effective value f1 and a threshold value with respect to the waveform w2 of the measured frequency spectrum data d1 when the outer ring is fixed and the inner ring is rotated at 150 revolutions per minute in the rolling bearing as the sliding member. t1 is written. Further, the first-order value q 1 , the second-order value q 2 , and the fourth-order value q 4 of the frequency component generated due to the scratches on the rolling elements of the rolling bearing as the sliding member are written on the waveform w 2 by a dotted line. . In this case, the effective value f1 is calculated by calculating the average level of the amplitude of the waveform w2, and is −8.5 dB. Further, since the threshold value t1 is set to t1 = (f1 + 10 dB) (1), the threshold value t1 becomes 1.5 dB. In this example, rolling primary value q 1 wound on due to generate frequency components of the moving object (2 fb), of the secondary value q 2, 4-order value q 4, secondary value q 2 is the threshold t1 Since it is smaller and buried in noise, it indicates that the collation process is necessary only for the first-order value q 1 and the fourth-order value q 4 which are larger than the threshold value t1.

【0027】このように閾値t1によって有用なピーク
の選別を可能にすると、例えば、摺動部材の特定部位で
の異常に起因して発生する周波数成分の1次値、2次
値、4次値に対応する実測周波数スペクトルデータ上の
ピークに対して照合のための演算処理を実施する前に、
閾値t1によって有効なピークを抽出する抽出処理をす
れば、有意でないピークに対して照合処理を実施する無
駄を省くことができ、演算処理量による負担を更に軽減
して、診断処理の迅速化を促進することができる。
In this way, when the useful peak can be selected by the threshold value t1, for example, the first-order value, second-order value, and fourth-order value of the frequency component generated due to the abnormality at the specific portion of the sliding member are generated. Before performing arithmetic processing for matching on the peak on the measured frequency spectrum data corresponding to
If the extraction processing for extracting the effective peaks by the threshold value t1 is performed, it is possible to eliminate the waste of performing the matching processing for the insignificant peaks, further reduce the burden of the calculation processing amount, and speed up the diagnosis processing. Can be promoted.

【0028】なお、以上の実施の形態では、特定部位の
損傷の有無を診断する場合を示している。しかし、前述
したように、実測デジタルデータに対して周波数分析及
びエンベロープ分析等の適宜解析処理を行って実測周波
数スペクトルデータd1を生成した場合に、例えば、図
8に示すように、この実測周波数スペクトルデータd1
の実効値f1を算出して、算出した実効値f1を基準レ
ベルL0 に設定し、機械設備3の特定部位の異常(本例
では外輪損傷を示す)に起因して発生する周波数成分の
1次値Q1 に対する実測周波数スペクトルデータd1上
のレベルLh と基準レベルL0 とのレベル差lの大きさ
から、異常を起こしている外輪における損傷の大きさを
推定できる。なお、図8は摺動部材である回転体のエン
ベロープ波形を示す。
In the above embodiment, the case of diagnosing the presence or absence of damage to a specific portion is shown. However, as described above, when the actually measured frequency spectrum data d1 is generated by performing appropriate analysis processing such as frequency analysis and envelope analysis on the actually measured digital data, for example, as shown in FIG. Data d1
Is calculated, and the calculated effective value f1 is set to the reference level L 0 , and 1 of the frequency component generated due to the abnormality (in this example, the outer ring is damaged) of a specific part of the mechanical equipment 3 is generated. From the magnitude of the level difference 1 between the level L h and the reference level L 0 on the actually measured frequency spectrum data d1 with respect to the next value Q 1, the magnitude of damage to the outer ring that is causing an abnormality can be estimated. Note that FIG. 8 shows an envelope waveform of the rotating body that is a sliding member.

【0029】図9は、摺動部材としての転がり軸受にお
いて、軌道輪の損傷である剥離が生じた場合に、剥離の
大きさと、実測周波数スペクトルデータd1上に表れる
ピークと基準レベルとの間のレベル差との関係を示した
ものである。このように、一般的に、レベル差は損傷の
大きさに比例して増大するため、逆に、実測周波数スペ
クトルデータd1上のピークにおけるレベル差を求める
ことで、損傷の大きさを推定することが可能である。し
かも、機械設備3の損傷に起因する実測周波数スペクト
ルデータd1上でのピークレベルの増大は、異常に起因
する周波数成分の1次値に対応するピークで一番顕著に
なる。
FIG. 9 shows the relationship between the magnitude of peeling and the peak and reference level appearing on the actually measured frequency spectrum data d1 when the rolling bearing as the sliding member is peeled, which is damage to the bearing ring. It shows the relationship with the level difference. Thus, in general, the level difference increases in proportion to the size of the damage. Therefore, conversely, the level difference at the peak on the actually measured frequency spectrum data d1 is obtained to estimate the size of the damage. Is possible. Moreover, the increase of the peak level on the actually measured frequency spectrum data d1 due to the damage of the mechanical equipment 3 becomes most remarkable at the peak corresponding to the primary value of the frequency component due to the abnormality.

【0030】そのため、既述したように、機械設備3の
特定部位での異常に起因して発生する周波数成分の1次
値に対する実測周波数スペクトルデータd1上のレベル
hとこの実測周波数スペクトルデータd1の実効値f
1とのレベル差lを計算することで、最小限の演算処理
で効率よく損傷の大きさを推定でき、推定した損傷の大
きさから損傷部品の交換時期を決定することで、過剰な
部品交換やメンテナンスを回避して、摺動部材を含む機
器や設備における維持コストの削減が可能になる。
Therefore, as described above, the level L h on the actually measured frequency spectrum data d1 with respect to the primary value of the frequency component generated due to the abnormality at the specific portion of the mechanical equipment 3 and the actually measured frequency spectrum data d1. Effective value f of
By calculating the level difference 1 with 1, it is possible to efficiently estimate the damage size with a minimum of arithmetic processing, and by determining the replacement time of the damaged part from the estimated damage size, excessive replacement of parts can be performed. It is possible to reduce maintenance costs in equipment and facilities including sliding members by avoiding maintenance.

【0031】なお、前記基準レベルL0 には、実効値f
1の代わりに、実測周波数スペクトルデータd1の平均
値を採用するようにしてもよい。
The reference level L 0 has an effective value f
Instead of 1, the average value of the measured frequency spectrum data d1 may be adopted.

【0032】なお、本発明の評価方法及び装置による診
断対象となる摺動部材は、上記の実施の形態で示した転
がり軸受に限らない。軸受以外の各種の摺動部材を診断
対象とすることができ、例えば、ボールねじ、リニアガ
イド、モータ等を含めることができる。また、摺動部材
は機器や設備に組み込んだ状態のままでも、摺動部材の
駆動時に発生する音や振動が所定の振動検出手段によっ
て検出できる状況であれば、機器や設備から取り外し
て、直接診断可能である。
The sliding member to be diagnosed by the evaluation method and apparatus of the present invention is not limited to the rolling bearing shown in the above embodiment. Various types of sliding members other than bearings can be diagnosed, and for example, ball screws, linear guides, motors, etc. can be included. Even if the sliding member is still installed in the equipment or facility, if the sound or vibration generated when the sliding member is driven can be detected by the prescribed vibration detection means, remove it from the equipment or facility and directly Can be diagnosed.

【0033】[0033]

【発明の効果】以上述べたように、請求項1及び請求項
2に記載の本発明の評価方法及び装置によれば、摺動部
材を含む機械設備の特定部位の異常時に発生する周波数
成分に対応する実測周波数スペクトルデータ上のピーク
の有無を調べる照合処理は、異常に起因した周波数成分
の1次値、2次値、4次値の3回に限定されているた
め、例えば、1次から高次の周波成分まで多数の周波数
成分に対して照合処理を繰り返す従来技術の場合と比較
すると、照合処理時の演算処理量が大幅に低減する。そ
のため、機械設備から検出した振動信号の解析作業時の
演算処理手段への負担が大幅に軽減され、診断作業の迅
速化を図ることができる。また、演算処理量が低減した
ことで、演算処理手段として使用するコンピュータに、
演算処理能力が低い安価なコンピュータを使用すること
が可能になり、装置コストの低減を図ることも可能にな
る。
As described above, according to the evaluation method and apparatus of the present invention as set forth in claims 1 and 2, the frequency component generated when the specific part of the mechanical equipment including the sliding member is abnormal is detected. The matching process for checking the presence or absence of a peak on the corresponding actually-measured frequency spectrum data is limited to three times of the primary value, secondary value, and quaternary value of the frequency component caused by the abnormality. Compared with the case of the conventional technique in which the matching process is repeated for a large number of frequency components up to high-order frequency components, the amount of calculation processing during the matching process is significantly reduced. Therefore, the load on the arithmetic processing means during the analysis work of the vibration signal detected from the mechanical equipment is significantly reduced, and the diagnosis work can be speeded up. Moreover, since the amount of calculation processing is reduced, the computer used as calculation processing means
It is possible to use an inexpensive computer with low calculation processing capacity, and it is possible to reduce the device cost.

【0034】更に、異常時に発生する周波数成分の1次
値のみで判断すると、たまたまノイズ等の影響で、対応
する実測周波数スペクトル上のピークにずれが生じた
り、逆にピークが増大しているために誤診断を生じる可
能性がある。しかし、上記のように、異常に起因して発
生する周波数成分の1次値、2次値、4次値の3回に渡
って照合処理を実施する場合には、3回ともノイズの影
響を受ける確率は殆どなく、診断に対する信頼性を向上
させることができる。
Further, if only the first-order value of the frequency component generated at the time of abnormality is judged, the peaks on the corresponding actually measured frequency spectrum may deviate due to the influence of noise or the like, or conversely the peaks may increase. May cause a false diagnosis. However, as described above, when the matching process is performed three times, that is, the first-order value, the second-order value, and the fourth-order value of the frequency component generated due to the abnormality, the influence of noise is generated in all three times. There is almost no probability of receiving it, and the reliability of diagnosis can be improved.

【0035】また、請求項3及び請求項4に記載の構成
にすると、例えば、機械設備の特定部位での異常に起因
して発生する周波数成分の1次値、2次値、4次値に対
応する実測周波数スペクトルデータ上のピークに対して
照合のための演算処理を実施する前に、閾値によって有
効なピークを抽出する抽出処理を行なえば、有意でない
ピークに対して照合処理を実施する無駄を省くことがで
き、演算処理量による負担を更に軽減して、診断処理の
迅速化を促進することができる。
Further, according to the third and fourth aspects, for example, the primary, secondary, and quaternary values of the frequency component generated due to an abnormality in a specific part of the mechanical equipment are generated. If the extraction process that extracts valid peaks by the threshold value is performed before performing the calculation process for matching on the corresponding peaks on the measured frequency spectrum data, it is useless to perform the matching process on insignificant peaks. It is possible to omit the above, further reduce the load due to the amount of calculation processing, and accelerate the diagnosis processing.

【0036】また、一般に、機械設備の損傷に起因する
実測周波数スペクトル上でのピークレベルの増大は、異
常に起因する周波数成分の1次値に対応するピークで一
番顕著になる。そのため、請求項5に記載した評価方法
のように、機械設備の特定部位の異常時に発生する周波
数成分の1次値に対する実測周波数スペクトルデータ上
のレベルとこの実測周波数スペクトルデータの実効値又
は平均値とのレベル差を計算することで、最小限の演算
処理で効率よく損傷の大きさを推定できる。従って、推
定した損傷の大きさから損傷部品の交換時期を決定する
ことで、過剰な部品交換やメンテナンスを回避し、摺動
部材を含む機器や設備における維持コストの削減が可能
になる。
In general, the increase of the peak level on the actually measured frequency spectrum due to the damage of the mechanical equipment becomes most remarkable at the peak corresponding to the primary value of the frequency component due to the abnormality. Therefore, as in the evaluation method according to claim 5, the level on the measured frequency spectrum data with respect to the primary value of the frequency component that occurs when a specific part of the mechanical equipment is abnormal and the effective value or average value of the measured frequency spectrum data. By calculating the level difference between and, the size of the damage can be estimated efficiently with a minimum of arithmetic processing. Therefore, by determining the replacement time of the damaged component based on the estimated damage size, it is possible to avoid excessive component replacement and maintenance, and reduce the maintenance cost of the equipment or facility including the sliding member.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】本発明に係る評価方法を実現する評価装置の第
1の実施の形態の構成を示すブロック図である。
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of a first embodiment of an evaluation apparatus that realizes an evaluation method according to the present invention.

【図2】図1に示した評価装置による処理手順を示すフ
ローチャートである。
FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure by the evaluation device shown in FIG.

【図3】転がり軸受の外輪の傷で異常振動が発生してい
る時の実測周波数スペクトルを示す波形図である。
FIG. 3 is a waveform diagram showing an actually measured frequency spectrum when abnormal vibration occurs due to a scratch on the outer ring of the rolling bearing.

【図4】転がり軸受における傷の箇所と周波数との関係
を示す図である。
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a relationship between a location of a scratch on a rolling bearing and a frequency.

【図5】異常時の周波数成分と実測周波数スペクトルデ
ータのピーク箇所との照合処理の処理手順を示すフロー
チャートである。
FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of matching processing between a frequency component at the time of abnormality and a peak portion of the actually measured frequency spectrum data.

【図6】外輪の傷により異常振動が発生している時の実
測周波数スペクトル上の周波数成分の照合箇所を示す波
形図である。
FIG. 6 is a waveform diagram showing the matching points of frequency components on the actually measured frequency spectrum when abnormal vibration occurs due to a scratch on the outer ring.

【図7】転動体の傷により異常振動が発生している時の
実測周波数スペクトル上の周波数成分の照合箇所を示す
波形図である。
FIG. 7 is a waveform diagram showing a matching portion of frequency components on an actually measured frequency spectrum when abnormal vibration occurs due to a scratch on a rolling element.

【図8】異常に起因した周波数成分と実測周波数スペク
トルとのエンベロープ波形図である。
FIG. 8 is an envelope waveform diagram of a frequency component caused by an abnormality and an actually measured frequency spectrum.

【図9】転動体表面の剥離の大きさと実測周波数スペク
トルに表れるピークの平均レベルのレベル差との相関図
である。
FIG. 9 is a correlation diagram between the magnitude of delamination on the surface of the rolling element and the level difference between the average levels of the peaks appearing in the actually measured frequency spectrum.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 評価装置 3 1または複数の摺動部材を含む機械設備 5 振動検出手段 7 増幅手段 9 AD変換手段 13 演算処理手段 1 Evaluation device 3 Mechanical equipment including one or more sliding members 5 Vibration detection means 7 Amplification means 9 AD conversion means 13 arithmetic processing means

Claims (5)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 摺動部材を含む機械設備から発生する音
又は振動を検出し、検出した信号を解析して、前記機械
設備に起因する異常の有無を診断する評価方法であっ
て、 前記機械設備から発生した音又は振動のアナログ信号を
AD変換によりデジタル信号に変換して実測デジタルデ
ータを生成し、この実測デジタルデータに対して周波数
分析及びエンベロープ分析等の適宜解析処理を行って実
測周波数スペクトルデータを生成し、前記機械設備の異
常に起因した周波数成分の1次、2次、4次値に対する
前記実測周波数スペクトルデータ上のピークの有無によ
り、前記機械設備に対する異常の有無の診断を行うこと
を特徴とする評価方法。
1. An evaluation method for detecting sound or vibration generated from mechanical equipment including a sliding member, analyzing the detected signal, and diagnosing whether or not there is an abnormality caused by the mechanical equipment. A sound or vibration analog signal generated from equipment is converted into a digital signal by AD conversion to generate measured digital data, and the measured digital data is subjected to appropriate analysis processing such as frequency analysis and envelope analysis to measure the measured frequency spectrum. Data is generated, and the presence / absence of abnormality of the mechanical equipment is diagnosed by the presence / absence of peaks on the measured frequency spectrum data for the primary, secondary, and quaternary values of the frequency component caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment. Evaluation method characterized by.
【請求項2】 摺動部材を含む機械設備から発生する音
又は振動を検出し、検出した信号を解析して前記機械設
備に起因する異常の有無を診断する評価装置であって、 前記機械設備から発生した音又は振動のアナログ信号を
デジタル信号に変換して実測デジタルデータを生成する
AD変換手段と、このAD変換手段が出力する実測デジ
タルデータに対して周波数分析及びエンベロープ分析等
の適宜解析処理を行って実測周波数スペクトルデータを
生成すると共に、前記機械設備の異常に起因した周波数
成分の1次、2次、4次値に対する前記実測周波数スペ
クトルデータ上のピークの有無により、前記機械設備に
対する異常の有無の診断を行う演算処理手段とを備えた
ことを特徴とする評価装置。
2. An evaluation device for detecting sound or vibration generated from mechanical equipment including a sliding member, analyzing the detected signal, and diagnosing whether or not there is an abnormality caused by the mechanical equipment. AD conversion means for converting an analog signal of sound or vibration generated from the digital signal into digital signal to generate measured digital data, and appropriate analysis processing such as frequency analysis and envelope analysis for the measured digital data output by the AD conversion means. To generate the measured frequency spectrum data, and determine whether or not there is a peak on the measured frequency spectrum data for the primary, secondary, and quaternary values of the frequency component caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment. An evaluation device, comprising: an arithmetic processing unit for diagnosing the presence or absence of
【請求項3】 前記実測周波数スペクトルデータの生成
後、この実測周波数スペクトルデータの実効値を算出す
ると共に、この実効値に基づいて閾値を設定し、前記機
械設備の異常に起因した前記周波数成分の1次、2次、
4次値に対する前記実測周波数スペクトルデータ上のピ
ークは前記閾値を超える場合にのみ有効なピークとして
扱うことを特徴とする請求項1記載の評価方法。
3. After generation of the actually measured frequency spectrum data, an effective value of the actually measured frequency spectrum data is calculated, and a threshold value is set based on the effective value to detect the frequency component caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment. Primary, secondary,
The evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein a peak on the measured frequency spectrum data for a quaternary value is treated as an effective peak only when the peak value exceeds the threshold value.
【請求項4】 前記演算処理手段は、前記実測周波数ス
ペクトルデータの生成後、この実測周波数スペクトルデ
ータの実効値を算出すると共に、この実効値に基づいて
閾値を設定し、前記機械設備の異常に起因した前記周波
数成分の1次、2次、4次値に対する前記実測周波数ス
ペクトルデータ上のピークは前記閾値を超える場合にの
み有効なピークとして扱うことを特徴とする請求項2記
載の評価装置。
4. The calculation processing means calculates the effective value of the actually measured frequency spectrum data after generating the actually measured frequency spectrum data, and sets a threshold value based on the effective value to detect an abnormality of the mechanical equipment. 3. The evaluation apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the peaks on the measured frequency spectrum data for the primary, secondary, and quaternary values of the frequency component caused are treated as valid peaks only when the peaks exceed the threshold value.
【請求項5】 摺動部材を含む機械設備から発生する音
又は振動を検出し、検出した信号を解析して、前記機械
設備に起因する異常の有無を診断する評価方法であっ
て、 前記機械設備から発生した音又は振動のアナログ信号を
AD変換によりデジタル信号に変換して実測デジタルデ
ータを生成し、この実測デジタルデータに対して周波数
分析及びエンベロープ分析等の適宜解析処理を行って実
測周波数スペクトルデータを生成後、この実測周波数ス
ペクトルデータの実効値又は平均値を算出して、算出し
た実効値又は平均値を基準レベルに設定し、前記機械設
備の異常に起因した周波数成分の1次値に対する前記実
測周波数スペクトルデータ上のレベルと前記基準レベル
とのレベル差から前記機械設備の特定部位の損傷の大き
さを推定することを特徴とする評価方法。
5. An evaluation method for detecting a sound or vibration generated from mechanical equipment including a sliding member, analyzing the detected signal, and diagnosing whether or not there is an abnormality caused by the mechanical equipment. A sound or vibration analog signal generated from equipment is converted into a digital signal by AD conversion to generate measured digital data, and the measured digital data is subjected to appropriate analysis processing such as frequency analysis and envelope analysis to measure the measured frequency spectrum. After the data is generated, the effective value or average value of the measured frequency spectrum data is calculated, the calculated effective value or average value is set as a reference level, and the primary value of the frequency component caused by the abnormality of the mechanical equipment is calculated. Estimating the magnitude of damage to a specific part of the mechanical equipment from the level difference between the level on the measured frequency spectrum data and the reference level. Evaluation method according to claim.
JP2001327742A 2000-11-06 2001-10-25 Evaluation method and apparatus Expired - Fee Related JP3858978B2 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001327742A JP3858978B2 (en) 2001-10-25 2001-10-25 Evaluation method and apparatus
PCT/JP2001/009699 WO2002037067A1 (en) 2000-11-06 2001-11-06 Abnormality diagnosing device and method for mechanical equipment
US10/415,931 US20040030419A1 (en) 2000-11-06 2001-11-06 Abnormality diagnosing device and method for mechanical equipment
EP01982740A EP1338873A1 (en) 2000-11-06 2001-11-06 Abnormality diagnosing device and method for mechanical equipment
US11/896,022 US20080010039A1 (en) 2000-11-06 2007-08-29 Anomaly diagnosis apparatus and method of machine installation
US11/896,020 US7587299B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2007-08-29 Anomaly diagnosis apparatus and method of machine installation

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001327742A JP3858978B2 (en) 2001-10-25 2001-10-25 Evaluation method and apparatus

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006214501A Division JP4003086B2 (en) 2006-08-07 2006-08-07 Evaluation method and apparatus

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2003130763A true JP2003130763A (en) 2003-05-08
JP3858978B2 JP3858978B2 (en) 2006-12-20

Family

ID=19143921

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2001327742A Expired - Fee Related JP3858978B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2001-10-25 Evaluation method and apparatus

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3858978B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7640139B2 (en) 2004-10-18 2009-12-29 Nsk Ltd. Abnormality diagnosing system for mechanical equipment
US11333577B2 (en) 2018-08-23 2022-05-17 Nsk Ltd. Method and device for diagnosing abnormality in rolling bearing

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7640139B2 (en) 2004-10-18 2009-12-29 Nsk Ltd. Abnormality diagnosing system for mechanical equipment
US11333577B2 (en) 2018-08-23 2022-05-17 Nsk Ltd. Method and device for diagnosing abnormality in rolling bearing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3858978B2 (en) 2006-12-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Yang et al. Vibration feature extraction techniques for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: a literature survey
Guo et al. Faulty bearing signal recovery from large noise using a hybrid method based on spectral kurtosis and ensemble empirical mode decomposition
US4366544A (en) Judging system for detecting failure of machine
US6801864B2 (en) System and method for analyzing vibration signals
JP2002022617A (en) Apparatus for diagnosing bearing
JP4120099B2 (en) Bearing abnormality diagnosis method and abnormality diagnosis device
JP6038347B2 (en) Abnormal sound diagnosis device
JP2006113002A (en) Anomaly diagnosis system for mechanical equipment
JP2003528292A (en) State-based monitoring of bearings by vibration analysis
JP4935165B2 (en) Abnormality diagnosis apparatus and abnormality diagnosis method
JP4929810B2 (en) Abnormality diagnosis apparatus and abnormality diagnosis method
JP2017032520A (en) State monitoring device and state monitoring method
JP4997936B2 (en) Rolling bearing abnormality diagnosis device and vehicle
JP4003086B2 (en) Evaluation method and apparatus
JP3829924B2 (en) Evaluation device
JP2003232674A (en) Abnormality diagnosing method and abnormality diagnosing device of machine equipment or apparatus
JP2006118869A (en) Defect detector for rolling bearing, and defect detection method for the rolling bearing
JP2000146762A (en) Abnormality diagnostic system for rolling bearing
JP3846560B2 (en) Abnormality diagnosis method and abnormality diagnosis apparatus for mechanical equipment or equipment
JPH0743259A (en) Method and apparatus for detecting abnormality
JP2003130763A (en) Method and device for evaluation
JP2003050157A (en) Bearing diagnostic apparatus
JP2018080924A (en) Method and system for diagnosing abnormality of bearing
JP6815489B2 (en) Vibration detection device and abnormality judgment system
JPH10174373A (en) Deterioration diagnostic device for electric apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20041025

RD04 Notification of resignation of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424

Effective date: 20060324

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20060621

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20060807

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20060830

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20060912

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 3858978

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100929

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110929

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110929

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120929

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120929

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130929

Year of fee payment: 7

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees