JP2002251512A - System and method for controlling sales prediction of component - Google Patents

System and method for controlling sales prediction of component

Info

Publication number
JP2002251512A
JP2002251512A JP2001049697A JP2001049697A JP2002251512A JP 2002251512 A JP2002251512 A JP 2002251512A JP 2001049697 A JP2001049697 A JP 2001049697A JP 2001049697 A JP2001049697 A JP 2001049697A JP 2002251512 A JP2002251512 A JP 2002251512A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
parts
customer
sales
database
forecast
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2001049697A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Kazuo Nagasaka
和夫 長坂
Yoshikazu Hayashi
義和 林
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sintokogio Ltd
Original Assignee
Sintokogio Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sintokogio Ltd filed Critical Sintokogio Ltd
Priority to JP2001049697A priority Critical patent/JP2002251512A/en
Publication of JP2002251512A publication Critical patent/JP2002251512A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To make a maker of industrial machine facilities provide service for expendable parts timely to a customer. SOLUTION: This system has an actual result database of a monthly part sale classified by customer, a database extraction means for preparing an actual result database of a monthly part sale of cycle parts classified by customer and an actual result database of a monthly part sale of parts manufactured each time classified by customer, the first prediction means, a difference judging means, a cause grasping means, the second prediction means and an output means.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、部品販売予測方法
に関する。特に、本発明は、サイクル部品と都度製作部
品が混在する産業機械設備など関して好適な部品販売予
測方法に関する。
The present invention relates to a method for predicting the sales of parts. In particular, the present invention relates to a component sales prediction method suitable for industrial machinery and the like in which cycle parts and parts manufactured each time are mixed.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、自動車の消耗部品の部品交換時期
等の販売装置は公知である(例えば、特開平10−15
7579号公報)。しかしながら、たとえば、鋳造設
備、表面処理設備、各種組立設備などの産業機械設備に
関する消耗部品は、納入顧客の設備の稼働率や加工処理
条件によりその消耗時間が異なり、産業機械設備に関す
る消耗部品は消耗度合いを予測することが困難である。
また、産業機械設備は、設備を構成するユニットの部分
的なオ−バ−ホ−ルをする場合があり、これも産業機械
設備に関する消耗部品は消耗度合いを予測することが困
難な一因になっている。このため、産業機械設備メ−カ
−はタイムリ−なサ−ビスを顧客に提供できない場合が
あり、顧客は適量の消耗部品よりも多い部品を確保して
いる必要があった。
2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, a vending apparatus for replacing a consumable part of a vehicle with a part is known (for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No.
No. 7579). However, for example, consumable parts related to industrial machinery such as casting equipment, surface treatment equipment, and various types of assembling equipment have different consumption times depending on the operating rate of the customer's equipment and processing conditions. It is difficult to predict the degree.
In addition, industrial machinery and equipment may partially overhaul the units that make up the equipment, and this is one of the causes of the difficulty in predicting the degree of wear of consumable parts related to industrial machinery and equipment. Has become. For this reason, the industrial machine equipment manufacturer may not be able to provide timely service to the customer, and the customer needs to secure more parts than an appropriate amount of consumable parts.

【0003】[0003]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明は、上記の問題
に鑑みて成されたもので、産業機械設備のメ−カ−が顧
客に対してタイムリ−に消耗部品のサ−ビスをすること
ができる部品販売予測管理システム及び方法を提供する
ことを目的とする。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and is intended to provide a manufacturer of industrial machinery and equipment with a service for consumable parts to a customer in a timely manner. It is an object of the present invention to provide a parts sales forecast management system and method capable of performing the following.

【0004】[0004]

【課題を解決するのための手段】上記の目的を達成する
ために本発明における部品販売予測管理システムは、顧
客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−スと、該実績デ−タ
ベ−スを抽出してサイクル部品の顧客別月別部品販売の
実績デ−タベ−ス及び都度製作部品の顧客別月別部品販
売の実績デ−タベ−スを作成するデ−タベ−ス抽出手段
と、サイクル部品に関する過去の販売実績デ−タベ−ス
から顧客別月別成約予測を予測する第1予測手段と、部
品販売予測がサイクル部品である場合には顧客別月別成
約予測と前記顧客別部品別販売実績を比較して販売実績
が成約予測通りか否かを判断する差異判断手段と、実績
が予測を下回るときには、前記過去のデ−タベ−スを分
析して原因を把握する原因把握手段と、部品販売予測が
都度製作部品の場合には都度製作に影響を及ぼす因子か
ら顧客別月別成約を予測する第2予測手段と、顧客別月
別成約と前記顧客別部品別販売実績を比較して販売実績
が成約予測通りか否かを判断する差異判断手段と、実績
が予測を下回るときには、前記過去のデ−タベ−スを分
析して原因を把握することができる原因把握手段と、前
記、第1予測手段、第2予測手段、原因把握手段の結果
を可視的に出力する出力手段と、を有することを特徴と
する。本発明によれば、サイクル部品と都度製作部品の
混在する産業機械設備の場合であっても、産業機械設備
メ−カ−は、サイクル部品の部品販売予測管理と都度製
作部品の部品販売予測管理が精度良くできて、顧客への
サ−ビスをタイムリ−に実現できる。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In order to achieve the above object, a parts sales forecast management system according to the present invention uses a results database of monthly sales of parts for each customer and a database of the results. A database extraction means for extracting and creating a database of the results of monthly parts sales by customer for cycle parts and a results database of monthly parts sales by customer for manufactured parts each time, and a cycle part. A first forecasting means for predicting monthly contract forecasts for each customer from a database of past sales results, and, when the component sales forecast is a cycle part, comparing the monthly contract forecast for each customer with the sales results for each customer. Difference determination means for determining whether or not the sales performance is as expected according to the contract forecast; cause determination means for analyzing the past database to determine the cause when the performance is lower than expected; Is the place for production parts The second forecasting means for predicting the monthly closing by customer from the factors affecting the production each time, and comparing the monthly closing by customer and the sales performance by parts by customer to judge whether the sales performance is as expected for the closing Means for judging the difference, a cause grasping means for analyzing the past database and grasping a cause when the actual result is lower than the forecast, a first predicting means, a second predicting means, and a cause. Output means for visually outputting the result of the grasp means. According to the present invention, even in the case of industrial machinery and equipment in which cycle parts and production parts are mixed, the industrial machinery equipment manufacturer manages the parts sales forecast management of cycle parts and the parts sales prediction management of production parts each time. Can be performed with high accuracy, and services to customers can be realized in a timely manner.

【0005】また、本発明の実施の他の形態として、前
記実績デ−タベ−スの作成の際に、購入動機、たとえ
ば、メンテナンス点検診断、消耗、予備、突発、定期交
換であることを特徴とする請求項1に記載の部品販売予
測管理システムとすることができる。本発明によれば、
メンテナンス点検診断、消耗、予備、突発、定期交換を
入力することにより、更にきめ細かい、サイクル部品の
部品販売予測管理と都度製作部品の部品販売予測管理が
実現できる。
Another embodiment of the present invention is characterized in that, when the performance database is created, a purchase motive, for example, maintenance inspection diagnosis, exhaustion, spare, sudden, periodic replacement. The parts sales forecast management system described in claim 1 can be used. According to the present invention,
By inputting maintenance inspection diagnosis, wear, spare, sudden, and regular replacement, more detailed forecast management of parts sales of cycle parts and parts sales prediction management of manufactured parts can be realized.

【0006】さらに、本発明の実施の形態として、前記
実績デ−タベ−スの作成の際に、顧客分類、例えば、顧
客の属する業界、顧客規模、顧客生産能力、生産品目、
所在地、納入実績、機械別シェア、メ−カ−か下請けか
の区別(メ−カ−区分)の少なくとも一つを含むことを
特徴とする部品販売予測管理システムとすることができ
る。本発明によれば、実績デ−タベ−スの作成の際に、
顧客分類、例えば、顧客の属する業界、顧客規模、顧客
生産能力、生産品目、所在地、納入実績、機械別シェ
ア、メ−カ−区別の少なくとも一つを入力することによ
り、類似顧客別に、更にきめ細かい、サイクル部品の部
品販売予測管理と都度製作部品の部品販売予測管理が実
現できる。
Further, as an embodiment of the present invention, when the performance database is created, the customer classification, for example, the industry to which the customer belongs, the customer scale, the customer production capacity, the production item,
A parts sales forecast management system including at least one of a location, a delivery record, a machine-based share, and a distinction between a manufacturer and a subcontractor (manufacturer classification) can be provided. According to the present invention, when creating a performance database,
By entering at least one of customer classifications, for example, the industry to which the customer belongs, the customer scale, the customer production capacity, the production item, the location, the delivery record, the machine-specific share, and the manufacturer distinction, it is possible to further fine-tune for similar customers. In addition, it is possible to realize the parts sales forecast management of cycle parts and the parts sales forecast management of manufactured parts each time.

【0007】加えて、本発明の実施の形態として、前記
顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−スがサ−バに設け
られ、複数のクライアント端末からレコ−ド入力されて
作成されることを特徴とする部品販売予測管理システム
とすること、また、前記第1予測手段及び第2予測手段
がクライアント側で作動するソフトウエアで構成された
ことを特徴とする部品販売予測管理システムとすること
ができる。本発明によれば、顧客に対応する各地の営業
マンがそれぞれ入力及び分析ができ、顧客へのサ−ビス
が円滑になる。
[0007] In addition, as an embodiment of the present invention, a database of the results of parts sales by customer per month is provided in a server and is created by inputting records from a plurality of client terminals. And a parts sales prediction management system characterized in that the first prediction means and the second prediction means are constituted by software operated on the client side. Can be. According to the present invention, a sales person in each place corresponding to a customer can perform input and analysis, and service to the customer can be smoothly performed.

【0008】また更に、本発明の実施の形態として、上
記の発明を実施するためのプログラム及び部品管理予測
管理方法がある。
Further, as an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a program for implementing the above-mentioned invention and a component management prediction management method.

【0009】ここで、本発明において、顧客別月別部品
販売の実績デ−タベ−スとは、顧客別月別に部品販売の
実績をデ−タベ−ス化したものである。このデ−タベ−
スは、顧客、担当者、機械型式、部品番号(品番)、部
品名称(品名)、受注年月、サイクル区分即ちサイクル
部品か否かの区分、受注個数、受注金額を、最小限のカ
テゴリとして構成している。また、このデ−タベ−スに
は、購入動機のカテゴリとして、メンテナンス点検診
断、消耗、予備、突発、定期交換の別のデ−タを付加す
ることもできるようになっている(図8)。さらに、こ
のデ−タベ−スには、顧客分類、例えば、顧客の属する
業界、顧客規模、顧客生産能力、生産品目、所在地、納
入実績、機械別シェア、メ−カ−か下請けかの区別(メ
−カ−区分)の少なくとも一つを含むことを特徴とする
部品販売予測管理システムとすることができる(図
9)。尚、機械別シェアには、部品名、品番を追加して
も良い。これにより、更に細かい分析が可能である。ま
た、販売ル−トとして、直接取引、代理店経由、商社経
由などを入力しても良い。契約先の分類又は契約先名の
入力をしてもよい。抽出とは、たとえば、基のデ−タベ
−スから特定カテゴリが同一デ−タである小デ−タベ−
スを基のデ−タベ−スから作成することをいう。読み出
して可視化するかどうかは問わない。サイクル部品と
は、定期的に交換することを前提とした部品をいい、た
とえば、消耗部品がこれにあたる。都度製作部品とは、
定期的交換を前提とせずに、ユニットの交換やオ−バ−
ホ−ルなどにより発生して都度製作する部品をいう。デ
−タベ−ス抽出手段とは、たとえば、ソ−ト機能、を有
するソフトウエアであれば、その種類を問わない。
Here, in the present invention, the database of the results of sales of parts by month for each customer is a database of the results of sales of parts for each month of each customer. This data base
The minimum categories are customer, person in charge, machine model, part number (part number), part name (article name), order date, cycle category, that is, whether or not a cycle part, order quantity, and order price. Make up. Further, this database can be added with other data such as maintenance / inspection diagnosis, consumption, spare, sudden, and regular replacement as categories of purchase motivation (FIG. 8). . Further, the database includes a customer classification, for example, an industry to which the customer belongs, a customer scale, a customer production capacity, a production item, a location, a delivery record, a machine share, and a distinction between a manufacturer and a subcontractor ( A component sales forecast management system including at least one of (manufacturer categories) can be provided (FIG. 9). Note that a part name and a part number may be added to the machine-specific share. This allows more detailed analysis. Further, as a sales route, a direct transaction, via an agency, via a trading company, or the like may be input. The classification of the contractor or the name of the contractor may be input. The extraction means, for example, that a small database in which a specific category is the same data from a base database.
This means that the data is created from the original database. It does not matter whether it is read out and visualized. The cycle part is a part that is assumed to be periodically replaced, for example, a consumable part. What is a part manufactured each time?
Unit replacement and over-
A part produced by a hole or the like and manufactured each time. The database extraction means is not limited as long as it is software having a sort function, for example.

【0010】サイクル部品に関する過去の販売実績デ−
タベ−スから顧客別月別成約予測を予測する第1予測手
段は、たとえば、多次元デ−タ分析技術を利用した、多
次元デ−タベ−スを利用して実現することができる(特
開平10−171777号公報参照)。また、市販のソ
フトウエアにより第一次予測手段の一部は実現可能であ
り、これと組みあわせて第一次予測手段は実現可能であ
る。この場合、ソ−ト機能、表計算機能、多変量解析機
能などを利用する。
[0010] Past sales data on cycle parts
The first prediction means for predicting the monthly contract forecast for each customer from the database can be realized by using, for example, a multi-dimensional database utilizing a multi-dimensional data analysis technology (Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. see Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 10-171777). Further, a part of the primary prediction means can be realized by commercially available software, and the primary prediction means can be realized in combination with this. In this case, a sort function, a spreadsheet function, a multivariate analysis function and the like are used.

【0011】顧客別月別成約予測と前記顧客別部品別販
売実績を比較して販売実績が成約予測通りか否かを判断
する差異判断手段とは、たとえば、日にち毎の目標数か
ら実績数を減算した差を計算し、その値が基準値より大
きくなったか否かで判断する。顧客別の月別の目標数と
実績数を縦軸に、日にちを横軸にして表示して、グラフ
化することも可能である。
The difference determining means for comparing the monthly contract forecast for each customer with the sales results for each part for each customer to determine whether or not the sales result is in accordance with the contract forecast is, for example, subtracting the actual number from the target number for each date. The calculated difference is calculated, and it is determined whether or not the value has become larger than the reference value. It is also possible to display a graph by displaying the number of targets and the number of results for each customer on the vertical axis and the date on the horizontal axis.

【0012】原因を把握する原因把握手段とは、上記多
次元デ−タベ−スを用いて特徴的なカテゴリを自動的に
発見し使用者に提示する機能を用いることができる。前
述の特開平10−171777号公報には、その機能の
記載がある。
As the cause grasping means for grasping the cause, a function of automatically finding a characteristic category using the above-mentioned multidimensional database and presenting it to the user can be used. The aforementioned JP-A-10-171777 has a description of its function.

【0013】部品販売予測が都度製作部品の場合には都
度製作に影響を及ぼす因子から顧客別月別成約を予測す
る第2予測手段は、例えば、産業機械設備において都度
製作部品が発生する頻度が、都度製作に影響を及ぼす因
子、即ち、機械型式、ユニット、工事部位、部品名、必
要個数、部品価格などと関連づけてデ−タベ−ス化され
ており、これを利用して、顧客別月別成約を予測するも
のである。例えば、工事物件が生じた場合に生じる都度
製作部品の量が、過去の工事物件と機械型式、工事部位
などを指定することにより予測できるものである。これ
は、産業機械設備を構成するユニットの部分的なオ−バ
−ホ−ルをする場合に有効に、都度製作部品の予測が可
能になる。これも、前記市販のソフトウエアを利用し
て、第2予測手段の実現が可能できる。但し、都度製作
品はその頻度が低いことから、過去の履歴を長期間イン
プットしておく必要がある。
[0013] In the case where the component sales forecast is a part manufactured each time, the second predicting means for predicting a contract by month for each customer from a factor affecting the manufacturing each time, for example, the frequency at which a part manufactured each time occurs in industrial machinery and equipment, The database is compiled in association with the factors that affect the production each time, that is, the machine type, unit, construction site, part name, required quantity, part price, etc. Is to predict. For example, the amount of parts produced each time a construction article is generated can be predicted by designating a past construction article, a machine model, a construction site, and the like. This is effective when partially overhauling the units constituting the industrial machine equipment, and it is possible to predict the manufactured parts each time. This also makes it possible to realize the second prediction means using the commercially available software. However, since the frequency of production is low, it is necessary to input past history for a long time.

【0014】可視的に出力する出力手段とは、パソコン
画面、携帯電話等のモバイル電子端末の画面、など、そ
の形態は問わない。また、原因分析手段や差異判断手段
の結果は、必要なカテゴリだけを抽出して一覧表化した
りグラフ化することが可能である。これには、様々なア
プリケ−ションソフトが販売されている。そして、抽出
条件を変えることで、分析手段、判断手段にあわせた表
示タ−ゲットの絞り込みが可能になる。たとえば、顧客
ごとの月別販売の実績(図12)を機械ごとの月別販売
実績(図13)に変えることで、同じ機械の顧客差を把
握して、タイムリ−な顧客へのサ−ビスが可能になる。
The output means for visually outputting can be in any form, such as a personal computer screen, a screen of a mobile electronic terminal such as a mobile phone, or the like. Further, the results of the cause analysis unit and the difference determination unit can be extracted and charted or graphed by extracting only necessary categories. This includes a variety of applique - have been sold and Deployment software. By changing the extraction conditions, it is possible to narrow down the display targets according to the analysis means and the judgment means. For example, by changing record of monthly sales per customer (FIG. 12) to the machine per month sales record (Fig. 13), grasps the customer difference of the same machine, timely - a service to the customer - bis possible become.

【0015】[0015]

【発明の実施の形態】図1は、本発明の部品販売予測管
理システムの全体構成の例を示す図である。図1におい
て、本発明の部品販売予測管理システムでは、図3に示
す顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−スと、デ−タベ
−ス抽出手段により、条件により抽出される図4に示す
サイクル部品の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−ス
と、同じく条件により抽出される図5に示す都度製作部
品の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−スと、が、可
視化可能になっている。また、本発明の部品販売予測管
理システムでは、サイクル部品の予測をする第1予測手
段と、都度製作部品の予測をする第2予測手段を有して
いる。尚、第2予測手段では、都度製作に影響を及ぼす
因子から顧客別月別成約を予測する。そして、第1予測
手段及び第2予測手段を用いた、サイクル部品の顧客別
月別部品成約予測デ−タベ−スと、都度製作部品の顧客
別月別部品成約予測デ−タベ−スと、が可視化可能にな
っている。加えて、本発明の部品販売予測管理システム
には、顧客別月別部品成約予測と顧客別部品別販売実績
を比較して販売実績が成約予測通りか否かを判断する差
異判断手段(図6,図7)を有している。さらに、本発
明の部品販売予測管理システムは、実績が予測を下回る
ときに用いる、前記過去のデ−タベ−スを分析して原因
を把握する原因把握手段を有している。さらに、本発明
の部品販売予測管理システムは、前記第1予測手段、第
2予測手段、原因把握手段の結果を可視的に出力する出
力手段を有している。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of the overall configuration of a parts sales forecast management system according to the present invention. In FIG. 1, the parts sales forecast management system of the present invention is shown in FIG. 4 which is extracted based on conditions by the database for the actual sales of parts for each customer shown in FIG. 3 and the database extraction means. Visualization of the performance database of monthly parts sales by customer for cycle parts and the performance database of monthly parts sales by customer for each time production parts shown in FIG. Has become. Further, the parts sales prediction management system of the present invention has first prediction means for predicting cycle parts and second prediction means for predicting manufactured parts each time. The second predicting means predicts a customer-by-customer monthly contract from factors that affect production each time. Then, a customer-based monthly contract conclusion prediction database of cycle parts and a customer-specific monthly contract conclusion prediction database of manufactured parts using the first prediction means and the second prediction means are visualized. It is possible. In addition, the parts sales forecast management system of the present invention includes a difference determining means (FIG. 6, FIG. 6) for comparing the monthly contract forecast for each customer with the sales results for each part for each customer to determine whether the sales results are as expected. FIG. 7). Further, the parts sales forecast management system of the present invention has a cause grasping means for analyzing the past database and grasping the cause, which is used when the actual result is lower than the forecast. Further, the parts sales prediction management system of the present invention has output means for visually outputting the results of the first prediction means, the second prediction means, and the cause grasping means.

【0016】図2は、本発明の部品販売予測管理システ
ムの全体の流れの例を示す図である。図1において、本
発明の部品販売予測管理システムの全体の流れは、次の
ようになっている。まず、第1段階として、顧客別月別
部品販売の実績デ−タベ−ス(図3)をサイクル部品と
都度製作部品に抽出してサイクル部品及び都度製作部品
の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−スを作成する
(図4、図5)。図4は、顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ
−タベ−ス(図3)からサイクル部品のみの顧客別月別
部品販売の実績デ−タベ−スを抽出した結果である。図
5は、顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−ス(図3)
から都度製作部品のみの顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−
タベ−スを抽出した結果である。次いで、第2段階とし
て、販売予測する部品がサイクル部品の場合にはサイク
ル部品に関する過去の販売実績デ−タベ−スから予測し
た顧客別月別成約予測と前記顧客別部品別販売実績に対
応する今月分を比較して、販売実績が成約予測通りか否
かを判断する(図6、図7)。図6は、顧客別月別成約
予測と顧客別部品別販売実績の比較表である。この比較
表は、差異判断手段の結果表示として機能する。図7
は、顧客別月別成約予測と顧客別部品別販売実績の日当
り比較表である。この日当り比較表も、差異判断手段の
結果表示として機能する。過去の具体的数値を入力して
表示したものが図10及び図11である。図10におい
ては、過去3年間の数値が入力され、それに基づき、図
11の月別予測と実績が表示される。そして、第3段階
として、実績が予測を下回るときには、前記過去のデ−
タベ−スを分析して原因を把握する。例えば、図10を
分析することにより、販売が順調な機械名と、販売が遅
れている機械名がわかる。さらに、顧客別、担当者別に
ソ−トすることにより、原因追及が可能になる。その
後、第4段階として、販売する部品が都度製作部品の場
合には顧客要求案件及び機械診断により予測した顧客別
月別成約予測と前記顧客別部品別販売実績を比較して販
売実績が成約予測通りか否かを判断する(図6、図
7)。また、第5段階として、実績が予測を下回るとき
には、前記過去のデ−タベ−スを分析して原因を把握す
る。尚、第2段階と第4段階は選択により順序を変える
ことが可能である。このようにして、部品販売予測管理
を実施する。
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the overall flow of the parts sales forecast management system of the present invention. In FIG. 1, the overall flow of the parts sales prediction management system of the present invention is as follows. First, as a first step, a database of the results of monthly sales of parts for each customer (FIG. 3) is extracted into cycle parts and parts manufactured each time, and the results data of sales of parts for each cycle of the cycle parts and parts manufactured each time is collected. A database is created (FIGS. 4 and 5). FIG. 4 is a result of extracting a performance database of customer-specific monthly sales of only cycle parts from a performance database of monthly sales of parts by customer (FIG. 3). FIG. 5 is a database of the results of parts sales by customer and month (FIG. 3).
From the actual sales data of monthly parts only
This is the result of extracting a database. Next, as a second stage, when the parts to be sold are cycle parts, the contract conclusion forecast for each month predicted by the customer based on the past sales performance database on the cycle parts and the current month corresponding to the sales performance for the customer parts. By comparing the minutes, it is determined whether or not the sales results are as expected in the contract (FIGS. 6 and 7). FIG. 6 is a comparison table of monthly contract forecasts for each customer and sales results for each customer. This comparison table functions as a result display of the difference determining means. FIG.
Is a daily comparison table of customer-specific monthly contract forecasts and customer-specific parts sales performance. This daily comparison table also functions as a result display of the difference determining means. FIG. 10 and FIG. 11 show specific past numerical values input and displayed. In FIG. 10, numerical values for the past three years are input, and based on the numerical values, the monthly prediction and the actual results in FIG. 11 are displayed. Then, as a third stage, when the actual result is lower than the prediction, the past data is used.
Analyze the database to understand the cause. For example, by analyzing FIG. 10, the name of a machine that is selling well and the name of a machine that is late selling can be found. Further, by sorting by customer and person in charge, it becomes possible to find the cause. Then, as a fourth step, if the parts to be sold are parts manufactured each time, the sales results for each customer are compared with the monthly contract forecasts for each customer predicted based on customer requirements and machine diagnosis, and the sales results for each customer are compared with the sales forecasts. It is determined whether or not (FIGS. 6 and 7). As a fifth step, when the actual result is lower than the prediction, the past database is analyzed to grasp the cause. The order of the second and fourth stages can be changed by selection. In this way, component sales forecast management is performed.

【0017】[0017]

【発明の効果】本発明の部品販売予測管理システムは、
上記の説明から明らかなように、顧客別月別部品販売の
実績デ−タベ−スと、該実績デ−タベ−スを抽出してサ
イクル部品の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−ス及
び都度製作部品の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−
スを作成するデ−タベ−ス抽出手段と、サイクル部品に
関する過去の販売実績デ−タベ−スから顧客別月別成約
予測を予測する第1予測手段と、部品販売予測がサイク
ル部品である場合には顧客別月別成約予測と前記顧客別
部品別販売実績を比較して販売実績が成約予測通りか否
かを判断する差異判断手段と、実績が予測を下回るとき
には、前記過去のデ−タベ−スを分析して原因を把握す
る原因把握手段と、部品販売予測が都度製作部品の場合
には都度製作に影響を及ぼす因子から顧客別月別成約を
予測する第2予測手段と、顧客別月別成約と前記顧客別
部品別販売実績を比較して販売実績が成約予測通りか否
かを判断する差異判断手段と、実績が予測を下回るとき
には、前記過去のデ−タベ−スを分析して原因を把握す
ることができる原因把握手段と、前記、第1予測手段、
第2予測手段、原因把握手段の結果を可視的に出力する
出力手段と、を有することを特徴とすることから、サイ
クル部品と都度製作部品の混在する産業機械設備の場合
であっても、産業機械設備メ−カ−は、サイクル部品の
部品販売予測管理と都度製作部品の部品販売予測管理が
精度良くできて、顧客へのサ−ビスをタイムリ−に実現
できるなど、産業界に与える効果は著大である。
The parts sales forecast management system of the present invention
As is clear from the above description, a performance database of monthly parts sales by customer, and a performance database of monthly parts sales by customer by extracting the performance database and extracting the performance database. Data on monthly sales of parts manufactured by customer for each time
Database extracting means for creating a service, first forecasting means for forecasting a monthly closing forecast for each customer from a past sales performance database for cycle parts, and a case where the part sales forecast is a cycle part. Means for comparing difference forecasts for each customer by month and sales performance for each customer for the parts to determine whether the sales results are in accordance with the forecasts for the contracts; and when the results are lower than the forecasts, the database of the past is used. And a second predicting means for predicting each customer's monthly contract based on factors affecting production each time the parts sales forecast is a manufactured part, and a customer-specific monthly contract. A difference judging means for comparing the sales results for each customer for each part to judge whether the sales results are as expected or not, and analyzing the past database to grasp the cause when the results are lower than expected A source that can be And grasping means, said first prediction means,
Since the second prediction means and the output means for visually outputting the result of the cause grasping means are provided, even in the case of industrial machine equipment in which cycle parts and parts manufactured each time are mixed, the Machinery and equipment manufacturers can accurately predict and manage the sales of parts for cycle parts and the sales of parts manufactured each time, and realize services to customers in a timely manner. is Chodai.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明の部品販売予測管理システムの全体構成
の例を示す図である。
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of the overall configuration of a parts sales prediction management system of the present invention.

【図2】本発明の部品販売予測管理システムの全体の流
れの例を示す図である。
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the overall flow of the parts sales prediction management system of the present invention.

【図3】本発明の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−
スの一例を示す図である。
FIG. 3 is a data table of the results of sales of parts by customer and by month according to the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of a service.

【図4】本発明のサイクル部品の顧客別月別部品販売の
実績デ−タベ−スの一例を示す図である。
FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of a performance database of monthly parts sales by customer for cycle parts according to the present invention.

【図5】本発明の都度製作部品の顧客別月別部品販売の
実績デ−タベ−スの一例を示す図である。
FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a database of the results of sales of parts manufactured by customers for each month according to the present invention.

【図6】本発明の差異判断手段の可視化画像の一例であ
る。
FIG. 6 is an example of a visualized image of a difference determination unit of the present invention.

【図7】本発明の差異判断手段の可視化画像の一例であ
る。
FIG. 7 is an example of a visualized image of a difference determination unit of the present invention.

【図8】本発明の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−
スの別の例を示す図である。
FIG. 8 is a result data base of monthly sales of parts by customer according to the present invention.
FIG. 9 is a diagram showing another example of the software.

【図9】本発明の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−
スの更に別の例を示す図である。
FIG. 9 is a data record of sales of parts by customer according to the present invention;
FIG. 10 is a diagram showing still another example of the process.

【図10】本発明の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ
−スの更に別の例(過去を表示したとき)を示す図であ
る。
FIG. 10 is a diagram showing still another example (when the past is displayed) of the performance database of monthly parts sales by customer according to the present invention.

【図11】本発明の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ
−スからの月別予測実績を示す図である。
FIG. 11 is a diagram showing monthly predicted results from a database of results of monthly sales of parts by customer according to the present invention.

【図12】本発明の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ
−ス(顧客ごと)の別の例を示す図である。
FIG. 12 is a diagram showing another example of a performance database (for each customer) of monthly parts sales for each customer according to the present invention.

【図13】本発明の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ
−ス(機械ごと)の別の例を示す図である。
FIG. 13 is a diagram showing another example of a performance database (for each machine) of monthly sales of parts by customer according to the present invention.

Claims (9)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−
スと、該実績デ−タベ−スを抽出してサイクル部品の顧
客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−ス及び都度製作部品
の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−スを作成するデ
−タベ−ス抽出手段と、サイクル部品に関する過去の販
売実績デ−タベ−スから顧客別月別成約予測を予測する
第1予測手段と、部品販売予測がサイクル部品である場
合には顧客別月別成約予測と前記顧客別部品別販売実績
を比較して販売実績が成約予測通りか否かを判断する差
異判断手段と、実績が予測を下回るときには、前記過去
のデ−タベ−スを分析して原因を把握する原因把握手段
と、部品販売予測が都度製作部品の場合には都度製作に
影響を及ぼす因子から顧客別月別成約を予測する第2予
測手段と、顧客別月別成約と前記顧客別部品別販売実績
を比較して販売実績が成約予測通りか否かを判断する差
異判断手段と、実績が予測を下回るときには、前記過去
のデ−タベ−スを分析して原因を把握することができる
原因把握手段と、前記、第1予測手段、第2予測手段、
原因把握手段の結果を可視的に出力する出力手段と、を
有することを特徴とする部品販売予測管理システム。
[1] Data record of parts sales by customer and by month
And a database for extracting the performance database and the performance database of monthly parts sales by customer for cycle parts and the performance database for monthly parts sales by customer for each time production parts. -Database extraction means, first prediction means for predicting monthly contract forecasts for each customer based on past sales performance data relating to cycle parts, and monthly contracts for each customer if the component sales forecast is cycle parts. A difference judging means for comparing the forecast with the sales performance of the parts for each customer to judge whether or not the sales performance is in accordance with the contract forecast; and, when the performance is lower than the forecast, analyzing the past database to determine the cause. Means for grasping the cause, second forecasting means for predicting each customer's monthly contract based on factors affecting production each time the parts sales forecast is a manufactured part, and customer's monthly contract and the customer's parts Compare sales results Difference determination means for determining whether or not the result is in accordance with the contract forecast; cause determination means for analyzing the past database to determine the cause when the actual result is lower than the prediction; Prediction means, second prediction means,
Output means for visually outputting the result of the cause grasping means.
【請求項2】 前記実績デ−タベ−スの作成の際に、
購入動機を記入することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の
部品販売予測管理システム。
2. When creating the performance database,
2. The parts sales forecast management system according to claim 1, wherein a purchase motive is entered.
【請求項3】 前記購入動機がメンテナンス点検診
断、消耗、予備、突発、定期交換であることを特徴とす
る請求項2に記載の部品販売予測管理システム。
3. The parts sales forecast management system according to claim 2, wherein the purchase motive is a maintenance inspection diagnosis, a wear, a spare, a sudden, or a periodic replacement.
【請求項4】 前記実績デ−タベ−スの作成の際に、
顧客分類を記入することを特徴とする請求項1に記載の
部品販売予測管理システム。
4. When creating the performance database,
2. The parts sales forecast management system according to claim 1, wherein a customer classification is entered.
【請求項5】 前記顧客分類が顧客の属する業界、顧
客規模、顧客生産能力、生産品目、所在地、納入実績、
機械別シェア、メ−カ−か下請けかの区別の少なくとも
一つを含むことを特徴とする請求項4に記載の部品販売
予測管理システム。
5. The industry in which the customer classification belongs to the customer, customer scale, customer production capacity, production items, location, delivery record,
5. The parts sales forecast management system according to claim 4, wherein the system includes at least one of a machine-based share and a distinction between a manufacturer and a subcontractor.
【請求項6】 前記顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タ
ベ−スがサ−バに設けられ、複数のクライアント端末か
らレコ−ド入力されて作成されることを特徴とする請求
項1に記載の部品販売予測管理システム。
6. The database according to claim 1, wherein the database of the results of parts sales by customer for each month is provided in a server, and is created by inputting records from a plurality of client terminals. Parts sales forecast management system.
【請求項7】 前記第1予測手段及び第2予測手段が
クライアント側で作動するソフトウエアで構成されたこ
とを特徴とする請求項1に記載の部品販売予測管理シス
テム。
7. The parts sales prediction management system according to claim 1, wherein the first prediction means and the second prediction means are constituted by software operated on a client side.
【請求項8】 顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−
スを抽出してサイクル部品の顧客別月別部品販売の実績
デ−タベ−ス及び都度製作部品の顧客別月別部品販売の
実績デ−タベ−スを作成する機能と、サイクル部品に関
する過去の販売実績デ−タベ−スから顧客別月別成約予
測を予測する機能と、部品販売予測がサイクル部品であ
る場合には顧客別月別成約予測と前記顧客別部品別販売
実績を比較して販売実績が成約予測通りか否かを判断す
る判断機能と、実績が予測を下回るときには、前記過去
のデ−タベ−スを分析して原因を把握する原因把握機能
と、部品販売予測が都度製作部品の場合には都度製作に
影響を及ぼす因子から顧客別月別成約を予測する機能
と、顧客別月別成約と前記顧客別部品別販実績を比較し
て販売実績が成約予測通りか否かを判断する判断機能
と、実績が予測を下回るときには、前記過去のデ−タベ
−スを分析して原因を把握する原因把握機能と、前記予
測機能、原因把握機能の結果を可視的に出力する機能
と、を実現するための部品販売予測管理プログラム。
8. A data base of monthly sales of parts by customer.
To extract the nest cycle parts customer by month parts sales performance data of - eat - scan and each time production parts customer by month parts sales performance data of - eat - and the ability to create a scan, past sales performance on the cycle parts A function for predicting monthly contract forecasts for each customer from the database, and when parts sales forecasts are cycle parts, comparing the monthly contract forecasts for each customer and the sales results for each customer, the sales results are forecasted. A judgment function for judging whether or not the result is satisfied, a cause grasping function for grasping the cause by analyzing the past database when the actual result is lower than the forecast, and a function for grasping the cause when the parts sales forecast is a manufactured part each time. A function for predicting monthly contracts by customer from factors affecting production each time, and a judgment function of comparing sales results by customer and monthly sales by customer and comparing the sales results by parts by customer to judge whether or not the sales results are as expected for contracts, Actual is below forecast In some cases, parts sales forecast management for realizing a cause grasping function for analyzing the past database to grasp the cause and a function for visually outputting the results of the prediction function and the cause grasping function. program.
【請求項9】 顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タベ−
スをサイクル部品と都度製作部品に抽出してサイクル部
品及び都度製作部品の顧客別月別部品販売の実績デ−タ
ベ−スを作成する段階と、販売予測する部品がサイクル
部品の場合にはサイクル部品に関する過去の販売実績デ
−タベ−スから予測した顧客別月別成約予測と前記顧客
別部品別販売実績に対応する今月分を比較して販売実績
が成約予測通りか否かを判断する段階と、実績が予測を
下回るときには、前記過去のデ−タベ−スを分析して原
因を把握する段階と、販売する部品が都度製作部品の場
合には顧客要求案件及び機械診断により予測した顧客別
月別成約予測と前記顧客別部品別販売実績を比較して販
売実績が成約予測通りか否かを判断する段階と、実績が
予測を下回るときには、前記過去のデ−タベ−スを分析
して原因を把握する段階と、を有することを特徴とする
部品販売予測管理方法。
9. Data record of parts sales by customer and monthly
To extract the cycle parts into cycle parts and as-built parts, and to create a database of the actual results of cycle parts and as-built parts by customer per month, and, if the parts to be sold are cycle parts, cycle parts Comparing the monthly sales forecast by customer predicted from the past sales performance database with the current month corresponding to the sales performance by parts by customer to determine whether the sales performance is as expected. When the actual results are lower than the forecasts, the past database is analyzed to understand the cause, and when the parts to be sold are manufactured parts each time, the customer contracts and monthly contracts forecasted by the customer based on the customer's request and machine diagnosis. Comparing the forecast with the sales performance of each part for each customer to judge whether the sales performance is as expected, and when the performance is lower than the forecast, analyze the past database to understand the cause You Parts sales forecast management method characterized by comprising the steps, a.
JP2001049697A 2001-02-26 2001-02-26 System and method for controlling sales prediction of component Pending JP2002251512A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001049697A JP2002251512A (en) 2001-02-26 2001-02-26 System and method for controlling sales prediction of component

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2001049697A JP2002251512A (en) 2001-02-26 2001-02-26 System and method for controlling sales prediction of component

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2002251512A true JP2002251512A (en) 2002-09-06

Family

ID=18910762

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2001049697A Pending JP2002251512A (en) 2001-02-26 2001-02-26 System and method for controlling sales prediction of component

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2002251512A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106897795A (en) * 2017-02-17 2017-06-27 联想(北京)有限公司 A kind of inventory forecast method and device

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09179850A (en) * 1995-12-25 1997-07-11 Hitachi Ltd Demand prediction model evaluating method
JPH10134027A (en) * 1996-10-29 1998-05-22 Toyota Motor Corp Method and device for supporting prediction of sale
JPH11259564A (en) * 1998-03-09 1999-09-24 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Sales prediction supporting system

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH09179850A (en) * 1995-12-25 1997-07-11 Hitachi Ltd Demand prediction model evaluating method
JPH10134027A (en) * 1996-10-29 1998-05-22 Toyota Motor Corp Method and device for supporting prediction of sale
JPH11259564A (en) * 1998-03-09 1999-09-24 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Sales prediction supporting system

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106897795A (en) * 2017-02-17 2017-06-27 联想(北京)有限公司 A kind of inventory forecast method and device

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6032125A (en) Demand forecasting method, demand forecasting system, and recording medium
JP3481570B2 (en) Demand forecasting equipment in parts inventory management
Chiadamrong The development of an economic quality cost model
EP1717740A1 (en) Profit-and-loss management information presenting method
WO2003054757A2 (en) Sales optimization
Abdul-Hamid et al. An analytic hierarchy process approach to the choice of manufacturing plant layout
EP3690793A1 (en) Component procurement system and component procurement method
JP2002288278A (en) Analysis system for product cost variation
Reiner Supply chain management research methodology using quantitative models based on empirical data
JP2004323162A (en) Maintenance business simulator, maintenance service planning support system and maintenance business support system
JP2002297958A (en) Daily delivery goods ordering optimization support system, its method and program
JP2003288476A (en) Line capacity integrated evaluation/management operation system for production line and line capacity integrated evaluation/management operation method for the production line
US20130035990A1 (en) Software solution for Visual Sales process simulation and management
JP2002251512A (en) System and method for controlling sales prediction of component
JP2002229631A (en) Evaluating method and device for product cost, evaluating method and device for profitability by using these and investment strategy determining method
US20220092509A1 (en) Work Improvement Support Apparatus, and Work Improvement Support System
JP2006351003A (en) Production simulation device and method
JP2005222187A (en) Profit increment simulation method and system by introduction of task support system
JP2002279147A (en) In-house production determination support device, in- house determination support method, machine-readable recording medium with in-house production determination support program recorded thereon and in-house determination support program
WO2015145594A1 (en) Warehouse profit simulation device
JP2002259667A (en) Numerical value customer managing system by cell group
JP2002073147A (en) Manufacture cost calculation system and recording medium with recorded manufacturing cost calculating program
JP3695152B2 (en) Cost index calculation device
Sarigol et al. Product assortment with sustainable product attributes: The case of a tire producer
Fleischer et al. Optimizing the life-cycle-performance of machine tools by reliability and availability prognosis

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20071030

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20091221

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100108

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20100506