JP2002110493A - Method and apparatus for extracting failure in machining process - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for extracting failure in machining process

Info

Publication number
JP2002110493A
JP2002110493A JP2000304253A JP2000304253A JP2002110493A JP 2002110493 A JP2002110493 A JP 2002110493A JP 2000304253 A JP2000304253 A JP 2000304253A JP 2000304253 A JP2000304253 A JP 2000304253A JP 2002110493 A JP2002110493 A JP 2002110493A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
information
extracting
history information
analysis
manufacturing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2000304253A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Masayuki Tanaka
昌行 田中
Katsuyuki Ogawa
克之 小河
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Panasonic Holdings Corp
Original Assignee
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd filed Critical Matsushita Electric Industrial Co Ltd
Priority to JP2000304253A priority Critical patent/JP2002110493A/en
Publication of JP2002110493A publication Critical patent/JP2002110493A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To enable anyone to quickly extract failure factors causing the product yield to drop in machining processes such as diffusion steps to meet the actual situation in a semiconductor manufacturing factory. SOLUTION: Using manufacturing apparatus history information I2 including troubles and maintenance information about manufacturing apparatus and inspecting apparatus, and quality result information I1 expressing the yields and electric characteristic values of products, a multi-step multivariate analyzing means 4 analyzes the relations between both information to limit, and extracts failure factors in the manufacturing apparatus history information I2.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、半導体製造工場の
拡散工程等の加工プロセス工程における異常抽出方法及
び装置に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a method and an apparatus for extracting abnormalities in a processing process such as a diffusion process in a semiconductor manufacturing plant.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】半導体製造の拡散工程等の加工プロセス
工程において、その工程で加工される製品の品質低下の
要因を分析して特定する従来の方法及び装置として、特
開平10−135091号公報に開示されたものがあ
る。
2. Description of the Related Art Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. Hei 10-135091 discloses a conventional method and apparatus for analyzing and specifying factors of quality deterioration of a product processed in a processing step such as a diffusion step in semiconductor manufacturing. Some have been disclosed.

【0003】この従来の方法及び装置では、品質に影響
を与える因子として、製造装置履歴、気体の圧力や流量
といった製造装置に設定する製造条件、装置の処理結果
を評価するために行なわれる検査の結果であるインライ
ン測定値等を主な調査対象としている。
In this conventional method and apparatus, factors affecting quality include manufacturing apparatus history, manufacturing conditions such as gas pressure and flow rate set in the manufacturing apparatus, and inspections performed to evaluate processing results of the apparatus. The main results of the survey are the inline measured values that are the results.

【0004】品質低下の要因を分析するに際しては、製
品の加工歩留りや電気的特性値等の品質結果情報を目的
変数(最終的に求めたい結果を表わす変数)とし、上記
した製造装置の履歴情報、製造条件、インライン測定値
等の情報を説明変数(目的変数を説明するための変数)
として、それらの間の因果関係を多段階多変量解析手段
を用いて解析することで要因を抽出している。多段階多
変量解析手段とは、1回の解析で用いる説明変数の数を
一定にして、公知の変数増減法を用いて自動的に異常項
目(説明変数)を絞り込む、という解析を複数回行なっ
た後、各解析で絞り込まれた項目だけで最終の解析を行
なうものである。
When analyzing the cause of quality deterioration, quality result information such as the processing yield of a product and electrical characteristic values are used as objective variables (variables representing results to be finally obtained), and the history information of the manufacturing apparatus described above is used. Information such as manufacturing conditions, in-line measured values, etc. are explanatory variables (variables for explaining objective variables)
The factors are extracted by analyzing the causal relationship between them using a multi-stage multivariate analysis means. The multi-stage multivariate analysis means performs a plurality of analyzes in which the number of explanatory variables used in one analysis is fixed, and abnormal items (explanatory variables) are automatically narrowed down using a known variable increase / decrease method. After that, the final analysis is performed using only the items narrowed down in each analysis.

【0005】また、解析情報の作成にあたって、単一の
品種ではデータの数が集まらず解析できないような場合
には、同一製造条件の品種をひとくくりとし、「品種グ
ループ」としてまとめて解析することにより、多品種少
量生産に対応できるようにしている。さらに、製造装置
の履歴情報が残っていない場合には、仮の製造装置番号
を新規に付与することにより、データの抜けに対する事
前のデータ加工と人の判断を省き自動的に抽出処理がで
きるようにしている。
[0005] Further, when creating analysis information, if the number of data cannot be collected and analysis cannot be performed with a single product type, products under the same manufacturing conditions are collectively analyzed as a "product type group". With this, it is possible to cope with high-mix low-volume production. Furthermore, when the history information of the manufacturing apparatus does not remain, a temporary manufacturing apparatus number is newly assigned, so that it is possible to automatically perform the extraction processing without prior data processing and human judgment for missing data. I have to.

【0006】[0006]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】ところで、上記した従
来の分析方法で製造装置の履歴情報をも説明変数とする
のは、品質低下は、製造条件や製造方法だけではなく、
トラブル対応やメンテナンス等に人的ミスがあった場合
にも発生するからである。しかしながら、このような人
的ミスについては人の勘と経験に頼った解析しかされて
いないのが現状であり、品質低下の要因を誰でもが簡単
に解析するわけにはいかないという課題があった。
By the way, in the above-mentioned conventional analysis method, the history information of the manufacturing apparatus is also used as an explanatory variable.
This is also caused by a human error in troubleshooting or maintenance. However, such human errors are currently analyzed only based on human intuition and experience, and there is a problem that it is not easy for everyone to analyze the factors of quality deterioration. .

【0007】本発明は上記課題を解決するもので、品質
低下の要因を実態に即して迅速にかつ誰でもが抽出でき
る加工プロセス工程の異常抽出方法及びその装置を提供
することを目的とする。
An object of the present invention is to solve the above-mentioned problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a method and an apparatus for extracting abnormalities in a machining process step, which can promptly extract the cause of quality deterioration in accordance with the actual situation. .

【0008】[0008]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記課題を解決するため
に、請求項1記載の本発明は、半導体製造工場の拡散工
程等の加工プロセス工程において製品の歩留り低下を引
き起こす異常要因を抽出する異常抽出方法であって、製
造装置及び検査装置に関するトラブルやメンテナンスの
情報を含んだ装置履歴情報と製品の歩留りや電気的特性
値を示す品質結果情報とを用いて両情報間の因果関係を
多段階多変量解析手法で解析することにより、前記装置
履歴情報に含まれる異常要因を絞り込み抽出することを
特徴とする。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention according to the first aspect of the present invention is directed to an abnormality for extracting an abnormal factor causing a reduction in product yield in a processing process such as a diffusion process in a semiconductor manufacturing plant. An extraction method, in which a causal relationship between two pieces of information is multi-staged using apparatus history information including information on troubles and maintenance related to a manufacturing apparatus and an inspection apparatus and quality result information indicating a product yield and an electrical characteristic value. The analysis is performed by a multivariate analysis method, thereby narrowing down and extracting an abnormal factor included in the apparatus history information.

【0009】すなわち、製品の歩留りや電気的特性値を
示す品質結果情報を目的変数とし、装置トラブルやメン
テナンス等の装置履歴情報を説明変数として、重回帰分
析により異常の候補を抽出し解析の助けとするのである
が、説明変数の数が多すぎると有効な解析結果が得られ
ないので、多段階多変量解析手法を用いる。多段階多変
量解析手法は、前述したように、1回の解析で用いる説
明変数の数を一定にして、公知の変数増減法を用いて自
動的に異常項目(説明変数)を絞り込む、という解析を
複数回行ない、各解析で絞り込まれた項目だけで最終の
解析を行なうものである。これにより、無限の説明変数
の数に対応して、実態に即した精度の高い異常抽出を自
動的に迅速に誰にでも実施可能となる。
That is, quality result information indicating product yield and electrical characteristic values is used as an objective variable, and device history information such as device troubles and maintenance is used as an explanatory variable, and an abnormal candidate is extracted by multiple regression analysis to assist analysis. However, since an effective analysis result cannot be obtained if the number of explanatory variables is too large, a multi-stage multivariate analysis method is used. As described above, the multi-stage multivariate analysis method is a method in which the number of explanatory variables used in one analysis is fixed, and abnormal items (explanatory variables) are automatically narrowed down using a known variable increase / decrease method. Is performed a plurality of times, and the final analysis is performed using only the items narrowed down in each analysis. As a result, it is possible to automatically and rapidly perform an abnormality extraction with high accuracy in accordance with the actual situation in response to the infinite number of explanatory variables.

【0010】請求項2記載の本発明は、半導体製造工場
の拡散工程等の加工プロセス工程において製品の歩留り
低下を引き起こす異常要因を抽出する異常抽出装置であ
って、製造装置及び検査装置に関するトラブルやメンテ
ナンスの情報を含んだ装置履歴情報と製品の歩留りや電
気的特性値を示す品質結果情報とを記憶する記憶手段
と、前記記憶装置に記憶された品質結果情報と装置履歴
情報とを用いて装置履歴と品質結果との因果関係を多段
階多変量解析手法により解析し前記装置履歴情報に含ま
れる異常要因を絞り込み抽出する多段階多変量解析手段
とを備えたことを特徴とする。
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided an abnormality extracting apparatus for extracting an abnormal factor which causes a reduction in product yield in a processing process such as a diffusion process in a semiconductor manufacturing plant. A storage unit for storing apparatus history information including maintenance information and quality result information indicating a product yield or an electrical characteristic value; and an apparatus using the quality result information and apparatus history information stored in the storage device. A multi-stage multivariate analysis means for analyzing a causal relationship between the history and the quality result by a multi-stage multivariate analysis method, and narrowing down and extracting an abnormal factor included in the device history information.

【0011】多段階多変量解析手段は、入力されるパラ
メータに基づいて重回帰分析の目的変数である品質結果
情報と説明変数である装置履歴情報とを記憶装置から検
索するデータ検索部と、検索したデータから解析用デー
タを作成する解析用データ作成部と、解析用データを多
段階で多変量解析して異常抽出処理する自動抽出処理部
と、処理中の作業用データを記憶する作業用データ記憶
部と、これらの処理を制御する中央制御部とを備えた構
成とすることができる。
The multi-stage multivariate analysis means includes: a data search unit for searching a storage device for quality result information as an objective variable of multiple regression analysis and device history information as an explanatory variable based on input parameters; Analysis data creation unit that creates analysis data from the extracted data, automatic extraction processing unit that performs multivariate analysis of the analysis data in multiple stages and extracts abnormalities, and work data that stores the work data being processed A configuration including a storage unit and a central control unit that controls these processes can be provided.

【0012】[0012]

【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明の一実施形態におけ
る加工プロセス工程の異常抽出方法及び装置を図1〜図
6を参照して説明する。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS A method and an apparatus for extracting an abnormality in a machining process according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to FIGS.

【0013】図1において、1は異常抽出を行うために
必要なパラメータと製造条件を入力する入力装置、2は
品質結果情報I1と、製造装置・検査機についてのトラ
ブルやメンテナンス等の情報を含んだ装置履歴情報I2
と製造履歴情報I3と、解析結果情報I4とを記憶して
おく記憶装置、3は異常抽出を行う中央処理装置、4は
中央処理装置3に属し解析を行う多段階多変量解析手
段、5は抽出結果などを表示又は印字する表示装置・印
字装置である。
In FIG. 1, reference numeral 1 denotes an input device for inputting parameters and manufacturing conditions necessary for extracting abnormalities, and 2 includes quality result information I1 and information on troubles and maintenance of manufacturing devices and inspection machines. Device history information I2
Storage device for storing the manufacturing history information I3 and the analysis result information I4, 3 is a central processing unit for performing abnormality extraction, 4 is a multi-stage multivariate analysis means belonging to the central processing unit 3 and performing analysis, and 5 is It is a display device / printing device that displays or prints the extraction result and the like.

【0014】多段階多変量解析手段4は、記憶装置2か
ら必要な情報を検索するためのデータ検索部A、検索し
たデータから解析用のデータを作成する解析用データ作
成部B、異常の原因を抽出するための自動抽出処理部
C、これらの処理の制御を行う中央制御部D、各処理の
作業データの記憶、受け渡しをするための作業用データ
記憶部Eを備えている。
The multi-stage multivariate analysis means 4 includes a data search unit A for searching necessary information from the storage device 2, an analysis data generation unit B for generating data for analysis from the searched data, , A central control unit D for controlling these processes, and a work data storage unit E for storing and transferring work data of each process.

【0015】図2に示すように、拡散工程において、ロ
ットL1〜L6がそれぞれ装置DA,DB,DCに順次
送られ黒丸で示した時間に製造(加工)され、また装置
DA,DB,DCがそれぞれメンテナンスMA,MB,
MCで示した時間にメンテナンスされるものとする。し
たがって、ロットL1〜L6の製造履歴情報と、装置D
A,DB,DCについてのメンテナンスの記録、および
装置DCでトラブルTCが発生した場合にはトラブル発
生/解除の記録である装置履歴情報とが蓄積される。ま
た、検査工程でロットL1〜L6の歩留まりY1〜Y6
や電気的特性が測定され品質結果情報として記録され
る。
As shown in FIG. 2, in the diffusion step, lots L1 to L6 are sequentially sent to the devices DA, DB, and DC, respectively, and manufactured (processed) at the times indicated by black circles. Maintenance MA, MB, respectively
It is assumed that maintenance is performed at the time indicated by MC. Therefore, the manufacturing history information of the lots L1 to L6 and the device D
A maintenance record of A, DB, and DC, and device history information that is a record of trouble occurrence / cancellation when a trouble TC occurs in the device DC are accumulated. In the inspection process, the yields Y1 to Y6 of lots L1 to L6
And electrical characteristics are measured and recorded as quality result information.

【0016】このような拡散工程で、ある品種の平均歩
留りが図3のように目標値より低下した場合に、歩留り
低下に影響を与えた要因を抽出する処理について図4〜
図6を参照して説明する。
In such a diffusion process, when the average yield of a certain product falls below a target value as shown in FIG. 3, a process for extracting a factor that has affected the yield has been described with reference to FIGS.
This will be described with reference to FIG.

【0017】図4に示すように、データ検索部Aのパラ
メータ入力部A1に、解析のためのパラメータとして対
象品種と、その品種に関する図3に示したような解析指
定対象期間P1−P2等とを入力装置1より設定する。
ここで、P1−P2は平均歩留まりの変化からオペレー
タの判断で定めるものである。次に、設定したパラメー
タに従って、解析用データ検索部A2により、製造装置
履歴情報I2から拡散工程での製造履歴I21および装
置履歴情報I31を、品質結果情報I1から検査工程で
の歩留り情報I11を、検索する。検索したデータを製
造履歴情報記憶部E1及び歩留り情報記憶部E2及び装
置履歴情報記憶部E3に記憶する。
As shown in FIG. 4, a target product type as a parameter for analysis and an analysis designation target period P1-P2 as shown in FIG. Is set from the input device 1.
Here, P1−P2 is determined by the operator from the change in the average yield. Next, according to the set parameters, the analysis data search unit A2 obtains the manufacturing history I21 and the device history information I31 in the diffusion process from the manufacturing device history information I2, and the yield information I11 in the inspection process from the quality result information I1, Search for. The searched data is stored in the manufacturing history information storage unit E1, the yield information storage unit E2, and the device history information storage unit E3.

【0018】次に、図5に示すように、解析用データ作
成部Bの解析不良データ処理部B1で、上記製造履歴情
報記憶部E1及び装置履歴情報記憶部E3の情報をもと
に、各ロットが装置メンテナンス等の装置履歴以降かど
うかを示すマークを付与し、加工情報記憶部E4に登録
する。
Next, as shown in FIG. 5, the analysis failure data processing section B1 of the analysis data creating section B performs each processing based on the information of the manufacturing history information storage section E1 and the apparatus history information storage section E3. A mark indicating whether or not the lot is after the apparatus history such as apparatus maintenance is added and registered in the processing information storage unit E4.

【0019】たとえば、歩留り低下が生じその要因抽出
が行なわれるのが同一品種のロットL1〜L3である場
合には、ロットL1に、メンテナンスMA,MB,MC
以前であってトラブルTC以降であるというマークを付
与し、ロットL2に、メンテナンスMB以前であってメ
ンテナンスMA, MC,トラブルTC以降であるとい
うマークを付与し、ロットL3に、メンテナンスMA,
MB以前であってメンテナンスMC,トラブルTC以降
であるというマークを付与することになる。
For example, when the yield is lowered and the cause of the factor extraction is performed in the lots L1 to L3 of the same product type, the maintenance MA, MB, MC
Before the maintenance MB, a mark indicating that it is after the trouble TC is given to the lot L2, and before the maintenance MB, a mark indicating that it is the maintenance MA, MC, and after the trouble TC is given to the lot L3.
A mark indicating that it is before the MB and after the maintenance MC and the trouble TC is added.

【0020】そして、説明変数データ作成部B2で加工
情報記憶部E4からデータを読み込み、時系列に読み込
んだ装置履歴の先頭から一定数の装置履歴および製造履
歴情報だけ抜き出し、歩留り情報記憶部E2からのデー
タと組み合わせて解析用データ記憶部E5に登録する。
残りの全ての装置履歴情報も一定数ずつ分割して抜き出
し(端数となった製造条件や製造付帯条件については最
後の条件からさかのぼって一定数となるようにする)、
歩留り情報記憶部E2からのデータと組み合わせて解析
用データ記憶部E5に登録する。
Then, the explanatory variable data creating section B2 reads data from the processing information storage section E4, extracts only a certain number of apparatus histories and manufacturing history information from the beginning of the chronologically read apparatus histories, and outputs the data from the yield information storage section E2. The data is registered in the analysis data storage unit E5 in combination with the above data.
All the remaining device history information is also divided and extracted at a fixed number (manufacturing conditions and manufacturing ancillary conditions that are fractions are set to a certain number retroactively from the last condition),
It is registered in the analysis data storage unit E5 in combination with the data from the yield information storage unit E2.

【0021】次に、図6に示すように、自動抽出処理部
Cの一次多変量解析処理部C1において、上記解析用デ
ータ記憶部E5から上記一定数のデータ毎に読み込みを
行い、歩留まりデータを目的変数とし装置履歴情報を説
明変数とした重回帰分析(数量化I類)を実行し、変数
増減法により、予めオペレータにより設定された基準値
より分散比F値が高い製造条件や製造付帯条件を抽出す
る。このとき、多重共線性異常が発生した場合はその装
置履歴情報を解析の範囲から取り除くことでデータの信
頼性を向上させる。結果を仮解析結果記憶部E6に登録
する。この一次多変量解析処理部C1の処理をすべての
分割登録データに関して行う。次に、二次多変量解析処
理部C2において仮解析結果記憶部E6からデータ解析
結果を読み込み、一次多変量解析処理部C1で抽出され
た製造条件や製造付帯条件に対して一次多変量解析処理
部C1と同様の処理を行い、予めオペレータにより設定
された基準値より分散比F値の高い装置履歴情報、すな
わち歩留り低下に影響を与えた要因を抽出し、解析結果
記憶部E7に登録する。
Next, as shown in FIG. 6, in the primary multivariate analysis processing section C1 of the automatic extraction processing section C, reading is performed for each of the fixed number of data from the analysis data storage section E5, and the yield data is read. A multiple regression analysis (quantification class I) is performed using the apparatus history information as an explanatory variable as an objective variable, and manufacturing conditions and manufacturing incidental conditions in which the dispersion ratio F value is higher than a reference value set in advance by an operator by a variable increase / decrease method. Is extracted. At this time, if a multicollinearity error occurs, the reliability of the data is improved by removing the device history information from the analysis range. The result is registered in the temporary analysis result storage unit E6. The processing of the first-order multivariate analysis processing unit C1 is performed for all the division registration data. Next, the secondary multivariate analysis processing unit C2 reads the data analysis result from the temporary analysis result storage unit E6, and the primary multivariate analysis processing unit C1 performs a primary multivariate analysis process on the manufacturing conditions and manufacturing incidental conditions extracted. The same processing as that of the section C1 is performed, and the apparatus history information having a higher dispersion ratio F value than the reference value set in advance by the operator, that is, the factor that has affected the yield reduction is extracted and registered in the analysis result storage section E7.

【0022】解析結果表示処理部C3では、解析結果記
憶部E7のデータに基づいて、装置履歴情報毎の分散比
F値の結果グラフ、製造条件や製造付帯条件別の平均歩
留り、歩留り分布グラフ等を表示(装置)・印字装置5
を通じて表示する。さらにデータ保存処理部C4によっ
て、解析結果及びパラメータを記憶装置2に登録し、そ
れにより、必要に応じて結果表示及びパラメータを変更
した再解析を可能とする。
In the analysis result display processing section C3, based on the data in the analysis result storage section E7, a graph showing a result of the dispersion ratio F value for each apparatus history information, an average yield, a yield distribution graph for each manufacturing condition and manufacturing incidental condition, etc. Display (device) and printing device 5
View through Further, the data storage processing unit C4 registers the analysis result and the parameter in the storage device 2, thereby enabling the result display and the re-analysis with the parameter changed as necessary.

【0023】パラメータとしては、上記した歩留り情報
に代えて電気的特性の情報を用いてもよい。また前述し
た従来の異常抽出方法と同様に、単一の品種ではデータ
の数が集まらず解析できないような場合に、同一製造条
件の品種をひとくくりとして解析したり、製造装置の履
歴情報が残っていない場合に、仮の製造装置を登録する
ようにしてもよい。
As the parameter, information on electric characteristics may be used instead of the above-mentioned yield information. In addition, as in the case of the conventional abnormality extraction method described above, when the number of data cannot be analyzed for a single product type and analysis is not possible, the product types with the same manufacturing conditions can be analyzed as a whole, and the history information of the manufacturing equipment remains. If not, a temporary manufacturing apparatus may be registered.

【0024】[0024]

【発明の効果】以上のように本発明によれば、半導体製
造工場の拡散工程のように複雑な製造プロセスを持つ工
程でも、品質低下が発生した時に、品質結果と装置履歴
との因果関係を自動的に迅速に解析して原因を抽出する
ことができ、抽出結果に基づき速やかに対処することで
歩留り向上を実現できる。
As described above, according to the present invention, even in a process having a complicated manufacturing process such as a diffusion process in a semiconductor manufacturing factory, when a quality deterioration occurs, the causal relationship between the quality result and the device history is determined. The cause can be extracted by automatically and quickly analyzing, and the yield can be improved by taking prompt action based on the extraction result.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明の一実施形態における加工プロセス工程
の異常抽出装置を示す全体構成図である。
FIG. 1 is an overall configuration diagram showing an abnormality extraction apparatus for a processing process step according to an embodiment of the present invention.

【図2】図1の異常抽出装置による異常抽出対象となる
拡散工程の概念図である。
FIG. 2 is a conceptual diagram of a diffusion process to be subjected to abnormality extraction by the abnormality extraction device of FIG. 1;

【図3】図2の拡散工程における、ある品種の平均歩留
まりを示した説明図である。
FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing an average yield of a certain product in the diffusion step of FIG. 2;

【図4】図1の異常抽出装置により異常抽出を行う際の
データ検索処理を説明するブロック図である。
FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a data search process when an abnormality is extracted by the abnormality extraction device of FIG. 1;

【図5】図1の異常抽出装置により異常抽出を行う際の
解析用データ作成処理を説明するブロック図である。
FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an analysis data creation process when an abnormality is extracted by the abnormality extraction device of FIG. 1;

【図6】図1の異常抽出装置により異常抽出を行う際の
自動抽出処理を説明するブロック図である。
FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an automatic extraction process when an abnormality is extracted by the abnormality extraction device of FIG. 1;

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

2 記憶装置 4 多段階多変量解析手段 A データ検索部 B 解析用データ作成部 C 自動抽出処理部 2 storage device 4 multi-stage multivariate analysis means A data retrieval section B analysis data creation section C automatic extraction processing section

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 半導体製造工場の拡散工程等の加工プロ
セス工程において製品の歩留り低下を引き起こす異常要
因を抽出する異常抽出方法であって、 製造装置及び検査装置に関するトラブルやメンテナンス
の情報を含んだ装置履歴情報と製品の歩留りや電気的特
性値を示す品質結果情報とを用いて両情報間の因果関係
を多段階多変量解析手法で解析することにより、前記装
置履歴情報に含まれる異常要因を絞り込み抽出すること
を特徴とする加工プロセス工程の異常抽出方法。
1. An abnormality extracting method for extracting an abnormal factor causing a decrease in product yield in a processing process such as a diffusion process in a semiconductor manufacturing plant, the device including information on trouble and maintenance related to a manufacturing apparatus and an inspection apparatus. By analyzing the causal relationship between the two pieces of information using the history information and the quality result information indicating the product yield and the electrical characteristic value by a multi-stage multivariate analysis method, the abnormal factors included in the apparatus history information are narrowed down. A method for extracting abnormalities in a machining process step, characterized by extracting.
【請求項2】 半導体製造工場の拡散工程等の加工プロ
セス工程において製品の歩留り低下を引き起こす異常要
因を抽出する異常抽出装置であって、 製造装置及び検査装置に関するトラブルやメンテナンス
の情報を含んだ装置履歴情報と製品の歩留りや電気的特
性値を示す品質結果情報とを記憶する記憶手段と、 前記記憶装置に記憶された品質結果情報と装置履歴情報
とを用いて装置履歴と品質結果との因果関係を多段階多
変量解析手法により解析し前記装置履歴情報に含まれる
異常要因を絞り込み抽出する多段階多変量解析手段とを
備えたことを特徴とする加工プロセス工程の異常抽出装
置。
2. An abnormality extracting apparatus for extracting an abnormal factor causing a decrease in product yield in a processing process such as a diffusion process in a semiconductor manufacturing factory, the apparatus including information on trouble and maintenance related to a manufacturing apparatus and an inspection apparatus. A storage unit for storing history information and quality result information indicating a product yield or an electrical characteristic value; and a causal relationship between the device history and the quality result using the quality result information and the device history information stored in the storage device. An abnormality extraction device for a machining process step, comprising: a multi-stage multivariate analysis means for analyzing a relationship by a multi-stage multivariate analysis method and narrowing down and extracting an abnormal factor included in the device history information.
JP2000304253A 2000-10-04 2000-10-04 Method and apparatus for extracting failure in machining process Pending JP2002110493A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2000304253A JP2002110493A (en) 2000-10-04 2000-10-04 Method and apparatus for extracting failure in machining process

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2000304253A JP2002110493A (en) 2000-10-04 2000-10-04 Method and apparatus for extracting failure in machining process

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2002110493A true JP2002110493A (en) 2002-04-12

Family

ID=18785328

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2000304253A Pending JP2002110493A (en) 2000-10-04 2000-10-04 Method and apparatus for extracting failure in machining process

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2002110493A (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2004047885A (en) * 2002-07-15 2004-02-12 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Monitoring system and monitoring method of semiconductor manufacturing apparatus
JP2004207703A (en) * 2002-12-06 2004-07-22 Tokyo Electron Ltd Process control system and process control method
JP2006146459A (en) * 2004-11-18 2006-06-08 Renesas Technology Corp Method and system for manufacturing semiconductor device
US7209846B2 (en) 2004-08-27 2007-04-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Quality control system for manufacturing industrial products
JP2008177534A (en) * 2006-12-19 2008-07-31 Toshiba Corp Managing method of semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and management system of semiconductor manufacturing equipment
WO2010143492A1 (en) 2009-06-11 2010-12-16 株式会社日立製作所 Device abnormality monitoring method and system
US8515719B2 (en) 2009-01-14 2013-08-20 Hitachi, Ltd. Apparatus anomaly monitoring method and system
JP2019032807A (en) * 2017-08-04 2019-02-28 富士電機株式会社 Factor analysis system, factor analysis method, and program
US10496730B2 (en) 2014-03-14 2019-12-03 Nec Corporation Factor analysis device, factor analysis method, and factor analysis program
US11580414B2 (en) 2016-03-23 2023-02-14 Nec Corporation Factor analysis device, factor analysis method, and storage medium on which program is stored
CN116703041A (en) * 2023-08-07 2023-09-05 宁德时代新能源科技股份有限公司 Fault analysis method, device, equipment and storage medium

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7257457B2 (en) 2002-07-15 2007-08-14 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. System and method for monitoring semiconductor production apparatus
JP2004047885A (en) * 2002-07-15 2004-02-12 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Monitoring system and monitoring method of semiconductor manufacturing apparatus
JP2004207703A (en) * 2002-12-06 2004-07-22 Tokyo Electron Ltd Process control system and process control method
US7209846B2 (en) 2004-08-27 2007-04-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Quality control system for manufacturing industrial products
JP2006146459A (en) * 2004-11-18 2006-06-08 Renesas Technology Corp Method and system for manufacturing semiconductor device
JP2008177534A (en) * 2006-12-19 2008-07-31 Toshiba Corp Managing method of semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and management system of semiconductor manufacturing equipment
US8515719B2 (en) 2009-01-14 2013-08-20 Hitachi, Ltd. Apparatus anomaly monitoring method and system
WO2010143492A1 (en) 2009-06-11 2010-12-16 株式会社日立製作所 Device abnormality monitoring method and system
JP2010287011A (en) * 2009-06-11 2010-12-24 Hitachi Ltd Device abnormality monitoring method and system
US8566070B2 (en) 2009-06-11 2013-10-22 Hitachi, Ltd. Apparatus abnormality monitoring method and system
US10496730B2 (en) 2014-03-14 2019-12-03 Nec Corporation Factor analysis device, factor analysis method, and factor analysis program
US11580414B2 (en) 2016-03-23 2023-02-14 Nec Corporation Factor analysis device, factor analysis method, and storage medium on which program is stored
JP2019032807A (en) * 2017-08-04 2019-02-28 富士電機株式会社 Factor analysis system, factor analysis method, and program
JP7139625B2 (en) 2017-08-04 2022-09-21 富士電機株式会社 Factor analysis system, factor analysis method and program
CN116703041A (en) * 2023-08-07 2023-09-05 宁德时代新能源科技股份有限公司 Fault analysis method, device, equipment and storage medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3576335B2 (en) Method and apparatus for extracting abnormalities in process processing steps
JP4878085B2 (en) Management method for manufacturing process
KR20020019022A (en) Semiconductor processing techniques
JP2002110493A (en) Method and apparatus for extracting failure in machining process
KR20040094831A (en) Correlation of end-of-line data mining with process tool data mining
US7885789B2 (en) Recipe parameter management system and recipe parameter management method
JP4355193B2 (en) Semiconductor device manufacturing method and semiconductor device manufacturing system
WO2010110365A1 (en) Factor analysis apparatus and factor analysis method
CN114551271A (en) Method and device for monitoring machine operation condition, storage medium and electronic equipment
TWI663569B (en) Quality prediction method for multi-workstation system and system thereof
JP2011181666A (en) Method and system for detecting warning sign of apparatus abnormality in manufacturing semiconductor
CN110763979A (en) LED wafer point measurement automatic system based on MES system
JP2002236511A (en) System and method for production control
JP2000198051A (en) Device for and method of extracting abnormality of facility flow, and storage medium recorded with program for extracting abnormality from facility flow
CN113341888A (en) Multivariable process control method
WO2010084685A1 (en) Production management system
CN110914771A (en) Quality analysis device and quality analysis method
US20130138239A1 (en) Semiconductor yield management system
JP4998154B2 (en) Manufacturing failure factor analysis support device
JP2008250910A (en) Data mining method and process management method
JPS6332650A (en) Trouble diagnosing device for production facilities
JP2000252180A (en) Method of extracting abnormalities during process and apparatus therefor
US20050075835A1 (en) System and method of real-time statistical bin control
Lee et al. Determining golden process routes in semiconductor manufacturing process for yield management
TW200928726A (en) Automated abnormal machine tracking and notifying system and method