JP2001228790A - Training result evaluating device - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To eliminate the necessity of having the knowledge related to the display method of standard operations and the knowledge related to the operating method of a standard operation editing editor for a conventional training result evaluating device in which the standard operations are directly generated employing the editor. SOLUTION: Training result data received from a plant operation trainer device 5 are processed by a training result data input processing function 6. The processed training result data are stored in a training result storage device 7. A list of the stored training result data is displayed on a man machine interface 2 by a standard operation editing function 3. Standard operations which are judged by a user to be appropriate from the list are registered in a standard operation storage device 4 so that standard operations are generated without having the knowledge related to the editing of the operations.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a training result evaluation apparatus for evaluating the contents of a driving operation in a plant operation training conducted using a plant operation training apparatus by using a standard operation as a reference.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art In a conventional training result evaluation apparatus, standard operations are created and edited on a standard operation editing editor.
FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a conventional training result evaluation device. In FIG. 16, reference numeral 1 denotes a training result evaluation device, and 2 denotes a man-machine interface for operating and using the training result evaluation device 1. For example, a keyboard, a mouse, and a C
It is composed of an RT display and the like. Reference numeral 3 denotes a standard operation editing function for editing standard operations using the man-machine interface 2. Reference numeral 4 denotes a standard operation storage device for storing the standard operations edited by the standard operation editing function 3. Reference numeral 5 denotes plant operation training. 6 is a training result data input processing function for processing training result data input from the plant operation training device 5, and 7 is training result data processed by the training result data input processing function 6. Is a training result storage device for storing training results, and a training result evaluation function 8 for evaluating training results.

In the conventional training result evaluation apparatus thus configured, the standard operation is performed by the standard operation editing function 3 independently of the operation result obtained by operating the plant operation training apparatus 5.
Has been directly created using a standard operation editing editor displayed on a CRT display.

FIG. 17 is a diagram showing a standard operation expressed in a table format of a conventional training result evaluation apparatus. In the figure,
9 is an operation No. and 10 is an operation name. First, a table is displayed by specifying the number of operations using the keyboard, and 1 and 2 are displayed in the operation No. 9 column in the table.
Then, the operation name 10 corresponding to the operation No. 9 is input using the keyboard, and the table showing the standard operations in FIG. 17 is completed.

[0005]

In the conventional standard operation creation method, since the standard operation is directly created using the standard operation editing editor, knowledge on the standard operation expression method and the operation method of the standard operation editing editor are used. Knowledge about was required. Therefore, the creation and revision of standard operations
Only a technician with such knowledge is possible, and revision and addition of the standard operation cannot be easily implemented.
In the example of FIG. 17, in order to create a standard operation, the format and operation name of the table must be known, and the operation name 10 is specified in a method for specifying the number of operations and a specific column in the table. You need to know how to enter.

As described above, in the conventional standard operation creation method, only those who have knowledge of the standard operation expression method and knowledge of the operation method of the standard operation editing editor can be used. Could not be easily performed. On the other hand, when designing a training result evaluation device, it is difficult to construct standard operations that can be applied to a wide range of driving conditions only by design work on a desk.
As for the operation of complex plants, the optimal operation items, operation procedures, and priorities are fluctuated due to revisions and revisions aimed at routinely efficient operation procedures, equipment improvements, and modification of control methods, so training results are appropriate. In order to evaluate the standard operation, it was necessary to revise the standard operation from time to time.

Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. Hei 10-198484 describes that standard operations called evaluation rules are visualized so that standard operations can be easily edited. However, a specific expression method is mentioned. Therefore, from the contents of JP-A-10-198484, it seems that the standard operation cannot be visualized.

The present invention has been made to solve the above-described problem, and has as its first object to be able to create a standard operation without knowledge of a method of expressing the standard operation. A second object is to express a standard operation using an operation flow diagram.

[0009]

A training result evaluation device according to the present invention includes a standard operation registration unit for registering, as a standard operation, a training result input from a plant operation training device and usable for evaluation as a standard operation. It is a thing. The standard operation registration unit has an editing unit that edits a training result registered as a standard operation.

The standard operation is represented by an operation flow diagram in which a plurality of operations are ordered.
Further, in the operation flow diagram used for expressing the standard operation, a plurality of alternatively executed operations are expressed as a first diagram connected in parallel.

In the operation flow diagram used for expressing standard operations, a plurality of operations executed in an arbitrary order are represented as a second diagram connected in parallel.
In the operation flow diagram used for expressing the standard operation,
A plurality of series of operations to be performed alternatively is a first diagram connected in parallel, and a plurality of operations performed in an arbitrary order are expressed as a second diagram connected in parallel, The first figure and the second figure are distinguished by using specific symbols.

Further, the operation flow diagram used for expressing the standard operation is a hierarchical operation in which a series of operations are assigned to one operation constituting the standard operation. Further, the timings at which the operations are performed are given to the operations constituting the standard operation.

The operations constituting the standard operation are provided with conditions which should be satisfied at the time of execution of the operation. In addition, the operations constituting the standard operation are weighted.

[0014]

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Embodiment 1 FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a training result evaluation device according to Embodiment 1 of the present invention. In FIG. 1, reference numeral 1 denotes a training result evaluation device, and 2 denotes a man-machine for operating and using the training result evaluation device 1.
The interface includes, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, and a CRT display. Reference numeral 3 denotes a standard operation editing function which constitutes a standard operation registration unit for registering training results as standard operations using the man-machine interface 2, and has an editing unit for editing standard operations. 4
Is a standard operation storage device for storing standard operations registered by the standard operation editing function 3, and constitutes a standard operation storage unit. 5 is a plant operation training device which is a simulator for performing plant operation training, and 6 is a plant operation training device 5
A training result data input processing function for processing training result data input from a training result storage device for storing training result data processed by the training result data input processing function 6, and a training result for evaluating training results It is an evaluation function.

In the first embodiment, a list of operation contents recorded in the training result storage device 7 is read into the standard operation editing function 3, and an appropriate operation as a standard operation is registered in the standard operation storage device 4. However, this is different from the conventional device.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing tabular data stored in the training result storage device according to the first embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 2, 9 is an operation number assigned to the operation, and 10 is an operation name corresponding to the operation No. 1
1 is the time when the operation was performed. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a standard operation of the training result evaluation apparatus according to the first embodiment of the present invention in the form of a flowchart. In FIG. 3, reference numeral 12 denotes each operation of the operation procedure, and 12a, 12b,.
2n indicates each operation.

Next, the operation of the training result evaluation apparatus according to the first embodiment will be described. The operation of the training result evaluation apparatus includes three operations: (1) recording of operations, (2) creation of standard operations, and (3) evaluation, which will be sequentially described below.

(1) Recording of Operation When an operation is performed by the plant operation training apparatus 5, a signal including an operation name 10 corresponding to the operation content is sent to the training result data input processing function 6. Training result data input processing function 6
Then, the operation name 10 of the transmitted signal is appended with the time 11 and transmitted to the training result storage device 7. The training result storage device 7 records a signal corresponding to the transmitted operation content and the time 11 in chronological order. Here, the signal corresponding to the operation content sent from the plant operation training device 5 corresponds to the performed operation on a one-to-one basis, and furthermore, the name corresponding to the operation is:
It is assumed that the operation name 10 constituting the signal is added.

Next, a more detailed description will be given with reference to FIG. In the plant operation training device 5, when the operation of PB1 on, that is, the pressing of the push button 1, is performed, the operation name 10 and the time 1 when the operation is performed are displayed in the training result data input processing function 6.
1 is sent. In the training result data input function 6, the received operation name 10 is appended with the time 11 at which the operation was performed. Subsequently, in the plant operation training device 5, PB2
When the operation is on, that is, when the push button 2 is pressed, the operation name 10 and the time 11 at which the operation was performed are sent to the training result data input processing function 6. In the training result data input processing function 6, the received operation name 10 is appended with the time 11 at which the operation was performed, and is stored in chronological order with the previously received operation of pressing the push button 1. Next, by requesting storage of the training result by designating a file from the man-machine interface 2, the operation content stored in the training result data input processing function 6 is sent to the training result storage device 7 and stored. Is done.

(2) Creation of standard operation After the operation is recorded, the recorded operation is registered as a standard operation. In response to a user request from the man-machine interface 2, a list of operation contents recorded in the training result storage device 7 is read into the standard operation editing function 3. In the standard operation editing function 3, a list of the read operation contents is displayed on the man-machine interface 2 in the format of FIG. The user checks the contents of the displayed list, and if appropriate as a standard operation, registers and saves it in the standard operation storage device 4. If the contents of the displayed list are inappropriate as a standard operation, the operation is recorded again.

(3) Evaluation Training is performed using the plant operation training device 5, the contents of the training operation are stored in the training result storage device 7, and the standard operation corresponding to the training operation content is stored in the standard operation storage device 4. , The training operation content can be evaluated. The evaluation of the operation is performed, for example, by counting the number of operations that match the standard operation in order from the top. First, the contents of the training operation to be evaluated are read from the training result storage device 7 into the training result evaluation function 8, and subsequently, the standard operation to be used as the evaluation standard is read from the standard operation storage device 4 into the training result evaluation function 8. . The contents of the training operation are compared with the standard operation in order from the first operation, and it is determined whether or not the operations are the same. Do this until you find the first different operation
Otherwise, if there is no different operation, the operation is performed until the end of the standard operation. The number of identical operations is divided by the number of all standard operations, and this is used as an evaluation point.

As described above, in the first embodiment, the standard operation is created from the contents of the operation performed by the plant operation training apparatus, so that the knowledge on the description method of the standard operation and the method of editing the standard operation with the editor is provided. Without it, it is possible to create standard operations.

Here, the case where the standard operation is expressed in the form of a table has been described.
It is not limited to the table format. For example, FIG. 3 illustrates the same standard operation as in FIG. 17 in the form of an operation flow, and the same effect can be obtained by this expression method.

Embodiment 2 FIG. In the first embodiment, the method in which the operation result performed using the plant operation training device 5 is used as it is as the standard operation has been described. However, in order to create the standard operation, the operation is performed using the plant operation training device 5. In this case, if a part of the operation procedure is mistaken, the operation is performed again in the first embodiment, but it may be more efficient to edit a part of the operation procedure than to perform the operation again. In this case, the operation results obtained by using the plant operation training device 5 may be edited by the standard operation editing function 3 to create a standard operation, whereby the efficiency of the first embodiment can be improved. .

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an operation in which the operation procedure of the training result evaluation apparatus according to the second embodiment of the present invention is incorrect. 4, 12a to 12d are the same as those in FIG. FIG. 5 shows Embodiment 2 of the present invention.
FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an operation in which the operation procedure of the training result evaluation device is correct. 5, 12a to 12d are the same as those in FIG. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a training result evaluation apparatus according to the second embodiment of the present invention in which the operation procedure is replaced. In FIG. 6, 12a to 12d are the same as those in FIG.

In the second embodiment, for example, the operation shown in FIG. 4 is performed. However, as shown in FIG. 5, the order of the operations 12c and 12d is reversed, and the operation 12a is further performed as shown in the correct operation procedure. After that, if the waiting time until the operation 12b is performed is long, it is suitable for a case where it is expected that the order of the operations 12c and 12d is rearranged by using the editor, rather than performing the operation again. Things. The order changing operation may be performed, for example, by rewriting a line connecting the operations as shown in FIG. 6, or by providing a command for changing the order in an editor.

As described above, in the second embodiment, when it is desired to partially change the content of the operation performed in the first embodiment,
It is possible to edit standard operations efficiently. At this time, since the standard operation is expressed as an operation flow, the standard operation can be edited with knowledge of the operation flow.

Embodiment 3 In the third embodiment, in a standard operation in the form of a flow chart, if it is sufficient to execute any one of a plurality of operation procedures, these operation procedures are described in parallel if it is sufficient. A simple flow diagram can be used as a standard operation. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a standard operation of the training result evaluation device according to the third embodiment of the present invention in a parallel form, and is a first diagram connected in parallel. In FIG. 7, 12e to 12j indicate each operation. FIG. 8 is a view in which the standard operation of FIG. 7 is developed, and is a table showing the operation to be determined, its previous operation, and the determination result.

In order to evaluate the training results based on the standard operation shown in FIG. 7, for example, first, FIG. 7 is developed for each route as shown in FIG. Score is performed as in the first embodiment, and the one with the highest score is set as the evaluation point. Now, the training result is the operation 12e,
Assuming that the operation is performed in the order of operation 12h, operation 12i, and operation 12j, the operations are sequentially compared with the determination target operation of the two routes in FIG. 8, and operation item A, operation item B1, operation item B11, and operation item C are performed. In comparison with the route of
, Except for the following, operation item A and operation item B
2. In comparison with the route of the operation item B21 and the operation item C,
Since all operations match, the score is also higher. The route with the higher score is used as an evaluation point for the training result.

According to the third embodiment, it is possible to visually represent, in parallel, standard operations in which any one of a plurality of operation procedures can be selectively executed.

Embodiment 4 FIG. In the third embodiment, a method of expressing a standard operation by expressing one of a plurality of operation procedures in parallel when it is necessary to execute one of the plurality of operation procedures has been described. Are required to be performed, but a plurality of operations may be performed in any order between the operations as shown in FIG. FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a standard operation in which the order among a plurality of operation items is arbitrary in the training result evaluation apparatus according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention in a parallel format, and a second diagram connected in parallel. It is. In FIG. 9, 12e, 12j, 12k to 12n, 12p
Indicates each operation. 13 is an and operator. FIG. 10 is an expanded view of the standard operation of FIG.

In order to perform the evaluation based on the standard operation shown in FIG. 9, for example, FIG. 9 is first developed into the format shown in FIG. 10 to evaluate the training result. In the case of FIG. 9, there are a plurality of routes, and it is necessary to evaluate all the routes. However, if the route is developed as shown in FIG. 10, the evaluation can be easily performed. That is, in FIG. 10, all operations permitted in the previous operation column are covered, and the previous operation column is used for evaluation. Each operation in the training result is evaluated if the operation itself is in the determination target operation column in FIG. 10 and the previous operation matches the operation in the previous operation column, assuming that the operation is established. Regarding the operation immediately after the and operator, all the operation items of a plurality of paths are described in the previous operation column, and it is assumed that all the operations correspond to the operation items.

The example of FIG. 9 also connects each operation item in parallel using the symbol of the and operator 13,
The method and the expression of the third embodiment are distinguished.

As described above, by assigning a specific symbol to either the method of the third embodiment or the method of the fourth embodiment, or attaching a different symbol to both methods, it is possible to distinguish between the two methods.

According to the fourth embodiment, it is necessary to perform all of a series of operations, but a plurality of operations that can be performed in any order can be visually expressed in parallel.

Embodiment 5 In the first and second embodiments, a method of expressing a standard operation in the form of an operation flow diagram has been described. In the fifth embodiment, in the expression of the standard operation, a series of operations is assigned to one operation item. The standard operation is hierarchically expressed as shown in FIG. FIG. 11 is a diagram hierarchically illustrating the operation of the training result evaluation device according to the fifth embodiment of the present invention.
In FIG. 11, 12e, 12j, 12q to 12v indicate each operation. In this expression method, the evaluation of the operation item 12j to which the hierarchical expression is assigned is performed according to the assigned actual operation.

According to the fifth embodiment, standard operations can be expressed in a hierarchical manner, and complex standard operations can be expressed visually.

Embodiment 6 FIG. In the flowchart representation of the standard operation described in the first and second embodiments, each operation item can be given a timing condition at which the operation is to be performed. Embodiment 6 shows a case where a timing condition is added to each operation item of the standard operation. FIG. 12 is a diagram in which timing conditions are added to operation items of the training result evaluation device according to the sixth embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 12, the standard operation
A start determination condition, a completion determination condition, and a timing condition of an allowable time are given. As the timing condition, a condition for starting time measurement is given as a start determination signal name obtained from the plant operation training device 5. The condition for completing the time measurement is also given as a completion determination signal name obtained from the plant operation training device 5. In addition, an allowable time from when the start condition is satisfied to when the completion condition is satisfied is also given.

For example, as a condition for establishing the operation B, the start determination condition is to perform the operation A, and the completion determination condition is to perform the operation B. When the allowable time is 30 seconds, the condition is satisfied. When the operation B is performed so as to perform the operation B, the operation B is established. When the operation B itself is the completion determination condition, entry of the completion determination condition can be omitted. In actual training, the time from when the start condition is satisfied to when the completion condition is satisfied is
If the time exceeds the allowable time, the operation is evaluated as failed.

According to the sixth embodiment, the timing at which each operation is performed is indicated, so that more accurate evaluation is possible.

Embodiment 7 FIG. In the sixth embodiment, the method of adding the timing at which the operation should be performed to the operation item has been described. However, in the seventh embodiment, the condition to be satisfied when performing the operation is added to the operation item of the standard operation. It is attached. FIG. 13 is a diagram showing conditions of digital signals attached to operation items of the training result evaluation device according to the seventh embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 14 is a diagram showing conditions of analog signals attached to operation items of the training result evaluation device according to the seventh embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 14, a plurality of conditions of the plant state 1 and the plant state 2 are given. As shown in FIG. 14, a plurality of conditions can be given to one operation item.

In the seventh embodiment, if the conditions shown in FIGS. 13 and 14 are not satisfied when the operation is performed,
It is determined that the operation has failed. According to the seventh embodiment, since the conditions that should be satisfied at the time when each operation is performed are indicated, more accurate evaluation can be performed.

Embodiment 8 FIG. In the flow diagram representation of the standard operation described in the first and second embodiments, each operation item may be given a weight indicating importance. Embodiment 8 is an example in which weights given to respective operation items of the standard operation are described. FIG.
FIG. 15 is a diagram showing weights assigned to operation items of the training result evaluation device according to the eighth embodiment of the present invention.

When evaluating the training results, the total weight of all operations to be performed and the total weight of all successful operations are calculated, and the total weight of successful operations is The value divided by the sum of the weights is multiplied by 100 to obtain an evaluation point.

According to the eighth embodiment, since each operation is weighted, more accurate evaluation is possible.

[0046]

Since the present invention is configured as described above, it has the following effects. A training result that is input from the plant operation training device and can be used for evaluation as a standard operation is provided as a standard operation registration unit that registers the standard operation as a standard operation.
It can be easily registered as a standard operation. Further, since the standard operation registration unit has an editing unit for editing the training result registered as the standard operation, the training result can be changed and registered as the standard operation.

Further, since the standard operation is expressed by an operation flow diagram in which a plurality of operations are ordered, no special knowledge on the method of expressing the standard operation is required. Furthermore, in the operation flow diagram used to represent the standard operation, a plurality of alternatively executed operations are represented as a first diagram connected in parallel, so that the plurality of operations can be visually recognized. Can be expressed in a typical way.

Further, in the operation flow diagram used for expressing the standard operation, a plurality of operations executed in an arbitrary order are expressed as a second diagram connected in parallel, so that the operations are executed in an arbitrary order. Multiple operations can be visually represented. Also, in the operation flow diagram used to represent the standard operation, a series of operations to be executed alternatively is a first diagram connected in parallel, and a plurality of operations executed in an arbitrary order are Since the first figure and the second figure are distinguished by using a particular symbol, and the first figure and the second figure are easily distinguished from each other, it can.

Further, the operation flow diagram used for expressing the standard operation is hierarchically expressed by allocating a series of operations to one operation constituting the standard operation. It is possible. In addition, since the timings at which the operations constituting the standard operations are performed are given, more accurate evaluation of the training result can be performed.

Also, since the operations that constitute the standard operation are given conditions that should be satisfied at the time of execution of the operation, it is possible to evaluate the training result more accurately. In addition, since the operations constituting the standard operation are weighted, more accurate evaluation of the training result can be performed.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a training result evaluation device according to a first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing tabular data stored in a training result storage device according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a standard operation of the training result evaluation apparatus according to the first embodiment of the present invention in a flow diagram format.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an operation in which the operation procedure of the training result evaluation apparatus according to the second embodiment of the present invention is incorrect.

FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an operation in which the operation procedure of the training result evaluation apparatus according to the second embodiment of the present invention is correct.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an operation procedure of the training result evaluation device according to the second embodiment of the present invention, which is replaced;

FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating a standard operation of the training result evaluation apparatus according to the third embodiment of the present invention in a parallel form.

FIG. 8 is an expanded view of the standard operation of FIG. 7;

FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a standard operation in which the order among a plurality of operation items is arbitrary in the training result evaluation device according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention in a parallel form.

FIG. 10 is an expanded view of the standard operation of FIG. 9;

FIG. 11 is a diagram hierarchically illustrating the operation of the training result evaluation device according to the fifth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 12 is a diagram in which timing conditions are added to operation items of the training result evaluation device according to the sixth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 13 is a diagram showing digital signal conditions attached to operation items of the training result evaluation device according to the seventh embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating conditions of analog signals attached to operation items of the training result evaluation device according to the seventh embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 15 is a diagram showing weights assigned to operation items of the training result evaluation device according to the eighth embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 16 is a diagram showing a configuration of a conventional training result evaluation device.

FIG. 17 is a diagram showing a standard operation expressed in a table format of a conventional training result evaluation device.

[Explanation of symbols]

1 Training result evaluation device, 2 man-machine interface, 3 standard operation editing function, 4 standard operation storage device,
5 plant operation training device, 6 training result data input processing function, 7 training result storage device, 8 training result evaluation function, 9 operation No., 10 operation name, 11 time, 12
operation.

 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continued on the front page (72) Inventor Satoshi Tamura 2-3-2 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Inside Mitsubishi Electric Co., Ltd. (72) Takashi Kokubo 1-1-3 Uchisaiwaicho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo East Inside the Tokyo Electric Power Company (72) Inventor Toshihiro Shibamoto 1-3-1 Uchisaiwaicho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo F-term in the Tokyo Electric Power Company (Reference) 5B020 GG05 JJ03 5E501 AC02 AC20 AC34 CA03 CB02 CB09 DA15 FA22

Claims (10)

[Claims] 1. A training result evaluation device for evaluating a training result obtained by performing a plant operation training using a plant training device by comparing the training result with a standard operation registered in advance. A training result evaluation device comprising: a standard operation registration unit that registers a training result usable for the evaluation as a standard operation. 2. The training result evaluation device according to claim 1, wherein the standard operation registration unit has an editing unit for editing a training result registered as a standard operation. 3. The training result evaluation device according to claim 1, wherein the standard operation is represented by an operation flow diagram in which a plurality of operations are ordered. 4. An operation flow diagram used for expressing a standard operation, wherein a plurality of alternatively executed operations are expressed as a first diagram connected in parallel. Item 3. The training result evaluation device according to Item 3. 5. An operation flow diagram used for expressing a standard operation, wherein a plurality of operations executed in an arbitrary order are expressed as a second diagram connected in parallel. Or the training result evaluation device according to claim 4. 6. An operation flow diagram used for expressing a standard operation is a first diagram in which a plurality of alternatively executed operations are connected in parallel, and a plurality of operations to be executed in an arbitrary order are described. 4. The training result evaluation device according to claim 3, wherein the operation is expressed as a second diagram connected in parallel, and the first diagram and the second diagram are distinguished by using a specific symbol. . 7. An operation flow diagram used for expressing a standard operation is hierarchically expressed by allocating a series of operations to one operation constituting the standard operation. Item 7. The training result evaluation device according to any one of items 6. 8. The training result evaluation device according to claim 1, wherein a timing at which the operation constituting the standard operation is performed is given. 9. The training according to claim 1, wherein an operation constituting the standard operation is provided with a condition that should be satisfied when the operation is executed. Result evaluation device. 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the operations constituting the standard operation are weighted.
The training result evaluation device according to any one of the above.