JP2001216354A - General affairs system, evaluating method, and storage medium - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To fairly rank individual merit-rating object persons after merit-rating object persons are narrowed down and to automate processes from the selection of merit-rating object persons to the evaluation determination. SOLUTION: This general affairs system is quipped with a merit-rating item master 7 where in merit-rating elements S1, S2, and S3 for evaluating object persons as to some qualification and the weights and evaluation priority levels of the merit-rating elements S1, S2, and S3 are set, a merit-rating object person information storage part 6 stored with merit-rating data of the object persons by the merit-rating elements S1, S2, and S3, a merit-rating score calculation part 8 which calculates merit-rating scores of object persons on the basis of the weights set in the business report item master 7 and merit-rating data of the merit-rating object persons, and an evaluating process part 20 which ranks the object persons according to the calculated merit-rating scores and the information of a promotion master 15 and a promotion master 16 and further ranks the object persons who having the same score in further detail according to the evaluation priority levels of the merit-rating item master 7.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a general affairs system used for a general affairs department which performs, for example, personnel affairs and salary management.
It relates to an evaluation method and a storage medium.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art The work of the general affairs department, which performs personnel affairs and payroll management, is often carried out by humans in practice, and tends to be performed manually. Therefore, labor saving and promotion of automation are desired.

A conventional general affairs system includes an employee information storage unit,
This is a system that includes an announcement information storage unit, a qualification / post information storage unit, an evaluation target extraction unit, an evaluation item master, an evaluation score calculation unit, a pay raise, a promotion processing unit, and the like.

In the case of this general affairs system, an evaluation target extraction unit extracts an evaluation target person using each information such as an employee information storage unit, an announcement information storage unit, a qualification / post information storage unit, and the like. hand over.

[0005] The evaluation score calculation unit calculates an evaluation score based on one or several conditions set in advance in the evaluation item master for each of the extracted evaluation subjects, and calculates a calculation result (evaluation score). ) Is passed to the raise and promotion processing section. The raise and raise processing unit evaluates each subject to be evaluated and raises based on the passed calculation results.

In other words, the calculation of the evaluation score and the evaluation such as the promotion and the salary increase for the evaluation subject are performed based on the conditions set in the evaluation item master.

In the conventional general affairs system, conditions preset in the evaluation item master are conditions (uniform conditions) determined uniformly for large items, and the same evaluation score is often obtained as an evaluation result. . In this case, a plurality of persons to be evaluated have the same rank, and if further evaluation is to be performed for the persons to be evaluated having the same rank, a person in personnel affairs or general affairs will evaluate.

[0008]

As described above, in the case of the conventional general affairs system, the conditions preliminarily set in the evaluation item master are conditions determined uniformly for the large items (the same conditions). As a result, there are many cases where multiple appraisers have the same evaluation score, which ultimately results in human judgment and evaluation, which may make it impossible to perform a fair evaluation, and cannot eliminate human resources from the general affairs department. There was a problem.

The present invention has been made in order to solve such problems, and it is possible to narrow down the subjects to be evaluated and to perform fair ranking for each subject to be evaluated, and to evaluate and evaluate from the selection of the subjects to be evaluated. It is an object of the present invention to provide a general affairs system, an evaluation method, and a storage medium that can achieve automation and labor saving of processing up to the issuance.

[0010]

In order to achieve the above object, a general affairs system according to the first aspect of the present invention selects a subject to be evaluated at a predetermined first time. A subject selection means, a plurality of evaluation elements for evaluating the evaluation subject selected by the first selection means, and an evaluation item master in which respective weights for these evaluation elements are set; Evaluation data storage means for storing evaluation data for each evaluation element, and a score for evaluating the evaluation target person based on the weight set in the evaluation item master and the evaluation data of the evaluation target person in the evaluation data storage means. Calculating means, a second target person selecting means for selecting a person to be evaluated at a second time point for performing the evaluation, and a target person selected by the first and second target person selecting means. Case, title and is characterized by comprising a means for performing the promotion-raise processing of the subject based on the calculated score by said calculating means.

According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a general affairs system, wherein first subject selecting means for selecting a subject to be evaluated at a predetermined first point in time, and the first selecting means. A plurality of evaluation elements for performing the evaluation of the evaluation target and an evaluation item master in which respective weights for these evaluation elements are set; evaluation data storage means for storing evaluation data for each evaluation element of the evaluation target; Calculating means for calculating a score for evaluating the subject based on the weight set in the subject item master and the subject data in the subject data storage means; and A second target selecting means for selecting an evaluation target, a means for comparing qualifications and positions of each target selected by the first and second target selecting means, If the qualifications and positions are different, the promotion and promotion of the target person based on the qualifications and positions at the second time point selected by the second target person selection means and the score calculated by the calculation means. Means for performing a raising process.

According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a general affairs system which sets a plurality of evaluation elements for evaluating a person to be evaluated at a predetermined first time point, and weights and evaluation priorities for these evaluation elements. Means for inputting evaluation data for each evaluation element of the evaluation target person, and a weight set in the evaluation item master,
Calculation means for calculating a score for evaluating the subject based on the input evaluation data for each evaluation element of the subject to be evaluated, history storage means for storing past promotion / salary histories, First ranking means for ranking the target person based on the score calculated by the means and the past promotion / raising history of the history storage means, and a result ranked by the first ranking means. , For those with the same score,
And a second ranking means for further ranking based on the evaluation priority of the evaluation item master.

According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided an evaluation method wherein a subject to be evaluated at a first predetermined time is selected, and a plurality of evaluations for evaluating the selected subject are performed. Setting the elements and the respective weights for these evaluation elements in the evaluation item master, evaluating the evaluation target person based on the evaluation data for each evaluation element of the evaluation target person and the weight set in the evaluation item master. Calculating a score for performing the evaluation, selecting an evaluation target person at a second time point for performing the evaluation, qualifications and positions of the target persons selected at the first time point and the second time point, Performing a promotion / raising process of the subject based on the score calculated for evaluating the subject.

According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, there is provided an evaluation method, comprising the steps of: selecting an evaluation subject to be evaluated at a predetermined first time; and a plurality of evaluations for evaluating the selected evaluation subject. Setting the elements and the respective weights for these evaluation elements in the evaluation item master, evaluating the evaluation target person based on the evaluation data for each evaluation element of the evaluation target person and the weight set in the evaluation item master. Calculating a score for performing the evaluation, selecting an evaluation subject at a second time point for performing the evaluation, and comparing the qualifications and positions of the target persons selected at the first time point and the second time point, respectively. And if the qualifications and positions of the subject are different, the qualifications of the subject selected at the second time point,
The present invention is characterized in that it includes a step of performing a promotion / raising process of the subject based on the position and a score calculated for evaluating the subject.

According to a sixth aspect of the present invention, there is provided an evaluation method for evaluating a plurality of evaluation elements for evaluating a person to be evaluated at a predetermined first time point, and weights and evaluation priorities for these evaluation elements. Setting the item master data, inputting the evaluation data for each evaluation element of the subject, evaluating the input data for each evaluation element of the subject, and the weight set in the evaluation item master. Calculating a score for evaluating the subject based on the subject, and ranking the subject based on the calculated subject's score and the past promotion / raising history of the subject. It is characterized in that it has a step and a step of further ranking the items having the same score as a result of the ranking based on the evaluation priority of the evaluation item master.

According to a seventh aspect of the present invention, there is provided a storage medium storing a program for causing a computer to execute a process, wherein the computer stores a first predetermined program in the computer.
At the time of the evaluation to select the subject to be evaluated, a plurality of evaluation elements for performing the evaluation of the selected subject and each weight for these evaluation elements are set in the evaluation item master, the subject of the evaluation The evaluation data for each evaluation element and the weight set in the evaluation item master are used to calculate a score for evaluating the evaluation target person, and the evaluation target person is selected at a second time point at which the evaluation is performed. First
A program for performing the promotion and raise of the target person based on the qualification and position of the target person selected at the time point and the second time point and the score calculated for evaluating the evaluated person. It is characterized by being stored in a readable manner.

According to an eighth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a storage medium storing a program for causing a computer to execute a process.
At the point of time, the subject to be evaluated is selected, a plurality of evaluation elements for evaluating the selected subject and the respective weights for these evaluation elements are set in the evaluation item master, and the subject to be evaluated is set. The evaluation data for each evaluation element and the weight set in the evaluation item master are used to calculate a score for evaluating the evaluation target person, and the evaluation target person is selected at a second time point at which the evaluation is performed. First
The qualifications and positions of the subject selected at the time point and the second time point are compared. If the comparison result shows that the qualifications and the position of the subject are different, the qualifications of the subject selected at the second time point , A program for performing a promotion / raising process of the subject based on the position calculated and the score calculated for evaluating the subject is stored in a computer-readable manner.

The storage medium according to the ninth aspect of the present invention evaluates a plurality of evaluation elements for evaluating a person to be evaluated at a predetermined first time point, and weights and evaluation priorities for these evaluation elements. An item master is set, and a score for evaluating the person to be evaluated is calculated based on the evaluation data for each element to be evaluated of the person to be evaluated and the weight set in the item to be evaluated master. The evaluation subject is ranked based on the score of the evaluation subject and the past promotion / raising history of the evaluation subject. A program for further ranking based on the program is stored in a computer-readable manner.

In the first, fourth and seventh aspects of the present invention, at the first time point for performing the evaluation, a person to be evaluated at the first time point is selected, and the selected person to be evaluated is evaluated. A plurality of evaluation elements for evaluation and their respective weights are set in the evaluation item master. continue,
Based on the weight set in the evaluation item master and the evaluation data of each evaluation element of the evaluation target person, a score for evaluating the evaluation target person is calculated.

Then, at the second time when the next evaluation is performed,
A new evaluation target is selected, and the second time point and the first
The qualifications, titles,
Because the target person is promoted and raised based on the calculated score, even if the qualification and position of the target person are different between the first time and the second time, the qualification and position at the evaluation time are promoted and raised. Processing can be performed.

In the inventions according to the second, fifth, and eighth aspects, at the first time when the evaluation is performed, a plurality of evaluations for selecting the evaluation target to be evaluated and evaluating the selected evaluation target are provided. The elements and their respective weights are set in the evaluation item master. Subsequently, a score for evaluating the subject is calculated based on the weight set in the subject item master and the subject data for each subject element. Then, at the second time point for performing the next evaluation, a new evaluation target is selected, and the qualifications and positions of each target person selected at the second time point and the first time point are compared. If, as a result of this comparison, the qualifications and job titles of the subject are different, the qualifications and job titles of the subject selected at the second point in time and the score calculated to evaluate the subject are evaluated. Since the promotion / raising process is performed, the promotion / raising process can be performed by the qualification and the position of the target person at the second time point when the evaluation is actually performed.

In the invention according to claims 3, 6 and 9, at the first time when the evaluation is performed, a plurality of evaluations for selecting the evaluation target to be evaluated and evaluating the selected evaluation target are selected. The elements and their respective weights and evaluation priorities for these evaluation elements are set in the evaluation item master. Subsequently, a score for evaluating the subject is calculated based on the weight set in the subject item master and the subject data for each subject element. Then, at the second time point for performing the next evaluation, the calculated score of the subject is calculated,
The appraisal target is ranked based on the past promotion / salary history of the appraisal person, and as a result of this ranking, items with the same score are further ranked based on the evaluation priority of the evaluation item master. Since the evaluation is performed, the evaluation results hardly have the same rank, the evaluation result is not left to human judgment, and a fair evaluation can be performed for the target person.

As a result, it is possible to narrow down the subjects to be evaluated and to perform a fair ranking for each subject to be evaluated, and to automate and save labor from selection of the subjects to be evaluated to evaluation and announcement. Can be.

[0024]

Embodiments of the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a general affairs system according to one embodiment of the present invention.

As shown in the figure, this general affairs system
Employee basic information storage unit 1, Announcement information storage unit 2, Qualification / post information storage unit 3, Evaluated person extraction unit 4, Evaluated data setting unit 5, Evaluated person information storage unit 6, Evaluated item master 7, Evaluation score calculation Unit 8, evaluation score information storage unit 9, raise evaluation subject extraction unit 10, promotion evaluation target extraction unit 11, evaluation target information storage unit 12, past evaluation information storage unit 13 storing past evaluation information, evaluation Group storage unit 14, raise evaluation master 15, promotion evaluation master 16, evaluation processing unit 20, evaluation result information storage unit 23, raise processing unit 24, raise information storage unit 2.
5, a promotion processing unit 26, a promotion information storage unit 27, and the like.

The basic information storage unit 1 stores career information (information such as name, date of birth, date of joining, number of years of service, number of working days, and whether or not to retire) of all employees belonging to the company. ing. The announcement information storage unit 2 stores information on announcements already issued to each employee. The qualification / post information storage unit 3 stores information such as the current qualification / post of each employee. The person to be evaluated extraction unit 4 stores information stored in the employee basic information storage unit 1, the announcement information storage unit 2, the qualification / post information storage unit 3, and the like (the evaluation criteria stored in the qualification / post information storage unit 3). Title, qualifications, etc. as of day)
Based on, the subject to be evaluated is extracted. Appraisal data setting part 5
Sets the evaluation data of the person to be evaluated read by the OCR in the person to be evaluated information storage unit 6 for each element of the person to be evaluated. Further, the evaluation data setting unit 5 can set a score for each evaluation element by manual input from a keyboard or the like in the evaluation target information storage unit 6 for each target person. In the evaluation item master 7, a plurality of evaluation elements are set for each position and qualification of the person to be evaluated. In addition, this evaluation item master 7 includes:
As new information, the weight of each element at the time of evaluation score calculation and the evaluation priority when the same score at the time of evaluation setting are set. Furthermore, this evaluation item master 7
, A history is managed for each implementation period, and by setting optimal evaluation elements and weights in consideration of past evaluation elements and weights, the evaluation accuracy can be improved.

The evaluation score calculation unit 8 calculates a score for each evaluation item for each employee from the score for each evaluation element of the person to be evaluated and the weight of each element of the evaluation item master, and calculates an evaluation score information storage unit 9
To memorize. The raise evaluation target person extracting unit 10 extracts the target person for which the raise evaluation is to be performed and stores it in the evaluation target information storage unit 12. The promotion-evaluation target person extracting unit 11 extracts a target person for whom the promotion evaluation is performed, and stores the target person in the evaluation-subject information storage unit 12.
The evaluation group storage unit 14 stores information on evaluation groups grouped by job title, qualification, organization, and the like. The history is managed in the pay raise evaluation master 15 and the promotion evaluation master 16, and the evaluation master at that time is used for calculation of the past evaluation score.

The evaluation processing section 20 includes a raise evaluation processing section 21 and a promotion evaluation processing section 22. Raise evaluation processor 21
Performs a raise ranking and a raise evaluation based on the information stored in the raise evaluation master 15 and the past evaluation information stored in the past evaluation information storage unit 13. The promotion evaluation processing unit 22 performs the promotion ranking and the promotion evaluation based on the information stored in the promotion evaluation master 16 and the past evaluation information stored in the past evaluation information storage unit 13. The evaluation result information storage unit 23 stores information on the evaluation result processed by the evaluation processing unit 20 (salary increase point, increase rank, increase evaluation and promotion score, upgrade order, upgrade evaluation). The raise processing unit 24 determines a raise amount or the like based on the result of the raise evaluation, and stores it in the raise information storage unit 25. The promotion processing unit 26 creates promotion or demotion issuing proposal information such as one rank up or rank down based on the result of the promotion evaluation, and stores the information in the promotion information storage unit 27.

In this general affairs system, in addition to the above configuration,
For example, an input / output unit such as a keyboard, a mouse, a monitor, a printer, and an optical character reader (hereinafter, referred to as an OCR) is provided. The OCR reads the evaluation data of the mark sheet by an instruction operation from a keyboard, a mouse, and the like. Processing can be performed by displaying an input screen, read evaluation data, and the like on the display screen. In addition, each of the above components is replaced with software (program) and stored in a ROM or the like, and the program is loaded from the ROM into the CPU.
May be read into a RAM or the like to execute the processing.

The operation of the general affairs system will be described below with reference to FIG. In a general company, at a certain point in the year, all employees (employees) are evaluated by a human resources department or a general affairs department for pay raise and promotion. The general affairs system is used for evaluation. The appraisal time is often different from the actual pay raise and promotion time.

In the case of this general affairs system, the person to be evaluated extraction unit 4 stores the employee basic information storage unit 1, the announcement information storage unit 2, the qualification / post information storage unit 3, etc. at the time of the evaluation reference date of all employees. The subject to be evaluated is selected based on the post, qualification, etc. of the subject, and the selection result is stored in the subject evaluation information storage unit 6. At this time, those who are not subject to the evaluation, such as those who are scheduled to retire, those who have not worked for a sufficient number of days, and those who have not worked for many years are excluded.

Subsequently, the evaluation data setting unit 5 sets the evaluation data for the evaluation target stored in the evaluation target information storage unit 6.

There are various data input methods for setting the evaluation data. Here, a case where data is read from a mark sheet will be described. When data is read from the mark sheet, the mark sheet in which the respective evaluation data of the evaluation subject stored in the evaluation subject information storage unit 6 is set in the OCR, and when the read operation is performed on the OCR, the mark sheet is read by the OCR. Are sequentially read.

Then, the evaluation data setting unit 5 sets the evaluation data as information of each evaluation target in the evaluation target information storage unit 6 for each evaluation element. As an example, as the evaluation data of the employee 1, as shown in FIG. 2, the item of the employee 1 in the evaluation target person information storage unit 6 includes the qualification 1 and the evaluation elements S1 and S
2, S3, N1, N2, etc. are set.

As the evaluation element, there are various indices different for each company, for example, the coordination of the evaluation target person and the sales amount. The score for each evaluation element may be set for each evaluation target person by manual input from a keyboard or the like without using such a mark sheet or OCR.

As shown in FIG. 2, the appraisal item master 7 stores appraisal elements S1, S2, S3,.
N1, N2, etc. are set, and a weight and an evaluation priority are set for each of them. S * and N * are evaluation elements set from different viewpoints. Here, the evaluation element S1 has a weight of 50.
% And “1” are set as evaluation priorities. In addition, 30% is set as the weight and “3” is set as the evaluation priority in the evaluation element S2. In the evaluation element S3, a weight of 20% and an evaluation priority of “2” are set. As the evaluation priority, “1” has the highest priority, and the priority becomes “2” and “3” in the following order. The evaluation priorities are evaluated elements S1, S2, S3,..., N1,
This information is considered when the result of scoring taking into account the weights of N2... And the total score at the time of evaluation setting are the same.

After the scores for each evaluation element are set in the evaluation subject information storage unit 6 as described above, when the evaluation score calculation unit 8 is started, the evaluation score calculation unit 8 starts the evaluation target information storage unit 6.
Then, the total score for each evaluation item S and N for each employee is calculated from the score of each evaluation element of the person to be evaluated and the weight of each evaluation element S1, S2, S3, N1, N2 of the evaluation item master 7. This score calculation result is stored in the column of Employee 1 and Qualification 1 in the evaluation score information storage unit 9 shown in FIG. As an example, S
It is assumed that the score obtained by summing the values obtained by multiplying the scores of 1, S2, and S3 by the weight is the S score, and the score obtained by summing the values obtained by multiplying the scores of the N1 and N2 by the weight is the N score.

By the way, there is a time lag between the time of calculating the score of the evaluation item and the time of the promotion evaluation and the pay raise evaluation. For this reason, there may be employees who are promoted or paid during this time. Therefore, in order to improve the accuracy, it is necessary to perform the evaluation based on the position, qualification, etc. of the employee at the time of the evaluation of the promotion and the salary increase.

Therefore, in the case of this general affairs system, at the present time when the promotion evaluation and the pay increase evaluation are actually performed, the pay evaluation subject extraction unit 10 and the promotion evaluation subject extraction unit 11 are activated, and the employee basic information storage unit 1, Announcement information storage unit 2, qualification
Positions of all employees stored in the position information storage unit 3 etc.
Qualifications and the like are searched, and an evaluation subject is extracted based on the position, qualification, and the like of each employee at this time, and stored in the evaluation subject information storage unit 12.

In the evaluation processing section 20, the position and qualification of the evaluation subject at the present time stored in the evaluation subject information storage section 12 and the score of the evaluation item stored in the evaluation score information storage section 9 are calculated. Is compared with the score.

If the position, qualification, and the like of the person to be evaluated are different between the time when the evaluation is performed and the time when the evaluation score is calculated, the current position and qualification are prioritized. As a result, it is possible to appropriately perform the evaluation process when the position, qualification, and the like are different between the time of the evaluation score calculation and the time of the evaluation.

As shown in FIG. 2, the pay-up evaluation master 15 used for calculating the evaluation score of the pay-up and the promotion evaluation master 16 used for calculating the evaluation score of the promotion have a weight for each evaluation item, evaluation priority. The ranking etc. are set.

The evaluation processing section 20 includes a raise evaluation processing section 21
, The past evaluation item score stored in the past evaluation information storage unit 13, the current evaluation item score (S score and N score) stored in the evaluation score information storage unit 9, and the pay raise evaluation master 15. Is calculated based on the respective score weights of the evaluation items S and N set in (1).

In the promotion evaluation processing section 22, the past evaluation item score stored in the past evaluation information storage section 13 and the current evaluation item score (S) stored in the evaluation score information storage section 9 are stored. The score of promotion is calculated based on the score and N score) and each score weight of each evaluation item S and N set in the promotion evaluation master 16.

The history is managed in the promotion evaluation master 15 and the salary evaluation master 16, and the evaluation master at that time is used for calculating the past evaluation score.

Subsequently, in the evaluation processing section 20, the raising score and the promotion score of each calculation result and the evaluation group storing section 14
(E.g., salary rank, promotion rank, etc.) based on the evaluation group information stored in. The ranking based on the promotion score and salary score is based on the job title,
It is performed in evaluation group units that are grouped by qualifications, organizations, etc.

In this case, the ranking is performed in the descending order of the promotion score and the pay raise score for each evaluation group. If there is a tie, each evaluation element is ranked in the order of the priority set in the evaluation item master 7. , And a person with a high element score is ranked high.

After the order of promotion and salary increase is determined,
In the evaluation processing unit 20, evaluations such as the highest rank S and the highest rank A due to the limitation of the number of people are performed.

As shown in FIG. 2, the information of the evaluation result such as the above-described promotion, the ranking of the salary increase, and the evaluation result is as follows.
The evaluation result information storage unit 23 stores as a raise score, a raise rank, and a raise evaluation, and as a promotion score, a raise rank, and a raise evaluation.

Subsequently, a promotion process and a pay-up process are performed based on the information stored in the evaluation result information storage unit 23.

In this case, the pay raise processing section 24 determines a pay grade, a stick, a pay raise, etc. based on the result of the pay raise evaluation stored in the evaluation result information storage section 23. Remember.

Further, the promotion processing section 26 creates promotion instruction plan information such as one rank up, etc., or demotion announcement plan information such as one rank down based on the result of the promotion evaluation, and stores it in the promotion information storage section 27. Remember. For example, when the promotion announcement plan information is set to rank S, it means that the qualification is upgraded by one rank.

As described above, according to the general affairs system of this embodiment, the evaluation score calculation / evaluation setting suitable for the evaluation purpose, a plurality of evaluation items, the score for each item, and the weight are set, so that the evaluation score calculation, Evaluation processes such as promotion and raise can be performed fairly and automatically.

Further, there is a time difference between the evaluation time and the evaluation time such as promotion and raise, which reflect the contents of the evaluation, during which there are personnel changes, promotion, retirement, etc.
If the qualification, salary, etc. fluctuate, the promotion and salary increase will be evaluated based on the position and qualification at the time of the appraisal due to the above time difference,
Although correct evaluation could not be performed at the evaluation time, in the present invention,
At the time of evaluation, the evaluation target is selected, compared with the position and qualification at the time of the evaluation, and the difference from the time of the evaluation is determined.
Evaluations commensurate with the position and qualifications at the time of evaluation can be made.

Further, when there are a plurality of items having the same score as a result of the evaluation calculation respectively performed for each evaluation subject, the evaluation items are not simply evaluated as the same rank but are individually evaluated in the evaluation item master 7. Since more detailed ranking is performed based on the evaluation priority information set for each element, the evaluation subjects rarely have the same rank. A fair assessment can be made with minimal intervention.

Further, by storing the pay-up evaluation result information and the promotion evaluation result information as the evaluation result information in the evaluation result information storage unit 23, the evaluation issuance information and the salary class of the person to be evaluated are used by using the evaluation result information. It is possible to automatically create a revision plan of the wage raise information.

The present invention is not limited only to the above embodiment. In the above embodiment, the example in which the general affairs system is realized by a plurality of components has been described, but each component may be realized as software.

In this case, the software may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium such as a floppy disk. When the computer reads the software (program) stored in the storage medium, the same processing as described above is performed. Will be possible.

As a storage medium, a magnetic disk,
Floppy disk, hard disk, optical disk (C
D-ROM, CD-R, DVD, etc.), a magneto-optical disk (MO, etc.), a semiconductor memory, or any other storage medium that can store programs and that can be read by a computer. May be.

An OS (Operating System) running on the computer based on the instructions of the program installed in the computer from the storage medium.
Alternatively, MW (middleware) such as database management software and network software may execute a part of each process for realizing the present embodiment.

Further, the storage medium is not limited to a medium independent of the computer, but also includes a storage medium in which a program transmitted via a LAN or the Internet is downloaded and stored or temporarily stored.

Further, the number of storage media is not limited to one, and the case where the processing in this embodiment is executed from a plurality of media is also included in the recording medium of the present invention, and any media configuration may be used.

The computer executes each processing in the present embodiment based on a program stored in a storage medium. The computer includes one device such as a personal computer and a system in which a plurality of devices are connected to a network. Any of these configurations may be used.

The computer is not limited to a personal computer, but also includes an arithmetic processing unit, a microcomputer, and the like included in information processing equipment, and is a general term for equipment and devices capable of realizing the functions of the present invention by a program. .

[0065]

As described above, according to the first, fourth, and seventh aspects of the present invention, a subject is selected and selected at the first time point when the evaluation is performed and at the second time point when the evaluation is performed. The target person is promoted / increased based on the qualification and position of the target person and the calculated score. Therefore, even if the qualification and position of the target person are different between the first time and the second time, the evaluation is performed. Promotion and raise processing can be performed by the qualification and post at the time.

According to the second, fifth, and eighth aspects of the present invention, a target person is selected at each of the first time point when the evaluation is performed and the second time point when the evaluation is performed. If the qualifications and job titles of the subjects are different as a result of the comparison, the qualifications and job titles of the subjects selected at the second point in time and the score calculated to evaluate the subject are evaluated. Since the target person is promoted / raised, the qualification and position of the target person at the second point in time for actually evaluating
A raise operation can be performed.

According to the third, sixth, and ninth aspects of the present invention, the score of the subject to be evaluated is calculated at the first time when the evaluation is performed, and the calculated subject is calculated at the second time when the evaluation is performed. The ranks of the appraisal persons are ranked based on the scores of the appraisal persons and the past promotion / raising history of the appraisal persons.As a result of this ranking, those with the same score are based on the evaluation priority of the evaluation item master. Further, the ranking is performed, so that the evaluation results hardly have the same rank, and the evaluation result is not left to the judgment of a person, so that a fair evaluation can be performed for the target person.

As a result, it is possible to narrow down the subjects to be evaluated and to perform a fair ranking for each subject to be evaluated, and to automate and save labor from selection of the subjects to be evaluated to evaluation and announcement. Can be.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of a general affairs system according to one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an operation of the general affairs system.

[Explanation of symbols]

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Employee basic information storage part, 2 ... Announcement information storage part, 3 ... Qualification / post information storage part, 4 ... Evaluation person extraction part, 5 ... Evaluation data setting part, 6 ... Evaluation person information storage part, 7 ... Evaluation item master, 8 ... Evaluation score calculation unit, 9 ... Evaluation score information storage unit, 10 ... Raise evaluation target person extraction unit, 11 ... Promotion evaluation target extraction unit, 12 ... Evaluation target information storage unit, 13 ... Past Evaluation information storage unit, 14: evaluation group storage unit, 15: raise evaluation master, 16: promotion evaluation master, 20: evaluation processing unit, 21: raise evaluation processing unit, 22: promotion evaluation processing unit, 2
3 ... Evaluation result information storage unit, 24 ... Raise processing unit, 25 ... Raise information storage unit, 26 ... Promotion processing unit, 27 ... Promotion information storage unit.

Claims (9)

[Claims] 1. A first subject selecting means for selecting a subject to be evaluated at a predetermined first point in time, and a subject to be evaluated selected by the first selecting means is evaluated. A plurality of evaluation elements and an evaluation item master in which respective weights for these evaluation elements are set; evaluation data storage means storing evaluation data for each evaluation element of the evaluation target person; and weights set in the evaluation item master Calculating means for calculating a score for evaluating the person to be evaluated based on the evaluation data of the person to be evaluated in the evaluation data storage means; and a second means for selecting the person to be evaluated at the second point in time when the evaluation is performed. Target person selecting means; qualifications and titles of the target persons selected by the first and second target person selecting means; and a promotion / raising process of the target person based on the score calculated by the calculating means. (C) system characterized by comprising a means for. 2. A first subject selecting means for selecting a subject to be evaluated at a predetermined first time, and an evaluation of the subject selected by the first selecting means. A plurality of evaluation elements and an evaluation item master in which respective weights for these evaluation elements are set; evaluation data storage means storing evaluation data for each evaluation element of the evaluation target person; and weights set in the evaluation item master Calculating means for calculating a score for evaluating the person to be evaluated based on the evaluation data of the person to be evaluated in the evaluation data storage means; and a second means for selecting the person to be evaluated at the second point in time when the evaluation is performed. A means for comparing the qualifications and titles of each target person selected by the first and second target person selection means; and The qualification at the second time point selected by the second target person selecting means,
A general affairs system, comprising: means for performing a promotion / raising process of the target person based on a position and a score calculated by the calculation means. 3. An evaluation item master for setting a plurality of evaluation elements for evaluating the evaluation target person at a predetermined first time point, and weights and evaluation priorities for these evaluation elements, and the evaluation object Means for inputting evaluation data for each evaluation element of the user, weights set in the evaluation item master, and input evaluation data for each evaluation element of the evaluation target person for evaluating the target person. Calculation means for calculating a score; history storage means in which past promotion / raise histories are stored; and a target calculated based on the score calculated by the calculation means and the past promotion / raise history of the history storage means. A first ranking means for ranking, and, as a result of the ranking by the first ranking means, those having the same score are further based on the evaluation priority of the evaluation item master. (C) system characterized by comprising a second ranking means for ranking. 4. A step of selecting a person to be evaluated at a predetermined first time point, a plurality of evaluation elements for evaluating the selected persons to be evaluated, and respective weights for these evaluation elements. Setting the evaluation item master, evaluation data for each evaluation element of the evaluation target person, and calculating a score for evaluating the evaluation target person based on the weight set in the evaluation item master, Selecting a person to be evaluated at a second point in time for performing the evaluation; and calculating the qualifications and positions of the persons selected at the first and second points in time, and evaluating the person to be evaluated. Performing a promotion / raising process of the target person based on the obtained score. 5. A step of selecting a subject to be evaluated at a predetermined first time point, a plurality of rating elements for evaluating the selected subject, and respective weights for these rating elements. Setting the evaluation item master, evaluation data for each evaluation element of the evaluation target person, and calculating a score for evaluating the evaluation target person based on the weight set in the evaluation item master, Selecting a person to be evaluated at a second time point for performing the evaluation; comparing the qualifications and positions of the persons selected at the first time point and the second time point, respectively; If the qualifications and titles of the target person are different,
Performing a promotion / raising process of the target person based on the qualification and title of the target person selected at the second time point and a score calculated for evaluating the subject. Evaluation method. 6. A step of setting a plurality of evaluation elements for evaluating a person to be evaluated at a predetermined first time point, and respective weights and evaluation priorities for these evaluation elements in an evaluation item master, Inputting the evaluation data for each evaluation element of the target person; and evaluating the evaluation target person based on the input evaluation data for each evaluation element of the evaluation target person and the weight set in the evaluation item master. Calculating the score of the subject, and ranking the subject based on the calculated score of the subject and the past promotion / raising history of the subject.The result of this ranking is the same. And further ranking the scored items based on the evaluation priority of the evaluation item master. 7. A storage medium storing a program for causing a computer to execute a process, wherein the computer causes the computer to select a person to be evaluated at a predetermined first time, and evaluates the selected person to be evaluated. A plurality of evaluation elements for performing the evaluation and the respective weights for these evaluation elements are set in the evaluation item master, based on the evaluation data for each evaluation element of the evaluation target person and the weight set in the evaluation item master. A score for evaluating the subject to be evaluated is calculated, and a subject to be evaluated is selected at a second point in time when the evaluation is performed. The qualification, position, and the like of the subject selected at the first and second points in time, respectively. Computer-readable storage of a program for performing the promotion / pay-up process of the subject based on the score calculated for evaluating the subject. A storage medium characterized by the above-mentioned. 8. A storage medium storing a program for causing a computer to execute a process, wherein the computer selects a subject to be evaluated at a predetermined first time, and evaluates the selected subject. A plurality of evaluation elements for performing the evaluation and the respective weights for these evaluation elements are set in the evaluation item master, based on the evaluation data for each evaluation element of the evaluation target person and the weight set in the evaluation item master. A score for evaluating the subject is calculated, and a subject to be evaluated is selected at a second time when the evaluation is performed, and the qualifications and positions of the subject selected at the first time and the second time are determined. If the qualifications and positions of the subject are different,
A computer-readable program for performing the promotion / raising process of the target person based on the qualification and position of the target person selected at the second time point and the score calculated for evaluating the subject to be evaluated. A storage medium characterized by being stored. 9. An evaluation item master sets a plurality of evaluation elements for evaluating an evaluation target person at a predetermined first time point, and respective weights and evaluation priorities for these evaluation elements. Score based on the evaluation data for each evaluation element of the user and the weights set in the evaluation item master, to calculate a score for evaluating the person to be evaluated. The appraisal subject is ranked based on the past promotion / pay-up history, and as a result of this ranking, those with the same score are further ranked based on the evaluation priority of the evaluation item master. A storage medium characterized by storing a computer-readable program.