JP2001188825A - Compensation distribution system and recording medium - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a compensation distribution system by which compensation is easily and appropriately distributed. SOLUTION: Proposal information stored in a table is transmitted in S210. Whether or not the selected result of the proposal information is received is decided in S220, shifting to S230 is performed upon receiving the selected result of the proposal information and shifting to S240 is performed when not receiving it. In S230, pertinent proposal information is extracted, based on the received selected result and transmitted. In the meantime, in S240, whether or not a distribution instruction is received is decided. Shifting to S250 is performed upon receiving the distribution instruction and shifting to S220 is performed when not receiving the distribution instruction. In S250, the compensation is distributed to the pertinent person of the extracted proposal information. The distribution rate of the compensation is decided by considering a proposal order. Then, a compensation money amount inputted through the Internet beforehand is multiplied by the distribution rate and the distribution money amount of respective proposer are decided.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0001]

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a reward distribution system for recruiting proposals and distributing a reward according to a result of adoption.

[0002]

2. Description of the Related Art Hitherto, companies and the like have been soliciting proposals and planning new products and services with reference to the proposals collected by the solicitation. Generally, such proposals are solicited by letters, telephone calls, e-mails, WWW forms, and the like, and the contents of the proposals are recorded on an electronic medium or a paper medium together with information of the provider. Then, the company or the like gives a reward for a proposal adopted as a plan from among these proposals.

[0003]

However, there are many identical proposals, and if the proposals are adopted as a plan, there is a problem that it is difficult to distribute a reward. Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a reward distribution system that can easily and properly execute reward distribution for proposals.

[0004]

According to the reward distribution system according to the first aspect of the present invention, which has been made to solve the above-mentioned problems, the proposer can input the proposal contents and the proposer from the proposal input means. Can be input. As the proposer information, for example, information such as a mail address, address / name, and telephone number may be used. The contents of the proposal and the proposer information input in this way are stored in the storage unit in association with information that can specify the proposal order of the proposal. Here, the “information that can specify the input order of the proposal content” includes, for example, a number indicating the order of the proposal, information indicating the date and time of the proposal, and the like. Further, “to store in association” means to store so that the proposer and the proposal order can be specified from at least the proposal contents.
Hereinafter, the proposal contents, the proposer information, and the proposal order will be referred to as proposal information.

[0005] The proposal information thus stored in the storage means can be output by the proposal information output means. The proposal information output by the proposal information output means may be, for example, information including proposal contents. Further, for the adopted proposal, the distribution ratio determining means can determine the distribution ratio of the reward in consideration of the proposal order. The reward may be anything that can be distributed, such as, for example, the amount of money, points, and the quantity of goods.

[0006] According to such a reward distribution system, the reward distribution rate is determined for the proposal contents adopted from the proposed proposal contents in consideration of the proposal order. For example, when there are a plurality of proposals having the same content, the distribution rate of reward can be increased in order from the proposer who has proposed the content of the proposal first.

In the case where a person judges and inputs a proposal to be adopted from among the proposed contents, a reward distribution system according to claim 2 may be used. According to this configuration, the proposal information to be adopted is automatically extracted from the storage unit by the selection information extraction unit only by selecting the proposal of the proposal content to be adopted from the proposal information output by the proposal information output unit. be able to. Then, the proposal information extracted in this manner can be used as the adopted proposal. Therefore, the work of extracting the adopted proposal information from the proposal information is facilitated. Note that a proposal for an adoption candidate may be selected from the proposal information, a proposal for the adoption candidate may be extracted and output again, and proposals to be gradually adopted may be narrowed down, and the last remaining proposal may be adopted as the adopted proposal.

[0008] By the way, when soliciting proposals, for example, after deciding a proposal to be adopted from the collected proposals,
We may solicit proposals again based on the proposals we have adopted. For example, when soliciting proposals for one product plan, first, a product plan is recruited and a product plan to be adopted is determined. Then, for the adopted product plan, a plan for manufacturing such as design and technology is solicited, and a manufacturing plan to be adopted is determined. Then, the sales plan is recruited for the product plan and the manufacturing plan, and the sales plan to be adopted is determined. These decisions may be made concurrently or stepwise. As described above, when there are a plurality of steps of determining a proposal to be adopted, it is preferable that the step be determined as in claim 3.

According to the reward distribution system of the present invention, the distribution ratio of the reward is determined by the distribution ratio determining means in consideration of the existence of each step. In this way, for example, the distribution can be performed by considering the number of steps as the existence of each step. For example, when there is a decision on a proposal to be adopted in the three steps of the above-described product planning, manufacturing planning, and sales planning, a reward can be distributed to these three plans in three equal parts. Further, as the existence of each step, the distribution can be performed in consideration of the contribution ratio of each step. For example, when contributing to sales in the order of product planning, sales planning, and manufacturing planning, for example, 50% can be allocated to product planning, 20% to manufacturing planning, and 30% to sales planning.

[0010] When a proposal to be adopted is determined in a plurality of steps as described above, a proposal made by one proposer in a plurality of steps may be adopted. Also,
Even in the case of one step, one person makes a plurality of proposals, and the plurality of proposals may be adopted. In this way, when a plurality of proposals of one proposer are adopted, as described in claim 4, a reward is given for each proposer based on the distribution ratio determined by the distribution ratio determining means. Is calculated. This makes it easy to distribute the reward for each proposer.

[0011] In addition, it is preferable to determine the distribution rate in consideration of not only the rewards to the proposers but also the participation status of the participants in the system as described in claim 5.
In this way, for example, the reward can be automatically distributed to the participants such as the system planner and the operator.

When the reward is distributed according to the distribution ratio described above, the total of the rewards input by the reward input means may be distributed according to the distribution ratio. . In this way, the reward can be easily distributed. In the case where the reward is monetary, when making such an allocation, it is preferable to input the total amount as described in claim 7 and determine the total of the reward by taking into account the cost from the total amount. For example, the amount of profit may be input as the total amount, and the cost of operating the reward distribution system may be subtracted to obtain the total reward. In this way, the total reward can be automatically obtained from the total amount.

If there are expenses to be borne, claim 8
As shown in the figure, the costs are
It is advisable to allocate them taking into account their involvement. For example, it is good to distribute so that the participant of a system may bear a burden.
Further, it is preferable to calculate the cost allocation ratio in the same manner as the allocation ratios described in the first to fifth aspects. Then, the expenses may be distributed according to the distribution ratio of the expenses, similarly to the reward distribution means. Also, for example, the fund may be collected first, and the cost may be applied to the fund, and the profit may be allocated to the employer. This facilitates the allocation of expenses. Further, for example, expenses can be automatically allocated to a proposer, a system planner, an operator, and the like. Further, for example, by subtracting the expenses of the participants from the reward amount for each participant, it is also possible to automatically calculate the payment amount to the participants.

The distribution ratio determined by the distribution ratio determining means is:
The distribution ratio calculated by the proposer-specific distribution ratio calculation means and the reward distributed by the reward distribution means may be output. Then, the total of the awards may be determined, for example, at the time of soliciting proposals, or may be input from the Internet as described in claim 9. In this way, for example, the total of the reward can be automatically input periodically based on the sales and profits of the store on the Internet.

The above-mentioned input, selection, output and the like may be performed with the Internet. That is, claim 10
As shown in (1), the proposal input means may input proposal contents from the Internet. If you do this,
For example, since information can be input from a terminal or the like connected to the Internet, a large amount of proposals can be collected in a short time. Moreover, the order of proposals is automatically recorded,
The distribution rate can also be easily determined. Note that, of course, the proposer information may be input from the Internet, or the selection by the proposal selection means may be performed via the Internet. Further, the total amount and the cost may be input via the Internet.

[0016] Further, the proposal information output by the proposal information output means may be output to the Internet. By doing so, it is possible to browse what kind of proposal has been made from a terminal or the like connected to the Internet. The output of the above-mentioned distribution ratio may be output to the Internet.

As described in claim 12, the function of realizing each of the above means by a computer can be provided, for example, as a program activated on the computer side. In the case of such a program, for example, it can be used by recording it on a computer-readable recording medium such as a floppy disk, a magneto-optical disk, a CD-ROM, or a hard disk, and loading and activating the computer system as needed. it can.

[0018]

Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. It is needless to say that the embodiments of the present invention are not limited to the following examples, and can take various forms as long as they belong to the technical scope of the present invention.

An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. As shown in FIG. 1, the reward distribution system 1 according to the present embodiment includes a computer 10, the Internet 20, and a plurality of terminals 30 connected to the Internet 20. The computer 10 is a normal computer, and includes a CPU, a ROM, a RAM, a peripheral interface, a hard disk 12, a network interface 14, and the like (not shown). The network interface 14 is connected to the Internet 20 and performs input of information from the Internet 20 and output of information to the Internet 20 under the control of the CPU. Then, the CPU performs processing described later, stores the input information in the hard disk 12, reads the stored information, and outputs the read information.

The processing executed on the computer 10 will be described with reference to the drawings. First, the reward distribution system 1 performs the input processing shown in FIG. 2, and stores the information input in the form of the table shown in FIG. Then, the distribution processing shown in FIG. 4 is performed using the stored information.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an input process executed by the CPU of the reward distribution system 1. In S110, the input page of the proposer information and the proposal content is transmitted to the terminal 30 via the network interface 14 as the homepage of the Internet 20.

In S 120, it is determined whether or not the proposer information and the proposal content, which are responses to the transmitted home page, have been received from terminal 30. When the proposer information and the proposal content are received (S120: YES), the process proceeds to S130. On the other hand, if not received, S
Execute 120.

In S130, the proposal number is incremented. In the subsequent S140, the proposal number, which is the proposal information,
The received proposer information and proposal contents are stored in the hard disk 12 in a table format. FIG. 3 shows an example of the table thus stored. FIG. 3 shows that first the proposal content a of the proposer A is received, then the proposal content a of the proposer B is received, then the proposal content b of the proposer B is received, and then the proposal content of the proposer C is received Table 4 stored in the hard disk 12 when the content a is received and subsequently the proposal content b of the proposer C is received.
It is a figure showing a state of 0. In this way, each time the proposer information and the proposal content are received, the proposal information is stored together with the proposal number.

Next, FIG. 4 shows a process of selecting a proposal to be adopted from among the proposal contents thus collected and distributing a reward. The stored proposal information is stored in the table 40.
A specific example of the above case is shown for each step. In S210,
In step S140, the proposal information stored in the table is transmitted to the hard disk 12. For example, the table 40 is transmitted to the terminal 30.

In S220, it is determined whether or not the selection result of the proposal information has been received. If the selection result of the proposal information has been received (S220: YES), the process proceeds to S230, and if not (S220: NO), the process proceeds to S240. For example, if the user adopts the proposal content a, information indicating that the proposal orders 1, 2, and 4 in the table 40 have been selected is received.

In S230, the corresponding proposal information is extracted and transmitted based on the received selection result. For example, the rows of the proposal order 1, 2, 4 are extracted from the table 40 and the terminal 3
0, and then proceeds to S220. On the other hand, in S240, it is determined whether a distribution instruction has been received. When the distribution instruction has been received (S240: YES), the process proceeds to S250, and when the distribution instruction has not been received (S240: N
O), proceed to S220.

In S250, a reward is distributed to the person corresponding to the extracted proposal information. At this time, the distribution ratio of the award is determined in consideration of the proposal order. For example, in the example of the table 40, distribution is made to the proposers in the proposal order 1, 2, 4 so that 4 /
The allocation rate is (1 + 2 + 4), and 2 / (1 + 2 + 4) is the allocation rate for B, the proposer of proposal order 2, and 1 / (1 + 2 +) for C, the proposer of proposal order 2.
4) is the distribution. Then, the distribution rate is multiplied by a reward amount previously input via the Internet 20, and
Determine the allocation amount for each proposer. Of course, the method of calculating the distribution ratio is not limited to this example as long as the order of proposal is taken into consideration, and any method may be used.

In the present embodiment, the processing of the CPU in the Internet 20 and S120 corresponds to the suggestion input means, and the processing of the table in the hard disk 12 and the processing of the CPU in the tables 40 and S140 correspond to the storage means. Further, the processing of the CPU in the Internet 20 and S210 corresponds to a proposal information output unit.
Corresponds to the allocation ratio determining means, the proposer-specific allocation ratio calculating means, and the reward allocation means. Furthermore, the processing of the CPU in the Internet 20 and S120 corresponds to a proposal selection input unit, and the Internet 20 and S23
0 corresponds to the selection information extracting means,
The Internet 20 corresponds to a reward input unit.

Further, the present invention can also take the following embodiments based on the reward distribution system 1 of the above embodiment. This embodiment is called an Internet unit product. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing a relationship between users of the system to which the present invention is applied, and FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram showing a process of soliciting proposals and deciding a project.

As shown in FIG. 5, the organizer discloses a patent on the Internet 20 and proposes a plan. And
The company proposes plans and discloses technology. The proposer also proposes a plan proposal and a demand request. In this way, a plan is determined based on the plan proposal of the organizer, the company, and the proposer, and goods and services based on the plan are sold in the Internet 20 consuming market. Then, the profits obtained from the sales are distributed to the proposers of the project.

FIG. 6 shows a process for recruiting proposals and deciding a plan. First, the media is notified of the installation of the present system. Then, information such as patent information, its peripheral information, and related person information is disclosed on the Internet 20. Then, proposals for product planning are solicited using the present system. Then, a proposal to be adopted is selected from these proposals and determined as a product plan. Similarly, it recruits manufacturing and sales plans, sells products and services based on these determined plans, and distributes the profits to the proposers at each stage using the present system.

As described above, when there are a plurality of steps for soliciting and deciding a proposal, the number of steps is taken into account when determining the distribution rate in S250 of FIG. It is good to make the system which decides the distribution rate. For example, the distribution amount is first distributed at a distribution ratio of 30% for product planning, 30% for manufacturing planning, and 40% for sales planning, and then, as described above, this distribution amount is further proposed according to the distribution ratio of each proposer. To be distributed among people.

As shown in FIG. 7, a proposal may be solicited, a plan may be decided, and a distribution money may be distributed. FIG. 7 is basically the same as FIG. 6, except that the distribution money is first divided into the proposer and the organizer and then distributed by the above-described system. In each planning stage, the proposers of the adopted proposals are registered on a first-come-first-served basis. For example, a proposal other than the proposal adopted from the above-described table 40 may be moved to another table.

The distribution of rewards to participants such as the proposer, the organizer, and the company may be performed by the system.
In this case, for example, the total amount that can be distributed is input and distributed first among the participants, and further distributed by the members of the participants (for example, each proposer). For example, when allocating in S250 of FIG. 4 described above, the allocation is first performed at the allocation ratio between the participants, and further multiplied by the allocation ratio for each proposer.

It is preferable that the expenses necessary for the operation of the present system be paid by the participants accordingly. In the case where the system allocates the expenses appropriately, for example, the total amount to be allocated by the system is input from the Internet 20, and the amount corresponding to the expenses is subtracted from the total amount to obtain the allotable reward amount. The reward may be distributed by using.

Further, the amount of expenses is multiplied by the amount of expenses multiplied by the allocation ratio obtained in S250 in FIG. 4, and the amount of payment to each proposer is calculated by subtracting the amount of expenses from the reward allocation of each proposer. May be required. Of course, this distribution method may be any method. For example, the number of proposers (employees), the number of participants, the degree of contribution, etc. may be taken into account.

It is to be noted that the expenses may be collected first, and the expenses from the funds may be applied. If a profit is obtained, the expenses may be distributed among the proposers (employers), the participants, and the like.
When the system performs this distribution, for example, S250
Then, the amount of the expense is compared with the amount of the award, and when the amount of the award exceeds the amount of the expense, the amount of the excess is multiplied by the allocation rate to be allocated.

According to the system described so far, each of the members can participate as a member via the Internet 20 in place of a system in which the existing manufacturer-initiated commercialization process is started from planning. In the past, companies conducted market research, planning specifications, and development specifications, and so-called marketing surveys, in which consumers' opinions were taken into account,
No matter how good a proposal is, it cannot be realized without the technical, sales, and design capabilities of the company, and the final product specifications will be finalized with internal consensus. Was the system.

The Internet according to an embodiment of the present invention
The distinctive feature of unit products lies in the disclosure of patent information and the production of products based on those patents. It can be embodied based on information.

Further, the productization process is open, and the company itself can be a “one proposer” participating in the process. The organizer is not a mere intermediary, but a central project called “patent”. Provided. Further, when the contents of the projects are similar, there is a high possibility of realization of the project because there is credibility by a public organization such as a patent.
In addition, by using the Internet 20, it is possible to organize plans quickly, and it is possible to reduce the possibility of missing market demand.

According to the above system, the organizer,
Proposers and companies can participate from the same standpoint, and it is possible to easily provide a mechanism in which proposals for excellent planning contents become the center of a project, and the results are distributed according to the degree of contribution.

[Brief description of the drawings]

FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a reward distribution system according to an embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating an input process according to the embodiment.

FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram illustrating a configuration of a table storing proposal information according to the embodiment;

FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a reward distribution process according to the embodiment.

FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing a relationship between users of the reward distribution system according to the embodiment;

FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram showing a process of recruiting proposals and determining a plan according to the embodiment;

FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram showing distribution of distribution money according to the embodiment.

[Explanation of symbols]

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Reward distribution system 10 ... Computer 12 ... Hard disk 14 ... Network interface 20 ... Internet 30 ... Terminal 40 ... Table

 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuing from the front page (71) Applicant 500018516 Hiroshi Hatano 4846 Hirokute, Asahimae-cho, Owariasahi-city, Aichi Prefecture Wis Terrier 32-2G Terms (reference) 5B049 AA01 AA02 BB11 CC01 CC36 CC38 DD01 EE01 EE05 FF03 GG04 GG07

Claims (12)

[Claims] 1. Proposal input means for inputting proposer information for specifying a proposer and proposal contents, proposal order information capable of specifying an input order of the proposal contents, the proposer information, and the proposal Storage means for associating the contents with the proposal information and storing the proposal information stored in the storage means; proposal information output means for outputting the proposal information stored in the storage means; And a distribution rate determining means for determining a rate. 2. The reward distribution system according to claim 1, further comprising: proposal selection input means for selectively inputting proposal information to be adopted from proposal information output by the proposal information output means; Selection information extraction means for extracting from the storage means the proposal information selected and input by the selection input means, wherein the proposal information extracted by the selection information extraction means is used as the adopted proposal information. Reward distribution system. 3. The reward distribution system according to claim 1, wherein the distribution rate determining means determines a proposal to be adopted in determining the distribution rate of the reward a plurality of times. A reward distribution system that determines a reward distribution ratio in consideration of the existence of each step. 4. The reward distribution system according to claim 1, further comprising: a proposal for calculating a distribution ratio for each proposer based on the distribution ratio determined by said distribution ratio determining means. A reward distribution system, comprising: individual distribution rate calculating means. 5. The reward distribution system according to claim 1, wherein said distribution rate determining means includes:
A reward distribution system characterized in that the distribution ratio is determined in consideration of the involvement status. 6. The reward distribution system according to claim 1, further comprising: reward input means for inputting a total of rewards, and a reward total input by said reward input means being calculated according to said distribution rate. A reward distribution system for distributing the reward. 7. A reward distribution system according to claim 6, wherein: a total amount input means for inputting a total amount; and a total reward determination for determining a total of said rewards by taking into account expenses from the total amount input from said total amount input means. Means for reward distribution. 8. The reward distribution system according to any one of claims 1 to 7, further comprising a cost distribution means for allocating expenses to be borne by the participants of the system in consideration of their involvement status. Characteristic reward distribution system. 9. The reward distribution system according to claim 6, wherein said reward input means inputs a total of rewards from the Internet. 10. The reward distribution system according to claim 1, wherein said proposal input means inputs said proposal content from the Internet. 11. The reward distribution system according to claim 1, wherein said proposal information output means outputs proposal information to the Internet. 12. A computer-readable recording medium on which a program for causing a computer to function as each of the means in the reward distribution system according to claim 1 is recorded.