JP2001064708A - Hot-repairing method of furnace wall in blast furnace - Google Patents

Hot-repairing method of furnace wall in blast furnace

Info

Publication number
JP2001064708A
JP2001064708A JP2000140095A JP2000140095A JP2001064708A JP 2001064708 A JP2001064708 A JP 2001064708A JP 2000140095 A JP2000140095 A JP 2000140095A JP 2000140095 A JP2000140095 A JP 2000140095A JP 2001064708 A JP2001064708 A JP 2001064708A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
refractory
blast furnace
furnace wall
nozzle
furnace
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2000140095A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3584852B2 (en
Inventor
Satoru Wakabayashi
悟 若林
Kazuma Oshima
一馬 大島
Masahiro Kashiwada
昌宏 柏田
Akio Kasahara
明夫 笠原
Hiroshi Shibuta
浩 紫冨田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority to JP2000140095A priority Critical patent/JP3584852B2/en
Publication of JP2001064708A publication Critical patent/JP2001064708A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3584852B2 publication Critical patent/JP3584852B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Blast Furnaces (AREA)
  • Furnace Housings, Linings, Walls, And Ceilings (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a hot-repairing method of the furnace wall in a blast furnace, by which such problems as to exist in a dry-type spreading method or wet-type spreading method can be resolved. SOLUTION: In the repairing method which spreads a refractory onto the damaged portion of the furnace wall refractory in the furnace inside part by stopping the blasting in the blast furnace, 2-15 mass% water and a prescribed ratio of dispersant to the refractory composition, are mixed into the refractory composition having the grain constitution containing <=5 mm maximum grain diameter and >=25% grain of <=0.075 mm grain diameter, and beforehand uniformly kneaded. After press-feeding this slurry-state monolithic refractory to a nozzle, a hardening promoter is added in the nozzle part and spread together with a high pressure gas to the damaged portion of the blast furnace wall. Since the refractory composition can uniformly be mixed, the problem existing in the dry-type spreading material can be improved. Further, it is not developed in this repairing method to solidify the refractory kneaded material before spreading onto the blast furnace wall and stick on a hose and the nozzle part in the wet-type spreading method.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、高炉の炉内壁を被
覆する耐火煉瓦が損傷若しくは脱落し、炉体鉄皮に過度
の熱負荷が発生したり、或いは、炉内壁に生成した凹凸
がコークスや焼結鉱などの原料の円滑な荷下がりを阻害
し、高炉炉況が悪化すると予想される場合に、一時的に
高炉の送風を停止して該損傷部位の補修を行い、高炉繰
業寿命の延長化と高炉の安定操業を図ることができる高
炉炉壁の熱間補修方法に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a refractory brick for covering a furnace inner wall of a blast furnace, which is damaged or falls off, causing an excessive heat load on the furnace shell or coke formed on the furnace inner wall. If the blast furnace condition is expected to deteriorate due to the hindrance to the smooth unloading of raw materials such as slag and sinter, the blast furnace is temporarily stopped to repair the damaged area and the blast furnace service life The present invention relates to a method for hot repair of a blast furnace wall which can extend the length of the blast furnace and stably operate the blast furnace.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】高炉の炉内壁は一般的に冷却盤又はステ
ーブクーラと耐火煉瓦の組み合わせからなっている。し
かし、シャフト上部の炉内壁は比較的温度が低いので、
約600〜800mm程度の厚みのシャモット質或いは
高アルミナ煉瓦で内張りされているだけである。
2. Description of the Related Art The inner wall of a blast furnace generally comprises a combination of a cooling board or stave cooler and a refractory brick. However, the furnace inner wall at the top of the shaft has a relatively low temperature,
It is only lined with a chamotte or high alumina brick with a thickness of about 600-800 mm.

【0003】解体調査或いは炉内原料を減尺した場合の
観察結果によると、シャフト上部のシャモット質或いは
高アルミナ煉瓦で内張りされた部分は、損耗或いは脱落
等、劣化が進行し易い部分であることが判っている。こ
の原因は炉内のコークス、鉱石等の原料の降下時の摩擦
が大であることと、炉内ガス流が壁面効果によって壁面
に集中するためであると考えられる。
[0003] According to the results of dismantling inspections or observations in the case where the raw material in the furnace is reduced, the portion lined with chamotte material or high alumina brick on the upper part of the shaft is a portion where deterioration such as wear or drop is likely to progress. I know. It is considered that this is because the friction during the fall of the raw material such as coke and ore in the furnace is large and the gas flow in the furnace is concentrated on the wall surface by the wall effect.

【0004】このような原因で生じた炉壁の損耗部で
は、炉体鉄皮にホットスポットを生じ、変形、亀裂等の
発生原因となって、炉体寿命を短縮させる要因となる。
また、この炉壁の損耗は、均一に進行するものではな
く、円周方向や高さ方向の位置によって異なるので、炉
内プロフィールが円周方向や高さ方向で不均一となった
り、壁面に凹凸が生じたりする。
[0004] In the worn portion of the furnace wall caused by such a cause, a hot spot is generated in the furnace shell, which causes deformation, cracks, and the like, and shortens the life of the furnace body.
In addition, the wear of the furnace wall does not progress uniformly, but varies depending on the position in the circumferential direction and the height direction.Therefore, the profile in the furnace becomes uneven in the circumferential direction and the height direction, and the furnace wall becomes uneven. Irregularities may occur.

【0005】これを放置したまま操業を継続すると、炉
内原料及び還元ガスの円滑な物流を阻害することにな
る。炉内壁面の劣化による炉況への影響としては、一時
的に原料の荷降下が停止する「棚つり」や、原料が一気
に数十cmから数mも降下する「スリップ」、また、還
元ガスが一時的に偏流する「ガス振り」等が発生するこ
とがある。これらの現象が発生すると、高炉は適正な還
元作用を果たせなくなり、操業上の大きな問題となる。
[0005] If the operation is continued while the above is left as it is, the smooth flow of the raw material in the furnace and the reducing gas is hindered. Deterioration of the inner wall of the furnace can affect the furnace condition, such as "shelf hanging", where the loading of the raw material stops temporarily, "slip", where the raw material drops several tens to several meters at a stroke, and reducing gas. There is a case where “gas swing” or the like in which the gas temporarily drifts occurs. When these phenomena occur, the blast furnace cannot perform a proper reducing action, which is a major operational problem.

【0006】以上の問題に鑑み、従来より高炉を一時的
に休風し、その間に、前述したシャフト上部の耐火煉瓦
の損傷部分に耐火物を吹付け補修することが行われてお
り、該補修を安全かつ効率的に行うための方法が過去に
多数報告されている。
In view of the above problems, conventionally, the blast furnace is temporarily shut down, and during that time, the above-mentioned damaged portion of the refractory brick at the upper part of the shaft is sprayed with a refractory material to repair it. Many methods have been reported in the past for safely and efficiently performing the method.

【0007】この耐火物の吹き付け施工方法は、乾式工
法と湿式工法に大別される。このうち乾式工法は、配合
耐火物粉体を高圧エアーに随伴させてホース内を搬送
し、施工場所において、吹付けノズルを介して加水し、
吹付けるものであるが、この乾式工法では、粉体耐火物
と水との混合が吹付けノズル部のため十分に行えないの
で、多量の粉塵の発生を伴うと共に、吹付けた耐火物は
吹付け面に付着することなく落下する、いわゆるリバウ
ンドロスが多量に発生することを余儀なくされるという
問題が有る。
[0007] The method of spraying refractories is roughly classified into a dry method and a wet method. Of these, the dry method is to transport the compounded refractory powder through the hose with high-pressure air and add water through the spray nozzle at the construction site.
In the dry method, the powder refractory and water are not sufficiently mixed due to the spray nozzle, so that a large amount of dust is generated and the sprayed refractory is blown. There is a problem that a large amount of so-called rebound dross that falls without adhering to the attachment surface must be generated.

【0008】一方、湿式工法は、圧縮ポンプに予め水と
耐火組成物とを混練したスラリー状耐火材料を投入し、
ホース又は配管内を圧送して、ノズル部分で硬化促進剤
を添加して吹付けるものであるが、この湿式工法では、
混練した後に圧送するため、圧送している途中のホース
又は配管内で耐火物が硬化する可能性がある。また、ノ
ズル部分での硬化促進剤との混合が不十分で、吹付けら
れた耐火材料が吹付け補修部から流れ落ちて、所定の補
修厚さや平滑性が確保できない可能性が有るという問題
もある。
On the other hand, in the wet method, a slurry-like refractory material in which water and a refractory composition are kneaded in advance is charged into a compression pump,
The hose or pipe is pressure-fed, and a hardening accelerator is added and sprayed at the nozzle, but in this wet method,
Since the pressure is fed after kneading, there is a possibility that the refractory hardens in the hose or the pipe during the pressure feeding. In addition, there is a problem that the mixing with the curing accelerator at the nozzle portion is insufficient, and the sprayed refractory material flows down from the sprayed repair portion, and there is a possibility that a predetermined repair thickness and smoothness cannot be secured. .

【0009】つまり、高炉の炉内壁を補修する場合に
は、吹付け時の雰囲気温度が高温であることに加えて、
設備が非常に大きく、高温雰囲気下で長い距離の圧送が
必要となるので、圧送している途中で不定形耐火物の硬
化が進行するという湿式工法の問題が顕著化する。従っ
て、従来から乾式工法が多く採用されていた。
In other words, when repairing the inner wall of a blast furnace, in addition to the high ambient temperature at the time of spraying,
Since the equipment is very large and it is necessary to perform long-distance pumping in a high-temperature atmosphere, the problem of the wet construction method in which the curing of the amorphous refractory proceeds during the pumping becomes significant. Therefore, the dry method has been often used.

【0010】[0010]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、高炉の
炉内壁を補修するに際しては、乾式工法の場合にも上述
した問題点は顕在化し、以下に列挙するような問題が存
在することになる。 a.水と混合するタイミングが吹付けの直前であるた
め、均一に混合することが難しく、混合をよくするため
に水分の添加量を増加させる。従って、吹付けた耐火物
の気密性にむらが生じ、吹付けによる補修効果を維持で
きる期間が短くなる。
However, in repairing the inner wall of the blast furnace, the above-mentioned problems become apparent even in the case of the dry method, and the following problems exist. a. Since the timing of mixing with water is immediately before spraying, it is difficult to mix uniformly, and the amount of water to be added is increased to improve mixing. Therefore, the airtightness of the sprayed refractory becomes uneven, and the period during which the repair effect by spraying can be maintained is shortened.

【0011】b.水と混合するタイミングが吹付けの直
前であるため、耐火物粒子の一部は吸湿しないまま炉内
壁に吹付けられ、耐火物の一部が壁に付着せずに炉内に
落下する。これら付着せずに落下した耐火物は炉内で熱
硬化し、炉内の還元ガス流を阻害するだけでなく、原料
を巻き込んで炉壁に付着物のように固着し、棚吊りを引
き起こして、炉況悪化の原因となる場合がある。
B. Since the timing of mixing with water is immediately before the spraying, a part of the refractory particles is sprayed on the inner wall of the furnace without absorbing moisture, and a part of the refractory falls into the furnace without adhering to the wall. These refractory materials that have fallen without being adhered are heat-hardened in the furnace, not only hindering the flow of reducing gas in the furnace, but also entrain the raw materials and adhere to the furnace wall like deposits, causing shelving. , Which may cause deterioration of the furnace condition.

【0012】c.吸湿しないままの耐火物は炉内で粉塵
として舞い上がり、視野が悪化して吹付けたい場所に精
度よく吹付けることができなくなる上に作業環境を著し
く悪化させ、作業員の健康をも害する。
C. The refractory that has not absorbed moisture soars up as dust in the furnace, deteriorating the field of view, making it impossible to accurately spray at the desired spray location, significantly deteriorating the working environment, and impairing the health of workers.

【0013】このような問題点を改善すべく、例えば特
開平6−341766号では、リバウンドロス量を減少
させるため、吹付けに先立って、吹付けノズルから圧縮
空気を噴出させることにより炉内表面のクリーニングを
行う技術が提案されている。この技術によれば、ある程
度は炉内表面の付着物等を除去することが可能であるこ
とから、吹付け効率が上昇してリバウンドロス量が減少
するという効果が得られるものと考えられる。
In order to improve such a problem, for example, in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. Hei 6-341766, in order to reduce the amount of rebound dross, compressed air is blown from a spray nozzle prior to spraying to reduce the inner surface of the furnace. There has been proposed a technique for performing cleaning. According to this technique, it is possible to remove deposits and the like on the inner surface of the furnace to some extent, so that it is considered that the effect of increasing the spraying efficiency and reducing the amount of rebound loss is obtained.

【0014】また、特開平5−256584号では、高
炉炉壁の損傷部分及び損傷量を距離測定装置によって計
測し、この計測値に基づいて耐火物の吹付け位置と吹付
け量を決定し、吹付け機を制御操作する技術が提案され
ている。この技術によれば、炉内の粉塵等による炉内作
業性の問題、安全性の問題を解決することができる。
In Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 5-256584, a damaged portion and a damage amount of a blast furnace wall are measured by a distance measuring device, and a refractory spray position and a spray amount are determined based on the measured values. Techniques for controlling and operating a spraying machine have been proposed. According to this technique, it is possible to solve the problem of workability in the furnace and the problem of safety due to dust and the like in the furnace.

【0015】しかしながら、特開平6−341766号
及び特開平5−256584号は、両者共に水と混合す
るタイミングが吹付けの直前であるという根本的な欠点
があるため、耐火物粒子の一部が吸湿しないまま炉内に
吹付けられること、および水分添加量が多いという乾式
工法最大の問題は解決されず、大量のリバウンドロスが
発生することになる。
[0015] However, JP-A-6-341766 and JP-A-5-256584 both have a fundamental defect that the timing of mixing with water is immediately before spraying. The biggest problems of the dry method, such as spraying into the furnace without absorbing moisture and adding a large amount of water, are not solved, and a large amount of rebound dross is generated.

【0016】加えて、特開平6−341766号では、
空気を噴出させてクリーニングを行う際に、炉壁部の付
着物と共に炉内の粉塵が大量に舞い上がって炉内の視界
が悪化し、作業能率が低下すると共に、作業員の健康を
害するという問題点も依然として存在する。
In addition, JP-A-6-341766 discloses that
When performing cleaning by blowing air, a large amount of dust in the furnace together with deposits on the furnace wall soars, which deteriorates the visibility in the furnace, reduces work efficiency, and impairs the health of workers. Points still exist.

【0017】以上のように、高炉熱間補修を乾式工法で
行う場合には、前述した問題を全て解決することは難し
い。
As described above, when the blast furnace hot repair is performed by the dry method, it is difficult to solve all the above-mentioned problems.

【0018】一方、湿式工法に関しては、例えば特開平
10−232092号で、吹付けを行う前に予め不定形
耐火物と水分を混練しておく技術が提案されている。こ
の技術によれば、吹付け前に十分に水との混練が可能で
あるため、良好な吹付け成績を得ることができる。
On the other hand, with regard to the wet method, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. Hei 10-232092 proposes a technique in which an amorphous refractory and moisture are kneaded before spraying. According to this technique, it is possible to sufficiently knead with water before spraying, so that good spraying results can be obtained.

【0019】しかしながら、例えば高炉の炉内壁面を補
修する場合では、雰囲気温度が470Kと高く、また、
この高温雰囲気下で圧送ポンプよりホース内を圧送する
距離が10m以上と長くなるので、ホース内の耐火物
は、圧送途中に高温下による硬化が進行して詰まりを起
こし、吹付けが不可能になると考えられる。従って、こ
の問題を解決しない限りは高炉炉壁を熱間補修する場合
に湿式工法を採用することができない。
However, for example, when repairing the inner wall surface of a blast furnace, the ambient temperature is as high as 470 K, and
In this high-temperature atmosphere, the distance for pumping the inside of the hose from the pressure pump becomes longer than 10 m, so that the refractories in the hose are hardened by the high temperature during the pumping and become clogged, making spraying impossible. It is considered to be. Therefore, unless this problem is solved, the wet construction method cannot be adopted when hot repairing the blast furnace wall.

【0020】また、特開平5−4873号公報では、混
練時には破壊されずに、吹付け時の雰囲気温度により破
壊されるマイクロカプセルを用い、これに硬化剤や硬化
促進剤を封入することで、耐火物の熱硬化の進行を制御
し、ホース内での詰まりを防止する技術が提案されてい
る。
In Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. Hei 5-4873, microcapsules which are not broken at the time of kneading but are broken by the atmospheric temperature at the time of spraying are used, and a hardening agent or a hardening accelerator is sealed therein. Techniques have been proposed for controlling the progress of thermosetting of refractories and preventing clogging in hoses.

【0021】しかしながら、この技術においても、高炉
炉壁を補修する場合には、高温雰囲気下でホース内を圧
送する距離が10m以上と長いので、やはり圧送途中で
マイクロカプセルが溶融し、ホース内の耐火物の硬化が
進行して詰まりを起こしてしまう。また、硬化剤、硬化
促進剤等をマイクロカプセル化する費用も嵩むため、大
量に吹付けを行う高炉炉壁吹付けの場合にはコスト的に
も実用的ではない。
However, even in this technique, when repairing the wall of a blast furnace, since the distance for pumping the inside of the hose under a high-temperature atmosphere is as long as 10 m or more, the microcapsules also melt during the pumping, and Hardening of the refractory proceeds and causes clogging. In addition, the cost of microencapsulating a curing agent, a curing accelerator, and the like increases, so that it is not practical in terms of cost in the case of blast furnace wall spraying in which a large amount is sprayed.

【0022】本発明は、上記した乾式吹付け方法や湿式
吹付け方法にあった問題点を解決できる高炉炉壁の熱間
補修方法を提供することを目的としている。
An object of the present invention is to provide a hot repair method for a blast furnace wall which can solve the problems of the above-mentioned dry spraying method and wet spraying method.

【0023】[0023]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記した目的を達成する
ために、本発明に係る高炉炉壁の熱間補修方法は、最大
粒径が5.0mm以下で、0.075mm以下の粒子が
25%以上である粒度構成の耐火組成物に、所定量の水
と分散剤を加えて均一に混練し、このスラリー状の不定
形耐火物をノズルまで圧送した後、ノズル部において硬
化促進剤を添加し、高圧の気体と共に高炉炉壁の損傷部
分に吹付けることとしている。そして、このようにする
ことで、耐火組成物と水、分散剤を均一に混合でき、し
かも、吹付けノズルに至るまでに固まることもない。
In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, a method for hot repairing a blast furnace wall according to the present invention comprises a method for repairing a blast furnace wall having a maximum particle size of 5.0 mm or less and particles of 0.075 mm or less. % And a predetermined amount of water and a dispersant are added to the refractory composition having a particle size composition of at least 0.1%, and the mixture is uniformly kneaded. After the slurry-like amorphous refractory is pumped to the nozzle, a curing accelerator is added at the nozzle portion. Then, the high-pressure gas is sprayed onto the damaged part of the blast furnace wall. By doing so, the refractory composition, the water and the dispersant can be mixed uniformly, and furthermore, they do not harden before reaching the spray nozzle.

【0024】[0024]

【発明の実施の形態】発明者らは、高炉において湿式吹
付け技術を確立すべく研究を行った結果、以下に述べる
条件によれば、上記した問題点を解決することができる
ことを知見した。まず、耐火組成物の粒度を均一に揃え
ることで粒子同士の凝集にむらがなくなり、硬化時間を
制御するための分散剤の効果が高いことを見出した。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The inventors of the present invention have conducted research to establish a wet spraying technique in a blast furnace, and have found that the above-mentioned problems can be solved under the following conditions. First, it has been found that by making the particle size of the refractory composition uniform, there is no unevenness in aggregation of the particles, and the effect of the dispersant for controlling the curing time is high.

【0025】すなわち、水と混練した後の耐火組成物の
硬化の進行は、その構成粒子の大きさと密接に関係す
る。発明者らは、種々実験を重ね、耐火組成物の粒度分
布と分散剤の量が耐火組成物の硬化進行に及ぼす効果を
調査した。その結果、耐火組成物の最大粒径を5.0m
m以下とし、かつ、0.075mm以下の粒子を25%
以上含有する粒度構成のものを使用することで、硬化進
行を制御する分散剤の効果が高いことを見出した。耐火
組成物の最大粒径を5.0mm以下とし、かつ、0.0
75mm以下の粒子を25%以上含有するものを使用す
ることで、高温の炉内を圧送する途中で、不定形耐火物
が熱硬化することがなくなる。
That is, the progress of hardening of the refractory composition after kneading with water is closely related to the size of the constituent particles. The inventors repeated various experiments and investigated the effects of the particle size distribution of the refractory composition and the amount of the dispersant on the curing progress of the refractory composition. As a result, the maximum particle size of the refractory composition was 5.0 m.
m and less than 0.075 mm
It has been found that the use of the composition having the above-mentioned particle size has a high effect of the dispersant for controlling the progress of curing. The maximum particle size of the refractory composition is 5.0 mm or less, and 0.0
By using a material containing 75% or less of particles having a diameter of 75 mm or less, the irregular-shaped refractory does not thermally harden while being pumped in a high-temperature furnace.

【0026】本発明に係る高炉炉壁の熱間補修方法に適
用する耐火組成物の構成としては、耐火性骨材として、
アルミナ、シリカ、ジルコニア、カルシア、マグネシア
等の酸化物や、炭化珪素等が用いられ、耐火性粉末とし
ては、アルミナセメント等が用いられる。特に、アルミ
ナセメントは不定形耐火物の結合剤として機能し、吹付
け補修の効果維持に寄与する。
The composition of the refractory composition applied to the hot repair method for the blast furnace wall according to the present invention is as follows.
Oxides such as alumina, silica, zirconia, calcia, and magnesia, silicon carbide, and the like are used. As the refractory powder, alumina cement and the like are used. In particular, alumina cement functions as a binder for irregular refractories and contributes to maintaining the effect of spray repair.

【0027】次に、不定形耐火物に対する水分の配合割
合について説明する。発明者らの実験によれば、耐火組
成物に対する添加水分の質量比が2%未満では不定形耐
火物の流動性が低下し、ホース又は配管内を圧送する場
合の圧力損失が増大して圧送性が低下し、ホース又は配
管内で詰まらせてしまうことが判明した。一方、水分の
添加量が15%を超えると、ノズル内にて硬化促進剤を
添加してもその効果が発現せずに、吹付け時、たれ落ち
が発生することが判明した。従って、本発明では、不定
形耐火物に対する水分の配合割合を、2〜15%とし
た。
Next, the mixing ratio of water to the amorphous refractory will be described. According to the experiments by the inventors, when the mass ratio of the added water to the refractory composition is less than 2%, the fluidity of the amorphous refractory decreases, and the pressure loss when pumping the inside of the hose or the pipe increases, and the pumping is performed. It has been found that the properties are reduced and clogging occurs in hoses or pipes. On the other hand, it was found that when the amount of water added exceeds 15%, even if a curing accelerator is added in the nozzle, the effect is not exhibited, and dripping occurs during spraying. Therefore, in the present invention, the mixing ratio of moisture to the amorphous refractory is set to 2 to 15%.

【0028】次に、硬化時間を延ばすための分散剤の耐
火組成物に対する配合割合について説明する。分散剤の
具体例としては、ヘキサメタ燐酸ソーダ、ポリアクリル
酸ソーダ、リグニンスルホン酸ソーダ、トリポリ燐酸ソ
ーダ等が挙げられ、これらを1種類又は2種類以上併用
することが可能である。
Next, the mixing ratio of the dispersant to the refractory composition for extending the curing time will be described. Specific examples of the dispersant include sodium hexametaphosphate, sodium polyacrylate, sodium ligninsulfonate, sodium tripolyphosphate, and the like, and one or more of these can be used in combination.

【0029】発明者らの実験によれば、これらの分散剤
の量は、水分の量とも関係するが、0.01%未満では
分散剤を添加した効果が低く、圧送中に硬化してしまう
ことが多いことが判明した。一方、2.0%を超えると
耐火物中の不純物となって吹付け後、耐火物の剥離性を
高めてしまうという問題が発生する場合があった。以上
のことから、分散剤の耐火組成物に対する配合割合は、
0.01〜2.0%とすることが望ましいことが判明し
た。
According to the experiments performed by the inventors, the amount of these dispersants is related to the amount of water. However, if the amount is less than 0.01%, the effect of adding the dispersants is low, and the dispersants harden during pumping. It turns out that there are many cases. On the other hand, if it exceeds 2.0%, it may become an impurity in the refractory and, after spraying, may cause a problem that the releasability of the refractory is enhanced. From the above, the mixing ratio of the dispersant to the refractory composition,
It turned out that it is desirable to be 0.01-2.0%.

【0030】また、本発明に係る高炉炉壁の熱間補修方
法に適用する硬化促進剤とは、前記耐火混練物の硬化時
間を調整するために使用する補助剤であって、アルミン
酸カリウム、珪酸ソーダ、珪酸カリウム、水酸化ナトリ
ウム、水酸化カリウム、水酸化カルシウム、硫酸、硫酸
塩、硝酸塩、炭酸ソーダ、炭酸カリウム、リチウム塩等
が採用される。
The hardening accelerator used in the hot repair method of the blast furnace wall according to the present invention is an auxiliary agent used for adjusting the hardening time of the refractory kneaded material, and includes potassium aluminate, Sodium silicate, potassium silicate, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, sulfuric acid, sulfate, nitrate, sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, lithium salt and the like are employed.

【0031】これらの硬化促進剤はノズル部で添加する
が、ノズル部には専用の別ラインを設けても良いが、ノ
ズル部に送り込む高圧の気体に硬化促進剤を混合して送
り込めば、ラインは併せて1本で済むため、より好まし
い。この硬化促進剤の添加量は、特に限定されるもので
はないが、不定形耐火物に対し、質量比で0.1〜3.
0%が望ましく、硬化促進剤の種類にあわせて決定す
る。
These hardening accelerators are added at the nozzle portion, but a separate line dedicated to the nozzle portion may be provided. However, if the hardening accelerator is mixed with the high-pressure gas fed into the nozzle portion and sent, This is more preferable because only one line is required. The addition amount of this curing accelerator is not particularly limited, but is 0.1 to 3.% by mass with respect to the amorphous refractory.
0% is desirable, and is determined according to the type of the curing accelerator.

【0032】次に、スラリー状の耐火物を吹付ける際の
気体圧力について説明する。発明者らの実験によれば、
スラリー状の耐火物を吹付ける際の気体の圧力が600
kPa未満では耐火物の接着性が低下して吹付け補修効
果の維持期間が短くなるのと共に、炉壁まで届かずにま
たは届いたとしても炉内に落下するリバウンドロスが多
く発生した。一方、1200kPaを超える圧力では炉
内壁に吹付けた時に耐火物が空気を閉じ込めて気孔を発
生するようになり、気密性が低下した。以上のことか
ら、スラリー状の耐火物を吹付ける際の気体圧力は、6
00〜1200kPaとすることが望ましいことが判明
した。
Next, the gas pressure when the slurry-like refractory is sprayed will be described. According to our experiments,
When the pressure of the gas at the time of spraying the slurry refractory is 600
If the pressure is less than kPa, the adhesiveness of the refractory deteriorates, the maintenance period of the spray repair effect is shortened, and rebound dross falling into the furnace without reaching or even reaching the furnace wall is generated. On the other hand, at a pressure exceeding 1200 kPa, when sprayed on the inner wall of the furnace, the refractory trapped air and generated pores, resulting in reduced airtightness. From the above, the gas pressure when spraying a slurry-like refractory is 6
It turned out that it is desirable to set it to 00-1200 kPa.

【0033】高炉内壁の補修にあっては、高炉を一時的
に休風し、その間に補修を行う。耐火組成物の吹付け速
度は、高炉の炉容積と補修範囲にもよるが、1時間あた
り2.5〜10トンが必要である。ところで、耐火組成
物を水及び分散剤と混練するタイミングについては、吹
付ける全量を予め混練しておいても良いが、混練した
後、炉壁に吹付けるまでの時間を短縮させるという観点
からは、2.5トン以上の処理能力を有する混練装置を
用いて耐火組成物と水及び分散剤を混練しながら順次圧
送して吹付ける方法が望ましい。
In the repair of the inner wall of the blast furnace, the blast furnace is temporarily shut down, and repair is performed during that time. The spraying rate of the refractory composition depends on the furnace volume of the blast furnace and the repair range, but is required to be 2.5 to 10 tons per hour. By the way, with respect to the timing of kneading the refractory composition with water and a dispersant, the whole amount to be sprayed may be kneaded in advance, but from the viewpoint of shortening the time until kneading and spraying to the furnace wall. It is desirable that the refractory composition, water and dispersant be kneaded and sprayed sequentially while being kneaded using a kneading apparatus having a processing capacity of 2.5 tons or more.

【0034】次に、炉内での吹付け時、ノズルの先端か
ら炉壁の吹付け位置までの距離を500mm以上とする
ことが望ましい理由について説明する。すなわち、前記
距離が500mm未満であると、耐火物が十分に拡散せ
ずに吹付けられることになって、場所によっては吹付け
量が異なり、炉壁に凹凸が生じる可能性が高くなるから
である。炉壁に凹凸が生じると、前述したように炉内原
料及び還元ガスの円滑な物流を阻害し、操業上の大きな
問題となる。また、吹付け時の空気を巻き込んで耐火物
内に気孔が発生する可能性もある。なお、ノズルの先端
から炉壁の吹付け位置までの距離の上限は、スラリー状
の耐火物を吹付ける際の気体圧力が600kPa未満に
ならない範囲で適宜決定する。
Next, the reason why it is desirable to set the distance from the tip of the nozzle to the spray position on the furnace wall to be 500 mm or more when spraying in the furnace will be described. That is, if the distance is less than 500 mm, the refractory will be sprayed without being sufficiently diffused, and the amount of sprayed will differ depending on the location, and the possibility that irregularities will occur on the furnace wall increases. is there. When irregularities are generated on the furnace wall, as described above, the smooth distribution of the raw material in the furnace and the reducing gas is hindered, which causes a serious problem in operation. In addition, there is also a possibility that air bubbles may be generated in the refractory due to entrainment of air at the time of spraying. Note that the upper limit of the distance from the tip of the nozzle to the spray position on the furnace wall is appropriately determined within a range in which the gas pressure when spraying the slurry refractory does not become less than 600 kPa.

【0035】また、発明者らは、スラリー状耐火物の圧
送用配管又はホース、並びに、吹付けに用いるノズルに
ついても実験を繰り返し、吹付けノズル、及び、圧送に
使用する配管又はホースの条件について以下のような知
見を得た。
In addition, the inventors have repeated experiments on the piping or hose for pumping slurry-like refractories and the nozzle used for spraying, and as to the conditions of the spray nozzle and the pipe or hose used for pumping. The following findings were obtained.

【0036】まず、吹付けノズルについては、内径を1
0mm以上とすることで良好な吹付け成績が得られた。
なお、内径の上限は、スラリー状の耐火物を吹付ける際
の気体圧力が600kPa未満にならない範囲で適宜決
定する。一方、配管又はホースについては、その内径が
40mm以上、曲率半径を500mm以上とすると、ス
ラリー状耐火物を非常に円滑に圧送することができた。
なお、配管又はホースの内径や曲率半径が上記した値未
満の場合には、圧力損失が増加して詰まりが発生する場
合がある。
First, for the spray nozzle, the inner diameter is set to 1
By setting it to 0 mm or more, good spraying results were obtained.
Note that the upper limit of the inner diameter is appropriately determined within a range in which the gas pressure at the time of spraying the slurry-like refractory does not become less than 600 kPa. On the other hand, when the inner diameter of the pipe or the hose was 40 mm or more and the radius of curvature was 500 mm or more, the slurry-like refractory could be pumped very smoothly.
If the inner diameter or radius of curvature of the pipe or hose is less than the above-mentioned values, pressure loss may increase and clogging may occur.

【0037】また、高炉を休風した後、耐火物を吹付け
る前に、炉壁の補修対象位置の付着物や異物を除去する
ことは、吹付け補修効果を向上させるのに有効な手段で
ある。そこで、発明者らは炉壁に水を噴射することで良
好なクリーニングが可能であることを知見した。特に水
を噴射する場合、気体を噴射する場合のような粉塵は発
生しないし、炉壁に吹付けられた水はすぐに蒸発して水
蒸気となるので、送風後の操業に支障はない。また、こ
の水の吹付け時に気化熱を奪うため、吹付け補修付近の
雰囲気温度が低下し、配管又はホース内で耐火物の硬化
が進行することを抑制する効果もある。なお、水を噴射
するノズルは、耐火物を吹付けるノズルを流用しても、
また、別のノズルを使用しても良い。
Further, after the blast furnace is shut down and before the refractory is sprayed, removing adhering matter and foreign matter at the repair target position on the furnace wall is an effective means for improving the spray repair effect. is there. Therefore, the inventors have found that good cleaning is possible by spraying water on the furnace wall. In particular, when water is sprayed, dust is not generated as in the case where gas is sprayed, and the water blown to the furnace wall evaporates immediately to become steam, so that there is no hindrance to the operation after blowing. In addition, since the vaporization heat is deprived during the spraying of the water, the atmospheric temperature near the spray repair is reduced, and there is also an effect of suppressing the progress of hardening of the refractory in the pipe or hose. In addition, even if the nozzle that sprays water uses a nozzle that sprays refractories,
Further, another nozzle may be used.

【0038】本発明に係る高炉炉壁の熱間補修方法は、
上記した発明者らの知見に基づいてなされたものであ
り、高炉を休風して炉内側の炉壁耐火物の損傷部分に耐
火物を吹付け補修する方法において、最大粒径が5.0
mm以下で、かつ、0.075mm以下の粒子を25%
以上含有する粒度構成の耐火組成物に、耐火組成物に対
して質量比で2〜15%の水と、耐火組成物に対して所
定割合の分散剤を加えて予め均一に混練しておき、この
スラリー状の不定形耐火物をノズルまで圧送した後、ノ
ズル部において硬化促進剤を添加し、高圧の気体と共に
吹付けることを要旨とするものであり、必要に応じて、
耐火組成物と水、分散剤の混練を、予め混練しておくの
に代えて、補修作業時に順次混練するようにしたり、ま
た、スラリー状の不定形耐火物に硬化促進剤を添加する
のに代えて、高圧気体に硬化促進剤を添加したり、ま
た、耐火組成物に対する分散剤の添加量を0.01〜
2.0%としたり、また、高圧気体の圧力を600〜1
200kPaとしたり、ノズル先端から炉壁の吹付け位
置までの距離を500mm以上としたり、内径が10m
m以上のノズルを使用したり、不定形耐火物をノズルま
で圧送する配管又はホースとして、内径が40mm以上
のものを使用したり、曲率半径が500mm以上のもの
を使用したり、不定形耐火物の吹付け前に炉壁に水を噴
射したりする。
The hot repair method for the blast furnace wall according to the present invention comprises:
The present invention has been made based on the findings of the inventors described above. In a method of blowing a refractory onto a damaged portion of a refractory on a furnace wall inside the furnace by shutting down the blast furnace, the maximum particle size is 5.0.
mm and particles of 0.075 mm or less
To the refractory composition having the above-mentioned particle size composition, water of 2 to 15% by mass relative to the refractory composition, and a predetermined ratio of a dispersant to the refractory composition are added and uniformly kneaded in advance, After the slurry-like amorphous refractory is fed to the nozzle by pressure, a hardening accelerator is added at the nozzle portion, and sprayed together with a high-pressure gas.
The kneading of the refractory composition, water, and dispersant, instead of being kneaded in advance, instead of sequentially kneading during repair work, or for adding a curing accelerator to a slurry-like amorphous refractory. Alternatively, a curing accelerator may be added to the high-pressure gas, or the amount of the dispersant added to the refractory composition may be from 0.01 to
2.0%, and the pressure of the high pressure gas is 600 to 1
200 kPa, the distance from the nozzle tip to the spray position of the furnace wall is 500 mm or more, and the inner diameter is 10 m.
m or more, or use a pipe or hose with an inner diameter of 40 mm or more, a radius of curvature of 500 mm or more, or an irregular refractory Or spray water on the furnace wall before spraying.

【0039】本発明に係る高炉炉壁の熱間補修方法は、
上記したように構成したので、耐火組成物と水、分散
剤、硬化促進剤を均一に混合できて耐火物吹付け時にむ
らが生じない。しかも、吹付けノズルに至るまでに配管
やホース内で固まることもない。加えて、高炉内での発
塵やリバウンドロスが少ないので、安全性に優れ、効率
的でもある。
The hot repair method of the blast furnace wall according to the present invention comprises:
With the above configuration, the refractory composition and water, a dispersant, and a curing accelerator can be uniformly mixed, and unevenness does not occur when spraying the refractory. In addition, it does not harden in the pipe or hose before reaching the spray nozzle. In addition, there is little dust and rebound loss in the blast furnace, so it is safe and efficient.

【0040】また、本発明に係る高炉炉壁の熱間補修方
法を、冷却用の気体又は液体を通すことが可能なパイプ
を、鉄皮に対する埋め込み深さを変化可能なように炉壁
に埋め込んだ高炉に適用した場合には、パイプに耐火物
をかぶせて吹付けることで、パイプがガイドの役目を果
たすので、リバウンドロスを抑制することができる。損
耗が激しく、埋め込んだパイプと炉壁の間に隙間がで
き、耐火物吹付け時のリバウンドロス抑制効果が悪化す
る可能性がある場合には、パイプを手前に引くことで、
炉壁とパイプとの隙間をなくし、リバウンドロス抑制効
果の高い位置にパイプをセットすることが可能になる。
このようにすれば、より効果的な補修が可能になる。
Further, according to the hot repair method for a blast furnace furnace wall according to the present invention, a pipe through which a cooling gas or liquid can pass is embedded in the furnace wall so that the embedding depth in the steel shell can be changed. In the case of application to a blast furnace, the pipe serves as a guide by spraying the pipe with a refractory, so that rebound loss can be suppressed. If the wear is severe, a gap is created between the embedded pipe and the furnace wall, and the rebound loss suppression effect during refractory spraying may deteriorate, pull the pipe forward.
The gap between the furnace wall and the pipe is eliminated, and the pipe can be set at a position where the rebound loss suppressing effect is high.
In this way, more effective repair can be performed.

【0041】[0041]

【実施例】以下、本発明に係る高炉炉壁の熱間補修方法
の効果を確認するために行った実験結果について説明す
る。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The results of experiments conducted to confirm the effects of the method for hot repair of blast furnace walls according to the present invention will be described below.

【0042】不定形耐火物として下記表1の粒度構成の
アルミナ骨材、炭化珪素系骨材及びアルミナセメントを
使用した。この耐火組成物に、下記表1に示した割合で
水と、分散剤としてヘキサメタ燐酸ナトリウムを、予め
地上にて1時間あたり5トンの処理能力を有する混練装
置を用いて混練した後、高さ45mの高炉炉頂部まで搬
送し、その後耐火ホースにより高炉炉頂マンホールから
炉壁付近の吹付けノズルまで約15m搬送し、ノズル部
分で、硬化促進剤としてアルミン酸ナトリウムを添加
し、下記表1で示した圧力で気体と共に、高炉炉壁の損
耗部分に40トン吹付けた。
Alumina aggregates, silicon carbide-based aggregates and alumina cements having the particle sizes shown in Table 1 below were used as the amorphous refractories. The refractory composition was kneaded with water and sodium hexametaphosphate as a dispersant in the proportions shown in Table 1 below in advance using a kneading apparatus having a processing capacity of 5 tons per hour on the ground. It was conveyed to the blast furnace top of 45 m, and then about 15 m from the blast furnace manhole to the spray nozzle near the furnace wall by a refractory hose. At the nozzle portion, sodium aluminate was added as a hardening accelerator. At the indicated pressure, 40 tons were sprayed together with the gas on the worn part of the blast furnace wall.

【0043】なお、本実験では、耐火組成物の粒度構
成、添加水分量が本発明の範囲を外れた比較例や、配合
分散剤量、吹付け気体圧力、ノズル先端から炉壁までの
距離、水噴射によるクリーニングの有無、ノズルの内
径、ホースの内径及び曲率半径、ガイド用パイプの有無
についても表記した。また、耐火組成物等の粉体と水分
を別々に搬送し、吹付け直前のノズル内で混合する乾式
工法(下記表1、表2における従来)によっても、同様
の実験を行って、本発明と比較した。
In this experiment, in the comparative examples in which the particle size composition and the amount of added water of the refractory composition were out of the range of the present invention, the amount of the mixed dispersant, the blowing gas pressure, the distance from the nozzle tip to the furnace wall, The presence / absence of cleaning by water injection, the inner diameter of the nozzle, the inner diameter and curvature radius of the hose, and the presence / absence of a guide pipe are also shown. A similar experiment was conducted by a dry method (conventional in Tables 1 and 2 below) in which powder such as a refractory composition and water were separately conveyed and mixed in a nozzle immediately before spraying. And compared.

【0044】その結果を下記表2に示すが、従来の乾式
工法では、ホーストラブルはなかったものの、リバウン
ドロスが25%もあり、また、付着状態にもむらがあっ
て、補修効果を維持できたのは5日間と短いものであっ
た。また、耐火組成物の粒度構成、添加水分量が本発明
の範囲を外れた比較例では、ホーストラブルがあって吹
付けが行えなかったり、また、吹付けが行えたものも、
補修効果は従来の乾式工法よりも若干長く15日間維持
できたものの、リバウンドロスが26%もあり、また、
付着状態にもむらがあった。
The results are shown in Table 2 below. In the conventional dry method, although there was no hose trouble, rebound loss was as high as 25%, and adhesion was uneven, so that the repair effect could be maintained. It was as short as five days. In addition, the particle size composition of the refractory composition, the amount of added water is out of the range of the present invention, the comparative example was not able to spray due to a hose trouble, also those that could be sprayed,
The repair effect was slightly longer than that of the conventional dry method and could be maintained for 15 days, but rebound loss was as high as 26%.
The adhesion was uneven.

【0045】これに対して、本発明方法によれば、いず
れの請求項に対応するものも、リバウンドロスやホース
トラブルは皆無であり、また、付着状態も良好で、30
日間以上も補修効果を維持することができた。なお、本
実施例では、請求項2及び請求項3に対応するものや、
請求項4〜11の他の実施態様については示していない
が、本発明者らの実験によれば同様の効果が得られたこ
とは言うまでもない。
On the other hand, according to the method of the present invention, any one of the claims has no rebound dross and no trouble with the hose, and has a good adhesion state.
The repair effect was maintained for more than a day. In the present embodiment, ones corresponding to claims 2 and 3 and
Although other embodiments of claims 4 to 11 are not shown, it is needless to say that similar effects were obtained according to experiments by the present inventors.

【0046】[0046]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0047】[0047]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0048】[0048]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明に係る高炉
炉壁の熱間補修方法によれば、高炉の炉壁部分が損傷
し、それにより「装入物棚つり」や「スリップ」、「ガ
ス振り」等の影響が現れた場合に、高炉を一時的に休止
し、炉壁耐火煉瓦の損傷部分に耐火物を熱間吹付け補修
する場合に、 a.水と混合するタイミングが吹付けの直前であるた
め、均一に混合することが難しい。従って、吹付けた耐
火物の気密性にむらが生じ、吹付けによる補修効果を維
持できる期間が短くなる。
As described above, according to the hot repair method for a blast furnace furnace wall according to the present invention, the furnace wall portion of the blast furnace is damaged, thereby causing "loading shelf hanging", "slip", When the influence of "gas swing" or the like appears, the blast furnace is temporarily stopped, and refractory is hot-sprayed and repaired on the damaged portion of the furnace wall refractory brick. Since the timing of mixing with water is immediately before spraying, it is difficult to mix uniformly. Therefore, the airtightness of the sprayed refractory becomes uneven, and the period during which the repair effect by spraying can be maintained is shortened.

【0049】b.水と混合するタイミングが吹付けの直
前であるため、耐火物粒子の一部は吸湿しないまま炉内
に散布され、それらの耐火物は壁に付着することなく炉
内原料上に落下する。これらの耐火物は炉内で熱硬化
し、炉内の還元ガス流を阻害するだけでなく、原料を巻
き込んで炉壁に付着物のように固着し、「棚吊り」を起
こして炉況悪化の原因となる場合がある。
B. Since the timing of mixing with the water is immediately before spraying, some of the refractory particles are sprayed into the furnace without absorbing moisture, and the refractories fall onto the raw material in the furnace without adhering to the walls. These refractories harden in the furnace and not only impede the flow of the reducing gas inside the furnace, but also entrain the raw materials and adhere to the furnace walls like deposits, causing "hanging shelves" and deteriorating the furnace conditions. May cause.

【0050】c.吸湿しないままの耐火物は炉内で粉塵
となって舞い上がり、視野が悪化して吹付けたい場所に
精度良く吹付けることができない上に、作業環境を著し
く悪化させ、作業員の健康をも害する。という、従来の
乾式吹付け方法にあった問題点を改善することができ
る。
C. Refractories that do not absorb moisture fly up as dust in the furnace, which deteriorates the field of view, making it impossible to spray precisely where you want to spray, as well as significantly deteriorating the work environment and impairing the health of workers. . That is, the problem associated with the conventional dry spraying method can be improved.

【0051】また、本発明に係る高炉炉壁の熱間補修方
法によれば、補修を行う場合の雰囲気温度が450K程
度と高く、圧送ポンプより吹付けノズルまでのホース長
さが10m以上と長いことに起因して、高炉炉壁に吹付
ける前に耐火混練物が固着し、ホースの中あるいはノズ
ル部分で固まって吹付けできなくなってしまうという、
一般の湿式吹付け方法にあった問題点を解決することも
できる。
Further, according to the hot repair method for the blast furnace wall according to the present invention, the atmosphere temperature for repair is as high as about 450 K, and the hose length from the pressure pump to the spray nozzle is as long as 10 m or more. Due to this, the refractory kneaded material sticks before spraying on the blast furnace wall, and it hardens in the hose or nozzle part, making it impossible to spray.
Problems associated with general wet spraying methods can also be solved.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (51)Int.Cl.7 識別記号 FI テーマコート゛(参考) F27D 1/16 F27D 1/16 C C04B 35/68 (72)発明者 柏田 昌宏 和歌山県和歌山市湊1850番地 住友金属工 業株式会社和歌山製鉄所内 (72)発明者 笠原 明夫 和歌山県和歌山市湊1850番地 住友金属工 業株式会社和歌山製鉄所内 (72)発明者 紫冨田 浩 和歌山県和歌山市湊1850番地 住友金属工 業株式会社和歌山製鉄所内 Fターム(参考) 4K015 BA05 BA08 4K051 AA01 AB03 HA08 LA02 LA11 LJ01 LJ04 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────の Continued on the front page (51) Int.Cl. 7 Identification symbol FI Theme coat ゛ (Reference) F27D 1/16 F27D 1/16 C C04B 35/68 (72) Inventor Masahiro Kashiwada 1850 Minato, Minato, Wakayama-shi, Wakayama Prefecture. Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd.Wakayama Works (72) Inventor Akio Kasahara 1850 Minato, Wakayama, Wakayama Prefecture Sumitomo Metal Works, Ltd.Wakayama Works (72) Inventor Hiroshi Tomita 1850 Minato, Wakayama, Wakayama Sumitomo Metal Works 4K015 BA05 BA08 4K051 AA01 AB03 HA08 LA02 LA11 LJ01 LJ04

Claims (11)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 高炉を休風して炉内側の炉壁耐火物の損
傷部分に耐火物を吹付け補修する方法において、最大粒
径が5.0mm以下で、かつ、0.075mm以下の粒
子を25%以上含有する粒度構成の耐火組成物に、耐火
組成物に対して質量比で2〜15%の水と、耐火組成物
に対して所定割合の分散剤を加えて予め均一に混練して
おき、このスラリー状の不定形耐火物をノズルまで圧送
した後、ノズル部において硬化促進剤を添加し、高圧の
気体と共に吹付けることを特徴とする高炉炉壁の熱間補
修方法。
1. A method for repairing a refractory by spraying a refractory onto a damaged part of a refractory inside a furnace by shutting down a blast furnace, wherein the maximum particle size is 5.0 mm or less and 0.075 mm or less. Is added to a refractory composition having a particle size composition of 25% or more, water at a mass ratio of 2 to 15% with respect to the refractory composition, and a predetermined ratio of a dispersant with respect to the refractory composition, and uniformly kneading in advance. A method for hot repairing the wall of a blast furnace, characterized in that after the slurry-like irregular refractory is fed to a nozzle, a hardening accelerator is added to the nozzle portion and sprayed together with a high-pressure gas.
【請求項2】 耐火組成物と水、分散剤の混練を、予め
混練しておくのに代えて、補修作業時に順次混練するこ
とを特徴とする請求項1記載の高炉炉壁の熱間補修方
法。
2. The hot repair of a blast furnace furnace wall according to claim 1, wherein the refractory composition, water and the dispersant are kneaded in advance, instead of being kneaded in advance, during the repair work. Method.
【請求項3】 スラリー状の不定形耐火物に硬化促進剤
を添加するのに代えて、高圧気体に硬化促進剤を添加す
ることを特徴とする請求項1又は2記載の高炉炉壁の熱
間補修方法。
3. The blast furnace wall heat according to claim 1, wherein a hardening accelerator is added to the high-pressure gas instead of adding the hardening accelerator to the slurry-like amorphous refractory. Repair method.
【請求項4】 耐火組成物に対する分散剤の添加量を、
0.01〜2.0%としたことを特徴とする請求項1〜
3のいずれか記載の高炉炉壁の熱間補修方法。
4. An amount of a dispersant added to a refractory composition,
The amount is set to 0.01 to 2.0%.
3. The hot repair method for a blast furnace wall according to any one of the above items 3.
【請求項5】 高圧気体の圧力が600〜1200kP
aであることを特徴とする請求項1〜4のいずれか記載
の高炉炉壁の熱間補修方法。
5. The pressure of a high pressure gas is 600 to 1200 kP.
The hot repair method for a blast furnace wall according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein a.
【請求項6】 ノズル先端から炉壁の吹付け位置までの
距離を500mm以上となすことを特徴とする請求項1
〜5のいずれか記載の高炉炉壁の熱間補修方法。
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the distance from the nozzle tip to the spray position of the furnace wall is 500 mm or more.
6. The hot repair method for a blast furnace wall according to any one of items 5 to 5.
【請求項7】 内径が10mm以上のノズルを使用する
ことを特徴とする請求項1〜6のいずれか記載の高炉炉
壁の熱間補修方法。
7. The hot repair method for a blast furnace furnace wall according to claim 1, wherein a nozzle having an inner diameter of 10 mm or more is used.
【請求項8】 不定形耐火物をノズルまで圧送する配管
又はホースとして、内径が40mm以上のものを使用す
ることを特徴とする請求項1〜7のいずれか記載の高炉
炉壁の熱間補修方法。
8. The hot repair of a blast furnace wall according to claim 1, wherein a pipe or a hose having an inner diameter of 40 mm or more is used as a pipe or a hose for pressure-feeding the refractory to the nozzle. Method.
【請求項9】 不定形耐火物をノズルまで圧送する配管
又はホースは、曲率半径が500mm以上のものを使用
することを特徴とする請求項1〜8のいずれか記載の高
炉炉壁の熱間補修方法。
9. The hot blast furnace wall according to claim 1, wherein a pipe or a hose for pressure-feeding the refractory to the nozzle has a radius of curvature of 500 mm or more. Repair method.
【請求項10】 不定形耐火物の吹付け前に、炉壁に水
を噴射することを特徴とする請求項1〜9のいずれか記
載の高炉炉壁の熱間補修方法。
10. The hot repair method for a blast furnace furnace wall according to claim 1, wherein water is injected into the furnace wall before spraying the irregular-shaped refractory.
【請求項11】 冷却用の気体又は液体を通すことが可
能で、かつ、鉄皮に対する埋め込み深さを変化可能なパ
イプを予め炉壁に埋設した高炉に適用することを特徴と
する請求項1〜10のいずれか記載の高炉炉壁の熱間補
修方法。
11. A blast furnace preliminarily buried in a furnace wall, wherein a pipe through which a gas or a liquid for cooling can be passed and whose burying depth in a steel shell can be changed is applied. 10. The hot repair method for a blast furnace wall according to any one of items 10 to 10.
JP2000140095A 1999-06-25 2000-05-12 Hot repair method of blast furnace wall Expired - Fee Related JP3584852B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2000140095A JP3584852B2 (en) 1999-06-25 2000-05-12 Hot repair method of blast furnace wall

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP17944399 1999-06-25
JP11-179443 1999-06-25
JP2000140095A JP3584852B2 (en) 1999-06-25 2000-05-12 Hot repair method of blast furnace wall

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2001064708A true JP2001064708A (en) 2001-03-13
JP3584852B2 JP3584852B2 (en) 2004-11-04

Family

ID=26499298

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2000140095A Expired - Fee Related JP3584852B2 (en) 1999-06-25 2000-05-12 Hot repair method of blast furnace wall

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3584852B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009127967A (en) * 2007-11-27 2009-06-11 Nippon Steel Corp Method and apparatus for hot-spraying refractory material
CN101851692A (en) * 2010-06-02 2010-10-06 河北省首钢迁安钢铁有限责任公司 Construction method for curing non-aqueous slurry at normal temperature in blast furnace
JP2014505175A (en) * 2011-02-08 2014-02-27 ポール ワース エス.アー. Stave cooler for metallurgical furnace

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009127967A (en) * 2007-11-27 2009-06-11 Nippon Steel Corp Method and apparatus for hot-spraying refractory material
CN101851692A (en) * 2010-06-02 2010-10-06 河北省首钢迁安钢铁有限责任公司 Construction method for curing non-aqueous slurry at normal temperature in blast furnace
JP2014505175A (en) * 2011-02-08 2014-02-27 ポール ワース エス.アー. Stave cooler for metallurgical furnace

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3584852B2 (en) 2004-11-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4377913B2 (en) Method for spraying amorphous refractories, spraying material used therefor, and construction equipment
KR101604259B1 (en) Powdery set-accelerating agent and method for spray application of monothilic refractory
WO2007066660A1 (en) Method of castable refractory spray application and spray material for use therein
CN110860681A (en) Continuous casting coating tundish spraying method
JP2007155215A (en) Spraying method for monolithic refractory, and spray material used therein
JP3584852B2 (en) Hot repair method of blast furnace wall
JP2006220348A (en) Spraying method of monolithic refractory
JP4669362B2 (en) Method for spraying amorphous refractories, spraying material used therefor, and construction equipment
CN102850071B (en) Iron ladle repairing material and method for repairing thermal-state iron ladle
JP2002220288A (en) Spraying method of monolithic refractory
JP6393437B1 (en) Method for spraying irregular refractories and spraying materials used therefor
JP3422900B2 (en) Method of spraying irregular shaped refractories and its construction
RU2735014C1 (en) Method of metallurgical aggregates lining
JP3449673B2 (en) Spraying construction method
JP2001199774A (en) Method for wet spray application of amorphous refractory
JP2001114573A (en) Method for spraying refractory and refractory spraying material
JP2002048481A (en) Method for executing wet spray of monolithic refractory
JP2001002477A (en) Method for executing wet spraying and spraying material used in the spraying method
JP6420920B1 (en) Method for spraying irregular refractories and spraying materials used therefor
JPH04332387A (en) Spraying method for refractory material
WO2019181505A1 (en) Monolithic refractory spray application method, and spray material used therein
JP3592877B2 (en) Spraying method for irregular refractories
JP3850974B2 (en) Refractory spray construction method and spray material used in this method
JP3790622B2 (en) Refractory spray construction method and spray material used in this method
JP2003254672A (en) Method for spraying monolithic refractory excellent in corrosion resistance

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20040607

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20040713

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20040726

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 3584852

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20070813

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080813

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080813

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090813

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090813

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100813

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110813

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110813

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120813

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120813

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130813

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130813

Year of fee payment: 9

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313111

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130813

Year of fee payment: 9

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees