JP2000288706A - Method for continuously casting steel - Google Patents

Method for continuously casting steel

Info

Publication number
JP2000288706A
JP2000288706A JP11100604A JP10060499A JP2000288706A JP 2000288706 A JP2000288706 A JP 2000288706A JP 11100604 A JP11100604 A JP 11100604A JP 10060499 A JP10060499 A JP 10060499A JP 2000288706 A JP2000288706 A JP 2000288706A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
casting
casting speed
slab
center
reduction
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP11100604A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP3488656B2 (en
Inventor
Masahiko Kokita
雅彦 小北
Hitoshi Nakada
等 中田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority to JP10060499A priority Critical patent/JP3488656B2/en
Publication of JP2000288706A publication Critical patent/JP2000288706A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3488656B2 publication Critical patent/JP3488656B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Continuous Casting (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To reduce the occurrence of center segregation to a level having practically no problem, even in the case of generating the change of casting speed. SOLUTION: In a continuous casting method for executing rolling reduction to a cast slab in the continuous casting process, in 0.3-0.7 mm/m of rolling reduction gradient, the rolling reduction is executed so that the rolling reduction gradient X (mm/m) and the solidified shell thickness Y (mm) satisfy the equation Y=50X+45, within range from a position where the solidified shell thickness becomes >=70 mm before the center solid phase ratio at the thickness center part of the cast slab at the casting time in the permissible min. casting speed reaches 0.3, to a position where the center part of the cast slab at the casting time in the permissible max. casting speed reaches a fluid limit solid phase ratio.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、連続鋳造で製造さ
れるスラブ鋳片の中心偏析を、連続鋳造のプロセスで圧
下を行なうことによって、初期から末期までのできるだ
け広い領域に亘って実用上問題のないレベルまで低減す
る為の鋼の連続鋳造方法に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a practical problem in which the center segregation of a slab slab manufactured by continuous casting is reduced by a continuous casting process over a wide range as possible from the initial stage to the final stage. The present invention relates to a method for continuously casting steel to reduce the level to a level free from defects.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】鋼の連続鋳造方法においてスラブ鋳片厚
み中心部に発生する偏析(中心偏析)は、解決されるべ
き重要課題の一つである。こうした中心偏析を改善する
技術としては、これまで電磁攪拌技術の適用、低温鋳
造、連鋳機内のバルジングを防止する為のロールピッチ
の短縮などの手段が採用されており、これまでにも相当
の成果が上がっている。
2. Description of the Related Art Segregation (central segregation) occurring at the center of the slab slab slab thickness in a continuous steel casting method is one of the important issues to be solved. As a technique for improving such center segregation, means such as application of electromagnetic stirring technology, low-temperature casting, and reduction of roll pitch to prevent bulging in a continuous casting machine have been adopted. The results are up.

【0003】一方、凝固末期の凝固収縮に伴う溶鋼流動
に伴って引き起こされる偏析については、例えば特公昭
59−16862号、特公平3−6855号、同3−8
863号、同3−8864号、同4−20696号、同
4−22664号、同5−30548号等に開示されて
いる様に、凝固末期のロール間隔を制御し、未凝固鋳片
を軽圧下する技術が知られている。これらの技術によれ
ば、連続鋳造のプロセスの適切な時期(例えば、中心固
相率が0.1〜0.3の時点から流動限界固相率までの
間の適切な時期)に、適当な圧下速度(例えば、0.5
〜2.0mm/min)で圧下することが有効であるこ
とが知られている。そして、これらの軽圧下技術によっ
て、目標とする鋳造速度で鋳造された部位については、
実用上問題のないレベルまで中心偏析を低減することが
できるとされている。
On the other hand, segregation caused by molten steel flow accompanying solidification shrinkage at the end of solidification is described in, for example, JP-B-59-16682, JP-B-3-6855, and 3-8.
No. 863, No. 3-8864, No. 4-20696, No. 4-22664, No. 5-30548, etc., the roll interval at the end of solidification is controlled to reduce unsolidified slabs. Techniques for rolling down are known. According to these techniques, at an appropriate time in the process of continuous casting (for example, an appropriate time between the time when the central solid fraction is 0.1 to 0.3 and the flow limit solid fraction), Reduction speed (for example, 0.5
It is known that it is effective to reduce the pressure by 2.0 mm / min). And, for the parts cast at the target casting speed by these light reduction technologies,
It is said that the center segregation can be reduced to a level at which there is no practical problem.

【0004】[0004]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら、特許2
593367号、同2593377号、同259338
4〜6号、同2532306号等に開示されているよう
に、上記の様な技術においても凝固が開始してから完了
するまでの間で鋳造速度を変更した部位については、中
心偏析が発生し易いという問題があった。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION However, Patent 2
No.593933, No.2593377, No.259338
As disclosed in JP-A Nos. 4-6, 2532306, etc., even in the above-described technique, center segregation occurs at a portion where the casting speed is changed from the start to the completion of solidification. There was a problem that it was easy.

【0005】そして、上記各特許においては、こうした
課題に対応するべく、鋳造速度の変更によって生じた偏
析悪化鋳片を判定して、こうした偏析悪化鋳片の圧延前
の加熱条件(分塊加熱条件)を高温長時間にして生じた
中心偏析の消失を図る様にしている。
In each of the above patents, in order to cope with such a problem, the segregation deteriorated slab caused by the change of the casting speed is determined, and the heating condition (rolling heating condition) of the segregation deteriorated slab before rolling is determined. ) At a high temperature for a long time to eliminate the center segregation generated.

【0006】ところが、鋳片の圧延前の加熱条件を高温
長時間に設定することは、コストアップやスラブ物流の
混乱を引き起こすことになる。また、連続鋳造のプロセ
スにおいては、実際に以下(1)〜(3)に示す様な領
域が存在することによって、不可避的に鋳造速度の変更
を余儀なくされているのも事実である。こうしたことか
ら、鋳造速度の変更があった場合においても、鋳造開始
から鋳造末期までの全ての領域に亘って実用上問題のな
い中心偏析品質を保証することが望まれているのが実状
である。 (1)鋳造初期における鋳造速度を一定速度までの加速
領域 (2)最終鋳造スラブの引け巣を低減する為の鋳造末期
における減速領域 (3)溶鋼温度が高かったり、次回チャージの到達遅れ
などによる減速領域 本発明は上記事情に着目してなされたものであって、そ
の目的は、鋳造速度の変更が生じた場合であっても、実
用上問題のないレベルまで中心偏析の生成を減少して改
善することができる様な鋼の連続鋳造方法を提供するこ
とにある。
However, setting the heating condition before rolling the slab to a high temperature for a long time causes an increase in cost and confusion in slab distribution. Also, in the continuous casting process, it is a fact that the casting speed is inevitably changed due to the existence of the following regions (1) to (3). For this reason, even when the casting speed is changed, it is a reality that it is desired to guarantee the center segregation quality that has no practical problem over the entire region from the start of casting to the end of casting. . (1) Acceleration range in which the casting speed in the early stage of casting is increased to a certain speed (2) Deceleration region in the last stage of casting to reduce shrinkage cavities in the final casting slab The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and its purpose is to reduce the generation of center segregation to a practically acceptable level even when the casting speed is changed. An object of the present invention is to provide a continuous casting method of steel that can be improved.

【0007】[0007]

【課題を解決するための手段】上記課題を解決した本発
明の連続鋳造方法とは、スラブ鋳片を連続鋳造のプロセ
スで圧下を行なう連続鋳造方法において、許容最大鋳造
速度での凝固シェル厚みが70mm以上となる位置か
ら、許容最大鋳造速度で鋳造する時の鋳片中心部が流動
限界固相率に達する位置までの区間内を0.3〜0.7
mm/mの圧下勾配で、当該圧下勾配X(mm/m)と
前記凝固シェル厚みY(mm)が下記(1)式を満足す
る様に圧下する点に要旨を有するものである。
The continuous casting method of the present invention that solves the above-mentioned problems is a continuous casting method in which a slab slab is reduced in a continuous casting process, wherein a solidified shell thickness at an allowable maximum casting speed is reduced. The section from the position of 70 mm or more to the position where the center of the slab when casting at the allowable maximum casting speed reaches the flow limit solid fraction is 0.3 to 0.7.
The gist is that the reduction is performed so that the reduction gradient X (mm / m) and the thickness of the solidified shell Y (mm) satisfy the following formula (1).

【0008】 Y=50X+45 ……(1)[0008] Y = 50X + 45 (1)

【0009】[0009]

【発明の実施の形態】本発明者らは、鋳造速度が目標の
速度以下になった部位においても実用上問題のないレベ
ルにまで中心偏析を維持することを目的として、特に圧
下を加える時期をストランドのより上流側に延長すると
いう観点から検討を行なった。その結果、許容される最
大鋳造速度で鋳造する時の鋳片厚みが70mm以上とな
る位置から圧下を開始し、目標の最大鋳造速度(本発明
ではこれを「許容最大鋳造速度」と呼ぶ)でスラブ中心
部が流動限界固相率に達する位置まで0.3〜0.7m
m/mの圧下勾配で、更に当該圧下勾配と前記鋳片厚み
が所定の関係を満足する様に圧下してやれば、鋳造全長
に亘る広い範囲で実用上問題とならないレベルまで中心
偏析が改善され、内部割れ等の他の欠陥も防止できるこ
とが判明した。
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION The inventors of the present invention have set a time period for applying a reduction especially for the purpose of maintaining the center segregation to a level at which there is no practical problem even at a portion where the casting speed is lower than a target speed. The study was carried out from the viewpoint of extending to the upstream side of the strand. As a result, the reduction is started from a position where the slab thickness when casting at the allowable maximum casting speed becomes 70 mm or more, and the target maximum casting speed (this is called “allowable maximum casting speed” in the present invention). 0.3-0.7m until the center of slab reaches the flow limit solid fraction
If the rolling gradient is reduced to m / m and the rolling gradient and the slab thickness are further reduced so as to satisfy a predetermined relationship, the center segregation is improved to a level that does not pose a practical problem in a wide range over the entire casting length, It has been found that other defects such as internal cracks can also be prevented.

【0010】凝固末期の鋳片を圧下することによって中
心偏析を改善する為には、凝固鋳片の中心固相率が0.
1〜0.3の位置から、中心部が流動限界固相率になる
までの領域の適切な時期において、凝固収縮による溶鋼
流動を防止する程度に圧下することが有効であることが
知られている。
In order to reduce center segregation by rolling down the slab at the end of solidification, the center solid phase ratio of the solidified slab should be reduced to 0.1%.
It is known that it is effective to reduce the molten steel from the position of 1 to 0.3 to the extent that the molten steel flow due to solidification shrinkage is prevented at an appropriate time in the region until the center reaches the flow limit solid fraction. I have.

【0011】こうしたことから、従来の連続鋳造のプロ
セスにおいては、目標の鋳造速度を定め、その鋳造速度
で中心固相率が上記の範囲となる領域に相当する部位の
ロール間隔を調整し、目標鋳造速度で鋳造されたときに
所定の圧下量が上記領域に施される様にしている。こう
した状況を、図面を用いて説明する。
In view of the above, in the conventional continuous casting process, a target casting speed is determined, and at that casting speed, the roll interval of a portion corresponding to the region where the center solid fraction is in the above range is adjusted. When cast at a casting speed, a predetermined amount of reduction is applied to the above-mentioned region. Such a situation will be described with reference to the drawings.

【0012】図1は、従来の連続鋳造のプロセスにおけ
る軽圧下の時期を説明する為の図である。即ち、この図
1では、上記目標鋳造速度(許容最大鋳造速度)を1.
2m/minとし、この鋳造速度で中心固相率が0.1
〜0.3(図中fs=0.3で示す)のときから、中心
固相率が0.8(fs=0.8)となる流動限界までの
範囲となる領域に相当する部位のロール間隔を調整し
て、この部位に圧下勾配が0.6mm/mの軽圧下を施
すものである。
FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining the timing of light pressure reduction in the conventional continuous casting process. That is, in FIG. 1, the target casting speed (allowable maximum casting speed) is 1.
At this casting speed, the center solid phase ratio was 0.1 m / min.
~ 0.3 (indicated by fs = 0.3 in the figure), the roll corresponding to a region ranging from the flow limit at which the central solid phase ratio becomes 0.8 (fs = 0.8) By adjusting the interval, a light reduction with a reduction gradient of 0.6 mm / m is applied to this portion.

【0013】しかしながら、この様な軽圧下を施す様に
操業条件を設定すると、当該部位が凝固中において、鋳
造速度が例えば1.2m/minから0.5m/min
に減速した場合には、中心固相率が0.1〜0.3(f
s=0.3)のときから、中心固相率が0.8(fs=
0.8)となる流動限界固相率までの領域が、図1に示
す様に鋳造の上流側に移動し、中心固相率が低い側から
適切な圧下領域が順次外れてしまい、中心偏析レベルが
改善されないことになる。
However, if the operating conditions are set so as to apply such a light reduction, the casting speed is, for example, from 1.2 m / min to 0.5 m / min while the part is solidified.
When the speed is reduced to 0.1 to 0.3 (f
From the time when s = 0.3, the central solid phase ratio is 0.8 (fs =
As shown in FIG. 1, the region up to the flow limit solid phase ratio of 0.8) moves to the upstream side of the casting, and the appropriate rolling region sequentially deviates from the side where the central solid phase ratio is low. The level will not be improved.

【0014】そこで本発明者らは、上記の問題を解消す
る為に、図2に示す様に鋳片圧下開始時期をより上流側
に設定して鋳造速度が減少したときでも中心固相率が
0.1〜0.3に相当する位置から圧下を開始し、且つ
鋳造速度が最大のときに中心部が流動限界固相率に達す
る位置までの区間内を圧下することが有効であると考え
た。しかしながら、この様に操業条件を設定すると、次
に示す様な若干の問題が発生した。
In order to solve the above-mentioned problem, the present inventors set the slab reduction start timing to a more upstream side as shown in FIG. It is considered effective to start rolling from a position corresponding to 0.1 to 0.3 and to reduce the pressure in the section up to the position where the center reaches the flow limit solid fraction when the casting speed is maximum. Was. However, when the operating conditions are set in this way, some problems as described below have occurred.

【0015】(1)目標鋳造速度(許容最大鋳造速度)
で鋳造したときよりも凝固シェルの薄い領域から圧下さ
れることのになるので、圧下によって凝固界面に歪が働
き、内部割れが発生し易くなる。この為に、凝固シェル
厚みが薄い時期に圧下を開始したり、圧下勾配(圧下
量)が大きくなった場合には内部割れが発生し、良質の
鋳片を得ることができない。
(1) Target casting speed (allowable maximum casting speed)
Since the pressure is reduced from a thinner region of the solidified shell than when casting is performed, strain acts on the solidified interface due to the reduction, and internal cracks are easily generated. For this reason, when the reduction is started at a time when the thickness of the solidified shell is small, or when the reduction gradient (reduction amount) is increased, internal cracks occur, and a high quality cast piece cannot be obtained.

【0016】(2)鋳造速度が減速した場合には、鋳片
中心部が流動限界固相率を超えてから圧下されることに
なるので、この領域の鋳片を、大きい圧下勾配で強く圧
下すると凝固の小さな不均一に起因して、鋳片厚み中心
部に濃化溶鋼が残留する閉じ込めが発生し、却って局所
的な中心偏析が悪化することになる。
(2) When the casting speed is reduced, the slab is reduced after the center of the slab exceeds the flow limit solid fraction, and the slab in this region is strongly reduced with a large reduction gradient. Then, due to the small non-uniformity of solidification, confinement in which the concentrated molten steel remains in the center of the slab thickness occurs, and local center segregation worsens rather.

【0017】本発明者らは、こうした不都合が発生しな
い様な最適な圧下条件について様々な角度から検討した
結果、上記の様な構成を採用して軽圧下すれば、上記目
的が見事に達成されることを見出し、本発明を完成し
た。
The present inventors have studied from various angles the optimum rolling conditions that do not cause such inconveniences. As a result, if the above structure is used and the rolling is lightly performed, the above-mentioned object is successfully achieved. That is, the present invention has been completed.

【0018】以下、本発明の作用・効果について実施例
によってより具体的に示すが、下記実施例は本発明を限
定する性質のものではなく、前・後記の趣旨に徴して設
計変更することはいずれも本発明の技術的範囲に含まれ
るものである。
Hereinafter, the operation and effect of the present invention will be described more specifically with reference to examples. However, the following examples are not intended to limit the present invention. All of them are included in the technical scope of the present invention.

【0019】[0019]

【実施例】C濃度が0.5〜0.6%の普通鋼を用い、
鋳片断面サイズが280mm×2100mmのスラブ連
鋳を実施した。このとき、直径:280mmのロールを
用いて初期のロール間隔を350mmとして凝固末期圧
下鋳造を行なった。
[Example] Using a normal steel having a C concentration of 0.5 to 0.6%,
Slab continuous casting with a slab cross section size of 280 mm x 2100 mm was performed. At this time, rolling at the end of solidification was performed using a roll having a diameter of 280 mm and an initial roll interval of 350 mm.

【0020】前記図1に示したロール間隔(圧下勾配:
0.6mm/m)で鋳造したときに、平均鋳造速度の変
化に応じて中心偏析レベルが如何に変化するかを調査し
た。このとき、直径:5mmのドリルによって鋳片の中
心偏析部位を幅方向に30mmピッチでドリリングし、
切粉を採取してC濃度の分析を行ない、幅方向の最大の
C濃度をCmaxとし、この値をバルクのC濃度C0で
割った値(Cmax/C0)で中心偏析の評価を行なっ
た。尚、上記平均鋳造速度とは、メニスカスから凝固位
置に到達するまでの平均鋳造速度を意味する。
The roll interval (rolling gradient:
It was investigated how the center segregation level changes according to the change in the average casting speed when casting at 0.6 mm / m). At this time, the center segregation site of the slab was drilled at a pitch of 30 mm in the width direction with a drill having a diameter of 5 mm.
A chip was collected and analyzed for C concentration, and the maximum C concentration in the width direction was defined as Cmax, and the center segregation was evaluated by dividing this value by the C concentration C0 of the bulk (Cmax / C0). The average casting speed means an average casting speed from the meniscus to the solidification position.

【0021】その結果を図3に示すが、鋳造速度が目標
値である1.2mm/mよりも減少するにつれて、中心
偏析レベルが悪化していることが分かる。
FIG. 3 shows the results, and it can be seen that the center segregation level deteriorates as the casting speed decreases from the target value of 1.2 mm / m.

【0022】次に、前記図2で示したロール間隔(圧下
勾配:0.6mm/m)で圧下した場合の中心偏析の鋳
造速度依存性を調査した。その結果を、前記図3の結果
(図中○印で示す)と共に図4に示すが、鋳造速度が
1.2m/minにおいて、前記図1で示したロール間
隔パターンで実施したときと比べて中心偏析レベルはば
らつきが大きく悪くなっているが、鋳造速度の変化に対
して中心偏析の変化が小さくなっており、実用上の中心
偏析レベル(Cmax/C0で1.3以下)にほぼ収ま
っていることが分かる。
Next, the casting speed dependence of center segregation when the roll was reduced at the roll interval (reduction gradient: 0.6 mm / m) shown in FIG. 2 was examined. The results are shown in FIG. 4 together with the results of FIG. 3 (indicated by a circle in FIG. 3). At a casting speed of 1.2 m / min, compared to the case where the roll spacing pattern shown in FIG. 1 was used. Although the center segregation level has a large variation and deteriorates, the change of the center segregation is small with respect to the change of the casting speed, and almost falls within the practical center segregation level (Cmax / C0: 1.3 or less). You can see that there is.

【0023】図5は、鋳造速度:1.2m/minでの
圧下勾配と圧下開始時の凝固シェルの厚みの変化が鋳片
内部割れ発生程度に及ぼす影響を示すグラフである。ま
た、図6は圧下勾配と中心偏析レベルの関係を示したグ
ラフである。これらの結果から、実用上の中心偏析レベ
ルの達成に必要な圧下勾配:0.3mm/m以上の圧下
(図6)での限界の圧下開始時期は凝固シェル厚みが7
0mm(図5)であることが分かる。
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the effect of the reduction gradient at the casting speed of 1.2 m / min and the change in the thickness of the solidified shell at the start of the reduction on the degree of internal cracks in the slab. FIG. 6 is a graph showing the relationship between the draft and the center segregation level. From these results, the reduction gradient required to achieve the practical center segregation level: the minimum reduction start time at the reduction of 0.3 mm / m or more (FIG. 6) is 7 mm in the solidified shell thickness.
It can be seen that it is 0 mm (FIG. 5).

【0024】一方、図7は、圧下勾配をパラメータとし
てとして平均鋳造速度(該当部位がメニスカスから凝固
位置に到達するまでの平均鋳造速度)の減速を行なった
場合の中心偏析レベルの変化を示したグラフである。こ
の結果から、明らかな様に圧下勾配が0.7mm/mを
超えると、減速時間の中心偏析のバランスが悪くなり鋳
片品質が悪化していることがわかる。
On the other hand, FIG. 7 shows the change in the center segregation level when the average casting speed (the average casting speed until the relevant portion reaches the solidification position from the meniscus) is reduced using the rolling gradient as a parameter. It is a graph. From this result, it is apparent that when the rolling reduction gradient exceeds 0.7 mm / m, the balance of the center segregation of the deceleration time is deteriorated, and the cast slab quality is deteriorated.

【0025】以上の結果から、本発明では圧下開始時期
は凝固シェル厚みが70mmのときとし、また圧下勾配
を0.3〜0.7mm/mと規定したのであるが、内部
割れを防止する為には、凝固シェル厚みと圧下勾配の関
係も適切に規定する必要がある。即ち、前記図5から明
らかな様に、凝固シェル厚みが圧下勾配に比べて薄過ぎ
ると内部割れが発生する危険性があるので、本発明では
図5の結果に基づき、凝固シェル厚みと圧下勾配の関係
を前記(1)式を満足する様に規定したのである。
From the above results, in the present invention, the rolling start timing is set when the solidified shell thickness is 70 mm and the rolling gradient is specified to be 0.3 to 0.7 mm / m. It is necessary to appropriately define the relationship between the thickness of the solidified shell and the reduction gradient. That is, as is apparent from FIG. 5, if the thickness of the solidified shell is too thin compared to the rolling gradient, there is a risk of occurrence of internal cracks. Therefore, in the present invention, based on the results of FIG. Is defined so as to satisfy the above equation (1).

【0026】図8に、本発明の適用前(従来技術)と適
用後で実用上問題となる中心偏析レベルが達成された部
位(中心偏析良好部位)の比率を比較して示した。これ
らの結果は、(チャージ/鋳造回数)が3の条件で行な
ったものであるが、適用前では中心偏析良好部位が65
%程度であったものが、適用後では90%まで向上して
いることが分かる。
FIG. 8 shows a comparison of the ratio of the portion where the center segregation level which is practically problematic is achieved (the center segregation good portion) before the application of the present invention (prior art) and after the application. These results were obtained under the condition that the (charge / casting number) was 3. However, before the application, the center segregation favorable region was 65%.
%, But after application, it has been improved to 90%.

【0027】[0027]

【発明の効果】本発明は以上の様に構成されており、鋳
造時の鋳造速度の変更や鋳造初期・末期の非定常部によ
る鋳片の中心偏析悪化を最小限に止めることができる連
続鋳造方法が実現できた。
The present invention is configured as described above, and is capable of continuously changing casting speed during casting and minimizing deterioration of center segregation of the slab due to unsteady portions at the beginning and end of casting. The method has been realized.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】従来の連続鋳造のプロセスにおける軽圧下の時
期を説明する為の図である。
FIG. 1 is a diagram for explaining the timing of light pressure reduction in a conventional continuous casting process.

【図2】本発明の連続鋳造のプロセスにおける軽圧下の
時期を説明する為の図である。
FIG. 2 is a diagram for explaining the timing of light pressure reduction in the continuous casting process of the present invention.

【図3】図1に示したロール間隔(圧下勾配:0.6m
m/m)で鋳造したときに、平均鋳造速度の変化に応じ
て中心偏析レベルが如何に変化するかを示したグラフで
ある。
FIG. 3 shows a roll interval (rolling gradient: 0.6 m) shown in FIG.
10 is a graph showing how the center segregation level changes according to the change in the average casting speed when casting at m / m).

【図4】図2で示したロール間隔(圧下勾配:0.6m
m/m)で圧下した場合の中心偏析の鋳造速度依存性を
示すグラフである。
FIG. 4 shows the roll interval (rolling gradient: 0.6 m) shown in FIG.
3 is a graph showing the casting speed dependence of center segregation when the rolling is reduced at m / m).

【図5】鋳造速度1.2m/minでの圧下勾配と、圧
下開始時の凝固シェルの厚みの変化が鋳片の内部割れ発
生程度に及ぼす影響を示すグラフである。
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the effect of a reduction gradient at a casting speed of 1.2 m / min and a change in thickness of a solidified shell at the start of reduction on the degree of internal cracking of a slab.

【図6】圧下勾配と中心偏析レベルの関係を示したグラ
フである。
FIG. 6 is a graph showing a relationship between a rolling gradient and a center segregation level.

【図7】圧下勾配をパラメータとしてとして平均鋳造速
度の減速を行なった場合の中心偏析レベルの変化を示し
たグラフである。
FIG. 7 is a graph showing a change in the center segregation level when the average casting speed is reduced using the rolling gradient as a parameter.

【図8】本発明の適用前(従来技術)と適用後で実用上
問題となる中心偏析レベルが達成された部位(中心偏析
良好部位)の比率を比較して示したグラフである。
FIG. 8 is a graph showing a comparison of the ratio of a portion (center segregation good portion) where a center segregation level, which is a practical problem, is achieved before application of the present invention (prior art) and after application.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 スラブ鋳片を連続鋳造のプロセスで圧下
を行なう連続鋳造方法において、許容最大鋳造速度での
凝固シェル厚みが70mm以上となる位置から、許容最
大鋳造速度で鋳造する時の鋳片中心部が流動限界固相率
に達する位置までの区間内を0.3〜0.7mm/mの
圧下勾配で、当該圧下勾配X(mm/m)と前記凝固シ
ェル厚みY(mm)が下記(1)式を満足する様に圧下
することを特徴とする鋼の連続鋳造方法。 Y=50X+45 ……(1)
In a continuous casting method in which a slab cast is reduced by a continuous casting process, a cast slab is cast at a maximum allowable casting speed from a position where a thickness of a solidified shell at an allowable maximum casting speed is 70 mm or more. In the section up to the position where the center reaches the flow limit solid fraction, the rolling gradient is 0.3 to 0.7 mm / m, and the rolling gradient X (mm / m) and the solidified shell thickness Y (mm) are as follows. A continuous casting method for steel, characterized by reducing the pressure so as to satisfy the formula (1). Y = 50X + 45 (1)
JP10060499A 1999-04-07 1999-04-07 Steel continuous casting method Expired - Lifetime JP3488656B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP10060499A JP3488656B2 (en) 1999-04-07 1999-04-07 Steel continuous casting method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP10060499A JP3488656B2 (en) 1999-04-07 1999-04-07 Steel continuous casting method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2000288706A true JP2000288706A (en) 2000-10-17
JP3488656B2 JP3488656B2 (en) 2004-01-19

Family

ID=14278478

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP10060499A Expired - Lifetime JP3488656B2 (en) 1999-04-07 1999-04-07 Steel continuous casting method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3488656B2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008018439A (en) * 2006-07-11 2008-01-31 Kobe Steel Ltd Continuous casting method for slab steel with less center segregation
JP2008018438A (en) * 2006-07-11 2008-01-31 Kobe Steel Ltd Continuous casting method for slab steel with less center segregation

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008018439A (en) * 2006-07-11 2008-01-31 Kobe Steel Ltd Continuous casting method for slab steel with less center segregation
JP2008018438A (en) * 2006-07-11 2008-01-31 Kobe Steel Ltd Continuous casting method for slab steel with less center segregation
JP4515419B2 (en) * 2006-07-11 2010-07-28 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Continuous casting method of slab steel with little center segregation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP3488656B2 (en) 2004-01-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6129137A (en) Method for producing thin slabs in a continuous casting plant
JP3488656B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JP2011147985A (en) Continuous casting method and apparatus
JP4998734B2 (en) Manufacturing method of continuous cast slab
JP3246372B2 (en) Continuous casting of steel
JPS6234461B2 (en)
JP5018441B2 (en) Method of drawing slab after completion of casting in continuous casting
JPH0550201A (en) Light rolling reduction method in continuous casting
JP2964888B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP3994848B2 (en) Continuous casting method of steel
JP2004528987A (en) Method and apparatus for continuous casting of ingots, slabs or thin slabs
JPH11156511A (en) Steel slab continuous casting method
JP3687535B2 (en) Continuous casting method of steel
JP2561180B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP3111954B2 (en) Continuous casting method
WO2024004364A1 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JP3093533B2 (en) Continuous casting of thin cast slab
JP7273307B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JP2000288705A (en) Continuous casting method
JP3341340B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP3114679B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JPS6228056A (en) Continuous casting method
JPH06262320A (en) Continuous casting method
JPH11192539A (en) Method for continuous casting of chromium-containing molten steel having excellent internal defect resistance
JP2000107845A (en) Method for casting molten chromium base stainless steel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20030930

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081031

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20081031

Year of fee payment: 5

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091031

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20091031

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20101031

Year of fee payment: 7

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111031

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20111031

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20121031

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20131031

Year of fee payment: 10

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term