JP2000076345A5 - Production capacity / cost examination support method - Google Patents

Production capacity / cost examination support method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2000076345A5
JP2000076345A5 JP1998248872A JP24887298A JP2000076345A5 JP 2000076345 A5 JP2000076345 A5 JP 2000076345A5 JP 1998248872 A JP1998248872 A JP 1998248872A JP 24887298 A JP24887298 A JP 24887298A JP 2000076345 A5 JP2000076345 A5 JP 2000076345A5
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
cost
line
production capacity
database
algorithm
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP1998248872A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2000076345A (en
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed filed Critical
Priority to JP24887298A priority Critical patent/JP2000076345A/en
Priority claimed from JP24887298A external-priority patent/JP2000076345A/en
Publication of JP2000076345A publication Critical patent/JP2000076345A/en
Publication of JP2000076345A5 publication Critical patent/JP2000076345A5/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

【特許請求の範囲】
【請求項1】 部品情報とその部品を基板に実装するライン構成情報とを入力し、費用データベースと設備データベースとライン構成データベースと、生産能力検討アルゴリズムとコスト検討アルゴリズムと面積生産性検討アルゴリズムとにより、前記ラインの面積生産性を評価することを特徴とする生産能力・コスト検討支援方法。
【請求項2】 商品の生産計画情報と部品情報とその商品を生産するライン構成情報とを入力し、費用データベース、勤務形態データベース、部品割り付けを含む設備データベース、ライン構成データベースとライン別生産能力検討アルゴリズムとライン別コスト検討アルゴリズムとライン別面積生産性検討アルゴリズムにより、ライン毎のトータルコスト、設備コストとライン毎の面積生産性のバランスを評価することができることを特徴とする生産能力・コスト検討支援方法。
[Claims]
[Claim 1] The area of the line is input by inputting the part information and the line configuration information for mounting the component on the board, and using the cost database, the equipment database, the line configuration database, the production capacity examination algorithm, the cost examination algorithm, and the area productivity examination algorithm. A production capacity / cost examination support method characterized by evaluating productivity.
[Claim 2] Input the product production plan information, the parts information, and the line configuration information for producing the product, and input the cost database, work schedule database, and parts allocation.Settings includingBalance of total cost for each line, equipment cost and area productivity for each line by the equipment database, line configuration database, production capacity examination algorithm for each line, cost examination algorithm for each line, and area productivity examination algorithm for each line.ReviewCan be valuedRukoA production capacity / cost examination support method characterized by.

【0001】
【発明の属する技術分野】
本発明は、事業計画、商品企画設計、工場管理段階における生産能力・コスト検討を行う時に必要とする生産能力・コスト検討支援方法に関するものである。
[0001]
[Technical field to which the invention belongs]
The present invention, business plans, the present invention relates to production capacity and cost study supporting援方method that is required when performing product planning design, production capacity and cost study in factory management stage.

本発明は上記問題を解決するもので、経験に頼らず、設計部門と製造工場において、設計から製造に至るまでに生産能力・コスト検討に費やす時間と作業を削減して、生産能力とコストを短時間で出力し、また、工場の生産能力と商品のコストのバランスを把握し、実態に即した生産能力・コスト検討を支援することのできる生産能力・コスト検討支援方法を提供することを目的とする。 The present invention solves the above-mentioned problems, and reduces the time and work spent on the production capacity and cost examination from design to manufacturing in the design department and the manufacturing factory without relying on experience, and reduces the production capacity and cost. and output in a short period of time, also, to understand the balance of the cost of production capacity and product of the factory, to provide the production capacity and cost study supporting援方method capable of supporting the production capacity and cost study in line with the actual situation that With the goal.

上記問題を解決するために本発明は、部品情報とその部品を基板に実装するライン構成情報とを入力し、費用データベースと設備データベースとライン構成データベースと、生産能力検討アルゴリズムとコスト検討アルゴリズムと面積生産性検討アルゴリズムとにより、前記ラインの面積生産性を評価することを特徴とするものである。 In order to solve the above problem, the present invention inputs component information and line configuration information for mounting the component on a board, and inputs a cost database, an equipment database, a line configuration database, a productivity study algorithm, a cost study algorithm, and an area. It is characterized in that the area productivity of the line is evaluated by a productivity examination algorithm .

請求項1記載の本発明は、部品情報とその部品を基板に実装するライン構成情報とを入力し、費用データベースと設備データベースとライン構成データベースと、生産能力検討アルゴリズムとコスト検討アルゴリズムと面積生産性検討アルゴリズムとにより、前記ラインの面積生産性を評価することを特徴とするものである。 According to the first aspect of the present invention, component information and line configuration information for mounting the component on a substrate are input, and a cost database, an equipment database, a line configuration database, a production capacity study algorithm, a cost study algorithm, and area productivity are input. It is characterized in that the area productivity of the line is evaluated by the study algorithm .

本発明の請求項記載の生産能力・コスト検討支援方法は、商品の生産計画情報と部品情報とその商品を生産するライン構成情報とを入力し、費用データベース、勤務形態データベース、部品割り付けを含む設備データベース、ライン構成データベースとライン別生産能力検討アルゴリズムとライン別コスト検討アルゴリズムとライン別面積生産性検討アルゴリズムにより、ライン毎のトータルコスト、設備コストとライン毎の面積生産性のバランスを評価することができることを特徴とするものであり、この方法によれば、情報を入力することで、ライン毎のトータルコスト、設備コストとライン毎の面積生産性のバランスを評価することができるライン別面積生産性検討表を経験に頼ることなく自動的に得ることができる。 The production capacity / cost examination support method according to claim 2 of the present invention includes input of product production plan information, parts information, and line configuration information for producing the product, and includes a cost database, a work style database, and parts allocation. equipment database, the line configuration database and line-specific production capacity study algorithm and line-specific cost study algorithm and line-specific area productivity study algorithm, the total cost of each line, evaluate the balance of the area productivity of equipment costs and line by line to it is characterized in the can be Turkey, according to this method, by inputting the information, the total cost of each line, to evaluate the balance of the area productivity of equipment costs and line by line You can automatically obtain the area productivity study table for each line without relying on experience.

JP24887298A 1998-09-03 1998-09-03 Device and method for supporting production capacity and cost examination Pending JP2000076345A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP24887298A JP2000076345A (en) 1998-09-03 1998-09-03 Device and method for supporting production capacity and cost examination

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP24887298A JP2000076345A (en) 1998-09-03 1998-09-03 Device and method for supporting production capacity and cost examination

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2000076345A JP2000076345A (en) 2000-03-14
JP2000076345A5 true JP2000076345A5 (en) 2005-10-27

Family

ID=17184689

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP24887298A Pending JP2000076345A (en) 1998-09-03 1998-09-03 Device and method for supporting production capacity and cost examination

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2000076345A (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4648067B2 (en) * 2005-04-26 2011-03-09 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Operation mode determination method, operation mode determination device, and program
JP4938372B2 (en) * 2006-07-05 2012-05-23 ルネサスエレクトロニクス株式会社 Equipment management system
CN104932466A (en) * 2015-05-21 2015-09-23 上海鼎灿投资咨询有限公司 Industrial production control system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Sambasivarao et al. Selection and implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies: classification and literature review of issues
Belhadi et al. A framework for effective implementation of lean production in small and medium-sized enterprises
Hobday Innovation in South‐East Asia: lessons for Europe?
Flandrin Maximum signal energy concentration in a time-frequency domain
Bullinger Turbulent times require creative thinking: new European concepts in production management
Morita Multi‐skilling, Delegation and Continuous Process Improvement: A Comparative Analysis of US–Japanese Work Organizations
Todd An appraisal of the development pole concept in regional analysis
JP2000076345A5 (en) Production capacity / cost examination support method
Bratton Japanization at work: the case of engineering plants in Leeds
van der Krogt et al. On supporting Lean methodologies using constraint-based scheduling
Sharashkina Methodical aspects of organization and carrying out of functional-cost analysis on the basis of process approach for the purpose of expenses and quality optimization
Apte et al. An analysis of the production line versus the case manager approach to information intensive services
Majchrzak et al. Things are always more complicated than you think: An open systems approach to the organizational effects of computer-automated technology
Riis The use of production management concepts in the design of production management systems
CN103034930A (en) Automation software life cycle model deployment system
JPH10240806A (en) System for supporting mounting-factory development examination
CN105741123A (en) Customer relation management system applied to service industry
Dawson Advanced technology design, people and organization: experience of Australian industrial collaboration
Tang et al. Development and implementation of an integrated quality information system—a China experience
Doerr et al. Design, coordination and control of hybrid factories: Research issues from an exploratory field study
Roehm et al. Springing to world-class manufacturing
Kumar et al. Case study: reconfiguring a manufacturing system for strategic advantage‐a real‐world application
SE9802924D0 (en) Simulation system 1
Apte Fall zyxwvutsrqponmlkj
KR20020085907A (en) Automatic fieldwork order decision system using bill of process