IE840931L - Reinforced fluoropolymer composite - Google Patents

Abstract

A novel composite comprises a substrate having a coating matrix including an initial layer of a perfluoropolymer and an overcoat comprising a fluoroelastomer, a fluoroplastic, a fluoroelastomer/fluoroplastic blend, or a combination thereof. The perfluoropolymer in the initial layer may be a perfluoroplastic, a perfluoroelastomer, or blends thereof. In a separate embodiment, the novel composite includes a substrate coated solely with one or more layers of perfluoroelastomer alone or as a blend with a perfluoroplastic. Where the substrate is not susceptible to hydrogen fluoride corrosion, the composite may include solely one or more layers of a blend of a fluoroelastomer and a hydrogen-containing perfluoroplastic. Cross-linking accelerators may be used to cross-link one or more of the resins contained in the coating layers. Each composite may be topcoated with the layer or layers of a fluoroplastic, fluoroelastomer, and/or a blend thereof. The composite is flexible, exhibits good matrix cohesion and possesses substantial adhesion of the matrix to the material acting as the reinforcement or substrate. A method for making such a composite comprises the unique deployment of a perfluoropolymer directly onto the substrate in a relatively small amount sufficient to protect the substrate from chemical corrosion without impairing flexibility, followed by the application of the overcoat layer.

Description

58634 2 This invention relates to new and useful fluoro-polymer composites comprising coated substrates. More particularly, the invention relates to a new fluoroelastomer/ fluoroplastic matrix useful as a coating in the manufacture of reinforced woven composites which are flexible, exhibit good matrix integrity, and possess good adhesion or bonding of the coating matrix to the substrate. The invention includes composites which also have extraordinary chemical resistance, particularly at elevated temperatures and in humid environments. The invention further relates to a 3 method of making such composites whereby the desirable high temperature, chemical inertness of fluoroplastic materials is combined with the desirable mechanical properties of fluoroelastomers in such a way as to maintain a desirable 5 fabric-like flexibility.

Perhaps the most well-known subclass of fluoro-polymers are substances called "perfluoroplastics" which are generally recognized to have excellent electrical characteristics and physical properties, such as a low coefficient 10 of friction, a low surface free energy (i.e., non-wetting to many organic fluids), and a very high degree of hydrophobicity. Fluoroplastics, and particularly perfluoroplastics (i.e., those fluoroplastics which do not contain hydrogen), such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTPE), fluoro (ethylene-propylene) 15 copolymer (PEP) and copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene and perfluoro-propyl vinyl ether (PFA), are resistant to a wide range of chemicals, even at elevated temperatures, making them particularly useful in a variety of industrial and domestic applications. However, due to the partially 20 crystalline nature of these fluoroplastics, they exhibit a degree of stiffness or lack of compliance which is detrimental to the utilization of these desirable properties.

This shortcoming is particularly noticeable and objectionable in a reinforced composite where some degree of flexi-25 bility, elasticity, and/or conformability is necessary.

The broad class of fluoropolymers also includes substances called "fluoroelastomers" which are not only elastomeric, but also possess, although to a lesser degree, the aforementioned physical and electrical properties of 4 a fluoroplastic. Fluoroelastomers, including perfluoro-elastomers, have the low flex modulus and conformability which fluoroplastics lack. The hydrogen-containing fluoroelastomers, however, do not maintain other advantageous 5 physical properties associated with fluoropolymers over as broad a temperature range, or at as high a level, as do the perfluoroplastics. In other words, perfluoroplastics simply perform better over a wider temperature range. Moreover, the fluoroelastomers which contain hydrogen (i.e., which are 10 partially fluorinated) generally degrade rapidly at higher temperatures resulting not only in the loss of physical integrity but also in the formation of hydrofluoric acid. Hydrofluoric acid is, of course, highly corrosive to most materials, including those normally used as reinforcing sub-15 strates for textile composites, and particularly to fiberglass substrates. For this reason, hydrogen-containing fluoroelastomer based composites presently used in high temperature environments require relatively frequent replacement. Notwithstanding these drawbacks, fluoroelastomers 20 containing hydrogen are considered excellent candidates for use in a variety of commercial applications requiring a lower flex modulus than that possessed by the stiffer fluoroplastics.

In this regard, attempts have been made to employ reinforced fluoroelastomer composites where good thermo-25 chemical, as well as mechanical properties, i.e. low modulus, are required at higher temperatures. One such application is in high temperature expansion joints which connect large duct sections in applications such as power plant systems.

These ducts have in the past been joined at their section 5 ends by metal bellows which, while basically chemically and thermally sound, provide minimal thermo-mechanical shock resistance under normal operating conditions, which can involve temperatures up to 550°F., or even 650°F. In an 5 effort to improve the mechanical properties of metal expansion joints, the flexibility of an industrial fabric is desired, and fabric composites coated with fluoroelastomer based rubber compounds have been used.

These fabric composites have used various rein-10 forcement materials, including fiberglass fabric, coated with a matrix containing a fluoroelastomer composition based on copolymers of hexafluoropropylene (HFP) and vinylidene fluoride (VFj) or terpolymers including HFP, VF^ and tetra-fluoroethylene (TFE). The fluoroelastomer materials used 15 all contain at least some hydrogen and, as such, are susceptible to the shortcomings associated with hydrofluoric acid elimination. Moreover, in order for the prior art fluoro-polymer composites to be useful in high temperature, chemically corrosive applications, they customarily incorporate a 20 relatively thick matrix of the fluoroelastomer based rubber, thereby increasing their stiffness and potentially aggravating problems deriving from hydrofluoric acid formation and thermal embrittlement. In an effort to avoid these problems, composites using hydrogen-containing fluoroelastomer com-25 pounds are being reinforced with acid resistant alloys such as INCONEL*, or high temperature synthetics, such as NOMEX* and KEVLAR*. None of these composites, however, offers the desired combination of thermal and chemical resistance with acceptable matrix integrity.

* Trade Mark 6 Even where chemically insusceptible substrates, such as PTFfi, have been coated with fluoropolymers, such as in Westley, U.S. Patent No. 3,513,064, the resulting composites could only be achieved by selecting specific coating 5 materials as limited by processing conditions, such that the composites possessed properties permitting use only in certain narrow applications.

In the hope of achieving an improved balance of fluoropolymer properties, prior attempts have been made to % 10 combine the respective good properties of fluoroplastic and fluoroelastomer materials in the manufacture of coated fabric. But these attempts have produced blends which either suffer the combined disadvantageous properties of the components or exhibit diminished good properties, particularly at 15 higher temperatures, for example above about 500°F. A typical example of these prior attempts is found in U.S.

Patent No. 3,019,206 to Robb.

While perfluoropolymers, whether thermoplastic or elastomeric, possess excellent thermal and chemical stability, 20 it is difficult to form durable bonds between them and other materials due to their low surface free energy and chemical inertness. This difficulty is conventionally obviated by providing roughened surfaces to promote mechanical bonding, such as employing inorganic fillers or abraded surfaces. 25 Specific surface treatments, such as those based upon chemical etching, may also be employed. But none of these known techniques results in bonding which is particularly strong or durable under environmental stresses, such as ultraviolet or thermally induced oxidation. 7 Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide a fluoropolymer composite comprising a substrate coated with a fluoroelastomer/fluoroplastic matrix. The invention composite is flexible, exhibits good matrix cohe-5 sion, and possesses excellent adhesion of the matrix to the material acting as the reinforcement or substrate, while maintaining the low stiffness associated with a fluoroelastomer combined with, where desired, the superior high temperature performance of a fluoroplastic. 10 It is also an object of this invention to provide a fluoropolymer composite which is relatively light, but strong, and which is both chemically and thermally superior, particularly at elevated temperatures and under humid conditions, while ameliorating the polymer degradation problems 15 that have heretofore arisen in the use of composites having a coating matrix based upon a hydrogen-containing fluoroelastomer.

It is a further object of this invention to provide a fluoropolymer composite having outstanding thermo-20 chemical properties for use as chemical liners, expansion joints, and life safety devices, such as escape hoods, escape chutes and chemically protective clothing.

It is yet another object of this invention to provide a composite having the combined advantages of perfluoro-25 plastics and fluoroelastomers which can be used to make excellent plied constructions, including multiple biased-plied composites, as well as composites having a single coated face. 8 In accordance with the invention, a gradation of fluoropolymer layers is accomplished to form a coating matrix for application to a substrate in the manufacture of a novel composite. The fluoropolymer layers may include perfluoropolymer as well as hydrogen-containing fluoropolymer components which are deployed in a novel and unique way so as to combine as desired the respective advantageous properties of different fluoropolymer components. The hydrogen-containing fluoropolymer components include fluoroplastics,|fluoroelastomers and blends of fluoroelastomers and fluoroplastics. The perfluoropolymer component or components are initially applied and provide a hydrogen-free interface such that a substrate material, which might otherwise be susceptible to the potential corrosive effects of hydrogen fluoride generated by any hydrogen-containing fluoropolymer component or otherwise, is shielded from such effects while the basic flexibility of the substrate is maintained. A fluoroplastic component may also comprise the topcoat or surface layer, or a part thereof, where the behavior of a thermoplastic, rather than an elastomer, is desired. Hydrogen-containing fluoroelastomer components are so deployed within the coating matrix so as to be isolated by the perfluoropolymer layer from a substrate potentially susceptible to HF corrosion, yet are so situated as to enhance the flexibility of the resulting composite membrane. When deployed as, or within, the top or surface coat, the fluoroelastomer component also functions to enhance the conformability of the composite and 9 generally to endow the surface with rubber-like characteristics.

The novel reinforced composites accprding to the invention have a low modulus of stiffness and good chemical resistance and comprise a substrate coated with a matrix comprising: a) an initial layer of a perfluoropolymer selected from a perfluoroplastic, a perfluoroelastomer, a blend of perfluoroplastic and perfluoroelastomer, said initial layer being applied as a relatively light coating to maintain a low stiffness modulus for the composite and to provide the substrate with chemical resistance; and b) an overcoat layer of a fluoroelastomer, a fluoroelas-tomer/fluoroplastic blend, said fluoroelastomer comprising from 10% to 901 by weight of the blend, or a combination thereof.

In other embodiments of the invention, the basic coating matrix will comprise elements a) and b) as set forth above having a multitude of fluoropolymer coating layers all strategically deployed to achieve the desired properties. In those embodiments wherein a substrate is coated with a 10 matrix on only one face, the substrate may be adhered to a different substrate on its other face. Bach composite according to the invention may be topcoated with a layer or layers of a fluoroelastomer, fluoroplastic and/or a blend of 5 a fluoroplastic and fluoroelastomer which may be different in composition from any overcoat blend.

In addition, relatively small amounts of cross-linking accelerators, such as triallyl isocyar.jrate, triallyl imidazole, and the like, may be used to cross-link 10 one or more of the resins contained in the coating layers, as desired, by use of high energy electrons or actinic irradiat ion.

The composites made in accordance with various embodiments of the invention are characterized by good IS matrix cohesion and adhesion between the substrate and the fluoropolymer matrix. Composites may also be prepared which possess extraordinary resistance to thermal and/or chemical degradation and accommodation to thermo-mechanical shock.

Invention composites require much less coverage, i.e. 20 reduced coating thickness, than similar prior art composites so as to provide a lighter and/or thinner, yet stronger product.

Any suitable reinforcement material capable of withstanding processing temperatures may be employed as a substrate. 25 Examples include, inter alia, glass, fiberglass, ceramics, graphiti (carbon), PBI (polybenzimidazole), PTFE, polyaramides, such as KEVLAR* and NOMEX* metal wire, polyolefins such as TYVEK*, polyester1 * such as REEMAY, polyamides, polyimides, novoloid phenolic fibers, thermoplastics such as KYNAR* TEFZEL*, and KYNOL*, polyether sulfone: * Trade Mark 11 polyether imides, polyether ketones, cotton, cloth and other natural as well as synthetic textiles. The substrate may comprise a yarn, filament, monofilament or any other fibrous material either as such or assembled as a textile, or any 5 woven, non-woven, knitted, matted, felted, etc. material.

Depending upon the nature of the substrate and the intended end use of the composite, the reinforcement or substrate is impregnated, either initially or simultaneously with the initial polymer layer, with a suitable lubricant or saturant, 10 such as methylphenyl silicone oil, graphite, a highly fluo-rinated fluid, such as FLUOROLUBE*or KRYTOX*, and the like, and may include a coupling agent. The lubricant or saturant performs three functions vis-a-vis the reinforcing substrate: (1) As a lubricant, it protects the substrate 15 from self-abrasion by maintaining the mobility of the reinforcing elements; (2) As a saturant, it inhibits extensive penetration of the initial polymer coat into the substrate which could reduce flexibility; and 20 (3) In a finished product, it remains in the sub strate to inhibit wicking of moisture or other degrading chemicals through the substrate. The lubricant or saturant may either be applied separately as an initial pass or in combination with the first application of perfluoropolymer 25 component.

The invention also encompasses a novel method of making invention composites which provides for the unique deployment of the various coating layers comprising the * Trade Mark 12 matrix, as heretofore described, particularly so as to minimize the deleterious effects of any hydrogen fluoride generated by a hydrogen-containing fluoroelastomer or fluoroplastic component and to maintain good overall composite flexibility. As such, the method results in the achievement of an improved product having a low modulus of stiffness and good chemical resistance applicable over a broad range of temperatures for a variety of end uses.

The initial layer, described as element a) above, 10 is applied so as to minimize the stiffness of the final com posite and to maximize adhesion of the matrix to the substrate. The application of the initial layer a) may be accomplished in one or more passes and, preferably, any openings in an assembled substrate will remain substantially open in order to enhance 15 flexibility, «hen the additional overcoat layer or layers according to element b) are applied-. In instances where the substrate to be employed is an assembled, fibrous material, the initial coating layer may be applied to the elements of the material (e.g. filament or yarn) prior 20 to their assembly, by e.g. dip coating, impregnating or by extrusion coating. Thereafter, such materials may be assembled by weaving, knitting, felting, matting, etc.

In those embodiments which include both a hydrogen-containing fluoropolymer and a chemically-susceptible 25 substrate, such as one which is susceptible to HF, the per- fluorinated initial layer should be sufficient to substantially protect the reinforcing substrate, and in particular, 13 a fiberglass substrate, from chemicals such as hydrogen fluoride which may be encountered. Again, depending on the substrate, additional thin layers of perfluoropolymer may be applied to insure that the reinforcement has an adequate 5 protective layer. With the proper selection, application, and deployment of the coating layers, the penetration of aggressive chemicals such as hydrogen fluoride is impeded by the protective hydrogen-free perfluoropolymer interface, while flexibility is maintained. 10 The initial coating is then covered with a layer or layers of a fluoroelastomer, a fluoro- elastomer/fluoroplastic blend or any combination thereof, as elementb) described above. Preferably, this portion of the matrix includes a layer or layers of a blend containing the 15 fluoroelastomer in such proportions so as to impart the desired balance of fluoropolymer properties to the composite. For example, where a composite having more pronounced elastomer ic properties is desired, increased proportions of the fluoroelastomer are used in the blend. It has been found 20 that through the combination of the layer a) and the layer b), particularly employing the fluoroelastomer/fluoroplastic blend according to the invention, adequate cohesion within the matrix itself as well as matrix to substrate adhesion is often achieved by thermal means alone without any prior 25 physical or chemical treatment of the substrate or individual matrix layers and without the use of adhesion promoters. Through the use of the invention matrix and the particular deployment of the layers thereof vis-a-vis each other and the substrate in accordance with the invention method, the 14 ability to maintain an adequate degree of adhesion is achieved, while maintaining flexibility and the desired properties of the different fluoropolymer components of the matrix. This same feature allows for the selection of a top coat or surface layer having the attributes of a fluoroplastic or a fluoroelastomer, or any combination thereof, as may be desired.

Accordingly, once the initial and overcoat layers have been deployed, a topcoat of any fluoroelastomer layer may thereafter be applied .

A surface coat of a perfluoroelastomer , such as KALREZ, or the fluoropolymer i blend coatings containing copolymers of perfluorlnated polyvinyl ether described in U.S. Patent No. 4,252,859 to Concannon et al., imparts better thermal properties and chemical resistance than, for example, the embodiment having a hydrogen-containing fluoroelastomer or blend thereof.

Coating layers of the invention matrix may be applied by dip coating from an aqueous dispersion, but any conventional method, such as spraying, dipping, and flow coating, from aqueous or solvent dispersion, calendering, laminating and the like, may be employed to form the coating, as is well-known in the art.

The term "fluoroplastic" as used herein shall encompass both hydrogen-containing fluoroplastics and hydrogen-free perfluoroplastics, unless otherwise indicated. Pluoroplastic means polymers of general paraffinic structure which have some or all of the hydrogen replaced by fluorine, including inter alia polytetrafluoroethylene (PTPE), fluori-nated ethylene propylene (PEP) copolymer, perfluoroalkoxy * Trade Mark 15 (PFA) resin, polychlorotrifluoroethylene (PCTFE), ethylene-chlorotrifluoroethylene (ECTFE) copolymer and its modifications, ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene (ETFE) copolymer and its modifications, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), and poly-5 vinylfluoride (PFV).

Similarly, the term "fluoroelastomer" as used herein shall encompass both hydrogen-containing fluoroelastomers as well as hydrogen-free perfluoroelastomers, unless otherwise indicated. Fluoroelastomer means any polymer with 10 elastomeric behavior or a high degree of compliance, and containing one or more fluorinated monomers having ethylenic unsaturation, such as vinylidene fluoride, and optionally one or more other compounds containing ethylenic unsaturation. The fluorinated monomer may be a perfluorinated mono-olefin, 15 for example hexafluoropropylene or tetrafluoroethylene, or a partially fluorinated monoolefin which may contain other substituents, e.g. chlorine or perfluoroalkoxy, for example vinylidene fluoride, pentafluoropropylene, chlorotetrafluoro-ethyl and perfluoroalkyl vinyl ethers, e.g. perfluoro (methyl 20 vinyl ether) or (propyl vinyl ether); the mono-olefin is preferably a straight or branched chain compound having a terminal ethylenic double bond. The elastomer preferably consists of units derived from fluorine-containing monomers. Such other monomers include, for example, olefins having a 25 terminal ethylenic double bond, especially ethylene and propylene. The elastomer will normally consist of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and fluorine atoms.

Any fluoropolymer component may contain a functional group such as carboxyl, and sulfonic acid and salts 30 thereof, halogen as well as a reactive hydrogen on an alkyl side chain. 16 Preferred elastomers are copolymers of vinylidene fluoride and at least one other fluorinated monomer, especially one or more of hexafluoropropylene, pentafluoropropylene, tetrafluoroethylene and chlorotrifluoroethylene. Available fluoroelastomers include copolymers of vinylidene fluoride and hexafluoropropylene, and terpolymers of vinylidene fluoride, hexafluoropropylene and tetrafluoro- * * ethylene, sold by DuPont as VITON and by 3M as FLUOREL and * by Daiken as DAIEL. Additionally, elastomeric copolymers of vinylidene fluoride and chlorotrifluoroethylene are available from 3M as Kel-F? The use of AFLAS*, which is a copolymer of TFE and propylene, as manufactured by Asahi, is also contemplated.

Preferred perfluoroelastomers include elastomeric copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene with perfluoro alkyl como-nomers, such as hexafluoropropylene or perfluoro (alkyl vinyl ether) comonomers represented by F\ C • CP, / 2 0 1 Rf in which R^ is a perfluoroalkyl or perfluoro (cyclo-oxa alkyl) moiety. Particularly preferred are the perfluorovinyl ethers where n - 1-4 and X ■ H, Na, K or F. Particularly contemplated is KALREZ * which is a copolymer including TFE and perfluoro- methylvinyl ether (PMVE).

* Trade Mark 1? If desired, and as is well-known in the art, fillers or additives such as pigments, plasticizers, stabilizers, softeners, extenders, and the like, can be present in the matrix composition. For example, there can be present aub-5 stances such as graphite, carbon black, titanium dioxide, alumina, alumina trihydrate, glass fibers, beads or micro-balloons, carbon fibers, magnesia, silica, asbestos, woll-astonite, mica, and the like.

The deployment of the various matrix layers upon 10 the substrate in accordance with the invention is essentially accomplished by a method which comprises the steps of: 1. If necessary or desired, removing the sizes or finishes from the substrate material, for example, in the instance of woven fiberglass, by 15 heat cleaning the substrate or scouring a woven synthetic fabric. 2. Applying, as an initial layer to one or both faces of the substrate, a perfluoropolymer, preferably a perfluoroplastic such as PTFE or a 20 perfluoroelastomer, such as KALRE2* or blends thereof. As heretofore noted, in one embodiment of the invention one or more layers of perfluoro-elastomer, or a blend thereof as previously disclosed, may simply be applied to the substrate to 25 prepare a composite. As hereinbefore discussed, a suitable saturant or lubricating agent, preferably methylphenyl silicone oil, typically in a mixture containing 2-14 parts by weight lubricant, may also be applied to the substrate either initially * Trade Mark 18 or simultaneously with the perfluoropolymer. In instances where sufficient flexibility otherwise exists, a coupling agent may be used to enhance the adhesion of the matrix to the substrate, as desired. As previously set forth, the initial coating is applied so to minimize the stiffness of the composite and which may be a relatively light application depending upon the weight and openness of the substrate. As indicated above, where the substrate is coated on only one face, the other face of the substrate may be adhered to a different substrate material. 3. Applying, in one or more layers, as an overcoat to the initial layer, a fluoroelastomer, a blend of a fluoroelastomer and a fluoroplastic, preferably a perfluoroplastic, such as PTFE, or any combination thereof. Where a fluoroelastomer/fluoroplastic blend is used, either alone or as a layer on top of a fluoroelastomer layer, the blend should contain 10-90% by weight of the fluoroelastomer component, preferably 25-60* by weight. 4. If desired, applying a topcoat of an additional layer of a fluoroelastomer, preferably a perfluoroelastomer, or fluoroelastomer/fluoroplastic blend. 19 5. Optionally, applying a surface coating of a fluoroelastomerin greater thicknesses by extruding or laminating a melt processible film such as VITON* AFLAst or KALREz! 5 Moreover, it is clearly an advantage that the com posites of the present invention may be produced, if so desired, by aqueous dispersion techniques. The process may be carried out under the conditions by which the cohesiveness of the matrix and adhesion to the substrate is thermally 10 achieved. A preferred process for the manufacture of invention composites comprises an initial application of a per-fluoropolymer from a latex or dispersion to a suitably prepared substrate at temperatures leading to fusing or consolidation of the applied polymer. Following this initial 15 coat, an overcoat comprising a fluoroelastomer, or blends of fluoroelastomer and fluoroplastic derived from a latex or dispersion blend, is applied in such a manner as to dry the coating, but not to exceed the upper temperature limits of its most thermally labile component. 20 The resulting, partially consolidated coating layers may then be subjected to more modest heat under pressure to further consolidate or strengthen the applied coating. Calendering is a convenient process to achieve this result. The topcoat is then applied at a temperature required to fuse 25 the component with the highest melting point in order to complete consolidation with minimal heat exposure for the most thermally labile components. A latex is often available for this operation. Optionally, an uppermost coating may be * Trade Mark 20 applied by extrusion coating, calendering, or laminating the polymeric components on to the previously consolidated coating. Extrusion coating is most desirable when a foamed topcoat is desired. 5 It should be understood that in any embodiment according to the invention, the uppermost or surface layer may be applied as a foam to enhance compressibility or to increase thickness at low density.

The following additives may be included in the 10 process for making the matrix composition: a surface active agent such as an anionic active agent or a non-ionic active agent; a creaming agent such as sodium or ammonium alginate; a viscosity-controlling agent or a thickener such as methyl cellulose or ethyl cellulose; a wetting agent such as a fluo-15 rinated alkylcarboxylic acid, an organic solvent, or sulfonic acid; or a film former.

The achievement of the remarkable properties of the invention composites is further explained and illustrated below with reference to the accompanying drawings in 20 which: FIGS. 1 and 1A show enlarged schematic side view sections of woven composites by which several embodiments according to the invention are shown and illustrated.

FIG. 2 is an enlarged schematic plan view of a 25 cross-section of an open weave fiberglass composite coated according to an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a chart showing the relationship between tensile strength retained and time of exposure of the Example 2 invention composite to elevated temperatures in air. 21 FIG. 4 is a chart showing the relationship between tensile strength retained and time of exposure of the Example 2 invention composite immersed in 2N sulfuric acid at its boiling point. 5 In FIG. 1, the previously assembled (woven) yarn 10, having first been treated with silicone oil, is coated with a fluoropolymer initial coating layer 12 which completely covers both the warp 14.and fill 16 of the yarn 10. The layer 12 is then covered with an overcoat layer 18 comprising 10 a blend of fluoroelastomer and fluoroplastic. The resulting composite may be further coated with an optional fluoroelastomer topcoat 20 as shown.

FIG. 1A shows a side view section of a woven composite wherein initial coating layer 12 is applied to the 15 yarn prior to assembly (weaving) and completely surrounds and jackets the yarn 10. Such a composite may have enhanced flexibility, depending on the nature of coating layer 12.

FIG. 2 shows the deployment of the various layers of a coating matrix according to one embodiment of the inven-20 tion wherein the substrate is woven. An enlarged section of a plain woven substrate is shown wherein both the warp 14 and fill 16 of the yarn 10 are initially coated with a light layer of lubricant (not shown) and fluoropolymer 22. The layer 22 is displayed in such a way as to cover and protect 25 the yarn 10, while leaving the openings 24 in the woven substrate free and clear so as not to substantially diminish the overall flexibility of the final composite. To the initially coated substrate is then applied an overcoat layer 26 of a fluoroelastomer/fluoroplastic blend according to the 22 invention which covers the yarn 10, including the warp 14 and fill 16, as well as the openings 24 which, when filled with the more elastic blend layer 26, imparts a lower flex modulus to the resulting composite. 5 The invention and its advantages are also illus trated by the following examples. The examples illustrate composites employing a variety of substrates and coating matrices contemplated by the invention. The test procedures used for the chemical and physical testing and property 10 determinations for the composites prepared according to the invention and the controls are identified below: 23 PROPERTY TEST PROCEDURE Weight (kg/m2) FED STD 191-5041 Thickness (cm) FED STD 191-5030 Tensile Strength (kg/m) Warp Fill FED STD 191-5102 Tensile after fold (kg/tn) (or Flex Fold) Warp Fill BIRDAIR LP-78* Trapezoidal Tear (kg) Warp Fill FED STD 191-5136 Coating Adhesion (fcg/m) Dry Wet BIRDAIR LP-62** Rack Elongation (%) Warp Fill BIRDAIR LP-59*** Flexural Rigidity (mg.cra) ASTM D-1388 Dielectric Strength (volts) ASTM D-902 Porosity. SCF per hour per sq. m. at 2.2 KPa (9 in H20) pressure ASTM D-7 37 Hot Air Exposure, Hot Acid Exposure (%) *•** 24 * This is a comparative flex-fold test whereby a rectangular test specimen (long dimension parallel to warp yarns in the "warp test" and parallel to filling yarns in "fill test") is folded at its center, rolled with a weighted roller, ten times, and tested as per G.S.A. 171 #5102. The test values are compared with tensile values for an unfolded specimen. Fold resistance is reported as percent of strength retained after the fold. (In the examples which follow, the results are expressed in actual tensile strength after folding, and the percent retention is not calculated.) * This test measures the adherance of the coating matrix to a substrate by subjecting a specimen (prepared from two pieces of the sample composite joined face to face as in making a production type joint or seam) to an Instron Tester, Model 1130, whereby the pieces forjning the specimen are separated for a specified length (7.6 cm) at a specified rate of strain (5 cm/min.). The average reading during separation is deemed the adhesion value in kg/m.

* This test relates to elongation or stretch characteristics under the continuous static loads experienced in actual applications. A cut rectangle (long dimension parallel to warp yarns for "warp" tests and parallel to filling yarns for "fill" tests) is attached to a rack and a 170 g weight at either end. A predetermined distance (25.4 cm) is marked off on the specimen and the 6 oz. weight is replaced with a specified load. After one minute, the change in distance between the "25.4 cm" marks is recorded. The same measurement is repeated at 1, 2, 4, 12 and 24 hour intervals to provide data for a plot of stretch vs. time. "Initial Stretch" is defined as per cent increase in length. Stretch is calculated using a scale graduated in lOths and lOOths of an inch, each .1" increase over 10" gauge marks equals 1% stretch (l inch = 2.54 cm).

* These tests measure the tensile strength retained by materials exposed to hot air or hot sulfuric acid for various lengths of time. A number of cut rectangles are suspended in the indicated environments. At the stated intervals, specimens are removed and tensile strength measured. The results are reported as percent tensile strength retained after exposure. 1 kg force = 9.8 N.

EXAMPLE 1 In accordance with a preferred embodiment of this 2 invention, an 0.61 kg/m fiberglass substrate, Chemfab style no. 15227, was heat cleaned to remove residual sizing. 25 A combination of PTFE (TE-3313 obtained from DuPont as an aqueous dispersion, 60% solids,) and methylphenyl silicone oil (ET-4327 obtained from Dow Corning as an aqueous emulsion, 35% solids,) was then applied to the surface of the 5 substrate by dipping, drying and fusing in a two zone coating tower with drying zone temperatures of approximately 93°C-177°C and a baking or sintering zone temperature of 371°c. The coating contained 93 parts PTFE, 7 parts methylphenyl silicone. The combination was applied as a very light 10 undercoat, 0.17 kg/m2, to avoid undesired stiffness. Only the yarns in the substrate were coated, the windows remaining substantially open. 2 A second coating, totaling approximately 0.68 kg/m, was applied from a blend of VITON B fluoroelastomer (VTR-5307 15 obtained from DuPont as a terpolymer latex, 60-65% solids) and PTFE (TE-3313). The coating was applied in several passes, by dipping, drying, and baking in a two zone tower with drying temperatures of 93-177°c and a baking zone temperature of only 260°c. The blend, designated FMK-4-10-B, comprised 20 60 percent PTFE and 40 percent terpolymer fluoroelastomer, by weight.

The material was completed by calendering the coated fabric with a I49°c calender followed by a final dry pass through the coating tower to fuse or sinter the coating, 25 with the baking zone at 371° C.

EXAMPLE 2 In accordance with the procedure of Example 1, a composite was prepared on a heat cleaned glass cloth substrate 26 2 (Chemfab Style No. 122, 1.08 kg/m ) using the same primer 2 coat composition to a weight of 1.36-1.39 kg/m and the same blend to a weight of 1.83-1.90 kg/m^. In addition, a topcoat of PTFE was applied in several passes through TE-3313, 5 to bring the total composite weight to approximately 2.04-2.10 kg/m2. in this example the PTFE topcoat was applied following the application of the blend, which was not calendered beforehand, by dipping, drying, and baking at 310°C. The resulting material was calendered and processed through 10 the tower, dry, with baking zone at 37l°c to sinter or fuse the coating. The so-called dry-fused composite was given a final coat of PTFE by dipping in TE-3313, drying, and fusing at 371°C. The composite was 0.117 cm thick, had tensiles in kg/m of 25000/24555 warp to fill, flex-fold in kg/m of 15 25000/24216 warp to fill, and tear strength in g of 105/134 warp and fill. The coating adhesion was measured at 411 kg/m 2 and the porosity was 0.144 SCF/hr/m .

Four additional composites were manufactured in accordance with the method of Example 2, using glass cloth 20 reinforcements of lighter weights and proportionately lighter builds of the various matrix components, as illustrated in the following table: 27 Ex. 2A Ex. 2B Ex. 2C Ex. 2D Reinforcement Style No. 15227 128 116 1080 Reinforcement Weight* 0.61 0.20 0.11 0.05 Undercoat Weight 0. 17 0.05 0.03 0.08 Blend Coat Weight 0. 37 0.15 0.11 0.06 PTFE topcoat Weight 0.30 0.03 0.01 0.05 Total Weight 1.45 0.43 0.26 0.24 * All weights in kg/m2 These composites were tested as indicated in Table I below: 9 Q t. v TABLE I Ex. 1 Ex. 2 Ex. 2A Ex. 2B Ex. 2C Ex. 2D Weight (ka/m2) 1.59 2.04 1.43 044 0.27 0.21 Thickness (cm) 0-089 0.117 0-086 0.023 0.015 0.013 Tensile (fea/m) Warp 188^0 Fill 16072 25000 24555 17554 16597 3875 3322 3161 2929 2643 2375 Flex-Fold (kg/m) Warp 17143 Fill 11519 25000 24216 16358 15858 3804 2321 3253 3089 1636 2500 Tear (g) Warp 48 Fill 53 105 134 47 58 7.2 7.3 4.5 4.5 3.4 2.9 Dry 294.7 Coating Adhesion 410.7 385.7 69.6 91.43 67.8 Rack Elongation At 1071 kg/m (%) Warp Tensile Stress Nat Tested 2.0 2. ,2 Not Tested Rack Elongation At 1071 kg/m (%) Fill Tensile Stress Not Tested 5.5 7, .8 Not Tested Flexural Warp Not 193,000 110,000 Not Rigidity (mg cm) Tested Tested Porosity _ (SCF/hr/ m Z) 0.00 0.144 0.089 Not Tested 29 Additionally, Example 2A was tested after 9 months service in an expansion joint at an electrical power generat ing station. The material in service showed considerably less degradation than conventional joints based on fluoroelastomer .

EXAMPLES 3-8 Six additional composites were manufactured in accordance with the method of Examples 1 and 2, except that the ratio of the fluoroelastomer/PTFE blend was varied as follows: TABLE II Ex. 3 Ex. 4 Ex. 5 Ex. 6 Ex. 7 Ex. 8 VTR-5307 (Formula Wt.*) 16 40 53 64 96 120 TE-3313 ( " ) 150 125 117 100 67 42 VTR-5307 (Component Wt. **) 10 25 33 40 60 75 TE-3313 ( " ) 90 75 67 60 40 25 10 * Parts by weight of ingredient used, in concentration supplied by manufacturers.

* Parts by weight of component supplied by ingredient. 9 1 Tliese compositions were tested as indicated in Table III below: TABLE III Property Units Ex. 3 Ex. 4 * x. 5 Ex. 6 Ex. 7 Ex. 8 B1 end Ra t io wt. * elas./ wt. J PTFE 10/90 25/75 3 3/6 7 40/60 60/40 75/25 W» ight kg/m2 1.59 1.51 1.53 1-52 1.49 1.47 Th ickness cm 0.096 0.091 0-094 0.091 0.091 0.089 Tensile strength wa ro fill kg/m 21430 7054 21519 13304 19412 10036 21251 11513 18037 12501 18840 12054 Tear strength warp fill 9 51 39 54 67 53 64 60 67 49 48 53 54 elex-fold streng th war d fill kg/m 16876 8036 15000 13036 not run 19555 12679 17630 13483 17144 12769 Coat ing Adhes ion kg/m 308.9 294.7 303.6 326.8 344.7 276.8 Dielectric volts st rength (5|1 cm electrode) 5500 5300 4700 5200 5500 4500 Porosity at SCF/hr/m* 2.2 KPa (9" water) pressure .000 0.12 .000 0.12 .000 0.74 Flexural rigidity mg .cm 135900 122200 112300 112000 99300 61500 32 Preparation of Controls A control A composite was prepared using Chemfab 2 style 15227 glass cloth (0.61 kg/m ) which was heat cleaned to remove residual sizings. This substrate was then coated 5 to 1.39 kg/m2 with a blend of (a) a fluoroelastomer (L-6517 obtained from 3M and being a copolymer latex, 55% solids), and (b) PTFE (Teflon 30B from DuPont) in an 80/20 (PTFE/fluoroelastomer) ratio,by weight. The coating was applied in several passes at processing temperatures of 10 204°c. Control B is simply a portion of Control A baked under dry fuse conditions as are the invention composites. Control C is, in turn, a portion of Control B having a fused top coat of PTFE (TE-3313) in an amount of approximately 0.04 kg/m2. 33 The results of physical tests of these contents are set forth below in Table IV TABLE IV Control Property Units A B C (number of hiqh bake passes) temperature (none) (1) (2) We ight kg/m2 1.39 1.39 1.40 Th ickness cm 0.076 0.081 0.081 Tensile strength wa r p fill kg/m 16697 14608 15054 11786 13447 13394 Tear strength warp fill 9 59 58 44 41 43 40 Coat ing Adhes ion kg/m 17. 8"* 17.8* 17.8 * very poor seal; coating is squeezed out of joint 34 EXAMPLES 9 A-C A comparison was made using samples of the composites prepared in accordance with Examples 1 and 2, but using different commercially available fluoroelastomers. The first 5 composite, 9A, was prepared essentially as was the composite of Example 6. Composite 9B was made in essentially the same manner, but substituting the L-6517 fluoroelastomer (a 3M copolymer latex, 55% solids) . Similarly, composite 9C was prepared by substituting yet another 3M fluoroelastomer 10 (L-6546, a terpolymer latex containing 60% solids) for the DuPont VTR 5307. 35 The results of the physical tests conducted with these composites are reported in Table V below: TABLE V Examples PROPERTIES 9A 9B 9C Weight (kg/m^) 1.51 1.50 1. 53 Thickness (cm) 0.054 0.094 0.091 comp Tensile (kg/m) fill 21251 22073 22626 10536 14340 16555 comp Flex Fold (kg/m) fill 16787 15537 15715 10804 17412 14912 comp Tear (g) fill 58 49 60 53 67 64 Poros ity (SCF/hr./ m2) .000 .000 .000 Coating Adhesion (kg/m) 325.0 271.4 237 .5 36 EXAMPLE 10 A-C Composite 10A was prepared using Style 15227 glass cloth (0.61 kg/m2) which was first heat cleaned to remove residual sizings. A combination of PTFE (TE3313) and methyl phenyl silicone oil (Dow Corning) was then applied to the substrate surface in an amount of 0.17 kg/m2. a second coating of a blend of 3M fluoroelastomer (L-6517) and FEP resin (DuPont TE-9503 aqueous dispersion, 55% solids) in a 40/60 ratio was then applied in several passes in an amount 2 of 0.26 kg/m . The composite was finished with a top-coat of PTFE (TE-3313) in an amount of 0.17 kg/m2 to yield a composite weight of 1.22 kg/m . a second composite 10B was prepared by substituting a 40/60 blend of 3M L-6546 fluoroelastomer and DuPont TE-9503, and a third composite 10C was similarly prepared using a 40/60 blend of DuPont VTR5307 and TE-9503. 37 The results of physical tests with these composites i3 set forth in Table VI below: TABLE VI Samples Prope r ty 10 A 10 B 10 C Weight (kg/^2) 1.22 1.25 1.27 Thickness (cm) 0.066 0.091 0.086 Tensile (kg/m) Warp 18358 20108 15751 Fill 9322 10536 6429 Flex-Fold (kg/m) Warp 12661 13661 14697 Fill 10322 11072 6125 Tear (9) Warn 49 50 43 Fill 43 62 30 Coating Adhesion (kg/m) Dry 1^8.2 91.1 112.5 Wet Poros i ty (SCF/hr ./ «n 2) 0.933 0.367 1-489 Flexural 85, 700 132, 600 not Rigidity (nig.cm) run 38 EXAMPLE 11 A-C Composites using reinforcements other than glass were prepared as indicated in Table VII. Composites 11A, 11B, and 11C were made in accordance with the method employed 5 in the Example 2, using a three component matrix consisting of the PTFE-silicone oil primer, the intermediate blend component, and the PTFE topcoat. 39 TABLE VII Ex. 11A Ex. 11B Ex. 11C Re i nforcement Mater i al aramid Kevlar a ramid Nomex graphi te Weave r Style No.

Chemfab 100-20 Chemfab 100-10TCN Fiber i te W-134 Re i nforcement Weight* 0.224 0.095 0.196 PTFE-si1icone oil primer we ight 0.084 0.146 0.088 Blend weight 0.255 0.209 0.214 PTFE topcoat we ight 0.047 0.068 0.030 Total weight 0.610 0.618 0.528 * all weights in kg/m2 49 The composites prepared in accordance with Example 11 were tested as indicated in Table VIII below.

TABLE VIII EXAMPLE 11A 11B 11C Weight (kg/m2) 0.604 0.638 0.523 Th ickness (cm) 0 .048 0.051 0.038 Tensile (kg/ strength Warp 'm) Fill 11804 14554 1304 1161 7197 7197 Warp Flex-Fold (kg/m) strength Fill 11411 14733 1411 1357 2107 5625 Tear (c) strength Warp Fill 38 38 2.4 4.1 18 23 Coat ing Adhes ion Dry kg/m 183.9 321.4 196.4 1 41 Bot Air and Bot Acid Exposure Teat Results Tensile Strength (warp) Retained aftec Exposure (I) 2N. sulfuric acid at b.p. air at 232°C air at 274°C lwk 2wk 4wk lwk 2wk 4wk lwk 2wk 4wk Ex. 1 69 57 nc* 95 99 nc 95 91 nc 2 80 57 54 100 95 89 92 72 75 2A 77 66 52 96 81 98 73 84 81 3 94 46 nc 100 98 nc 100 82 nc 4 98 46 nc 98 86 nc 95 84 nc 5 63 53 nc 99 100 nc 93 94 nc 6 100 56 nc 91 94 nc 95 86 nc 7 100 59 nc 96 100 nc 97 95 nc 8 94 48 nc 100 98 nc 99 92 nc 9A 74 56 46 100 94 90 91 79 80 9B 66 45 45 95 95 99 86 59 73 9C 55 33 41 91 91 95 84 59 67 10A 76 49 54 100 100 100 100 69 100 10B 73 53 51 100 88 100 96 82 90 IOC 93 63 59 100 93 100 96 83 96 * Test not complete as of date of filing 4 2 EXAMPLES 12 A-D Four additional composites were manufactured in accordance with the method of Examples 1 and 2, however the lubricant/saturant was either (1) ET-4327 methyl-phenyl sili-5 cone oil emulsion applied in FMK-4-10-A (CHEMFAB internal designation for mixture of TE-3313 (DuPont) and ET-4327 (Dow Corning Corp.) containing approximately 93 percent by weight PTFE and 7 percent by weight silicone oil diluted with water to a specific gravity of 1.32); (2) ET-4327 methyl-phenyl 10 silicone in an aqueous solution (mixture of 1 part by volume ET-4327 methyl-phenyl silicone oil emulsion, manufactured by Dow Corning, and 8 parts by volume tap water); (3) ET-4327 methyl-phenyl silicone in an aqueous solution, 1 part by volume:4 parts by volume tap water; or (4) a mixture of 9 pbw 15 ET-4327 diluted with tap water, 1:8 by volume) and 1 pbw AQUADAG E colloidal graphite dispersion. With the exception of the material having the FMK-4-10-A initial fuse dip, a second fuse dip of TE-3313 (1.35 specific gravity) was applied following the application of the lubricant. The four com-20 positions were then completed in accordance with the procedures of Examples 1 and 2.

The resulting materials were tested for weight; thickness; tensile, tear, and flex fold strength and coating adhesion; and MIT flex endurance. The results are shown in 25 Table IX as follows: TABLE rx 12 A J 20 12C 120 10 15 20 Lubrjcant/saturant Composition Applied from Pick-up (kg/m2) Weight (kg/m2) Thickness (cm) Tensile (kg/m) strength f i 11 Tear (9) strength fill Flex-fold (kg/m) <<) strength fill Coating adhesion (kg/m) MIT Flex'"*' (folds to failure x 10J) wa rp fill Si Iiconc FMK4-10A 0.0136(1) 1-46 0.089 19555 17322 54 53 12769 13929 357 49 44 S i1iconc 1:8 sol. 0.1018(2) 1.42 0.089 19876 16197 56 60 16429 15715 286 35 44 5 i1icone 1:4 sol. 0.0238(2) 1.42 0.089 18930 16251 55 61 16608 15000 286 Silicone-graphite 9 pbw 2 1/2:5 soL 1 pbw Aquariag E 0.0136(3) 1.46 0.086 19108 18037 63 72 66 54 17590 16697 339 87 83 25 NOTliS: (1) Calculated value based on 71 FMK4-10A pick-up. (2) experimentally dctcrnil ncd valucn. (3) Measured on iiclufil run. (4) Ilolled on 10X with 4.5 g roller. (5) MIT Folding Endurance Tester, 0.10 cm jaws, 2.270 kg weight,- No. 10 spring, 44 EXAMPLE 13 Composites using TE-5489 (low crystallinity, compliant, pecfluorinated TFE copolymer obtained from DuPont) resin dispersion were prepared as follows. In Example 13, 5 Chemfab Style 116 glass was heat cleaned and given four fuse dips through the full strength TE-5489 (33% solids, 1.23 specific gravity, 9.5 cps) . The 0.103 kg/m2 heat cleaned sub- 2 strate picked up a total build of approximately 0.024 kg/m . Microscopic examination of the product revealed a resilient, 10 uncracked and generally flaw-free coating encapsulating the yarns and well adhered to them.

EXAMPLE 14 Example 14 was prepared by pouring 25 grams of TE-5489 on a 3 x 12.7 cm piece of heat cleaned and silicone 15 treated 15227 glass cloth in a tray. The water was dried away in an air circulating oven at 75°C and the resulting fabric, saturated with the dried polymer, was molded in a 0.10 cm thick chase at approximately 204°c for ten minutes in a platen press. The resulting composite was extremely 20 flexible and compliant, and the coating was strong and resilient and was resistant to scratching.

EXAMPLES 15 A-C Examples 15A and 15B were prepared as follows. Following heat cleaning, two lengths of Chemfab Style 129 25 glass cloth (0.210 kg/m2) (ECD 225 1/3, 38 x 40) were coated in multiple semifused dip passes through 50:50 (weight) blends of TE-5489 and commercially available perfluorinated resin dispersions (as described below), followed by final dry fuse 45 passes. Example 15A received 7 passes through such a blend 2 made with TE-3313 which resulted in a 0.324 kg/m composite. Example 15B received 6 passes through a blend mada with TE-9503 thermally concentrated in the laboratory to 63% 2 5 solids, and resulted in a 0.314 kg/m product. These examples were tested as shown below.

TABLE XI Property We ight 10 Thickness Dielectric strength 6 mm (i") elec. 50 mm (2") elec.

Strip Tensile 15 strength warp fill Trap, tear strength 20 warp fill Coating adhesion Units kg/m2 cm volts kg/n 15A 0.322 0-023 1700 1300 5500 5625 9 12 15B 0.316 0.023 1700 1300 5804 6215 kg/m 126.8 10 10 78 .6 25 30 Example 15C was prepared as follows. Following heat cleaning, Chemfab Style 15227 glass cloth(0.611 kg/m2) (ECB 150 4/3, 18 x 19) was treated with silicone oil by dipping the cloth in ET-4327 diluted 1:8 by volume with water, followed by drying and baking at 343°c. An initial coat of 50:50 (weight) blend of TE-3313 and TE-5489 was then applied « by dipping, wiping with smooth bars, drying, and baking at 260°c. This initial coat weighed 0.173 kg/m2. An overcoat of FMK-4-10-B was then applied in five successive semifuse 46 2 2 passes totalling 0.601 kg/m . A top coat of 0.034 kg/m of PTFE was applied in a single, unwiped seraifused pass through TE-3313 at 1.30 specific gravity. The material was then calendered and finally completed by fusing in a single dry fuse pass at 382°c.

The finished composite was softer than Examples 1 and 2. The coating, although not as glossy and feeling more compressible than the coatings of Examples 1 and 2, otherwise was as durable when the material was subjected to rough handling such as scraping and creasing. The warp tensile strength of this material was 15412 kg/m; the coating adhesion strength was 158.9 kg/m.

EXAMPLES 16 A-F Example 16A was prepared by giving Chemfab Style 100-20 woven KEVLAR fabric (approximately 16 x 16 count, approximately 0.224 kg/m , yarn construction unknown) 2 wiped fuse dips through undiluted TE-5489 dispersion. Sintering zone temperatures were 288°c during both passes. The 2 finished weight of the fabric was 0.302 kg/m .

Example 16B was made with the same reinforcement as Example 16A and was given a single fuse dip through TE-5489 under the same conditions as the initial operation on Example 16A, bringing its total weight to 0.268 kg/m2 . This was followed by three semifuse dips, wiped, through FMK-4-10-B, with baking zone at 260°C, which raised the total weight, in succession, to 0.387, 0.458 and 0.577 kg/m2, respectively. The material was completed with a fuse pass at 37l°c. 4? Example 16C was also made with the same reinforcement as Examples 16A and 16B, but in Example 16C the initial coat consisted of a blend of 50% by weight PTFE from TE-3313 and 50% by weight polymer from TE-5489, applied as a wiped 5 fuse dip at 288°c. The total weight of the reinforcement and the initial coat thus applied was 0. 285 kg/m2- As an overcoat, 3 dips of FMK-4-10-B were applied and dry fused essentially as they were in making Example 16B, yielding a finished product weighing 0.570 kg/m2. The three products 10 were tested as shown in the following table. 48 TABLE XII Trap, tear strength warp Property Units 16A 16 B 16 C Weight kg/m2 0.295 0.577 0.560 Thickness cm 0.043 0.048 0.048 MR* 40 32 fill NR * NR 33 Strip Tensile k9/m strength warJ 7768 '10715 11268 fill 10376 11429 14769 Coating adhesion kg/m 85,7 128.5 178.5 * NR - no reading (yarns bunched) A reinforcement for Examples 160, E and F was made by heat cleaning Style No. W-134 woven graphite fabric (0.197 kg/m2, approximately 12 x 12 count manufactured by Fiberite Corporation) by baking at 360°C. Example 16D was then made by giving the reinforcement two wiped fuse dips through TE-5489 dispersion at 288°c. The finished weight 2 was 0.282 kg/m .

In making the composition of Example 16E, the heat cleaned graphite was given a silicone treatment by dipping the unwiped reinforcement through ET-4327, diluted 1:8 by volume with water, followed by drying and baking at 260°c. This was followed by a wiped fuse dip through TE-5489 and baking at 288°C bringing the 0.204 kg/m2 silicone treated 2 fabric to a total weight of 0.251 kg/m . Three additional 49 wiped, semifused dips of FMK-4-10-B were applied and followed by baking at 500°P bringing the weight to 0.404, 0.462 and 0.533 kg/m2, respectively, after each pass. A final bake was accomplished at 371°c. 5 Example 16P was made according to essentially the same procedure as Example 16E, using the silicone treated reinforcement, but with the 50:50 solids blend of TE-3313 and TE-5489 replacing the TE-5489 as the initial coat. The weight following this step was 0.265 kg/m2. Three wiped, 10 semifused dips of FMK-4-10-B were subsequently applied and dry fused as they were in making Example 16E, resulting in a 2 finished weight of 0.526 kg/m . The three products were tested as shown in the following table.

TABLE XIII Prooer tv Units 16 D 16E 16F Weight kg/m2 0.285 0.560 0.526 Thickness cm 0.035 0.043 0.043 Strip Tensile strength warp fill kg/m 6482 5833 7911 7768 6429 6125 Trap, tear strength warp fill 9 12 8 7 9 4.3 1.8 Coating adhesion kg/m 117.8 142.8 203.5 EXAHPLES 17 A-M * Several examples incorporating a KALREZ latex obtained from DuPont and identified as 34045-133 were * Trade Mark 50 prepared by a laminating process which involved evaporating the dispersion to dryness to obtain a crumb, pressing the crumb to a film in a platen press and laminating the film to a substrate, also in a platen press. Example 17A was prepared by heat cleaning Style 15227 glass and giving the glass a silicone treatment by dipping through ET-4327 diluted 1:8 by volume with water followed by drying and baking. The treated substrate was then dipped through the KALREZ dispersion, unwiped, and baked at 260°c. The resulting composite weighed 0.706 kg/m2.

Example 17B was prepared by giving a portion of the coated fabric of Example 17A four semifused passes through TE-3313, viscosified to approximately 150 cps while wiping with 1 mm wire wound bars. The resulting 1.229 kg/ 2 m material was pressed in a platen press for 1 minute at approximately 9100 kPa with platens heated to 160°c. The coated surfaces were protected by release sheets of CHEMFAB 100-10 TCGF (PTFE coated glass fabric) during the pressing. The material was then baked for 20 minutes in an air circulating oven at 271°c to remove residual surfactant. It was returned to the press, protected by clean aluminum foil on both sides, and sintered by pressing at minimum pressure (less than 105 kPa), with platens heated to 382°c, for 5 minutes. The resulting material weighed approximately 1.205 kg/m2 Example 17C was prepared by giving a portion of the coated fabric of Example 17A five wiped passes through undiluted VTR-5307 fluoroelastomer latex. Each pass was dried and baked at approximately 149-232°c. The material 51 was then baked in a 27l°Cair circulating oven for 20 min. to remove residual surfactant. The final weight was 1.0I)3 kg/r.i2 .

Example 17D was prepared by giving a portion of 5 coated fabric of Example 17A three semifuse passes wiped with 1 mm wire wound bars, through FMK-4-10-B, all passes at 25.4 cm/min.The material, which at this point weighed 0.117 kg/m2, was subsequently baked 20 minutes in a 271°c air circulating oven and fused in a platen press at less 10 than 105 kPa with 382°c platens for 5 minutes between sheets of clean aluminum foil.

In Example 17E, a KALREZ*crumb was prepared by evaporating a quantity of KALREZ*dispersion to dryness in an air circulating oven at 75-85°C. Ten grams of the crumb 15 were placed between an approximately 45.7 x 45.7 con piece of aluminum foil treated with silicone mold release (SPRITS SILICONE MOLD RELEASE* sold by Sprits of Melville, New York) on one side and a similar sized sheet of silicone resin coated glass fabric (available as SRC-5 from Oak Industries, 20 Inc., Hoosick Falls, New York) on the other. The material was placed between smooth caul plates of 3.2 mm stainless steel and pressed for 5 minutes at 800 kN (80 tons) force on the platens at 288°c, following which the work was cooled under pressure. The result was a circular piece of KALREZ*film approximately 25 20.3-25.4 cm in diameter and varying in thickness from 0.013 to • 0.020cm.

The film was then folded over an edge of a portion of Example 17A in such a way that approximately equal semicircular areas of film were opposite each other on opposite * Trade Mark 52 sides of the Example 17A coated reinforcement. This sandwich was placed in the press between thicknesses of glass cloth serving as compression pads to force the film into the irregularities of the reinforcement. Aluminum foil, treated 5 with a silicone mold release, was used between the film and compression pads. Stainless caul plates were used. The laminate was pressed for 5 minutes at 288°c employing a force 2 of 100 kN (10 tons) on the platens, (approximately 281-335 kg/m on the 25.4 cm diameter semicircular composite) . The composite 10 was cooled under pressure.

The foil was easily stripped away to obtain the resulting semicircular laminated composite surrounded by the more lightly coated reinforcement. This material was again placed in the press between mold-release-treated aluminum 15 foil sheets for 5 minutes with 50 kN (5 tons) force on the platens at 177°C to smooth out the fabric imprint which came through the foil from the compression pad. The completed smooth laminate was 0.066 to 0.074 cm thick near the center and 0.066 to 0.068 cm near the edges, under the microscope, 20 no voids were visible, either looking through the face of the fabric or at cut edges. Visually, it could not be distinguished from dip coated material except for its complete lack of bubbles, pin holes and craters.

Similar laminated composites were made by the same 25 technique as Example 17E, using Examples 17D, 17C and 17B as substrates. These were designated Examples 176, 17B, and 17J, respectively.

To facilitate comparisons, the compositions of Examples 17A-E and G, H and J are summarized in the follow-30 ing table. 53 TABLE XIV Example No. 17A 17B 17C 170 Re in forcement 15227 15227 15227 15227 1st layer (dip coat) ET-4327 ET-4327 ET-4327 ET-4327 2nd layer (dip coat) Kalrez Kalrez Kalrez Kalrez 3rd layer (dip coat) - TE-3313 VT3-53Q7 FMK-4-10-B blend Weight (kg/m2) 0.706 1.205 1.093 1. 117 (portions of the above materials were in turn laminated to produce the following :) Laminate Exp. No. JL7E L7J 17H 17G Laminated matrix comp. Kalrez Kalrez Kalrez Xalrez Thickness (cm) 0-068-0 .076 0.094-0.104 0.076-0.086 0.084-0.089 15 Example 17K was prepared by placing a film made from KALREZ latex as described in the procedure for preparing Example 17E on one side of a piece of Chemfab Style 129 glass fabric which had been previously heat cleaned. The layup was protected on both sides by aluminum foil and placed in a 20 platen press and pressed for one minute at 288°c using mini mum obtainable force. The material which was removed from the press was a one-sided composite with the film well adhered to the reinforcement. A piece of the one-sided composite was coated on the bare glass side with contact adhesive 25 (Armstrong "N-lll INDUSTRIAL ADHESIVE")* The same adhesive was also applied to one side of a swatch of polyester-cotton fabric. After drying, the two adhesive-coated materials were pressed together to form a two-ply fabric having one * Trade Mark 54 perfluoroelastomer face and one polyester-cotton face, such as would be suitable for a garment.

Example 17L was a graphite reinforced perfluoro-polymer composite which was prepared by using the Example 160 5 material as a substrate and making a laminate according to the techniques employed in producing Example 17E. As heretofore noted, the initial coating on the substrate was derived from TE-5489, a low crystallinity perfluoropolymer based dispersions. The resulting laminate was approximately 0.015 10 inches thick with a smooth, resiliant matrix which appeared to thoroughly saturate the reinforcement.

Example 17M was a laminate prepared by bonding 0.013 cm thick PTFE skived film (available from Chemplast, Inc., Wayne, New Jersey) to both faces of a substrate of 15 Example 17D, which in turn consisted of 15227 reinforcement, silicone treated with an initial coat of KALREZ followed by an overcoat of blended fluoroelastomer-PTFE (FMK4-10B). The laminate was pressed under the following conditions: platen temperature, 382°C; pressure, 100 kN (10 tons) force on a specimen 20 measuring approximately 12.7 cm x 25.4 cm; time at temperature, 5 minutes; cooled under pressure to 260°C; and removed from press. The completed specimen was 0.089 to 0.094 cm thick. The PTFE appeared to be strongly adhered to the overcoat. There was no tendency toward separation even after 25 repeated splitting off of small areas of the laminated overcoat and attempting to pull the layers apart.

EXAMPLES 19 A&B Example 19A was prepared as follows: Chemfab Style 122 glass fabric was heat cleaned. A silicone oil 55 lubricant/saturant and an initial coat of PTFE were then applied simultaneously in a single dip through a bath of FMK 4-10A followed by drying and baking. The prepared reinforcement was laminated between 0.0 3 cm sheets of uncured calen-5 dered sheet stock identified as "Fluorel based Diak catalyzed fluoroelastomer compound suitable for flue duct applications" (Passaic Rubber Corporation, Clifton, N.J.) The rubber was brushed with acetone on the sides contacting the fabric before the material was laid-up and the sandwich was cured by press-10 ing for 15 minutes between 177°c platens at approximately 176 to 211 kg/m (on specimen) and cooling under pressure to 93°c. The resulting reinforced rubber slab was approximately 0. 035 cm thick and was very flexible with a good integrity.

Example 19B was prepared according to the same pro-15 cedures as those employed in the preparation of Example 19A except that the substrate used was 15227 as the reinforcement and the rubber slabs were not brushed with acetone prior to lay-up. The resulting material was also 0.102 cm thick, appeared to be equally flexible when compared with Example 19A, 20 and also possessed good integrity.

EXAMPLES 20 A&B A KALREZ crumb containing 1.5 parts per hundred parts rubber of Triallylisocyanurate (TAIC) (manufactured by Nippon Kasei Chemical Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan and avail-25 able in the United States from Mitsubishi International Corporation, New York, New York) was made by adding the necessary TAIC as a 5% solution in denatured ethanol to the KALREZ dispersion and evaporating the treated latex to dryness 56 at about 90°C. The addition of TAIC in this manner did not appear to induce coagulation.

Two composites were made according to techniques identical with those used in preparing Examples 17E, G, B 5 and J. One was made on Example 17A, designated Example 20A, and one was made on Example 16A, designated Example 20B.

Each of these composites was irradiated with a 1 MeV electron beam to a total of 4, 8 and 16 megarads, respectively. The beam current employed was 5 milliamps. Determination of the 10 dyanamic modulus for the irradiated composites suggests that the radiation had induced cross-linking.

EXAMPLE 21 Composites manufactured in accordance with the of Example 2 were plied and laminated in a platen with 0.013 cm pep film as a melt adhesive between using the following laminating conditions: platen temperature : 354°c pressure : approximately 3500 kPa time at temperature : 6 min.

Four examples of 2 ply laminates were produced, dif-in the relative orientation of the warp yarns in the Examples were made with warp yarns parallel (0° skew) , 30°, skewed 45°, and perpendicular (90° skew).

Composites manufactured in accordance with Example 2A were also laminated, using pressing conditions similar to 30 those described above, but with lower pressure, approximately 1960 kPa (450 kN (45 tons) force on 45.7 x 45.7 cm laminate). Ply method 15 press, plies, 20 25 fering plies, skewed 57 warp yarn orientations of 0, 30, 45, and 90 degrees were employed in making these examples also.

The laminates were tested for strip tensile and trapezoidal tear strength. The results of these tests are 5 reported in Table XVI below.

TABLE XVI Strip Tensile and Trapezoidal Tear Strength of 2 Ply Laminates Ply Construction Warp Yarn Strip Tensile (kg/m)1 Trapezoidal Tear (kg/m) Orientation (deq) Warp Fill Warp Fill Example 2 Single ply control 22591 20376 3304 3625 0 338412 316982 7411 8983 30 23323 2!)000 9054 12608 " 4 5 22591 22198 9661 13054 » 90 25680 26984 9250 8661 Example 2A Single ply control 14876 15519 1554 1804 q 26216 266G2 2393 2679 3Q 1-1787 15209 2911 5090 15322 M554 2661 3714 4 5 14769 15233 2947 3697 Notes: 1. Specimen width 5.08 cm; calculated breaking stress per (2.54cm) of width shown in table 2. Specimens slipped in jaws with highest clamping pressure 59 EXAMPLE 22 A knit fiberglass fabric weighing approximately 0.170 kij/m2 was given an unwiped dip through Dow Corning ET-4327, which had been diluted 1:8 by volume with tap water dried and baked. The treated knit substrate was then given a single dip through KALREZ dispersion; dried; and baked at 371 °c. The coated reinforcement was placed between layers of a film prepared from Kalrez and the sandwich, protected by aluminum foil treated with a silicone mold release, was pressed between platens 288°c at approximately 700 kPa for 5 minutes and cooled under pressure. The resulting composite was soft and flexible.

EXAMPLE 23 In accordance with the method used in preparing Example 22, but with different laminating conditions (i.e., 382°c platen temperature, approximately 3500 kPa pressure, 3 minutes at temperature followed by cooling under pressure) , a laminate was made with a film of FMK-4-10-B reinforced with knitted fiberglass fabric which had been primed with I ET-4327 and dip coated in a Kalrez latex.

EXAMPLES 24 A-D A series of four specimens similar to Example 2A was produced comparing PFA, PEP, and PTFE as topcoats and PFA and PTFE as the resin constituent of the perfluoro-polymer/fluoroelastomer blend overcoat. The construction of the composites is summarized in the following table. 60 Example No. 24A 24B 24C 24D Reinforcement — 15227, Heat Cleaned Initial Layer FMK-4-10-A Overcoat, layer 1 FMK-4-10-B FMK-4-10-B TE-335/ FMK-4-10-B VTR 5307 Overcoat, layer 2 TE-3313* TE-3313* TE-3313* TE-3313* Topcoat TE-335 TE-3313 TE-3313 TE-9503 NOTES: FMK-4-10-B is 60/40 weight blend of TE-3313 and VTR 5307 TE-335 is PFA (perfluoroalkoxy modified PTFE) dispersion (Du Pont) TE-3313 is a PTFE dispersion.

TE-9503 is FEP dispersion (Du Pont) *Viscosified All materials were processed in a manner similar to Example 2A. The initial layer was applied in an unwiped fuse dip. The overcoat layers were applied in multiple, wiped, semifuse 2 dips to bring total fabric weight to approximately 1-36 kg/m . The fabrics were calendered to consolidate the semifused layers, dry fused, and completed with single unwiped fuse dips through the topcoat dispersions.

Samples of the materials were tested for initial physical properties with results shown below. 61 TABLE XVII Property Units 24A 24B 24C 24D Weight kg/m ^ 1 .39 1 .39 1. 51 1 .38 Thickness cm 0.081 0.081 0.096 0.081 Tens ile kg/m wa rp 17269 16662 15358 16787 fill 15233 15626 12858 13036 Tear 9 warp 49 48 58 53 fill 59 55 54 61 flex fold kg/m warp 10840 13572 13090 14519 fill 15590 14162 10715 13804 Dielectr ic Strength, 50 mm (2") elec. volts 3700 4000 3800 4000 MIT Flex folds to warp failure, X10-3 34 37 33 46 Coating Adhesion kg/m i 276.8 253.6 219 .6 253- 6 EXAMPLES 25 A-C Pieces of copper foil, 0.008 cm thick, etched on one side (available from Yates Industries, Inc., Bordentown, New Jersey; specify type "A" etch) were washed with soap and water, rinsed with distilled water, wa'shed with reagent grade acetone, and air dried. The etched surface was treated with gamma-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (available from Union Carbide 82 Corporation, New York, New York as A-1100) by dipping in a 1% aqueous solution and drying in an air circulating oven at 107°c. Laminates were made on the treated foil substrate as shown in the following table: 25A 25B 25C Initial coat layer 0.013cn»FEP film* TE-5489 film* FMK-4-10-B film* (from solids) (from solids) Overcoat layer FMK-4-10-8 film no overcoat no overcoat Platen temperature (°C) 283 Pressure on specimen fkPa ) 910 Time at temperature (min) 5 Laminate thickness (cm) 0.0274 0.0157 0.0165 * Each film was processed above the fusing temperature of the respective resins.

TE-5489 as supplied by DuPont contains a high temperature methyl-phenyl silicone oil. When the dispersion is dried to form a crumb and the crumb is pressed into a film in accordance with the method of Example 17E, the silicone oil saturates and coats the films and prevents adhesion to other components in hot pressed laminates. To remove this silicone, the cast film was chopped and washed in clean toluene in a Ross Mixer-Emulsifier, dried in an air circulated oven at 50*C, and re-pressed to a film. This was # repeated four times and the resulting silicone-free film was used in making Example 25B. 63 The three examples are foils with durable, compressible polymeric coatings. Example 25B possessed a particularly soft yet resiliant coating very firmly bonded to the copper surface. The coating can be gouged with a 5 knife but shows no tendency to delaminate even in boiling water. Example 25C has a somewhat less resiliant and softer coating than 25B, but appears equally resistant to delamina-tion. Example 25A has coating characteristics similar to 25C, but was the most easily gouged of the three. 10 EXAMPLE 26 A piece of ordinary, 16 ga. cold rolled steel was abraded with 200 grit sandpaper on one side until the surface was bright and shiny and free of mill scale and rust. The surface was washed with reagent grade acetone, allowed to 15 air dry, flooded with 6 normal sodium hydroxide solution, allowed to stand several minutes, washed with distilled water, and allowed to air dry. The surface was treated with silane and a polymer film comprised of resin derived from TE-5489 (silicone-free) was press laminated to it, in accordance 20 with the method of Example 25B. The result was sheet steel with a soft, compressible, resilient coating; firmly bonded and when gouged with a knife showing no tendency toward delamination.

EXAMPLE 27 25 A piece of 3.2 mm window glass was washed with soap and water, washed with reagent grade acetone, immersed in 6 normal sodium hydroxide solution for several minutes, washed with distilled water, and allowed to air dry. The 64 surface was silane treated and a film of silicone-free TE-5489 was press laminated to the glass substrate, essentially in accordance with the method of Examples 25B and 26, but using very low pressure, less than 350 kPaon specimen, and begin-5 ning with the platens at room temperature, raising them to 550°P over a period of approximately one half hour, and allowing them to air cool to room temperature over a period of several hours, thus avoiding thermal shock which might have broken the glass. The TE-5489 produced a resilient, 10 .005 inch coating which did not delaminate in boiling water after 24 hrs. exposure.

EXAMPLE 28A A thin extruded coating of PTFE was applied by paste extrusion to ECG 37 1/3 fiberglass yarn. The jacketed 15 yarn thus produced was woven into an approximately 14 x 15 2 count plain woven fabric weighing approximately 1.188 kg/m (about 60% of which is represented PTFE). Overcoat layers were applied as follows: Cast films of FMK-4-10-B were laminated to both sides of this substrate in a platen press 20 at a pressure of approximately 1960 kPa. Platen temperatures of 371°c were maintained for 5 minutes, followed by cooling to approximately 65°c over a period of about 15 minutes, also under pressure. The resulting product weighed 1.392 kg/ 2 m , had excellent physical integrity, and was exceptionally 25 flexible.

EXAMPLE 28B A cast film of a 60/40 weight % blend of TE-3313 and fluoroelastomer (derived from L-9025) latex (obtained 85 from 3M) was laminated to the substrate of Example 28A. The resulting product had a flexibility and integrity comparable to Example 28A.

EXAMPLE 28C 5 The woven substrate of Example 28A was given 8 semi- fuse passes through FMK-4-10-B followed by a final dry fuse pass. This resulted in a material 0.112 cm thick and weigh- 2 ing 1.779 kg/m . The product had excellent integrity and was somewhat more flexible than Example 2A, even though it 10 was 20 percent heavier and approximately 30 percent thicker. The material was subjected to physical testing with the following results: Trapezoidal Tear Strength, Warp Direction 118 g Elongation at 714 kg/m load, Warp Direction 4.5% EXAMPLE 29 A substrate of Style 15227 glass cloth was heat cleaned and impregnated with ET 4327 methyl phenyl silicone emulsion. An initial layer of perfluoroelastomer was applied in a single fuse dip operation through DuPont's TE-5506 experi mental low crystallinity perfluorinated polymer in aqueous dispersion having specific gravity of 1.39.

A blend containing 104 parts by weight of TE-3313 (57.7 percent PTFE solids) and 154 parts by weight of KALREZ latex (26 percent perfluoroelastomer solids) was prepared. The mixture was evaporated to dryness in an air circulating oven operating at 90°C and the resulting cake was chopped and washed several times in hot water in a Waring blender 15 20 25 66 and again dried at 90°C to yield a coarse, flaked crumb.

Using the technique employed in making Example 17E, the crumb was pressed into a film and the film was laminated to the 2 substrate. The substrate weighed 0.838 kg/m . 5 The film and the laminate were both pressed under the following conditions: platen temperature, 288°C; force on platens, 9072 kg (approximately 3290 kPa on film, 7700 kPa on laminate); time at temperature, 3 min.

The resulting flexible product was approximately 10 0.102 cm thick, and exhibited good physical integrity, with a resilient, well-adhered, and tough coating.

EXAMPLE 30 A film was prepared from TE 5489 derived solids treated to remove silicone oil as described in Example 17E. 15 10 grams of toluene-washed crumb were pressed in a platen press between pieces of aluminun foil treated with a silicone mold release. The platens were operated at 160°c under a force of 10 kN (1 ton) for one minute. Thereafter, the material was cooled under pressure. 20 The resulting film was placed on a piece of 100 percent polyester knit fabric, Style 5162, white, 1980 (manufactured by Armtex, Inc., Pilot Mountain, North Carolina) and pressed essentially as described in Example 17K, but with a platen temperature of 160°C and 4530 kg of force on 25 the platens for one minute.

A durable, flexible composite having a thickness of approximately 0.038 cm resulted. The knit reinforcement was thoroughly encapsulated by the perfluoroelastomer matrix.

G? EXAMPLE 31 Employing methods described in Example 30, 5 grams of TE 5489 solids were pressed into a film and laminated to * one side of a piece of TYVEK spun-bonded polyolefin, Style 5 1056D (manufactured by DuPont). Platen temperatures of 115°C were employed to laminate the material and the work was pressed for 2 minutes with approximately 454 kg of force on the platens. After a 1 minute dwell at temperature and pressure, the material was cooled under pressure to about 10 room temperature. The resulting laminate containing per- fluoropolymer on one face (approximately o.02 3 cm thick) was flexible and tough.

EXAMPLES 32 A&B Employing methods similar to those described in 15 Example 31, laminates of TE-5489 fluoroelastomer on two styles of REEMAY* spun-bonded polyester (manufactured by DuPont) were prepared. Example 32A included DuPont Style 2431 reinforcement and Example 32B contained DuPont Style 2024 reinforcement. In both examples, pressing conditions 20 were as follows: platen temperature, 166°c; force on platen,20 kN (2 tons);time at temperature, 2 minutes; and cooling under pressure. Composites so produced contained perfluoropolymer on one face and polymer on the other. Moreover, the composites were flexible and tough. 25 EXAMPLE 33 Example 33 was prepared by using the materials and techniques employed in making Example 30, but with reduced laminating pressure to obtain a composite with perfluoropolymer * Trade Mark 68 on one face of the Armtex Style No. 5162 polyester knit. Pressing conditions were: platen temperature, 168°C; force on platen, 453-907 kg; time at temperature, 1 minute; and cooling under pressure. 5 The resulting laminated composite at 0.030 cm of thickness was noticeably more flexible and conformable than that of Example 30. The polymer matrix was firmly bonded to the reinforcement, showing no tendency toward delamination. 10 EXAMPLE 34 Employing the techniques used in making Example 33, a single faced laminate employing resin derived from TE-5489 was produced on a 50/50 polyester/cotton interlock fabric, 1.85 yield at 1.52 m width (Style No. 443833 15 produced by Burlington Industries, New York, New York) .

The resulting product was a durable, flexible and conformable laminate. The perfluoropolymer was firmly anchored to one side. The unlaminated side of the composite maintained its soft textile quality. 20 EXAMPLES 35 A&B Examples 35 A&B were made using methods essentially similar to those used in making Examples 2A and 2B with the exception that Dupont VTR-5307 latex in the PTFE/fluoroelastomer latex blend was replaced with AFLAS* TFE/propylene copoly-25 mer latex was obtained from Xenox, Inc., Bouston, Texas.

The blend was made by mixing 104 pbw of Dupont TE-3313 with 129 pbw of the AFLAS*latex, thereby maintaining the 60/40 proportion of PTFE to fluoroelastomer. The composition of Examples 35 A&B is shown below: * Trade Mark 59 Example 35A Example 353 re inforcemen t component weiaht reinforcement finish initial layer overcoat layer topcoat 10 15227 glass cloth 0.61 kg/m2 silicone oil** PTFE** 0-17 kg/m2 AFLAS/PTFE 0.36 kg/m2 PTFE 0 .04 kg/m2 129 glass cloth* 0.22 kg/m2 silicone oil** PTFE** 0.03 kg/m2 AFLAS/PTFE 0.09 kg/m2 PTFE 0.02 kg/m2 * Style No. 129 glass cloth, ECD 225 1/3, plain weave, 38 x 40, 0.223 kg/m2 , manufactured by Chemical Fabrics Corporation.

** Reinforcement finish and initial layer applied simultaneously.

The physical properties of Examples 35 A & B are as follows: 15 Property Units Example 35A Example 355 20 weight kg/m2 thickness cm strip tensile strength kg/m warp fill trapezoidal tear strength g warp fill tensile strength after fold kg/m 25 warp fill 1.181 0.076 14519 16197 42 50 14412 17144 0.367 0.023 4607 5929 9 11 not tested coating adhesion kg/m 216.1 94.6 70 EXAMPLES 36A-C Example 36A was prepared by the following procedure: ECB150 4/3 fiberglass yarn was treated with silicone oil and impregnated with TE-5506 low crystallinity perfluoropolymer 5 (DuPont) in a single application using a mixture of TE-5506 and ET-4327 emulsion (Dow Corning), followed by drying and fusing. The bath was prepared by mixing 199 pbw of TE-5506 (50.3% solids) with 23 pbw of ET-4327 (35% solids) and was diluted with water to a specific gravity of 1.225. The pro-10 portion of perfluoropolymer to silicone polymer in the bath was 12.5 to 1, by weight.

The impregnated yarn prepared according to Example 36A was woven into a 14 x 14 count fabric weighing approxi- 2 mately 0.679 kg/m. The woven fabric was then baked at approxi-15 mately 288°c for 1 minute and used in preparing Examples 36B and 36C as follows. Example 36B was prepared by applying to the fabric of Example 36A an intermediate coating of PTFE/ 2 fluoroelastomer blend, weighing approximately 0.441 kg/m , in 4 semifused passes through PMK 4-10-B. The coating was fused 20 by baking for 1 minute at approximately 700°F and an overcoat of PTFE was applied from TE-3313 (DuPont) diluted to a specific gravity of 1.30. The final weight of the example was 1.154 kg/m2.

Example 36C was prepared by applying to the fabric of Example 36A an intermediate coating of PTFE in 6 semifuse 25 dip passes through TE-3313 at 1.485 specific gravity followed by calendering, dry fusing, and a final fuse dip through TE-3313 at 1.30 specific gravity. No overcoat layer was applied. 71 Examples 36B-C were subjected to physical testing and the following results were obtained: Test we i a h t th ickness tensile s t reng th warp fill Units kg/m2 cm kg/m tensile strenqth after fold kg/m fill trapezoidal tear strength g fill coatina adhesion kg/m Example 36B 1.154 0.039 11251 10536 10268 42 173.2 Example 36C 1.181 0.084 11911 9197 8125 43 191.1

Claims (23)

Claims: 72

1. . A composite having a low modulus of stiffness and good chemical resistance which comprises a substrate coated with a matrix comprising: 5 a) fin initial layer of a perf luoropolymer selected from a perfluoroplastic, a perfluoroelastomer, a blend of perfluoroplastic and perfluoroelastomer, said initial layer being applied as a relatively light coating to maintain a low stiffness modulus for the composite and 10 to provide the substrate with chemical resistance; and b) an overcoat layer of a fluoroelastomer, a fluoroelastomer/fluoroplastic blend, said fluoroelastomer comprising from 10% to 90% by weight of the blend, or a combination thereof. 15

2. A composite according to claim 1 wherein said initial layer is applied to the substrate in an amount sufficient to provide chemical resistance while at the same time leaving any openings in the substrate substantially open so as to maintain flexibility. 20

3. A composite according to claim 1 wherein the initial layer comprises a perfluoropolymer and a lubricating agent.

4. A composite according to claim 1 wherein the substrate is treated with a coupling agent to promote 25 bonding.

5. A composite according to claim 1 wherein said fluoroelastomer comprises from 25% to 60% by weight of said blend.

6. A composite according to claim 1 wherein an 30 intermediate layer comprising a fluoroelastomer is interposed between said initial layer and said overcoat layer. 73

7. A composite according to claim 1 having a topcoat selected from a fluoroplastic, a fluoroelastomer, a fluoroplastic/fluoroelastomer blend or a combination thereof. 5

8. A composite according to claim 1 wherein resins in said layers,are at least partially cross-linked.

9. A composite according to claim 1 wherein only one face of said substrate is coated with a matrix.

10. A composite according to claim 1 wherein said 10 substrate is reinforcement material capable of withstanding composite formation temperatures.

11. A composite according to claim 10 wherein said substrate is a yarn, filament, monofilament, or other fibrous material. 15

12. A composite according to claim 10 wherein said substrate is a textile selected from woven and non-woven materials.

13. A composite according to claim 1 or 10 wherein said substrate is selected from glass, fibreglass, 20 ceramics, graphite, polybenzimidazole, polyaramides,

14. PTFE, metal, polyolefins, polyesters, polyamides, copolymers of TFE, polyether sulfones, polyimides, polyether ketones, polyethenimides, novoloid phenolic fibers, natural and synthetic textiles. 25 14. A composite according to claim 1 or 7 wherein said fluoroplastic comprises PTFE, PFA, or FEP.

15. A composite according to claim 1 or 7 wherein said fluoroelastomer is selected from copolymers of vinylidene fluoride and at least one other fluorinated 30 monomer selected from hexafluoropropylene; tetrafluoroethylene; chlorotrifluoroethylene; and pentafluoropropylene.

16. A composite according to claim 1 wherein said perfluoroelastomer comprises a copolymer of TFE and 35 perfluorovinylether such as PMVE or PPVE. 74

17. A composite according to claim 1 wherein any fluoropolymer component may contain a functional group selected from carboxyl and sulfonic acid and salts thereof, halogen, and a reactive hydrogen on an alkyl side chain.

18. A method for the manufacture of a composite including a substrate coated with a matrix, wherein the said matrix is formed by a gradation of fluoropolymer layers, which comprises the steps of: i) first applying an initial layer comprising a perfluoropolymer in an amount sufficient to substantially shield the substrate from chemical corrosion without impairing flexibilty; ii) thereafter applying to said initial layer an overcoat layer comprising a fluoroelastomer, a fluoroelastomer/fluoroplastic blend comprising 10-90% by weight of the fluoroelastomer, or a combination thereof.

19. A method according to claim 18 wherein said initial layer comprises a perfluoropolymer, a lubricating agent, and a coupling agent.

20. A method according to claim 18 wherein the outermost layer is applied as a foam.

21. A composite according to claim 1, substantially as hereinbefore described and exemplified.

22. A method according to claim 18 for the manufacture of a composite including a substrate coated with a matrix, substantially as hereinbefore described and exemplified.

23. a composite including a substrate coated with a matrix, whenever manufactured by a method claimed in a preceding claim. F. R-. KELLY & CO. , AGENTS FOR THE APPLICANTS.