IE83909B1 - Transgenic animals, cells and cell lines therefrom, and their use - Google Patents
Transgenic animals, cells and cell lines therefrom, and their useInfo
- Publication number
- IE83909B1 IE83909B1 IE1991/0572A IE57291A IE83909B1 IE 83909 B1 IE83909 B1 IE 83909B1 IE 1991/0572 A IE1991/0572 A IE 1991/0572A IE 57291 A IE57291 A IE 57291A IE 83909 B1 IE83909 B1 IE 83909B1
- Authority
- IE
- Ireland
- Prior art keywords
- cells
- cell
- animal
- expression
- promoter
- Prior art date
Links
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 title description 54
- 210000004027 cells Anatomy 0.000 claims description 487
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 claims description 104
- OZAIFHULBGXAKX-UHFFFAOYSA-N precursor Substances N#CC(C)(C)N=NC(C)(C)C#N OZAIFHULBGXAKX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 60
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 49
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 claims description 35
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 claims description 35
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 claims description 21
- 101710017890 large T Proteins 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N insulin Chemical compound N1C(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)CN)C(C)CC)CSSCC(C(NC(CO)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CCC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CSSCC(NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(C)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2NC=NC=2)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)CNC2=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)C(=O)NC(C(C)O)C(=O)N3C(CCC3)C(=O)NC(CCCCN)C(=O)NC(C)C(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(O)=O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)CC)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)C(C(C)O)NC(=O)C1CSSCC2NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(C)C)CC1=CN=CN1 NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 13
- 241000829100 Macaca mulatta polyomavirus 1 Species 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 210000004255 neuroglia Anatomy 0.000 claims description 11
- 241000700159 Rattus Species 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000002759 chromosomal Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 210000004602 germ cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 7
- 102000004877 Insulin Human genes 0.000 claims description 6
- 108090001061 Insulin Proteins 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 210000001082 somatic cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 5
- 229920002332 Noncoding DNA Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000000520 microinjection Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 210000000663 muscle cells Anatomy 0.000 claims description 3
- 210000004102 animal cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000001519 tissues Anatomy 0.000 description 88
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 54
- 210000002950 fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 description 36
- 210000001130 Astrocytes Anatomy 0.000 description 34
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 description 28
- 102000038129 antigens Human genes 0.000 description 28
- 108091007172 antigens Proteins 0.000 description 28
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 27
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 24
- 230000001413 cellular Effects 0.000 description 24
- 230000002068 genetic Effects 0.000 description 24
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 24
- 102000001389 Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Human genes 0.000 description 23
- 108010093505 Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Proteins 0.000 description 23
- 241000699660 Mus musculus Species 0.000 description 23
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 23
- 239000002609 media Substances 0.000 description 22
- 208000005623 Carcinogenesis Diseases 0.000 description 18
- 102000008070 Interferon-gamma Human genes 0.000 description 17
- 108010074328 Interferon-gamma Proteins 0.000 description 17
- 229940044627 gamma-interferon Drugs 0.000 description 17
- 101700086956 IFNG Proteins 0.000 description 16
- 102100016020 IFNG Human genes 0.000 description 16
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 16
- 238000004166 bioassay Methods 0.000 description 16
- 229920003013 deoxyribonucleic acid Polymers 0.000 description 16
- 210000002889 Endothelial Cells Anatomy 0.000 description 15
- 102000004965 antibodies Human genes 0.000 description 15
- 108090001123 antibodies Proteins 0.000 description 15
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 15
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 15
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 15
- 206010018338 Glioma Diseases 0.000 description 13
- 102000014150 Interferons Human genes 0.000 description 12
- 108010050904 Interferons Proteins 0.000 description 12
- 210000001541 Thymus Gland Anatomy 0.000 description 12
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 description 12
- 229940079322 interferon Drugs 0.000 description 12
- 102000016359 Fibronectins Human genes 0.000 description 11
- 108010067306 Fibronectins Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 230000010261 cell growth Effects 0.000 description 11
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 11
- 230000011712 cell development Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000037320 fibronectin Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000001105 regulatory Effects 0.000 description 10
- 210000000496 Pancreas Anatomy 0.000 description 9
- 102000010780 Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 108010038512 Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 210000003491 Skin Anatomy 0.000 description 9
- 201000009910 diseases by infectious agent Diseases 0.000 description 9
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 9
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 9
- 238000002054 transplantation Methods 0.000 description 9
- 210000003169 Central Nervous System Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 239000006144 Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium Substances 0.000 description 8
- 101700075357 MYC Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 210000002966 Serum Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 208000010183 Thymus Hyperplasia Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000001054 cortical Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 8
- 210000004556 Brain Anatomy 0.000 description 7
- 102000014961 Protein Precursors Human genes 0.000 description 7
- 108010078762 Protein Precursors Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 230000032823 cell division Effects 0.000 description 7
- 101700034118 myca Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 description 7
- 210000001736 Capillaries Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 229920001850 Nucleic acid sequence Polymers 0.000 description 6
- 210000004248 Oligodendroglia Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001143 conditioned Effects 0.000 description 6
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 238000002224 dissection Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000001605 fetal Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000003102 growth factor Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000000411 inducer Substances 0.000 description 6
- 102000005614 monoclonal antibodies Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 108010045030 monoclonal antibodies Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000002992 thymic Effects 0.000 description 6
- 241001430294 unidentified retrovirus Species 0.000 description 6
- 210000001072 Colon Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 210000002027 Muscle, Skeletal Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 102000004142 Trypsin Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108090000631 Trypsin Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000003140 astrocytic Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001580 bacterial Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 5
- 210000003386 epithelial cell of thymus gland Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 230000002518 glial Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001965 increased Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000001404 mediated Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001177 retroviral Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229960001322 trypsin Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 239000012588 trypsin Substances 0.000 description 5
- 102100007493 CNTF Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 241001227713 Chiron Species 0.000 description 4
- 108010005939 Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 229920001405 Coding region Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 210000001671 Embryonic Stem Cells Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 102000003974 Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108090000379 Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000011782 Keratins Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108010076876 Keratins Proteins 0.000 description 4
- GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-UUNJERMWSA-N Lactose Natural products O([C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)O[C@@H]1CO)[C@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](CO)O1 GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-UUNJERMWSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 102100015262 MYC Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 210000004940 Nucleus Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 210000001328 Optic Nerve Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000003213 activating Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000024245 cell differentiation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010192 crystallographic characterization Methods 0.000 description 4
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N edta Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 210000002919 epithelial cells Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-XLOQQCSPSA-N lactose Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](CO)O[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O GUBGYTABKSRVRQ-XLOQQCSPSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 239000008101 lactose Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000000670 limiting Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000003226 mitogen Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000004380 optic nerve Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000000056 organs Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000000069 prophylaxis Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 4
- 210000001626 skin fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000002194 synthesizing Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000001185 Bone Marrow Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 3
- 102000020504 Collagenase family Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108060005980 Collagenase family Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000001039 Dystrophin Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010069091 Dystrophin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 210000001161 Embryo, Mammalian Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 210000000105 Enteric Nervous System Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 108010010803 Gelatin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 208000006454 Hepatitis Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 102000008949 Histocompatibility Antigens Class I Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010088652 Histocompatibility Antigens Class I Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 229940088597 Hormone Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 210000004153 Islets of Langerhans Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 description 3
- 210000004185 Liver Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 210000002536 Stromal Cells Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 210000001744 T-Lymphocytes Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000002159 abnormal effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000890 antigenic Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000036760 body temperature Effects 0.000 description 3
- 201000011510 cancer Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 231100000504 carcinogenesis Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 108091006028 chimera Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000010367 cloning Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229960002424 collagenase Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 230000001086 cytosolic Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 3
- 235000013601 eggs Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 230000003511 endothelial Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002708 enhancing Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000008273 gelatin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920000159 gelatin Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 235000019322 gelatine Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 235000011852 gelatine desserts Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000003862 glucocorticoid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 231100000283 hepatitis Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 239000000710 homodimer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000005556 hormone Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000002390 hyperplastic Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002372 labelling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000003130 muscle precursor cell Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 description 3
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 description 3
- 230000001737 promoting Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002829 reduced Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000004083 survival Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000035897 transcription Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001890 transfection Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003612 virological Effects 0.000 description 3
- 101700033661 ACTB Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100011550 ACTB Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101710032514 ACTI Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 210000003710 Cerebral Cortex Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000002987 Choroid Plexus Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 102000004594 DNA Polymerase I Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010017826 DNA Polymerase I Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100013100 DNM2 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101710031877 DNM2 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108009000133 Differentiation Pathway Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 210000002351 Embryonic Muscle Cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 102100008634 FGF2 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101700082364 FGF2 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- CEAZRRDELHUEMR-URQXQFDESA-N Gentamicin Chemical compound O1[C@H](C(C)NC)CC[C@@H](N)[C@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](NC)[C@@](C)(O)CO2)O)[C@H](N)C[C@@H]1N CEAZRRDELHUEMR-URQXQFDESA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229940065521 Glucocorticoid inhalants for obstructive airway disease Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 210000003494 Hepatocytes Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 241000701806 Human papillomavirus Species 0.000 description 2
- 210000004408 Hybridomas Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 102000012411 Intermediate Filament Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010061998 Intermediate Filament Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010054278 Lac Repressors Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 210000002540 Macrophages Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 108020004999 Messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108090000157 Metallothionein Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000003792 Metallothionein Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 210000004080 Milk Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 241000713333 Mouse mammary tumor virus Species 0.000 description 2
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 102000008730 Nestin Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010088225 Nestin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 229940037128 Systemic Glucocorticoids Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 102000006601 Thymidine Kinase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108020004440 Thymidine Kinase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000004887 Transforming Growth Factor beta Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108090001012 Transforming Growth Factor beta Proteins 0.000 description 2
- GSEJCLTVZPLZKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tris Chemical compound OCCN(CCO)CCO GSEJCLTVZPLZKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000007983 Tris buffer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 102000016350 Viral Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010067390 Viral Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000011543 agarose gel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000002403 aortic endothelial cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000003190 augmentative Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003115 biocidal Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000004922 colonic epithelial cells Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000001332 colony forming Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003636 conditioned culture media Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229940079593 drugs Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000003623 enhancer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002255 enzymatic Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001747 exhibiting Effects 0.000 description 2
- 108020001507 fusion proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000037240 fusion proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 229960002518 gentamicin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000001963 growth media Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000004962 mammalian cells Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920002106 messenger RNA Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000008267 milk Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000013336 milk Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000002297 mitogenic Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004264 monolayer culture Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000877 morphologic Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229960004927 neomycin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 210000000653 nervous system Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 108091008124 oncoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000025475 oncoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 230000031055 positive regulation of mitosis Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003389 potentiating Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001718 repressive Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002103 transcriptional Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001131 transforming Effects 0.000 description 2
- VHJLVAABSRFDPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1,4-dimercaptobutane-2,3-diol Chemical compound SCC(O)C(O)CS VHJLVAABSRFDPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- RBTBFTRPCNLSDE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3,7-bis(dimethylamino)phenothiazin-5-ium Chemical compound C1=CC(N(C)C)=CC2=[S+]C3=CC(N(C)C)=CC=C3N=C21 RBTBFTRPCNLSDE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101710006356 ACTI Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700029306 ANG1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000015780 Adenovirus E1A Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010024878 Adenovirus E1A Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 1
- DLRVVLDZNNYCBX-CAPXFGMSSA-N Allolactose Chemical class O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@@H]1OC[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)O1 DLRVVLDZNNYCBX-CAPXFGMSSA-N 0.000 description 1
- AVKUERGKIZMTKX-NJBDSQKTSA-N Ampicillin Chemical compound C1([C@@H](N)C(=O)N[C@H]2[C@H]3SC([C@@H](N3C2=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)=CC=CC=C1 AVKUERGKIZMTKX-NJBDSQKTSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101710044578 At3g10140 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000002237 B-cell of pancreatic islet Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000001124 Body Fluids Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004958 Brain cells Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- WOVKYSAHUYNSMH-RRKCRQDMSA-N Bromodeoxyuridine Chemical compound C1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@H]1N1C(=O)NC(=O)C(Br)=C1 WOVKYSAHUYNSMH-RRKCRQDMSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229950004398 Broxuridine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 101700046715 CSTI Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 240000001432 Calendula officinalis Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005881 Calendula officinalis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 102000000844 Cell Surface Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010001857 Cell Surface Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000001638 Cerebellum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 108010035532 Collagen Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000008186 Collagen Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 206010010071 Coma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000000877 Corpus Callosum Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N D-Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101700020566 DEFA4 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700086219 DVA-1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010012601 Diabetes mellitus Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101700033006 EGF Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100010813 EGF Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229940110715 ENZYMES FOR TREATMENT OF WOUNDS AND ULCERS Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000003038 Endothelium Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000003979 Eosinophils Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229940116977 Epidermal Growth Factor Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000003237 Epithelioid Cells Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000000981 Epithelium Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003743 Erythrocytes Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000272184 Falconiformes Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000002779 Fornix, Brain Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 102100008842 GH1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 206010064571 Gene mutation Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108090000079 Glucocorticoid Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000003676 Glucocorticoid Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 240000007842 Glycine max Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010469 Glycine max Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 210000002360 Granulocyte-Macrophage Progenitor Cells Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003714 Granulocytes Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 108010051696 Growth Hormone Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229960002897 Heparin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- ZFGMDIBRIDKWMY-PASTXAENSA-N Heparin Chemical compound CC(O)=N[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](COS(O)(=O)=O)O[C@@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](C(O)=O)O[C@@H](O[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](OS(O)(=O)=O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]3[C@@H](OC(O)[C@H](OS(O)(=O)=O)[C@H]3O)C(O)=O)O[C@@H]2O)CS(O)(=O)=O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O ZFGMDIBRIDKWMY-PASTXAENSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010073071 Hepatocellular carcinoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000251188 Holocephali Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001135574 Human adenovirus 12 Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010020718 Hyperplasia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101710006353 IP3R Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700035656 ISOTI Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700035039 ITI Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700052013 ITR2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700068039 ITRP Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010022498 Insulinoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000001617 Interferon Receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010054267 Interferon Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000003963 Intermediate Filaments Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003734 Kidney Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- KDXKERNSBIXSRK-YFKPBYRVSA-N L-lysine Chemical compound NCCCC[C@H](N)C(O)=O KDXKERNSBIXSRK-YFKPBYRVSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101710009221 LD Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000003141 Lower Extremity Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004698 Lymphocytes Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000004472 Lysine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 101710033910 MT-I Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101700036939 MTI Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000124008 Mammalia Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000003593 Megakaryocytes Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003584 Mesangial Cells Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000035633 Metabolized Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940042115 Methylene blue Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 241000711466 Murine hepatitis virus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 description 1
- 210000003205 Muscles Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 102100009139 NGF Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 229940053128 Nerve Growth Factor Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 108010025020 Nerve Growth Factor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000000623 Oestrogen receptor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108050008051 Oestrogen receptor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000003980 Papillomavirus E7 Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010057576 Papillomavirus E7 Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000002381 Plasma Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000003324 RBC Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 108050002653 Retinoblastoma Protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010038997 Retroviral infection Diseases 0.000 description 1
- PYWVYCXTNDRMGF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Rhodamine B Chemical compound [Cl-].C=12C=CC(=[N+](CC)CC)C=C2OC2=CC(N(CC)CC)=CC=C2C=1C1=CC=CC=C1C(O)=O PYWVYCXTNDRMGF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000283984 Rodentia Species 0.000 description 1
- SUKJFIGYRHOWBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sodium hypochlorite Chemical compound [Na+].Cl[O-] SUKJFIGYRHOWBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005708 Sodium hypochlorite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002105 Southern blotting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 240000003186 Stachytarpheta cayennensis Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000009233 Stachytarpheta cayennensis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 101700062451 TI Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710002875 TYRO3 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000007984 Tris EDTA buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 102100014870 VIM Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000251539 Vertebrata <Metazoa> Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010065472 Vimentin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010006886 Vitrogen Proteins 0.000 description 1
- LEBBDRXHHNYZIA-LDUWYPJVSA-N [(2S,3R,4S,5R,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl] N-[(Z)-1,3-dihydroxyoctadec-4-en-2-yl]carbamate Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCC\C=C/C(O)C(CO)NC(=O)O[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O LEBBDRXHHNYZIA-LDUWYPJVSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001058 adult Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229960000723 ampicillin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000001093 anti-cancer Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960000070 antineoplastic Monoclonal antibodies Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000003376 axonal Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000227 basophil cell of anterior lobe of hypophysis Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 1
- 102000005936 beta-Galactosidase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010005774 beta-Galactosidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000000560 biocompatible material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004071 biological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001488 breeding Effects 0.000 description 1
- BDOSMKKIYDKNTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N cadmium Chemical compound [Cd] BDOSMKKIYDKNTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052793 cadmium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000000711 cancerogenic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001720 carbohydrates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 231100000357 carcinogen Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000003183 carcinogenic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000423 cell based assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010370 cell cloning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000030833 cell death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003915 cell function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004663 cell proliferation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002932 cholinergic neuron Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 101710005830 cmfA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229960005188 collagen Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229920001436 collagen Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000000112 colonic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000023298 conjugation with cellular fusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000016396 cytokine production Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004059 degradation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001809 detectable Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002405 diagnostic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000673 dose–response relationship Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000004520 electroporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003619 fibrillary Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007667 floating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005187 foaming Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007429 general method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001434 glomerular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004884 grey matter Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000122 growth hormone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940020899 hematological Enzymes Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000002607 hemopoietic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920000669 heparin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 231100000844 hepatocellular carcinoma Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000000415 inactivating Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002779 inactivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 1
- BPHPUYQFMNQIOC-NXRLNHOXSA-N isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside Chemical compound CC(C)S[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O BPHPUYQFMNQIOC-NXRLNHOXSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003902 lesions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004807 localization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036210 malignancy Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000013011 mating Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035800 maturation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002503 metabolic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960000907 methylthioninium chloride Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006011 modification reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000051 modifying Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007193 modulation by symbiont of host erythrocyte aggregation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010369 molecular cloning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960000060 monoclonal antibodies Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000000869 mutational Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003098 myoblast Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000001613 neoplastic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002569 neurons Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 210000000535 oligodendrocyte precursor cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002246 oncogenic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000590 oncogenic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000004091 panning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004977 physiological function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035790 physiological processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007747 plating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000021625 positive regulation of cell division Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001959 radiotherapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102000005962 receptors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108020003175 receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000001172 regenerating Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000022532 regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009256 replacement therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004043 responsiveness Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108091007521 restriction endonucleases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 201000000582 retinoblastoma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000392 somatic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000009987 spinning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002269 spontaneous Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000087 stabilizing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004500 stellate cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004154 testing of material Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001225 therapeutic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000025366 tissue development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002753 trypsin inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000381 tumorigenic Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000588 tumorigenic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 241000701161 unidentified adenovirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001529453 unidentified herpesvirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000021037 unidirectional conjugation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000003442 weekly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001262 western blot Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004885 white matter Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; CARE OF BIRDS, FISHES, INSECTS; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K2217/00—Genetically modified animals
- A01K2217/05—Animals comprising random inserted nucleic acids (transgenic)
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
- A01K—ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; CARE OF BIRDS, FISHES, INSECTS; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
- A01K67/00—Rearing or breeding animals, not otherwise provided for; New breeds of animals
- A01K67/027—New breeds of vertebrates
- A01K67/0275—Genetically modified vertebrates, e.g. transgenic
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2510/00—Genetically modified cells
- C12N2510/04—Immortalised cells
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2517/00—Cells related to new breeds of animals
- C12N2517/02—Cells from transgenic animals
Description
TRANSGENIC ANIMALS, CELLS AND
CELL LINES THEREFROM, AND THEIR USE
This invention relates to "conditionally" transgenic
non—human vertebrate animals, e.g. mammals, in which germ
and/or somatic cells have chromosomally incorporated
therein a nucleic acid sequence or sequences expression
of which, during normal animal development, is inhibited
but which may be activated in isolated tissue culture.
The invention is also concerned with such isolated
cultures and their use in producing immortalized cell
lines.
Such cell lines in turn have many useful
applications.
The study of physiological function on the cellular
level has greatly benefited from the availability of cell
lines which allow biochemical experimentation to be
conducted on homogenous populations of clonally derived
cells. Such cell lines have frequently been derived from
tumours of either spontaneous or experimental origin.
More recently, it has become possible to use genetic
manipulations to create cell lines by the insertion of
particular types of genetic information into the cellular
genome.
The various types of genetic information which allow
the generation of cell lines share the property of
preventing cells from differentiating into a non—dividing
end-stage cell.
In Virology 127, 74-82 (1983), Petit et
al described the use of SV4O in the immortalization of
rodent embryo fibroblasts, and numerous studies have
defined differentiation inhibiting genes by their ability
to rescue fibroblasts from entry into a phenotype of
senescence, a phenotype normally seen after a limited
number of fibroblast divisions. In terms of generation
of cell lines, the entry of fibroblasts into such a
senescent phenotype is sometimes called "crisis", and the
ability to rescue cells from entry into crisis provides a
valuable assay system for the identification of genes in
this family. As the cells in which this particular type
of genetic information is expressed can be established as
tissue culture lines which will grow for effectively
infinite periods in vitro, this family of genes has been
called the establishment genes or immortalizing genes
(Land et al, Nature 1983, 304, 596-602, Ruley Nature
1983, 304, 602-606). As these genes also inhibit end-
stage differentiation, they are also sometimes called
maturation arrest genes.
Current analysis suggests that the differentiation
inhibiting genes are frequently members of a family of
oncogenes called the nuclear oncogenes. These nuclear
oncogenes include a number of viral oncogenes which as
yet have no known cellular counterparts (e.g., SV4O large
T antigen, polyoma large T antigen, human papilloma virus
E7 antigen) (Jat and Sharp 1986, J. Virology 59, 746-750,
Rassoulzadegan et al, 1982 Nature 300, 713-718, 1983 PNAS
, 4354-4358, Phelps et al, 1988 Cell 53, 539-547, and
Petit et al supra) and also a number of genes with known
cellular homologues (of which myc is the best example).
In addition, some genes in the family of cytoplasmic (or
growth—controlling) oncogenes also inhibit
differentiation in some cell types. For example, the src
gene inhibits differentiation of glial progenitor cells.
It is however rare for genes thought to function in the
stimulation of cell division also to have the capacity to
inhibit cellular differentiation processes.
In recent experiments a variety of methods have been
used to place immortalizing oncogenes into cells to allow
the establishment of cell lines. For example, in
Molecular and Cellular Biology Vol 6, p.1204—1217 (April
1986), Jat et al described a murine retrovirus shuttle
Vector system and its use to construct recombinant
retroviruses for infection of rat Flll cells. Resultant
cell lines which expressed SV4O large T were not
tumorigenic but exhibited efficient microcolony formation
(in soft agar). Moreover, using these recombinant
retroviruses, they showed that the SV4O large T antigen
by itself is capable of efficiently immortalizing primary
fibroblasts without crisis (Jat and Sharp supra).
Various types of transfection strategies exist, and
retroviral-mediated gene insertion is the most commonly
used strategy for introducing immortalizing genetic
elements.
These strategies share a number of
disadvantages. First, there is at present no means of
targeting specific cellular populations. Second, the
efficiency of effective gene insertion is low (of the
order of 1 in 104 cells or less) and therefore requires
the use of large numbers of cells in order to establish
cell lines with any regularity. Third, effective
integration of the genetic element requires the induction
of cell division in tissue culture. Fourth, extended
growth in tissue culture is required before cells can be
used in experimentation, and this growth usually involves
a period of time in artificial conditions which impose
highly artificial selective pressure on cell populations.
It would be of great value to have a method which
would allow cell lines to be established from a wide
variety of cell types with an efficiency and reliability
greater than that available with present technology.
In addition, all cells of the body can be divided
into the two different classes of precursor cells and
end-stage cells. Precursor cells (which include
progenitor cells and stem cells) are the cells involved
in replenishment of specific cellular populations within
the body. They can be restricted to the production of
only one type of end-stage cell (e.g., skeletal muscle
precursors are thought to give rise to only skeletal
muscle), they can be bipotential (e.g., granulocyte-
macrophage progenitor cells give rise only to
granulocytes and macrophages), or they can give rise to a
multiplicity of cell—types (e.g., haematopoetic stem
cells give rise to all the cells of the bloodstream, and
embryonic stem cells can give rise to all of the cell-
types of the body). In contrast, end—stage cells
represent cells which have reached a final point in their
differentiation pathway, and are no longer capable of
generating a multiplicity of cell types or, more
importantly, of taking part in replenishment of damaged
tissue populations.
There are a small number of instances, all of them
involving the haematopoetic system, where sufficient
knowledge about specific precursor cells exists to permit
restoration of normal tissue function by using a
primitive form of precursor transplantation therapy to
replace both precursor cells and differentiated end—stage
cells. This primitive form of precursor therapy is the
principle behind the widely—used bone marrow transplant,
which works by the emplacement of haematopoetic stem
cells (along with other cells) from a donor individual
into a recipient suffering from depletion of some or all
of their normal haematopoetic populations (frequently as
a result of radiotherapy to treat a disseminated
malignancy). The injected haematopoetic stem cells
colonize the patient's own bone marrow, and go on to
produce megakaryocytes, lymphocytes, macrophages,
eosinophils and all of the other diverse cell types
derived from this single stem cell population.
Although there are many areas of contemporary and
future scientific and medical practice where the ability
to carry out precursor replacement therapy could be of
significant value, efforts in this direction are
presently frustrated by the paucity of current knowledge
about the identity of the precursor populations which
contribute to the normal development of most tissues of
the body. Despite the many years of work which has gone
into the study of these populations, there are only a
limited number of instances where specific precursor
populations have been identified and can be manipulated
in tissue culture in a manner which might allow them to
be subsequently introduced into damaged tissue.
Similarly, there are only a limited number of instances
in which the identity of the molecular signals which
cause precursors to divide or to differentiate along
specific pathways is known. Obtaining such knowledge,
which could be of great Value in causing the body's own
precursor populations to more effectively replenish
themselves or repair damaged tissue, is hampered
enormously by the lack of suitable cellular assay systems
and also by the lack of suitable source materials for the
purification of these important molecules.
In W089/D9816, McKay et al described a general
method of immortalizing cell lines in which a growth
promoting gene is introduced into vertebrate cells. The
intention is that function of this gene be controlled by
an external factor or factors so that the gene function
can be regulated at will. It is stated that precursor
cells may then be grown with the gene activated, and the
resulting cell population then allowed to differentiate
by inactivating the gene by changing the conditions to
"non—permissive" conditions. In addition, Almazan et al,
at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Society for
Neuroscience, Toronto,
(November 1988)(see Soc. Neurosci.
Abstr. 14(2) 1988 1130), described the immortalization of
an oligodendrocyte precursor cell using a temperature
sensitive oncogene—carrying retrovirus.
However, although the utilization of existing
techniques to insert genes into precursor cells has
allowed for the development of particular cell lines with
precursor qualities, not only do the problems inherent in
the generation of any cell lines apply also to the
generation of precursor cell lines, but the establishment
of precursor cell lines suffers from the further
difficulty that precursors may represent only a small
fraction of the cells in any given tissue, and the
possibility of successfully introducing the required
genetic information into the cells is correspondingly
reduced.
So—called "transgenic" animals have also been known
for some years, i.e. animals having incorporated into the
animal genome a foreign gene or genes which may be
expressed in their new chromosomal environment to change
the characteristics of the animal in a directed manner.
Papers on transgenic animals first appeared in the
literature in 1982. Thus, Palmiter et al. (Cell, 1982,
:701-710) microinjected a plasmid containing the mouse
metallothionein—I promotor/regulatory region joined to
the structural gene of herpes virus thymidine kinase.
They showed expression of the hybrid gene in vivo and
regulatability of the gene in vivo by heavy metals.
Gordon and Ruddle (Prog. Clin. Biol. Res., 1982, 85:111-
) also demonstrated inheritance of injected DNA
sequences. Palmiter et al (Nature, 1982 :611—615) showed
that mice transgenic for growth hormone, as regulated by
the metallothionien promotor, grew to abnormally large
size.
In 1983, McKnight et al. (Cell, 1983, 32:335—341),
Lacy et al (Cell, 1983, 34:343-358), Palmiter et al.
(Science, 1983, 22:809—814), Brinster et al (Nature,
:332—336), and Gordon (J. Exp. Zool., 1983, 228:313—
) all reported on characterization of transgenic
animals without discussion of cell growth in tissue
culture.
In 1984 the first papers indicating that the
expression of oncogenes would disrupt normal development
appeared. Brinster et al. (Cell, 1984, 37:367-379)
demonstrated that mice expressing SV4O large T antigen
under the control of the metallothionien promotor
developed tumours of the choroid plexus.
Tumours
developed long after birth, indicating the involvement of
hybridoma fusion partners.
In US patent 4,736,866, Leder and Stewart describe
transgenic non—human mammals in which the germ and somatic
cells_contain an activated oncogene sequence. Such animals
are, inter alia, useful models for the testing of anti—cancer
‘ drugs due to their increased tendency to develop neoplasms,
and the lower level of drug dosage that can consequently be
employed in such testing. ,The animals do, however, exhibit a
pronounced tendency to develop abnormally, and this virtually
eliminates their usefulness as models for normal cell
development studies or as sources of therapeutic biological
materials.
EP+A—0 298 807 describes the production of transgenic
animals from which cell lines expressing a protein of interest
can be obtained, wherein said animals are produced using a
construct comprising an oncogenic sequence as well as elements
for its expression, together with an expression block coding
for and expressing the protein of interest.
Palmiter et al. (Nature, 1985, 3l6':457-460),
continuing a previous analysis of the effects of SV4O
large T antigen in transgenic mice, showed that the
development of choroid plexus tumours required the
presence of the SV4O enhancer region, and that different
SV4O constructs yielded different types of tumours. Cell
lines were isolated from hepatocellular tumours of some
mice, and these cells were shown to express T antigen in
their nuclei. The authors described production of mice
with the ts58 temperature—sensitive derivative of SV40,
but stated that this construct was not temperature-
sensitive. Despite the widespread use of T antigen in
the creation of transgenic mice and the widespread use of
the ts58 (=tsA58) mutant in the generation of
conditionally immortal cell lines in vitro through the
use of, e.g., retroviral—mediated gene insertion, no
other work in the prior art (including later work of
Palmiter and colleagues) returned to the use of this
mutant.
It can be said that the general goal in transgenic
work reported thus far has been to introduce into the
germline genetic information which disrupts normal
development, generally of specific tissues. In complete
contrast, as will be clear hereinafter, the present
invention is concerned with the creation of transgenic
animals in which normal development is not disrupted, but
from which cells can be harvested, inter alia, in which
activation of the transgenes in tissue culture will
specifically facilitate the study of cells from
_11_
potentially all tissues of the body.
Thus, for example, even though other laboratories
have previously gone so far as to build genetic
constructs in which a regulatable promotor (H—2Kb) has
been used to regulate oncogene expression, the
possibility that use of such promotors in transgenic
animals might allow conditional oncogene expression in
vitro has not previously been recognized. The most
detailed example of this is the studies linking the H—2Kb
promotor with the c-myc gene described by Morello et al.
(Oncogene Research, 1989, 4:111—125), who constructed
several transgenic strains carrying a fusion gene in
which the 5’ H—2Kb promotor sequences were linked to the
human c-myc proto-oncogene in order to determine whethe
constitutive c-myc expression was found in all tissues
and to ascertain the biological effects of such
constitutively enforced myc expression in these
transgenic animals. The authors obtained 33 mice which
led to the establishment of 5 transgenic strains. The
authors reported expression of the H-2/myc construct in
most organs analyzed, with maximal expression in the
lymphoid organs and minimal expression in the brain and
in the liver. The level of expression of H—2K/myc was in
parallel with the expression of H-2K. Morello et al.
also reported that no pathology was observed over a
period of 20 months in four of the H—2K/myc mice, and
concluded from this that a second genetic event was
necessary for immortalization with this construct.
....:]_2_.
In earlier transgenic work, Efrat and Hanahan (Mol.
Cell Biol., 1987, 7:192-198) examined cell—specific
activity of a reverse promotor element in two lineages of
transgenic mice in which the promotor was used to target
T antigen expression to the beta islet cells of the
pancreas.
Expression of the gene was examined in tumour
cells. Also, Efrat et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
1988, 85:9037-9041) examined the behaviour of three
pancreatic beta—cell lines established from insulinomas
derived from transgenic mice carrying a hybrid insulin-
promotor SV40 T antigen gene. The beta tumour cells,
which were all derived from primary beta—ce1l tumours,
maintained the features of beta cells for 50 passages in
culture. The authors concluded that "targeted expression
of an oncogene with a cell—specific regulatory element
can be used both to immortalize a rare cell type and to
provide a selection for the maintenance of its
differentiated phenotype". In the present invention, an
important contribution to the science is that "targeted
expression" is not necessary. As will be clear
hereinafter, the present transgenic animals can be
storehouses of cell types which can be chosen and taken
at will, when desired, for immortalization.
In yet other transgenic work, Bieberich et al. (Mol.
Cell Biol., 1987, 7:4003—4009) also used transgenic mice
to study class I antigen function, and found that skin
grafts from transgenic mice were rapidly rejected by mice
of the background strain, that the class 1 transgene was
inducible by interferon treatment and suppressible by
human adenovirus 12 transformation.
Also in 1987, Choi et al. (J. Virol., 1987, 61:30l3—
3019) examined expression of simian virus 40 early region
genes under transcriptional control of the mouse mammary
tumor virus long terminal repeat. Cells cultured from
the transgenic animals showed expression of the chimeric
gene which was inducible by glucocorticoids. Many, but
not all, tissues which expressed the simian virus 40
sequences showed premalignant features and developed into
tumours.
In 1988, Paul et al. (Klin Wochenstr., 1988, 66,
Suppl. 1l:134-139; Exp. Cell Res., 175, 354-365) created
permanently growing hepatocyte lines by growing liver
cells from mice expressing SV4O virus sequences driven by
the mouse metallothionein enhancer sequence. Most
hepatocytes in the liver displayed an immortalized
phenotype in culture, and became increasingly
transformed—like with further growth in culture.
Although the initial cells were nonmalignant, they
clearly differed from normal cells in that cells did not
require addition of epidermal growth factor to chemically
defined medium to promote cell division.
In vivo, the
mice developed hepatocellular carcinomas.
MacKay et al. (Kidney Int., 1988, 33:677-684)
_]_4_
established permanent cell lines of cloned glomerular
epithlial, mesangial and endothelial cells from a line of
mice transgenic for simian virus 40. These mice appeared
normal at birth but by 3 to 4 months of age had sclerosis
affecting a variable percentage of their glomeruli. The
cells derived from these mice maintained features
characteristic of their normal counterparts despite their
transformed phenotype.
Langdon et al. (Oncogene Res., 1988, 3:27l—279)
studied the growth of E mu-myc transgenic B-lymphoid
cells in vitro to examine their progression to
lymphomatous characteristics. Results demonstrated that
cells initially required bone marrow feeder layers, after
which cultures resolved to monoclonal or oligoclonal
composition and then only at a later point achieved
growth autonomy, thus indicating the importance of
multiple events in establishing growth autonomy.
In W089/09816, supra, there is a suggestion that it
may be possible to introduce the conditionally
immortalized cells described therein into animals, and
thereby produce transgenic animals in which the growth
promoting gene present in said cells is inactive at
normal body temperatures. However, the work described
does not take up this suggestion, and how such a
technique should be successfully applied is simply not
described.
There is no disclosure of a promotion system
or conditional oncogene producing only low levels of
expression as are used in the present invention (see below), nor is there
any disclosure of the use of a stable transgenic animal as a source of
cells, differentiated or precursor cells (which later may be immortalized
in culture).
It would clearly be highly desirable to provide a method for
efficiently obtaining cell lines from potentially any tissue of the body.
That is a goal which, aside from specific problems noted above, and
even with the immense interest in transgenic animals, has not hitherto
come remotely close to realization in the art.
The present invention provides in one aspect a transgenic non-
human eukaryotic animal having germ cells and/or somatic cells a
chromosomally incorporated sequence, wherein:
said sequence encodes a thermolabile form of the SV40 large T
antigen product which is conditionally active; and
said sequence is under the control of a regulatable promoter,
such that said thermolabile form of the SV40 large T antigen
product is at a sufficiently low fimctional level in vivo to permit normal
development of said cells in said animal; and
such that under permissive conditions in culture in which the
promoter is activated, said product has a functional level of expression
sufficient to prevent complete differentiation of cells taken from said
animal.
The promoter may be a non-constitutive promoter such that
expression of said sequence is normally inhibited allowing normal cell
development, but precursor cells taken from said animal may be
prevented from completing differentiation in tissue culture by providing
permissive conditions for said promoter and differentiation inhibiting
product thereby activating expression of said sequence. In connection
with these “conditional” transgenic animals, by “non—constitutive
promoter” as used herein is meant a promoter system Which: (a) can be
induced to cause much higher levels of expression of the sequence under
its control than occur in the absence of induction, and (b) in the absence of
..16_
induction either does not detectably permit expression or
permits expression only at a level which does not inhibit
normal cell development. It will be appreciated that a
promotor system which is "leaky" or which does permit a
small amount of expression may be tolerated if the level
of expression fails to impede a normal development
pattern. As will be apparent, there are various ways in
which expression levels may be kept down in the animals
but still be induced to rise when desired.
"Conditionality" may thus be achieved using multiple
means, as in the specific work described herein which
uses a form of double conditionality involving a
conditional oncogene. Multiple conditionality may, for
example, alternatively depend upon the use of a promotor
system employing two or more regulatory genetic elements,
the regulation of all of which is necessary to cause the
higher levels of expression referred to in (a) above to
be achieved.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a method of
providing a non—human animal which carries a preselected
mutation and has cells carrying a chromosomally incorporated
sequence as defined above, which method comprises effecting
chromosomal incorporation of a sequence as defined above into
at least some of said animal cells, to provide a non—human
animal according to any one of the preceding claims, crossing
it with a mutant non—human animal parent which expresses a
preselected mutation, and obtaining the descendant thereof
carrying said mutation and chromosomally incorporated
sequence.
Well differentiated cell types can, if desired, be
effectively put into tissue culture from such animals,
_]_7_.
and, in addition, the present invention provides a method
for obtaining precursor cells from normal tissue in a
manner which greatly improves the potential for
understanding not only the identity of these cells but
also the biological principles which regulate their
development.
The present invention, by its achievement of low
expression levels in vivo in the absence of induction,
enables successful creation of transgenic animals in
which development and differentiation of tissues occurs
normally in vivo, providing a storehouse of biological
material for various purposes.
In general, the invention concerns transgenic non-
human eukaryotic animals with germ cells and/or somatic
cells which contain a differentiation inhibiting DNA
sequence which is inactive in most, or all, tissues of
the normal animal and which is constructed so as to
specifically have the minimum possible effects on normal
development of the animal. Activation of the genetic
construct, which is capable of preventing terminal
differentiation, is preferentially achieved through
manipulation of dissected tissue in vitro, although the
constructs can also be activated in vivo.
Thus, in another aspect, the invention provides a
transgenic non—human eukaryotic animal having germ cells
and/or somatic cells into which a differentiation
_.l8_
inhibiting sequence which is itself conditionally active
and inducible has been chromosomally incorporated under
the control of a promotor such that expression of said
sequence is normally held below an effective level thus
allowing normal cell development but precursor cells
taken from said animal may be prevented from completing
differentiation in tissue culture by activating
expression of said sequence.
In animals of the type defined immediately above,
the conditionally active differentiation inhibiting
sequence may be TAgts and/or the promotor may be a "weak"
non—inducible promotor, e.g. the TR promotor. It will be
appreciated by the skilled reader that molecular
enegineering of any of a large number of promoters (as
reviewed in, for example, Levine and Manley, Cell, 1989,
59:405—408, Abel and Maniatis, Nature, 1989, 341:24—25,
and Mitchell and Tjian, Science, 1989, 245:371—378 will
enable the creation of weak, non—inducible promotors also
suitable for use in the present invention.
In a further aspect, the invention includes a cell
which has been isolated from an animal as defined above
or which has been derived from such an isolated cell and
which has chromosomally incorporated therein said
differentiation inhibiting sequence expression of which
may be activated.
The invention also includes a cell line derived from
-19..
such a cell and which has been immortalized by activating
expression of said differentiation inhibiting sequence.
In yet a further aspect, the invention includes a
differentiated cell derived either from a cell as defined
above by allowing it to differentiate without activation
of expression of said differentiation inhibiting sequence
or from a cell line as defined above by deactivating
expression of said differentiation inhibiting sequence or
from a cell as defined above wherein expression of said
differentiation inhibiting sequence has been activated
but which cell may nonetheless be induced to
differentiate by exposure to an external factor and has
been so exposed.
The invention also includes a method of producing a
transgenic non—human eukaryotic animal having cells into
which a differentiation inhibiting sequence has been
chromosomally incorporated but in a regulable manner such
that expression of said sequence may be activated but is
normally inhibited allowing normal cell development,
comprising effecting chromosomal incorporation of said
differentiation inhibiting sequence under the control of
a non—constitutive promotor into at least some cells of
said animal or effecting chromosomal incorporation of a
differentiation inhibiting sequence which is itself
conditionally active and inducible into at least some
cells of said animal.
..20_
The technique used to achieve transgenesis is
immaterial to the inventive concept, but normally micro-
injection at the embryonic stage is the preferred route
using procedures well known in the art. Micro—injection
can be used at any developmental stage from the
unicellular stage to later embryonic stages.
Transgenic animals can, however, be generated in a
variety of ways, all of which are to be seen as
encompassed within this invention. The genetic construct
can be inserted into embryonic stem cells, and these
genetically manipulated stem cells can be injected into
fertilized zygotes at a stage where a small number of
cells are present. The embryonic stem cells in some
cases become incorporated successfully in the zygote and
cells derived from these genetically manipulated cells
can differentiate to form many or all of the cell types
found in the body. In some animals, such cells will also
contribute to the germ line, thus providing a means of
making fully transgenic animals as progeny from the
initial chimaeras. It has also been suggested that sperm
themselves can be used as a vector for creating
transgenic animals (although this claim is currently
considered controversial) and so the possibility of
incorporation as a result of events at a preconception
stage should not be discounted. The manner and timing
(in animal developmental terms) of achieving chromosomal
incorporation in accordance with the invention does not
matter, provided that the differentiation inhibiting
sequence ultimately appears in at least some cells of a
transgenic animal under the control of a non-constitutive
promotor so that the sequence is regulatable.
The central feature of this invention is the intent
to avoid a level of expression of the experimentally-
introduced genetic information such that normal
development is impeded. This feature distinguishes the
present invention from all other transgenic
experimentation thus far reported. This necessary aspect
of the present invention is principally achieved by
utilizing promotor sequences which must be specifically
activated in order to allow appreciable expression of the
differentiation inhibiting gene. In the non—limiting
Examples provided hereinafter, oncogene function is
further limited by using an oncogene sequence which
itself is only conditionally active. The invention
accordingly envisages the principle of multiple
conditionality. This may be achieved, for example, by
the use of a plurality of genetic regulatory elements
which, used in concert, provide an overall non-
constitutive promotor system as defined above, or it may
be achieved by the use of one or more genetic regulatory
elements and conditional oncogene—like sequences which,
again,
used in concert, achieve the desired effect thus
providing such a system.
The differentiation inhibiting sequences relevant to
this invention, are capable of inhibiting differentiation
of precursor cells. Such sequences or genes include
_22..
oncogenes which encode for proteins which localize to
cellular nuclei. A number of these nuclear oncogenes
have the ability to immortalize cells (and thus render
them capable of growth for indefinite periods without
entering a state of terminal differentiation) and also to
inhibit the differentiation of precursor cells into non-
dividing end-stage cells. Several of these genes are not
only of viral origin but also have, at present, no known
mammalian counterparts in the normal genome. For
example, the normal cellular counterparts of SV4O large T
antigen, human papilloma virus E7 protein and polyoma
large T antigen are currently unknown, even though it has
been shown that all of these viral proteins are able to
interact with normal cellular proteins in a manner
thought to be related to the function of the viral
proteins in neoplastic transformation (Whyte P. et al,
1988 Nature 388,
-129, De Caprio J.A. et al, 1988 Cell
, 275-283, and Dyson N. et al, 1989 Science 243, 934-
937). Some normal cellular proteins which localize to
the nucleus, such as c—myc, also are able to immortalize
cells and inhibit precursor cell differentiation (Land et
al supra, Dotto G.P. et al, 1985 Nature 318, 472-475, and
Dmitrovsky E. et al, 1986 Nature 311, 748-750). In
addition, a small number of oncogenes thought to be
associated with growth regulation, such as src, have the
ability to immortalize and inhibit the differentiation of
specific precursor populations.
Broadly, it can be stated that at present there are
five diverse groups of genes which may function as
differentiation inhibiting sequences in this invention.
Some of the known genes in each category are listed in
the Table below. The first category of genes are members
of the nuclear oncogene family, and include genes like
SV4O large T antigen and also genes like myc and myb.
The second category of genes are those which can be
converted by mutation from suppressor genes to
immortalizing genes. The one representative of this
category known at present is p53, which appears to
interact in an as yet unknown manner with the family of
proteins also involved in modulation of the
retinoblastoma gene product activity. The third category
of genes are those commonly thought to be involved in
control of cell proliferation, but which also appear to
be able to inhibit the differentiation of some cell
types. The fourth category of genes are typified by a
secreted molecule called differentiation inhibiting
activity, which seems to work through cell—surface
receptors to inhibit the differentiation of embryonic
stem cells. Finally, it has recently been discovered
that co—operative interactions between mitogens can also
inhibit precursor cell differentiation. In studies on
the oligodendrocyte—type 2 astrocyte progenitor cell of
the rat optic nerve, it has been found that stimulation
of these precursor cells simultaneously with platelet-
derived growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor
completely inhibits differentiation of precursors into
oligodendrocytes and allows O—2A progenitors to be grown
...24_.
indefinitely in tissue culture in the apparent absence of
mutational activation of nuclear oncogenes (Bogler et
al., 1990, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87:6368—6372).
These last two sets of results indicate that it may be
possible also to use soluble factors, controlled by
inducible, non—constitutive promotors, to inhibit
differentiation of cells. In such circumstances, the
"differentiation inhibiting sequence" used in the
invention is the genetic sequence encoding said factors.
TABLE
Nuclear oncogenes
SV4O large T
polyoma large T
adenovirus EIA
HPV E7 and E6
myc
erb A
myb
dominant mutations altering tumour suppressor genes
some mutants of p53
growth regulatory genes which inhibit differentiation
V-src
genes which produce differentiation inhibiting agents
differentiation inhibiting activity
._.25_
genetic sequences encoding combinations of growth factors
which work to inhibit differentiation
platelet—derived growth factor + basic fibroblast
growth factor.
Lists of nuclear oncogenes, which are most
frequently the genes having differentiation inhibiting
capability, have recently been compiled by Hunter (Cell,
, 64:249-270).
The differentiation inhibiting sequences used in the
present invention are included in the genome in a manner
which limits the potential of the immortalizing gene to
function in vivo. For example, a thermolabile form of
the SV4O large T antigen (TAg) (Tegtmeyer, 1975 J.
Virology 15, 613-618) may be used which is rapidly
degraded and thus inactivated at the normal body
temperature of the mouse (39.50C). In an embodiment of
this invention this temperature—sensitive TAg (TAgts) is
placed under the control of a promotor which normally
controls expression of Class I antigens of the major
histocompatability complex (Kimura et al, 1986 Cell 44,
261-272, and Baldwin Jr. A.S. et al, 1987 Mol. Cell Biol.
7, 305-313). This promotor can be activated by exposure
to gamma interferon, but is normally active only at low
levels in most tissues of the body of healthy animals.
The rationale behind the use of a controllable, non-
constitutive promotor is to inhibit expression of the
_26_
gene of interest, except when such expression is desired.
Non—constitutive promotors which are usable in the
present invention are regulatable by changing the
conditions. Under certain conditions (non-permissive)
the promotor function is inhibited and normal cellular
development takes place. If the conditions are changed
(e.g., in the example referred to above, by exposure to
gamma interferon) to be permissive, appreciable
expression occurs. Avoiding appreciable expression is
critical, as it is known that revertant mutations of a
conditional oncogene itself would be likely to cause
abnormal development if the oncogene were allowed to be
expressed in all tissues at all times, that low levels of
activity of a conditional oncogene might become effective
if high enough levels of the gene product are expressed
(as described in the Example 1 hereinafter), and
expression of functional levels of wild—type
differentiation inhibiting sequences in vivo causes
tissue transformation (as demonstrated by such other
transgenic models as those offered by, e.g., U.S. Patent
).
Revertant mutations which occur by random mutation
seem to occur with a frequency of 1 in 105 cells. As the
body of an animal contains many more than 1012 cells,
this means that many cells of the body will express
revertant mutations of the conditional gene. Moreover,
experimentation in tissue culture indicates that
revertant mutations which involve other cellular control
--»——-——~———————..._.._.__._.__.__.
_27_
pathways may even occur at frequencies of up to 1 in 104.
Thus, every tissue in the body would be expected to carry
large numbers of cells which would be expressing, say a
functional oncogene capable of inhibiting normal pathways
of differentation. Such a situation is incompatible with
normal development. Indeed, prior to the realization of
this critical concept, unpublished attempts were made by
one of the inventors (P. Jat) and colleagues to create
transgenic mice in which TAgts was placed under control
of the promotor for beta-actin, which would cause TAgts
to be constitutively expressed at a reasonably high level
in every cell of the body. Such genetic constructs do
not appear to be compatible with survival of the
manipulated embryo. Therefore to circumvent the problem
of reversion it is essential to use a promotor which
dampens expression of TAgts to below an effective level.
Another possible promotor system for use in this
invention would be one based on a lactose (lac) inducible
operon isolated from bacteria. The lac—inducible system
is based on having binding sites for a particular protein
located between the transcriptional promotor and the
transcriptional start sites. Normally, the repressor
binds to the operator and sterically hinders
transcription. when the inducer substance is present in
the cell, it complexes the repressor and prevents it
binding to the operator and thereby allows transcription
to occur.
The specific inducer used is the allo-lactose
analogue IPTG, which is non—metabolizeable and does not
_28_
occur naturally. Lactose can also activate this inducer
I
but lactose is rapidly metabolized and is present at low
levels in almost all tissues. The one bodily fluid known
to contain high levels of lactose is milk, raising the
possibility that this construct would be induced in the
milk-producing cells of lactating females. Unlike Class I
antigens, which are expressed by many cells in both a
constitutive and inducible manner (resulting in an
increased level of expression as compared to the
situation before induction), the lac repressor may yield
a still tighter control of expression of the
differentiation inhibiting genes used in the present
transgenic animals. The lac system is also, of course,
known to operate in mammalian cells.
The lac—inducible promotor is the one known example
of a bacterial promotor which can be activated by a
substance which is not likely to cause induction in
normal warm—blooded animals, but one can envisage that
other analogous bacterial promotor systems will be
discovered. In addition, it would be possible to use
mutant forms of bacterial promotors, as exemplified by
the lap mutation of the lac repressor.
Such promotors
could be used in the method of this invention.
A further example of an inducible promotor is the
metallothionein promotor, which is activated by the heavy
metals zinc and cadmium. This promotor could also be
used in the method of this invention.
_29_
The MMTV promotor, which is regulated by
glucocorticoids, is an inducible promotor which has been
used in transgenic experimentation. This promotor,
however, suffers from the liability that endogenous
glucocorticoid production would activate expression of
the differentiation inhibiting construct.
At least two advantages of the Class I promotor
system can be cited, apart from its general applicability
across the animal kingdom (see below). in those
First,
tissues in which there is a low level of endogenous Class
I antigen expression, the level of activity of this
promotor appears normally to be too low to support
production of, say, sufficient TAgtsA58 antigen to
interfere with normal development. However, addition of
an inducer (e.g., gamma interferon) can superinduce
activity of this promotor and bring levels of TAgtsA58
antigen to a level where full activity of the
differentiation inhibiting gene can be seen. Moreover,
the use of this promotor allows expression of, say,
TAgtsA58 to be induced in tissues which there is normally
no Class I antigen expression (such as the central
nervous system) because essentially all cells have
functional interferon receptors.
A major advantage of the present invention is that
the general concepts developed can be applied to all
species of warm—blooded animals.
For example, in the
_.30_
example referred to above, the Class I promotor normally
causes high levels of expression of major
histocompatability complex genes when cells are exposed
to gamma interferon (Wallach D. et al, Nature 299, Q33-
836). This pathway of gene activation is already
certainly known to occur in humans, bovines, rats, and
mice, and seems likely therefore to occur in all warm-
blooded animals. In addition, as already mentioned, the
bacterial lac promotor is known to operate in mammalian
cells.
The animals of this invention can be used as a
source material for the growth, identification,
purification and detailed analysis of, inter alia,
precursor cells from potentially all tissues of the body
(Morston G. et al, Hemopoietic Growth Factors, A. Review
Cancer Research 1988, 48, 5624-5637). Dissected tissue
can be placed into tissue culture in conditions which
activate the immortalizing/ differentiation inhibiting
gene, and precursor cells can then be grown indefinitely.
In addition, cells not normally thought of as precursor
cells (such as fibroblasts) can also be immortalized by
the experimental manipulations which form a part of this
invention. As previously indicated, the animals of this
invention differ from the animals of U.S. Patent 4736866
in that they are not suitable for testing of carcinogens
or for testing of materials thought to confer protection
against the development of neoplasms.
Generally, the
tissues of the animals of the present invention undergo
-31..
normal development until the time they are placed in
tissue culture. In the case of the present performed
work, normal development has been experienced with the
exception of the thymus (which shows a delayed
hyperplastic enlargement of the entire organ), and even
within the thymus the function of the genetic construct
which prevents terminal differentiation is itself
conditional. Evidence exists that cells which have been
subjected to abnormal developmental conditions (as in
U.S. Patent 4736866) do not express the properties of
normal cells, and that such cells are also predisposed to
undergo further mutations which activate oncogenes.
Thus, cells harvested from the tissues of animals which
express activated oncogenes in vivo may be unreliable as
suitable models for the study of normal cells, and
particularly for the study of normal precursor cells. In
contrast, cells isolated from the tissues of the animals
described in the present invention are expected to have
undergone normal development, and when grown in vitro can
be expected to be as close to their normal counterparts
as it is possible to be once a cell expresses an
immortalizing protein.
Accordingly, another aspect of the invention
provides a method of providing immortalized cells, which
method comprises isolating from an animal of the
invention precursor or differentiated cells having
chromosomally incorporated therein said differentiation
inhibiting sequence and subjecting said cells to
_32__
conditions in tissue culture whereby expression of said
differentiation inhibiting sequence is activated.
Preventing levels of oncogene expression which might
perturb normal development could also theoretically be
achieved by manipulation of the promotor system to create
still finer tuning mechanisms than exist with a single
genetic control element. For example, a theoretically
useful promotor system would be that described by Reid et
al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA., 1989, 86:840-844, in
which the thymidine kinase promotor (which is
constitutively expressed at low levels) is put downstream
of a short (18 nucleotide) sequence which is sufficient
for conferring inducibility with interferon onto the TK
promotor. This promotor construct could theoretically be
used to drive expression of tsA58 and thus lower the
basal constitutive level of expression while still
retaining the interferon inducibility.
It is also possible to extend the principle of dual
conditionality offered herein, in which the expression of
the thermolabile TAgtsA58 mutant of SV4O is controlled by
the promotor elements of the Class I antigen gene. This
could be extended by the use of other temperature-
sensitive genes with the capacity of inhibiting normal
differentiation. In addition, it is possible to build
chimeric oncogenes which are rendered conditional by
virtue of containing a hormone receptor sequence which is
essential for oncogene function. Examples of such
-33..
proteins are discussed by Picard et al. (Cell, 1988,
:1073—1080) and Eilers et al.
(Nature, 340:66—
,
68), who have produced adenovirus E1A protein with a
hormone binding domain of the rat glucocorticoid receptor
and myc protein with the binding domain of the human
oestrogen receptor, respectively. In both instances, the
effect of the chimeric protein on host cell function is
dependent upon binding of the appropriate hormone to the
chimeric protein.
In a particular embodiment of the present invention,
the differentiation inhibiting sequence or gene used is a
temperature sensitive large T antigen derived from simian
virus SV40. The utilization of this gene imparts a
secondary level of control on gene activity during normal
development, in that the protein encoded by this mutant
gene is rapidly degraded at temperatures approximating
those of the normal body temperature of a mouse.
However, as described elsewhere herein, sufficient
evidence exists to indicate that utilization of the
temperature sensitive gene in combination with a
constitutive (i.e., non-regulatable) promotor would be
expected not to be compatible with normal development if
the promotor was as powerful as, for example, the beta-
actin promotor. Thus, other differentiation inhibiting
genes can also be used in the present invention, insofar
as they are regulatable by a non—constitutive promotor
which is inactive in most or all tissues of the normally
developing body.
__34__
Primary cells used in the work described below to
illustrate this invention were cells from the skin,
thymus, pancreas, central nervous system, colonic crypts,
endothelium, skeletal muscle, and enteric glial cells.
However, it is to be understood that the method of the
present invention can be used to immortalize virtually
any type of cell from the body of an appropriate
transgenic animal. Because the particular cells chosen
to exemplify the invention herein are from tissues in
which extensive cellular characterization has been
carried out, it can be confirmed that the cell lines
derived by the method of the present invention express
properties expected of normal cells. These cell lines
thus provide direct verification of the ability of the
present method to be used to produce continuous cell
lines of a wide variety of cell types from a wide Variety
of tissues. In addition, some of the work described
herein demonstrates directly the utility of the animals
in generating cultures in which novel cell types are
amenable to study.
In the accompanying drawings:-
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of genetic
construct H—2KbtsA58, referred to in the Examples
hereinafter;
Figure 2 is a growth analysis diagram demonstrating
that control of the biological activity of the
_35_
SV40tsA58 gene occurs in accordance with the
principles of the invention; and
Figure 3 shows DNA synthesis under various
conditions for heart fibroblast cells from a mouse
in accordance with the invention and carrying the
genetic construct of Figure 1.
The skin was utilized as a principal source of
fibroblasts to confirm that the general principles
embodied in this invention were correct. Cells from the
skin were placed into tissue culture in conditions which
activate the promotor used and at temperatures which are
permissive for expression of the immortalizing function
of TAgts. These cells were grown for various lengths of
time before being switched to conditions which did not
activate promotor function, which were non—permissive for
TAgts function, or both. As shown in Figure 2 for
different transgenic mice, removal of the promotor
activating compound (in this case murine gamma
interferon) was associated with a reduction in the growth
rate of the cells. Growth of cells from most animals was
not completely suppressed unless the cells were grown in
the absence of gamma interferon and at 39.5°C; this
capacity of cells to continue growing, albeit at a
reduced rate, in the absence of gamma interferon seems
likely to be due to the low level of constitutive
expression of Class I antigens in fibroblasts (Israel A.
et al, Nature 322, 743-746).
Indeed, it is striking that
_36_.
even the low level of constitutive expression of this
promotor which is seen in normal fibroblasts was not
associated with the development of any obvious
hyperplastic abnormalities of the skin. Figure 2 also
shows that expression of a higher copy number of the gene
of interest can be associated with continued slow growth
of cells even when cells are grown at 39.5°C in the
absence of interferon (cultures derived from animals 11
and 36 in the work described below). This slow growth is
similar to that seen if cells deprived of gamma
interferon are grown at 33°C, and is probably due to a
breakthrough of activity of the large amounts of T
antigen produced (due to the presence of multiple gene
copies) prior to its inactivation through degradation at
this non—permissive temperature.
The entry of fibroblasts into a non—dividing state
when activity of the differentiation inhibiting gene is
terminated by gamma interferon withdrawal and growth at
39.50C is similar to that observed in previous studies on
the effects of immortalization of fibroblasts with TAgts.
In these previous studies (in which TAgts expression was
controlled with a constitutively active viral LTR and in
which retroviral—mediated gene insertion was used to
generate cell lines expressing only a single copy of the
TAgts gene), cells grown at 33°C could be grown in tissue
culture indefinitely. In contrast, when cells were
switched to 39.5OC they rapidly lost the capacity to
undergo further cell division (Jat and Sharp, 1989 Mol.
_.37_
Cell Biol. 9, 1672-1681).
The entry of conditionally immortalized fibroblasts
into a non—dividing state is of particular interest in
respect to the way in which this non—dividing state
reflects a normal differentiation pathway of fibroblasts.
Normal fibroblasts undergo a limited number of divisions
before entering a state of senescence in which the cells
show normal metabolic function with the exception of
being refractory to further cell division (Hayflick L. et
al, 1961 Exp. Cell Res. 25, 285, Todaro et al, 1963 J.
Cell Biol. 17, 299—3l3). The phenotype expressed by
conditionally immortalized fibroblasts when they are
switched from permissive to non—permissive conditions
resembles the state of normal senescence so closely as to
be indistinguishable. Thus, conditionally immortalized
cells can undergo the differentiation events of their
normal counterparts when grown in non-permissive
conditions.
Two of the cell lines developed from the thymus, as
an illustration of this invention, are defined as
epithelial cell lines by virtue of expression of
cytokeratins. The derivation of an epithelial cell line
was of particular interest because of the importance of
these cells in human cancer, and the derivation of a
thymic epithelial cell line was of further interest due
to the putative importance of these cells in the
development of the T—lymphocyte populations of the
_38_
thymus. Cell lines were derived from the thymus because
of the tendency of many of the transgenic mice produced
to develop thymic hyperplasia. The cell lines derived
from this tissue all behaved in a conditional manner in
tissue culture, and were growth arrested when grown in
the absence of interferon at 39.50C. The conditionality
of these cell lines in vitro indicates that even in this
tissue the constitutive levels which occur in vitro are
insufficient to cause sufficient levels of TAg to be
expressed to be able to interfere with normal processes
of differentiation and growth control. Such an
observation is consistent with the hypothesis that the
generation of thymic hyperplasia in vivo was enhanced by
the presence of a hepatitis infection in the mouse
colony. Such an infection would cause augmented
production of interferon in the thymus, thus driving the
levels of T antigen above the threshold of non-
effectiveness. These results further support the View
that it is necessary to avoid levels of TAgts being
inappropriately expressed in every cell in body (rather
than just those cells exposed to inducer) as a
consequence, in this case of disease in the mouse
colony).
A cell line from the central nervous system, as a
further illustration of this invention, is of particular
interest as a putative precursor for glial tumours and as
a demonstration of the potential usefulness of the
transgenically derived cell lines as tools for the study
_39_
of differentiation control. This cell line expresses
astrocyte specific antigens when grown in certain tissue
culture conditions, but can be induced to express a
fibroblast~like phenotype in other tissue culture
conditions. The rationale for the characterization of
this CNS line as a putative glioma precursor comes from
observations that human gliomas can be antigenically
divided into two categories: cells which express glial
fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and are clearly derived
from astrocytes, and cells which do not express GFAP but
instead express fibronectin (FN). It has been
demonstated that cloning of GFAP—expressing lines can
lead to the generation of GFAP—negative cell lines which
express fibronectin, thus suggesting that the
fibronectin—expressing cells (which do not correlate with
any known CNS glial cell) may be traceable back to a CNS
lineage. It is potentially relevant to these
observations that some experiments indicate that an
apparently rare subset of GFAP—positive astrocytes may
also express FN (which is not expressed by most
astrocytes). The cell line described herein can be
switched from a GFAP—positive phenotype to a FN—positive
GFAP—negative phenotype by growth in fetal calf serum.
The ability to manipulate the differentiation of this
cell provides a suitable assay system for use in the
purification of the specific molecular signals which
induce differentiation along the FN-positive GFAP-
negative pathway.
_40_
A further cell line prepared by the method of the
present invention was derived from the pancreas. A small
percentage of the cells in this line spontaneously
express insulin in all conditions of growth, and some
cells of the line also can be labeled with a monoclonal
antibody
(A2B5) thought to label islet cells of the
pancreas. It is not yet known if the variable expression
of these markers within the cell line is due to failure
to create appropriate differentiation—inducing
microenvironments in the tissue culture conditions.
Other matters specifically illustrated by the work
described herein (and relevant aspects of the invention)
are specifically referred to in the respective Examples
hereinafter.
The following non—limiting Examples are given to
demonstrate and illustrate the principles of the
invention.
As used in what follows, "mouse x" means the xth
mouse from the first described experiment.
EXAMPLE 1
Construction of pH-2KbtsA58 Genetic Construct
Recombinant pH—2KbtsA58 was
(see Figure 1)
constructed by attaching the 5’—promotor element of
the H—2Kb gene to the early region coding sequences
from the SV4O mutant tsA58. The promotor fragment
was isolated as the approximately 4.2kb EcoRl—Nrul
fragment from plasmid pH-2Kb (which was provided by
Dr. Andrew Mellor, MRC London). This plasmid was
constructed by cloning the EcoRl fragment which
encompasses the genomic sequences encoding the H—2Kb
gene from the cosmid 88H8 (Weiss et al, Nature 1983,
301, 671-674) into plasmid pBR327. The tsA58 DNA
was described by Tegtmeyer 1975 J. Virology 16, 168-
178. In the present Examples, the SV4O tsA58 coding
sequences were isolated as an approximately 2.6 kb
Bgll-BamHl fragment from pUCSV40tsA58 which was
provided by Dr. Hartmut Land (of the Imperial Cancer
Research Fund, London). This plasmid was
constructed by inserting the Kpnl (nucleotide 294)
to the BamHl (nucleotide 2533) fragment from tsA58
DNA, which encodes the T antigen coding sequences,
into the Kpnl and BamHl sites of pUCl9. The Bgll
site was blunt—ended using the Klenow fragment of
DNA polymerase I. The two fragments were ligated
with an equimolar amount of pUCl9 which had been
digested with EcoRl and BamHl. The ligated products
were transformed into JS4, a recA‘derivatiVe of E.
coli MClO6l (Casadaban and Cohen 1980 J. Mol. Biol.
138, 179-207; Sedivy et al 1987 Cell 50, 379-389)
and ampicillin colonies isolated. DNA minipreps
were prepared from isolated colonies and analysed by
digestion with various restriction endonucleases to
_42._
determine if the promotor fragment had been
successfully fused to the T antigen coding
sequences .
Production of Transgenic Mice containing HZKQ-Taqts
fusions
The above H—2Kb—TAgtsA58 plasmids were digested with
EcoRl and Sall to prepare DNA fragments which were
free of vector sequences. These DNA fragments were
isolated on agarose gels and injected into male
pronuclei of fertilized one—cell mouse eggs at a
concentration of 1-2 ug/ml DNA in TE buffer (lOmM
Tris, pH 7.5, 0.2 mM EDTA). The eggs which survived
micro—injection were transferred to pseudopregnant
females as described in Wagner et al (1981) P.N.A.S.
78, 5016. The eggs were derived from a CBA X
C57BL/10 mating. The mice were obtained from the
MRC breeding colonies, and were housed in an
environmentally controlled facility maintained on a
hour dark: 14 hour light cycle. The eggs in the
foster females were allowed to develop to term.
Analysis of Transgenic Mice
At 7-14 days of age, each pup was analyzed to
determine if it carried the transgene. DNA prepared
from a small section of tail was initially analyzed
on a slot blot. Genomic DNA was isolated from 0.1-
_43_
.15 cm sections of tail by the method described in
Sambrook et al "Molecular Cloning" (Cold Spring
Harbor 1989). The resulting nucleic acid pellet was
washed once in 80% ethanol, dried and resuspended in
200 ul of 10.0 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA. The
presence of the construct was determined by
hybridizing the filter with a 32p-labeled fragment
specific for the SV4O large T antigen. The probe
was prepared by the random priming method of
Feinberg & Vogelstein. The integrity of the TAg
gene was verified by Southern blot analysis by
digesting 10 ug of tail DNA with BamHl. The
digested DNA was fractionated on an 0.8% agarose
gel, transferred to Zeta BindTM (Biorad) and
hybridized with an SV4O specific probe using
published methods (as described in Sambrook et al).
Blots were probed with a 32p labeled probe for the
TAg gene. All manipulations were carried out using
either the manufacturers recommended conditions or
by standard protocols as described in Sambrook et
al, supra. The slot blot indicated that 34 out of
88 mice carried the chimeric gene. The number of
copies of this fusion gene present in the mice DNA
varied from 1 up to 15 copies per cell.
Animals containing the H—2Kb-TAgtsA58 fusion gene
developed normally with the exception of the
development of a thymic hyperplasia. There appeared
to be a distinct correlation between the levels of
_.44_
TAg mRNA expressed and the rapidity of onset of
thymic hyperplasia. That the thymic enlargement
seen was not the result of neoplastic transformation
was indicated by the fact that both lobes of the
thymus were equally enlarged, and that injection of
even as many as 107 thymus—derived cells into naive
recipient mice (either subcutaneously or
intraperitoneally) in no case caused tumours in the
host mice. In addition, as described below, almost
all stromal cell lines derived from these enlarged
thymi appeared to be conditional for growth in
culture. The thymic hyperplasia may have been in
part due to the presence of an infection of mouse
hepatitis virus in the animal colony, which would be
expected to cause interferon production in infected
animals. Therefore the hepatitis infection is
likely to have been aggravated by the already high
levels of endogenous Class I antigen expression in
thymic tissue, resulting in expression of TAgtsA58
at a higher level in vivo than would be the case for
other tissues of the body. One of the strains of
mice expressing only one copy of the hybrid gene
took longer (6 months for heterozygotes and 3-4
months for homozygotes) for the hyperplasia to
OCCLIIT .
As described below for cells grown in tissue
culture, in cases where large amounts of TAgtsA58
are transcribed (in association with the presence of
_45_
multiple genetic copies in the DNA of the mice), it
appears that marginal effects of TAgtsA58 on growth
promotion do occur even at the permissive
temperature. In one of the mice in which only one
copy of TAgtsA58 was present in the genome thymic
hyperplasia developed only after several months, and
mice were able to breed normally and effectively,
transmitting the H2Kb—TAgtsA58 fusion to the
offspring.
The following demonstrates the importance of
screening for mice which show low levels of
transgene expression in vivo in order that the mice
function in accordance with the principles of the
invention. As already indicated, this method of
selection is antithetical to the standard methods of
transgenic animal selection, in which high levels of
in vivo transgene expression are sought so as to
have a maximal probability of disrupting normal in
vivo development.
To demonstrate that the expression of H2KbTAgtsA58
in tissues of transgenic mice allowed the generation
of cell lines which were conditionally immortalized,
the growth of skin fibroblasts was examined.
Fibroblasts were derived from 5 different mice by
._46_
first sacrificing the mouse by cervical dislocation,
sterlizing the skin and fur with ethanol, shaving
off the fur, and dissecting several square cm of
skin. This skin was then finely minced with a
sterile scalpel and digested in 500 units per ml
collagenase for 2 h at 37°C in Leibovitz's L-15
medium. Trypsin was then added to a final
concentration of 3000 units per ml, and tissue was
incubated for a further 15 min at 37°C. Following
this incubation, the enzymatic digestion was
terminated by the addition of a solution of soy bean
trypsin inhibitor (1000 units per ml) and DNAse (15
units per ml) also prepared in L—15. Tissue was
then brought to a volume of 5 ml and was gently
triturated up and down in a sterile plastic pipette
a total of 20 times. Undissociated chunks of tissue
were allowed to settle out and the cells contained
in the supernatant were first washed by
centrifugation and then resuspended in Dulbecco’s
Modified Eagle's Medium containing 2 mM glutamine
and 10% fetal calf serum and 100 U/ml of recombinant
murine gamma interferon. In all cases in which
cells were derived from mice carrying the H2Kb—
TAgtsA58 the cultures prepared in this way grew
effectively in tissue culture flasks. Cells were
also prepared and grown in identical ways from
identically aged normal controls and as, discussed
below, the cells from normal mice succumbed to
senensence after short periods of time.
._47_
The cultures prepared from the H2Kb—TAgtsA58 fusion
transgenic mice were grown at 33°C in the presence
of 100 U/ml of gamma interferon for between 8 and 12
weeks before being tested for the conditionality of
their growth. Long before this time all cells
derived from mice which did not harbour the H2Kb—
TAgtsA58 fusion construct had undergone crisis and
stopped dividing, as expected for non—immorta1ized
fibroblasts. In all fibroblast lines derived from
the H2KbTAgtsA58 fusion transgenic mice, the
placement of these cells in non-permissive
conditions inhibited cell growth. Figure 2 shows
the results of a colony—forming assay, in which 1000
cells were plated in a 6 cm dish in DMEM + FCS
lacking interferon for 24 h, and then were switched
into medium which either contained or did not
contain 100 U/ml of murine gamma interferon and
allowed to grow for 14 days at either 33°C or
39.5OC, during which time medium was changed twice-
weekly. The 24 h preplating in normal medium
insures that the initial plating efficiency was the
same in all cultures. After 14 days the cultures
were stained with 2% methylene blue, 50%
ethanolzwater and the number of colonies obtained
was counted. As shown in Figure 2, the growth of
cells in fully permissive conditions (i.e., 33°C,
100 U/ml of murine gamma interferon) was greater
than in any of the non—permissive conditions.
_48_
Detailed analysis of skin fibroblast cultures for
conditionality of growth revealed 3 families of
cultures, depending upon the ability of cells to
grow in fully permissive, semipermissive and
nonpermissive conditions; permissive conditions
were defined for these purposes as growth at 33°C in
the presence of IFN—gamma, semipermissive conditions
included either growth at 33°C in the absence of
IFN—gamma or 39.50C in the presence of IFN—gamma and
nonpermissive conditions were growth at 39.50C in
the absence of IFN—gamma.
In the first family of cultures, growth was fully
conditional and only occurred in permissive
conditions. If cells were grown at 39.5°C, and/or
were grown in the absence of IFN—gamma, cell
division did not occur either in standard growth
assays or in colony forming assays. These
fibroblasts thus behaved as expected from previous
studies in which rat embryo fibroblasts were
conditionally immortalized with tsA58TAg by
retroviral infection (Jat & Sharp, 1989, Mol. Cell.
Biol., 9:3093-3096). In these previous studies, it
has been shown that fibroblasts which are
conditionally immortalized using retroviral—mediated
gene insertion to create cell lines which express
tsA58TAg will continue to proliferate only if
maintained in permissive conditions. Upon
_49_
temperature shift to non~permissive conditions,
fibroblasts rapidly express the senescent phenotype
expressed by normal fibroblasts which have been
grown for extended periods in vitro. All cultures
derived from different individuals within the H2Kb—
TAgtsA58 strain of mice yielded identical results.
In a second family of cultures, optimal growth was
obtained in fully permissive conditions, a lesser
degree of growth was seen in semipermissive
conditions and no growth occurred in nonpermissive
conditions. In the third family, cell growth did
not completely cease even when cells were grown
under nonpermissive conditions, although the best
growth was seen in fully permissive conditions and
the slowest growth occurred at the fully
nonpermissive conditions.
The conditionality of growth observed in the
fibroblasts derived from transgenic animals was
correlated with the levels of tsA58TAg expressed by
these cells. In all cultures, the level of tsA58TAg
was reduced by temperature shiftup and/or by removal
of IFN—gamma. Interestingly, when the most
conditional cultures (those derived from progeny of
mouse H2ts6) were grown at 33°C in the absence of
IFN—gamma, a condition where these cells did not
grow, low levels of TAg could still be detected.
This observation is discussed in further detail in
_50...
the next Example.
To determine whether cell lines which were
conditionally immortal could be rendered fully
immortal by the introduction of a constitutively
active differentiation inhibiting gene, some of the
fibroblasts isolated from the H2ts6 mice were
infected with a retrovirus which expressed a wild-
type SV4O T antigen and the neomycin resistance gene
(Jat & Sharp, J. Virol., 1986, 59:746—750). Cells
which were successfully infected were selected by
growth in the G418 antibiotic. when these cells
were then switched to non—permissive conditions, the
cells continued to grow. These experiments thus
demonstrate that a cell line can be converted from a
conditional to a non-conditional growth state if it
is considered desirable to do so.
Analysis of Cell Lines from H2K9—TAqtsA58
Transgenic Mice
Analysis of thymic cell line
This work demonstrates that even in the single
instance found where the genetic construct used does
disrupt normal development, the cell types which
have undergone hyperplastic expansion in vivo remain
conditional in their in Vitro growth.
_51_
This work further demonstrates that thymic
epithelial cells derived from H2ts6 mice express the
family of intermediate filament proteins normally
expressed by these cells in vivo, thus making these
cells a potentially suitable source for the
purification of proteins expresed in their normal
counterparts.
This work also demonstrates that the thymic
epithelial cell lines derived from H2ts6 mice have
the ability to rosette T—lymphocytes, thus making
them a suitable cell—type for the study and
potential biochemical dissection of a normal
cellular interaction.
Because of the development of thymic hyperplasia in
many of the H2Kb-TAgtsA58 fusion transgenic mice it
was of importance to characterize the growth of
thymic derived cells. To this end, thymic tissue
was prepared for culture in the same manner as for
fibroblasts, except that the periods for which
enzymes were added were limited to a total of 15 min
of collagenase together with a further 15 min in the
additional presence of trypsin. These cells were
then grown as were the skin fibroblasts until
confluent flasks were obtained, after which clonal
cell lines were isolated by limited dilution single
cell cloning.
_52_
The cell lines isolated from the thymuses of
the H2Kb-TAgtsA58 fusion transgenic mice were
conditional in their growth, and were growth
arrested when grown in the absence of interferon at
39.5°C. The conditionality of these cell lines in
vitro indicates that even in this tissue the
endogenous levels of Class I antigen expression are
insufficient to cause sufficient levels of T antigen
to be expressed to be able to interfere with normal
processes of differentiation and growth control.
Such an observation is consistent with the
hypothesis that the reason for the generation of
thymic hyperplasia in vivo was probably due to the
presence of a hepatitis infection in the mouse
colony. Such an infection would cause augmented
production of interferon in the thymus, thus driving
the levels of T antigen above the threshold of non-
effectiveness. These results further support the
importance of the use of an inducible, non-
constitutive promotor, as a potent constitutive
promotor would cause levels of TAgts to be
inappropriately expressed in every cell in the body
rather than just those cells exposed to inducer as a
consequence, in this case, of disease in the mouse
colony.
Two of the cell lines derived from the thymus were
characterized antigenically, and were found to
express cytokeratins by staining the cells with the
LE6l pan- anti keratin monoclonal antibody. As
_53_..
keratins are specifically expressed in epithelial
cell populations, the labelling of these cells with
the LE6l antibody indicates that these cells are
thymic epithlial cells.
The cytokeratin positive thymic epithelial cell
lines discussed above specifically bound T-
lymphocytes, as detected in a standard rosetting
assay. Stromal cells were mixed with unfractionated
freshly isolated thymocytes from nontransgenic
BALB/c mice in a ratio of 1:12. Cells were kept in
a small volume (200 microlitres) and incubated on
ice for one hour. The mixture was then centrifuged
at 200 g for 5 minutes, the pellet gently
resuspended in 1 ml of PBS and the number of
rosettes was counted using a haemocytometer, with 3
or more thymocytes attached to a stromal cell
counting as a rosette. In this assay, the
cytokeratin+ thymic epithelial cell lines
efficiently formed rosettes with thymocytes.
Analysis of a putative qlioma precursor cell
To derive cell lines of the central nervous system,
cells were dissociated from the cerebral cortices of
mouse 11 by the methods described in Noble et al
(1984, J. Neurosci. 4, 1892-1903). The mouse was 3
weeks old at the time of dissection. Cells were
grown in chemically—defined medium (Bottenstein and
_54..
Sato, 1979, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 514-
517) in the presence of 10 ng/ml of platelet-derived
growth factor [BB homodimer (supplied by British
Biotechnology) and 10 ng/ml PDGF AA homodimer
(supplied by Chiron Corporation)] and 10 ng/ml of
basic fibroblast growth factor (supplied by
Boehringer-Mannheim). Cells were grown through an
initial passaging and then cloned by limiting
dilution. Ten clones were isolated and
characterized for antigen expression. Of these, 1
clone consisted of cells which all expressed glial
fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a cytoskeletal
protein specifically expressed by astrocytes in the
CNS (Bignami, et al, 1972 Brain Res 43, 429-435).
GFAP expression was analyzed using an anti-GFAP
antiserum purchased from Dakopatts Ltd and
appropriate fluorescent second layer antibodies
(purchased from Southern Biotechnology).
To examine the differentiation potential of the
GFAP—expressing clone of cells, cells were replated
on poly—L—1ysine coated glass coverslips and treated
with a variety of different substances to induce
differentiation. Of particular interest were the
effects of fetal calf serum, which induced cells to
develop a GFAP- phenotype. The GFAP— cells did
express the extracellular matrix protein fibronectin
(FN), which has been reported as being expressed on
only some poorly defined astrocytic subpopulations
_55_
among the CNS glial cells. Although the parental
cell line expressed both GFAP and FN, some
experiments have suggested that in the absence of
serum this parental cell can take on a GFAP+FN-
phenotype.
The isolation of a cell with the capacity to be
regulated between a GFAP+ phenotype and a GFAP—FN+
phenotype is of exciting interest in light of the
results of recent studies on antigen expression in
human gliomas. Although morphological
classification of human gliomas has generally
assumed that these cells share a close lineage
relationship with the normal glial cells of the CNS,
extensive antigenic analysis of cells derived from
gliomas has not been in agreement with the
morphological categorization of these tumours
(Kennedy et al 1987 Neuropath Appl. Neurobiol 13,
327-347). Most importantly, studies thus far have
indicated that gliomas can be slotted into one of
two antigenic categories, the first being a GFAP+
phenotype and the second being a GFAP—FN+ phenotype.
In work by Kennedy et al, the GFAP-FN+ glioma
phenotype was found to occur in almost 90% of cell
cultures derived from gliomas. The origin of these
cells remains unclear, although it has been shown
that clones derived from a GFAP+ glioma may be GFAP—
and FN+ (Westphal et al, 1988, Cancer Research 48,
-740).
_56..
The results on human gliomas raise the striking
possibility that there exists within the nervous
system a precursor cell with the possibility of
differentiating along both astrocytic (GFAP+) and
non-glial (GFAP—FN+) pathways. The cell we have
isolated represents the first time such a cell has
been clearly isolated from brain in a manner that
allows rigorous examination of this possibility.
The congruence between the many studies on antigen
expression in glioma cells and the antigenic
phenotypes which can be expressed by the cell
isolated from mouse 11 suggests clearly that this
cell line is a candidate for being a glioma
precursor cell.
Analysis of pancreatic cells
Pancreatic cells isolated from the pancreas of mouse
11 in the same manner as cortical cells, and grown
and cloned in the same manner as cortical cells,
have undergone preliminary characterization in
tissue culture. A small proportion of cells in the
most closely examined clone express insulin (as
recognized by anti—insulin antibodies purchased from
ICN) and can be labelled with the monoclonal
antibody A2B5 (hybridoma cell line obtained from Dr.
Marshall Nirenberg of the National Institute of
Health, USA), both of which are markers for
_57_
pancreatic islet cells (Eisenbarth et al, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 79, 5066-5070).
It is retrospectively unfortunate that both the
cortical and pancreatic clones were isolated from
mouse 11, which turned out from much later analysis
to have been one of the least conditional of the
transgenic mice. Preliminary results do however
indicate that the cortical and pancreatic cells may
be more conditional than fibroblasts. More
importantly, neither the brain nor pancreas of mouse
11 showed any evidence of gross developmental
abnormalities, indicating that the levels of
TAgtsA58 which may have been expressed in these
cells was insufficient to interfere with in vivo
differentiation. Alternatively, it may be that
placement of these cells in tissue culture
conditions caused them to express higher levels of
Class I antigen than would be the case in vivo.
One of the transgenic mice created with the
H2KbtsA58 construct (Mouse No. 6) has bred
successfully to produce several litters, all of
which have pups which carry the original genotype.
In all the Examples that follow, the transgenic
animals used were heterozygous progeny of what is
termed the H2ts6 strain (Mouse No. 6).
_58_
EXAMPLE 2
Cells were prepared from the heart of one of the
offspring of mouse 6 by the same methods by which
fibroblasts were prepared from the skin of other
mice. The mouse from which the heart tissue was
prepared (called "daughter of 6") exhibited no
obvious abnormalities in organ size upon dissection.
Cells from daughter of 6 (which were recognised as
being likely heart-derived fibroblasts) were grown
for 4 weeks at 33°C in the presence of recombinant
murine gamma interferon. For experimental analysis,
cells were plated onto poly—L—lysine coated glass
cover slips at 33°C in DMEM + 10% fetal calf serum
overnight. On the following day the cells were
switched to growth at 33°C or 39.5°C in the presence
or absence of gamma interferon. After 3 days of
growth in permissive or non-permissive conditions,
bromodeoxyuridine was added for 24 h and cells were
then fixed (by the protocol supplied by Becton
Dickinson) and stained with anti-bromodeoxyuridine
antibodies (purchased from Becton Dickinson),
followed by a rhodamine conjugated second antibody
(purchased from Southern Biotechnology) to label
nuclei of cells which had engaged in DNA synthesis
during the previous 24 h. As shown in Figure 3,
cells grown at 33°C in the presence of interferon
had a 20-fold greater synthesis of DNA during the
_59_.
labelling period than cells grown at 39.5OC in the
absence of interferon. Cells grown in semi-
permissive conditions showed intermediate levels of
DNA synthesis fully compatible with survival.
EXAMPLE 3
(1) The following work demonstrates the principle
that cells derived from the H2ts6 mice are
conditionally immortal, and undergo a normal pathway
of terminal differentiation when switched from
permissive to non—permissive conditions.
(2) This work further demonstrates that it is
possible to express subfunctional levels of oncogene
product, thus confirming the principle that it is
possible to express levels of oncogene product which
do not interfere with normal developmental pathways.
Moreover, this work also demonstrates the need
(3)
for fine regulation of oncogene activity in order to
keep activity below a level which would interfere
with normal development.
Cultures of skin fibroblasts from H2ts6 mice were
prepared as described in Example 1, and displayed
the conditionally immortalized phenotype discussed
in detail in the previous Example.
._60..
Western blot analysis of expression of T antigen in
cultures of fibroblasts derived from H2ts6 mice
showed a relatively low level of T antigen
expression at 33°C in the presence or absence of
IFN—gamma although expression was clearly higher in
the presence of IFN—gamma. This observation
indicated that it might be possible to observe
dramatic alterations in cell growth as a result of
small changes in the level of this gene product. To
test this possibility, a dose-response analysis was
effected in which cell growth and colony formation
were titred against the concentration of IFN—gamma.
Fibroblasts derived from progeny of H2ts6 mice
showed promotion of cell growth by levels of IFN—
gamma as low as 1 U/ml. Analysis by colony
formation and by cell number analysis showed that
addition of 100 U/ml of IFN-gamma to these cultures
only increased the frequency of colony formation by
3.5 fold in comparison with that seen in the
presence of 1 U/ml, and was only 40% increased over
that achieved with application of 10 U/ml. The
difference in TAg levels at the different doses of
IFN-gamma was not large, with 1 U/ml causing a 2.5-
fold increase over basal levels and 100 U/ml causing
approximately a 6-fold increase over basal levels.
_6]__.
EXAMPLE 4
Generation of astrocyte cell lines
This Example demonstrates four aspects of the use of
animals of the invention:
(1) Astrocyte cell lines, representing a defined
differentiated cell type, were generated from the
central nervous system, a tissue where the
endogeneous level of class 1 antigen expression is
essentially non—existent and where no mRNA
production in vivo can be detected. Thus, it is
demonstrated that transcription of the oncogene
construct in vivo is not a prior requisite to the
generation of a cell line.
(2) The astrocyte cell lines express the normal
cell-type specific marker associated with this cell
type, thus demonstrating the potential usefulness of
cells derived from the H2ts6 mice as a source of
purification of a cell-type specific protein.
(3) The astrocyte cell lines produce a mitogenic
activity known to be expressed by the normal
counterparts of the cells, thus indicating that
the astrocyte cell lines derived from the H2ts6 mice
are capable of promoting the division of another
cell type, and thus represent a potential source for
_62-
the purification of the mitogenic factor.
(4) Finally, the astrocyte cell lines were
generated by first growing brain cells in normal
(non-permissive) tissue culture conditions, followed
by purification of the cell-type of interest,
followed by growth of the cells of interest in
permissive conditions. This thus demonstrates that
the turning on of oncogene function can occur after
cells have been grown in tissue culture for a period
of time, thus demonstrating that cells need not even
be conditionally immortalized at the time of initial
dissection.
Cultures of cortical astrocytes were prepared by
standard procedures (Noble et al., 1984, J.
Neurosci., 4:l892-1903; Noble & Murray, 1984, EMBO
J., 3:2243-2247). Briefly, cortices from newborn
H2ts6 mice were dissociated into single cells by
enzymatic digestion of tissue with 0.25% collagenase
in L—15 medium and an equal volume of 0.25% trypsin.
Cultures were grown at 37°C in DMEM containing 10%
fetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine and 25 microgram/ml
of gentamicin. After 7-10 days cultures were placed
on a rotary platform overnight at 37°C, and were
rotated at speeds just below those which would cause
foaming of the medium (i.e., about 60-75 rpm). As
described previously (Noble et a1., 1984), this
procedure produces cultures which are 95% pure
_63._
astrocytes, as judged by the expression of the
astrocyte—specific cytoskeletal protein GFAP (glial
fibrillary acidic protein) in 95% of these cells.
After cultures of astrocytes were enriched to >95%
purity, clonal cell lines were generated by first
shifting cells to 33°C in the presence of gamma-
interferon. Cells were then infected with a
retrovirus which harbours genes for bacterial beta-
galactosidase and a neomycin resistance gene, using
the standard infection protocol described for the
use of this virus (Price et al., Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci., USA, 1987, 85:156-160). One day after
infection, cells were removed from the flask by
incubation with 0.25% trypsin (see Noble et al.,
1984, supra) and replated in medium containing the
G418 antibiotic. Resistant clones of cells emerged
from the selection condition, and 10 random clones
were selected for further study. Clonal cell lines
were readily generated in this manner and 7 of the
cell lines constitutively expressed glial
fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a specific marker
for astrocytes in the CNS.
To examine the ability of the astrocyte cell lines
to produce mitogenic activity normally associated
with these cells, oligodendrocyte-type-2 astrocyte
(O-2A) progenitor cells were plated from the optic
nerves of 7 day old rats onto the astrocyte
_64_
monolayers. In previous experiments (Noble &
Murray, 1984) it has been shown that astrocytes, but
not meningeal cells or fibroblasts, were able to
stimulate division of O—2A progenitors in vitro, and
that the O—2A progenitors stimulated to divide by
astrocyte conditioned medium expressed a particular
bipolar morphology which is only seen when these
progenitors are grown in the presence of astrocyte
monolayers, astrocyte—conditioned medium or
platelet—derived growth factor (the mitogen produced
by these astrocyte monolayers). O—2A progenitors
grown on monolayers of clonal astrocyte cell lines
derived from the H2ts6 strain of transgenic mice
were indistinguishable from those grown on
nontransgenic astrocytes in their division and
expression of the expected bipolar morphology.
EXAMPLE 5
Glial precursors of the CNS
This Example demonstrates that:
(1) It is possible directly to immortalize cells
from the central nervous system with the
characteristics of novel precursor cells by growth
of cells in permissive conditions, and that the
cells grown in this way display the blockade of
differentiation normally associated with expression
...65_
of nuclear oncogenes. Thus, this Example further
demonstrates the ability to generate immortalized
cell cultures from a tissue of the body in which
there is no detectable in vivo expression of the
transgene.
(2) Cell division requires the presence of
appropriate growth factors, thus indicating the
potential usefulness of cells derived from the H2ts6
mice as assay systems useful in growth factor
purification.
(3) Precursor cells derived from the H2ts6 mice can
be induced to undergo differentiation by switching
cells from permissive to non—permissive conditions,
thus demonstrating the potential usefulness of these
cells in allowing the growth of novel precursor
cells.
(4) Precursor cells grown according to the methods
of the invention also retain the capacity to undergo
normal differentiation when grown in permissive
conditions if cells are exposed to either defined
molecular factors or to medium conditioned from a
cellular source. This Example thus further
demonstrates the potential suitability of cells
derived from the H2ts6 mice for use in assay systems
which would enable the purification of factors which
induce cellular differentiation.
-66..
Cortical cells were dissociated as described in
Example 3, except that cells were derived from
embryonic day 18 mice and were grown in chemically
defined medium (ingredients as described in Raff et
al., 1983, Nature, 303:390—396) containing 10 ng/ml
of the AA—homodimer of platelet-derived growth
factor (Chiron Corporation), 5 ng/ml of basic
fibroblast growth factor (Chiron Corporation) and 20
U/ml IFN—gamma. Cells could be passaged readily,
and passaged cells maintained in the indicated
conditions showed no evidence of differentiation
into defined glial cell types. Cultures contained
bipolar cells which could be labeled with the A2B5
monoclonal antibody (Eisenbarth et al., 1979, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A. 76:4913—49l7), and looked
like the O—2A progenitors which have been described
in cultures of optic nerve cells (e.g., Raff et al.,
Nature, 1983, 303:390—396; Noble & Murray, 1984,
EMBO J., 3:2243-2247). Cultures also contained a
separate group of novel cells which were labeled by
antibodies against the vimentin intermediate
filament (antibodies from Dako-Patts, Ltd.) and with
antibodies against SSEA—1 (stage—specific embryonic
antigen-1, described in Gooi et al., Nature, 1981,
292:156-158). These novel cells expressed a very
primitive morphology and consisted of small round
cells with few processes or cytoplasmic extensions.
In previous experiments with cultures prepared from
_.67_
cortices of embryonic rats, similar cells have been
seen which invariably differentiated into astrocytes
or oligodendrocytes upon passaging, regardless of
the medium into which passaged cells were replated.
In contrast, cells derived from the H2ts6 mice
maintained in the described growth conditions could
readily be repeatedly passaged without undergoing
differentiation.
The cortical cells derived from cortices of H2ts6
mice could be induced to differentiate by several in
vitro manipulations. In all cases, cultures
produced oligodendrocytes (which seemed to be
derived from the A2B5+ Cells, as the
oligodendrocytes were A2B5+SSEA—1‘) and astrocytes
(which appeared to be derived from the SSEA—l+ cells
as the astrocytes were frequently SSEA-1+ but always
AZBS‘). In both Cases cellular morphology altered
dramatically. Oligodendrocytes expressed their
normal multipolar appearance and could be labelled
by monoclonal antibodies against galactocerebroside
(Ranscht et al., 1982, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA.,
79:2709—2713). Cellular morphology also changed
dramatically in the case of astrocytic
differentiation, and the small primitive—looking
SSEA—1+ cells were replaced by SSEA—1+ cells with
large cell bodies and broad membrane expanses. The
cells undergoing astrocytic differentiation not only
looked like astrocytes, but also expressed GFAP.
_68_
First, removal of PDGF and FGF resulted in
differentiation and cell death, thus demonstrating
that the oncogene—expressing cells required the
continuous presence of appropriate growth factors in
order to continue growing. Second, cells which were
maintained in the growth medium and in the presence
of growth factors also differentiated if IFN-gamma
was removed from the medium (thus turning off the
TAgts expression). This result demonstrates that
expression of TAgts is necessary to prevent
differentiation even if cells are grown in
conditions which allow oncogene—expressing cells to
continue growing in a non-differentiated state.
Third, cells grown in the presence of PDGF and bFGF
in fully permissive conditions (i.e., 33°C, + IFN—
gamma) could be induced to differentiate if exposed
to medium conditioned by purified cortical
astrocytes (prepared as in Noble et al., 1984, J.
Neurosci. 4:l892—1903), thus demonstrating the
potential suitability of the H2ts6 precursor cells
for use in assay systems for the detection and
purification of differentiation inducing agents.
Fourth, cells grown in the presence of PDGF and bFGF
in fully permissive conditions could be induced to
differentiate by exposure to 10 ng/ml transforming
growth factor—beta (British Biotechnology) or by
exposure to 2 ng/ml of ciliary neurotrophic factor
(Synergen), thus indicating the responsiveness of
._69_
the precursor cells to defined differentiation
inducing agents known to be present in the central
nervous system, thus further indicating the
potential suitability of the H2ts6 precursor cells
for use in assay systems for the detection and
purification of differentiation inducing agents.
EXAMPLE 6
Endothelial Cells
(1) This Example demonstrates that the H2ts6 mice
can be used to generate cell lines of endothelial
origin.
(2) This Example further demonstrates that the
endothelial cell cultures generated from the H2ts6
mice secrete a novel differentiation-promoting
activity known to be secreted by normal endothelial
cells. Thus, this Example further demonstrates the
potential usefulness of cell lines derived from the
H2ts6 as a source material which would allow
subsequent purification of a molecule expressing a
unique biological activity.
Endothelial cell colonies were prepared as
follows: Two adult mice (2-3 months of age) were
decapitated under CO2 coma. The brains were washed
in Leibowitz L—15 medium containing 25 microgram/ml
of gentamicin and then placed in fresh L—15. Each
brain was placed in a 30 mm petri dish containing a
few mls of L—15. The cerebellum and other white
matter tracts (corpus callosum, optic bulb) were
removed by dissection. The meningeal sheath was
removed without leaving any traces. The remaining
grey matter was chopped finely with a sterile
scalpel blade and then forced through a gauge 19
needle once and incubated in 0.1% collagenasezdipase
(BCL) in L—15 for 60 min at 30°C. The tissue was
spun at 1000 g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatant
discarded. Twenty ml of 25% BSA in L—l5 were added
and mixed thoroughly but without frothing and spun
at 2000 g for 20 min. The floating layer of tissue
together with the supernatant was removed with care
without disturbing the small pellet. The
supernatant and the tissue were mixed and spun again
at 2000 g for 20 min. This time the tissue layer
and supernatant were discarded and the two pellets
were suspended in 10 ml of 0.5% BSA in L-15 and spun
at 1000 g for 10 min at 4°C to wash the pellets.
The pellet was suspended in 0.1% collagenasezdispase
(in L—15) and incubated at 300C for two hours.
After the incubation, DNAse was added to a final
concentration of 10 microgram/ml and the resulting
~capillary—containing tissues were spun at 1000 g for
min at 4°C. The pellet was again suspended
gently in 1 ml of Ca—Mg—free DMEM and layered onto a
ml Percoll gradient and spun at 1000 g for 10 min
_7 1-
at 4°C. (A linear gradient of 50% Percoll
(Pharmacia) in Ca—Mg—free PBS was prepared in
advance by mixing 5 parts isotonic Percoll [9 parts
Percoll with 1 part 10X Ca—Mg—free PBS] with 5 parts
of 1X PBS and spinning at 26,000 g for one hour.)
The top half of the tube contained cellular debris
and single cells. The bottom half contained red
blood cells seen as a red ring, and just above this
ring were the intact capillaries. This layer was
removed carefully and suspended in 15 ml of L—l5 and
spun at 1000 g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant
was discarded and the capillaries suspended gently
in growth media (DMEM with 4.5 g/L glucose
supplemented with 2mM glutamine, 20% plasma derived
serum as described by Vogel et al. (Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci., 1978, 75:2810—28l4), 10 IU/ml Heparin
(Sigma), 5 ng/ml basic FGF (Chiron Corporation) and
U/ml of IFN-gamma. The capillaries were plated
onto Vitrogen (Flow Lab) coated 96 well plates at
50% occupancy and incubated at 7.5% C02. The media
was changed after three days and then every two days
thereafter. Wells with single capillaries were
tagged at day 3 and followed to confluence.
Endothelial cells arising from these capillaries
grew as colonies with tight boundaries. These cells
could then be passaged by gently trypsinizing cells
(0.025% trypsin in Ca—Mg free DMEM containing 2 mM
EDTA, 3 min at 300C) and replating them in Falcon 75
cm2 flasks which had been precoated with gelatin by
_'72_
incubating the growth surface of the flasks
overnight with 2% (w/v) of gelatin (Difco) made up
in sterile tissue culture grade water. Just before
use, the gelatin was aspirated and the flasks were
washed with medium. Unlike normal capillary
endothelial cells derived from brains of mice, these
cells could be repeatedly passaged.
The endothelial cell cultures were examined to
determine if these cells made a novel
differentiation regulating activity produced by
their normal counterparts. Differentiation of O—2A
progenitors into type—2 astrocytes requires the
presence of at least two appropriate inducing
factors, these being ciliary neurotrophic factor
and an unknown factor found in the matrix of
endothelial or meningeal cultures (Lillien & Raff,
1990, Neuron, 5:l11—119). Our own studies have
shown that the factor which co—operates with ciliary
neurotrophic factor to induce astrocytic
differentiation is secreted by a variety of normal
endothelial cells, but not by other cell types. The
endothelial cell lines produced from H2ts6
transgenic mice are as potent a source of this
differentiation stabilizing activity as are any of
the nontransgenic endothelial cells which have thus
far been examined.
The assay employed to recognize the endothelial
_73_
cell-derived factor which works co—operatively with
ciliary neurotrophic factor is to prepare cultures
of optic nerve cells from nerves of 7 day old rats
by standard methods (e.g., Raff et a1., 1983,
Nature, 303:390—396) and grow these cells at a
density of 3000-5000 cells per cover slip in the
presence of chemically-defined medium (prepared as
in Raff et al., 1983, Nature, 303:390—396) which has
been conditioned for 24 hours by confluent cultures
of bovine aortic endothelial cells. O—2A progenitor
cells grown in this manner all turn into type-2
astrocytes within 4 days of in vitro growth, while
cells grown in chemically—defined medium which is
not conditioned by endothelial cells all turn into
oligodendrocytes. The type-2 astrocytes are
recognized as being stellate cells which are GFAP+
and are also labeled with the A2B5 monoclonal
antibody.
Examination of medium conditioned by the
endothelial cell lines prepared from cerebral
cortices of H2ts6 mice demonstrates that these
endothelial cells secrete a biological activity
indistinguishable from that secreted by
nontransgenic endothelial cells in terms of both
effect and potency.
EXAMPLE 7
Colonic Epithelial Cells
(1) This Example demonstrates that the invention
allows the direct immortalization of a novel
category of epithelial cells which have proven
intractable to the application of in vitro methods
of gene insertion for the generation of immortalized
cell lines.
Colons were removed from 14-18 day old H2ts6 mice.
The colons were sterilized by washing them in 0.04%
sodium hypochlorite (in PBS). In some cases, crypts
were removed from the Colons by incubating tissue
for 1.5 h in 3mM EDTA + 0.05 mM dithiothreitol.
Tissue was washed with PBS and then shaken by hand
which results in the dislodging of intact crypts
from the surrounding tissue. These crypts, which
are seen as a finger—shaped group of cells are then
grown in monolayer culture on a substrate of rat-
tail collagen on a medium of Dulbecco’s Modified
Eagle's Medium containing the defined chemical
additives specified in Raff et al. (1983, Nature,
303:390-396) plus 2% fetal calf serum + 20 U/ml of
IFN—gamma + 20% conditioned medium (conditioned for
24 h) from tumour line LIM 1863 (Whitehead et al.,
1987, Cancer Res., 47:2683-2689). Crypts sit down
and epithelium starts to spread out. With
nontransgenic crypts, cells will remain viable on a
feeder layer of bovine aortic endothelial cells,
although they cannot be passaged (Whitehead et al.,
1991, J. Tissue Cult. Methods (in press)). In
contrast, cells derived from the transgenic animals
can be grown and passaged without a feeder layer and
set up in monolayer culture. In other cases, the
colons were grown in explant culture. The medium
used throughout was as described above. Cultures
were fed two—three times a week, with fresh addition
of interferon with each feeding.
The crypt cultures gave rise to patches of flat
cells with a clear epithelioid morphology, while
explant cultures gave rise to mixed cultures
containing a number of morphologically distinct cell
types. The epithelioid cells derived from the
crypts are labeled with two anti—keratin antibodies
(LE 61 and LP 34, as cited in Lane, vide infra), and
labeling shows a characteristic fibrillary pattern
of cytoplasmic staining.
Use of these mice has thus provided the means for
establishing colonic epithelial cells in culture in
a manner that was previously impossible and from
tissues that have previously been impossible to
culture for more than 24-48 hours.
The major cell types of interest in the explant
cultures are discussed in the following Example.
EXAMPLE 8
Glial Cells of the Enteric Nervous System
Explant cultures of colon, prepared as described in
the previous Example, contained two cell types of
particular interest. One of these cells was a small
processing cell which was labeled with antibodies
against GFAP, thus identifying this cell as one of
the glial cells of the enteric nervous system.
These cells have been readily passaged, and should
be readily convertable to cell lines. Although
there is considerable interest in the glial cells of
the enteric nervous system, no cell lines have been
described for this tissue to date.
The second cell type had a fibroblast like
morphology and did not label with anti—GFAP
antibodies. However, upon treatment with
transforming growth factor—beta, these cells are
induced to express nestin, an intermediate filament
protein thought to be specifically expressed by
precursor cells of the central nervous system
(Lendahl, Cell, 1990, 602585-595). The normal
cellular counterpart of these cells is not known,
but their induced expression of nestin raises the
_.'77_
possibility that these cells are a novel precursor
population.
EXAMPLE 9
Myoblasts
This Example demonstrates that cell lines generated
by the method of the invention retain their capacity
to undergo normal differentiation in vitro.
This Example further demonstrates that cell lines
derived from the H2ts6 mice have the capacity to
undergo normal differentiation in vivo, thus
indicating the potential usefulness of cell lines
derived from the H2ts6 mice in cell transplantation
applications.
Clonal myoblast cultures were prepared by direct
limiting dilution cloning of cells derived from
dissection of skeletal muscle from hindlegs of
neonatal mice into standard tissue culture
conditions for the growth of muscle precursor cells
(as described, e.g., in Morgan et al., 1987, J.
Muscle Res. and Cell Motil., 8:386—396), except that
cells were grown at 33°C in the presence of gamma-
interferon. Clonal cultures were grown continuously
for several weeks, and were passaged repeatedly,
before transplantation of cells directly into the
_78_.
skeletal muscle mass of nontransgenic mice bearing a
known mutation of the dystrophin gene. The
dystrophin gene mutation means that this protein
shows abnormal localization within the
multinucleated myotubes which are formed by fusion
and differentiation of muscle precursor cells. The
transplanted cells derived from transgenic mice
could be readily identified by the fact that they
generated skeletal myotubes which expressed normal
dystrophin. In addition, the muscle precursor cells
derived from the H2ts6 transgenic mice were able to
fuse into multinucleate myotubes in vivo by either
growing cells at high density or turning off
oncogene expression by growth of cells in non-
permissive conditions.
Cell lines of the present invention, in which
expression of the differentiation inhibiting gene is
regulated, differ from currently available cell lines in
that it is theoretically possible to obtain cell lines
from any tissue of the body and select for cell lines of
any identity. Thus, the present technique differs
qualitatively from previous techniques in which genetic
information was transfected or infected into cells in a
manner which does not allow targeting of particular
populations or reliable immortalization of rare cells.
with this new technique, rare cells can be isolated by
any means available in the art (e.g., fluoresence-
activated cell sorting, density centrifugation, panning,
._79..
immunoselection with magnetic beads, selective adhesion
to defined protein or carbohydrate substrates, etc.) and
grown in conditions which support activation of the
differentiation inhibiting gene, and thus allow the rare
cells to be grown in large quantities. Any use to which
such cells can be put thus becomes a real practical
possibility for the first time, including (but not
limited to) the isolation of cellular components or
substances from such rare cells.
Immortalized cells or differentiated cells derived
from animals of the invention have a number of important
uses, including, inter alia, the following specific
further aspects of the invention:
A) The use of either immortalized cells which have been
obtained by a method as defined above or of
differentiated cells derived therefrom or of cells
isolated from an animal of the invention and wherein
expression of said differentiation inhibiting sequence
has been activated but which cell may nonetheless be
induced to differentiate by exposure to an external
factor and have been so exposed or of cells isolated from
an animal of the invention which have been grown in vitro
and a non—conditional immortalizing gene or genes
thereafter inserted in vitro, either as a source of a
cell—produced substance, optionally a growth or
differentiation factor, or in an assay system in relation to
_80_
such a substance (in one illustrative embodiment of this
use, the cell—produced substance is an antibody);
B) The use either of immortalized cells which have been
obtained by a method as defined above or of
differentiated cells derived therefrom or of cells
isolated from an animal of the invention and wherein
expression of said differentiation inhibiting sequence
has been activated but which cell may nonetheless be
induced to differentiate by exposure to an external
factor and have been so exposed or of cells isolated from
an animal of the invention which have been grown in vitro
and a non-conditional immortalizing gene or genes
thereafter inserted in vitro, in the production of a
medicament, either: said medicament being for the
treatment or prophylaxis of a condition characteristic of
a cell deficiency or cell—produced factor deficiency or
of a cellular malfunction by cell transplantation; or
said medicament comprising a cell—produced factor derived
from any of the aforesaid cells;
C) An extremely important aspect is a method of
therapy or prophylaxis practised on the human or animal
body which comprises administering either: immortalized
cells which have been obtained by a method as defined
above or differentiated cells derived therefrom or cells
isolated from an animal of the invention wherein
expression of said differentiation inhibiting sequence
has been activated but which cells may nonetheless be
_8l_
induced to differentiate by exposure to an external
factor and have been so exposed or cells isolated from an
animal of the invention which have been grown in vitro
and a non—conditional immortalizing gene or genes
thereafter inserted in vitro; or a factor derived from
any of the aforesaid cells. Particular embodiments are
methods of transplantation therapy practised on the human
or animal body and in which immortalized cells which have
been obtained by a method as defined above or
differentiated cells derived therefrom by deactivating
expression of said differentiation inhibiting sequence or
cells isolated from an animal of the invention and
wherein expression of said differentiation inhibiting
sequence has been activated but which cells may
nonetheless be induced to differentiate by exposure to an
external factor and have been so exposed or cells
isolated from an animal of the invention which have been
grown in vitro and a non—conditional immortalizing gene
or genes thereafter inserted in vitro, are transplanted
into said body under conditions either allowing
differentiation of immortalized cells to occur or
preventing expression of the differentiation inhibiting
sequence in the case of differentiated cells, with
consequent compensation for a deficiency of or
malfunction in pre—existing cells in said body (in two
illustrative embodiments of such methods, the
transplanted cells are either insulin—producing cells
from the pancreas of said animal or precursor cells
...82_.
therefor, the transplantation therapy being for the
treatment or prophylaxis of an insulin-deficiency
disease, or glial cells or glial precursor cells, the
transplantation therapy being for the treatment or 05
prophylaxis of a disease or disorder of the nervous
system); and
D) The use of immortalized cells which have been
obtained by a method as defined above or of
differentiated cells derived therefrom or of cells
isolated from an animal of the invention and wherein
expression of said differentiation inhibiting sequence
has been activated but which cells may nonetheless be
induced to differentiate by exposure to an external
factor and have been so exposed or of cells isolated from
an animal of the invention which have been grown in vitro
and a non—conditional immortalizing gene or genes
thereafter inserted in vitro, in a method of in vitro
diagnosis.
Cell lines are already routinely used as assay
systems in the purification of factors which stimulate
._83_
cell division and differentiation. Cell lines can also
be used as assay systems for the purification of genes
which regulate division and differentiation. Many of the
established oncogenes were identified by virtue of their
ability to convert established cell lines to a neoplastic
state. Genes which induce cells to differentiate into
specific cell types can also be identified by
transfection of genetic material into suitable recipient
cells, as evidenced by recent studies on the
identification of genes which control muscle cell
differentiation. One could envisage, e.g., using
insulin—negative pancreatic cell lines as suitable assay
systems for the identification of factors or genes which
induce some pancreatic cells to produce insulin.
In general, the present invention provides a means
by which large numbers of differentiated cells or
precursor cells can be produced. For example, if a large
quantity of a specific type of cell is needed for use in
diagnostic methods, for transplantation into an
individual or for use as a means of producing a desired
product (e.g., a mitogen or differentiation factor), then
appropriate cells can be selected using known techniques.
These cells can subsequently be grown in permissive
conditions for a desired amount of time. The cells can
be studied in permissive conditions, where induction of
at least some aspects of differentiation appears to be
possible.
In addition, cells can be switched to non-
permissive conditions compatible with more extensive
..84_
differentiation along normal pathways. Moreover, cells
can be genetically manipulated in tissue culture so as to
express a wild—type differentiation—inhibiting sequence,
thus allowing the growth of large numbers of cells (e.g.,
for purposes of purification of a desired protein
produced by the cells) without the continued use of
permissive growth conditions.
It is clear from the principles of the present
invention that conditionally immortalized cells obtained
from the present transgenic animals can be introduced (in
non—permissive conditions) into an individual, in whom
they will reside in a non—permissive environment. The
introduction of such cells is invaluable for the
development of precursor transplantation therapies in
which large numbers of precursor cells are transplanted
into diseased tissue in order to replenish the
populations required for normal function. For example,
insulin producing cells derived from the pancreas of a
transgenic animal of this invention can be surgically
implanted into the pancreas of animals suffering from
insulin—deficiency diseases (such as type I diabetes).
The use of genetically engineered cells to enhance
regenerative processes or restore tissue function has
become of increasing practical interest. For example,
Gage and colleagues (Science, 1988, 242, 1575) described
the injection of fibroblasts genetically engineered to
overproduce nerve growth factor into the site of a
_85._
fimbria—forniX lesion. These transplanted cells
prevented retrograde axonal degeneration for at least 2
weeks in initial studies, and more recently have been
shown to promote survival of the cholinergic neurons for
up to 8 weeks (Rosenberg, et al, 1989 Am. Soc. Neurosci.
Abs. No. 433.2).
Many tumours are histologically related to cells
found in the early stages of tissue development. The
animals of the present invention provide a ready source
of cells for the identification of potential precursors
of tumour cells. In addition to the strategy already
discussed in relation to the identification of a putative
glioma precursor cell, it will also be possible to use
other technologies of gene insertion (e.g., transfection,
electroporation, retroviral—mediated gene insertion) to
further manipulate the genome of any of the cell lines
isolated from the animals of the present invention.
Thus, specific precursors or differentiated cell types
can be initially grown in numbers large enough to allow
utilization of less efficient methods of gene insertion
and these further modified cells can be utilized in the
study of neoplastic transformation of defined cell types.
Furthermore, the animals of the present invention
provide a means of obtaining immortalized cell lines
exhibiting preselected mutations. A further aspect of
the invention is thus use of an animal of the invention
as a parent for crossing with a mutant animal parent
_86_
which expresses a preselected mutation in producing a
descendant mutant animal exhibiting normal cell
development and from which immortalizable cells
expressing
such a use
respective
descendant
includes a
said mutation may be isolated. Preferably, in
both parents are homozygous for those of their
traits which must be exhibited by any
as defined above. The invention accordingly
further aspect which is cells, immortalized or
immortalizable, expressing said preselected mutation and
derived
It
various
various
without
concept.
from a descendant as defined and produced above.
will be apparent to the skilled reader that
modifications and alterations may be made to the
embodiments discussed and/or described above
departing from the scope of the present inventive
Claims (25)
1. A transgenic non—human eukaryotic animal having within its germ cells and/or somatic cells a chromosomally incorporated sequence, wherein: said sequence encodes a temperature sensitive form of the SV40 large T antigen product which is conditionally active; and said sequence is under the control of a regulatable promoter, such that said thermolabile form of the SV40 large T antigen product is at a sufficiently low functional level in vivo to permit normal development of said cells in said animal; and such that under permissive conditions in culture in which the promoter is activated, said product has a functional level of expression sufficient to prevent complete differentiation of cells taken from said animal.
2. An animal according to claim 1 wherein said promoter is an HLA class I promoter.
3. An animal according to claim 2 wherein said promoter is an HLA H-2K” promoter.
4. An animal according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein said promoter comprises a plurality of genetic regulatory elements in operable association.
5. An animal according to any one of claims 1 to 4 which is a mouse or rat.
6. A method of providing a transgenic non—human eukaryotic animal which carries a preselected mutation and has cells 88 carrying a chromosomally incorporated sequence as defined in claim 1, which method comprises effecting chromosomal incorporation of a sequence according to claim 1 into at least some of said animal cells, to provide a transgenic non—human animal according to any one of the preceding claims, crossing it with a mutant non—human animal parent which expresses a preselected mutation, and obtaining the descendant thereof carrying said mutation and chromosomally incorporated sequence.
7. A non~human animal according to any one of claims 1 to 5 or a descendant thereof, which also carries a preselected mutation.
8. A method of establishing a cell in culture, said method comprising; removing a cell having a chromosomally incorporated sequence as defined in claim 1 from a non—human animal according to any one of claims 1 to 5 or 7; subjecting the removed cell to permissive conditions in culture in which the promoter is activated, wherein said conditions lead to a functional level of expression of said differentiation inhibiting product to prevent complete differentiation of the cell.
9. A method according to claim 8 wherein said cell is selected from the group consisting of a pancreatic cell, a precursor of an insulin producing cell, a glial cell, a glial cell precursor, a muscle cell and a muscle cell precursor.
10. A method according to claim 8 or 9 which further comprises providing an external factor to said culture to induce differentiation. 89
11. An isolated cell of a non-human eukaryotic animal having a chromosomally incorporated sequence as defined in any one of claims 1 to 5 and 7 under the control of a regulatable promoter.
12. An isolated cell according to claim 11 for use in a method of treatment of the human or animal body.
13. A method for producing an expression product of the cell of any one of claims 8 to 12 which method comprises culturing said cell under conditions favouring the production of said expression product.
14. A method of producing a transgenic non—human eukaryotic animal, the animal carrying a construct comprising a sequence which sequence encodes a thermolabile form of the SV40 large T antigen product which is conditionally active; and said sequence is under the control of a regulatable promoter, such that said thermolabile form of the SV40 large T antigen product is at a sufficiently low functional level in vivo to permit normal development of said cells in said animal; and such that under permissive conditions in culture in which the promoter is activated, said product has a functional level of expression sufficient to prevent complete differentiation of cells taken from said animal; which method comprises effecting chromosomal incorporation of a sequence into at least some of the cells of said animal.
15. A method according to claim 14 wherein chromosomal incorporation is effected by a microinjection technique at an embryonic stage of animal development. 90
16. A method according to claims 14 or 15 wherein said promoter is an HLA class I promoter.
17. A method according to claim 16 wherein said promoter is an HLA H-2K” promoter.
18. A method according to any one of claims 14 to 17 wherein said promoter comprises a plurality of genetic regulatory elements in operable association.
19. A method according to any one of claims 14 to 18 wherein said animal is a mouse or rat.
20. A transgenic non-human eukaryotic animal according to claim 1, substantially as hereinbefore described.
21. A method according to claim 6 of providing a transgenic non- human eukaryotic animal, substantially as hereinbefore described and exemplified.
22. A method according to claim 8 of establishing a cell in culture, substantially as hereinbefore described and exemplified.
23. An isolated cell according to claim 11 of a non-human eukaryotic animal, substantially as hereinbefore described.
24. A method according to claim 13 for producing an expression 20 product, substantially as hereinbefore described and exemplified. 91
25. A method according to claim 14 of producing a transgenic non- human eukaryotic animal, substantially as hereinbefore described. ANNE RYAN & CO. AGENTS FOR THE APPLICANTS
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GBUNITEDKINGDOM20/02/19909003791.2 | |||
GB909003791A GB9003791D0 (en) | 1990-02-20 | 1990-02-20 | Transgenic animals,cell lines therefrom,and their use |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
IE83909B1 true IE83909B1 (en) | |
IE910572A1 IE910572A1 (en) | 1991-08-28 |
Family
ID=10671295
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
IE057291A IE910572A1 (en) | 1990-02-20 | 1991-02-20 | Transgenic animals, cells and cell lines therefrom, and¹their use |
Country Status (12)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5688692A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0516664B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP3333902B2 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE258226T1 (en) |
AU (2) | AU660604B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2076345C (en) |
DE (1) | DE69133355T2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK0516664T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2213742T3 (en) |
GB (1) | GB9003791D0 (en) |
IE (1) | IE910572A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1991013150A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (38)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5866759A (en) * | 1991-02-20 | 1999-02-02 | Ludwig Institute For Cancer Research | Transgenic mice expressing TSSV40 large T antigen |
US7361505B1 (en) * | 1991-07-08 | 2008-04-22 | Neurospheres Holdings Ltd. | Multipotent neural stem cell compositions |
US5489743A (en) * | 1993-01-19 | 1996-02-06 | Amgen Inc. | Transgenic animal models for thrombocytopenia |
US5700657A (en) * | 1993-12-13 | 1997-12-23 | Genzyme Corporation | Vectors and vector systems including genes encoding tumor suppressor proteins and producer cells transformed thereby |
US6392118B1 (en) * | 1994-07-20 | 2002-05-21 | Neurotech S.A. | Mx-1 conditionally immortalized cells |
US5935849A (en) * | 1994-07-20 | 1999-08-10 | Cytotherapeutics, Inc. | Methods and compositions of growth control for cells encapsulated within bioartificial organs |
AUPM710194A0 (en) * | 1994-07-26 | 1994-08-18 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation | Virus vector |
WO1996007733A1 (en) * | 1994-09-09 | 1996-03-14 | Zymogenetics, Inc. | Preparation of immortalized cells |
AU715737B2 (en) * | 1994-11-08 | 2000-02-10 | Cellfactors Plc | Human cell-lines |
US6495364B2 (en) | 1995-05-23 | 2002-12-17 | Neurotech, S.A. | Mx-1 conditionally immortalized cells |
US5994619A (en) * | 1996-04-01 | 1999-11-30 | University Of Massachusetts, A Public Institution Of Higher Education Of The Commonwealth Of Massachusetts, As Represented By Its Amherst Campus | Production of chimeric bovine or porcine animals using cultured inner cell mass cells |
US5905042A (en) * | 1996-04-01 | 1999-05-18 | University Of Massachusetts, A Public Institution Of Higher Education Of The Commonwealth Of Massachusetts, As Represented By Its Amherst Campus | Cultured inner cell mass cell lines derived from bovine or porcine embryos |
GB9607953D0 (en) * | 1996-04-17 | 1996-06-19 | Univ Liverpool | Transgenic rat |
US6235969B1 (en) | 1997-01-10 | 2001-05-22 | University Of Massachusetts | Cloning pigs using donor nuclei from non-quiescent differentiated cells |
US6215041B1 (en) | 1997-01-10 | 2001-04-10 | University Of Mmassachusetts | Cloning using donor nuclei from a non-quiesecent somatic cells |
FR2761576B1 (en) * | 1997-04-04 | 2002-08-30 | Inst Nat Sante Rech Med | NON-HUMAN TRANSGENIC ANIMAL IN WHICH EXPRESSION OF THE GENE CODING FOR INSULIN IS SUPPRESSED |
US6479285B1 (en) | 1997-07-02 | 2002-11-12 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | p53 as a regulator of cell differentiation |
US6235527B1 (en) * | 1997-11-29 | 2001-05-22 | University Of Utah Research Foundation | Lineage restricted glial precursors from the central nervous system |
US6498285B1 (en) * | 1997-08-06 | 2002-12-24 | Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Methods for producing transgenic pigs by microinjecting a blastomere |
US5968829A (en) | 1997-09-05 | 1999-10-19 | Cytotherapeutics, Inc. | Human CNS neural stem cells |
CA2345442A1 (en) * | 1998-10-02 | 2000-04-13 | Ys New Technology Institute Inc. | Established cells |
ATE319811T1 (en) * | 1999-05-07 | 2006-03-15 | Univ Utah Res Found | PRECURSOR CELLS FROM THE MOUSE NEURAL TUBE AND FROM MOUSE EMBRYONAL STEM CELLS LIMITED TO ONE CELL LINE |
JP4321936B2 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2009-08-26 | 独立行政法人科学技術振興機構 | Immortalized pericyte cell line |
US20040170955A1 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2004-09-02 | Wadih Arap | Human and mouse targeting peptides identified by phage display |
US7452964B2 (en) * | 2001-09-07 | 2008-11-18 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Compositions and methods of use of targeting peptides against placenta and adipose tissues |
US7420030B2 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2008-09-02 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System | Aminopeptidase A (APA) targeting peptides for the treatment of cancer |
US20050074747A1 (en) * | 2000-09-08 | 2005-04-07 | Wadih Arap | Biopanning and rapid analysis of selective interactive ligands (brasil) |
WO2003007979A1 (en) * | 2001-07-18 | 2003-01-30 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | An anti-angiogenic state in mice and humans with retinal photorecptor cell degeneration |
US7671010B2 (en) * | 2002-08-30 | 2010-03-02 | The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Texas System | Compositions and methods of use of targeting peptides for diagnosis and therapy of human cancer |
US8507445B2 (en) * | 2001-09-07 | 2013-08-13 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Compositions and methods of use of targeting peptides for diagnosis and therapy of human cancer |
US20040048243A1 (en) * | 2001-09-07 | 2004-03-11 | Wadih Arap | Methods and compositions for in vitro targeting |
GB2387599B (en) * | 2002-04-17 | 2005-08-10 | Jason Peter Brown | Methods for producing antibodies |
CA2522207A1 (en) * | 2003-04-14 | 2004-10-28 | Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System | Methods for ex vivo hybridoma-free production of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies and generation of immortalized cell populations |
WO2005121318A2 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-22 | The University Court Of The University Of Edinburgh | Neural stem cells |
EP2379711B8 (en) | 2008-12-23 | 2017-03-22 | BOCO Silicon Valley, Inc. | Target populations of oligodendrocyte precursor cells and methods of making and using same |
WO2016086197A1 (en) | 2014-11-25 | 2016-06-02 | The Brigham And Women's Hospital, Inc. | Method of identifying and treating a person having a predisposition to or afflicted with a cardiometabolic disease |
US10683552B2 (en) | 2014-11-25 | 2020-06-16 | Presidents And Fellows Of Harvard College | Clonal haematopoiesis |
CN116590345B (en) * | 2023-05-06 | 2024-01-30 | 北京中医药大学 | Immortalized mouse podocyte line and preparation method, differentiation method and application thereof |
Family Cites Families (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4870009A (en) * | 1982-11-22 | 1989-09-26 | The Salk Institute For Biological Studies | Method of obtaining gene product through the generation of transgenic animals |
US5087571A (en) * | 1984-06-22 | 1992-02-11 | President And Fellows Of Harvard College | Method for providing a cell culture from a transgenic non-human mammal |
US4736866B1 (en) * | 1984-06-22 | 1988-04-12 | Transgenic non-human mammals | |
FR2596414B1 (en) * | 1986-03-28 | 1989-10-06 | Pasteur Institut | HYBRIDOMAS OBTAINED FROM TRANSGENIC ANIMAL LYMPHOCYTES CARRYING A GENE EXPRESSING A SPECIFIED PROTEIN AND PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF SUCH PROTEIN FROM SUCH HYBRIDOMAS |
EP0247494B1 (en) * | 1986-05-20 | 1996-07-31 | The General Hospital Corporation | Method for evaluating the effect of a heterologous agent on an animal |
EP0263908B1 (en) * | 1986-10-15 | 1991-09-25 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Method for the production of proteins by means of inducible expression systems in genetically modified eukaryotic host-cells multiplicated in-vivo |
ATE132266T1 (en) * | 1987-05-01 | 1996-01-15 | Stratagene Inc | MUTAGENEOSIS TESTING USING NON-HUMAN LIVING BEINGS CONTAINING TEST DNA SEQUENCES |
FR2637613B1 (en) * | 1987-06-19 | 1991-09-27 | Transgene Sa | PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF STABLE CELL LINES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DETERMINED PROTEINS FROM TRANSGENIC ANIMALS; TUMOR CELL LINES AND PROTEINS OBTAINED |
EP0390857A4 (en) * | 1987-12-15 | 1991-04-17 | The Trustees Of Princeton University | Transgenic testing systems for mutagens and carcinogens |
EP0428519B1 (en) * | 1988-04-12 | 1993-06-16 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method for manipulation of the cell types of eukaryotes |
US5270191A (en) * | 1988-04-12 | 1993-12-14 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method for manipulation of the cell types of eukaryotes |
EP0351921A3 (en) * | 1988-07-22 | 1991-07-17 | Merck & Co. Inc. | Modified beta adrenergic receptor |
AU650616B2 (en) * | 1988-09-21 | 1994-06-30 | Animal Biotechnology Cambridge Limited | Derivation of pluripotential embryonic cell lines from domestic animals |
GB8823869D0 (en) * | 1988-10-12 | 1988-11-16 | Medical Res Council | Production of antibodies |
FR2649721B1 (en) * | 1989-07-13 | 1994-07-08 | Univ Paris | IMMORTALIZING CONSTRUCTION FOR CONDITIONAL CELL IMMORTALIZATION |
-
1990
- 1990-02-20 GB GB909003791A patent/GB9003791D0/en active Pending
-
1991
- 1991-02-20 AU AU73286/91A patent/AU660604B2/en not_active Expired
- 1991-02-20 AT AT91904013T patent/ATE258226T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1991-02-20 EP EP91904013A patent/EP0516664B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-02-20 IE IE057291A patent/IE910572A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1991-02-20 DK DK91904013T patent/DK0516664T3/en active
- 1991-02-20 JP JP50407791A patent/JP3333902B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1991-02-20 DE DE69133355T patent/DE69133355T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-02-20 CA CA002076345A patent/CA2076345C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-02-20 ES ES91904013T patent/ES2213742T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-02-20 WO PCT/GB1991/000262 patent/WO1991013150A1/en active IP Right Grant
-
1993
- 1993-02-11 US US08/017,320 patent/US5688692A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1995
- 1995-10-05 AU AU33053/95A patent/AU676118B2/en not_active Expired
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0516664B1 (en) | Transgenic animals, cells and cell lines therefrom, and their use | |
IE83909B1 (en) | Transgenic animals, cells and cell lines therefrom, and their use | |
JP6005666B2 (en) | Production of hematopoietic progenitor cells by programming | |
JP4318736B2 (en) | Non-human animals expressing human antibody genes and their use | |
JP4129472B2 (en) | Methods for producing mammals having specific genetic characteristics | |
US7145057B2 (en) | Chimeric bird from embryonic stem cells | |
WO2005080598A1 (en) | Method of screening somatic cell nucleus initializer | |
US5866759A (en) | Transgenic mice expressing TSSV40 large T antigen | |
Rosenfeld et al. | Transgenic mice: applications to the study of the nervous system | |
JP2005523012A (en) | Cancer model | |
Merlino | Transgenic mice as models for tumorigenesis | |
US20120096568A1 (en) | Transgenic lsd1 animal model for cancer | |
CA2368620A1 (en) | Genetic modification of male germ cells for generation of transgenic species and genetic therapies | |
WO1997032608A1 (en) | Genetically engineered primary oligodendrocytes for transplantation-mediated gene delivery in the central nervous system | |
US6825394B1 (en) | Conditionally immortalized cell lines derived from transgenic animals | |
JP4033390B2 (en) | Immortalized natural killer cell line | |
Iannaccone et al. | Exploring pathogenetic mechanisms using transgenic animals | |
US20030110524A1 (en) | Transgenic organisms and their uses | |
JPH10509313A (en) | Transgenic organisms and methods of using the same | |
Noble | Production and Growth of Conditionally Immortal Cell Lines from the H-2K b ts A58 Transgenic Mouse | |
McKinnon et al. | Transplantation of genetically engineered primary cells for the analysis of gene function in CNS development | |
JP2004518405A (en) | Somatic cell cloning gene transfer to produce recombinant proteins, cells, and organisms | |
JP2001224367A (en) | Immortalized blood vessel capillary epithelial cell line | |
Andres et al. | Biology of disease | |
Chalifour | Overview: Recent Aspects of Transgene Technology |