GB2557263A - Method - Google Patents
Method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2557263A GB2557263A GB1620494.3A GB201620494A GB2557263A GB 2557263 A GB2557263 A GB 2557263A GB 201620494 A GB201620494 A GB 201620494A GB 2557263 A GB2557263 A GB 2557263A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- index
- perivascular
- risk
- fai
- attenuation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 93
- 210000000577 adipose tissue Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 61
- 238000002591 computed tomography Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 61
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 210000004204 blood vessel Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 230000007211 cardiovascular event Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 230000000747 cardiac effect Effects 0.000 claims description 117
- 239000000090 biomarker Substances 0.000 claims description 52
- 208000035868 Vascular inflammations Diseases 0.000 claims description 51
- 230000002792 vascular Effects 0.000 claims description 29
- 210000004351 coronary vessel Anatomy 0.000 claims description 22
- 210000001367 artery Anatomy 0.000 claims description 21
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 206010011906 Death Diseases 0.000 claims description 12
- 206010049993 Cardiac death Diseases 0.000 claims description 11
- 210000000709 aorta Anatomy 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000003325 tomography Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000004054 inflammatory process Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 206010061218 Inflammation Diseases 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000007477 logistic regression Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 210000001715 carotid artery Anatomy 0.000 claims description 5
- 210000001105 femoral artery Anatomy 0.000 claims description 4
- 208000007474 aortic aneurysm Diseases 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000029078 coronary artery disease Diseases 0.000 description 35
- 238000010968 computed tomography angiography Methods 0.000 description 32
- 230000002526 effect on cardiovascular system Effects 0.000 description 24
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 22
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 18
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 16
- 238000013517 stratification Methods 0.000 description 16
- 230000034994 death Effects 0.000 description 15
- 231100000517 death Toxicity 0.000 description 15
- 208000004434 Calcinosis Diseases 0.000 description 12
- 230000002308 calcification Effects 0.000 description 10
- 201000001320 Atherosclerosis Diseases 0.000 description 9
- 208000037260 Atherosclerotic Plaque Diseases 0.000 description 9
- 206010020772 Hypertension Diseases 0.000 description 7
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000003902 lesion Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000009862 primary prevention Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000009863 secondary prevention Effects 0.000 description 7
- 208000035150 Hypercholesterolemia Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 230000004087 circulation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 206010012601 diabetes mellitus Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 6
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 6
- 230000000414 obstructive effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000000611 regression analysis Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 6
- 208000024891 symptom Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 229940121710 HMGCoA reductase inhibitor Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000008346 aqueous phase Substances 0.000 description 5
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000002471 hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 208000006011 Stroke Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 210000002216 heart Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000002757 inflammatory effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001338 necrotic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012014 optical coherence tomography Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 4
- 208000031481 Pathologic Constriction Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 208000005475 Vascular calcification Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000702 anti-platelet effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000017531 blood circulation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000004556 brain Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000013211 curve analysis Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 208000002173 dizziness Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 208000019622 heart disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 3
- 210000000265 leukocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000001325 log-rank test Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002483 medication Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007505 plaque formation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000391 smoking effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000005477 standard model Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000036262 stenosis Effects 0.000 description 3
- 208000037804 stenosis Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 208000019553 vascular disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 230000009278 visceral effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- MZOFCQQQCNRIBI-VMXHOPILSA-N (3s)-4-[[(2s)-1-[[(2s)-1-[[(1s)-1-carboxy-2-hydroxyethyl]amino]-4-methyl-1-oxopentan-2-yl]amino]-5-(diaminomethylideneamino)-1-oxopentan-2-yl]amino]-3-[[2-[[(2s)-2,6-diaminohexanoyl]amino]acetyl]amino]-4-oxobutanoic acid Chemical compound OC[C@@H](C(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCN=C(N)N)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCCCN MZOFCQQQCNRIBI-VMXHOPILSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 208000004476 Acute Coronary Syndrome Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 241001489705 Aquarius Species 0.000 description 2
- 206010003211 Arteriosclerosis coronary artery Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 206010008479 Chest Pain Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 208000000059 Dyspnea Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 206010013975 Dyspnoeas Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 102000010834 Extracellular Matrix Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010037362 Extracellular Matrix Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 2
- 238000012879 PET imaging Methods 0.000 description 2
- 108060008682 Tumor Necrosis Factor Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000000852 Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001154 acute effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000001789 adipocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000032683 aging Effects 0.000 description 2
- 206010003119 arrhythmia Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 206010003230 arteritis Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000036523 atherogenesis Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002876 beta blocker Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229940097320 beta blocking agent Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 210000000748 cardiovascular system Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000001168 carotid artery common Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- HVYWMOMLDIMFJA-DPAQBDIFSA-N cholesterol Chemical compound C1C=C2C[C@@H](O)CC[C@]2(C)[C@@H]2[C@@H]1[C@@H]1CC[C@H]([C@H](C)CCCC(C)C)[C@@]1(C)CC2 HVYWMOMLDIMFJA-DPAQBDIFSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002405 diagnostic procedure Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000002744 extracellular matrix Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000002608 intravascular ultrasound Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010253 intravenous injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052740 iodine Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 210000003734 kidney Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000013160 medical therapy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002107 myocardial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000010125 myocardial infarction Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 231100000862 numbness Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000003076 paracrine Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000003516 pericardium Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000002600 positron emission tomography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000750 progressive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000700 radioactive tracer Substances 0.000 description 2
- PUZPDOWCWNUUKD-ULWFUOSBSA-M sodium;fluorine-18(1-) Chemical compound [18F-].[Na+] PUZPDOWCWNUUKD-ULWFUOSBSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 230000009885 systemic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- USKPQBRNXDJQGX-CKUXDGONSA-N 2-acetyloxybenzoic acid;methyl (2s)-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(6,7-dihydro-4h-thieno[3,2-c]pyridin-5-yl)acetate;sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O.CC(=O)OC1=CC=CC=C1C(O)=O.C1([C@H](N2CC=3C=CSC=3CC2)C(=O)OC)=CC=CC=C1Cl USKPQBRNXDJQGX-CKUXDGONSA-N 0.000 description 1
- ZCYVEMRRCGMTRW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 7553-56-2 Chemical compound [I] ZCYVEMRRCGMTRW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000004611 Abdominal Obesity Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010002329 Aneurysm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010002383 Angina Pectoris Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 201000006474 Brain Ischemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000007204 Brain death Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000282465 Canis Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000024172 Cardiovascular disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010010144 Completed suicide Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010061818 Disease progression Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010050256 Dysstasia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000005189 Embolism Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000282324 Felis Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010017577 Gait disturbance Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010019280 Heart failures Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000008454 Hyperhidrosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000031226 Hyperlipidaemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000001276 Kolmogorov–Smirnov test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012313 Kruskal-Wallis test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000124008 Mammalia Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000000585 Mann–Whitney U test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000001145 Metabolic Syndrome Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010028813 Nausea Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- SNIOPGDIGTZGOP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitroglycerin Chemical compound [O-][N+](=O)OCC(O[N+]([O-])=O)CO[N+]([O-])=O SNIOPGDIGTZGOP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000008589 Obesity Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000002193 Pain Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010033557 Palpitations Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000005764 Peripheral Arterial Disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000030831 Peripheral arterial occlusive disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000288906 Primates Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000010378 Pulmonary Embolism Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000001647 Renal Insufficiency Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000283984 Rodentia Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010040047 Sepsis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010049418 Sudden Cardiac Death Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000001435 Thromboembolism Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010047141 Vasodilatation Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010047513 Vision blurred Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000011868 Wald Chi square test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000000690 abdominal obesity-metabolic syndrome Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000008186 active pharmaceutical agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002293 adipogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003484 anatomy Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000002333 angiotensin II receptor antagonist Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940125364 angiotensin receptor blocker Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229940044094 angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000006793 arrhythmia Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000031018 biological processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001574 biopsy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036770 blood supply Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 201000011510 cancer Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000001627 cerebral artery Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 235000012000 cholesterol Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 208000020832 chronic kidney disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000035602 clotting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008602 contraction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002872 contrast media Substances 0.000 description 1
- 208000026758 coronary atherosclerosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005750 disease progression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002592 echocardiography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003414 extremity Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000000497 foam cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229960003711 glyceryl trinitrate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001624 hip Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 201000001421 hyperglycemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000006575 hypertriglyceridemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004968 inflammatory condition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001596 intra-abdominal fat Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000009545 invasion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011630 iodine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000006370 kidney failure Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000013433 lightheadedness Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002540 macrophage Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000002595 magnetic resonance imaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036210 malignancy Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000003205 muscle Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 208000031225 myocardial ischemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000004165 myocardium Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000008693 nausea Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000101 novel biomarker Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020824 obesity Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000001543 one-way ANOVA Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000036542 oxidative stress Effects 0.000 description 1
- 206010033675 panniculitis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000000803 paradoxical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008506 pathogenesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007170 pathology Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004197 pelvis Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011458 pharmacological treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035479 physiological effects, processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003449 preventive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000770 proinflammatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 210000001147 pulmonary artery Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002254 renal artery Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000009666 routine test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002784 sclerotic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013077 scoring method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000018316 severe headache Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000013220 shortness of breath Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000000329 smooth muscle myocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004003 subcutaneous fat Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000011477 surgical intervention Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035900 sweating Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003626 triacylglycerols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000012762 unpaired Student’s t-test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000024883 vasodilation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/02—Arrangements for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/03—Computed tomography [CT]
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/02—Arrangements for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/03—Computed tomography [CT]
- A61B6/032—Transmission computed tomography [CT]
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/50—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment specially adapted for specific body parts; specially adapted for specific clinical applications
- A61B6/504—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment specially adapted for specific body parts; specially adapted for specific clinical applications for diagnosis of blood vessels, e.g. by angiography
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/52—Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/5205—Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis involving processing of raw data to produce diagnostic data
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/52—Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/5211—Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis involving processing of medical diagnostic data
- A61B6/5217—Devices using data or image processing specially adapted for radiation diagnosis involving processing of medical diagnostic data extracting a diagnostic or physiological parameter from medical diagnostic data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
- G06T7/0012—Biomedical image inspection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/60—Analysis of geometric attributes
- G06T7/62—Analysis of geometric attributes of area, perimeter, diameter or volume
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16H—HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE HANDLING OR PROCESSING OF MEDICAL OR HEALTHCARE DATA
- G16H50/00—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics
- G16H50/30—ICT specially adapted for medical diagnosis, medical simulation or medical data mining; ICT specially adapted for detecting, monitoring or modelling epidemics or pandemics for calculating health indices; for individual health risk assessment
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
- G06T2207/10072—Tomographic images
- G06T2207/10081—Computed x-ray tomography [CT]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
- G06T2207/30048—Heart; Cardiac
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
- G06T2207/30101—Blood vessel; Artery; Vein; Vascular
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Vascular Medicine (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Pulmonology (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Apparatus For Radiation Diagnosis (AREA)
Abstract
A method using data from a computer tomography (CT) scan along a length of a blood vessel to determine the perivascular water index (PVWi) of a blood vessel (the volume of the voxels within a window above and below the attenuation of water that corresponds to the water content around the vessel) by determining the total volume of water within an attenuation window around the attenuation of water within the perivascular space a predetermined distance from the outer wall of the vessel and correcting by dividing the total volume of water determined by the volume of the total perivascular volume. Also claimed is a method for predicting morality risk or risk of a cardiovascular event by using a CT scan of a blood vessel to determine the calcium index (Calcium-i) and fibrous plaque index (FPi) and at least one of fat attenuation index of the perivascular adipose tissue (FAIPVAT) and PVWi. Each of the values determined are then compared to a predetermined cut-off value or using the absolute value to generate an output value that indicates the risk of a cardiovascular event.
Description
(54) Title of the Invention: Method
Abstract Title: Determining perivascular water index of a blood vessel using computer tomography (57) A method using data from a computer tomography (CT) scan along a length of a blood vessel to determine the perivascular water index (PVWi) of a blood vessel (the volume of the voxels within a window above and below the attenuation of water that corresponds to the water content around the vessel) by determining the total volume of water within an attenuation window around the attenuation of water within the perivascular space a predetermined distance from the outer wall of the vessel and correcting by dividing the total volume of water determined by the volume of the total perivascular volume. Also claimed is a method for predicting morality risk or risk of a cardiovascular event by using a CT scan of a blood vessel to determine the calcium index (Calcium-i) and fibrous plaque index (FPi) and at least one of fat attenuation index of the perivascular adipose tissue (FAIrvat) and PVWi. Each of the values determined are then compared to a predetermined cut-off value or using the absolute value to generate an output value that indicates the risk of a cardiovascular event.
FIGURE 1
1/8 (A) (B)
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Distance from the RCA wall (mm) =100x (FAIPVAT- FAInon-PVAT) |FAIPVAT |
FIGURE 1
2/8 (A) (B)
(C) ' '-40η r=0.176
o
-100 -80 -60 -40
FAIpvat (HU)
P=0.18 (D) ' ' -40Ί
-100'
-110'
-60'
I
J’70' i -80' <
Ll_
-90·
-100' o >o
-110J
RCA calcium volume index
FIGURE 2
P=0.869
0.1 - 399 >400
Total Agatston score
3/8 (A) (B) η
— PVWi <0.1 -- PVWi> 0.1 .15o 1050-
1-specificity (C) (D)
-PVWi<0.1 HU PVWi > 0.1 HU
10η —PVWi <0.1 -- PVWi >0.1)
HR[95%CI1: 1.57[1.09-2.27], p=0.016
P log-rank = 0.019 . 4
A 3 +->
o
E 21 4 ς fr’ Q £Λ*Λ*Λ*Λ
HR[95%CI1: 2.35(1.08-5.111. p=0.032
M8MK
JNJOCoS
SWXX'
P log-rank = 0.027 ^8>Ta 6 +-> i_ o E
U 4ra T3 ra -, u 2 c 2 0HR[95%CI1: 1.57 [0.99-2.49], p=0.06
P log-rank = 0.056
20 40 60 80 100
Follow-up time (months)
20 40 60 80 100
Follow-up time (months)
20 40 60 80 100
Follow-up time (months)
FIGURE 3
4/8 (A)
HR [95% Cl],
HIGHvsLOW· :1.94 [1.24-3.04], P=0.004 (B) (D)
FAI PVAT tertiles Low
Mid —
High —
HR [95% CI]HIGHVS L0W: 3.89 [1.41-10.74], P=0.009
FAI PVAT tertiles
Low * Mid High,
Plog-rank = 0.004
Plog-rank = 0.001
Follow-up time (months)
Follow-up time (months) (c)
FA:
AUC=0.663[0.547-0.780] P=0.004
Cut-off: -70.1 HU
Sensitivity: 65.4% Specificity: 71.9%
0.6 0.8
1-specificity (E) (F)
HR [95%Cl]: 1.25 [0.86-1.82], p=0.242
- VPCI < 14.5%
- VPCI > 14.5%
Plog-rank = 0.241
4HR [95% Cl]: 2.22 [1,.02-4.83], p=0.046 — VPCI <14.5% VPCI >14.5%
Plog-rank = 0.04
1-specificity ) 20 40 60 80 100
Follow-up time (months) ) 20 40 60 80 100
Follow-up time (months)
FIGURE 4
5/8 (A) η HR [95%CI]: 2.1 [1.5-3.1], p<0.001
FAlp,
0s>· o E ω 5 Ί (Z) J fC
No at risk ,J—
P log-rank < 0.001
20 40 60 80 100
Follow-up time (months) iT<-70.1 HU (—) 1337 1320 1307 1198 640
FAIpvat>-70.1 HU (--) 535 515 501 444 (B)
5-1 | |
so 0s- >· | 4 - |
nj +-» o | 3- |
E (J /0 | 2- |
Ό i_ fC U | 1- |
η HR [95%CI]: 5.2 [2.3-11.8], p<0.001
P log-rank < 0.001 (C)
20 40 60 80 100
Follow-up time (months)
No at risk
FAIpv,T<-70.1HU—- 1337 1320 1307 1198 640 70
Mortality Hazard Ratio [95%CI]*
All-cause
Cardiac
Non- cardiac
0.7 +—
FAIpvat<-70.1 HU better
1.8 [1.1-3.0]
H 5.4 [1.6-18.0]
1.2 [0.6-2.4]
P-value
0.03
0.006
0.541
20
FAIpvat> -70.1 HU better
FIGURE 5
6/8 (A) The Oxford Integrated Cardiac CT score (OxScore)
1. FAIpvat 2. Fibrous (> -70.1 HU) Pteque index
3. Calcium index
4. EpAT total volume |yg|i|§jS|tgilO0i:S|i|fS| soft plaques
OsSSis|68;iiiegSSi®es lllleiseori (B) (D) = The individualized probability for all-cause OR cardiac mortality over 6.4 years
OxScore (%)= 100*107(1+107) where y= c + a*FAIPVAT + b*EpAT-vol + d*FPi + e*Calcium-i a, b, d, e = beta coefficients and c = constant calculated on logistic regression with:
FA1pvat (=1 if > -70.1 HU andO if < -70.1 HU), FPi, Calcium-i, EpAT volume (in cm3)as the independent and p/Z-caase OR card/ac morfa/Ty as the dependent variables.
Mortality risk stratification based on the OxSCORE
All-cause mortality Cardiac mortality
Average follow-up: 77.0 months (C)
(n=192) xow(n=1680)
Average follow-up: 77.0 months
HR [95%CI]: 7.7[5.0-12.1], p<0.001
HR [95%CI]: 1.8[1.1-2.9], p=0.014
Reference group (E) sp
0s·
S 10 <
No at risk
Ststsssss;
k <0.001
20 40 60 80 100
Time to follow-up (months) >12 η
64<3
0No at risk
HR[95%CI]: 22.3 [9.7-51.6], p<0.001 Reference group ,<0.001
20 40 60 80 100
Time to follow-up (months)
1059 | 1047 | 1043 | 969 | 507 | 56 | »» 1680 | 1658 | 1641 | 1497 | 680 | 70 |
596 | 586 | 576 | 515 | 171 | 13 | 192 | 177 | 167 | 145 | 36 | 1 |
217 | 202 | 189 | 158 | 38 | 2 |
FIGURE 6
7/8
Model 1.* age, gender, ITf'N, high tbalesterol, OM, smoking, CAO, CCS ϊ 400 Model 2; Model 2 * OxScore variables iTA;^, FPi, Calcium -1, EpA volume)
Total mortality (A) ‘1 [&3« <.»«$ .v·.^
I .J» jt’*· zV' . I «Si· Z s*k I >«*
Z ο ί.- / / > I A-Z ·%' I /
C ¢) 4“| ./ & | &(AUC},.?= 0.031., p<0.05 °Ί p^c.^0001
{//SAitetellsO// {[[hsiisiityysfesi | Model 1 | ||
llllllll | 3$% | Any | |
2 <S% | ? ?% | -’..VS | |
0 .. <Λ | :24/1914: | [3./191} | [27/1285] |
C4 X | |||
» F &¥% | A .6¾ | 11,1% | 10 s\ |
'φ.,.τ................... | {5/109} | [3//6613 | |
<fi£ Φ | |||
75 Any | 9.3% | 6 1% | |
[29/1123) | [35/749] | [114/1877,] |
0.2 8.4 8.6 8,3? 1 l-specificity
NRI = 7,6 %
Mattel l;AijC *8.76 {0;754.3,S08], (teG.891
Itetigi 2; Aiil = 8,791 {0,744.3,837), i.«f.i.80i average follow-up; 77 £ 14,2 months
Cardiac mortality (c) (D)
υ.δ >
c:
<p
G. I A(AUC5,.?= 0.10., p<0.01 .....| Pwstd.Ch/.< 0.001
.........:Λ<..............................I.$ 9.2 9.4 9. S 9.S 1
1-specificity , MjatfeillAUC 9 0 X.'.S Γ9. ?i··:.· 8.-::73), ::-..0.007 ·Μοάή2;Αΰ£·* 0)946 {8,917,0.8741,ρ<34®ί
r | wiglily/isiisi | Model 1 | |||
||[®||||||i^|| | Any | ||||
& .%». | n.r·. | 6,6% | 9 | ||
© | iB/lfeO | {5/76} | [:)/1636) | ||
X | |||||
& | ? | iWS%O | 0 4% | 8.1% | |
T3 © 2 | r> | ;/9.i] | [14/77} | [15/186! | |
*© © | siAhy/i | :S'4%: | :ii. 3% | 3 4« | |
s | [7/:78)} | {19/171) | (26/1872} |
NRI = 11.3 % average follow-up; 77 i 14.2 months
FIGURE 7
8/8
PVWi (-30 to 30 HU)
FIGURE 8
METHOD
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to novel biomarkers of cardiovascular risk and methods for predicting all-cause mortality and cardiac events, including cardiac mortality.
Background of the Invention
Atherosclerosis is a progressive process in which an artery wall thickens as a result of invasion and accumulation of white blood cells. This inflammatory process results in plaques within the vessel wall containing living white blood cells, dead cell debris and fatty deposits including cholesterol and triglycerides.
Stable atherosclerotic plaques, which tend to be asymptomatic, are typically rich in extracellular matrix and smooth muscle cells, while unstable plaques are rich in macrophages and foam cells and the extracellular matrix separating the lesion from the arterial lumen (also known as the fibrous cap) is usually weak and prone to rupture. Ruptures of the fibrous cap eventually induce clot formation in the lumen, and such clots can block arteries or detach, move into the circulation and eventually block smaller downstream vessels causing thromboembolism. Chronically expanding plaques are frequently asymptomatic until vessel occlusion (stenosis) is severe enough that blood supply to downstream tissue is insufficient.
Atherosclerosis is asymptomatic for decades because the arteries enlarge at all plaque locations and blood flow is not immediately affected. Indeed, plaque ruptures are also asymptomatic unless they result in sufficient narrowing or closure of an artery that impedes blood flow to different organs so as to induce symptoms. Typically, the disease is only diagnosed when the patient experiences other cardiovascular disorders such as stroke or heart attack. Symptomatic atherosclerosis is typically associated with men in their 40s and women in their 50s to 60s. Sub-clinically, the disease begins to appear in childhood, and noticeable signs can begin developing at puberty. While coronary artery disease is more prevalent in men than women, atherosclerosis of the cerebral arteries and strokes equally affect both sexes.
Atherosclerosis may cause narrowing in the coronary arteries, which are responsible for bringing oxygenated blood to the heart, and this can produce symptoms such as the chest pain of angina, shortness of breath, sweating, nausea, dizziness or lightheadedness, breathlessness or palpitations. Cardiac arrhythmias may also result from cardiac ischemia. Atherosclerosis that causes narrowing in the carotid arteries, which supply blood to the brain and neck, can produce symptoms such as a feeling of weakness, not being able to think straight, difficulty speaking, becoming dizzy and difficulty in walking or standing up straight, blurred vision, numbness of the face, arms, and legs, severe headache and losing consciousness. These symptoms may also be present in stroke, which is caused by marked narrowing or closure of arteries going to the brain leading to brain ischemia and death of cells in the brain. Peripheral arteries, which supply blood to the legs, arms, and pelvis may also be affected. Symptoms can include numbness within the affected limbs, as well as pain. Plaque formation may also occur in the renal arteries, which supply blood to the kidneys. Plaque occurrence and accumulation leads to decreased kidney blood flow and chronic kidney disease, which, like all other areas, are typically asymptomatic until late stages.
Vascular inflammation is a key feature in atherogenesis and plays a critical role in atherosclerotic plaque stability by triggering plaque rupture leading to acute coronary syndromes (see Ross R. N Engl J Med 1999;340:115-26, and Major AS et al Circulation 2011;124:2809-11). Importantly, more than 50% of acute coronary syndromes are caused by highly inflamed but anatomically non-significant atherosclerotic plaques (Fishbein MC et al. Circulation 1996;94:2662-6), which are not identifiable by any of the existing clinical diagnostic tests.
Early, non-invasive diagnosis of vascular inflammation has been hailed as the “holy grail” of cardiovascular diagnostics and could help improve risk stratification in primary and secondary prevention. However, the current state-of-the-art methods for the diagnosis of vascular inflammation and cardiovascular risk prediction are suboptimal and have several limitations. Circulating inflammatory biomarkers (e.g. CRP, TNF-α) have a limited value in cardiovascular risk prediction since they are not specific to the cardiovascular system and have poor correlation with local vascular inflammation (see Weintraub et al. Eur Heart J 2000;21:958-60; Lee R et al. Current medicinal chemistry 2012;19:2504-20; and Margaritis M etal. Circulation 2013;127:2209-21).
In the field of cardiovascular imaging, the predictive value of Agatston coronary calcium score measured by CT has been long-established. However, coronary calcification represents a non-reversible process that does not change in response to appropriate medical therapy (e.g. statins) (Alexopoulos N et al. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013;61:1956-61). In fact, calcified plaques are considered more stable and less likely to rupture compared to plaques with high-risk features, such as a thin-cap fibroatheromas and a large necrotic core (Huang H et al. Circulation 2001;103:1051-6). Detection of high-risk plaque features such as microcalcification, a large necrotic core or positive remodelling on CT angiograms have all been shown to predict future cardiac events (Hecht HS et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:1336-9; and Saremi F et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:W249-60), but the reliability of the method is affected by the observer’s expertise and CT settings and parameters, including spatial resolution (Maurovich-Horvat P et al. Nat Rev Cardiol 2014;11:390-402; and Fleg JL et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:941-55).
Newer invasive methods such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have been more successful in detecting high-risk plaques but are invasive, expensive, carry a small yet significant risk of in-procedure complications (Bezerra HG et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:1035-46; and McDaniel MC et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:1155-67), and are therefore not eligible for primary prevention and wide screening of low-risk individuals. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-FDG is expensive, associated with significantly higher levels of radiation exposure compared to CT alone, not readily available and limited by myocardial uptake of the radiotracer that results in significant background noise (Joshi NV et al. Lancet 2014;383:705-13; and Rogers IS et al. Curr Cardiol Rep 2011;13:138-44). Even the introduction of newer radiotracers (such as 18F-NaF), although promising, carries many of the limitations of traditional PET imaging, including but not limited to significant radiation exposure, limited availability and no demonstrated value in primary or even secondary prevention (Joshi NV etal. Lancet 2014;383:705-13).
Perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) surrounds (coronary) arteries and may be involved in local stimulation of atherosclerotic plaque formation. PVAT can be quantified using a number of techniques, including for example, echocardiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The quantity of PVAT correlates with some parameters of metabolic syndrome including increased waist circumference, hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia, and with coronary atherosclerosis. PVAT has long been known to secrete pro-inflammatory proteins and induce inflammation of the artery wall. The long-held understanding of the pathology of atherogenesis in the vascular wall was that it is stimulated externally, and it was suggested that PVAT played a key role in this process.
It has recently become clear that vascular inflammation and oxidative stress has the ability to affect the biology of PVAT as the vascular wall releases mediators able to exert a paracrine effect on the neighbouring PVAT (see e.g. Margaritis et al. Circulation 2013; 127(22):2209-21). This observation was in contrast to the classical theory according to which PVAT sends paracrine signals to the vascular wall. It is now understood that the biology of PVAT is shaped by signals received from the blood vessel it surrounds, and characterisation of PVAT can provide useful information regarding the biology and health of that blood vessel.
In WO2016/024128 it was demonstrated that the quantified radiodensity of perivascular tissue (QRpvat), which is also known as and referred to herein as the fat attenuation index of perivascular tissue (FAIPVat), is positively associated with the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and the volume of fibrous plaque in the proximal RCA independently of the presence of coronary calcium. As part of the same study, the present inventors also showed that FAIPVat changes in a dynamic way in response to local rupture of a culprit lesion in patients with acute Ml and can distinguish culprit from non-culprit lesions. These observations supported the inventors’ hypothesis that FAIPVat could function as a dynamic biomarker of vascular inflammation and cardiovascular risk and offer diagnostic and prognostic information beyond that of traditional biomarkers, such as coronary calcium.
However, there remains an urgent need for the identification and development of functional biomarkers that will describe vascular inflammation, rather than structural and non-reversible changes in the vascular wall, and diagnostic tools to aid non-invasive detection of vascular inflammation and enable stratification of patients who are at risk of suffering serious cardiac events.
Summary of the Invention
According to a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for determining the perivascular water index (PVWi) of a blood vessel, comprising (i) using data gathered from a computer tomography scan along a length of the vessel to determine the total volume of voxels of water within an attenuation window around the attenuation of water within the perivascular space a pre-determined distance from the outer wall of the vessel, and (ii) correcting the total volume of the voxels of water for the size of the vessel by dividing the total volume of voxels of water determined in step (i) by the total perivascular volume.
According to a second aspect, the present invention is directed to the use of perivascular water index (PVWi), as defined according to the method of the first aspect of the invention, as a functional biomarker of vascular inflammation. According to this aspect, PVW can be used alone, or in combination with one or more other biomarkers, to predict all-cause or cardiac mortality risk in a patient. In particular, PVW can be used in combination with one or more of calcium index, fibrous plaque index, fat attenuation index of the perivascular adipose tissue, volumetric perivascular characterisation index, fat attenuation index and total volume of the epicardial adipose tissue to predict allcause or cardiac mortality risk in a patient.
According to a third aspect, the present invention provides a method for predicting the risk of a patient suffering a cardiovascular event, said method comprising:
(a) using data gathered from a computer tomography scan along a length of a blood vessel to determine: (i) calcium index (Calcium-i); and (ii) fibrous plaque index (FPi), and at least one of (iii) fat attenuation index of the perivascular adipose tissue (FAIPVat); (iv) perivascular water index (PVW); and (v) volumetric perivascular characterisation index and the possible addition of any of the following.
(b) comparing each of the values determined in (a) to a pre-determined cut-off value or using the absolute value of each variable in order to generate an output value that indicates the patient’s risk of suffering a cardiovascular event.
In a preferred embodiment of the method of the third aspect of the invention, both FAIpvat and PVW are determined in step (a) of the method.
In one embodiment, the method according to the third aspect of the invention further comprises determining one or more of (vi) fat attenuation index of total volume of the epicardial adipose tissue (EpAT-vol), (vii) the epicardial adipose tissue (FAIEpat), (viii) age and (ix) gender of the patient.
In certain embodiments, the method according to the third aspect of the invention can be used for non-invasive monitoring of aortic aneurysms and/or carotid plaques.
Description of the Drawings
The invention is described with reference to the following Figures, in which:
Figure 1 provides a definition of perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) indices. (A) Coronary CT angiography images were reconstructed in 3 dimensions. The right coronary artery was tracked and the proximal 10-50mm of its course were selected on curved multiplanar reconstruction images. The inner and outer walls of the vessel were manually optimized and the perivascular area (up to 20mm distal to the outer vessel wall) was analysed based on the respective tissue attenuation. A Hounsfield Unit range of -15 to +15 was used to detect perivascular water, whereas a range of -190 to -30 was applied for detection of adipose tissue. (B) The perivascular area was then split in 20 concentric cylindrical layers of 1mm thickness and fat attenuation index (FAI), defined as the mean attenuation of adipose tissue within the pre-defined range, was then calculated in each layer and plotted against the distance from the vessel wall. PVAT was defined as AT within a radial distance equal to the diameter of the vessel, whereas AT in the most distal layer was defined as non-PVAT. The volumetric perivascular characterization index (VPCI) was then defined as the percent change from FAIPVATto FAInOn-pvAT. Further analysis by tertiles of fibrous plaque index (FPi, fibrous plaque volume divided by the total volume of the vessel) revealed a positive association between fibrous plaque burden and FAI of the adipose tissue in the perivascular area. Perivascular Water Index (PVWi) was defined as the total volume of voxels of water within an attenuation window around the attenuation of water (-15 to +15 HU) within the perivascular space a predetermined distance from the outer wall of the vessel (e.g. a radial distance equal to the diameter of the vessel) divided by the total perivascular volume.
Figure 2 shows the correlation between perivascular fat attenuation index (FAIPVAt), perivascular water index (PVWi), fibrous plaque index (FPi) and coronary calcification.
FAIpvat is strongly correlated with perivascular water, supporting the hypothesis that changes in FAIPVat reflect a shift from a lipophilic to a greater aqueous phase (A). On the other hand, there was only a weak correlation between FAIPVat, a functional biomarker, and FPi, a structural wall biomarker, suggesting that the two indices reflect a different local biology (B). Similarly, no correlation was found between FAIPVat and coronary calcium (RCA calcium index and total Agatston score) (C, D). Taken together, these findings suggest that FAIPVat describes a different biology than anatomical plaque burden and it is entirely independent of the local calcium load or the Agatston score.
Figure 3 shows PVWi as a predictor of all-cause, cardiac and non-cardiac mortality. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a cut-off of 0.10 with 57.7% sensitivity and 63.3% specificity for prediction of cardiac mortality (A). Comparison of KM curves by the log-rank test as well as univariate Cox regression analysis showed that high PVWi values (>0.10) are associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause (B) and cardiac mortality (C) but not non-cardiac mortality (p=NS). AUC: area under the curve; Cl: confidence intervals; HR: hazard ratio PVW: Perivascular Water index; ROC:
receiver operating characteristic curve.
Figure 4 shows the predictive value of FAIPVat and VPCI for all-cause and cardiac mortality. We first explored the predictive value of our novel imaging indices by splitting the study population in tertiles according to their respective FAIPVAt and VPCI values.
Individuals in the high FAIPVat group had an almost two-fold increase in their risk of death (A) and almost four times higher risk of cardiac mortality compared to those in the lowest fertile (B). Notably, visual assessment of the Kaplan-Meier curves revealed a similar trend for the mid- and low-tertile groups, suggesting the presence of a certain cutoff, above which the risk of mortality significantly increases. In fact, ROC curve analysis revealed an optimal cut-off of -70.1 HU that was able to predict cardiac death with 65.4% sensitivity and 71.9% specificity (C). By following a similar approach, an optimal cut-off of 14.5% was identified for VPCI as a predictor of cardiac mortality (D). Interestingly, high VPCI values (>14.5%) were associated with a higher risk of cardiac-related (F) but not all-cause mortality (E). AUC: area under the curve; Cl: confidence intervals; FAIPVat:
fat attenuation index of perivascular adipose tissue; HR: hazard ratio; ROC: receiver operating characteristic curve, VPCI: volumetric perivascular characterisation index.
Figure 5 shows the predictive value of high FAIPVat (^-70.1 HU) for all-cause, cardiac and non-cardiac mortality. In univariate Cox regression analysis, high FAIPVat was linked to a two-fold increase in the risk of all-cause mortality (A) and a more than five-fold increase in the risk of cardiac death (B) compared to the low FAIPVAt group. More importantly, FAIPVat remained predictive of both all-cause and cardiac mortality in multivariable cox-regression (Panel C, where HR: hazard ratio from cox regression (for
FAIPVat <-70.1HU vs >-70 HU)). *adjusted for age, gender, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, active smoker status, medications (antiplatelets and statins), presence of coronary artery disease, calcium index, Agatston score (>400 vs <400) and type of CT scanner). Interestingly, the predictive value of FAIPVat appears to be specific for cardiac rather than non-cardiac mortality, suggesting that the new biomarker describes a cardiac-specific biology and that it provides additional information, beyond that of traditional risk factors and biomarkers used in cardiac risk stratification. CAD: Coronary Artery Disease; FAIPVat: Fat Attenuation Index of Perivascular Adipose Tissue; HU: Hounsfield units.
Figure 6 shows mortality and cardiac risk-stratification based on the OxScore. A novel predictive model was constructed based on four imaging indices that were shown to be strong and independent predictors of all-cause and cardiac mortality in multivariable Cox regression analysis (A). These were FAIPVat, a novel marker of coronary inflammation, fibrous plaque index, a biomarker of soft plaques, calcium index, an imaging index of local calcium deposition in the proximal right coronary artery and finally epicardial adipose tissue (EpAT) volume, an established index of epicardial/visceral adiposity. Based on a logistic regression model, the individual probabilities of all-cause/cardiac mortality were calculated and the study population was subsequently reclassified into risk groups as follows: for all-cause mortality: OxScorehigh: £10%, OxScoremid: 5-10%,
OxScoreiow: <5% (B) and for cardiac mortality: OxScorehigh: £3% versus OxScoreiow: <3% (D). Patients in the OxScorehigh group for all-cause mortality had an almost eight times higher risk of death during follow-up compared to the OxScoreiow group (C), whereas those in the high-risk group for cardiac-specific mortality, were more than 22 times more likely to die of cardiac causes compared to the low risk group (E). FAIPVat: Fat
Attenuation Index of Perivascular Adipose Tissue; FPi: Fibrous Plaque index; HR: Hazard Ratio; HU: Hounsfield units.
Figure 7 compares OxScore against traditional risk factors and cardiac CT measurements. In order to examine the predictive value of OxScore beyond age, gender, traditional cardiovascular risk factors and standard interpretation of a cardiac CT scan (presence of new or previously known coronary artery disease or high Agatston score > 400), two different models were constructed as follows. Model 1 included age, gender, hypertension (HTN), hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, active smoker status, presence of coronary artery disease (CAD), Agatston coronary calcium score (CCS), while Model 2 was created by adding the OxScore variables into Model 1. Interestingly, addition of the OxScore variables into the model significantly improved the predictive value for both all-cause and cardiac specific mortality (A[AUC]=0.031, P<0.05 for all-cause and A[AUC]=0.10, P<0.01 for cardiac mortality) (A, C). Furthermore, addition of the OxScore improved risk classification compared to the standard model, as shown by an NRI index of 7.6% and 11.3% for all-cause and cardiac mortality respectively (B, D). Notably, OxScore appears to predominantly improve reclassification of non-events, suggesting a potential value for this novel risk scoring system in identifying high-risk individuals among those with already present traditional cardiovascular risk factors. AUC: area under the curve; CAD: coronary artery disease; CT: computed tomography; FPi: Fibrous Plaque index; NRI: net reclassification improvement. NS: non significant.
Figure 8 shows how PVWi (perivascular water index) is calculated around different vessels. PVWi is calculated along the right coronary artery (RCA) (A), left anterior descending artery (LAD) (B), left circumflex artery (LCx) (C), aorta (D) and the common carotid artery (E), respectively.
Detailed Description of the Invention
The present inventors have developed a new functional biomarker of vascular inflammation which can be used alone or in combination with other known structural and/or functional biomarkers of vascular inflammation, to predict, with a high degree of accuracy, the risk of a coronary event occurring.
The new functional biomarker of vascular inflammation is a novel index that has been identified by the present inventors, which is referred to herein as “Perivascular Water
Index (PVWi)”. PVWi is defined as the volume of the voxels within a window above and below the attenuation of water that corresponds to the water content around the inflamed vessel. This biomarker can be used to detect vascular inflammation and/or predict risk of a coronary event occurring on its own, or in combination with other functional or structural biomarkers, as described in detail below.
Therefore, according to a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for determining the perivascular water index (PVWi) of a blood vessel, comprising:
(i) using data gathered from a computer tomography scan along a length of the vessel to determine the total volume of voxels of water within an attenuation window around the attenuation of water within the perivascular space a pre-determined distance from the outer wall of the vessel, and (ii) correcting the total volume of the voxels of water for the volume of the vessel by dividing the total volume of voxels of water determined in step (i) by the total perivascular volume.
The total perivascular volume is defined as the total volume of voxels within a radial distance away from the vascular wall that is representative of the vessel dimensions. For example, the distance may be the diameter of the vessel, or any other aspect that describes the dimensions of the vessel (such as (vessel diameter)/2 or (vessel diameter) x 3, or any other subdivision or multiple of a dimension of the vessel.
As used herein, the term “computer tomography scan” refers to a scan generated using computer-processed x-rays to produce tomographic images of specific areas of the scanned perivascular region. The term “computed tomography scan” is synonymous with the terms CT scan and CAT scan. Preferably the CT scan of a blood vessel, or a section thereof, is carried out using routine methods and commercially available instruments.
As used therein, the term “perivascular” refers to the space that surrounds a blood vessel. The term “perivascular tissue” refers to the tissue that surrounds a blood vessel, and may include perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT). The terms “perivascular tissue” and “perivascular space” are used interchangeably herein.
The term “radiodensity” is synonymous with the term “attenuation” and the two terms can be used interchangeably, although the term “attenuation” is preferred.
Attenuation, which is measured in Hounsfield units (HU), is a measure of the relative inability of X-rays to pass through material. Measurement of attenuation values allows tissue types to be distinguished in CT on the basis of their different radio-opacities. Fat is not very radiodense, and it typically measures between -190 and -30 HU while muscle, blood and bone measure between +10 and +40, between +30 and +45, and between +700 and +3000 HU respectively.
In the context of the present invention, an “average” value is understood to mean a central or typical value, and it can be calculated from a sample of measured values using formulas that are widely known and appreciated in the art. Preferably, the average is calculated as the arithmetic mean of the sample of attenuation values, but it can also be calculated as the geometric mean, the harmonic mean, the median or the mode of a set of collected attenuation values. The average value may be calculated by reference to data collected from all voxels within a concentric tissue layer or by reference to a selected population of voxels within the concentric tissue layer, for example water- or adipose tissue-containing voxels.
The term “voxel” has its usual meaning in the art and is a contraction of the words “volume” and “element” referring to each of an array of discrete elements of volume that constitute a notional three-dimensional space.
The term “vascular inflammation” has its usual meaning in the art, and refers to a progressive inflammatory condition characterized by the vascular infiltration by white blood cells, build-up of sclerotic plaques within vascular walls, and in particular, arterial walls. Vascular inflammation is a key process for the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis and vascular disease.
The phrase “conditions associated with vascular inflammation” includes any disease where vascular inflammation is known to play a key role in pathogenesis, such as coronary artery disease, aortic and other vascular aneurysms, carotid plaques, peripheral arterial disease.
In a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the attenuation window around the attenuation of water is from -30 to +30 Hounsfield units (HU), and more preferably from -15 to +15 HU.
In a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the pre-determined distance from the outer wall of the vessel referred to in step (i) can be any one of the following io three distances:
1. A distance equal to the diameter or radius of the underlying vessel.
2. A distance that is representative of a dimension of the underlying vessel (e.g. any subdivision or multiple of the radius or diameter of the vessel).
3. A standard predetermined distance that is not equal to or related to the diameter of the underlying vessel (e.g. 5mm).
Preferably, the blood vessel is a coronary blood vessel, such as the aorta. In a preferred embodiment the data is gathered from a computerised tomography scan along a length of the right coronary artery, left anterior descending artery, left circumflex artery, aorta, carotid arteries or femoral arteries. More preferably, the data is gathered from a computerised tomography scan along a 4cm length, starting 1cm distally to the origin of the right coronary artery.
For the avoidance of doubt, the methods of the invention utilise CT scan data that has been obtained in vivo, by scanning a living body, but the claimed methods are not practised on the living human or animal body.
PVWi has utility as a functional biomarker of vascular inflammation, and in particular can be used to predict cardiac mortality risk in a patient.
Therefore, a second aspect of the present invention is directed to the use of perivascular water index (PVWi), as defined according to the method of the first aspect of the invention, as a functional biomarker of vascular inflammation.
PVWi may be used alone, or may be used in combination with additional functional and/or structural biomarkers. Preferably, the structural biomarkers include one or more of calcium index (Calcium-i), fibrous plaque index (FPi) or total epicardial adipose tissue volume (EpAT-vol). Preferably, the additional functional biomarkers of vascular inflammation include one or more of the fat attenuation index of the perivascular adipose tissue (FAIpvat), volumetric perivascular characterisation index (VPCI) and epicardial adipose tissue Fat Attenuation Index (FAIEpAT).
VPCI is defined as the difference between the quantified attenuation (or radiodensity) of perivascular adipose tissue (FAIPVat) and the quantified attenuation (or radiodensity) of non-perivascular adipose tissue (FAIopvat)· Non-perivascular adipose tissue (nPVAT) is defined as adipose tissue that is located 2cm or more away from the outer wall of the vessel.
The VPCI and FAI indices are defined and described in detail in the present inventors’ earlier patent publication WO2016/024128, the entire contents of which are incorporate by reference. In that publication FAI is referred to as the QR index (but the two are synonymous).
The terms “Fibrous Plaque Index (FPI)” and “(Fibrous) plaque” are synonymous and are used interchangeably herein. Fibrous plaque index is defined as the total volume of all voxels corresponding to fibrous tissue within the wall of a vascular segment (e.g. between 65 and 260 HU), divided by the total volume of the respective vascular segment.
Calcium index (Calcium-i) is also known in the art as “(coronary) calcification”, “calcium volume” of an artery, and these synonyms may be used interchangeably herein. Calcium-index is defined as the total of volume of all voxels corresponding to local calcium within the wall of a vascular segment (>465 HU), divided by the total volume of the respective coronary segment.
Epicardial adipose tissue volume (EpAT-vol) refers to the total volume of all voxels (within the pre-specified thresholds of -190 to -30 HU) corresponding to epicardial adipose tissue. Epicardial adipose tissue is defined as any adipose tissue located between the myocardium and the pericardium. Alternatively, EpAT-vol can be indexed for differences in body size, e.g. body surface area.
Epicardial adipose tissue Fat Attenuation Index (FAIEpAT) refers to the average attenuation of all voxels corresponding to EpAT (within the pre-specified threshold of 190 to -30 HU).
The terms “patient” and “subject” are used interchangeably herein. These terms can refer to any animal (e.g. mammal), including, but not limited to, humans, non-human io primates, canines, felines, rodents and the like. Preferably the patient or subject is a human. The patient may be an individual who has been diagnosed as suffering from a condition associated with vascular inflammation or who is suspected of, or at risk of, suffering from a condition vascular inflammation, in particular vascular inflammation affecting the coronary vessels.
A third aspect of the present invention is directed to a novel method for predicting cardiac events, including cardiac death. The method is based on a novel scoring system that has been developed by the present inventors and is referred to herein as the “OxScore (Oxford integrated coronary CT Score)”.
The OxScore is based on the observation that vascular inflammation will increase the aqueous phase of the tissue surrounding the inflamed vessel, and this is identified by combining measurements of the volume of this aqueous phase with a shift of the overall attenuation of the tissues surrounding the vessel. When this approach was combined with information about the structure of the vascular wall and epicardial/visceral obesity, the inventors generated a novel score that has been found to be superior to any other imaging biomarker in predicting all-cause and cardiac mortality. This represents a new risk score that predicts mortality due to any or cardiac-specific causes. The method is based on a combination of computed tomography (CT) biomarkers that track vascular inflammation and vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques through volumetric and qualitative changes of the attenuation (or radiodensity) of vascular and perivascular tissues. OxScore provides a unified score that strongly predicts cardiac events and cardiac mortality, and significantly more strongly than any of these indices in isolation.
Uniquely, the OxScore is the only method where coronary artery disease is evaluated by quantification of changes both in the vessel wall, (the location of coronary artery plaques), and in the surrounding tissue (where changes reflect the inflammatory status and risk of the plaque). No other similar approaches have been described previously, and the method of this aspect of the invention is the first to monitor changes in perivascular tissue attenuation and volumetric characteristics to quantify vascular inflammation and cardiovascular risk.
Accordingly, a third aspect of the invention provides a method for predicting the risk of a patient suffering a cardiovascular event, said method comprising:
(a) using data gathered from a computer tomography (CT) scan along a length of a blood vessel to determine:
(i) calcium index (Calcium-i); and (ii) fibrous plaque index (FPi) and at least one of (iii) fat attenuation index of the perivascular adipose tissue (FAIPVat);
(iv) perivascular water index (PVWi); and and the possible addition of one or more of the following:
(v) volumetric perivascular characterisation index (VPCI) (vi) total epicardial adipose tissue volume (EpAT-vol);
(vii) fat attenuation index (FAI) of epicardial adipose tissue (FAIEpAT);
(b) comparing each of the values determined in (a) to a pre-determined cut-off value or using the absolute value of each variable in order to generate an output value that indicates the patient’s risk of suffering a cardiovascular event.
In one embodiment, FAIPVat is determined in step (a). In another embodiment PVWi is determined in step (a). In a preferred embodiment, both FAIPVat and PVWi are determined in step (a) of the method.
The indices FAIPVat, PVWi, VPCI, Calcium-i and FPi, FAIEpat, EpAT-vol are as defined herein above.
Preferably, the data is gathered from a CT scan along a length of the right coronary artery, left anterior descending artery, left circumflex artery, aorta, carotid arteries or femoral arteries.
In a preferred embodiment, the data is gathered from a computerised tomography scan along a 4 cm length, starting 1 cm distally to the origin of the right coronary artery.
In a preferred embodiment, the data is gathered from a computerised tomography scan along a length of the aorta.
Preferably, the cut-off points for each of (i) to (vii) are derived from ROC curves. Based on the ROC curves, an optimal cut-off point is selected that yields the optimal sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of the desired endpoint, e.g. cardiac mortality (see, for example, Figures 3, 4).
In one embodiment, the method according to the third aspect of the invention further comprises the age and/or gender of the patient as well as other established cardiovascular risk factors, such as coronary calcium (measured on non-contrast CT scans, e.g. Agatston score), hypertension, hyperlipidemia/hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, presence of coronary artery disease, smoking, family history of heart disease etc.
In one embodiment, the output value that corresponds to or indicates risk of a cardiac event is a continuous single value function. For example, the absolute values for each variable can be integrated into one single formula along with calculated coefficients to yield an individualised risk prediction/probability.
An example for a specific cohort, wherein constants are determined on the basis of the background of the patient cohort, is provided below (also see Figure 6).
An example of a formula used to calculate the OxScore probability of all-cause/cardiac mortality is provided below.
OxScore = Risk (probability) of event (%) = 100*10y/(1+10y) and y = c + a *FAIPVAt + b*FPi + d*Calcium-l + e*EpATvol where, a, b, d, e = beta coefficients and c = constant calculated on logistic regression with FAIpvat, FPi, Calcium-I, EpAT volume as the independent variables and all-cause, cardiac mortality or cardiac events as the dependent variable. Alternatively, coefficients can be calculated from Cox regression hazard models.
In one embodiment, both PVWi and FAIPVATare included in the same model.
In an alternative embodiment, PVWi, FAIPVAt, VPCI, FPi, Calcium-i, EpAT volume, FAIepat, age and gender are all included in the same model. An example of the OxScore-based mortality risk is provided below:
OxScore = Risk (probability) of event (%) = 100*10y/(1+10y) where, y = c + a *FAIPVat + b*FPi + d*Calcium-l + e*EpATvol + f*FAIEpAT+ g*PVWi + h*VPCI + k*age + Tgender where, a, b, d, e, f, g, h, k, I = beta coefficients and c - constant calculated on logistic regression with FAIPVat, FPi, Calcium-I, EpAT volume, FAIEpat, PVWi, VPCI, age and gender (as categorical, e.g. 1=male, 0=female) as the independent variables and allcause, cardiac mortality or cardiac events as the dependent variable. Alternatively, coefficients can be calculated from Cox regression hazard models.
In an alternative embodiment, the output value that corresponds to or indicates risk of a cardiac event is a value that falls within one of three discrete brackets corresponding to low, medium and high risk of suffering a cardiovascular event (see Figure 6).
Preferably, the patient has been diagnosed with vascular inflammation, or a condition known to be associated with vascular inflammation.
The OxScore and the individual indices on which it is based are useful for predicting cardiac death and cardiac events and so the method of the invention can be used to stratify patients according to their risk of cardiac mortality.
OxScore method can be used as an adjunctive tool in routine clinical CT angiograms to identify patients at high risk of cardiac events and mortality including a sensitive and specific screening tool in people who are apparently healthy and low-risk according to the traditional interpretation of their scans. The OxScore method has utility both in primary prevention (healthy population with no diagnosis of heart disease yet) and secondary prevention (patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease), to identify an individual’s risk status beyond traditional risk factors, to guide pharmacological treatment decisions, and to monitor response to appropriate medical treatments. To this end, OxScore could be measured automatically using dedicated software providing a rapid, non-invasive estimation of an individual’s risk status and guide clinical decision making.
Accordingly, the patient may be an individual who has been diagnosed as suffering from a condition associated with vascular inflammation, or who is suspected of, or at risk of, suffering from a condition vascular inflammation, in particular vascular inflammation affecting the coronary vessels. Alternatively the patient may be a healthy individual who has not been diagnosed as suffering from a condition associated with vascular inflammation, and/or who is not known to be at risk of suffering from a condition vascular inflammation.
Despite the popularity of coronary CT angiography as a diagnostic method for coronary artery disease, coronary calcium score (CCS) remains the only CT-based method of cardiovascular risk stratification, with an established role in clinical practice. However, CCS is only a structural biomarker and only identifies one component of the coronary plaque (calcification), which does not change with the inflammatory status of the vessels and does not improve following appropriate medical management. CCS primarily reflects ageing and it even predicts non-cardiac events (i.e. it is sensitive but not specific for cardiac events). More importantly, no method has been described with an ability to track subclinical changes in coronary inflammation on routine everyday CT angiography.
The OxScore method combines “functional” biomarkers of vascular inflammation (PVWi, VPCI, FAIpvATand FAIEpat) with indices of structural vascular disease (calcium-i and FPi) and visceral adiposity (EpAT-vol), to generate an integrated scoring system that significantly advances both the diagnostic and prognostic value of routine clinical CT angiography.
Importantly, the method of the invention is non-invasive and is based on the analysis of conventional CT images; it does not require any additional image acquisition.
Certain embodiments of the method of this aspect of the invention can be used for noninvasive monitoring of aortic aneurysms and/or carotid plaques. However, EpAT volume and FAI cannot be applied to other vessels.
The OxScore method may be utilised in a method of treating a condition associated with vascular inflammation in a patient.
According to this aspect of the invention, a method of treating a condition associated with vascular inflammation in a patient comprises carrying out the method according to the third aspect of the invention as described above, and, if the outcome of said method indicates that the patient is at risk of suffering a cardiac event, administering a suitable therapy and/or surgical intervention to said patient.
The invention is further described with reference to the following non-limiting example:
EXAMPLE
METHODS
Patients
In this prospective study, a cohort of 1993 subjects was recruited prospectively between 2005 and 2009, following a clinically indicated CTA performed at the Erlangen University Hospital (Erlangen, Germany). A total of 1872 subjects had analysable CTA scans and were included in the study. The vast majority of the scans were performed for exclusion of coronary artery disease (CAD) (91.7%). Most of the patients had presented with atypical symptoms (85.3%) and less than half had a history of chest pain (43.4%). A minority of the scans (3.8%) was performed in patients with previously known CAD to evaluate possible disease progression (3.7%) or the patency status of a vascular graft (0.1%). Following the baseline CT scan, only a small proportion of the cohort was diagnosed with obstructive CAD (21.6%). The patient demographics and clinical characteristics of the studied population are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Cohort demographics and clinical characteristics ofthe study population
Subjects screened (n) Subjects included in the study (n) Age (years) Male gender (%) | 1993 1872 60.1±11.9 62.9 |
Risk factors* Hypertension (%) Hypercholesterolemia (%) Diabetes Mellitus (%) Active/past smoking (%) Family history of heart disease (%) | 61.9 54.7 12.4 12.8/21.4 25.6 |
Medications at baseline Antiplatelets (aspirin/clopidogrel) (%) Statins (%) ACEi or ARBs (%) Beta-blockers (%) | 37.6 34.6 43.1 44.8 |
CT scan CT scanner type 64-slice (%) 64-slice DSCT (%) 128-slice DSCT (%) Tube voltage 100 keV (%) 120 keV (%) | 18.1 79.2 2.7 22.2 77.8 |
Total Agatston score1 <400 (%) >400 (%) | 85.3% 14.7% |
Follow-up Duration in months (median [range]) Total mortality n (%) Confirmed cardiac mortality n (%) Confirmed non-cardiac mortality n (%) Unknown cause of death n (%) | 72 [51-109] 114 (6.1) 26 (1.4) 72 (3.8) 16 (0.9) |
(DS)CT: (dual source) computerised tomography; values presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise stated; maximum missingness: *9.2%, **13.9%, +24.4%
Study design
This is a prospective cohort study of subjects who underwent CTA between 2005 and 2009. Follow-up was performed at an average interval of 77.0±14.2 months (range: 51-109 months) after the baseline scan. Data were collected on the primary endpoints of all-cause and cardiac mortality. Significant and independent predictors of all-cause and cardiac-specific mortality were then integrated into a single model, to generate a novel CTA-based method of cardiovascular risk stratification.
Definitions: Cardiac and non-cardiac mortalities were defined according to the “2014 ACC/AHA io Key Data Elements and Definitions for Cardiovascular Endpoint Events in Clinical Trials” (Hicks et al., 2015) taking also into account the recommendations of the Academic Research
Consortium (Cutlip et al., 2007). Cardiac death was defined as any death due to proximate cardiac causes (e.g. myocardial infarction, low-output heart failure, fatal arrhythmia). Deaths fulfilling the criteria of sudden cardiac death were also included in this group. Any death not covered by the previous definition, such as death caused by malignancy, accident, infection, sepsis, renal failure, suicide or other non-cardiac vascular causes such as stroke or pulmonary embolism was classified as non-cardiac. A subgroup of deaths where the data on the cause of death could not be collected with certainty were classified as “deaths of unknown cause”. CAD was defined as the presence of obstructive disease seen on CTA (>50% stenosis) or previous, known history of CAD.
CT angiography
All participants underwent coronary CTA and in most of the scans (75.6%) additional noncontrast images were acquired for the purpose of measuring Agatston coronary calcium score.
The vast majority of the scans (79.2%) were performed in a dual-source 64-slice scanner, whereas the rest were done either in a 64-slice (18.1%) or dual-source 128-slice scanner (2.7%). Heart rate was optimised using intravenous injection of beta-blockers and sublingual glyceryl-trinitrate (800ug) was also administered to achieve maximum coronary vasodilatation. CTA was performed following intravenous injection of 95ml of iodine based contrast medium at a flow rate rate of 6mL/sec (tube energy of 80, 100 or 120 kV). Prospective image acquisition was used by ECG-gating at 75% of cardiac cycle (with 100msec padding for optimal imaging of the right coronary artery if required).
Analysis ofCT angiograms: The reconstructed images were transferred to a processing system and analysis workstation (Aquarius Workstation® V.4.4.11 and 4.4.12, TeraRecon Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). Vascular and perivascular tissue components were characterized according to previously described and validated attenuation maps (Obaid et al., 2013). Since our attenuation-based method for characterization of vascular and perivascular tissue has only been validated sufficiently in CT angiograms performed at a tube voltage of either 100 or 120 kV (Obaid et al., 2013; Okayama et al., 2012) scans done at 80 kV (n=14) were excluded from our study. Additional exclusion criteria were the presence of significant artefacts that made the analysis not possible (e.g. blooming or step artefacts) or poor overall image quality that io precluded a reliable assessment of the coronary anatomy in the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) or the total epicardial adipose tissue (EpAT). Four researchers blinded to patient demographics and outcomes worked independently for the analysis of the vascular wall perivascular tissue (two researchers) and EpAT (two researchers). The inter/intra observer variability for these analyses is presented in supplementary Table 2.
Table 2. Inter- and intra-observer variability
Variable | Inter-observer CV (%) | Intra-observer CV (%) |
Vessel diameter | 1.97 | 0.91 |
Fibrous plaque index | 2.80 | 1.35 |
Perivascular Water index | 1.78 | 1.68 |
FAl pvat | 0.53 | 0.18 |
EpAT volume | 3.46 | 2.67 |
CV: coefficient of variation; EpAT: Epicardial Adipose Tissue; FAl: Fat Attenuation Index; PVAT: Perivascular Adipose Tissue
Agatston coronary calcium score: The Agatston coronary calcium score was calculated on the non-contrast images using standard analysis tools (Aquarius Workstation® V.4.4.11 and 4.4.12, TeraRecon Inc., Foster City, CA, USA).
Adipose tissue analysis: Adipose tissue was defined as all voxels with attenuation within a pre5 specified window of -190 to -30 Hounsfield Units (HU). The total EpAT volume was assessed in a semi-automated manner by tracking the contour of the pericardium from the level of the pulmonary artery bifurcation to the apex of the heart at the most caudal end. Voxel attenuation histograms were plotted and FAI was defined as the mean attenuation of all voxels within the pre-specified range of-190 to -30 HU (Tamarappoo et al., 2010; Hell et al., 2016). To adjust for io differences in mean attenuation between scans done at different tube voltages, adipose tissue FAI for scans done at 10OkV was divided by a conversion factor of 1.11485 to be comparable to scans performed at 120kV, as previously described (Okayama, 2012 et al.)
Coronary wall analysis: The vascular segment of interest was identified on 3-dimensional curved multiplanar reconstruction images. For the purposes of our study, analysis was restricted to the proximal 10-50 mm of the RCA. The benefits of this method have been described in our previous work (Antonopoulos et al., in review). In short, the absence of large branches in this segment allows a clear anatomical separation of PVAT and non-perivascular adipose tissue (non-PVAT) compartments, while the proximal 10mm of the RCA are excluded due to their proximity to the aorta. The lumen as well as the inner and outer wall border were tracked in an automated way with additional manual optimization and validated HU thresholds were applied for characterization of vascular wall components (65 to 260 HU for fibrous plaque and >465 HU for calcification) (Obaid et al., 2013). The Fibrous Plaque index (FPi) and Calcium-index (Calcium-i) were defined by dividing the total volume of fibrous plaque or coronary calcium by the volume of the respective vessel segment.
Perivascular tissue analysis: Following tracking of the segment of interest in the proximal RCA (i.e. the proximal 4cm of the RCA starting 1cm away from the RCA ostium), the perivascular area was segmented into 20 concentric cylindrical layers of 1mm thickness each. Based on our previous work (Antonopoulos et al., in review), we defined PVAT as adipose tissue located within a radial distance equal to the diameter of the respective vessel extending from the outer vessel wall. This is based on a biological definition of PVAT derived from adipose tissue biopsies from the perivascular area which demonstrated a different adipose tissue phenotype (with smaller adipocytes, lower expression of adipogenic genes and less lipophilic/greater aqueous phase) close to the vessel compared with adipose tissue 2cm away from the vascular wall. In addition, mean attenuation of PVAT has been shown to be independent of lumen attenuation (Antonopoulos et al., in review), thus avoiding a partial volume effect (Hell et al.,
2016) Voxel attenuation histograms were plotted and the mean attenuation of all voxels characterized as adipose tissue within this volume was defined as FAIPVat· Next, the respective
FAI index was calculated for adipose tissue in each of the 20 concentric cylindrical layers and was plotted against the radial distance from the outer vessel wall. On the other hand, FAInOn-pvAT was defined as the FAI value of adipose tissue in the most distal cylindrical layer (2cm away from the vascular wall). In order to describe the change in adipose tissue attenuation between PVAT and non-PVAT, the volumetric perivascular characterization index (VPCI) was created io and was defined as the % change from FAIPVat to FAInOn-pvAT [VPCI=100x(FAIPVAT-FAInonpvat)/|FAIPVat|] (Figure 1). In our previous work (Antonopoulos et al, under review) we found that VPCI correlates with the presence of “soft atherosclerotic plaques”, as defined by using the standard plaque analysis methodology (Obaid et al., 2013).
Based on our working hypothesis that vascular inflammation impairs the differentiation of adipocytes and shifts the balance towards a greater aqueous than lipophilic phase, we then tracked the volume of the aqueous phase in the perivascular area by applying an attenuation window of -15 to +15 HU. The total volume of all voxels within this range was then divided by the total perivascular volume to define the Perivascular Water Index (PVWi).
Statistical analysis
All continuous variables were tested for normal distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Mean values between two independent groups were compared by unpaired Student’s t-test or
Mann-whitney U test as appropriate, while one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparisons between three or more groups. Correlations between continuous variables were assessed with Pearson’s r or Spearman’s rho coefficient, as appropriate.
The predictive value of the variables of interest for the primary endpoints of all-cause and cardiac mortality was first tested in univariate Cox regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated and compared by the log-rank test. Based on receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis, an appropriate cut-off was identified for PVW, FAIPVAt and VPCI and the imaging biomarkers were then tested in a multivariable Cox regression model, adjusting for age, gender, traditional risk factors, clinically relevant medication, image acquisition parameters, presence of CAD and Agatston score. Imaging biomarkers derived from a standard coronary CTA that were found to be independent predictors of all-cause/cardiac mortality were selected to generate a novel predictive model for cardiovascular risk stratification. Based on bivariate logistic regression, an individual probability (risk) was calculated for each study participant and the study population was stratified according to the respective risk for all-cause or cardiac mortality. Then the the additional predictive value of our set of biomarkers (“OxScore”) was compared against a standard model composed of age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors, CAD and Agatston score (>400 vs <400) (Model 1). The predictive value of Model 1 was compared against Model 2 (Model 1 + OxScore variables) by the Wald Chi-square test io and the C-statistic (Area Under the Curve) of the respective receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves both for cardiac and all-cause mortality. Risk restratification of the study population was quantified by the Net Reclassification Improvement index.
RESULTS
Patients and Outcomes
Among the 1993 subjects who underwent CTA, 121 scans were excluded (107 due to poor image quality or presence of artefacts, 14 scans performed at 80kV), leaving 1872 suitable for analysis. The subjects were followed up for an average of 77±14.2 months after the baseline scan [range from 51 to 109 months]. During the follow up, there were 114 deaths (26 confirmed cardiac (1.4%), 72 confirmed non-cardiac (3.8%) and 16 deaths of unknown cause (0.9%)).
Validation of the method
In accordance with our previous findings, in this study we observed a strong correlation between FAIPVat and PVW (Fig. 2A). FAIPVat was only weakly correlated with FPi (r=0.179,
P<0.001., Fig. 2B) but there was no significant correlation between FAIPVAt and either RCA calcium-i (P=0.18, Fig. 2C) or total Agatston score (P=0.869, Fig. 2D). These findings confirmed that FAIPVat describes a different (although indirectly related) biology, distinct from anatomical plaque burden and is entirely independent of the presence of coronary artery calcification. However, since PVW and FAIPVat describe a similar biology they were not included in the same multivariable model.
Prediction of mortality
The predictive value of PVWi was first tested in ROC analysis that identified a cut-off of
0.10 with 57.7% sensitivity and 63.3% specificity for prediction of cardiac mortality (Fig 3A).
Comparison of KM curves by the log-rank test as well as univariate Cox regression analysis showed that high PVWi values (>0.10) are associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause (Fig 3B) and cardiac mortality (Fig 3C) but not non-cardiac mortality (p=NS, Fig 3D).
Next, the predictive value of FAIPVat and VPCI were tested in univariate Cox regression hazard models. Individuals in the highest fertile of FAIPVat had a significantly higher risk of both all-cause and cardiac mortality, compared to those in the low fertile (Fig. 4A-B). In ROC curve io analysis for cardiac mortality, a cut-off of -70.1 HU was identified as the value yielding the optimal sensitivity and specificity for FAIPVAt as a predictor of cardiac death (65.4% and 71.9% respectively) (Fig. 4C). By following a similar approach, an optimal cut-off of 14.5% was identified for VPCI as a predictor of cardiac mortality (Fig. 4D). Interestingly, high VPCI values (>14.5%) were associated with a higher risk of cardiac-related but not all-cause mortality (Fig.
4E-F).
In univariate Cox-regression analysis (Table 3), both high FAIPVat values (> -70.1 HU) and FAIEpat were found to be significant predictors of all-cause and cardiac mortality but not non-cardiac death, with higher adipose tissue attenuation in both depots linked to a higher allcause or cardiac-specific mortality risk (Figure 5A-B). High VPCI values (> 14.5%) were also associated with a two-fold increase in the risk of cardiac death, but not all-cause or non-cardiac mortality. Fibrous plaque burden (measured by FPi) was a significant predictor of all-cause and cardiac deaths, but not non-cardiac mortality. Epicardial obesity (measured by EpAT-vol) and coronary calcification (Calcium-iRCA) were also found to be significant predictors of all three endpoints.
Table 3. Univariate Cox regression for prediction of all-cause, cardiac and non-cardiac mortality
CTA-derived indices | All-cause mortality HR[95%CI], p value | Cardiac mortality HR[95%CI], p value | Non-cardiac mortality HR[95%CI], p value |
PVWi (> 0.1 versus <0.1) | 1.57 [1.09-2.27], p=0.016 | 2.35 [1.08-5.11], p=0.032 | 1.57 [0.99-2.49], p=0.06 |
FAIpvat (- -70.1 HU vs < -70.1 HU) | 2.11 [1.445-3.082], p<0.001 | 5.206 [2.298-11.975], p<0.001 | 1.516 [0.923-2.491], p=0.100 |
FAIEBaT(per1 HU increase) | 1.043 [1.012-1.075], p=0.006 | 1.081 [1.016-1.152], p=0.014 | 1.035 [0.996-1.075], p=0.08 |
Calcium-i (>0 vs 0) | 3.606 [2.493-5.217], p<0.001 | 5.644 [2.59-12.3], p<0.001 | 3.093 [1.934-4.945], p<0.001 |
FPi (per 0.01 unit increase) | 1.037 [1.007-1.067], p=0.014 | 1.115 [1.064-1.17], p<0.001 | 1.011 [0.973-1.051], p=0.56 |
EpAT volume (per cm3 increase) | 1.006 [1.003-1.009], p<0.001 | 1.007 [1.001-1.012], p=0.021 | 1.005 [1.001-1.009], p=0.008 |
VPCI (>14.5% vs <14.5%) | 1.250 [0.860-1.817], p=0.242 | 2.215 [1.015-4.832], p=0.046 | 1.037 [0.642-1.676], p=0.881 |
Agatston CCS (>400 vs <400) | 3.457 [1.635-3.861], p<0.001 | 3.08 [0.927-10.235], p=0.066 | 3.339 [1.854-6.015], p<0.001 |
EpAT: Epicardial Adipose Tissue; CCS: Agatston coronary calcium score, CI: Confidence interval, FAI: Fat Attenuation
Index, FPi: Fibrous Plaque index; HR: Hazard Ratio, HU: Hounsfield units, PVAT: Perivascular Adipose Tissue, PVWi: perivascular water index; VPCI: Volumetric Perivascular Characterisation Index io Survival analysis of the 16 deaths of unknown cause, identified coronary calcification and EpAT volume as significant predictors of mortality (HR [95%]: 3.45 [1.28-9.28], p=0.014 for calcium-i, 4.24 [1.51-11.93], p=0.006 for Agatston score and 1.008 [1.001-1.015], p=0.018 for EpAT volume (in cm3). There was a non-significant trend for higher mortality with high FAIPVat values (HR [95% Cl]: 1.98 [0.70-5.57], p=0.198). No significant predictive value was found for VPCI (HR [95% Cl]: 1.10 [0.40-3.04], p=0.861), FPi (HR [95%]: 0.99 [0.91-1.07], p=0.74) or FAIEpat (HR [95%CI]: 1.02 [0.94-1.11], P=0.63) as predictors of the deaths of unknown cause.
Multivariable adjustment for age, gender, traditional risk factors, presence of CAD, clinically relevant medication at baseline, CT scanner type and Agatston score (>400 vs <400) identified
FAIPVat as a strong independent predictor of all-cause mortality, driven mainly by cardiac but not non-cardiac mortality (Table 3, Figure 5C). Indeed, FAIPVat>-70.1 HU was linked to an almost two-fold increase in the adjusted risk for all-cause and to a more than five-fold increase in the risk for cardiac mortality over an average of 6.4 years, compared to individuals in the low
FAIpvat group. Notably, these effects were independent of the average radiodensity or total volume of the EpAT depot. EpAT volume, a marker of epicardial adiposity, was a significant predictor of mortality, while fibrous plaque burden and vascular calcification (measured as FPi and calcium-i in the proximal RCA respectively) were also identified as strong and independent predictors of all-cause mortality.
Table 4. Multivariable Cox regression for prediction of all-cause, cardiac and non-cardiac io mortality
CTA-derived indices | All-cause mortality HR[95%CI], P value | Cardiac mortality HR[95%CI], P value | Non-cardiac mortality HR[95%CI], P value |
FAIpvat (--70.1 HU vs <-70.1 HU) | 1.786 [1.058-3.014], p=0.03 | 5.433 [1.642-17.976], p=0.006 | 1.232 [0.631-2.407], p=0.541 |
FAIEpat (per 1 HU increase) | 1.048 [1.00-1.100], p=0.052 | 1.001 [0.904-1.107], p=0.991 | 1.059 [0.997-1.125], p=0.064 |
Calcium-i (>0 vs 0) | 1.882 [1.179-3.005], p=0.008 | 3.351 [1.241-9.044], p=0.017 | 1.593 [0.867-2.927], p=0.133 |
FPi (per 0.01 unit increase) | 1.054 [1.021-1.088], p=0.001 | 1.174 [1.092-1.263], p<0.001 | 1.027 [0.986-1.070], p=0.198 |
EpAT volume (per 1 cm3 increase) | 1.008 [1.004-1.012], p<0.001 | 1.008 [0.998-1.018], p=0.137 | 1.007 [1.001-1.013], p=0.022 |
VPCI (>14.5% vs <14.5%) | 0.780 [0.512-1.188], p=0.247 | 1.000 [0.386-2.588], p=0.999 | 0.739 [0.432-1.262], p=0.268 |
Agatston CCS (>400 vs <400) | 1.267 [0.717-2.240], p=0.416 | 0.598 [0.172-2.077], p=0.419 | 1.512 [0.727-3.142], p=0.268 |
Model adjusted for: age, gender, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, active smoker status, medications at baseline (antiplatelets, statins), presence of coronary artery disease, CT scanner used, Agatston
CCS score (>400 vs <400); CTA: Computed tomography angiography; CCS: coronary calcium score, Cl: Confidence interval, FAI: fat attenuation index, HR: hazard ratio, Cl: Confidence interval; HU: Hounsfield units, PVAT: perivascular adipose tissue; EpAT: Epicardial adipose tissue; FPi: Fibrous plaque index; VPCI: Volumetric perivascular characterization index.
The OxScore
Next, all four imaging biomarkers that were found to be independent predictors of mortality were combined to generate a novel cardiac CTA risk score that would be easy to calculate in routine clinical CTA, the “OxScore” (Figure 3A). The four biomarkers that were included in the model (namely FAIPVat, FPi, Calcium-1 and EpAT-vol) describe different aspects of cardiac and coronary physiology and can be calculated using semi-automated techniques on routine contrast CTA images. FAIPVat is a novel marker of vascular inflammation, while FPi and calcium-i reflect local structural disease by describing the presence of fibrous or calcified/mixed plaques. Finally, EpAT-volume is a marker of epicardial adiposity, a well-established risk factor o of adverse cardiometabolic events.
Combination of these four indices into a combined model (OxScore) generated an individualised risk score for all-cause and cardiac-specific death (Figure 6). Stratification of the study population based on the proposed model identified a high-risk subgroup (OxScorehigh) with an almost eight-fold higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to the low-risk group (OxScoreiow)· Similarly, application of the novel model identified a group of 192 study participants with a significantly higher risk of cardiac death during follow-up compared to the low-risk subgroup of 1680 study participants (Figure 6B-E).
Comparison of the OxScore against traditional cardiac CT indices
Next, the predictive value of the new OxScore model was compared against traditional risk factors and cardiac CT indices, including the presence of high coronary calcium (as demonstrated by an Agatston score of >400 versus <400) and obstructive CAD. Two predictive models were constructed as follows: Model 1: age, gender, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, current smoker status, CAD and Agatston score (>400 versus <400), Model 2: Model 1 + OxScore variables (FAIPVAt, FPi, Calcium-I, EpAT volume). Both models were significant predictors of all-cause and cardiac mortality, as demonstrated in ROC curve analysis (Fig. 7A, C). However, addition of the OxScore into the standard model significantly improved the predictive power of the overall model (A[AUC]=0.031, P<0.05) with respect to all-cause mortality (Fig. 7A) and resulted in a net reclassification of 7.6% of the study population (NRI=7.6%), mainly by improving classification of non-events (Fig. 7B). By following a similar approach for cardiac mortality, inclusion of OxScore resulted in an even more pronounced, significant improvement in the predictive value of the model (A[AUC]=0.10, P<0.01) while also improving cardiac risk classification (NRI=11.3%).
Validation of perivascular indices in other vessels
Finally, we explored whether perivascular indices such as perivascular water index, can be measured along vessels other than the proximal RCA. Figure 8 demonstrates how PVWi is calculated around different vessels. More specifically, PVWi is calculated along the right coronary artery (RCA) (Fig. 8A), left anterior descending artery (LAD) (Fig. 8B), left circumflex artery (LCx) (Fig. 8C), aorta (Fig. 8D) and the common carotid artery (Fig. 8E), respectively.
Discussion
In this study the present inventors demonstrate that a novel imaging biomarker, that detects coronary artery inflammation by analysing the spatial changes of CT attenuation of peri15 coronary adipose tissue (FAIPVat), is a powerful predictor of all-cause and cardiac mortality. As a previously validated biomarker of vascular inflammation, the new index advances significantly the current state of the art, by overcoming the limitations of calcium or fibrous plaque indices, that are driven by non-reversible structural changes of the vascular wall. By combining FAIPVat with a number of structural biomarkers, derived fmor the same segment of the coronary artery (Calcium-I, FPi) as well as total EpAT volume, the inventors have created a new integrated CTA risk score, the OxScore, that enables re-stratification of subjects in both primary and secondary prevention based on routine CTA, dissociating risk prediction from the simple presence of atherosclerotic plaques or calcification. This new re-stratification can be applied both prospectively and retrospectively in routine CTA imaging, and may guide the targeted deployment of more aggressive preventive strategies to a significant proportion of subjects where CTA does not reveal significant anatomical coronary artery disease, but the risk of future coronary events remains high.
Early, non-invasive diagnosis of vascular inflammation (an early biological process preceding plaque formation but also leading to plaque rupture) has been hailed as the “holy grail” of CAD diagnostics and could help improve risk stratification in primary and secondary prevention. However, the current state-of-the-art methods for the diagnosis of vascular inflammation and cardiovascular risk prediction are suboptimal and have several limitations. Circulating inflammatory biomarkers (e.g. CRP, TNF-α) have a limited value in cardiovascular risk prediction since they are not specific to the cardiovascular system and have poor correlation with local vascular inflammation (Weintraub et al., 2000; Lee et al., 2012; Margaritis et al., 2013). In the field of cardiovascular imaging, the predictive value of Agatston coronary calcium score measured by CT has been long-established (Greenland et al., 2004). However, coronary calcification represents a non-reversible process that does not change in response to appropriate medical therapy (e.g. statins) (Alexopoulos et al., 2013). In fact, calcified plaques are considered more stable and less likely to rupture compared to plaques with high-risk features, such as a thin-cap fibroatheromas and a large necrotic core (Huang et al., 2001). Detection of high-risk plaque features such as microcalcification, a large necrotic core or io positive remodelling on CTA have all been shown to predict future cardiac events (Hecht et al., 2015; Saremi et al., 2015) but the reliability of the method is affected by the observer’s expertise and CT settings and parameters, including spatial resolution (Maurovich-Horvat et al., 2014; Maurovich-Horvat et al., 2014; Fleg et al., 2012). Newer invasive methods such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have been more successful in detecting high-risk plaques but are invasive, expensive, carry a small yet significant risk of inprocedure complications (Bezerra et al., 2009; McDaniel et al., 2011) and are not suitable for primary prevention and wide screening of low-risk individuals. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-FDG is expensive, associated with significantly higher levels of radiation exposure compared to CT alone, not readily available and limited by myocardial uptake of the radiotracer that results in significant background noise (Rogers et al., 2011; Joshi et al., 2014). Even the introduction of newer radiotracers (such as 18F-NaF), although promising, carries many of the limitations of traditional PET imaging, including but not limited to significant radiation exposure, limited availability and no demonstrated value in primary or even secondary prevention (Joshi et al., 2014). Therefore, there is still need for a functional biomarker that will describe vascular inflammation rather than structural and non-reversible changes in the vascular wall. This biomarker should be easy to obtain through routine tests that are already performed under the current clinical guidelines.
In their previous work, the present inventors have demonstrated that FAIPVATis positively associated with the presence of CAD and the volume of fibrous plaque in the proximal RCA independently of the presence of coronary calcium. In the same study, it was shown that FAIPVAt changes in a dynamic way in response to local rupture of a culprit lesion in patients with acute Ml and can distinguish culprit from non-culprit lesions. These observations supported the inventors’ hypothesis that FAIPVat could function as a dynamic biomarker of vascular inflammation and cardiovascular risk and offer diagnostic and prognostic information beyond that of traditional biomarkers, such as coronary calcium.
In the current study the present inventors explore the predictive value of FAIPVat along with other vascular/perivascular imaging biomarkers in a large prospective cohort of mid-low risk individuals undergoing coronary CTA and a mean follow-up of 6.4 years. High FAIPVATwas found to be a significant and independent predictor of all-cause and cardiac but not non-cardiac mortality, independently of age, gender, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, presence of CAD and coronary calcium. The predictive value of FAIPVAt appears to be driven by cardiac rather than non-cardiac mortality. This is in accordance with the underlying biology, given that FAIPVat is believed to be affected by local rather than systemic inflammation.
More importantly, this study is the first to describe the predictive value of peri-coronary adipose tissue quality characterized by non-invasive CTA. Previous studies have described that lower attenuation of the visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue depots on CT is associated with adverse cardiometabolic effects independently of fat volume (Rosenquist et al., 2013) while decreasing attenuation in the same depots has more recently been associated with a deterioration of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (Lee et al., 2016). Similarly, lower attenuation in the EpAT has been associated with high-risk plaque features (Lu et al., 2016). In this regard, the findings of the present inventors are radical, since they demonstrate an opposite, “paradoxical” trend for PVAT attenuation. However, these observations are in line with previous studies of the present inventors on the interplay between the vascular wall and PVAT and the effects of vascular inflammation on PVAT quality. Taken together, these findings suggest that local rather than systemic factors affect PVAT quality, and contrary to other fat depots, PVAT quality can function as a “sensor” of inflammation in the underlying coronary artery and therefore a specific predictor of adverse cardiac events.
It is evident that FAIPVAt describes a different vascular biology than FPi and Calcium-i.
While the latter two biomarkers reflect structural changes of the vascular wall (namely fibrous plaque and vascular calcification respectively), FAIPVat is a dynamic marker of vascular inflammation. Indeed, using multivariable cox regression models, we demonstrated that FAIPVAt is a strong predictor of all-cause and cardiac mortality independenly of FPi and calcium-i, even after adjustment for potential confounfers, such as age, gender, epicardial fat volume, cardiovascular risk factors and clinically relevant medication. On the contrary, the predictive value of calcium-i or Agatston score (current CTA biomarker recommented for risk stratification) is significantly reduced or eliminated in multivariable models after adjustment for age, suggesting that vascular calcification, is at least partly, a surrogate of ageing.
As previously discussed, current scoring systems for cardiovascular risk prediction often fail to detect “vulnerable subjects” for cardiac events within populations of mid-low risk asymptomatic individuals. More than half of ruptured plaques derive from lesions that were previously asymptomatic and non-obstructive (<50% stenosis) (Fishbein et al., 1996). Similar lesions are frequently seen on CT angiograms but there is currently no available method to identify which patients are at high-risk and therefore in need of more aggressive medical intervention. A quick, reliable, easy-to-use and readily available method that would detect this io group of patients would be invaluable in the clinical setting. In the current study, the present authors combined our observations on the predictive value of FAIPVat along with other indices of the perivascular and vascular tissue into a novel score, the OxScore. The proposed scoring method takes into account traditional structural biomarkers of vascular disease (Calcium-i, FPi), adiposity (EpAT volume) and combines them with a novel functional index of coronary and perivascular tissue inflammation (FAIPVat) to generate a powerful tool for cardiovascular risk stratification. Overall, OxScore was not only an independent predictor of future mortality, but more importantly improved risk stratification beyond the traditional interpretation of a CTA scan, that includes Agatston score and/or the presence of obstructive CAD.
Conclusions
The present inventors have demonstrated a new imaging biomarker for detection of coronary artery inflammation, through quantification of CT attenuation of peri-coronary adipose tissue. The new biomarker, Perivascular Fat Attenuation Index (FAIPVat), predicts all-cause and cardiac mortality independently of traditional risk factors, the presence of CAD and coronary calcification. The present inventors now propose a novel CT-based risk score, the OxScore, that significantly improves cardiac risk stratification of low to mid-risk individuals undergoing routine CTA. Based on the current findings and its simplicity, the method can even be applied retrospectively in existing scans and re-stratify populations who have been discharged following CT angiograms with non-obstructive disease. This method has the potential to change clinical practice, establishing coronary CTA as a powerful prognostic tool in both primary and secondary prevention.
Claims (25)
- Claims1. A method for determining the perivascular water index (PVWi) of a blood vessel, comprising5 (i) using data gathered from a computer tomography scan along a length of the vessel to determine the total volume of voxels of water within an attenuation window around the attenuation of water within the perivascular space a pre-determined distance from the outer wall of the vessel, and (ii) correcting the total volume of the voxels of water for the volume of the vessel by10 dividing the total volume of voxels of water determined in step (i) by the total perivascular volume.
- 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the attenuation window around the attenuation of water is from -30 to +30 Hounsfield units (HU).
- 3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the attenuation window around the attenuation of water is from -15 to +15 HU.
- 4. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the pre-determined distance from20 the outer wall of the vessel is a standard distance that is not equal to or related to the diameter or radius of the underlying vessel.
- 5. A method according to any of claims 1 to 3, wherein the pre-determined distance from the outer wall of the vessel is either a distance equal to the radius or diameter of the underlying25 vessel or a distance that is representative of a dimension of the underlying vessel.
- 6. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the data is gathered from a computerised tomography scan along a length of the right coronary artery, left anterior descending artery, left circumflex artery, aorta, carotid arteries or femoral arteries.
- 7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the data is gathered from a computerised tomography scan along a 4cm length, starting 1cm distally to the origin of the right coronary artery.
- 8. The method according to any of claims 1 to 5, wherein the data is gathered from a computerised tomography scan along a length of the aorta.
- 9. Use of perivascular water index (PVWi) as a functional biomarker of vascular5 inflammation, wherein PVWi is defined according to the method of any of claims 1 to 8.
- 10. Use of PVWi as a functional biomarker according to claim 9, wherein the biomarker is used to predict all-cause or cardiac mortality risk in a patient.io
- 11. Use of PVWi as a functional biomarker according to claim 10, wherein PVWi is used in combination with additional functional and/or biomarkers of vascular inflammation.
- 12. Use of PVWi as a functional biomarker according to claim 11, wherein the structural biomarkers of vascular inflammation include one or more of calcium index and fibrous plaque15 index, and/or wherein the additional functional biomarkers of vascular inflammation include one or more of the fat attenuation index of the perivascular adipose tissue (FAIPVat), fat attenuation index of the epicardial adipose tissue (FAIEpAT) and volumetric perivascular characterisation index (VPCI).20
- 13. A method for predicting the mortality risk or risk of a patient suffering a cardiovascular event, said method comprising:(a) using data gathered from a computer tomography (CT) scan along a length of a blood vessel to determine:(i) calcium index (Calcium-i); and25 (ii) fibrous plaque index (FPi);and at least one of (iii) fat attenuation index of the perivascular adipose tissue (FAIPVat);(iv) perivascular water index (PVWi); and30 (b) comparing each of the values determined in (a) to a pre-determined cut-off value or using the absolute value of each variable in order to generate an output value that indicates the patient’s risk of suffering a cardiovascular event.
- 14. A method according to claim 13, both FAIPVat and PVWi are determined in step (a).
- 15. A method according to claims 13 or 14, wherein the data is gathered from a computerised tomography scan along a length of the right coronary artery, left anterior5 descending artery, left circumflex artery, aorta, carotid arteries or femoral arteries.
- 16. The method according to claim 15 wherein the data is gathered from a computerised tomography scan along a 4 cm length, starting 1 cm distally to the origin of the right coronary artery.
- 17. The method according to claims 13 or 14, wherein the data is gathered from a computerised tomography scan along a length of the aorta.
- 18. The method according to any of claims 13 to 17, wherein step (a) further comprises 15 using the data gathered from a computer tomography scan along a length of a blood vessel to determine (v) volumetric perivascular characterisation index (VPCI), and wherein the value of (v) is included in step (b) of claim 13.
- 19. The method according to any of claims 13 to 18, further comprising determining one or 20 more of (vi) epicardial adipose tissue volume (EpAT-vol) and (vii) fat attenuation index of the epicardial adipose tissue (FAIEpat) and wherein the value of (vi) and/or (vii) is included in step (b) of claim 13.
- 20. The method according to any of claims 13 to 19, further comprising determining one or 25 more of (viii) the age and (ix) gender of the patient and wherein the value of (viii) and/or (ix) is included in step (b) of claim 13.
- 21. The method according to any of claims 13 to 20, wherein coefficients for each of (i) to (vii) are derived from Cox hazard or logistic regression models.
- 22. The method according to any of claims 13 to 20, wherein the cut-off points for each of (i) to (vii) are derived from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
- 23. The method according to any of claims 13 to 22, wherein the output value is a continuous single value function or a value that falls within one of three discrete brackets5 corresponding to low, medium and high risk of a cardiac event, cardiac death or all-cause mortality.
- 24. The method according to any of claims 13 to 23, wherein the method is used to stratify patients according to their risk of all-cause or cardiac mortality.
- 25. The method according to any of claims 13 to 24, wherein the patient has been diagnosed with vascular inflammation, or a condition known to be associated with vascular inflammation.15 26. Use of the method according to any of claims 13 to 25 for non-invasive monitoring of aortic aneurysms and/or carotid plaques, wherein said method does not include determining EpAT volume or FAIEpAT.IntellectualPropertyOfficeApplication No: GB 1620494.3
Priority Applications (20)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB1620494.3A GB2557263A (en) | 2016-12-02 | 2016-12-02 | Method |
ES17792171T ES2938857T3 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Vascular inflammation detection method |
SG11201903840WA SG11201903840WA (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Method |
ES21198980T ES2952254T3 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Vascular inflammation detection method |
US16/345,165 US11393137B2 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Method for predicting cardiovascular risk |
CA3226114A CA3226114A1 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Method for determining perivascular water index (pvwi) |
CN202310836385.4A CN117918872A (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Method for determining cardiovascular risk |
CA3040391A CA3040391A1 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Method for predicting cardiovascular risk |
PCT/GB2017/053262 WO2018078395A1 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Method |
KR1020197015673A KR102487832B1 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Cardiovascular risk analysis method |
AU2017351986A AU2017351986B2 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Method |
RU2019112787A RU2758548C2 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Perivascular water index and its application for predicting all-cause mortality or mortality from cardiac events |
EP21198980.1A EP3960087B1 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Method of detecting vascular inflammation |
CN201780081809.3A CN110267596B (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Method for determining perivascular index |
EP17792171.5A EP3531917B1 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Method of detecting vascular inflammation |
JP2019546092A JP7210463B2 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Method |
HUE21198980A HUE063284T2 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2017-10-31 | Method of detecting vascular inflammation |
US17/454,540 US11880916B2 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2021-11-11 | Method of assessing the level of vascular inflammation |
US18/062,829 US11948230B2 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2022-12-07 | Method for predicting cardiovascular risk |
AU2022287535A AU2022287535B2 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2022-12-12 | Method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB1620494.3A GB2557263A (en) | 2016-12-02 | 2016-12-02 | Method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB201620494D0 GB201620494D0 (en) | 2017-01-18 |
GB2557263A true GB2557263A (en) | 2018-06-20 |
Family
ID=58159761
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB1620494.3A Withdrawn GB2557263A (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2016-12-02 | Method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
GB (1) | GB2557263A (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2578485A (en) * | 2018-09-18 | 2020-05-13 | Univ Oxford Innovation Ltd | Radiomic signature of a perivascular region |
US20220061790A1 (en) * | 2018-10-29 | 2022-03-03 | Oxford University Innovation Limited | Radiomic signature of an epicardial region |
US20220110598A1 (en) * | 2018-09-18 | 2022-04-14 | Oxford University Innovation Limited | Radiomic signature of adipose |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2019185457A1 (en) * | 2018-03-26 | 2019-10-03 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Spectral inflammation map from spectral imaging data |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016024128A1 (en) * | 2014-08-15 | 2016-02-18 | Isis Innovation Limited | Method for characterisation of perivascular tissue |
-
2016
- 2016-12-02 GB GB1620494.3A patent/GB2557263A/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016024128A1 (en) * | 2014-08-15 | 2016-02-18 | Isis Innovation Limited | Method for characterisation of perivascular tissue |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2578485A (en) * | 2018-09-18 | 2020-05-13 | Univ Oxford Innovation Ltd | Radiomic signature of a perivascular region |
US20220110598A1 (en) * | 2018-09-18 | 2022-04-14 | Oxford University Innovation Limited | Radiomic signature of adipose |
US20220061790A1 (en) * | 2018-10-29 | 2022-03-03 | Oxford University Innovation Limited | Radiomic signature of an epicardial region |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB201620494D0 (en) | 2017-01-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11948230B2 (en) | Method for predicting cardiovascular risk | |
Kristensen et al. | Prognostic implications of nonobstructive coronary plaques in patients with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multidetector computed tomography study | |
Prabhakaran et al. | Presence of calcified carotid plaque predicts vascular events: the Northern Manhattan Study | |
Park et al. | Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by CT angiography identify coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison to fractional flow reserve | |
Baumgart et al. | Comparison of electron beam computed tomography with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography for detection of coronary atherosclerosis | |
Ito et al. | Impact of epicardial fat volume on coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients with a zero calcium score | |
Abdeldayem et al. | Positive remodeling index by MSCT coronary angiography: a prognostic factor for early detection of plaque rupture and vulnerability | |
Hell et al. | Non-invasive prediction of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses by contrast density difference in coronary CT angiography | |
GB2557263A (en) | Method | |
Sipola et al. | Computed tomography and echocardiography together reveal more high-risk findings than echocardiography alone in the diagnostics of stroke etiology | |
Mancuso et al. | Left atrial dysfunction in Chagas cardiomyopathy is more severe than in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: a study with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography | |
Feuchtner et al. | Non obstructive high-risk plaque but not calcified by coronary CTA, and the G-score predict ischemia | |
Xie et al. | Relationship of epicardial fat volume with coronary plaque characteristics, coronary artery calcification score, coronary stenosis, and CT-FFR for lesion-specific ischemia in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease | |
Blanke et al. | CT detection of pulmonary embolism and aortic dissection | |
Benedek et al. | ANALYSIS OF CORONARY PLAQUE MORPHOLOGY BY 64-MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND CALCIUM SCORING IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS. | |
Cimsit et al. | Correlation of clot distribution with morphometric measurements and pleuroparenchymal findings in acute pulmonary embolism: experience with 692 cases | |
Romanov et al. | EPICARDIAL ADIPOSE TISSUE VOLUME AND DISTRIBUTION IN CHRONIC HEART FAILURE PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION AND PRESERVED LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION | |
Nikolova et al. | EVALUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PULMONARY ARTERIAL OBSTRUCTION INDEX AND SEVERAL CT MARKERS OF RIGHT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM | |
de Graaf et al. | Computed tomography angiography and other applications of computed tomography | |
Hamdy et al. | CT’s Role for Myocardial Viability Assessment | |
Schuijf et al. | How to identify the asymptomatic high-risk patient? | |
van Velzen et al. | Monitoring and Investigations in ICCU: CT Angiography and other Applications of CT | |
de Graaf et al. | Computed tomography angiography and other applications of CT | |
Klok et al. | Usefulness of ECG-synchronized MDCT assessed right and left ventricular function for predicting short term clinical outcome in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WAP | Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1) |