GB2399720A - Accelerating assessment of an optical tranmission system using Bit Error Rate (BER) tests - Google Patents
Accelerating assessment of an optical tranmission system using Bit Error Rate (BER) tests Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2399720A GB2399720A GB0306533A GB0306533A GB2399720A GB 2399720 A GB2399720 A GB 2399720A GB 0306533 A GB0306533 A GB 0306533A GB 0306533 A GB0306533 A GB 0306533A GB 2399720 A GB2399720 A GB 2399720A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- ber
- laser transmitter
- extinction ratio
- optical transmission
- transmission system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/24—Testing correct operation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/07—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems
- H04B10/075—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems using an in-service signal
- H04B10/079—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems using an in-service signal using measurements of the data signal
- H04B10/0795—Performance monitoring; Measurement of transmission parameters
- H04B10/07953—Monitoring or measuring OSNR, BER or Q
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/07—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems
- H04B10/075—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems using an in-service signal
- H04B10/079—Arrangements for monitoring or testing transmission systems; Arrangements for fault measurement of transmission systems using an in-service signal using measurements of the data signal
- H04B10/0799—Monitoring line transmitter or line receiver equipment
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Optical Communication System (AREA)
- Testing Of Optical Devices Or Fibers (AREA)
- Detection And Prevention Of Errors In Transmission (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Transmission In General (AREA)
Abstract
An apparatus (10) for accelerating assessment of an optical transmission system (3) using Bit Error Rate (BER) tests includes a controllable laser (2) and a data generator (1) coupled to the controllable laser (2) for modulating the controllable laser (2) with data. An output of the controllable laser (2) is coupled into an optical transmission system (3) to be assessed. The output of the optical transmission system (3) is coupled to a BER measurement unit (4) for determining the BER of the system. A processing module (6) is coupled to the BER measurement unit (4) and to the controllable laser (2) to control an extinction ratio of the controllable laser (2) to provide relatively high BER values at the BER measurement unit (4). The processing module (6) calculates Q-factors for at least two different extinction ratios from the measured test BER values and extrapolates to determine a Q-factor for an operational extinction ratio, whereby the operational BER value for the operational extinction ratio of the controllable laser (2) can be calculated. The data generator may be a Pseudo Random Bit Sequence (PRBS) generator and the optical transmission system may utilise Forward Error Correction (FEC).
Description
A Method and Apparatus for Assessing Performance of Optical Systems
Field of the Invention
1] This invention relates to a method and apparatus for assessing performance of optical systems, and particularly, though not exclusively, to such a method and apparatus for accelerating assessment of performance using bit error rate (BER) tests.
Background of the Invention
2] In an assessment of the performance of optical transmission systems, bit error rate (BER) tests are usually used. BER is defined as the ratio between the number of erroneously received bits to the total number of bits received over a period of time. In modern optical transmission systems, the BER test normally takes a long time to perform. For example, to evaluate a BER of 10-'4 for data that is transmitted at a bit rate of 2.5 Gb/s, the measurement time needed is 12 hours. Performance of an optical system can also be defined by a parameter called Q-factor. The Q-factor indicates the signal-to-noise ratio of the signal and is defined as: Q = ' - 0 cr. + crO whereto is the mean value of the "1's",,u0 is the mean value of the "0's", a' is the standard deviation of the level of "1's" and an is the standard deviation of the level of "0's". Q-factor measurement can greatly accelerate the test. Through reducing test time, the efficiency and benefit in cost and time can be obtained in design, manufacture, installation, maintenance and monitor of optical transmission systems.
3] Several methods have been proposed to estimate the BER by calculation of the Q-factor. For example, one method disclosed in an article entitled "Margin Measurements in Optical Amplifier Systems" by Neal S. Bergano, F.W. Kerfoot and C.R. Davidson, published in IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 5, No. 3, March 1993, adjusts the 'Decision Threshold' level of a tester's receiver away from the optimal value which gives the minimum BER. The shift of the decision threshold level increases the BER measured to a high level that is measurable in a short time. The measured high BER values - 2 are then used to mathematically extrapolate to the BER at the optimal decision threshold.
4] Another known method is the 'Light Interference' method, which was described by P. Palacharla, J. Chrostowski and R. Neumann in a paper entitled "Techniques for Accelerated Measurement of Low Bit Error Rates in Computer Data Links" published in the Proceedings of the IEEE Fourteenth Annual Intemational Phoenix Conference on Computers and Communications, Scottsdale, AZ, March 28-31, 1995, pp.184-190. In this method, a sinusoidal interfering light source is coupled to the transmission data signal to increase the BER measured at the receiver, allowing the high BER to be measured in a short time. Through the resultant Q-factor measurement, BER in the absence of the interference signal can then be extrapolated.
Brief Summary of the Invention
10005] The present invention seeks to provide an alternative method and apparatus for accelerating assessment of performance using bit error rate (BER)
tests, as compared to the prior art.
lO006] Accordingly, in a first aspect, the invention provides an apparatus for accelerating assessment of an optical transmission system using Bit Error Rate (BER) tests, the apparatus comprising a controllable laser transmitter and a data generator coupled to the controllable laser transmitter for modulating the laser transmitter with transmission data, the controllable laser transmitter having an output coupled to an optical transmission system to be assessed, a BER measurement unit coupled to an output of the optical transmission system, a processing unit coupled to the BER measurement unit and to a laser controller coupled to the controllable laser transmitter for adjusting the extinction ratio of the controllable laser transmitter to provide relatively high test BER values at the BER measurement unit, the processing unit including a calculator for calculating a Q-factor for at least two different values of the extinction ratio from the relatively high measured test BER values and for obtaining a Q-factor value by extrapolation therefrom for an extinction ratio of the controllable laser transmitter in normal operation thereby enabling the BER to be calculated for normal operation of the controllable laser transmitter. - 3
[0007l The controllable laser transmitter may be an electrically and directly modulated laser diode which outputs a digital light signal, the light output of the laser diode being modulated by the transmission data.
8] In one embodiment, the data generator may be a Pseudo Random Bit Sequence (PRBS) Generator.
9] The optical transmission system may include a forward error correct (FEC) element.
0] According to a second aspect, the invention provides a method for accelerating assessment of an optical transmission system using Bit Error Rate (BER) tests, the method comprising the steps of generating test data for modulating a laser transmitter, outputting light from the laser transmitter modulated by the test data, receiving the modulated light via an optical transmission system, measuring the BER for the received light, adjusting an extinction ratio of the laser transmitter to produce relatively high measured BER values, calculating a Q-factor for at least two different values of the extinction ratio from the measured BER values, obtaining a Q-factor by extrapolation therefrom for an extinction ratio of the laser transmitter in normal operation, and calculating the BER for normal operation of the laser transmitter.
1] The step of generating data may involve generating Pseudo Random Bit Sequence (PRBS) data. In one embodiment, the method may further comprise the step of forward error correction (FEC) in the optical transmission system prior to measurement of BER values.
2] The step of outputting light from the laser transmitter may comprise modulating the light output of a laser diode of the laser transmitter to provide a digital output light signal.
Brief Description of the Drawings
3] Two embodiments of the invention will now be more fully described, by way of example, with reference to the drawings, of which: FIG. 1 shows, schematically, an apparatus according to a first embodiment of the present invention for accelerated assessment of an optical transmission system; 4 FIG. 2 shows, schematically, an apparatus according to a second embodiment of the present invention for accelerated assessment of an optical transmission system; and FIG. 3 shows an example of Gaussian probability distribution of binary signals in optical transmission systems with two different extinction ratios.
Detailed Description of the Drawings
4] Thus, FIG. 3 shows, as an illustrative example, Gaussian probability distributions of binary signals in an optical transmission system for two different extinction ratios of a laser transmitter. The continuous line shows the distributions of the average "O" level and the average "1" level at a higher extinction ratio and the dotted line shows the distributions at the lower extinction ratio. As can be seen, although the spacing of the "O" and "1" distributions has changed, so that they are much closer together at the lower extinction ratio, the average power of the transmission data signal at the different extinction ratios is unchanged. Thus, without changing the average power of the optical transmission data signal nor the decision threshold of the receiver, there is still more area of overlap between the "1" and "0" probability distributions as the extinction ratio of the laser transmitter decreases. Therefore, the bit error rate (BER) increases as the extinction ratio decreases, resulting in a higher BER to be measured.
5] Figure 1 shows an apparatus 10 for accelerated assessment of an optical transmission system 3. The apparatus includes a data pattern generator 1, which is coupled to a laser transmitter 2. The data pattern generator 1 outputs a pseudo random bit sequence (PRBS) of test data which is used to modulate the light output of the laser transmitter 2. The laser transmitter may include a laser diode, which is modulated by the test data. The modulated output of the laser transmitter (laser diode) 2 is inserted into the optical transmission system 3 under test. The output data signal from the optical transmission system 3 is detected by a BER measurement unit 4. The measured BER values are passed to a control and processing module 6. The control and processing module 6 is used to control the operation of the whole test set and to process the received data for BER measurement and Q-factor calculation. In order to reduce the time taken for the BER measurements to be carried out, a laser controller 5 is used to adjust the extinction ratio of light output from the laser transmitter 2. The control and processing module 6 thus controls the extinction ratio of the laser transmitter 2 and, from the BER values received from the BER measurement unit 4, and the associated extinction ratios, determines a BER value for the system under optimum conditions.
0016] The relationship between Q-factor and BER will now be explained.
BER is defined by: BER = p(l)P(O/ 1) + p(0)P(1/ 0) (1) where p(l),p(0) and P(1/O),P(0/1)representthe probabilities and the conditional (Gaussian) probabilities of "1" level and "0" level signals, respectively.
7] For a Gaussian noise system, the conditional probabilities are expressed as: P(1/ 0) = 2 erfc( , ) (2) P(O/1) =-eric(i With) (3) 2 at, where,u, and,uO represent the average power of "1" level, "0" level signals and Ah represents the threshold level of the receiving decision circuit; of, and 0 represent the root mean square (rms) noise level for the "1" level and "0" level signals, respectively, and eric is an error function.
10018] Thus, BER can be expressed as: BER=4eric(/l> /I )+4eric( , ) (4) The minimum bit error rate (BER) occurs at an optimal threshold Uh_opima', when the two terms in Equation (4) are equal, that is: With TO = 1 Ah = Q (5) <Jo ETA [0019] Hence, BER can be expressed as: BER =-eric( Q) =-eric e( RR (6 2 a/: 2 (, +C'O)(re.R +)] where the Q-factor is defined as: Q = (,ul -,uO) /(, + crO), the average signal power is defined as: Pang = (CUP +Uo)/2 and the extinction ratio of the signal is defined as: rFR = pi /po. From Equation (6), it can be seen that the BER can be mathematically expressed in terms of the extinction ratio of the signal.
0] Thus, in order to test the system to provide the BER for the system in operation, the extinction ratio of the laser transmitter 2 is adjusted by the laser controller 5 to a first low value so that the BER measured by the BER measurement module is high. Thus, the measurement can take place in a relatively short period of time. Using equation (6), the processing module 6 can then calculate the Q-factor for that first extinction ratio value. The laser controller then sets the extinction ratio to a second low value and the BER is again measured and the Q- factor is calculated for that second extinction ratio value. Thus, the Q- factor for much higher extinction ratio values can be extrapolated from the Q-factor values at low extinction ratios. The processing module 6 carries out the extrapolation to determine the Q-factor for operational extinction ratio values and then calculates the BER. In this way, the optimum extinction ratio to provide the lowest BER can be determined. ! [0021] A second embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to FIG. 2, in which the same elements as those of FIG. 1 have the same reference numbers. Again, a BER pattern generator 1 outputs a pseudo random bit sequence (PRBS) transmission data signal to laser transmitter 2, the: laser diode of which outputs light modulated with PRBS transmission data into an optical transmission system 7 which, in this case, includes a forward error correct (FEC) element. The output data signal from the optical transmission system 7 is detected by the BER measurement unit 4. The extinction ratio of the light output of the laser transmitter 2 can be adjusted to result in high BER values in the system under test. The control & processing module 6 is used to control the work and operation of the whole test set and to process the received data for BER measurement and Q-factor calculation and to extrapolate to - 7 determine optimal BER. The accelerated BER testing through Q-factor measurement allows evaluation of how the FEC element corrects and improves the quality of the transmission data signal.
2] Again, the extinction ratio values of the laser transmitter 2 are set so as to generate a high BER after passing through the optical transmission system 7. However, for an optical transmission system with an FEC element, setting the second extinction ratio to a value different to the first extinction ratio value may not provide a different BER measurement because the FEC element corrects and improves the quality of the transmission data signal so that the BER measurement may well be very similar for the second extinction ratio value as for the first extinction ratio value. Thus, in this embodiment, the second extinction ratio of the laser transmitter is adjusted continuously by the laser controller 5 until the processing module 6 receives a measured BER that is substantially different to the BER measured for the first extinction ratio value. In this way, the relationship between the extinction ratio values and the Q-factor can be properly determined so that the BER at the operational extinction ratio values can be extrapolated.
3] It will thus be apparent that the present invention can be used to assess relatively quickly optical transmission systems having relatively low operational BER.
4] It will be appreciated that although only two particular embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, various modifications and improvements can be made by a person skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, the PRBS data from the BER pattern generator can generate data signal for the assessment of various types of optical transmission systems, such as SONET/SDH. - 8
Claims (10)
- Claims 1. Apparatus (10) for accelerating assessment of an opticaltransmission system (3) using Bit Error Rate (BER) tests, the apparatus (10) comprising a controllable laser transmitter (2) and a data generator (1) coupled to the controllable laser transmitter (2) for modulating the light output of the laser transmitter (2) with test transmission data, the controllable laser transmitter (2) having an output coupled to an optical transmission system (3) to be assessed, a BER measurement unit (4) coupled to an output of the optical transmission system (3), a processing unit (6) coupled to the BER measurement unit (4) and to a laser controller (5) coupled to the controllable laser transmitter (2) for adjusting the extinction ratio of the controllable laser transmitter (2) to provide relatively high test BER values at the BER measurement unit (4), the processing unit (6) including a calculator for calculating a Q-factor for at least two different values of the extinction ratio from the relatively high measured test BER values and for obtaining a Q-factor value by extrapolation therefrom for an extinction ratio of the controllable laser transmitter (2) in normal operation thereby enabling the BER to be calculated for normal operation of the controllable laser transmitter (2).
- 2. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the data generator (1) is a Pseudo Random Bit Sequence (PROS) generator.
- 3. Apparatus according to either claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the controllable laser transmitter (2) comprises an electrically and directly modulated laser diode which outputs a digital light signal, the light output of the laser diode being modulated by the test transmission data.
- 4. Apparatus according to any preceding claim, wherein the optical transmission system (7) includes a forward error correct (FEC) element.
- 5. Apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the laser controller (5) comprises a continuous controller for continuously adjusting the extinction ratio of the controllable laser transmitter to provide a second relatively high test BER - 9 - value substantially different to a first relatively high test BER value at the BER measurement unit.
- 6. A method for accelerating assessment of an optical transmission system using Bit Error Rate (BER) tests, the method comprising the steps of: generating test data for modulating light output of a laser transmitter; outputting light from the laser transmitter modulated by the test data; receiving the modulated light via an optical transmission system; measuring the BER for the received light; adjusting an extinction ratio of the laser transmitter to produce relatively high measured BER values; calculating a Q-factor for at least two different values of the extinction ratio from the measured BER values; obtaining a Q-factor by extrapolation therefrom for an extinction ratio of the laser transmitter in normal operation; and calculating the BER for normal operation of the laser transmitter.
- 7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the step of generating data comprises generating Pseudo Random Bit Sequence (PROS) data.
- 8. A method according to either claim 6 or claim 7, wherein the step of outputting light from the laser transmitter comprises modulating the light output of a laser diode of the laser transmitter to provide a digital output light signal.
- 9. A method according to any one of claims 6 to 8, further comprising the step of forward error correction (FEC) in the optical transmission system prior to measurement of BER values.
- 10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the step of adjusting an extinction ratio of the laser transmitter comprises continuously adjusting the extinction ratio of the laser transmitter to provide a second relatively high test BER value substantially different to a first relatively high test BER value.
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0306533A GB2399720B (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2003-03-21 | A method and apparatus for assessing performance of optical systems |
US10/762,699 US7263287B2 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2004-01-22 | Method and apparatus for assessing performance of optical systems |
CNA2004100392911A CN1533058A (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2004-02-11 | Method and device for evaluating optical system property |
DE102004006950A DE102004006950B4 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2004-02-12 | Apparatus and method for accelerating the evaluation of an optical transmission system |
JP2004069188A JP2004289820A (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2004-03-11 | Method and instrument for evaluating performance of optical system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0306533A GB2399720B (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2003-03-21 | A method and apparatus for assessing performance of optical systems |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB0306533D0 GB0306533D0 (en) | 2003-04-23 |
GB2399720A true GB2399720A (en) | 2004-09-22 |
GB2399720B GB2399720B (en) | 2005-10-12 |
Family
ID=9955248
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB0306533A Expired - Fee Related GB2399720B (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2003-03-21 | A method and apparatus for assessing performance of optical systems |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7263287B2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2004289820A (en) |
CN (1) | CN1533058A (en) |
DE (1) | DE102004006950B4 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2399720B (en) |
Families Citing this family (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2005006576A2 (en) * | 2003-07-03 | 2005-01-20 | Ubi Systems, Inc. | Controlling the extinction ratio in optical networks |
US7643752B2 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2010-01-05 | Clariphy Communications, Inc. | Testing of transmitters for communication links by software simulation of reference channel and/or reference receiver |
US8111986B1 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2012-02-07 | Clariphy Communications, Inc. | Testing of transmitters for communication links by software simulation of reference channel and/or reference receiver |
US7853149B2 (en) * | 2005-03-08 | 2010-12-14 | Clariphy Communications, Inc. | Transmitter frequency peaking for optical fiber channels |
US8254781B2 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2012-08-28 | Clariphy Communications, Inc. | Testing of receivers with separate linear O/E module and host used in communication links |
US7664394B2 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2010-02-16 | Clariphy Communications, Inc. | Testing of receivers with separate linear O/E module and host used in communication links |
US7609981B2 (en) * | 2005-09-07 | 2009-10-27 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Deliberate signal degradation for optimizing receiver control loops |
US7590351B2 (en) * | 2005-09-15 | 2009-09-15 | Finisar Corporation | Extinction ratio control using a frequency spread tone to modulate optical signal power levels |
US8521019B2 (en) * | 2008-07-14 | 2013-08-27 | Nanotech Semiconductor Ltd. | Method and system for closed loop control of an optical link |
JP5851892B2 (en) * | 2012-03-12 | 2016-02-03 | アズビル株式会社 | Noise amplitude calculating apparatus and method |
US8938164B2 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2015-01-20 | Intel Corporation | Optical link auto-setting |
US9608721B2 (en) | 2014-05-01 | 2017-03-28 | Mellanox Technologies Demark Aps | Method of calculating transmitter and dispersion penalty for predicting optical data link and signal quality |
CN106220587B (en) * | 2016-08-15 | 2018-05-18 | 辽宁中医药大学 | Two kinds of alkaloid compounds and its extraction separation method in purslane |
CN107919907B (en) | 2016-10-10 | 2020-05-08 | 富士通株式会社 | System performance prediction method and device |
CN110650054A (en) * | 2019-09-29 | 2020-01-03 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method, apparatus and system for configuring optical operating point of modulator |
CN112994786B (en) * | 2019-12-12 | 2024-02-23 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Optical module degradation testing method, system, equipment and storage medium |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2001050556A1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2001-07-12 | Sycamore Networks, Inc. | In circuit biasing and testing of a laser in a wdm transceiver board |
EP1326362A1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-07-09 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) | Accelerated measurement of bit error ratio |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5325397A (en) | 1989-12-07 | 1994-06-28 | The Commonwealth Of Australia | Error rate monitor |
US5546325A (en) * | 1993-02-04 | 1996-08-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated system, and corresponding method, for testing electro-optic modules |
US5764651A (en) | 1996-05-17 | 1998-06-09 | Integrated Device Technology, Inc. | Bit error rate detection system |
JPH118590A (en) * | 1997-04-25 | 1999-01-12 | Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd | Optical transmission system and supervisory and control method therefor |
US6008916A (en) | 1997-09-19 | 1999-12-28 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Distortion penalty measurement technique in optical systems based on signal level adjustment |
US6069718A (en) | 1997-09-19 | 2000-05-30 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Distortion penalty measurement procedure in optical systems using noise loading |
-
2003
- 2003-03-21 GB GB0306533A patent/GB2399720B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2004
- 2004-01-22 US US10/762,699 patent/US7263287B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-02-11 CN CNA2004100392911A patent/CN1533058A/en active Pending
- 2004-02-12 DE DE102004006950A patent/DE102004006950B4/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-03-11 JP JP2004069188A patent/JP2004289820A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2001050556A1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2001-07-12 | Sycamore Networks, Inc. | In circuit biasing and testing of a laser in a wdm transceiver board |
EP1326362A1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2003-07-09 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) | Accelerated measurement of bit error ratio |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
Conference Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE Fourteenth Annual International Phoenix Conference on Computers and Communications, 28-31 March 1995, pp 184-190, "Techniques for accelerated measurement of low bit error rates in computer data links", Palacharla, P. et al, See in part. paras 3 & 3.1 & Fig 4 * |
http://ftp.agilent.com/pub/semiconductor/morpheus/docs/low_ber.pdf, Optical Network Interface Design Symposium (ONIDS), Paper 4, "Rapid testing of extremely low BER", Galloway, F.H. and Knibbe, T. See whole document * |
IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 5, No. 3, March 1993, pp 304-306, "Margin measurements in optical amplifier systems", Bergano, S. et al., See whole document * |
IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 9, No. 8, Aug 1997, pp 1131-1133, "Measurements of very low bit-error rates of optical switches based on semiconductor optical amplifiers", Zhou, J. et al, See whole document * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE102004006950B4 (en) | 2006-08-31 |
JP2004289820A (en) | 2004-10-14 |
US20040184802A1 (en) | 2004-09-23 |
GB2399720B (en) | 2005-10-12 |
US7263287B2 (en) | 2007-08-28 |
CN1533058A (en) | 2004-09-29 |
GB0306533D0 (en) | 2003-04-23 |
DE102004006950A1 (en) | 2004-10-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7263287B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for assessing performance of optical systems | |
JP3391800B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for measuring strain in optical transmission system | |
JP3321555B2 (en) | Method for manufacturing optical transmission module and bit error rate characteristic inspection system | |
US7725033B2 (en) | Optical wavelength controlling method and a system thereof | |
US6445471B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for making transmission characteristics uniform in a wavelength division multiplexing optical communications system | |
US9768914B2 (en) | Blind channel estimation method for an MLSE receiver in high speed optical communication channels | |
US7561797B1 (en) | Optical signal transmitter with active optical e-field degradation | |
US20080226288A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for performing receiver sensitivity testing and stressed receive sensitivity testing in a transceiver | |
US8081879B2 (en) | System for dynamically optimizing a decision threshold voltage in an optical transponder | |
CN101496318A (en) | Method and arrangements for determining the optical signal-to-noise ratio for an optical transmission system | |
CN108966687A (en) | Channel OSNR and channel OSNR nargin are determined under real network conditions | |
US20070003280A1 (en) | Method and system for determining receiver power for required bit error rate | |
US20060095216A1 (en) | Optic module calibration using an enhanced golden module | |
US6889347B1 (en) | Automatic configuration and optimization of optical transmission using raw error rate monitoring | |
US10862589B2 (en) | Histogram based optimization for optical modulation | |
US6433899B1 (en) | Eye quality monitor for a 2R regenerator | |
CN112118498B (en) | Wavelength correction method of optical module and optical network system | |
US6901108B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for adaptive control | |
US8077761B2 (en) | Data transmission and reception module, and method of adjusting reception threshold value thereof | |
US20130294763A1 (en) | Optical Signal Power Selection and Control | |
US7593640B2 (en) | Method of dynamically controlling an optical module | |
WO2023071326A1 (en) | Fault locating method, device and optical network system | |
CN105991186B (en) | Monitoring device, method and the receiver of optical signal to noise ratio | |
US20030117613A1 (en) | Method of measuring the error rate of an optical transmission system and apparatus for implementing the method | |
US12113888B2 (en) | Frame synchronization system, frame synchronization circuit, and frame synchronization method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PCNP | Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20080321 |