GB2345891A

GB2345891A - Seat belt retractor with force limiting means

Info

Publication number: GB2345891A
Application number: GB0011285A
Authority: GB
Inventors: David Blackadder; Martyn Neil Palliser; Alan George Smithson; Andrew Park; John Taylor; Carlo Martellini; Andrew Wood
Original assignee: AlliedSignal Ltd
Current assignee: Honeywell UK Ltd
Priority date: 1996-01-24
Filing date: 1997-01-24
Publication date: 2000-07-26
Anticipated expiration: 2017-01-24
Also published as: GB0011285D0; GB2346849A; GB0011281D0; GB2345891B; GB2346849B

Abstract

A seat belt retractor comprises: a spool 1 mounted on a shaft 10 for rotation; a length of seat belt webbing wound on the spool for retraction or pay-out; means for locking the spool shaft against rotation when a crash condition is sensed; and force limiting means for allowing further pay-out of the webbing after the spool has locked. The force limiting means comprises an energy absorbing arrangement connecting the spool to the spool shaft by means of a resilient biasing member, the connection being rigid below a pre-determined force, and above the pre-determined force there being relative rotation of the spool with respect to the spool shaft. The force limiting means may comprise a coiled tension spring 17 wound around the spool shaft, or it may comprise a clock spring or a spring operating in a similar manner to a normal retractor spring. The force limiting means is intended to reduce excessive forces applied to the occupants body during a vehicle impact.

Description

RETRACTOR SPOOL DESCRIPTION The present application is divided from GB 97 01 443. 5 and is related to copending divisional application GB 00 11 281. 3 The present invention relates to a retractor spool for a vehicle safety restraint.

A retractor spool generally consists of a cylindrical bobbin with a circular cross-section. Seat belt webbing is attached to and wound around the spool and the spool is mounted on a spool shaft to be rotatable in the retractor to wind in webbing under action of a retractor spring and to pay out webbing under the influence of relatively gentle forwardly directed inertia of a vehicle occupant, for example to allow for normal movement associated with vehicle occupancy such as reaching forwards to activate in-car controls (for a radio or a window) or to reach a glove compartment or door pocket. In the event of a crash situation, the more extreme momentum of the occupant activates a crash sensor which locks the spool against rotation and thus prevents forward motion of the occupant and injury due to occupant collision with the interior fixtures of the vehicle such as the steering wheel, dashboard or windscreen.

However, this sudden locking of the seat belt spool under crash conditions can itself sometimes cause injury to the occupant due to sudden impact of the torso with the belt webbing. This is particularly true in high velocity crashes.

In recent years this problem has been recognised and some solutions proposed.

One solution has been to rely on natural elongation of the webbing under high loads, and on the spool film effect (natural tightening of the webbing wound on the spool under high loads), to produce a load limiting effect.

Another known proposal has been described in EP 0 297 537 A, wherein force limiting is effected by interposing a plastically deformable member between the spool and the innermost winding of the belt webbing or by interposing an elastic member such as a spring rubber member or resin member between an end flange of the spool and the latch plate. This allows a pay-out of webbing in proportion to the inertia of the vehicle occupant at the moment of a crash condition being sensed. This pay-out lessens the otherwise severe restraining forces on the occupant at high vehicle speeds especially during the initial moments of the crash.

It thus reduces the injurious effects of the seat belt in a crash.

The present invention proposed improved load limiting arrangements for retractors.

According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided A seat belt retractor comprising a spool mounted on a spool shaft for rotation in the retractor, a length of seat belt webbing wound on the spool for retraction or pay out depending on the rotation direction of the spool; means for Locking the spool shaft against rotation when a crash condition is sensed; force limiting means for allowing further pay-out of the seat belt webbing after the spool shaft has locked, under the influence of an occupant's forward momentum in the crash condition, wherein the force limiting means comprises an energy absorbing arrangement connecting the spool to the spool shaft, the connection being rigid below a predetermined force, and above the predetermined force there being relative rotation of the spool with respect to the spool shaft to allow pay out of belt webbing; wherein the force limiting means comprises resilient biasing means acting between the spool and the spool shaft.

The force limiting means comprises an energy absorbing member connecting the spool to the spool shaft, the connection being rigid below a predetermined force, and above the predetermined force there being relative rotation of the spool with respect to the spool shaft to allow pay out of belt webbing.

The invention is particularly applicable to the load limiting retractor known as the constant force retractor and described in co-pending International application PCT/US95/15002, publication WO 96/16843.

The force limiting means comprises resilient biasing means acting between the spool and its axis of rotation, for example a coiled tension spring wound around a spool shaft coaxial with the spool, or a clock spring or springs operating in a similar manner to a normal retractor spring.

In such an arrangement there will be an initial preset torque in the spring which determines the minimum load at which limiting starts to occur. As the load increases beyond this minimum, the spring is wound up tight and the diameter of its centre bore decreases. A maximum force limitation occurs when the spring is wound tightly about the spool shaft.

Alternatively this arrangement could be used with a spring mechanism the centre bore size of which increases with increasing load up to a maximum determined by the size of the internal bore of the spool.

This aspect of the invention is particularly advantageous because the force limiting means is re-usable and is automatically reset after crash conditions have abated. After impact the restrained occupant rebonds off the belt into his seat. The taut spring then uncoils, rewinding slack in the belt webbing and satisfactorily restraining the occupant in the event of a second impact.

For a better understanding and to show how the same may be carried into effect, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings in which: The sole figure is a cross-sectional view of a retractor according to the invention; Like parts are denoted by like reference numerals throughout.

In the single figure a torsion spring 17 is coiled around the spool shaft 10 within the hollow of spool 1. It is fixed at its ends 18 to the spool and at its middle to shaft 10 by pin or bolt 19.

In a crash impact the forward momentum of the occupant being restrained acts on the spool 1 to try to pay out more belt webbing. Since the shaft 10 is locked by a locking mechanism, activated by a crash sensor, then the relative rotation of the spool to the shaft tightens the spring 17 as more webbing is paid out, until the spring is coiled tightly around the shaft at which point pay-out ceases since the spool 1 is locked to the locked shaft 10.

When webbing tension is released as the crash conditions abate, the spring acts to rotate the spool in a rewinding direction thus drawing in the extra payed-out webbing together with any slack (which may have been caused by webbing stretch or by cinching of webbing on the spool).

Thus the occupant is well protected against a second impact.

If the spring 17 is wound the opposite way then, as webbing is paid out in a load limiting operation, the spring will expand until it fills the spool 1, which defines therefore the maximum force at which load limiting operates.

The spring will draw in webbing as it subsequently recoils itself.

Claims

1. A seat belt retractor comprising a spool mounted on a spool shaft for rotation in the retractor, a length of seat belt webbing wound on the spool for retraction or pay-out depending on the rotation direction of the spool; means for locking the spool shaft against rotation when a crash condition is sensed; force limiting means for allowing further pay-out of the seat belt webbing after the spool shaft has locked, under the influence of an occupant's forward momentum in the crash condition, wherein the force limiting means comprises an energy absorbing arrangement connecting the spool to the spool shaft, the connection being rigid below a predetermined force, and above the predetermined force there being relative rotation of the spool. with respect to the spool shaft to allow pay out of belt webbing; wherein the force limiting means comprises resilient biasing means acting between the spool and the spool shaft.

2. A seat belt retractor according to claim 1 wherein the force limiting means comprises a coiled tension spring wound around a spool shaft coaxial with the spool.

3. A seat belt retractor according to claim 1 or 2 wherein the force limiting means comprises a clock spring.

4. A seat belt retractor according to claim 1 or 2 wherein the force limiting means comprises a spring operating in a similar manner to a normal retractor spring.

5. A retractor substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings.