GB2294129A - Fault monitoring system - Google Patents
Fault monitoring system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2294129A GB2294129A GB9420797A GB9420797A GB2294129A GB 2294129 A GB2294129 A GB 2294129A GB 9420797 A GB9420797 A GB 9420797A GB 9420797 A GB9420797 A GB 9420797A GB 2294129 A GB2294129 A GB 2294129A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- time
- action
- occurrence
- fault condition
- operator
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G21—NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
- G21C—NUCLEAR REACTORS
- G21C17/00—Monitoring; Testing ; Maintaining
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0208—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the configuration of the monitoring system
- G05B23/0216—Human interface functionality, e.g. monitoring system providing help to the user in the selection of tests or in its configuration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
- G05B23/0267—Fault communication, e.g. human machine interface [HMI]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G21—NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
- G21D—NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
- G21D3/00—Control of nuclear power plant
- G21D3/008—Man-machine interface, e.g. control room layout
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E30/00—Energy generation of nuclear origin
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E30/00—Energy generation of nuclear origin
- Y02E30/30—Nuclear fission reactors
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
- Monitoring And Testing Of Nuclear Reactors (AREA)
Abstract
An indicating system 10 for use in a plant where predetermined action is required upon the occurrence of a fault condition includes a data processing facility 12 and a data inputting facility 16 for inputting data into the data Processing facility 12. A graphic display device (Figure 2) is connected to the data processing facility for displaying, in graphic form, action to be taken by an operator upon the occurrence of a particular fault condition. A time indicating unit 20 is connected to the data processing facility for indicating the time available to the operator to take the appropriate action to bring the plant to a required state. <IMAGE>
Description
AN INDICATING SYSTEM
THIS INVENTION relates to an indicating system. The invention relates particularly to an indicating system for use in a plant where predetermined action is required upon the occurrence of a fault condition. While the invention has particular application in nuclear power stations and will, for ease of explanation, be described with reference to that application hereinafter, it will readily be appreciated that the system could be used in other process plant applications.
According to the invention, there is provided an indicating system for use in a plant where predetermined action is required upon the occurrence of a fault condition, the indicating system including
a data processing means;
a data inputting means for inputting data into the data processing means;
a graphic display means connected to the data processing means for displaying, in graphic form, action to be taken by an operator upon the occurrence of a particular fault condition; and
a time indicating means connected to the data processing means for indicating the time available to the operator to take the appropriate action to bring the plant to a required state.
Conveniently, the graphic display means may, additionally, display action to be taken in a narrative form.
The graphic display means may be controlled by the processing means and is operable to display, in a graphic form, the action to be taken upon the occurrence of the particular fault condition. Thus, in the case of a nuclear power station, when a fault condition occurs, the display means may display the operating, failsafe or fallback state to which a reactor of the nuclear power station must be taken. Hence, for example, in the case of an auxiliary feedwater regulating line being inoperable, the lower state to which the reactor must be taken may be the normal intermediate shutdown state with residual heat removal system valved in. This must be effected within a specified time period.
In this specification, the term "operator" is to be understood in a broad sense as referring to any personnel of the plant who would operate the plant and/or need to respond to a fault condition.
The data processing means may comprise a computer.
Then, the data inputting means could be in any one of a variety of formats. Thus, for example, the data inputting means may include a manual inputting means, conveniently, a keyboard of the computer, by means of which the operator enters data into the data processing means. In addition, or instead, the data inputting means may include an automatic inputting means whereby, upon the occurrence of the fault condition, a signal is input into the data processing means. Further, if appropriate, the data inputting means could be an emergency response facility of the plant.
The time indicating means may comprise a clock and a time display means, the time display means being driven by the clock to be decremented as time passes so that the operator has an indication of the reducing time available in which to carry out the necessary remedial action.
The time display means may be in the form of a counter. The counter may be operable, under the action of the data processing means, to change format depending on the urgency of the situation. Hence, for example, upon the occurrence of a fault condition, the counter may flash in a particular colour, for example, white.
Thereafter, depending on the urgency of the situation, the displayed time may change colour, for example, to amber and then to red.
The system may include a discernible alarm means ' connected to the data processing means to be activated upon the occurrence of a particular incident, for example, when the counter changes colour. The discernible alarm means may comprise an audible alarm means and/or a visual alarm means.
The alarm means may be of a continuous or "nagging" type which requires a positive response by the operator. Further, the alarm means may comprise an annunciator to alert a supervisor in a remote location.
The system may include a data storage means which contains information relating to graphics of the graphic display means, the time indicating means as well as action taken by the operator upon the occurrence of the fault condition and how long the condition was allowed to continue before the required operating state of the plant was attained.
The data storage means may, additionally, contain information relating to detailed procedures to be followed by the operator in carrying out the appropriate action.
The invention extends also to a method of operating a plant where predetermined action is required upon the occurrence of a fault condition, the method including
graphically displaying a sequence of actions to be taken by an operator on the occurrence of a fault condition in the plant; and
indicating permissible time limits in which the action must be taken.
The method may include making available predetermined data to enable the sequence of actions to be displayed graphically. The data may be made available automatically or manually.
The method may include displaying the time in a predetermined format and causing the displayed time to be decremented.
The method may include displaying cascading or additive fault conditions or a decision tree to aid the operator in deciding upon appropriate remedial action or to prepare for possible future actions.
Further, the method may include, as critical time periods are approached, causing the displayed time to change format, for example, causing the displayed time to change colour.
Also, the method may include, upon the occurrence of a fault condition, activating an alarm means.
The invention is now described by way of example with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings.
In the drawings,
Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of an indicating system, in accordance with the invention;
Figure 2 shows a first example of a display of the system; and
Figure 3 shows a second example of a display of the system.
Referring to Figure 1 of the drawings, an indicating system, in accordance with the invention, is illustrated and is designated generally by the reference numeral 10. As indicated above, the system 10 is intended particularly for use in a nuclear power station environment and shall be described with reference to that application hereinafter.
The system 10 comprises a data processing means in the form of a computing device 12.
Conveniently, the computing device 12 is a personal computer (PC). A data inputting means 14 is connected to the computer 12. The data inputting means 14 can be in any one of a variety of formats. Thus, the data inputting means could be a manual inputting means such as a keyboard 16 of the computer. Access may be granted only after the insertion of a predetermined access code, to improve the security of the system 10.
Instead, or in addition, the data inputting means could be an automatic inputting means such as a surveillance input via a push-button panel, or a "permit-to-work" (PTW) input, both of which are input via remote terminals using a predetermined access code at all times. Still further the computer 12 could be connected to an emergency response facility of the nuclear power station. This latter input may be effected from a process computer of the nuclear power station only.
The system 10 includes a display means which, conveniently, is a screen display device 18 of the computer 12. The display device 18 displays thereon, in graphic form, action to be taken by an operator of the system 10 upon the occurrence of a particular fault condition, as will be described in greater detail below.
The system 10 also includes a time indicating means, illustrated schematically at 20 in Figures 2 and 3 of the drawings. The time indicating means 20 indicates the time available to the operator of the system 10 to take the necessary or relevant action.
The time indicating means 20 comprises a clock (not shown) controlled by the computer 12 and a time display means or counter 22 which is driven by the clock to be decremented as time passes so that the operator has a ready indication of the reducing time available in which to carry out the necessary action.
Where the display device 18 is a colour display unit, the counter 22, under control of the computer 12, can be caused to change colour depending on the urgency of the situation, as will be described below.
The system 10 also includes a discernible alarm means 24 connected to the computer 12. The alarm means 24 includes an audible alarm device 26, such as a siren or loudspeaker, as well as a visual alarm device 28 such as a flashing light. The alarm means 24 may be activated, for example, when the counter 22 changes colour.
The system 10 includes a data storage means 30, indicated schematically as a database in Figure 1 of the drawings. The data storage means 30 contains information relating to the display graphics to be displayed on the display device 18 as well as to the time indicating means 20. The data storage means 30 also retains the responses made and time to instigation of those responses.
In a development of the invention, the data storage means 30 also contains information relating to the operating procedures and/or instructions to be followed by the operator in carrying out the necessary action as displayed by the graphic display device 18.
Thus, for example, by pressing a predetermined key on the keyboard 16, the operator can access the operating procedures and instructions stored in the data storage means 30 which will be displayed on the display device 18. It will be appreciated that, instead, the operating procedures could be displayed on a separate screen.
These procedures may then be displayed immediately on the occurrence of the fault condition to improve the efficiency of the system 10.
The data stored in the data storage means 30 may also be used to calculate or re-calculate the allowable or tolerable risk periods prior to the reactor power having to be reduced to reach a safe state, for example, probabilistic risk assessment for use in future incidents.
Upon the occurrence of a fault condition in the nuclear power station, the operator will be apprised thereof by the computer 12 becoming operational.
Additionally, the alarm means 24 could be activated concurrently. Normally, the inputting of the fault condition into the ' computer 12 would occur automatically. Instead of automatic inputting of the fault condition, it will be appreciated that the fault condition could be entered into the computer 12 manually via the keyboard 16.
Once the fault condition has been recorded by the computer 12, the computer 12 causes the appropriate graphic display to be displayed on the display device 18. Simultaneously, the time indicating means 20 is also displayed on the display device 18. Initially, the maximum tolerable time period flashes in a first colour and the clock starts decrementing the time causing the counter 22 to be decremented. Initially, the time is decremented in hours only.
Should it be possible to recover or correct the fault in a predetermined time, once the fault is corrected, this would be entered by the operator via the keyboard 16 to clear the fault condition and to reset the system. Instead, the clearance of the fault condition may be entered into the computer 12 automatically via sensors of the plant. These sensor could, for example, reflect the position of a valve or a circuit breaker.
If it is not possible to clear the fault condition within the specified time period, the clock then continues to count down to a predetermined time before the so-called "drop-dead" time. At the predetermined time before the mandatory "drop-dead" time, an audible warning signal is given by the device 26 of the alarm means 24. Simultaneously, the colour of the display device 20 changes to another colour and the counter 22 changes to a lesser time interval, for example, a minute display.
At the "drop-dead" time, a further audible warning is given by the device 26 of the alarm means 24 and the colour of the time indicating means 20 changes to yet a further colour. The frequency at which the time indicating means 20 flashes increases. Further, a prohibited state above the present state is displayed on the display device 18. The prohibited state is one to which the plant must not normally be taken in present circumstances.
Once a safe operating state has been reached, an audible signal is given by the device 26 of the alarm means 24. The lowest prohibited state is now displayed on the display 18 and blinks constantly.
In all cases, the audible warning given by the device 26 of the alarm means 24 is of a nagging or continuous type which demands a coded response or acknowledgment by the operator and/or will automatically alert a supervisor by default.
As an example, a display 32 is shown in
Figures 2 and 3 where a motor driven pump of the plant or an associated feedwater regulating line goes inoperable. When this occurs data relating thereto is entered automatically into the computer 12 or, instead, the operator enters the appropriate data into the computer via the keyboard 16. After entering of the data, this causes the display 32 as shown in Figure 2 or Figure 3, as the case may be, to be displayed on the display device 18 of the computer 12. The time indicating means 20 is also displayed in the display 32.
As indicated, in this example, two times 22.1 and 22.2 are shown in the display 32. The time 22.1 flashes white and counts down at one hourly intervals. The time 22.2 is a display, also in white. The time 22.1 is the overall tolerable period of risk for this fault condition.
It is to be noted that, in the example given, the display 32 comprises eleven symbols 40 representing the eleven operating states of the nuclear power station. These symbols 40 represent the following states: - symbol 40.1 - normal operating power of the reactor;
symbol 40.2 - reduced operating power of the reactor;
symbol 40.3 - hot standby;
symbol 40.4 - hot shutdown;
symbol 40.5 - normal intermediate shutdown;
symbol 40.6 - normal intermediate shutdown with residual heat removal system in action;
symbol 40.7 - monophasic intermediate shutdown;
symbol 40.8 - normal cold shutdown;
symbol 40.9 - maintenance shutdown;
symbol 40.10 - refuelling shutdown;
symbol 40.11 - refuelling shutdown with fuel removal.
The time 22.2 is the irreducible period to take the nuclear reactor of the power station from the power state, as represented by symbol 40.1, to an intermediate state, as represented by symbol 40.6
The times 22.1 and 22.2 indicated give the operator an indication of the time available to him to correct the fault. In other words, in this example, the operator would have sixty two hours to correct the fault failing which the fallback procedure must be carried out.
In this case, the limiting conditions for operation (LCO) specify that the plant must be taken from its normal power state (40.1) to the normal intermediate shutdown state with residual heat removal system in action (40.6) in seventy two hours if no recovery is possible.
When eleven hours remain, the colour of the timer 22.1 changes to amber and the count down changes to five minute intervals until "drop dead" time as indicated by the time 22.2 is reached. The time 22.2 is the minimum allowable time where attainment of the failsafe state (40.6) must be achieved. Thereafter, the time displayed by the time indicating means 20 changes to indicate to the operator the time available to move from the state represented by the symbol 40.1 to the state represented by the symbol 40.3 (in this case one hour) which flashes red. The time indicating means 20 counts this time down in five minute intervals for sixty minutes to zero time where flashing ceases, the colour changes to white and a prohibited state appears at 34 on the display 32 and is coloured yellow.The prohibited state display 34 in any LCO is used to depict the operating state which must not be entered from any lower state or mode without predetermined corrective action having been completed.
At nine hours to move from the state represented by the symbol 40.4 to the state represented by the symbol 40.6, a further time display changes from amber to red and starts flashing whilst counting down at 0.5 hour intervals to the time at which the required state (40.6) must be attained. An audible signal is emitted via the device 26 of the alarm means 24 until completion is acknowledged. The prohibited state display 34 appears after the failsafe state (40.6) has been reached. It will be appreciated that, for lower mandatory fallback states, the displayed prohibited state 34 will be lowered accordingly.
Should it be confirmed, in the first instance, that recovery of the fault is not possible within the sixty two hour time period, it may be decided to commence the ten hour fallback at once. Then, by pressing the appropriate key on the keyboard 16, the display 32 as shown in Figure 2 or Figure 3 is immediately changed to the fallback display as described above.
At all stages, a hard copy record is made of the situation for later analysis.
Heretofore, as far as the applicant is aware, it has been necessary for operators to refer to manuals to ascertain what action needs to be taken in the event of a fault condition arising. Interpretative debate is often necessary to interpret the manuals until it is decided to declare an official fault condition resulting in time wastage which can be critical. Handwritten memoranda keep track of the elapsed time in LCO's and if more than one LCO is active, it can be extremely difficult to track each LCO independently and accurately especially with long running LCO's which straddle shift changes. This has led to delays and errors occurring, which, in the case of nuclear power stations, could have extremely serious consequences.
With the provision of the indicating system 10, in accordance with the invention, these problems are, to a large extent, obviated. The system 10 is further improved by having the information processed and displayed on a computer 12 where chances of human errors are reduced.
The system 10 can be made failsafe in the event of a failure of, for example, computer hardware or power, by instantaneously switching to a standby computer, an uninterruptable power supply and/or triggering a special limiting condition which defaults to the use of LCO hardcopy manuals which are stored nearby.
Claims (19)
1. An indicating system for use in a plant where predetermined action is required upon the occurrence of a fault condition, the indicating system including
a data processing means;
a data inputting means for inputting data into the data processing means;
a graphic display means connected to the data processing means for displaying, in graphic form, action to be taken by an operator upon the occurrence of a particular fault condition; and
a time indicating means connected to the data processing means for indicating the time available to the operator to take the appropriate action to bring the plant to a required state.
2. The system as claimed in Claim 1 in which the graphic display means, additionally, displays action to be taken in a narrative form.
3. The system as claimed in Claim 1 or Claim 2 in which the data processing means comprises a computer.
4. The system as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which the data inputting means includes a manual inputting means by means of which the operator enters data into the data processing means.
5. The system as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which the data inputting means includes an automatic inputting means whereby, upon the occurrence of the fault condition, a signal is input into the data processing means.
6. The system as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which the time indicating means comprises a clock and a time display means, the time display means being driven by the clock to be decremented as time passes so that the operator has an indication of the reducing time available in which to carry out the necessary remedial action.
7. The system as claimed in Claim 6 in which the time display means is in the form of a counter.
8. The system as claimed in Claim 7 in which the counter is operable, under the action of the data processing means, to change format depending on the urgency of the situation.
9. The system as claimed in any one of the preceding claims which includes a discernible alarm means connected to the data processing means to be activated upon the occurrence of a particular incident.
10. The system as claimed in Claim 9 in which the alarm means is of a continuous type which requires a positive response by the operator.
11. The system as claimed in any one of the preceding claims which includes a data storage means which contains information relating to graphics of the graphic display means, the time indicating means as well as action taken by the operator upon the occurrence of the fault condition.
12. The system as claimed in Claim 11 in which the data storage means, additionally, contains information relating to detailed procedures to be followed by the operator in carrying out the appropriate action.
13. A method of operating a plant where predetermined action is required upon the occurrence of a fault condition, the method including
graphically displaying a sequence of actions to be taken by an operator on the occurrence of a fault condition in the plant; and
indicating permissible time limits in which the action must be taken.
14. The method as claimed in Claim 13 which includes making available predetermined data to enable the sequence of actions to be displayed graphically.
15. The method as claimed in Claim 13 or Claim 14 which includes displaying the time in a predetermined format and causing the displayed time to be decremented.
16. The method as claimed in Claim 15 which includes, as critical time periods are approached, causing the displayed time to change format.
17. The method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims which includes, upon the occurrence of a fault condition, activating an alarm means.
18. A new indicating system for use in a plant where predetermined action is required upon the occurrence of a fault condition substantially as described and as illustrated herein.
19. A new method of operating a plant where predetermined action is required upon the occurrence of a fault condition substantially as described herein.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
ZA947893A ZA947893B (en) | 1993-09-05 | 1994-10-07 | An indicating system |
GB9420797A GB2294129A (en) | 1993-09-05 | 1994-10-14 | Fault monitoring system |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
ZA931602 | 1993-09-05 | ||
GB9420797A GB2294129A (en) | 1993-09-05 | 1994-10-14 | Fault monitoring system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB9420797D0 GB9420797D0 (en) | 1994-11-30 |
GB2294129A true GB2294129A (en) | 1996-04-17 |
Family
ID=26305812
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB9420797A Withdrawn GB2294129A (en) | 1993-09-05 | 1994-10-14 | Fault monitoring system |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
GB (1) | GB2294129A (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA947893B (en) |
Cited By (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2377070A (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2002-12-31 | Fisher Rosemount Systems Inc | Enhanced device alarms in a process control system |
US7250856B2 (en) | 2000-11-07 | 2007-07-31 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Integrated alarm display in a process control network |
US7657399B2 (en) | 2006-07-25 | 2010-02-02 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Methods and systems for detecting deviation of a process variable from expected values |
US7660701B2 (en) | 2004-06-12 | 2010-02-09 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | System and method for detecting an abnormal situation associated with a process gain of a control loop |
US7676287B2 (en) | 2004-03-03 | 2010-03-09 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Configuration system and method for abnormal situation prevention in a process plant |
US7702401B2 (en) | 2007-09-05 | 2010-04-20 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | System for preserving and displaying process control data associated with an abnormal situation |
US7827006B2 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2010-11-02 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Heat exchanger fouling detection |
US7853431B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2010-12-14 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | On-line monitoring and diagnostics of a process using multivariate statistical analysis |
US7912676B2 (en) | 2006-07-25 | 2011-03-22 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Method and system for detecting abnormal operation in a process plant |
US7957936B2 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2011-06-07 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Presentation system for abnormal situation prevention in a process plant |
US8005647B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2011-08-23 | Rosemount, Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring and performing corrective measures in a process plant using monitoring data with corrective measures data |
US8032340B2 (en) | 2007-01-04 | 2011-10-04 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Method and system for modeling a process variable in a process plant |
US8032341B2 (en) | 2007-01-04 | 2011-10-04 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Modeling a process using a composite model comprising a plurality of regression models |
US8044793B2 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2011-10-25 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Integrated device alerts in a process control system |
US8055479B2 (en) | 2007-10-10 | 2011-11-08 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Simplified algorithm for abnormal situation prevention in load following applications including plugged line diagnostics in a dynamic process |
US8073967B2 (en) | 2002-04-15 | 2011-12-06 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Web services-based communications for use with process control systems |
US8145358B2 (en) | 2006-07-25 | 2012-03-27 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Method and system for detecting abnormal operation of a level regulatory control loop |
US8301676B2 (en) | 2007-08-23 | 2012-10-30 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Field device with capability of calculating digital filter coefficients |
US8417595B2 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2013-04-09 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Economic calculations in a process control system |
EP2653942A1 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2013-10-23 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Operation management support device of power plant |
US8606544B2 (en) | 2006-07-25 | 2013-12-10 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Methods and systems for detecting deviation of a process variable from expected values |
US8762106B2 (en) | 2006-09-28 | 2014-06-24 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Abnormal situation prevention in a heat exchanger |
US9201420B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2015-12-01 | Rosemount, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing a function in a process plant using monitoring data with criticality evaluation data |
US9927788B2 (en) | 2011-05-19 | 2018-03-27 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Software lockout coordination between a process control system and an asset management system |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0099681A1 (en) * | 1982-07-01 | 1984-02-01 | Westinghouse Electric Corporation | Method and apparatus for one-line monitoring of the operation of a complex non-linear process control system |
US4853175A (en) * | 1988-03-10 | 1989-08-01 | The Babcock & Wilcox Company | Power plant interactive display |
EP0411869A2 (en) * | 1989-08-03 | 1991-02-06 | Westinghouse Electric Corporation | Expert advice display processing system |
-
1994
- 1994-10-07 ZA ZA947893A patent/ZA947893B/en unknown
- 1994-10-14 GB GB9420797A patent/GB2294129A/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0099681A1 (en) * | 1982-07-01 | 1984-02-01 | Westinghouse Electric Corporation | Method and apparatus for one-line monitoring of the operation of a complex non-linear process control system |
US4853175A (en) * | 1988-03-10 | 1989-08-01 | The Babcock & Wilcox Company | Power plant interactive display |
EP0411869A2 (en) * | 1989-08-03 | 1991-02-06 | Westinghouse Electric Corporation | Expert advice display processing system |
Cited By (37)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7113085B2 (en) | 2000-11-07 | 2006-09-26 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Enhanced device alarms in a process control system |
US7250856B2 (en) | 2000-11-07 | 2007-07-31 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Integrated alarm display in a process control network |
US7957936B2 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2011-06-07 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Presentation system for abnormal situation prevention in a process plant |
US8417595B2 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2013-04-09 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Economic calculations in a process control system |
US8620779B2 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2013-12-31 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Economic calculations in a process control system |
US8044793B2 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2011-10-25 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Integrated device alerts in a process control system |
GB2377070B (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2004-12-15 | Fisher Rosemount Systems Inc | Enhanced device alarms in a process control system |
GB2377070A (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2002-12-31 | Fisher Rosemount Systems Inc | Enhanced device alarms in a process control system |
US8073967B2 (en) | 2002-04-15 | 2011-12-06 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Web services-based communications for use with process control systems |
US9760651B2 (en) | 2002-04-15 | 2017-09-12 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Web services-based communications for use with process control systems |
US9094470B2 (en) | 2002-04-15 | 2015-07-28 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Web services-based communications for use with process control systems |
US7676287B2 (en) | 2004-03-03 | 2010-03-09 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Configuration system and method for abnormal situation prevention in a process plant |
US7660701B2 (en) | 2004-06-12 | 2010-02-09 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | System and method for detecting an abnormal situation associated with a process gain of a control loop |
US9201420B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2015-12-01 | Rosemount, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing a function in a process plant using monitoring data with criticality evaluation data |
US8005647B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2011-08-23 | Rosemount, Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring and performing corrective measures in a process plant using monitoring data with corrective measures data |
US7657399B2 (en) | 2006-07-25 | 2010-02-02 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Methods and systems for detecting deviation of a process variable from expected values |
US7912676B2 (en) | 2006-07-25 | 2011-03-22 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Method and system for detecting abnormal operation in a process plant |
US8145358B2 (en) | 2006-07-25 | 2012-03-27 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Method and system for detecting abnormal operation of a level regulatory control loop |
US8606544B2 (en) | 2006-07-25 | 2013-12-10 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Methods and systems for detecting deviation of a process variable from expected values |
US8762106B2 (en) | 2006-09-28 | 2014-06-24 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Abnormal situation prevention in a heat exchanger |
US7966149B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-06-21 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Multivariate detection of transient regions in a process control system |
US7853431B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2010-12-14 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | On-line monitoring and diagnostics of a process using multivariate statistical analysis |
US7853339B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2010-12-14 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Statistical signatures used with multivariate analysis for steady-state detection in a process |
US8014880B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-09-06 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | On-line multivariate analysis in a distributed process control system |
US7917240B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-03-29 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Univariate method for monitoring and analysis of multivariate data |
US7937164B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2011-05-03 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Multivariate detection of abnormal conditions in a process plant |
US8489360B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2013-07-16 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Multivariate monitoring and diagnostics of process variable data |
US8032340B2 (en) | 2007-01-04 | 2011-10-04 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Method and system for modeling a process variable in a process plant |
US8032341B2 (en) | 2007-01-04 | 2011-10-04 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Modeling a process using a composite model comprising a plurality of regression models |
US7827006B2 (en) | 2007-01-31 | 2010-11-02 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Heat exchanger fouling detection |
US8301676B2 (en) | 2007-08-23 | 2012-10-30 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Field device with capability of calculating digital filter coefficients |
US7702401B2 (en) | 2007-09-05 | 2010-04-20 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | System for preserving and displaying process control data associated with an abnormal situation |
US8055479B2 (en) | 2007-10-10 | 2011-11-08 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Simplified algorithm for abnormal situation prevention in load following applications including plugged line diagnostics in a dynamic process |
EP2653942A1 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2013-10-23 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Operation management support device of power plant |
EP2653942A4 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2014-05-21 | Toshiba Kk | Operation management support device of power plant |
US9070266B2 (en) | 2010-12-15 | 2015-06-30 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Operation management support apparatus for power plant |
US9927788B2 (en) | 2011-05-19 | 2018-03-27 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Software lockout coordination between a process control system and an asset management system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ZA947893B (en) | 1995-05-24 |
GB9420797D0 (en) | 1994-11-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
GB2294129A (en) | Fault monitoring system | |
KR950010956B1 (en) | On line interactive execution of process operating procedures | |
US4853175A (en) | Power plant interactive display | |
US6532550B1 (en) | Process protection system | |
GB2238650A (en) | Plant monitor system | |
KR20020094032A (en) | Alarm management system | |
US5812622A (en) | Operator work station for nuclear power plants | |
US11079826B2 (en) | Control apparatus, control method, and program | |
GB1592907A (en) | Industrial process control system | |
JPS61206099A (en) | Alarm information processing for display unit | |
JP2002082747A (en) | Supervisory control device | |
JPH0481202B2 (en) | ||
Shaw | DCS-based alarms: Integrating traditional functions into modern technology | |
JPS59127199A (en) | Alarm display | |
JP2668046B2 (en) | Alarm display device | |
Roth-Seefrid et al. | Advanced information systems to enhance operational safety | |
JPS6326800Y2 (en) | ||
KR20160087596A (en) | System for automatic notification of nuclear power plant event and Method for automatically notifying nuclear power plant event using thereof | |
Takizawa et al. | A post trip operational guidance system for BWR plants | |
JPH05260605A (en) | Monitoring device with malfunction alarm display | |
Jones | Standard Practices for Design of MTR and ETR Safety Circuits | |
JPS63317802A (en) | Building control system | |
JPS6036994A (en) | Monitor device for operation of plant | |
JPS6210837Y2 (en) | ||
Broadhead et al. | Management of the station alarm systems |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WAP | Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1) |