GB2250590A - Determination of urea - Google Patents

Determination of urea Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2250590A
GB2250590A GB9125040A GB9125040A GB2250590A GB 2250590 A GB2250590 A GB 2250590A GB 9125040 A GB9125040 A GB 9125040A GB 9125040 A GB9125040 A GB 9125040A GB 2250590 A GB2250590 A GB 2250590A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
indicator
urea
alkali
buffer
milk
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
GB9125040A
Other versions
GB9125040D0 (en
Inventor
Sinikka Rajamaeki
Anne-Maria Riihimaeki
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Valio Oy
Original Assignee
Valio Meijerien Keskusosuusliiki
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Valio Meijerien Keskusosuusliiki filed Critical Valio Meijerien Keskusosuusliiki
Publication of GB9125040D0 publication Critical patent/GB9125040D0/en
Publication of GB2250590A publication Critical patent/GB2250590A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/02Food
    • G01N33/04Dairy products
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/58Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving urea or urease

Abstract

Determination of the concentration of urea in a sample, especially milk, is by means of urease, alkali and an indicator. The sample is reacted with urease and alkali in a closed space in which the indicator system is placed such that it is not in contact with the other reagents.

Description

A process and a test means for the determination of urea The invention relates to a process and a test means for the determination of urea in a sample by means of urease, alkali and an indicator. The process is especially suitable for rapid determination of the concentration of urea in milk.
The metabolism of a ruminant, such as a cow, is essentially affected by the functions of the rumen and the forestomachs. The energy and protein supply of rumen microorganisms affects the feed utilization.
If the supplies of energy and proteins are not balanced, the utilization of feed proteins is deteriorated. This is manifested e.g. in increased urea levels in blood after feeding.
Several researches have shown that the amount of urea in milk varies with the level of urea in blood (e.g. Oltner & Wiktorsson 1983, Livestock Prod.
Sci. 10:457, Refsdal 1983, Acta Vet. Scand. 24:518).
Variation in the level of urea in blood as well as in milk is largely due to changes in feeding (e.g.
Ref sal and Oltner & Wiktorsson, as above). For this reason, the concentration of urea in milk has been used as an indicator in the assessment of successful feeding. In feeding according to standard requirements, a urea concentration range of 20 to 30 mg of urea in 100 ml of milk has been observed (Setälä et al. 1987, Karjatalous 10:52 and 11:54).
Urea can be determined by a process in which it is degraded by urease into ammonium carbonate, and the ammonium ions are reacted with phenol and hypochlorite to achieve a blue compound which can be determined spectrophotometrically (Fawcett & Scott 1960, J. Clin. Path. 13:156). The process has also been applied to milk (e.g. Rajamki & Rauramaa 1984, Finnish Chemical Letters 2:47-48).
To get the maximum benefit from a urea determination, the determination should be performed as a rapid "cow-side" determination in the cowhouse.
The above-mentioned process is unsuitable for this purpose, because it has to be performed in a laboratory.
Urea can also be determined by reacting a sample containing urea with urease and observing the change in pH caused by the hydrolysis product by means of a suitable indicator. This process is utilized in the determination of the concentration of urea e.g. in blood, plasma and urine (GB Patent Specification 922 665). A strip test of this type for milk is disclosed in Tierärtzl. Prax. 1985, 13:559.
A common drawback of strip tests is that they are able to analyze only an extremely small amount of sample, and so the obtained result often remains unreliable. The result varies on account of the small amount of sample, but it is also affected by the way the performer of the test pipettes the sample on the strip or dips the strip into the solution to be analyzed. The problem is further aggravated by the fact that when the test strip is dipped into milk, milk as such disturbs accurate reading of the color change in the strip. To eliminate the disturbing influence of milk, strips have been developed in which a reaction zone to be brought into contact with milk is positioned beside an indicator zone (FI Patent Application 891920). The reaction zone contains urease, alkali, glucose and tenside.The strip is kept in a tube closed at one end only until ammonia liberated from the reaction zone has diffused into the indicator zone, which takes place slowly.
The strips are preferably read only after two hours.
A determination process has now been discovered which is more reliable-than strips to be immersed in milk and more rapid than a strip in which the indicator zone is positioned beside the reaction zone to be immersed in milk and which is kept in a tube closed at one end during the reaction time.
The process and the test means according to the invention are characterized by what is disclosed in the claims. In the process, the sample is reacted with urease and alkali and at least the reaction with the alkali is carried out in a closed space in which the indicator system is placed in such a way that it is not in contact with the other reagents. The sample can first be reacted with urease and then with alkali, and at least the last-mentioned reaction is carried out in the above-mentioned closed space. If the sample, instead, is reacted with urease and alkali simultaneously, the reaction is entirely carried out in a closed space. The test means comprises a closed space in which at least the reaction with alkali is carried out and in which the indicator system is placed in such a way that it is not in contact with the other reagents.
The reaction reagents comprise urease and alkali. Urease degrades urea contained in the sample to be analyzed into ammonium salts, and the alkali liberates ammonia from the salts. Ammonia is absorbed into the indicator system and it causes a color change in the pH indicator within a predetermined period of time.
The indicator system comprises one or more pH indicators. The indicator is generally dissolved in a suitable buffer. It is also possible to use several buffer/indicator mixtures which change color at dif ferent pH values. The determination of the concentration of urea in milk is preferably carried out as a so-called double test. The buffer/indicator mixtures of the double test are preferably such that a urea concentration below 20 mg/100 ml does not yet cause a color change in either one of the buffer/indicator mixtures, whereas one of the mixtures reacts at a concentration between 20 and 30 mg/100 ml and both mixtures react when the urea concentration is greater than 30 mg/100 ml. Preferably, the buffer/indicator mixtures both contain a phosphate buffer, though in different concentrations.The phosphate buffers preferably contain sodium salt of phenol red and sodium salt of bromtymol blue at a weight ratio of 1:1, for instance One phosphate buffer is preferably 0.00025M and the other 0.00230M sodium dihydrogenphosphate buffer.
The indicator system may be in liquid or solid form. An indicator system in liquid form can be separated from the other reagents by means of a gaspermeable membrane. The membrane may be e.g. of Teflon tube tape or Teflon filter membrane with a porosity of 0.5 pm. The indicator system is preferably solidified by using alginate and/or by absorbing in filter paper and drying.
The indicator system is preferably placed in the cover of a closable container. The cover may comprise two parts, in which case two different buffer/indicator mixtures are placed in it. Urease, sample and alkali are introduced to the bottom of the container, and the cover is closed tightly. After a predetermined period of time, the colours of the indicator system are read. The process according to the invention is especially suitable for the determination of the concentration of urea in milk but it can also be applied to other samples, such as urine.
The invention will be illustrated by means of the following non-restrictive examples.
Example 1 Buffer/indicator mixture I containing 25 mg of sodium salt of phenol red, 25 mg of sodium salt of bromtymol blue and 3 g of alginate in 100 ml of 0.00025M sodium dihydrogenphosphate is absorbed in filter paper. Buffer/indicator mixture II otherwise similar to the mixture I except that the concentration of sodium dihydrogenphosphate is 0.00230M is absorbed in another filter paper. The papers are dried at 90"C for 60 min and then placed in a twopart cover of a tightly closable 10 ml container in such a way that a partition wall of the cover separates the papers from each other. Urease (about 60 to 250 U) is introduced to the bottom of the container in liquid or solid form. 1 ml of milk is added to the container, and 0.5 to 1 ml of 0.1M NaOH is added after 2.5 minutes, and the cover is closed.
After 2.5 minutes, the colours of the buffer/ indicator mixtures I and II formed in the cover of the test container are read. The results are compared with a color chart and interpreted as follows: Color combination of Urea concentration of the cover of the test sample, mg/100 ml container yellow/yellow < 20 orange-red/yellow 20 to 30 orange-red/orange-red > 30 Example 2 Urea concentrations were determined from 118 milk samples as described in Example 1 and by a spectrophotometric reference method (Fawcett & Scott 1960, J. Clin. Path. 13:156). The results are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Distribution of milk samples (number of samples) into different urea con centration classes Urea mg/100 ml < 20 20-30 > 30 < 20 17 3 20 to 30 2 34 3 > 30 - 8 51 Reference process Total/samples 19 45 54 118 As compared with the reference process, 8604% of the samples fell into the right class when determined by the process according to the invention.
Table 2 shows the corresponding sample distribution when the internal deviation of the reference process (+ 5t) is taken into account. The proportion of samples fallen into the right class is then 94.1t.
Table 2. Distribution of milk samples (number of samples) into different urea con centration classes Urea mg/100 ml < 20 20-30 > 30 < 20 18 1 20 to 30 1 40 1 > 30 - 4 53 Reference process Total/samples 19 45 54 118 Example 3 The concentration of urea in 64 milk samples was determined by using AzostixR test strips intended for farm use ( Tierärtzl. Prax. 1985, 13:559), by the above-mentioned reference process and by the process according to the invention. The results are shown in Tables 3 and 4.
Table 3. Distribution of milk samples (number of samples) into different urea con centration classes by the test strip Urea mg/100 ml < 20 20-30 > 30 < 20 7 20 to 30 6 21 5 > 30 - 1 24 Reference process Total/samples 13 22 29 64 When using the test strip, 82.8% of the samples (53/64) fell into the right class.
Table 4. Distribution of milk samples (number of samples) into different urea con centration classes by the process of the invention Urea mg/l00 ml < 20 20-30 > 30 < 20 13 2 20 to 30 - 17 2 > 30 - 3 27 Reference process Total/samples 13 22 29 64 When using the process of the invention, 89.1t of the samples (57/64) fell into the right class.
Example 4 0.5 ml of the buffer/indicator mixture I mentioned in Example 1 was introduced into a 4 ml container in liquid form, that is, the mixture did not contain alginate. The mouth opening of the container was covered with a Teflon membrane having a porosity of 0.5 pm. To another similar container, 0.2 ml of milk and about 15 U of urease were added. After 2.5 minutes, 200 pl of 0.lM NaOH was added to it. The container with the buffer/indicator mixture and the container with the sample and the other reagents were combined with their mouth openings against each other with tape into a fully closed space in which the gas permeable membrane separated the buffer/indicator mixture from the other reagents. The containers so combined were shaken for one minute, whereafter the color of the indicator mixture was read. A duplicate determination was made by using the liquid-form buffer/indicator mixture II mentioned in Example 1.
The results were interpreted as in Example 1. The concentration of urea in 24 milk samples was determined. 87.5% of the samples fell into the right class. The results are shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Distribution of milk samples (number of samples) into different urea con centration classes Urea mg/100 ml < 20 20-30 > 30 < 20 6 20 to 30 1 8 1 > 30 - 1 7 Reference process Total/samples 7 9 8 24

Claims (13)

Claims
1. A process for determining the concentration of urea in a sample by means of urease, alkali and an indicator, characterised in that at least the reaction with the alkali is carried out in a closed space in which the indicator system is placed in such a way that it is not in contact with the other reagents.
2. A process according to claim 1, characterised in that at least the reaction with the alkali is carried out in a closed container, the indicator system being placed in the cover of the container.
3. A process according to claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the determination is carried out as a double test by using an indicator system comprising two buffer/indicator mixtures changing color at different pH values.
40 A process according to claim 3, characterised in that one buffer/indicator mixture changes color at a urea concentration of at least 20 mg/100 ml and the other buffer/indicator mixture changes color at a urea concentration greater than 30 mg/100 ml.
5. A process according to claim 4, characterised in that the buffer/indicator mixtures contain a phosphate buffer of two different concentrations.
6. A process according to claim 5, characterised in that the phosphate buffers contain the sodium salt of phenol red and the sodium salt of bromthymol blue at a weight ratio of about 1:1.
7. A process according to any of claims 1 to 6, characterised in that the sample is milk.
8. A process for determining the concentration of urea in milk carried out substantially as hereinbefore described or exemplified.
9. A test means for the determination of urea by means of urease, alkali and an indicator, characterised in that it comprises a closed space in which at least the reaction with the alkali is carried out and in which the indicator system is placed in such a way that it is not in contact with the other reagents.
10. A test means according to claim 9, characterised in that the indicator system is in solid form.
11. A test means according to claim 9 or 10, characterised in that it comprises a closable container, the indicator system being placed in the cover of the container and the other reagents on its bottom.
12. A test means according to any of claims 9 to 11, characterised in that it comprises the reagents mentioned in claim 3, 4, 5 or 6 required for a double test.
13. A test means for the determination of urea in milk by means of urease, alkali and an indicator, substantially as hereinbefore described or exemplified.
GB9125040A 1990-12-03 1991-11-26 Determination of urea Withdrawn GB2250590A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI905949A FI88310C (en) 1990-12-03 1990-12-03 FOERFARANDE OCH MEDEL FOER BESTAEMNING AV UREA

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB9125040D0 GB9125040D0 (en) 1992-01-22
GB2250590A true GB2250590A (en) 1992-06-10

Family

ID=8531506

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB9125040A Withdrawn GB2250590A (en) 1990-12-03 1991-11-26 Determination of urea

Country Status (7)

Country Link
DK (1) DK195091A (en)
EE (1) EE02945B1 (en)
FI (1) FI88310C (en)
GB (1) GB2250590A (en)
IE (1) IE913920A1 (en)
NO (1) NO302387B1 (en)
SE (1) SE512818C2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2731276A1 (en) * 1995-03-03 1996-09-06 D Aquitaine Comp Chimique Test strip for urea determn. in milk
EP1754973A2 (en) * 2005-07-26 2007-02-21 Raudszus Electronic GmbH Method and device for sampling and directly analysing collected flowable material, in particular milk deliveries
CN102539421A (en) * 2010-12-21 2012-07-04 内蒙古蒙牛乳业(集团)股份有限公司 Method for qualitatively detecting urea in milk

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2711634A1 (en) * 1977-03-17 1978-09-21 Riedel De Haen Ag Test kit for urea determn. esp. in serum - comprising spaced reaction and indicator zones in a container and used e.g. to diagnose renal insufficiency
EP0339331A2 (en) * 1988-04-29 1989-11-02 ARZNEIMITTELWERK DRESDEN GmbH Test strip for the determination of urea, and its use

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2711634A1 (en) * 1977-03-17 1978-09-21 Riedel De Haen Ag Test kit for urea determn. esp. in serum - comprising spaced reaction and indicator zones in a container and used e.g. to diagnose renal insufficiency
EP0339331A2 (en) * 1988-04-29 1989-11-02 ARZNEIMITTELWERK DRESDEN GmbH Test strip for the determination of urea, and its use

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2731276A1 (en) * 1995-03-03 1996-09-06 D Aquitaine Comp Chimique Test strip for urea determn. in milk
EP1754973A2 (en) * 2005-07-26 2007-02-21 Raudszus Electronic GmbH Method and device for sampling and directly analysing collected flowable material, in particular milk deliveries
EP1754973A3 (en) * 2005-07-26 2008-01-23 Raudszus Electronic GmbH Method and device for sampling and directly analysing collected flowable material, in particular milk deliveries
CN102539421A (en) * 2010-12-21 2012-07-04 内蒙古蒙牛乳业(集团)股份有限公司 Method for qualitatively detecting urea in milk

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO914711L (en) 1992-06-04
SE512818C2 (en) 2000-05-22
SE9103370D0 (en) 1991-11-14
DK195091A (en) 1992-06-04
NO302387B1 (en) 1998-02-23
SE9103370L (en) 1992-06-04
NO914711D0 (en) 1991-11-29
EE02945B1 (en) 1996-10-15
GB9125040D0 (en) 1992-01-22
FI905949A0 (en) 1990-12-03
FI88310B (en) 1993-01-15
DK195091D0 (en) 1991-12-02
IE913920A1 (en) 1992-06-03
FI88310C (en) 1993-04-26
FI905949A (en) 1992-06-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3979262A (en) Compositions and methods for the determination of oxidizing agents
Kusche et al. Comparison of the14C-putrescine assay with the NADH test for the determination of diamine oxidase: description of a standard procedure with a high precision and an improved accuracy
KR920010312B1 (en) Measurement of Potassium Ion in Fluid
CN101319999B (en) Novel nessler&#39;s reagent and method for rapidly measuring soil ammonium nitrogen
EP0027236B1 (en) Ascorbate resistant composition, test device and method for detecting a component in a liquid test sample
EP0007345A1 (en) Process for preparing biological compositions for use as a reference control in diagnostic analysis
JPH04120464A (en) Method of determining calcium and magnesium
EP0215170B1 (en) Single color reading method for determining fructosamine
US3816262A (en) Reagent formulations for assaying biological specimens amd methods of preparing and using same
CN107505470A (en) Stable creatinine detection reagent box and its application method
CA1260371A (en) Free flowing granular indicator material for peroxidase-like activity
US3663175A (en) Method of determining hemoglobin in blood
US3087794A (en) Chemical test for differentiating leucocytes from erythrocytes
US4141856A (en) Reference material for establishing anion concentrations in analytical chemistry tests
GB2250590A (en) Determination of urea
US3536448A (en) Uric acid detection
US4818703A (en) Stabilized alkaline picrate reagent for jaffe creatinine determination
US3778384A (en) Diagnostic composition for the quantitative determination of glucose
EP0124285A2 (en) Method and device for detecting microorganisms
Asp Improved method for the assay of phenylglycosidase activity with a 4-aminoantipyrine reagent
US4030885A (en) Bilirubin determination
Seiter et al. Automated fluorometric micromethod for blood glucose
SU1337410A1 (en) Method of determining toxicity of nutrient medium used for growing cultures of animal cells
CN115201134B (en) Creatinine detection kit resistant to piceatannol interference and application thereof
FI98864B (en) Method and test arrangement for determination of acetone

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WAP Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1)