GB2227754A

GB2227754A - Gas flow restrictor for glass coating apparatus

Info

Publication number: GB2227754A
Application number: GB8824103A
Authority: GB
Inventors: David Martlew; Malcolm James Rigby
Original assignee: Pilkington PLC
Current assignee: Pilkington Group Ltd
Priority date: 1988-10-14
Filing date: 1988-10-14
Publication date: 1990-08-08
Also published as: ES2039873T3; JP2534368B2; CA2000267A1; US4995340A; EP0369602A1; DE68904532D1; DE68904532T2; JPH02167842A; GB8824103D0; ATE84771T1; EP0369602B1

Abstract

An apparatus for coating flat glass by directing a reactant gas over the glass surface incorporates a gas flow restrictor 2 which comprises a chamber 24 which is adapted to receive a supply of reactant gas and is adapted to output a flow of the reactant gas over the flat glass being coated. A series of at least two restrictions 27, 64, 38 is provided in the gas flow restrictor, each restriction 27, 64, 38 comprising a plate member 28, 66, 40 extending across the chamber 24 and having a plurality of apertures 36, 68, 52 therethrough.

Description

. 1 GAS FLOW RESMiCTCR FOR GLASS COA-:NG-APPARA tUS" The present invention

relates to a gas flow restrictor for an apparatus for coating flat glass by directing a reactant gas against the glass surface.

It is well known that coatings with desirable properties for architectural uses can be produced using gaseous reactants which decompose on the hot glass surface. Thus silicon coatings, useful as solar control coatings, have been produced by pyrolysing a silane- containing gas on a hot glass surface, and there have been many proposals to produce other solar control and low emissivity (high infra red reflection) coatings from other appropriate gaseous reactants. Unfortunately, it has proved difficult in commercial practice to achieve sufficiently uniform coatings of the required thickness.

UK Patent Specification No. 1507996 discloses an apparatus for coating flat glass in which a gas distributor extends acrosss the width of the glass surface to be coated. The gas distributor includes means for releasing gas from a gas supply duct to a guide channel uniformly across the width of the channel, the channel in use eXtending across the width of the glass to be coated. The guide. channel is shaped to cause the gas to flow substantially parallel to the glass surface to be coated under laminar flow conditions. The releasing means comprises a gas flow restrictor which is constituted by an array of channels of small crosssectional area between the supply duct and the guide channel. The array of channels is formed by a waffle plate which comprises a plurality of crimped metal strips arranged "out-of-phase", as illustrated in Figure 3 of the specification.

International Patent Specification No. WO 85/01522 discloses an apparatus for coating a ribbon of moving glass in which a coating gas passes through a box housing a series of alternating converging and diverging passageways. The gas exits from the box onto the glass in a uniform laminar flow of constant velocity across the width of the glass.

Whilst both of these prior proposals were stated to achieve uniform coatings on the glass substrate, nevertheless the Applicants have found that these proposals in practice encounter technical problems which can reduce the uniformity of the flow of gas over the glass and hence the uniformity of the coatings. In particular, the waffle plates of UK Patent Specification No. 1507996 are prone to blockage resulting from contaminants in the system. Also, in some applications the gaseous reactants must pass through the waffle plate at high temperatures, such as 300 - 400% and at such temperatures the metal strips are liable to distort or slip out of position. These phenomena can reduce the uniformity of the gas flow. In the apparatus of International Patent Specification No. W085/01522, a plurality of wall members define the converging and diverging passageways. These wall members each have one end which is fixed to an outer wall of the apparatus and a free end which is spaced a small distance from an opposing outer wall and defines a narrow slot therebetween. At high temperatures, the wall members can distort thereby varying the size of the narrow slot. This can affect the uniformity of the gas flow. In addition, the apparatus can be difficult to fabricate to the required standards of accuracy.

The present invention aims to overcome the disadvantages of the prior proposals described above.

Accordingly, the present invention provides a gas flow restrictor for an apparatus for coating flat glass by directing a reactant gas over the glass surface, the gas flow restrictor comprising a chamber which is adapted to receive a supply of reactant gas and is adapted to output a flow of the reactant gas over the flat glass being coated, and a series of at least two restrictions, each restriction comprising a plate member extending across the chamber and having a plurality of apertures therethrough.

The apertures of each plate member may be uniformly distributed.

Advantageously, the apertures of adjacent plate members are out of line with one another.

Preferably, the apertures in each plate member are disposed in a row.

The apertures may be circular holes. The diameter of the holes may be one half of the spacing between the centres of adjacent holes. Preferably, the holes have a diameter of from 2 mm to 10 mm. Optionally the distance between the centres of the holes is not more than three times the diameter of the holes. In one particularly preferred arrangement, the holes are 5 mm in diameter and are spaced 10 mm apart.

The shape, dimensions and relative positions of the apertures may vary for different plate members.

In one preferred arrangement, a first plate member is adjacent to an inlet for the,-esLrictor and a secona plate member is adjacent to an outlet for the restrictor.

The gde, restrictor may furth.r include a gas flow deflector.3t the out't. The jas flow deflector may comprise an deflector member which is disposed adjacent the apertures of the second plate member.

A third plate member may additionally be provided between the first and second plate members.

An embodiment of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:Figure 1 is a vertical sectional view through a gas flow restrictor in accordance with the present invention; and Figure 2 is a plan view of part of an elongate plate member of the gas flow restrictor of Figure 1.

Referring to Figure 1, a gas flow restrictor, designated generally as 2, is mounted over a vertical channel 4 defined between two blocks 6, 8 of graphite which are suspended across a ribbon of glass (not shown) moving from left to right. The vertical channel 4 extends transversely over the ribbon of glass being coated. The gas flow restrictor 2 constitutes part of a gas distributor which may be of a similar arrangement to that illustrated in UK Patent Specification No. 1507996, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. An outlet 10 of the gas flow restrictor 2 is aligned with the vertical channel 4. An inlet 12 of the gas flow restrictor 2 is, in the illustrated embodiment, connected to a fantail distributor 14. The fantail distributor 14 has a front (or upstream with reference to the direction of glass movement) wall 16 and a back (or downstream, with reference to the direction of glass movement) wall 18, each being in the shape of an inverted fan. The front and back walls 16, 18 converge towards one another as the width of the fantail increases in a downwards direction.

The gas flow restrictor 2 comprises pairs of opposed elongate walls 20, 22 and 21, 23 which define an elongate chamber 24. The elongate walls 20, 22 and 21, 23 extend transversely across the ribbon of glass being coated, walls 20 and 21 being upstream walls and walls 21 and 23 being downstream walls. Opposed end walls 26 are provided at each end of the elongate chamber 24, each end wall 26 being 0 disposed parallel with the direction of movement of the ribbon of glass.

At the inlet 12 of the gas flow restrictor 2, is disposed an inlet restriction 27 comprising an inlet elongate plate member 28 which extends across the chamber 24. The inlet plate member 28 is sealingly fixed between opposing pairs of horizontal plates 30, 32, each pair of plates 30, 32 being attached e.g. by welding, to a respective elongate wall 20, 22 and to the fantail distributor 14. The plates of each pair 30, 32 are tightly connected together by threaded connectors 34. Gaskets (not shown) are disposed between each pair of plates 30, 32 and the inlet plate member 28.

Figure 2 shows the inlet plate member 28 in greater detail. A row of apertures 36 which extends along the length of the inlet plate member 28 is provided through the plate member 28, the apertures 36 connecting the inlet 12 with the remainder of the chamber 24. The apertures 36 are circular holes and typically the diameter of each hole 36 is one half of the spacing between adjacent holes 36. The holes preferably have a diameter of from 2 mm to 10 mm. The distance between the centres of the holes preferably is not more than three times the diameter of the holes. In one particularly preferred embodiment, the holes 36 have a diameter of 5 mm and have centres spaced 10 mm apart. The row of holes 36 is disposed on an upstream side of the ?longate chamDer 24 i.e. the row of holes 36 is nearer Lo the upstream wall 20 than to the downstream wall 22 of the chamber 24.

Adjacent."-he outlet 10 of the gas flow restrictor 2 is dispo,,,ed an outlet restriction 38. The outlet re,triction 38 is of substantially the same construction as the inlet restriction 27 in that it comprises an outlet elongate plate member 40 which is sealingly fixed between two opposing pairs of plates 42, 44, the upper plate of each of said pairs of plates 42, 44 being connected e.g. by welding to a respective elongate wall 21, 23. The plates 42, 44 are separated from the outlet plate member 40 by gaskets (not shown). The plates 42, 44 are tightly connected together by threaded connectors 46 which also firmly attach the plates 42, 44, and thereby the- gas flow restrictor 2, to a plate 48 which is fixed to the tops of the graphite blocks 6, 8. The outlet plate member 40 is provided with a row of holes 52 which is the same as that of inlet plate member 28, the row of holes 52 being disposed on the upstream side of the elongate chamber 24.

A gas flow deflector 54 is mounted at the outlet 10 of the gas flow restrictor 2 below the outlet plate member 40. The gas flow deflector 54 comprises an elongate L-shaped member 56 which is integral with the lower of said pair of plates 42 and is disposed adjacent the holes 52. The free arm 58 of the L-shaped member 56 extends upwardly towards the outlet plate member 40 to define therebetween a gap 60 through which reactant gas from the holes 52 must pass after having been deflected by the horizontal arm 62 of the L-shaped member 56.

The purpose of the gas flow deflector 54 is to remove certain localised increases in gas flow which may occur. Thus there is a tendency for the gas flow to be more intense in the immediate vicinity of each of the holes 52 in the outlet plate member 40 on the downstream side of the plate member 40. The presence of the gas flow deflector 54 evens out these localised increased intensities of flow. In some instances it may be possible to omit the gas flow deflector 54 from the gas flow restrictor of the invention.

An intermediate restriction 64 is disposed between the inlet and outlet restrictions 27, 38. The intermediate restriction 64 has the same construction as the inlet restriction 27 and comprises an intermediate elongate plate member 66 with a row of holes 68. The intermediate plate member 66 is sealingly fixed between opposing pairs of horizontal plates 70, 72 which are attached e.g. by welding to the elongate walls 20, 21 and 22, 23 respectively. Gaskets (not shown) are disposed bktween th r.lates 70, 72 and the intcrffleuliate plate member 66 and the flanges 70, 72 are tightly connected together by threaded connectors 74. The row of holes 68 of the intermediate plate member 66 is, in contrast to the inlet and outlet plate members 28, 40, disposed on a downstream side of the elongate chamber 24 i.e. the row of holes 68 is nearer to the downstream walls 22, 23 than to the upstream walls 20, 21 of the chamber 24. This arrangement results in the row of holes of adjacent elongate plate members being out of line with each other.

The operation of the gas flow restrictor 2 will now be described.

The gas flow restrictor 2 forms part of a coating apparatus which is suspended across an advancing ribbon of glass. The coating apparatus may have one or more of the vertical channels 4 and a corresponding number of gas flow restrictors 2 depending on whether one or more reactant gases are to be introduced separately into a coating chamber over the ribbon of glass. The or each vertical channel exits above the ribbon of glass and when there is more than one vertical channel, the channels a,,e located in series in a direction along the direction of movement of the ribbon of glass. An exhaust duct is provided downstream of the vertical channel(s).

1 When the ribbon of glass is float glass, the width of the ribbon ol glass may be abrut 3 me.tt,,s. Each vertical channel ind each gas tlow restrictor must be the same length as the width of the glass to be coated so that reactant gas is directed uniformly over the glass surface. Ace-., rdingly,.I-e gas flow restrictor may be about 3 metres ling and it is this lenjth requirement which has led to the problems in the prior art referred to above concerning the attainment of a uniform gas flow over the entire width of the glass to be coated.

With the present invention, these problems are overcome by tightly clamping each restriction and providing in each restriction apertures whose distribution and size can be accurately controlled and are not subject to significant variations as a result of differential thermal expansion in different parts of the gas distributor.

A reactant gas, diluted in a carrier gas, is fed to the inlet 12 of the gas flow restrictor 2 through the fantail distributor 14. The gas impinges on the inlet restriction 27 and is forced through the apertures 36 at high velocity. The pressure drop across the apertures 36 through the inlet plate member 28 is greater than that along the inlet 12. The restriction 27 accordingly tends to cause the gas to be evenly distributed along the length of the chamber 24. The flow is then forced through the apertures 68 in the intermediate plate member 66 of the intermediate restriction 64. The apertures 68 are not in line with the apertures 36 of the inlet restriction 27. Accordingly, this prevents a "jetting" effect, i.e. a jet of gas cannot pass through one aperture 36 in the inlet restriction 27 and then directly through a corresponding aperture 68 in the intermediate restriction 64 without being deflected. Again, the gas is forced through the apertures 68 at high velocity and a pressure build up on the inlet vide of the intermediate restriction 64 causes further equalisation of gas flow along the length of the intermediate restriction 64. In a similar manner the gas issuing from the apertures 68 is then forced through the apertures 52 in the outlet restriction 34. Since the apertures 68, 52 in the intermediate and outer restrictions are out of alignment, the jetting effect referred to above is prevented. The gas issues from the apertures 52 in the outlet restriction 38 as a gas flow which is substantially uniform across the length of the gas flow restrictor 2 i.e. across the width of the ribbon of glass. The gas is deflected by the gas flow deflector 54 and is forced through the gap 60. The gas flow deflector 54 prevents jets of gas from the apertures 52 impinging directly on the ribbon of glass which could cause 1 9 - localised regiurs -If increased coating thickness and could result in a streaking effect on the coating. A uniform gas flow issues from the gap 60 and is directed downwardly along the channel 4 towards the ribbon of glass.

The advantages of the gas flow restrictor described are that each restriction is substantially unaffected by the high temperatures of around 300-4OCC which are typically encountered. Because for each aperture in the restriction, the whole circumference of each aperture is defined by a single plate, the size of each aperture (and hence the distribution of the gas flow) is not affected by differences in the thermal expansion of two separate members. This is in contrast to the situation in which the gas flows through a slot defined between the edges of two separate members, when differences in thermal expansion between the two members are liable to lead to irregularities in the width of the slot. It is difficult enough to produce narrow slots of regular width over a distance of about 3 metres; when such narrow slots are subjected to the high temperatures encountered when coating a hot ribbon of float glass there is a risk that the slots will distort and lead to non-uniform flows of gas. The present arrangement, which relies on a series of holes in a plate member, is not susceptible to the same problems of distortion. Although the Pimensions of the holes will be affected by temperature, the holes will all tend to expand to the same extent and provide more uniform ga,.. flioi-, across the width oF th-? jas restrictor.

As indicated above, although the gas flow restrictor can be 3 metres wide, the distortion prr.,h,,ems of the prior art systems are overcome or at least alleviated by the present invention. Also, each plate member is relatively easy to manufacture by drilling a row of holes in the plate member. Each restriction is fully sealed by the adjacent plate and this ensures that the gas is constrained to flow only through the apertures which are of predetermined dimensions and spacing. This enables proper control over the uniformity of flow of gas across the ribbon of glass to be maintained.

The number of restrictions in the gas flow restrictor may be varied as desired depending upon the particular coating application. Thus for example, in some applications, the intermediate restriction 66 may be omitted; in this case, it is desira ble to have the row of holes 68 on the downstream side of the elongate chamber 24 to prevent "jetting" through aligned holes in the row of holes 36 and the row of holes 52.

Furthermore, the size, spacing and positions of the holes in the restrictions can be varied. In addition, the shape, dimensions and relative positions of the holes may vary for different plate members.

k I SLAIMS 1. A gas flow restrictor for an apparatus for coating flat glass by directing a reactant gas over the glass surface, the gas flow restrictor comprising a chamber which is adapted to receive a supply of reactant gas and is adapted to output a flow of the reactant gas over the flat glass being coated, and a series of at least two restrictions, each restriction comprising a plate member extending across the chamber and having a plurality of apertures therethrough.

Claims

2. A gas flow restrictor according to Claim 1 wherein the apertures of

each plate member are uniformly distributed.

3. A gas flow restrictor according to Claim 1 or Claim 2 wherein the apertures of adjacent plate members are out of line with one another.

4. A gas flow restrictor according to any one of Claims 1 to 3 wherein the apertures in each plate member are disposed in a row.

5. A gas flow restri,;tor according to iny foregoing claim wherein the apertures are circular holes.

6. A gas flow restrictor according to Claim 5 wherein the distance between the centres of the holes is not more than three times the diameter of the holes.

7. A gas flow restrictor according to Claim 6 wherein the diameter of the holes is one half of the spacing between the centres of;Rdjace.ii holes.

8. A gas flow restrictor according to any one of Claims 5 to 7 wherein the holes have a diameter of from 2 mm to 10 mm.

4 9. A gas flow restrictor according to Claim 8 wherein the holes are 5mm in diameter and are spaced 10 mm apart.

10. A gas flow restrictor according to any foregoing claim wherein the shape, dimensions and relative positions of the apertures vary for different plate members.

11. A gas flow restrictor according to any foregoing claim wherein a first plate member is adjacent to an inlet for the restrictor and a second plate member is adjacent to an outlet for the restrictor.

12. A gas flow restrictor according to Claim 11 further including a gas flow deflector at the outlet.

14. A gas flow restrictor according to Claim 12 wherein the gas flow deflector comprises a deflector member which is disposed adjacent the apertures of the second plate member.

15. A gas flow restrictor for an apparatus for coating flat glass substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings.

1 Pucd 1990 at The Patent Ottice. Slat H0u34.66,'71 High Holbcizi. London WC I FL 4TP.?Urther copies inay be obumed from The Patantchmot. We& Branch. St Uary Cray. Orpington. Kent BM 3RD Printed by UWUplax technique. M. St liwy Cray. Kent, Con 1JS7