GB2099256A - Bistatic radar - Google Patents

Bistatic radar Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2099256A
GB2099256A GB8115657A GB8115657A GB2099256A GB 2099256 A GB2099256 A GB 2099256A GB 8115657 A GB8115657 A GB 8115657A GB 8115657 A GB8115657 A GB 8115657A GB 2099256 A GB2099256 A GB 2099256A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
antenna
scan
azimuth
cycles
angle
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB8115657A
Other versions
GB2099256B (en
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ferranti International PLC
Original Assignee
Ferranti PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ferranti PLC filed Critical Ferranti PLC
Priority to GB8115657A priority Critical patent/GB2099256B/en
Priority to DE19823219583 priority patent/DE3219583A1/en
Priority to FR8209114A priority patent/FR2506950B1/en
Publication of GB2099256A publication Critical patent/GB2099256A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2099256B publication Critical patent/GB2099256B/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/003Bistatic radar systems; Multistatic radar systems

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
  • Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)

Abstract

A radar comprises a transmitting station Tx and a spaced receiving station Rx, each station having a steerable antenna capable of tracking through a limited angle in azimuth. The antennae are controlled such that on one half of a sweep the beams (A and B) sweep a volume of space, whilst on the other half of the sweep the beams (A' and B') sweep a different volume of space at a different range from the receiver (Rx). <IMAGE>

Description

SPECIFICATION Radar systems Radar systems are in common use for the detection and tracking of airborne targets such as aircraft and missiles. Although many systems share an antenna between a transmitter and a receiver, it is known to separate the transmit and receiver antennae. This enables triangulation techniques to be used for the location of the target. An additional advantage is that the separation reduces the problem of "clutter", that is strong unwanted return signals due to objects which are close to both the transmitter and receiver.
When the antennae are well separated, providing what is known as a "bistatic" system, the scans of the two antennae have to be synchronised, so that a known volume of space is scanned. This volume is that over which the beam from the transmitting antenna intersects the beam of the receiver antenna. Hence the range at which surveillance cover is obtained is controlled by the angle of the beams of the transmitter and receiver antennae, and the angle at which the beams converge. Thus the range may be varied by varying the convergence angle. Many bistatic systems operate over limited scan angles; for example a coastal radar system is frequently not required to scan on the landward side of the base line joining the transmitter and the receiver. In such a case, a scan cycle is made up of two half-cycles scanned in opposite directions, usually at constant velocity.This may be used to increase the apparent scan rate without increasing the speed of rotation of the antennae, since each half cycle of the scan may cover the same volume of space.
It is an object of the invention to increase the volume of space covered during a single scan cycle of the antennae.
According to the present invention there is provided a radar system comprising a transmitting station and a receiving station located at separate spaced locations, an antenna system at each location capable of tracking through a limited angle in azimuth such that a complete scan cycle comprises two half-cycles scanned in opposite directions, and antenna control means operable to control the orientation of the two antennae such that the two half cycles of a scan cover volumes of space at different ranges from the receiving antenna.
An embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which Figure 1 illustrates the arrangement and operation of a known bistatic radar system; Figure 2 is a diagram illustrating the antenna drive signals for the system of Figure 1; Figure 3 illustrates the operation of a radar system according to the invention; Figure 4 illustrates the antenna drive signals for the system of Figure 3; and Figure 5shows a block diagram of circuitry for implementing the invention.
Referring now to Figure 1, a radar system of the type referred to, namely a bistatic system, has a transmitter Tx and a receiver Rx separated along a base line. The transmitter and receiver each have a steerable antenna movable through a limited angle of azimuth and elevation. Each antenna has a narrow beamwidth. By way of example only, the range of azimuth angle may be of the order of 75 , with an antenna beamwidth of 0.5 .
Figure 1 also illustrates how a bistatic system operates. The transmitter Tx emits radiation continuously or in pulses, and hence illuminates a volume of space defined by the width of the transmitter beam A. If the receiver antenna is pointing in a suitable direction, then the receiver antenna will detect radiation reflected from an object in an appropriate part of the transmitter beam A. The volume of space covered by the receiver antenna beam is denoted at B. Hence any object in the volume over which beams A and B intersect will be detected by radiation reflected to the receiver antenna. Similarly, the Figure shows at A' and B' the situation when the transmit antenna has rotated in azimuth in a clockwise direction through a certain angle, and the receiver antenna has rotated in the same direction through the same angle.The conveyence angle O between the two beams is shown. In a conventional bistatic system the antennae scan backwards and forwards in step with one another, covering the same surveillance volume on each half-cycle of the scan. If the transmitter and receiver antennae rotate at a constant rate, then the volume of space or surveillance volume over which the beams intersect is crescent-shaped, as shown in Figure 1, being bounded by two circles which pass through transmitter and receiver.
The range of the surveillance volume from the receiver varies throughout each half-cycle of the scan, but is readily determined. It depends upon the angular relationship of the two antennae at the start of each scan.
The general position of the scanned volume is therefore determined by the requirements of the radar system.
Figure 2 shows the form of the antenna drive signals forthe transmit and receive antennae. Each signal is a reversing ramp function. Two curves are shown, one, RD, for the receive antenna, and the other, TD, for the transmit antenna. The curves indicate, at any instant in time, the bearing of the appropriate antenna, and the convergence angle 0 is given by the vertical distance between the two curves. Since the area scanned as shown in Figure 1 is the same for both clockwise and anticlockwise rotation of the antennae, the two in Figure 2 are always the same vertical distance apart.
It would be useful if a radar system could cover a large surveillance volume in a scan cycle, but to enlarge the volume usually means increasing the antenna beamwidth. However this results in a loss of radar power and definition. It is possible to increase the beamwidth of the receiver antenna alone, and this is frequently done by providing a number of feed horns each supplying signals to a separate receiver.
Figure 3 illustrates a way of increasing the surveillancce volume even further. In this example, beams A and B trace out a crescent-shaped volume as before over half a cycle of the scan, say during the clockwise rotation of the antennae. At the end of the half-cycle, the convergence angle between the two antennae beams is changed from #cw to #acw. This has the effect of moving the position of the volume at the intersection of the beams. Thus the two antennae cover a second crescent-shaped volume at a greater range than the first. At the end of the second half-cycle of the scan, the convergence angle between the two beams is restored to its original vaiue, so that the first area is again covered. The two volumes shown in Figure 3 are contiguous.However, by suitable variation of the convergence angle the two volumes may be separated, or may overlap. In order to produce contiguous zones, the convergence angle during one half of the sweep must be different from that during the other half of the sweep by an amount equal to the sum of the beamwidths of the two antenae.
Figure 4 shows the two antenna drive signals necessary to produce the desired effect. The convergence angle during the clockwise part of the scan is shown as 8,. As shown in Figure 4, the scan of the transmit antenna is reversed before that of the receive antenna, the time interval between the two reversals being shown as At. As a result, the convergence angle during the anticlockwise part of the scan is increased to a value #acw. At the end of this second part of the scan the transmit antenna is again reversed a time At before the receive antenna, restoring the convergence angle to Occo.
The time interval At may be defined by the expression.
At = 1/2#.(#T - #R) where co is the constant angular scan rate of each antenna, FT is the beam width of the transmit antenna, and jbR is the beam width of the receive antenna.
The relationship between the two convergence angles may be expressed as eacw = #cw + T + R If overlapping or separated swept volumes are required on the clockwise and anticlockwise parts of the scan, then the above expressions will not apply.
Whether control is excercised in an analogue or a digital manner, the bearings of the two antenna from a datum position may be denoted by suitable equations. The equations given below for receiver antenna bearing O and transmitter antenna bearing #T apply when contiguous volumes are being scanned. For each antenna the cycle may be split into three sections.
Thus: OR = #RO + cot for 0 < t < T/4 and OR = HRO + coT'2 - cot for T/4 < t < 3T/4 and #R = 0Ro - coT + cot for 3T/4 < t < T where #Ro is the receive antenna bearing when t = 0 T is the scan cycle period and co is the constant angular scan rate.
and: = = oRo(3cw + cot for 0 < t < (T14 - At) and 0T = oRo - Ocw + co(T/2 - 2At) - cot for (T/4 - At) < t < (3T/4 - At) and #&gamma; = 0Ro - Ocw - coT + cot for (3T/4 - At) < t < T where (3cw is the beam convergence angle during, say, clockwise scan, and At = 1/20)(0T + P)R) The necessary control to apply these equations may be effected in a number of ways. Antenna control systems usually employ digital techniques, in which case the necessary ramp functions are in fact produced by a large number of small steps. Hence one way of providing the necessary control is to provide a processor which will continually solve the equations given above. If the radar system to which the invention is applied is already controlled by a processor, then it is only necessary to modify the program accordingly.
Alternatively a logic circuit may be derived to provide the necessary control, and Figure 5 is a block diagram of such a logic arrangement.
Referring now to Figure 5, this shows a clock pulse generator CK applying clock pulses to an incremental reversible counter UDC1. The clock pulses are also divided down in a divider DV to produce synchronising pulses for the counter at a rate determined by the scan period of the system. The synchronising signals determine the instant at which the direction of count of the reversible counter occurs. The counter produces a ramp output which is reversed by the synchronising pulses from the divider, so that a triangular waveform is produced. This forms the antenna azimuth demand for the transmit antenna. A subtractor SUB1 subtracts from this demand the actual antenna azimuth position obtained from a suitable transducer, and derives the error signal output to be applied to the antenna azimuth servo.It will be seen that the transmit antenna demand will be of the form described with reference to Figure 4.
A second incremental reversible counter UDC2 is also supplied with clock pulses, and derives a second triangular waveform. However, the reversals of this counter is delayed by passing the synchronising output of divider DV through a delay circuit DC, which provides a delay equal to the value At discussed above. In order to derive the value At the delay circuit DC has inputs denoting the values of o, T and R, all of which will be constants.
The output from the second counter UDC2 is a second triangular waveform the reversals of which are delayed with respect to that from counter UDC1 by the time At. However, it is necessary to provide an azimuth offset between the two triangular waveforms in order to produce the desired relationship between the clockwise and anticlockwise convergence angles. This offset is provided by subtracting in subtractor SUB2 a constant value equal to Ocw + 1/2 (0T + A), and determines the average range of both sections of the scan pattern. The output of subtractor SUB2 then forms the demand input to the receive antenna azimuth drive. Subtractor SUB3 subtracts from this demand the actual receive antenna azimuth position obtained from a transducer, and derives the error signal output to be applied to the antenna azimuth servo. The receive antenna servo demand will be of the form described with reference to Figure 4.
Other logic arrangements may be used to produce the desired effect. As already stated, the embodiment described with reference to Figures 3, 4 and 5 relates to an antenna sweep pattern covering two contiguous areas.

Claims (6)

1. A radar system comprising a transmitting station and a receiving station located at separate spaced locations, an antenna system at each location capable of tracking through a limited angle in azimuth such that a complete scan cycle comprises two half-cycles scanned in opposite directions, and antenna control means operable to control the orientation of the two antenna such that the two half cycles of a scan cover volumes of space at different ranges from the receiving antenna.
2. A system as claimed in Claim 1 in which the antenna control means are operable to change the convergence angle between the beams of the two antenna systems between successive half-cycles of the sweep.
3. A system as claimed in Claim 2 in which the antenna control systems includes means for generating for such antenna systems an azimuth demand signal of substantially triangular waveform, and means for delaying the successive reversal points of one waveform relative to the other by a predetermined time interval.
4. A system as claimed in Claim 3 in which the two volumes of space swept in the two half-cycles of a scan are contiguous the predetermined time interval being half the time taken for either antenna to scan through an angle equal to the difference between the two convergence angles necessary to sweep the two volumes.
5. A system as claimed in Claim 4 in which the antenna control system includes means for applying an azimuth angle offset to said one waveform, the value of the offset determining the average range of the swept volume from the receiver.
6. A radar system substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
GB8115657A 1981-05-26 1981-05-26 Bistatic radar Expired GB2099256B (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8115657A GB2099256B (en) 1981-05-26 1981-05-26 Bistatic radar
DE19823219583 DE3219583A1 (en) 1981-05-26 1982-05-25 RADAR SYSTEM
FR8209114A FR2506950B1 (en) 1981-05-26 1982-05-26 RADAR DETECTION SYSTEM

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8115657A GB2099256B (en) 1981-05-26 1981-05-26 Bistatic radar

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB2099256A true GB2099256A (en) 1982-12-01
GB2099256B GB2099256B (en) 1984-11-28

Family

ID=10521974

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB8115657A Expired GB2099256B (en) 1981-05-26 1981-05-26 Bistatic radar

Country Status (3)

Country Link
DE (1) DE3219583A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2506950B1 (en)
GB (1) GB2099256B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5200755A (en) * 1989-12-06 1993-04-06 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Bistatic radar system
US7268722B2 (en) * 2002-12-24 2007-09-11 Robert Bosch Gmbh Angular resolution antenna system

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2044007A (en) * 1979-02-27 1980-10-08 Decca Ltd Bistatic radar systems

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5200755A (en) * 1989-12-06 1993-04-06 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Bistatic radar system
US7268722B2 (en) * 2002-12-24 2007-09-11 Robert Bosch Gmbh Angular resolution antenna system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR2506950B1 (en) 1986-02-28
FR2506950A1 (en) 1982-12-03
DE3219583A1 (en) 1983-01-13
DE3219583C2 (en) 1991-04-04
GB2099256B (en) 1984-11-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2006270435B2 (en) A method of generating accurate estimates of azimuth and elevation angles of a target for a phased-phased array rotating radar
US4387373A (en) Synthetic monopulse radar
US4048637A (en) Radar system for detecting slowly moving targets
CN86103423A (en) Work in the radar system of two frequency ranges
US4961075A (en) Two and one-half dimensional radar system
US3827049A (en) Radar system for tracking targets flying at low altitude
GB1529304A (en) Imaging system
US3229283A (en) Direction finding and distance measuring system
US4121209A (en) Two-axis motion compensation for AMTI
US3378843A (en) Monopulse tracking radar system capable of locating a plurality of unresolved targets
US3121868A (en) High resolution object location system
US4320397A (en) Echo tracker/range finder for radars and sonars
US3733604A (en) Aircraft guidance system
US4012740A (en) Radio-frequency direction-finding arrangement
US4212012A (en) Continuous wave radar
GB2099256A (en) Bistatic radar
US3346859A (en) Mainlobe doppler clutter return compensator for moving platform radar
US3174147A (en) Doppler radar system
US3438030A (en) Object detection system
US3882500A (en) System for the automatic tracking of a moving target
US3045232A (en) Electronic velocity indicator apparatus
US2569485A (en) Automatic ranging system
US3670334A (en) Attitude control system
US4577192A (en) Electronic countermeasures false target system
US3343160A (en) Electronic navigation system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
732 Registration of transactions, instruments or events in the register (sect. 32/1977)
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee