GB2085478A - Alkaline anodic activation of chlorine anodes - Google Patents
Alkaline anodic activation of chlorine anodes Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2085478A GB2085478A GB8131072A GB8131072A GB2085478A GB 2085478 A GB2085478 A GB 2085478A GB 8131072 A GB8131072 A GB 8131072A GB 8131072 A GB8131072 A GB 8131072A GB 2085478 A GB2085478 A GB 2085478A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- anodes
- anode
- electrode
- chlorine
- activation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25B15/00—Operating or servicing cells
Abstract
The present invention relates to a process for activation of chlorine anodes comprising as electrocatalyst mixed crystals of the oxides of ruthenium and titanium. The activation procedure comprises anodically polarising the inactive electrode by passing a current through the cell in an electrolyte which has a pH value above 12. The activated anodes thus produced operate at a lower electrode potential than normal unused anodes and enables the anodes to attain steady state more quickly than hitherto.
Description
SPECIFICATION
Alkaline anodic activation of chlorine anodes
The present invention relates to a process for activation of chlorine anodes comprising mixed crystals of the oxides of ruthenium and titanium as electrocatalysts.
Chlorine anodes are anodes used for the production of chlorine by electrolysis. Whilst several such anodes are availabie, the anodes most widely used commercially are those in which a base or core of an electrode is coated with a mixed crystal material comprising the oxides of titanium and ruthenium. Such anodes and methods of preparation thereof are described for example in US Patent Nos: 3632498 and 3616445.
These anodes appear to suffer a voltage rise in use due to poisoning by organic material and the activity of such anodes is conventionally restored by (i) cleaning with an organic solvent or (ii) by alkaline cathodic cleaning.
(i) The method of cleaning with an organic solvent consists of placing the poisoned anode in solvent, e.g. dichloromethane or chloroform, for a period of time and then rinsing thoroughly with distilled water. This technique has the disadvantage of requiring (a) removal of electrodes from the industrial cells and (b) large tanks filled with potentiaily dangerous organic solvents which have to be maintained at their boiling point.
(ii) The cathodic cleaning method relies on the short-circuiting of the mercury cells (in which such anodes are usually used) which results in reversal of the polarity of the electrode, i.e. the anode becomes the cathode. Thereafter the polarity is reversed again to restore the electrode to its anode status. This procedure of double reversal of polarity may have to be repeated several times to enable the anode to recover its initial potential. Whilst this technique does not necessitate the removal of the electrode from the cell, the restoration of the electrode potential to its original value is short-lived and the activity soon falls off again.Moreover, it is not advisable to subject anodes which have ruthenium oxide and titanium oxide as electrocatalysts to such a cathodic treatment because there is a risk of changing the oxidation state of the active electro-catalyst species which may in part account for the shortened life of the anode. In addition, the duration of the activation procedure is relatively long.
It has now been found that by a modified anodic treatment, it is not only possible to improve the activity of fresh anodes supplied commercially, hereafter termed as "unused" anodes, and to restore the activity of poisoned anodes, but it is also possible to reduce the duration of the activation treatment significantly.
Accordingly, the present invention is a method of lowering the electrode potential of unused or poisoned electrodes such as anodes in chlorine cells, said electrodes having an electrocatalytic coating comprising the oxides of titanium and ruthenium thereon, said method comprising anodically polarising said electrode by passing a current through the cell containing an electrolyte which has a pH value above 12.
As mentioned previously, the anodes used in the present invention maybe prepared for example by the process described in US Patent Nos: 3616445 or 3632498. The anodic polarisation maybe achieved "in situ" in the cell containing the unused or poisoned electrode or in a separate cell. Where the polarisation is carried out "in situ," the pH value of the electrolyte in the cell may be brought to the desired value, suitably a pH value of between 12 and 15, by dosing the electrolyte with a solution of caustic soda or caustic potash. A current is thereafter passed through the cell for a short duration which could be as low as five minutes. Thereafter, the reactivated anode is ready for use. However, it will be necessary to restore the pH of the electrolyte to its original value prior to the anodic polarisation for producing chlorine.This may be achieved by dosing the electrolyte with an appropriate amount of acid, e.g. hydrochloric acid, to bring the pH value down to the required level.
The current density used for achieving the anodic polarisation may vary over a wide range, preferably between 0.1 and 20 KA/m2. The temperature of anodic polarisation may be the same as that at which the anode was originally being used, suitably between 60 and 800 C. The process of the present invention is particularly suitable for activating anodes poisoned by hydraulic oils.
The present invention has the following advantages over conventional methods.
1) The activated anodes thus produced operate at lower electrode potentials than normal unused anodes.
2) The process is capable of activating both poisoned and unused anodes.
3) The duration of the activation procedure in the present process is shorter than conventionally experienced.
4) The process cleans and activates the surface of newly installed anodes so that steady state is attained quickly.
The process of the present invention is further illustrated with reference to the following Examples.
In the Examples and comparative tests reported below the following materials and procedures were used:
1. Anode
The anode having a surface area of 0.5 cm2 was a dimensionally stable anode of titanium provided
with an electrocatalytic coating of ruthenium oxide as supplied by Permelec s.p.A. of Italy under the
Registered Trade Mark of "DSA(R)".
2. Cathode
Two types of cathodes were used as counter electrodes.
(a) Teflon Bonded Graphite Cathodes
2 g of graphitized carbon (graphitized at 26000 C) were mixed with 5 g of PTFE dispersion (Fluon,
Registered Trade Mark, supplied by'lCI) in an ultrasonic bath for 10 minutes. The resuiting paste was
then applied to a 2 x 5 cm, 80 mesh Pt gauze. The pasted Pt gauze was finally sintered at 3500C for
one hour under an atmosphere of N2.
(b) Graphite
5 x 2 x .3 cm piece of denuder graphite was used as the cathode. The graphite was immersed in
concentrated HCI for about one hour before it was used as the cathode.
In all cases titanium wires provided the electrical contacts.
3. The Cell
The test cells used were two compartment cells, one housing a reference electrode and the other
for housing the working electrodes, namely the cathode and anode, for electrolysis.
A saturated Calomel electrode, SCE, was situated in one compartment of the test cell and was
employed as an external reference electrode. The potential of the SCE at 300C against platinized
platinum in a chlorine saturated 25 percent NaCI solution at 700C was 1.065 + 0.005 volts. This
represents the reversible chlorine potential under the experimental conditions employed.
The other compartment housing the working electrodes was a one litre vessel with flanges. The
reference electrode compartment was connected to the working electrode compartment by a Luggin capillary. The distance between the Luggin capillary and the DSA was adjusted to about 2 mm.
The test cell was heated on a hot plate and a magnetic follower was used to stir the solution. All
experiments were carried out at the specified temperature in 25 percent "Analar" sodium chloride
solution.
4. Electrochemical Measurements
The DSA polarization curves were measured galvanostatically by passing a constant current
through the cell and measuring the anode potential against the external reference electrode. The
electrode potential was IR corrected by introducing a mains operated current interrupter which
employed solid state relays, into the circuit. The relay interrupts the DC current at mains frequency
producing a train of square wave current through the cell. Ohmic overvoltage is instantaneous and can
therefore be measured by monitoring the variation of electrode potential with time on an oscilloscope
screen.
EXAMPLE 1-4 Initially the new, unused anodes were standardised in a test cell containing 700 ml of saturated
brine at about 700 C. In this case the graphite cathode was used. A current of 6 kA!m2 was then
switched on and the electrode potential monitored until it reached a constant value as shown in Table 1.
This showed the variation of electrode potential of the new anode with time.
The anode was then transferred to another cell containing 700 ml of saturated brine at 700 C.
Predetermined volumes of 15 percent NaOH were then added to the electrolyte to bring the calculated
pH value above 12 as indicated in Table 2, and a current of 6 kA/m2 was passed through the cell for five
minutes to activate the anode. The activated anode was then rinsed with water and transferred back to
the original test cell containing only saturated brine. Finally a 6 kA!m2 current was passed through the
cell and the electrode potential measured after 30 minutes of continuous electrolysis. The results of a
series of tests (Examples (1-4) obtained at different pH values are summarised in Table 2.
At the end of the experiment the activity of the electrode was tested again for 1 8 hours in a fresh
saturated brine solution. During that period the iR corrected electrode potential of 1.16 volts vs SCE
was maintained. The results in Table 2 were reproduced twice.
The results show that activation by anodically polarizing the anode for five minutes in saturated
brine containing only 0.25 percent NaOH enables the anode to function at a lower potential than
hitherto.
TABLE 1
VARIATION OF ELECTRODE POTENTIAL OF
ANODE WITH TIME
Curent = 6 kA/m, T = 70 C
Potential vs SCE Time not iR corrected (minutes) (volts) 0 1.95 8 1.65 20 1.5 30 1,44 120 1.42 240 1.42 TABLE 2
ALKALINE ANODIC TREATMENT IN SATURATED BRINE CONTAINING
VARYING CONCENTRATIONS OF NaOH
Time of activation - 5 minutes
Current - 6 kAim2 Temperature - 70 C
iR iR Corrected % Calculated Potential vs SCE Correction Potential (vs SCE) Examples NaOH pH value Volts Volts Volts 0 1.415 0.220 1.195 1 0.21 12.7 1.38 0.22 1.16 2 0.42 13.02 1.38 0.22 1.160 3 0.81 13.3 1.370 0.22 1.155 4 1.0 13.4 1.38 0.22 1.16 EXAMPLES 5 AND 6
In order to test the effectiveness of the activation procedure on poisoned anodes, the same anodes and procedure as discussed in Example 1 to 4 above were used both for standardisation and activation,
except that a 25% sodium chloride solution was used as electrolyte and Teflon-bonded graphite was
used as the cathode. The pH of the electrolyte was adjusted to between 24 and aliquots of hydraulic oil (saturation, (2 ml in 700 ml) in Example 5 and 200 ppm in Example 6) were introduced into the cells as poisons to deactivate the anode.The anodic potential was then monitored as before. The effect of the poisoning is shown in Table 3 below, monitored-again. The results are summarised in Table 3 below.
The poisoned, deactivated anodes were then subjected to anodic polarization at 8kA/m or 10 kA/m in the presence of 10% sodium hydroxide (pH above 14) and 1 5% sodium chloride. Oxygen gas evolution was the main reaction at the anode under such conditions. The treated anode was then transferred to another test cell containing 25% sodium chloride. The current was switched on and finally the electrode potential monitored again. The results are summarised in Table 3 below.
It is clear from the results in Table 3 that alkaline anodic polarization reactivates the anode. It was
shown in Examples 1-4 that 5 minutes of alkaline anodic polarization will activate new anodes.
TABLE 3
ANODIC ACTIVATION IN 10 PERCENT NaOH AND 15 PER CENT NaCI
Potential v (not iR corrected) Potential After Example Oil Current Before Oil After Oil Activation Activation No. ppm kAim2 Addition Addition Procedure (not iR corrected) 5 Sat i 8 ise 3.4 Anodic 1.65 for 22 h (2ml) after polarization 24 h for 1 h at 8kA/m 6 200 10- 1.57 1.71 Anodic 1.51 - 1.53 after polarization for 30-h 28 h for I h at 10kA/m2
Claims (6)
1. A method of lowering the electrode potential of unused or poisoned electrodes used as anodes in chlorine cells, said electrodes having an electrocatalytic coating comprising the oxides of titanium and ruthenium thereon, said method comprising anodically polarising said electrode by passing a current through the cell containing an electrolyte which has a pH value above 12.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the anodic polarisation is carried out "in situ" in the cell containing the unused or poisoned anode.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2 wherein the pH of the electrolyte during anodic polarisation is between 12 and 15.
4. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the current density used for the anodic polarisation is between 0.1 and 20 KA/m2.
5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the temperature at which the anodic polarisation is carried out is between 60 and 800C.
6. A method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the electrode is a dimensionally stable anode of titanium provided with an electrocatalytic coating of ruthenium oxide and titanium oxide.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB8131072A GB2085478B (en) | 1980-10-17 | 1981-10-15 | Akaline anodic activation of chlorine anodes |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB8033513 | 1980-10-17 | ||
GB8131072A GB2085478B (en) | 1980-10-17 | 1981-10-15 | Akaline anodic activation of chlorine anodes |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB2085478A true GB2085478A (en) | 1982-04-28 |
GB2085478B GB2085478B (en) | 1983-08-03 |
Family
ID=26277243
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB8131072A Expired GB2085478B (en) | 1980-10-17 | 1981-10-15 | Akaline anodic activation of chlorine anodes |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
GB (1) | GB2085478B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1997014824A1 (en) * | 1995-10-16 | 1997-04-24 | Rainer Partanen | Electrocatalyser solution |
-
1981
- 1981-10-15 GB GB8131072A patent/GB2085478B/en not_active Expired
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1997014824A1 (en) * | 1995-10-16 | 1997-04-24 | Rainer Partanen | Electrocatalyser solution |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB2085478B (en) | 1983-08-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Brown et al. | Low overvoltage electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolving electrodes | |
Vuković | Voltammetry and anodic stability of a hydrous oxide film on a nickel electrode in alkaline solution | |
CA1117589A (en) | Method of stabilising electrodes coated with mixed oxide electrocatalysts during use in electrochemical cells | |
GB2160545B (en) | Electrolytic cleaning of filters in situ | |
Iwakura et al. | Electrochemical properties of Ni (Ni+ RuO2) active cathodes for hydrogen evolution in chlor-alkali electrolysis | |
EP0255099B1 (en) | Cathode bonded to ion exchange membrane for use in electrolyzers for electrochemical processes and relevant method for conducting electrolysis | |
Ferreira et al. | The effect of temperature on the water electrolysis reactions on nickel and nickel-based codeposits | |
US4561949A (en) | Apparatus and method for preventing activity loss from electrodes during shutdown | |
Vuković | Oxygen evolution on an electrodeposited ruthenium electrode in acid solution—the effect of thermal treatment | |
Burke et al. | MODIFICATION OF THE ELECTRONIC TRANSFER PROPERTIES OF Co, 0. AS REQUIRED FOR ITS USE IN DSA-TYPE ANODES | |
GB2085478A (en) | Alkaline anodic activation of chlorine anodes | |
Savadogo et al. | New hydrogen cathodes in acid medium: Case of nickel electrodeposited with heteropolyacids (HPAs) | |
NO752310L (en) | ||
JPS62267488A (en) | Low overvoltage electrode for alkaline electrolyte | |
GB2056495A (en) | Process for the preparation of low hydrogen overvoltage cathodes | |
CA1249547A (en) | Treatment of cathodes for use in electrolytic cell | |
JPS586789B2 (en) | Method for preventing deterioration of palladium oxide anodes | |
CA2013123A1 (en) | Electrolytic regeneration of alkaline permanganate etching bath | |
JP3673000B2 (en) | Electrolyzer for electrolyzed water production | |
KR0151393B1 (en) | Metal electrodes for electrochemical processes | |
US4462875A (en) | Preparation of nickel-oxide hydroxide electrode | |
Behzadian et al. | Electrocatalytic effect on hydrogen evolution from copper materials plated from a chloride-containing bath | |
US3574074A (en) | Surface treated platinized anodes | |
KR100837423B1 (en) | The method for generating deactivated electrode in the cell for electrolyzing salt water | |
JP3408462B2 (en) | Method for protecting gas diffusion cathode in alkaline chloride electrolytic cell |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PCNP | Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |