GB2033746A - Prevention of tooth decay - Google Patents

Abstract

Dental compositions contain as an active ingredient for inhibiting tooth decay a chlorodeoxysucrose derivative of the general formula <IMAGE> (wherein: R<4 alpha > is a hydroxy group and R<4 beta > is a hydrogen atom, or, one of R<4 alpha > and R<4 beta > is a hydrogen atom and the other is a chlorine atom; R<6> is a hydroxy group or, if at least one of R<4 alpha >, R<4B> or R<1>' is a chlorine atom, then it is a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom; R<1>' is a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom; and R<6>' is a hydroxy group, or if at least one of R<4 alpha >, R<4 beta > or R<1>' is a chlorine atom, then it is a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom).

Description

SPECIFICATION Prevention of tooth decay This invention relates to substances of use in preventing tooth decay.

In tooth decay, also known as dental caries, the enamel and thereafter the dentine are etched away until the internal pulp is reached. Eventually the tooth may die. Caries appear to be caused by acid released when bacteria in the mouth utilise carbohydrates such as sucrose. Examples of the bacteria involved include Streptococcus spp.

It is possible to reduce the incidence of caries by regular exposure of the teeth to fluoride ions. Such ions react with the enamel and render it more resistant to etching by acid. However, there is a strong feeling in the UK and elsewhere that it is not right to enforce mass medication on the population by addition of fluoride to water supplies.

It is accepted that regular cleaning of the teeth can lead to a more healthy dentition. A further way of lessening the chance of tooth decay is to reduce the carbohydrate intake, especially the amount of sucrose in the diet. For this reason there is a growing market for artificial sweeteners which can replace the sucrose and are non-cariogenic (ie do not cause caries).

It is important at this stage to distinguish between non-cariogenic and anticariogenic behaviour. A substance is non-cariogenic if it does not contribute to the incidence of caries.

Thus, for example, low-calorie sweeteners such as saccharin are non-cariogenic. Low-sugar foodstuffs and related products containing these sweeteners cause less tooth decay because, for the same sweetness, their content of cariogenic material has been largely substituted by the non-cariogen.

A substance is anticariogenic, on the other hand, if it can reduce the cariogenicity of a product by virtue of the addition of the substance to the product. Anticariogenic substances can thus help avoid the need to lower the carbohydrate content of a product in order to lower its cariogenicity.

In our West German Offenlegungsschrift No. 2700036 we have described the use of a group of chlorodeoxysucrose derivatives as artificial sweetening agents. This group comprises sucrose derivatives of the general formula

in which R' represents a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom; R2 and R3 respectively represent a hydroxy group and a hydrogen atom, a chlorine atom and a hydrogen atom, or a hydrogen atom and a chlorine atom, the 4-position being the 5 configuration; R4 represents a hydroxy group; or, if at least two of R', R2, R3 and R5 represent chlorine atoms, R4 represents a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom; and R5 represents a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom; provided that at least one of R', R2, R3 and R5 represents a chlorine atom.

Our hope was that these compounds could be used to replace at least part of the sucrose in the diet, and thereby act as non-cariogenic materials.

Particular examples of compounds of the above general formula (I) are as follows (the systematic name is given first, followed by a trivial name using "galactosucrose" in those cases where an inverted 4-chloro substituent is present): 1. 1 '-chloro-1 '-deoxysucrose 2. 4-chloro-4-deoxy-a- D galactopyranosyl-ss-5fructofuranoside [ie 4-ch loro-4-deoxy galacto- sucrose] 3. 4-chlorn-deoxy-a- galactopyranosyI- 1 -chloro-1 -deoxy-P- fructofurnnoside ie 4,1 '-di- chloro-4, 1-4,1 '-dideoxygalactosucrose] 4. 1 ',6'-dichloro- 1 ',6'-dideoxysucrose 5. 4-chlorn4-deoxy-a- galactopyranosyl-1 , 6-dichloro-1 , 6-dideoxy-fi- fructofurnnoside [ie 4,1 ', 6 '-trich loro-4, 1 '.6 '-'-trideoxy galactosucrose] 6. 4,6-dichloro-4,6-dideoxy-a-5galactopyranosyl-6-chloro-6-deoxy-ss)fructofuranoside [ie 4,6, 61-trichloro-4, (3,6 '-trideoxy galactosucrose] 7. 6,1 ',6-trichloro-6, 1 ',6'-tridoexysucrose 8. 4,6-dichloro-4, 6-dideoxy-ar-Dgalactopyranosyl-l ,6-dichloro-l ,6-dideoxy-P-Dfructofurano- side [ie 4,6,1',6'-tetrachloro-4,6,1',6'-tetradeoxygalactosucrose] 9. 4,6,1 ',6'-tetrachloro-4, 6,1 ',6'-tetradeoxysucrose.

Unexpectedly, we have now found that not only do compounds such as the compounds no 1 to no 9 appear to fulfil our hope of non-cariogenicity, but also they exhibit an anticariogenic effect when retained in the mouth.

More specifically, we have found that there is a group of chlorodeoxysucroses which can reduce the amount of acid produced by mouth bacteria and which can reduce the adhesion of bacterial cells to dental surfaces.

Based upon these findings, we provide as an active ingredient for inhibiting tooth decay a chlorodeoxysucrose derivative of the general formula

wherein: R4" is a hydroxy group and R4" is a hydrogen atom, or, one of R4a and R4p is a hydrogen atom and the other is a chlorine atom; R6 is a hydroxy group or, if at least one of R4a, R4ss or R1' is a chlorine atom, then it is a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom; R" is a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom; and R6' is a hydroxy group or, if at least one of R4", R4ss or R1, is a chlorine atom, then it is a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom.

Compounds of the formula (II) possess the ability to interfere with sucrose-mediated adherence of bacterial cells to teeth, as well as the ability to interfere with sucrose-mediated acidogenisis (ie acid-production) by bacteria in the mouth.

Possibly the compunds (II) are substrates for sucrose receptor sites on bacterial extracellular and membrane-bound proteins. Using radiolabelled material we have found evidence that the compounds (II) inhibit nucleic acid synthesis by mouth bacteria, resulting in the accumulation of low molecular weight products.

The compounds of formula (II) can be mono-, di-, tri- or tetrachloro derivatives of sucrose or (where R4ss is a chlorine atom) of D-galactose.

For a monochloro derivative it is preferred that R'" is the chlorine atom. For dichloro derivatives it is preferred that R1' and R6, are the chlorine atoms. For trichloro derivatives it is preferred that R6' is one of the chlorine atoms, with the other two chlorine atoms preferably then being provided by any two of (i) R4" or R4, (ii) R6 and (iii) R". Particularly preferred trichloro derivatives are those wherein Re, R1, and R6', or R4ss, R1, and R6' are the chlorine atoms, with the latter combination being the most preferred trichloro derivative and indeed the most preferred compound of general formula (II).

More generally, it is preferred that when one of R4" and R4p is a chlorine atom, then it is R4p which is the chlorine. Compounds (II) wherein R'' is chlorine show most promise, particularly when there are one or two other chlorines provided by R4p, R6 or A chlorodeoxysucrose derivative (II) may, as desired be incorporated in otherwise cariogenic foodstuffs and beverages, where if sweet it may also serve the purpose of sweetening the product. Alternatively, it may be administered separately, eg in the form of tablets to be sucked or chewed, or as a mouthwash or as a material to be added to the foodstuff or beverage before ingestion.

-Examples of compositions in accordance with the invention include not only the tablets and mouthwashes, but also toothpaste, chewing gum and other products which have been formulated to take advantage of the anti-cariogenic properties of the compounds (it). An appropriate level of compound (II) can be determined having regard to the properties of the particular compound which is selected and the type of product to be prepared.

It is not possible to be precise regarding the level of compound (II) to be employed; much will depend on the properties of the other ingredients with which it is mixed to prepare the composition of the invention.

Use can simultaneously be made of any sweetening characteristics possessed by the compounds (II), but for preference the level of the compound should be less than 15.(x)-' weight percent, where xis the sweetening power of the compound (II). The sweetening power x is assessed by a serial dilution procedure using comparison with 10% sucrose solution to determine the concentration required to produce a solution of the compound (II) isosweet with the 10% sucrose.

As described in our West German Offenlegungsschrift no. 2700036, the compounds nos 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9 are many times sweeter than sucrose. For the present purposes it is preferred to employ such sweet compounds at relatively low levels, eg at less than 0.1 wt% of the dental composition.

On the other hand, the compounds nos. 1, 2 and 6 of the Offenlegungsschrift do not possess such strong sweetening action. Compounds of formula (II) which are less than 10 times sweeter than sucrose (ie compounds whose 1 % solutions are not as sweet as 10% sucrose solution) can be employed at higher levels in the present dental compositions, and may form up to 1 % or more of the composition.

In general, the compounds (II) will be formulated as dental compositions using various conventional formulation aids. Examples of these aids include solid or liquid carriers, flavour and colour additives, and other active ingredients. Depending on the type of product to be made, it may also be appropriate to include humectants, surfactants, thickening agents, binders or other known ingredients.

Chlorodeoxy derivatives of sucrose are known in general. They may be obtained by reacting a suitably protected sucrose with a chlorinating reagent which introduces a chlorine atom at the or each desired position. Such reagents can replace a free hydroxy group by a chlorine atom or can react with an esterified hydroxy group to introduce the chlorine. Positions requiring protection may for example be esterified or blocked with acetal or ether groups which can be easily removed after chlorination. Typical reagents include sulphuryl chloride to form the chlorosul phate ester which ester on treatment with chloride ions in turn gives the chlorodeoxy derivatives.

Further details of suitable preparative methods are given for example in our German Offenle gungsschrift No. 2700036 and in the literature mentioned therein.

The available toxicity data indicates that the chlorodeoxysucroses are of very low toxicity. For example, in the rat the compound no. 5 mentioned above has an LD50 of more than 1 6 g/kg, being the maximum dose that it is practically possible to administer pero5.

The efficacy of the chlorodeoxysucrose derivatives of formula (II) is shown by the following experimental work. The experiments (A) and (B) describe work on pH reduction and adherence; experiments (C) and (D) extend this work to show the generality of the effect for the derivatives of formula (all); experiment (E) describes in vivo animal tests; and experiments (F) and (G) are part of the trials we are now carrying out using human volunteers.

(A) Effect on Reduction of pH by Streptococcus mutans: Mouth flora such as S. mutans cause dental caries by producing acid which erodes the tooth enamel. The cells exude a polysaccharide which firmly adheres them to the tooth surfaces as plaque, thus enhancing the local erosion by the acid. The effect of chlorodeoxysucroses on acid production by S. mutans in sucrose solutions was studied in comparison with the effect produced by xylitol, an agent proposed as a caries preventative.

The experiments were effected by adding washed, standardised suspensions of exponential phase cells of S. mutans NCTC 10832 to solutions containing sucrose, xylitol or 4,1',6'- ,trichloro-4,1',6'-trideoxygalactosucrose (compound no. 5 also referred to herein as "TGS") or combinations of sucrose with xylitol or TGS, each solution being 0.05 molar with respect to each saccharide. Plain aqueous solutions were used and also solutions containing amino acids (protein hydrolysate) 1 % w/v to approximate the buffering effect of natural saliva. Control experiments were effected using no saccharide in order to illustrate the endogenous metabolism of the organism. Each experiment was quadruplicated and was run at 37"C. The pH was measured at 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3 and 4 hours.The results were as shown in the following table: Time (h) Amino Saccharide acids 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 3.0 4.0 Sucrose - 5.69 4.57 4.57 .4.58 4.54 4.63 4.55 Sucrose + 5.98 5.55 -5.36 5.10 5.00 4.92 4.79 Xylitol - 5.94 5.50 5.42 5.39 5.32 5.38 5.37 TGS - 5.88 5.67 5.69 5.69 5.61 5.67 5.63 Sucrose/ xylitol - 5.93 4.63 4.61 4.76 4.54 4.68 4.66 Sucrose/ xylitol + 6.03 5.64 5.38 5.21 5.08 4.92 4.82 Sucrose/TGS - 6.27 -5.05 4.90 4.86 4.75 4.94 4.80 Sucrose/TGS + 5.98 5.67 5.47 5.35 5.26 5.13 5.03 None - 5.83 5.37 5.27 5.25 5.27 5.31 5.29 None + 6.00 5.93 5.88 5.87 5.86 5.83 5.76 The data were analysed by the Duncan Procedure which indicated that there were no statistically significant differences among treatments grouped together in the sub-sets shown in the following Table: Sub-set Solution Mean pH a Sucrose 4.57 Sucrose/xylitol 4.63 b Sucrose/TGS 4.82 Sucrose/amino acids 4.91 c Sucrose/amino acids 4.91 Sucrose/amino acids/xylitol 4.94 d Sucrose/amino acids/TGS 5.14 e None 5.30 Xylitol 5.36 f TGS 5.64 g None/amino acids 5.82 From these results it will be seen that the inclusion of xylitol never had a statistically significally effect (consider, in turn, the carbohydrates grouped at sub-set a, sub-set c, and sub set e). Thus xylitol is non-cariogenic but not anti-cariogenic.

On the other hand, the TGS always had a favourable effect which was statistically significant.

Thus, the addition of TGS to sucrose reduced the amount of acid produced, as did the addition of TGS to the mixture of sucrose and amino acids. Moreover, the TGS on its own had a favourable effect against the endogenous metabolism of the micro-organism, whereas xylitol gave about the same mean pH as when carbohydrate was excluded.

(B) Adherence to teeth: The extent to which cells of S. mutans adhere to teeth was investigated using a recognized model system. Solutions of the same substances as in (A) were made up, and the degree of deposition of suspended cells on to glass was studied using a "Magiscan" image analyser (Talyer et al, 1 978 Praktischen Metallographie, Sonderbande 8: 433-442).

The results were as shown in the following Table: Coverage (%) Carbohydrate Amino acid After 0.5 h After 4.0 h Sucrose - 37.28 65.83 Sucrose + 31.89 75.95 Xylitol - 42.31 74.21 .TGS 30.42 64.81 Sucrose/xylitol - 35.32 62.30 Sucrose/xylitol + 33.55 83.62 Sucrose/TGS - 27.47 64.92 Sucrose/TGS + 26.49 64.43 None None + Note: Each reading is the mean of 40 determinations.

As analysed by the Mann Whitney U-test, the results show that TCGS reduces the degree of adhesion significantly and that the reduction is greater than that of xylitol. Indeed, in the presence of amino acids xylitol appeared to cause an increase rather than a decrease.

Additionally, scanning electron microscopy of glass with adherent cells revealed a qualitative difference in adhering material. Adherent cells deposited from a sucrose medium characteristi cally clumped and were coated with extracellular polysaccharide. Addition of TGS, on the other hand, was found to reduce the extracellular coating and the size of the clumps. No such effect was observed in the case of xylitol.

(C) Further tests on pH reduction: Twelve sets of tests were carried out in the same way as described above at (A) but using solutions which were 0.055 molar in the respective chlorodeoxy derivative.

Solutions of the following were employed: (i) Saline, negative control for endogenous metabolism (ii) Sucrose, positive control (iii) 6,1 ',6'-trichloro-6,1 '6'-trideoxysucrose, compound no. 7.

(iv) Compound no. 7 plus sucrose (v) 1 ',6'-dichloro-1 ',6'-dideoxysucrose, compound no. 4 (vi) Compound no. 4 plus sucrose (vii) 4,1 ',6'-trichloro-4, 1 ',6'-trideoxygalactosucrose, Compound no. 5.

(viii) Compound no. 5 plus sucrose (ix) 4,6,6'-trichloro-4, 6, 6'-trideoxygalactosucrose, Compound no. 6.

(x) Compound no. 6 plus sucrose (xi) 1 '-chloro-1 '-deoxysucrose, compound no. 1 (xii) Compound no. 1 plus sucrose The acid production was monitored as before. There was a tendency for the pH to level off after 2 hours, and accordingly the data for 2, 3 and 4 hours was pooled and subjected to statistical analysis. By analysis in accordance with the Duncan procedure, the sub-sets were identified as shown in the following table: Sub-set Solution Mean pH a (ii) 4.33 b (vi) 4.59 c (xii) 4.81 (x) 4.82 d (xi) 5.09 (ix) 5.20 e (ix) 5.20 (viii) 5.30 (iv) 5.33 f (viii) 5.30 (iv) 5.33 (i) 5.43 g (iv) 5.33 (i) 5.43 (v) 5.48 h (iii) 6.48 (vii) 6.82 Sub-set a is the sucrose solution, and all of the other solutions gave a statistically significant decrease in the amount of acid produced.The compounds no. 7 and no. 5 are especially effective, since the solutions (iv) and (vii) both resulted in a pH which was one pH unit less than that of solution (ii), sucrose with no added chlorodeoxysucrose. Particularly striking are the subsets h and i, where solutions of the respective compounds 1 and 5 give a better result than the negative control, saline, which is grouped in sub-set g.

(D) Further tests on adherence to teeth: While recording the pH during the tests of (C), the adherence was monitored in the same way as in (B). The percentage coverage of a glass slide was determined at 0.5 and 4 hours for each solution, and the results treated by the Duncan procedure. The sub-sets were as follows: After 0.5 hours Sub-set Solution % coverage a (xii) 27.5 (iv) 28.5 b (iv) 28.5 (iii) 29.7 c (xi) 35.6 d (viii) 38.2 e (vii) 41.4 (x) 42.7 f (i) 49.4 g (ii) 51.2 (v) 51.6 (ix) 51.6 (vi) 51.8 Four of the five tested compounds reduced adherence of the cells in the presence of sucrose, with only compound no. 4 falling in the sub-set gwhich includes sucrose itself. The most active compounds at 0.5 hours are compounds no. 1 and no. 7.

After 4 hours Sub-set Solution % coverage a (iv) 30.

b (xii) 38.4 c (viii) 45.9 d (xi) 52.3 (iii) 54.2 (vii) 58.4 f (x) 64.3 g (vi) 68.2 (ii) 69.2 (v) 70.3 (ix) 70.8 h (i) 75.3 Equally as with the test after 0.5 hours, these results show that only compound no. 4 did not reduce the adherence. Compounds no. 1 and no. 7 were again the most active.

(E) Tests using rats: Studies were carried out on the effect of chlorodeoxysucroses on cariogenic food products, using 4,1 ',6'-trichloro-4, 1', 1 ',6'-trideoxygalactosucrose as the chlorodeoxysucrose. Cariogenicity was examined using the gnotobiotic rat caries model (see for example Drucker and Green, Arch.

Oral Biol. Vol 23 pp 183-187).

The experiment involved the use of germ-free Liverpool hooded rats inoculated orally with Streptococcus mutans NCT 10823 (a caries-producing organism). The rats were fed a diet consisting essentially of 33% by weight skim milk and 67% by weight carbohydrate. The carbohydrate consisted of (i) starch, or (ii) sucrose, or (iii) starch together with sufficient of the chlorodeoxysucrose to give a sweetness as perceived by a human of the same order as that of the sucrose. After 21 days the rats were sacrificed and the lower jaw lesions were counted to give a caries score for each rat (see Konig, Marthaler and Muhlemann, Dt. Zahn-Mund-u.

Keiferheilk Vol. 29, 99-1 27).

A statistical analysis of the caries scores for each rat showed that, as expected, the starch diet was significantly less cariogenic than the sucrose diet and also that the chlorosucrose plus starch diet was less cariogenic than the sucrose diet. This would be expected, since the proportion of the chlorodeoxysucrose was extremely small, less than 0.2g.

However, the results also showed that, surprisingly, the starch plus chlorosucrose diet was less cariogenic than the starch diet, thus indicating that the chlorodeoxysucrose appeared to be decreasing the cariogenicity of the starch.

(F) Test using human volunteers: The compound 4,1',6'-trichloro-4,1',6'-trideoxygalactosucrose was selected as a suitable candidate for further testing. A mouthrinse in accordance with the invention was prepared using the selected compound as active ingredient. The level of the active ingredient was initially chosen to be such that the mouthrinse tasted the same as a 15% w/v solution of sucrose.

Six subjects were used, who were first acquainted with the available toxicological data and who subsequently agreed to take part in the tests. The subjects were instructed not to clean their teeth on their day of testing. At sampling time 0 min, each subject took 5% w/v glucose mouthrinse for 2 minutes, then waited a further 8 minutes before the buccal and lingual plaque of one side of the jaw (upper and lower) was removed and placed on aluminium foil and sealed.

8 ml of the mouthrinse in accordance with the invention was used for precisely 2 minutes, and the dental plaque from the other side of the jaw removed after a further 8 minutes, and placed on aluminium foil and sealed.

In order that differing concentrations of plaque did not give rise to different rates of acid production, samples of wet plaque were accurately weighed and suspended in sterile saliva at 10 mg wet weight ml- 1 Plaque was homogenised before testing.

Samples (0.2 ml) were tested after admixture with 0.1 ml 5% w/v glucose and 0.2 ml sterile saliva. The pH was monitored in quadruplicated tests.

The pH fell throughout each test.

Graphs of pH fall for individual subjects indicated a beneficial, antiacidogenic, effect of the mouthwash with active ingredient, except for two subjects. In these two cases the plaque control was rather less acidogenic than in the other cases and therefore any apparent failure was not a practical disadvantage. Conversely, the other four, more acidogenic plaques were all rendered less acidogenic by the active mouthwash.

All subjects believed that the mouthwash with active ingredient increased the yield of plaque, presumably by lessening adherence.

Pooling of data at different times was not justifiable, and the Duncan procedure could not be followed. Data was therefore analysed by computer using an 'Analysis of Variance' program and a 'Description of Populations' program.

As part of the treatment of the data pooled for the six subjects, the significance of the beneficial effect on acidogenicity of plaque was determined. The probability, 'p', was as shown in the following Table: Time (h) 'p' 0.5 0.008 1.0 0.003 2.0 0.045 3.0 0.509 4.0 0.172 22.0 0.600 The probability values at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 hours are exceptionally low, indicating a real decrease in pH drop ie a true antiacidogenic effect.

The tests were supplemented by re-testing one subject without a glucose-pre-rinse. Samples taken were an untreated plaque control, and a post-mouthrinse plaque.

Again there was a beneficial effect by using the mouthrinse of the invention. The significance was as shown in the following table: Time (h) 'p' 0.5 0.001 1.0 0.001 1.5 0.001 2.0 0.004 2.5 0.131 3.0 0.023 3.5 0.509 4.0 0.603 An antiacidogenic effect is strongly indicated by these results.

The compound 6,1 ',6'-trichloro-6, 1 ',6'-trideoxysucrose was also selected as a suitable candi date for further testing in the same way on human volunteers. A mouthrinse was prepared using the compound at a level such that the mouthrinse had the same sweetness as a 15% w/v solution of sucrose. We were unable to obtain statistically conclusive proof that the mouth rinse was evincing an anti-acidogenic effect, though all subjects again perceived that the mouthwash increased the yield of plaque, presumably by lessening adherence.

Given that the chlorodeoxysucrose derivatives (I) exhibit an anti-cariogenic effect, the skilled man will have no difficulty in formulating dental compositions which employ them as an active ingredient. Suitable compositions include toothpastes and tooth powders; mouthrinses; pastilles, lozenges and other forms for retention in the mouth until dissolved; and chewing gums.

The following formulations are given by way of non-limiting example.

Example 1 Mouthwash Ingredient Percent by Weight Humectant, glycerine 10 Solvent, ethyl alcohol 10 Flavour 1 Surfactant 0.1 TGS 0.02 Water to 100 This mouthwash has a sweet taste which can be modified if desired by addition of known additives eg to give a more astringent flavour.

Example 2 Tooth paste Ingredient Percent by Weight Abrasive, calcium pyrophosphate 45 Humectant, glycerine 25 Surfactant 3 Binder 1 Soluble Fluoride 0.09 TGS 0.009 Peppermint flavour 1.1 Water to 100 Example 3 Chewing Gum Ingredient Parts by Weight Gum rubber base 25 Glucose syrup 1 5 Spearmint oil 1.2 Calcium carbonate 1.8 TGS 0.005 CLAIMS 1.A chlorodeoxysucrose derivative of the general formula

(wherein: R4a is a hydroxy group and R4p is a hydrogen atom, or, one of R4a and R4 is a hydrogen atom and the other is a chlorine atom; R6 is a hydroxy group or, if at least one of R4a, R4ss or R1' is a chlorine atom, then it is a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom; R1' is a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom; and R6' is a hydroxy group, or if at least one of R4*, R4ss or R1, is a chlorine atom, then it is a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom), for use in a method for treatment of human or animal body by therapy practised on the human or animal body.

2. A derivative as claimed in Claim 1, wherein R" is a chlorine atom.

3. A derivative as claimed in Claim 1 or 2, wherein R6, is a chlorine atom.

4. A derivative as claimed in Claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein R4 is a chlorine atom.

5. A derivative as claimed in any of Claims 1 to 4, wherein R6 is a chlorine atom.

6. A derivative as claimed in Claim 1, which is compound no. 1, 4, 5, 6 or 7, as defined in this specification.

7. A dental or other composition for use in a method for treatment of the human or animal body by therapy practised on the human or animal body, the composition containing a chlorodeoxysucrose derivative of the general formula (II) as defined in any of Claims 1 to 6.

8. A method of making a dental composition using a preparative manner known per se characterized in that a derivative (II), as defined in any of Claims 1 to 6, is included as an active ingredient to prevent tooth decay.

Example 3 Chewing Gum Ingredient Parts by Weight Gum rubber base 25 Glucose syrup 1 5 Spearmint oil 1.2 Calcium carbonate 1.8 TGS 0.005

Claims (8)

1. A chlorodeoxysucrose derivative of the general formula

(wherein: R4a is a hydroxy group and R43 is a hydrogen atom, or, one of R4a and R4p is a hydrogen atom and the other is a chlorine atom; R8 is a hydroxy group or, if at least one of R4a, R4ss or R1' is a chlorine atom, then it is a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom; R'' is a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom; and R6' is a hydroxy group, or if at least one of R4a, R4ss or R1' is a chlorine atom, then it is a hydroxy group or a chlorine atom), for use in a method for treatment of human or animal body by therapy practised on the human or animal body.

2. A derivative as claimed in Claim 1, wherein R'' is a chlorine atom.

3. A derivative as claimed in Claim 1 or 2, wherein R6' is a chlorine atom.

4. A derivative as claimed in Claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein R4p is a chlorine atom.

5. A derivative as claimed in any of Claims 1 to 4, wherein R6 is a chlorine atom.

6. A derivative as claimed in Claim 1, which is compound no. 1, 4, 5, 6 or 7, as defined in this specification.

7. A dental or other composition for use in a method for treatment of the human or animal body by therapy practised on the human or animal body, the composition containing a chlorodeoxysucrose derivative of the general formula (II) as defined in any of Claims 1 to 6.

8. A method of making a dental composition using a preparative manner known per se characterized in that a derivative (II), as defined in any of Claims 1 to 6, is included as an active ingredient to prevent tooth decay.