GB1518829A - Interference prevention in computer - Google Patents
Interference prevention in computerInfo
- Publication number
- GB1518829A GB1518829A GB52579/75A GB5257975A GB1518829A GB 1518829 A GB1518829 A GB 1518829A GB 52579/75 A GB52579/75 A GB 52579/75A GB 5257975 A GB5257975 A GB 5257975A GB 1518829 A GB1518829 A GB 1518829A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- access
- processes
- read
- matrix
- write
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/46—Multiprogramming arrangements
- G06F9/52—Program synchronisation; Mutual exclusion, e.g. by means of semaphores
- G06F9/524—Deadlock detection or avoidance
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Storage Device Security (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
1518829 Interference prevention HONEYWELL INFORMATION SYSTEMS Inc 23 Dec 1975 [30 Dec 1974] 52579/75 Heading G4A A computing system includes a protection system for preventing interferences between processes based on a continuously updated record of the history of utilization of resources. There may be a set of utilization tables, Fig. 4, one for each resource and indicating the processes (A-D) which have previously accessed that resource and whether each access was a read (R) or write (W), and a matrix, Fig. 5, of the relationship between processes resulting from the sequential accessing of the resources by the processes; when a new access is requested the utilization tables are accessed to determine new relationships between processes implied by the request and it is then determined from the matrix whether the new access would violate rules of interference and thus should be denied. If a new relationship already exists in the matrix the access is allowed whereas if its inverse exists explicitly or implicitly in the matrix the access is denied; if neither exists the access is allowed, the utilization tables and matrix being updated after each access. In the matrix of Fig. 5 0 indicates no direct relationship between the processes, 1 indicates "follows but does not depend upon" (write follows read) and 2 indicates "follows and depends upon" (read or write follows write). Thus the accesses shown in dotted lines for resource R 4 in Fig. 4 would be denied. If a read access is denied the access is routed to an earlier generation of the resource if such is available and reading of it would not produce interferences. If this is not possible, or for a denied write access, the process which interferes with the requested access is aborted, as are any processes depending thereon and the system is restored to its state prior to execution of the aborted processes. The aborted processes are subsequently re-run. The computing system operates under the control of microinstructions partially stored at the time of system initialization, some of the microinstructions being stored in a hardware area of the main memory (11, Fig. 1, not shown), some in programmable read-only and random access memory in the processing unit and some in read-write and read-only storage sections of control stores (42, 52, 62, Fig. 1, not shown) in peripheral subsystems. Details of the form of the microinstructions and nested branches are given.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US53762174A | 1974-12-30 | 1974-12-30 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB1518829A true GB1518829A (en) | 1978-07-26 |
Family
ID=24143422
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB52579/75A Expired GB1518829A (en) | 1974-12-30 | 1975-12-23 | Interference prevention in computer |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPS5941208B2 (en) |
AU (1) | AU8762475A (en) |
DE (1) | DE2557835A1 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2296884A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB1518829A (en) |
IT (1) | IT1051545B (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4224664A (en) * | 1976-05-07 | 1980-09-23 | Honeywell Information Systems Inc. | Apparatus for detecting when the activity of one process in relation to a common piece of information interferes with any other process in a multiprogramming/multiprocessing computer system |
US4096561A (en) * | 1976-10-04 | 1978-06-20 | Honeywell Information Systems Inc. | Apparatus for the multiple detection of interferences |
JPS5443644A (en) * | 1977-09-13 | 1979-04-06 | Fujitsu Ltd | Processing system for deadlock automatic release at exclusive control time |
-
1975
- 1975-12-17 AU AU87624/75A patent/AU8762475A/en not_active Expired
- 1975-12-22 DE DE19752557835 patent/DE2557835A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1975-12-22 IT IT30606/75A patent/IT1051545B/en active
- 1975-12-23 GB GB52579/75A patent/GB1518829A/en not_active Expired
- 1975-12-26 JP JP50159756A patent/JPS5941208B2/en not_active Expired
- 1975-12-29 FR FR7540017A patent/FR2296884A1/en active Granted
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JPS5193137A (en) | 1976-08-16 |
JPS5941208B2 (en) | 1984-10-05 |
FR2296884A1 (en) | 1976-07-30 |
AU8762475A (en) | 1977-06-23 |
IT1051545B (en) | 1981-05-20 |
FR2296884B1 (en) | 1979-09-07 |
DE2557835A1 (en) | 1976-07-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
GB1525208A (en) | Computer system with interference protection | |
US5392433A (en) | Method and apparatus for intraprocess locking of a shared resource in a computer system | |
EP0090575B1 (en) | Memory system | |
US4486831A (en) | Multi-programming data processing system process suspension | |
US5142676A (en) | Separate content addressable memories for storing locked segment addresses and locking processor identifications for controlling access to shared memory | |
US5675725A (en) | Computer backup system operable with open files | |
US20070143287A1 (en) | Coordinating access to memory locations for hardware transactional memory transactions and software transactional memory transactions | |
GB1488980A (en) | Memory and buffer arrangement for digital computers | |
JPH0738160B2 (en) | Security method | |
US3555513A (en) | Multiprocessor digital computer system with address modification during program execution | |
US10929293B2 (en) | Atomic operations for fabric shared memories | |
US5161219A (en) | Computer system with input/output cache | |
CA1273123C (en) | Vector access control system | |
US20180121371A1 (en) | Reading by user-level processes | |
US4982322A (en) | Apparatus and method for prohibiting access in a multi-cache data processing system to data signal groups being processed by a data processing subsystem | |
GB1518829A (en) | Interference prevention in computer | |
CN106547619A (en) | Multi-user's memory management method and system | |
JPH059815B2 (en) | ||
JP2533931B2 (en) | Data contents protection method of dynamic allocation area | |
JPH036644A (en) | Storage protection system | |
JPH04314151A (en) | Shared data area destruction preventing system | |
CN115934586A (en) | Memory partition protection method in AMP mode of Sparc V8 multi-core processor | |
JP2830293B2 (en) | Program execution method | |
ES432949A1 (en) | Data processing system | |
JPS5921062B2 (en) | Memory contention control method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PS | Patent sealed [section 19, patents act 1949] | ||
PCNP | Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |