FI60376B - MUGG SOM AER STAPLINGSBAR MED EN ANNAN LIKADAN MUGG - Google Patents

Description

E5SF * 1 [b1 «« ANNOUNCEMENT, Λ77, J | A LBJ (11) utläggningsskrift 0U0 / b C (45) Patent granted 11 01 1932 Patent meddelat (51) Kv.ik? /Int.ci.3 B 65 D 21 / 02, 1/10, A47 G 19/25 SUOM I_FI N LAN D (21) P »t * nttlh * k« nu * - P »t * nt» n * öknlnj 7713 * + 6. (22) H »k * ml * ptlvt - Arwöknlng» dag 27 .Ob. 77 ^ (23) Alkuptlvt — Glltighetsdig 27-0U.77 (41) Tullut | ulklMk * l - Bllvlt offtntllg 29-10.77

Patent and register shark Utu · _ .... ....

Patent-oeh registerrtyrelMn eeh utl.ikrifun publkurad 30-09-81 (32) (33) (31) Requested privilege — Begird prloritet 28.0 * 4.76

Great Britain (GB) 17152/76 (71) Mars Incorporated, 1651 Old Meadow Road, McLean, Virginia 22101, USA (72) Robert Henry Day, Bracknell, Berkshire, Great Britain (GB) (7 * 0 Berggren Oy Ab (5 * 0 Mug - Muggle with another similar cup - Mugg som är staplingsbar med en annan likadan mugg

In the sale of beverages from a vending machine, it is known to stack a large number of thin-walled mugs inside each other in the vending machine, whereby a certain amount of solutes are placed in each space between the stacks. In use, the mugs are removed one after the other from the bottom of the stack and each mug is usually filled with near-boiling water that dissolves the ingredients.

In this way, each mug is made into a beverage that is ready to be consumed.

Such mugs can also be used in a dispenser from which the mugs can be removed one at a time by hand.

The present invention is directed to thin-walled mugs suitable for these purposes. Such mugs must meet a number of requirements for their mechanical properties and functions, not only when the stacked mugs are removed one after the other, but also when the mugs are transported from the factory where they are assembled into stacks and stored. Mugs of this type are described, for example, in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,512,677 and 3,927,766.

2 60376

The invention therefore relates to a Mug of a known type as set out in the specification of the appended claim 1, which, however, has been improved by the new design shown in the characterizing part of the same claim.

These various basic properties of the mugs of the present invention are best explained by a particular example. Such an example is shown in the accompanying drawings, in which Figure 1 shows a side view of the mugs and Figures 2-5 show partial enlargements illustrating the contact between two adjacent mugs in a stack. (For clarity, the surfaces that actually touch each other are shown as slightly separate).

The cup of the example has a volume of 22 cl and is made of impact-resistant polystyrene with an average wall thickness of 0.2 mm.

The mugs in the drawings have a base 2 and a jacket wall 4 which is widened upwards from the base to the edge 6.

When several identically similar mugs according to Fig. 1 are stacked vertically on top of each other, the mugs adhere to each other due to the interaction of the wall part A of the cup and the wall part B of the second cup. In other words, the inside of a wall portion cooperates with the next higher in the stack cup wall on the outer side B, while the wall part B of non-operates with the next lower stack cup wall part inside of the A.

The normal stacking state of two adjacent mugs in a stack is shown in Figure 3. In the claims, this state is referred to as the "first stacking state". The bottom walls 2 of the adjacent mugs are then located 12.5 mm apart. This distance is called the "stacking height".

The wall part A has inner surfaces 8, 10 and 12 and an angle 14 in the joint between the surface 12 and the surface 13. Wall portion B has outer surfaces 16 and 18 and a plurality of alternating outer surfaces 20 and 22 around the circumference.

Surfaces 10 and 18 are cylindrical and uniform around the circumference of the mug. They form a uniform, sliding closure around the circumference of the cup 3 60376 in the normal stacking state. As will be explained later in the specification, the closure may mean a precise or light fit, a light compression fit, or a loose fit with a small clearance.

Surfaces 8 and 16 are frustoconical, taper downwards at the same angle and uniform around the circumference of the cup. They form a uniform seal around the second perimeter in the normal stacking state and also act as a support to prevent the mugs from separating from each other. Suitably the surfaces 8 and 16 form an angle of 30 ° with the vertical axis of the cup.

The surfaces are sectors of a truncated cone-shaped surface and taper downward. Surfaces 22 are sectors of a flat, annular, horizontal surface. There are suitably 6 surfaces 20, each having a central angle of 15 °, and likewise six surfaces 22, each having a central angle of 45 °. All surfaces 20 and 22 join the lower edge 25 of the cylindrical surface 18. The surfaces 20 and 22 are connected to the circumference 27 of the bottom surface 2 by vertical surfaces 21 and 23. These surfaces 21 and 23 are all parts of a common vertical, cylindrical surface.

Surface 12 is a flat horizontal ring. The surface 13 extending downwards from the corner 14 is suitably vertical and cylindrical and joins the wall part B of the same cup. In the normal stacking state, the surfaces 20 rest against an angle 4, which prevents the relative axial movement of the mugs towards each other. The surfaces 20 suitably form an angle of 30 ° with the vertical central axis of the cup. Surfaces 12 and 22 form a stop that limits the relative axial movement of the mugs toward each other, which will be described in more detail below.

The cups can be separated by applying axial forces up and down to two adjacent upper and lower cups, e.g. by applying these forces to the edge 6 of the cup. while the wall portion B momentarily twists somewhat radially inward until the surface 18 can pass the inner surface 24. Continuous application of axial forces causes the surfaces 18 and 24 to slide over each other until the mugs are completely separated from each other.

6 0 3 7 6

When stacking, the mugs are placed in the position of Figure 2, where the surfaces 20 rest on an inner surface 26 which is in the shape of a truncated cone, widens upwards and is uniform in circumference. The assembly of Figure 2 can be used to temporarily stack the mugs between the step of making the mugs and the step of separating the mugs from each other to fill the beverage concentrate, followed by the connection to the normal stacking state according to Figure 3. In this last step, after the seal has been placed in the area between the bottom walls 2 of the two adjacent mugs, axial forces are applied to the mugs to force them towards each other, resulting in the surfaces 20 sliding over the surface 26 temporarily until the surfaces 18 and 24 can slide over each other, at which point the mugs reach the position shown in Figure 3. When the mugs reach the position shown in Figure 3, the wall portions A and B return to their unstressed shapes so that surface 18 has a larger radius than surface 24 and surfaces 10, 18 and 8, 16 work together to form two closures as described above with surfaces 20 abutting against angle 14. . The surface 26 suitably forms an angle of 30 ° with the central vertical axis of the cup.

It is entirely possible that stacked mugs are sometimes dropped or handled in such a way during transport between the factory in which they are stacked and the place of use in such a way that the stack is subjected to a strong axial impact. For example, a box with multiple stacks may fall to the ground from a truck platform. The function of the parts of the wall part B forming the surfaces 20 is to dampen such an impact as shown in Fig. 4, which protects the mugs from damage. As a result of this damping, the parts of the upper cup which form the surfaces 20 of the two adjacent cups change shape, while the corner 14 of the lower cup essentially retains its shape. The cups move axially towards each other so that the closure between the surfaces 8 and 16 temporarily opens, but the closure between the cylindrical surfaces 10 and 18 does not open under the effect of this axial relative movement. The maximum relative movement of the mugs ends in the position of Figure 5, and this is referred to in the claims as the "second stacking mode".

When the mugs reach the position of Figure 5, the surfaces 22 abut the surface 12, from which they receive a substantial support area, thus effectively stopping the axial relative movement of the mugs towards each other. This arrangement ensures that the remaining part of the jacket walls of the two adjacent cups (especially the wall parts C and D in Fig. 1) do not come so close to each other that there is a risk of the cups wedging together. If such a wedge were to occur, it would, of course, prevent the mugs from being satisfactorily removed at the point of use.

The ratios of the wall portions A and B are thus selected with respect to the wall thickness of the mugs so that the deformation of the surfaces between the position according to Fig. 3 and the position according to Fig. 5 does not cause permanent damage to the cup. The ratios are suitably selected so that the resilience of the wall portion B is unchanged after such a temporary deformation, so that two adjacent mugs automatically return after their axial impact to their relative positions of Figure 3, where the closure between surfaces 8 and 16 is restored.

Mugs can usually be made by thermoforming them from a material in the form of a flat sheet, using a drawing mandrel to partially stretch the sheet, whereby the sheet is brought into contact with a matrix by a pneumatic pressure difference which determines the appearance of the finished cup. This appearance is not identical to the shape of the matrix due to shrinkage during cooling. The internal shape of the cup is indirectly determined by its appearance depending on the local thickness of the finished mug material. When using this manufacturing method, there is a certain uncertainty in the dimensions of the cooperating inner and outer surfaces. In particular, what has been referred to above as the barrier between the cylindrical surfaces 10 and 18 may cause light compression or loose fitting. As a result, the wall portions A and B are suitably arranged so that the surfaces 20 in the first stacking space according to Fig. 3 deform somewhat under the effect of the pressure applied to the corner 14. In this way, when compression or play occurs, friction between surfaces 10 and 18 is overcome when returning from the position of Figure 5 to the position of Figure 3.

If, on the other hand, the fitting is loose and has a clearance so that atmospheric air or fine powder can penetrate the beverage materials from the outside between the surfaces 10 and 18, the truncated conical surfaces 8 and 16 form a second barrier which is not critically dependent on the cooperating surfaces 8 and 16. dimensions, but depends on the axial compression of the surfaces 8 and 16 in the first stacking state according to FIG. This axial pressure is caused in particular by the angle 14 intended for this purpose by somewhat changing the shape of the surfaces 20, as mentioned in the previous paragraph.

Surfaces 8 and 16 are, of course, different from each other due to axial impacts, as shown in Figures 3-5, but surfaces 10 and 18 also form a small barrier with a small clearance to prevent materials from spilling out and in particular to ensure that material particles do not enter the space. 16 is formed during a short-term impact. Thus, a reliable seal between surfaces 8 and 16 is restored as the mugs return to the state of Figure 3, and the material particles are unlikely to keep these surfaces apart.

Although the first closure formed by surfaces 10 and 18 and the second closure formed by surfaces 8 and 16 are desirable, they are not absolutely necessary, especially if the mugs are used in conditions where the storage time between the assembly and the stacked mugs will be short or if air is not a beverage. to the detriment of the ingredients. Under such conditions, the unitary surface 8 can be replaced by a surface whose circumference is discontinuous.

Although surfaces 8 and 16 are shown in the shape of a truncated cone, other shapes are possible. For example, each surface may have a partially concave and partially convex vertical section towards the inside of the cup in the same manner as a weakly curved S.

In the example, the wall parts A and B are located entirely in the jacket wall of the cup. However, the wall part B may extend to the bottom and also be part of it.

In the example, the axial shock absorption is provided by surfaces 20 which form an oblique angle with the vertical axis of the cup. Other types of dampers can also be used. Shock absorbers for cup stacks are disclosed, for example, in British Patent Publication 865,024, and the surfaces 20 of the present disclosure can be compared to the surfaces of Figures 9-13 of the aforementioned British Patent Publication. Other types of damping devices shown in Figures 14-21 of said patent publication can also be used in the present invention.

7 60376

In the example, the Mug is single-walled at both its base and jacket. The present invention can also be applied to double-walled mugs consisting of an inner and an outer part, which are usually attached to each other at the edge 6. In such two-walled mugs, the wall part A should belong to the inner part and the outer part of the wall part B.

In the example, the surfaces 8 and 16 preventing the separation of two adjacent cups are located above the surfaces 10 and 18, which form a cylindrical closure. All of these surfaces are located above the corner 14, the surface 20 forming the damping device, and the surfaces 12 and 22, which prevent the mugs from further compressing. However, the relative positions of these different surface pairs can be arranged in a different way.

The labyrinth effect can be achieved by changing the wall portion forming the surface 13 so that a third seal is formed just inside the lower cup surface 24 between the lower cup surface 24 (Fig. 3) and the outer side of the upper cup.

Claims (2)

60376 8 1. A mug to be nested with another similar cup, comprising a wall portion having an inner and outer surface so shaped that when the Mug is inserted vertically into another similar cup, the outer surface of the upper cup cooperates with the inner surface of the lower cup, with both outer and inner surfaces having stop surfaces (12 , 22) cooperating to limit the nesting distance of the cups and holding surfaces (8, 16) which overlap when the cups are nested holding the cups together, the cups being detachable from each other only using sufficient axial force to cause radial resilience of the holding surfaces of the wall portions, that the stop surface (12) and the holding surface (8) on the inner surface of the cup are spaced apart by a vertical distance greater than the vertical distance between the stop surface (22) on the outer surface of the cup and the holding surface (16) so that the mugs can slide into each other in stacking mode and that in the cup o n resiliently retractable portions (20) adapted to engage an identical second cup portion (14) and to keep the holding surfaces (8, 16) in contact with each other in the stacking state but allowing the cups to slide relative to each other so that the stop surfaces (12, 22) of the two overlapping cups approach each other . Mug according to claim 1, characterized in that the resiliently retractable parts (20) comprise a series of truncated conical surfaces spaced apart on the circumference of the cup between one stop surface (12), either inside or outside, and an adjacent cylinder surface (21), and that the part (14) of a similar cup to which the resiliently retractable parts (20) engage is a shoulder (14) located close to the other stop surface (22) of the cup, either outside or inside. Mug according to claim 2, characterized in that the truncated cone-shaped surfaces (20) extend away from the second stop surface (22) of the cup in such a vertical distance that when the mugs are nested and the holding surfaces (8, 16) are in contact with each other, the shoulder (14) deformation of truncated cone-shaped surfaces.