FI124326B

FI124326B - Process for the treatment of biomass

Info

Publication number: FI124326B
Application number: FI20125556A
Authority: FI
Inventors: Aija Jantunen; Maria Luhtala
Original assignee: Kemira Oyj
Priority date: 2012-05-25
Filing date: 2012-05-25
Publication date: 2014-06-30
Also published as: FI20125556A; WO2013175062A1

Description

METHOD FOR TREATMENT OF BIOMASS

The invention relates to a method for treatment of biomass, such as sludge, according to the preamble of the enclosed independent claim.

5

Biomass, such as sludge, which is obtained, for example, as a by-product in treatment of waste water, contains valuable nutrients, which make the sludge potentially interesting fertilizer in agriculture. However, the sludge may also contain pathogenic micro-organisms and parasites, such as fecal coliforms, 10 Salmonella spp., helminth ova. The legislation requires that if the sludge is intended to be used as a fertilizer, it must be treated or hygienised so that there is no risk of pathogens or parasites for humans or environment.

It is known to treat sludge with peracetic acid. However, peracetic acid is difficult to 15 transport long distances, as it is relatively corrosive. Thus there exists a need for a simpler, potentially safer, method for treatment of sludge, which would still provide excellent treatment result, i.e. effectively reduce the number of pathogenic microorganisms and parasites in the sludge.

20 For example, J. A. Barrios et al., Journal of Residuals Science & Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2004 discloses treatment of sludge with peracetic acid to reduce the microbial content.

^ An object of this invention is to minimise or even eliminate the disadvantages

O

™ 25 existing in the prior art.

o o ° An object of the invention is also to provide a method which provides simple and ^ effective treatment of biomass, especially sludge, such as digested or non- lo digested sludge.

£j 30 ° These objects are attained with an invention having the characteristics presented below in the characterising parts of the independent claims.

2

Typical method according to the present invention for treatment of biomass is described in enclosed claim 1. The method comprises, inter alia, - obtaining biomass having a dry solids content of at least 3 weight-%, - mixing performic acid to the biomass, and 5 - allowing performic acid to react with the biomass.

Typical use of performic acid is for treatment of biomass, preferably sludge, such as digested or non-digested sludge, having dry solids content of 3 - 50 weight-%.

10 Typical arrangement for treatment of biomass comprises - a mixing apparatus, such as a mixing tank with a mixer, a screw mixer or a horizontal mixer, - means for feeding biomass having dry solids content of 3 - 50 weight-% to the mixing apparatus.

15 - a preparation unit for performic acid, and - means for feeding performic acid prepared in the preparation unit to the mixing apparatus.

Now it has been surprisingly found out that mixing of performic acid to the biomass 20 effectively reduces the amount of pathogenic micro-organisms. The use of performic acid is easy, as it can be prepared in situ by commercially available preparation apparatuses. Thus there is no need for long distance transports of treatment chemicals from a chemical manufacturer to the biomass treatment ? station, which effectively reduces risk for accidents and/or handling mistakes

O

25 during transport, o σ> ° In context of the present application the term “biomass” is selected from sludge, * such as digested sludge or non-digested sludge; digested biowaste; faeces ίο contaminated substances, such as septic tank waste or manure; industrial waste cm 30 comprising pathogenic micro-organisms such as E. coli and/or Salmonella spp.; or ° biosolids. Especially, biomass may be sludge, which may be digested sludge, non- digested sludge or dewatered sludge, non-digested sludge being preferred, non-digested dewatered sludge being more preferred. According to one embodiment, 3 biomass is preferably sludge from municipal waste water treatment, still more preferably non-digested sludge from municipal waste water treatment.

The biomass, such as sludge, which is treated, may have a dry solids content of at 5 least 3 weight-%, preferably at least 5 weight-%, more preferably at least >10 weight-% and it may be dewatered for obtaining an optimal dry solids content. According to one embodiment of the invention the biomass, preferably digested or non-digested sludge from waste water treatment, is dewatered to a dry solids content of 10 - 50 weight-%, preferably 15-30 weight-%, before adding the 10 performic acid to the biomass. Use of relatively dry dewatered biomass, such as sludge, is preferred as it makes the treatment of biomass more economical. For example, it is possible to treat sludge at the waste water treatment plant or at a separate sludge treatment station, which is situated at different location than the waste water treatment plant. For example, the dewatered sludge can be 15 transported from the treatment plant to a separate sludge treatment station.

According to one embodiment of the invention the biomass to be treated is dewatered mechanically by using a centrifuge, a belt filter press or a screw press. Mechanical dewatering provides effective results without increasing the chemical 20 load of the process. Furthermore, most waste water treatment plants have suitable mechanical dewatering apparatuses, and no new investments are needed.

Performic acid, CH203, is used as an aqueous solution. Typically the performic ^ acid has a concentration at least 10 %, calculated as weight to volume, typically ^ 25 around 13.5 %, calculated as weight to volume. Preferably the aqueous performic ° acid solution is used as an equilibrium solution, o

X

According to the invention performic acid is used in amount of 10-50 kg/ton ίο biomass dry solids, preferably 15-45 kg/ton biomass dry solids, more preferably cn 30 20 - 40 kg/ton biomass dry solids. The dose is given as 100% performic acid. In

O

cm case small dose of performic acid is used, it may be necessary to prolong the reaction time for obtaining the desired reduction in amount of pathogenic microorganisms. In this application the term “reaction time” covers not only the actual 4 mixing of performic acid and the biomass, but also the following residence time during storage, e.g. in a storage tank, silo, container, reservoir or pile, while the number of pathogenic micro-organisms is still decreasing. According to one embodiment of the invention performic acid is allowed to react with the biomass, 5 such as sludge, at least 25 min, preferably at least 30 min, more preferably at least 60 min, min and/or until the level of E. coli is < 1000 cfu/g, preferably < 500 cfu/g, more preferably <250 cfu/g. In case the dosage of performic acid is < 15 kg/ton biomass dry solids, the reaction time is at least 6 days. It has been observed that the amount of pathogenic micro-organisms is actually reducing during the days 10 following the addition and mixing of the performic acid to the biomass.

According to one embodiment it is possible to dose additional chemicals, such as acids or other oxidants, to the biomass before adding the performic acid to the biomass. For example, the dosage of the performic acid may be optimised by 15 lowering the pH of the biomass before the addition of performic acid. pH of the biomass may be lowered by appropriate addition of another acid before the addition of performic acid.

The arrangement for treating biomass comprises a mixing apparatus, which may 20 be a mixing tank having a mixer, a horizontal mixer or a screw mixer. The mixing tank is typically equipped with a blade mixer. The type of mixing apparatus depends on the dry solids content of the biomass to be treated. In case the biomass to be treated is relatively dry, i.e. dewatered sludge, the mixing apparatus ? is typically a screw mixer or a horizontal mixer.

? 25

CD

^ The preparation unit for performic acid is commercially available from Kemira Oyj, ° sold under name DesinFix technology. Performic acid is thus prepared in the immediate vicinity of the mixing apparatus, which guarantees the high chemical ίο efficiency of the performic acid. Performic acid is led to the mixing apparatus

LO

cj 30 through suitable connections and fed to the mixing apparatus through suitable

O

feeding means. During mixing the pH of the biomass decreases, typically to a pH value < 6, more typically to a value of 3 - 6. At the same time the temperature of 5 the mixture is increasing, which also promotes the reduction of pathogenic microorganisms.

The method according to the invention may be performed as a batch process or as 5 a continuous process.

According to one embodiment the arrangement further comprises at least one storage tank, container, silo, reservoir or pile or the like for storing the treated biomass, such as sludge. After the mixing of the biomass and performic acid, the 10 treated biomass may be transferred to the storage tank, silo or to the storage pile, where it may be stored before its use as a fertiliser. At the same time the desired reduction in amount of pathogenic micro-organisms may continue in the storage tank or container, vessel, silo, reservoir or pile or the like. It is also possible to transfer the treated biomass directly to the transportation vehicle, with which it is 15 transported to the final destination of use, e.g. field or farmland.

The arrangement may also comprise one or several receiver tanks, containers, silos, reservoirs, piles or the like, which are arranged prior to the mixing apparatus. Especially when the separate biomass treatment station is situated at a different 20 location than the origin of generation of the biomass, e.g. municipal water treatment, the receiver tank(s), silos, pile(s) or the like may function as buffer stock for the biomass to be treated.

^ It is possible that the treated biomass is stabilised with lime, CaO.

? 25

CD

^ According to one preferred embodiment, non-digested sludge from municipal ° waste water treatment is dewatered mechanically by using a centrifuge, a belt filter * press or a screw press. After the dewatering, the dewatered sludge having dry ίο solids content > 10 weight-% may be treated directly by mixing with performic acid, dj 30 or the dewatered sludge may be stored in a container, silo or pile before treatment ° with performic acid. The treatment with performic acid may be performed in connection with the municipal waste water treatment or at a separate sludge treatment station. The dewatered sludge may be transported to the separate 6 sludge treatment station by using a transport vehicle, such as truck, lorry or the like. After the mixing with performic acid and appropriate reaction time, under which the level of E. coli in the treated sludge is reduced to < 1000 cfu/g, preferably < 500 cfu/g, the treated sludge is either stored for further use, or 5 transported directly for final destination of use.

According to one embodiment of the invention performic acid is used for treatment of biomass, preferably sludge, such as digested or non-digested sludge, having dry solids content of 3 - 50 weight-% for reducing the level of E. coli in the treated 10 biomass to < 1000 cfu/g, preferably < 500 cfu/g, more preferably <250 cfu/g, still more preferably < 200 cfu/g, sometimes even < 100 cfu/g.

EXPERIMENTAL

15 Example 1 1000 g of clarification sludge, which was not anaerobic fermented and which had dry solids content of 4 weight-%, was poured into a 2 liter beaker. Blade mixer was used to mixing the sludge with mixing speed 300 rpm. Performic acid equilibrium solution having active performic acid, PFA, concentration 13.5 weight-to-volume-% 20 (Kemira DEX-135) was dosed to the sludge with pipette. The dosing amount was 10, 20 and 30 kg active performic acid/ton dry solids. Mixing time was 30 minutes.

Samples were taken to the microbial analysis. E. coli was analysed with ? Chromocult® Coliform agar, with E. coli/Coliform Supplement to avoid the ^ 25 overgrowth of gram-positive bacteria, Pseudomonas or Aeromonas spp..

° Salmonella was analysed according to the method NMKL 71:1999 Salmonella.

CD

° First microbial analysis was done on the next day from the treatment. Meanwhile * the sample was stored in cold room at δΌ. The same analyses were also done ίο after 7 days from the treatment. Meanwhile the samples were stored in room ou 30 temperature, caps open. pH was also determined always when microbial analyses ° were done.

Results are given in Table 1.

7

Example 2 2000 g of dewatered sludge, which was not anaerobic fermented and which had dry solids content of 24 weight-% was put into a Lödige mixer. Performic acid 5 equilibrium solution having active performic acid, PFA, concentration 13.5 weight-to-volume-% (Kemira DEX-135) was dosed to the mixer with syringe. The dosing amount was 10, 20 and 30 kg active performic acid/ton dry solids. Mixing time was 60 minutes.

10 Samples were taken to the microbial analysis. E. coli was analysed with Chromocult® Coliform agar, with E. colliColiform Supplement to avoid the overgrowth of gram-positive bacteria, Pseudomonas or Aeromonas spp.. Salmonella was analysed according to the method NMKL 71:1999 Salmonella. First microbial analysis was done on the next day from the treatment. Meanwhile 15 the sample was stored in cold room at 5Ό. The same analyses were also done after 7 days from the treatment. Meanwhile the samples were stored in room temperature, caps open. pH was also determined always when microbial analyses were done, sample being diluted 1:1 with water before pH measurement.

20 Results are given in Table 1.

Ί· δ

CvJ

co o

CD

O

X

cc

CL

CO

LO

C\J

δ

C\J

8

Table 1. Results of Example 1 and Example 2.

after 1 day after 7 days

Dry solicls E. coli Salmonella E. coli Salmonella content PFA dose

(%) (kg/ton DS) (cfu/g) /25g pH (cfu/g) /25g pH

4 untreated 300000 detected 6.4 30000 detected 5.6 4 10 8000 detected 5.8 6000 detected 6.1 4 20 100 not detected 4.8 <100 not detected 5.1 4 30 <100 not detected 4.3 <100 not detected 4.4 24 untreated 700000 detected 6.7 1000 not detected 8.2 24 10 5000 detected 5.7 800 not detected 6.0 24 20 200,0 not detected 5.0 <100 not detected 5.1 24 30 <100 not detected 4.5 <100 not detected 4.6

Results given in Table 1 shown clear reduction in amount of E. coli and 5 Salmonella. Desired reduction may be achieved even with lower dosage of performic acid, provided that the reaction time is long enough.

Even if the invention was described with reference to what at present seems to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is appreciated that the invention ς 10 shall not be limited to the embodiments described above, but the invention is

C\J

^ intended to cover also different modifications and equivalent technical solutions o ^ within the scope of the enclosed claims.

o

X

IX

CL

CD

m m

LO

CM

O

CM

Claims

A process for treating biomass comprising: - collecting biomass selected from a sludge such as a digested sludge or a 5 untreated sludge; digested biowaste; material contaminated with faeces such as septic tank waste or manure; industrial waste comprising pathogenic microorganisms such as E. coli and / or Salmonella spp .; or biohumus having a dry matter biomass content of at least 3% by weight, 10. mixing permic acid with the biomass, and - reacting the permic acid with the biomass, characterized in that the permic acid is used in an amount of 10-50 kg / tonne biomass dry matter, preferably 15-45 kg. kg / ton of biomass dry matter, more preferably 20-40 kg / tonne of biomass dry matter.

Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that the biomass is dried to a dry matter content of 10 to 50% by weight, preferably 15 to 30% by weight, before the permic acid is added to the biomass. 20

Method according to Claim 2, characterized in that the biomass is mechanically dried using a centrifuge, a press belt press or a screw press. 't δ ^ 25

Process according to one of Claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the aqueous permic acid is used as an equilibrium solution. o X

Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that the permic acid is reacted with the slurry for at least 25 minutes, preferably for 30 minutes at least 30 minutes, more preferably at least 60 minutes. and / or until the concentration of E. coli is <1000 cfu / g, preferably <500 cfu / g, more preferably <250 cfu / g.