FI106093B - Trolling spoon - Google Patents

Description

106093

UISTIN - DRAG

The invention comprises a metal or spoon baffle which does not rotate about its longitudinal axis and swims floating in an upright position.

All lures operate on the same principle. In the water, they develop a movement that should mimic the prey that predators strike and catch on the hooks on the lure. There are three main ways to use the lure. Let's chop, ie immerse the lure to the desired depth, where it is moved with a short rod in up-down movements, ie chopped to lure the prey into a blow. Another way is trolling, where you pull the lure behind the boat. The third and perhaps most popular form of fishing with a lure is casting or snapping, where the lure is thrown with a casting rod and rewound with a reel, or reel.

There are many types and looks of lures, but they can be roughly classified into four main groups. Fishing rods, baskets, wobblers and spoons known as spoon baits or metal lures.

The newcomer is the jig, which has a frame made of completely softer rubber mass that has a hook which, due to its hooked shape, tends to swing back and forth quickly while the jig is swimming.

Ice fishing is a separate chapter due to their different fishing methods, so the ice fishing is not discussed here.

The magazine is an old invention comprising a heavier body and a lighter body rotating around it. The baskets come in many sizes and colors, but they are all similar in structure.

,, T Wobblers are used as both throwing and hauling lures. A special feature of wobblers is that they also look like real prey fish in appearance. The body is elongated and the front end is clearly more caudal. The wobble swim movement is a regular wobble without any surprising throws. '· «·' Motion is most often developed by a turf plate in the nose. A special feature of a wobble is always standing upright in the water.

»» T • · · * 1 1 * Spoon lure is the most popular lure type in the world, made out of a single piece of metal that is twisted into a variety of shapes to develop attractive swim movements. Unlike other lure types, spoons} '·' · m are known for their irregular motion and random rotation around their longitudinal axis. Not only does irregular movement attract predatory fish, it is also based on its popularity. '. ·. simplicity and ease-of-use, especially upwind.

t · I «,,, 'The negative feature of the wobble on the thrown nose is its poor wind diameter. The tosses »» t. # Are especially short in the upwind and the wobble often turns transversely in the air, causing the hooks a · a · 2 106093 to catch the line. The regularity of the swim movement can also be detrimental to poor fishing weather.

The cap or spinner always does the same rotating motion by mimicking the spinning insects. Spinnar always has its own supporters and, due to its diversity, should be considered a complement to the wobble and a spoon rather than a competitor.

As mentioned above, there are many types and colors of spoon reels. The common feature, however, is that they rotate more or less all around their longitudinal axis. This rotation is bad for a fishing line which, over time, turns into unusable. This is attempted by using n.s. lures between lure and line. The trimmer is a rotating small joint that should rotate instead of a fishing line. The downside to spoon lures is the spinning, which not only spoils the line but also reduces fishing.

The technology is not aware of any example of a solution that attempted to prevent a spinning motion by developing a spoon baffle that would float in an upright position. Instead, the Finnish Pat. The 68153 has attempted to provide stability to the swimming movement of the traditional spoon model by fitting wings parallel to the longitudinal axis of the lure body to the side of the lure. This partially reduces the rotation but does not cause the lure to stand up, which is not the goal of the patent. Two things prevent you from standing up while swimming. The shape of the lure body and the wings parallel to the longitudinal axis of the lure.

U.S. Patent 4,180,936 is the latest flat metal lure inventions utilizing wing technology. In this embodiment, there is a section fitted from front to back along the longitudinal axis of the lure body; _ one long wing which is identical in shape to the hull. The most important anomaly in the US • · · is the lack of an angle between the wing and the longitudinal axis of the body for the center in question. This angle is precisely the driving force of the lure movement.

: ·. ·. Purpose US-pat. The solutions were to provide a lure that holds horizontally undulating •.,; 'At different depths of their swim. With the present invention, it has again been desired to achieve a wavering ·.,. · * Solution in which the flat body remains in an upright position.

«· I» I * • i. Rehnfors Pat. No FI 8983 has developed solutions based on the use of wings of the lure,; 111 * to modify your swimming style. In these solutions, the so-called. metal fish on both sides of the lure:. ·. fitted with wings not angularly parallel to the longitudinal axis of the lure *: i ·. right and left hemisphere. Therefore, they develop a rotating motion in the lure, which is the object of the invention.

• · · »M t

• * «I

• ♦ · <1.1 In Rehnfors' patent, the wings are on both sides of the lure, but parallel to the sides of the lure. Thus, when the lure is swimming, it remains in the supine position rather than in an upright position.

• · · ·· #

Vi: The wobble swim movement has always been accomplished in two main ways. Peat or stern plate or a combination of both. Since the stern plate resembles the wing of the present invention, I mention two prior art solutions. First, remember that wobblers do not '. '' Fight the same problems as spoonbacks. Wobblers never rotate: "': about their longitudinal axis, that is, they always stay in an upright position, so when" wobble-like "parts appear in wobble solutions, they try to solve quite different problems. Problems are quite different; 106093 can be automatically applied to spoon reels and vice versa, so I consider applying a flat tail or wing to a spoon reel as a technique other than its use in lobbies.

The first wobble solution representing flat stern technology is USAPAT 5,490,347. Since the flat stern does not represent a new technique in the wobble world, the claims emphasize otherwise. Weights in the stern and horizontal surfaces on the hull, which is otherwise fish-shaped, typical of wobblers. Because the wobblers always stay upright and do not rotate, the flat stern is intended to give the wobble a wobbly motion.

Another example of a flat stern is US PAT 3.550.304. In this solution, a new V-shaped, double-winged tail hinged behind the hull is new. The V-shape of the tail is very effective in turning the stern sideways by means of turbulence. At the same time, the hinged tail moves up and down. Also, this solution does not combat rotating motion, and staying upright is not a problem as it is a wobble for which a moving tail is used to create a new, more special movement for the lure.

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a new type of spoon baffle which swims without rotation in an upright position.

The above result is obtained by means of a metal or spoon baffle according to the invention, characterized in that at least one of the two sides of the lure, at an angle to the side, longitudinal (equal) angles opening in the same direction relative to the longitudinal axis of the lure. ,,. '· 1 So the spoon repeater must meet certain criteria in order for it to swim without spinning upright: ·. . like a wobbler. First, the lure body must be flat in order to have a water diameter feature '..! should be as smooth as possible. Conventional spoon lures have a convex, '...' angular, curved or other shape that causes movement of the lure. The side profile of the lure is irrelevant. The traditional fish shape, which is wider in the middle and narrows towards the ends, works well. The flat shape of the lure does not prevent decorative elements such as engraving in the form of scales, eyes or tufts. The necessity of a flat lure is due to · '· 1; the fact that the shape of the lure alone should not be a trigger. In the solution according to the invention, this task is exclusively assigned to the wing. In principle, could: ·; · :! think of a body with shapes, but each individual shape should have another self-compensating or eliminating shape so that the end result is still neutral, meaning in practice that the lure, regardless of shape, has no directional or other directional shape. your spinner and swimmer in upright position have a wing system mounted in the lure that is divided into two parts. Front wings and rear wing. It is most practical to make the wings from the same material: "." F as the lure, ie thin metal or sheet metal, but of course another material that meets the same requirements is acceptable. Since the blade must extend to both sides of the lure, for manufacturing reasons it is more practical to insert one blade into the slit in the lure than to attach two separate blades to each side of the lure, which of course '· 1 ·' The function of the blade in width is to hold the lure up and: ^ #> · develop the lure movement in the longitudinal direction. These tasks include wing angles to the lure.;. decisive. In the width direction, the safest basic solution is achieved if the angles between the sides of the trunk and the wings are 90 °. The larger the deviation from this, the more sensitive the lure is to rotation.

The lure is also most likely to remain upright if the wing angles on both sides of the lure are equal. In the longitudinal direction, the blade must be at an angle to the longitudinal axis of the lure so that floating motion can occur in the lure. The steepness of an angle is less important than the existence of an angle. In order to prevent the lure from rotating, the wing halves should be obliquely parallel to the longitudinal direction, either upwards or downwards, i.e. the angles formed by the longitudinal axis open in the same direction. The rear wing is located on the backside of the lure body either attached to its edge or at its sides such that the majority of the wing is located on one side of the longitudinal axis of the lure, which is opposite to it and remains below the lure. The wing may indeed leave above the longitudinal axis to then intersect the longitudinal axis of the lure to continue obliquely downward. In one case, the wing is completely above the longitudinal axis. When the lure's center of gravity is clearly on one side of the longitudinal axis of the wing, the lure will swim in the water above the wing where it will do similar work. The praiseworthy and technically cheapest result is achieved with one stern blade that starts at the center of the lure below the longitudinal axis. The wing continues through the gently inclined downwardly and continue past the rear end of the lure about a half length of the lure circling at the end of steeper downwards. As a rule, you can say that length replaces width. Thus, the wing does not have to be extra wide when it first walks along the sides and continues past the stern for quite some time. But if you want the wing to be n.s. just a short tail it must be wider than the lure height to be able to hold the lure upright. Intermediaries of the above solutions include those where the wing has a starting point approximately in the center of the lure from the height of the longitudinal axis, from where it extends obliquely to the rear and crosses the edge of the lure before the tail end. sloping downwards, in line with the rear. Alternatively, the wing may terminate •; edge, In these solutions, the wing width is smaller than the tail, but wider than the first solution. Alternatively, the narrow rear wing may receive assistance from the front wings, resulting in oversized • '·'; width can be waived. The front wing has a 'stabilizing meaning' at the front on its nose, regardless of its position, but its best position to guide the lure is its downward edge on the forehead '· · 1, with the lure aiming downwards. Also, the part of the wing outside the lure body may be split, that is, two wings, whereby the fin adjustment of the lure is * |: ··. possible.

• III »<» II »

A workable solution could be a detachable system, with different sizes and colors of detachable vanes available on the flat base hull, which may be necessary or desirable. The lure would have holes, slits, gaps, or other similar fastening solutions made specifically for the wings.

• · · · • · »* #« 0 •

In the following, the invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which Fig. 1 and Fig. 1A show a "···" side and top view of a highly functional solution comprising one long rear wing.

Figures 2 and 2A show a solution representing a single short wide aft wing.

• »· M · m ·

Figures 3 and 3A show a side and top view of a solution using a short stern wing extending far to the side of the hull.

11 «,. S Figures 4 and 4A show a side and top view of a solution in which the wing does not extend beyond the edge of the lure body.

I I I III

«« · «•« · • 1 5 106093

Figures 5 and 5A show a solution with a small auxiliary wing mounted on the end of the lure in addition to a smaller wing behind the edge.

Figures 6 and 6A show a side and top view of a single wing solution where the wing runs at the bottom of the lure and curves away from the edge down the lure end.

Figure 7 is a side elevation of Figure 1.

Figure 8 shows an alternative shape for the flat body.

In the embodiments shown in Figures 1,1A and 2,2A, the wing (2) extends far behind the rear end (IB) of the body (1). In both cases, the wing (2) leaves below the longitudinal axis (3) of the lure body (1). In Fig. 1, the wing (2) passes only a longer distance along the lure body (1) before it crosses the edge (1R) of the lure (1). (7) shows a fishing line lure (1) attached.

(5) hooks (6) attached to the lure (1) hooks attached to the wing (2). (KU) is the steeply curved portion of the wing (2). (2S) shows the side of the lure (1).

In Fig. 3, 3A, the wing (2) slightly crosses the edge (1R) of the lure body (1), but instead runs along the lure body (1) to the middle (4). In each of the figures (5) the lure hook is shown and (7) the fishing line lure (1) is attached. (L) shows the end of both the wing (2) and the lure (1) of the line.

In Fig. 4, 4A, the wing (2) does not extend over the edge (1R) of the lure (1). The wing (2), on the other hand, is long forward and extends past the middle of the lure body (1) slightly above the longitudinal axis (3) of the lure (1).

'1 Ί In Figure 5, 5A, the trailing wing (2) of the lure (1) is small and leaves the edge (1R) of the lure (1). The lure. An additional wing (2B) is mounted on the front of the cam '(1) beak to assist in holding the lure (1); '\ Upright.

(t t C f \ 'Fig. 6, 6A shows a solution in which the stern wing (2) leaves from the front edge (2E) of the lure (1): T: continuing to rearward along the edge, just before the end of the stern (1R) curves downwards.

1 · • · Ψ f; \ '// 1;' Fig. 7 shows the wing arrangement of Fig. 1 obliquely from the sides of the wing (2) and the lure (1). the optimum 90 ° angle (LK) between. (PK) represents the angle formed by the blade (2). with the longitudinal axis (3) of the lure (1). (6) shows a hook attached to the wing (2).

• '' k · # ·,

Fig. 8 shows a lure frame model (1) with mutually compensating shapes (+ - + -).

··· 't <· ·> · 1 The invention is by no means limited to the above examples but by a person skilled in the art! It is known that the wing mentioned in the invention may vary in appearance in terms of location and in terms of quantity -., 1! \., within the scope of the claims.

<1 · [· «

VJ: Patent Claims

f1 1 • a 1. Flat, metal or spoon baffle with blades, characterized in that at least one lure body (1S) is mounted on the sides (2S) or edge (2R), (2R) or both of the flat (IL) body (1) of the lure. 1) both sides extending in width along the sides of the lure (1) a «(2) 106093 angle (L) blade, the halves of which are formed longitudinally in relation to the longitudinal axis (3) of the lure opening corners (PK).

Metal or spoon baffle according to claim 1, characterized in that the lure (1) has a single blade (2) which extends equally to both sides as a starting point just behind the center of the lure (1) below the longitudinal axis (3) of the lure. downwards, crossing the edge (1R) of the lure (1), extending backwards even up to the length of the lure (1), making at the end a steeper arc obliquely downwards (KU).

Metal or spoon baffle according to Claim 1, characterized in that the wing (2) is attached at the very end of the lure (1) near the longitudinal axis (3) of the lure, from where the wider wing (2) departs obliquely downwards.

A metal or spoon baffle according to claim 1, characterized in that the wing (2) extends approximately in the center of the lure (1) from its longitudinal axis (3), from which it curves downward, crossing the edge (1R) of the lure (1). the tip of the rear of the lure (1) continuing along a steep arc, stopping at about the same line (L) with the rear.

Metal or spoon baffle according to claim I, characterized in that the wing (2) curves down the side (2S) of the lure (1) downwardly obliquely to the edge (1R) of the lure (1).

A metal or spoon baffle according to claim 1, characterized in that the blade (2) is attached to the periphery (2R) of the backside of the lure (1) and extends obliquely downwards.

A metal or spoon spreader according to claim 1, characterized in that the blade (2) · · ·: is engaged over the entire distance at the lower or upper edge of the lure (2R, 2E) by curving the rear end of the lure (1R) (<'obliquely downwards).

Ill ',,; A metal or spoon baffle according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that at least one additional wing (2B) is mounted in the peripheral or other area of the front side of the lure (1).

11 «III« III *. The metal or spoon baffle according to any one of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that the ", Vi" wings are at approximately 90 ° (LK) to the sides of the lure.

A metal or spoon lure according to one of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that the body of the lure (1) is made of metal 1 to 2.5 mm thick.

p ·· • · * • P M ·. ·.: *! ··. A metal or spoon lure according to claims 1-10, characterized in that the lure body (1), for decorative reasons, is provided with mutually compensating (+ - + -) forms such as angles ( + - + -) balls, stripes, recesses or. ••• j such that, due to the compensating factor, the lure form (IM) il: behaves in water in the same way as a flat form (IL).

•.

A metal or spoon lure according to any one of claims 1 to 11, characterized in that the hook (6) attached to the lure (1) is attached to the wing (2).

Metal or spoon spreader according to one of Claims 1 to 12, characterized in that the angles (PK) formed by the wing V (2) with the longitudinal axis (3) are equal.

A metal or spoon spreader according to claim 1, characterized in that the blade (2) extends from the front end of the body (1) obliquely downwards, cutting below the longitudinal axis (3) of the rear edge (1R).

• I 4

• · I I

• I 1 «<I t · f« • · • T »· m» e '

• · · I

• «· f 9 · • *» • · · M · 1

• · I I

• · «· 1 •« · M »IM ·« • · · · * MM * ·. ··: :::: • # ♦ · • · · · · • • • • • • • • • • • • · * · 1 «« * t • »« I «• ·« · «

Claims (14)

106093 1. A flat winged metal or spoon pull, CHARACTERIZED BY, that the sides (2S) or edge (2R) of the draw plate (1L) body (1), or both, are provided with at least one wing (2) which extends onto the bed sides of the body body (1) and which at the width lie at an angle (LK) with the sides of the pull (1) and whose halves form in relation to the longitudinal axis (3) of the pull (1) eat the same inclined angles (PK). 2. A metal or spoon pull according to claim 1, characterized in that the drawbar (1) has a wing (2) which evenly extends on both sides of the starting position slightly behind the midpoint of the drawbar (3), (4). , continuing rearward slightly obliquely downwardly intersecting the edge of the drawbar (1) (1R), continuing rearwardly even to a distance corresponding to the length of the towing (1), making at the end a lateral yaw inclined downwardly (KU). 3. A metal or spoon pull according to claim 1, characterized in that the wing (2) is fixed completely in the rear of the drawbar (1) in connection with the longitudinal axis (3) (4), from which the unusually wide wing (2) is inclined downwards to the rear . 4. A metal or spoon pull according to claim 1, characterized in that the wing (2) protrudes fairly from the drawbar (1) midway from its longitudinal axis (3) (4), from where it curves the rearward and downwardly crossing the drawbar (1). before the trailing tip of the pull (1), continuing in an increasingly steeper pitch, stopped in approximately line with the trailing tip (L). 5. Metal or spoon pull according to claim 1, characterized in that the wing (2) curves along the side (2) of the pull (1) obliquely downwardly sealing at the edge (1) of the pull (1). 6. A metal or spoon pull according to claim 1, characterized in that the wing (2) is attached to the canyon of the rear part (2R) of the tow (1) continuing obliquely rearward and downward. 7. A metal or spoon pull according to claim 1, characterized in that the wing (2) is fixed. along the entire lower or upper edge (2R, 2E), curving obliquely downwards from the rear end of the pull (1) (1R). • · »· Metal or spoon pull according to any of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the edge or other area of the drawbar (1) of the front (1) has at least one additional wing (2B), which can be fixed in its entirety in the upper nose portion or the boiler (1). • · • · ·: V: Metal or spoon pull according to any of claims 1-8, characterized in that the blades are fairly at 90 ° angle (LK) with the sides of the draw (1). Metal or spoon pull according to any of claims 1-9, characterized in that the body of the draw (1) is made of 1-2.5 mm thick metal. * · »• · ·· 1 11. Metal or spoon pull according to any of claims 1-10, characterized by. The draw (1) has been given for ornamental reasons with regard to water resistance / the compensating forms (+ - + -) such as e.g. angles (+ - + -), balls, stripes, dilutions or the like, which thus depend on the compensation factor, causing the draw shape (1M, to behave in the water on ···, the same way as the flat shape (IL).) »·%« · • · · »· 106093 Metal or spoon pull according to any of claims 1-11, characterized in that the hook (6) of the tow (1) is fixed to the wing (2). Metal or spoon pull according to any of claims 1-12, characterized in that the angles (PK) formed by the halves of the wing (1) and the longitudinal axis (3) are equal in size. 14. A metal or spoon pull according to claim 1, characterized in that the wing (2) runs from the front of the traction body (1) obliquely down the cutting edge of the rear part (1R) below the longitudinal axis (3). «•« «• 11« • «· (« Il «II • IIII • · 9. t • I • IIII • I ♦« «« I «· · I •« I «· I · II · I« Il I • • · »· • · · <· 1 · •« V · • Il »·· · • · · · ♦ ♦ ·· • 1 · • I1 ··· · • I« I • 1 «·« "1 ··· · Ml! • Ml • 1 «• · • I ·· Ml # • 2 · • ·· · 1 ·· · • M ·· · III • I • · • I 1 • I · • 1 1 • I 1 · • «I 2 • · ·