EP4353375A1 - Procédé de détermination de variables de réglage d'une cage de laminoir, programme de commande correspondant, dispositif de commande muni d'un tel programme de commande et cage de laminoir muni d'un tel dispositif de commande - Google Patents

Procédé de détermination de variables de réglage d'une cage de laminoir, programme de commande correspondant, dispositif de commande muni d'un tel programme de commande et cage de laminoir muni d'un tel dispositif de commande Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP4353375A1
EP4353375A1 EP22200877.3A EP22200877A EP4353375A1 EP 4353375 A1 EP4353375 A1 EP 4353375A1 EP 22200877 A EP22200877 A EP 22200877A EP 4353375 A1 EP4353375 A1 EP 4353375A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
rolling
rolls
value
initial
control device
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP22200877.3A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Hubertus Grillmeier
Sven Schätzler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Primetals Technologies Germany GmbH
Original Assignee
Primetals Technologies Germany GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Primetals Technologies Germany GmbH filed Critical Primetals Technologies Germany GmbH
Priority to EP22200877.3A priority Critical patent/EP4353375A1/fr
Priority to PCT/EP2023/077316 priority patent/WO2024078918A1/fr
Publication of EP4353375A1 publication Critical patent/EP4353375A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B37/00—Control devices or methods specially adapted for metal-rolling mills or the work produced thereby
    • B21B37/28—Control of flatness or profile during rolling of strip, sheets or plates
    • B21B37/42—Control of flatness or profile during rolling of strip, sheets or plates using a combination of roll bending and axial shifting of the rolls
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B2269/00—Roll bending or shifting
    • B21B2269/02—Roll bending; vertical bending of rolls
    • B21B2269/04—Work roll bending
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B2269/00—Roll bending or shifting
    • B21B2269/02—Roll bending; vertical bending of rolls
    • B21B2269/06—Intermediate roll bending
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B2269/00—Roll bending or shifting
    • B21B2269/12—Axial shifting the rolls
    • B21B2269/16—Intermediate rolls

Definitions

  • the rolling stand has - like every rolling stand - two work rolls, which act directly and immediately (i.e. without other rolls arranged in between) on the flat rolled material.
  • the rolling stand also has two backup rolls, which counteract the deflection of the work rolls. If there were no other rolls, the rolling stand would be a so-called four-high stand. In this case, in addition to the work rolls and the backup rolls, there are two intermediate rolls, which are arranged between the two work rolls and the two backup rolls. The rolling stand is therefore a so-called six-high stand.
  • the actual values that describe the flat rolled stock before rolling in the rolling mill can be, for example, the width, thickness, profile, contour, flatness, temperature, chemical composition, history and others.
  • the flat rolled stock is often made of steel, sometimes of aluminum. In rare cases it can also be another metal, such as copper.
  • the flat rolled stock is usually a strip, in rare cases a heavy plate.
  • the rolling is usually cold rolling. In exceptional cases, however, it can also be hot rolling.
  • the present invention is further based on a control device for a rolling stand for rolling a flat rolled metal stock, wherein the rolling stand has work rolls, backup rolls and intermediate rolls arranged between the work rolls and the backup rolls, wherein the control device is programmed with such a control program so that when the machine code of the control program is processed, it operates the rolling stand according to such an operating method.
  • the resulting contour of the rolled stock and the resulting flatness of the rolled stock are important quality characteristics. Influencing the contour and flatness are - at least with relatively thin rolled stock - inseparably linked. Influencing the flatness and/or the contour is possible in various ways.
  • the contour and/or flatness of a six-high stand i.e. a rolling stand in which, in addition to the work rolls and the backup rolls, there are also intermediate rolls arranged between the work rolls and the backup rolls, usually referred to as a 6-high stand
  • the contour and/or flatness can also be influenced by moving the intermediate rolls in opposite directions. This is particularly true for a so-called UCM (universal crown mill).
  • the object of the present invention is to provide possibilities by means of which the range within which high-quality rolling of a flat rolled product is possible can be increased.
  • an operating method of the type mentioned at the outset is designed in that the control device determines the intermediate roll setting value, the initial work roll control value and the initial intermediate roll control value in such a way that the initial work roll control value and/or the initial intermediate roll control value have a respective predetermined minimum distance from their minimum and maximum values.
  • the minimum distance can be determined as required. If the possible setting range, i.e. the range from the respective minimum value to the respective maximum value, is standardized to 100% and the respective minimum value is assigned the value 0%, the minimum distance can be, for example, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35% and even higher, for example 40% or 45% or even 50%. Of course, other values are also possible. It is even possible to choose a different value for the minimum distance from the respective minimum value than for the minimum distance from the respective maximum value. For example, it can be specified that the initial work roll control value must be at least 30% away from its minimum value and at least 40% away from its maximum value. The sum of the two minimum distances can of course not exceed 100%.
  • the minimum distances for the initial work roll control value may be specified differently than for the initial intermediate roll control value. For example, it may be required that the initial work roll control value is spaced from its minimum value by at least 30% and from its maximum value by at least 40%, the initial intermediate roll control value is at least 20% away from its minimum value and at least 50% away from its maximum value.
  • the numerical values given are purely exemplary to illustrate the principle.
  • the minimum distances in such a way that at least one of the two initial control values is not halfway between the limits of its respective setting range, but closer to its minimum or maximum value.
  • the intermediate rolls are usually designed the same and installed in the rolling stand inversely to one another.
  • the intermediate rolls also have a cone on one side within their running surface.
  • the control device determines the intermediate roll control value preferably as the signed distance of the cone from the side edge of the flat rolled stock. This procedure is particularly easy to implement.
  • the target values for the target contour and/or the target flatness can include, for example, a C2 value and a C4 value of a Chebyshev polynomial. Describing the target contour or the target flatness in this way is particularly simple. It is often completely sufficient if the target values only include these two values.
  • the equations can be algebraic equations and differential equations.
  • the rolling stand also has a cooling device to influence the contour and/or flatness of the flat rolled stock, by means of which sections of the work rolls can be individually cooled across the barrel width of the work rolls.
  • the control device preferably also takes into account the individual cooling of the sections of the work rolls when determining the intermediate roll setting value, the initial work roll control value and the initial intermediate roll control value.
  • control program with the features of claim 6.
  • Advantageous embodiments of the control program are the subject of dependent claims 7 to 10.
  • the execution of the control program causes the control device to design an operating method of the type mentioned at the outset in that the control device determines the intermediate roll setting value, the initial work roll control value and the initial intermediate roll control value in such a way that the initial work roll control value and/or the initial intermediate roll control value have a respective predetermined minimum distance from their minimum and maximum values.
  • control program can also be designed in an advantageous manner.
  • the advantageous designs of the control program and the advantages achieved thereby correspond to those of the operating method according to the invention.
  • control device with the features of claim 11.
  • the control device is programmed with a control program according to the invention, so that the control device operates the rolling stand according to an operating method according to the invention when executing the machine code of the control program.
  • the object is further achieved by a rolling stand for rolling a flat rolled metal product with the features of claim 12.
  • the control device of the rolling stand is designed as a control device according to the invention.
  • a rolling stock 2 is to be rolled in a rolling stand 1.
  • the rolling stock 2 consists of metal, for example steel or aluminum.
  • the rolling stock 2 is a flat rolling stock, i.e. a strip (normal case) or a heavy plate (exception).
  • Rolling in the rolling stand 1 is usually cold rolling. In exceptional cases, however, it can also be hot rolling.
  • the rolling stand 1 has working rolls 3, which form a roll gap between them in which the rolling stock 2 is rolled.
  • FIGS 1 and 2 only the working rolls 3 of the rolling stand 1 are shown, i.e. in FIG 1 the upper and lower working roll 3 and in FIG 2 only the upper working roll 3 (the lower working roll 3 is covered by the upper working roll 3).
  • FIG 3 shows the rolling stock 2 and the rolls 3 to 5 of the rolling stand 1 arranged above the rolling stock 2. Below the rolling stock 2 there is the same sequence of rolls 3 to 5, even if this is in FIG 3 (and also in FIG 1 ) is not shown.
  • the rolling stand 1 has backup rolls 4, i.e. an upper and a lower backup roll 4.
  • the rolling stand 1 also has intermediate rolls 5.
  • the intermediate rolls 5 are arranged between the work rolls 3 and the backup rolls 4.
  • the upper intermediate roll 5 is arranged between the upper work roll 3 and the upper backup roll 4, so that a sequence of three rolls 3 to 5 arranged one above the other results above the rolling stock 2.
  • the lower intermediate roll 5 is arranged between the lower work roll 3 and the lower Support roller 4 is arranged so that a sequence of three rollers 3 to 5 arranged one above the other is also produced below the rolling stock 2.
  • the working rolls 3 and the support rolls 4 are, as in FIG 3 As can be seen, they are generally symmetrical and identical to one another.
  • the intermediate rollers 5 are also generally identical to one another. However, they are often not symmetrical.
  • the intermediate rollers 5 can have a cone 7 on one side within their running surface 6. Such a grinding of the intermediate rollers 5 is often referred to as a one-sided intermediate roller grinding.
  • the intermediate rolls 5 are usually installed inversely to each other in the rolling stand 1. If, as in FIG 3 shown, the cone 7 of the upper intermediate roller 4 in the area of FIG 3 right side edge of the flat rolling stock 2, the cone 7 of the lower intermediate roll 4 is located in the area of FIG 3 left side edge of the flat rolled stock 2.
  • the rolling stand 1 has according to FIG 1 various actuators 8 to 10, namely a sliding device 8, a work roll bending device 9 and an intermediate roll bending device 10.
  • profile is used as a purely scalar measure for the deviation of the thickness of the flat rolled stock 2 at a predetermined distance from the side edges of the flat rolled stock 2.
  • Cxx is common for the profile, where xx (in the unit “mm") stands for the predetermined distance from the side edges of the flat rolled stock 2.
  • contour is used for the course of the thickness of the rolled stock 2 across the width of the rolled stock 2 minus the thickness of the rolled stock 2 in the middle of the rolled stock 2.
  • flatness in its literal sense, initially only includes visible distortions of the flat rolled stock 2. However, it is used as a synonym for the internal stresses prevailing in the flat rolled stock 2, regardless of whether these internal stresses lead to visible distortions of the flat rolled stock 2 or not.
  • an axial displacement of the intermediate rollers 5 can be set.
  • the axial displacement of the intermediate rollers 5 is generally in opposite directions to each other. If the upper intermediate roller 5 is thus displaced to the left by a certain amount, the lower intermediate roller 5 is displaced to the right by the same amount.
  • the displacement of the intermediate rollers 5 is in FIG 3 by a double arrow within the upper Intermediate roll 5 is indicated.
  • the extent of the axial displacement is determined by an intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ .
  • the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ can be set as shown in FIG 3 in particular as the signed distance of the cone 7 from the side edge of the flat rolling stock 2.
  • a bending force can be exerted on the work rolls 3 to bend the work rolls 3.
  • the bending of the work rolls 3 is in FIG 3 indicated by double arrows next to the upper work roll 3.
  • the associated work roll control value for the work roll bending device 9 is designated with the reference symbol B1.
  • a bending force for bending the intermediate rolls 5 can be exerted on the intermediate rolls 5 by means of the intermediate roll bending device 10.
  • the bending of the intermediate rolls 5 is in FIG 3 indicated by double arrows next to the upper intermediate roll 5.
  • the corresponding intermediate roll control value for the intermediate roll bending device 10 is designated by the reference symbol B2.
  • the rolling of the rolling stock 2 in the rolling stand 1 is controlled by a control device 11 of the rolling stand 1.
  • the control device 11 is usually software-programmable, as indicated within the control device 11 by the designation " ⁇ P" for "microprocessor".
  • the control device 11 is therefore programmed with a control program 12.
  • the control program 12 includes machine code 13 that can be processed by the control device 11.
  • the processing of the machine code 13 by the control device 11 causes the control device 11 to operate the rolling stand 1 according to an operating method that is explained in more detail below.
  • the control device 11 first receives actual variables I and target variables Z in a step S1.
  • the actual variables I describe the flat rolling stock 2 before rolling in the rolling stand 1.
  • the actual variables I can include, for example, the geometric dimensions of the flat rolling stock 2, in particular its width and its thickness.
  • the actual variables I can also include other geometric parameters of the flat rolling stock 2, for example its profile, its contour and its flatness.
  • the actual variables I can also include other properties of the flat rolling stock 2, for example its temperature, its chemical composition and possibly also its history.
  • the target values Z can include values that describe a target contour K* of the flat rolling stock 2 after rolling in the rolling stand 1.
  • the target values Z for the target contour K* can include a C2 value k2 and a C4 value k4 of a Chebyshev polynomial, i.e. the coefficients for the Chebyshev functions of the 2nd and 4th degree.
  • a description of the target flatness is also required. possible.
  • the target flatness can, if necessary, be described analogously to the target contour K* by a corresponding C2 value and a corresponding C4 value.
  • the value x 0 stands for the center of the flat rolled stock 2, the values -1 and +1 for the left and right side edges of the flat rolled stock 2.
  • the FIGS 5 and 6 show the corresponding functions.
  • the control device 11 determines the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ , an initial work roll control value B10 and an initial intermediate roll control value B20.
  • the determination is carried out taking into account the actual variables I. It is carried out in such a way that an expected contour KE of the flat rolling stock 2 is approximated as closely as possible to the target contour K* - as described by the target variables Z. Alternatively or additionally, the determination can also be carried out in such a way that an expected flatness of the flat rolling stock 2 is approximated as closely as possible to the target flatness described by the target variables Z.
  • step S2 is, as far as defined so far, not yet unambiguous.
  • Several combinations of the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ , the initial work roll control value B10 and the initial intermediate roll control value B20 are therefore possible, with each such combination achieving that the expected contour KE and/or the expected flatness of the flat rolling stock 2 is as close as possible to the target contour K* and/or target flatness described by the target variables Z.
  • the control device 11 additionally takes into account the condition that the initial work roll control value B10 and/or the initial intermediate roll control value B20 have a respective predetermined minimum distance from their minimum values B1min, B2min and maximum values B1max, B2max when determining the values UC ⁇ , B10, B20. At least one of the two initial control values B10, B20 therefore meets the condition specified for it. In the simplest case, the determination is made in such a way that the initial work roll control value B10 and/or the initial intermediate roll control value B20 are as far away as possible from their minimum values B1min, B2min and maximum values B1ax, B1max.
  • a step S3 the control device 11 sets the axial displacement of the intermediate rolls 5 according to the determined intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ .
  • the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ is thus specified to the shifting device 8.
  • the axial displacement of the intermediate rolls 5 is no longer changed during the rolling of the flat rolling stock 2 in the rolling stand 1.
  • the control device 11 sets the work roll control value B1 to the initial work roll control value B10 and the intermediate roll control value B2 to the initial intermediate roll control value B20.
  • step S1 to S4 are carried out by the control device 11 before the rolling of the flat rolling stock 2 in the rolling stand 1. From step S5 onwards, the rolling stock 2 is rolled in the rolling stand 1.
  • step S5 the rolling stand 1 is controlled during operation, i.e. while the rolling stock 2 is being rolled in the rolling stand 1.
  • the control device 11 controls, among other things, the two bending devices 9, 10 according to their respective control values B1, B2. It therefore sets the bending devices 9, 10 according to their respective control values B1, B2.
  • the control values B1, B2 have the initial control values B10, B20 at least at the start of the rolling of the flat rolling stock 2 in the rolling stand 1, so that the control device 11 sets the bending devices 9, 10 according to their respective initial control values B10, B20 at least at the start of the rolling of the flat rolling stock 2 in the rolling stand 1.
  • the initial control values B10, B20 are initially retained until an actual value for the contour K can be recorded by means of a measuring device 14 arranged on the outlet side of the rolling stand 1.
  • the control device 11 therefore checks in a step S6 whether such an actual value is available to it. If and as long as this is not the case, the control device 11 goes directly back to step S5. In this case, the control device 11 in particular keeps the control of the bending devices 9, 10 unchanged according to their initial control values B10, B20. However, as soon as an actual value for the contour K is available to the control device 11, the control device 11 goes to a step S7. In step S7, the control device 11 changes the control values B1, B2 with the aim of bringing the actual contour K given by the actual value closer to the target contour K*. The control device 11 then goes back to step S5. The renewed control of the bending devices 9, 10 during the renewed execution of step S5 is now carried out with the correspondingly changed control values B1, B2.
  • steps S5, S6 and S7 is maintained until the flat rolling stock 2 has been completely rolled in the rolling stand 1.
  • FIG 7 shows for several intermediate roll setting values UC ⁇ which C2 values k2 and C4 values k4 can be set by setting the work roll control value B1 and the intermediate roll control value B2.
  • a trapezoid 15 in the k2-k4 space results (exactly or at least approximately).
  • the trapezoids 15 are in FIG 7 each supplemented by a small letter (a to e).
  • the addition of the respective small letter serves only to linguistically distinguish the trapezoids 15 from one another.
  • the small letters are only used below when reference is to be made very specifically to a very specific one of the trapezoids 15. If reference is made to the trapezoids 15 in general, the small letter is omitted.
  • the procedure for the respective intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ is completely analogous.
  • the edges of the trapezoids 15 correspond to the fact that one of the two control values B1, B2 is minimal or maximal and the other of the two control values B1, B2 runs through its possible value range.
  • the corners of the respective trapezoid 15 correspond to the fact that both control values B1, B2 are minimal or maximal. It is clear that the position of the corresponding trapezoid 15 in the k2-k4 space can be adjusted by varying the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ .
  • the target contour K* can be set with the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ c.
  • the target contour K* can also be set with the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ e. Both for a However, only a small control reserve is available for increasing the intermediate roll control value B2 and for reducing the C2 value k2 and for increasing the C4 value k4.
  • the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ d is selected, not only the target contour K* can be set. Rather, a large control reserve is available for both reducing and increasing the intermediate roll control value B2 (and also the work roll control value B1). Correspondingly, a large control reserve is also available for both reducing and increasing the C2 value k2 and also for both reducing and increasing the C4 value k4.
  • the initial work roll control value B10 and/or the initial intermediate roll control value B20 in such a way that at least one of the two values B10, B20 is as far away as possible from its minimum value B1min, B2min and maximum value B1max, B2max.
  • a deviation from this rule can be justified by the fact that a later heating of the work rolls 3 occurs during the rolling of the rolling stock 2 in the rolling stand 1 and, correspondingly, a change in the contour of the work rolls 3 occurs.
  • a concrete determination of the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ can be made, for example, in such a way that a symmetrical convex geometric figure is defined in the k2-k4 space.
  • a suitable symmetrical convex geometric figure is, for example, a rectangle (special case: square) whose edges are oriented parallel to the k2 or k4 axis and have a predetermined relationship to one another.
  • Another suitable symmetrical convex geometric figure is, for example, an ellipse (special case: circle) whose main axes are oriented parallel to the k2 or k4 axis and have a predetermined relationship to one another. Then, as a rule, the desired intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ is clearly determined by the condition that when the symmetrical convex geometric figure is centered relative to point 16, the area covered by the symmetrical convex geometric figure is maximized.
  • the target contour K* is specified so unfavorably that it can "just barely" be achieved. An example of such a case would be if the target contour K* could be described in k2-k4 space by point 16'. If the initial work roll control value B10 and/or the initial intermediate roll control value B20 should not be in the middle between their minimum values B1min, B2min and maximum values B1max, B2max, this procedure can be modified by using distorted figures.
  • FIG 8 shows schematically a possible procedure for determining the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ .
  • FIG 8 corresponds to the result of an implementation of step S2 of FIG 4 .
  • the control device 11 first determines an average value B1M for the work roll control value B1.
  • the control device 11 forms the unweighted arithmetic mean of the minimum and maximum work roll control values B1min, B1max in step S11.
  • the control device 11 determines an average value B2M for the intermediate roll control value B2 in a step S12.
  • control device 11 sets the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ to an initial value.
  • control device 11 determines the associated initial control values B10, B20 for which the expected contour KE corresponds to the target contour K* as much as possible (alternatively or additionally: the expected flatness corresponds to the target flatness as much as possible).
  • a step S15 the control device 11 checks whether the determined initial work roll control value B10 corresponds exactly or at least approximately to the associated average value B1M. If this is the case, the control device 11 proceeds to a step S16. If this is not the case, the control device 11 checks in a step S17 whether the determined initial intermediate roll control value B20 corresponds exactly or at least approximately to the associated average value B2M. If this is the case, the control device 11 also proceeds to step S16. If this is not the case, the control device 11 varies the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ in a step S18 and from there returns to step S14.
  • step S16 the control device 11 checks whether the variation of the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ should be terminated.
  • the check in step S16 can, for example, consist of an evaluation of the symmetrical convex geometric figure explained above. If the variation of the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ should not be terminated, the control device 11 goes to step S18. Otherwise, the procedure of FIG 8 The last determined values UC ⁇ , B10, B20 are then calculated in steps S3 and S4 of FIG 4 used.
  • the control device 11 can be operated as shown in FIG 9 implement a model 17.
  • the rolling of the flat rolling stock 2 in the rolling stand 1 is modelled by means of the model 17.
  • the model 17 is based on mathematical-physical equations. In particular, it can locally resolve two- or three-dimensionally, coupled differential equation systems
  • the actual variables I and the target variables Z are included in the mathematical-physical equations.
  • the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ , the initial work roll control value B10 and the initial intermediate roll control value B20 are also included in the mathematical-physical equations.
  • Model 17 supplies the expected contour KE (alternatively or additionally the expected flatness) as an output variable.
  • a corresponding model 17 as such is known to experts.
  • control device 11 can, for example, determine the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ , the initial work roll control value B10 and the initial intermediate roll control value B20 in the context of step S2 or step S14 by solving an optimization problem in which the model 17 is included.
  • the actuators 8 to 10 mentioned i.e. the sliding device 8, the work roll bending device 9 and the intermediate roll bending device 10, are the only actuators by means of which the contour K and/or the flatness of the flat rolling stock 2 can be influenced.
  • the rolling stand 1 has actuators for influencing the contour K and/or the flatness of the flat rolling stock 2 as shown in FIG 2 additionally has a cooling device 18. In this case, sections of the work rolls 3 can be individually cooled by means of the cooling device 18 across a barrel width of the work rolls 3.
  • the control device 11 also takes into account an individual cooling B3 of the sections of the work rolls 3 when determining the intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ , the initial work roll control value B10 and the initial intermediate roll control value B20.
  • the individual cooling B3 of the sections of the work rolls 3 can be carried out by the control device 11 as part of the execution of steps S2 or S14 of the FIG 4 or 8 be taken into account or can the individual cooling B3 of the sections of the work rolls 3 be an additional input variable of model 17 and be taken into account accordingly in model 17.
  • the present invention has many advantages.
  • the influence of the specific intermediate roll setting value UC ⁇ has essentially no influence on the setting range of the two bending devices 9, 10. However, it has a significant influence on the resulting effect of the associated control values B1, B2 on the roll gap and thus on the contour K and the flatness of the rolled rolling stock 2.
  • a very wide range of different flat rolling stock 2 can be rolled properly in the rolling stand 1 using the procedure according to the invention. This applies both to the strength of the flat rolling stock 2 and to its dimensions as well as to the requirements for profile, contour K and flatness.
  • a costly and time-intensive exchange of the work rolls 3 for other work rolls 3 with an adapted crowning is not necessary in many cases.
  • the individual cooling B3 of the work rolls 3 can be used. However, this is not usually necessary. This is an advantage in particular because the individual Cooling B3 of the work rolls 3 is, on the one hand, very slow and, on the other hand, has only a small adjustment range.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Control Of Metal Rolling (AREA)
EP22200877.3A 2022-10-11 2022-10-11 Procédé de détermination de variables de réglage d'une cage de laminoir, programme de commande correspondant, dispositif de commande muni d'un tel programme de commande et cage de laminoir muni d'un tel dispositif de commande Pending EP4353375A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP22200877.3A EP4353375A1 (fr) 2022-10-11 2022-10-11 Procédé de détermination de variables de réglage d'une cage de laminoir, programme de commande correspondant, dispositif de commande muni d'un tel programme de commande et cage de laminoir muni d'un tel dispositif de commande
PCT/EP2023/077316 WO2024078918A1 (fr) 2022-10-11 2023-10-03 Procédé de détermination de grandeurs manipulées d'une cage de laminage, programme de commande correspondant, dispositif de commande comprenant un tel programme de commande, et cage de laminage comprenant un tel dispositif de commande

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP22200877.3A EP4353375A1 (fr) 2022-10-11 2022-10-11 Procédé de détermination de variables de réglage d'une cage de laminoir, programme de commande correspondant, dispositif de commande muni d'un tel programme de commande et cage de laminoir muni d'un tel dispositif de commande

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4353375A1 true EP4353375A1 (fr) 2024-04-17

Family

ID=83690313

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP22200877.3A Pending EP4353375A1 (fr) 2022-10-11 2022-10-11 Procédé de détermination de variables de réglage d'une cage de laminoir, programme de commande correspondant, dispositif de commande muni d'un tel programme de commande et cage de laminoir muni d'un tel dispositif de commande

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP4353375A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2024078918A1 (fr)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0094104A2 (fr) * 1979-10-04 1983-11-16 Hitachi, Ltd. Laminoir et méthode pour laminer des tôles
JPS6046804A (ja) * 1983-08-24 1985-03-13 Hitachi Ltd 圧延機の形状制御方法
EP1481742A2 (fr) * 2003-05-30 2004-12-01 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Ordinateur de commande et procédé de détermination assistée par ordinateur pour le control de la planéité et du profile pour une cage de laminoir
EP3536411A1 (fr) * 2018-03-09 2019-09-11 Primetals Technologies Germany GmbH Prévention des bords d'usure lors du laminage d'un produit plat à laminer

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0716693B2 (ja) * 1986-01-07 1995-03-01 新日本製鐵株式会社 板圧延における形状制御方法

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0094104A2 (fr) * 1979-10-04 1983-11-16 Hitachi, Ltd. Laminoir et méthode pour laminer des tôles
JPS6046804A (ja) * 1983-08-24 1985-03-13 Hitachi Ltd 圧延機の形状制御方法
EP1481742A2 (fr) * 2003-05-30 2004-12-01 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Ordinateur de commande et procédé de détermination assistée par ordinateur pour le control de la planéité et du profile pour une cage de laminoir
EP3536411A1 (fr) * 2018-03-09 2019-09-11 Primetals Technologies Germany GmbH Prévention des bords d'usure lors du laminage d'un produit plat à laminer

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
EYRING H ET AL: "NEUBAU EINES ZWEIGERUESTIGEN NACHWALZWERKES FUER DAS DRESSIEREN UND REDUZIEREN VON FEINSTBLECH", STAHL UND EISEN,, vol. 112, no. 4, 15 April 1992 (1992-04-15), pages 73 - 81, 154, XP000274132, ISSN: 0340-4803 *
QING-LONG WANG ET AL.: "Numerical and experimental analysis of strip cross-directional control and flatness prediction for UCM Cold Rolling Mill", JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, vol. 34, 2018, pages 637 - 649, XP085431748, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.07.008

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2024078918A1 (fr) 2024-04-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3411162B1 (fr) Reglage de position de bande
EP2691188B1 (fr) Procédé permettant de faire fonctionner un train de laminoir
DE69404527T2 (de) Walzwerk und Verfahren
DE102006011975A1 (de) Betriebsverfahren für ein Walzwerk zum Walzen eines bandförmigen Walzguts
EP3706929B1 (fr) Réglage ciblé de contour à l'aide de spécifications correspondantes
EP2162245B1 (fr) Laminage d'un feuillard dans un laminoir en utilisant la dernière cage du laminoir comme réducteur de traction
EP3208673B1 (fr) Étalonnage en ligne d'une emprise de laminage d'une cage de laminoir
WO2018192798A1 (fr) Optimisation de la modélisation de modèles de processus
DE102014215397B4 (de) Bandlageregelung mit optimierter Reglerauslegung
EP1703999B1 (fr) Procede et cage de laminoir pour influer de maniere multiple sur des profils
EP2200763B1 (fr) Adaptation d'un régulateur dans un laminoir sur la base de la dispersion d'une grandeur réelle d'un produit laminé
AT409229B (de) Verfahren zur verbesserung der kontur gewalzten materials und zur erhöhung der gewalzten materiallänge
EP4353375A1 (fr) Procédé de détermination de variables de réglage d'une cage de laminoir, programme de commande correspondant, dispositif de commande muni d'un tel programme de commande et cage de laminoir muni d'un tel dispositif de commande
DE3516779A1 (de) Formsteuervorrichtung fuer flachmaterial
EP4103339B1 (fr) Détermination de la sensibilité d'une grandeur cible d'une matière à laminer pour un paramètre de fonctionnement d'un train de laminage à chaud
EP4217125B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de laminage d'une bande métallique
DE102018212074A1 (de) Verfahren zum Ermitteln von Stellgrößen für aktive Profil- und Planheitsstellglieder für ein Walzgerüst und von Profil- und Mittenplanheitswerten für warmgewalztes Metallband
DE10208389B4 (de) Walzgerüst, Walzwerk und Walzverfahren
EP3536411B1 (fr) Prévention des bords d'usure lors du laminage d'un produit plat à laminer
EP3714999B1 (fr) Détermination de la nomination d'un rouleau
DE10159608B4 (de) Walzverfahren für ein Band mit einer Schweißnaht
DE3129514A1 (de) Verbundwalzwerk
DE102022211278B3 (de) Verfahren und Computerprogramm zum Anpassen des Soll-Dickenwertes für eine Regelung der Dicke eines neu zu walzenden Bandes für mindestens ein Walzgerüst
EP3854494B1 (fr) Répartition dépendante de la fréquence des grandeurs de réglage permettant de changer la section transversale de produit laminé dans un laminoir
EP3969194B1 (fr) Laminage à chaud comprenant une configuration flexible des cages de laminoir

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC ME MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE