Classifications

• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04B—TRANSMISSION
  • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
  • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
  • H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
  • H04B7/0413—MIMO systems
  • H04B7/0417—Feedback systems
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
  • H04W8/00—Network data management
  • H04W8/22—Processing or transfer of terminal data, e.g. status or physical capabilities
  • H04W8/24—Transfer of terminal data
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04B—TRANSMISSION
  • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
  • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
  • H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
  • H04B7/06—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station
  • H04B7/0613—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission
  • H04B7/0615—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal
  • H04B7/0619—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal using feedback from receiving side
  • H04B7/0621—Feedback content
  • H04B7/0628—Diversity capabilities
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04B—TRANSMISSION
  • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
  • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
  • H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
  • H04B7/06—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station
  • H04B7/0613—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission
  • H04B7/0615—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal
  • H04B7/0619—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal using feedback from receiving side
  • H04B7/0621—Feedback content
  • H04B7/063—Parameters other than those covered in groups H04B7/0623 - H04B7/0634, e.g. channel matrix rank or transmit mode selection
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04J—MULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
  • H04J11/00—Orthogonal multiplex systems, e.g. using WALSH codes
  • H04J11/0023—Interference mitigation or co-ordination
  • H04J11/0026—Interference mitigation or co-ordination of multi-user interference
  • H04J11/0036—Interference mitigation or co-ordination of multi-user interference at the receiver
  • H04J11/004—Interference mitigation or co-ordination of multi-user interference at the receiver using regenerative subtractive interference cancellation
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
  • H04L1/004—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
  • H04L1/0045—Arrangements at the receiver end
  • H04L1/0047—Decoding adapted to other signal detection operation
  • H04L1/005—Iterative decoding, including iteration between signal detection and decoding operation
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04L27/00—Modulated-carrier systems
  • H04L27/26—Systems using multi-frequency codes
  • H04L27/2601—Multicarrier modulation systems
  • H04L27/2647—Arrangements specific to the receiver only
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04B—TRANSMISSION
  • H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
  • H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
  • H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
  • H04B7/0413—MIMO systems
  • H04B7/0452—Multi-user MIMO systems
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
  • H04L1/004—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
  • H04L1/0045—Arrangements at the receiver end
  • H04L1/0047—Decoding adapted to other signal detection operation
  • H04L1/0048—Decoding adapted to other signal detection operation in conjunction with detection of multiuser or interfering signals, e.g. iteration between CDMA or MIMO detector and FEC decoder
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
  • H04L1/12—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel
  • H04L1/16—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using return channel in which the return channel carries supervisory signals, e.g. repetition request signals
• • H—ELECTRICITY
  • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
  • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
  • H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
  • H04L5/0001—Arrangements for dividing the transmission path
  • H04L5/0014—Three-dimensional division
  • H04L5/0023—Time-frequency-space

Definitions

• TITLE Telecommunication method for iterative reception and corresponding devices Field of the invention
• the present invention relates to the field of telecommunications.
• the invention relates more particularly to digital communications with iterative reception of a radio signal (6G, 5G, WiFi, etc.) and feedback of an indicator of a minimum processing time required in reception for a given number of iterations.
• a radio signal (6G, 5G, WiFi, etc.)
• Digital communications refer to digital transmission chains that use well-known transmit and receive signal processing modules as illustrated in Figures 1 and 2.
• the diagram in Figure 1 illustrates a baseband architecture of a transmitter in a very generic way.
• This architecture can equally well process several users according to a MU-MIMO mode, as well as one user or several users with a SU-MIMO mode.
• the input data relating to each user UE1,. . ., UEK come from a binary source such that these binary data are representative for example of an audio signal (voice), of a multimedia signal (television stream, Internet stream), etc.
• a user's data is conventionally coded by an error-correcting coder COD (for example convolutional code, Turbo Code, LDPC, polar code (Polar code)) known under the name of channel coder.
• COD for example convolutional code, Turbo Code, LDPC, polar code (Polar code)
• the data is conventionally block-interleaved by an n-interleaver.
• a possible demultiplexing ensures a distribution of a user's data over several spatial layers.
• a binary coder with MAP symbol (in reference to mapping in English) also called modulator converts a block of binary data of a spatial layer, for example a code word, after the possible demultiplexing, into a spatial stream of modulated symbols.
• a modulated symbol corresponds to a point of a constellation (BPSK, QPSK, mQAM, etc.).
• This modulator maps m bits of the input data to a point of the constellation of order 2 m (the constellation comprises 2 m points in the complex plane).
• mQAM Quadrature Amplitude Modulation according to the English terminology
• the spatial streams associated respectively with the spatial layers constitute the input streams of the MIMO coding (SU-MIMO or MU-MIMO).
• MIMO coding spatial linear coding, etc.
• the choice of the type of MIMO coding depends on the knowledge of the transmission channel which is known to the transmitter via for example an indicator (CQI, PMI, RI) fed back from the users.
• CQI, PMI, RI indicator
• the transmission of data between the spatial layers takes place on the same time-frequency resource per antenna in accordance with a resource allocation RES. There may therefore be interference between spatial layers.
• An OFDM modulator MOD generates, from the symbols mapped as input on the sub-carriers, OFDM multi-carrier symbols in time which are transmitted by an antenna ANT.
• This OFDM MOD modulator is implemented by an inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT).
• IDFT inverse discrete Fourier transform
• iterative receivers with interference subtraction have been known for more than 20 years, in particular from the REF1 patent. They are identified under the name of soft-IC according to the terminology used for the 5G standard of the 3GPP. These receivers consist of carrying out a reference reception processing (reference receiver) which can be seen as a zero iteration with a detector (equalizer) and a decoder of the channel code (Convolutional code, Turbo code, LDPC) then to iterate several times between the decoding and the detection by canceling at each new iteration the interference between spatial layers reconstituted following the decoding.
• reference reception processing reference reception processing
• detector equalizer
• decoder of the channel code Convolutional code, Turbo code, LDPC
• FIG. 2 represents a diagram illustrating the principle of an iterative receiver with interference subtraction.
• the received signal S r is detected by a detector DET then decoded by a decoder DECOD.
• a feedback loop sends decoding information back to the detector to perform IC interference subtraction.
• the possibly multi-user detector can be a soft IC (Minimum Mean-Square Error based soft Interference Cancellation) MMSE detector.
• the output of the decoder includes soft information which is used to reconstruct the interfering symbols and thus estimate the interference to subtract it; interference subtraction is therefore performed in a flexible form.
• Different types of receivers are identified depending on whether the interference subtraction is performed successively, in parallel or according to a hybrid process.
• SIC subtraction is successive
• each decoded user (UE) has its signal subtracted and the successfully decoded users (UEs) are extracted from the pool of users to be decoded before decoding the remaining users.
• the method When the subtraction is done in parallel (PIC), the method performs an iterative detection and decoding, all the users (UEs) are decoded in parallel and the successfully decoded users (UEs) have their signal extracted from the pool of users (UEs ) to be decoded for the next iteration.
• a hybrid receiver soft-hard IC uses a hard-IC detector to successively cancel successfully decoded users on each iteration.
• the diagram in Figure 3 illustrates an architecture of a conventional chain in baseband of an iterative receiver equipped with two reception antennas.
• the receiver can also implement an iterative technique of successive interference subtraction.
• the receiver can be equipped with more than two antennas.
• the number of reception antennas is independent of the number of transmission antennas.
• the iterative character comes from the fact that the processing is iterated several times between the channel decoding carried out by the decoder and the detection/equalization carried out by the detector/equalizer for the same user.
• a DEMOD multi-carrier demodulator demodulates the multi-carrier symbols received by an antenna to generate complex symbols. Given that the data intended for a user is transmitted on some of the time-frequency resources, the complex symbols mapped on these resources are extracted from the set of demodulated OFDM symbols to feed the detector/equalizer.
• the extraction RES 1 is performed knowing the resource allocation rules used on transmission.
• the MIMO detector/equalizer 1 performs multi-spatial layer detection (spatial streams or spatial layers) by exploiting a priori information supplied by the decoding of the interfering symbols carried out by the decoder DECOD.
• This detector/equalizer can be a linear filter whose coefficients are corrected over the iterations after interference subtraction
• the dynamic correction of the coefficients of the linear filter is carried out according to statistical parameters of the signal estimated during the previous iteration and takes account of the estimation H of the channel of transmission, noise and decoding of the previous iteration.
• a MIMO detector/equalizer 1 includes a complex symbol demodulator and feeds a soft decoder.
• the decoder receives as input non-binary values such as probabilistic information and also delivers non-binary outputs.
• S1S0 Soft Input Soft Output
• the decoder S1S0 evaluates from observations and probabilistic quantities representative of a priori probabilities available to it on the coded bits associated with the data supplied by the demodulator after deinterleaving, probabilistic quantities representative of probabilities a posteriori on these coded bits.
• a posteriori probabilities represent the probabilities of transmission of these coded bits, they can take the form of logarithmic ratios of a posteriori probabilities LAPPR (Log A Posteriori Probability Ratio).
• the DECOD decoder therefore returns to the detector/equalizer via a return loop probabilistic information on the coded data.
• This information can be in the form of extrinsic information which, after interleaving, is considered by the detector/equalizer MIMO′′ 1 as a priori information.
• a new iteration is performed using the updated channel estimate and subtraction of the decoder contribution to obtain extrinsic information.
• one of the criteria for the design of this new generation is the reduction in latency compared to the specifications of the previous generation i.e. LTE adv (4G 3GPP), for example for a service called URLLC the latency should be less than 1ms.
• This reduction in latency implies a reduction in the processing time of the data received by the mobile terminal. It comes that the network must imperatively know the minimum processing time necessary for decoding in order to be able to schedule the transmission of the HARQ-ACK/NACK, that is to say the acknowledgment in the upstream direction of the decoding of a transmitted data packet. . Indeed, the acknowledgment can only be done after the decoding of the data of a packet and the verification of a small error detection code (CRC) associated by the recipient.
• CRC small error detection code
• the minimum processing time for data decoding by the recipient refers to two tables specified in the 3GPP specification TS 38.214 V15.10.0 (2020-06) in sub clause 5.3 titled “UE PDSCH processing procedure time” in Table 5.3 -1 Table 1 and in table 5.3-2 Table 2 reproduced in the Appendix.
• Column p gives the spacing between subcarriers of the transmitted OFDM signal which is equal to 2 ⁇ X 15kHz (see TS 38.300 V15.11.0 (2020-09) under clause 5.1) which corresponds to an OFDM symbol duration of a given, the minimum processing time on reception of the PDSCH is therefore expressed in number N r of OFDM symbols for a spacing between subcarriers 2 ⁇ X 15kHz which corresponds to the processing time
• DMRS reference signals
• the UE terminal transmits to the base station its minimum processing time by referring to one of the two tables given in the specification TS 38.214 mentioned above as defined in the 3GPP TS 38.306 V15.9.0 (2020-03) subclause 4.2.7.5 entitled “FeatureSetDownlink parameters” table Table 3 which is reproduced in the Appendix.
• the duration of the minimum processing time is expressed in number N of OFDM symbols between the last OFDM symbol of the PDSCH and the first OFDM symbol of the control channel carrying the ACK/NACK acknowledgement.
• the subject of the invention is a telecommunication method with feedback from a terminal to an access point of a minimum processing time necessary to carry out by the terminal N iteration(s) of detection and decoding of at least one packet of data transmitted by the access point and carried by the same physical channel.
• N > 1.
• the invention further relates to a telecommunications terminal which comprises: an iterative receiver with N iteration(s) with flexible detection and flexible decoding of data packets transmitted by an access point, a receiver for receiving a time indicator of a time allocated by the access point to the terminal to upload an acknowledgment of receipt after decoding by the iterative receiver of at least one data packet, a transmitter for:
• the invention further relates to an access point which comprises: a receiver for receiving a feedback from a terminal of a minimum processing time necessary to carry out by the terminal N iteration(s) of decoding of at least one data packet transmitted by the access point, a transmitter for:
• the invention further relates to a computer program on an information medium, said program comprising program instructions adapted to the implementation of a method according to the invention when said program is loaded and executed in a terminal or access point.
• the invention further relates to an information carrier comprising program instructions suitable for implementing a method according to the invention, when said program is loaded and executed in a terminal or an access point.
• the invention further relates to a digital signal transmitted or received comprising a minimum processing time necessary to carry out by a terminal N iteration(s) of detection and decoding of a data packet transmitted by an access point and received by a terminal.
• the iterative character of the reception processing offers substantial improvements in the performance of a terminal provided that the terminal has time to carry out its calculations.
• the invention defines an inexpensive protocol to ensure that the deployment of iterative receivers within an access network which can serve terminals of very different types not making it possible to achieve the same performance effectively brings a gain.
• the network is able to determine the best compromise between latency and throughput for transmission to the terminal.
• the gain is therefore both for the user of the terminal, who can benefit from a better speed associated with better reception, and for the network operator, who can more efficiently serve different terminals of different types, including the iterative type, by determining the best compromise between latency and throughput for a given service.
• the number of iterations is considered as the number of decodings of the channel coding performed by the decoder beyond the reference reception processing which can be seen as a zero iteration. This number is proportional according to a first approximation to the processing time necessary for the receiver to obtain the decoded data.
• a detection and decoding iteration includes an interference subtraction.
• the network allocates a minimum time so that the receiver at iterative reception with interference subtraction can implement complex processing.
• the user is therefore guaranteed to benefit from superior performance.
• this mode makes it possible to serve more users via the same access point although they may interfere with each other since the invention guarantees a minimum processing time so that the terminals can implement their iterative reception. with interference subtraction.
• the processing time determined per iteration is the same for all the iterations.
• a terminal capable of processing interference between users for an MU-MIMO transmission increases an additional processing time per iteration as a function of a number of interfering users processed by the iterative decoding with subtraction interference, this additional time taking into account a structure of the multi-user receiver of the SIC, PIC or hybrid type.
• the access point knows the users in its radio coverage and can estimate among them those whose interference subtraction must bring a substantial gain to the terminal. Thus, when determining the trade-off between latency and throughput, an access point can determine a number of interfering users that can be serviced and for which the interference subtraction helps achieve throughput.
• a table of processing times is determined by type of terminal and the minimum processing time is reported by the terminal by indicating its SIC, PIC or hybrid type.
• Such a mode makes it possible to limit the feedback of information associated with the processing time.
• a table of processing times is determined by the terminal and the terminal uploads the table to the access point.
• the processing time is quantified in number of multi-carrier symbols.
• Such a mode is particularly suitable for transmission with multi-carrier modulation and in particular of the OFDM type.
• the data packets are received via a PDSCH channel of a 5G access network.
• the access point schedules a mechanism for repeating transmitted data packets by taking into account the minimum processing time necessary to perform N′ decoding iterations by the terminal. N' > 1.
• the access point transmits to the terminal a time indicator of a time allocated by the access point to the terminal to send back an acknowledgment of receipt after decoding by the iterative receiver of at least a data packet.
• the terminal performs N” iteration(s) of decoding a data packet received, such that the processing time of the N” iteration(s) is less than a time allocated by the access point to the terminal to transmit an acknowledgment of receipt of the data packet.
• N > 1.
• Figure 1 is a diagram of a baseband architecture of a very generically described transmitter in relation to the prior art
• FIG 2 is a diagram illustrating the principle of an iterative interference subtraction receiver described in relation to the prior art
• FIG 3 is a diagram of an architecture of a conventional chain in baseband of an iterative receiver with interference subtraction equipped with two reception antennas described in relation to the prior art
• FIG 4 Figure 4 is a diagram of an embodiment of a terminal according to the invention
• Figure 5 is a diagram of an embodiment of an access point according to the invention
• Figure 6 is a diagram illustrating the principle of an iterative receiver with subtraction of SIC type interference
• FIG 7 is a diagram illustrating the principle of an iterative PIC type interference subtraction receiver.
• the invention is placed in the context of a communication with the transmission of data packets between two devices.
• a terminal that wants to communicate with more or less remote equipment generally uses an access network that includes an access point. Communication is established via the access point.
• the access point designates both a base station of a mobile access network and an access point of a fixed access network such as a WiFi network.
• the terminal T AL comprises a receiver RE1, a transmitter EM1, a memory MEM1 comprising a buffer memory, a computer pP 1 whose operation is controlled by the execution of a program Pgl whose instructions allow the implementation of a method 1 of telecommunication according to the invention.
• the code instructions of the program Pg are for example loaded into the buffer memory MEM1 before being executed by the processor pP1.
• the microprocessor pP I controls the various components of the terminal, the receiver RE1 and the transmitter EM1.
• the receiver RE1 comprises an iterative receiver REIC which performs one or more iterations of a soft detection DET and a soft decoding DECOD with interference subtraction IC of one or more data packets TBs transmitted by an access point through a transmission channel.
• the receiver RE1 also makes it possible to receive a time indicator Indic transmitted by the access point, for example via a control channel.
• This indicator Time indicator makes it possible to determine when and on which uplink channel (PUCCH/PUSCH), the terminal must send back an acknowledgment of receipt ACK/NACK of the decoding, by its iterative receiver, of one or more data packets transmitted through the access point.
• the transmitter EM1 makes it possible to: send back to the access point a minimum processing time Tmin necessary for the terminal to perform N iteration(s) of an iterative decoding with interference subtraction of one or more data packets transmitted by the access point, send the ACK/NACK acknowledgment.
• the Time Indic indicator makes it possible to allocate a time to the terminal during which it can carry out a maximum of N' iteration(s) of decoding the or several data packets and reassemble acknowledgment. However, for a given packet, the receiver may only proceed with 1 ⁇ N” ⁇ N′ iterations because the packet may be decoded correctly before reaching N′ iteration(s).
• the microprocessor pP controls the transmitter EM1 so that it goes up the minimum processing time Tmin.
• the microprocessor pP drives the receiver RE1 so that it receives the time indicator Indic.
• the microprocessor pP also controls the transmitter EM1 so that it transmits the acknowledgment of receipt ACK/NACK after the decoding of the data packet while ensuring that the time between the reception of the data packet and the transmission of the ACK/NACK acknowledgment is less than or equal to the time allocated by the Time Indic indicator.
• FIG. 5 is a diagram of an embodiment of an access point according to the invention.
• the access point PA comprises a transmitter EM2, a receiver RE2, a memory MEM2 comprising a buffer memory, a computer pP2 whose operation is controlled by the execution of a program Pg2 whose instructions allow the implementation of a method 1 of telecommunication according to the invention.
• the EM2 transmitter is used to send TBs data packets to at least one user (terminal).
• the access point PA therefore further comprises a transmission chain which generally comprises at least one COD channel coding of input data DATA, one MIMO coding when the access point has several transmission antennas and a multi modulation OFDM carriers to generate these data packets.
• the transmitter EM2 also makes it possible to transmit a temporal indicator Indic of the timing of the return of an acknowledgment of receipt ACK/NACK after decoding by the iterative receiver of the terminal of one or more data packets.
• the receiver RE2 makes it possible to receive a minimum processing time Tmin necessary for the terminal to perform N > 1 iterations of an iterative decoding with interference subtraction of one or more data packets transmitted by the access point.
• the microprocessor pP controls the receiver RE1 so that it receives the processing time Tmin.
• the microprocessor pP drives the transmitter EM2 so that it emits the indicator Indic temp.
• the invention also applies to one or more computer programs, in particular a computer program on or in an information medium, adapted to implement the invention.
• This program may use any programming language, and be in the form of source code, object code, or intermediate code between source code and object code such as in partially compiled form, or in any other form desirable for implementing a method according to the invention.
• the information carrier can be any entity or device capable of storing the program.
• the medium may comprise a storage means, such as a ROM, for example a CD ROM or a microelectronic circuit ROM, or else a means of magnetic recording, for example a USB key or a hard disk.
• the information medium can be a transmissible medium such as an electrical or optical signal, which can be conveyed via an electrical or optical cable, by radio or by other means.
• the program according to the invention can in particular be downloaded from an Internet-type network.
• the information carrier may be an integrated circuit in which the program is incorporated, the circuit being adapted to execute or to be used in the execution of the method in question.
• the terminal Before the communication is established, the terminal exchanges information with the access point generally by implementing a control protocol via a control channel. Among this information, the terminal can inform the access point of its capabilities (capabilities): number of antennas, binary symbol modulations that it knows how to decode, number of spatial layers that it can process, etc.
• capabilities capabilities: number of antennas, binary symbol modulations that it knows how to decode, number of spatial layers that it can process, etc.
• the terminal also sends back to the access point a minimum processing time Tmin that it needs to perform N>1 iterations of an iterative decoding with interference subtraction d one or more data packets transmitted by the access point.
• the data packets are transmitted after multi-carrier modulation, typically OFDM.
• the processing time can then be determined for a given value of spacing p between sub-carriers For example, for a terminal with a maximum number of iterations fixed at three, the left part of the table Table 1 i.e. position 0, can thus become the array Table 4 reproduced in the Appendix with processing times determined for a number of iterations ranging from two to three.
• a processing time table can be determined by type of terminal i.e. SIC type, PIC type or hybrid type. Such a table is then known to the access point and the terminal, for example because it is specified in a standard. In this case, the feedback by the terminal of the minimum processing time corresponds to a feedback of the indication of its type.
• the iterative receiver begins by detecting and decoding the first user UE1, UE1 det-decod at from the input signal S r , generally the one received with the strongest signal, then successively it detects and decodes the following users. It then determines the interference due to this first user UE1, Int maj, and subtracts it from the input signal to detect and decode the second user UE2, UE2 det-decod. It determines the interference due to the first and second users, Int maj, and subtracts it from the input signal to detect and decode the third user.
• the UEK user determines the interference due to users UE2 to UEK and subtracts it from the input signal to detect and decode during a following iteration i2 the first user UE 1. This next iteration then proceeds in a manner similar to the previous iteration.
• This next iteration may be followed by one or more other iterations that proceed similarly to the previous one.
• the iterative receiver detects and decodes UE1 det-decod, UE2 det-decod, UEK det -decod, in parallel all UE1-UEK users. It then performs the interference determination and interference subtraction IC for each of the users so that at the following iteration each detection and decoding of a user is carried out from the input signal S r corrected for the interference due to other users.
• the number N of iterations is defined by the fact that the n th decoding of the same user that the receiver seeks to decode belongs to iteration n-1.
• the terminal uploads an additional processing time per iteration as a function of a number K of interfering users processed by the iterative decoding with interference subtraction, this additional time taking into account a structure of the receiver SIC, PIC or hybrid type multi-users.
• the reference reception processing which can be seen as a zero iteration of an SIC type receiver, can either be with single-user decoding, the terminal only attempts to decode the data that is intended by considering the other users as interference without subtraction during this zero iteration in accordance with a first case, or with successive decoding of the other interfering users and interference subtraction after decoding of each user in accordance with a second case.
• the reference processing time includes an additional processing time compared to the reference processing time of the first case and which corresponds to the decoding of K-1 interfering users. This processing time can be uploaded by the terminal to the access point.
• the minimum processing time to perform N iterations is in any case the processing time beyond the reference time.
• the processing time table is determined by the terminal and the terminal sends the table back to the access point, for example during the exchanges of information occurring before the establishment of a communication.
• the processing time is quantified in number of multi-carrier symbols.
• the number of iterations is considered to correspond to the number of decodings of the channel coding performed by the decoder (ie to the number of decoding iterations). Therefore this number of iterations reflects, according to this approximation, the processing time necessary for the receiver to obtain the decoded data corresponding to one or more data packets using a radio frequency time resource (shared physical channel, PDSCH), indicated beforehand to the terminal by a physical control channel (PDCCH Physical Downlink Control CHannel), defined by several OFDM symbols in time and several sub-carriers in frequency.
• a radio frequency time resource shared physical channel, PDSCH
• PDCCH Physical Downlink Control CHannel physical Downlink Control CHannel
• the network determines the best compromise between latency and throughput by taking into account the minimum processing time reported by the terminal as well as available information (for example, the type of service, the resources available in the upstream direction for the transmission of the ACK/NACK acknowledgment, the TDD configuration in terms of slots for the up direction and the down direction, the radio conditions of the users in terms of interference and signal to noise ratio, etc.).
• available information for example, the type of service, the resources available in the upstream direction for the transmission of the ACK/NACK acknowledgment, the TDD configuration in terms of slots for the up direction and the down direction, the radio conditions of the users in terms of interference and signal to noise ratio, etc.
• the greater the number of iterations that can be performed the greater the achievable throughput, but the greater the necessary latency.
• certain services such as a service of the URLLC type to which a telemedicine application may belong is associated with a very strong latency constraint.
• the latency budget is transmitted to the terminal in the form of a time indicator Indic of a time allocated by the access point to the terminal to send back an acknowledgment of receipt after decoding by the iterative receiver of one or more data packets.
• the latency budget corresponds to the time between the reception of the PDSCH by the terminal and the time ordered by the indicator indic to transmit the acknowledgment of receipt ACK/NACK.
• the terminal When the terminal has decoded one or more data packets and their verification code (CRC), the terminal can send back a message of good reception ACK or bad reception NACK.
• the PDSCH physical channel transmits one or more MAC layer data packets called “Transport blocks” (TBs) per transmission (TTI Transmission Time Interval).
• TTI Transmission Time Interval Transmission Time Interval
• specification TS 38.212 paragraph 5.3.2 of the 5G standard defines only one "Transport block” (TB) per PDSCH for transmission with up to four spatial layers to a terminal while specification TS 36.212 paragraph 5.3.2 of the LTE standard defines in certain cases two "Transport blocks" for which a single acknowledgment of receipt can be transmitted by the terminal according to specification TS 36.321 paragraph 5.3.2.1 of the LTE standard. According to specification TS 38.321 paragraph 5.3.2.2 of the 5G standard, an acknowledgment can relate to one or two transport blocks.
• a message of good reception ACK or bad reception NACK is associated with several data packets or "Transport Blocks" (TBs) or several ACKs or NACKs are transmitted simultaneously, one per packet.
• a repetition mechanism can be implemented so that the access point retransmits the packet(s) concerned by a bad reception NACK message.
• the access point schedules the mechanism for repeating data packet(s) transmitted based on the compromise called the latency budget.
• This compromise takes into account the minimum processing time Tmin necessary for the terminal to perform N decoding iterations and therefore to reach a certain bit rate, takes into account the constraints and performance perf imposed.
• the access point transmits to the terminal the time Indic during which the terminal must have transmitted its message of good reception ACK or bad reception NACK. Knowing this time Indic at its disposal, the terminal adapts the number N” of iterations that it performs before having to send back its message of good reception ACK or bad reception NACK.
• the access point When the access point is a base station, it can belong to a 5G type access network.
• the data packets are then transmitted via a PDSCH channel of the 5G access network.
• REF2 B. Ning, R. Visoz and AO Berthet, "Extrinsic versus a Posteriori Probability based iterative LMMSE-IC algorithms for coded MIMO communications: Performance and analysis, "2012 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS), Paris, 2012, p.p. 386-390.

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
• Signal Processing (AREA)
• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Mathematical Physics (AREA)
• Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
• Radio Transmission System (AREA)
• Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
• Detection And Prevention Of Errors In Transmission (AREA)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=74592161

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (4)

Family Cites Families (4)

• 2020
  • 2020-12-03 FR FR2012579A patent/FR3117300A1/fr not_active Withdrawn
• 2021
  • 2021-12-02 WO PCT/FR2021/052179 patent/WO2022117963A1/fr active Application Filing
  • 2021-12-02 US US18/255,723 patent/US20240007150A1/en active Pending
  • 2021-12-02 EP EP21848161.2A patent/EP4256829A1/de active Pending

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events