EP4158176A1 - Procédé de commande reposant sur un modèle en boucle ouverte et en boucle fermée d'un moteur à combustion interne - Google Patents

Procédé de commande reposant sur un modèle en boucle ouverte et en boucle fermée d'un moteur à combustion interne

Info

Publication number
EP4158176A1
EP4158176A1 EP21729461.0A EP21729461A EP4158176A1 EP 4158176 A1 EP4158176 A1 EP 4158176A1 EP 21729461 A EP21729461 A EP 21729461A EP 4158176 A1 EP4158176 A1 EP 4158176A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
manipulated variables
quality measure
discrete
internal combustion
combustion engine
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP21729461.0A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Jens Niemeyer
Roman GEISELHART
Knut GRAICHEN
Daniel Bergmann
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rolls Royce Solutions GmbH
Original Assignee
Rolls Royce Solutions GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rolls Royce Solutions GmbH filed Critical Rolls Royce Solutions GmbH
Publication of EP4158176A1 publication Critical patent/EP4158176A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
    • F02D41/14—Introducing closed-loop corrections
    • F02D41/1401—Introducing closed-loop corrections characterised by the control or regulation method
    • F02D41/1406—Introducing closed-loop corrections characterised by the control or regulation method with use of a optimisation method, e.g. iteration
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
    • F02D41/14—Introducing closed-loop corrections
    • F02D41/1401—Introducing closed-loop corrections characterised by the control or regulation method
    • F02D41/1402—Adaptive control
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/30—Controlling fuel injection
    • F02D41/3005—Details not otherwise provided for
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
    • F02D41/14—Introducing closed-loop corrections
    • F02D41/1401—Introducing closed-loop corrections characterised by the control or regulation method
    • F02D2041/1412—Introducing closed-loop corrections characterised by the control or regulation method using a predictive controller
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
    • F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
    • F02D41/14—Introducing closed-loop corrections
    • F02D41/1401—Introducing closed-loop corrections characterised by the control or regulation method
    • F02D2041/1433—Introducing closed-loop corrections characterised by the control or regulation method using a model or simulation of the system
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D2200/00—Input parameters for engine control
    • F02D2200/02—Input parameters for engine control the parameters being related to the engine
    • F02D2200/04—Engine intake system parameters
    • F02D2200/0402—Engine intake system parameters the parameter being determined by using a model of the engine intake or its components
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F02D35/00—Controlling engines, dependent on conditions exterior or interior to engines, not otherwise provided for
    • F02D35/02—Controlling engines, dependent on conditions exterior or interior to engines, not otherwise provided for on interior conditions

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for model-based control and regulation of an internal combustion engine, in which an optimizer calculates a quality measure and sets it as decisive for the operating point of the internal combustion engine.
  • the behavior of an internal combustion engine is largely determined by an engine control unit as a function of a desired performance.
  • corresponding characteristic curves and maps are usually applied in the software of the engine control unit.
  • the manipulated variables of the internal combustion engine for example the start of injection and a required rail pressure, are calculated from the desired output.
  • These characteristic curves / maps are equipped with data at the manufacturer of the internal combustion engine on a test bench. However, the large number of these characteristic curves / maps and the correlation of the characteristic curves / maps with one another cause a high level of coordination effort.
  • DE 10 2006004516 B3 describes a Bayesian network with probability tables for determining an injection quantity
  • US 2011/0172897 A1 describes a method for adapting the start of injection and the injection quantity using combustion models using neural networks. Since trained data is mapped here, it must first be learned during a test bench run.
  • a method for model-based control and regulation of an internal combustion engine is known from DE 10 2017005783 A1, in which the setpoint values for the injection system actuators are calculated using a combustion model and the setpoint values for the gas path actuators are calculated using a gas path model. Both the combustion model and the gas path model are based on Gaussian process models.
  • An optimizer determines a quality measure from the setpoint values and predicts how the quality measure will change if the setpoint values change within a prediction horizon would develop. Once the best possible quality measure has been calculated, the optimizer sets the injection system target values and the gas path target values as decisive for the operating point of the internal combustion engine.
  • Manipulated variables with discrete switching states are, for example, the activation of the second exhaust gas turbocharger during register charging, a cylinder bank deactivation, the activation of a pre- or post-injection and the opening or closing of various flaps.
  • So-called branch and bound methods for optimal solution finding in the case of discrete manipulated variables are very computationally expensive, since in the worst case all combinatorial possibilities of the discrete manipulated variables have to be examined.
  • Their use in an internal combustion engine quickly leads to very complex structures which cannot be displayed on an engine control unit.
  • the invention is based on the object of improving the previously described model-based method with regard to the integration of manipulated variables.
  • the procedure is carried out in three steps.
  • the optimizer calculates a pre-optimized quality measure as a function of the operating situation, the discrete manipulated variables with discrete setting values being interpreted as continuous manipulated variables with a continuous setting range.
  • the pre-optimized quality measure is a computational variable, that is, it is not applied to the internal combustion engine.
  • these continuous manipulated variables are then quantized and set as new discrete manipulated variables with discrete setting values. The quantization takes place on the basis of switching thresholds and hysteresis.
  • the optimizer calculates a post-optimized quality measure as a function of the new discrete manipulated variables and the operating situation of the internal combustion engine and sets it as decisive for the operating point of the internal combustion engine.
  • the new discrete manipulated variable are assumed to be fixed. To this extent, they no longer represent a degree of freedom for optimization within the predicted horizon.
  • the rest Continuous manipulated variables are re-optimized in such a way that the solution with regard to the fixed new manipulated variables is the best possible.
  • the operating situation of the internal combustion engine is understood to mean both the external framework conditions, in particular the emission limit values or the desired output, and the current operating point.
  • Both the pre-optimized quality measure and the post-optimized quality measure are determined by using the combustion model to calculate the injection system setpoints for controlling the injection system actuators, for example the setpoint rail pressure, and using a gas path model to calculate the gas path setpoints for actuating the gas path actuators are calculated and then these target values are changed by the optimizer with the aim of finding a minimum.
  • the invention allows optimization tasks to be solved with input variables that are partially continuous in value and partially discrete value with limited computing capacity for the optimization method used. Instead of a parallel calculation of the manipulated variables, as is necessary for the implementation of branch-and-bound methods, the invention uses a serial method. Only then can the quality measure and the resulting values for the manipulated variables be fully calculated on an engine control unit.
  • Fig. 5 shows a subroutine
  • FIG. 1 shows a system diagram of an electronically controlled internal combustion engine 1 with a common rail system.
  • the common rail system comprises the following mechanical components: a low-pressure pump 3 for delivering fuel from a fuel tank 2, a variable suction throttle 4 for Influencing the fuel volume flow flowing through, a high-pressure pump 5 for delivering the fuel with an increase in pressure, a rail 6 for storing the fuel and injectors 7 for injecting the fuel into the combustion chambers of the internal combustion engine 1.
  • the common rail system can also be designed with individual stores, in which case, for example, an individual memory 8 is integrated in the injector 7 as an additional buffer volume.
  • the further functionality of the common rail system is assumed to be known.
  • the gas path shown includes both the air supply and the exhaust gas discharge.
  • the compressor of an exhaust gas turbocharger 11 In the air supply are arranged: the compressor of an exhaust gas turbocharger 11, a charge air cooler 12, a throttle valve 13, a junction 14 for merging the charge air with the recirculated exhaust gas and a variably controllable inlet valve 15.
  • a variably controllable exhaust valve 16 In the exhaust gas duct are arranged: a variably controllable exhaust valve 16, an EGR actuator 17, the turbine of the exhaust gas turbocharger 11 and a turbine bypass valve 18.
  • the mode of operation of the internal combustion engine 1 is determined by an electronic control unit 10 (ECU).
  • the electronic control unit 10 contains the usual components of a microcomputer system, for example a microprocessor, I / O modules, buffers and memory modules (EEPROM, RAM).
  • the operating data relevant to the operation of the internal combustion engine 1 are applied as models in the memory modules.
  • the electronic control unit 10 uses this to calculate the output variables from the input variables.
  • the following input variables are shown as examples in FIG.
  • a target torque M (SOLL), which is specified by an operator, the actual rail pressure pCR, which is measured by means of a rail pressure sensor 9, the engine speed nIST, the charge air pressure pLL, the charge air temperature TLL, the humidity phi of the charge air, the exhaust gas temperature TAbgas, the air-fuel ratio lambda, the NOx actual value, optionally the pressure pES of the individual accumulator 8 and an input variable EIN.
  • the additional sensor signals (not shown) are combined under the input variable IN, for example the coolant temperatures.
  • FIG. 1 are shown as output variables of the electronic control unit 10: a signal PWM to control the suction throttle 4, a signal ve to control the injectors 7 (start / end of injection), a control signal DK to control the throttle valve 13, a control signal VVT to control the Inlet or outlet valve, a control signal AGR for controlling the EGR actuator 17, a control signal TBP for controlling the turbine bypass valve 18 and an output variable AUS.
  • the output variable AUS is representative of the further actuating signals for controlling and regulating the internal combustion engine 1, for example for an actuating signal for activating a second exhaust gas turbocharger a register charge.
  • the throttle valve 13, the EGR actuator 17, the turbine bypass valve 18 or the suction throttle 4 can be controlled with a continuous control signal and can therefore be set in a continuous range of values.
  • a discrete manipulated variable would be the control signal for activating a second exhaust gas turbocharger, since this control signal can only assume individual discrete values, i.e. intermediate values do not exist.
  • FIG. 2 shows a model-based system diagram.
  • a combustion model 19 a gas path model 20 and an optimizer 21 are listed within the electronic control device 10.
  • Both the combustion model 19 and the gas path model 20 map the system behavior of the internal combustion engine as mathematical equations, for example in the form of Gaussian process models.
  • the combustion model 19 statically depicts the processes during the combustion.
  • the gas path model 20 depicts the dynamic behavior of the air routing and the exhaust gas routing.
  • the combustion model 19 contains individual models, for example for the formation of NOx and soot, for the exhaust gas temperature, for the exhaust gas mass flow and for the peak pressure. These individual models, in turn, depend on the boundary conditions in the cylinder and the parameters of the injection.
  • the combustion model 19 is determined for a reference internal combustion engine in a test bench run, the so-called DoE test bench run (DoE: Design of Experiments).
  • DoE test bench run operating parameters and manipulated variables are systematically varied with the aim of mapping the overall behavior of the internal combustion engine as a function of engine variables and environmental conditions.
  • the optimizer 21 evaluates the combustion model 19 with regard to the target torque M (SOLL), the emission limit values, the environmental boundary conditions, for example the humidity phi of the charge air, and the operating situation of the internal combustion engine.
  • SOLL target torque M
  • the operating situation is defined by the engine speed nIST, the charge air temperature TLL, the charge air pressure pLL, etc.
  • the function of the optimizer 21 now consists in evaluating the injection system setpoints for controlling the injection system actuators and the gas path setpoints for activating the gas path actuators .
  • the optimizer 21 selects that solution in which a quality measure is minimized.
  • the measure of quality is calculated as the integral of the quadratic target / actual deviations within the prediction horizon. For example in the form:
  • the optimizer 21 determines the best possible quality measure by finding a minimum by calculating a first quality measure at a first point in time, varying the injection system setpoints and the gas path setpoints, and using these to forecast a second quality measure within the prediction horizon. On the basis of the deviation of the two quality measures from one another, the optimizer 21 then defines a minimum quality measure and sets this as decisive for the internal combustion engine. For the example shown in the figure, this is the set rail pressure pCR (SL) for the injection system.
  • the set rail pressure pCR (SL) is the reference variable for the subordinate rail pressure control loop 22.
  • the manipulated variable of the rail pressure control loop 22 corresponds to the PWM signal to act on the suction throttle.
  • the optimizer 21 indirectly determines the target gas path values for the gas path.
  • these are a lambda setpoint LAM (SL) and an EGR setpoint AGR (SL) for specifying the two subordinate control loops 23 and 24.
  • the measured variables MESS are to be understood as meaning both directly measured physical variables and auxiliary variables calculated from them.
  • the actual lambda value LAM (IST) and the actual EGR value AGR (IST) are read in.
  • the manipulated variables of the internal combustion engine are combined with the reference symbol SG. This includes both the continuous manipulated variables with a continuous setting range and the discrete manipulated variables with discrete setting values.
  • Continuous manipulated variables can be adjusted steplessly between a minimum and maximum value, for example the start of injection and the end of injection with which the injector (Fig. 1: 7) is directly acted upon.
  • Discrete manipulated variables with discrete setting values can only be set in stages in fixed values, for example cylinder deactivation.
  • FIG. 3 shows a block diagram with the operating situation BS of the internal combustion engine as the input variable and the quality measure as the output variable, here referred to as the post-optimized quality measure J (NA).
  • a pre-optimization 25, a quantization 26 and a post-optimization 27 are shown within the block diagram.
  • the pre-optimization 25 calculates a pre-optimized quality measure J (VO) in which the discrete manipulated variables with discrete setting values are interpreted as continuous manipulated variables with a continuous setting range.
  • VO pre-optimized quality measure J
  • An example of a discrete manipulated variable is the pre-injection, which can only be activated or deactivated. By using pre-injection, the peak pressure of the combustion can be reduced significantly.
  • the pre-optimized quality measure J (VO) is a purely internal calculation variable which has no access to the actuators of the internal combustion engine. In other words: the pre-optimized quality measure J (VO) is access-free and is not connected to the internal combustion engine.
  • a second step 26 new discrete manipulated variables SG (new) are calculated from the continuous manipulated variables SG (k) via the quantization.
  • preinjection a fixed assignment to preinjection is activated again in the quantization, or preinjection is deactivated.
  • the quantization 26 offers the advantage that, for example, the variable valve control is set to three discrete values, namely minimum, mean value and maximum, for example 450 °, 495 ° and 540 ° crankshaft angle. This considerably reduces the computational effort in the subsequent determination of the post-optimized quality measure.
  • the calculated values are also stabilized via optional hysteresis bands.
  • a post-optimized quality measure J (NA) is calculated by the optimizer.
  • the new discrete manipulated variables SG (new) are not changed. In this respect, these are not a degree of freedom when calculating the post-optimized quality measure J (NA).
  • the actually continuous manipulated variables are adapted to the course specified from the quantization, for example the pre-injection. In other words: In the case of post-optimization, the manipulated variables that are actually described by continuous manipulated variables are varied.
  • the post-optimized quality measure J (NA) corresponds to the minimum quality measure J (min), which the optimizer uses as is set significantly for the operating point of the internal combustion engine (1), so the internal combustion engine is switched on.
  • the method is shown in a program flow chart in FIG. After the initialization at S1, it is checked at S2 whether the start process has ended. If this is still running, query result S2: no, it branches back to point A. If the starting process has ended, the operating situation of the internal combustion engine is recorded at S3. The operating situation is defined by the engine speed nIST, the charge air temperature TLL, the charge air pressure pLL, etc.
  • the optimizer subroutine is called and the initial values, for example the start of injection, are generated at S5.
  • steps S6 to S8 the subroutines pre-optimization, quantization and post-optimization are called up one after the other. These subroutines are described in connection with FIGS.
  • the post-optimized quality measure calculated in the post-optimization subroutine is set as the minimized quality measure J (min), which determines the operating point of the internal combustion engine. Subsequently, at S10 it is checked whether an engine stop has been initiated. If this is not the case, query result S10: no, the system branches back to point B. Otherwise the program schedule is ended.
  • the pre-optimization subroutine is shown as a program flow chart.
  • a first quality measure J1 (VO) of the pre-optimization is calculated using equation (1).
  • An essential feature here is that when calculating the first quality measure J1 (VO), in addition to the continuous manipulated variables with a continuous manipulating range, the discrete manipulated variables with discrete values are interpreted as continuous manipulated variables via interpolation.
  • a running variable i is set to zero. The initial values are then changed at S3 and calculated as new setpoint values for the manipulated variables.
  • the running variable i is increased by one.
  • a second quality measure J2 (VO) of the pre-optimization within the prediction horizon, for example for the next 8 seconds, is then forecast at S5.
  • the second quality measure J2 (VO) is subtracted from the first quality measure J1 (VO) and compared with a limit value GW.
  • the further progress of the quality measure is checked by calculating the difference between the two quality measures.
  • the comparison of the running variable i with a limit value iGW is used to check how often an optimization has already been carried out.
  • the two limit value considerations are a termination criterion for further optimization. If further optimization is possible, query result S6: no, the system branches back to point A. Otherwise, the optimizer will use the
  • the second quality measure J2 (VO) is output as a pre-optimized quality measure J (VO) together with the manipulated variables calculated in the process, and the program returns to the main program in FIG.
  • the pre-optimized quality measure J (VO) is a pure arithmetic variable, that is, the calculated injection system target values, the calculated gas path target values and the calculated manipulated variables are not applied to the internal combustion engine by the optimizer.
  • the quantization subroutine is shown in FIG.
  • the pre-optimized quality measure J (VO) with the associated manipulated variables is read in at S1.
  • those manipulated variables are discretized with original discrete setting values.
  • this takes place on the basis of corresponding threshold values with a hysteresis band. Oscillating calculation values are avoided via the hysteresis band.
  • a hysteresis band other logics can also be used which prevent rapid switching, for example a time control.
  • the new discrete manipulated variables SG (new) are then output at S3 and a return is made to the main program in FIG.
  • the post-optimization subroutine is shown as a program flow chart.
  • a post-optimized quality measure is determined from the operating situation of the internal combustion engine and the new discrete manipulated variables SG (new) via the post-optimization subroutine.
  • the new discrete manipulated variables are not updated.
  • a first quality measure J1 (NA) of the post-optimization is calculated using equation (1).
  • a running variable i is set to zero. The initial values are then changed at S3 and calculated as new setpoint values for the manipulated variables.
  • the running variable i is increased by one.
  • a second quality measure J2 (NA) of the post-optimization within the prediction horizon, for example for the next 8 seconds, is then forecast at S5.
  • the second quality measure J2 (VO) is subtracted from the first quality measure J1 (VO) and compared with a limit value GW.
  • the further progress of the quality measure is checked by calculating the difference between the two quality measures.
  • the comparison of the running variable i with a limit value iGW is used to check how often an optimization has already been carried out.
  • the two limit value considerations are a termination criterion for further optimization. If further optimization is possible, query result S6: no, the system branches back to point A.
  • the optimizer outputs the second quality measure J2 (VO) as the minimum quality measure J (min) and returns to the main program in FIG.
  • the two FIGS. 8 and 9 show, in a comparison, the course of selected variables over time in seconds.
  • the variables shown are: the variable valve control VVT in degrees crankshaft angle, the start of injection SB in degrees before top dead center (TDC), the combustion pressure pZYL in the cylinder and the engine speed nMOT.
  • the combustion pressure pZYL the maximum permissible combustion pressure pMAX is also shown as a dashed line. On the left-hand half of the drawing, these sizes are shown when the previous optimization is applied, while these sizes are shown on the right-hand half of the drawing when the invention is used.
  • the representation in FIG. 8 and FIG. 9 is based on a step-like increasing setpoint torque as the input variable.
  • the variables according to FIG. 8 are described.
  • the optimizer uses the pre-optimization to calculate a pre-optimized quality measure based on the operating situation.
  • the discrete manipulated variables with discrete setting values are interpreted as continuous manipulated variables with a continuous setting range.
  • VVT variable valve control
  • the VVT actuator for controlling the variable valve with three defined actuator positions however, such a course cannot be represented.
  • a calculated start of injection SB and the corresponding cylinder pressure pZYL correspond to the pre-optimized quality measure.
  • the maximum value pMAX is maintained for the cylinder pressure pZYL.
  • the manipulated variable results in an increasing engine speed nMOT in the period under consideration.
  • FIG. 9 is described below.
  • the VVT curve shown corresponds to the curve after quantization. It becomes clear here that, in contrast to the illustration in FIG. 8, the VVT curve shows only three discrete values, namely 450 °, 495 ° and 540 ° crankshaft angles. The advantage is that the VVT actuator can be controlled with only three values, which significantly reduces the computational effort.
  • the post-optimized quality measure is calculated from the VVT curve based on the operating situation of the internal combustion engine. The course of the start of injection SB and the cylinder pressure pZYL, which in this case also remains below the maximum value pMAX, correspond to this. Reference number
  • EGR actuator exhaust gas recirculation

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Combined Controls Of Internal Combustion Engines (AREA)
  • Electrical Control Of Air Or Fuel Supplied To Internal-Combustion Engine (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé de commande en boucle ouverte et en boucle fermée d'un moteur à combustion interne, selon lequel une mesure de qualité pré-optimisation (J(VO)) est calculée sur la base de la situation de fonctionnement (BS) par un optimiseur à une première étape. Lors du calcul de la mesure de qualité pré-optimisation (J(VO)), des variables manipulées distinctes ayant des réglages distincts sont interprétées en tant que variables manipulées continues (SG(k)) ayant une plage de réglage continue, dans laquelle ces variables manipulées continues (SG(k)) sont quantifiées et définies en tant que nouvelles variables manipulées distinctes (SG(nouvelle)) ayant des réglages distincts à une deuxième étape, dans laquelle une mesure de qualité post-optimisation (J(NA)) est calculée sur la base des nouvelles variables manipulées distinctes (SG(nouvelle)) et de la situation de fonctionnement (BS) du moteur à combustion interne (1) par l'optimiseur à une troisième étape, et la mesure de qualité post-optimisation (J(NA)) est définie comme étant critique pour le point de fonctionnement du moteur à combustion interne (1) par l'optimiseur (21).
EP21729461.0A 2020-05-27 2021-05-25 Procédé de commande reposant sur un modèle en boucle ouverte et en boucle fermée d'un moteur à combustion interne Pending EP4158176A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102020003174.9A DE102020003174B4 (de) 2020-05-27 2020-05-27 Verfahren zur modellbasierten Steuerung und Regelung einer Brennkraftmaschine
PCT/EP2021/063945 WO2021239752A1 (fr) 2020-05-27 2021-05-25 Procédé de commande reposant sur un modèle en boucle ouverte et en boucle fermée d'un moteur à combustion interne

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4158176A1 true EP4158176A1 (fr) 2023-04-05

Family

ID=76250316

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP21729461.0A Pending EP4158176A1 (fr) 2020-05-27 2021-05-25 Procédé de commande reposant sur un modèle en boucle ouverte et en boucle fermée d'un moteur à combustion interne

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US11788484B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP4158176A1 (fr)
CN (1) CN115720605A (fr)
DE (1) DE102020003174B4 (fr)
WO (1) WO2021239752A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102020000327A1 (de) * 2020-01-21 2021-07-22 Mtu Friedrichshafen Gmbh Verfahren zur modellbasierten Steuerung und Regelung einer Brennkraftmaschine
GB2615843A (en) * 2022-05-26 2023-08-23 Secondmind Ltd Engine control unit calibration

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102006004516B3 (de) 2006-02-01 2007-03-08 Mtu Friedrichshafen Gmbh Bayes-Netz zur Steuerung und Regelung einer Brennkraftmaschine
JP5006947B2 (ja) 2010-01-14 2012-08-22 本田技研工業株式会社 プラントの制御装置
CA2917658A1 (fr) * 2013-08-01 2015-02-05 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Procede de commande d'alimentation ascendante et appareil associe
DE102017005783B4 (de) * 2017-06-20 2021-12-02 Mtu Friedrichshafen Gmbh Verfahren zur modellbasierten Steuerung und Regelung einer Brennkraftmaschine
DE102017114731A1 (de) * 2017-06-30 2019-01-03 Technische Universität Dortmund Verfahren zum regeln eines mechatronischen systems, regelungseinheit für ein mechatronisches system und mechatronisches system
DE102017009582B3 (de) 2017-10-16 2018-07-26 Mtu Friedrichshafen Gmbh Verfahren zur modellbasierten Steuerung und Regelung einer Brennkraftmaschine
DE102018001727B4 (de) 2018-03-05 2021-02-11 Mtu Friedrichshafen Gmbh Verfahren zur modellbasierten Steuerung und Regelung einer Brennkraftmaschine
US10550786B1 (en) 2018-10-02 2020-02-04 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Predictive torque management for powertrain having continuous actuators and multiple discrete modes

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102020003174B4 (de) 2022-03-24
CN115720605A (zh) 2023-02-28
US11788484B2 (en) 2023-10-17
DE102020003174A1 (de) 2021-12-02
WO2021239752A1 (fr) 2021-12-02
US20230093283A1 (en) 2023-03-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3698032B1 (fr) Procédé de commande et de régulation d'un moteur à combustion interne sur la base de modèles
DE19615545C1 (de) Einrichtung zur Dieselmotorbetriebsregelung mit Abgasrückführung und Ansaugluftdrosselung
DE102017009582B3 (de) Verfahren zur modellbasierten Steuerung und Regelung einer Brennkraftmaschine
DE102008004361A1 (de) Verfahren zur Regelung eines Verbrennungsmotors, Computerprogramm und Steuergerät
EP3762597A1 (fr) Procédé de commande et de réglage à base de modèles d'un moteur à combustion interne
WO2018234093A1 (fr) Procédé pour la commande et la régulation basées sur des modèles d'un moteur à combustion interne
DE112007003300T5 (de) Dynamische Steuerung eines homogen kompressionsgezündeten Verbrennungsmotors
DE10219382A1 (de) Steuerungsvorrichtung für eine Brennkraftmaschine
EP4158176A1 (fr) Procédé de commande reposant sur un modèle en boucle ouverte et en boucle fermée d'un moteur à combustion interne
DE102011017036B4 (de) Verfahren zur Regelung der NOx-Konzentration im Abgas einer Brennkraftmaschine
EP3599359B1 (fr) Procédé de commande et / ou de régulation du fonctionnement d'un moteur à combustion interne, en particulier d'un moteur à combustion interne d'un véhicule automobile, en particulier fonctionnant partiellement selon le procédé de miller
EP3155247B1 (fr) Procédé et unité de commande pour réaliser un échange gazeux dans un cylindre d'un moteur à combustion interne et moteur à combustion interne équipé d'une telle unité de commande
DE102020208938A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben eines zweistufigen Aufladungssystems, Steuergerät und ein Kraftfahrzeug
WO2020030481A1 (fr) Procédé de commande et de régulation basées sur modèle d'un moteur à combustion interne
DE102007007945A1 (de) Verfahren zum Einstellen einer Abgasrückführrate einer Brennkraftmaschine
WO2018046212A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif permettant de commander la masse de gaz résiduel demeurant dans le cylindre d'un moteur à combustion interne après une opération d'échange des gaz et/ou la masse d'air de balayage balayée dans le collecteur d'échappement du moteur à combustion interne pendant une opération d'échange des gaz
DE10234719B3 (de) Verfahren zur Füllungsregelung einer Brennkraftmaschine
DE102004035316B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Steuerung einer Brennkraftmaschine
DE102019005996B4 (de) Verfahren zur modellbasierten Steuerung und Regelung einer Brennkraftmaschine
WO2018158089A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de commande d'un moteur à combustion interne suralimenté par un turbocompresseur à gaz d'échappement
DE102015214363A1 (de) Verfahren zum Bearbeiten von Sensorsignalen
WO2017182254A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour régler le débit massique d'une vanne de recirculation des gaz d'échappement
DE102019203099A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Betreiben eines Motorbremssystems für ein Kraftfahrzeug
DE102009024290B4 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Brennkraftmaschine
DE102018120974A1 (de) Verfahren zur Ermittlung eines Sollverbrennungsgaszustands für einen Dieselmotor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20230102

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230531

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)