EP3912314A1 - Network management - Google Patents
Network managementInfo
- Publication number
- EP3912314A1 EP3912314A1 EP20700045.6A EP20700045A EP3912314A1 EP 3912314 A1 EP3912314 A1 EP 3912314A1 EP 20700045 A EP20700045 A EP 20700045A EP 3912314 A1 EP3912314 A1 EP 3912314A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- network
- user
- slice
- configuration
- performance
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 65
- 230000002860 competitive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 39
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 34
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 12
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000036963 noncompetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000001613 Gambling Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000003139 buffering effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013523 data management Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011867 re-evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002459 sustained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/70—Admission control; Resource allocation
- H04L47/76—Admission control; Resource allocation using dynamic resource allocation, e.g. in-call renegotiation requested by the user or requested by the network in response to changing network conditions
- H04L47/762—Admission control; Resource allocation using dynamic resource allocation, e.g. in-call renegotiation requested by the user or requested by the network in response to changing network conditions triggered by the network
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
- H04L41/08—Configuration management of networks or network elements
- H04L41/0803—Configuration setting
- H04L41/0813—Configuration setting characterised by the conditions triggering a change of settings
- H04L41/0816—Configuration setting characterised by the conditions triggering a change of settings the condition being an adaptation, e.g. in response to network events
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
- H04L41/08—Configuration management of networks or network elements
- H04L41/0895—Configuration of virtualised networks or elements, e.g. virtualised network function or OpenFlow elements
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
- H04L41/08—Configuration management of networks or network elements
- H04L41/0896—Bandwidth or capacity management, i.e. automatically increasing or decreasing capacities
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
- H04L41/40—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks using virtualisation of network functions or resources, e.g. SDN or NFV entities
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/16—Threshold monitoring
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/20—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks the monitoring system or the monitored elements being virtualised, abstracted or software-defined entities, e.g. SDN or NFV
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/10—Flow control; Congestion control
- H04L47/12—Avoiding congestion; Recovering from congestion
- H04L47/122—Avoiding congestion; Recovering from congestion by diverting traffic away from congested entities
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/10—Flow control; Congestion control
- H04L47/24—Traffic characterised by specific attributes, e.g. priority or QoS
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/70—Admission control; Resource allocation
- H04L47/76—Admission control; Resource allocation using dynamic resource allocation, e.g. in-call renegotiation requested by the user or requested by the network in response to changing network conditions
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/70—Admission control; Resource allocation
- H04L47/78—Architectures of resource allocation
- H04L47/781—Centralised allocation of resources
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/70—Admission control; Resource allocation
- H04L47/80—Actions related to the user profile or the type of traffic
- H04L47/805—QOS or priority aware
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/70—Admission control; Resource allocation
- H04L47/80—Actions related to the user profile or the type of traffic
- H04L47/808—User-type aware
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/70—Admission control; Resource allocation
- H04L47/82—Miscellaneous aspects
- H04L47/822—Collecting or measuring resource availability data
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/535—Tracking the activity of the user
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
- H04L41/50—Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
- H04L41/5003—Managing SLA; Interaction between SLA and QoS
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
- H04L43/0852—Delays
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method of managing a telecommunications network, and in particular to a method of managing the telecommunications network so as to improve fairness amongst competing users; the present invention also relates to a telecommunications network therefor.
- Network performance e.g . bandwidth, latency, jitter, etc.
- Network performance can vary greatly; this may (all things otherwise being equal) result in unfair conditions amongst users that are engaged in a competitive activity over the network (such as gaming, auctions, voting, gambling/betting, financial trading, etc.) or that use the network to support a competitive activity (such as a sporting competition).
- a user that receives information over a network before other users gains a competitive advantage, not least, by being able to react sooner to new information. It is therefore an aim of the present invention at least to alleviate the aforementioned problem.
- a method of managing a telecommunications network comprising a first network slice onto which the first user is allocated, the method comprising the step of: measuring network performance in respect of the first user and in respect of the second user; comparing network performance associated with the first user and the second user; identifying whether there is a disparity between the network performance associated with the first user and the second user that exceeds a threshold; and if it is identified that the disparity exceeds the threshold, adapting the network configuration of the first network slice so as reduce the disparity in the network performance associated with the first user and the second user.
- the term“allocated” with reference to allocation of a first user to a network slice preferably connotes: the identification or selection of a network slice onto which to register the first user, but where the first user has not yet - but is to be - registered with the first network slice; where the first user is registering with the first network slice; and/or where the first user is already registered with the first network slice.
- the phrase “measuring network performance” preferably connotes measuring, retrieving, determining, identifying, estimating and/or inferring network performance.
- the term“user” preferably connotes a User Equipment (UE) and/or an individual (as identified via, for example, an account or other personal identifier).
- UE User Equipment
- the telecommunications network is a local or wide area network.
- the network is a wired (fixed) and/or a wireless network.
- the telecommunications network is a mobile cellular or satellite-enabled network.
- the network configuration of the first network slice includes: allocation of users onto and/or from the first network slice; allocation of processing resources to or from the first network slice; and/or rules for handling data packets.
- the network performance (or an associated metric) includes: latency; jitter; error rate; throughput; bandwidth; Quality of Service; and/or Round-Trip Time (RTT).
- the method further comprises the step of ascertaining a current configuration of the first network slice prior to adapting the first network slice.
- the first user and second users are competing over the network at the same time.
- the first user and second users are competing over the network at different times.
- the network configuration of the first network slice is performed by re-allocating the first user to a second network slice.
- first user is re-allocated to the second network slice.
- first and/or second users are re-allocated onto the same network slice.
- adapting the network configuration of the first network slice comprises adapting the User Plane Function (UPF).
- UPF User Plane Function
- said second network slice is created in response to identifying a disparity between the network performance associated with the first user and the second user that exceeds the threshold.
- the second network slice is created with a configuration (for example, in the same manner as for the first network slice) to reduce the disparity in the network performance associated with the first user and the second user.
- the first network slice is closed or deleted when re-allocating the first user to the second network slice.
- adapting the network configuration of the first network slice comprises prioritising and/or impeding processing of a network communication to and/or from the first user.
- impeding processing of a network communication includes inducing a handicap upon the processing of network communications, which may be performed by increasing latency, error rate and/or jitter, and/or by reducing: speed; and/or bandwidth.
- adapting the network configuration of the first network slice comprises changing a bandwidth allowance of the first network slice.
- adapting the network configuration of the first network slice comprises reallocating network resources to and/or from the first network slice.
- adapting the network configuration of the first network slice is performed without changing a pathway through the telecommunications network of network communications from and/or to the first user.
- adapting the network configuration of the first network slice is performed by changing a path through the telecommunications network of a network communication from and/or to the first user.
- the path of a network connection through the telecommunications network may include the identity and/or sequence of nodes through which a network communication is routed.
- the path is adapted so that it is substantially identical for the first and the second users.
- Adapting the path of a network connection may include changing the Internet Service Provider, Mobile Network Operator, Radio Access Network and/or network access technology/protocol.
- adapting the network configuration of the first network slice comprises changing the location within the telecommunications network of a network resource to be accessed by the first and/or second user/s.
- the location of the network resource is made the same for the first and second users.
- adapting the network configuration of the first network slice comprises corrupting a network communication from and/or to the first user.
- the network configuration of the first network slice is adapted so as to make more equal the network performance for the first and second user.
- the network configuration of the first network slice is adapted so as substantially equalise the network performance, optionally connoting making network performance equal to an extent that it provides no - or negligible - competitive advantage to the first or second users, and more preferably, such that the disparity in network performance is no more than 20%, still more preferably no more than 10%, yet more preferably no more than 5%, still more preferably no more than 2%, and even more preferably no more than 0.5%.
- the network configuration is adapted so as to reduce the disparity in network performance by at least 25%, more preferably by at least 50%, still more preferably by at least 75%, yet more preferably by at least 95%, and still more preferably by at least 99%.
- the network configuration of the first network slice is adapted so as to worsen network performance for the first and/or second user/s.
- the network configuration of the first network slice is adapted so as to improve network performance for the first and/or second user/s.
- the method further comprises the step of determining an extent of the disparity, and adapting the network configuration of the first network slice in proportion to the determined extent of disparity.
- the method further comprises the step of limiting the extent to which the network configuration of the first network slice is adapted.
- the network configuration is adapted within a threshold extent (maximum and/or minimum) value.
- the threshold is a fixed and/or an absolute value.
- the threshold is dynamic and/or proportional to the extent of disparity.
- the method further comprises the step of limiting the frequency with which the network configuration is adapted.
- the measured network performance is filtered, time-averaged and/or smoothed so as to help reduce the frequency with which the network configuration is adapted.
- the network performance comprises a plurality of network performance metrics, and wherein the network configuration is adapted in dependence upon a weighting and/or ranking of the plurality of network performance metrics.
- the weighting and/or ranking is dependent on the identified activity.
- the method further comprises the step of identifying an activity in which the first and second users are, or are to be, engaged over the telecommunications network.
- the activity is a type of activity, for example competitive or non-competitive, or in another example a uniquely- identifiable activity.
- identifying the activity is performed by identifying a type of network communication from the first and second users, wherein the type of network communication may be: data format; session information; and/or network address information.
- the step of measuring the network performance (and/or adapting the network) is triggered in dependence on the type of activity, and more preferably in dependence on identifying the type of activity as a competitive (multi-user) activity performed over the telecommunications network.
- the method further comprises the step of adapting the network configuration in dependence on identifying that the first and second users are, or are to be, engaged in the same activity.
- the extent to which the network performance is adapted is dependent on the identified activity.
- network performance is provided by at least one metric, and wherein said metric is selected in dependence on the identified activity.
- a subset (to those available to be measured) of network performance metrics is selected for measuring in dependence on the identified activity.
- the network configuration is adapted in dependence on the identified activity.
- the way in which network configuration is adapted includes how network performance is adapted and where, within the telecommunications network, the network configuration is adapted.
- the network configuration is adapted for the first and/or second user/s.
- the network configuration is adapted for the second network slice.
- the method further comprises the step of identifying when the first and second users are both competing in a competitive activity over the telecommunications network, and performing said method when identifying that the first and second users are both competing in the competitive activity.
- first and second users are both competing in said activity at the same time.
- the method further comprises the step of reversing the adapting of the network configuration.
- the adapting of the network configuration is reversed (partially or fully) when it is identified that the participation of the first and/or second user in said activity has ended.
- a telecommunications network for facilitating the interaction between a first user and a second user over the telecommunications network, comprising a first network slice onto which the first user is allocated; a processor configured to: measure network performance in respect of the first user and of the second user; compare network performance associated with the first user and the second user; identify whether there is a disparity between the network performance associated with the first user and the second user that exceeds a threshold; and a controller configured to: adapt the network configuration of the first network slice so as reduce the disparity in the network performance associated with the first user and the second user when the disparity exceeds the threshold.
- the processor and/or the controller is/are provided: in a core of the telecommunications network; an edge of the telecommunications network; and/or User Equipment (UE) associated with the first and/or second user/s.
- the controller may be provided as, at least part of, the Access and Mobility management Function of the core network.
- the network slice is an end-to-end network slice.
- a computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor associated with a telecommunications network, causes the telecommunication network to perform a method as described above.
- the invention extends to any novel aspects or features described and/or illustrated herein.
- the invention extends to methods and/or apparatus substantially as herein described and/or as illustrated with reference to the accompanying drawings.
- the invention also provides a computer program and a computer program product for carrying out any of the methods described herein and/or for embodying any of the apparatus features described herein, and a computer readable medium having stored thereon a program for carrying out any of the methods described herein and/or for embodying any of the apparatus features described herein.
- the invention also provides a signal embodying a computer program for carrying out any of the methods described herein and/or for embodying any of the apparatus features described herein, a method of transmitting such a signal, and a computer product having an operating system which supports a computer program for carrying out any of the methods described herein and/or for embodying any of the apparatus features described herein.
- Any apparatus feature as described herein may also be provided as a method feature, and vice versa.
- means plus function features may be expressed alternatively in terms of their corresponding structure, such as a suitably programmed processor and associated memory.
- any feature in one aspect of the invention may be applied to other aspects of the invention, in any appropriate combination.
- method aspects may be applied to apparatus aspects, and vice versa.
- any, some and/or all features in one aspect can be applied to any, some and/or all features in any other aspect, in any appropriate combination. It should also be appreciated that particular combinations of the various features described and defined in any aspects of the invention can be implemented and/or supplied and/or used independently.
- Figure 1 shows an exemplary network
- Figure 2 shows a process for improving network fairness of the network
- Figure 3 is a signalling diagram showing the signalling between a network user and the remainder of the network in order to improve network fairness;
- Figures 4 show exemplary tables of network performance values for improving network fairness of the network.
- Figure 5 shows a process for improving network fairness amongst users engaging in an auction.
- the network 100 is a mobile cellular network comprising a plurality of User Equipment (UE) 1 10 (e.g . in the form of a mobile cellular device, laptop or tablet). Each UE 1 10 is configured to utilise the telecommunications network 100 by accessing a Radio Access Network (RAN) 1 15, as provided by a RAN access point 120 (e.g. in the form of a macro-, micro-, pico- or femto-cell site). In turn, the RAN access point 120 is connected to a core of the network 125.
- RAN Radio Access Network
- the core network 125 is available to connect to remote networks and/or services 170, and not least to the Internet. As a result, the plurality of UEs 1 10-1 to 1 10-4 are also able to communicate with a UE 1 10-5 on a remote network 170.
- the core network 125 in turn comprises the following functional components:
- AMF Access and Mobility management Function
- NSSF Network Slice Selection Function
- NPAF Network Performance Ascertaining Function
- AUSF Authentication Server Function
- SMF Session Management Function
- PCF Policy Control function
- the network 100 provides and manages a plurality of network slices.
- Network slicing provides a virtualised network comprising multiple logical networks -“network slices” - within a single physical network. This is typically undertaken to offer differentiated service models, which might include varying performance and/or stability characteristics within a network.
- the NSSF 135 is configured to identify and to select a suitable network slice for UEs.
- the network 100 adapts its configuration in order to improve the fairness of the network for users; this is achieved by reducing significant inequality in network performance amongst the UEs 1 10, when such UEs are together partaking in an appropriate competitive activity over the network 100 and/or are relying upon the network to support a competitive activity.
- Figure 2 outlines a process 200 for managing the network 100 so as to improve fairness for a first UE 1 10-1 and for a second UE 1 10-2 that are engaged in a competitive activity over the network 100.
- network performance for the first 1 10-1 and second 1 10-2 UEs is ascertained by the NPAF 137 (by means of interfaces with, not least, the UPF 160).
- Network performance includes: jitter; latency; bandwidth (download and/or upload); Round-Trip Time (RTT) delay; and error rate.
- RTT Round-Trip Time
- a next step 220 the ascertained network performance in respect of the first UE 1 10-1 is compared to that of the second UE 1 10-2 so as to assess whether there is a disparity (i.e . an inequality) in the network performance for each UE. If so, an evaluation is made as to whether or not the disparity is significant, for example by assessing whether the disparity exceeds a threshold 230.
- a disparity i.e . an inequality
- step 240 the network 100 is reconfigured so as to improve fairness for the first and second UEs, as outlined below in more detail.
- the network configuration is adapted so as to affect network performance in such a way as to:
- Adapting the network configuration so as to reduce the disparity in network performance is performed, for example, by:
- ⁇ a different network, and in particular a different network slice.
- MNO Mobile Network Operator
- ISP Internet Service Provider
- Any combination of the above-listed methods is used to improve or degrade network performance for a given UE, thereby to help equalise network performance amongst UEs in an effort to improve network fairness.
- the network configuration for a given UE and in particular the configuration of a network slice with which a UE is - or is to be - associated, is adapted by the network core 125.
- the network configuration is adapted by the AMF 130, SMF 150 and/or the UPF 160, as appropriate.
- the process 200 then reiterates by reverting to the first step 210. Likewise, if at step 220 there is no disparity, or if at step 230 the disparity is insignificant (in that it does not exceed the threshold), then the process also reiterates by reverting to the first step 210.
- Figure 3 shows, in more detail, a process 300 for improving network fairness for a given UE (in particular the signalling across the network 100) by reallocating the UE onto a different network slice so as to improve network fairness.
- the first 1 10-1 and second 1 10-2 UEs are competing against one another in a competitive activity over the network 100.
- a first step 310 the first UE 1 10-1 and the core network 125 (and in particular the AMF 130) engage in signalling, via the RAN 120, so as to establish a connection.
- the UE is allocated, by means of the NSSF 135, to a first network slice.
- a Protocol Data Unit (PDU) session is thereby established, and this is achieved, for example, as outlined in the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Technical Specification 23.502, version 15.2.0, section 4.3.2.2, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
- 3GPP 3rd Generation Partnership Project
- the NPAF 137 ascertains (via an interface, at least, with the UPF 160) the network performance in respect of the first UE 1 10-1 and reports the ascertained network performance to the AMF 130.
- steps 310 and 320 are repeated for the second UE 1 10-2 (not shown in Figure 3), so as to connect the second UE 1 10-2 to the network 100 (or another network) and to measure the network performance associated with the second UE 1 10-2.
- the NPAF 137 compares the ascertained network performances of the first 1 10-1 and second UEs 1 10-2 so as to identify any significant disparities in network performance.
- the network performance associated with the second UE 1 10-2 is ascertained to be significantly better than the network performance associated with the first UE 1 10-1 .
- the NSSF identifies a network slice - a second network slice - that will help achieve this result; to do so, the AMF 130 requests Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (NSSAI) from the NSSF 137 based on a desired specification for the second network slice, as provided by the AMF 130. Accordingly, the AMF 130 instructs 330 the first UE to detach from the first network slice and instead to attach to the second network slice, as identified by the NSSF.
- NSSAI Network Slice Selection Assistance Information
- the first UE 1 10-1 subsequently requests attachment to the second network slice 340 and, once said request has been accepted, a Protocol Data Unit (PDU) session with the second network slice 350, for example as outlined in the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Technical Specification 23.502, version 15.2.0, section 4.3.2.2.
- 3GPP 3rd Generation Partnership Project
- the network performance of the second network slice offers improved network performance over the first network slice onto which the first UE was allocated, and a network performance that more closely matches the network performance experienced by the second UE.
- the first and the second UE may compete over a network having substantially similar network performance.
- Certain networks allow UEs to engage in activities that do not involve competition amongst various UEs. As a result, it may not be appropriate to attempt to improve fairness as outlined herein for all activities, nor for all UEs. In such circumstances, the network 100 is configured to distinguish between activities where it is appropriate to improve network fairness (“competitive activities”) and activities where it is not possible and/or not appropriate to improve network fairness (“non-competitive activities”). Accordingly, the network 100 will only improve network fairness as outlined herein for such competitive activities. Examples of competitive activities include: multiplayer games; financial trading; auctions; voting; and data communication that supports a competitive activity and/or“real life” competition ( e.g . professional sporting events, such as motor racing).
- a non-competitive activity is an activity: with no inherent competition; relating solely to the communication of information that has no ability to affect the outcome of a competitive activity and/or “real life” competition; serving only a single UE; and/or where the outcome is driven solely by chance.
- Example of non-competitive activities therefore typically include: on-demand streaming of media; single-player gaming; and games purely of chance.
- the network 100 identifies (or infers) the activity (explicitly or simply whether or not it is a competitive activity) by inspecting network communications traversing the network 100, for example by assessing the:
- payload data type e.g. whether it is video, sound, voice, text, image, etc.
- format and/or content e.g. whether it is video, sound, voice, text, image, etc.
- type of UE receiving or sending the network communication e.g. hardware type and/or operating software version.
- Identification of the activity is performed by the core network 125 (in particular by means of the UPF 160, which then reports identified activities and/or corresponding sessions to the AMF 130 and/or NPAF 137) and/or by the UE(s) that is(/are) engaged in the activity.
- the activity is communicated to the network by the UE and/or by a network server (or servers) that facilitates the activity. Accordingly, there is provided an interface for informing the AMF 130 and/or the NPAF 137 that traffic associated with a particular session and/or competitive activity is to be monitored.
- the network 100 is configured to differentiate between competing and non competing UEs, where competing UEs are, together and at the same time, engaged in the same competitive activity (whether or not against one another).
- Non-competing UEs are UEs that are not engaged in an activity - whether or not a competitive activity - together and/or at the same time. Competing UEs may be competing at the same time or at different times.
- the network 100 is configured to identify sets of competing UEs, for example by using a similar process to that for identifying a competitive activity (as described above), as performed by the core network 125 and/or by the UE(s) that is(/are) engaged in the same competitive activity, which is facilitated by network servers (or nodes) facilitating the competitive activity.
- Network performance is ascertained by the first UE 1 10-1 , the second UE 1 10-2 and/or the core network 125, specifically the NPAF 137.
- network performance is directly measured.
- network performance is estimated or inferred, for example from a network configuration for the first UE 1 10-1 and/or second UE 1 10-2, as established by, for example the NSSF 135, AMF 130 or UPF 160.
- the network configuration includes: the network slice onto which a UE is allocated; priority with which network communications are handled by the network; the characteristics or capabilities of the UE device; and a Service Level Agreement.
- the network performance is available to be measured between any points within the network 100.
- the network performance is measured end-to-end (that is, from a UE to the resource - or another UE - with which the UE is communicating) or for a round trip (from the UE, through the network and back to the same UE).
- the network performance is measured between only a portion of the network 100, including between the UE and the RAN access point 120 or between the RAN access point 120 and the network resource - or another UE - with which the UE is communicating.
- Measured network performance is made available to, and within, the core network 125 by means of an interface between the AMF 130, NPAF 137, UPF 160, and/or the application server(s) providing the competitive activity (which may reside on the remote network 170.
- Network performance is ascertained by measuring network performance metrics; these are stored within the core network 125 within a database.
- Figures 4 show exemplary tables storing network performance metrics.
- the extent to which a network configuration is adapted so as to improve fairness amongst competing UEs is dependent, at least, on the disparity in measured network performance.
- the network 100 aims to offset significant disparity in network performance, but without causing significant detriment to the practicability and/or mutual enjoyment of the competitive activity.
- the extent to which the configuration of the network is adapted is limited, not least so as to maintain acceptable network performance and to honor Service Level Agreements. This is appropriate, for example, in relation to degrading latency when users are competing in a fast-paced action game. Accordingly, the network 100 is prohibited (according to rules) from adapting network performance to an extent that exceeds threshold values, and is available only to be varied within a range of values.
- the threshold values are absolute (e.g . a fixed value of network performance, such as a change in latency of no more than 100ms) and/or relative (e.g. a proportion of users’ network performance, such as a change of no more than 50% of a given UE’s latency).
- the frequency with which the network 100 is adapted is limited.
- the network configuration is adapted so as to improve fairness when network performance exceeds a threshold value for a sustained (predefined) period of time.
- filtering of extreme values
- smoothing such as time-averaging
- Degrading network performance is selected as a least preferred - last resort - option. Instead, the network first assesses whether it is possible to improve the network performance for the UE(s) having a worse (or the worst) network performance amongst a group of competing UEs so as to reduce the disparity with the UE(s) having a better (or the best) network performance; if this improvement is insufficient to minimise the disparity, only then is the network performance in respect of the UE(s) with the better (or the best) network performance degraded.
- Figures 4 show exemplary tables 400 storing data in relation to network performance for UEs 1 10; these tables identify individual UEs and their network performance so as to assess when it is appropriate to adapt their network configuration so as to improve fairness.
- Each table 400 comprises a plurality of fields for each UE, including, for example, fields for:
- IMSI International Mobile Subscriber Identity
- a first UE 100-1 and a third UE 100-3 are both engaged in a game and are assigned to different (competing) opponent groups within the game.
- the network identifies from table 400-1 a significant disparity in network performance between the first and third UEs, in particular in relation to latency. Accordingly, in order to improve fairness of the competition between the first and third UEs, the network reconfigures the network for the first and/or third UEs so as to balance, not least, latencies.
- network performance metrics are instead scored (or banded). These scores are, for example, determined in accordance with a key according to the table provided below:
- having a network performance that is likely to afford a competitive advantage receives a lower score (i.e . 1 being the lowest), whereas a network performance that is likely to afford a competitive disadvantage network performance (such as high jitter or high RTT) receives a higher score (i.e. 5 being the highest).
- the network 100 reacts so as to reduce any disparity in the overall score of network performance 450 amongst the competing UEs.
- Figure 5 shows a process 500 for improving network fairness for UEs 1 10 competing in an auction over the network 100.
- the network identifies a first UE 1 10-1 as being eligible to have its network performance reconfigured in order to improve fairness; this is, for example, identified by way of a flag that it communicates to the network when the first UE 1 10-1 attaches to the network.
- the NPAF measures the network performance in respect of the first UE 1 10- 1 .
- the first UE 1 10-1 then engages in an auction over the network, which is ascertained by the network 530.
- the network identifies other UEs that are competing with the first UE in the auction, and the NPAF measures the network performance in respect of these other UEs, and the network identifies a disparity in network performance which renders the auction unfair 540.
- the network adjusts the network performance in respect of the first 1 10-1 and/or other UEs to an extent so as to minimise the disparity in network performance, thereby to maximise fairness 550.
- the telecommunications network 100 is generally shown and described as a cellular wide area network in accordance with 5G technology.
- the telecommunications network 100 is any kind of telecommunications network, including a wired network, a local area network, or combination of network types.
- the UEs 1 10 are shown as accessing the same core network. However, it will be appreciated that the UEs can access different core networks (and be connected to one another via the remote network 170).
- the network instead of - or prior to - adapting the network configuration in response to identifying a disparity in network performance amongst competing UEs, the network instead notifies the competing UE (or at least one of the competing UEs) that there is an unfairness in network performance. An option is then given to the UEs - or at least one of the UEs (such as the UE with the lower/lowest network performance) - for the network to take action so as to improve fairness.
- network performance is balanced for pairs of competing UEs or in aggregate across competing groups of UEs, such as teams.
- the aforementioned processes of improving network fairness are performed when competing UEs 1 10 are used to support a competitive activity (rather than the UEs directly participating in the competitive activity).
- the UEs are associated with a competitor that is participating in a sport, and the UEs are used to communicate - over the network - with other competitors, a wider team and/or a referee.
- the UE is a voice, text or data (including telematics) communication device, and by the aforementioned process fairness can be sought to be improved by, for example, ensuring that new information pertinent to the outcome of the sport (e.g . changes to rules, conditions, race routes, participants, etc.) can successfully reach the intended recipients at substantially the same time.
- the NPAF 137 resides at the edge of the network, and for example at the RAN access point (e.g. at an eNodeB).
- the NPAF 137 ascertains network performance via the UPF 160, SMF 150, PCF 155, and/or AMF 130, with which the NPAF is in communication (either directly or indirectly) via appropriate interfaces.
- the network 100 is also configured to adapt network performance so as to improve fairness in dependence on user characteristics, such as skill at a competitive activity and/or hardware capabilities.
- a network slice is provided as an end-to-end network slice, spanning access, transport and core networks.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP19151635 | 2019-01-14 | ||
PCT/EP2020/050236 WO2020148116A1 (en) | 2019-01-14 | 2020-01-07 | Network management |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3912314A1 true EP3912314A1 (en) | 2021-11-24 |
EP3912314B1 EP3912314B1 (en) | 2024-02-14 |
Family
ID=65036598
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP20700045.6A Active EP3912314B1 (en) | 2019-01-14 | 2020-01-07 | Network management |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20220116336A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3912314B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN113475043B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2020148116A1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7889669B2 (en) * | 2005-09-26 | 2011-02-15 | Alcatel Lucent | Equalized network latency for multi-player gaming |
US9590854B1 (en) * | 2014-06-25 | 2017-03-07 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Automated network security |
US10117142B2 (en) * | 2015-08-28 | 2018-10-30 | Viavi Solutions Uk Limited | Modeling mobile network performance |
US11026060B2 (en) * | 2016-05-13 | 2021-06-01 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for network slice attachment and configuration |
EP3563610B1 (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2020-03-04 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Network slice selection |
CN108738072B (en) * | 2017-04-21 | 2023-08-15 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Method, device and terminal for realizing network slice admission control |
US10463969B2 (en) * | 2018-03-26 | 2019-11-05 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Maintaining communications integrity of network-based user interactions |
CN108833181B (en) * | 2018-06-25 | 2020-10-30 | 北京邮电大学 | NG-CN network slice system and network slice selection method |
-
2020
- 2020-01-07 US US17/422,367 patent/US20220116336A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2020-01-07 WO PCT/EP2020/050236 patent/WO2020148116A1/en unknown
- 2020-01-07 EP EP20700045.6A patent/EP3912314B1/en active Active
- 2020-01-07 CN CN202080008902.3A patent/CN113475043B/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2020148116A1 (en) | 2020-07-23 |
EP3912314B1 (en) | 2024-02-14 |
CN113475043A (en) | 2021-10-01 |
US20220116336A1 (en) | 2022-04-14 |
CN113475043B (en) | 2023-08-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2021129861A1 (en) | Data flow control method and device | |
JP4991840B2 (en) | Provide quality of service for various traffic flows in the communication environment | |
ES2675198T3 (en) | Method and system for detecting cooperative congestion in cellular networks | |
US20060135258A1 (en) | System, network entity, client and method for facilitating fairness in a multiplayer game | |
US9246775B2 (en) | System, method and apparatus for filtering subscriber network traffic | |
US11198062B2 (en) | Latency management in an event driven gaming network | |
US11070605B2 (en) | Maximum sustainable encoding bit rates for video downloads | |
CN109274596A (en) | Data transmission method and relevant apparatus | |
GB2580595A (en) | Network management | |
US10382339B2 (en) | Large scale bandwidth management of IP flows using a hierarchy of traffic shaping devices | |
US12113670B2 (en) | Network management | |
US10390299B2 (en) | Access method and device in heterogeneous network | |
US20220116336A1 (en) | Network management | |
CN107277071A (en) | The accelerated method of online game | |
US11925871B2 (en) | Competitor selection | |
EP3928481B1 (en) | Network management | |
Kalan et al. | Implementation of sand architecture using sdn | |
US20240080706A1 (en) | End-to-end wi-fi optimization | |
Chen et al. | Does online mobile gaming overcharge you for the fun? | |
Wang | Performance evaluation of multi-player online games in IEEE 802.11 g wireless networks | |
KR20210048261A (en) | Surppoting apparatus for slice management, and method thereof for connection management | |
Chen et al. | Does Playing Online Mobile Games Overcharge You for the Fun? | |
Boussetta et al. | Effects of packetization delay on multiplayer gaming experience over ad hoc networks | |
Liu et al. | FPS Game Performance in Wi-Fi Networks |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20210621 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
RAP3 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230623 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Ref document number: 602020025621 Country of ref document: DE Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: H04L0012700000 Ipc: H04L0047000000 Ref legal event code: R079 Ipc: H04L0047000000 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: H04L 41/5003 20220101ALN20230911BHEP Ipc: H04L 47/70 20220101ALI20230911BHEP Ipc: H04L 43/20 20220101ALI20230911BHEP Ipc: H04L 41/40 20220101ALI20230911BHEP Ipc: H04L 41/0895 20220101ALI20230911BHEP Ipc: H04L 43/16 20220101ALI20230911BHEP Ipc: H04L 41/0816 20220101ALI20230911BHEP Ipc: H04L 43/08 20220101ALI20230911BHEP Ipc: H04L 47/76 20220101ALI20230911BHEP Ipc: H04L 47/24 20220101ALI20230911BHEP Ipc: H04L 47/80 20220101ALI20230911BHEP Ipc: H04L 47/122 20220101ALI20230911BHEP Ipc: H04L 47/00 20220101AFI20230911BHEP |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20230929 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602020025621 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20240214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240614 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240515 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1658024 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20240214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240514 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240514 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240514 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240614 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240515 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240614 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240614 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20240214 |