EP3891664A1 - Method for training at least one algorithm for a control device of a motor vehicle, computer program product, and motor vehicle - Google Patents
Method for training at least one algorithm for a control device of a motor vehicle, computer program product, and motor vehicleInfo
- Publication number
- EP3891664A1 EP3891664A1 EP19800939.1A EP19800939A EP3891664A1 EP 3891664 A1 EP3891664 A1 EP 3891664A1 EP 19800939 A EP19800939 A EP 19800939A EP 3891664 A1 EP3891664 A1 EP 3891664A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- quality
- motor vehicle
- computer program
- program product
- algorithm
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 55
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 45
- 238000013528 artificial neural network Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 40
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000003014 reinforcing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- GNFTZDOKVXKIBK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-(2-methoxyethoxy)benzohydrazide Chemical compound COCCOC1=CC=CC(C(=O)NN)=C1 GNFTZDOKVXKIBK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- FGUUSXIOTUKUDN-IBGZPJMESA-N C1(=CC=CC=C1)N1C2=C(NC([C@H](C1)NC=1OC(=NN=1)C1=CC=CC=C1)=O)C=CC=C2 Chemical compound C1(=CC=CC=C1)N1C2=C(NC([C@H](C1)NC=1OC(=NN=1)C1=CC=CC=C1)=O)C=CC=C2 FGUUSXIOTUKUDN-IBGZPJMESA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 description 4
- BSYNRYMUTXBXSQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Aspirin Chemical compound CC(=O)OC1=CC=CC=C1C(O)=O BSYNRYMUTXBXSQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000010801 machine learning Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013473 artificial intelligence Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 231100001261 hazardous Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003203 everyday effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013442 quality metrics Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002787 reinforcement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011273 social behavior Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Neural networks
- G06N3/08—Learning methods
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60W—CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
- B60W50/00—Details of control systems for road vehicle drive control not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. process diagnostic or vehicle driver interfaces
- B60W50/06—Improving the dynamic response of the control system, e.g. improving the speed of regulation or avoiding hunting or overshoot
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60W—CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
- B60W40/00—Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models
- B60W40/02—Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models related to ambient conditions
- B60W40/04—Traffic conditions
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60W—CONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
- B60W60/00—Drive control systems specially adapted for autonomous road vehicles
- B60W60/001—Planning or execution of driving tasks
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0265—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion
- G05B13/027—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion using neural networks only
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
- G06N3/004—Artificial life, i.e. computing arrangements simulating life
- G06N3/006—Artificial life, i.e. computing arrangements simulating life based on simulated virtual individual or collective life forms, e.g. social simulations or particle swarm optimisation [PSO]
Definitions
- a method for training at least one algorithm for a control device of a motor vehicle the control device for implementing an autonomous driving function with intervention in motor vehicle units, a computer program product and a motor vehicle being described.
- DE 10 2015 007 493 A1 discloses a method for training a decision algorithm based on machine learning that is used in a control device of a motor vehicle, the decision algorithm depending on the current operating state and / or the input data describing the current driving situation for controlling the Output data to be taken into account during operation of the motor vehicle and a reliability value describing the reliability of the output data are determined and used in the motor vehicle on the basis of a basic training data set was trained, whereby if the reliability value falls below a threshold value, the input data on which the determination of the output data associated with the reliability value is based are stored as assessment input data and are displayed at a later point in time to a human assessor, after which output data corresponding assessment output data are received by an operator input of the assessment person and the Decision algorithm is trained on the basis of an improvement training data record formed from the assessment input data and the assigned assessment output data.
- a disadvantage of the known methods is that the development of series-ready algorithms for autonomously driving motor vehicles is complex and takes a very long time.
- the task thus arises to further develop methods for training at least one algorithm for a control unit of a motor vehicle, computer program products and motor vehicles of the type mentioned at the outset in such a way that autonomous driving functions can be implemented faster and with higher quality than previously in autonomously driving motor vehicles.
- the object is achieved by a method for training at least one algorithm for a control device of a motor vehicle according to claim 1, a computer program product according to the independent claim 9 and a motor vehicle according to the independent claim 11. Further refinements and developments are the subject of the dependent claims.
- a method for training at least one algorithm for a control device of a motor vehicle is described below, the control device for implementing an autonomous driving function while engaging in units of the motor vehicle on the The basis of input data using the at least one algorithm is provided, the algorithm being trained by a self-learning neural network, comprising the following steps:
- step e) (i) if the quality in step d) is worse than the first quality measure, the method is continued from step c), or
- step d if the quality in step d) is better than the first quality measure and worse than the second quality measure, the process is continued from step d).
- an algorithm for developing an autonomous driving function that develops through a self-learning new ronal network can be developed faster and more reliably than with conventional methods.
- the algorithm can reach a certain level of maturity before the self-learning neural network takes the algorithm in a next step towards a more complex situation in a secure virtual environment due to the real motor vehicle Adapt environment can.
- the increased complexity results, for example, from the variance of sensor input signals from real sensors, delays in the signal chain, temperature dependencies and similar phenomena.
- step d By introducing the quality measure for the algorithm by which the determined metric is measured, if the algorithm is unsuitable in the higher reality level in step d), a long learning process can be avoided by initially learning the less complex full simulation in step c ) is reset and the algorithm is further developed there.
- Corresponding metrics can be, for example, average number of accidents per route, number of hazardous situations per route, number of disregard for traffic rules per route, etc.
- a quality can be determined from the metrics, which are measured using quality measures. For example, stricter quality measures mean fewer accidents per route, fewer hazardous situations per route, etc. The training can only be continued in the next stage if the quality standards are not exceeded. This can prevent unstable algorithms from taking long learning times and a higher quality algorithm can be achieved earlier.
- step f) if the quality in step f) is worse than the second quality measure, the process is continued from step e).
- the algorithm in a next step the algorithm can be further developed by the self-learning neural network in a mixed-real environment in which the risk to road users is minimized.
- the learning process can also be accelerated by checking the quality on the basis of the quality measure and possibly returning to an earlier stage in the development of the algorithm.
- Another possible further development provides that h) a simulation of traffic situations relevant to the autonomous driving function in a real environment and a training of the self-learning neural network by simulating critical scenarios and determining the quality are carried out until a fourth quality measure is met , where the fourth quality measure is stricter than the third quality measure, where,
- step i) if the quality in step h) is worse than the third quality measure, the process is continued from step g) or if the quality in step h) is worse than the second quality measure, the process is continued from step e).
- the algorithm in a next step the algorithm can be further developed by the self-learning neural network in a real environment. At this point it can be assumed that the algorithm is already stable enough that road safety is no longer at risk.
- the learning process can also be accelerated by checking the quality and possibly returning to an earlier stage in the development of the algorithm.
- Another possible further embodiment provides that if the metric fulfills the fourth quality measure, the computer program product module is released for use in road traffic.
- Another possible further embodiment provides that method steps f) and / or h) are carried out by safety drivers.
- the metric has a measure of accidents per route unit and / or time-to-collision and / or time-to-brake and / or required deceleration. Corresponding metrics are easy to determine.
- neural network learns according to the “reinforcing learning” method.
- Reinforcement learning stands for a number of machine learning methods in which an agent, here the self-learning neural network, constantly learns a strategy to maximize the rewards received.
- the agent is not shown which action is the best in which situation, but receives a reward at certain times, which can also be negative.
- the agent approximates a utility function that describes the value of a particular state or action.
- the self-learning neural network can constantly further develop the algorithm.
- Another possible further development provides that the neural network tries out variations to the existing algorithm at random.
- a first independent subject relates to a device for training at least one algorithm for a control device of a motor vehicle, the control device being provided for implementing an autonomous driving function by engaging aggregates of the motor vehicle on the basis of input data using the at least one algorithm, the algorithm is trained by a self-learning neural network, the device being set up to carry out the following steps: a) providing a computer program product module for the autonomous driving function, the computer program product module containing the algorithm to be trained and the self-learning neural network;
- the computer program product module in a simulation environment to simulate at least one traffic situation relevant to the autonomous driving function, the simulation environment being based on map data of a real environment and on a digital vehicle model of the motor vehicle, such as training the self-learning neural network by simulating critical scenarios and determining a quality, the Quality is a result of a quality function that is at least one metric until a first quality measure is met;
- step e) (i) if the quality in step d) is worse than the first quality measure, the method is continued from step c), or
- step d if the quality in step d) is better than the first quality measure and worse than the second quality measure, the process is continued from step d).
- step f) if the quality in step f) is worse than the second quality measure, the process is continued from step e).
- step h) a simulation of traffic situations relevant to the autonomous driving function in a real environment and a training of the self-learning neural network by simulating critical scenarios and determining the quality is undertaken until a fourth quality standard is met, the fourth quality standard being stricter than the third measure of quality, whereby if the quality in step h) is worse than the third quality measure, the process is continued from step g) or if the quality in step h) is worse than the second quality measure, the process is continued from step e).
- Another possible further embodiment provides that the device is furthermore set up for this purpose, if the quality meets the fourth quality standard, the computer program product module is released for use in road traffic.
- Another possible further embodiment provides that the device is set up so that method steps f) and / or h) can be carried out by safety drivers.
- the device is set up to use a measure of accidents-per-route unit and / or time-to-collision and / or time-to-brake and / or required deceleration as a metric.
- neural network is set up to learn according to the “reinforcing learning” method.
- Another possible further embodiment provides that the neural network is set up to try out variations to the existing algorithm at random.
- Another independent subject relates to a computer program product with a computer-readable storage medium on which instructions are embedded which, when executed by a computing unit, cause the computing unit to be set up to carry out the method according to one of the preceding claims.
- a first further embodiment of the computer program product provides that the commands have the computer program product module of the type described above.
- Another independent object relates to a motor vehicle with a computing unit and a computer-readable storage medium, a computer program product of the type described above being stored on the storage medium.
- a first further embodiment provides that the computing unit is part of the control unit.
- Another further embodiment provides that the computing unit is networked with environmental sensors.
- 1 shows a motor vehicle which is set up for autonomous driving
- Fig. 2 shows a computer program product for the motor vehicle from Fig. 1, as well
- Fig. 3 is a flowchart of the method.
- FIG. 1 shows a motor vehicle 2 which is set up for autonomous driving.
- the motor vehicle 2 has a motor vehicle control unit 4 with a computing unit 6 and a memory 8.
- a computer program product is stored in the memory 8 and is described in more detail below, in particular in the context of FIGS. 2 and 3.
- the motor vehicle control unit 4 is connected, on the one hand, to a number of environmental sensors, which allow the current position of the motor vehicle 2 and the respective traffic situation to be detected. These include environmental sensors 10, 12 on the front of motor vehicle 2, environmental sensors 14, 16 on the rear of motor vehicle 2, a camera 18 and a GPS module 20. Depending on the configuration, further sensors can be provided, for example wheel speed sensors, acceleration sensors etc., which are connected to the motor vehicle control unit 4.
- computing unit 6 has loaded the computer program product stored in memory 8 and is executing it. On the basis of an algorithm and the input signals, the computing unit 6 decides on the control of the motor vehicle 2, which the computing unit 6 can achieve by intervening in the steering 22, engine control 24 and brakes 26, each of which is connected to the motor vehicle control unit 4.
- FIG. 2 shows a computer program product 28 with a computer program product module 30.
- the computer program product 30 has a self-learning neural network 32 that trains an algorithm 34.
- the self-learning neural network 32 learns according to methods of reinforcing learning, i. H. by varying the algorithm 34, the neural network 32 tries to obtain rewards for improved behavior according to one or more criteria or standards, that is to say for improvements in the algorithm 34.
- the algorithm 34 can essentially consist of a complex filter with a matrix of values, often called weights, which define a filter function which determines the behavior of the algorithm 34 depending on input variables, which are recorded in the present case by the environmental sensors 10 to 20 and control signals for controlling the motor vehicle 2 are generated.
- the quality of the algorithm 34 is monitored by a further computer program product module 36, which monitors input variables and output variables, determines metrics therefrom, and checks the compliance with the quality by the functions using the metrics.
- the computer program product module 36 can give negative and positive rewards for the neural network 32.
- FIG. 3 shows a flow chart of the method.
- the computer program product module and a learning environment are provided.
- both the motor vehicle as a model and the environment are provided virtually.
- the model of the motor vehicle corresponds to the later real model in terms of its parameters, sensors, driving characteristics and behavior.
- the model of the environment is based on map data of a real environment in order to make the model as realistic as possible.
- the quality GM results from a quality function G (M), which is a function of at least one metric M.
- G M
- a corresponding metric M can be a measure such as accident-per-route unit and / or time-to-collision and / or time-to-brake and / or have similar measured variables, for example required decelerations, lateral acceleration, falling below safety margins, violations of applicable traffic regulations etc.
- the training takes place using a real motor vehicle in a virtual environment.
- the algorithm 34 can be developed further so that it can take into account the behavior of the real motor vehicle 2. Differences can arise, for example, from the use of real sensors, which can have different signal levels, noise, etc.
- the quality function G (M) is always monitored during the training.
- the aim is that the quality G M is better than a second quality measure G2.
- the second quality measure G2 is stricter than the first quality measure G1.
- the quality G M may occur below the first quality measure G1 falls. In this case, the system switches back to the purely virtual environment and the training is continued until the algorithm 34 exceeds the first quality measure G1 and the training with the real motor vehicle 2 is continued.
- the method is reset to the previous training step. If the quality function even falls below the threshold value of the first quality measure G1, the method is reset to the initial training step.
- the algorithm 34 can be released for free traffic.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Transportation (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
- Feedback Control In General (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102018220865.4A DE102018220865B4 (en) | 2018-12-03 | 2018-12-03 | Method for training at least one algorithm for a control unit of a motor vehicle, computer program product and motor vehicle |
PCT/EP2019/078978 WO2020114674A1 (en) | 2018-12-03 | 2019-10-24 | Method for training at least one algorithm for a control device of a motor vehicle, computer program product, and motor vehicle |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3891664A1 true EP3891664A1 (en) | 2021-10-13 |
Family
ID=68501579
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19800939.1A Pending EP3891664A1 (en) | 2018-12-03 | 2019-10-24 | Method for training at least one algorithm for a control device of a motor vehicle, computer program product, and motor vehicle |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20220009510A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3891664A1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN113168570A (en) |
DE (1) | DE102018220865B4 (en) |
MA (1) | MA54363A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2020114674A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR3116634B1 (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2022-12-09 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | Learning device for mobile cyber-physical system |
DE102021202083A1 (en) * | 2021-03-04 | 2022-09-08 | Psa Automobiles Sa | Computer-implemented method for training at least one algorithm for a control unit of a motor vehicle, computer program product, control unit and motor vehicle |
WO2023069558A1 (en) * | 2021-10-19 | 2023-04-27 | Cyngn, Inc. | System and method of large-scale automatic grading in autonomous driving using a domain-specific language |
DE102022204295A1 (en) | 2022-05-02 | 2023-11-02 | Robert Bosch Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung | Method for training and operating a transformation module for preprocessing input records into intermediate products |
WO2023247767A1 (en) * | 2022-06-23 | 2023-12-28 | Deepmind Technologies Limited | Simulating industrial facilities for control |
DE102022208519A1 (en) | 2022-08-17 | 2024-02-22 | STTech GmbH | Computer-implemented method and computer program for the movement planning of an ego driving system in a traffic situation, computer-implemented method for the movement planning of an ego driving system in a real traffic situation, control device for an ego vehicle |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102015007493B4 (en) | 2015-06-11 | 2021-02-25 | Audi Ag | Method for training a decision algorithm and a motor vehicle used in a motor vehicle |
DE112016003350T5 (en) * | 2015-07-24 | 2018-04-05 | Google Llc | CONTINUOUS CONTROL WITH LOW STRENGTH LEARNING |
US10521677B2 (en) * | 2016-07-14 | 2019-12-31 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Virtual sensor-data-generation system and method supporting development of vision-based rain-detection algorithms |
CN107862346B (en) * | 2017-12-01 | 2020-06-30 | 驭势科技(北京)有限公司 | Method and equipment for training driving strategy model |
US11613249B2 (en) * | 2018-04-03 | 2023-03-28 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Automatic navigation using deep reinforcement learning |
-
2018
- 2018-12-03 DE DE102018220865.4A patent/DE102018220865B4/en active Active
-
2019
- 2019-10-24 US US17/294,337 patent/US20220009510A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2019-10-24 CN CN201980080062.9A patent/CN113168570A/en active Pending
- 2019-10-24 EP EP19800939.1A patent/EP3891664A1/en active Pending
- 2019-10-24 MA MA054363A patent/MA54363A/en unknown
- 2019-10-24 WO PCT/EP2019/078978 patent/WO2020114674A1/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN113168570A (en) | 2021-07-23 |
WO2020114674A1 (en) | 2020-06-11 |
US20220009510A1 (en) | 2022-01-13 |
DE102018220865B4 (en) | 2020-11-05 |
DE102018220865A1 (en) | 2020-06-18 |
MA54363A (en) | 2022-03-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2020114674A1 (en) | Method for training at least one algorithm for a control device of a motor vehicle, computer program product, and motor vehicle | |
DE102019206908B4 (en) | Method for training at least one algorithm for a control unit of a motor vehicle, computer program product, motor vehicle and system | |
EP4052178A1 (en) | Method for training at least one algorithm for a control device of a motor vehicle, computer program product, and motor vehicle | |
DE102017200180A1 (en) | Method and test unit for the motion prediction of road users in a passively operated vehicle function | |
DE102019203712B4 (en) | Method for training at least one algorithm for a control unit of a motor vehicle, computer program product, motor vehicle and system | |
DE102006044086A1 (en) | Traffic situation e.g. accident-critical driving situation, simulating system, has reference vehicle, where behavior of vehicle temporally takes place based on information detected by detection unit during simulated traffic situation | |
WO2021115918A1 (en) | Method for creating a road user algorithm for computer simulation of road users, method for training at least one algorithm for a control unit of a motor vehicle, computer program product, and motor vehicle | |
DE102016224291A1 (en) | Method for the computer-aided adaptation of a predetermined semi-automated driving system of a motor vehicle | |
AT523834B1 (en) | Method and system for testing a driver assistance system | |
DE102013200116A1 (en) | Method for developing and/or testing driver assistance system for motor vehicle, involves determining motor vehicle parameter, and transferring control function of vehicle between rider and corresponding driver assistance system | |
DE202013010566U1 (en) | Driver assistance system for a motor vehicle | |
WO2018134026A1 (en) | Method for navigating a motor vehicle along a prescribable route | |
WO2019206513A1 (en) | Method for driving manouevre assistance of a vehicle, device, computer program, and computer program product | |
DE102021004426A1 (en) | Method for training an autonomous driving function | |
DE102014201769A1 (en) | Method for determining a road gradient | |
WO2021170580A1 (en) | Method for training at least one algorithm for a control device of a motor vehicle, computer program product, and motor vehicle | |
AT524822A1 (en) | Method for testing a driver assistance system of a vehicle | |
DE102020201931A1 (en) | Method for training at least one algorithm for a control unit of a motor vehicle, method for optimizing a traffic flow in a region, computer program product and motor vehicle | |
DE102019213797A1 (en) | Method for evaluating a sequence of representations of at least one scenario | |
DE102007050254A1 (en) | Method for producing a collision protection system for a motor vehicle | |
WO2022077042A1 (en) | Method and a system for testing a driver assistance system for a vehicle | |
DE102017221971A1 (en) | Method for adapting a vehicle control system | |
DE102020116054A1 (en) | Method, device, computer program and computer-readable storage medium for determining a neural network and for operating a vehicle | |
DE102019212830A1 (en) | Analysis and validation of a neural network for a vehicle | |
DE102021202083A1 (en) | Computer-implemented method for training at least one algorithm for a control unit of a motor vehicle, computer program product, control unit and motor vehicle |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20210617 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RAV | Requested validation state of the european patent: fee paid |
Extension state: MA Effective date: 20210617 |
|
RAP3 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: STELLANTIS AUTO SAS |