EP3884557A1 - Feed-in method for a wind power system, and wind power system - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for feeding electrical power into an electrical supply grid by means of a wind power system comprising at least one wind farm, at a grid connection point, the electrical supply grid comprising at least one distribution grid and at least one additional higher grid portion lying hierarchically above the distribution grid, and the grid connection point being connected to the distribution grid, the method comprising the following steps: in a capturing step, capturing an initial feed-in limit related to the grid connection point, which initial feed-in limit specifies an initial power limit up to which the wind power system can feed electrical power into the electrical supply grid; in a basic checking step, checking if the farm power that can be generated from wind by the wind farm is limited by the initial feed-in limit, in particular whether said farm power lies above the initial power limit, the wind farm thus being throttled in the power output thereof by the initial power limit, in particular throttled to a power below the initial power limit; in an evaluation step, if it was detected in the basic checking step that the farm power is throttled, evaluating whether the initial power limit can be increased; in a changing step, if it was determined in the evaluation step that the power limit can be increased, increasing the initial power limit to an increased power limit; and feeding electrical power above the initial power limit if the initial power limit was increased to an increased power limit in the changing step. In the evaluation step, it is checked whether the initial feed-in limit can be changed by means of a limit redistribution.

Description

 Feed-in process for a wind energy system and wind energy system

The present invention relates to a method for feeding electrical power using a wind energy system. The invention also relates to a wind energy installation, a wind farm and a wind energy system which comprises at least one wind farm.

Wind turbines and wind farms are well known, they feed wind power into an electrical supply network. Depending on the country, the proportion of such wind turbines, wind farms or wind energy systems is increasing, and with it their importance. Unconditional parallel grid operation, in which wind turbines or wind farms always feed as much power into the electrical supply network as can currently be generated due to the existing wind and their technical performance, will be less and less adhered to.

Frequently, the electrical supply network can limit a power limitation for feeding electrical power through wind energy plants, wind farms or wind energy systems for very different reasons. Such limits may be due in part to network capacity utilization. This can be caused, for example, by the fact that more and more wind turbines or wind farms are connected to an existing network. Especially For reasons of self-protection and / or for reasons of grid stabilization or also for planning reasons, a corresponding limitation of the feed-in power can then be specified. Such a requirement is often made by a network operator. According to document US Pat. No. 6,724,097, a solution is known which proposes to connect a wind farm to a grid connection point, the nominal power or maximum possible feed-in power of the wind farm being greater than the connection capacity of the grid connection point. Here too, it is based on the consideration that a wind farm is often not operated at nominal power and then the limit of the connection capacity is not reached. The wind farm can then basically be dimensioned larger than the grid connection point.

In particular, this does not take into account the problem that dynamic limitation of the power to be fed in is also considered. It is also accepted here that in the event of sufficient wind and a sufficient number of available wind turbines, i.e. if the park could generate more power than the grid connection point allows, throttling must be carried out in order not to exceed the power limit of the grid connection point.

In the priority application for the present application, the German Patent and Trademark Office researched the following prior art: WO 2018/006 921 A1, DE 10 2012 101 928 A1, DE 10 2013 207 264 A1, US 2013/0 178 991 A1, US 6,724,097 B1.

The present invention is therefore based on the object, at least one of the above. Address problems. In particular, a solution is to be proposed which minimizes the curtailment of a wind energy installation, the wind farm or a wind energy system. At least an alternative solution to previously known solutions is to be proposed.

According to the invention, a method for feeding in electrical power is proposed. This method uses a wind energy system and such a wind energy system comprises a wind farm. The wind energy system can consist exclusively of the wind farm, but it can also contain other units, in particular a photovoltaic system and, in addition or alternatively, an electrical storage device. It is envisaged that the wind energy system feeds into an electrical supply network at a network connection point. In this case, a topology is assumed in which the electrical supply network has at least one distribution network and at least one further higher network section lying hierarchically above the distribution network. In particular, it is provided that the network connection point is arranged on the distribution network, so that the wind energy system thus feeds into the distribution network. A network section located hierarchically above the distribution network is one to which the distribution network is subordinate, in particular such that several or many distribution networks are subordinate to this higher network section. In particular, the higher network section can have a higher voltage than the distribution network. In particular, it is possible for the distribution network to be a medium-voltage network and the higher network section to be a high-voltage network or a high-voltage network in the sense in which those skilled in the art usually use these terms. It is also possible that the distribution network is a high-voltage network and the higher network section is a high-voltage network. In any case, the network connection point is connected to the distribution network, so that the wind energy system feeds into the distribution network. It is also contemplated that there is at least one further distribution network that is indirectly or directly connected to this distribution network, into which the wind energy system feeds, so that a power exchange can be carried out between two or more such distribution networks. The proposed process involves several steps.

An initial feed-in limit related to the grid connection point is recorded in a recording step. Such an initial feed-in limitation is one that specifies a power limit up to which the wind energy system can or may feed electrical power into the electrical supply network. This can be a current feed-in limitation in particular, but it can also be a feed-in limitation that lies in the future, which is then also taken into account for the corresponding future in the subsequent steps, and it can also, as will be described later, a course of a Feed-in limitation. Probably the simplest case, which is partly based on the explanations below for the sake of simplicity, is the one in which the feed-in limitation has a fixed value, which at least initially exists as a temporarily fixed value.

This detection can particularly mean that a corresponding limit value, namely the power limit, is transmitted externally, that is to say is transmitted to the wind energy system from outside the wind energy system. So in the acquisition step there is a such received performance limit evaluated and used as a basis for the further procedure. However, it is also possible that known conditions lead to a performance limit. E.g. Depending on a network frequency of the electrical supply network, a power limitation can be provided, or generally critical times are known in which a power limit would have to be taken into account and the power limit can then be detected, ie determined, as a function of these predetermined times.

It is also possible that a power limit is permanently connected to the network connection point, that is to say it is assigned to it, and, for example, a power limit at different heights can be received and then it must be checked whether the power limit received from the outside is relevant, i.e. smaller is the limit permanently assigned to the network connection point.

In a basic test step, it is then checked whether the park power that can be generated from the wind farm is limited by the initial feed-in limitation. In particular, it can be checked here whether it is above the initial power limit, so that the wind power output is throttled by the initial power limit. In particular, it can be considered here that the wind farm is throttled to a power below the initial power limit.

Particularly when there is not only one wind farm in the wind energy system, it is possible that the throttling results only from the total power generated in the wind energy system. In other words, the wind farm alone could therefore be below the power limit, but together with an additional power generated by a photovoltaic system, the sum of this power could be above the power limit. This can still have consequences for the wind farm's power generation.

In the basic test step, it is therefore checked in particular whether the initial feed-in limitation is relevant at all or whether the wind farm or the wind energy system generates comparatively little power at the moment, which is therefore below the power limit. In an evaluation step, it is then evaluated whether the initial feed-in limit, i.e. the initial power limit, can be increased. Of course, this only happens then, if it was recognized in the basic test step that the parking performance is throttled at all.

It was particularly recognized here that such an initial power limitation can have very different reasons and these reasons, which can be central reasons, for example, lead to an individual limitation converted, for example, using a flat-rate key. The feed-in limitation that is specified for the network connection point often has a higher-level power limitation as the cause, which is relevant to various participants, to put it generally, and is distributed among them. Such subscribers can be different feeders, each of which in turn feeds into the electrical supply network. However, a power limit of the higher network section can also be the cause, to which distribution networks are several subscribers who then receive a corresponding limit.

This can mean that the power limitation of the specific network connection point would not necessarily have to be adhered to as long as the overall overall goal, that is to say the above-mentioned overall power limit, is observed. Such a higher-level performance limit, or another higher-level goal that has led to this specific performance limit at the network connection point, can be very complex, as will be explained below. In any case, it often comes into consideration that the initial feed-in limit, that is to say the initial power limit, can be changed in special cases and / or when special boundary conditions are taken into account and / or when other measures are taken.

This is exactly what is found in the evaluation step. And if the evaluation step was so successful that this performance limit can be increased, this is carried out in a change step. In the change step, the initial feed-in limit and then the initial power limit are increased to an increased feed-in limit or an increased power limit.

Correspondingly, electrical power can then be fed in above the initial feed-in limit, that is to say above the initial power limit, if a corresponding increase has been carried out in the change step. For this purpose, it is suggested that in the evaluation step it is checked whether the initial feed-in limitation can be changed via a limitation redistribution. Such a redistribution of limits is thus the possibility of limiting the feed-in to increase in whole or in part at the network connection point in which a redistribution of the limitation in the electrical supply network is carried out. If there is a feed-in limit at the grid connection point, it is checked whether this feed-in limitation can instead be applied, for example, to a neighboring grid connection point of another producer, i.e. whether the existing grid connection point can allow more feed-in if the neighboring grid-connection point allows less feed-in. A redistribution can also mean that the feed-in limitation of the network connection point to a transmission point is transferred from the distribution network to another network. In this case, the network connection point would not be limited, or less limited, but the connection point of the distribution network. Here, too, it cannot generally be assumed that this is possible, but rather that should be checked. Criteria for this are mentioned and explained below.

It is also possible to apply a redistribution of boundaries to several points in the electrical supply network. So not only two points are considered and part of the boundary is shifted from one point to the other, but in this case more than two points are considered and the redistribution takes place in such a way that only the sum of the boundaries of all points is observed at the end . This can also be done dynamically. Here, too, it must of course be checked whether such a redistribution of limits is possible at all, in particular whether the initial feed-in limitation of the network connection point is natural in nature, that it does not directly affect the network connection point, but is only the result of the overall consideration mentioned. In other words, this would be particularly the case if the actual limitation is not necessary at all for the specific network connection point, but if there is a general limitation at another point, which can be divided up differently between the points mentioned. It is therefore necessary to check whether redistribution can be considered.

It is preferably proposed that to check whether the initial feed-in limitation can be changed via a limitation redistribution, it is checked whether at least one of the following criteria is present, the criteria also being able to overlap. There can also be several criteria at the same time or one criterion can also be a condition for another criterion.

A possible criterion is whether the feed-in limitation does not result from the distribution network. The underlying idea here is that the distribution network does not boundary demands and this limitation requirement only comes from outside. As long as the external limitation, that is to say from outside the relevant distribution network, is also kept from the distribution network to the outside, the initial limitation in the distribution network can possibly be handled differently, namely in such a way that it can be increased. E.g. To give a simple illustrative example, adjacent to the wind energy system can be a large consumer, who in turn also needs a lot of power at the moment. In this case, the wind energy system can possibly feed in more power than was permitted due to the initial power limit, because this too much power, or part of it, flows directly into the consumer mentioned as an example and is therefore not recognizable outside of the distribution network.

Another criterion is whether the feed-in limitation is specified by the higher network section. It was also recognized here that such a higher-level power limitation was distributed to individual feeders such as the wind energy system, although a different distribution is also possible or is even more sensible. Here, too, the idea can come into play that exceeding the initial power limit on the wind energy system can be justifiable or even sensible if this is adapted to other producers and / or consumers. Here, too, it is considered that the initial performance limit can be exceeded, but if this has no effect outside the distribution network. However, it is also possible that the total power fed into the distribution network, which is subject to this superordinate power limitation, can also be partially transmitted to another network section, such as an adjacent distribution network, instead of to the higher network section that has specified this power limitation . It is proposed as a criterion that a check is carried out to determine whether a non-overloaded network section has been identified. The underlying idea here is that an overloaded network section can lead to a power limitation, although there is also a non-overloaded network section that can absorb more power. Reducing the load on the overloaded network section can then not only be achieved by feeding in less power, which would require the initial power limit, but also by performing an at least partial power redistribution in which the power in or to the overloaded network section is reduced and in or is increased to the non-congested network section. This is also a measure that can be used to avoid reducing the wind power generated. At the same time, a weakening of the network is avoided because - put simply - Reducing a power feed, although this is ultimately not necessary, can lead to a weakening of the grid.

Another criterion is to determine that there is no physical limitation of the network connection point. A physical limit or limitation of the network connection point can be given, for example, by the total power of the transformer or a line to the network connection point, or by lines in the distribution network which are designed only for a specific output which cannot be exceeded, not to mention the ones mentioned Endanger elements. Limiting a transformer from the distribution network to the higher network section is not part of this. Such a physical limit could be circumvented if necessary, either by excessive power not reaching such a transformer and / or by the fact that the power or a part thereof leaves the distribution network at another connection point.

It is also possible that, for example, a network operator controls the feeding in of electrical power by, for example, penalty costs being incurred for a power exceeding a certain limit value, in particular if a feed-in limit is exceeded. What initially appears to be an economic aspect is a control tool that can be used to control the behavior of the feeders, such as the behavior of the wind energy system, because this means that fluctuating wind power is not readily passed on. Based on the behavior of the feeders, the penalty costs mentioned can also be adjusted in order to better control the feed-in of power. In this respect, this tax process can be adapted by changing the penalty costs. This is where the proposed solution comes in, which has recognized such a, at least possible, control tool and proposes to take this into account as well. Since such penalty costs can be specified in particular by the network operator, the corresponding wind energy system can and will also receive the corresponding information about it from the network operator. This can be taken into account in a simple manner.

If it is recognized that the feed-in limit is linked to penalty costs, it can be calculated whether compliance with the upper power limit is more profitable or the conscious feeding with power above the power limit. This allows a network operator to tax the feeders concerned by specifying such penalty costs.

As a further criterion, it is proposed to check whether the feed-in limit is part of several feed-in limits of the distribution network, which are specified in such a way that the sum of the feed-in limits are less than a total limit, whereby at least one feed-in limit can become higher as long as the total of the feed-in limits is less than a total limit remains. In this case, power can basically be exchanged or power quotas exchanged between several feeders. For example, a feeder who can feed in just more than his power limit can use the quota or part of the quota of a neighboring producer who cannot feed in up to the initial power limit at the moment.

This can be relevant, for example, if one of the feeders is a wind farm and another feeder is a photovoltaic system. Then it happens regularly that in a weather situation there is a lot of wind energy but little solar energy, or vice versa. Then, for example, a wind farm or wind energy system can feed in strong winds above the initial power limit, if there is one, if a photovoltaic system connected to the same distribution network can then feed in little power and is below its initial power limit. In this simple example, the wind energy system can then feed in as much more power above the initial power limit than the photovoltaic system remains below its initial power limit due to low solar energy.

Such use of other quotas does not have to be limited to one distribution network, but can also be exchanged between several distribution networks, or even with higher network sections.

According to a further criterion, it is checked whether a feed-in limitation is provided for at least one further power generator that feeds into the same distribution network, which the further power generator does not use. This criterion specifically relates to the idea of exchanging quotas between power producers. In particular, this concerns the idea that a power generator, which can basically also be referred to as a feeder, can feed in more power than the initial power limitation if the other power generator, i.e. the further feeders feed in less power than the initial power limit.

It is therefore particularly suggested here that a power level by which the at least one further power generator is below a power limit to be complied with is offered as a tradable capacity to other feeders, in particular other power generators such as the wind energy system, in whole or in part. A power level is thus recorded by which the at least one further power generator is below its power limit and this is given to other feeders or power producers as tradable capacity, which can also be referred to as a tradable quota. As a result, power producers who could feed in above their power limit can still feed in by using such a free quota.

Another proposed criterion is designed in such a way that the initial feed-in limitation has its cause in the higher network section and a neighboring distribution network can take up power, thereby allowing the initial feed-in limitation to be exceeded. The distribution network is thus directly, at least in some other way than via the higher network section, coupled to a further neighboring distribution network. Power can therefore not only be transferred to the higher network section, but also to the neighboring distribution network. If a bottleneck now occurs in the higher network section, or a similar problem that leads to a cause of the initial feed-in limitation, power transmission to the higher network section can actually be reduced accordingly. By continuing to use the neighboring distribution network, however, power can be transferred instead. As a result, the initial feed-in limit and thus the initial power limit can be exceeded. This output, which is actually too high, is dissipated elsewhere, namely to the neighboring distribution network.

Various criteria have thus been proposed, which can also be combined, some of which also overlap, and as a result mean that an initial feed-in limit may not have to be complied with or not at all. A reduction in performance can therefore be averted or at least weakened. In particular, this is based on the consideration that it was recognized that an initial feed-in limitation is often not essential and that it is important to recognize what is the reason for this initial feed-in limitation. There may be cases when such an initial feed-in limit has to be observed. It but there are also many cases that result particularly from the above criteria in which an initial feed-in limitation can be avoided. It was also recognized that it was not sufficient to determine the reason for this avoidability, but rather to take appropriate measures in the light of the reason for this avoidability so that the limitation could be at least partially circumvented.

According to one embodiment, it is proposed that in the change step the increased power limit is specified as a time profile and, in addition or alternatively, a feed-in forecast is determined which provides a time profile of the power to be fed in for a forecast period. It was particularly recognized here that an infeed limitation can often also depend on network conditions and other circumstances, which can change, sometimes change quickly and / or sometimes change continuously. When evaluating the cause of the initial power limitation, it can also be recognized whether there is a reason for the initial power limitation that is variable and, if necessary, how variable it is, that is, how it can change. From this, a kind of roadmap for increasing the performance limit can be derived. In this respect, such a timetable forms a chronological course of the increased performance limit.

E.g. the reason for the power limitation can be a network reconstruction of a remote network section. The course of such a network restoration can be predicted quite well and such a course of the increased power limit over time can also be predicted. Another possibility of specifying such a time course can be that consumers in the vicinity are known to increase or decrease their power requirements at certain times, for example, and accordingly the increased power limit can be correspondingly high or low when the power consumption decreases this consumer is the reason for, or is one of the reasons for, that the wind energy system can increase the initial power limit.

E.g. measurement of the power consumption of consumers can also be carried out in order to determine an increased power limit. This can be done in a supplementary way, for example to adjust a forecast. This can be particularly useful if a measured value is above the forecast, which can create additional grid connection capacity for the wind energy system. It is also possible, however, that an increased power limit based on a wind forecast is only needed for certain periods of time. If, for example, the wind speed drops, which may be known from a weather forecast, an increased power limit may initially be desired, which is no longer required later due to the falling wind. In this case, the time course of the increased performance limit would be such that it slowly decreases until it reaches the initial performance limit and then falls below it.

Instead of specifying the increased power limit as a time course, or in addition to it, a feed-in forecast can also be determined which provides a time course of the power to be fed in for a forecast period. This can also include a time profile or a section of the time profile, in which the power to be fed in is below the initial power limit, at least temporarily. Such a feed-in forecast can be based, for example, on weather data, that is to say a weather forecast. Such a feed-in forecast can be particularly helpful if a power quota is taken into account, i.e. if a type of power trading takes place between several feeders or between feeders and consumers, so that it is clear when the wind energy system in question requires power capacities or can release power capacities. Such a feed-in forecast is preferably accompanied by an accuracy statement which provides information about how large a deviation from this forecast or this prognosis progression is to be expected. This means that predictability based on such a feed-in forecast can be improved.

According to one embodiment, it is proposed that electrical power that the wind farm generates from wind and that cannot be fed in due to the initial feed-in limitation is used to supply loads within the park. Of course, this also includes the case that the power limit could be increased, but is still so low that a reduction in the power fed in is still necessary, albeit to a lesser extent.

It was particularly recognized here that a reduction in the power generated from wind can be prevented or at least reduced. Controllable loads are those that can increase their power consumption if necessary. Such loads can be, for example, cold stores, should the wind farm or the wind energy system be in the vicinity of such a cold store, which can also be part of an electric filling station which has a connected rest area and is supplied by the wind energy system or forms part of the wind energy system. Such a cold store usually has such a high thermal capacity that even several hours without energy or without much energy can keep the temperature in an acceptable range. The cooling can therefore be started when such a case of the initial feed limitation occurs.

Another controllable consumer can be one that converts electrical current into another form of energy, e.g. in methane or hydrogen.

According to a further embodiment, it is proposed that, when the feed-in limitation is linked to penalty costs for exceeding, an exceedance is assessed with which the fed-in power exceeds the initial power limit. In particular, it is proposed to set up a penalty function for the penalty costs depending on the amount exceeded. In this way, the exceedance can be evaluated in numbers and processed further.

For this purpose, it is further proposed in particular that a remuneration function for a feed-in remuneration be set up depending on the amount exceeded. This can create an incentive for the operator of the wind energy system not to exceed the limit, if possible, or only to a certain extent. This enables controllability to be achieved, because the higher the penalty costs, the more the operator of the wind energy system could decide not to increase the excess power even further. Such a remuneration function thus creates the possibility of an external tax intervention.

In particular, it is further proposed that an overshoot of the input power is controlled via the initial power limit depending on a comparison of the penalty cost function and the remuneration function. In particular, this can be designed in such a way that the input power is exceeded to such an extent that the penalty cost function does not exceed the remuneration function. It can therefore be controlled so that the penalty costs do not exceed the remuneration. This is also a means of control that even the network operator can use. After all, he knows the remuneration costs and can then indirectly control the exceeding of the initial benefit limit by setting the penalty cost function accordingly. According to one embodiment, it is proposed that the feed-in is additionally controlled as a function of a maximum limit which is above the initial power limit and must not be exceeded. Accordingly, at least a two-stage check must be carried out, namely first of all whether the initial performance limit can be exceeded, and if so, whether the increased performance limit is below the maximum limit or that the increased performance limit is limited by the maximum limit. As a result, technically indispensable upper limits can also be taken into account. Damage to elements can thus be avoided in particular. Such a maximum limit is preferably in the form of a time profile which permits particularly short-term increases. Short-term increases in performance even above a technically determined permanent upper limit can make sense, for example, with thermally related upper limits. At thermal upper limits, a brief increase in power due to the thermal inertia of the system or corresponding element can be tolerated for a short time. It is preferably checked whether the feed-in limitation is relevant at the moment or in a future period. This test is carried out in particular at least in the acquisition step and / or in the basic test step. In any case, this means that you can react immediately or plan ahead in the event of future feed restrictions. For example, steps can be taken in advance to implement the increase in the performance limit that take some time to implement.

According to one embodiment, it is proposed that for feeding in electrical power above the initial power limit, electrical power, in particular the power exceeding the initial power limit, is supplied to at least one consumer connected in the distribution network. This also applies in particular to the case where the consumer connected to the distribution network has served as a criterion that the initial power limit can be exceeded at all. It can also be the case here that the cause of the initial feed-in limitation is not in the distribution network. This proposal made here can also be used in other cases, or can also be used. In any case, it is proposed here to provide power to a consumer of the same distribution network, in order thereby to be able to generate and feed this power without, however, performance limits in other areas of the electrical supply network, for example at a transfer point from the distribution network to the higher network section must be exceeded. Such a concrete supply of power to a consumer can take place, for example, by voltage control in the electrical supply network, for example by corresponding reactive power feed-in by decentralized generators in the relevant network section and / or by step transformers. For this purpose, a communication structure is preferably proposed, via which the wind energy system communicates with the consumer. In addition to communication via radio networks or telephone networks, including mobile telephone networks, a ripple control can also be provided in which the wind energy system sends a signal to the consumer or consumers via a power line.

As a further variant, it is proposed that the at least one consumer is controlled depending on general criteria, such as, for example, time of day, solar radiation or wind speed. The wind energy system can then, for example, rely on the consumer consuming a predetermined minimum power at a predetermined time, or it is specified that the consumer from a predetermined wind speed, e.g. easily measure or take from a weather forecast, an agreed minimum performance decreases. This can also be referred to as a driver circuit or driver control.

According to one embodiment, the method is characterized in that tradable capacities of other power generators of the distribution network are used for feeding in electrical power above the initial power limit. It was recognized here that there are often several producers who feed into the same distribution network and such producers have different needs to exceed the initial performance limit. Such capacities are traded here and thus form tradable capacities, namely capacities of additional feed-in power.

This proposal can also be based on the variant that the existence of such tradable capacities or the possibility of trading such capacities was also the criterion or one of the criteria that the initial performance limit could be exceeded at all. However, this proposed measure can also be combined with different criteria and this measure can also be combined with other measures or this measure can form a supplement. In particular, this is proposed so that tradable capacities of photovoltaic systems, electrical storage and / or other wind farms connected to the distribution network are used. It was particularly recognized here that power from wind turbines or wind farms, i.e. power from wind, is often available in an anti-cyclical manner to power from photovoltaic systems, i.e. solar energy. So if the wind farm can feed in a lot of power, a photovoltaic system can often only feed in a little power, or vice versa. As a result, there are usually such proposed tradable capacities, namely tradable power capacities. It may also be the case that local weather conditions, such as a thunderstorm, cause the photovoltaic system to feed in less than expected, but there is more in the wind. The unused capacity can then be passed on by the photovoltaic system or a photovoltaic system park to the wind farm. It also comes into consideration that, for example, a neighboring wind farm does not feed in or only feeds in at a reduced rate due to maintenance and thus has capacities available. Likewise, electrical stores from which the distribution network is fed can have tradable capacities, or at least absorb excess power and store them temporarily. This can also avoid or reduce wind farm curtailment in the event of a corresponding initial feed-in limitation. It may also make sense for a storage company not to feed stored amounts of electricity or to feed them in late. This frees up feed-in capacities that can be passed on to the wind energy system as a grid connection charge.

According to one embodiment, the method is characterized in that the wind energy system additionally comprises a photovoltaic system and optionally an electrical storage device which can store at least an energy quantity of 10 minutes nominal output of the wind farm. The memory therefore has a significant storage capacity. Here too, the fact is exploited that a wind farm and photovoltaic systems often work counter-cyclically and thus, with little output from one system, the other system has a lot of power and can feed in. The peculiarity here is that the wind farm and solar systems are combined in the same wind energy system. As a result, such a power equalization can already be carried out within the wind energy system on account of the countercyclical power generation of both systems, as a result of which the initial feed-in limitation can be at least partially avoided. For this purpose, it is also proposed that the wind farm, the photovoltaic system and possibly the electrical storage device are each identified by a nominal power and the sum of these nominal powers forms a total power. If all of these systems are operated at nominal power, which is rarely the case at the same time, the wind energy system with the two or three systems together could generate the total power as the sum of all of their nominal powers.

However, this is only for illustration and instead it is proposed here that the network connection point is limited to a fixed power value below the total power and above or in the range of the largest rated power of the named power. The total power cannot be fed in due to the limitation of the grid connection point. In this respect, the network connection point is permanently limited to such a fixed power value, in particular such a limitation is essential because it can also be due to physical reasons. In addition, this fixed power value is above the largest nominal power. If, for example, the wind farm has the largest nominal output, the fixed output value is in the range or above the nominal output of the wind farm and below the total output. In this respect, the grid connection point is underdimensioned with regard to the entire wind energy system, but for the wind farm alone it is well dimensioned or oversized. This may result in reserves that, for example, some PV power can be generated and fed in when the wind farm is operated at nominal power. Here, too, the underlying idea is that it is hardly to be expected that the wind farm and the photovoltaic system can achieve nominal power at the same time, but that the nominal power can be expected to be counter-cyclical for both of them.

For this purpose, it is now additionally proposed, at least optionally, that the network connection point is dynamically limited to a dynamic power value below the largest nominal power. A dynamic limitation is therefore proposed, which makes the grid connection point appear undersized even for the wind farm. However, this limitation is dynamic and can be increased if necessary and at least allow more power than the nominal power of the wind farm. Such a dynamic limitation of the network connection capacity means that the fixed power value to which the network connection point is limited is composed of a basic component and a dynamic component. E.g. the limit can be based on the nominal output of the wind farm as 100% from an 80- percentage basic component and a dynamic component of 30%, so that the fixed power value, to which the grid connection point is limited, is 110%. More than 110% cannot therefore be physically fed in via this grid connection point, and in this respect this fixed power value is fixed as an upper limit that cannot be exceeded.

This fixed performance value as an absolute upper limit, i.e. the 110% mentioned by way of example, is composed of a basic share, for example of 80%, and a dynamic share of 30%. The basic share is therefore always available, so that a feed-in of 80% is always possible, unless there are other reasons not to do so. However, the 110% can only be achieved if this dynamic share of 30% is supplemented. To do this, this dynamic share must first be procured as additional grid connection capacity. This can be done, for example, so that a corresponding capacity is still available in the connected distribution network, e.g. in the case of an under-utilized feeder. According to the invention, a wind energy system for feeding electrical power into an electrical supply network at a network connection point is also proposed. Such a wind energy system comprises at least one wind farm. It can also additionally include a photovoltaic system and instead or additionally an electrical storage device that can store at least an amount of energy in the amount of 10 minutes of nominal output of the wind farm.

A network topology is required for this wind energy system, in which the electrical supply network to which the wind energy system is connected via the network connection point has at least one distribution network and at least one further higher network section which is hierarchically above the distribution network. So there are at least two network levels and the wind energy system is connected to the distribution network above the network connection point, that is to say at the lower level.

The wind energy system further comprises a detection unit for detecting an initial feed-in limit related to the grid connection point, which specifies an initial power limit up to which the wind energy system can feed electrical power into the electrical supply network. Such a detection unit can in particular be a process computer which is connected to an external unit via which it receives the initial feed-in limitation. The initial feed-in limitation can thus, for example, be sent as a corresponding command signal to the detection unit, i.e. the process computer mentioned. However, it is also possible that internal criteria, for example a time-dependent feed-in limitation, have already been implemented in the detection unit, in particular the process computer mentioned, and the initial feed-in limitation is thereby detected. The registration unit can also be part of a central parking computer.

Furthermore, a test unit is provided for checking whether the park power that can be generated from the wind farm is limited by the initial feed-in limitation. In particular, the test unit checks whether the park power that can be generated from wind is above the initial power limit, so that the wind power output is throttled by the initial power limit, in particular throttled to a power below the initial power limit. For this purpose, the test unit can be connected as a process computer to a central park computer and can receive information about the park performance that can be generated from the wind farm. In addition, the test unit can receive the initial feed-in limitation as information from the detection unit and base it on the test. The test unit can also be part of a central parking computer.

Furthermore, an evaluation unit is provided for evaluating whether the initial power limit can be increased if it was recognized in the test unit that the parking power is being throttled. In particular, the evaluation unit can be designed as a process computer and check whether the initial feed-in limitation can be exceeded under certain circumstances. For this purpose, the evaluation unit can in particular also receive information from the registration unit about the initial feed-in limitation, including the cause of this feed-in limitation. The evaluation unit can be part of a central parking computer. In addition, a change unit is provided for increasing the initial performance limit to an increased performance limit if it was recognized in the evaluation unit that the performance limit can be increased. The change unit can also be designed as a process computer and coupled to the evaluation unit in order to obtain from this information whether the initial performance limit can be increased at all. Furthermore, the change unit can receive further information from the registration unit, for example, in order to be able to derive from this how much and perhaps for what time the power limit can be increased. The change unit can also be part of a central parking computer, specifically that of central parking computer, which in a variant can include the registration unit, the test unit, the evaluation unit and the change unit. According to one embodiment, the units there can be separated or structured as corresponding logical units. In addition, a feed device is provided for feeding electrical power above the initial power limit if the change unit has increased the initial power limit to an increased power limit. In particular, the infeed device can be controlled by the change unit and / or the central parking computer. The feed device can in particular be an inverter for generating and feeding in an electrical alternating current. The feed device can also be the entirety of all inverters of the individual wind turbines of the wind farm. In the simplest case, the change unit can also control the feed device and release it to increase the initial power limit in such a way that the power limit is lifted. Accordingly, the change unit can also set the performance limit again if the cancellation is no longer possible.

It is now also proposed for this wind energy system that the evaluation unit checks whether the initial feed-in limitation can be changed via a limitation redistribution. This can be checked in particular as explained above in connection with the explanations for the feed-in procedure, in particular as explained in connection with the possible criteria for checking for the existence of a limitation redistribution. The evaluation unit can in particular collect and evaluate the corresponding information. It can receive this information particularly from the registration unit. In particular, it is proposed that the wind energy system be prepared to carry out a method according to at least one embodiment described above. In particular, a central parking computer is provided for this.

In particular, this parking computer can include the registration unit, the test unit, the evaluation unit and the change unit. Such or another central parking computer is preferably connected to each wind energy installation of the wind farm via a park information network in order to thereby send information to the wind energy installation and / or to receive information from the wind energy installation. In addition, such a central parking computer is preferably with an external unit such as one external control center, in particular a control center of a network operator connected or connectable in order to receive information from there and / or to transmit information there.

The invention is explained in more detail below by way of example using embodiments with reference to the accompanying figures.

Figure 1 shows a wind turbine in a perspective view.

Figure 2 shows a wind farm in a schematic representation.

FIG. 3 schematically shows a wind energy system together with part of an electrical supply network with other generators and consumers. FIG. 1 shows a wind energy installation 100 with a tower 102 and a nacelle 104. A rotor 106 with three rotor blades 108 and a spinner 110 is arranged on the nacelle 104. During operation, the rotor 106 is set into a rotary movement by the wind and thereby drives a generator in the nacelle 104.

FIG. 2 shows a wind farm 112 with, for example, three wind energy plants 100, which can be the same or different. The three wind energy plants 100 are therefore representative of basically any number of wind energy plants of a wind farm 112. The wind energy plants 100 provide their power, namely in particular the electricity generated, via an electrical parking network 114. The currents or powers of the individual wind turbines 100 generated in each case are added up and a transformer 116 is usually provided, which transforms up the voltage in the park in order to then feed into the supply network 120 at the feed-in point 118, which is also generally referred to as PCC. FIG. 2 is only a simplified illustration of a wind farm 112, which shows no control, for example, although of course there is a control. For example, the parking network 114 can also be configured differently, for example by also having a transformer at the outlet of each wind energy installation 100, to name just one other exemplary embodiment.

FIG. 3 schematically shows a wind energy system 300, namely essentially in the left half of FIG. 3 and a part of an electrical supply network 302, namely essentially in the right half of FIG. 3. The wind energy system 300 here has, by way of example, a wind farm 304 which runs through three wind turbines is also symbolically symbolized, a photovoltaic system 306 and an electrical storage 308. In addition, a central parking computer 310 is provided, which can control the wind farm 304, but also the other elements of the wind energy system 300, namely especially the photovoltaic system 306 and the electrical storage 308. For this purpose, the central parking computer 310 has a detection unit 31 1, a test unit 312, an evaluation unit 313 and a change unit 314. These four units can each be provided as a microprocessor and are therefore identified as mi, m2, m3 and P ₄ . The central park computer 310 can control the wind farm 304, the photovoltaic system 306 and the electrical store 308, which can be designed as a battery store, and can also receive information from there, which is indicated by a double arrow.

The communication between the central parking computer 310 and the wind farm 304 can in particular also take place individually with corresponding feed devices 316. Each of the wind turbines can have such a feed device 316, which can in particular generate an electrical three-phase alternating current that can be fed in. This is indicated by the symbol of a semiconductor switch. FIG. 3 clearly shows such an infeed device 316 only for one of the three symbolically represented wind energy plants and in the case of the others such an infeed device 316 is only indicated. In particular, the change unit 314 can be connected to the feed devices 316 in order to transmit to them a signal for changing the electrical power to be fed.

The wind energy installation of the wind farm 304 as well as the photovoltaic installation 306 and possibly the electrical storage 308 can ice-feed into a first distribution network 324 via a park disconnector 318 and a park transformer 320 at a network connection point 322. They then also feed into the electrical supply network 302, of which the first distribution network 324 is a part.

The central parking computer 310 also communicates with an external control center 326, which can be operated in particular by a network operator who is responsible for the electrical supply network 302 or a part thereof. Here, too, information can be exchanged in both directions. In particular, the receiving unit 31 1 can communicate with the external control center 326 and from there also receive an initial feed-in limitation as information. Furthermore, the central parking computer 310, in particular the receiving unit 31 1, can also provide information on the origin or origin such an initial feed-in limitation. Such an initial feed-in limitation is related to network connection point 322.

The external control center 326 can also transmit further initial feed-in restrictions to other feeders, in particular to a symbolically represented second photovoltaic system 328. This second photovoltaic system 328 is not part of the wind energy system 300, but feeds in independently and can therefore also have an independent switch. The second photovoltaic system 328 could also feed into the electrical supply network 302 via a transformer, which is not shown here for the sake of simplicity. In general, many switches, similar to the parking switch 318, are shown symbolically in the electrical supply network 302 in FIG. 3, which are intended to illustrate particularly that there is the possibility of disconnection at various points. Possibly. The network operator can also control such switches from his external control center 326 and query their position, which is indicated by corresponding double arrows. All switches similar to the parking switch 318 are shown open in FIG. 3 only for the purpose of better recognition. The normal operating case is that all of these switches are closed.

In addition to the first distribution network 324, a second distribution network 330 and a third distribution network 332 are shown. These three distribution networks 324, 330 and 332 can have the same hierarchical level and in particular also the same voltage level, although this is not a mandatory requirement.

In addition, a higher network section 334 lying above the first distribution network 324 and thus also above the second and third distribution network 330 or 332 is shown. This higher network section 334 is among others connected to the first distribution network 324 via a high-voltage transformer 336 and a mains disconnector 338.

Furthermore, a settlement 340 is shown symbolically, which is connected to the second distribution network 330. Furthermore, a factory 342 is connected to the third distribution network 332 as an industrial consumer. Also illustratively, a conventional power plant 344 is connected to the third distribution network 332 via a high-voltage transformer 346. However, this representation can also illustrate a situation, according to which the conventional power plant 344 is connected to a higher-order network section connected. In particular, the power plant can also be connected directly to the higher network section 334, for example.

Basically, the distribution networks 324, 330 and 332 shown, the higher network section 334, the consumers 340 and 342 and the feeders 328 and 344 can be seen as part of the electrical supply network, at least from the point of view of the wind energy system 300. From a different perspective, even the wind energy system 300 could be understood as part of the electrical supply network.

On the basis of this schematic representation of a constellation of an electrical supply network 302 with a wind energy system 300, at least part of the inventive idea can be explained. If the central parking computer 310, particularly the receiving unit 31 1, receives an initial feed-in limitation from the control center 326, this can first be determined by the detection unit 311. This information can be passed on to the test unit 312. Based on this, the test unit can then check whether the park power that can be generated from the wind farm is limited by this initial feed-in limitation. In other words, the test unit 312 can in particular check whether there is sufficient wind at all for such an initial feed-in limitation to have any influence on the current feed-in state of the wind farm.

If it has been found that the initial feed-in limit is relevant for the wind farm, the evaluation unit 313 can evaluate whether this initial power limit can possibly be increased. If this is the case, the change unit 314 can increase the initial power limit, which was predetermined by the initial feed-in limitation, and also determine an increase value or a new value after the increase for the power to be fed in. The result can then be passed on to the feed-in devices 316, so that the wind turbines of the wind farm 304 can behave accordingly. Incidentally, the previously specified and then possibly initially implemented initial feed-in limitation may also have been communicated to the wind energy plants in this way. Various limit redistributions come into consideration, some of which will now be explained by way of example with reference to the illustrated constellation in FIG. 3. In particular, one variant, which is also good for illustration, is that the network operator, for which his control center 326 is representative, desires a power limitation for the transmission of power to the higher network section 334. The higher network section 334 is also illustrated in FIG. 3 with a further separating sub-line 350, which is intended to indicate that the higher network section 334 can also be part of a transmission network or leads to a transmission network. Particularly for reasons of protecting or controlling such a transmission network, this exemplary desired limitation can be taken into account, namely a limitation of the power, which, to speak clearly, is to be transmitted via the high-voltage transformer 336. The mains disconnect switch 338 is of course closed in this case.

This limitation can now have been distributed uniformly among the feeders, particularly the regenerative feeders, namely the wind energy system 300 and the second photovoltaic system 328. It then turned out for the wind energy system 300 that this initial feed-in limitation actually limits the feed-in, namely the wind farm here 304 must or should reduce its generated power. The reason for this, to put it graphically, can be uncomfortable autumn weather with strong wind and little sun. In this case, however, the second photovoltaic system 328 is located, which e.g. in terms of its nominal power can be greater than the photovoltaic system 306 of the wind energy system 300, far below the feed-in limit specified for it. If the wind energy system 300 knows this, namely because the evaluation unit 313 in particular has evaluated it, the wind energy system 300 can accordingly feed in more power than the initial feed-in limit prescribed for it. The power limitation actually provided for the high-voltage transformer 336 is then still observed.

Incidentally, this example also comes into consideration if the second photovoltaic system 328, unlike illustrated in FIG. 3, would not be connected to the second distribution network 330 but to the same distribution network 324. As a further variant, which can also be combined with the abovementioned, it is contemplated that it is known that the symbolically represented factory 342, that is to say a bulk consumer, requires a great deal of power, or has even registered an increased power requirement. Such information can be obtained, for example, from factory 342 or another ren large consumer, to the external control center 326 are given. The latter can forward this information to the central parking computer 310, so that this information finally also reaches the evaluation unit 313.

If this high or even increased power requirement of the factory 324 is known, there is also the possibility that the wind energy system 300 exceeds the actually specified initial feed-in limit, but this increased power then flows, at least in part, directly to the bulk consumer, i.e. here to the factory 342, without that this power must pass through the high voltage transformer 336. This is also a redistribution because the initial feed-in limitation, which is due to the higher network section 334, can be distributed in another way, in that the excess power is virtually diverted past the problem point. In this respect too, the high-voltage transformer 336 is mentioned for reasons of better illustration, without this actually having to be the problem. In this respect, this high-voltage transformer 336 can be understood as a transmission point to the higher network section 334.

Further limitation redistributions are also possible, namely to use the two further distribution networks, that is to say the second and third distribution networks 330 and 332, in general. It can also be considered here that each of these distribution networks is in turn connected to the higher network section 334 via a different connection point and thus the power flows can be changed.

In this respect, the limitation redistribution, which applies to any embodiment, can also be synonymously referred to as power redistribution.

A further variant of the redistribution of limits or redistribution of benefits can consist in that a limitation of benefits is controlled via a cost function. E.g. a power limit can be specified that is defined so that exceeding this power limit leads to a charge or a reduction in the feed-in tariff. In this case, the wind energy system 300 shown can then check whether it is advisable to exceed the initial feed-in limit and thereby accept a reduction in the remuneration, or instead, particularly if the limit is limited in time, to feed power into the electrical store 308 . As a result, the wind energy system can be indirectly controlled externally. However, it is also contemplated that such technically effective controls via costs or remuneration can have different effects for the sum of all those involved, in particular the feeder and consumer, so that overall stable control results. In particular, a cost target for exceeding an initial feed-in limit can go hand in hand with a reduction in costs for consumers who draw power, as is the case with so-called post-electricity, for example, in which even end consumers, such as small households, obtain electricity more cheaply at night than during the day. Thus, if the wind energy system exceeds the initial feed-in limit, with the result that the remuneration is reduced, cheaper electricity can be obtained from the households in the settlement 340, for example, which is then used. Other feeders, such as the conventional power plant 344 shown by way of example, can save primary energy by reducing the feed-in, which is generally the case with a wind farm system. is not the case unless the wind energy system has an electrical store. Accordingly, it makes more sense for a conventional power plant to comply with a power limitation.

All of this can then lead to the overall result that a desired power balance is created because, for example, the wind farm feeds in more power, but a conventional feeder feeds in less and a consumer sometimes consumes more power. It was thus recognized that it can be assumed that in future a calculation of the network utilization and network capacity-dependent network usage may be useful in distribution and transmission networks. In this case, a variable evaluation of the grid connection power comes into consideration, as does a dynamic limitation.

A solution is thus proposed to control a wind energy installation, a wind farm and / or a wind energy system in accordance with these general conditions.

In particular, wind farms with a variable grid connection power are proposed. This means that a variable network charge can also be taken into account.

An increase in the system yield or an avoidance of yield losses can be realized. In addition, it is taken into account that in the simplest case there will be a simple, temporary and / or dynamic limitation of the network connection capacity in the future can, namely on a dynamic connected load as an alternative or supplement to feed-in management. This can be reacted to by simply limiting the parking capacity to this dynamic connected load.

However, it is proposed to check whether the limitation results from the distribution network or from the higher network levels due to a limitation, especially for revenue-optimized operation, for example at the parking level.

It is also proposed to check whether the limitation affects the current feed-in or the future feed-in and whether there may be a loss of earnings. If the limitation comes from the higher network levels and there is a risk of curtailment, there is a chance of secondary marketing of the electricity quantities in the distribution grid, whereby curtailment can then be avoided.

If there is no possibility of secondary marketing, there may be the possibility of temporarily using at least some of the grid connection capacity of other feeders located nearby, for example of photovoltaic systems or wind farms with grid power still available, or also of wind farms that are currently under maintenance.

Another possibility, which can also be supplemented, is the use of park-internal loads instead of lowering the generated power. Only when there is no possibility of increasing the grid connection capacity does the wind farm or wind energy system have to regulate itself.

It was recognized that the proposed solutions can also have economic advantages.

If, for example, the dynamic grid connection power does not only consist of a fixed limit, but is linked to a price, in a further embodiment the wind power plant or the wind system can carry out a simple cost analysis. It can, in particular, be checked whether the expected feed-in price justifies an increase in the grid connection capacity. The same applies here Check whether free grid connection capacities of neighboring regenerative feeders can be used.

Another area of application for regenerative feeders with a variable grid connection power are combined systems consisting of wind turbines, photovoltaic systems and storage systems. Together, these can form a wind energy system. For example, the grid connection power of such a wind power system can be limited to 80% of the power of the wind power plants and can have, for example, a 30 percent dynamic share. The grid connection power would be variably limited to a value of 80% to 110% of the nominal power of the wind farm of such a wind energy system.

However, it was recognized that the wind turbines on the one hand and the photovoltaic systems on the other hand usually generate a lot of power at different times, so that the restriction to a value only a little above the nominal value of the wind farm alone can be sufficient. Even the value is often not reached, which can be taken into account by the exemplary dynamic share of 30%.

Claims

Expectations

Method for feeding electrical power by means of a wind energy system comprising at least one wind farm into an electrical supply network, at a network connection point, the electrical supply network having at least one distribution network and at least one further higher network section lying hierarchically above the distribution network, and the network connection point being connected to the distribution network, comprehensively the steps

 in an acquisition step, acquiring an initial feed-in limit based on the grid connection point, which specifies an initial power limit up to which the wind energy system can feed electrical power into the electrical supply network,

 In a basic test step, check whether the park power that can be generated from the wind farm is limited by the initial feed-in limit, in particular whether it is above the initial power limit, so that the wind farm is throttled in its power output by the initial power limit, in particular to a power below the initial one Power limit is throttled,

 in an evaluation step, if it was recognized in the basic test step that the parking performance is being reduced, evaluating whether the initial performance limit can be increased,

 in a change step, if it is recognized in the evaluation step that the performance limit can be increased, increasing the initial performance limit to an increased performance limit and

 Feeding electrical power above the initial power limit if, in the change step, the initial power limit was increased to an increased power limit, whereby

 the evaluation step checks whether

 the initial feed-in limit can be changed via a limit redistribution.

Method according to claim 1,

characterized in that

To check whether the initial feed-in limit can be changed via a limit redistribution, it is checked whether

there is at least one criterion from the list:

the feed-in limitation does not result from the distribution network, the feed-in limitation is determined by the higher network section,

 a network section that is not overloaded can be recognized,

 there is no physical limitation of the network connection point, - the feed-in limit is linked to penalty costs for exceeding the feed-in limit,

 the feed-in limit is part of several feed-in limits of the distribution network, which are specified in such a way that the sum of the feed-in limits lie below a sum limit, whereby at least one feed-in limit can be increased as long as the sum of the feed-in limits remains below a sum limit,

 for at least one other power generator that feeds into the same distribution network, a feed-in limitation is provided that the other power generator does not take advantage of, in particular a power level by which the at least one other power generator is below a power limit to be observed for him as tradable capacity other feeders, in particular the wind energy system, can be offered in whole or in part for use,

 the initial feed-in limit has its cause in the higher network section and a neighboring distribution network can take up power, thereby allowing the initial feed-in limit to be exceeded.

3. The method according to claim 1 or 2,

 characterized in that

 - In the change step, the increased performance limit is specified as a time course, and / or

 a feed-in forecast is determined which provides a chronological progression of the power to be fed in for a forecast period.

4. The method according to any one of the preceding claims,

 characterized in that

Electrical power that the wind farm generates from wind and that cannot be fed in due to the initial feed-in limitation is used to supply controllable loads within the park. 5. The method according to any one of the preceding claims,

 characterized in that

 in the case of a coupling of the feed-in limit to penalty costs for an exceedance, an excess amount is assessed with which the fed-in power exceeds the initial power limit, in particular in such a way that

 a penalty function is set up for the penalty costs depending on the amount exceeded,

 a remuneration function for a feed-in remuneration is set up depending on the amount exceeded and

 - an exceeding of the fed-in power is controlled via the initial power limit depending on a comparison of the penalty cost function and the remuneration function.

6. The method according to any one of the preceding claims,

 characterized in that

 In addition, the feed-in is controlled depending on a maximum limit that is above the initial power limit and must not be exceeded.

7. The method according to any one of the preceding claims,

 characterized in that

 it is checked whether the feed-in limitation is currently or in a future

Period is relevant, this test being carried out in particular at least in the acquisition step and / or in the basic test step.

8. The method according to any one of the preceding claims,

 characterized in that

 for feeding electrical power above the initial power limit, electrical power, in particular the power exceeding the initial power limit, is supplied to at least one consumer connected in the distribution network.

9. The method according to any one of the preceding claims,

 characterized in that

tradable capacities of other power generators of the distribution network are used to feed electrical power above the initial power limit, in particular that tradable capacities connected to the distribution network

 Photovoltaic systems,

 electrical storage and / or

 other wind farms can be used. 10. The method according to any one of the preceding claims,

 characterized in that

 the wind energy system additionally

 a photovoltaic system and optional

 comprises an electrical store which can store at least an amount of energy in the amount of 10 minutes of the rated output of the wind farm, the wind farm, the photovoltaic system and possibly the electrical store each being characterized by a rated output and the sum of these rated outputs forming a total rated output, wherein

 the grid connection point is permanently limited to a fixed power value below the total nominal power and above the largest of the nominal powers, whereby optional

 the grid connection point is dynamically limited to a dynamic power value below the largest of the nominal powers.

11. Wind energy system for feeding electrical power into an electrical supply network, at a network connection point, wherein

 the wind energy system comprises at least one wind farm, and the electrical supply network

 at least one distribution network and

 has at least one further higher network section located hierarchically above the distribution network, and

 the network connection point is connected to the distribution network, and the wind energy system further comprises

 a detection unit for detecting an initial feed-in limit related to the grid connection point, which specifies an initial power limit up to which the wind energy system can feed electrical power into the electrical supply network,

a test unit for checking whether the park power that can be generated from the wind farm is limited by the initial feed-in limit, in particular whether it is above the initial power limit, so that the wind farm is limited in its output by the initial power limit is throttled, in particular throttled to a power below the initial power limit,

 an evaluation unit for evaluating whether the initial performance limit can be increased if it was recognized in the test unit that the parking performance is throttled,

 a change unit for increasing the initial performance limit to an increased performance limit when it is recognized in the evaluation unit that the performance limit can be increased, and

 a feed device for feeding electrical power above the initial power limit if the change unit has increased the initial power limit to an increased power limit, wherein

 the evaluation unit checks whether the initial feed-in limitation can be changed via a limitation redistribution. 12. Wind energy system according to claim 11,

 characterized in that

 the wind energy system is prepared to carry out a method according to one of claims 1 to 10, in particular that

 the wind energy system identifies a central parking computer and at least one method is implemented on it.