EP3841143A1

EP3841143A1 - Polyurethane having improved hardness

Info

Publication number: EP3841143A1
Application number: EP19755393.6A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Hans Georg Grablowitz; Hartmut Nefzger; Olaf Fleck
Original assignee: Covestro Intellectual Property GmbH and Co KG
Current assignee: Covestro Deutschland AG
Priority date: 2018-08-24
Filing date: 2019-08-21
Publication date: 2021-06-30
Also published as: WO2020038998A1; JP2021535248A; CN112739737B; CN112739737A; US20210189060A1; EP3613787A1

Abstract

The invention relates to polyester polyols of particular purity and to the use thereof for preparing polyurethanes having improved properties, in particular improved hardness.

Description

Polyurethanes with improved hardness

The present invention relates to polyester polyols with particular purity and their use for the production of polyurethanes with improved properties, in particular with improved hardness.

Polyurethanes are a class of plastics well known to those skilled in the art. They are produced by the addition reaction of polyhydric alcohols with polyisocyanates. In principle, many compounds with at least two hydroxyl groups per molecule are suitable as polyhydric alcohols. These can be monomeric compounds such as Be glycerin. However, technically and economically more important are polyhydric alcohols, which are themselves polymers. In particular, polycarbonate polyols, polyester polyols, polyether polyols, polyether carbonate polyols or polyether esters are used.

Polycarbonate polyols are obtained by a condensation reaction of low molecular weight carbonates and low molecular weight polyhydric alcohols. The molar ratio of carbonate to polyol determines the molar mass of the polycarbonate polyol. A molar excess of polyol is used to obtain hydroxyl-functional end products. In many cases, the low-molecular alcohol used contains impurities. 1,6-hexanediol often also contains 1,4-cyclohexanediol. If these impurities are incorporated into the polyol, products are formed which, in addition to primary OH groups, also have secondary OH groups.

EP 2 213 696 has shown that a high proportion of by-products with secondary hydroxyl groups means that the polyurethanes produced from the corresponding polycarbonate have a lower tensile strength and a lower resistance to oleic acid. There is no noticeable influence of the proportion of secondary hydroxyl groups in the polycarbonate polyol on the hardness of the polyurethane produced therefrom.

Polyester polyols are produced by a condensation reaction of polyhydric carboxylic acids and polyhydric alcohols. The quantitative ratio of the two components is chosen so that there is a molar excess of hydroxyl groups in the reaction mixture and the resulting polymer therefore has free, terminal hydroxyl groups. Polyester polyols commonly used for the production of polyurethanes have a number average molecular weight between 500 and 4000 g / mol and an average OH functionality between 1.8 and 3.5. But they can also have molecular weights below 500 and above 4000 Da; likewise functionalities of less than 1.80 and more than 3.5. Common polyester polyols and suitable production processes are described in M. lonescu, Chemistry and Technology of Polyols for Polyurethanes, Rapra Technology Ltd., Shawbury 2005, Chap. 8 and 16 or JH Saunders and KC Frisch in Polyurethanes, Chemistry and Technology, Part I Chemistry, Inscience Publishers John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1962, Cape. II. In this process, too, the presence of impurities in the alcohol can form polyols with secondary OH groups, as described above.

The study on which the present application is based has surprisingly shown that in the production of polyurethanes with polyester polyols, the hardness of the resulting product is also very significantly influenced by the proportion of secondary hydroxyl groups in the polyester polyol. Contrary to expectations, a consistent influence on the tensile strength as described in EP 2 213 696 could not be observed.

Therefore, the present patent application relates to polyester polyols with a low content of secondary hydroxyl groups, and their use for the production of polyurethanes with improved hardness.

In a first embodiment, the present invention relates to a polyester polyol with a proportion of secondary OH groups in the total amount of terminal OH groups of at most 5%.

The polyester polyols have OH numbers of 18 to 300 mg KOH / g and consist of at least 95% by weight, preferably at least 98% by weight, of bifunctional structural components. The% by weight missing from 100% can be more than bifunctional, for example trifunctional or tetrafunctional, but also monofunctional, with mixtures of, for example, trifunctional and tetrafunctional structural components also possible. Examples of trifunctional structural components are glycerol, 1,1,1-trimethylolpropane, pentaerythritol, 1,2,3-benzenetricarboxylic acid, 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid, 1,2,4-benzenetricarboxylic acid, malic acid and tartaric acid.

In the context of the present invention, however, particular preference is given to polyester polyols which can be obtained from exclusively bifunctional structural components.

One or more of the structural components can be bio-based, i.e. be produced from renewable raw materials and / or by means of at least one fermentative process step.

The structural components for the polyester polyols according to the invention are a.) At least one aromatic and / or aliphatic dicarboxylic acid and / or dicarboxylic acid equivalent and

b) at least one linear and / or branched aliphatic diol with only primary hydroxyl groups and / or optionally c) at least one aliphatic hydroxycarboxylic acid with a primary hydroxyl group, which may also be in the form of a lactone

for use

In principle, all aliphatic and / or aromatic dicarboxylic acids with 4 to 12 carbon atoms, as well as their anhydrides or low molecular weight diesters, can be used as dicarboxylic acid equivalents as structural component a).

In principle, all aliphatic diols having 2 to 14 carbon atoms can be used as structural component b). The aliphatic diols with 2 to 14 carbon atoms are linear, but can also have one or more alkyl side chains.

Examples of suitable structural components a) are: phthalic acid, isophthalic acid, terephthalic acid, tetrahydrophthalic acid, hexahydrophthalic acid, cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, azelaic acid, sebacic acid, tetrachlorophthalic acid, maleic acid, non-succinic acid, fumaric acid, fumaric acid, fumaric acid, fumaric acid, fumaric acid, fumaric acid, fumaric acid, fumaric acid, fumaric acid, 3,3-diethylglutaric acid and 2,2-dimethylsuccinic acid. The corresponding analogous anhydrides and / or low molecular weight diesters which are referred to in the context of this invention as diarboxylic acid equivalents can also be used as the acid source.

Particularly suitable as component a) are linear, unbranched dicarboxylic acids having 4 to 10 carbon atoms, adipic acid, succinic acid, phthalic acid, isophthalic acid and terephthalic acid, and the dicarboxylic acid equivalents of the abovementioned compounds. Examples include: phthalic anhydride, succinic anhydride, dimethyl terephthalate,

Terephtalic acid.

Suitable structural components b) are, for example: ethylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, 1,7-heptanediol, 1,8-octanediol, 1,9- Nonanediol, 1,10-decanediol, 1,11-undecanediol, 1,12-decanediol, 2-methyl-propanediol-1,3,2,2-dimethyl-propanediol-1,3,3-methylpentanediol-1,5.

Particularly suitable as component b) are linear, unbranched diols having 2 to 12 carbon atoms selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, 1,10-decanediol, 1,12-decanediol and 2,2-dimethyl-propanediol-1,3.

Linear, unbranched hydroxycarboxylic acids with> 6 and <10 C atoms can be considered as component c). 6-Hydroxycaproic acid and e-caprolactone are particularly preferred. As is generally known, the molar proportions of components a), b) and optionally c) determine the average degree of polymerization of the polyester polyols. In any case, the components must be composed such that the number of hydroxyl groups used exceeds the number of carboxyl groups used.

The polyester polyols are produced in a manner known per se by polycondensation.

It can be done in such a way that components a), b) and, if appropriate, c) are presented together; but you can also use them in several stages.

In principle, all catalysts known for the production of polyesters can be used as catalysts. These are, for example, tin salts, e.g. Tin dichloride, titanates, e.g. Tetrabutyl titanate, bismuth salts, e.g. Bismuth acetate and bismuth neodecanoate or strong acids, e.g. p-toluenesulfonic acid and sulfuric acid. However, the polyesters can also be produced without the use of catalysts.

Typically, the polyesters are made without the use of a solvent. However, they can also be prepared with the addition of a solvent, in particular a water-carrying solvent (azeotropic esterification), such as benzene, toluene or dioxane. The discharge of the water of reaction in the solvent-free variant is normally supported by applying a negative pressure, in particular towards the end of the esterification. Here pressures from 1 to 500 mbar are used. However, esterification is also possible above 500 mbar. The discharge of the water of reaction can also be supported by passing an inert gas, such as nitrogen or argon.

The reaction is carried out at an elevated temperature. Reaction temperatures of 100 to 250 ° C., preferably 160 to 230 ° C., are customary in the solvent-free variant. In azeotropic esterification, the reaction temperature is determined by the type and amount of entrainer and is usually in the range from 100 to 180 ° C.

The reaction is carried out until a conversion in which the acid number of the polyester polyols according to the invention is at most 10, preferably at most 5, particularly preferably at most 2 and very particularly preferably <1 mg KOH / g.

The proportion of secondary hydroxyl groups in the total amount of the hydroxyl groups present in the polyester polyol is at most 5 mol%, preferably at most 2 mol% and even more preferably at 1 mol%. The proportion is preferably determined by means of ¹³ C-NMR at a measuring frequency of 151.0 MHz in chloroform-dl. The proportion of primary hydroxyl groups (CH -OH) is preferably determined using the following formula:

Proportion CHz-OH = F (signal CH ₂ -OH) / (F (signal CH ₂ -OH) + F (signal CH-OH)) * 100%

Here F is the area of the respective signal in the NMR spectrum and CH-OH stands for secondary bonded OH groups.

A particularly preferred, complete measurement method is disclosed in the exemplary embodiments.

In order to obtain polyester polyols with the low secondary hydroxyl group content required according to the invention, it is necessary to use sufficiently pure alcohols to prepare the polyester. The suitability of an alcohol for the production of a polyester polyol suitable according to the invention can be checked by conventional analysis methods such as gas chromatography or high-performance liquid chromatography.

Surprisingly, the study on which the present study is based has shown that contamination of the alcohol used for the production of the polyester polyol with compounds which contain secondary OH groups leads to a disproportionately high increase in the proportion of secondary OH end groups in the product. A proportion of 4.3 mol% of 1,4-cyclohexanediol in the total amount of hexanediol and 1,4-cyclohexanediol has led to a proportion of 8 mol% of secondary OH end groups in the polyester.

Therefore, in order to maintain the abovementioned proportions of secondary OH end groups of 5.0 mol%, 2.0 mol% and 1.0 mol% of the total amount of the OH end groups of the polyester polyol, it is preferred that for the preparation of the polyester polyol used reaction mixture the proportions of all polyols with at least one secondary OH group are a maximum of half of the desired value for the finished polyester polyol. For the aforementioned maximum values in the polyester polyol, this means upper limits of at most 2.5 mol%, at most 1.0 mol% or at most 0.5 mol%. It is particularly preferred that the sum of the proportions of 1,4-cyclohexanediol, 2,2,4-trimethylpentane-1,3-diol and 2,3-dihydroxybutanediol does not exceed the aforementioned values.

Polymerizable composition

In a further embodiment, the present invention relates to a polymerizable composition comprising at least one polyester polyol with the one further above in this Registration defined maximum content of secondary OH groups based on the total amount of terminal OH groups present and at least one polyisocyanate.

All definitions given above for the polyester polyol also apply to this embodiment.

isocyanate

The term “polyisocyanate” denotes molecules with an average isocyanate functionality of at least 2. Suitable polyisocyanates are aromatic, araliphatic, aliphatic or cycloaliphatic polyisocyanates. Mixtures of such polyisocyanates can also be used. Preferred polyisocyanates are selected from the group consisting of butylene diisocyanate and hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI ), 1,5-pentamethylene diisocyanate (PDI), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), 2,2,4 and / or 2,4,4-trimethylhexamethylene diisocyanate, the isomeric bis (4,4'-isocyanatocyclohexyl) methanes or their mixtures of any isomer content , isocyanatomethyl-l, 8-octane diisocyanate, 1,4-cyclohexylene diisocyanate, 1,4-phenylene diisocyanate, 2,4- and / or 2,6-tolylene diisocyanate, 1,5-naphthylene diisocyanate, 2,4'- or 4,4 ' - Diphenylmethane diisocyanate, triphenylmethane-4,4 ', 4 "-triisocyanate and their derivatives with urethane, isocyanurate, allophanate, biuret, uretdione, iminooxadiazinedione structure. Mixtures of the same are further preferred. Hexamethylene diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate and the isomeric bis (4,4'-isocyanatocyclohexyl) methanes and mixtures thereof are particularly preferred.

NCO: OH ratio

The polymerizable composition is preferably characterized in that the molar ratio of isocyanate groups to hydroxyl groups of the at least one polyester polyol is between 0.7: 1.0 and 2.5 to 1.0, more preferably between 0.8: 1.0 and 2, 0 to 1.0, and more preferably 0.9: 1.0 to 1.8: 1.0.

catalyst

The polymerizable composition according to the invention preferably additionally contains at least one catalyst which accelerates the formation of urethane groups from hydroxyl and isocyanate groups. All urethanization catalysts known to the person skilled in the art can be used for this, such as organometallic compounds and tertiary amines. Tin dioctoate, dibutyltin dilaurate, triethylamine, 1,4-diazabicyclo [2,2,2] octane and bismuth dioctoate are particularly preferred. use

In yet another embodiment, the present invention relates to the use of a polyester polyol or a polymerizable composition as defined above in this application for the production of a polyurethane plastic.

All of the definitions given above for the polyester polyol and the polymerizable composition also apply to this embodiment.

It is particularly preferred to use a polyester polyol or a polymerizable composition for producing a polyurethane plastic with particularly high hardness. "Particularly high hardness" here denotes the improvement in the hardness of the polyurethane plastic produced according to the invention compared to polyurethane plastics which were produced from polyester polyols with a higher proportion of secondary hydroxyl groups. In particular, one with a polyester pole according to the invention, which by a proportion of secondary hydroxyl groups in the total amount of terminal Is characterized by a hydroxyl group of at most 2 mol%, the polyurethane plastic produced has a Shore D hardness which is at least 3 mol% higher than the hardness of a polyurethane plastic which is coated with a polyester polyol containing secondary hydroxyl groups of at least 5 mol%. % of the total of the terminal hydroxyl groups The Shore D hardness is preferably measured in accordance with DIN ISO 7619-1 in the version from February 2012.

In a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the alcohol component of the polyester polyol consists of at least 90% by weight, more preferably at least 95% by weight, of 1,6-hexanediol. Here, the polyurethane plastic has a Shore D hardness that is at least 8% above the value that is otherwise identical when using one

Polyester polyol with a proportion of secondary OH groups in the total amount of terminal OH groups of at least 5 mol% is measured.

In a further particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the alcohol component of the polyester polyol consists of at least 90% by weight, more preferably at least 95% by weight, of 1,6-hexanediol. Here, the polyurethane plastic has a König pendulum hardness that is at least 5% above the value measured when using an otherwise identical polyester polyol with a proportion of secondary OH groups in the total amount of terminal OH groups of at least 5 mol% becomes.

In a further particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the alcohol component of the polyester polyol consists of at least 90% by weight, more preferably at least 95% by weight, of 1,4-butanediol. The polyurethane plastic has a Shore D Hardness which is at least 3% above the value measured when using an otherwise identical polyester polyol with a proportion of secondary OH groups in the total amount of terminal OH groups of at least 5 mol%.

In a further particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention, the alcohol component of the polyester polyol consists of at least 90% by weight, more preferably at least 95% by weight, of 1,4-butanediol. Here, the polyurethane plastic has a König pendulum hardness which is at least 4% above the value measured when using an otherwise identical polyester polyol with a proportion of secondary OH groups in the total amount of terminal OH groups of at least 5 mol% becomes.

method

In yet another embodiment, the present invention relates to a process for the production of polyurethane plastics with particularly high hardness, comprising the steps of a) mixing a polyester polyol with a proportion of secondary hydroxyl groups in the total amount of terminal hydroxyl groups of at most 2% with at least one polyisocyanate; b) reaction of the mixture to form a polyurethane.

All definitions given for the embodiments disclosed above also apply to the method according to the invention.

The mixing of polyester polyol and polyisocyanate in process step a) can be carried out using all processes known to the person skilled in the art. The product of process step a) is the polymerizable composition defined earlier in this application.

The methods of reacting a polymerizable composition to a polyurethane are well known to those skilled in the art. All methods known from polyurethane chemistry and suitable for the specific polymerizable composition can be used. The reaction of the polyester polyol with the polyisocyanate to form a polyurethane can be carried out in various ways, for example by heating the mixture in a reaction vessel to a defined conversion or placing the mixture on a substrate or a mold and the reaction on the substrate or the mold takes place. In addition, it is also possible to bring the mixture onto a substrate or into a mold by an in-situ mixing process, where the further reaction to the polyurethane then takes place. The resulting polyurethane can optionally be processed further in subsequent reactions, for example by one in the case of free isocyanate groups Chain extension is carried out with polyamines or a reaction with atmospheric moisture to give polyurethaneureas. An overview of such processes can be found in the Plastics Handbook, Vol. 7, Polyurethanes; Becker, Braun and Oertel, Hanser Verlag, (1993).

The polyurethanes described above can be used in a wide variety of applications, in particular as moldings, elastomers, adhesives, coatings, films, sealants and fibers. These include in the volumes of the plastics handbook (see above) or in: Polyurethanes: lacquers, adhesives and sealants; Meier-Westhues, Vincentz-Verlag, (2007).

The following exemplary embodiments only serve to illustrate the invention. They are not intended to limit the scope of the claims in any way.

Examples

Methods and terms:

Hydroxyl number: The OH number was determined in accordance with the specification of DIN 53240-1

(Process without catalyst, version from June 2013).

Acid number was determined according to DIN EN ISO 2114 (June 2002).

Viscosity: Dynamic viscosity: Rheometer MCR 51 from Anton Paar according to DIN 53019-1 (version from September 2008) with a measuring cone CP 50-1, diameter 50 mm, angle 1 ° at shear rates of 25, 100, 200 and 500 s ^1st The polyols according to the invention and not according to the invention show viscosity values which are independent of the shear rate.

Shore hardness: DIN ISO 7619-1; Version of Feb. 2012

Pendulum hardness according to König: DIN 55945; 2016-08

Tension 100%, tension 300%, tensile stress at break and elongation at break: DIN 53504 (version of 1.10.2009)

Key figure: Describes the molar ratio of NCO to NCO reactive groups of a recipe multiplied by 100

Share of secondary OFI end groups: quantitative ¹³ C-NMR, in deuterochloroform, TMS = 0 ppm,

Bruker AV III HD 600 MHz spectrometer.

Production of the Polvester poles

(Preparation of the polyester polyol Example A-1:

In a 4-liter four-necked flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, 50 cm Vigreux column, thermometer, nitrogen inlet, and column top, distillation bridge and vacuum membrane pump, 1534.4 g (10.5 mol, corresponds to 53.32% by weight tin) were placed .) Adipic acid and 1343 g (11.369 mol, corresponds to 46.68 parts by weight) of hexanediol and heated under nitrogen blanketing over the course of 60 min. to 200 ° C, with water of reaction distilling off at a temperature of about 150 ° C. After about 3 hours, the water of reaction had come to a standstill. The reaction was completed by adding 24 ppm of stannous chloride dihydrate, reducing the pressure gradually by applying a vacuum over the course of about 2 hours to finally 15 mbar and the reaction at 200 ° C. for a further 15 hours continued led.

Analysis of the polyester:

Hydroxyl number: 41.1 mg KOH / g

Acid number: 0.5 mg KOH / g

Viscosity: 1600 mPas at 75 ° C

Share of secondary OH end groups: undetectable

Table 1: Synthesis and properties of polyester polyols according to the invention and not according to the invention (V = comparison)

The polyester polyols A-2 (V) and A-3 (V) were analogous as for Ex. A-1.

For the polyester polyols Bl to B-3 (V), against the background of the lower boiling point of 1,4-butanediol compared to 1,6-hexanediol in the chosen mode of operation, the loss of OH groups due to the addition of 1.4 is required -Butanediol and then equilibrating (180 ° C, 6 hours stirring at normal pressure) to balance, so as to achieve the OH numbers given in Table 1.

As expected, Table 1 shows that only the polyester polyols A-1 and B-1 have almost exclusively primary hydroxyl end groups. Comparative examples A-2 (V), A-3 (V), B-2 (V) and B-3 (V) have surprisingly high proportions of secondary hydroxyl end groups in the light of the small amounts of diol used with secondary hydroxyl groups, such as does the following:

In the example A-2 (V) a total of 756.9 mmol of primary hydroxyl groups in the form of 1,6-hexanediol and 34.5 mmol of secondary hydroxyl groups in the form of 1,4-cyclohexanediol are used; thus the proportion of secondary hydroxyl groups is 34.5 / (34.4 + 756.9) * 100 = 4.3 mol%. In the polyester polyol, there is a disproportionately large number of secondary hydroxyl groups, measured at the starting material mixture, with 8 mol%. This makes it clear that the proportion of impurities such as cyclohexanediol, that for the production of a polyester polyol with a defined proportion of secondary Hydroxyl groups on the total amount of terminal hydroxyl groups cannot be determined by simple stoichiometric calculations.

Manufacture of polyurethanes

To produce the polyurethanes, the polyesters listed in Table 1 are crosslinked with a commercially available polyisocyanate (Desmodur N3300) in the ratio (NCO / OH: 1.0). A leveling agent (Byk 302; 0.1% by weight) and a catalyst which is customary for this reaction (DBTL, 10% in butyl acetate; 0.02% by weight on solids content) are used to obtain suitable test specimens.

The 2-component systems and test specimens based on the polyester and the polyisocyanate are manufactured according to the following detailed formulation and the steps described below:

Polyester 174.68 g

Desmodur N 3300 24.72 g

DBTL, 10% in butyl acetate 0.40 g

BYK 302 0.2 g

Total 200.00 g

The polyester is weighed into a suitable vessel and heated to 80 ° C. The polyisocyanate (Desmodur N 3300) is also preheated to 80 ° C and added with manual stirring in the ratio NCO: OH = 1: 1.

Calculation: 247 = (% OH) / (% NCO) = m [g] isocyanate per 100 g polyol

The catalyst DBTL with 0.02% (on solids content) and Byk 302 with 0.1% (on solids content) are added immediately after the addition of the polyisocyanate and after homogenization and stirred vigorously, but as free of bubbles as possible.

The networked systems are immediately processed below:

Using a doctor blade, the systems are mounted on a glass plate and a backing paper for free films with 500 pm wet film.

The coated lacquer films are tempered for 16 hours at 80 ° C in a convection oven. After tempering the glass plates, they are conditioned for approx. 1 hour at room temperature (approx. 23 ° C). Then the layer thickness is measured and the paint film is patterned according to further criteria.

Another test specimen is cast to determine the Shore hardness. For this purpose, the networked system is applied bubble-free in a plastic lid with a diameter of approx. 6 cm and also tempered at 80 ° C for 16 h. The resulting test specimen should have a diameter of at least 35 mm and a thickness of at least 6 mm. Before the application tests, all test specimens are conditioned for a sufficiently long time in a standard atmosphere (for plastics, 23 ° C, 50% relative humidity). The tests of the shore hardness, the pendulum hardness according to König and the execution of the tensile tests are carried out according to the underlying standards known to the person skilled in the art.

Table 2: Results of the application test of coatings obtained from the polyurethanes described above

Linear regression analysis shows:

Al to A3:

Shore D decrease: 2.4% per mol% of secondary OH group; R ² = 1.00

Decrease in pendulum hardness: 1.4% per mol% of secondary OH group; R ² = 0.98

Bl to B3:

Shore D decrease: 0.7% per mol% of secondary OH group; R ² = 0.97 Decrease in pendulum hardness: 1.13% per mol% of secondary OH group; R ² = 0.97

The extremely high correlation coefficients show that the relationship between the content of secondary OH groups and the weakening of the mechanical properties is very close, so that the observed effects can be reliably extrapolated even for very small differences in the content of secondary OH groups.

Claims

claims

1. Polyester polyol with a share of secondary OH groups in the total amount of terminal OH groups of at most 2 mol%.

2. Polymerizable composition containing at least one polyester polyol according to claim 1 and at least one polyisocyanate.

3. Use of a polyester polyol according to claim 1 or a polymerizable composition according to claim 2 for the production of a polyurethane plastic.

4. The use according to claim 3, wherein the alcohol component of the polyester polyol consists of at least 90% by weight of 1,6-hexanediol and the polyurethane plastic has a Shore D hardness which is at least 7% above the value, which is measured when using an otherwise identical polyester polyol with a proportion of secondary OH groups in the total amount of terminal OH groups of at least 5 mol%.

5. The use according to claim 3, wherein the alcohol component of the polyester polyol consists of at least 90% by weight of 1,4-butanediol and the polyurethane plastic has a Shore D hardness which is at least 4% above the value, which is measured when using an otherwise identical polyester polyol with a proportion of secondary OH groups in the total amount of terminal OH groups of at least 5 mol%.

6. The use according to claim 3, wherein the alcohol component of the polyester polyol consists of at least 90 wt .-% of 1,6-hexanediol and the polyurethane plastic has a pendulum hardness according to König, which is at least 2% above the value at Use of an otherwise identical polyester polyol with a proportion of secondary OH groups in the total amount of terminal OH groups of at least 5 mol% is measured.

7. The use according to claim 3, wherein the alcohol component of the polyester polyol consists of at least 90% by weight of 1,4-butanediol and the polyurethane plastic has a König pendulum hardness which is at least 3% above the value at Use of an otherwise identical polyester polyol with a proportion of secondary OH groups in the total amount of terminal OH groups of at least 5 mol% is measured.

8. Process for the production of polyurethane plastics with particularly high hardness, comprising the steps a) mixing a polyester polyol according to claim 1 with at least one polyisocyanate; b) reaction of the mixture to form a polyurethane.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the alcohol component of the polyester polyol consists of at least 90% by weight of 1,6-hexanediol and the polyurethane plastic has a Shore D hardness which is at least 7% above the value, which is measured when using an otherwise identical polyester polyol with a proportion of secondary OH groups in the total amount of terminal OH groups of at least 5 mol%.

10. The method according to claim 8, wherein the alcohol component of the polyester polyol consists of at least 90% by weight of 1,4-butanediol and the polyurethane plastic has a Shore D hardness which is at least 3% above the value, which is measured when using an otherwise identical polyester polyol with a proportion of secondary OH groups in the total amount of terminal OH groups of at least 5 mol%.

11. The method according to any one of claims 8 to 10, wherein the reaction mixture formed in step a) is applied to a surface before curing in step b).

12. Polyurethane plastic obtainable by the method according to one of claims 8 to 11.